►
From YouTube: 3.21.2023 Board of Adjustment
Description
3.21.2023 Board of Adjustment
A
B
Eight
at
the
bottom
of
decision
of
the
board
section
so
just
above
the
motion
passed
7-0.
B
Less
non-conforming,
but
it
should
read,
what's
being
asked
for,
would
be
less
non-conforming.
Okay,.
C
C
A
For
the
first
minutes,
mr
raymond,
yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair
page,
nine.
The
second
paragraph.
D
After
speaking
to
the
petition
last
sentence,
it
says
mr
bardong
said
there
was
no
street.
D
And
that
the
land
went
into
the
backyard
of
the
planet,
fitness
gym,
I
I
would
delete
plan.
D
D
Lot
8
was
probably
not
a
buildable
lot
if
we
can,
after
the
the
comma
say,
and
that
portions.
A
E
Stated
in
our
packet,
okay,
a
second
thank
you
all
in
favor,
aye
aye
well
abstain.
I
wasn't
here.
A
A
A
E
D
On
one
of
them,
we
certainly
can
virginia
okay,
make
a
motion
to
postpone
item
be
under
old.
E
For
jeffrey
and
melissa
foy
at
the
property
at
67
ridges
court
is.
A
There
a
second
to
this
notion.
Second,
hey
thank
you
is
there
discussion.
D
I'm
just
curious
for
the
reason
for
the
applicants
request
to
postpone
board
members
that.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
all
in
favor
of
this
postponement
say:
hi
hi,
hi,
okay
opposed
all
right.
So.
A
Speakers
get
15
minutes
if
they
think
they
will
need
more
than
the
15
minutes.
We
appreciate
it
if.
A
The
first
petition
this
evening,
madam
chair
point
of
order
before
we
begin.
D
The
old
business
item
I
do
have
a
request
of
the
chair.
If
I
could
so
old
business
item,
2-a.
D
The
one
reigns
avenue
appeal:
my
intent
is
to
sit
in
on
this
application
based
off
of.
D
To
receive
any
comment
from
the
board,
the
basically
our
board
of
adjustment,
new
hampshire.
D
D
Board
members,
and
and
so
far
as
a
vote
of
those
other
board
members
to
help
them
decide.
D
On
the
appropriateness
of
their
remaining
as
a
voting
member
on
a
particular
application,
so.
D
D
The
a
decision
by
the
planning
board,
of
which
councilor
beth
moreau,
who
is
my
wife,
was,
is.
D
D
D
D
D
D
Decide
on
on
that
that
matter,
I
appreciate
you
bringing
this
up.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
comments.
C
Planning
board
deliberations
on
this
and
one
of
the
and
mr
william's
wife
vice
chair,
chair,
chair.
C
C
C
To
welcoming
other
people's
feelings
on
that,
but
I
think
that,
given
that
that
is
something
that.
B
Personally,
don't
see
a
conflict
of
interest
and
I
would
appreciate
having
a
board
member
ram.
B
Of
it,
I
think
again,
I
I
don't
think
that
there
is
a
an
issue,
but
I
guess
I
don't
know
how.
B
Heavily
to
wait
just
the
mere
perception,
and
I
would
appreciate
the
board
member
room.
B
A
A
Is
a
different
to
me,
it's
a
slightly
different
situation.
Would
you
like
us
to
call
legal.
A
Right
so
I
I
guess,
if
it
helps
madam
chair,
I
guess
I
would
say
that
my
motion
is:
is
that.
D
I
would
be
not
recusing
myself
and
would
appreciate
a
vote
of
the
board
to
determine.
D
The
amelia's
split
vote
I
I
will
continue
on
with
with
participating
in
this
vote.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
A
G
Interveners
in
the
superior
court
case
and
to
give
you
an
english
translation
that.
G
Board
still
has
jurisdiction
over
and
and
which
ones
go,
go
straight
to
the
superior
court.
The.
G
G
G
Now,
one
of
the
issues
to
be
considered
is
as
raised
in
the
the
appeal
papers
to
this
zoning.
G
G
G
That's
this
board
should
exercise
jurisdiction
over
that
issue.
There
are
the
the
basis
for.
G
The
basis
for
the
request
for
him
to
have
disqualified
himself
has
been
the
subject
of.
G
G
It
should
include
a
a
lengthy
letter
by
the
present
planning
board
chairman
rick.
G
G
G
Don't
need
to
get
into
the
merits
right
now,
but
the
the
merits
are
laid
out
to
laid
out
for.
G
You
why
why
we
think
that
he
should
he
was
ineligible
to
serve
now
the
the
essential
reason.
G
Why
I
think
that
the
essential
reason
why
I
think
think
that
this
board
should
entertain
an.
G
Appeal
on
that
issue,
is
this
board
is
in
charge
of
administrative
appeals
relating
to
you
know.
G
Relating
to
land
use,
land
use
board
matters,
he
was
a
member
of
a
land
use
board
and
this
board.
G
G
Under
a
a
relatively
recent
statute
that
was
passed
by
the
new
hampshire
legislature,
I
want.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
What
that
means
is
the
legislature
wants
to
in
order
to
reduce
the
burden
on
the
courts
as
much.
G
G
G
G
G
G
Conditional
use
permit
by
the
planning
board
now
the
final
final
item
on
the.
G
G
It
the
as
I
understand
it,
the
planning
board,
I'm
not.
Let
me
preface
by
my
remarks.
G
G
Of
the
project
now
the
developers
in
this
case
have
instructed
a
plan
where
there's
going.
G
As
well,
we're
going
to
have
valet
parking,
but
there's
certain.
There
are
certain
omissions.
G
G
Going
to
have
this
big
hotel,
that's
and
have
an
overflow
of
people
and
too
many
cars
for
the.
G
Parking
that
for
the
parking
that
it
has
and
those
are
important
issues
and
since.
G
G
G
Much
have
to
watch
the
you
pretty
much
have
to
watch
the
video
of
the
meeting,
because
the.
G
G
G
G
A
I
didn't
get
there
fasting,
though
one
of
your
other
accounts
was
the
conservation
commission.
The.
G
See
let
me
remember
now
I
look
planning
if
I
recall
correctly,
the
conservation
commission's.
G
Permit
should
be
granted
and
if
that's
the
case,
I
think
that
that
falls
out.
I
think
that.
G
Falls
out
of
the
case
too,
I
don't
think
that
the
I
don't
think
they
think
that
this
zoning
board.
G
G
Board,
I
don't
think
that
I
don't
think
that
that
is
a
matter
of
this
board's
concern.
C
C
G
I
don't
think
the
sport
has
any
business.
I
don't
think
that
that
this
sport
has.
G
Any
more
business
touching
that
issue
than
it
does
adjudicating
whether
or
not.
G
The
wetlands
conditional
use
permit
was
a
process
was
properly
issued.
E
G
Okay,
thank
you.
I
think
they
approved
that
on
end
of
december,
beginning.
G
In
january,
okay,
okay,
so
it
was
more
than
last
month.
It
was
two
three
months
ago.
A
Mr
man,
yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
on
the
matter
of
the
composition
of
the
board,.
D
And
and
the
administrative
appeal
or
an
administrative
decision,
my
experience
is
that.
D
D
D
Related
to
a
property,
and
therefore
that
is
something
that's
appealable
to
this
board.
I
just.
D
Want
to
validate
first
of
all
that
in
in
your
mind,
there
is
nothing
in
the
zoning
ordinance
that.
G
And,
generally
speaking,
there's
a
zoning
board
of
adjustment.
It
has
the
right
to
has
the
right.
G
To
entertain
administrative
appeals
and
I'll
rant
you
it's
kind
of
a
close
case,
but
unbalance.
G
Know,
there's
no
harm
done
because
if
I'm
wrong
well,
this
would
be
the
distinguished.
G
At
the
zoning
board
of
appeals
level
before
burdening
the
courts
with
additional
issues,
I.
G
D
G
Besides
parking
conditional
use
permits,
I
mean
it's
the
the
zoning.
You
know
the.
G
Parking
there
can
that
there
ought
to
be,
and
this
board
is
in
far
better
position
than.
G
The
parking
plan
that
is
being
opposed
by
the
developers
is
adequate,
so
you
know,
I
think.
G
The
than
the
matter
of
you
know,
as
I
say
in
a
sort
of
a
close
case,
but
I
think
I
think
you.
G
G
A
much
stronger
case
because
there
are
other
provisions
of
the
zoning
ordinance
untied.
G
G
I
don't
remember,
since
it
was
only
last.
G
It
was
only
only
last
december
or
early
january
that
they
that
they
granted.
I
I'm
gonna
defer
to
planning
director
of
purebreds
on
that
one.
H
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
E
Did
this
project
ever
get
an
approval
from
the
conservation
commission?
It
was
a
a
tie,
vote.
E
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
C
Yes,
so
just
I
will
say
just
for
the
record
attorney
graham
still
was
a
very
fine
attorney.
I.
C
Hope
he
has
a
good
retirement
I'll
do
my
best
to
live
up,
and
I
I
will
say
that
from
my.
C
C
C
Clear
to
the
court
that
it
never
came
before
us
first
time
I
really
delved
into
this-
was
watching.
C
C
That
extremely
difficult
to
follow,
you
know,
I
don't
know
if
you
know
so
I
I
just
that's
just.
J
D
J
J
B
I'll
share
my
thoughts
at
this
point
board
member
marginson
mentioned
that
it
hasn't
this.
B
Case
hasn't
been
before
us,
but
I
have
out
of
my
own
personal
interest.
I
have
followed
this
case.
B
The
superior
court
to
me,
I'm
I'm,
inclined
to
say
that
we
we
don't
have
jurisdiction.
B
You
know
it's
already
been
admitted
that
over
the
conditional
use
pyramids.
That's
that's.
B
Not
even
in
question,
so
it's
really
down
to
the
parking
and
also
hearing
the
comment
that.
B
The
htc
didn't
change
the
parking
or
the
site
plan
that
would
also
weigh
into
my
consideration.
C
C
How
they
want
to
deal
with
that
yeah,
I'm
sure
I
I
would
agree
with
ms
bargason.
I
think.
D
There's
three
points
that
the
court
sent
back
to
us.
I
think
maybe
independent
discussion
and.
C
Well,
I
actually
think
it's
the
because
the
court
said
that
it
was
the
january
14th
appeal
letter.
C
I
mean
a
big
portion
at
one
through
eight.
Is
the
ineligible
member
and
go
through
those.
H
Okay,
I
guess
also
as
a
further
thought,
because
of
my
inclination
to
that.
We.
B
Don't
have
jurisdiction
that
would
also
support
my
position
that
board
member
iam.
C
Because
I
don't
want
to
make,
I
don't
want
to
lead
too
much,
but
I
I
think
that
there
clearly
is.
B
On
that
vote
on
the
planning
board,
but
I
don't
see
that
as
being
under
our
jurisdiction
so.
C
So
and
mr
man,
I'm
sorry,
madam
chair
on
so
on
the
specific
issue
and
again
not
not.
D
D
Is
is
there
something
in
our
zoning
ordinance
that
would
would
would
affect
the
composition.
D
Of
the
board
and
and
who
should
be
on
it,
I
did
not
see
anything
in
the
applicants
or
the
the.
D
Appellants
discussion
that
would
indicate
that
that
they
cited
anything
specific
to.
D
Is
is
that
this
is
not
something
that
the
that
this
zoning
board
should
be
reviewing.
E
E
The
changes
are
no
longer
there,
as
mr
ryoma
has
already
said,
there's
nothing
in
our
planning.
E
E
B
Just
clarify
I,
I
may
have
bespoke
my:
it
was
listening
about
the
specific
board
member
and
more.
C
In
paragraphs
one
through
seven
of
the
january
14th
letter,
the
zba
has
no
jurisdiction
over.
A
C
C
C
A
A
C
Use
and
paragraphs
80
through
10.
and
the
okay,
I
will
let
you
speak
for
someone
to
speak
to
not.
D
Say
that
the
the
appellants
representative
has
has
stated
that
that
they
do
not
believe
it
is.
A
That
there
does
appear
to
be
a
certain
unanimity
that
that
that
is
not
available
to
this
board.
B
Jurisdiction
over
paragraphs
eight
through
ten
just
to
beat,
though,
is
there
a
second.
B
The
reasons
we've
stated
if
there's
no
further
discussion,
okay,
what
what's
this
motion
now?
Yes,.
E
A
A
C
C
C
E
Obviously,
if
you're
watching
the
planning
board
meeting
the
whole
application
was
rushed
in.
E
My
opinion,
considering
that
the
planning
board
was
still
waiting
for
an
htc
approval.
E
E
E
E
Applying
the
zoning
and
the
ordinance
in
place,
not
that
I
can
tell
what
concerns
me
more
is.
E
Rush
through
the
process
or
gave
misinformation
to
sway,
obviously
other
planning
board
members.
E
But
again,
that's
not
appealable
to
us!
So
that's
where
I'm
at
right
now.
A
Thank
you,
mr
bam.
Yeah
and
again,
I
would
caution
the
board
our
our
responsibility
here.
D
The
historic
district
commission
again
looking
through
the
zoning
ordinance,
I
don't.
D
D
D
Certainly,
you
know
talks
to
it,
but
you
know
and
starting
to
put
additional
wrinkles
into
the.
D
Granting
of
a
conditional
use
permit
did
the
board?
Did
the
planning
board
wander
into.
D
The
the
one
aspect
of
this,
where
there
is
something
where
they
either
intentionally
or.
D
Not
clearly
covered
by
the
zoning
ordinance
now
there
is
also
in
that
paragraph
10.112.143.
D
D
D
They
wander
outside
of
that
and
I
don't
know
if
I
have
definitive
answer
on
that,
but
I
think.
D
A
A
A
A
Yes,
if
I
could
just
make
a
comment,
I
think
I
briefly
mentioned
it
before,
but
now
that
we're.
B
Talking
about
paragraph
11,
something
that
swayed
my
decision
is
that
the
htc
that.
B
Didn't
make
any
changes
to
the
the
site
plan
that
was
before
them
regarding
parking
and
such.
C
I
would
move
that
the
zba
does
not
have
jurisdiction
over
11
to
the
extent
that
it.
C
Talks
about
the
historic
district
commission
having
[
__
]
that
the
planning
board
should
have.
C
C
The
concurrent
processes
are
allowed
in
our
zoning
ordinance.
I
think
the
only.
C
A
A
A
A
K
B
Comment,
I
appreciate
it
for
our
own
sakes
breaking
this
down
by
by
paragraph.
I
know.
B
Legal
counsel
is
by
deciding
on
this
if
we
decided
that
we
did
have
jurisdiction
on
this.
B
One
portion
of
parking:
how
would
that
affect
the
outcome
of
the
total
procedural.
F
They
got
a
little
closer
if
you
decide
that
there
is
jurisdiction
over
any
of
the
accounts.
F
Claimed
by
attorney
mccallum,
we
would
all
await
further
instruction
from
superior
court
based
on.
F
Motions
of
the
party
and
madam
chair,
if
you,
if
I
may,
please
make
a
recommendation
to
the.
F
Board
on
how
to
help
work
through
some
of
these
issues,
if
the
board
or
any
board
member
wants
to.
F
B
Be
in
regards
to
the
construction,
interpretation
and
application
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
We
would
cite
this
particularly
in
one:
yes,
yes,
okay,
yeah.
If.
A
B
I'll
make
a
motion
that
this
board
does
not
have
jurisdiction
over.
B
Yeah
and
my
reason
would
be
because
there's
no
specific
provisions
of
the
ordinance
cited.
D
I
would
second
for
discussion,
I'm
sure,
okay,.
A
Yes,
mr
van
for
discussion
purposes
for
discussion
purposes,
I
I
am
torn
I
I
I
and.
D
You
know
I
I
do
think
that
this
was
probably.
D
Word
in
our
zoning
ordinance
that
may
give
the
the
planning
board
an
out
here.
D
D
In
our
second
sentence
of
section
10.112.143,
in
making
this
determination
again
talking
about.
D
Particulars
that
that
the
appellant
has
has
brought
up
here-
and
I
think
I
think
the
word
that.
D
D
D
Use
permit,
that's
my
that's
my
thought.
Yes,
I
don't
know
if
it
would
require
modifying
my.
B
Motion
but
yeah,
in
addition
to
the
lack
citing
a
specific
provision
of
the
ordinance
in
the.
B
Appellants
paragraph
11
that
we
don't
we're
only
considered
we
already
it's
been
conceded
that.
B
Anything
regarding
conditioning
these
pyramids
automatically
goes
to
superior
court,
so
the.
D
Of
it
is,
is
that
has
been
made
clear
through
the
through
the
ordinance,
the
law
really
and.
D
Broad
agreement
that
that
the
that
the
law
is
pretty
clear
on
that
point.
C
Don't
have
jurisdiction
but
we're
reading
a
lot
into
you
know
taking
this
out
of
our.
B
Decide
that
we
do
have
jurisdiction,
we
would
decide
that
we
don't
have
jurisdiction
or.
C
B
A
A
C
A
So,
mr
matson,
I
saw
you
I
I
just
I
yeah.
I
would
share
the
concerns
of
the
other
board
members.
D
B
Have
jurisdiction
regarding
the
paragraph
12
discussing
the
conservation
law
foundation.
B
Being
misquoted
and
the
concept
of
that
affecting
the
planning
board,
is
there
a
second.
A
E
B
Which,
I
guess
is
that
a
again,
it's
still
only
a
recommendation.
B
But
yes
again,
this
would
relate
to
the
conditional
use
permit
and
then
also.
A
Is
that
a
motion
I'll
make
a
motion
that
this,
the
zoning
board
of.
B
Adjustment
does
not
have
jurisdiction
regarding
paragraph
13
discussing.
B
The
conservation
commission
and
their
recommendation
to
the
planning
board.
C
And
then
for
reasons,
I'm
not
really
sure,
but
it
was
very
rushed.
But
I
will
note
that
the.
C
The
planning
board
is
not
is
not
applying
the
conditional
use
permit
correctly;
they
have
to.
C
C
C
A
Requested
item
b,
did
you
specifically
postpone
that
was
postponed
yeah?
We
did
them.
B
A
A
A
A
A
Yes,
all
right,
I'm
sure
I'll
start
off
with
make
some
comments
so
and
re
refamiliarizing
myself.
D
Again,
with
with
this
application
after
having
had
some
time
away
for
it
from
it,.
D
Applicant
had
has
put
forward
in
their
written
word
and
reviewing
the
the
testimony
of
the.
D
Office
district,
where
that
is,
and
in
fact
allowed
it
talks
about
the
feasibility.
D
Of
using
the
waterfront
but
the
and
the
fact
that
the
waterfront
is
very
minimal
and
that.
D
I
again
find
that
argument
a
bit
wanting.
There
are
some
some
of
the
uses
that
are
allowed
in
a.
D
Waterfront
business
district,
admittedly
not
many-
and
it's
it's
restricted
greatly,
because.
D
D
Are
trying
to
celebrate
here
in
our
400th
year
since
the
since
the
founding
of
portsmouth
and.
D
Of
a
residential
use,
but
one
of
the
options
is
marine
related
research
and
development,
which.
D
D
So
the
I
think
there's
a
disconnect
there,
where
a
lot
of
what
the
applicant's
argument
is
is
hey.
I.
D
D
D
D
D
You
know
many
other
zones
in
the
city.
In
fact
I
would
say
this
would
be
an
ideal
project
for
our.
D
Proposed
so
in
my
mind,
I
think
that
that
what
has
been
proposed
here
is.
D
The
hardship
argument-
that's
argued
by
the
by
the
applicant
in
terms
of
its
suitability,.
D
For
the
waterfront
business
district
zone
is
also
spurious,
so
those
are
my
initial
thoughts.
A
Thank
you,
yes,
miss
martin,
so
there
is
so
for
the
record.
I
went
back
and
I
watched
our
the.
C
C
I
think
sort
of
looking
at
it
afterwards,
you're
like
oh,
but
I
mean,
but
I
will
say
that.
C
That
night
and
I
still
do
not
support
it,
I
think
that,
in
terms
of
hardship
there,
it
the
this.
C
However,
I
mean
we
are
rezoning,
this
property
and
I
take
that
very
seriously
and
we'd
be.
C
On
the
downtown,
the
edge
of
downtown-
and
so
I
think
it
even
fits-
does
not
fit
the
spirit.
C
And
intent
of
the
mixed
residential
business
district
also,
the
density
this
would
allow.
B
Members
so
far-
and
I
guess
one
thing
is
yeah,
it
was
definitely
the
density
of
this
project.
B
Was
almost
hidden
in
the
fact
that
waterfront
business
doesn't
have
any
criteria
regarding
that.
B
B
Offices
be
used
for
waterfront
business
purposes
and
also
reducing
the
allow.
The
density.
B
Would
allow
for
potential
future
applications
without
being
appropriately
different
anybody
else.
A
A
That
would
be
suggested
that
I
would
find
that
I
couldn't
support
this
application
and
maybe.
A
Thank
you.
I
guess
I
would
just
add
the
part
of
my
consideration
in
my
previous
statement.
B
Is
that
I
feel
that
I
mean
perhaps
it's
a
little
bit
speculation,
but
that
something.
B
Point
so
somewhat
a
kind
of
like
setting
the
criteria
would
or
the
stipulations
would.
B
Help
that
move
along,
but
if
that's,
if
the
other
board
members,
don't
see
that
as
appropriate,
I
can.
D
Attempt
at
an
emphasis
on
honoring
the
waterfront
business
district,
and
I
and
I.
D
Respectful
of
that
aspect
of
it
could
have
potentially
had
a
project
that
could
have
been.
D
D
Sometimes
make
an
argument
that
nearby
properties
are,
you
know,
are
in
another
zone
and
therefore.
D
Other
you
know
maybe
multiple
other
waterfront
business
properties
that
have
single-family
homes.
D
Or
did
most
recently
have
a
conforming
use
and
now
asking
to
to
negate
that
any
other
kind.
C
D
It
got
me
into
trouble,
but
I
will
I'll
give
it
I'll
give
it
another
shot.
Get
yourself
out.
E
D
To
deny
it,
we
only
have
to
have
it
fail
at
one.
I
do
actually
think
that
it
fails
at.
D
D
Vision
in
mind
of
what
the
importance
is
of
these
these
parcels
and
what
their
uses
should
be
so.
D
As
crafted
through
our
zoning
ordinance,
that
tells
us
that
you
know
trying
to
keep
waterfront.
D
Think
the
applicant
try
to
make
a
case
that
that
their
property
really
was
in
some
senses.
D
Improperly,
zoned
that
it
does
have
sort
of
unique
characteristics,
in
particular
with
its.
D
Limited
access
to
the
waterfront,
but
again
I
don't
think
that
that
that
they
can
that
they.
D
D
E
I
would
agree
with
what
mr
ryoma
has
said.
Like
he's
pointed
out
before,
if
the
applicant
applied.
E
E
A
A
D
You
I
I
was
counting
on
being
recused
for
6
35
and
I
was
going
to
have
my
break
then.
Okay,
but.
H
A
A
A
L
L
L
Last
may,
or
so
we
were
before
this
board,
oh
by
the
way
nicole,
giusto,
is
with
me.
She
is.
L
The
owner
and
operator
of
lovewell
veterinary
clinic
so
about
eight
nine
months
ago,
we.
L
About
a
stone's
throw
away
on
the
other
side
of
the
cvs,
and
we
we
got
approval
for
this.
L
L
Outside
of
this
office,
location,
nothing
is
changing,
parking
is
not
changing.
Water
is
not.
L
L
L
L
Of
chemicals,
obviously,
there
will
not
be
from
a
small
pet
animal
veterinary
practices.
L
L
L
L
Think
it's
known
as
800
islington
street
plaza,
so
there's
not
going
to
be
a
traffic
safety.
L
Not
going
to
be
a
problem,
10.232.26,
no
significant
increase
of
storm
water.
L
L
You
approved
a
very
similar
identical
application
in
a
nearby
location
six
or
eight
months
ago.
A
Babe,
yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
First
of
all,
just
to
comment,
I'm
hoping
that
the
ports.
D
D
D
Become
something
that
somebody
could
use
in
the
future
if
there
was
a
stipulation
put
in
some.
D
D
D
D
This
kind
of
space,
I
think
of
I
think
dogs
and
cats
getting
in
there
and
you
know
the
odd.
D
D
Nature
of
that
parking
lot
in
that
area,
and
with
with
the
fact
that
you
know
there's,
there
is.
D
That
is
there,
the
even
on
a
on
a
busy
day
pick
and
pay
parking
starts
to
wander
into
that
area.
D
Those
areas-
it's
certainly
not
like
a
a
filling
station
gas
station
or
anything
along
those
lines.
D
D
D
D
Out
of
there
again,
not
what
the
applicant
is
asking
for,
but
this
runs
with
the
land.
So
I.
D
Think
it's
important
that
we
are
are
careful
on
that.
There
are,
you
know,
access
ways,
odor.
D
Veterinary
practice,
10.23
3.24,
no
creation
of
traffic
safety,
hazard
or
substantial
increase
in.
D
Compared
to
the
other
uses
that
are
around
it,
and
while
there
is
some
challenges
to
the.
D
What
is
being
asked
for
here
is
a
use
variance.
There
is
no
change
the
existing
property
in
the.
A
A
A
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
A
D
D
D
D
M
Maybe
it
would
be
helpful
if
we
could
map
up
and
it
may
have
a
huge
253
on
our
package.
I
think.
D
Okay,
yeah,
I
guess
I
I
mean
it
looks
like
a
parking
lot.
I'm
not
quite
sure
where
the
wetlands.
D
N
Yeah,
so
neil
hanson
with
time
bonds,
so
the
wetlands
are
on
the
opposite
side
of
the.
N
Street
right,
where
john's
pointing
there
and
a
previous
concept
version
of
this
plan
had
a.
N
N
D
M
Other
part
of
the
right,
the
hardship
issue.
Yeah
I
mean
I
I
saw
that
argument
is
20
feet,
wider.
D
Okay,
you're
asking
for
22
feet,
you
know
20
foot
width
would
give
you
10
of
those
22
tooth,
but
okay.
D
I'm
trying
to
understand
you
talk
about
all
surrounding
properties.
Our
industrial.
D
Commercial
in
nature
and
have
similar
setbacks,
do
you
have
any
examples
that
help
reinforce.
D
Building
looks
like
it's
a
2.1
to
1
ratio
on
length
versus
with
I
tried
to
do
some
google.
D
M
But
I
may
have
to
have
the
the
applicant
speak
directly
to
that,
but
the
building
that
they're.
D
D
M
D
D
M
These
more
detailed
plans
became
available
that
we
realized
we
needed
to
come
back
for.
A
Yes,
I'll
make
a
motion
to
recommend
approval
and
I
I
appreciate
the
questions
and
answers.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
to
meet
the
five
criteria,
number
one,
no
adverse
effect
of
or
diminution.
B
Of
values
of
surrounding
properties
that
we
suffered,
this
is
on
peas,
the
other
surrounding.
B
B
B
B
And
the
large
right-of-way
and
the
utilities
on
the
street,
this
was
pushed
result
in
pushing.
B
B
Substantial
justice,
the
hardship
of
the
nile,
is
not
outweighed
by
the
benefit
to
the
public.
A
D
Not
really
being
supported
by
the
the
facts
of
the
of
the
case,
why?
I
do
think
our
facts
is
that.
D
That
they
won't
be
overly
imposing
for
the
industrial
area.
So
with
that,
I
would
support.
D
The
act
the
what
is
being
asked
for
okay,
any
other
discussions.
Okay,
I'm
getting
short
over
here.
A
O
A
Sorry
I
got
punchy
this
late
at
night
cool,
so
my
fiance
she's
mortified,
my
fiance
bennett
and
I.
O
House
and
it's
a
little
bit
shallow
and
so
we'd
like
to
extend
it
a
bit
and
so
the
variances
we're.
O
Looking
for
are
on
an
existing
setback
where
the
deck
is
10
feet
away
from
the
property
line.
O
O
Thinking
about
it,
a
won't
be
contrary
to
the
public
interest,
so
the
deck
is
pre-existing.
So.
O
Be
able
to
run
around
out
there
if
possible
and
then
two
of
the
property
lines
where
there's.
O
You
know
under
20
feet
of
clearance.
One
is
the
house
to
our
left,
which
they.
O
The
spirit
of
the
ordinance
will
be
observed,
the
existing
deck
or
the
extension
of
the.
O
O
I
think
that
also
covers
10.233.23.
Substantial
justice
will
be
done.
O
And
then
the
values
of
the
surrounding
properties
might
be
diminished.
0.24.
O
We're
one
of
the
few
single-family
homes
in
the
neighborhood.
So
although
I'm
not
a
licensed.
O
O
O
Hardship
but
you
know
not
not
the
end
of
the
world,
but
we
would
really
much
appreciate
it.
O
That's
my
application.
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
the
legal
jargons,
some
of.
E
Fiance
is
in
the
pink
shirt:
yes,
okay,
yeah
just
identifying
people
in
the
photos.
Yeah,
that's
her.
O
So
it
is
20
and
a
half
feet,
long
yeah.
What's
the
width
from
the
width
of
it
is.
A
Okay,
thank
you
madam
chair.
First
of
all,
it
is
now
a
matter
of
public
record
that
you
said.
D
That
you
talked
about
having
two
children,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
your
your
fiance.
D
Took
note
of
that
so
she's
the
one
with
the
math
skills?
Well,
so
that
one
of
my
volunteers.
D
I
D
H
Certain
degrees,
that's
correct
and
yeah,
so
looking
at
page
337
and
that
you
have
up
here.
D
Out
what
was
going
on
looking
in
combination
with
the
pictures,
what
is
the
basis
for
the
10.
O
O
O
D
D
D
O
C
D
D
B
The
first
is:
are
you
planning
on
changing
the
stairs?
No
okay,
okay
and
a
second
in
this.
B
Image,
you
can
see
the
green
pipe
coming
out
of
the
ground.
I
don't
know
if
you
know
what.
B
That
is,
or
maybe,
if
it's
a
sewer
clean
out,
how
that
covering
that
the
what
the
effect
would
be.
O
I
actually
don't
know
what
that
is,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
covering
it
would
or
wouldn't.
O
Do
that's
when
I
can
also
ask
my
contractor
and
our
plumbers
too
okay,
but
presumably
you'd,
be.
B
Able
to
remove
the
lattice
where
it
took
very
essentially
as
a
crawl
space
under
there
yep,
okay.
O
I
think
that
covers
it
really
appreciate
it.
My
only
question
is:
how
would
I
find
out
my
exact.
I
I
I
I
Oh
yeah,
I
guess
I
would
just
add
that
just
so,
it's
not
a
two-part
process.
If
we
approved
the.
B
Rear
property
corners:
if
there's
stakes
there
or
property
rods,
you
could
instead.
B
B
From
the
property
line,
if
say,
the
edge
of
the
stairs
was
nine
foot
nine.
You
would
just.
B
A
B
A
A
C
E
The
10
feet
doesn't
bother
me
as
much.
The
building
coverage
does
a
little
bit.
E
State
street
is
at
35
percent
or
below
that
being
said
to
the
five
criteria.
E
Granting
the
variants
would
do
substantial
justice.
I
believe
it
would.
E
I
don't
think
it
would
at
all.
If
anything,
it
would
enhance
the
value
of
this
property.
E
E
With
not
granting
it
would
present
a
hardship.
I
believe
that
this
is
the
more
densely.
B
A
A
D
Of
the
lot
it
is
not
impacting
the
the
surrounding
neighbors
would
not
be.