►
From YouTube: 11.1.2022 City Council Special Meeting
Description
11.1.2022 City Council Special Meeting
A
Tuesday
november
1st
2022,
with
the
subject
of
the
supplement,
supplemental
appropriation
for.
A
And
next
up
is
the
public
hearing
and
adoption
of
resolution
resolution
authorizing
a
supplement.
A
Thousand
dollars,
we
will
start
with
a
presentation,
I
believe
from
susan.
Yes,.
A
Thank
you
so
by
way
of
background,
if
people
are
not
aware
in
2016
when
the
city
purchased.
C
Of
that
lot,
deer
street
associates
also
known
as
foundry
place,
that
contract
provided
that.
C
Space
requirements
for
their
projects
on
the
adjacent
and
lots
lots
of
six
and
lot
three.
C
C
C
C
C
In
addition,
building
permits
for
lot
6
and
lot
3
were
issued
to
dsa.
C
C
Resolve
that
lawsuit,
in
addition
to
waiving
fees,
license
fees
payable
to
the
city
for
their
use,.
C
Arising
that
have
a
crew
to
date
from
the
breach
of
that
contract.
So
on
october.
A
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
city
council
questions
before
we
go
to
a
public
hearing.
A
You're
on
council
table
and
it's
my
understanding.
D
City
attorney
that,
as
part
of
this
agreement,
dsa
will
pay
the
city
145
thousand
dollars.
A
Any
change
in
the
term
previously
the
term
of
the
145
000
was
agreed
to
when
it.
C
A
E
Just
clerical
it's
hard
to
hear
some
of
you
that
are
speaking
to
the
attorney,
who
did.
E
E
E
E
E
E
F
F
F
F
F
F
E
I've
spoken
to
you
before
about
this
mayor,
mceachron
and
council.
Tabor
are
well
aware
of
a.
E
E
E
E
E
E
The
sa
actually
were
part
of,
at
least
at
that
time,
the
new
hampshire
workforce,
housing
coalition.
E
E
E
E
E
The
things
I
said,
except
maybe
the
force
major,
were
in
full
aware
that
we
were
in
negotiations.
E
E
E
E
E
E
A
We
will
make
an
exception
for
paige
will
ask
you
to,
and
this
will
be
my
second
time.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
F
F
F
F
The
other
thing
I'd
like
to
address
is
transparency,
and
I
like
to
just
call
to.
F
Attention
your
transparency,
or
lack
thereof
at
the
meeting
that
you
had
at
5
15
on
this.
F
F
A
H
H
A
H
H
H
A
A
I
C
About
approximately
five
hundred
thousand
dollars,
okay,
thank
you
and
I
think
those
are
important.
I
Aspects
to
know,
and
and
I'm
going
to
make
a
few
comments,
as
some
of
you
know,
I
I
just.
I
I
I
Jimmy's
but
used
to
be
the
health
food
store,
but
that
was
not
really
agreeable
to
the
public.
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
barrel,
so
we
have
two
options:
they're
gonna
ask
for
more
money
than
the
land
is.
I
I
Then
we're
in
a
conundrum,
so
we
have
two
options:
they
won't
sell
it
to
us
for
what
we
think
is.
I
I
At
least
as
much
as
buying
the
property
outright
at
the
inflated
price,
if
you
will
so
the
city.
I
Because
it
didn't
really
have
a
choice
and
it's
a
complex,
real
estate
transaction.
But
that's.
I
The
last
speaker,
I
think,
that
setting
up
the
contract
that
way
where
you
have
outstanding.
I
I
I
I
Have
held
up,
I
am,
however,
skeptical
that
you
could
say
that
2020
was
not
such
an
unusual
year.
I
That
you
would
not
get
forced
majora
to
hold
up
in
a
court
of
law,
because
why?
It's
true
many.
I
I
I
While
and
and
then
everything
exploded,
so
I
don't
think
the
force
major
argument
holds.
I
Holds
up
to
scrutiny
so
I
I
don't
question
the
city
accepting
the
force
major
argument
at.
I
Had
a
good
case,
so
then
we
get
to
the
point
where
we
are
today
and
what
happened
in.
I
Let
me
just
check
the
date
here.
I
believe
it
was
october
of
2020
.,
I'm
sorry
november
16th.
I
I
Space
space
at
a
garage
that
in
a
city
where
people
complain
that
the
garage
is
not
full
so.
I
On
his
face
seems
like
a
sound
financial
move,
but
I
I
understand
that
maybe
not
everybody.
I
Would
see
it
that
way?
So
during
the
discussion,
I
believe
it
was
counselor
kennedy
made
a
motion.
I
The
when
the
vote
was
taken-
and
I
believe
it
was
a
6-3
vote
to
not
grant
the
parking
spaces.
I
By
trade,
I
certainly
would
be
interested
to
hear
from
from
legal
experts
why
the
city
was
in.
I
Any
legal
experts
so
with
that
being
said,
I
voted
against
this
settlement
agreement.
I
I
I
I
I
J
J
Had
suggested,
though,
the
145
000
correct,
it
is
my
understanding
and
susan,
and
I
conferred
about.
K
A
D
It's
taxpayer
money
to
settle
a
lawsuit
and
that's
always
distasteful,
and
we
had
lengthy.
D
But
it's
just
really
expensive
to
do
that
when
you
have
to
use
outside
counsel.
D
I
agree
with
counselor
bagley
the
mayor
and
I
were
part
of
the.
D
D
D
A
Council
boa
thank
you.
Honor
I'd
just
like
to
say
that
in
the
current
state
that
we
live
in
the.
L
A
J
And
part
of
me
really
actually
did
want
to
let
this
go
to
trial
and
I
hate
to
say
it.
But
let
the.
A
Counselor
denton
any
other
comments.
A
quick
legal
question,
city
attorney
is
the
does
this.
A
End
any
legal
hold
on
documents
that
covered
us
in
the
previous
council
with
regard
to
this
case.
C
Do
you
mean
non-public
minutes,
or
I
mean
we
were
advised
of
a
when
we're
sued.
A
We've
think
to
a
person
up
here
thinks
we
overpaid
for
the
foundry
garage.
Let
it
be
listen.
A
Let's
not
pick
the
property
publicly
before
we
before
we
buy
the
property,
like
that's
a
good.
A
A
A
About
precedent,
you
know,
I
don't
I
don't
worry
about
developers
coming
in
here
and
and
speaking.
A
And
suing
us,
unless
we
have
a
contract
with
those
developers
that
we
are
liable.
If
we
break.
A
A
Of
a
contract
in
the
best
way
possible
that
limits
the
exposure
that
we
have
forced
measure
was.
A
A
A
You
know
I
I
wish
mr
rogers
well.
History
has
not
been
favorable
to
his
ability
to
deliver.
A
A
To
do
more
than
have
a
surface
parking
lot,
that's
closed
off
to
the
public.
That
is
filled
with
a.
A
Dumpster,
that
has
gas
cans
strewn
about.
We
need
to
do
more
in
that
place
and
I'm
hoping.
A
That
this
agreement
moves
us
into
the
direction
of
actually
doing
something
with
that
and
using.