►
From YouTube: 5.17.22 Board of Adjustment
Description
5.17.22 Board of Adjustment
B
Good
evening,
everyone
present
and
via
electronics
and
welcome
to
the
first
of.
B
B
Say
if
it
saves
any
people
some
time,
I'm
going
to
just
briefly
state
the
rules
of
how
we.
B
B
Presentation
the
questions
are
from
the
board,
then
we
invite
people
who
who
speak
in
favor.
B
To
come
up
state
their
name
and
address
and
give
their
comments
within
five
minutes
and
then.
B
Please
be
succinct
and
stick
ticks
to
the
main
facts
in
every
with
respect
to
everybody's
time.
So.
C
C
B
Having
said
all
that
the
status
of
a
couple
of
projects,
let
me
just
address
these
in
turn
in.
B
And
if
it's
re
resubmitted
as
a
new
project
and
go
through
the
entire
procedure
to
be
get
to
this,.
B
B
Heard
tonight
or
next
week
or
anytime
until
it's
resubmitted,
if,
if
it
is
so
resubmitted,.
B
Excuse
me,
and
then
we
have,
we
have
a
request
for
a
rehearing.
We
have.
B
And
I
would
propose
that
before
that
we
take
perhaps
those
postponements
out
of
order.
B
B
With
that
proposal
at
this
point
there
are
two
aspects
to
that:
one
is
the.
B
That
same
project
is
a
request
to
grant
variances
and
the
for
applicants
are
requesting
that
both.
B
Yep
next
next
month,
so
I
would
propose
that
we
deal
with
those
separately
just
for
clarity.
B
And
if
and
if
what
someone
on
the
board
wishes
to
make
a
motion
with
respect
to
the.
B
D
Item
c,
as
requested,
thank
you,
mr
mantle.
Okay.
Is
there
a
second
to
that
motion?
Miss
eldridge
thank.
B
B
Good
those
voice
vote
will
do
on
this.
Those
in
favor
are
postponing
to
the
july
meeting.
B
B
Secondly,
the
same
request
same
motion
to
request
postpone
item
d
as
requested.
Thank
you.
B
Your
motion,
mr
mantle
again
request
postpone
they
can
postpone
pretty
pretty
routine.
Yes,
okay,.
B
Postpone
until
july
voice
vote
those
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
aye
any
opposed.
None.
B
B
Request
is
the
request
of
the
applicant,
so
your
your
motion
is
the
same
yep
again
a
question
a.
D
Quest
postpone
okay,
granted
granted
routine
okay,
mr
lee,
and
I
can
just
add
in
all
these.
E
B
B
B
B
And
and
just
to
repeat
in
case
someone's
coming
late,
we
have
already
announced
that.
B
And
thank
you
the
going
back
to
the
top
of
the
agenda.
B
E
Here,
I'd
move:
we
approve
the
minutes
for
the
meeting
of
april
19th
as
as
presented
thank.
B
B
Motion
again,
I
have
no
changes
or
correction
from
me
or
anybody
else
wants
to.
Please
do
but.
E
B
Okay,
thank
you,
wolf
all
right
again,
a
voice
vote,
I
think,
will
be
sufficient
here.
Those.
B
B
B
We
have
old
business
item,
a
which
is
189
gate
street,
which
is
a
chair.
I'm
going.
B
And
as
a
as
a
matter
of
long-standing
custom
and
in
the
ordinances,
I
believe
too.
In
the.
B
B
To
request
a
postponement
of
that
request
for
rehearing,
I'm
not
sure
if
that
would
be
the.
B
When
we're
down
to
five
members
so,
mr
chair,
just
if
I
may
my
name's
chris
mulligan,
I'm.
G
Here
representing
the
original
applicants,
the
owners,
the
nirvan
family,
that
own.
G
Gate
street,
to
the
extent
you're
asking
if
we
would
like
a
lot
a
larger.
G
G
E
B
Just
go
ahead
with
it:
well,
they
requested
a
rehearing.
I've
read
the
minutes
of.
E
B
D
B
E
E
You
know
we
they
did,
you
know,
raise
some
rejections.
I
think
we
covered
all
those
very.
H
B
All
right
all
right,
miss
modgeson
is
resuming
our
seat.
We
have
already
dealt
just.
B
B
C
B
Second,
miss
margerson.
Thank
you.
Your
motion,
please.
Mr
mail,
simple
request.
One-Year
extensions
are.
D
B
Excuse
me,
those
in
favor
of
granting
the
one-year
extension
for
138
maplewood
avenue.
B
B
I
I
I
The
board
mr
chair
with
me
tonight
I
have
several
members
of
the
senior
staff
of
nova
cure.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Face
of
the
penthouse
is
9.9
and
a
half
9.9
from
the
paraffin
edge
of
the
roof.
So
we.
I
I
Doyle,
from
nova
cure
up
just
to
address
the
board
and
tell
you
a
little
bit
about.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
As
a
company
is
that,
while
we
started
in
the
u.s
with
exactly
one
employee,.
J
In
manchester
and
when
he
said
you
know
when
I
was
discussing
him,
where
should
we
start
our.
J
U.S
operations,
he
said
of
course,
portsmouth
now
he
happened
to
live
here,
but
in
the
in
the
16.
J
J
J
J
And
that's
the
the
reason
that
we're
here
petitioning
for
this.
What
I
think
will
be
a.
J
K
K
Is
highlighted
in
yellow,
specifically,
what
this
request
is
for
everything
else
on
the
page
has.
K
The
permission
to
build
this
rooftop
pavilion
on
the
existing
furniture
store
site,
which.
K
K
Penthouse
on
the
von
mall
side,
it's
more
than
20
feet
at
the
small
at
the
smallest
dimension,.
K
Towards
worth
lot
and
nearly
26
feet,
when
you
get
further
down
the
site,
the
one
anomaly
to
this.
K
Site
is
the
little
clipped
corner
that
you
see
in
the
upper
left.
Part
of
the
pavilion
of
yes,
you.
K
That's
where
the
nine
feet
comes
in,
and
it
just
happens
in
that
one
spot
we're
trying
to
keep.
K
The
purity
of
the
rectangle
simple,
and
so
we
we've
elected
to
to
just
keep
it
a
a
pure
rectangle.
K
That
outdoor
terrace
space,
the
next
slide.
So
what
we've
done
just
before
and
we'll
just
touch.
K
Is
prepare
a
series
of
of
views
both
with
and
without
the
pavilion
to
give
you
an
appreciation.
K
For
because
of
the
nature
of
the
setback,
in
other
words,
that
this,
this
historic
building
would.
K
Have
typically
had
some
so
industrial
light
wells
or
or
roof
monitors,
and
so
we
sort
of.
K
Fashioned
the
shape
of
this
to
be
similar
to
that
in
its
character.
K
The
slides
as
an
example
from
hanover
street
you're,
not
you're,
not
going
to
see
it
at
all.
K
Symbolize,
the
mass
of
what
will
be
seen
as
you
get
close
to
it
on
von
maul
again
by.
K
Go
through
and
we
just
get
a
little
bit
further
away.
So
as
you
as
you
get
a
a
a
more
distant.
K
Vista,
so
our
our
point
is
in
and
that
even
for
a
butters
who
may
live
directly
adjacent
to.
K
Position
for
someone
that
might
be
living
on
an
upper
level
condominium
by
virtue
of
having.
K
K
It
really
is
the
the
elevator
overrun
that
would
be
serving
that
that
penthouse,
that
you
see.
K
K
The
elevator
overrun
now,
when
you
see
these
these
elevations
it
it
does
look
that
it
has
a
much.
K
The
actual
elevation
and
that's
why
it's
important
to
sort
of
fall
back
on
the
perspective.
K
K
K
That
setback
that
I've
been
I've
been
speaking
about,
because
that
really
changes.
The
perception.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Dating
back
to
the
19th
century,
it's
a
it
sits
on
a
regularly
shaped
lot
that
has.
I
Under
today's
ordinance,
you
know
with
let's
say,
10
10
foot
ceilings.
You
could
build.
I
I
I
And
we
respectfully
request
approval
myself,
nova,
cure
team
mark
steve
wilson,
all.
D
I
Instance,
I
think
an
example
of
that
would
be
25
maple
wood.
I
understand
that
yeah,
but
the.
D
I
I
think
we're
going
to
come
pretty
close.
Well,
I
mean
you,
could
you
could
build.
I
I
L
So
it's
a
good
question
gives
me
your
name,
your
name
and
address
sir.
My
name
is
steve
wilson.
L
L
On
the
project,
thank
you
and
I
was
the
guy
who
sold
got
it
approved
as
a
mixed-use
project,
so.
L
L
L
And
that
it's
it's
14
feet
on
the
first
floor
instead
of
12
and
then
it's
12
instead
of
10
and.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
D
L
D
In
this
project
is
the
building
to
the
right,
the
new
building
correct,
that's
one
of
the
ones.
D
Building,
which
is
a
flat
roof,
has
no
mansard
correct.
Thank
you,
okay,
and
since,
since
you.
L
L
L
L
B
I
This
we
don't
have
that
we're
only
seeking
this,
this
auditorium
penthouse
for
lack
of
a
better.
I
Word
over
a
portion
of
it,
so
it's
you
know
so
a
you
know.
Instead
of
having
the
four-story.
I
I
Seeking
the
the
penthouse
over
a
portion
of
it,
so
that
we
do
think
it's
a
different
project.
C
Anybody
anybody
else
that
questions
at
this
point.
D
D
I
I
I
Space
and
it
was
not
well
received,
so
we
went
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
we
scrapped
that
and.
I
The
only
reason
we're
back
before
you
tonight
is
we're
seeking
the
the
penthouse
for
their
use.
I
Are
permitted
by
right
to
do
office
space
in
this
zone,
so
we
wouldn't
be
here
the
only
the
only.
I
B
C
M
Raised
for
agenda
item
one,
but
I
don't
think
we
were.
We
never
had
anyone
called
on
for
the.
C
That
was
the
motion
for
reconsideration
on
gate
street.
That's
typically
just.
M
A
little
delay,
the
attorney
for
the
other
side,
was
able
to
speak
on
it.
B
A
F
Take
this
up
later
yeah,
let
me
let
me
no,
let
me
suggest
you
call
apologize
for
interrupting.
M
C
B
B
B
To
you,
the
procedural
aspects
of
requests
for
re-hearing,
it's
a
little
bit
complicated.
B
C
B
Moving
along
we've
had
call
for
people
who
want
to
speak
in.
B
B
N
At
25
maplewood
right
next
to
it,
I
did
also
submit
a
letter
with
more
valid
some
points
that.
N
Were
important
to
me,
but
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
a
few
more.
I
think
it's
wonderful.
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
B
C
N
L
L
Applicant
for
the
fourth
story:
penthouse,
it
was
the
fourth
floor
on
that
building.
It.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Trickery
here
this
is
straight
up
what
you,
what
you're
seeing
and
so
to
say
we
don't
want
any.
L
L
B
N
N
N
N
B
Ms
margerson,
I
just
want
to
ask
peter
quickly.
The
previous
zoning
relief
was
for
a
fourth.
F
Floor,
correct,
correct
and
and
to
exceed
the
maximum
front
yard
set
back
on
hanover
street.
F
Okay,
any
indication
of
public
space
or
something
like
that.
That
sounds
like
a
cup.
B
Second,
mr
thank
you
for
discussion.
Your
your
motion
with
respect
to
fishes
feed
over.
B
So
fisher
devote
fisher
v.
Dover
requires
us
to
address
whether
or
not
the
we're
basically
getting.
F
At
the
apple
once,
an
application
of
her
variance
is
denied
and
the
the
criteria
is.
F
F
40
percent,
so
I
I
do
not
believe
that
fisher
v
dover
applies.
This
is
a
different
application.
B
Yeah,
I
think
it's
permanent
that
we
we
take
this.
B
C
E
And
I
really
can't
get
on
board
with
that.
For
that
reason,
okay,
any
further
discussion.
B
Oh
mr
mantle
yeah,
I'll
chime
in
not
part
of
the
original
thing,
and
I
think
it's
great.
D
The
cabot
house
versus
the
new
building
I
didn't
know
there
was
a
cup
involved
with.
D
D
Could
be
one
story,
it
could
be
two,
it
could
be
six,
but
it's
at
40
feet.
You're
allowed
three.
D
Stories
or
40
feet
and
an
extra
two
feet
for
the
penthouse
for
me,
you're,
adding
a
four
story.
D
I
grant
it
it's
a
penthouse,
but
the
difference
between
40
feet
and
51
and
a
half
that's
another.
D
D
Street
and
hanover
street
and
all
the
buildings
downtown
because
of
the
immediate
neighbors.
D
B
Hold
that
thought
miss
madison,
I
just
you
know
I
say
appreciate
the
excellent
presentation.
F
So
but
I
I
will
not
be
supporting
this
application
and
somewhat
regrettably,
because.
F
Which
is
to
regulate
building
heights?
That
is
specifically
stated
in
the
in
the
ordinance.
F
F
F
Could
get
an
extra
two
feet
for
the
build
for
the
penthouse
and
therefore
there's
a
real.
B
Okay,
just
for
I
ought
to
chip
in
with
respect
to
this
park.
This
has
mentioned
the
so-called
park.
B
Has
been
mentioned
several
times
and
as
mr
lee
said,
he
and
I
were
on
the
board
at
the
time.
B
Located
the
size,
the
likely
hood
of
people
finding
it
useful,
so
it
it
just
it
just
was
a.
B
An
idea
that
didn't
go
anywhere
so
the
york,
the
other
recollections
that
have
been
presented
with.
B
A
Everybody
on
this
because
I
know
it's
11
and
a
half
feet,
but
the
city
is
a
living.
A
A
F
F
Zoning
ordinance
that
they're
asking
for
relief
from
section
10a,
10
5a
4340.
It
only
allows
for.
F
F
Feet
I
find
that
it
is
just
a
a
not
a
slight
variation
on
the
ordinance,
but
in.
F
E
E
B
Else
before
we
go
to
a
vote,
no
okay,
the
I
won't
be
supporting
the
motion,
but.
B
B
O
Good
evening
I'm
adam
fitzpatrick,
I.
O
Three
young
boys,
so
the
project
we're
proposing,
is
basically
an
addition
to
our
existing
home.
O
We've
got
about
1250
square
feet
now
we
need
a
little
more
space
for.
O
O
Moisture
issues
there,
so
storage
is
quickly
being
eaten
up
with
all
the
the
kids
stuff.
O
During
the
the
course
of
the
project,
we
also
intend
to
to
basically
remake
the
entire
exterior.
O
O
And
they're
all
supportive,
a
couple
of
them
did
have
some
questions
initially,
so
I
sent
them.
O
To
run
through
the
the
five
criteria
quickly,
the
variances
are
not
contrary
to
public
interest.
O
The
existing
neighborhood
there's
many
other
structures
in
the
neighborhood
that
are
similar
to.
O
O
Older
neighborhood,
a
lot
of
the
lots
are
split
up
in
smaller
segments
than
they
would
be
today.
O
Yet
to
see
those
property
values
go
down
in
any
any
way
you
know
to
the
contrary,
improving
our.
O
You
know
exterior
of
this
property
would
would
likely
kind
of
improve
the
neighborhood
overall.
O
An
unnecessary
hardship-
and
this
is
a
smaller
lot-
it's
about
a
five
thousand
square
foot
lot.
O
Fifty
by
a
hundred,
if
that
was
a
lot
split
up
today,
it'd
obviously
be
a
70-foot
frontage.
O
And
on
the
front
side,
the
fronts
are
set
back
eight
feet
instead
of
15
feet.
That's.
O
O
Condition
of
that
area
that
shed
is
already
four
feet
on
the
back
side
on
the
right
side,
yard.
O
And
I'm
only
asking
for
you
know
effectively,
was
it
a
foot
and
a
half
nine
and
a
half.
O
Feet
versus
seven
feet
due
to
the
height
of
the
shed,
the
requirement
is
nine
and
a
half
feet.
O
So
it's
a
very
minor
thing.
There
are
plenty
of
other
sheds
in
the
neighborhood
that
that
are
of
similar
construction
and
position
in
their
lot.
O
Yeah
so
that
was
constructed
by
the
city
some
time
ago
and
I'm
not
sure
exactly.
O
O
O
O
That
structure
as
well,
so
that
is
something
that
that
I
will
have
to
address
with
the
city.
O
O
O
In
the
summer,
especially
mold
issues
from
time
to
time
and
the
access
to
the
attic
space.
O
B
Favor
to
speak,
mr
smith,
anybody
on
the
no
one,
no
all
right!
Anybody
in
opposition.
B
F
F
F
F
Of
the
ordinance,
this
meets
that
criteria,
these
setback
ordinances,
these
setback
requirements.
F
F
Does
not
violate
the
public
interest
and
spirit
of
the
ordinance.
Substantial
justice
is
done.
F
To
the
public,
I
I
do
not
find
as
to
four
granting
the
variance
would
not
diminish
the.
F
F
Calls
for
70
lot
depth,
however,
so
therefore,
I
would
say
the
property
can't
be
reasonably
used
in.
F
Use
of
it
a
shed
in
the
back,
where
the,
where
it
include
encroaches
more
into
the
rear
yard
setback.
F
F
It
should
be
in
the
lot
depth
so
therefore,
I
say
that
it
does
meet
the
unnecessary
hardship
test.
F
B
H
Nice
to
see
you
all,
I'm
here
with
paul
and
janice
lanzoni
owner
of
411
south
main
street.
H
Which
is,
if
you
walked
out
the
street
here
on,
to
took
a
right
onto
south
street
you'd,
be
three.
H
H
H
H
H
With
dormers
and
an
accessory
dwelling
unit
above
the
garage
with
the
current
project,
we.
H
H
H
That
they're
trying
to
improve
upon.
We
feel
that
this
reorientation
and
modernization
of.
H
Go
up
a
couple
pages
briefly
I'll.
Just
go
really
quick
through
actually
page
two.
H
H
And,
as
you
can
see,
the
corner
of
the
garage
there,
and
that
is
also
as
you'll
see
in
future.
H
H
H
What
informed
our
design
decisions
for
the
new
proposal?
The
2017
application
proposed.
H
H
There
was
still
a
right
yard
setback
required
because
it
was
still
going
to
be
over
the
setback.
H
So
those
were
the
three
sort
of
dimensional
variances
and
then
the
non-conforming
building.
H
H
H
H
H
Minutes
from
the
from
the
abutters,
some
of
the
bigger
concerns
were
that
the
windows
there
were.
H
H
H
It
was
really
an
imposing
use
that
was
going
to
be
occupied
above
the
garage.
That
was
what.
H
H
And
the
benefit
of
removing
and
replacing
a
small
usable
garage
didn't
outweigh.
H
H
You
can
see
that
the
first
3d
rendering
here
that's
an
aerial
view
from
cell
street.
H
H
H
Were
you
know
that
the
taller
height
of
the
building
was
at
least
dealt
with
more
of
an.
H
Having
the
ridge
sort
of
be
right
in
your
face
this,
what
I'll
call
an
architectural
site
plan.
H
Where
the
new
garage
is
and
the
entry
sunroom
that
connects
the
two
in
the
back.
H
H
H
H
I
don't
think
it
would
be
in
your
sight
line
regardless
still
quite
low.
It's
an
eight
foot
tall.
H
Eve
line
structure
a
couple
feet
off
the
ground.
The
next
page
is
just
a
couple
more
images.
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
And
then
the
next
page
is
a
key
that
shows
you
the
view
that
you're
going
to
look.
H
So
again,
just
to
reiterate,
I
put
together
a
little
chart
here.
It
shows
you
previous
proposal.
H
We
are
not
at
the
eight
foot,
one
8.1
request
from
last
time,
but
we
were
matching
the
6.2
foot.
H
H
To
speak
to
the
criteria,
I'll
jump,
I
will
bunch
the
first
two
together.
The
variance
is.
H
H
H
Long-Standing
proof
of
concept
already
in
action
on
the
site,
basically
claiming
that
there
has.
H
H
H
H
H
To
the
zoning
ordinance
requirements,
the
lot
has
a
unique
shape.
Actually,
mr
seth,
would
you
mind.
H
If
we
put
it
back
into
the
existing
to
the
architectural
site
plan,
I
think
it's
sheet.
Seven.
H
Yeah
that
one
thank
you.
The
lot
has
a
unique
shape,
as
you
can
see,
the
sort
of
curvature
of.
H
H
With
but
because
of
that
angle,
it's
quite
skewed
and
then
the
orientation
of
the.
H
H
H
H
To
the
page
south
there
the
you
know
that
would
be
one
area
that
one
one
could
argue
you
you
could.
H
H
H
H
Of
the
other
properties
that
are
around
it,
that
and
the
curvature
of
the
road
when
comparing
these.
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
B
Johnson,
no
miss
miss
martinson.
Excuse
me
so,
mr
johnson,
so
I
just
you've
referenced
it
a
little.
F
Bit,
but
I
just
want
you
to
directly
address
why
again
why
fisher
v
dover
doesn't
apply
to
this.
F
Application,
the
for
many
reasons,
there's
no
adu
being
applied
for
the
house,
the
orientation.
H
Is
different,
I
guess
those
would
be
the
two
main
reasons
I'll
go
with
those
okay.
Thank
you.
B
B
P
P
.28
acres
with
nine
of
butters,
so
we
were
actually
here
last
month,
speaking
in
favor.
P
P
P
P
The
old
plan
was
very
overwhelming.
The
new
design
definitely
has
fewer
variances,
but
we
are.
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Visually,
but
we
do
support
the
application
in
general,
we
would
hate
to
lose
good
neighbors.
P
P
B
H
A
Thank
you
of
this.
I
think
that
the
variance
they're
requesting
is
minor,
considering
that
the.
A
Garage
is
at
that
same
set
back
now
and
I
think
overall,
it's
an
improvement
to
the
property.
The.
A
A
A
A
A
Thank
you,
mr
lee.
I
would
be
happy
to
second
that
and
I'll
just
add,
as
I
drive
around
to.
E
I
remember
this
one
very
well
from
2017
and
the
garage
was
almost
massive
as
a.
B
Anybody
else
miss
barges.
I
just
want
to
state
for
the
record
that
fischerd
v.
F
Dover
does
not,
in
my
opinion,
does
not.
I
am
supporting
the
motion
and
I
do
not
think
that.
F
Part
of
this
of
this
current
application,
I
agree
it's
a
very,
very
different
application.
B
B
As
presented,
miss
eldridge,
yes,
miss
rogerson.
Yes,
mr
mantle,
yes,
mr
mcdonald,
yes.
B
And
mr
lee,
yes
and
I
vote
yes
also
you're
all
you're
approved.
Thank
you
very
much.
You're
welcome.
C
B
We're
sneaking
up
on
nine
o'clock,
in
fact
we're
there
in
fact
we're
there
yeah.
B
B
Which
is
the
item
c
under
new
business.
B
B
M
M
M
M
With
a
master
bath
and
a
a
kid's
bathroom
on
the
second
and
then
on
the
first
floor,
there.
M
Inches
from
the
left
side,
property-
and
we
will
be
going
up
to
the
second
floor
for.
M
Bungalow,
we
don't,
we
don't
really
want
to
build
a
huge.
You
know,
propose
a
huge
house
here.
M
We
wanted
to
keep
it
modest
and
sweet
just
the
way
it
is,
but
it
looked
much
more
functional.
M
Very
much
so
a
mix
of
different
styles
of
homes
and
some
mostly
single
family
actually,
but.
M
M
House
a
little
safer
for
them
and
it'll
allow
them
to
have
a
more
designated
backyard.
M
Honestly,
one
at
a
time
and
that's
a
great
thing,
because
it
is
improving
our
community
and
our.
M
Been
doing
the
same
thing
and
then,
lastly,
the
literal
enforcement
for
the
ordinance.
M
Will
result
in
unnecessary
hardship.
The
existing
structure
is
a
small.
M
M
Is
it's
a
long
it's
a
long
lot,
but
it's
pretty
much
just
the
house
and
the
driveway.
M
In
order
to
not
balance
the
house
and
and
not
request
a
variance
for
that
side,.
M
The
I
just
wanted
to
so
we're
doing
at
18.
M
M
The
east
east
elevation:
we
are
proposing
that
the
office
gets
it's
like
two
feet:
three
inches.
M
And
I
think
that's
it.
That's
the
side
that
does
face
the
abutting
neighbors
that
we
need
the.
M
M
A
Too
sorry
about
that,
I
think
peter
and
I
miss,
can
I
show
you
them?
I
can
show
you
photos.
No.
I
I.
D
B
Will
you
motion
please
going
through
this
and
driving
by
the
property
this
afternoon.
D
C
B
Srb
district,
who
presents
this
case,
please
thank
you,
mr
chair
good
evening,
chris
mulligan
from.
G
G
G
This
property-
what's
interesting,
and
perhaps
a
little
unorthodox
about
this
project-
is
that
the.
G
The
what
is
the
existing,
very
modest
dwelling
as
the
accessory
dwelling
unit,
so
there
will.
G
G
A
secondary
conditional
use
permit
for
some
wetlands
some
work
within
the
wetlands
buffer.
G
G
Is
due
to
certain
characteristics
of
this,
both
the
property
itself.
G
G
Landing
and
and
stairs
to
get
into
a
kitchen
area
there,
so
so
the
existing
layout
of.
G
The
house
counsels
us
to
keep
the
driveway
where
it
is
for
use
for
that
particular.
G
Designed
and
installed
before
the
state
was
involved
in
reviewing
and
permitting
those.
So
I.
G
G
G
G
On
jones
avenue
and
it's
in
a
kind
of
a
bend
in
jones
avenue
such
that
two
driveways.
G
G
Public,
if
the,
if
the
variants
were
denied
the
applicant,
would
have
to
either.
G
G
G
G
G
Ordinance,
I
believe,
and
it's
on
a
bend
in
jones
avenue
such
that
a
second
second
driveway.
G
G
G
Well-
and
he
can
answer
questions
as
well.
Thank
you
any
questions
for
mr
mulligan.
Yes,
mr
miller,.
D
Is
the
proposed
actually
you're
going
to
have
to
point
out
the
current.
O
Hello,
donald
stickney,
owner
of
213
jones
ave,
thank
you
for
having
us
tonight
is
one.
J
A
field
that's
currently
located
here
with
the
new
plan.
There
you
go.
C
K
B
B
Does
anyone
want
to
lead
off
the
discussion.
B
E
As
mr
mulligan
pointed
out,
there's
some
drainage
through
there
and
some
wetlands
and
all.
E
E
E
E
E
The
doing
this
has
not
diminished
the
value
of
any
surrounding
properties
in
any.
E
E
F
Only
thing
that
I
have
to
add
is
that
this
is
a
huge
property.
I
recognize
that
not
a
lot
of
it.
F
This
allows
this
applicant
to
make
use
of
a
detached
accessory
dwelling
unit,
assuming
that
the.
B
Thank
you
anything
any
further
discussion
before
we
vote,
apparently
not
let's,
let's
vote
we'll.
B
You,
mr
mcdonald,
yes,
mr
lee,
yes,
miss
eldridge
and
yes,
miss
margerson.
Yes,
and
I
vote
yes
also.
Q
Mainly
because
there's
almost
no
room
for
a
a
staircase
inside
the
house,
we
need
to
do.
Q
We'd
like
to
get
the
the
front
eaves
of
the
house.
Q
A
little
bit
further
from
the
basement
to
mitigate
some
some
moisture
problems.
Q
The
main
difficulty
with
this
is
there's
no
way
to
make
this
lot
conforming.
If
we
go
30
foot
30.
Q
House
that
absolutely
couldn't
couldn't
conform
in
in
any
way
at
all,
so
basically
we're
just.
Q
Planning
on
putting
a
second
story
up
similar
to
what
many
of
the
neighbors
have
already
done,.
Q
I
think
it's
pretty
self-explanatory
any
questions.
No,
what
but,
would
you
like
to
touch
on
the.
Q
Q
Q
B
R
B
While
we're
passing
this
on,
are
there
any
questions
from
the
board?
Anybody.
C
D
R
As
to
hardship
since
covid,
both
my
wife
and
myself
are
now
are
required.
R
To
maintain
in-home
offices
and
that
will
be
permanently
you
know,
permanent
moving
forward.
R
So,
and
I
would
like
to
read
again,
genevieve
peck
said
musky
to
reiterate
that,
yes,
maintaining.
R
That
household
operating
small
offices
from
our
employers
it
would
absolutely
be
helpful.
R
R
R
Tell
them
who
you
are
hello,
I
am
sloan
musky
and
I'm
a
child
who
lives
at
night.
Germany
now.
C
Usually,
when
I
go
to
my
friend's
house,
they
always
like
hey.
Do
you
want
to
come
into
my.
C
B
B
Second,
to
that,
second,
second,
miss
eldridge.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay.
Your
motion,
mr
mcdonald,.
B
Clear
on
the
record
sure
thank
you
first,
the
variance
is
not
contrary
to
the
public
interest.
E
Infringe
on
that,
the
spirit
of
the
ordinance
is
observed.
Excuse
me,
the
the
ordinance
is.
E
Got
a
lot
of
purposes,
I
found
out
to
lessen
congestion
in
the
streets
to
secure
safety
from.
E
E
E
And
that's
what
the
case
is
here,
and
so
I
think
substantial
justice
is
indeed
done.
E
They
are
about
to
take
a
big
step
and
improve
their
lives
and.
E
This
is
something
that
the
city
shouldn't
you
know
when
the
ordinances.
A
C
Make
a
statement
and
possible
recommendations
for
stipulation,
since
the
whole
house
is
going
up.
C
Two
stories,
the
seven
foot
rear
yard-
should
have
been
advertised.
It
wasn't,
but
I
think
if.
C
C
That
the
rear
yard
is
is
seven
feet,
okay
is,
what
is,
it
is,
what
is
it
exists,
but
since.
C
It's
going
up,
yeah,
okay,
that
likely
should
have
been
in
the
advertisement.
Okay,
good
right.
B
Good
idea
agreeable
to
the
maker
on
the
motion,
mr
mcdonald,
yes
and
and
ms
eldridge.
B
B
B
B
B
B
S
S
Things
leak
and
all
sorts
of
things
around
that
in
the
backyard
we'd
be
going.
Obviously.
S
26
and
then
to
the
front,
the
design
basically
has
like
a
little
front
porch.
That
kind
of
like.
S
S
And
then
the
overall
building
coverage
would
be,
you
know
increasing
to
29.
S
Versus,
what's
20
is
allowed.
Currently,
all
of
that
being
said
is
that
we,
the
design.
S
And
the
variances
would
be
trying
to
stay
commiserate
with.
What's
in
our
neighborhood.
B
Apparently,
not
okay.
Okay
variants
will
not
be
contrary
to
public
interest.
S
Increase
the
value
of
our
fellow
neighbors
homes,
spirit
of
the
ordinance
will
be
observed.
We're.
S
S
Add
some
space
to
do
so.
The
values
of
surrounding
properties
will
not
be.
S
Diminished,
I
think
it's
a
my
opinion
is
that
the
nice
tasteful
modern
take
on
a
ranch.
S
S
S
Right
next
door,
so
we'll
be
kind
of
staying
in
line
with
that
and
then
lastly,
the
the
literal.
S
S
Without
building
the
addition,
we
feel
that
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
actually
stay
in
the
house.
S
That
visits
us
from
pennsylvania
we're
expecting
our
child,
so
we're
looking
for
space
to
grow.
S
Not
to
mention
working
from
home,
looking
for
space
to
do
that
and
in
order
to
actually
like.
S
We
bought
this
house
wanting
to
kind
of
keep
a
realistic
budget
and
mortgage.
S
To
move
in
portsmouth
now
for
a
house
that
will
kind
of
fit
our
growing
family
without
this.
S
So
we're
trying
to
stay
in
this
neighborhood
and
do
something
that's
commiserate
with.
S
Most
of
the
buildings
in
our
neighborhood
yeah
anything
you
would
like
to
add.
C
Owner
of
this
home,
or
soon
to
hopefully
be
this
home
right
now,
we
call
it
the
little
green
nugget.
C
And
just
to
chime,
in
that,
my
current
work
from
home
office
is
also
the
guest
room.
C
B
Point
no,
apparently
not.
I
got
a
question
for
peter
on
the
by
the
way
I
love
the
plants
is
the.
B
Anyone
have
a
motion.
E
E
E
E
E
E
D
D
B
B
No,
it's
a
good
observation,
we'll
we'll
take
the
vote.
Miss
eldridge,
yes,
motorist.
C
B
B
Well,
we
just
take
all
we
can
just
take
a
motion
to
or
move
it
to
next
week.
You
can
do
that.