►
From YouTube: Planning Commission | November 13, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
B
F
A
B
A
C
C
A
Thank
you.
The
agenda
is
approved.
This
time
is
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
Planning
Commission
on
the
consent,
calendar
non
public
hearing
items
and
items
of
general
interest
within
this
jurisdiction
matter
of
the
Commission
comments
on
a
public
hearing
may
be
made
at
the
time
of
the
actual
public
hearing.
Please
note:
the
Planning
Commission
is
prohibited
from
taking
action
on
items
not
listed
on
the
posted
agenda.
Three
minutes
will
be
allowed
for
each
speaker.
G
A
Certainly
I
think
we
can
accommodate
that
it
would
not
be
a
problem.
So
if
you
want
to
hold
your
comments
too,
then
that
would
be
great
all
right.
Thank
you
thanks.
So,
if
anyone's
here
to
speak
on
items
a
non
public
hearing,
if
you're
here
for
living
out
or
whatnot,
you
can
speak
now,
okay,
hearing
no
more
comments,
we'll
move
forward
on
the
agenda.
The
first
item
is
living
out.
I
need
to
recuse
myself
for
that
item
and
mr.
C
Thank
You
chair
woods.
The
item
that
we
are
discussing
is
item
4a
under
new
business,
Co
or
Palm
Springs
LLC
for
the
approval
of
a
final
development
plan
for
planned
development,
district
application,
5.1
449,
PG
d,
3
8
9,
a
95
unit,
three-story
condominium
building
and
a
4990
square
foot
retail
structure
located
at
1122,
East,
tahquitz
canyon
way
zone
REO,
section
14.
Mr.
marker
Thank.
H
H
Thank
You
Commissioner
donenfeld.
This
is
a
project
that
the
Planning
Commission
has
reviewed.
Previously
back
in
June
of
2019,
you
made
a
recommendation
of
approval
for
the
plant,
the
preliminary
plan,
development,
district,
a
track
map
and
mitigated
declaration
and
a
recommendation
of
approval
to
the
City
Council.
The
City
Council
followed
up
that
with
their
meeting
on
June
5th
2019.
H
They
also
approve
the
preliminary
plant
development
plan
and
voted
to
approve
the
project
so
in
as
a
planned
development
district,
it
goes
through
two
reviews.
It
goes
through
the
preliminary
which
is
conducted
by
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
City
Council,
and
then
the
final
planned
development
district
comes
back
to
the
Planning
Commission.
H
So
in
today's
review
of
the
final
PD
you'll
look
at
if
the
plan
before
you
is
what
we
say
substantially
conforming
to
what
the
preliminary
PD
was
and
what
we'll
review
also
is
the
site
plan,
access,
mass
and
scale,
the
architectural
details,
the
landscape,
hard
scape
and
the
lighting
so
we'll
go
through
each
of
these
briefly
and
then
follow
up
with
some
questions.
I'm
sure,
so
the
first
port
portion
of
it
is
the
site
plan
and
access.
H
So
the
plan
that
was
given
to
you
in
your
packets
is
slightly
different
than
the
plan
that
was
handed
to
you
today,
and
the
reason
being
is
that
the
one
of
the
conditions
of
approval
of
public
benefit
is
that
they
add
a
bench
and
a
water
fountain
to
the
public
park
at
the
corner
of
taco
Woodson
Hermosa.
So
the
plan
that
was
given
to
you
on
on
last
week
had
omitted
that,
but
the
planets
before
you
today
has
the
park
bench
and
the
fountain
noted.
H
Is
not
a
blow-up
of
where
the
park
bench
and
where
the
fountain
will
be,
but
there
is
a
blow-up
of
the
design
of
the
park.
So
when
the
slide
that's
before
you
today,
this
slide
and
then
this
next
slide.
The
slide.
That's
here
is
the
one
that
the
Planning
Commission
look
at
looked
at
at
luminaire
review,
and
it
is
substantially
in
conformance
other
than
at
the
very
top
right
hand,
corner
the
Planning
Commission
reviewed,
an
area
that
was
called
a
passive
or
a
a
general
sort
of.
H
H
The
final
PD
shows
that
they've
added
several
pickle
courts,
pickleball
courts,
some
bocce
courts
and
then
moved
the
event
space
over
to
this
area.
That's
highlighted,
so
staff
is
comfortable
with
cop
who
was
saying
that
the
site
plan
is
substantially,
in
conformance
with
the
previous
plan,
the
premium,
the
preliminary
development
plan,
which
only
moved
these
items
around
and
I,
basically
answered
a
question:
the
Planning
Commission.
What
was
going
to
happen
at
that
vacants
sort
of
site?
And
that's
now
they
have
active
recreational
space
there.
H
So
moving
on,
this
is
a
the
site
plan
showing
access
to
the
the
property.
As
you
know,
the
building
is
three
stories
and
has
three
wings
with
the
center
core.
Access
from
the
site
comes
off
a
Hermosa
and
there's
two
access
points,
one
that
leads
into
the
residential
area
and
then
one
that
leads
into
the
retail
portion
of
the
building,
which
is
also
the
guest
portion
and
then
a
connection
in
the
drop-off
circle
area
to
the
retail
portion.
H
So
the
Planning
Commission
EC
had
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time
discussing
the
circulation,
and
this
reflects
what
was
originally
approved
as
part
of
the
preliminary
design,
so
just
orient
everybody.
The
dog
park
that
we
have
spent
lots
of
time
talking
about
is
down
here
along
taco,
it's
this
is
the
retail
building
and
then
the
residential
portion
to
the
top
at
the
top
in
your
packet.
There's
a
series
of
slides
of
what
the
design
will
look
like
a
lot
of
the
passive
recreation
area,
an
active
recreational
area.
H
H
This
is
the
front
entry
that
goes
into
the
into
the
residential
portion
with
a
portico
Shore
and
then
the
glass
facade
that
goes
to
the
top
of
the
building.
There
was
discussion
of
the
center
area
if
there
was
going
to
be
a
statue
or
some
kind
of
water
feature
and
in
this
design
it
just
has
landscaping
in
it
and
then
once
again,
there's
some
slides
of
the
scale
and
massing
which
we'll
get
into
in
a
little
bit.
H
The
heights
of
the
building
are
slightly
different
than
what
the
PD
reviewed
and
I'm
going
to
go
over
them
right
now.
So
the
top
of
the
roof
is
34
feet.
The
top
of
the
roof
screen
at
the
very
top
of
the
building
is
38
and
the
top
of
the
elevator
shafts
are
43
7.
This
is
slightly
taller,
the
overall
height.
Then
what
was
approved
as
preliminary
it
was
41
feet
41-7.
H
H
Moving
on
to
the
retail
building,
this
is
the
corner
pocket
public
park
that
is
at
the
corner
of
taco.
It's
in
Hermosa
you'll
see
that
there's
a
the
retail
building
anchors.
This
portion,
there's
a
large
signature
tree
that
also
anchors
in
uniform
Lowe
plants
with
walls
that
public
that
define
the
public
space
versus
the
private
space.
H
If
you
remember,
the
Planning
Commission
in
AAC
had
some
comments
about
the
Corten
steel,
which
is
the
top
this
the
third
floor
of
the
building.
If
they
were
concerned
about,
if
it
would
bleed
or
melt
on
to
the
white,
the
applicant
has
come
back
with
a
a
steel
core,
10
steel.
Like
finish,
that
is
not
exactly
core
10,
but
will
look
like
it
and
it
is
an
a
painted
product
and
the
applicant
may
want
to
discuss
that
if
you
choose
to
bring
them
up.
H
So
the
guardrails
are
glass,
seamless,
glass,
the
front
facade
is
a
bronze
glazing
and
then
you'll
see
it's
the
natural
ashlar
stone
that
they're
proposing
also
owned
so
in
the
hardscape
and
landscape
and
lighting
portion
of
the
building.
So
what
they've
done
is
they've
divided
the
the
site
into
three
sections.
This
is
an
overall
planting
plan,
but
they
have
called
the
back
portion
where
the
pickleball
courts
I'm.
Sorry,
the
the
west
side
of
the
building
where
the
large
pool
is
is
called
the
resort
and
there's
a
series
of
specific
plantings
that
are
there.
H
The
area
where
the
pickleball
courts
are
or
the
northern
portion
of
the
site
is
called
the
retreat
and
there's
a
series
of
plants
large
shade
trees
and
then
multiple
rich
citrus
plants
are
also
there
and
then
the
retail
portion,
which
is
the
front
facing
the
street.
There's
a
series
of
plantings
and
shade
trees
that
will
act
as
the
shading
for
the
parking
areas.
H
In
your
packet,
there
is
a
series
of
exhibits
that
discusses
the
parking
lot.
Shading
includes
the
types
of
amenities
that
would
be
included
in
each
of
these
sections
of
the
of
the
site
plan,
the
resort
the
retreat
in
the
retail.
So
it
shows
things
like
park
benches,
the
pathways
and
all
those
amenities
with
some
photographs
of
the
types
of
designs
that
we
would
expect.
H
They
also
included
an
overall
wall
and
fence
and
gate
program.
You'll
see
that
there's
gates
that
are
included
at
the
the
pickleball
courts
that
act
as
the
barriers
for
either
the
pools
or
the
active
areas
there's
gates
around
the
dog
park
on
the
private
patios
at
the
front
and
the
back
of
the
doesn't
first
floor
and
then
a
series
of
walls
and
fences
that
will
be
used
so
within
the
the
packet.
H
There
are
also
designs
on
gates
the
types
of
gates
that
are
proposed
for
the
sporting
sporting
courts,
and
then
the
community
gates,
the
overall
complex,
will
be
gated.
You'll
have
to
have
an
access
to
get
into
the
the
passive
and
the
recreational
areas
of
the
site.
However,
the
front
portion
where
the
gas
park
guest
parking
is,
and
the
retail
section
will
be,
the
public
area.
H
H
H
There
is
some
lighting
for
the
pickleball
courts
and
then
other
lighting
that
as
accents-
and
there
are
examples
of
each
of
these
types
of
lights
that
they're
proposing
and
they
include
colored
lights
for
the
palm
trees,
to
light
up
and
down
the
types
of
parking
lot
lighting,
which
would
range
between
18
and
25
feet,
tall
they're,
LED,
cut-off
lights
that
focus
all
the
light
down.
Some
tree
floodlights
and
other
structure
lights.
H
H
When
the
Planning
Commission
looked
at
the
preliminary
PD
and
approved
the
track
map,
there
was
up
in
the
far
corner
where
the
pickleball
courts
were.
There
was
a
lot
that
was
carved
out,
as
you
can
see
now,
by
moving
the
pickleball
courts
to
that
that
location
that
veigar
that
separate
lot
has
been
removed.
So
this
is
this
will
be
a
three
lot
subdivision
that
will
go
to
the
City
Council
for
final
review.
H
So
once
again,
this
is
the
overall
site
plan.
There
are
no
findings
that
the
Planning
Commission
needs
to
make
other
than
to
state
that
the
project
is
substantially,
in
conformance
with
the
preliminary
preliminary
approved
plan,
so
Jared
our
Commissioner
donenfeld.
That
concludes
my
report
and
the
applicant
is
here:
should
you
Cho
so
choose
to
talk
to
him.
C
I
H
H
H
H
F
F
B
F
I
I
H
Right,
you,
you
have
it
in
your
packet.
I
C
I
H
H
I
So
you'll
make
sure
I
don't
want
to
come
back
to
us,
but
you'll
make
sure
that
the
vocabulary
of
the
bus
shelter
matches
the
vocabulary
of
the
retail
building.
Yes,
okay,
and
then
there
was
another
kid
I
guess:
I
couldn't
figure
out
where
the
drinking
fountain
was
and
the
bench
was.
Can
you
point
that
out
to
me
it's.
H
E
H
C
Further
questions
I
have
a
couple
just
a
couple
questions
and
one
maybe
for
the
applicant
I,
think
I
think
it's
terrific
that
we're
doing
of
an
animal
facility
for
not
only
residents
but
for
the
community
there
is
an
outdoor
space.
What
is
your
plan?
Dogs
are
wonderful
animals,
but
they
bark
a
lot
and
their
barks
can
get
quite
loud
and
move
quite
far
into
space
and
I'm
wondering
do
you
have
any
plan
or
concern
about
dogs
barking
predominately
at
night
that
would
affect
the
residents
of
the
living
in
the
complex.
J
C
C
E
Out
on
tahquitz
I,
you
have
decorative
papers
coming
out
of
Hermosa
and
we
were
educated
on
understanding
that
off
of
Hermosa.
That's
really
your
main
entrance
to
this
facility,
but
on
out
on
tahquitz,
you
have
a
right
turn
only,
but
on
that
driveway
I
only
see
asphalt
was
there
ever
a
crosswalk
or
some
sort
of
decorative
paper
touch
on
tahquitz
because
talk,
which
is
our
main
Boulevard
I.
B
My
name
is
fully
a--make
William
I'm,
with
CT
collaborative
landscape
architecture,
office
yeah.
In
the
past.
We
we
didn't
really
address
that
area
as
a
pedestrian
crosswalk
in
accent
paving.
We
wanted
to
keep
it
more
off
of
Hermosa,
partly
also
because
of
a
tea
path
of
travel
requirements
too.
So
we're
trying
to
accentuate
areas
that
are
more
ad,
a
path
of
travel,
with
the
accent.
E
B
B
E
B
There's
thought
behind
it
was
since
it's
just
for
residents
only.
We
don't
want
to
draw
too
much
attention
to
the
public
and
that's
why
we
picked
four
to
five
feet
as
the
walkway,
the
one
around
the
retail
is
more
geared
towards
the
public.
That's
the
reasoning
for
the
width
and
the
scale
of
it.
If
you
will.
E
B
So
yes,
this
is
also
something
that
we'll
have
to
make
sure
that
photometric
studies
obviously
need
to
kick
in
too,
with
the
electrical
engineer
and
get
their
confirmation
to.
But
this
was
just
our
conceptual
schematic
pass
for
the
lighting
layout.
If
you
will,
because
they'll
have
to
come
in
and
do
the
calculations
and
studies
for
lighting.
C
C
C
C
C
A
Okay,
we'll
move
on
on
it,
and
the
next
item
is
a
public
hearing
item
number
two:
a
which
is
Fenton
booth
on
behalf
of
Glenwood
management,
company
LLC
for
a
proposed
tentative
tract
map.
Number
three:
seven:
eight,
oh
seven,
for
the
creation
of
a
1
lakh
condominium
map
for
a
previously
approved
seventeen
unit
apartment
complex
located
at
two
one.
Five
o
North
is
n
Jo
road.
Can
we
have
a
staff
report?
Please?
Yes,.
K
Thank
you,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
Planning
Commission.
So
if
you
recall,
on
July
26
2017,
the
Planning
Commission
approved
a
major
architectural
application
for
the
development
of
these
17
units
apartment
complex
at
21,
50s
on
Harrow
Road,
so
that
project
got
underway
and
if
I
can
just
show
you
this
slide
here.
This
is
the
slide.
It's
an
area
of
of
the
site
and
its
general
vicinity.
K
So,
as
you
can
see
the
project's
already
underway,
however,
we
got
a
meaning
had
a
call
and
a
meeting
with
the
woody
developers
and
proposed
the
creation
of
a
condominium
app.
So
that's
the
application.
That
is
that's
the
item
that
is
before
you
discipline
again.
You
previously
approved
this
project
for
a
17
unit.
Three
structures
apartment
complex.
The
applicant
stated
that,
due
to
over
costs
over
on,
they
had
no
choice
at
this
time,
but
to
combat
the
development
into
a
condominium
complex.
So
the
followed
are
what
the
Municipal
Code
are
require.
K
That
is
submit
a
tentative
parcel
map,
application
that
requires
a
review
and
a
recommendation
to
the
to
the
City
Council
by
the
Planning
Commission.
That's
essentially,
what's
before
you
today,
it
does
meet
all
the
requirement
of
the
general
plan
and
the
zoning
and,
of
course,
it
development
standards
in
terms
of
the
lot
area,
the
width
of
the
Lord
and
the
depth
of
the
Lord
itself
and
the
density
it
is
zone
r2,
so
condominium
units
are
allowed
there
and
the
general
plan
designation
is
medium
density
residential.
K
The
density
is
also
consistent
with
that
of
the
general
plan.
Again,
staff
was
able
to
make
the
required
findings
for
tentative
parcel
map
in
support
of
this
application.
In
addition
to
that
D
on
the
environmental
determination,
it
does
meet
all
the
five
findings,
as
established
under
the
guidelines
of
sequa.
So
as
a
result
of
that,
our
staff
is
recommending
that
the
Planning
Commission
make
a
recommendation
of
approval
to
to
the
City
Council.
This
is
the
map.
This
is
the
one
lot
condo
map
itself
that
has
been
proposed
as
we
as
I
had
mentioned
earlier
on.
K
There
are
three
main
structures
that
constitute
the
17
units.
Earlier
on
that
she
had
asked
a
question
about
the
building
specifications
of
an
apartment,
complex
being
converted
into
a
condominium.
That
question
was
posed
to
the
city's
building
official
and
he
confirmed
that
the
arts
you
ratings
of
apartment
complex,
is
the
same
as
our
of
condominium,
so
it
is
consistent
that
will
conclude
staff
report.
It
is
a
public
hearing.
K
K
C
F
C
There
any
discussion
as
I
recall
there
was
a.
There
was
some
discussion
about
the
fact
the
Commission
was
in.
It
was
very
pleased
with
the
fact
that,
by
making
these
rental
they
would
probably
become
much
more
affordable
housing
products
for
people.
It's
not
low-income
housing
but
more
affordable
at
a
place
where
it
was
appropriate.
It
seemed
like
a
really
good
project.
It
wasn't
that
one
of
our
basic
discussion
points.
F
F
Unfortunately,
the
applicant
has
indicated
in
their
justification
letter
that
they
intended
these
to
be
apartments,
but
over
the
South
past
several
months,
as
the
cost
relative
to
construction
have
gone
up,
they
are
no
longer
able
to
make
a
profit
with
these
units
as
apartment
units.
The
representative
for
the
applicant
may
be
able
to
give
additional
discussion,
but
that
was
our
understanding.
It's
that
in
the
construction
process,
the
cost
of
the
project
became
much
more
expensive.
Thank.
K
L
I
K
F
F
I
I
I
E
K
E
K
E
E
K
A
C
Have
a
question:
of
course
we
are,
as
you
can
tell
we're
concerned
about
affordable
housing.
Can
you
tell
me
at
this
time
if
it
were,
if
it
were
going
to
be
rental,
what
the
rental
price
points
per
month
would
have
been
an
estimate
only
of
course,
and
what
is
your
estimate
as
to
what
the
price
points
are
going
to
be
as
units
for
sale,
I.
C
I
Can
I
address
that
from
that?
Certainly,
you
know.
We've
asked
that
question
of
developers
before
and
I
don't
want
to
cast
a
wide
net
here
and
say
all
developers
aren't
willing
to
tell
us
the
truth,
but
there's
there's
no
I
mean
it's
just
a
number
at
this
point.
There's
no,
you
know
there's
nothing
on
a
piece
of
paper
that
says
the
rent
has
to
fall
between
this
and
this
or
the
sale
of
the
condominium
unit
has
to
be
between
this.
J
C
C
I,
it
is
I
think
we've
often
had
a
situation
where
we're
going
from
a
rental
which
is
in
the
community
interest.
We
thought
to
sale,
which
is
in
the
developers
interest,
but
not
necessarily
in
affordable
housing
interest
for
the
city.
It
would
be
nice
to
be
nice
to
just
have
a
some
sort
of
a
ballpark.
If
you
will
how.
M
B
M
K
E
E
E
However
I
don't
think
you
know
respectfully
mr.
Sandborn,
it's
the
civil
engineer.
Perhaps
we
need
somebody
who
has
that
kind
of
information
and
I'm
proposing
that
we
should
continue
this
project
until
we
get
those
answers,
because
I
would
like
for
the
project
to
finish.
I
would
like
it
to
be
apartments,
but
if
they're
not
they
could
be
condominiums.
E
A
Okay,
so
any
other
questions
of
the
applicant,
whether
the
applicant
is
here.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
and
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
at
this
point.
I
think
I
forgot
to
open
the
public
hearing,
so
it
opened
and
closed
right.
No,
no.
We
can
open
for
discussion.
Oh
no,
we've
already
asked
there's
no
one
here.
C
Would
I'm
very
sympathetic
to
what
miss
song
said?
That
was
my
thought
too.
I
think
we're
not
trying
to
delay
what
is
the
inevitable
if
that's
the
inevitable,
but
I
think,
since
this
is
a
change
and
we
are
so
sensitive
as
a
city
and
becoming
more
sensitive
to
our
need
for
affordable
housing,
and
we
were
so
interested
in
this
project
because
it
was
going
to
be
part
of
fulfilling
that
need
it
would
be.
D
I
F
E
So,
thank
you
Flynn
as
usual
clarifying
so
I
think
we
have
two
options
which
is
decide
on
this
project.
However,
we
decide
and
have
the
City
Council
consider
this
project
as
a
new
project
with
the
conditions
that
are
being
posed
by
the
department,
or
we
find
more
information
by
cabling
it
and
asking
for
the
developer
to
come
in
and
answer
our
questions.
A
So
just
my
point
of
view
is
I'm
not
sure
tabling.
It
will
do
much
for
us,
but
I
do
agree
completely
and
wholeheartedly
that
the
conditions
that
were
waived
would
be
a
recommendation
to
reinsert
those
conditions
in
because
it
would
be
very
hard
for
the
city
to
ever
get
those
conditions
or
get
that
type
of
public
infrastructure
improvement
at
a
future
date.
So
I
would
be
in
concurrence
either
way
there
be
a
continuance
or
if
we
were
to
make
a
motion
now
to
add
that
as
a
recommendation
to
the
City
Council.
E
One
more
point:
I
think
we
were
looking.
We
can't
judge
this
project
of
thinking
that
the
developer
was
going
to
make
a
de
terre
will
an
affordable
rental
project.
It
was
always
gonna
be
a
for
market
project.
Nobody
belapur
will
do
that
at
their
own
choice,
but
what
we
like
the
fact
is
that
there
was
a
different
mechanism
of
different
type
of
housing
that
is
they're.
Not
all
condominiums
are
not
all
single-family,
but
there
was
more
stock
of
apartment
housing
that
that's
what
I
believe.
E
So
we
were
in
this
situation
in
which
now
the
applicant
is
asking
to
this.
For
this
to
be
a
condominium
project,
and
so
I
would
say,
as
part
of
the
discussion
is
that
we
would
allow
I
would
say
I
would
recommend
that,
but
to
have
the
council
and
the
departments.
Look
at
this
as
a
brand-new
condominium
project.
A
D
A
Okay,
the
motion
passes
four
to
one.
Thank
you
very
much
and
then
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
item
to
be
James
Hill
on
behalf
of
the
labyrinth,
excess
extracts
LLC
for
a
conditional
use,
permit
a
CU
p
application
to
operate
a
1,600
square
foot
cannabis
manufacturing
facility
within
an
existing
industrial
building,
located
at
four
seven
seven,
nine
East
Ramon
Road.
Can
we
have
a
staff
report?
Please
yeah.
K
K
So
there
are
a
few
issues
that
staff
has
identified
with
this
project
number
one
is
that
which
is
really
not
an
issue,
but
the
applicant
is
proposing
is
significant
interior
renovation
to
accommodate
the
use
and
the
applicant
is
also
proposing
to
use
six
inch
CMU,
as
was
within
the
existing
structure
of
the
proposed
site
in
the
English
plans
that
you
have.
There
are
indications
of
shipping
containers
and
I'm
gonna
go
through
my
slides
in
a
minute
want
to
give
you
the
background
of
this
for
a
minute.
There
are
some
shipping
containers
in
that
plan.
K
K
So
again,
the
request
is
for
a
Co
P
to
allow
the
they
allow
the
operation
of
a
type
six
cannabis
manufacturing
facility
and
I
want
to
state
very
clearly
up
front
that
this
is
just
a
manufacturing.
This
is
different
between
what
staff
proposed
presented
to
you
couple
weeks
ago,
and
this
application
on
this
application
does
not
involve
cultivation
of
any
type.
So
it's
simply
manufacturing
and
the
products
that
the
end
product
that
will
be
manufactured
here
will
be
sold
or
given
to
a
third
party
for
distribution.
K
So
all
of
those
would
not
be
carried
out
at
the
side.
So,
having
said
that,
I
just
want
to
go
over
the
some
slides
that
I
have
here.
This
is
an
area
view
of
the
site
and
its
surrounding
the
vicinity.
As
you
can
see
there,
it
is.
There
are
three
main
structures
on
that
parcel.
It
is
the
small
parcel
that
is
between
the
one
or
not
and
sort
of
a
that's
where
that
is
the
1606
1600
square
foot
structure
at
our
house.
The
cannabis
facility
I
also
want
to
go
over
the
the
restriction
zone.
K
K
K
K
This
plan
here
is
the
foundation
that
would
be
the
new
foundation,
and
so,
if
you
look
at
it
closely
on
all
the
four
corners
of
the
structure,
there
will
be
six
inch,
CA
new
walls
and
that's
the
foundation
of
that
and
I
have
the
legend
right
next
to
it,
describing
the
type
of
material
that
will
be
used
inside
of
that
structure.
That
I
showed
you
earlier.
K
This
is
the
floor
plan.
This
is
just
a
blow-up
of
the
floor
plan
of
how
the
special
internal
special
species
are
distributed.
That
is,
you
have
offices,
you
have
where
the
manufacturing
operation
will
be
taking
place
and
then
again
this
is
just
a
building
elevation.
This
is
how
it
looks
like
now,
but
the
reason
why
I
want
to
show
this
is
that,
in
the
plans
that
you
have
before
you
that
are
difficult
to
read,
you
have
there
are
doors
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
shut.
K
So
in
the
package
that
staff
came,
there
were
two
conditions
that
are
missing,
that
staff
will
be
proposing
that
show
the
Planning
Commission
make
the
necessary
or
the
required
finding
super
to
approve
this
project.
These
two
conditions
are
to
be
added
in
addition
to
this
project,
specific
conditions
that
are,
in
your
package
number
one
grants
for,
revocation
which
states
that
had
non-compliance
with
any
of
the
conditions
of
disapproval
or
with
any
applicable
city,
county
state
and
federal
codes,
ordinances
resolutions
and
all
our
law
shall
constitute
grants
to
revoke
the
conditional
use
permit.
K
In
addition,
such
violation
will
also
result
in
enforcement
actions,
including
citations
arrest
and
business
closure,
in
accordance
with
the
law.
Second
condition
will
is
relative
to
AAC
and
City
Council
review
that
the
applicant
shall
be
required
to
submit
a
minor
architectural
application
for
any
facade
improvements
to
be
that
would
be
reviewed
by
the
council
and
that
any
signage
proposed
other
side
shall
be
reviewed
by
the
architectural
Advisory
Committee.
K
So
there
was
a
a
negative
declaration
on
that
staff
is
been
that
staff
is
proposing.
We
did
prepare
an
initial
study
for
this
project
and
a
categorical
exempt
is
being
proposed
for
it
according
to
the
guidelines
of
sequa,
so
you
may
be
asking
how
is
this
different
than
the
project
you
saw
last
week?
There
are
some
few
differences
so
number
one
again
the
type
of
operation.
This
is
strictly
type
six,
it
is
restricted
to
manufacturing.
There
will
be
no
cultivation.
K
The
one
you
saw
last
week
was
type
six
and
type
seven,
so
they
could
use
volatile
solvents.
This
will
not
include
or
would
not
require
volatile
solvents
number.
Two,
if
you
recall
this
size
and
the
scope
of
that
project
was
much
lighter.
That
was
8,000,
similar
and
40
square
feet.
Approximately
80%
of
that
space
was
for
cultivation.
In
this
case,
it's
only
1600.
It's
only
for
manufacturing,
like
I
said
it
is
strictly
restricted
to
manufacture
and
there
will
be
no
cultivation
ends.
K
This
was
also
built
in
the
90s,
but
staff
is
comfortable
with
the
renovation
that
has
been
proposed,
designed
to
prevent
exfiltration
other
was
the
concrete
the
blocks
and
the
ceiling
staff
is
comfortable
with
that
and
then
the
doors
the
doors
in
this
facility
is
not
as
numerous
or
as
many
as
the
one
you
saw
before,
and
finally,
the
order
of
control
improvements,
that's
been
made,
or
that's
been
proposed
as
significant
and
stuff
believe
that
there
will
be
they
will
be
able
to
prevent.
Although
exfiltration.
K
It
is
mostly
surrounded
by
existing
cannabis
facilities
and
other
industrial
uses,
as
a
result
start
is
able
to
make
the
required
findings
and
recommendation
is
that
you
adopt
a
categorical
exempt
under
the
guidance
of
sequa
and
approve
the
conditional
use
permit,
in
addition
to
all
those
conditions
that
staff
has
proposed
to
you
or
any
other
additional
conditional
that
the
Commissioner
might
deem
necessary.
With
that,
my
staff
report
is
concluded,
it
is
a
public
hearing,
I,
believe
the
applicants
are
in
the
audience
to
make
a
presentation
to
the
Commission.
C
Interesting
that
you
make
the
distinction
between
six
and
seven
I
was
my
understanding.
The
reason
we
and
we
took
so
much
time
with
recommendations
to
Council
was
that
we
based
on
expert
testimony.
We
felt
that
six,
both
six
and
seven,
because
the
actual
marijuana
product
is
being
handled,
poses
a
tremendous
risk
with
respect
to
odor.
C
F
Me
go
ahead
and
address
that
as
the
one
who
drafted
the
proposed
changes
to
her
ordinance
recommending
changes
based
on
the
manufacturing
types
in
terms
of
this
proposal,
they're
proposing
type
six
manufacturing,
which
is
non-volatile
manufacturing
type,
seven
uses
volatile
materials
in
the
extraction
process.
So
there
is
a
distinction
between
type
six
and
type.
Seven,
however,
for
the
purposes
of
the
ordinance
that
will
not
become
effective
until
January,
we
are
grouping
type,
six
and
type
seven
together.
F
C
As
I
understand
counsel,
it
has
taken
our
recommendations
and
they
are
revising
the
ordinance.
Have
we
been
any
given
any
direction
from
Council
or
maybe
from
the
City
Council
or
our
legal
counsel,
with
respect
to
how
we
should
treat
pending
applications
that,
under
the
new
law,
might
not
be
approvable
in
the
areas
for
which
they're
being
sought?
Yes,.
F
Council
did
discuss
that
at
their
meeting
last
week.
They
have
authorized
that
those
applications
that
are
in
process
that
have
an
administrative
permit
already
issued
and
have
filed
their
conditional
use
paperwork
may
go
ahead
and
proceed
through
the
process.
However,
there
is
a
caveat
to
that
that,
as
Planning
Commission
considers
those
applications
at
a
conditional
use
permit
public
hearing,
you
all
still
need
to
make
findings
that
there
will
not
be
impacts
to
adjacent
properties,
and
so
you
may
consider
them
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
F
C
I
I
apologize
because
I
was
not
at
that
study
session.
I
had
other
commitments.
Could
you
it
is,
are
using
the
word
volatile?
Oh,
is
it
a
word
of
art
where
you're
using
I
mean
I,
know
volatile
means,
excitable
or
something
along
those
lines?
But
what
does
it
mean
specifically
when
you
use
that,
in
reference
to
the
to
the
analysis
to.
N
I
N
N
I
N
B
A
D
A
While
you're
up
here
Kim's
further
on
that
same
question,
yeah,
we
had
heard
during
the
testimony
we're
looking
at
the
ordinance
that
growing,
especially
the
flowering
season,
causes
an
immense
amount
of
odor.
Once
the
cannabis
is
once
the
flowers
are
harvested
and
brought
to
this
facility,
you
just
said
that
they
still
have
an
odor
to
them.
Correct.
A
N
Is
entirely
subjective,
but
from
my
experience,
flowering
disabling
that
kind
of
like
breaking
up
the
product
tends
to
cause
more
release
of
odours,
as
does
kind
of
that
final
rush
of
flowering
I
would
kind
of
equate
them
as
an
equal
kind
of
intensity.
One
is
substantially
longer,
though
growing
season
is
a
is
it
matter.
We,
the
breaking
up
of
a
product,
is
a
matter
of
moments
and
doesn't
happen.
Consist
constantly
it's
a
momentary
occurrence.
So.
A
If
I
can
go
I,
just
don't
little
further
in
this
I
did
notice
that
there's
the
the
doors
that
have
that
that
go
to
the
exterior
doors
mm-hmm,
that
there
are
actually
airlocks
and
and
inside
of
that
building.
That
would
give
a
buffer
between
where
the
actual
cannabis
is
actually
being
manufactured
and
where
the
exterior
door
is.
However,
how
is
delivery
handle
that,
if
you
can
answer
I.
N
A
I
I
So,
there's
a
proposed
project,
specific
condition
on
this
on
the
screen
right
now
and
part
of
that
says
that
that,
unless
it's,
unless
the
project
is
a
complaint,
compliance
with
federal
laws,
if
it's
not
in
compliance
with
federal
laws,
it
can
this:
u
P
can
be
revoked
and
is
it's
it's?
My
understanding
that
federal
law
prohibits
possession
of
marijuana
is
that
wrong?
No.
L
I
B
L
L
N
L
If
I
may
I
think
the
Commission's
concern
here
is
that,
because,
on
the
federal
level,
cannabis
is
still
considered
a
schedule,
1
controlled
substance,
not
prescribed
aligned
area
circumstances.
If
we
put
that
condition
in
there,
could
that
cause
some
sort
of
a
conflict
so
and
it's
just
kind
of
the
state
of
the
law
with
cannabis
right
now
how
it
is?
Okay,
thank
you.
So.
A
I
have
a
question
as
well:
we
have
been
very
diligent
about
type
6
and
type
7,
particularly
because
of
the
odors
that
they
generate.
We
have
heard
that
a
lot
of
people
use
carbon
filters,
but
those
carbon
filters
are
only
as
good
as
the
how
often
they're
changed
how
active
that
carbon
is
in
those
filters.
So
we've
been
very
cautious
in
approving
near
residential,
any
sort
of
six
or
seven
type.
Six
or
seven.
Can
you
tell
me
on
this
particular
incident?
What
type
of
filtration
system
is
it?
N
Its
carbon
filtration
and
as
far
as
the
advancement
for
odor
filtration
carbon
filtration,
is
the
top
carbon
or
potassium
filtration,
which
are
about
equal
there's.
What
we're?
What
we're
doing
in
the
for
the
new
requirements,
if
I
could,
for
a
second,
is
going
to
be
enhancing
the
dilution
ratio
of
what
has
discharged
the
exterior.
But
as
far
as
filtration
goes,
this
is
the
top
level
of
filtration.
It's
a
carbon
filtration
and.
A
N
E
E
N
E
F
E
N
E
N
E
N
Had
just
looking
at
that
that
condition
I
in
ideal
a
feel
free
to
me,
I,
don't
know
what
exactly
they're
making
inside
the
this
manufacturing
facility,
but
in
general
the
end
product
of
a
manufacturing
process
that
may
use
volatile
or
non-volatile
substances.
The
end
product
is
THC
and
other
cannabinoids,
which
includes
terpenes,
so
they're
they're
come
they're
extracting
and
extracting
those
elements
for
sale
and
distribution.
Okay,.
F
K
I
N
I
E
E
E
E
I
E
N
A
Are
there
more
questions
of
staff,
hearing
no
questions,
staff,
I'll,
open
the
public
hearing
and
is
the
applicant
present?
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
very
much.
If
they
ever
going
to
come
forward,
you
have
up
to
ten
minutes
to
talk
about
your
project
and
you
may
want
to
filter
in
some
of
the
questions.
You've
heard
asked.
O
I'm
Bob
Hillman,
CEO
of
labyrinth,
extracts
and
James
Hill
co-ceo
of
labyrinth
extracts.
We
were
coming
out
of
our
seats
to
try
to
explain
volatile
non
volatile.
The
the
volatility
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
odor.
That's
just
the
method
of
extracting
the
oil
set.
Our
president
cannabis,
dried
plant
material
emits
less
odor
that
wet
plant
materials
such
as
what
he
was
talking
about.
O
If
you
ever
had
fresh
flowers,
they
smell
very
odors
when
they're
fresh
kind
of
go
down
when
they're
not,
but
if
you
can
still
smell
our
method,
we
bring
them
in
we've
made
it
at
at
all
realms
to
to
make
it
odor
control
in
there
by
even
putting
concrete
walls
recirculating
air
carbon
filters,
everything
we
could
possibly
do
in
a
small
facility.
Even
though
we
don't
emit
a
lot
of
odor
you're
you're
transferring
of
the
material
into
the
building
and
processing
it
for
freezing.
O
We
freeze
it
to
help
control
the
the
odor
and
then
it's
processed
in
in
these
rooms
that
are
completely
hermetically
sealed.
They're
done
so
also
for
fire
proofing.
We
have
sprinklers.
We
have
fire
suppression
in
there
and
we
have
also
odor
sensors
that
detect
the
chemicals
and
detect
the
smell
if
it
gets
above
a
certain
level.
So
a
we
control
the
the
odor.
We
control
the
volatility
and
we
control
the
safety
of
it.
In
such
a
small
little
area.
C
O
And
so
once
the
materials
frozen
it's
put
into
a
system
that
is
closed-loop,
it's
never
exposed
to
the
environment
again,
so
it's
closed-loop
terpenes
are
actually
stripped
and
taken
out
of
our
oil.
It's
what
makes
it
taste
like
you
would
think
when
you're
making
products
for
consumption,
that
taste
is
not
desirable,
so
we
we
literally
strip
that
out
and
then
that's
disposed
again.
It's
also
not
exposed
to
the
air
or
the
environment.
It's
taken
and
just
most
up
through
a
hazard
company
that
picks
up
all
the
material
anyway.
O
O
No,
we've
we've
done
everything
in
our
power
through
engineering
through
modern
equipment,
custom
designed
to
have
automation
and
back
checks
and
and
redundancies
so
that
there,
if
there
was
a
failure,
whether
it
be
odor
control,
whether
it
be
fire
suppression,
we
always
would
have
backup
for
not
only
smell
but
for
safety
reasons,
safety
and
security,
and
that's
another
reason
why
there
are
concrete
walls
inside
for
safety.
Great.
A
J
A
J
J
A
A
O
I
can
appreciate
his
concern
about
odor
I
mean
I.
Would
too
if
I
lived
in
the
area
and
we've
done
everything
we
could
we
followed
the
rules
of
the
city?
We
started
this
process
over
a
year
ago,
we
received
our
city
license
for
cannabis.
Over
a
year
ago,
we
received
our
state
full
license
just
under
ten
months
ago,
so
we
have
followed
this
very
difficult,
long
process
to
get
to
this
point,
and
we've
done
everything
probably
tenfold
over
what
the
city
requirements
were
were
for.
We
picked
this
location
because
it
was
of
a
cannabis
location.
O
It
was
industrial.
If
you
see
in
the
pictures,
there's
literally
not
a
house
residential
or
public
area
within
a
thousand
feet.
We
have
an
airport
across
the
street
so
unless
I
would
think
that
they
would
emit
more
odors
than
we
would.
I
would
suggest
that
you
would
look
at
the
science
behind
it
and
see
that
we've
done
everything
that
we
could
do
to
mitigate
this
and
moving
is
just
not
an
option
at
this
point
no
I
think
Kim.
We
because
the
state
great.
O
O
C
B
O
In
our
particular
process,
what
we
do
is
very
simple:
it's
like
making
tea.
We
we
dip
the
the
cannabis
in
a
very,
very
cold,
solvent
and
it
it
liquefies
the
oil
inside
that
oil,
our
terpene
oils
amongst
other
cannabinoids.
We
then
distill
it
and
in
distilling
what
you
do
is
you
heat
to
different
temperatures
and
terpenes
are
probably
one
of
the
the
lightest
they
at
like
90
degrees.
They
will
start
to
oil
off
so
at
90
degrees.
O
We
capture
it
inside
of
a
vessel
with
vacuum,
and
it's
sealed
in
that,
and
then
we
dispose
of
that
sealed
container
that
somebody
comes
out
and
picks
it
up.
We
don't
just
dump
it
outside,
that's
they
can
be
valuable
because
they
do
offer
the
taste
and
the
nuances
that
that
smoking
cannabis
people
like,
but
we're
not
making
our
oil
for
that
we're
making
it
for
more
of
a
consumption
process,
and
you
don't
want
to
taste
that
in
your
lack
of
a
better
word,
gummy
bears
right.
O
O
Sighs
it's
currently
there,
so
there's,
there's
plumbing
already
there
in
the
existing
building
for
the
bathroom
is
attached
outside
so
on
the
outside
corner.
So
what
we
wanted
to
do
was
upgrade
it
for
a
DA.
It
currently
is
not,
and
so
we
had
to
put
ramps
and
make
it
larger
and
to
do
so,
we
kind
of
pushed
it
away
from
the
building
to
be
able
to
get
the
I
guess.
The
angle
for
the
ramps,
but.
E
O
Because
the
the
area
is
secured,
it's
a
security
area
that,
even
though
it
goes
outside
it's
part
of
our
our
area
that
and
it
is
fenced
and
and
secured
them
behind
so
out
of
view
of
any
kind.
It's
the
way
the
building
was
built,
and
that's
we
kind
of
have
to
go
with
that's
where
the
plumbing
is
so
we
have
to
go
where
the
drains
are,
or
we
would
have
to
tear
up
the
existing
structure.
O
O
It's
an
access
panel
for
I
would
have
to
refer
exactly
what
you're
talking
to,
but
to
the
best
of
my
recollection,
it's
access
panel
for
I,
don't
wanna,
say
plumbing
I
think
it
was
for
electrical,
and
so
they
rather
remember
it's
concrete.
So
we
can't
just
cut
out
later
if
we
want
to
access
or
at
addition,
so
there's
conduits
that
go
in
through
the
concrete
walls
for
expansion,
change
of
type
of
equipment,
modifications
you
have
to
be
able
to
get
into
that
kind
of
like
a
circuit
breaker
panel.
E
O
Can't
know
because
we
have
to
be
intrinsically
safe,
so
what
that
means
is
we
have
to,
even
though
we're
working
with
non-volatile
materials
that
won't
explode,
we
still
chose
to
go
with
intrinsically
safer
explosion-proof
equipment
that
would
not
provide
sparks
or
any
chance
of
generating
kind
of
an
open
flame,
and
that
is
to
be
intrinsically
safe.
You
can
only
access
that
from
outside
of
that
particular
envelope.
It's
a
law,
NFPA
National,
Fire,
Protection,
Association,
okay,.
E
O
O
We
picked
Palm
Springs
because
of
its
cannabis
friendly
nature.
We
picked
Palm
Springs
because
of
most
of
the
cities
that
offer
that
same
opportunity
for
license
are
not
as
friendly
or
may
not
be
as
well
of
a
suited
City.
They
a
lot
of
them,
are
outlining
cities.
We
picked
this
particular
location
because
there's
limited
access
to
approvable
buildings
for
this
particular
business
type.
If
you
look
right
now,
there's
probably
three
buildings
available
in
all
of
Palm
Springs
that
allow
cannabis,
then
that's
just
the
owner.
O
E
E
O
Is
an
interesting
building
if
you
look
at
it,
there's
three
main
buildings:
this
is
a
highly
industrial
area.
The
front
of
the
the
building
I
believe
has
a
cup
already
for
for
a
dispensary,
although
it's
not
in
place,
we
took
the
back
area
or
in
the
middle
area
that
had
no
parking,
we're
adding
parking,
we're
only
supplier
to
have
two
spots.
We
put
three
spots
plus
handicap
and
we
did
that
on
purpose
again,
the
ad
a
we're
looking
for
that's
it
to
work
in
our
facility,
and
so
many
of
them
have
some
some
physical
issues.
O
E
O
D
O
O
O
There
we
go
okay,
if
you
look
at
the
bottom
left
hand
corner
that
is
our
freezer
and
that's
where
we
store
all
materials
that
comes
in
you
can
see.
It's
also
concrete.
The
room
right
outside
of
that
is
I,
guess
the
pre-processing.
We
have
to
bylaw
way
it
barcode
it
and
report
it
to
the
state
on
a
manifest.
So
that's
the
area
that
when
it
comes
in,
we
make
sure
that
it
complies
with
those
those
governmental
requirements
and,
and
it's
quarantined
inside
of
the
freezer.
We
then
would
have
somebody
go
in
there.
O
You
don't.
The
lobby
was
designed
to
have
guests
again
by
California
state
law.
If
someone
were
to
walk
into
the
building
and
we
they
have
to
have
access
to
the
building
the
federal
government
in
including
the
city
and
the
police
department
they
have
to
come
in.
They
are
not
allowed
to
walk
into
an
active
facility
and
have
to
being
one
they
have
to
be
in
a
buffer
zone
where
they
sign
in
so
couldn't
they
just
come
in
through
the
office.
The
office
is
back
behind
fencing.
O
A
Of
questions,
if
I
can,
if
there's
my
commissioners,
are
done
asking
questions,
it
seems
that
you've
done
everything
to
contain
the
odor
within
the
building
and
then
mitigate
that
odor
within
the
building.
The
question
I
have
more
is
about
the
delivery
of
product
in
and
out
of
iesson
trucks
and
how
that's
actually
going
to
happen.
You
explained
a
little
bit
at
when
did
you
freezers,
but
could
you
we
pull
it
up?
Could
you
just
and
how
do
we
contain
that
ocean
that
delivery
process.
O
Sir,
typically,
when
we
receive
our
plant
material,
we've
we've
gone
and
purchased
that
plant
material
off-site
they're
put
into
bends
for
lack
of
a
better
word,
closed
garbage
camps,
but
they're,
not
garbage
cans.
There's
secured
camps
and
they're
put
in
there
they're
delivered
off
of
a
truck
in
through
the
door.
We
then
take
them.
We
have
to
weigh
them,
so
the
doors
are
closed
before
we
open
them.
They're,
not
just
you
know,
opened
out
in
the
open
they.
They
spend
the
least
amount
of
time
going
from
the
truck
to
there,
but
they're
in
contained
okay.
O
A
A
The
reason
we're
doing
that
as
the
CEP
normally
runs
with
the
land
and
if
you
as
an
operator,
violate
that
CEP,
we
want
to
be
able
to
revoke
that
for
this
particular
area.
So
just
so
you're
aware.
Well,
absolutely
we
want
to
clean
operation.
The
other
thing
we're
doing
we
are
industrial
zones
needs
some
upgrading
and
we
believe
we
can
do
this
through
the
cannabis
industry
coming
in.
It's
one
way
to
look
at
it,
so
you
will
be
looking
at
some
architectural
review,
I
think
which
was
mentioned
earlier.
A
Maybe
some
Street
trees
in
the
parking
lot
or
something.
So
you
need
to
be
thinking
about
that
as
well.
If
this
were
to
be
approved
tonight,
so
to
give
that
some
thought
as
well
on
what
you're
gonna
do
to
make
it
look
more
architectural
interesting
to
make
that
parking
lot
a
little
more
friendly
to
our
desert
hot
Sun
here,
I
sense.
A
O
A
Still
get
that
we
still
get
this
okay
just
wanted
to
make
aware
of
that
other
than
that
I.
Don't
have
any
more
questions
to
staff.
Have
any
more
questions?
Excuse
me
does
Commission
have
any
more
questions.
Thank
you
very
much
and
with
that
I'll
close,
the
public
hearing
and
I'll
open
it
to
Commission
comments.
Thank
you.
C
A
Wishes
are,
if
I
could
just
say,
I
think
that's
an
important
distinction,
because
we
didn't
have
see
ups
when
he
first
started
out
with
that,
so
the
city
really
didn't
have
as
much
of
a
clawback.
If
somebody
wasn't
abiding
by
the
rules,
the
Cu
P
gives
us
that
opportunity
which
we
did
not
have
is
that
correct
planet
when
we
first
approved
some
of
the
initial
ones
that
are
causing
some
problems
so.
F
D
C
We're
in
sort
of
a
Mical,
because
we
know
we
have
a
new
ordinance
coming
into
effect
on
January
1,
but
the
law
is
the
law,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
if
this
applicant
has
shown
sufficient
safeguards
with
respect
to
the
issues
that
concern
us
in
the
community,
it's
an
approvable
application
under
the
law
as
it
exists
today,
so
I
would
I
and
I
think
they
have
I.
Think
they've
done
as
much
as
they
can
possibly
do.
This
is
an
evolving
technology
and
things
are
going
to
change,
but
having
the
CEP
handle
is
very
good.
E
Would
too,
but
I
would
strongly
ask
the
architect
to
relook
at
the
layout
and
include
the
restroom.
No
employees
should
go
outside
in
order
to
access
the
restroom
and
therefore
I
will
make
that
into
a
condition,
and
the
second
will
be
that
it
will
have
to
be
enhanced
both
architectural
II
and
also
inside
improvements.
We
don't
want
to
just
because
the
condition
is
there
for
the
benefit
of
the
employees.
The
veterans
that
you
want
to
have
a
nice
work
environment
to
come
into
work.
So
that
would
be
my
two
conditions.
L
Mr.
chair,
before
anyone
makes
a
motion,
I'd
also
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
the
motion
is
to
approve
with
the
conditions
of
approval,
as
we've
been
discussing.
What's
the
Commission's
attitude
about
removing
that
reference
to
federal
a
federal
law
violation
in
the
condition
if
the
Commission's
attitude
is
let's
remove
that
we
can
certainly
do
that.
So.
A
C
A
lawyer,
but
not
a
lawyer
who
knows
a
thing
about
cannabis
law,
not
the
extent
as
much
out
there
to
know.
It
would
seem
to
me,
mr.
priest
that
there
is
no
harm
in
having
the
federal
codes
regulations
statutes
in
there
and
you
don't
know
what
might
likely
happen
in
the
future
and,
of
course,
in
the
future.
We
may
well
see
legalization
at
the
federal
level
and
then
we'd
want
everyone
to
be
complying
with
it
now.
I
guess
the
law
is
the
law
and
you
could
you
don't
have
to
state
it
to
make
it?
C
L
C
L
Another
problem
and
I
would
point
out:
I
mean
if
the
key
concern
of
things
like
say,
federal,
environmental
laws
or
something
like
that:
they're
largely
matching
laws
on
the
state
level
for
things
like
that
as
well,
so
compliance
with
state
law
would
effectively
be
compliance
with
federal
law
on
most
of
those
issues.
Well,.
A
Since
we're
thinking
about
emotion,
I
I
do
think
it
is
really
great
to
hear,
and
although
we're
not
enforcing
airway,
that
the
applicant
is
willing
to
hire
veterans,
I
think
somebody
willing
to
hire
a
veteran
and/or.
Our
local
people
is
a
plus
for
our
economy
here
in
Palm,
Springs
and
I
hope
that
the
will
pay
a
living
wage
as
well.
I.
C
F
F
A
A
Okay,
next
up,
congratulations!
Thank
you.
The
next
one
is
new
church
to
LLC
for
a
time
extension
of
entitlements
to
renovate
the
existing
historic
Community,
Church
and
or
katrien
for
adaptive,
reuse
and
demolish
portions
of
the
site
for
the
construction
and
operation
of
a
hotel
with
accessories,
spa,
restaurant
and
meeting
space
on
a
3.1
acre
site
located
at
two-two
to
South
Korea
Road.
Can
we
have
a
staff
report
please?
Mr.
F
A
Motion
passes,
it
would
be
December.
11Th
will
come
back
to
us.
Thank
you
very
much.
The
next
ones
item
2d,
the
city
of
Palm
Springs,
for
a
change
of
zone
at
three
locations.
One
city-owned
property
zoned,
see
you
at
one
nine
west,
sunny
dunes
road
number,
two
city-owned
property
zone,
see
you
located
the
southwest
of
the
intersection
of
North
Indian
Canyon
Drive
and
Stevens
Road
and
number
three
privately
owned
properties
owned
zone.
See
you
at
342
North
Palm
Canyon
Drive.
Can
we
have
a
staff
report?
Please.
M
M
So
the
three
locations
you
see
here
on
the
screen,
they're
all
zoned,
see
you
and
I'll
go
into
more
detail
with
on
each
of
these
here:
location,
1,
190,
west,
sunny
dunes
Road
is
a
0.16
acre
site
west
of
South
home
Canyon
Drive
on
the
north
side
of
sunny
dunes
Road.
As
I
said,
existing
Antonian
is
Cu
civic
usin.
The
proposed
zone
is
c2
to
be
consistent
with
the
adjacent
zoning
on
all
sides
and
across
the
street.
M
Location
2
is
a
an
existing
undeveloped
parcel
located
on
North
Palm
Canyon
Drive
south
of
Stevens
Road,
it's
roughly
3/4
acres
in
size
and
currently
has
a
mixed-use
general
plan
designation.
So
in,
as
you
see
on
the
exhibit
on
the
screen
here,
the
existing
zoning
CU
proposed
zoning
to
be
c1
along
the
Palm
Canyon
Drive
frontage,
with
the
back
portion
proposed
to
be
r2
consistent
with
the
north
property
to
the
north
and
south
of
that
site,
and
so
the
general
plan
designation.
M
The
proposed
zoning
would
be
consistent
with
the
mixed-use
Durham
plan
designation
and
then
finally,
the
third
location,
314
North,
Palm,
Canyon
Drive.
It
is
the
core
can
bottle
class
1
historic
site
and
the
current
general
plan
designation
is
central
business
district
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
also
proposed
to
be
CBD
central
business
district.
M
So,
as
I
said,
the
city,
the
Planning
Commission,
initiated
the
zone
change
back
in
February
of
this
year,
staff
reviewed
and
evaluated
the
proposed
appropriate
proposes
to
zone
changes.
What
would
be
appropriate
for
the
proposed
zone,
changes
evaluated,
the
general
plan
designations
for
these
sites
and
evaluated
existing
zoning
around
the
properties,
and
we
would
recommend
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
the
council
approve
the
previous
zoning
designations
that
were
at
these
sites
to
be
consistent
with
the
surrounding
area
and
consistent
with
the
general
plan.
So
this
is
a
public
hearing
item.
M
The
council
would
also
hold
a
public
hearing
if
the
Planning
Commission
recommends
approval.
Today,
staff
has
prepared
a
resolution
for
you
to
consider
as
a
part
of
an
attachment
to
your
staff
report
with
the
findings
as
outlined
and
required
by
section
94
or
7
of
the
zoning
code.
That
concludes
my
report
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
Thank
you.
Thank.
I
I
A
Any
more
questions
of
staff
hearing
no
questions,
the
staff
if
the
applicant
is
obviously
the
city,
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
here
to
speak
on
this
item?
Okay,
I'll,
open
the
public
hearing
and
then
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
since
there's
no
one
here
to
speak,
and
then
we
can
talk
amongst
ourselves,
make
a
motion.
There
be
great.
Maria
comes
forward.
A
M
M
There
are
four
General
locations
within
the
city
that
have
the
professional
zoning
designation
and
two
of
these
areas
have
general
plan
designations
that
permit
residential.
So
this
request
is
being
brought
before
you
to
address
that
inconsistency,
because
because
the
current
professional
zone
does
not
allow
residential,
so
what
we're
looking
to
do
is
provide
an
avenue
to
have
residential
within
the
p's
own,
where
the
general
plan
allows
it.
So
here
on
the
screen,
you
have
the
areas
shown
in
red
throughout
the
city
that
have
the
P
zone,
the
P
professional
zone.
M
Designation,
generally,
you
can
see
for
reference
the
airport
on
the
right
side
of
the
map,
and
so
areas
that
are
zoned
professional,
are
located
south
of
the
airport
and
west
of
the
airport,
along
Ramon,
Road
and
off
of
el
cielo
and
tahquitz
canyon
way
and
then
areas
north
of
the
airport.
You
have
the
professional
zoning
off
of
sunrise,
Way
and
Vista
Chino
and
then
finally,
there's
a
couple
of
small
areas:
own
professional
across
the
street,
from
desert,
Regional
Hospital.
M
So
the
two
areas
where
the
general
plan
permits
residential
you
see
here
identified
on
the
screen.
The
mixed-use
designation
is
located
across
the
street
from
the
hospital
just
on
the
west
side
of
Indian
Canyon
Drive
south
of
mell
Avenue
north
of
to
Chiva,
and
then
also
the
general
plan
designation.
Permit.
The
general
plan
permits
low
density
residential
north
of
the
city,
no
and
east
of
sunrise
way.
M
So
to
give
you
more
of
it
more
context.
This
is
this
is
the
two
parcels
that
are
zoned
mixed-use
that
also
have
the
P
professional
designation
areas
surrounding
this
parcel
have
c1
Zone
on
Palm,
Canyon
and
r2
to
the
north
and
south
for
surrounding
zones
and
then,
as
I
said
east
of
sunrise
way
in
north
of
Vista
Chino,
we
have
various
Titan
different
land
uses.
The
orange
color
here
on
the
screen
shows
you
where
density
is
permitted
or
residential
as
permitted
by
the
general
plan,
and
these
are
you
know
where
you
see.
M
So
there's
a
portion
of
this
overall
professional
zone
district
area
that
does
permit
residential
but
I
would
I
would
just
say
that
overall,
the
other
is
the
other
areas
that
you
see
here
on.
The
map
that
are
not
called
out
for
residential
have
a
consistent
designation
that
permits
office
office
uses.
So
the
general
plan
really
coincides
in
those
locations
with
the
actual
professional
zoning,
as
it
is
currently
today
without
residential.
M
So
what
staff
is
proposing
for
the
text
amendment
to
the
zoning
code
is
to
allow
residential
buy
right
and
it
would
have
permit
single-family
dwellings
and
related
accessory
dwelling
units
subject
to
our
one
seed
development
standards,
if
designated
residential
by
the
general
plan.
So
that
would
address
the
area
north
of
Vista,
Chino
and
east
of
sunrise
way
and
also
allow
mixed-use
developments
where
the
designated
mixed
use
by
the
general
plan.
So
that
would
address
the
area
on
to
the
west
of
the
hospital.
M
The
zoning
code
to
the
list
of
prohibited
uses
to
modify
it
to
say
that
residential
uses
would
be
permitted
except
repeated,
except
as
otherwise
permitted,
which
would
be
as
I
stated
here
just
a
moment
ago,
and
also
to
allow
residential
density
that
and
within
the
development
standards.
Section
92
point
o
8.03,
where
it
states
residential
units
would
be
developed
consistent
with
the
general
plan.
M
A
E
M
We
haven't
spoken
with
this
property
owner.
We
have
spoken
with
one
of
the
owners,
one
of
the
property
owners
that
has
land
within
the
ldr
designation
as
they
have
it
expressed
interest
to
develop
the
property,
and
when
we
have
this
inconsistency
between
the
general
plan,
which
says
residential
only
versus
the
zoning,
which
says
you
can
only
do
an
office,
you
know
staff
it
has
its
hands
tied.
M
A
B
A
C
A
A
Okay,
we're
under
unfinished
business
item
3a,
which
is
far
west
industry
for
the
final
development
plan
and
a
revised
tentative
tract
map
to
construct
a
LAN,
a
residential
project
consisting
of
56,
single-family
residences,
25,
multi-family,
residential
condominiums
and
related
on
off-site
improvements.
On
a
twelve
point,
three
eight
acre
site
located
at
seven
seven,
seven,
seven.
M
M
M
Fourth,
there
were
to
add
pedestrian
gates
to
the
back
of
the
homes
of
budding
the
creek
and
then.
Lastly,
the
Commission
was
generally
opposed
to
the
two-story
unit
that
had
bulk
at
the
rear
of
the
home
along
the
talk
wits
Creek.
So
that
was
the
plan
three
and
so,
but
the
Afghan
had
proposed
a
plan
that
wouldn't
mix
up
line
three
with
all
in
the
project
site
along
that
buffer
or
along
that
edge,
and
so
the
Commission
made
it
known
that
they
were
opposed
to
that
that
project.
M
So
I'll
just
go
through
how
the
Afghan
has
responded
to
each
of
these
the
first
here
they
were
to
provide
visual
simulations
depicting
that
proposed
changes
and
so
they've.
Given
you
a
visual
simulation
of
the
project,
as
proposed
today
on
the
top
here
view
1a
and
then
view
1b
shows
the
assimilation
of
the
project
if
it
were
to
be
built
as
as
approved
under
the
preliminary
development
plan.
Without
the
proposed
grade
elevation
changes,
they
also
provided
provided
some
additional
simulations
as
they
as
requested.
M
M
M
M
M
Through
the
site,
with
a
fence
instead
of
the
wall
and
then
lastly,
the
third
vantage
point
that
was
requested
was
saying
in
the
middle
of
the
site.
Looking
at
what
you
would
see,
let's
say
from
the
back
of
you
know
a
house
to
the
others
back
of
another
house.
So
that's
what
you
see
in
this
visual
simulation.
That
was
the
third
request,
and
so
that
would
address
item
number.
One
item
number
two
consider
the
previous
wall
design
that
allowed
views
through
the
perimeter
of
the
site
on
the
west
side.
M
M
M
I
M
M
So
item
number
three,
the
northerly
buffer-
was
to
be
consistent
with
the
previous
approval,
and
so
that
was
specifically
related
to
the
setback
along
the
top
what's
Creek,
so
they
approved
preliminary
development
plan.
You
see
this
is
just
one
excerpt
of
the
landscape
plan
where
a
couple
of
Lots
back
up
to
the
talked
woods
Creek
and
looking
at
one
location.
Specifically,
there
was
a
12-foot
common
lot
buffer
between
the
rear
property
line
of
the
homes
and
the
perimeter
property
line
of
the
project.
M
So
what
you
had
seen
in
the
final
development
plan
on
September
25th
was
a
reduction
of
that
dimension
down
to
five
feet,
and
so
that
was
brought
into
question
at
that
meeting
and
staff
brought
that
to
the
applicants,
attention
and
so
they've
made
some
changes
to
the
file
developing
plan
that
you
saw
on
September
25th
and
the
new
buffer
common
lot.
I
guess
I'll
defer
to
lack
of
a
better
term.
Is
it
has
a
range
from
9
point
8
feet
to
12
feet.
M
So
while
it's
not
12
feet
overall,
it
also
doesn't
have
the
courtyards
that
extend
into
that
common
lot,
which
you
saw
on
the
previous
exhibit
the
previous
slide,
or
this
exhibit
here
shows
the
approved
preliminary
development
plan,
and
you
see
there
have
courtyard
walls
that
actually
extended
over
into
that
common
lot
property,
so
they've
pushed
those
or
they
pulled
those
walls
back
and
they're.
Now
only
within
the
property
of
the
individual
Lots
and
with
the
setback
in
total
you're
close
to
17
feet
for
some
of
these
homes
and.
I
M
M
Be
a
breeze
block
I'm.
Not
let
the
afternoon
confirm
that.
Okay
fourth
item
was
that
they
were
to
add
pedestrian
gates,
the
back
of
the
homes
that
would
let
the
Creek-
and
so
you
see,
circled
in
red
here
along
each
of
the
rears
rear
walls,
courtyard
walls
at
the
back
of
the
homes,
little
pedestrian
gates.
That
would
provide
access
to
the
to
the
creek
and
to
the
trail
along
the
edge
of
the
site.
So
that
has
been
incorporated
into
the
final
development
plan
design
and
as
I
said.
M
Lastly,
they
have
we've
gone
back
to
only
having
plan
1
and
plane
2
along
the
northerly
boundary
of
the
site.
So
when
you
look
at
the
the
plot
plan
and
the
unit
mix
that
is
being
proposed
plan,
one
and
plane
two
are
the
lighter
shades
of
tan
on
the
overall
site
plan,
and
so
they
only
have
the
plan
ones
and
plan
twos
along
the
edges
on
the
north
and
west
side
of
the
project.
M
M
So
that
would
address
all
of
the
Planning
Commission
comments.
Staff
is
recommending
approval
and
and
has
made
findings
and
support
the
project
being
substantially
conforming
to
the
preliminary
development
plan.
And
again,
your
action
today
is
to
staff
is
recommending
that
the
Commission
approved
the
found
of
ovum
plans
and
ratifying
the
tentative
map.
As
revised,
based
on
what
changes
were
discussed
at
September,
your
September
25th
meeting
so
I'll
conclude
my
presentation
and
happen
interesting
questions.
Mr.
chair,
great.
A
M
Staff
is
in
support
of
those
revisions
because
it
would
bring
the
properties
closer
well,
it
addresses
a
number
of
issues
that
this
site
has
in
terms
of
challenges
for
being
developed
because
of
the
drainage
issues
associated
with
the
site
and
the
surrounding
area.
Elevating
the
pads
would
allow
the
developer
to
to
convey
the
drainage
issues
through
the
site,
as
opposed
to
working
those
around
in
through
public
streets.
I
To
that
a
slide
that
shows
the
setback
from
the
house
to
the
property
line:
okay,
I
think
not
that
one,
not
that
one.
I
I
I
M
I
M
B
M
I
M
M
The
applicant
has
provided
an
exhibit
that
shows
the
overall
landscape
space
that
I
just
handed
out
to
you
and,
and
it
delineates
it
and
or
highlights
that
I
should
say
in
a
in
a
green
highlight
that
shows
the
overall
landscape
buffer
is
about
twenty
to
sixty
feet.
There's
a
range
of
twenty
feet
at
the
smallest
point
to
sixty
feet
at
the
widest
point
of
row,.
B
M
E
M
B
I
I
A
Okay,
planner
Newell
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
if
I
could
see
and
I
don't
know
if
the
applicants
better
to
answer
this
for
you
but
landscaping,
the
flood
control
area
needs
a
lot
of
approvals.
I,
don't
know
if
they're
looking
to
put
irrigation
in
there
I
know
it
was
a
condition
that
you
you
said
it
was
a
condition
of
approval,
but
I
was
looking
through
the
conditions
trying
to
find
out.
There
was
a
maintenance
condition,
I
didn't
see
it,
I
might
have
missed
it
and
I
know
we're
looking
to
just
at
general
conformance.
A
F
A
P
Well,
thank
you.
My
name
is
IRA
glass,
Gaiman
principal
of
Far
West
industries,
and
we
appreciate
any
to
be
here.
First
of
all,
congratulations
to
chair
woods,
Commissioner
garner
on
the
election,
both
Brian
and
I,
are
elected
pleasure
to
have
elected
officials
in
other
jurisdictions.
So
we
know
you've
been
through.
So
thank
you
for
being
here.
They
get
still
be
asleep.
We
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
work
the
last
month
with
staff
on
addressing
the
concerns
that
the
commissioners
raised
in
the
September
meeting
and
we
think
we've
addressed
all
of
them.
P
We're
going
to
each
talk
a
little
bit
about
them,
but
I
want
kind
of
give
you
a
big
picture
of
what
we've
done
and
why
we've
done
it.
A
lot
of
concerns
were
regarding
the
impact
of
views,
fun,
Bilardo
and
the
concern
that
the
change
in
elevation
that
we're
proposing
it
was
a
significant
difference
from
what
was
originally
approved
and
while
the
elevation
is
an
average
of
five
feet
difference,
the
impact
really
has
already
occurred.
On
the
previously
approved
plan.
P
The
previously
approved
plan
from
the
elevation
of
Bilardo
to
the
top
of
the
home
that
was
on
approved
on
the
previously
existing
plan
was
8.6
a
17
feet
above
the
elevation
of
Bilardo.
So
as
you're
going
down
Bilardo
that
view
impact
unfortunately
has
already
occurred.
So
the
difference
on
going
up
a
couple
feet,
depending
on
which
lot
it
is,
doesn't
really
affect
the
views
of
the
valley,
because
they've
already
really
been
impacted
by
what
was
already
additionally
improved.
P
So
we're
not
going
from
below
the
street
level
of
Bilardo
to
above
we're
already
above
the
street
level
Bilardo,
and
it's
just
slightly
additional
impact
in
return.
We're
actually
getting
quite
a
bit
of
difference
in
terms
of
drain
ability
on
the
property
be
able
to
go
directly
out
to
the
talkies
watch,
as
opposed
to
going
a
significant
distance
through
public
right
away
in
streets.
In
addition,
the
livability
of
those
homes
that
back
up
in
adjacent
to
Bilardo,
we
did
want
to
be
sensitive
to
your
request
for
fencing.
P
That
was
not
just
a
block
wall
and
we
agree
with
you
after
having
looked
at
it,
and
so
what
we're
proposing
is.
Actually,
we
would
prefer
to
have
the
rod
iron
wall
who'd
be
on
top
of
a
slight
retaining
wall,
but
then
it
will
be
all
wrought
iron,
so
that
really
does
open
up
the
view
and
the
feeling
from
Bilardo
and
actually
to
be
honest.
It
was
a
great
suggestion
because
it
actually
is
better
for
our
homeowners
as
well.
It
actually
helps
open
up
their
backyards
as
well.
P
So
that's
what
we're
proposing
on
the
north
side
facing
the
creek,
the
the
reduction
of
the
space
there
did
occur
because
of
the
legal
settlement
that
occurred
before
we
owned
the
property
and
the
removal
of
two
Paseos
and
adding
of
three
sidewalks.
But
we
did
in
response
to
your
directions,
really
look
at
kind
of
INRI
envisioning
that
be
space
behind
those
houses,
and
he
did
show
you
that
all
we're
really
asking
to
to
occur
behind
there
now
is
actually
just
a
little
five-foot
patio.
That's
off
the
kind
of
master
bedroom.
P
These
homes
actually
really
are
aimed
towards
the
center
courtyard,
the
side
courtyard.
That's
where
the
homes
and
the
the
livability
area
it
is,
and
so
we're
asking
for
these
little
5-foot
areas
and
back
now
with
those
5-foot
areas
and
what
we're
kind
of
talking
about
Commissioner
Hirshman.
Thank
you
very
much,
but
from
the
property
line
to
those
5-foot
little
patios.
P
That
is,
you
know
the
nine
point,
eight
to
twelve
point
two
of
the
impact,
so
it
is
very
close
to
what
we
were
trying
to
get
to
on
the
twelve
feet,
but
understand
that
those
patios
only
account
for
40
percent
of
the
total
property
line
along
the
creek,
and
so
sixty
percent
of
that
property
line
actually
has
five
more
feet
because
it
goes
all
the
way
to
the
house
and
so
on.
Those
areas.
You're
really
looking
at
fourteen
point,
eight
to
seventeen
point
two
feet
from
the
property
line.
P
Now
the
property
line
is
a
imaginary
line
that
no
one
will
ever
see
once
we
build
the
community.
What
you
do
see
is
the
trail
and
that's.
What's
between
20
and
60
feet
from
the
trail
edge
of
the
trail
to
the
home,
it's
between
20
and
60
feet
that
all
will
be
landscape.
We
are
understanding
like
we
have
in
many
other
communities,
we've
done
in
Palm
Springs
and
it's
been.
This
is
our
sixth.
P
Over
twenty
years
we
will
be
responsible
for
planting
and
maintaining
it
on
an
encroachment
agreement,
that's
something
that
will
actually
put
it
into
our
CC
and
ours
and
make
it
clear
that
is
responsibility
of
the
homeowner
association
going
on
that
point
in
the
future.
So
from
the
community
going
along
the
duck,
Beach
Creek
Trail,
you
really
are
between
20
and
60
feet
away
from
the
home.
So
it's
a
pretty
significant
landscape
buffer.
Most
of
the
landscaping
does
have
D
G
along
it.
P
So
there
is
areas
for
homeowners
to
walk
in
the
D
G
and
not
wheat,
raping
through
the
plans,
and
we
have
our
Landscape
Architect.
We'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
A
couple
things
as
we
talked
about
we
added
gates
from
each
individual
home
to
go
out
to
the
area.
The
other
thing,
the
trail,
the
trail
isn't
level
with
the
homes.
The
trail
is
actually
four
to
seven
feet
below
the
elevation
of
the
homes,
and
so
there
is
actually
a
bit
of
a
slope
there.
P
So
it
does
kind
of
create
more
of
a
visual
buffer
between
the
trail
and
the
homes
and,
as
we've
discussed,
we
eliminated
the
two-story
homes
that
have
the
massing
at
the
back.
The
concern
was
the
massing
close
to
the
trail,
and
we
done
have
gone
back
to
the
originally
approved
plan,
which
has
the
two-story
homes
up
all
the
massing
up
front
on
the
street
and
away
from
the
common
areas.
So
we
appreciate,
we
think
we've
addressed
and
working
with
staff
addressed
all
of
your
concerns.
P
J
My
name
is
Jarvis
Payne
I'm,
a
landscape
architect
with
our
GA
landscape,
architects
and
I
just
wanted
to
address
the
landscaping.
That's
occurring
off
of
the
Takas
Creek,
as
was
mentioned
earlier.
It
varies
anywhere
from
20
feet
to
60
feet
and
it
all
will
be
landscaped
in
native
vegetation,
that's
from
the
Takas
Creek
master
plan
and
there's
going
to
be
bringing
in
boulders
that'll
be
salvaged
from
the
site,
along
with
DG
and
it'll
all
be
irrigated,
controlled
by
a
central
irrigation
controller,
so
it'll
all
be
taken
care
of
by
the
HOA.
J
The
one
change
we
did
make
from
the
previous
plant
palette
that
from
the
previous
developer
is
they
included
a
a
native
poplar
tree
and
a
native
sycamore
tree
and
and
yes,
those
two
trees
are
native
but
where
they
occur
naturally
is
way
up
in
the
canyons
they're,
always
adjacent
to
year-round
water
and
more
shady
protected
environments.
If
you
tried
to
plant
those
trees
in
that
condition
there,
they
would
require
a
lot
more
water
and
chances
are.
They
would
not
survive
the
more
intense
afternoon,
Sun
and
and
the
wind
that
that
sites
going
to
get.
J
A
Before
you
move
on
to
your
next,
we
can
ask
you
a
very
quick
question
sure.
Just
we
got
a
handout
that
includes
the
green
zone.
The
handout
doesn't
include
the
trailhead
connection
that
was
in
our
packet
is,
that
is,
is
this
a
trailhead
connection,
the
pedestrian
connection
from
Palm
Canyon
to
the
trailhead?
Still
there?
Yes,
it's
just
missing
from
the
map
that
we're
getting
yeah.
A
G
G
You
know
Farwest
has
a
tradition
of
finishing
what
it
starts
and
we
have
built
many
communities
out
here,
just
to
name
a
couple
of
our
latest
icon,
Tuscany,
Heights
Murano,
just
to
name
a
few,
and
you
know
we
took
the
comments
that
you
guys
made
at
the
last
Planning
Commission
meeting
to
heart
and
have
incorporated
those
changes
into
what
you
see
today.
We
believe
that
this
is
going
to
be
a
great
project,
we're
looking
forward
to
getting
your
approval,
so
we
can
start
to
build
and
just
just
a
couple
quick
last
things.
G
One
is
on
the
the
package
that
you
got
today.
This
handout
the
last
couple
of
photos,
our
additional
site
simulations
we
took
as
if
you're
standing
on
Vallarta
looking
into
the
project,
one
at
the
approved
elevation
you
can
tell
that
is
listed
as
or
location.
Seven
number
view.
4B,
that's
the
the
approved
one.
G
G
Location
six
view
to
see
that
gives
you
an
idea
of
what
it
would
look
like
with
a
wrought
iron
if
we
left
it
with
either
breeze
block
or
solid
wall.
The
page
prior
to
that
location,
five
view
to
be,
you
can
see
that
you're
you're
really
missing
out
the
views,
which
is,
of
course,
what
every
homeowner
wants
to
see
us
the
beautiful
views
of
the
mountains.
So,
hopefully
we've
done
everything.
You've
asked
in
again
we're
here
to
answer
additional
questions.
If
you
see
it,
thank
you.
E
P
Which
is
the
dog
park
up
at
the
front?
The
only
change
in
terms
of
the
wall
design
is
that
we
would
carry
the
rod
iron
all
the
way
across
onto
that
side
as
well.
So
it's
consistent
in
the
entire
Bilardo
street
view
that
we'd
have
Rider
and
over
there
we
would
have
some
tighter
slats
down
below
that
dogs
couldn't
squeeze
between,
but
we
would
work
that
out.
Okay,.
J
J
Was
always
metal
picket?
That
was
never
code.
Wasn't
that
said
as
well.
No,
that
was
the
around
the
dog
park.
It's
always
been
metal
picket.
We
saw
that
dog
park
in
that
location
also
serving
the
public.
It
can
serve
the
community,
but
also
the
public,
coming
off
the
coming
off
the
trail.
Okay,
so
you
want
it
to
be
very.
E
E
B
Right
I
can
RMS
a
consultant,
represent
the
civil
engineer,
the
the
minimum
setback
I
believe
they
were
conditioned
to
me.
It
was
5
feet.
You
can
see
on
lot
55
where
we're
going
into
that
knuckle.
Pushes
the
house
farther
back
towards
Bilardo,
so
we
had
to
its
Brian
mentioned
the
livability
areas
more
to
the
side
in
that
central
courtyard.
So
we're
focused
on
maintaining
that.
So
we
didn't
feel
the
5
foot.
Setback
in
the
back
would
have
a
detrimental
effect
to
the
home.
B
B
B
We
also
there's
a
5
foot
interior
sidewalk
that
we
were
required
to
add
when
we
take
out
the
Paseos.
So
if
you
look
at
the
street,
we
we
have
that
sidewalk
shown
and
then
we
wanted
to
provide
a
setback
from
the
sidewalk.
In
addition
to
that,
so
that
the
the
interior
sidewalk
wasn't
going
right
by
the
home.
E
B
B
E
B
P
E
E
P
Were
attempting
to
be
responsive
to
the
concerns
of
the
commissioners
that
talked
about
wanting
to
have
view
along
that
entire
way,
we're
certainly
willing
to
work
with
staff
provided
some
sort
of
articulation.
Like
I
said
we,
we
like
the
idea,
because
it
actually
does
open
up
that
whole
corridor
from
both
Bilardo,
as
well
as
looking
up
from
the
homes
I.
G
When
he
had
something
from
the
last
meeting
that
we
were
at
originally,
what
we
had
talked
about
doing
was
doing
like
one
house
would
be
a
breeze
block
and
the
next
one
wrought
iron
and
so
on.
He
did
switch
back
and
forth,
but
after
hearing
comments
at
the
last
Planning
Commission
hearing,
it
was
more
advantageous.
It
seemed
that
planning
commissioners
wanted
to
see
all
of
it
opened
up
to
have
this
wrought-iron
scenario.
So
you
know
that's
why,
when,
when
mr.
G
G
G
D
So
I'm
just
still
curious
about
this
back
door
to
the
trail
so
I'm,
just
assuming
that
you're
probably
gonna,
make
it
spaced
out
enough,
so
that
there's
kind
of
some
natural
paths
to
the
to
the
trail
from
the
back
I.
Just
can't
imagine
having
this
a
beautiful
landscaping
and
then
people
kind
of
messing
it
up
because
there's
but
I'm
assuming
you're,
taking
that
into
account.
Yeah.
J
It's
going
to
be
a
combination
of
we're
taking
the
native
rock,
that's
gonna,
be
salvaged
from
the
site
and
arranged
that
in
a
sort
of
natural
configurations,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
a
solid
wall
and
then
we'll
have
D
G
as
the
ground
cover
and
massing
of
native
plants.
So
it's
we
both.
We
wanted
open
somewhat
so
for
views
and
permeability,
so
it
doesn't
appear
as
though
there's
a
wall
between
the
community
and
the
trail
right.
D
A
Okay,
this
is
a
question
if
you
can
just
stayed
there
there,
the
architecture,
Landscape
Architect
just
a
minute
but
I'm
gonna,
ask
staff
a
question.
First,
the
east
side,
or,
though
excuse
me,
the
west
side
of
Palm,
Canyon,
that
this
project
is
located
on,
isn't
it
was
not
built
out
when
we
did
the
east
side?
A
A
Okay,
so
it'd
be
part
of
this
project.
I
would
just
ask
of
staff
and
and
I
would
think
we'd
put
it
in
a
condition
that
that
needs
to
be
consistent
with
the
West,
including
the
lighting,
which
is
the
ring
lighting
and
the
trees
that
shine
up
on
the
palm
trees
and
shine
down
that,
which
is
what
we
put
on
the
east
side
of
the
street,
okay
and
and
then
I'm
a
little
underwhelmed
by
the
entrance.
I
think
your
other
projects
have
greater
entrances
to
them.
A
J
A
J
B
J
A
The
lighting
is
pretty
spectacular,
it's
the
first
time,
I,
think
we've
done
the
up
and
down,
and
it
works
really
well
in
that
dark
area
right
there,
okay,
great
any
other
questions
of
the
applicant
or
staff
hearing
that
I'll
open
it
to
Commission
discussion,
we're
still
her
spine
Commissioner
her
spine.
Excuse
me
thank.
I
You
yeah
I
thank
the
applicant
for
looking
at
a
lot
of
our
concerns
so
seriously
I'm
still
of
the
opinion
that
the
original
pad
elevations
along
the
west
side
of
the
site
need
to
prevail
for
me
to
we'll
be
able
to
certify
that
this
is
in
compliance
with
the
original
approval
and
I'll.
Tell
you
why
I
think
some
of
the
renderings
that
you've
produced
or
a
bit
disingenuous
I
went
out
there
today.
I
was
kind
of
studying
it,
and
it's
true
that
even
at
the
approved
Heights
there
will
be
some
blockage
to
the
view
down.
I
I
It's
true
that
between
AAC,
which
I
was
on
previous
to
Planning
Commission
Planning,
Commission,
gosh
I've
seen
this
project,
maybe
a
dozen
times
I'm,
not
really
exaggerating,
and
unfortunately
every
time
we've
seen
it,
we've
gotten
less
attention
paid
to
the
public
realm
and,
and
it's
just
been
dumbed
down
and
dumbed
down
every
time
we've
seen
it
and
and
I'm
not
willing
to
dumb
it
down
anymore.
We
used
to
have
a
very
lovely
little
Plaza
at
the
at
the
bridge
where
the
bridge
intersected,
Palm,
Canyon
or
the
bridge
intersected
the
the
corner
of
the
project.
I
We
had
the
Paseo
as
we
know
why
that
got
removed.
Now
we're
asking
now
we're
being
asked
to
sacrifice
an
important
view
corridor
and
and
for
someone
that
lives
on
the
south
side
southbound,
who
uses
Bilardo
quite
a
bit,
I'm
sensitive
to
that.
Maybe
some
of
the
other
commissioners
don't
drive
that
Street,
quite
as
often
as
I
do,
and
it
may
not
be
as
sensitive
to
that,
but
I
as
proposed
I,
wouldn't
be
able
to
support
it.
As
far
as
the
drainage
goes.
I
You
know
there
there's
always
a
solution:
I
lived
in
a
very
hilly
area
in
Los
Angeles
and
my
drainage
mice.
My
sewer
line
was
actually
below
the
street
and
and
I
had
I
had
to
use
a
sump
pump
for
my
sewage.
It
worked
for
20
years.
I
never
had
a
problem,
I
moved
out
here.
You
know
there
are
options,
you
might
mannan
surmountable
drainage
problem.
I
You
might
have
to
reconfigure
the
houses
you
might
have
to
come
up
with
1/4
housing
type,
that
and
and-
and
you
may
not
be
able
to
squeeze
a
dozen
houses
on
that
row.
You
may
only
be
able
to
squeeze
six
houses
on
that
row.
I,
don't
know
what
the
answer
is,
but
frankly
it's
not
my
problem.
My
problem
is
protecting
the
public's
desire
to
have
this
view.
Corridor
maintained
to
the
extent
possible
and
I
and
and
I
take
that
I.
I
E
I'm
I'm
underwhelmed
by
the
site,
perimeter
design
and
the
impact
that
is
making
on
the
lardo
I
think
when
the
elevation
was
lower.
It
was
a
lesser
impact
on
to
the
street,
and
so
now
that
you're,
bringing
the
you're
rendering
one
see
is
it's
very
clear
of
how
close
the
edge
of
the
buildings
are
to
the
street
and
it's
not
respectful.
E
Instead,
it's
now
the
buildings
are
imposing
and
if
you're
looking
at
those
setbacks
of
five
feet,
it's
just
to
crown
and
but
Bilardo
is
a
very
nice
street
and
a
nice
gift
to
the
community.
So
I'm
underwhelmed
by
the
eye
and
I
appreciate
that
you're
saying:
okay,
Planning
Commission.
What
design
do
you
want?
But
in
reality
you?
You
have
a
very
quality
qualified
team
to
put
a
street
design
together
that
that
goes
together
with
the
with
your
project
and
a
company
that
you
represent.
D
Yeah
I
mean
I
am
concerned
as
well
about
the
site
site
lines
over
there
and
Bilardo
would
do
drive-by
there
a
lot
and
understand
what
you,
what
you
mean
by
that
and
as
well
as
the
the
how
close
the
homes
are
to
the
street
and
and
honestly
hearing
the
comments
of
the
other
commissioners
I'm
likely
to
agree
with
them.
Just
I
respect
your
opinions
and
feel
like
this
is
your
your.
This
is
your
wheelhouse,
so
I.
A
Agree
with
my
fellow
commissioners,
however,
I
think
that
they
have
done
everything
they
can
in
the
direction
that
we
have
given
them.
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
possibly
look
at
it
and
providing
some
conditions
or
comments
to
it
to
have
them
come
back
as
an
example,
you
know
I
personally,
don't
know
what
a
dwarf
bottlebrush
looks
like,
but
there's
a
lot
of
it
as
you
go
through
this
site.
A
You
know,
I
just
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
little
bugs
versus,
like
you
know,
kind
of
trees,
but
I
think
we
can
condition
that
I
agree
with
you
about
the
undulation
of
long
Bilardo.
I
think
we
could
just
basically
say
something
like
provide
a
wall.
That's
undulating,
undulating!
Excuse
me
along
Bilardo,
I,
think
the
dog
park,
fencing
too,
could
use
a
little
tweaking
I.
Think
you
brought
up
that
earlier.
A
Commissioner
song
I
think
it
could
be
something
with
a
bit
of
sell
that,
along
with
a
little
wrought
iron
along
with
a
little
bit
of
solid,
especially
since
it's
on
such
a
slope
right
there
and
it's
gonna,
look
very
funny
with
those
smaller
fencing
for
the
dog
being
there.
I
do
think
that
the
to
the
point
of
benches
and
whatnot
at
the
trailhead,
the
tree
I,
think
we
can
light
that
the
same
way
there's
a
palm
tree
there.
It
can
be
up,
lit
and
down
lit.
A
We
can
ask
for
some
of
the
amenities
back
in
that,
but
I
think
that
they've
come
back
with
the
two
stories
facing
at
a
quits
being
forward
to
the
street.
They
put
in
some
bulb
outs,
which
I
think
is
a
great
idea
to
keep
from
speed,
boat,
bulb
outs
and
the
streets.
A
little
punch,
outs,
yeah
and
I.
Just
think
I'd
like
to
see
those
a
little
more
decorated
than
what
we've
seen
so
far
so
they're,
not
just
just
a
straight
yeah
I,
think
that's
great,
especially
with
the
sidewalks
there.
A
I
A
So
why
don't
I
take
a
stab
at
emotion,
okay,
and
then
we
can.
We
can
work
from
that
motion,
so
my
motion
would
be
to
approve
the
project
and
to
add
a
series
of
conditions.
Some
of
those
ages
talked
about
that
I
can
repeat-
or
we
can
add
more
especially
from
our
designer
like
designer
commissioners
on
on
Commission.
E
B
Say
yes,
I'd
say
the
drainage
is
not
simply
resolved
with
list
stations
or
some
pumps,
because
it
is
an
emergency
type
situation
with
drainage.
So
you
can't
really
put
mechanical
operations
and
try
to
take
a
drainage
across
South.
Palm
Canyon
Creek
creates
a
quite
a
significant
challenge
for
the
design
team
and
for
the
developer.
B
E
M
M
E
F
M
Back
to
the
original
plan,
I'm,
looking
at
what
we
had
approved
back
from
the
City
Council,
there
was
a
five
foot
setback.
You
know
it
varied
though,
but
the
standard
that
was
approved
was
five
feet.
The
area
where
you
have
a
lot
55,
which
was
referenced
by
the
applicant
where
the
knuckle
is
in
the
street.
That
was
one
home
that
was
closer
to
the
two
Bilardo
Road.
So
so
there
was.
There
were
some
conditions
where
homes
were
had
a
greater
setback
than
the
five
feet,
but
the
minimum
standard
was
five.
F
Mr.
chair,
this
is
what
I
have
in
my
notes.
Number
one
was
relative
to
the
design
of
the
fence
along
the
Bilardo
frontage.
Your
comment
was
relative
to
either
undulating
the
fence
or
providing
offsets.
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct?
Secondly,
was
relative
to
the
dog
park
fencing
you
wanted
to
see
revisions
to
the
proposed
fencing
around
the
perimeter
of
the
dog
park.
F
The
third
was
relative
to
the
palm
trees
in
providing
both
up
lights
and
down
lights
at
the
entry
off
of
Bilardo
Road,
and
then
the
fourth
was
relative
to
providing
additional
landscaping
at
the
bulb
outs
on
the
interior
streets,
and
then
you
had
also
mentioned
earlier
in
your
comments
that
you
wanted
to
have
a
condition
so
that
the
west
side
of
South
Palm
Canyon
matches
the
east
side
of
South
Palm
Canyon
in
terms
of
the
palms
trees
and
the
streetscape.
That's.
A
Correct
and
the
other
one
was
on
the
trailhead.
The
tack
woods
Creek
Trailhead
is
that
that
palm
tree
had
both
up
lighting
and
down
lighting
too
just
for
security
at
night
and
put
in
a
lift
to
Commission
her
spine.
Was
there
a
bench
there
originally?
Is
that
what
it
was
just
some
furniture
they
could
be
individual
chairs
or
something
you
know,
just
some
sort
of
individual
chairs
might
be
better.
People
can't
sleep
on
them,
but
just
something
for
somebody
to
have
a
respite.
If
they're
on
the
trailer
coming
off
the
trail
and.
A
Then
the
last
one
I
had
was
and
I'm
sorry
I'm,
not
a
landscape.
Architect
was
the
bottle
brush
trees
on
there
I'm
not
really
clear
what
those
look
like
if
they're,
actually
just
shrubs
or
the
trees,
did
you
want
to
try
and
answer
that
for
us,
Thanks
and
I'm
sorry
of
my
ignorance
on
the
bottle
brush.
J
It's
a
fairly
new
variety
of
tree.
It's
a
it's
called
bottled
bottle
brush,
but
it's
as
they
call
it
slim
it's
a
tree
that
only
gets
to
be
about
five
feet
wide
and
1215
feet
tall,
and
it's
really
good
in
very
tight
situations
like
that.
So
you
can
provide
landscaping
in
a
narrow
condition.
It
takes
heat
when
drought
really
well
and
it
flowers
nearly
year
round
and
it's
evergreen
with
very
little
litter,
and
so
we've
been
using
that
in
our
landscapes.
Now
in
areas
where
we
have
really
constrained
planting
beds,
great.
E
A
F
E
A
A
L
L
You
know
entertain
a
third
motion
and
continue
the
discussion
here
if
there
is
no
ultimate
action
by
the
Commission
one
way
or
the
other
I
would
recommend
that
perhaps
there
be
a
denial,
one
of
the
commissioners
who
may
be
in
favor
of
the
project
may
want
to
just
deny
it
so
you've
got
that
vote
and
then
it
could
be
appealed
to
the
council
if
the
applicant
would
like
to
do
that.
That
would
be
a
way
of
breaking
the
deadlock.
If
we
do
have
a
deadlock,
can.
L
I'm
sorry
right
now,
I
would
suggest
you
know,
entertain
an
alternate
motion,
maybe
to
deny
the
substantial
conformance
finding
if
we
end
up
with
the
on
that
another
alternative
would
be
like
a
third
motion.
If
that
doesn't
work,
then
my
suggestion
would
be
entertain
the
denial
and
have
a
commissioner
who
would
have
otherwise
voted
in
favor.
Just
deny
it
so
we've
broken
the
deadlock,
we
have
commissioned
action,
it
can
be
appealed
to
council
and
it's
not
stuck
in
limbo,
got
it
got.
A
L
E
Have
to
make
yeah
correct.
My
sense
is
that
we,
because
of
our
profession
and
because
of
being
planning
commissioners,
we
have
a.
This
is
what
we
do.
This
is
what
we
focus
on
Planning
Commission
I
mean
City
Council
members
have
a
lot
other
things
that
they
have
to
take
care
of
so
I'm,
making
a
plead
in
order
for
us
to
at
least
have
those
conditions
in
which
the
applicant
will
have
to
address
them.
That
we
would
raise
the
issue
again
and
revote
or
the
alternative
is
to
have
a
city
council,
decide
on
this
project.
L
F
D
A
A
Is
they
have
positions
to
fill
for
this
commission
to
keep
moving
as
quick
as
they
can?
The
question
really
was:
is:
will
the
new
council
appoint
those
members
and
can
they
do
that
in
time
for
the
I
think
it's
December
11th,
it's
the
next
Planning
Commission
meeting
correct
is
what
they're
working
on
I
just
would
like
to
unless
the
Commission
her
spine
wanted
to
say
something
more
well.
A
A
No
right,
that
is
my
opinion.
That's
that's
why
I'm
stating
it
I,
don't
think
that
that
is
personally
going
to
change
at
this
point,
I
think
we've
heard
from
our
city
engineer
and
we've
heard
from
the
applicant
and
I
think
it
becomes
cost
prohibitive
if,
if
it
may
be
technologically
available,
but
there
may
be
some
long-term
repercussions
to
it,
so
I
would
not
deny
the
project
based
on
the
pad
elevations.
At
this
point,
I'd
find
it
substantial.
B
A
D
Personally,
I'm
interested
in
seeing
what
some
new
people
on
the
Commission
would
think
about.
This
obviously
I
have
the
least
amount
of
architectural
experience.
So
that's
part
of
why
I
feel
very
conflicted
about
all
of
this,
because
I
do
respect
all
of
your
opinions
on
it.
So
I
would
be
interested
to
hear
what
others
who
would
be
on
the
Commission
would
have
to
say
and
I
do
agree
with
Maria.
That
I
think
that
this
would
be
better
decided
by
the
Planning
Commission,
rather
than
pushing
it
to
City
Council.
L
E
M
E
A
L
E
A
So
let
me
do
this,
let
me
and
I
apologize
we.
This
is
the
first
time
we
have
been
in
this
situation
as
a
commission
up
here.
I
think,
there's
validity
and
something
that
everyone
said
up
here
thus
far,
but
I
will
make
one
other
motion
to
again
approve
the
project
with
conditions
as
we've
listed
before
and
have
the
staff
work
with
the
applicant.
This
way,
I'm
changing
at
work
with
the
applicant
on
the
conditions
that
we
are
proposing
and
with
that
is
there
a
second.
D
A
One
of
the
things
that
we
have
is
a
Planning
Commission,
even
as
the
AAC
is
to
his
major
conformance
and
and
I
think
there
are
extenuating
circumstances
here
for
that
five
feet
personally.
I
think
also
the
applicant
has
made
a
good-faith
effort,
along
with
our
staff,
has
made
a
good-faith
effort
to
bring
this
back
to
us
and
I
think
drawing
out
the
development
process
on
something
that
can
bring
benefit
to
the
city
with
a
few
conditions
that
we're
adding
to.
A
E
Think
one
of
the
discussion
points
that
we
didn't
touch
is
that
the
the
applicant
also
could
consider
that
the
homes
on
that
along
that
area,
the
height,
could
be
reconsidered
so
that
if
the
building
height
also
comes
down
and
there's
a
hybrid
sort
of
solution,
you
have
to
bring
the
pad
elevation
up.
But
you
can
bring
the
building
height
elevation
down.
A
B
P
Coming
up
with
an
entirely
new
housing
product
is
challenging.
On
that
we
can.
We
were
just
working
with
our
numbers
with
a
civil
engineer.
We
can
do
the
10-foot,
so
we
believe
we
can
push
everything
forward
and
those
homes
already
have
the
massing
to
the
front
in
terms
of
the
second-story.
So
we
would
ask
the
Commission
to
consider
going
with
the
Commission
during
the
ten
feet
will
move
the
houses
forward.
We
think
there's
ability
to
do
that,
while
still
meeting
the
requirements
on
on
driveways.
P
P
A
B
E
The
big
elephant
in
the
room
is
we're
gonna,
really
miss
Commissioner
wood
and
gardener.
We're
really
happy
of
how
things
have
gone,
but
at
the
same
time
it's
going
to
be
a
huge
loss
and
Flynn
I.
Don't
know
how
you
have
the
heart
to
go
through
the
circle
of
changes,
but
I.
Look
at
you
for
motivation
and
inspiration.
E
I
F
A
Want
to
correct
graduate
commissioner
Gardner
on
your
election.
Congratulations
I!
Think
it's
a
it's
a
great
win
for
the
city
and
for
you
personally,
I
want
to
say
that
serving
on
the
Planning
Commission
has
been
nothing
shy
of
an
honor
and
I,
haven't
think
in
all
my
years
of
working
with
various
planning,
commissioners
and
various
City
Council's
never
found
a
body
with
such
diverse
opinions,
but
yet
work
together
and
that's
really
a
testament
to
everyone's
maturity
in
their
opinions
and
I
really
appreciate.
A
Having
worked
here
with
each
one
of
you
through
the
thing
and
I
very
thrilled,
they
have
served
as
chair.
It's
been
an
educational
experience
unto
itself
and,
lastly,
I
really
want
to
acknowledge
the
dedication
of
staff
to
this.
Commissioner,
to
the
city
in
general,
I
know
that
planner
nuo
came
with
unwith
out
any
fanfare
to
principal
planner.
Congratulations
for
those
uncondition
that
didn't
know
that
which
I
think
is
a
fantastic
testament
to
to
our
internal
talent.
So
with
that,
I'll
close
my
comments.
D
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
It's
all
of
this
happened
very
quickly.
I
didn't
even
think
that
the
council
would
put
me
on
Planning
Commission.
So
all
of
this
has
been
kind
of
a
surprise,
but
I
appreciate
everyone's
support
and
helping
me
and
guiding
me
and
through
all
of
it
and
I
do
hope
that
I
did
add
some
value
and
different
perspective
at
times
to
some
of
the
issues.
D
Also
has
somewhat
of
a
similar
background
in
the
sense
of
just
seeing
things
from
the
perspective
of
someone
who
isn't
steeped
in
architecture
or
planning,
just
because
I
do
think
that
it
can
be
helpful
to
kind
of
hear
from
someone
else,
sometimes
especially
when
it
comes
to
signs
in
our
districts.
So
thank
you
and
congratulations
to
Dennis
as
well
and
I
look
forward
to
to
serving
with
you
again
thanks.
F
Got
a
number
of
items
for
you.
First
of
all,
his
hints
provided
you
with
a
calendar
for
2020,
with
Planning
Commission,
architectural
Advisory,
Committee
and
city
council
meetings,
valuable
to
those
who
are
departing
to
City
Council.
You
still
get
to
see
your
City
Council
meeting
dates
planning.
Commissioners,
if
you
will
please
look
at
those
dates
and
just
let
us
know
if
there
are
any
issues
with
those.
Also,
this
gives
you
the
opportunity
to
schedule
your
vacations
you'll
notice
that
we
are
dark
in
August,
so
please
make
sure
you
take
time
off
and
enjoy.
F
Secondly,
we
are
tentatively
planning
a
joint
architectural
Advisory,
Committee
and
Planning
Commission
meeting
in
December
I
am
going
to
propose
to
do
that
on
December,
the
11th
so
that
it
will
be
on
the
same
day
as
our
regularly
scheduled,
Planning
Commission
meeting.
What
we
will
probably
do
is
start
that
at
noon
on
December
the
11th
with
the
AAC
and
then
continue
with
our
regular
Planning
Commission
meeting
starting
at
1:30.
F
F
At
the
direction
of
the
city
council
they've
requested
that
we
look
at
that
together
and
then
the
most
important
item
that
I
need
to
discuss
with
you
is
our
joint
architectural
advisory
committee
and
planning
commission
holiday
party
that
we
have
every
year
we
are
tentatively
looking
at
the
date
of
December,
the
5th
Thursday
December
the
5th,
and
hope
that
that
does
not
conflict
with
any
other
social
plans.
You
might
have
that
evening.
D
F
A
F
D
A
F
Yes,
I
will
give
you
a
very
brief
update.
Tova
is
the
one
just
on
North
Palm
Canyon,
immediately
north
of
Vista
Chino,
the
one
that
Commissioner
vice-chairman
rootsy
brings
up.
The
applicant
has
emailed
us
this
week
indicating
that
they
are
close
to
closing
the
deal
with
Marriott
as
their
operator,
which
means
they
can
then
proceed
with
submitting
their
construction
documents
and
moving
ahead
with
construction.
There
are
issues
with
maintenance
of
the
fence
which
they
are
aware
of
and
will
be
taken
care
of
shortly.
F
In
addition
to
other
things
that
vice-chairman
rootsy
has
mentioned
to
our
city
attorney
on
the
dream
hotel.
Unfortunately,
the
news
I
have
on
that.
One
is
not
good.
The
developer
of
that
project
is
in
litigation
with
the
contractor,
who
completed
the
underground
construction
for
the
parking
structure
on
the
hotel,
and
so
they
will
not
be
able
to
move
forward
with
the
above-ground
construction
or
finalizing
their
construction
documents
for
the
above-ground
construction
until
that
litigation
is
resolved.