►
From YouTube: Planning Commission | January 24, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
A
E
A
We
get
you
the
acceptance
of
the
agenda,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
move
items
three
and
three
be
new
business
ahead
of
item
two,
which
is
a
public
hearing.
If,
if
I
have
a
second
for
that,
but
we
have
a
motion
made
and
seconded
all
in
favor
aye
in
acceptance
of
the
agenda.
Do
we
need
a
motion
to
accept
it
from
miss
Flynn?
No.
E
A
A
This
is
a
time
for
public
comments.
This
time
has
been
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
Planning
Commission
on
consent,
calendar
and
other
agenda
items
and
items
of
general
interest
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
Commission.
Please
note
that
the
Commission
is
prohibited
from
taking
actions
from
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda.
Each
speaker
will
be
allowed
three
minutes
for
public
testimony.
If
you
are
speaking
on
items
three
and
three
be
now
would
be
the
time
to
testify.
If
you
wish
to
testify.
B
There
are
two
concerns,
one
of
which
I
emailed
to
mr.
Millar
and
you
have
about
water
runoff,
because
there's
an
arroyo
up
the
hill
that
shoots
right
down
that
road.
The
second
is
that
my
neighbor
mr.
mrs.
Dunn,
that
there
are
only
two
houses
up
at
the
end
of
the
cul-de-sac
and
we
very
much
like
to
be
able
to
get
home
and
if
any,
building
material
or
vehicles
pursuant
to
this
project
are
parked
on
the
Overlook
Glen
Road
and
have
to
the
elbow
on
the
horn
will,
but
the
the
builders.
B
A
G
Actually
he
is
probably
going
to
be
in
Germany
for
the
next
two
years,
because
he's
been
appointed,
or
at
least
his
waiting
for
a
final
confirmation
to
be
the
ambassador
of
Germany,
so
he's
asked
that
that
he
really
and
he
and
his
partner
really
very.
This
is
our
third
project
with
them
and-
and
we
would
love
to
you
know
they
wanted
to
be
here
throughout
the
process
and
they
just
said
I
think
I
would
be
pulling.
You
know
not
my
hair,
but
their
hair
out
during
the
process.
G
H
B
In
the
area
of
concerning
views,
saving
view
corridors
and
in
trying
to
save
some
of
the
trees
and
and
anything
else
and
and
the
my
client
he
can't
be
here-
he's
got
the
flu
and
is
really
under
the
weather.
But
he's
he's
a
great
guy
and
he's
I'm
sure
he'll
cooperate
fully
with
with
any
in
any
of
the
neighborhood
complaints
that
come
up
during
construction,
all
the
construction
in
access
and
what
heavy
will
be
via
Alpert.
B
I
I
need
to
do
on
Bill
back
I
live
at
356,
West,
El
Portal
a
long
time.
This
project,
that's
taking
place
that
Jim
and
claudio
are
preparing
I.
Think
finally
has
become
a
terrific
idea
for
our
property.
That's
below
our
property
at
one
time
was
just
on
acre.
Yes,
was
black
split
in
half
and
Claudio
and
Jim
hey,
but
the
new
project
together
and
it's
the
first
time
I've
seen
it.
That
really
looks
like
it's
a
good
deal
and
it's
a
pretty
house.
I
It's
got
plenty
of
playroom
plenty
of
property
and
we
accept
that
eight
years
ago
I
didn't
there
was
something
else.
It
was
two
story
house,
that's
not
the
situation
here
anymore.
It's
it's
a
very
well
constructed
house
Jim
and
you
get
a
wonderful
job
on
that
and
the
only
question
we
ever
had
and
Claudio
and
Jim
camped.
The
house
and
I
see
the
only
problem.
I
had
is
that
I
got
two
twin
palms
and
which
you're
gonna
be
taking
one
out,
and
there
are
only
80
years
old,
they're
fabulous.
I
They
said,
okay,
what
we
can
do
is
take
out
and
move
it
over,
move
it
over
four
feet:
okay,
that's
that's
an
option
of
course
I
like
to
see
it
stay
where
it
is
obviously,
and
then
you
put
the
driveway
in
the
left
hand,
side
and
then
everybody's
happy
I
have
a
long
that
that's
being
cut
into
for
about
15
feet
and
tell
you
to
thigh
was
going
to
put
two
koozie
there.
So
it's
it's
a
little
change
in
my
my
direction
as
far
what
I
want
to
do
with
the
property.
I
I
agree
with
with
Claudio
the
owner
and
Jim
what
they've
come
up
with
and
I
think
everybody
is
is
happy
with
that.
They've
come
up
a
couple
times
and
if
it
has
anything,
do
with
having
to
have
more
footage
because
of
what's
allowed
or
not
allowed
and
as
far
as
the
property
is
concerned,
I
think
that
would
all
be
squared
away.
I
We
have
we
have
no
problems
with
that
other
than
the
fact
that
if
it
needs
it's
four
more
feet,
we
have
property
on
the
left-hand
side,
where
they
could
take
four
feet
there
or
on
the
street
side,
which
we
have
our
property
going
all
the
way
up
about
300
feet
from
the
driveway.
They
can
take
five
feet
from
there
six
feet
from
there
ten
feet
from
there
without
moving
the
palm
tree
that
that's
the
only
problem.
I
F
J
F
A
That
passes
6-0
moving
right
along
to
new
business
item;
three:
a
Rick
Grinnell
and
Matthew
lash
lash
e
for
a
one-year
time
extension
of
a
major
architectural
approval
for
the
construction
of
a
three
thousand
eight
hundred
and
fifty
seven
square
foot
house
on
a
hillside
located
at
one
for
one
mountain
ridge,
drive
zone,
r1a,
H
staff
report.
Please
thank.
H
You,
madam
chair,
this
project
was
approved
by
the
Planning
Commission
on
January
13th
of
2016,
the
approvals
for
major
architectural
czar
good
for
two
years.
So
this
entitlement
is
about
to
expire.
The
applicant
did
submit
an
application
for
to
extend
it.
He
is
requesting
two
years,
however,
her
staff
has
written
their
the
approval
for
a
one-year
extension.
The
Planning
Commission
could
grant
a
two-year
extension
if
it
feels
that
is
necessary.
H
H
If
you
remember
the
Planning
Commission
had
the
applicant
do
scale
models
had
some
story
polls
that
were
approved
eventually
at
the
January
13
2016
meeting
here
is
some
architectural
elevations,
which
were
included
in
your
packet
and
some
additional
3d
images
of
the
project,
so
you'll
see,
and
your
staff
report
that
the
findings
that
need
to
be
made
to
make
a
time
extension.
One
of
them
is
that
the
delay
in
construction
is
due
to
the
applicants
overseas
assignment.
H
All
effort
has
been
made
by
by
him
in
the
past
two
years
to
exercise
the
entitlement
and
construct
the
new
homes,
which
is
evident
in
the
development
of
architectural
plans
and
finalized
technical
reports.
The
property
owner
has
indicated
that
that
the
plans
are
will
be
submitted
shortly
and
based
upon
this
information
staff
feels
that
the
applicant
has
success,
successfully,
demonstrated
a
willingness
and
ability
to
start
the
project
within
the
time
extension
request.
H
The
layout
design
and
overall
concept
and
scope
has
not
changed,
and
the
proposal
remains
compatible
with
existing
developments
with
the
on
site
and
surrounding
areas.
The
staff
feels
that
the
findings
have
been
met
in
support
of
the
time
extension.
So
that
concludes
my
report
and,
as
you
mentioned,
the
project
architect
is
here
for
any
questions.
J
E
Back
to
when
we
went
through
the
process
of
amending
the
code
relative
to
extensions
of
time
at
that
point
in
time,
the
Planning
Commission
expressed
a
preference
that
we
go
with
one-year
increments
on
the
extensions
of
these
types
of
applications.
However,
you
do
have
the
ability
in
terms
of
the
way
the
code
is
written,
to
grant
a
two-year
extension
at
this
point
in
time.
So
either
you
could
do
a
1
in
1
or
you
could
do
a
2-year
again.
It
depends
on
the
mitigating
circumstance.
Thank
you.
C
C
E
C
A
A
H
A
G
And
ready
for,
thank
you
ready
for
then
the
vertical
construction
when
they
start
to
come
about
six
months
after
they
start
to
or
six
months
before
they
were
gonna
come
back
so
two
years
he
knows
and
I
already
told
him
that
that's
the
the
limit
that
you
have.
So
we
have
to
dig
some
soil
and
do
something
to
vest
the
entitlement.
So
that
was
the
consideration
and
I
would
hope
that
you
know
the
the
Commission
would
grant
two
years,
because
we
we.
G
F
A
G
Extension,
we
I
believe
we
had
already
included
that
on
the
plans.
I
don't
know
the
percentage,
but
we
put
as
much
as
we
could
I
think
we're
were
we
did
a
study
of
the
requirement
to
put
you
know
as
much
as
we
could
and
I
think
we
have
plenty
of
roof
area,
so
I
don't
see
that
that's
problem
to
actually
put
that
in
there
because
we
had
planned
for
it.
So
thank.
A
F
A
The
reason
I
want
to
do
one
year
is
because
they
only
have
two
want
to
make
sure
that
they
don't
lose
the
timing
of
it
by
having
a
two-year
extension
and
then
not
take
the
steps
they
may
need
to
take
to
perfect
it
so
well.
If
you
only
have
if
you
have
a
one-year
extension
and
we
require
that
they
pull
the
print.
I
would
like
that.
They've
also
pulled
a
permit
in
that
time.
A
There
at
least
prepared
to
hold
on
to
the
site
and
move
forward
if
they
don't
move
forward,
given
that
they
have
approved
plans
and
I,
think
we
all
liked
your
plans.
I,
remember,
actually
loving
your
plans
when
they
came
up
before
you
would
only
have
to
review,
to
have
to
refil,
so
I
just
wanted
them
to
be
as
prepared
as
possible
with
this
and
stay
with
the
one
year
extension.
So
that's
the
reason.
I
have
I
have
a
one
year,
I've
going
along
with
staff
on
this.
C
E
Mean
in
terms
of
them
pulling
a
building
permit
starting
construction,
but
not
finishing
yes,
the
things
that
we
can
do
come
from
a
code
enforcement
standpoint.
Building
permits
have
a
period
of
time
under
which
construction
must
proceed.
If
construction
halts
for
a
certain
period,
then
the
building
permit
expires
once
the
building
permit
expires.
We
can
go
in
with
code
enforcement
and
have
them
restore
the
site.
So
there
are
options
available
to
us
if
they
start
construction,
but
do
not
finish
so.
It's
sort
of.
C
F
E
D
D
E
Yet
this
is
not
the
camera
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear.
This
is
a
single-family
house,
it's
much
different
in
terms
of
the
scope
of
development
and,
what's
required,
there's
different
language
under
our
planned
development
ordinance
in
terms
of
what
constitutes
exercising
the
permit.
So
again,
there
are
two
different
situations
here.
The
application
that
you
have
in
question
is
an
extension
of
time
on
this
residence,
and
so
your
comment
should
be
focused
on
the
extension
of
time.
Does
it
meet
the
criteria
and
whether
or
not
you
should
grant
that.
A
Are
there
other
comments?
I
just
I
had
some.
He
obviously
can
come
back
in
a
year
for
an
extension
for
up
to
chew.
The
Apple
in
could
have
chosen
to
not
go
for
an
extension
and
come
back
in.
They
clearly
decided
not
to
do
that.
So,
what's
in
front
of
us
is
whether
or
not
we
want
to
go
forward
with
an
extension.
I
would
rather
go
forward
with
the
one
year
see
where
they
are
at
the
end
of
the
year.
Let
them
come
back
for
a
second.
If
they
haven't
moved
forward
a.
A
A
A
H
You,
madam
chair
this
property.
Looking
at
the
site
plan,
that's
on
the
screen
was
once
owned
by
the
property
to
the
west,
the
becks
at
this
time,
there's
a
driveway
that
bisects
this
property
that
will
be
removed
to
make
way
for
the
construction
of
this
new
house
on
the
west
end
of
the
property
there's
a
new
driveway
that
will
be
constructed
when
the
AEC
reviewed
this
project
back
on
December
4th
and
then
once
again
on
January,
2nd
2018.
H
So
this
is
a
blow-up
of
the
front
of
this,
of
the
property
where
apple
tall
is,
and
you
can
see
in
the
middle
under
the
red
cloud.
There
are
two
little
stars:
those
are
the
palm
trees
that
the
Becks
are
had
requested
that
they
be
saved,
so
the
driveway
was
narrowed
to
twelve
feet,
to
allow
the
saving
of
one
and,
as
you
can
see,
the
other
one
is
in
the
middle
of
the
road,
so
they
are
proposing
to
move
that
palm
tree
somewhere
onto
the
becks
property.
To
save
it.
H
So
the
property,
as
you
see
it's
an
l-shaped
house,
4,500
square
feet.
It
faces
West
with
a
grassy
area
in
the
rear
and
a
future
pool
also
to
the
rear.
As
the
neighbors
had
mentioned,
there
is
an
access
road
that
runs
from
alpert
all
behind
this
property.
The
proposal
is
to
add
a
block
wall,
six
foot
tall
that
will
run
behind
the
house
and
adjacent
to
the
driveway,
so
there'll
be
no
construction,
materials
or
no
construction
activity
on
the
access
road,
as
proposed
one
of
the
requirements
of
the
city
engineering
department
is
dedication.
H
Street
dedication,
so
you'll
see
in
the
front
of
the
site
plan.
There
are
two
dashed
black
lines:
they
are
proposing
to
dedicate
ten
feet
so
that
will
site
the
house
twenty
feet
from
the
front
property
line.
However,
it
will
be
25
feet
from
the
previous
lot.
The
zoning
code
allows
this
automatic
reduction
of
a
setback
when
Street
is
dedicated
for
city
purposes,
so
the
development
standards
have
all
been
met
for
this
r1b
property.
H
H
There
are
some
3d
images
here,
showing
the
front
what
it
will
look
like
from
the
street.
The
landscape
plan
includes
use
of
desert
plants,
accent
plants.
The
architecture
visor
committee
worked
with
the
applicant
to
come
up
with
a
landscape
plan
that
was
adequate
and
it
did
receive
final
approval
from
them.
H
H
Notice
was
sent
to
all
property
owners
in
accordance
with
the
zoning
code,
which
is
there,
as
resulted
with
our
neighbors
visiting
today
and
making
testimony.
So
you
will
see
that
there
are
several
emails
from
the
residents
that
I
want
to
point
out.
There's
a
resolution
and
conditions
of
approval
that
are
included
in
your
staff
report.
We
have
made
the
findings
to
recommend
approval
of
the
project
and
there
is
a
categorical
exemption
for
hillside
development
and
a
notice
of
determination
will
be
filed
once
that
is,
the
entitlement
is
is
secured.
H
J
J
H
It's
difficult
to
look
in
this
grading
plan,
but
on
the
back
you'll
see
that
there's
a
dark
dash
line
that
shows
the
block
wall
and
towards
the
panhandle
of
this
lot.
It
shows
landscaping,
so
you
know
there's
conditions
of
approval
from
the
engineering
department
that
will
address
all
of
these
drainage
issues.
But
looking
at
this
plan-
and
maybe
the
applicant
there,
our
project
architect
can
mention
talk
to
this.
It
looks
like
the
wall
doesn't
continued
the
whole
way
through
which
may
allow
the
water
to
pass
through
the
lot.
A
H
So
in
this
slide,
as
the
driveway
enters
from
El
Portal
is
in
the
background,
there
is
a
wall
that
has
to
be
built
to
elevate
the
driveway.
So,
as
you
drive
up
the
driveway
it
curves
on
to
the
becks
property,
this
is
a
view
of
the
rear,
so
the
Panhandle
is
to
the
to
the
right
and
that's
where
the
water
will
come
down
from
the
neighbors
above.
So
this
is
the
wall.
That's
nine
feet
tall
is
on
the
the
west
side
of
the
property
line.
J
B
Regardless
of
the
location
of
the
wall,
the
project
applicant
needs
to
prepare
a
hydrology
study
showing
the
impacts
of
the
off
site
drainage
going
through
his
lot
and
that
one
of
the
conditions
is
that
the
lot
has
to
accept
the
drainage.
So,
even
if
there
is
a
wall
there,
it
may
require
the
installation
of
inlets
or
some
other
or
wall
openings,
something
to
allow
the
water
to
pass
through,
but
that
can't
be
determined
until
he
does
the
hydrology
study.
B
There
is
already
condition
on
the
lot
that
he
has
to
accept
the
off-site
drainage
and
then
convey
it
when
the
plans
come
in
and
a
study
comes
in,
we
can
figure
out
the
extent
of
the
draw
for
the
extent
of
the
drainage
that
needs
to
be
conveyed,
and
then
what
improvements
need
to
be
constructed
in
order
to
convey
that
drainage.
So.
J
F
F
H
This
is
a
copy
of
the
slide,
shows
the
landscape
plan
in
the
original
submitted
to
AAC.
The
applicant
had
a
row
of
ficus
on
the
east
side,
which
is
the
right
property
line
in
the
access
road
and
that
they
were
removed.
The
the
neighbors
to
the
east
did
not
want
them
blocking
views,
so
they've
removed
landscaping
from
the
rear,
I.
F
Understand
that
I'm,
talking
about
the
north
side
there
along
the
private
road.
If
you
look
at
that
private
road,
there
is
landscaping.
The
neighbor
to
the
east
has
provided
a
ficus
sort
of
a
ficus
hedge,
along
his
edge
of
that
property,
to
landscape
that
right
of
that
roadway,
it's
gonna
be
there's
also
a
block
wall
on
the
far
side
of
it
with
some
landscaping
in
between,
and
so
it's
gonna
be
very
stark
there
with
just
a
block
wall
on
this
property
side.
F
H
If
you
look
at
your
staff
report,
there
are
three
photographs
of
existing
conditions.
The
second
and
third
photograph
are
actually
taken
from
the
access
road,
so
you'll
see
that
the
the
road
is
is
macadam
or
asphalt,
and
then
it
drops
off
with
just
creosote,
shrubs
and
bushes,
so
those
are
and
they're
the
neighbor
does
show
a
while
with
a
ficus
that
mr.
Callen
Dean
just
spoke
of.
A
E
C
E
F
F
F
As
an
aside
here,
we're
getting
almost
all
these
houses
up
here,
having
such
an
interim
condition,
which
is
almost
clearly
going
to
be
the
ultimate
condition,
we're
not
going
to
ever
I
suspect.
It's
unlikely,
we'll
build
the
road
to
its
ultimate
width,
and
we
should
probably
start
focusing
more
on
that
interim
condition.
Make
sure
that
it's
acceptable,
rather
than
we
spend
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
the
ultimate
condition,
and
then
we
defer
everything
having
to
do
with
that.
If
I.
F
B
F
H
F
F
F
A
Had
one
for
staff
which
is
again
going
to
the
solar,
is
there
at
this
point?
The
drawings
don't
show
solar
and
the
conditions
don't
require
solar,
but
we
have
had
a
request
from
City
Council
to
include
solar
in
discretionary
permits.
So
we
would
need
to
add
a
requirement
of
two
watts
of
solar
per
square
foot
of
building
as
a
separate
condition
to
the
planning
conditions.
Correct
both.
A
G
A
F
I'll
move
the
staff
recommendation
with
the
addition
of
this
solar
requirement
that
you
were
talking
about
and
the
condition
that
no
construction
materials
to
be
stored
or
construction
should
not
occur
from
Overlook
Glen
Drive,
and
that
there
be
some
part
of
some
form
of
landscaping
to
be
approved
by
the
planning
director
along
that
back
wall.
That
would
be
adjacent
to
overlook
Glen
Drive.
It
be
landscaping
on
this
projects,
property.
J
Also
to
accept
and
it
but
I
have
a
little
concern
with
requiring
someone
to
landscape.
What
is
a
horribly
conditioned
access
road
on
a
site
on
the
property
that
it
isn't
even
owned.
I
mean
I'd,
we're
not
in
the
business
of
cleaning
up
access
roads
on
the
backs
of
applicants
for
approvals,
and
it's
such
a
shoddy
Road
I,
don't
think
any
landscape
would
even
approve
it
and
it's
not
their
property.
So
I
would
take
issue
with
that.
One
item
to
your
motion
are.
J
A
F
Yes,
my
proposal
is
that
the
landscaping
would
be
on
this
property,
not
on
the
adjacent
property
and
that,
yes,
that
does
it
looks
pretty
crummy
back
there
in
some
areas,
but
I
don't
think
that
obviates
the
need
to
that.
If
there
was
any
other
condition
out
there,
we
would
require
some
degree
of
landscaping
and
softening
of
that
block
wall
and
the
adjacent
property
to
the
east
has
provided
such
landscaping,
and
it
would
be
a
continuation
of
that
landscaping.
So.
H
A
B
A
J
F
J
B
J
J
B
K
D
D
A
E
A
On
Rosalyn
LLC
for
a
planned
development
district,
a
minor
architectural
application,
a
conditional
use
permit
and
a
variance
application,
proposing
renovation
and
additions
to
an
existing
62
room
hotel
to
add
an
outdoor
music
venue
and
outdoor
restaurant
use,
an
outdoor
cocktail
lounge
and
support
spaces
at
the
Monroe
Hotel
aka
infusion
Beach
Hotel,
located
at
1900
North
Palm
Canyon
Drive
staff
report.
Please
thank.
L
You,
madam
chair,
as
noted
in
your
very
small
staff
report,
that's
before
you
today.
This
project
was
first
heard
on
December
13th
and
was
continued
to
January
10th.
At
that
meeting,
the
Commission
approved
the
variance
application
and
the
conditional
use
permits.
So
the
matters
before
you
today
for
consideration
are
the
planned
development
district
and
the
minor
architectural
application.
As
noted
at
the
last
meeting,
you
had
a
considerable
amount
of
deliberation
on
the
project
and
you
asked
the
applicant
to
meet
with
staff
in
order
to
further
discuss
options
for
public
benefit.
L
On
January
17th,
the
applicants,
Matt
Rogers
and
Chris
Ross's
met
with
representatives
of
the
city,
including
myself,
director
director
Garcia,
and
went
through
a
number
of
issues
relative
to
public
benefit.
On
the
second
page
of
your
staff
report,
it
goes
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
this
and,
as
we
note
both
in
my
staff
report
and
the
applicant
has
a
letter
which
is
attached.
L
L
The
second
issue
is
that,
with
the
condition
that
the
Commission
imposed
at
the
last
meeting
of
limiting
the
occupancy
to
210
the
amount
of
off-street
parking,
that's
proposed
at
the
remote
law
at
2080,
North,
Palm,
Canyon
Drive,
which
is
commonly
referred
to
as
the
ding
slot,
actually
is
conforming
in
its
quantity.
So
the
deviation
that's
being
sought
with
respect
to
parking.
Is
that,
rather
than
it
being
a
self
parking
lot,
it
would
be
required
to
be
valet
park,
because
the
parking
lot
capacity
can
only
accommodate
these
numbers.
If
it
is
valid.
L
With
respect
to
the
issue
of
setbacks,
the
applicant
is
requesting
setback
reductions.
When
you
look
at
hotel
uses
within
a
c1
zone,
and
this
property
is
split
between
c1
and
r3,
the
development
standards
for
hotels
have
setbacks
that
are
greater
than
other
commercial
uses
in
the
c1
zone.
So
what
has
been
proposed
here
is
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
reductions
in
this
setback
for
hotel
uses.
However,
the
setbacks
that
they
have
established
and
that
they
are
proposing
are
consistent
with
the
setbacks
that
would
otherwise
be
imposed
or
required
in
the
c1
zone.
L
So
in
fact
it
is
a
a
technical
relief
and
development
standards
for
hotels
in
r3,
but
it
still
does
conform
to
the
setback.
Requirements
for
a
c1
zone
parcel
the
other
matter.
That
is
still
an
issue
that
is
part
of
the
development
standards
for
which
the
applicant
is
seeking.
Release
relief
is
the
amount
of
usable
open
space
in
the
site,
as
the
hotel
currently
sits
with
no
extra
worker
or
modifications
to
it.
It
has
41
percent
open
space.
The
applicant
is
requesting
this
be
reduced
to
38
percent.
L
As
noted,
when
you
have
a
are
3
zone,
the
required
usable,
open
space
would
be
45
percent,
but
when
you
have
a
c1
zone
there
is
no
acquirement
for
open
space.
So
you
have
an
existing
development
with
41%
open
space
on
a
lot
that
has
split
zoning,
half
C
1/2
hour
3.
So
the
request
to
go
from
41%
open
space
to
38%
open
space
is
technically
a
3
percent
reduction
in
open
space
and
the
last
item
for
which
the
applicant
is
seeking
relief
for
the
development
standards.
L
That's
your
last
meeting
the
applicant
had
proposed
the
public
benefit
for
the
project
being
the
project
itself,
that
is,
the
elimination
and
improvement
of
a
fairly
aging
hotel,
a
lot
of
sort
of
rundown
conditions
and
overgrown
landscaping.
So
they
it
was
addressed
in
terms
of
addressing
blight
and
then
also
in
terms
of
increasing
the
economic
activity
in
this
part
of
the
city
by
bringing
more
residents
bringing
more
activities
and
thereby,
theoretically
on
seeing
more
of
these
hotel
rooms
that
are
up
in
this
part
of
the
city
being
filled
on
a
more
frequent
basis.
L
With
the
discussion
that
we
had
with
the
applicant
on
the
17th,
the
applicant
came
forward
with
additional
public
benefit
offerings
and
they
are
listed
in
the
middle
of
your
second
page
of
your
staff
report
number
one.
They
are
looking
at
proposing
to
replace
the
public
sidewalks
along
the
project.
Frontages
that
are
buckled,
cracking
imposing
tripping
hazards.
This
public
sidewalk
would
be
replaced
all
the
way
up
to
via
khaila.
L
So,
as
I've
noted
in
the
bottom
of
that
paragraph,
the
amount
of
issues
for
which
the
applicant
is
seeking
relief
through
the
use
of
the
PDR
fewer
than
what
was
originally
discussed
in
your
staff
reports
in
the
previous
meetings.
The
project
is
now
offering
the
I'm
sorry,
the
tangible
project
benefits
which
are
being
offered
are
greater
than
what
you
had
seen
previously
when
it
was
only
proposed
as
the
project
itself
and
with
the
elimination
of
the
discussion
on
the
distance
between
buildings.
L
The
deviations
being
sought
are
actually
less
than
what
we
had
previously
identified
for
you,
and
we
believe
that
these
public
benefits
are
now
in
proportionate
amount
to
the
degree
of
relief
being
sought
through
the
planned
development
district
application.
The
last
thing
I
want
to
briefly
mention
is
that
at
the
last
meeting
there
was
some
desire
that
we
actually
tried
to
explain
and
further
clarify
what
this
thing
looks
like
when
you
drive
by
the
site
right
now
on
Palm
Canyon,
Drive
you're,
seeing
a
raw
unfinished
concrete
block
wall.
L
That
wall
was
part
of
the
component
requirements
by
the
state
of
California
for
the
pool
barrier.
The
unusual
situation
here
is
that
the
inspector
required,
where
we
normally
expect
to
see
a
five
foot
high
pool
barrier,
the
inspector
required
that
the
pool
barrier
be
5
feet
as
measured
from
the
top
of
the
pilasters
on
the
adjacent
wall
at
the
Billy
Reid
site.
A
A
L
You're
going
to
see
two
sets
of
these
images
and
we've
set
up
two
sets
so
that
you
understand
the
clarity
of
what's
happening
in
the
landscaping
and
what's
happening
with
these
walls.
So
this
image
that
you're
seeing
is
looking
at
the
site
from
Palm
Canyon
Drive.
This
is
the
existing
covered,
Porte
cochere.
This
is
the
existing
hotel
building.
It's
a
two-story
building
with
a
clay
tile,
mansard
roof.
L
This
wall
that
you
see
here
is
the
wall
that
many
of
you
have
probably
seen
if
you've
drawn
driven
this
portion
of
Palm
Canyon,
it's
a
stuccoed
wall
with
portions
that
have
a
landscape
planter
here.
This
landscape
planter
these
areas
that
are
designed
to
look
like
wood
are
actually
porcelain
tile
and
it
gives
some
variation
in
the
texture
and
the
material
and
the
color
on
this
wall.
At
these
points,
where
there
are
planters,
then
there's
a
mesh
if
you
will
or
a
grid
upon
which
vine
type
material
is
proposed
to
grow
upon.
L
A
L
Yeah,
what's
the
distance
approximately
15
feet,
it's
simply
a
painted
block
to
give
a
different
sort
of
the
the
issue
that
came
up
with
AAC
was
this
wall
seemed
very
long
and
stark,
and
so
the
notion
was
break
this
thing
up
with
some
different
materials,
some
different
colors
and
different
textures,
so
that
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
so
long
and
monotonous.
So
that's
what
they
were
doing
with
these
various
things.
There's
also
a
slight
offset
that
they've
done
here
in
order
to
also
get
some
variation
in
the
surfacing
of
this
wall.
L
So
what
you're
seeing
here
again
is
the
wall
that
is
basically
the
the
barrier
or
the
edge
of
of
the
outdoor
venue
space.
So
behind
this
wall,
what
you're
seeing
here
is
the
retractable
canopy,
that's
at
the
raised
stage
area
where
the
DJ
and
others,
which
is
not
a
ggj
going
on
there
could
be
a
seating
on
that
level,
so
you're,
seeing
here
just
the
very
bit
at
the
top
of
the
of
the
covered
canopy
over
that
area.
What
you're
seeing
here
is
the
northerly
edge
of
the
Billy
Reid's
parking
lot
now.
L
This
is
the
same
image.
You
saw
previously,
but
what
we've
tried
to
show
you
here
now
is:
there's
landscaping
material
that
happens
basically
between
the
edge
of
the
sidewalk
and
their
property
line,
and
it
also
helps
to
soften
and
bring
some
visual
interest
to
that
area.
I
would
also
note
that,
at
the
request
of
the
AAC,
they
have
gone
back
in
and
they
re
landscaping.
L
Okay,
so
this
is
the
area
within
the
pool
deck
area,
so
this
is
the
existing
hotel.
This
is
the
small
building,
which
is
the
food
service,
preparation
area.
This
is
the
outdoor
bar
and
then
there's
a
fence
with
plantings
that
are
here
that
give
basically
a
visual
separation
between
this
area,
which
is
the
pool
deck
area
in
this
area,
which
provides
access
to
the
hotel.
L
L
To
show
it
to
you
in
another
image
I,
let
me
see
if
I
can
get
through
these
images
and
if
there's
one
that
does
show
it
more
clearly,
that's
okay.
What
you're
seeing
here
now
is,
if
you
were
standing
on
that
area
where
those
hotel
rooms
are
now
you're
looking
out
toward
this
area
is
where
the
pool
cabanas
are
proposed,
and
then
this
is
one
of
the
outdoor
bars
and
again.
L
What
you're
looking
at
here
is.
This
is
now
looking
basically
west.
So
this
is
the
westernmost
outdoor
bar.
This
is
the
raised
stage
area
that
would
be
used
for
DJs
or
for
additional
seating
when
there
is
no
DJ
playing.
This
is
a
ramp
that
basically
provides
accessibility
up
to
that
raised
level
correct,
and
here
again
you
see
this
image
which
characterizes
what's
going
on
with
some
of
these
various
surfaces
and
textures.
This
was
the
one
I
hope
Michael
would
show
you,
but
basically
this
segment
of
roof
continues
over
and
attaches
to
the
building.
L
Again
here
you
see
the
cabanas
that
are
along
the
north
property
line,
and
this
is
looking
at
it
again
from
the
other
direction.
So
this
is
the
raised
DJ
booth
area.
This
is
the
one
of
the
outdoor
bars
that's
attached
to
the
security
building
that
little
ramp.
That
you
saw
goes
right
up
in
here
and
again.
These
are
the
pool
cabanas
that
lay
along
the
edge
of
the
property
and
that's
the.
F
L
F
L
F
Got
you
now
I
understand
that
a
little
bit,
the
only
other
question
that
I
have
is
maybe
it's
a
question
for
the
rest
of
Commissioners.
Is
that
that
the
landscaping
along
south
or
north
palm
canyon
there
with
the
agaves
it
looks
like
the
gobby's
there?
It
looks
a
little
little
thin,
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
get
something
more
or
less
or
some,
and
maybe
it's
just
my
view
or
is
anybody
else,
I
know
if
anyone
else
shares
it,
but
it
looks
like
just.
L
L
So
this
area
between
here
and
the
sidewalk
is
in
the
public
right-of-way
okay,
so
they
could
certainly
plant
this
area
and
we've
we
will
require,
through
the
standard
landscape
ordinance
that
has
roughly
50%
ground
cover
live
ground
cover,
but
the
the
issue
in
this
area
is
that
we
limit
this
to
generally
being
shrub
like
plants,
because
if
the
city
ever
needed
to
get
in
there,
they
don't
want
to
have
to
be
moving
monster,
sized
boulders
and
things
to
get
it
underground.
Utilities
that
may
need
to
be
repaired.
F
A
J
A
L
If
I'm
a
PLN
20
is,
is
responding
or
reflecting
the
applicants
statement
that
they
would
not
have
subwoofers
as
part
of
this
sound
system,
so
they
made
that
offer
at
the
last
Planning
Commission
hearing
I
brought
that
in
as
an
actual
condition
of
approval.
So
the
project
as
proposed
will
not
have
subwoofers
and
items
see
on
a
condition
of
approval,
Pele
and
16.
J
A
Just
as
a
procedural
matter
Flynn,
when
we
went
through
this,
we
were
going
through
it
piece
by
piece
last
time
with
the
understanding
that
we
would
get
all
of
the
conditions
back
and
then
approve
everything
together
in
the
right
places.
We
actually
didn't
get
that
back
from
staff
in
terms
of
what
we'd
suggested
for
various
items.
A
Although
I
think
many
of
us
have
a
pretty
good
memory
of
what
we
proposed
so
I
think
we're
going
to
have
to
go
through
these
and
just
as
a
condition,
I'm
concerned
that
the
the
parking
was
taken
off
the
table
as
a
variance
when
some
of
the
conditions
that
have
to
do
with
public
benefit
we're
going
to
be
discussed
later,
and
they
were
going
to
be
part
of
the
whole
package.
So
I
think
we've
got
a
you
know.
A
E
I,
don't
think
that
you
need
to
undo
your
previous
approvals.
What
I
think
we
can
do
is
as
part
of
the
planned
development
district
application.
We
will
include
all
of
those
conditions
wrapped
within
that
application.
The
motions
that
you
made
on
the
variance
and
the
conditional
use
permit
were
specific
to
those
two
items.
E
However,
those
are
incorporated
in
the
overall
scheme
of
the
development
of
the
project,
which
is
covered
by
the
plan
development
district,
and
so,
as
we
go
through
the
conditions
of
approval,
we
will
make
sure
that
they
are
included
as
part
of
the
conditions
of
approval
for
the
planned
development
district.
Okay,.
A
J
C
Job
security.
Thank
you
very
much
so
I'm
gonna
add
to
your
job
security
now
or
insecurity
in
terms
of
the
lighting.
That's
proposed
for
the
palm
trees.
I,
don't
I'm,
not
familiar
with
I,
haven't
been
out
there
at
night
to
study
what
the
deficiencies
are
relative
to
the
other
palm
trees
on
Palm
Canyon,
but
my
concern
would
be
if
we
just
say:
okay
go
light,
those
palm
trees
up
it
might
they
might
be
a
little.
They
might
be
out
of
character
with
the
rest
of
the
palm
trees.
There
will
you
have
some?
L
C
L
Any
project
that
you
consider
with
respect
to
uses
at
the
dinks
building,
which
will
have
to
be
valet
parked
you
may
at
that
time,
choose
to
require
it
to
also
be
free
part
of
free
valet
parking
service,
but
the
the
valet
parking
service
that
is
associated
with
any
future
use
at
the
dinks
building
is
not
part
of
your
consideration
today.
So.
L
C
L
C
So
I'm
trying
to
restate
what
you
said
so
under
r3
development
standards,
there's
a
45
percent
requirement
for
open
space,
but
but
sometime
in
the
past
they
were
grant
this
building
or
this.
This
development
was
granted
a
41
percent
open
space
were
standard
and
now
we're
taking
it
down.
First
from
41
to
45
to
41
and
now
we're
taking
it
down
to
38
is
that
is
that
what
we're
saying
well.
L
Not
exactly
what
what
has
happened
here,
this
hotel
was
developed,
I
believe
in
the
early
80s.
It's
the
date
of
the
sort
of
regional
construction
is
in
the
first
staff
report.
I
do
not
know
when
these
open
space
requirements
were
brought
into
the
zoning
code
as
best
as
I
can
tell
from
review
of
the
original
Case
Files.
When
this
hotel
was
developed,
there
was
no
mention
of
percentages
of
open
space,
so
my
surmising
is
that
when
this
hotel
was
developed
back
in
the
early
80s,
there
was
no
requirement
for
a
percentage
of
open
space.
C
But
if,
if
we
were
being
developed
today
would
start
with
45%
that
is
correct.
Okay,
in
terms
of
these
new
buildings,
it
does
the
code
then
specify
that
as
long
as
the
roof
structure
extends
to
an
existing
building,
it's
part
of
the
same
building
the.
L
Way
that
it's
written
is
that
buildings
shall
be
considered
attached
if
they
are
structurally
attached.
It's
a
bit
of
a
circular
statement,
the
way
that
it's
written
in
the
definitions,
but
the
way
that's
been
interpreted
in
the
12
or
so
years
that
I've,
been
here
at
the
city,
is
that
if
the
buildings
are
attached
at
the
roof
level,
then
they
are
considered
one
building
and
they
are
considered
attached
and.
C
L
L
When
participants
or
people
coming
to
attend
something
here
to
come
here
for
dinner,
whatever
they
would
walk
up
the
sidewalk,
they
would
walk
here.
If
it's
an
event
that
requires
tickets,
they
would
purchase
their
tickets
here
at
this
window
and
then
they
would
enter
the
venue
at
this
point,
and
this
is
the
point
where
this
building
is
attached
to
the
other
building
with
with
a
covered
roof
area.
So
within
this
building,
you
have
offices,
restrooms,
locker
rooms,
storage.
L
C
A
C
I've
before
we
get
to
that
question,
I'm
still
looking
at
the
OL
of
your
the
plans
that
we
received
I,
don't
know
when
we
received
them,
but
a
couple
of
times
ago
they
don't
indicate
any
sort
of
they
don't
indicate
that
they
don't
indicate
that
the
roof
extends
to
that
building.
Will
they
be
resubmitting
that
document
to
you,
or
does
that
just
go
straight
to
the
building
department
with
that
provision?
This.
L
C
L
C
L
Yeah,
we
have
it
all
right.
Let
me
try
to
walk
you
through
these.
Let's
start
with
the
street
front,
this
is
the
palm
canyon
street
front.
Okay.
So
when
you
were
looking
at
the
thing
where
there
was
some
green
vines
here
and
green
vines
here,
that
area
where
you
were
asking
about
the
dark
panel
is
here.
This
portion
of
the
wall
was
that
white
wall,
and
then
these
areas
were
the
areas
that
are
porcelain,
tile.
That's
designed
to
look
like
wood
flipping
to
the
other
side.
This
these
are
the
pool
cabanas.
L
L
L
This
is
the
ticketing
building
when
I
mentioned
to
you,
there's
a
window
where
you
pick
up
your
tickets
and
then
you
enter
the
venue
here.
This
is
how
you
go.
You
come
in
here
you
get
your
ticket,
you
walk
into
the
venue,
know
if
you're
thirsty
you
stop
here
at
the
bar
and
then
you
move
into
wherever
you're
going
to
sit.
If
you're
coming
here
to
on
an
evening
when
there
is
no
DJ,
they
can
walk
you
up
this
ramp
and
there
would
be
some
seating
up
here.
L
If
there's
a
venue
in
which
there
is
a
DJ,
then
this
area
serves,
as
the
rage
is
DJ
stage.
This
is
the
North
elevation,
which
there
really
is
nothing
happening
on
most
of
these
buildings
they're
very
utilitarian,
but
this
is
a
a
basically
a
stucco
clad
building.
These
are
roof
mounted
mechanical
equipment
units
that
are
screened
to
match
the
existing
building
and
the
new
building.
L
This
would
be
the
elevation
if
you
recall,
I
showed
you
that
ramp
in
one
of
those
elevations.
This
is
the
ramp.
That
gets
you
up
to
the
sound
stage
here,
and
so
this
is
looking
at
the
backside
of
the
security
building.
Paalam
Canyon
would
be
out
here.
Okay,
this
you
saw
just
a
glimpse
of
this-
is
where
the
buildings
connected
at
this
point.
This
is
the
devising
wall
with
the
adjacent
property.
L
These
are
relatively
insignificant,
but
these
are
your
bar.
This
is
your
freestanding
bar
that
if
you
go
to
site
plan
again
just
to
orient
you,
this
is
the
security
building,
the
bar
the
race
stage
area.
This
is
the
point
at
which
you
come
through.
Get
your
ticket
go
into
the
venue.
This
is
the
existing
Porte
cochere.
This
is
the
freestanding
bar
that
you
saw
in
the
renderings.
This
is
the
area
where
that
fences
of
landscaping
that
separates
the
rooms
from
the
event
space.
This
is
the
kitchen
building
and
that's
attached
to
the
main
building
here.
L
This
footprint
of
this
rectangle
and
this
rectangle
represent
the
existing
hotel
and
this
portion
here
inside
the
existing
hotel
is
a
previously
used
laundry
area,
that's
getting
gutted
to
provide
for
the
required
additional
toilets
for
the
outdoor
venue
space,
so
this
is
kind
of
what
you
have
standing
there
today,
I'll,
be
it
with
a
new
pool,
and
this
is
what's
proposed.
Thank
you.
C
J
Hate
interject
this
at
this
time,
because
we're
talking
about
job
security
from
stir
lion
I,
don't
know
how
my
fellow
commissioners
feel,
but
I
don't
feel
we
have
enough
information
here.
I
wish
ins
are
not
good,
I
mean
I'm,
not
an
architect,
and
even
though
you
can
see
my
architect
fellow
commissioners
are
shaking
their
head.
We've
got
some
issues
with
terms
and
additions,
which
don't
really
reflect
the
discussion
we
had
the
prior
to
prior
meeting
two
weeks
ago.
I
think
we
should
continue.
K
Looking
at
the
very
I
don't
know
the
term
you
use
Ken,
but
I
thought
it
was
quite
kind,
sparse
drawings
for
the
buildings,
and
you
know
these
are
really
minimal
buildings
and
I
think
how
they're
handled
how
the
elevations
are
handled
is
really
important
and
a
couple
of
this
sections
I've
noticed
rooftop,
mechanical
and
ducting
and
so
forth,
and
you
mentioned
that
they'll
be
screened,
but
these
are
fairly
low
buildings
and
that
screen
and
I
think
they'll,
probably
be
quite
a
bit
of
it
because
there
is
a
kitchen
are
gonna
may
have
a
major
impact
on
that.
K
What
these
buildings
look
like
so
I
would
for
one
need
to
see
much
more
complete
elevations,
and
if
the
buildings
are
going
to
be
connected
to
the
existing
buildings,
we
need
to
see
that
what
what
the
nature
of
that
connection
is
I
think
the
whoever
the
project
architect
is
or
sha.
They
really
need
to
provide
much
stronger
documentation,
because
these
drawings
are
not
doing
this
project
a
service
at
all.
It's
just
the
opposite.
L
A
I
think
that
what
you're
hearing
is
a
fairly
unanimous
feeling
on
the
Commission
about
the
material
that's
before
us
in
terms
of
sufficiency,
so
where
you
may
think
it's
preliminary
we're
looking
at
something
where
we've
done
preliminary
PDS
before
and
they
come
back
to
us
and
we
hadn't
looked
at
them
sufficiently
in
the
beginning
to
make
sure
that
we
were
comfortable
with
what
was
going
to
come
back.
So
I'm,
just
I'm
I'm,
at
least
going
to
say
that
I'm
completely
in
support
of
of
what
Commissioner,
Hudson
and
donenfeld
have
raised.
K
Me
you
know
these.
These
are
not
minor
details.
In
my
mind,
these
are
major
things
that
may
truly
affect
the
project
outcome
and
I
know,
as
chair
mentioned
too
often,
we've
had
projects
come
back
for
the
final
and
they're,
just
not
what
we
wanted
to
see.
So
now,
it's
the
time
to
clarify
some
of
these.
Mr.
C
If
if
I
was
being
asked
to
approve
this
design
for
these
modest
little
buildings
at
this
point,
I'd
have
to
say
no
I
mean
there's
I'm
gonna
be
very
kind
of
judgmental
there
they're
sort
of
mean
little
buildings,
there's
nothing
architectural
about
them.
They
they
need
a
little
bit
of
gusto
and
I'm,
not
seeing
any
of
the
gusto
there
and
and
that's
what
I'd
be
looking
but
I
don't
have
to
have
a
set
of
working
drawings
to
approve
it.
C
I
just
have
to
see
it
looking
better
and
and
and
looking
as
they're
gonna
propose,
propose
it
to
be
ie,
the
the
overhang
and
so
forth.
But
if
you
look
at
that
and
Plus
you
can't
even
read
it
I
mean
I
was
trying
to
read
that
I
was
trying
to
read.
This
I
was
trying
to
read
this
site
plan.
You
can't
read
it,
and
and
but
what
I
can
read?
I,
don't
like
yeah,
but
I
was
just
going
to
one
of
those
elevations
where
that
little
tiny
window
is
where
you're
going
to
be
buying
tickets.
C
That's
just
a
there!
There's
nothing
interesting
or
elegant
or
architectural
or
or
welcoming
about
that
facade.
It's
just
this
little
hole
in
a
in
a
stucco
wall,
yeah
and
and
it
it
needs
embellishment
or
it
needs
to
be
designed
in
such
a
way
that
the
building
itself
has
the
elegance
and
the
interest
errant.
I
B
C
A
Yeah
I
think
we'll
try
and
figure
out
exactly
how
we
handle
it.
I
think
we
have
several
levels
of
things
that
we're
looking
at.
We've
got
the
we
have
to
go
back
to
the
the
conditions
in
terms
of
noise,
taking
the
parking
out
of
the
the
public
benefit
which
I
think
at
the
parking
variance
is
part
of
the
thing
that
needs
to
go
into
public
benefit,
noise
conditions,
parking
conditions.
A
A
To
get
to
approval
today,
but
at
this
point
what
I
will
do
is
open
the
public
hearing
and
then
try
and
go
through
each
of
the
issues
on
a
comment
basis
with
as
a
part
of
a
motion
to
continue.
So
at
this
point,
the
public
hearing
is
open,
I
think
the
applicant
had
before
ten
minutes
and
rebuttals,
so
I
think
anyone
who
comes
before
us
has
three
minutes
unless
they're
questions.
So
does
anybody
wish
to
comment
seeing
no
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
comment?
The
public
hearing
is
closed
going
through
these
issues?
A
K
Okay,
guy
I'd
like
to
be
as
positive
and
helpful
to
the
applicant
as
possible,
so
my
comments
will
be
geared
towards
that
and
in
terms
of
the
design
you
know,
I
think
our
GA
Ron
Gregory's
landscape
firm,
always
does,
in
my
mind,
personal
opinion,
very
good
work,
there's
a
sense
of
detail
and
quality
to
it.
You
know
the
images
of
the
front
wall,
you
know
initially
they're
a
bit
hard
to
understand
and
and
but
I
can
appreciate
sort
of
the
care
that's
being
given
to
that
front.
K
Wall
and
I'd
like
to
see
personally
that
amount
of
care
given
to
the
facades
of
these
little
buildings
and
I
think
it
can
be
done
in
very
creative
ways.
I,
rather
like
the
fact
that
the
new
construction
is
quite
a
contrast
to
the
let's
call
it
sort
of
sort
of
Spanish
design
with
the
clay,
tile,
mansard
roof
so
and
I.
Think
chair
just
mentioned
also
something
interesting
my
mind.
K
You
know
what
is
this
building
really
look
like
from
India
and
Canyon,
both
in
terms
of
landscape
mentoring
was
made
kenmin
and
made
a
mention
that
the
applicant
will
be
augmenting
the
additional
or
existing
landscape
because
of
conditions
I'd
like
to
see
what
that
looks
like
I'd
like
to
see
what
the
back
side
of
the
kitchen
building
looks
like,
but
I
think
might
be.
My
major
comment,
as
I
said:
we
need
to
see
a
lot
I
think
Commissioner,
Hirsch
Pines
said
this
quite
well
that
these
are
small
buildings,
but
you
know
little
buildings.
K
You
know,
placement
of
Windows
or
doorways
can
make
a
big
difference
and
and
I
say
this,
because
I
think
the
applicant,
in
my
mind,
has
an
interesting
ability
or
a
business
model
here
about
what
they
want
to
do
and
the
quality
that
they
want
to
achieve
and
I
don't
think
the
architecture
of
the
buildings
is,
is
supporting
them
and
it's
a
matter.
It
doesn't
need
a
laboratory,
dimensional
drawings.
In
my
mind,
it
needs
just
elevation,
drawings
and
sections
that
can
be
read
on
by
a
layman
and
they're,
not
construction
documents.
There
are
lust
illustrative
doc.
K
It's
to
show
where
materials
are
what
the
colors
are
and
then
I
think
we
need
to
see
a
bit
more
about
if
these
buildings
are
attaching
to
the
existing.
You
know
what
does
that
attachment?
Look
like
just
aesthetically:
it's
is
it
stucco
on
stucco
or
is
it
you
know,
metal
to
stucco
I,
think
you
know
the
the
project
architect
could
probably
put
together
some
some
images
fairly
simply
fairly
quickly
because
again,
I
don't
view
them
as
complex
three-dimensional
documents.
I
think
those
are
my
major
comments
or
suggestions.
K
C
C
So
there
has
been
some
attention
lavished
on
that
area,
which
needs
to
be
lavished
on
those
other
two
little
buildings
as
well,
particularly
as
they
relate
to
what
the
public
sees,
which
I'm
a
little
unclear
of.
If
there's
this
kind
of
a
space
between
the
ticket
building
and
the
front
wall
that
it
is
not
seen,
I'm
does
does
that
building
stick
up
above
the
wall
and
I've
been
clear
on
that.
C
C
A
I
I
have
a
couple
of
comments
in
there
regarding
I
agree
with
everything
you
said
about
the
buildings.
I
think
that
we
need
to
see
the
attachments
I
like
the
idea
that
they're
modern
and
that
they
don't
mimic
what's
existing
there
as
I.
Look
at
the
front
I'm
a
little
bit
struck
I'm
concerned
about
the
black
paint
and
think,
possibly
that
needs
to
be
a
material
for
a
difference.
Maybe
an
IPE,
maybe
something
something
else
rather
than
just
black
paint.
It's
a
very
important
frontage.
A
The
orange
marker
is
a
little
disc.
I
know
it
relates
back
to
the
building,
but
I
think
there
could
be
a
better
monument
than
the
existing
marker
and
the
orange
color
doesn't
fit
with
the
new
wall.
I
would
like
to
see
landscape
on
both
sides
of
the
building
and
I'd
like
to
see
a
landscape,
a
landscape
plan
and
and
rear
elevations
for
Indian
Canyon,
because
that's
as
important
and
entrance
to
us,
as
especially
with
new
construction
going
on
across
the
street,
I,
think
the
improvement
of
Indian,
the
Indian
Canyon
side
is
really
important.
A
A
C
A
Right
but
I
still
might
like
to
see
a
material,
a
different
material
than
just
black
paint
at
that
point.
I
understand
that
it's
set
back,
but
it's
I
think
I
think
that
the
front
the
new
frontage
on
the
building
is
really
important
and
that
that
was
the
one
item
of
it.
The
other
is
the
question
about
the
sound
transmission.
Through
the
mesh.
There
was
a
green
mesh
with
with
plants
in
front
of
it
and
whether
that's
sufficient
to
keep
sound
back
the.
L
A
I
think
that's
I
think
that's
fine,
but
I
would
like
to
understand
the
rest
and
see
the
rest
of
the
project
and
hope
that
I
guess
hope
that
it's
a
more
modern
architecture
that
goes
with
the
pool
area
on
another
item,
I'm
not
quite
sure
why
the
raised
podium
needs
to
be
as
high
as
it
is,
and
I
know:
they've
gone
ahead
and
started
building
it.
But
that
would
be
a
question
that
I
would
have
is
to
is
that
elevation,
appropriate
I'm,
just
worried
about
noise
going
up
so.
A
E
A
I
think
if
we
miss
what
he's
incorporated
I,
don't
think
I
think
it
would
have
been
helpful
to
have
those
in
front
of
us
but
I
think
we
can
go.
We
can
go
through
it.
This
way.
The
project
description,
I
think
needs
to
identify
the
off-site
parking
and
it
only
identifies
amplified
as
opposed
to
ambient
sound
stage.
So
that's
an
administrative
one.
A
A
Under
administrative
8
for
the
noise
issues,
I
think
we
should
allow
for
subsequent
the
language
is
accurate
for
what
we
did
last
time,
but
I
think
we
should
allow
for
subsequent
approvals
at
the
Planning
Commission's
request.
If
there,
if
there
is
excessive
noise
or
other
conditions
coming
out
of
the
project,
so
did.
A
Okay,
because
we
I
think
we
wanted
that
and
Nicole
didn't
the
cause,
no
disturbance,
administrative
12.
We
have,
we
shared
a
concern
with
the
neighborhood
that
they
also
monitor
that
their
guests
there,
yes
at
the
entertainment,
restaurant
and
music
venue
not
Park
in
an
adjacent
parking
structure,
so
that
that
be
included
in
administrative
12.
A
A
Under
administrative
13
grounds
for
revocation
would
also
be
not
and
I
guess
the
conditions
of
approval,
including
the
noise
conditions
of
approval,
and
that's
probably
understood,
planning
condition
number
one.
The
lighting,
some
of
the
lighting
in
the
pictures,
that's
in
front
of
us,
is
up
lighting.
That
would
light
the
night
sky
and
generally
we
don't
do
we.
How
do
we
handle
that?
A
L
Outdoor
lighting
ordinance
addresses
landscape
lighting
as
an
exemption.
So
when
you
look
at
the
up
lights
that
the
city
has
in
the
palm
trees
and
if
you
look
around
the
many
different
projects
around
the
city,
the
Morris
and
the
Seoul
project
and
other
multifamily
projects,
you
see:
landscape
lighting,
that's
usually
lighting
up
the
trunks
of
trees.
Those
that
type
of
lighting
is
typically
not
included
within
the
outdoor
lighting,
ordinance
and.
A
A
A
A
L
A
A
D
A
A
A
The
guests
of
the
hotel
people
who
are
renting
rooms
she'll
not
be
parked
in
the
off-site
location
and
that
this
the
parking
on
site,
the
hotel
parking
is
reserved
for
hotel
guests,
except
that,
in
the
event
that
the
hotel
is
not
occupied
and
there's
excess
parking.
That
excess
could
be
used
for
the
restaurant
and
music
venue
guests.
D
L
Theoretically,
you
can
do
that,
but
the
problem
you're
going
to
run
into
and
I
would
recommend
that
you
keep
it
as
male
and
not
talk
about
having
that
20/80
lot
going
into
self-park,
because
if
two
or
three
people
self
parked
their
cars
there
and
then
they
decide
to
go
somewhere
else
and
all
of
a
sudden.
The
site
now
needs
to
be
opened
up
for
valet
parking.
You've
got
park,
blocked
cars
there
that
are
blocking
all
of
your
valet
parking.
It's
not
going
to
work
that
way,
but.
L
Doesn't
matter
if
you've
got
guests
going
to
Dinks
that
are
parked,
and
then
they
decide
to
go
down
the
street
to
to
Cannes
and
they
leave
their
car
in
that
lot
and
now
the
valet
people
need
to
get
that
lot
open
for
an
evening
event
for
the
infusion
Beach.
You
now
have
visitor
cars
that
are
locked
and
parked
in
spaces
where
you
need
those
spaces
open
for
the
valet
Parkers
to
park.
Both
buildings.
K
I
do
rather
support
you.
Do
Commission
from
a
route
sees
comment,
I've
always
been
sort
of
bewildered
as
okay
I
would
doubt
that
events
are
going
to
be
occurring
every
night,
I
guess
might
the
bone.
My
basic
statement
is
what
triggers
having
to
have
valet
parking.
Certainly
it's
not
going
to
be
every
day
all
day
long
I
know
it's
a
operational
thing,
but
I
agree
personally
that
there
may
be
can
situations
where
of
valet
is
not
necessary.
K
K
D
C
Can
see
both
sides,
I
I,
think
the
problem
is
that
you
you
be
it
it's
an
operational
issue,
we're
planning
commissioners.
How
do
you
make
sure
that
you
know
our
intended
outcome?
Is
gonna
be
in
not
in
force,
but
just
used
moving
forward
six
months,
five
years,
whatever
down
the
line?
That's
it's
just
a
really
hard
thing
to
try
to
write
in
operational
rules
that
are
that
specific
into
in
and
that
allow
for
flexibility
into
a
planning
document
and,
and
so
I'm
inclined
to
keep
it
the
way
it
is
and
I.
C
B
C
J
It
seems
to
me
that
logistically
will
be
very,
very
hard
to
monitor
the
self-parking
element
of
this
proposal,
because
this
is
a
very
fine-tuned,
stacked,
valet-parking
concept,
with
two
users:
two
commercial
users.
Very
often,
once
people
are
given
the
liberty
of
self-parking
for
whatever
brief
period
time
that
might
be
you're
likely
to
run
into
some
real
problems
with
cars
that
don't
go
away.
The
cars
that
stay
there,
you
try
to
open
up
and
they
can't
support
the
off-site
parking
they
need
for
their
their
guests.
J
A
What
and
once
we
once
we
can
review
how
this
happens,
but
at
that
point
Dinks
may
not
be
open,
so
that
periodic
reviews
of
that
makes
sense.
It
just
I,
think
I,
don't
know
how
they're
going
to
do
it
and
if
they're
intending
to
wall
off
half
of
the
parking
lot
for
valet
and
leave
the
other
half
open.
A
E
Let's
see,
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
stacking
for
valet
shall
occur
within
the
parking
lot
shall
not
extend
out
into
the
street
areas.
That
was
one
of
the
things
that,
unfortunately,
we
had
missed,
I
think
relative
to
parking.
That's
the
only
thing
I
saw
that
was
not
in
there
and
the
rest
of
the
conditions
were
relative
to
the
conditional
use
permit
in
noise.
I.
E
E
A
A
A
We
want
to
add
the
items
that
are
in
PL
20,
which
is
that
the
limiter
associated
with
the
sound
system
shall
be
preset,
and
the
owner/operator
of
the
system
shall
not
have
the
ability
to
override
or
bypass
such
limiters,
and
that
should
all
be
in
PL
16,
so
that
everything
in
PL
16
relates
to
noise
and
that
it's
not
in
two
different
parts
of
the
sets
of
conditions
so
that
when
the
applicant
reads
it
or
enforcement
code
enforcement
reads
that
they
see
it
all.
In
the
same
place.
A
E
E
A
A
B
A
And
PL
number
19
we
had
an
LP
should
be
required
for
any
and
all
special
events
proposed
at
the
subject
site
period
and
then,
even
if
those,
the
idea
was
that
it
was
a
special
event.
Even
if
it
didn't
exclude
210
occupants,
they
still
needed
a
leop
for
a
special
event.
So
if
they
were
doing
I'm
not
sure
what
they
would
be
doing,
but
we.
L
A
E
C
E
D
J
E
Terms
of
review
of
land
use
permits.
We
look
at,
for
example,
in
these
types
of
situations,
the
number
of
attendees.
Where
are
those
individuals
going
to
park?
What
are
the
hours
of
operation
here?
It's
kind
of
unique
in
that
the
hours
of
operation
would
be
limited
by
your
conditional
use.
Permit
already.
We
would
look
at
noise,
we
would
look
at
impacts
to
adjacent
properties,
so,
basically
using
the
standard
criteria
that
we
have
for
conditional
use
permits,
we
typically
apply
those
to
land
use
permits
as
well
seems.
J
To
me,
if
we
are
secure
in
the
criteria
we're
setting
forth
in
the
conditions
regarding
noise
and
monitoring
and
levels,
we
ought
to
not
incur
into
their
business
plan
to
the
extent
that
we
limit
how
many
special
events
they
can
have
during
a
year
in
our
review
process
in
six
months
in
a
year,
we'll
see
what's
going
on
and
how
it's
been
working.
And
we
can
maybe
address
that
later
on.
But
I
would
hate
to
put
any
sort
of
restriction
since
they
do
have
to
go
through
a
regulatory
review.
A
Just
going
back
to
noise,
I
did
leave
one
out
because
there
was
a
pretty
strong
feeling
that
we
should
have
some
site
monitoring
for
noise
and
off-site
locations
and
I
think.
But
the
baselines
could
be
set
up
for
that.
If
they're
noise
complaints,
say
they're
noise
complaints
up
the
mountain
that
we
could
choose
places
for
baseline.
C
A
I've
just
done
that,
though
I
mean
we
we've
just
done
it,
where
we
were
able
to
measure
on
a
concert
night
at
the
edges
of
a
property
that
was
having
holding
the
concert
and
then
measure
within
the
neighborhood
a
quarter
to
a
half
mile
away
and
get.
It
was
measured
with
noise
equipment
by
the
police,
department
and
golden
voice.
But.
D
E
E
Based
on
that
review,
you
may
wish
to
then
perhaps
do
another
survey
but
I
what
what
I
would
do
is
just
recommend
that
you
leave
that
open
so
that
in
your
six
month
or
twelve
month
review,
you
can
look
at
the
complaints
and
then
from
there.
You
can
require
additional
monitoring
at
that
point
in
time
and.
A
I,
don't
think
I
had
any
comments
on
the
fire
department
conditions,
I
think
once
we
get
to
public
benefit,
and
maybe
we
should
have
it.
Okay,
let's
we'll
we'll
go
through
that,
once
we
get
to
public
benefit,
we
may
want
to
begin
I
guess.
One
question
is
why
the
sidewalk
issue,
in
especially
at
the
property,
is
not
an
engineering
condition
that
if
there
are
any
problems
with
the
sidewalks,
that
should
be
a
standard
fix
condition
if.
J
F
The
question
is,
is:
does
it
include
the
offsite
area
that
extends
from
the
site
up
to
via
Esquire
this?
That
was
a
little
confusing
in
the
condition.
Is
there
an
off-site
condition
there
that
they
would
improve
that
sidewalk
all
the
way
up
to
the
VA
escuela,
as
well
as
the
lighting
of
the
trees
generally.
L
There
are
certain
triggers
that
allow
the
engineering
department
to
impose
conditions
in
this
case
you'll
note.
There
are
no
engineering
conditions
in
this
set
of
conditions
of
approval.
The
trigger
for
engineering
conditions
is
the
addition
of
10%.
Is
that
correct
on
commercial
projects,
if
there's
an
increase
of
10%
or
more
of
the
square
footage
of
the
facility
than
engineering
has
the
right
to
impose
conditions?
In
this
case,
this
project
did
not
reach
that
threshold,
and
so
by
ordinance,
the
city
does
not
have
the
authority
to
impose
an.
A
A
Was
actually
I
looked
at
them
today
and
I
couldn't
tell
I
mean
I
I
did
ask
and
was
told
that
there
were
some
sloping
problems
and
it
would
be
good
when
we
get
to
public
benefit,
to
get
a
list
of
the
deficiencies
on
sidewalks
and
provements,
going
down
to
V,
escuela
and
maybe
on
vo
escuela,
because
the
staff
who's
going
to
be
parking.
Cars
is
going
to.
B
A
A
A
F
I've
an
earlier
question
in
the
public
benefit
process.
I'm
the
applicant
is
proposing
that
the
project
itself
is
a
public
benefit
and
I
know
that
is
contradictory
to
the
policy
that
we've
proposed
with
the
PD
revisions
flynn.
Those
in
effect
now
are
they
something
that
we
have
the
discretion
to
imply
or
what's
the
status
of
that
the.
E
A
E
F
Then
we
should
probably
discuss
whether
there
is
blight
here
or
not
it.
Just
it's.
F
A
A
And
use
so
the
PD
addresses
the
question
of
use.
I
mean
we've
got
a
package,
that's
again
for
me,
it's
we're
allowing
a
use
that
we
wouldn't
have
allowed.
If
we
didn't
do
allow
we
allowed
the
off-site
parking
in
part
to
allow
them
to
have
this
use,
and
the
use
is
a
is
an
intensification,
a
significant
intensification
of
the
use
of
the
property
yep.
C
J
I'm
no
expert
but
I
did
walk
the
sidewalks
along
calm,
Canyon,
all
the
way
up
to
Dinks
from
the
site.
The
sidewalks
are
in
pretty
good
shape.
Yeah.
They
really
are
there
isn't
much
to
do
in
those
sidewalks
there's
a
little
bit
of
filling
in
here
and
there
so
I,
don't
think
a
commitment
to
do.
Sidewalks
is
a
very
significant
commitment
at
all.
So
we're
really
talking
about
lighting
now.
I
can't
speak
to
the
Indian
Canyon
side.
I
didn't
walk
the
Indian
Canyon
side
and
there
may
be
more,
but
quite
frankly,
I.
J
A
They,
the
I,
looked
at
the
Sun.
That's
why
I
wanted
a
report
on
the
sidewalks,
because
I
looked
at
them
from
all
three
sides
and
I
didn't
see,
I
didn't
even
see
cracks.
Maybe
there
was
sloping
issues,
but
I
didn't
see
any
cracks.
They
looked
pretty
good,
so
I
didn't
think
we
were
getting
anything
for
the
city
and
in
possibly
we
look
at
that
and
if
we
don't
do
that,
we
either
think
about
the
lighting
or
we
think
about
some
park.
Improvements
in
in
a
nearby
park.
K
I
think
the
lighting
is
questionable,
because
I
think
somebody
mentioned
you
know
that
this
one
section
of
Palm
Canyon
would
stand
out
then
and
was
mentioned:
okay,
improved
pedestrian
safety
up
to
the
Dinks
site,
and
yet
we're
saying
that
it's
all
valet
parking
anyway,
so
they're
sort
of
you
know
I,
just
don't
even
think
the
lighting.
It's
it's
just
not
well
thought
out.
I
think
you
know.
A
Street
and
we
had
the
wish
list
and
then
I
asked
I
actually
asked
people
who
are
working
on
the
Chino
cone
for
a
list
of
improvements,
because
that
I
thought
was
the
nearest
park.
Space
and
City
got
that.
But
maybe
we
could
consider
that
for
the
next
time
as
well
and
what
things
Flynn's
comfortable
with
our
adjacent
enough
to
the
property
that
we
could
add,
we
could
look
at
I.
F
B
A
J
L
C
A
C
B
B
F
In
time
I
proposed
sidewalks
and
there
is
no
lighting
on
that
end
of
town
there,
no
street
lamps
over
there.
So
there's
a
deficiency
in
lighting
and
the
light
of
the
decorative
lighting
turns
off
at
3
a.m.
so
it's
actually
incredibly
dark
over
there.
So
from
3
a.m.
to
6
a.m.
it's,
it's
a
public
safety
hazard.
F
So
that's
one
of
the
things
I'd
brought
up
to
the
city
in
previous
conversations
with
the
city,
so
I
immediately
went
to
lighting
because
I
think
that's
an
important
public
benefit
because
of
the
safety
issues
between
dinks
and
between
Billy,
reeds
and
such
there's,
just
no
lighting
over
there.
Thank.
B
A
F
We
talked
about
lighting
improvements
as
I.
Read
them,
we're
talking
about
lighting
improvements
within
the
palm
trees
and
that's
up
lighting.
That's
not
particularly
safety
lighting.
I,
know,
I!
Think
we.
If
we're
talking
about
down
you,
know
typical
street
lighting,
that's
something
different
and
it.
F
A
B
K
Yeah
and
I
think
you
know
everything
needs
to
be
done
in
my
mind
in
a
comprehensive
way,
I
mean
if
you're
gonna
have
conduit
going
to
these
palm
trees
and
providing
lighting
and
so
forth.
I
think
you
know
personally
I
think
that
entire
stretch
along
there
is
very
dangerous.
I
mean
I,
go
to
dink,
I'm,
sorry
of
Rex,
quite
a
bit
even
during
the
daylight
hours.
It's
it's
scary
there.
K
So
I
think
you
know.
I
would
rather
see
I,
don't
know
how
it
could
be,
given
this
correct
sense
of
her
proportionality
for
this
project,
in
terms
of
something
like
that.
But
even
if
it's
you
know
Lynn
mentioned
pain
and
to
the
the
traffic
signal.
Well,
that's
already
done,
but
maybe
the
applicant
pays
into
a
you
know
some
sort
of
local
Improvement
District
that
actually
deals
with
with
safety
issues,
lighting
and
so
forth.
K
J
The
problem
with
any
of
these
crosswalk
projects,
a
great
deal
of
study,
has
to
go
into
them.
They
do
traffic
studies
and
to
determine
whether,
in
fact
it's
called
for.
So
this
is
a
benefit
that
would
be
out
into
the
future,
based
on
the
due
diligence
that
would
have
to
be
done
to
see
if
one
was
even
necessary.
J
D
A
A
C
Was
something
else
into
the
mix?
What
I'm
gonna
throw
something
else
into
the
mix?
So
I
was
just
looking
on
Google
the
palm
trees
that
are
in
front
of
the
project.
I
look
like
through
the
correct
spacing,
but
if
you
go
just
to
the
north,
the
hotel,
just
to
the
north
of
that
all
the
way
to
the
escuela
there's
hardly
any
palm
trees.
So
maybe
the
public
benefit
could
be
upgrading
the
street
frontage
of
the
other
two
projects
when
they
own
and
one
is
between
the
two
that
they
own.
A
E
F
A
A
A
A
K
A
K
To
be
honest,
too
often,
I
think
AAC
concentrates
on
landscape.
It's
a
good
effect,
I.
Think
in
this
case,
maybe
you
can,
if
you
could
be
more
specific
with
AAC
in
terms
of
what
we'd
like
to
see.
Yes,
I'd,
like
that
AAC
review
to
be
as
successful
as
the.
B
A
Instead
of
sending
it
back
to
the
AAC,
I
think
the
way
I
would
state
the
motion
is
you've,
heard
our
concerns
and
the
conditions
you've
heard
our
concerns
on
the
architecture.
It
would
go
to
a
subcommittee
of
Planning
Commission
in
AAC.
They
can.
We
would
prefer
that
they
appoint
architects
to
it.
Although
we
do
want
to
see
a
landscape
across
it
right,
more
MORE.
L
A
If
I
asked
to
do
it
to
a
date
certain,
so
you
don't
need
to
redo
it
at
being
one
of
the
people
who
voted
yes,
I'm,
going
to
ask
that
we
recall
we
recall
the
motion
and
do
this
to
a
date.
Certain
is
one
month
and
you
come
back
with
drawings
on
those
buildings
one
month.
So
our
second
meeting
in
February.
So
the
motion,
then
you
want
to
remake
the
motion,
will.
F
A
A
Everybody
is
cour,
join
okay,
Commissioner
done
in
filth.
Yes,.
J
B
F
J
E
J
B
E
E
D
E
E
D
See
that's
the
thing.
I
have
a
problem
with
I
think
all
studies.
This
is
just
my
opinion,
based
on
my
experience,
working
for
companies
that
do
this
sort
of
thing
that
all
studies
should
be
paid
for
by
the
city
that
that
the
the
consultant
that
is
working
with
the
applicant
should
not
hire
the
the
people
who
are
doing
the
studies
because
they
could
be
tailored.
They
can
fix,
intend
to
be
somewhat
I,
don't
want
to
use
word
biased,
but.
F
Been
in
that
industry,
there's
pros
and
cons
of
doing
it
both
ways,
because
you
really
need
the
studies
done
just
to
have
the
applicant
formulate
his
proposal
in
a
lot
of
cases.
So
then
turning
around
say,
you
can't
use
those
studies
because
they
weren't
prepared
because
they
were
prepared
by
the
under
contractor.
The
applicant
creates
a
problem.
What
the
sequel,
clearly
sequel
law,
clearly
allows,
although
some
jurisdictions
go
further
element,
is
that
the
applique
city's
representative,
in
this
case,
nicole
Terranova,
called
Chris,
has
to
independently
validate
them.
F
They
have
to
have
their
own
independent
validation
right
that
those
technical
studies
are
accurate,
requiring
particularly
for
a
negative
declaration
that
we
require
that
all
of
them
be
prepared
under
contract
to
the
city
is
a
big
step,
might
be
I
mean
there.
Are
there
app?
There
are
some
jurisdictions
that
do
that.
There
are
other
jurisdictions
to
say.
Even
the
ER
can
be
prepared
under
contract
of
the
applicant
yeah.
D
A
That's
a
discussion
that
we
could
skip
I
mean.
Obviously
we
can't
make
any
decisions,
but
it's
a
discussion.
We
could
schedule
with
you,
although
it's
your
purview
as
to
how
you
handle
it
correct
and
that
it's
not
not
something.
The
Commission
can
do
anything
but
ask
you
about,
but
we
could
schedule,
we
could
skid,
we
don't
our
purview
is
limited
and
we
don't.
We
don't
make
just
policy
but
something
the
city.
A
A
C
E
E
That's
not
even
the
nice
stuff
yet
so,
there's
still
a
number
of
things
that
they
have
to
complete
on
Block
C,
so
as
a
condition
of
approval
before
we'll
issue
certificates
of
occupancy
for
certain
storefronts
in
Block
C,
they
do
have
to
complete
all
of
the
landscape
and
hard
scape
improvements.
So
we
still
have
the
ability
to
require
those
again
they're,
just
waiting
for
those
storefronts
to
fill
up.
A
E
C
F
E
So
the
restaurant
behind
and
then
house
up,
okay,
is
the
one
that's
on
the
corner
of
Museum
way
and
the
Paseo.