►
From YouTube: 9.20.2022 Board of Adjustment
Description
9.20.2022 Board of Adjustment
A
We
have
a
standard
meeting
tonight
with
one
exception.
The
first
order
of
business
is.
A
So,
mr
solomon,
if
you
he
had
to
come
up
what,
as
many
as
going
to
be
here
tonight,
are
here.
B
Good
evening
everybody
is
chairman's
pointed
out.
B
I
am
I'm
here
tonight
to
talk
about
a
change
in
state
law.
Recent.
B
Very
things
I'm
going
to
talk
with
you
about
tonight.
As
such,
there
is
no
established.
B
Than
me,
so
she
deserves
more
than
that.
She
wants
a
little
hurdle,
so
I
I'm
sure
that
she.
B
B
B
B
Consider,
for
example,
there
was
provisions
regarding
sending
school
districts
and.
B
B
C
State
department
and
this
bill
is
called
the
garage
tree
bill.
Usually
christmas.
B
B
B
B
As
being
the
factual
support
for
what
you
had
done,
this
allowed
a
fair
amount
of
latitude
in
in.
B
Defending
your
decisions,
I
think
the
obvious
effect
of
this
no
law
did
this
new
law.
Is
that.
B
That
latitude
is
very
much
diminished
now
you
are
going
to
be
required
to
state
on
the
record.
B
B
B
So
so
that
is
your
new
challenge
to
to
deal
with
the
challenge.
B
B
That
statement
is
a
legal
conclusion
and
when
you
make
your
decision
at
the
end
of.
B
Any
application,
that's
when
you're
making
your
legal
conclusion.
Your
legal
conclusion
is
not.
B
B
B
Decisions
granting
or
denying
applications.
As
I
said
a
few
minutes
ago,
you
have
the.
B
And
and
your
meetings
often
run
very
late,
we
are
worried
that
they
would
now
run
later.
B
B
B
B
B
The
the
way
it
should
work
is
that
it
was
you
know
in
order
to.
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
Upon
property
valuations,
you
are
correct,
there's
no
yardstick
that
you
can
really
apply.
B
That
you
can
support
that
decision
with
some
further
finding
of
fact,
based
upon
what
you,
as.
B
E
B
The
particular
comment
remember
facts,
for
our
purpose
have
to
be
relevant
to
the
elements
yeah.
B
Of
that
you
have
to
look
at
so
if
one
neighbor
says
well,
my
neighbor
is
a
bad
person.
Don't
give.
B
Them
any
relief,
that's
not
a
fact,
because
it's
not
relevant
to
any
issue
that
is
in
front
of
you.
B
B
A
A
Okay,
before
we
go
under
the
new
business,
I
should
state
the
ground
rules
that
we
operate.
A
Presentation,
if
that
up
is
a
is
that
appears
to
be
insufficient
before
the
presentation
starts.
We.
A
Ask
that
the
presenter
or
the
team
asks
for
a
requested,
an
additional
five
minutes.
A
We
ask
that
people
be
very
succinct
in
their
comments
and
just
address
the
the
main
points.
A
A
I
thought
they
were
very
well
done.
Did
someone
have
a
motion.
A
A
You
your
motion,
please
just
to
there
are
no
corrections
to
the
many
minutes.
They.
C
A
A
266
state
street
and
the
request
is
for
a
one-year
extension
and
does
someone
have
emotion
with.
A
A
F
One-Year
delays
all
the
time.
Obviously
they
have
a
good.
A
A
A
Request
is
approved
for
a
one-year
extension.
Okay
under
all
business
item
b,
reads
as
follows:
the.
A
A
G
Good
evening,
chairman
parrott
good
evening,
vice
chair
lee
and
distinguished
board
members.
G
A
G
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
in
hearing
our
project
this
evening
for
108
burkett
street.
G
G
G
G
G
And
materials
should
only
help
make
the
areas
area
safer
and
more
appealing
literal
enforcement
of.
G
G
G
G
Water
will
not
be
stagnant.
In
addition,
the
use
of
this
garage
would
significantly
improve.
G
G
G
G
G
I
would
open
the
floor
for
any
questions
at
the
moment.
Thank
you
for.
E
Mr
rossi,
yes,
can
you
restate
what
is
the
height
of
the
existing
garage
on
the
sidewall.
E
Versus
the
proposed-
yes,
sir,
mr
aussie,
so
the
height
in
the
middle
is
currently
11
feet.
Tall.
G
G
A
Is
there
anyone
present
or
on
zoom,
who
would
like
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal?
Anybody.
A
A
Anybody
last
call
we
have
richard
brady,
okay,.
A
What's
what's
the
name
richard
brady,
if
you
could
just
unmute
yourself.
K
J
A
Board,
what's
your
what's
your
pleasure
on
this
one,
someone.
C
Art
the
criteria
is
as
follows:
10.233.21
granting
the
variance
would
not
be
contrary
to.
C
C
Because
the
spirit
and
intent
are
and
or
often
stated
together
in
dealing
with
whether.
C
C
I
do
not
see
that
there's
any
threatened
health
safety
or
welfare
by
the
replacement
of
the
garage.
C
To
the
to
the
area,
and
I
find
that
there
is
just
a
mere
conflict
with
the
spirit
and
intent
of.
C
The
zoning
ordinance
in
that
the
setbacks
are
meant
to
improve
light
air
and
circulation.
This.
C
C
C
For
two,
as
you
suggested
the
I
would
find
that,
according
to
10.233.23
granting
the
variance
would.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Door
setback
is
sorry
is,
is
reasonable
with
respect
to
the
application
to
this
property.
C
The
proposed
use
is
a
reasonable
one.
This
is
a
garage
for
a
house
in
a
residential
area,
and
I.
C
H
H
Foot
side
the
two
foots:
yes,
the
it's
a
two
foot
side
yard
and
that
was
due
to
the
updated
survey.
C
A
A
A
A
A
L
L
L
Been
doing
this
for
approximately
as
long
as
the
city
attorney,
and
I
was
pleased
to
hear.
L
L
With
with
initial
consideration
for
findings,
because
that
would
be
probably
important
for
me.
L
L
And
very
helpful
to
me
that
it
just
raised
the
question.
In
my
mind
of
whether
or
not
there.
L
L
May
be
important
to
you
is
another
procedural
matter.
I
know
in
your
initial
introduction
you.
A
A
L
Submitted
that
shows
the
relative
site
and
its
proximity
to
the
pike
property.
L
L
Certainly
are
very
well
familiar
with
it
based
on
its
proximity.
Excuse
me:
do
you
represent.
L
L
Two
tax
maps
right
now,
254
lot,
1
and
266
lot,
one
it's
approved
with
a
building,
that's
been.
L
L
Was
built
in
a
later
time,
we're
not
sure
if
the
50s
or
the
30s,
but
it's
been
there
for
many.
L
Years,
probably
before
the
recent
enactment
of
the
current
zoning
ordinance,
that
particular.
L
L
L
L
Did
not
want
to
pass
it
over
and
not
address
it.
We'll
give
some
more
space,
it
will
push
the.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
When
you
look
at
this
site
being
outside
the
inner
city,
where
rents,
I
know,
are
at
their.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Rehearing
process
is
not
an
opportunity
for
a
second
bite
at
the
apple.
It's
essentially.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Use
will
any
type
of
proposal
with
the
mix
of
units
will
be
one
where
you
see
a
lot
of.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Saying
that
the
hardship
test
at
that
particular
time
it
was
unconstitutional
and
he
thought
new.
L
L
L
L
The
standard
today
is
is
quite
different.
After
bochia,
the
after
gray
rocks
that
we
had
the
bochia.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
H
L
A
Comments
at
this
point
no
question
so
a
question
for
clarification.
Excuse
me.
E
Can
you
help
me
understand
how
to
square
your
assertion
that
building
additional
60
units.
L
L
L
E
Did
have
one
other
question:
what
was
the
rationale
behind
offering
the
a
butter
pike.
L
L
L
There
may
be
some
odor,
there
may
be
some
trucks
passing
across
the
street
and
based
on
that.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
And
if
they
don't
they're
responsible
to
fix
it
or
relocate
the
tenant,
so
the
reason
why
tenants.
L
L
L
To
the
apartment
building,
I
don't
see
for
anyone
that's
been
to
that
site.
How
that
would.
L
But
it
seems
to
work,
there's
no
access
issue.
This
building
will
have
to
be
built
according.
L
L
C
Well,
that
leads
to
the
other
thing
you
know,
even
under
the
simplex
standard,
for
getting
a.
C
L
The
abstract,
when
you,
if
you're
back
in
26
with
euclid
and
ambler,
I
believe
they
might
have
said.
L
L
C
I
want
a
hug,
so
mr
mill,
then
mr
lee.
A
We've
got
a
just
a
couple
of
questions.
You
said
earlier:
a
residents
can
sue
for.
F
You
are
prepared,
as
part
of
the
lease
agreement
or
an
agreement
with
pike
to
indemnify
pike.
If
any.
F
Indemnified
they're
clear
nothing's
going
to
happen.
Would
you
do
the
same
thing
for
the
city.
F
You
know
they're
not
able
to
sue
pike
because
of
their
lease
agreement,
regardless.
J
E
E
E
K
There's
a
lot
to
be
discussed
here,
there's
a
lot
of
different
angles
here.
No
at
this
at
this.
A
Stage
there
is
no,
there
are
no
time
limits,
but
we
asked
you
to
be
sick,
obviously
to
be
succinct.
I.
A
K
K
Guys
already
know,
I
want
to
turn
it
over
to
larry
for
a
minute
he's
going
to
talk
about
what
pike.
K
M
There,
for
many
many
decades,
that
facility
is
supplied
much
of
the
aggregates
that
construction.
M
That's
a
recycling
pile
where
we
crush
concrete
and
used
hot
mix
pavement
some
of
the
things.
M
M
M
M
All
that
stuff
starts
to
get
very
loud.
I
would
say
that,
with
regard
to
the
value
of
the
asset.
M
Real
value
of
a
hot
mix
asphalt
plant,
so
I
don't
know
that's
germane
to
this
to
this
discussion.
A
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Going
to
spend
more
time
on
those
right
now,
I
do
want
to
talk
about
the
substantial
justice.
K
K
K
K
K
K
N
Mr
lee,
I
made
the
the
comparison
the
last
meeting,
that
this
was
in
the
transitional
zone
and.
N
N
K
N
N
N
N
N
K
K
K
K
A
So
yeah
any
anybody
else
over
here.
I
have
a
couple
of
points
too
anybody
else.
No,
you
you've
you've.
A
A
A
K
K
K
Beginning
is
a
question
beyond
me:
okay,
but
you're,
not
making
that
to
my
ears,
you're,
not
making.
A
A
A
A
K
K
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
A
A
I
And
we
have
ready
mix
concrete
batch
plant
right
next
to
pike
industries
at
650,
beverly
hill.
I
We
did
not
receive
notice
of
this
initial
meeting.
We
moved
our
offices
from
saugus
mass
to.
I
I
just
wanted
to.
I
sent
a
letter
to
the
board
and-
and
I
decided
I'm
not
going
to.
I
Read
it
jeff
said
everything
that
I
could
possibly
say,
and
he
probably
said
it
better.
I
Thing
about
a
comment
you
just
made
about
the
the
value
of
the
industrial
property.
It's
not
so.
I
I
I
I
Highway
I
mean
you
name
it.
We
do
it,
so
I
I
want
to
back
up
the
point
that
that
mr
major
made.
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
N
It
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay,
any
buddy
else.
Thank
you
very
much.
Next
next
speakers.
Please
welcome.
A
Mr
mayor
good
evening,
rick
paxtad
1395
elizabeth
street,
I
was
sitting
at
home.
I
was
actually.
M
Calling
in
for
the
next
application,
not
for
this
one,
not
really,
I
guess,
understanding
as
far.
M
Has
been
here
forever
born
and
raised
they
when
you
say
richie
your
reports,
man
period,
but.
M
As
I
watched
the
last,
I
guess
application
that
had
come
through
and
got
an
approval
and
then.
M
Re-Hearing
and
then
listening
to
the
attorney
tonight,
I
I
felt
compelled
to
come
down
and
just.
M
Let
the
board
know
a
couple
of
things.
One
of
the
concerns
is
the
multi-purpose
fields.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
People,
as
far
as
with
I
try
to
give
an
example
of
people
complaining,
you
know,
as
far
as
with.
M
M
M
M
There
has
to
be
that
separation,
we
have
to
have
that
equality
and-
and
I
guess
the
last
thing.
M
M
M
M
I
Fields,
but
I
I
want
to
speak
to
the
issue
of
of
this
particular
development,
but
also.
I
I
Great
state
for
15
years,
but
if
you
have
ever
lived
in
new
york
city,
you
know
that
zoning.
I
A
residential
kind
of
are
on
top
of
each
other,
and
I
lived
in
the
projects
in
new
york
city.
A
A
That
earlier,
okay,
so
so
the
issue
is
basically
that
zoning
is
defined
by
locality
and.
I
I
I
do
want
to
say
that
we
I
I
disagree
with
the
comments
of
the
of
the
former
speaker.
I
I
do.
I
Community,
and
that
is
all
types
of
housing
you
know.
Hopefully
we
get
to
the
point
where.
I
I
I
I
Of
restaurants
in
the
city
of
portsmouth,
he
cannot
find
housing
for
his
staff,
so
you
have
to
look.
I
To
add
housing
of
all
types
to
the
housing
stock
in
in
the
city
and
and
so
that's
all
I'll
say.
I
I
I
I
E
N
N
N
N
N
A
Initial
comments:
anybody,
no
no,
but
miss
margison,
no
surprise,
because
I
didn't
vote
for
the.
C
Original
variance
request,
but
I
will
not
be
supporting
this.
I
think
in
particular
the.
C
What
mr
rossi
said
about
the
spirit
and
intent
of
the
ordinance?
I
think
that
there
is
significant.
C
They
have
not
been
addressed
by
the
applicant
by
mr
richie
respectfully
also,
I
do
not
see.
C
Hardship,
I
think
this
is
well
in
terms
of
there
is
more
than
a
mere
conflict
with
the
zoning.
C
Ordinances,
it's
to
a
marked
degree,
very
conflicted
with
the
zoning
ordinance
the
need
to
separate.
C
J
J
J
N
Section
10.233-2-1
grain
nefarious
would
not
be
contrary
to
public
interest.
I
find
that
it
would.
N
N
N
In
2018,
and
no
no
no
outcry
from
the
pike
people
at
that
time
about
the
dangers
of
that.
N
N
N
N
I
can
I
do
agree
with
that,
so
I
find
that
that
thing
is
that
point
is
correct
and
that
would.
N
A
A
Landlord
and
a
manager,
some
of
them
might
not
work
out.
That's
true,
but
somebody
is
willing
to.
A
There
tends
to
be
a
tyndall
turnover
in
that
kind
of
properties.
Also,
so
nobody's
going
to
be.
A
A
View
of
it.
So
having
said
that,
the
motion
is
to
grant
mr
rossi
no
okay,
miss
eldridge,
no.
A
H
Want
to
we're
just
for
the
sake
of
this
new
legislation,
it
might
be
good
to
have
a
another.
H
Subsequent
motion
fails
to
receive
for
votes.
The
chair
will
solicit
comments
for
the
record.
H
H
Could,
if
that's
okay
with
the
chairman,
that's
the
easiest
way:
yeah,
okay,
so
I'll
go
ahead!.
E
E
E
The
ordinance
and
must
not
alter
the
essential
character
of
the
neighborhood
threaten
public.
E
E
E
Okay,
thank
you
any
anybody,
any
other
knows
wish
to
provide
some
further.
Yes,
miss
motors
so,
and
I
I.
C
Would
add
that
the
proposed
variants
should
not
merely
conflict
with
the
ordinance?
I
mean
it.
C
Must
not
unduly
into
a
marker
degree
that
can
flick
with
the
ordinance.
This
is
a
ordinance.
C
C
Know
that
the
health
department
weighed
in
on
it
I
take
very
seriously.
I
don't
certainly
agree.
C
C
Area,
but,
and
also
in
terms
of
hardship,
mr
richie
is
trying
to
create
affordable
housing.
F
And
asphalt
that
if
they
were
going
to
sell
it
to
another
owner,
to
do
the
exact
same
thing.
F
F
Lack
of
the
better
term
your
waste
pets
would
bring
down
the
bring
down
the
offer.
A
Okay:
okay,
we're
we're
we're
we're
adjourned
for
five;
no
more
than
ten
minutes
foreign.
A
And
we
ready
to
proceed
with
the
next
item
on
old
business.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
P
And
so,
if
we
can
locate,
oh
there's
there
for
the
garage
plan.
Is
there,
mr,
mr
and.
P
Protected
the
snow
and
also
the
john
and
taffy,
have
a
little
boy
and
a
newborn
that.
P
P
P
P
With
the
neighbor-
and
it
seems
to
be
fine
with
the
distance,
because
we're
going
to
be
about
two.
P
For
the
point
b,
what's
going
to
be
the
deck
the
pre
prior
to
this,
they
used
to
have
two
small.
P
Decks
from
each
side
of
the
duplex
as
a
duplex,
and
so
they
decided
to
have
one
single
deck.
P
Between
the
apartments
or
their
house
also,
mr
mrs
apuia
is
going
to
be
helping
taking
care
of.
P
P
Also,
I
I
saw
here
that
I
was
mentioned
that
the
point
see
the
30
percent
we're
going
to
be.
P
So
from
the
deck
we're
gonna
be
only
two
extra
feet
of
the
the
setbacks
permitted.
P
P
Of
the
things
that
the
neighbor
mentioned,
if
we
built
the
garage,
they
would
like
to
have
a
fence.
P
What
is
what
is
the
five,
the
five
criteria
that
this
board
has
to
so.
P
And
this
is
the
front.
The
first
point
second
point
is
going
to
be
the
deck
that.
P
We're
going
to
be
28
feet
instead
of
the
30
feet
that
is
supposed
to
be,
and
then
I.
P
And
the
other
thing
would
be
that
from
since
we
can
have
the
the
upper
deck
we're
only
going.
E
E
Is
there
something
about
this
property
in
particular,
compared
to
the
other
properties?
Why.
E
E
P
Main
thing,
but
the
reason
and
the
special
reason
that
they
request
and
these
first
of
it
as.
P
I
mentioned
in
first
of
all
I'd
like
to
forgive
me.
It's
my
first
time
participating
in
the
board.
P
Meeting,
so
that's
why
I'm
a
little
nervous
but
yeah.
So
since
we
have
mr
and
mrs
opria
as
a.
E
E
E
O
Yourself,
but
I'll
give
what
yeah
your
name,
your
name
and
address
for
the
oh,
I'm
sure
did.
O
Opria
and
my
address
is
one
three
four
four
islington
on
in
islington
street
in
portsmouth.
O
Daughter
and
son-in-law,
and
my
husband
and
I
and
the
pandemic
showed
us
that
we
want
to
be.
O
O
But
I
will
let
them
talk
to
their
own,
but
my
takeaway
was
that
this
will
do
they.
They.
O
And
I
said,
that's
perfectly
fine,
and
so
we
would
do
that.
Not,
as
part
of
you
know,
not.
O
Before
doing
the
garage,
but
that
fence
will
come
as
we
get
through
all
the
other
right
now.
I'm.
O
Just
trying
to
get
the
house
so
I
can
move
in
it
and
then
the
fence
will
be
coming,
but
we.
O
Made
a
commitment
to
build
that
fence
and
so
that
that
addresses
that
and
then
keeping
with
the.
O
Neighborhood,
I
have
done
a
walk
through
around
the
neighborhood.
There
are
many.
O
Houses
in
the
area
there
are
houses
in
the
area.
I
shouldn't
say
many
that
also
have.
O
It
up
to
abutment
and
I
dry
and
blank
again
I've
moved
to
the
area.
I
think
it.
O
Says
the
remodeling
our
house
is
for
the
I
think,
the
past
10
years
or
so
was
a
rental.
O
Bring
everything
up
to
code
and
to
really
give
it
a
clean,
fresh
look
to
it.
So
the
garage.
O
Will
be
keeping
with
the
style
of
the
house
and
can
only
increase
the
housing
value
around
there.
O
The
the
deck
and
what
jeff
was
saying
my
my
son-in-law.
I
won't
look
back
who.
O
Is
very
good
with
numbers
when
he
saw
the
20
to
30
and
I'll.
Let
him
do
the
calculation
we
think.
O
O
Next
spring
etc
at
our
fence
line
to
address
the
privacy.
But,
as
I
said
it,
we
could
build
a
six.
O
Get
around
the
table
as
and
also
the
kids,
without
worrying
about
the
kids
falling.
You
know
over.
N
N
It
benefits
you
so
that
is
that
nope
granting
the
various
stuff
is
to
do
substantial
justice.
A
Anybody
we
have
anybody
missed
his
death
on
the
zoom
nobody's
raised
their
hand.
Okay,
thank.
A
D
D
D
D
D
We
do
have
some
concerns
in
previous
talkings
with
them.
We
were
talking
about.
D
Originally
a
four
foot
setback
their
builder
said:
well,
they
can't
do
a
four
foot
setback.
It.
D
Was
a
little
younger,
we've
owned
this
house
for
20
years.
We
take
a
lot
of
pride
in
our
house
and.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
But
she
has
thoughts
about
that.
She
can
tell
you,
I
I
don't
know
if
light
and
air.
D
Or
any
concern
to
this
board
if
a
garage
goes
up
there.
I
have
my
grapes
on
a
on
a
large
trellis.
D
For
years,
would
would
would
hurt
we're
all
for
the
garage
but
four
feet
away.
I
want
to
know.
D
A
A
Q
Q
Islington
street
property-
and
I
have
myself
and-
and
we
have
lived
there
for
over
22
years-.
Q
Happening
does
directly
affect
us
and
the
the
the
islington
street
property
as.
Q
Q
Q
The
shed
that
they
have
mentioned
in
their
document
that
blocks
that
blocks
view
into.
Q
From
their
deck,
there
is
no
obstruction
of
my
shed
from
their
view
on
that
deck
across
the
whole.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
And
the
the
the
setback
of
the
the
30
feet
and
the
additional
two
feet
that
they
are
talking.
Q
About
having
to
make
it
an
eight
foot
deck
as
opposed
to
a
six
foot,
that
would
be
allowed.
Q
Lose
our
privacy
we
would
lose
and
it
would
be,
there
would
be
additional
noise
there.
I
also
have.
Q
Again,
my
property
is
directly
back
from
theirs.
My
property
is
also
directly
back
from
brad's.
Q
Garage
and
he
put
in
this,
the
the
stone
work
on
both
sides
of
his
garage,
and
I
have
no
problem.
Q
In
my
yard,
from
any
runoff
from
his
garage
and
there's,
as
he
said
also,
we
have
not
seen
any.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Be
wonderful
privacy
for
both
of
our
properties,
this,
the
the
types
of
plants
or
vegetation.
Q
Q
Wouldn't
have
the
effect
of
of
privacy
and
the
the
ordinance,
the
ordinances
and
the
setbacks.
Q
That
you
all
have
in
place.
I
understand
them
to
be
for
the
protection
of
a
butters
and
for
the.
Q
Water
damage
or
loss
of
quality
of
life
there
and
of
enjoying
it,
and
I'm
just
asking
you.
N
Q
Q
Q
My
my
grill
on
that
that's
right
there
directly
back!
Okay!
Thank
you!
Okay,
do
you
think
that
view.
E
E
Q
R
Good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
name
is
ralph
dibinato
senior
and
I'm
speaking
for
my
wife.
R
And
I
we
reside
at
1374
islington
street,
which
is
one
house
slot
down
from
the
house
that
you're.
R
Discussing
tonight
being
one
of
the
house
in
between
us,
I
first
want
to
say
that
linda
and
I.
R
R
With
their
concerns,
we
feel
are
legitimate,
but
I'm
going
to
keep
my
comments
to
the
five.
R
R
The
years
and
and
watching
on
the
website,
I
think
it's
the
most
misunderstood
of
the.
R
R
R
By
the
same
people,
probably
a
hundred
years
ago,
as
a
duplex,
the
lots
are
identical
in
size.
R
R
R
R
R
R
Fifth,
criteria
of
unnecessary
hardship-
it's
it
doesn't
exist
for
the
for
the
extent
of
exceptions.
R
A
A
H
M
Road
from
you-
and
I
don't
want
to
be
too
far
against
I've
known
previous
speakers-.
M
M
I
I
think
what
you're
hearing
is
acceptance,
just
they
want
to
have
it
limited.
I
looked
at
the.
M
M
Many
many
years
watch
my
family,
my
kids
grow
up
in
the
house
and
then
move
on
with
their.
M
M
M
A
P
Two
points:
we
bring
a
plot
plan,
we
send
a
plot
plan
by
the
way
we
did
a
survey.
P
P
Want
to
be
clear,
second
said
about:
the
water
goes
to
the
other
property,
the
water
or
what
is.
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
A
Speaker,
no,
mr
lee,
oh
miss
margison,
sorry!
Well!
I
just
I
just
want
to
know
for
the
record
that
it.
C
C
H
J
J
We
just
need
all
the
paperwork
that
that's
okay,
we
can.
We
can
submit
to
the
city,
okay,.
P
N
P
P
P
R
I
guess
still
against
in
its
present
plan.
I
wanted
to
make
a
comment
for
the
benefit
of
the.
R
R
Yeah
melbourne
street,
which
is
below
is
across
the
neighbor's
property.
There
is
none
on.
R
R
R
Not
accommodate
a
water
garden
that
any
that
I
have
seen,
but
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it.
R
R
N
D
Can
we
have
when
this
is
all
said
and
done?
Can
we
have
the
stuff
in
writing.
D
D
A
J
Okay,
last
last
call
okay,
seeing
done
mr
sith,
we
all
clear
on
awesome:
okay,
great
okay,.
N
C
Your
reasons
for
doing
it,
but
you
did
not
address
the
five
criteria
and
in
your
presentation
you.
C
A
A
E
Is
that
you
know
just
beseech
the
applicants
to
work
more
closely
with
their
neighbors,
so
that.
E
When
you
do
come
back,
we
don't
have
to
resolve
controversies.
Okay,
all
right.
A
F
A
A
Well,
that's
the
old
one
where's,
my
here's,
my
new
too
much
paper
here
here.
We
are.
J
Okay,
all
right
wow,
130
games,
okay,
item
b
on
the
new
business
reads
as
follows:
the.
J
H
C
Hello,
my
name
is
charlotte
bacon.
I
live
at
61
manning
street
that
abuts
this
particular
property.
J
J
No-
and
I
didn't
realize
that
this
was
going
to
be
going
on
and
just
received,
the
notice.
J
In
the
mail
that
the
project
was
going
to
be
just
because
excuse
me,
excuse
me
we're
waiting.
H
To
hear
from
the
applicant
to
see,
if
he's
here
to
present
and
then
okay,
because
we
don't
seem,
he.
H
A
A
F
And
peter,
if
you
could
just
go
to
I'll,
speak
real
quick.
I
know
I've
got
15
minutes,
but.
F
F
Property,
so
my
lot
is,
is
significantly
smaller
in
reality
than
it
does
look
in
presentation.
If.
F
You
could
go
to
the
next
one.
Perceived
lot
would
actually
have
my
current
lot
coverage
at
15.
F
F
F
About,
let's
see,
the
variance
will
not
be
in
contrary
to
public
interest,
the
appearance
and.
F
Location
of
the
shed
will
not
negatively
impact
my
my
neighbor's,
the
public
health
safety
or.
F
I'm
sorry
because
it
will
not
be
overcrowded
and
the
exact
the
existing
lot
of
the
fence
buffers.
F
Our
properties,
it
will
protect
privacy
from
both
sides.
Substantial
justice
will
be
done.
F
F
Any
gain
that
they
say
we're
both
the
same
right
and
the
value
of
the
surrounding
properties.
F
Will
not
be
diminished.
Many
of
my
abutting
neighbors
have
have
sheds
throughout
buildings.
F
And
it,
I
think,
we're
all
good
with
it
and
a
little
literal
enforcement
of
the
provision
of.
F
F
Small
lot-
and
you
know
it's
a
lot
coverage
is
an
issue,
but
the
perception
my
neighbors
would.
F
F
Under
five
minutes
any
questions
I
do
have
one
question,
but
it
might
actually
be
for
peter
how.
H
C
Do
any
of
the
other
neighbors
that
you
have
have
sheds
that
can
be
seen
from
the
street.
F
F
F
N
E
Okay,
variance
is
not
contrary
to
the
public
interest,
and
the
spirit
of
the
ordinance
is.
E
E
There's
no
detriment
to
the
public
that
outweighs
the
loss
to
the
applicant
if
he
were.
E
Not
allowed
to
have
the
shed,
so
I
think
that's
self-evident,
of
the
values
of
the
surrounding.
E
E
Appear
as
though
the
shed
is
in
the
front
yard,
when
it
really
is
not-
and
I
think
that
is
a.
E
N
H
A
And
nathan,
ever
ever,
thank
you.
Thank
you
vertical
revocable
trust,
applicant
and
owner.
A
S
S
S
S
Trying,
when
this
large
lot
was
subdivided,
I
don't
know,
maybe
three
four
years
back,
what
we're.
S
S
S
S
Familiar
with
the
you
know,
this
is
coming
out
south
street
to
head
out
of
town
over
here
is.
S
We're
looking
at
right
there
so
deborah
and
nathan
had
a
long-term
tenant.
S
S
S
It's
about
five
feet
from
that
corner
already
existing
the
dormers
proposed.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
A
A
E
I
I
move
my
motion
is
to
accept
the
variance
as
submitted
and
if
I
could
be
permitted
to.
E
The
overarching
fact
is
that
it
is
a
minimal
change
to
an
existing
structure.
That
is.
E
Non-Conforming
and
does
not
change
the
conformance
of
the
property
in
any
in
any
way
at
all,.
E
E
The
applicant
it's
something
like
that.
You
see
it's
a
tough
one.
It's
not
that
easy.
What
she
said.
E
Not
be
diminished,
I
toured
the
or
examined
the
property
earlier
today.
E
A
A
Though,
let's
let's
start
down
with
mr
metal,
the
motion
is
to
approve.
Yes,
thank
you.
Okay,
mr
lee.
Yes,.
A
Miss
martinson,
yes,
miss
eldridge,
yes,
mr
rossi.
Yes,
yes
and
I
vote
yes,.
A
J
I'm
gonna
take
a
shot
at
pronunciation
and
hope
I
can.
A
A
A
A
T
T
Congratulations
so,
okay!
Oh
thank
you!
Well
I'll
make
this
quick
and
address
everything
I'll
start.
T
T
T
The
plaza
my
warehousing
and
then
in
amherst
new
hampshire
on
101a.
I
purchased
that
as.
T
T
Not
only
the
value,
also
the
the
the
decor,
and
I
also
brought
it
up
to
code
and
made
it
safe.
T
And
I
also
brought
obviously
jobs
to
the
to
the
area,
so
the
following
standards,
I
believe.
T
Of
the
it's
not
going
to
be
a
detriment
to
the
neighborhood,
the
values
are
going
to
go
up.
T
Because
of
the
work
that
we're
going
to
do,
I'm
knocking
in
and
increase
the
the
resources.
T
T
We
will
not
do
any
manufacturing
or
assembly
inside
the
building.
We
have
warehousing
and.
T
T
It
won't
again
create
any
traffic
hazard
or
use
more
resources.
It
actually
will
lower,
because
the.
T
Like
that,
we're
going
to
remove
all
of
that
demand
on
municipal
services,
water
sewer
again.
T
T
Storm
water
runoff
into
the
street,
not
going
to
happen.
We
are
going
to
enhance
the.
T
Landscaping
the
front
of
the
building,
even
the
ramp,
is
all
cracked
and
we're
going
to
have.
A
Empty,
so
I
don't
I'm
going
to
call
for
speakers
anyway
for
form,
and
mr
smith
smith.
Excuse
me.
A
A
F
F
There
won't
be
any
of
that.
It's
going
from
a
retail
convenience
store
to
a
retail
showroom.
F
And
last
one:
well,
that's
not
the
last
one.
You
got
two
more
point,
two,
four,
no
creation
of.
F
H
Of
those
last
two
criteria,
the
last
two
yeah,
no
excessive
excessive
demand
on
municipal
services,.
F
F
J
C
Mixed
resident
business
zone
and
with
respect
to
10.233.23.