Home
Contribute
Contact Us
Browse all meetings
Home
Contribute
Contact Us
Browse all meetings
City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire
/
Fee Committee
/ 3 Feb 2022
City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire
/
Fee Committee
/ 3 Feb 2022
Previous Meeting
Next Meeting
⏯
Sync
Add meeting
Rate page
Subscribe
►
From YouTube:
3.7.2022 Fee Committee
Description
3.7.2022 Fee Committee
A
All right welcome to the march 7th fee committee meeting.
um
Just real quick note: the fee committee.
A
Has four members two counselors counselor taber and councillor denton?
They are the voting members.
A
And the city manager and the finance rep, which I am the finance rep-
um
we have a heavy agenda.
A
So if we could start with the acceptance of the meeting of may 25th 2001.
move, we accept.
B
Those minutes, second, all right, perfect and now to opening marks by the legal department.
C
Well, first off, let me get this mask off.
C
uh
I'm here because andrew asked me to be here
uh
and I the purpose
uh
was to just kind of have a.
C
General discussion of revenue raising capabilities of the municipality, with a particular focus on.
C
What the fee committee could do, or not do in terms of its recommendations to the city council.
C
Thinking about
uh
I've concluded this morning that there's about four different ways that.
C
Municipalities are in new, hampshire
uh
can raise money first, one, the obvious one is taxes such as.
C
Real estate taxes, automobile related taxes, the the thing about taxes is, they need to have very.
C
Expressed state legislative authority to do it if there isn't a statute, saying that a municipality.
C
Can implement a particular tax, then it can't and a tax would be distinct and, generally speaking,.
C
Those state legislative acts will also specify what that tax is.
The real estate tax, for example,.
C
Has to be based upon a proportion of value of real estate compared to other real estate in the city.
C
So compare taxes with the next.
The next item, which is municipalities, can implement fees now.
C
Fees differ from taxes in that, while taxes are actually a revenue, raising concept fees are.
C
Limited in that revenues can only be raised equal to the amount that it costs to operate.
The program.
C
For which the free is being levied.
C
So that taking a generous view, the highest fee that you could have or you could recommend.
C
For any different program would be, if you added up all of the city time and expenses.
C
That it takes to to operate the program for which you're going to collect the fee and.
C
And you divide that by the number of people who are going to be subject to this fee.
C
Then the highest fee is going to be to each one of those people is going to be roughly the.
C
The product of the mathematical calculation.
C
Fees, therefore, are always less than taxes, because you're not.
C
Really allowed to make money from a fee, you just recover your costs.
The third.
C
Revenue raising concept that can apply to municipality in new hampshire is.
C
You can enter contracts now.
It was actually this one that caused me to be here today, because.
C
Council denton had suggested that there might be a fee associated with.
C
Restaurants, that did business on city property, but did not comply with the composting ordinance right.
C
So it was in thinking about what it was that he was really asking for and exchanging.
C
Correspondence with him about it
um
that I came to the
uh
belief that what he's asking.
C
uh
To be considered here is not a fee, not really a cost.
That would recover
uh
not if not an amount of.
C
Money that will recover your cost of implementing any particular program.
What he's really talking.
C
About is a contract.
What he's saying is any restaurant that wants to use city property would.
C
Have to pay us to do it and the amount they would have to pay us in addition to the the amount that.
C
The city council has already established
uh
would include an additional amount, that's paid and.
C
That amount is in the nature of an agreement.
It's a contract between the city and the restaurants.
C
Which the city would basically say we will let you use our sidewalk and here's why you have to.
C
Pay the amount that the city council has already said, plus a further amount.
If you don't follow.
C
Our composting ordinance and the thing about these contract form as a revenue raising concept is that.
C
You do not require specific, enabling legislation.
The amount is not set by any state law or local.
C
Law, it is basically the product of negotiation.
uh
If you said to the restaurants, if you don't.
C
Comply with our composting ordinance, you're gonna have to pay ten thousand dollars for a.
C
They don't have to pay the ten thousand dollars, but they don't get to use the sidewalk either.
C
It's a negotiation, it's a it's a contract and
uh
and then so in the case of the.
C
um
That fee, the the amount of money that will be charged to
um
individuals that conducted.
C
Business on city property, but didn't comply with the composting ordinance that is within your.
C
Authority to make a recommendation, whatever amount, you think, serves the public, good and
uh
and the.
C
People that would pay that amount have the option of just not paying at all or not using the city.
C
Property, so that's like a contract kind of a revenue raising idea.
uh
Sometimes this gets used.
C
In
uh
in enforcement matters,
uh
in cases where we have
uh
brought an action, let's say against the.
C
Developer for building without a permit we, the city, will offer to settle that case.
C
We'll withdraw our action against you if you pay some amount now.
The developer in that case isn't.
C
Obligated to pay anything unless they agree to unless they make the contract with the city.
C
And they they often will because it's
uh
to their business
uh
advantage to settle the case by paying.
C
An amount of money rather than litigating it through to the bitter end, for example,.
C
The last or the fourth kind of way that a municipality in new hampshire can raise.
C
Money is through penalties.
um
Penalties, as the name suggests, are punishments.
C
And in order to assess a penalty against somebody, municipality in new hampshire has to have once.
C
Again, enabling legislation the state has to say you can you can assess penalties and the.
C
The principal way that that gets done is that city city councils have the authority to.
C
To adopt ordinances with penalty provisions and anyone who violates that that penalty.
C
Violates the ordinance is subject to the penalty provision and the state has given.
C
The city, all cities and towns, the authority to establish a penalty of up to a thousand dollars.
C
Per violation of the ordinance, in fact, that's what it's called violation.
That's the level of.
C
Quasi crime- and
uh
there were some major-
uh
the major limitation, however, is that in order.
C
To collect a penalty in the way that I've just described there needs to be a conviction in court.
C
So
uh
the city council could say a penalty of a thousand dollars.
C
You know every time you build without a permit, but in fact you have to convince a judge to actually.
C
Assess that penalty after a conviction so in terms of revenue raising for the municipality, this last.
C
Method, the penalty is,
uh
is pretty limited, use and is subject to
uh
some serious obstacles.
C
So those are really the ways that municipalities can raise money.
uh
The.
C
This, of course, is the fee committee, which, in general, has had the responsibility over the years.
C
Of determining fees, and, of course the fee, as we said, is the amount of money that it's.
C
Reasonably takes the city to recover for its cost of administering any particular program.
C
Now that function of the fee committee, I think.
C
Has kind of been expanded a little bit kind of a creeping expansion and
uh
and
uh
council of.
C
Denton's questions is a perfect example of that, because what
uh
you would be asked to opine on.
C
In response to his question is not really a fee, it's not really the amount of money necessary for.
C
The city to implement the program of having restaurants on sidewalks,
um
it's really a a.
C
Contract question: how much would you want to charge restaurants that do that.
C
um
But don't comply with the composting ordinance and the feed committee.
It is, I think, kind of an.
C
Appropriate body to consider the question, even though the question doesn't actually involve a fee.
C
So so there's my patch I'm happy to answer any questions.
Anybody has actually is there.
A
Any questions for bob or we can go right into the composting which is next on the agenda.
No.
D
Questions.
Thank you.
The provision that fees are to cover costs recover costs is that state statute.
B
Yes, yes, that's that's,
uh
there's a lot of case law well, state statute and case law from the supreme.
C
Court right, that's that's where it is, does it have to be monetary cost?
No, it wouldn't have to be.
A
More questions all right right into the composting, so I don't know how you want to go with it.
You.
A
Want to go ahead and ask your questions or I'll gladly give a quick one over the world for anyone.
D
Who's not tracking this, so
uh
the main push for me on composting over the past.
I guess four of the.
D
Prior six years has been because green food waste is the third largest source of greenhouse gas.
D
Emissions because it creates methane, so there's been numerous incentives pushed for the city to.
D
Support either residents who compost, whether it be with a rebate for curbside composting or for.
D
In this case, restaurants, who choose to compost and composting, is a lot more expensive than many might.
D
Think it could cost over a thousand dollars a month over two plus years ago, when I proposed the.
D
Single use disposable, ordinance for city property.
There was a number of things that were required.
D
One is that restaurants, essentially compost and the goal then, and it was limited outside dining.
D
I think there's probably six restaurants is that all of them would comply at some point.
D
Since covid have been there's far more outdoor dining, obviously I'm a huge supporter of it.
D
And ideally, in my mind when covid passes, outdoor dining will remain and at that point.
D
All the restaurants would be required to compost, and that would be done by them being.
D
Either I guess through contract, not through a fee, but it would cost just as much for them not to.
D
Compost as a wood compost, however, we're not there, and it was clear at the city council meeting from.
D
Two weeks ago, that the council is not looking to impose that much of a cost on restaurants.
D
Operating downtown with that in mind, I still would like to enter into some sort of contract.
D
With the restaurants who are not composting,
um
I'm not sure if council chamber, you have any thoughts.
D
On an amount, what I had originally proposed and didn't go through it at the last meeting.
D
Was simply whatever the amount that
uh
the council decided for all restaurants?
Half it for those.
D
That actually compost and then charge a fee to those that don't which would make them whole.
D
I do think that would be too much money and I would like to see something assessed.
Ideally.
D
On a monthly basis, in case they decide hey, we are actually going to start composting.
D
In that instance, and I'll gladly take any thoughts or feedback or.
B
Some of our restaurants downtown do compost now, some don't thank you for.
B
Researching what it does cost, I was surprised at how much it costs.
B
I think, philosophically I'd like those that choose not to compost to have to pay a little extra.
B
In the negotiated contract, but I'm also sensitive to.
B
It's easier for a large restaurant actually to compost.
At least those are the examples I know.
B
And it's harder for the smaller restaurants, so I'm sensitive to the burden on them.
B
But you know if we're in the range of 200 or something like that, I think that's would.
D
That be for the season or for the per month.
I would think of that for the season, but we can.
B
Have dialogue about it what's easier for the city, would it be, could it be done monthly or would it.
D
Be better just to do this season of outdoor dining just one flat fee, one in the contract.
E
Well, as I understand it, the way view permit is being stood up, there's an option for a payment.
E
Plan of two payments: okay, one halfway through the season july, I'm going to turn look at july.
E
And then one at the
uh
at the outset, so would two hundred dollar payments.
D
That work for so two 200 or 200 100 to 100, so we would just add a line.
A
On the fee schedule to, if you do not compost, it will be.
A
About 200 per season is that what you're envisioning yes, so how this works is is.
A
You you too will approve any fees that today and when the budget book gets published.
This will.
A
Be an
uh
appendix to the back of the budget and when the budget gets passed in june, this will go.
A
In front of the whole council and they will vote on the whole fee, there would be further debate.
A
Right so that if they had any questions at that time, it would come up at that time.
A
So if you both agree to that, we would add and bob would that, be.
That's okay, if we add add a line on.
A
Here yeah, it would go exactly the way you just said and in practice, as a practical matter, you.
C
Would tell every restaurant to want to have food service on city?
Sidewalks are on city property,.
C
That, I guess you would ask them if they're going to compost and if they are that's the end of it.
C
If they are not going to compost, then you would tell them there will be an additional.
C
200 fee collected in two payments, as you said and andrew, I think we should express it as a.
B
Failure to abide by and and our ordinance number that.
C
The other thing I would recommend is: if that's the way it happens.
C
Not everybody is always honest with the city, and
uh
so it might be a good idea.
C
To do little spot checks and see if, in fact, the restaurants that said they were composting are.
C
Composting, rather can we weigh in with an alternative, and if you like it I'll.
E
Tell you who to give the credit to, and if you don't like it it's my idea, how's that.
E
Rather than penalize people who don't do something, do you reward people who do do something.
E
By taking it off their bill, I don't know how he, if that was an option.
I'd prefer that.
E
That becomes an enforcement and a administrative thing.
B
um
I'm assuming, since the city manager proposed it you're comfortable with the implementation.
B
But philosophically I I like it so essentially would you do 1700 right, you'd do 1700.
E
Right but then that in and of itself needs a council vote to amend, correct.
A
No because it's on it's on the fee schedule now and that's in the case of a parking spot just.
A
You've already enacted the fee for this season, and it is in the fee schedule now as.
A
Current, so I don't know how, if this goes all the way till it's not going to be enacted till.
A
June, which makes it effective july 1?
How do you do that then?
Then you'd impact that july one.
F
Second, the second payment that assumes everybody takes advantage of two payments.
A
I could say at the I don't know.
B
um
Setting aside the implementation.
B
You know, I think, I think.
B
Counselor denton and I are in agreement about moving to rewarding right, correct, so.
B
How do we change our last vote of the council or do we need to.
C
Because thick you could do it, you could do it tonight.
You could do it easily, just by adding.
C
A 200 fee to every
um
city,
uh
public realm use of arrest by a restaurant.
C
To be waived, if the restaurant engages in composting one one motion, one vote done.
We just.
C
All right and within then, then that would time that would make the fee schedule in the budget.
A
Book and it would be there as that and then go through the regular budget process, cost city.
B
Management: okay, thank you, everyone for that all right.
um
By the way that was peter rice's idea,.
F
All right, we'll go to the you suggested, go to the fire department, which is on page 33 of your.
A
Schedule thanks bob.
E
Do we have
uh
chief germain and deputy chief powell here.
A
Go ahead just go ahead and start talking about your fee change there.
So we just.
G
Have
um
one fee change, I believe,
um
certainly just one related to fire prevention, and that is.
G
Last year we instituted a hot work permit, which is when people do work.
G
That creates sparks or use open flames such as welding
um
roof work and that sort of thing.
G
Is pretty common in other communities, so we instituted that last year and like many things.
G
You know we try and tweak it as things become apparent as to how they work well or don't work.
G
Well and it became apparent that we needed a longer permit, so we added a one-year permit.
G
For some of the larger projects in town there's many large projects that take more than a year and.
F
It just was a little bit cumbersome for them and for us to have them pull a new permit.
Every month.
G
So that really was the change and we
um
we went from dollars for a week, two hundred dollars for.
G
A month,
um
and then we added a year one for five hundred, so
um
pat in that third line, that is in.
E
Gray, it should say per year instead of per week for five, so we don't have that, but yeah we're.
G
Looking at early so it is, there should be 500 for the year 100 for a month and 50 for a day.
E
We don't have 50 for a day, but we, oh I'm sorry we do that, didn't change.
So it's not in great right.
E
But you're deleting the hot work permit per week right we're changing that to a.
G
Month for 100 and then we're adding a year option, so your choices, if you were going.
E
To get permitted as a day a month or a year yeah, so some jobs might be just a day got it.
A
Any questions counselors on that or on the fire altogether.
Just on that yep, I cannot
um
do you.
A
Approve, would you take a vote, say I'll I'll move that we approve those.
Second, all right.
A
And the counselor had additional questions if you want to go ahead so, regarding the hotel fee.
D
It says it's one hundred dollars annually and then per room is two dollars and fifty cents.
D
Giving increasing costs across the city, I was wondering if that still reflects accurately.
D
The amount of effort gone in or if that could be justified to be increased.
That's a good question.
G
So the first year that we did that
uh
with the hotels was
um
started in 2020.
G
And because we had never inspected existing hotels before it was, it was quite cumbersome.
G
Because we're going into places that hadn't been inspected and some have been open for decades.
G
And so we found a lot of problems, so it's cumbersome not just for us, but also for the hotels.
G
You know happen to fix whatever it is that we find so it's it's possible that we probably.
G
Use more resources than what we raised in fees, but I think moving forward that the numbers.
G
That we have are pretty good because having just inspected them, we expect to find fewer problems.
G
You know, we've fixed the problems that have.
G
Been there for years and now it's just a matter of maintenance, so I'm gonna restate.
D
That back, if I can, the
um
the current amount, there reflects what you're expecting it to actually cost.
D
This time, yes, okay, I mean what I essentially did was I looked at what other communities.
G
Charged and took that, but I think it's pretty close to what what it would cost.
Thank you.
F
Any further questions all right, good with the fire department.
I was wondering if we.
A
Could bring the police in real, quick, the the counselor had a real quick question.
E
Thank you, yeah yeah, all right.
D
Go ahead.
Thank you.
Captain
um
there's been a lot more awareness recently across the country.
D
Regarding how fees are negatively impacting some demographics more than others, I have no idea if.
D
The police department or the city or anyone tracks the kind of information, but just looking at the.
D
Fees that are listed do we have any statistics again.
I just want to make sure there's no.
D
Disproportionate effect on one group over another, so the fees that you're speaking of primarily are.
H
Alarm fees, so any private, residence or business that has an alarm would be in that category.
So.
H
You're, basically, looking at at two different
uh
two different categories, whether it's a private.
H
Homeowner or whether it's a business, whether it's a residential alarm or a business alarm,.
H
We have
um
first three false alarms.
These are for false alarms, so.
H
You would be allowed in a calendar year or it's run by fiscal year.
Three free, false alarms, meaning.
H
That the officers were dispatched to the alarm, the alarm is deemed to be an accident or false or.
H
Otherwise, not a real problem
uh
and then on the fourth.
The fee is imposed and then it subsequently.
H
Goes up each
uh
each time, there's a false alarm after that, as far as a breakdown between you so.
H
You really have two categories there, whether it's a private residence or whether it's a business so.
H
Those are the two demographics that we speak of.
um
I don't have.
I could find a breakdown, as perhaps.
H
Maybe karen knows a little bit better as far as where we customarily impose our fee more.
H
Given that we get a vast majority of our alarms to businesses and not residences, I would suspect that.
H
Our businesses are feed
uh
significantly more than private residences.
I was going to say.
Excuse me, I.
I
Looked at last year, last fiscal years and out of 1016 calls 25 of them were residents.
Oh wow.
J
Of those 25, eight were voided calls, meaning that the officer didn't arrive on scene.
F
14 were allowed under that three allowed calls and three were billed.
So all the remaining ones.
K
Were businesses and a lot of those were, you know, untrained staff tripping off the alarm
um
wildlife.
F
um
Etc, so, thank you yeah.
I was my fear and there was nothing to base it on was.
Let's say there were.
D
Far more billings at gosling meadows, then in the south end, but sounds that's not the.
D
Case so no thank you yep.
All right, thanks, any more questions, all right.
Thank you.
Okay,.
A
Thank you both all right.
The next is inspection department, shaun t wolfe, page 19.,.
L
So we are only proposing one fee increase this year, which would be for commercial roofing.
L
Which would be a hundred dollars for every permit for a commercial roofing job and historically.
L
Portsmouth does not charge for roofing at all.
um
It's not actually required an apple permit.
L
Application which does go against the state building code because roofing is, is a job that.
L
Does in fact require a permit by law, somehow that was missed.
So we like to add that back in, but the.
L
You know the primary reason that we want to see
uh
not only an application but a fee, because.
L
We've had several situations where and by and large your flat commercial roofs accommodate.
L
Either gas-fired or electrical powered rooftop units we've come across several that the roofers.
L
Have taken it upon themselves to disconnect and reconnect gas and electric, and we have gone.
L
After the fact, as a propane leak, or there was a breaker script and we went onto the roof.
L
And realized, in fact, that this was a brand new roof job that was done.
We didn't know about it,.
L
And, as a result, the unlicensed trays disconnected and reconnected gas or electric so.
L
Safety and also the hundred dollars really is.
L
um
Right in line with you know the administrative costs associated with with filing the permit and.
L
Then the inspector's time to go out there and do the job and enter in their inspection.
B
So we have to do this to comply with the law.
This is really not a choice correct, but the.
L
Feed the fee does not have to be assessed by law, there's no requirement that a fee is charged so.
L
We're proposing the fee just to cover to cover our costs associated.
D
I have a broader question not pertinent to and maybe either you andrew or karen could.
D
Better answer this, but if we wanted to waive fees, are we allowed to do that for certain.
D
Things I wouldn't waive any fee without council approval, okay,.
E
I'm not even looking at the attorney.
I don't know what the attorney's doing so the time to do that.
D
Would be when we vote on the fees and as part of the budget, I want to bring forward waiving fees.
A
Like what, what is your thought there's several things in here, so the overall picture is.
D
A number of these things apply if someone goes to install a solar array or a.
D
Electric vehicle charger, just in general,.
D
Is if we waived some of those they might add up to being 500 or more so just incentivizing people.
D
To do that to be rewarding good behavior, but this isn't the place and I'm fine.
A
I guess during the budget you could
uh
ask to add it I mean.
Can I put shanti on the spot shanti what.
E
Do you see in other communities?
What do you think is happening, so I mean there's a few.
L
Things that I see with that right
um
one is: it does kind of go against some of the goals and.
L
Objectives that the council has laid out for us, which would be to maintain financial stability, so.
L
One way to maintain maintain finance disability would be perhaps to increase fees and not to.
L
Waive them all together, so there would be essentially we'd be doing plan review.
L
Administrative work and inspections, the city would be donating that right, we'd be doing them for free.
L
Because
um
and then it would be really difficult to project and balance.
The budget I mean do have.
L
Analytics that would tell me how many many split heat pumps we did, how many solar arrays.
L
We did, and I could tell you you know just how much revenue permit revenue we would.
L
Be losing and how that will go against our proposed budget.
I understand incentivizing.
L
Maybe there's other ways to incentivize but to pull it out of the inspections budget.
L
We have to be call, I would be cautious about doing that.
You know, could you do that?
Obviously, not now.
D
But come budget time just let us know roughly how much what you said cost whether it be solar rays.
D
Or split heat pumps, I can do that absolutely, maybe I'm going in the wrong direction.
Counselor, but.
E
Perhaps the fact that shanti's here and we have a plan moving forward now that we're caught up maybe.
E
We're getting at the root of your or toward the root of your issue, which is incentivizing people.
E
To do the right thing
um
and not have the excuse of well they're backed up, and I they take too long.
E
I don't know, I think, the strategy that shanti's already employed in the first three months that.
E
He's been here to get caught up and to be proactive should hopefully help and motivate.
E
People to do the right thing, because there there is now a a decent process in place.
So maybe, if.
L
That was the question right was was how do we encourage the residents contractors developers.
L
To work with inspection department and be proactive in obtaining and applying for these.
L
Permits, I feel like we have gone, we've made tremendous strides in the last several months.
L
Towards that end, so I mean I hear it every day and so the you know the 100 permit fee.
L
That would be in place.
Perhaps for a solar array is really, I feel, fairly insignificant with a.
L
Maybe a twenty thousand dollar system, but on our end it's very significant because it does allow.
L
Our budget projections to hold true with what we need in order to keep this department running.
L
You know so that's fair,
um
yeah, okay, but I will put together those numbers for you.
Thank you.
Stop.
D
Curiosity: okay, all right a motion to accept is
uh
the original change.
Yes, so moved.
Second,.
B
All right, thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you for catching up the background.
L
Pleasure terrific turn around yeah yeah, okay
uh
recreation department.
Good afternoon.
It's 40.
E
Welcome todd
uh
so the general purpose of the recreation department fee changes are.
M
That most fees have not been adjusted for multiple years and we are just trying to bring ourselves.
M
In line with industry standards,
uh
while still continuing to offer substantial savings for our.
M
Residents I'm taking into account
uh
increased, you know, utilities and, and things like that, so.
M
As you'll see, spinnaker point is just a slight increase to membership fees
uh
for the year.
M
And then the indoor pool is a special revenue fund that the city will be taking.
M
Back over from the nonprofit sip, and so we we do need
uh
increased revenue to continue that to keep.
M
The pool, successful and operational there's been no changes at the pool in 11 years and.
M
So this those numbers reflect a six percent increase across the board for all.
M
All memberships, we also increased the per hour per hour, pool rental fee to match local area pools.
M
Because we were substantially lower than other local pools and then finally, the boat launch.
M
Is just a a small increase for non-resident season pass holders.
D
Any questions again, I have a general question not specific to those and.
D
The basis for this question is working at the shipyard.
I know.
There's military families there.
D
And there's no pool there and it dawned on me: would it be possible to waive fees for.
D
Military and military dependents who want to go use the pool versus charging them the.
D
Two dollars as non-residents for the outdoor pool.
Yes,
um
I mean it could be something that.
M
We can look into absolutely I'd, be a little concerned with the
um
amount.
I guess I'd have.
M
To learn more about how many people that we would think would actually utilize that, but.
M
I think it's something that could definitely be yeah if you could look into that right.
A
All right
um
a motion to accept
uh
recreation, changes.
A
I'll still move.
Second, all right.
Thank you todd.
Thank you.
Thank you.
A
uh
The next is public works, page 35, 36 37.
We have a number of changes
uh
this year.
N
The first one is the memorial bridge lighting request,
uh
bringing it up for 50 dollars to 75.
N
uh
The initial fee was set when we had really not much experience operating
uh
the facility.
N
uh
And the in the operation of the lighting- and
um
it does take
uh
some time to manage the requests.
N
um
Three different people touch those requests before they are.
N
Actually able to implement and staff has to actually.
N
Make sure the switches are flipped to have it work?
um
Yes, it's remote oftentimes, but it's.
N
Still time it takes so,
uh
we've proposed to adjust that from 50 to 75 for this year.
N
The next item is related to excavation permits and it's not the the fee for.
N
Excavation itself, it's it's a it's a deposit which we want to use as incentive for the.
N
People doing the excavations to follow up in a prompt manner to address the.
N
The excavations they've completed and the intent is to to refund the deposit.
N
When they successfully complete the excavation restoration and that's a it's supposed to be a 500.
N
To do that, we've found that contractors don't often reply to a time in a timely manner and.
N
We feel like having a little hold on.
It will give us the ability to hold it and if they don't do it.
N
We can go ahead and use that money and do the restoration in lieu of that.
N
Flagging permits are something that we haven't adjusted
uh
since 2014 we're proposing to bring.
N
The traditional flagging permit, which is a five-day or a five-day turnaround to from 25 to 50.
N
And the expedited
uh
permit from 50 to 75 the permits flagging permits require a significant.
N
Amount of staff time to review the detouring and the various things associated with traffic.
N
Patterns and safety,
uh
so we feel that this reflects
uh
the additional costs that we've.
N
We're incurring now
um
the next item is, is a new
uh
fee item
uh
crack ceiling,
um
this the dpw.
N
Recently purchased a crack ceiling machine.
um
This is crack ceilings where you break the pavement.
N
uh
Through excavation and leaves a seam
uh
there, which allows water to get in- and this.
N
Time of year, especially
uh
the freeze thaw cycle is destructive to the roadway crack.
Sealing allows.
N
Us to tighten up the system, so they get less water getting underneath the pavement popping it out.
N
We would not be using this
uh
unless somebody does not
um
have the ability to do it themselves and.
N
We would come in
um
to do it.
The intent isn't to go out and start a crack sealing business.
N
It's more just to address the vague, the vagaries of occasional person not following through they.
N
Don't do their work and then you know we can recoup the moneys associated with it.
N
The last item is
uh
recycling bins.
In the past we had grants to offset the costs associated.
N
With recycling bins, those grant monies have
um
have not they've dried up a little bit
uh
while.
N
They've dried up
um
and what we've found is that?
um
Because the bins have been free.
N
People
uh
use them for various things other than recycling, they come to the dpw and grab them and.
N
They don't have a lot of feeling of responsibility associated with them, so we find them.
N
You know people use them for moving, they use them for storage, they use them for a bunch of different.
N
Things so the idea is that in this case, there's a little bit of ownership and responsibility.
N
That there's some value to these bins that the city is currently subsidizing them.
So.
N
This is just to help offset that cost.
What was that cost?
uh
Ten dollars?
Okay,.
F
And any questions I think it's more a cip question, but are we not doing the totes for the recycling.
D
That was discussed years ago and may have gone to the wayside.
Yeah.
We, the challenge for the totes, is.
N
The hope was to be able to
um
apply them uniformly across the city.
N
And because of the challenge, toters work well
um
for areas that have the space to store them.
N
Okay, so there's a lot of apartment dwellers that don't have that type of thing, so it it.
N
Was felt that
um
that and the areas that certain areas of streets weren't large enough to build it.
N
Was really directed towards automated,
um
you know making it automated, so the staff were less exposed.
N
Yeah and they were less exposed in terms of operations, and- and you know we had- we had pursued.
N
That
uh
but we've unfortunately not been able to execute that situation, so we do not have a voter.
B
I was a little unclear on crack ceiling,
um
so does this involve the city.
B
Repairing private driveways would not.
We would not touch private driveways.
I didn't think so.
Yeah.
B
Yeah it's this would be.
This is purely a road
um
won't work.
Okay,.
B
So somebody would call and say: there's.
B
Damage that we need to fix on our road
um
and then there would this fee would kick in yeah.
B
If they created the damage- okay, that's what I was not a resident.
That said hey.
I want to do that.
So.
N
He's okay for 300 bucks!
That's interesting!
That would really help new service line.
N
Oh you want your trash picked up.
Send me some money yeah.
No, I think there's the intent was.
N
Really just little towns in new hampshire do that we don't do that.
No, this is this is
uh
not private.
N
This is purely things that
uh
somebody caused damage and that would be repaired.
N
And they would pay for that repair that helps me understand.
Okay, you had a couple of public.
A
Works questions, but do you want to take votes on the changes?
First, like we've done, the other sure.
F
Motion to accept the changes it changes so moved.
Second all right and then your additional question.
D
So for the cfc removal, I'm wondering I don't know if you could actually know this information, but.
D
If having a fee, discourages people to drop off their air conditioners or fridges versus.
D
If it was free or dare I say, if we actually paid people 20 to drop it off the reason.
D
Why I'm throwing it out there is.
I mentioned methane from food waste.
D
By far the worst guesses out, there are cfcs as far as greenhouse gases go.
So if there's a way.
D
To get people to bring more old equipment, there fridges air conditioners, I think it'd be better.
D
I just don't know how much you're getting I don't begin with.
I think the general public understands.
N
That there's a cost associated with disposing of these products.
N
um
You know roberta and jen could speak to the numbers, probably but
um
we've some we've seen a.
N
Significant increase in special waste disposal,
um
so this is really something that you know where.
N
I would be hesitant to to waive some of those fees.
um
You know we established
uh
adjusted fees.
Last.
N
Year and added some fees relative to bulky waste disposal last year,
um
and that was really just a.
N
Reflection of need to be doing this and illegal disposal happens, but it's pretty rare
um
and.
N
You know we found for the most part, people, don't that you know they.
They understand.
N
There's a disposable cost: do you see many air conditioners just being thrown out.
D
During dpw, not necessarily dpw, but if people leave it on the side of the curb.
D
At the end of the summer, hoping that the trucks will just pick it up and yeah, usually if it's.
N
Associated with a property it gets put back to the property and the property owner's contact.
N
um
And that you know we we usually do an effort to.
N
Track down who's associated with that,
um
if it's thrown out in the woods, that's a different thing.
N
So it's a lot of effort yeah.
Thank you.
F
I'm good.
B
Well, we have director rice here.
B
The past two years we've talked about stormwater at the fee committee and this may be.
B
A follow-up for the when we get to the budget but, as I recall we spend about.
B
550 000 of operating expense on stormwater and then there's capital expense as well.
B
And all that really is borne by.
B
Property tax at this point, 50 percent- is property tax.
The other 50 is from the sewer fund.
B
Yep correct, but it's you know it's one wallet for the most part.
So right have we ever looked at.
B
Where the largest sources of stormwater runoff are, and if we ever tried to say.
B
You know if walmart's got a 60 or 80 car parking lot and a flat roof there driving a larger share.
B
Of that 550 000 cost than a homeowner in his driveway yeah.
So brian is our point person.
N
For stormwater within the department- and he and other staff have been very involved in looking at.
N
Just this question that you're asking about- and I don't know if you want to add anything to it- sure.
O
uh
Counselor this this came up in
um
you know the council orientation and we've we've been exploring.
O
We're in the
uh
the fourth year of the five-year permit cycle for ms4 permitting.
We also have.
O
Our the great bay municipal permit, which part of that says, actually it directs us to look.
O
Into stormwater funding, because the next realm of of trying to reduce nitrogen in the bay.
O
And and in water quality is actually to address storm water, we're doing it at our wastewater.
O
Plants with with some really good success there, so what we've done?
um
We did a stormwater master plan.
O
Last year and it assessed what some of the future costs would be, and we hope to sometime this year.
O
Through the city manager bring forward a basically a work session with council, where we'd talk about.
O
A stormwater utility or special revenue fund or enterprise fund and actually.
O
Work on assessing those costs, so we had a master plan update last year that.
O
Looked at it and in general it would shift the fees to a direct fee, so it would be a fee.
O
Through through this committee, when it was finally established, and then it would go away from being.
O
Funded 50 50 by taxes and and sewer fees and just be a direct charge.
So, like you say, the walmarts.
O
Would have a have a larger fee because they have more area, and it would really be based on that.
So.
O
This has been done, you know throughout the country, it's it's fairly common actually, and there are.
O
Some communities in new england that are starting to do it.
um
South portland, has burlington vermont.
O
So it's it's!
It's fairly straightforward!
In that respect, you know everybody is assessed.
O
You know how large the property, if it's just a single family home, it's a flat rate monthly fee.
O
The bigger properties are prorated, what gets complicated are places that might come back.
O
With some some credits, so they actually are doing some treatment on site and then might be assessing.
O
Credits, because those are that stormwater is being treated actually on site, so we we do.
O
Hope to bring that forward
um
sometime this year, you know given time constraints and stuff and then.
O
Pitch it as a actually a separate entity here in in the coming years, dover.
O
You may have seen a little article about dover and and that.
O
Catchphrase the rain tax.
They want to call it rain tax, it's not a tax, it's a fee, but it sounds like.
O
Just another way to to to charge for something that might not be charged before, and this actually.
O
Is really just to proportionally charge people and the properties?
For
um
you know the actual.
O
Service which, what we're doing so there's a long answer, but it's always that's a good idea.
It is a.
O
Complicated thing, and once we dive into it again on the surface, seems pretty simple: it's like okay,.
O
Prorated cost, but then, when you get into credits it also would apply to perhaps some places that.
O
Aren't being paid, you know if they, if they don't have a sewer bill now suddenly they'll get that.
O
Stormwater bill, and also it would include everybody since it's a feed like utility.
O
It would you know, non-profits and, and that it would also it would apply to anybody's land per se.
O
Yeah, that's well.
Obviously it would benefit the city because it would incentivize large.
B
Properties to do the treatment on site- and I just it's an equity issue for me, you know.
B
If we base it on square footage, it seems more equitable than how we're funding it.
Now.
B
In fact, you know, would it be possible, maybe we could model it that that there would be some.
B
Goodness in in not having to raise sewer fees as much or something like that, if you had income from.
B
Sort of a stormwater utility there would be some offsets there.
I believe, but you know we need to go.
O
Through the full exercise of need to model it of all the cost, but we do anticipate doing that.
This.
O
Year so I think perhaps it wouldn't make promise, but you know this time next year we might be.
O
Putting something like that forward to the committee coming to channel 22 soon.
B
Thank you all right.
um
If, if you don't mind, counselor denton had some questions for other.
A
Departments that weren't on the agenda and they're real quick, we thought we'd just.
A
Pop them in real, quick starting with the city clerk
um
sure, let me scroll back up to that.
One.
E
This had to do with the fifa, restaurant tables and restaurant chairs.
Thank you.
So last year.
D
The fees were waived for the tables and chairs on the sidewalks, and I saw they weren't being waived.
D
This year- and I just wanted to get- I guess, both your thoughts and counselor tabor's thoughts.
D
On possibly waiving them again what that would cost as far as.
F
So the total amount of revenue that we receive for that
um
is 3 300 for the tables.
F
And 1060 for the chairs for a total of forty three hundred and sixty dollars.
F
um
One thing I will note to you is that we did send out renewal letters just last week.
F
But if you want us to send a follow-up letter that they're being waived, we can do that.
If that's the.
F
Decision that the council chooses to go forward with how much do you think we spent on sending.
D
That's those silly question: I guess how many people do you think we sent it to.
E
I can't tell you kelly, while you're looking.
These are for
uh
restaurant use without alcohol, correct.
I
Yes, right, 13 13.
all right, so not a significant number.
It would be that much money to spend on.
D
Postage if we wanted to right yeah, I'm fine percent.
I know what your thoughts are.
Yeah.
B
I you know I last year I was the one who made the motion to waive fees for restaurants due to covid.
B
But I I think, we're past that I'd like to, I hope, we're past that and.
B
You know, I think there has to be some enforcement mechanism for these sidewalk obstructions.
B
Which is to me what the fee operates to do.
That's fair and, I believe, they're only what ten dollars.
D
For a table and two dollars for a chair, 75 for a table and 10 for a chair got one right.
D
Yeah, I'm fine keeping them keeping them yeah.
It shouldn't be burdensome.
F
All right, thank you.
Thank you very much.
All right, then.
The planning department.
E
Good afternoon good afternoon, so this is really to address the question you had counselor.
E
Denton, the max: what's the max allowed by law that we can increase the wetland conditional use, permit.
E
To for each of the three categories, so I'm consistent with what our city attorney said: that.
J
Fees can be utilized for cost recovery for providing the services.
I understand that.
J
Our total fee collection on a yearly basis does not essentially exceed the value of the service.
J
That we're providing, I would say that for my staff working on quantifying this, that we probably spend.
J
85 to 90 percent of our time, supporting applications and the review of applications.
J
And we, I think, with earth in a an area where we could still improve the fees or increase the.
J
Fees, I did not propose any fee increases this year.
What came the deadline came very quickly.
J
After I, within a couple weeks of me arriving here, and I wasn't sure that I would have a good basis.
J
For understanding what the fee increases would look like, so I did not propose any.
J
Additional fees, I did take a look at
uh
wetland cps for keene concord and dover.
I can give you a.
J
Summary of those but they're not inconsistent with our general fee schedule.
For that same.
J
Type of permit, but, as you noticed I'm sure in our overall fee structure that there's been quite a.
J
Few fees that have not been updated for several years, I would have liked to have taken the time.
J
To do a little benchmark study and look at some of the neighboring communities.
I've also seen it done.
J
Basically, tracking the consumer price index for urban wage earners and then.
J
Taking a look at that year, over year to you know, identify an increase for.
J
Fees, I am not entirely familiar with that process, but that has been a way to adjust.
J
Fees on an annual basis, but I did not propose anything of that nature this year.
D
Thank you for coming in that explanation, the.
D
So since they're, in line with neighboring communities, at least the ones you looked at.
D
There wouldn't be much basis to increase it on just off that.
uh
No I mean I in just.
J
In summary,
um
the I think concord has a 250 dollar base fee, 100,
uh
anything that is less.
J
Than 100 square feet, it's an additional 50 and then more than 100 square feet up to a.
J
Thousand square feet, isn't I'm sorry additional 150 and then less than 100 square feet is 50.
J
Dover has a 200 flat fee and keene has a hundred dollar base fee?
That's!
In addition, that's.
J
Less the cost for butters and publishing, and then I believe
um
so those are the three communities.
J
They looked at it's not terribly out of line with what we're proposing but again.
J
The fees we are not you know at a point where we could say that the unreasonably.
J
Are being assessed in a way that does not contemplate cost recovery, I the jurisdiction.
J
I came from did 100 cost recovery, which required a real study of the hours put to.
J
And the wage associated with each of the people involved in review, it does get quite high.
J
Recognizing that state law is consistent here with where I came from, and it is in most states that.
J
Fees are need to be related, reasonably related to the service, provided we are well.
I think.
J
Within that range, so there could be an increase proposed.
uh
I am you know, concerned about the.
J
Fees that haven't been updated, since I think 2015.
Maybe those fees could be adjusted as well, but.
J
Generally, I did not propose any, but I think that you are within your your authority to slightly.
J
Raise them if you choose to, but they are not out of line with what those communities I mentioned.
J
um
Are charging?
I would add to that that the you know our our sites are complex?
We are our projects.
J
Are getting complex redevelopment is
uh
I mean I don't know how much green field development.
J
Is being proposed in some of these jurisdiction, but we have increasingly complex projects and.
J
In challenging and constrained sites, and so I would say that the level of complexity of the.
J
Projects in portsmouth may not be equivalent to those jurisdictions as most of the work.
J
We're doing is in a highly constrained urban environment along.
You know, impacted shore areas.
F
Now, if you have any appetite for increasing the three fees or.
D
Leave it where they are until they all come back next year,.
B
I would assume that the the greater than one thousand square feet category is where the the.
B
There's more work involved for your staff.
Would that be fair to assume?
um
I would say that.
J
That that is likely to be true.
um
That would be, I think, a fair statement can ask you a.
E
Question of counselor dan is: it is that noise much louder over on the base than it is here.
E
It's incredibly loud, it's louder here when it's raining out, because sound travels beforehand,.
D
Yeah, I always wanted to know, and now I can ask so it's three o'clock and most people are leaving and.
D
Hopefully we're not keeping people here past there.
It's all right interrupting, oh, but I was.
B
Beverly would 1250 or 1300 on the larger wetlands cups make sense.
I.
J
Think that you would still be within a
um
a reasonable sort of amount with that price.
D
Any way to do this per square foot, I know we shouldn't do it on the fly per square foot, but.
J
um
You know there are some jurisdictions that do do that,
um
but they have they mostly provide.
J
Ranges up to this many square foots, so it could be that over a thousand square feet, but I don't.
J
Know that we see many of those, so I would just.
uh
I would need to do a little more research to see.
J
To get a sense of what our and really just check in with staff, about what projects
um
you know.
J
That they would say really represent.
You know it really has to do with the.
J
Type of development, where it's located and what is currently on the site.
Sometimes they there is.
J
Some restoration, that's involved.
That requires a different level of review, because they're.
J
You know bringing certain areas back, so I just I can't say
uh
with any certainty, but I think that.
J
The larger the side, I think it's reasonable to say, is probably a more complex question.
J
Thank you.
F
Thank you.
Did we raise the fee for 1 000 square feet and greater to 1300.
B
Second, that, okay, all right, all those in fact hi.
A
All right
um
next, we had a question from the counselor denton to the health department.
E
Welcome kim thank you for staying for this.
A
And it's just: do you want to read it?
This is the question related to the supermarket fee.
E
Yeah, I know it's an odd question and looking at what was listed, my guess it was all for prepared.
D
Foods by hand, no, our fees are based on inspection times and facilities.
So again, this goes back to.
D
The conversation of the cfcs where actually supermarkets, they have lots of leaking cfcs.
D
In the floors, I'm not saying any of ours do, which that's how the floors stay cool is there's.
D
Miles and miles of piping below there to keep them that way.
So, there's an effort nationally to.
D
Try to get people to change the flooring and the piping in it in supermarkets and, along with the.
D
Evs and everything else the thought was well if you can incentivize good behavior, but since it's.
D
Not being what's inspected, I don't think we could actually increase it if they don't you're talking.
F
About chlorofluorocarbons, yes, well,
um
that's a little bit out of our realm once a building is.
J
Built we do the inspections.
On the you know, the operations and and the food service equipment.
J
But it's the building department, that's really involved in the pre-inspections.
My understanding.
F
Though cfcs were out of production in the 90s and banned in several countries, including this one.
J
In 2010, so I'm not real sure of those dates, but I would be surprised if we had antiquated enough.
K
Systems to make it worth the effort that you're thinking to to tackle that problem, that that's a.
D
Fair response- and it sounds like it's way out of your jurisdiction, so thank you any more questions.
F
Thank you kim.
Thank you for that.
Next would be the library welcome, christine.
D
Hi, so I want to ask you the same question, which I asked the recreation director regarding waiving.
D
Fees for non-residents for library cards, if it's military or dependent again, there's not.
D
A library at the shipyard and our library is much better than the one that's being reconstructed in.
D
Kittery, okay, I I can't answer exactly my my assumption would be that this would be.
K
Something for our board and discussion with the city manager to go to the council and term in.
K
Terms of how we change our fees, which we haven't done in about four, I want to say four years.
K
But I want to give you a little background on them.
um
My goal in them, I haven't set the fees that are.
K
Here now, but basically because new hampshire is one of about six states that does not have.
K
Any funding from the state or counties as other states do all of our budget comes from from.
K
The city of portsmouth, so we do anyone who owns property, anyone basically who's paying into the.
K
Paying into the tax base in portsmouth is is entitled to library cards, the non-residents.
K
In my mind should be somewhere around the same amount that the local citizens.
K
Are paying because we're not trying to punish them?
We're just trying to say.
K
These people in portsmouth have already paid into the tax base and therefore into our budgets,.
K
I know this has come up in the past because maine does have state funding or used to.
I haven't.
K
Checked it recently used to have state funding to their libraries and because it was determined by.
K
The supreme court- I understand where the where the shipyard is this has come up in the past.
K
And I think it's a fair question.
I think some libraries dover gives a discount to veterans not.
K
To active, as far as I recall to but to veterans and senior veterans, we give a discount to seniors.
K
um
And it's so it's certainly something that we could investigate, and that would be great.
D
If you could, how others are handling it, but I just want you to have that background.
That.
K
We're actually we're actually charging more than the per capita of our budget, but our non-resident.
K
Cards are per family, so I'd have to do.
The the numbers would be different if you suggested.
K
Let's say a family of four should pay four times the per capita which is not what's happening so.
K
We're somewhere in the middle there, dover charges twice as much as we do so with their discount for.
K
Veterans they're still paying more than we charge and we've tried to maintain that to the level.
K
Appropriate understanding, our costs for things like new services like downloadables and the.
K
Things that have increased our cost over the years, but I'd be happy to bring it up with the trustees.
D
You would that would be great for both military military, dependents and veterans.
K
Okay, do we know how many non-resident library cards there are
um
the numbers?
I didn't remember.
K
To get the numbers, but at the moment this year this fiscal year, it's been twenty thousand dollars.
K
In
um
in revenue, and so I don't know how many of them count yeah the head count, I'm I'm gonna tell.
K
You about four thousand non-resident mm-hmm, it's a good library, but we could divide that 20 000 by.
K
100,
um
so I can't I can't give you a direct.
I could find that for you as well, I'm just.
K
Impressed that I just looked quickly to see because if half of our non-residents.
K
Happen to be veterans or active duty, and I have no idea because we don't ask that.
K
um
You know it could be a loss of ten thousand dollars or, more just so, you're aware right.
B
Okay, that helps thank you order of magnitude on it.
Thanks, indeed,.
A
All right back to the agenda parking and transportation.
E
Did we answer councillor denton's question about the exemption waiver for.
E
Ev chargers and the utility excavation contractor permit for roads, sidewalks.
D
That wasn't directly answered, however, when the inspection department answered a similar question.
D
I'd imagine the response would be very similar where it would take away so,
um
okay.
D
I'm fine with that all right.
It's back to parking and transportation on page 48.
E
Welcome back so good afternoon,
uh
there was only one change this year recommended.
P
And that's in the
uh
the annual valet license on city property, so the division, mindful of a.
P
10 reduction of its prime inventory during the tourist season, the the driving this.
P
Conversation is the appropriate valuation of
uh
all available parking products, commercial valet.
P
And city operated spaces
uh
was last adjusted in fy 19..
Presently the license fee is 675.
P
For a year, regardless of location, whether it's a zone or b zone so considering there are 356 days.
P
Annually, where on street payments are enforced, the current fee of 675 is just a dollar forty per day.
P
But even considering
uh
highly reduced traffic in 2021, an a-zone space makes 1240 per day in the.
P
Last year, which is about 10 times that amount, so
um
uh
the division
um
uh
seeks to update.
P
This from 675 to 1500 per operation, which would equate to four dollars and 20 cents per space.
P
Per day, which still equates to a 65.7 percent
uh
savings, if you will
uh
for the lessee versus.
P
Potential revenue generation, which is justified by the explanation you see here on 348, which is.
P
Valet stations are only used when the restaurants open, so it's not a full-time situation in many.
P
Cases that was the original justification for the lower
uh
rate, but so for b zone.
The request would.
P
Actually be a reduction from the 675
uh
v levied a single b zone, space generated four dollars and.
P
Five cents per space each day in 2021, so for a valet operation located in b zone, the division.
P
Would introduce an annual fee of 500
uh
per operation using the revenue paradigm
uh
described.
P
Before a 500 fee would equate to 1.40 per day, which is a 65.4 percent,
uh
similar reduction.
P
In value
uh
the logic behind that being,
uh
if,
uh
if, if the it's the interest of fairness, you.
P
Know if we're trying to tie
uh
valet license fee to revenue generation, then it warrants.
P
A discussion as to location, a or b zone a zone obviously is high occupancy and greater demand.
P
Generating considerably more revenue and pricing should consider that fact.
Indeed, we have.
P
Separate a and b zone rates for single day, valet usage.
So in order to maintain consistent with the.
P
Formula, if we're to use the value per day paradigm for zone a it's, only fair, that we do so for zone b.
A
Yeah
um
before we vote, you did have a an additional parking question.
A
So the I guess two questions one was, and I may have missed it because you're just talking.
D
About zone a and zone b, but the actual hourly parking fee did I miss that and was that in here.
D
So
uh
parking fee parking rates are actually city ordinance, they're, not pervy to the fee committee.
P
I'm happy to discuss them and I don't think this is the venue.
B
And peter you can correct me if I'm, if I'm wrong there, that's good, that's correct!
Thank you.
Let's.
F
Answer that sure thank you ben all right
uh
motion to accept the parking changes.
Some move.
Second,.
A
Water and sewer page 56 welcome terry hello.
F
Sorry all right go ahead.
So, okay, we.
O
Move on no fee updates until we get to page 56, as xander said
um
so.
Each year we update our.
O
Rate model and part of that they look at assessing the fees which, in this instance, for fire services.
O
Are up updated based on these?
Are the monthly charges for based on size of the fire service.
O
The next item is backflow testing and it's been eight years since we updated that we.
O
Actually have staff that go out and test backflow devices that are in.
O
Properties throughout our our water system, about 2250 of those.
O
Tests occur each year, so this is basically just increase of the cost of that service.
O
On page 57, we do do some jobbing work on occasion for properties that are getting new services or, if.
O
So those costs are updated for three items, which are the hourly costs for backhoe, a dump truck.
O
And factor and those costs are recommended there on page 57 and lastly, the the the big change.
O
For
uh
this year for water sewer, we had our rate consultant.
Do a
uh
a look at capacity user.
O
Brian, this is good these we didn't mark them as changed like with the highlight in the schedule.
A
That you were sent so it's on page 58.
It's the last fees on water and sewer, but we'll correct.
A
That, before getting
uh
into the
uh
into the budget book, so it's the the capacity improvement.
A
Multiplier, yes, all right go ahead, thanks andrew
um
so anyway, our rate consultant looked at.
O
The capacity user charges- essentially, these are buying charges for the capital infrastructure.
O
And
um
given especially last year, just brought into service the pearce island facility, which.
O
All told's about 100 million dollars worth of investment, not to mention many other.
O
Investments in infrastructure, sewer separation and pump station improvements, especially on the sewer.
O
Side so they were last updated, fy, 19, so you'll see a big increase on the the water side is is about.
O
10, but it's the sewer that is recommending an increase, we'll start with the one inch again.
These.
O
Are prorated based on the service size because the larger the service, the larger capacity we have.
O
To serve and again this was updated by the rate consultant when we did the rate study a number of.
O
Years back and it follows industry standards for doing that, so, as you can see just based on the one.
O
Inch charge, which would be a residential and these are for news services, so this is a building.
O
That, let's say, doesn't exist today: they're coming in they're wanting a new service, so.
O
To buy into the system that capacity charge is recommended at 39.85 on the sewer and then.
O
Prorated, as you go up in size, based on what type of building it is and how large their services.
B
Those are some hefty increases, they are it's.
We we've got some hefty.
O
Hefty bills, where we're paying this year, you know just our payment at the island is.
O
Over four million dollars a year to start paying back that loan, do you foresee this being a plateau.
D
Or would keep going up, you revisit it, you can revisit it annually again.
It hadn't been done in.
O
Previous years, because of you know, it's really the pierce island prompted this, because
uh
it really.
O
uh
You know such a big number that we're starting to pay back so for all the years that, because we.
O
Had revolving loan funding for this, while we were building and constructing the facility.
O
We didn't have to pay back that debt, yet, which was quite fortunate, for you know the money now.
O
Now we are paying it that it's complete, so
um
that goes on the books and
uh
you know so.
Users now.
O
That are,
um
you know, a new new user on the sewer system.
Is you know the one the sewer.
O
Is going to this new facility?
That's the best way to say it and that's that's the buy-in component.
O
Existing customers are paying for it; they already they paid for their initial.
O
um
You know buy-in to the system and then they've been paying through the years as a rate payer.
B
Would this I can't remember, would this affect the sagamore creek
um
low pressure system, be the rates.
O
uh
I think there's going to be right before account yeah yeah.
I think that when we
um
go back.
Q
To the council to start talking about the cost apportionment one of the items will be on.
There is.
Q
Any kind of buy-in fees, but it's generally waived for for new construction, like that, this part of.
Q
The cost is generally waived for new connections- okay, because those folks are in for a lot already.
B
Could this be phased over a number of years?
It could be phased, but again these would be.
O
New customers, so I mean I'm, I'm not you know it's not a pro or an anti-development.
It's literally.
O
What is that cost so and balancing that is?
Is they are going to impact our system by.
B
Requiring more capacity right using more of our the available capacity, correct and and.
O
We do have
um
there are times where there's
uh
and then
um
you know bob sullivan city attorney.
O
Explained this there are occasions where
um
certain customers have negotiated different.
O
Fees based on maybe on-site improvements or off-site improvements, they're doing.
O
So, on some bigger projects, this this number may may change some bigger projects.
O
It might be higher for other reasons, depending on the type of sewer waste.
They are sending our way.
D
Is there any way to proactively tell people in advance these fees are going to go up, or is that.
D
Not possible so we don't know who's going to be building it.
In I mean these are these?
Are fees.
N
That go to new development.
Exactly so so people come in to do development, they're, they're, looking.
N
At fee structures, they're looking at you know what it takes to build in a place and they're.
N
Aware I mean other communities have impact fees.
um
You know in this case it's a it's a buy-in fee.
N
So how does this compare to similar-sized cities in new hampshire?
How would this compare to.
B
Say dover or nashua or keene?
I know I know when we did it.
We had an update through the.
O
Rate model it was, it was comparable, but we can.
We can take a look okay, so we're not way out.
B
We're not a big outlier.
No, no.
We are
um
a big
uh
investor, so I mean I don't know many communities.
O
In new hampshire that have spent the dollars, in fact, terry and I and peter we did an analysis.
O
The city has invested over 200 million dollars on system upgrades.
That's a lot a lot of money for.
O
That's in the last 10 years is that the figure you shared, something like that.
I left it on my desk.
Q
But it was 150 million over the last 10 and then 200 million over the last 20..
Okay, approximately.
N
For a community of 22 000 people, that's a significant investment yeah, the majority of it.
Q
Is over the last 10 years and if we didn't go with these increases, I would assume, or should we assume.
B
That the sewer rate would have to go up to make up the difference.
I mean we have to pay that.
B
Four million dollar bond cost that starts hitting us every year.
So so these fees are.
O
Not I think it's similar to, though beverly's not here, but
um
you know you don't necessarily count.
O
On these fees I mean we could have no development this year.
So if you, if you in your budget, said oh.
O
You know we we expect this monies to to pay for something and then have to have something offset.
O
It it does go more towards the bond payments and the expectation that we've been averaging around.
O
A hundred thousand dollars a year of revenue off of this, so it would go up more, but it is.
O
You know it's the way we do the rate model it helps offset, because we have net position.
O
So if we got 200 000 of fees above what we expected, that only helps us in the.
O
Additional years and our net position is really all designed to help buffer that impact of these.
O
Big projects smooth out the smooth it out yeah best we can.
We are unfortunately,.
O
Hit like everybody else, with some increasing costs that come budget time we'll have to talk about, but.
Q
Another thing to keep in mind here is you're, looking at a pretty wide spread.
Q
In terms of the size of the water service that they're getting up to 10 inches 10 inches is a.
Q
Gigantic pipe!
So when we look at some of the larger units that were just built downtown.
Q
You know normally, those buildings are four to six inch size.
So there it's it's pretty.
It's unusual.
Q
To see someone with a 10 inch pipe paying 190 000 for a sewer service, you know that's a user.
Q
Bigger than a roadway, you know right a lot of our pipelines, for you know, standard roadways.
Q
Are eight inch diameter, so someone bring coming in with a 10 inch diameter pipes shifting around.
Q
The way water flows in our system so just help me understand if somebody builds a 20-unit building.
Q
Two-Inch diameter two-inch two-inch diameter is this.
They then pay 12 752.
B
Per unit, no just for that service just for this single, so that what the it so.
O
You could divide it by the twenty, whatever in apartments or units.
B
So it's really six hundred dollars per unit energetically, right, yeah,.
Q
And you can see the history of the revenue brought in on the next page of the fee structure.
Q
um
So it was a hundred thousand back in fiscal 18 that actually dropped for water.
Q
Over time went down to seven about seventy sixty five thousand nine.
Fifty in fiscal 21.
Q
Sewer went the other direction, but
um
just gave you an idea what the.
Q
History for those two particular items looks like from a revenue perspective.
B
Yeah, no, it all makes starts to make sense.
Now, when you look at it, it's new development.
It's.
B
For the hookup, so it will be divided by a number of units.
B
Generally, it's a one-time fee too.
So right really just up front.
A
Any other questions.
A
Motion to accept the water sewer changes so moved.
B
Second, just in our stable and predictable budget world, we don't usually see jumps all those in.
B
Favor aye aye perfect.
All right
um
next would be the prescott park license agreements.
um
These are.
A
Not on the fee schedule, but in a agreement, the three agreements where it says that the.
A
Fee committee will annually review what
um
the three non-profits using prescott park pay for.
B
And I have to recuse, obviously
uh
prescott parkheart's festival.
D
First time I'm looking at this yeah, so so the.
A
Three organizations: the new hampshire arts association, the gondola.
A
And the ppaf, if you guys, want to get a little history of how it's gone, go ahead.
I
Sure
um
so you can see from the the document that judy just handed out.
This is the fourth year of.
I
The term of these license agreements at the end of this fourth year, which will be may early, may.
I
They can attempt to renegotiate another five-year term, so we're looking we're looking forward to.
I
uh
Working with the with the tenants of the of the park,
um
and as you can see from
uh
from the red.
I
On the document, because of covid, a lot of the fees have been waived over the last couple of years due.
I
To hardship what's very unusual about a license agreement is a that that a fee committee would.
I
Would recommend the increases annually?
That's just a kind of an unusual provision for any of.
I
Our license agreements, but,
um
interestingly,
um
the the task of setting the fee is the fee committee.
I
But in all of these agreements, the the city recognizes weather as a major component.
I
And the city manager has the authority to reduce or adjust these fees.
I
Now I know when we did it for kovid, those votes came to council specifically, and we did get one.
I
Request this year from the new hampshire art association, for a reduction in in fees.
D
Did they specify the amount they did not they didn't and they didn't in in years past.
I
Last year they got a third,
um
their their fees were reduced by a third, and I think.
E
Sorry to interrupt, they were reduced by two-thirds, one-third right and
uh
the financials for
um
the.
I
New hampshire, art association- and you can speak to this more about- they were running on a deficit.
I
Out of their trust fund is that correct?
That is correct, so for both last year and this year.
I
The deficit was greater this year than last year.
um
I don't have the circumstances as to why, but.
E
Just to note in the in this in the beginning, narrative is that.
E
Whatever the fee commit committee might recommend would need council approval.
D
So I'm just looking at the fy 22 for year.
D
Four, they still paid some okay, so council reduced by one-third.
D
And so the year five amount, that's what it would have been had year.
Five is for fiscal year 23..
So.
R
This is what your this is, what you're trying to set for now correct, so that number there.
D
That's essentially an increase off of year, one fiscal year, 19 per the agreement right.
R
It's actually in fiscal year.
um
What was it fiscal year 21?
The fee committee decided to.
R
Add increases to it based off of the cpi from november to the boston-based cpi, from november.
R
To november, so that's actually, where that increase comes from starting in fiscal year 21, if you're.
R
Looking at new hampshire arts association, you can see that there's a 32 increase.
That is the.
R
Cpi, for for fiscal year, 21, which was 2.12 percent so and that was determined by the fee committee on.
R
That year, we've kind of followed that ever since that there would be an increase based off of that.
A
So so it it's year, four to year, five is a five percent.
Five point: three one percent.
A
Increase and that's what the number is based on that is correct right, so the year five is.
A
Five percent more than year, four, all right before waiver before waiver yeah.
This is.
A
So this is, what is being proposed is what is, in
um
the year five.
D
And are these fees like the fees that attorney sullivan explained where they need to go towards.
D
um
These are in an agreement.
These are an agreement, okay, so so this is contract.
D
Yes, that makes more sense.
D
So I would like to reduce them, but then they'll be reviewed by the council.
D
Again correct correct!
Because if we reduce it to a third.
D
For the last year prior year of covid, I think it would make sense to at least reduce it.
D
To two-thirds this year, instead of just ramping up from a third to full.
A
So your request is to raise them to two-thirds of what the suggested is correct.
Okay,.
D
um
I I'll make all those in favor I'd, do them separately, so I would, I would do new.
I
Hampshire art association and then gondola and for the arts festival.
I would just.
I
Have the record reflect that it's a suggestion and a recommendation without a vote that is fair.
D
So for the new hampshire arts association, I would like to reduce fee to two-thirds of that.
F
Voting on the other two,
uh
yes,.
B
Yes, the arts association and the envelope yep, the arts association has asked for relief.
I
Yes, they're the only of the three that so far that we've got a written request: okay, because of covet.
B
That's what they stated: yes, okay, so they're coming into the year with the deficit.
Yes,.
D
And then
uh
motion to do the same to.
D
Reduce the proposed fee to by two-thirds two to two two thirds.
Thank you.
Two-Thirds.
A
Any questions for the gun, the gun for the gun, any questions.
A
I'll, second, that all right, all those in favor aye all right, hi now, the third one, the cpaf right and.
A
This one, I can't that's right all right, let's see if I get it correct this time, I'm going to.
D
Motion to reduce the fee to two-thirds the proposed year, five fy 23 amount, all those in favor.
A
Hi and counselor denton, you had a question similar to the one for
uh
library.
Yes, so and rick.
D
When it comes to the hourly fees, for either launching boat or boats and kayaks, or putting them.
D
Tying up to the pier any guess what it would cost.
We waive that for military military dependents.
D
Or veterans, I think, that's a separate fee structure, not not under the terms of these license.
I
Agreements correct so now, yeah now we're back to the we're back to the same.
The fee committee yeah.
I
Or the fee schedules, if I make the
um
the docs, are our special loan,
uh
that's structured through the.
N
uh
The trust which I think it could be a little more challenging to provide those discounts.
N
uh
The the boat launch is something that that could be considered, but I believe the I'd have.
N
Would have to get back to you on the structure of how we're paying back the boat doctor.
A
This this goes into the trust, this, the right.
These revenues do correct, correct, but not the.
N
Boat launch doesn't go into the trust boat launch does not, but the docking feasibility.
If the boat.
D
Launch would be the easiest one.
I would definitely ask that be looked into.
That's a recreation.
B
And that would be for non-residents.
That would be for non-resident.
D
Military dependents or veterans, so they show up the kayak and say that would be for the daily, not.
D
For I think, there's both a daily and a pass so just for the daily.
A
That's on page 43., thank you.
A
So what exactly do you want him to
uh
so this wouldn't be peter.
This would be more a question.
D
For recreation, if when they look into not charging military dependents,.
D
Or veterans for the outdoor pool, if the same could be done for the
uh
pure, silent boat launch.
D
And that would be not per season that would simply be per launch.
D
Stuff someone there's.
A
So so the budget book will re reflect what is here.
You know, besides the emotions that we took.
A
And the veterans report back, he can he's probably going to report back and if.
A
You guys want to change something in june when you're voting on it.
A
After a report back that's how it would happen that works.
Thank you.
D
Should we motion to adopt this and whole or.
D
The individual
um
we've kind of hit every we've kind of hit every
uh
change so.
B
Another stand is proposed right, but we do have one more thing on the agenda.
I'll just public comment.
A
Any public comment: yes, sir, I do have a seat.
Please state your name and your address.
Please thanks.
S
280 south street
um
and sitting here, I've made quite a couple notes and
uh
I'd like to
uh
propose.
S
Them to the members
um
and listening to
um
the city attorney described the
uh
the fee structure.
S
um
For the composting as a resident, I was kind of confused as to if we were actually talking about.
S
A fee here or a fine and then my next question to that would be: are the costs associated with.
S
Any of this, since you went the other way being covered by who has to enforce this.
S
Like I think I don't know who mentioned that, how do you enforce that people are actually composting.
S
That you gave them a discount already and
uh
do we know that we're covering our cost on that one.
S
The next thing I would like to ask is I'd just like to make a statement from the from the.
S
Inspection department on the roof permit, because I myself had to put a roof on two years ago,.
S
And I paid a fee, I paid a permit fee of fifty 50 and there was no inspection.
There was there.
S
Was nothing included in that I came over, I paid my fee and, and that was it so fyi I I don't know how.
S
That fits in, but that's what was happening at that time.
The next comment I would ask.
S
Is to you peter on the cost of the recycle bins of ten dollars?
I guess I would ask.
S
That the type of bins be upgraded or something, if you're going to ask us to pay for them.
S
This is one of my pet peeves, because I have repaired mine numerous times and on south street.
S
At 6 20 in the morning on tuesday, you can hear the trucks coming up and the the.
S
Gentleman throwing the bins down and
um
if you're going to ask the.
S
Taxpayers to pay for this, in addition to their taxes, I guess I would like.
S
Better equipment so that they don't break and crack and mine are ugly.
They have fifteen thousand.
S
Duct tapes on them, because of that, so that would be my question there, since that has gone through.
S
um
The last thing I guess in in listening to especially counselor denton,
um
I I would remind.
S
You that for every fee you waive or for everything you cut since this is the only place there's only.
S
Two places where we get revenue to pay for the services in the city.
This is the other one.
The.
S
Other one is property taxes assessed to the residents and and the commercial taxpayers, but.
S
For every fee you cut or take away or dismiss it, it has to be made up somewhere.
So it automatically.
S
Goes to the property taxpayers, so I would ask you to please think about that, as I have no idea.
S
The the amounts that we that that were discussed today that were decreased.
S
And all of this, if passed by the council, would go on the property tax pairs.
S
So that was
um
those are my comments and I don't know if
uh
you can answer any of my questions.
S
As far as the first parts, since this is public comment through the through the counselors, I've.
E
Asked
um
city attorney sullivan to come back to answer that question about fee versus fine.
E
Thank you because I just want to make sure we have this correct bob.
This is the question you.
E
Were in the room?
Initially
um
the compost question?
Yes, because it's it's all in how you set it up.
E
It's a fee for outdoor dining, but does it then become a fine?
Does it trip that issue, not the.
C
Way, I you know, I've had some communication with council then, and the way I look at it.
C
It's simply an agreed upon amount, it's contract between the city and the restaurant.
C
Saying if you
uh
compost well the way it's developed even today, it says if your compost.
C
uh
You are fine, but if you don't compost, you're gonna have to pay this extra 200.
I don't think.
C
It's a fee or of mine.
I think it's a contractual arrangement.
Thank you.
May I ask another so.
S
You didn't really go through the steps of how we get there, so you did mention that this needs.
S
To be in an ordinance, so are we there penalty has to be an ordinance.
um
The the way this one.
C
Would get there as I unders after the discussion today, is that probably tonight.
C
Somewhere, along the way, counselor 10 would
uh
um
get the authority from the rest of the council to.
C
Make a motion in a place: that's not on the agenda.
C
The motion would be that the private of the council.
C
With regard to outdoor dining service, be supplemented by the requirement that.
C
All restaurants serving food on city property pay, 200 additional composting amount ex, which would be.
C
Waived if the restaurant's actually complied with composting ordinance, could we also con consider.
E
The the converse so that we don't run a foul of the vote that the council took previously.
Could we.
E
Structure it to say, and again this gets back to enforcement.
E
The fee in the case of our parking space is 1500.
If you do not compost, the city will charge you 200.
E
An additional two for for not composting, so as long as it's contractual, it doesn't matter.
That's.
C
What I was trying to say I was I was
um
the result will be the same.
That's what I was trying to.
C
Call I'm just concerned about sticker shock or or council changing that number and having it.
E
Be a if I may, yes,
um
the the thought I had originally was that, instead of raising it to.
N
Cover the cost, you know to add the additional cost.
It would be reward.
The good behavior and detox.
N
Off the 1500 right, so that would be 1300 for folks that do compost and 1500, because the 1500's.
N
Already been approved by council yeah and they wouldn't raise, I could see restaurants being upset.
N
Right, there's been an increase in fee, and it wasn't right particularly noticed in that whole.
N
Thing in this way, you're able to reward the folks that are doing the right thing and it's a simple.
N
Document you know document your contract, mr fox,
um
and then then you qualify for that deduct.
D
And seeing as the council nationally voted to send it here, do you think would have to go back.
D
To the council for going to be rewarding versus increasing yeah, because you're changing it.
Okay,.
D
That's fair and I'll.
I could work that in tonight.
My my last question on that would be.
um
How is the.
S
Public going to be made aware of this: does this require a public hearing because of the change.
C
There's no requirement for public hearing on this kind of a council vote.
C
So probably the way that public would be informed of it is tomorrow, or anybody who applied for.
C
Outdoor service on city property just be told, this is the status of the council.
We can.
We can include.
E
That information, in the view, permit message out to permitees and we can certainly publicize it.
E
Through the various channels that we have okay, thank you.
Thank you any other questions.
No thank.
D
You for bringing all the staff here to answer my questions.
It's down to just a few
uh
motion to.
A
Close the meeting adjourn the meeting yes and before we adjourn does it make sense for one.
E
One or both of the counselors to put under their name for the march 21st agenda, the the report of.
E
The fee committee or what's the timing after this,
um
we we just publish it into the budget.
A
And that's the report and then, when the budget presentation happens you you can speak to it.
A
When, when we have like a work session on the budget or or not, you know, but it will.
A
Go up for a vote in early june, along with all the other budget resolutions.
A
And these will all be listed as an attachment, and you all will vote on it.
The the dining ones since.
A
The vote is happening now.
Those will not be in there as a change they'll be as an active fee.
A
If it's, the ones that were passed are active now and if you make the amendment it'll it'll.
A
Change the fee and it'll be in the budget book as already active all right.
Thank you.
A
For watching to adjourn yeah so moved seconds in favor, aye aye perfect.
Thank you.
Thank you.