►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting | July 11, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
B
A
B
B
A
D
A
We
are
at
public
comments.
This
time
has
been
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
Planning,
Commission
and
consent
calendar
and
other
agenda
items
and
items
of
general
interest
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
Commission.
Please
note
that
the
Planning
Commission
is
prohibited
from
taking
action
and
items
that
are
not
listed
on
the
posted
agenda.
Three
minutes
will
be
allowed
for
each
speaker.
A
A
3A
should
comment
on
this
portion
of
the
agenda
for
people
who
don't
know.
3A
is
election
of
officers,
but
public
hearing
items
are
2a,
which
is
the
text
amendment
to
be
Gannett
properties
and
to
see
Jas
infrastructure.
So
if
you're
here
in
one
of
these
three
items,
you
might,
you
may
either
testify
now
or
testifying
during
the
public
hearing
on
that
item.
F
A
A
A
Item
2a
is
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
for
his
own
text;
amendment
just
sections:
nine
1.00,
0.109,
3.0,
five:
point:
zero,
zero
and
nine
4.0
3.0
0
of
the
Palm
Springs
zoning
code
relating
to
development
standards
for
planned
development
districts
and
the
requirements
for
process
and
PDG
applications.
Staff
report
please,
madam.
D
It
will
also
impact
the
Golf,
Course
conversion
ordinance
and
then
any
land-use
items
that
would
come
forward
within
the
boundaries
of
the
reservation,
and
so
for
that
reason
we
are
requesting
to
continue
this
item
to
the
September
12th
meeting.
However,
as
you've
already
indicated,
if
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
who
would
like
to
testify
on
this
item,
we
would
certainly
welcome
their
comments
at
this
point
in
time.
But
we
will
continue
the
public
hearing
to
September
the
12th
and.
A
A
If
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
testify
in
item
2a,
the
public
hearing
is
open
there
being
no
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
testify.
The
public
hearing
is
closed
and
I'll.
Take
a
motion
to
continue
the
public
hearing
until
September
12th
2008.
She
miss
has
been
moved
and
seconded
all
in
favor
aye.
D
A
Passes
unanimously
to
be
Gannet
properties,
2014
LLC
for
a
conditional
use,
permit
adoption
of
a
mitigated,
negative
declaration
under
sequa
for
a
major
architectural
application
for
the
construction
of
a
63,000,
650
square
foot,
cannabis
cultivation
and
dispensary
facility,
consisting
of
four
separate
buildings
located
at
gana
Garnett
Road
and
interstate
10
off-ramp
zone
m1,
P,
section
23
staff
report.
Please
Thank.
G
You,
chair
I'd
like
to
start
with
a
description
of
the
project
site.
If
you
can
draw
your
attention
to
the
map,
that's
the
screens.
The
area
in
yellow
is
currently
a
four
point:
seven
three
acre
site
that
is
adjacent
to
garnet,
Road
and
interstate
10,
and
then
the
new
off-ramp
that
comes
eastbound
on
to
garnet
Road.
So
it's
at
the
interchange
of
the
I-10
and
Indian
Canyon
Drive,
which
is
on
the
east
or
to
the
right
of
the
slide.
G
G
So
the
site
consists
of
four
buildings
on
the
lot,
each
being
approximately
10,000
square
feet
for
cultivation
and
one
3650
square
foot
dispensary
facility,
which
is
on
the
very
left
of
the
slide
or
on
the
west
portion
of
the
property.
So
the
site
will
be
accessed
by
three
separate
driveways
and
the
building's
we
located
in
the
middle
of
the
Lots
with
parking
on
all
around
the
site.
There
also
is
pedestrian
entrances
from
a
new
sidewalk
that
would
be
built
along
Garnett
Road
onto
the
site.
G
The
entire
site
is
fenced,
with
a
fence
that
will
be
set
back,
20
feet
from
the
garnet
Avenue
and
it's
a
wrought
iron
fence,
picket
design,
the
building
that
face
that's
closest
to
garnet
road
will
be
set
back
30
feet,
which
is
within
the
development
standards
of
the
n1p
zone.
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
dispensary
will
be
in
building
1a
and
there's
a
building
1b
a
building
to
a
a
building
to
be
a
building
3a
into
building
3a
3b.
And
then
the
final
4th
building
is
off
to
the
right
along
the
off-ramp.
G
So
the
buildings
will
be
will
be
constructed
of
a
material
that
is
a
tilt
up,
can
concrete
with
stucco
pop
outs
that
will
frame
the
windows
and
doors
into
the
site.
In
this
slide,
the
top
slide
shows
the
dispensary
entry
with
a
canopy
that
will
delineate
as
to
where
the
the
public
space
is
how
you
get
into
the
public.
G
G
There
this
is
a
slide
of
the
landscape
plan.
That's
proposed
the
AEC
reviewed
this
project
on
April
16
2008,
and
they
had
several
comments,
and
one
of
them
was
to
simplify
the
landscape
plan,
which
this
is
a
revised
plan
that
was
reviewed
by
the
Planning
Committee
C,
and
when
it
when
I,
say
simplified,
it
means
they
reduced
the
number
of
plants
they
reduced
the
types
of
plants
to
be
a
more
desert,
hardy
variety
that
will
withstand
the
wind
in
the
heat
that
is
out
along
the
north
end
of
town.
G
G
So
I'm
just
gonna
flip
through
some
slides.
These
are
the
the
flat
line
elevation
showing
the
slopes
of
the
roof
that
the
mechanical
equipment
corrugated
metal.
That
will
hide
the
equipment
on
the
roof.
The
the
walls
are
scored
to
add
some
architectural
detail
and
then
the
pop
outs
will
angle
back
towards
the
roof
towards.
A
G
I
B
G
So
the
project
was
reviewed
or
an
initial
study
was
prepared
for
the
project
to
conform
with
California
Environmental
Quality
Act.
It
was
prepared
by
Terra
Nova,
who
analyzed
technical
studies,
and
there
was
a
mitigation
measures
relationship
to
biological
and
cultural
resources.
The
biological
would
mean
that
when
grubbing
or
grading
would
take
place,
there
would
be
a
monitor
on-site
to
make
sure
that
there
were
no
endangered
species
that
would
be
displaced
and
also
in
cultural,
that
if
there
were
any
artifacts
of
a
tribal
nature,
they
would
be
someone
on-site
to
monitor
that
activity.
G
So
notice
was
given
to
the
public.
Regarding
this.
This
hearing
there
is
also
notice
that
was
given
and
in
Notice
of
Intent
was
prepared
for
the
adoption
of
the
mitigated
negative
negative
decoration.
There
are
findings
that
the
Planning
Commission
need
to
make
in
order
to
approve
a
conditional
use
permit,
which
or
in
your
staff
report.
There
are
also
findings
that
that
are
made
for
meeting
and
buyer
I'm.
Sorry,
architectural
review,
which
is
also
in
your
staff
report.
G
There
were
some
additional
information
that
was
handed
out
today
that
included
company
ownership
information.
There
was
a
quest
about
who
actually
is
Garnett
properties.
Llc
you'll,
see
that
that
is
in
your
in
from
packet
of
information.
The
applicant
has
received
a
cannabis
license
from
the
city
and
the
state
to
partake
in
a
cultivation
manufacturing
testing
and
that
application
or
lobster
that
license
is
in
Paquette
also
to
review
in
the
very
last
page
of
the
additional
information.
There
are
three
conditions
that
we'd
like
to
add
to
the
conditions
of
approval.
G
One
is
a
cleanup
of
a
condition
that
talks
about
odors.
If
the
property
were
to
ever
emit
odors
in
the
future,
we
have
some
conditions
that
will
hopefully
eradicate
that
issue
or
that
problem.
So
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
bring
up
Nicole
Chris
from
Terra
Nova
to
discuss
the
environmental
or
answer
any
questions
regarding
the
sequin
alysus.
A
I
The
to
clarify
the
biological
mitigation,
it's
related
to
the
Migratory
Bird
Treaty
Act,
which
requires
that
that
we
assure
that
there
not
be
nesting
birds
on
the
property
when
grubbing
occurs,
and
so
that
mitigation
a
would
be
a
pre-construction
pre
grubbing
activity
that
that
a
biologist
would
make
sure
that
there
are
no
nesting
birds
on
the
site.
The
the
tribal
monitoring
I'm
sure
the
Commission
is
aware
that
those
those
conditions
are
almost
always
applied.
Now
the
tribe
wants
to
make
sure
that
there
are
no
resources
on
the
site.
E
My
question
is
with
respect
to
this
monitoring.
Both
of
the
respect
to
migratory
birds
and
historic
artifacts
are
the
monitors
who
are
themselves
professionals
in
their
particular
skill
sets.
Are
they
there
on
an
ongoing
basis,
or
are
they
there
when
they
initially
start
scrubbing
the
land,
because
my
my
question
would
be
in
the
course
of
of
the
construction.
Things
might
occur
that
a
specialist
or
you
might
want
to
take
a
look
at.
E
I
Good
that
that
is
the
presumption
yes
and
that's,
and
it
is,
it
is
consistent
with
the
requirements
of
law,
the
that
the
survey
be
done
immediately
before
the
grubbing
occurs
and
and
monitoring
is
not
required
after
that
for
practical
purposes,
no
self-respecting
bird
is
going
to
look
at
a
construction
site
and
think
that
it's
an
appropriate
place
to
put
a
nest.
If
we
put,
if
we've
made
sure
that
there
is
no
bird
there
before
we
start
grubbing
have.
I
There
are
common
Birds,
okay,
si,
yes,
as
regards
the
archeological
monitoring
that
is
different,
that
monitor
stays
on
the
site
and
and
inspects
as
grading
and
excavation
occurs
because
oftentimes
resources,
particularly
in
this
area,
where
there's
been
a
tremendous
amount
of
windblown
sand
over
the
years,
resources
can
be
found
at
depth,
and
so
the
monitor
stays
until
that
monitor
who
is
qualified
by
the
tribe
and
knows
what
he's
looking
for
and
what
the
what
the
potential
is
for
buried
resources
until
that
monitor
determines
that
monitoring
is
no
longer
necessary.
Thank.
A
A
I
And
this
would
address
the
long-term
potential.
Some
of
the
jurisdictions
in
which
we
work
for
these
kinds
of
facilities
require
that
the
specifics,
the
specifications
for
the
odor
control
system
be
included
in
the
application
packet,
but
in
in
this
case,
it
will
be
reviewed
at
building
permits.
Madam.
D
A
I
I
We,
yes,
we
use,
we
always
use
ite.
What
I
was
checking
for
was
whether
or
not
a
traffic
study
was
provided
to
us
in
this
case,
and
it
was
not
the
the
there
are
now
ite
standards
for
cannabis
dispensaries,
and
so
we
use
the
IT
standard
for
that.
There
are
not
IT
standards
for
cultivation,
yet
there
have
not
been
enough.
Studies
done
to
derive
a
trip,
and
so
we
in
multiple
jurisdictions
have
used
the
wholesale
nursery,
because
it
has
the
the
use
has
characteristics
of
a
wholesale
nursery.
I
I
Well,
not
really
because
of
a
wholesale
nursery
would
also
be
involved
in
in
transporting
its
materials,
and
so
that
factor
would
be
part
of
the
ite
trip
generation
code.
The
manufacturing
in
involves
the
distillation
of
the
product
on
site
and
distribution,
is
at
the
the
equivalent
of
the
wholesale
level
from
these
facilities.
They
they
transport
to
dispensaries
or
other
manufacturing.
A
F
A
H
H
H
G
H
H
G
E
G
E
G
Partially,
because
the
slope
of
the
roof
is,
you
can
see,
and
the
project
architect
can
describe
this,
but
the
parapets
are
tall
to
hide
the
the
large
amount
of
equipment.
So
these
uses
use
a
lot
of
cooling
equipment
on
the
roof.
So
it
is
to
screen
that
and
then
you
can
see
the
corrugated
metal
it
stays
at
a
horizontal
plane.
While
the
building
drops
in.
E
F
F
G
F
G
F
G
F
B
C
Yes,
thank
you,
I'm,
just
looking
at
the
roof
planned
sheet
a
six
point,
one,
it
actually
shows
the
roof
plans
for
just
two
of
the
buildings,
which
is
fine,
because
I
think
it
does
give
a
an
example
of
the
roof,
typical
roof
layout.
I
guess
my
question:
is
it's
showing
solar
panels?
The
question
is:
are
those
in
fact
going
to
be
built?
Are
those
just
placeholders
for
future
solar
panel
locations.
G
Well,
the
the
as
you
can
tell
by
the
buildings
it's
they're
pretty
utilitarian.
They
could
be
used
in
the
future
for
war
housing
and
the
applicant
may
be
able
to
answer
that
question
about
the
specifics
of
the
of
the
solar
panels.
If
they're
gonna
be
part
of
the
cultivation
facility
or
if
they
would
be
used
in
the
future
or
worse.
C
I'm
sure
it's
in
the
staff
report
or
in
the
project
report
I'm
just
trying
to
get
an
idea
of
how
many
people
staff
wise
will
be
involved
in
this
facility
in
terms
of
growing
cultivation,
the
other
dispense,
key
functions
and
so
forth,
and
then
I
guess
that
leads
into
my
final
question
is:
if,
in
the
future,
these
buildings
become
a
different
views,
does
the
parking,
as
is
shown
I,
guess,
meet
standard
industrial
zoning
type
requirements,
and
maybe
that's
a
question
if
either
for
the
applicant
or
the
architect,
actually
I'll.
D
A
G
J
Traditionally,
in
industrial
zones,
you
have
industrial
trucks
that
come
in
or
you
have
types
of
trucks
that
load
and
unload.
If
you're
looking
at
distribution,
you
normally
have
you
need
turnaround.
You
need
turning
radius
as
I
understand.
In
the
previous
question,
no
traffic
report
was
submitted
so
I'm
going
to
see
what
our
requirements
are
for
an
industrial
land
use
for
loading
and
unloading
of
goods.
Sure.
G
G
Sorry,
we
see
two
loading
areas
here
and
here
and
in
these
buildings
are
other
loading
zones
throughout
the
site
to
gain
access
into
the
building.
So
the
zoning
code
does
require
that
specific
radius
be
no
more
than
two
percent
which
these
curves
all
meet.
The
zoning
code
requirement,
so
a
truck
would
be
able
to
come
into
the
site
and
maneuver
correctly.
J
Thank
you
very
much.
The
other
question
I
had
is
one
of
the
conditions
condition
number
engineering,
seven
on
page
19
of
excuse
me,
13
of
23
I,
assume
that
that
condition
also
means
that
a
pedestrian
can
travel
from
the
sidewalk
without
having
to
use
a
vehicular
driveway
into
the
site.
There
would
be
a
requirement
so.
G
J
G
Right
so
I
have
a
slide
here
of
the
city
bike
plan,
and
currently
there
is
a
bike
path
that
runs
along
North,
Indian,
Canyon
Drive
that
continues
over
the
I-10
and
into
Desert
Hot
Springs.
So
there
is
a
bike
path
or
a
designated
bike,
trail
or
bike
way
that
will
skirt
the
the
site.
It'd
be
easier
for
a
bicyclist
to
make
a
left
hand
or
right
hand,
left
hand
turn
and
go
down
garnett
to
the
site.
G
J
And
the
last
question
I
have
for
staff,
and
this
may
not
be
a
fair
question,
but
it
came
in
our
honor
Dyess
today
on
a
cultivation.
What
exactly
is
the
taxing
mechanism
that
the
city
actually
generates
revenue
from
because
there's
a
retail
portion
dispensary
I
understand
but
on
the
actual
cultivation
side
of
it?
And
again
this
may
be
an
unfair
question.
I
apologize
and.
D
J
G
Yes,
the
AC
was
concerned
about
the
the
wind
conditions
up
in
the
north
end
of
town
and
they
were
afraid
that
the
DG
would
be
blown
away,
which
we
all
know
that
does
happen.
So
the
applicant
has
offered
to
do
three-quarter-inch,
Desert
Gold,
crushed
rock
at
two
inches
depth,
and
they
can
address
that
when
they
come
up
and
give
the
presentation.
G
A
At
this
point,
if
there
are
no
more
questions
of
staff
I'm
going
to
open
the
public
hearing
on
this,
the
applicant
has
ten
minutes
for
an
initial
presentation.
Is
there
somebody
who
has
a
time
clock
here
perfect?
Thank
you.
Are
you
our
official
timekeeper,
then
members
of
the
public
can
speak.
You'll
have
three
minutes,
and
the
applicant
will
have
a
three
minute
rebuttal
just
for
everyone.
At
that
point,
we
we
will
open
questions
for
the
applicant
before
I
close
the
public
hearing,
so
that
any
responses
they
give
us
are
part
of
the
public
record.
L
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
james
govt
architect,
I'm
representing
the
applicant-
and
I
am
the
architect-
and
I
don't
have
a
real
big
presentation
I'll
just
hit
some
of
the
highlights.
We
designed
this
project
to
be
an
industrial
park
type
project,
that's
what
the
zone
is
that's
what
the
land
use
is.
It
was
brought
up
about
several
times.
It's
am-1
peat
property
and
we've
done
a
lot
of
these
before,
but
we
we
tried
to
make
the
buildings
reasonably
interesting
to
look
at.
We
sloped
the
walls
and
then
left
the
pear
that
screams
straight.
L
There
was
a
question
about
the
location,
one
of
the
screens,
it's
quite
a
waste
back
on
that
building
the
flat
elevation
doesn't
really
show
it,
but
it's
in
fact
30
or
40
feet,
I'm,
not
sure.
If
you
look
at
the
3d
views
and
those
reviews
are
like
taken
from
eye
level,
you
won't
see
much
of
those
metal
parapets.
One
of
the
one
of
the
AAC
members
asked
that
they
not
be
glare
prone,
which
I
indicated
that
by
the
time
the
wind
blows
a
couple
of
months,
all
finished
will
be
gone
off
them
anyway.
L
L
They
were
asked
to
be
asked
me
to
look
at
an
eyebrow
for
the
dispensary,
which
kind
of
denotes
the
entry,
and
we
did
something
very
similar.
We
did.
It
smoked
tree
Commons
with
an
eyebrow.
You
know
that
could
hold
a
sign,
the
other
buildings,
the
cultivation
activities
are
not
signed,
and
so
we
just
left
them
plain.
The
property
is
fenced
anyway,
and
we
had
quite
a
discussion
about
the
landscaping
because
we're
we're
pretty
sensitive
about
what
goes
on
up
there.
The
wind
is
brutal.
We
did
the
train
station,
which
is
not
far
from
here.
L
We
had
pretty
good
luck
with
the
Palo
Verde
trees
at
the
train
station.
They
bend
over
a
little
bit,
but
they
didn't
blow
away
the
palm
trees.
We
have
some
palm
trees
at
the
train
station
that
that
have
held
up,
but
the
idea
was
to
simplify
and
get
rid
of
a
lot
of
the
ground
covers,
and
things
like
that
that
we're
just
going
to
get
buried
get
more
Rock
on
the
site.
L
Maybe
some
Boulder
work
try
to
keep
as
many
shade
trees
as
possible
again
with
the
limits
of
the
site,
and
so
that's
what
we
tried
to
do.
We
did
a
monument
sign,
important
place,
monument
sign
that
says:
garnett
Business,
Park
on
it
and
again
to
try
to
keep
keep
it.
Looking
like
a
business
part,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
it
look
nice
from
the
freeway
some
of
the
buildings
out
there.
Don't
look
so
good.
We
think
this
one
will
look
fine
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
Commission.
A
A
L
They're
a
little
tougher
to
work
with
the
Pala
Verdes
they
can,
they
can
blow
over,
they
need
to
be
staked
and
they
do
be
checked
occasionally.
The
key
is
to
is
to
get
them
in
and
get
them
staked
real.
Well,
so
they'll
go
through
one
or
two
wind
seasons,
then
generally
they're.
Okay,
again,
if
they're,
not
guy
wired
down
they'll
blow
over
and
Calvary's
will
die
if
they
blow
or
the
Mesquite's
will
not.
The
Mesquite's
were
designed
to
blow
over
their
core
horizontally.
As
you
all
know,.
A
A
A
L
A
F
M
Yes,
cannabis
operations,
just
because
it
allows
some
flexibility
and
goes
along
with,
with
whatever
permitting
will
be
allowed
at
the
site.
I
in
my
name
is
Michael
fine.
By
the
way,
madam
chair
commissioners,
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
the
manufacturer
is
going
to
be
chances.
Are
it's
going
to
be?
One
of
those
buildings
will
be
set
aside
for
that
purpose.
There's
a
variety
of
types
of
manufacturing
to
do.
It'll
probably
be
a
non-volatile
process
that
they
have.
M
Primarily,
it's
like
the
oils
and
stuff
that
are
done,
pipes
and
then,
and
that
that's
generally,
it
sends
like
an
extraction
process.
I
believe
is
primarily
what
it's
done.
There
might
be
some
edible
products
that
become
part
of
that
as
well,
but
then
that
goes
to
another
whole
process
that
involves
the
Health
Department
and
in
the
county
and
other
agencies,
as
as
it
involves
out
in
the
state
as
well.
Thank.
D
I
should
just
add
to
that.
The
city
has
issued
an
administrative
permit
to
the
applicant
for
cannabis
uses
and
the
administrative
permit
is
for
both
medical
cannabis
and
adult
use.
Cannabis
will
make
sure
that
our
conditions
of
approval
reflect
that
and
then
we
will
also
add
the
manufacturing
use
to
the
conditional
use
permit.
So
it's
clear
in
the
conditional
use
permit
that
they
do
have
the
ability
to
do
those
years.
F
H
Usually,
on
these
types
of
buildings,
I'm
pretty
I,
don't
have
a
strict
level
of
quality
or
architectural
integrity
that
I'm
looking
for,
because
mostly
they're
kind
of
hidden.
But
to
me
this
site
represents
an
entrance
to
our
city.
There's,
there's
I
know
it's
not
the
main
entrance
I
think
that's
reserved
for
111,
but
I.
Think
enough
people
visiting
from
the
coastal
areas
exit
onto
a
North
Indian
that
this
becomes
a
prominent
site,
not
a
premier
site,
but
but
it
is
prominent
and
to
me,
there's
there's
there's
a
lack
of
taking
that
into
account.
H
I
realized
what
the
buildings
are.
There
tilt-up
buildings,
but,
for
instance,
that
building
for
on
both
the
north
and
the
East
elevations
is
going
to
be
paid
attention
to
by
people
using
that
exit
ramp
and
the
entrance
ramp
there
and
I
do
at
a
minimum.
I'd
really
like
to
see
that
those
two
elevations.
H
Have
a
little
more
attention
paid
to,
though,
actually
a
lot
of
it
a
lot
of
it.
A
lot
more
attention
paid
to,
though
they're
really
elevations.
That
will
be
seen
by
a
lot
of
people
and
I
think
that
the
that,
maybe
that
kind
of
got
lost
in
the
site
planning
where
it's
it's
just
over
at
the
end
and
and
and
we
won't
really
need
to
do
too
much
to
them
and
then
I
understand
the
AAC's
concern
about
calling
some
architectural
attention
to
the
entrances
to
the
dispensary
building.
H
But
I
really
think
this
is
unlike
a
lot
of
tilt
up
buildings
that
we've
looked
at
or
I've
looked
at,
both
at
AAC
and
Planning
Commission,
where
the
traffic
doesn't
warrant
more
attention
paid
to
the
architecture.
But
but
in
this
case,
I
think
it
does.
I
really
think
this
site
is
prominent
enough.
That
another
look
needs
to
be
had
to
to
make
it
more
of
a
statement
as
you're
in
or
entering
the
city.
E
Yes,
I,
don't
know
why
I
usually
agree
with
my
fellow
Commissioner
mr.
spine
I.
Don't
think
this
is
a
very
prominent
site.
I've
gone
on
that
on
and
off
ramp
and
many
many
times,
you're
very
concerned
about
being
being
sure
that
you're
in
the
line
of
traffic
that
you're
being
safe
when
you
do
it
and
if
you
look
at
the
environment
and
the
neighborhood
in
which
these
are
being
built,
there
is
nothing
distinctive
about
the
texture
surrounding
this
site
and,
in
fact,
I
think
granted.
This
may
not
win
an
architectural
award.
F
Gonna,
compare
with
that
mr.
donfield
on
that
subject:
I
really
don't
have
any
further
comments
on
this
other
than
I
want
to
make
sure
we
get
the
sidewalk
and
all
the
entire
frontage
and
like
just
maybe
step
back
for
a
second.
This
is
not
really
for
this
project,
but
stepping
back
to
my
ears
of
the
general
plan
steering
committee.
We
did
identify
this
area
as
a
potential
future
major
business
complex
and
also
maybe
commercial-
and
this
is
no
problem
with
this
project.
F
But
it's
getting
a
lot
of
little
spot
projects
happening
here
and
there
with
no
overall
master
plan
at
that
area
and
I,
know
I
doubt
we
have
the
money
for
it,
but
it
would
certainly
be
nice
to
have
a
nicer
master
plan
of
this
area
and
potentially
the
gene
autry
trail
at
I-10
intersection
as
well.
So
we
don't
just
get
a
series
of
spot
projects
without
a
cohesive
whole.
How
we
do
that
I,
don't
know,
but
it's
certainly
something
to
think
about.
C
Actually,
I
have
agree
with
certain
points
of
each
of
the
three
previous
commissioners,
so
I'll
be
tactful
about
this.
First
of
all,
I
I
agree
with
Commissioner
dawnandphill,
actually,
I
think
this
architecture
for
the
building
type
is
very
good
I.
Think
mr.
Joffe,
you
know,
has
a
track
record.
I.
Think
he's
done
some
good
projects
throughout
town
I
think
you
know
in
my
mind
the
simpler,
the
more
minimal
about
building
the
better
at
this
at
this
location.
I
do
agree
with
Commissioner
Hirsch
fine
about
the
entry.
C
I
think
the
attempt
that
was
made
to
add
the
eyebrows
or
the
canopy
at
the
dispensary
entries
it's
a
little
bit.
Weak
I
would
as
well
like
to
see
those
two
canopies
be
a
bit
stronger
form
of
a
more
of
a
welcoming
entry
gesture.
Since
truly
those
are
that's
the
only
building
location
that
that
invites
the
public
and
then
finally
to
to
address
Commissioner,
Cal
or
dine
I
agree.
You
know
it's.
This
project
I'm
sure
will
be
a
good
one.
C
It
provides
jobs,
it
provides
tax
revenue,
but
as
I'm
not
sure
my
zoning
or
land
use
terminology
here,
but
it
is
adjacent
to
an
interstate
highway
and
usually
in
my
mind,
those
are
locations
for
businesses
which
cater
more
towards
the
the
motorists.
Let's
call
it
the
and
I
think
it
is
sort
of
a
missed
opportunity
in
this
case
that
this
I
couldn't
have
been
something
you
know,
dare
I,
say
it,
but
more
fast-food
restaurants.
But
you
know
that's
what
happens.
C
K
K
A
J
I
agree
with
all
the
commissioners
actually
I
do
think.
The
bigger
planning
issue
at
some
point
needs
to
be
addressed.
I
know
we
can't
do
it
in
this
particular
instance,
but
I
think
it's
an
incredibly
valid
point
as
we
move
forward
to
continue
to
reinforce
us
as
a
world-class
City
and
I
think
cannabis
cultivation
will
be.
Something
will
put
us
on
the
map,
as
real
classes
will
help
so
having
the
architecture
kind
of
match.
What
goes
on
could
be
a
good
thing.
You
know
it
could
be
a
nice
thing
when
you
come
in.
J
It
could
be
a
good
thing:
I
I
do
have
one
thing
both
for
the
applicants,
protection
and
our
protection
is
the
trip
generation,
for
this
was
done
for
nursery
it's
way
under
anything.
That
would
be
significant,
but
I
think
we
need
to
put
something
into
the
record,
and
maybe
it's
maybe
they
can
get
us
the
numbers
right
now,
just
that
this
actually
is
going
to
be
manufacturing,
so
those
numbers
might
be
a
little
bit
different
for
trip
generation.
J
I
think
we
probably
can
do
it
today
if
Nicole
can
call
with
those
numbers
I
don't
have
them
at
my
fingertip
and
the
other
other
thing
that
I
might
suggest
is.
The
son
line
is
doing
a
huge
study
to
try
and
get
workers
in
the
agricultural
field
around.
They
have
a
real
HUF,
tough
time
getting
to
their
jobs.
J
Right
now
and
and
a
lot
of
sun
line
is,
we
were
just
demonstrated-
doesn't
always
service
areas
that
that
these
workers
would
go
to
so
it's
on
the
forefront
of
their
thoughts
and
they're,
looking
at
Flex
things
and
all
kinds
of
stuff.
But
a
lot
of
agricultural
workers
will
also
ride
their
bike
and
take
it
with
the
bus.
So
I'm
really
highly
suggesting
that
for
each
of
those
separate
parcels
that
we
put
in
bike
boxes
because
bike
boxes
will
protect
it
against
the
sand
in
the
wind
and
that's
that's
all
I
am
thank
you.
A
Just
in
general
comments,
I
agree
with
what
I've
heard
from
the
commissioners
I
do
think
the
eyebrows
should
be
enhanced.
I
am
concerned
in
general,
although
I
do
think
the
marijuana
dispensary
may
be
general
public
serving.
We
don't
quite
know
how
much
use
that's
going
to
happen
yet,
but
I
think
it's
appropriate
for
the
site
we
are
getting
to
making
and
I
see
general
support
for
this.
I
didn't
see.
Support
commissioner
Hersh
pine
for
changing
the
street
face
or
the
the
freeway
face
on
building
four
but
I
think
we're
pretty
close
to
emotion.
A
F
I
will
I
will
move
the
staff
recommendation
inclusive
of
the
resolution
that
adopts
a
negative
declaration
inclusive
of
the
two
amendments
that
we
got
the
same
or
this
this
afternoon
and
I
think
we
have
at
least
two
additional
conditions.
One
would
be
to
ensure
that
the
sidewalk
is
continuous
from
the
I-10
off-ramp
to
the
Western
project
boundary
and
two
would
be
to
fix
the
eyebrows.
What.
E
E
I
F
F
I
F
I
A
D
A
C
A
A
One
minute
late:
we
are
calling
the
mini
meeting
of
the
Planning
Commission
back
to
order.
We
are
at
item
2
C,
which
is
j5
infrastructure
on
behalf
of
AT&T
Mobility,
for
a
conditional
use
permit
to
install
a
wireless
communication
facility
consisting
of
12
8
foot
tall
panel
antennas
on
the
roof
top
of
an
existing
warehouse
building
located
at
7
7
0
South
gene
autry
trail
staff
report.
Please
thank.
N
You,
madam
chair,
and
members
of
the
Planning
Commission,
so
this
is
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
wireless
facility
and,
as
you
said,
it's
going
to
be
mounted
on
a
on
an
existing
building
located
in
an
m10,
but
for
us,
I
also
want
to
bring
to
your
attention
that
this
Co
P
is
a
type
2
Co
P,
meaning
that
your
action
today
we'll
be
making
a
recommendation
to
the
City
Council.
Who
has
the
the
final
action
again?
N
It
is
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
wireless
facility,
and
this
is
going
to
be
mounted
on
an
existing
building.
There
will
be
12
and
10
as
part
of
this
facility.
8
of
them.
The
12
will
be
mounted
onto
a
location
on
the
rooftop,
so
era
of
them
will
be
located
on
the
north
easterly
portion
of
the
building
and
the
rest
4
will
be
mounted
on
the
south
easterly
portion
of
the
building.
Yes,
I'm
gonna
do
that.
N
After
a
very
brief
background,
I
will
go
through
my
exhibits
to
point
where
tools
will
be
looking
at
to
you.
So,
as
I
said,
this
type
of
use
is
allowed
within
the
m1
zoning
district.
The
height
of
this
building
is
currently
30
feet.
The
zoning
up
do
allow
up
to
40
feet.
So,
in
addition
to
the
building
of
when
the
antennas
are
mounted
on
it,
along
with
the
screening,
it
would
bring
the
the
overall
height
to
38,
so
it
will
so
be
within
the
aisle
boo
height
in
that
district.
N
So,
having
said,
I
just
want
to
go
through
the
exhibits,
real,
quick.
What
you
see
now
is
the
the
aerial
of
the
site.
The
this
is
the
building
right
there
where
the
address
is
so
it
is
bordered
by
Sonia,
Jones
and
then
South,
gene
autry
trail
and
Camino
pal
Sparrow
seller.
So
that's
the
general
area
of
the
building
this
exhibit
here
is
the
site
plan,
and
here
are
the
locations
of
the
just
go
up
there.
N
So
here
are
the
antennas.
Eight
of
them
will
be
mounted
on
this
portion,
and
four
of
them
were
planted
here
and,
as
I
mentioned,
they
will
be
screened
by
an
1/8
food
Ward
that
would
be
painted
to
match
the
existing
building
color.
The
same
tamela
apply
here
so
on
on
the
not
instantly
section
of
the
site.
It's
where
the
equipment
cabinet
will
be
located
right
here,
so
that
will
be
built
with
a
CMU
block
wall.
The
BT
color
will
also
match
that
of
the
existing
building.
N
N
N
N
N
A
E
N
B
A
E
N
E
H
F
N
So
when
you
look
at
that
screen
in
there,
so
our
recommendation
recommended
condition
to
Planning
Commission
is
to
relocate
the
see
that
to
the
middle
of
the
rooftop
or
move
it
to
the
edge
where
the
four
antennas
are
currently
located.
Those
those
would
be
less
visible
from
the
public
right
away.
So
again
it
is
a
type
2
conditional,
see
you
pee.
N
Your
action
is
to
make
a
recommendation
to
the
planning
to
the
City
Council,
assuming
you
are
fine,
with
the
conditions
that
staff
has
recommended
additional
findings
in
support
of
the
CPI
included
in
your
your
staff
report.
It
is
a
public
hearing,
so
that
will
conclude
that
my
staff
report,
the
reps
of
the
applicants,
are
here
to
make
any
additional
presentation
to
the
Learning
Commission.
Thank
you.
Questions.
J
N
We
will
do
that
if
we
try
to
be
Amano
palms,
for
instance,
if
it
were
to
be
the
locations
were
not
on
a
rooftop,
for
instance
yeah.
We
do
require
enhancement
of
landscaping
to
screen
these.
If
you
were
to
be
in
standalone
cell
tower,
yes,
we
would
do,
but
in
this
case
it's
on
a
rooftop,
so
staff
did
not
see
the
need
to
ask
for
additional
ask
a
general
in
this
case,
yeah.
K
N
And
in
fairness
to
the
applicant,
he
was
a
little
late
before
we
arrived
at
that
conclusion,
but
I
did
call
the
applicant
to
let
him
know
and
I
did
ask
them
to,
because
this
those
locations
are
based
on
studies
by
the
engineers.
So
I
did
ask
her
to
perhaps
invite
the
engineer's
are
along
today
in
case
of
any
impact
that
a
relocation
might
cause.
So
do.
K
N
F
N
A
C
F
F
A
F
N
B
Afternoon,
madam
chair
and
Chairman's
our
Commissioner
sorry,
the
antennas
will
be
at
38.
Six
and
I
will
call
up
the
RF
engineer
to
explain
why
we
cannot
relocate
into
the
center
because
we'd
have
to
increase
the
height
by
significant
due
to
the
shadowing
of
the
RF
emission.
So
I
can
call
it
the
earth
engineer
now.
O
K
O
Guess,
I
guess
I'm
here
to
comment
on
on
the
shouting
effect.
So,
basically
the
reason
we're
in
the
business
of
providing
coverage
to
the
customers,
and
we
want
to
provide
the
best
service
possible
with
every
cell
tower
that
we
have
in
order
for
RF
to
work
it
has
to
propagate
properly.
Not
it
has
to
propagate
properly.
He
has
to
keep
RF
energy
has
to
propagate
properly.
The
reason
we
as
antennas
is
the
antennas
is
a
medium
by
which
we
propagate
the
RF
energy.
O
We
generated,
there's
a
radio
it
propagates
out,
so
not
not
to
get
too
technical,
but
it
has
to
get
technical
to
explain
to
the
shadowing.
Rf
is,
as
you
guys
know,
from
physics.
You
may
probably
remember
part
of
modeling
RF
energies
is
as
a
waveform,
it's
a
wave
and
as
a
wave
it
has
certain
characteristics
and
as
a
waveform
when
it
propagates
as
soon
as
it
comes
out,
it
has
to
have
clear.
O
Line-Of-Sight
cannot
have
any
obstructions
once
a
wave
has
obstructions,
it
begins,
it
begins
to
be
clipped,
you
know
it
loses
energy
and
it
deflects.
It
reflects
it
refracts
and
and
as
opposed
to
a
hundred
energy,
that
a
hundred
percent
energy
comes
out
of
antenna
all
of
a
sudden.
Now
you
have
after
clipping
and
refracting
and
blocking
by
this,
and
that
you
might
have
fifty
percent
of
30
percent
of
energy
coming
out,
which,
which
is
not
good.
All
of
a
sudden.
Our
coverage
is
sacrificed.
O
That's
why
cell
phone
cell
towers
are
good
to
be
on
monopoles,
because,
usually,
when
you're
on
a
monopole,
if
there's
no
near
near
near
field
obstructions,
we
call
them
it's
perfect,
perfect
propagation
characteristics
the
wave
propagate
as
far
as
it
goes.
Basically,
the
only
free
space
will
will
stop
and
the
customers
that
we're
trying
to
serve
will
get
the
maximum
coverage.
Now,
when
you,
when
you
deal
with
the
rooftop,
you
have
naturally
have
winds
anywhere,
you
are
the
roof,
the
roof,
any
object,
that's
in
front
of
antenna
serves
as
an
obstructionist.
O
It
begins
to
clip
the
energy,
because,
when,
when
the
energy
comes
out
of
the
antenna,
it's
a
waveform
and
it
has
certain
certain
shape
and
any
object
next
to
it,
begins
to
reflect
that
clip
it
absorb
it.
Yes,
exactly
it's
an
attenuate,
the
energy
so
again,
there's
something
called
reactive
near-field.
O
We
then
that
near-field,
if
anything,
obstructs
the
the
signal
it'll,
it
will
not
be
the
signal
that
that's
supposed
to
be
there,
so
when
we
use
our
propagation
tools
to
model
how
far
a
certain
like
a
site
like
this
will
cover,
let's
say
a
mile
and
a
half
mile
away
in
this
direction,
maybe
half
a
mile
in
this
direction.
We
presume
that
the
energy
will
come
out
normally
and
will
not
be
attenuated.
Thirty
to
sixty
degrees
right
off
the
I
mean
percent
I'm.
Sorry,
all
right
off
the
bat.
Now.
O
For
that
to
happen,
this
near-field
has
to
be
overcome
in
the
near
field.
Is
the
near
field
for,
for
our
bandwidth
are
bad.
Eighteen
T
bandwidth
goes
from
700
to
over
to
about
2.5,
gigahertz,
700
I'm.
Sorry,
seven
get
a
megahertz
is
two
point
of
ignorance,
the
lowest
bands
that
we
have
700
and
800
they
for
that
wavelength.
Believe
it
or
not,
I
did
the
calculation
while
I
was
sitting
here.
The
near
field
is
680
feet,
680
v
now,
just
to
give
you
an
example
and
idea.
O
O
O
Yeah,
so
the
the
bottom
one
is
our
210.
So
if
you
see
the
antennas
that
are
further
away
from
the
parapet,
they
look
like.
If
you,
if
you
can,
you
know,
scale
that
probably
about
any
anywhere
from
a
foot
to
three
feet
from
the
parapet.
Now,
why
am
I
saying
that
I
did
also
the
calculation
for
what
do
you
need
to
clear
for
this
for
700-800
band?
What
clearance
do
you
need
for
perfect
way
for
him
to
come
out
so
for
half
for
for
half
and
then
half
a
foot?
I'm?
O
Sorry,
yes,
for
for
half
a
foot
distance
from
the
parapet,
you
would
need
nine
inches
for
one
foot
distant
from
the
parapet.
You
need
one
foot
for
two
feet:
distance
from
the
parapet.
Even
you
need
one
and
a
half
foot
of
vertical
clearance
in
order
for
the
antenna
energy
to
propagate.
Now
that
those
few
antennas
are
probably
at
least
two
feet
out
from
the
parapet
for
two
feet,
you
need
one
and
a
half
foot.
O
We
are
only
clearing
it
by
half
by
six
inches
so
already
other
than
the
antenna
other
than
the
90-degree
sector,
which
is
which
is
flush
with
a
with
a
parapet,
and
maybe
the
initial,
the
first
and
ten
on
the
333
sector
and
then
and
the
200
degree
sector,
all
the
other
antennas
already
sacrificing
coverage
because
of
the
nature
of
this
building,
and
because
of
the
way
that
RF
energy
will
propagate,
we
already
somewhat
sacrificing
it.
Yeah
I
just
just
want
to
give
you
an
idea
of
what
we're
facing.
O
So
if
we
were
to
move
back,
let's
say
10
feet
with
each
antenna
from
the
parapet.
We
would
need
3.5
or
foot
clearance
from
the
bottom
of
our
antenna,
and
the
bottom
antenna
counts
just
as
much
as
the
top
in
the
middle,
because
the
radiating
elements
are
all
throughout
the
antenna.
So
the
very
bottom
antenna
also
has
rating
elements
it
radiates.
If
the
antenna
is
this
big,
it
radiates
like
that
so
basically
10
feet
away.
O
We
would
need
three
through
almost
three
and
a
half
foot
clearance
from
the
bar
Montana
to
the
parapet
so
now
to
take
it
to
a
realistic
extent.
This
building
is
200
feet,
long
and
100
feet
wide,
roughly
so
the
long,
the
distance,
the
longest
distance
from
the
center
of
the
building
to
the
corner,
the
hypotenuse
of
the
triangle,
so
to
speak
that
calculates
to
be
112
feet
so
412
feet.
The
calculation
yields
12-foot
vertical
clearance,
12-foot.
O
What
appearance
to
the
bottom
one
antenna
so
from
the
top
from
the
top
of
the
parapet
which
which
is
at
40
feet,
I,
think
40-foot
right
to
the
bottom
antenna
would
have
to
be
12
feet.
Add
another
8
feet
for
the
length
of
the
antenna
and
now
you're
looking
at
the
top
of
the
structure
being
20
feet.
So
if
we
can
get
that,
then
we
will
have.
We
will
propagate
RF
energy.
O
A
A
O
O
T's
customers
but
and
I
know
to
business,
but
there
are
18
tea
customers
currently
there
and
their
lack
in
coverage
just
like
I'm
sure
there
are
there
other
people
who
have
other
cellphone
carriers
who
a
lack
in
coverage,
and
there
are
some
important
areas
we
want
to
cover
there.
I
wrote
them
down.
Obviously
the
airport
is
number
one
we
want
to
cover
the
airport
through
and
through
you
know,
whatever
in
building
structures,
there
are
even
people
sitting
in
the
plane.
O
We
want
to
have
one
make
sure
we
have
great
coverage
right
now,
we're
lacking
in
coverage
as
AT&T
Wireless,
in
that
in
that
area
to
the
northeast.
We
have
Simran
and
Sina
golf
clubs
and
in
the
relational
areas
around
there
to
the
east,
we
have
commercial
developments,
Lowe's
Walmart,
Office
Depot's.
We
don't
have
in
building
coverage.
O
D
The
other
thought
that
we
had
was
locating
all
of
the
attend
and
at
the
northeast
corner
of
the
building,
where
the
Adar,
if
the
other
four
could
be
moved,
I
think
based
on
your
presentation
here,
that
you
said
that
you
need
to
have
those
four
antennas
in
that
location
in
order
to
achieve
the
propagation
that
you
need
for
that,
so
it
doesn't
sound
like
we
could
move
all
of
them
to
that.
Northeast
corner
of
the
building,
unfortunately,
is.
O
B
A
B
O
H
O
Just
from
an
engineering
design
standpoint,
this
is
an
inferior
location
to
that,
because
the
sector
has
what
we
call
a
beam
with
a
span
of
energy
where
most
of
the
energy
comes
out
for
this
antenna.
It's
about
65
degrees,
so
it's
about
30
degrees
in
each
direction
from
there
from
from
where
we're
pointing.
O
C
H
O
O
H
You're
gonna
move
those
in
my
scenario:
you're
gonna
move
those
four
units
Atlas
at
the
southwest
corner
to
the
middle
of
the
building.
Mm-Hmm
you're,
not
gonna,
have
any
screening
so
you're,
not
gonna
have
that
20
percent
drop
in
your
propagation
factor,
but
to
get
the
same
propagation
of
that
corner.
How
high
would
those
units
have
to
be?
What
would
be
the
top
of
those
units?
There's
four
units
well.
O
O
B
B
H
B
C
O
C
Seen
a
building
mounted
before
but
I
understand
its
height
problems,
I
mean
I
other
question,
or
maybe
just
I'll
throw
it
out.
There
is
an
option
to
me
that
these
these
two
screens
elements
on
the
roof
are
just
awkwardly
placed
on
the
building.
If
the
one
at
the
South
under
the
building
was
centered.
C
This
building
has
it's
ironic,
I
think
this
is
a
tilt
up
building
that
has
some
architectural
elements
added
to
it.
These
sort
of
sort
of
gable
roof
forms.
What,
if,
rather
than
being
on
the
corner
of
your
screen,
I'll
just
call
it
a
penthouse.
I
know
it's
not.
That
was
centered
on
the
South
facade
of
the
building
and
the
companion,
the
screened
element
on
the
north
end
of
the
building
was
with
centered.
There
I
think
it
would
just
give
more
or
order
to
this
this.
These
elements
I.
O
C
That's
correct,
I!
Think
again,
you
know
we
have,
or
the
image
was
even
here,
but
especially
the
one.
Could
you
have
that
one
to
me
see
on
that
elevation,
sir?
If
you
could
turn
around
and
look
at
the
the
monitor
you
can
see,
there's
that
sort
of
peaked
element
that
koreas
element.
Could
we
place
your
screen
to
element
directly
in
lying
over
over
that
I'm,
just
thinking
to
me
as
an
architect
that
would
give
it
at
least
so
order,
and
this
view
yes
right
there
and
the
companion
piece
on
the
Southside.
C
You
know,
maybe
that,
along
with
moving
it
back
just
slightly
more
from
from
the
edge
of
the
building,
maybe
giving
it
the
enclosure,
your
your
screen
element
a
slightly
different
color,
so
it
doesn't
try
to
blend
in
you
know
in
such
a
I,
wouldn't
say
monotonous,
but
just
tries
to
blend
in
too
much
I
think
that
would
at
least
give
those
locations
some
some
architectural
order.
Okay,.
O
Your
point
is
well-taken
for,
for
the,
for
the
sake
of
covering
the
areas
to
the
north,
northwest
and
northeast.
This
is
fine.
This
is
I'm
talking
about
the
sector,
which
is
looking
at
330,
currently
right
here,
there's
a
sector
which
is
looking
at
330,
true
north.
So
we
could.
We
could
do
that
for
this.
For
the
sake
of
this
sector,
as
I
mentioned,
we
can
move
it
to
the
south.
However,
we
do
have
a
sector
looking
at
90
degrees.
That's
the
one
looking
at
Walmart
along
what
is
that
street
called.
O
Ramon
Ramon
Road
Walmart
office
depot
lowes,
that's
the
sector,
who's
gonna
be
looking
this
way.
So
if
we
move
it
here,
the
energy
of
that
wave
is
like
this.
It
goes
out
so
this
half
of
the
energy
has
to
come
out
like
this.
This
building
then
becomes
what,
along
with
the
parapet
along
here,
becomes
the
obstruction
for
that
sector
as
long
as
it's
sitting
at
the
edge
of
the
building,
it
overcomes
the
obstruction
as
you
move
it
back
now,
it's
50
feet
in.
O
O
E
O
K
O
O
O
O
F
O
O
A
Comments,
but
also
how
we
proceed.
It
seems
to
me
like
the
way
it's
placed
isn't
going
to
be
acceptable.
The
city,
staffs
recommendation
doesn't
work,
possibly
I
would
think.
Possibly
a
subcommittee
of
some
one
or
two
people
to
work
with
the
applicant
to
find
the
correct,
placing
and
have
it
come
back.
D
Rather
than
putting
together
a
subcommittee,
you
all
have
had
some
suggestions
and
gotten
feedback
from
the
engineer
relative
to
various
placements.
What
I
might
request
is
that
we
continue
this
item
to
the
next
meeting
and
hopefully
that
will
give
the
applicant
some
time
to
review
those
additional
locations
with
us
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
you
with
the
proposal
in
terms
of
what
those
would
look
like.
So.
A
K
J
I
I
agree
with
the
motion.
I
also
agree
with
that
Commissioner
Hudson
I
think
they
can
be
more
of
the
screens,
can
be
more
architectural
to
match
the
building,
be
it
the
blue
or
whatever
and
I
like
that
to
the
architects
on
the
thing.
I
also
think
that
it
is,
if
we
have
the
opportunity
at
this
point,
it
looks
like
some
of
the
landscaping
expect,
except
especially
along
sunny
dunes,
has
gone
away
that
we
asked
for
some
landscaping
enhancements
along
the
exterior
of
the
building
on
both
sunny
dunes
and
gene
autry.
C
I
would
I
would
encourage
as
many
visual
simulations
as
possible,
not
just
you
know,
directly
adjacent
to
the
building,
but
quite
a
ways
up:
gene
autry,
you
know
in
either
direction.
I
think
you
know
this
building
will
be.
The
antenna
will
be
seen
from
quite
a
distance,
so
any
sort
of
sort
of
further
tools
that
we
could
better
understand.
This
I
think
would
be
much
better.
A
H
Adding
to
those
simulations,
which
I
think
is
a
great
idea,
it
is,
is
perhaps
when
I
started
off
with
getting
out
of
the
applicant,
that,
by
bringing
the
unit
to
the
middle
of
the
building,
you'd
only
raise
it
by
a
foot
and
a
half
so
I'd
like
to
see
that
both
screened
and
not
screened.
How
that
looks.
F
O
A
Comment
the
proposal
before
us
didn't
work
just
much
too
bulky.
We
really
need
to
see
something
else,
so
we
anticipate
that
you'll
bring
something
back
to
us,
possibly
more
architectural,
looking
at
different
simulations,
but
I
just
want
to
say
really
clearly
driving
past
that
almost
every
day,
I
wouldn't
vote
for
it
in
terms
of
the
way
it
was
presented
and
how
it
looked.
But
I
really
want
to
see
you
get
the
cell
coverage.
You
need
so
I
hope
that
you
bring
us
back
things
that
you
think
will
work
and
with
that
there
was
a
motion.
A
F
B
A
C
I
A
D
D
In
the
case
of
the
AAC,
they
chose
to
reappoint
Maria
song
to
the
chair
position
for
an
additional
six
months,
even
though
she
has
term
limited
with
the
idea
that
they'll
hold
elections
again
in
January
to
appoint
a
new
chair,
and
then
they
appointed
mr.
Jake
way,
as
vice
chair
with
the
idea
that
he
would
receive
some
training
in
the
interim,
as
vice
chair
and
potentially
could
move
on
to
the
chair
position.
D
H
Is
so
is
the
I
was
at
the
AAC
meeting
where
they
set
up
that
that
program,
and
that
was
with
the
clear
intent
that
the
vice
chair,
the
new
vice
chair,
was
being
sort
of
groomed
for
the
position
of
chair
and
I
was
going
to
say
before
mr.
Hansen
generously
nominated
me
to
vice
chair.
My
comment
was
gonna,
be
I'd
like
to
see
the
status
quo
maintained,
so
we're
not
prejudicing
any
new
members
of
the
board
come
January
to
who
should
chair
that?
That
would
be
my
suggestion.
H
D
H
H
C
H
E
D
H
D
F
F
A
K
Monday
I
attended
a
neighborhood
information
meeting
that
was
organized
by
rescue
feet,
who
just
stepped
out
regarding
the
golf
course
conversion
and
just
trying
to
answer
questions
that
the
public
had
about
what
was
going
on
Flynn
and
David
Newell
the
made
a
terrific
presentation
that
explained
in
great
detail.
What's
going
on
and
answered
questions,
and
there
was
an
hour
and
45
minutes
that
where
there
were,
it
was
a
long
meeting
and
yeah
people
stain.
It
was
a
good
50-plus
people
there.
K
So
I
want
to
thank
them
for
taking
the
time
to
do
that
and
I
think
it
helped
the
community
a
lot
to
better
understand
the
issues
that
we're
dealing
with.
So
thank
you
for
that.
The
other
thing
is:
is
this
the
right
time
to
request
an
agenda
item
for
the
next
meeting?
Okay,
one
of
the
things
that
was
raised
at
the
Monday
meeting
and
I've
heard
from
other
people
in
the
public.
K
Is
this
question
of
a
moratorium,
putting
a
moratorium
on
any
Golf
Course
conversions
until
the
City
Council
has
had
a
chance
to
decide
on
the
ordinance.
This
is
something
that
this
we
know
the
City
Council
has
to
decide.
I
would
request
that
the
Planning
Commission
consider
this
issue
at
our
next
meeting
and
then
make
a
recommendation
one
way
or
the
other.
Are
we
allowed
to
do
that?
What.
D
B
Well,
moratoria
are
not
really
within
the
Planning
Commission's
jurisdiction.
Moratoria
originated
and
are
finalized
by
the
council.
Okay
they're,
basically
intended
as
like
an
emergency
interim
measure.
So
again
from
from
a
policy
standpoint.
If
the
Commission
would
like
to
discuss
it,
we
could
certainly
put
on
the
agenda
and
if
the
Commission
has
some
suggestions
they
want
forwarded
on
to
the
council,
it
just
wouldn't
be
like
a
formal
recommendation,
as
you
would
have
with.
Let's
see
you
P,
you
just
heard.
B
However,
all
other
land
use
entitlements
do
not
enjoy
vesting
until
it's
actually
been
approved.
So
if
the
city
were
to
change
the
rules,
mid
application
or
place
a
moratorium,
that
would
still
bind
the
project.
That's
part
of
the
reason
why
moratoria
are
used
because
an
applications
been
filed
with
the
city.
It
causes
concern.
G
D
B
K
A
F
A
Other
Commission
reports
requests
comments
might
want
to
hear
from
the
oh
there.
There
was
one
other
issue
that
we
raised
today
in
subcommittee,
but
also
wanted
to
raise
with
you,
which
is
that
people
have
a
hard
time
finding
the
information
about
when
sub
committees
meet,
and
there
are
two
possibilities
that
would
make
it
easier
right.
A
D
D
K
D
J
Flynn
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
appropriate
time
to
ask
you
this,
but
I
have
been
asked
many
times
about
the
development.
That's
on
Palm
Canyon,
directly
across
from
the
previous
McGruder
dealership,
where
all
of
the
palm
trees
have
been
ripped
out
and
it's
been
stagnant
can
and
I've
been
asked
repeatedly,
so
is:
are
you
able
to
give
it
just
a
brief
update,
certainly.
D
The
Cameron
project
is
the
one
that
you're
speaking
about
they
recently
went
before
the
City
Council
to
receive
an
extension
of
their
subdivision
improvement
agreement
as
part
of
City
Council
granting
that
extension
they
are
required
to
do
the
improvements
to
South
Palm
Canyon,
which
is
what
you
see
occurring
right
now,
with
the
palm
trees
being
out
and
the
sidewalk
ripped
up,
they
will
be
required
to
improve
South
Palm
Canyon
to
the
required
width.
We
get
into
doing
redoing
the
bridge
there
overtalk,
what's
Greek
they'll
be
replacing
the
palm-trees
reinstalling.
D
The
sidewalk
they'll
be
responsible
for
doing
the
new
signal
at
the
intersection
of
Mesquite
and
South
Palm
Canyon,
as
well
as
installing
a
median.
So
all
of
those
improvements
are
underway.
They
were
expected
to
be
complete
by
September.
It
looks
like
it
might
be
a
little
bit
longer
than
that
considering
we're
here
at
mid
July
right
now,
but
those
are
underway
also
as
part
of
that
they
will
be
required
to
install
interim
landscaping
around
the
perimeter
of
the
site
and
a
tubular
steel
fence
to
improve
the
appearance
of
the
site
as
well.
D
H
H
D
K
H
H
H
D
A
D
Dream
is
it's
underway:
I,
don't
believe
that
they
have
the
above-ground
building
permits
issued,
yet
they
are
in
the
process
of
giving
those
finalized.
They
had
they're
below
ground
they're
doing
in
the
underground
parking
garage.
That
portion
of
the
work
has
been
approved
and
is
under
construction.
They
are
also
on
the
City
Council
agenda
tonight
to
look
at
extending
the
construction
hours
for
their
concrete,
pour
so
they're
getting
that
in
place
so
that
they
can
move
forward.
D
I
D
Exactly
on
the
planning
department:
well,
we
have
a
link
on
the
left
hand,
side
of
the
page
for
project
status.
We
do
an
updated
sheet
every
month
with
the
projects
that
have
been
approved,
projects
which
have
received
their
building
permits
and
those
which
haven't
yet
received
their
building
permits,
but
are
still
within
their
2-year
approval
time
frame,
and
so
again
we
do
update
that
every
month
and
that
is
available
on
the
planning
webpage.
D
Like
to
get
our
small
lot
subcommittee
back
together
and
I
believe
the
date
that
we
discussed
was
July,
the
24th
mm-hmm.
If
members
calor
dine
and
her
spine
would
be
available
on
the
afternoon
of
the
24th
we'll
get
started
on
the
small
lot
ordinance,
we
were
looking
at
2:30
p.m.
aren't
you
on
that
as
well.
Yes,.