►
From YouTube: Regular City Council Meeting 7-1-2020
Description
Regular City Council Meeting 7-1-2020
A
A
A
A
A
B
D
E
B
The
microphones
are
on
so
say
the
City
Council
meeting
is
back
in
session
momentarily
and
I
just
want
to
say,
welcome
back
and
they
just
to
give
a
brief
update.
Howard
was
informing
us
that
around
8:15
this
morning
there
was
a
power
surge,
massive
power
surge
that
disrupted
everything.
So
we
appreciate
you
hanging
in
there
with
us.
They
will
go
back
and
match
up
the
audio
with
the
video,
so
that
you'll
eventually
be
able
to
see
this
morning's
session
all
in
one.
B
But
this
afternoon's
piece
we're
good
to
go,
and
so
we
appreciate
you
being
there.
I
know
there's
at
least
one
person
who's
watching
from
afar
from
Maryland,
and
you
know
who
you
are,
and
so
we
will
get
started
with
this,
and
the
first
thing
we
need
to
do
is
adjourn
as
the
City
Council
and
reconvene
as
the
bird
star
Isles
Canal
maintenance
assessment
district,
the
bird
store
hours
canal
maintenance
assessment
district
is
in
session.
E
E
So,
for
fiscal
year
2021
we
are
proposing
a
single-family
resident
assessment
rate
of
four
hundred
and
sixty
dollars.
So
this
is
ninety
five
dollars
less
than
what
we
had
shown
in
the
performer
last
year,
because
we
are
going
to
request
a
mid-year
appropriation
of
93
thousand
nine
hundred
eighty
to
pay
off
the
direct
dredging
debt
service.
E
So
again,
we
kind
of
just
try
and
show
you
a
history
of
assessments
and
where
we've
been
at
so
in
fiscal
year
17.
Originally
the
dredging
project
was
started
out
with
110.
We
were
able
to
decrease
that
to
95.
It
was
expected
to
go
through
fiscal
year
2021,
but
again,
paying
it
off
early
will
allow
us
to
have
a
proposed
rate
of
460
in
fiscal
year
2021,
and
this.
B
E
E
So
again,
we
kind
of
already
discussed
all
this.
In
the
current
fiscal
year,
2022
through
2025,
no
additional
rate
increases
are
ejected
because
again,
their
projects
are
not
currently
fully
approved.
So
until
that
time
that
they
approve
some
of
these
special
projects,
then
we
would
come
back
and
talk
about
additional
rate
assessments
in
future
years.
E
Again,
we
kind
of
already
talked
about
the
FEMA
extra
percentage
received
and
then,
of
course,
our
funding
for
the
riprap
mitigation,
as
it
is
in
a
future
year
to
come
from
carryover
of
unspent
see.well
funds
and
they
have
the
projected
reimbursement
in
a
following
year.
So
that'll
show
on
the
pro
forma
so
for
fiscal
year.
2021
again
we
use
the
same
assumptions
as
we
did
all
other
funds.
As
far
as
personnel
and.
E
Insurances
and
things
like
that,
so
again,
this
was
put
together
before
we
got
our
insurance
rate,
so
our
health
insurance
rate,
so
it's
still
at
6%,
but
we
will
be
lowering
that
to
the
1.5
percent
and
again
their
their
admin
charge
may
be
slightly
different
as
far
as
expenditures
as
well.
The
fiscal
year
2021
riprap
mitigation
project,
the
BSI
portion,
is
approximately
three
hundred
and
ten
thousand
and
again
it's
dependent
upon
permitting.
E
This
will
carry
it's
already
budgeted
in
fiscal
year.
2020
in
there's
was
a
small
amount,
so
we're
just
gonna
carry
that
over
to
fiscal
year,
2021
for
fiscal
year
22
through
25.
Our
assumptions
were
that
the
dredging
would
be
at
thirty-eight
thousand
per
year.
Mangrove
trimming
is
at
thirty
thousand
per
year.
Seawalls
has
an
estimated
increase
of
three
percent.
E
E
We
have
the
sea
wall,
maintenance,
engineering
study,
which
I
believe
is
complete
and
it
will
be
going
to
the
the
board
at
their
meeting
and
then
we'll
come
to
council
after
that,
Inlet
widening
barge
access
that
they
did
approve
the
design.
So
that
part
is
still
moving
forward.
They
did
need
an
additional
15,000
to
continue
with
that
part
of
the
process,
so
that
portion
of
the
project
is
approved.
It's
the
construction,
that's
not
currently
approved
and
the
channel
corridor
widening
again.
E
So
currently,
even
if
we,
if
the
projects
were
approved
and
put
on
here,
the
fun
could
handle
it,
probably
in
the
out
ears,
you
might
need
to
start
building
up
the
reserve
a
little
higher
because
remember
this
is
this
very
small
fund
and
even
though
we
try
and
use
a
certain
percentage,
this
fun
generally
has
a
little
bit
higher
percentage-wise
of
reserves,
because
obviously
one
seawall
is
a
lot
more
expensive
to
replace.
Then
then,
just
a
percentage
of
our
reserves.
There.
F
E
E
G
B
E
And
these
were
already
because
we've
taken
them
to
the
board,
we
are
presenting
them
as
we
present
it
to
the
board,
but
there's
slight
changes
and
for
the
final
budget.
When
you
see
your
final
budget,
those
slight
changes
to
it.
Okay,
so
one
other
thing
we
wanted
to
bring
up
for
BSI
is
the
use
of
the
Master
Agreement
for
FEMA
riprap
permitting,
and
the
reason
we
want
to
bring
this
up
is
because
we're
trying
to
get
this
permitting
moved
along
and
the
master
agreement.
E
If
we
use
the
master
agreement
for
permitting,
we
could
not
submit
the
permitting
to
FEMA
for
reimbursement,
so
that
portion
that
just
the
permitting
costs
will
not
be
reimbursed
and
the
reason
we're
suggesting
this
or
working
with
public
works
promise
is.
There
are
several
projects
out
there
that
are
going
to
acquire
some
of
the
same
types
of
studies
that
are
going
to
be
needed
to
do
this
type
of
permitting
for
the
riprap,
and
so
we
don't
want
to
duplicate
those
costs
between
different
engineers.
So
one
that's
doing
it
for
one
portion
of
our
permit.
E
That's
not
a
FEMA
related
project
versus
the
FEMA
related
project.
It
would
also
delay
us
if
we
decide
to
go
out
to
do
that
separately.
To
do
the
font
on
the
reimbursement.
It
would
have
to
be
a
federalized
contract
which
can
sometimes
drive
up
the
costs
a
little
bit,
because
again
it
could
there's
a
lot
of
extra
reporting
that
these
entities
have
to
do
so,
both
the
BSI
board
and
when
we
get
to
PGI.
E
E
E
For
the
construction,
we're
pretty
confident
they've
been
working
with
us,
we're
constantly
in
contact
with
them
about
this
particular
project.
They
are
trying
to
get
it
added
back
in
so
originally
the
mitigation
was
added
on
the
process,
so
you
had
to
construct
the
actual
replacements
plus
the
mitigation
first.
They
were
had
this
to
see.
Well,
they
added
the
mitigation
on.
G
E
B
H
E
H
E
G
E
E
So
for
this
fund
again
we're
gonna
kind
of
show
you
what
we
had
in
the
prior
year
versus
what
we're
proposing
for
fiscal
year
2021.
So
for
fiscal
year
20
we
had
the
$550
operating
assessment.
We
had
$100
for
the
hurricane
irma
assessment
at
a
total
of
650.
So
for
fiscal
year
21
we
were
able
to
drop
that
off
as
well
as
for
fiscal
year
2022
at
this
time,
so
we're
you
know.
We
were
only.
We
only
needed
that
for
two
years
at
this
time,.
G
E
E
Again,
a
lot
of
this
is
the
same
information,
but
err
for
the
hurricane
Irma
assistance
percentage
went
up
from
eighty
seven
and
a
half
to
ninety
five
percent,
which
is
why
we
were
allowed
to
able
to
drop
down
the
assessment
rate.
Funding
for
the
riprap
mitigation
is
included
in
fiscal
year
2021
now
so
originally
it
was
in
20.
We
did
move
it
up
to
2021.
E
We
would
do
it
as
a
lot.
The
long
draw
from
the
general
fund
that
we
transferred
to
PGI
and
then
we
expect
the
project
reaper.
The
timing
is
that
you
would
get
the
reimbursement
in
the
following
year,
so
fiscal
year,
2022
again,
this
is
still
pending
permitting
the
project
we
did
go
over.
The
same
type
of
increases.
E
Projections
were
used
as
in
all
other
funds,
and
again
we
will
reduce
the
health
insurance
for
the
one
and
a
half
percent,
and
any
change
to
the
administrative
fee
will
be
based
on
what
we
have
talked
about
fiscal
year.
22
through
25
estimates
that
the
mangrove
trimming
and
Inlet
dredging
will
remain
flat
throughout
those
years.
Seed
wells
have
an
estimated
3
percent
increase
and
all
others
are
pretty
much
standard
that
we've
been
using.
E
For
fiscal
year,
21
again
we
talked
about
the
sea
wall,
maintenance,
alternative
study
that
should
be
presented
to
the
board
at
their
next
meeting
and
then
we'll
come
to
Council
in
fiscal
year.
21.
They
do
need
a
new
handheld
GPS
unit
at
six
thousand
dollars.
The
PGI
spoil
site
channel
is
still
in
the
plan.
E
D
C
Debbie
I
think,
if
we
decide
to
go
through
with
us,
we're
gonna
have
a
whole
different
set
of
issues
than
anything
we
want
to
get
involved.
With
today
on
budget,
we
are
going
to
have
a
demand
for
assessments,
we're
going
to
have
it
and
for
the
people
that
live
in
the
bird
section,
not
paying
this
and
I
mean
we
are
opening
a
real
can
of
worms
that
I,
don't
I
think
go
far
beyond
the
dredging
and
I
I
would
hope
that
the
people
on
the
canal,
Advisory
Committee,
are
prepared
to
help
us
work.
G
H
B
H
I
G
B
There
are
those
of
us
who
have
lots
of
experience
in
yes,
and
we
know
what
I
think
that
you,
you
put
it
very
well
Debbie
all
that
would
need
to
be
required,
so
I
and
Lynn
and
I
want
to
do
whatever.
It
is
the
right
thing
for
the
community,
but
we
have
to
approach
it
correctly
as
well.
So
it's
the
only.
G
D
B
I
understand
and
is
so
that
I
I'm
I
don't
live
in
PGI.
So
I'm
looking
to
my
colleagues
that
you
know
represent
the
PGI
homeowners
property
owners
and
you
know
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
we
do
want
to
have
a
discussion,
but
we're
going
to
need
to
have
a
discussion
with
and
it
probably
a
future
discussion
with
and
have
PGI
Canal
Committee
members
present
I
also.
H
D
H
B
H
C
A
lot
of
decisions-
you
know
people
who's,
gonna,
say
based
on
the
conversations
that
I
had
with
people
after
our
last
meeting
when
Rick
brought
the
you
know
just
doing
the
design
plan,
that
was,
it
just
seemed
like
an
incredible
amount
of
money.
I
think
we're
gonna
have
to
have
some
real
real,
solid
numbers
to
go
forward
and
some
kind
of
plan.
How
we're
gonna
do
the
assessments
and.
C
H
E
M
B
E
E
D
B
B
E
So,
just
as
you,
here's
the
pro
forma
and
even
though
this
particular
project
is
not
included
in
here.
If
you
did
include
it,
it
wouldn't
necessarily
affect
the
first
couple
years,
but
you
might
need
towards
the
again
towards
the
very
end
of
the
the
pro
forma
area
that
you
might
need
an
assessment
for
that
particular
project.
But.
E
So
again,
if
you're
would
like
consensus
that
for
us
to
bring
back
to
you
on
July
8th
for
consideration
for
the
tentative
assessment
rate
of
$550
nodding.
Yes,
the
proposed
budget
as
presented,
except
with
those
two
minor
changes,
and
then
again
we
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
the
Ponce
Inlet
whiting
engineering
project
was
considered
a
priority
by
the
the
board
and
they
wanted
to
justify
that.
It
was
possibly
maintenance
and
get
it
add
back
to
budget
when
resolved,
and
then
the
use
of
the
Master
Agreement
for
the
female
River
ever
permitting.
E
H
E
So
it's
not
just
so
the
FEMA
riprap
is
for
both
is
both
both
canals,
but
it's
the
additional
rip-rapping
permits
that
are
gonna
be
required
by
these
two
canal
meetings.
Districts
that
would
have
maybe
had
to
be
under
SEP.
You
know
under
the
master
agreement,
and
then
you
would
had
to
gone
out
if
you
were
federalizing
it
and
you
would
have
had
two
companies
possibly
doing
the
same
type
of
work
for
two
different
projects,
even
though
they
could
have
been
combined.
So
that's
why
we
would
like
to
eliminate
that
duplication,
we're
good!
Thank
you.
Mm-Hmm.
E
C
E
Did
want
to
mention
one
other
thing:
I
mean
even
when,
with
this
project,
there
was
always
the
possibility
that
we
go
out
for
the
permit
and
we
don't
get
a
permit.
Both
boards
were
aware
of
that
when
they
wanted
to
continue
moving
forward
with
the
riprap
project.
So
again
that
that
possibility
is
still
out
there
that
you
know
what,
if
they
don't
give
us
a
permit.
Obviously
you
would
say
that
you
wouldn't
have
any
construction
costs
in
the
future,
but
it
is
a
risk
of
trying
to
go
out
for
the
permit.
Okay,.
I
B
M
C
B
M
M
M
And
so
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
officially
approve
the
agreement
next
week.
Unless
there
is
some
immediate
concern
about
the
key
elements
of
the
contract,
we
did,
we
did
utilize.
Howard's
existing
contract
is
the
basis
for
the
new
contract,
and
so
most
of
the
provisions
that
you'll
see
you're
already
familiar
with
I.
B
Have
to
I
don't
have
those
contracts
in
front
of
me.
Is
there
a
provision
in
the
contract
for
and
if
you
call
it
probationary
period,
so
the
second
you
know
so
that
it's
where
we
would
not
if
something
happened
and
and
he
assumed
the
position
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
we
find
oops.
This
is
not
working
or
whatever
that
we
were
able
to
terminate
the
contract
without
having
to
pay
the.
D
B
N
The
record
Phil
wicks
from
HR
manager,
if
you
terminate
him
between
August
24th
and
December
31st
of
22
August
24th
of
2020
and
December
21st
of
22,
you
will
be
responsible
for
a
severance
of
20
weeks,
which
is
statutory.
It
is
the
and
there
will
be
some
insurance
costs
also
following
his
separation
for
the
equal
amount
of
20
weeks.
Okay,.
N
K
N
Howard
originally
started
his
severance
was
six
months,
yeah,
okay
and
then
it
was
reduced
to
three
months
at
his
insistence,
and
now
it's
I
think
two
months
in
this
last
period
that
you've
managed
to
hang
on
to
him,
so
I
think
it
I
think
it's
importantly
has
the
comfort
of
that
essentially
you've.
Given
him
a
two-year
window,
where
he'll
have
some
money
to
walk
away
with
to
resettle
and
do
his
thing.
B
N
N
Anything
the
only
thing
is
really
outstanding.
Right
now
is
we're
still
waiting
on
the
background.
The
reason
to
that
is
that
the
company
that
we
use
first
of
all,
they
don't
go
on-site
in
right
now,
because
we
coded
so
they've
had
be
doing
everything
remotely
well.
The
county
and
the
county
administration
offices
have
been
closed
due
to
Cove
in
so
that's
been
difficult.
He
said
he
was
finally
able
to
track
down
somebody
yesterday
and
he's
going
to
put
together
the
report.
Hopefully
have
it
to
me
tomorrow.
N
Maybe
Friday
I'll
look
through
my
emails
and
unless
there's
something,
if,
with
your
permission,
unless
there's
something
that's
just
really
whoa,
we
don't
want
to
do
that.
I'll,
just
I'll,
send
it
on
to
McHale.
You
may
wind
up
getting
that
information
a
little
bit
later
than
what
the
agenda
would
be.
Okay,.
D
C
B
J
In
a
room,
the
Utilities
Director
I
have
some
good
news
for
you.
We've
completed
the
testing
and
calibration
at
the
RO
plant
and
we're
confident
that
we're
ready
to
with
better
thing
in
sync:
we've
been
blending
and
testing
that
blending,
and
we
are
now
actually
sending
to
make
the
blended
water
into
the
distribution
system.
So
Wow.
B
J
D
One
more
update
the
folks
who
are
putting
together
the
application
package
for
the
former
impact
University
military
heritage
museum.
They
have
drafted
their
work.
They
will
be
meeting
with
staff
very
shortly
to
make
sure
they
put
it.
I
got
all
the
information
needed,
so
that
is
moving
quicker
than
we
originally
thought.
Good.
D
H
B
K
K
So
if
we
look
at
that-
and
we
kind
of
compare
first
I
just
want
to
compare
Charlotte
County
to
it
and
see
where
we
are.
So,
if
you
look
at
Charlotte
County
as
a
whole,
we
have
an
experienced
an
uptick,
but
not
at
the
level
percentage-wise
as
the
rest
of
the
state.
The
group,
that's
on
the
on
the
rise
that
accounts
for
most
of
that
uptick
is
in
that
24
to
say,
40
year
old
age
group
right.
So
there's
that
and
to
try
to
wrap
some
logic
around
that
there.
K
K
About
the
state
in
general,
Oh,
Charlotte,
County
again,
our
demographics
know
I'll
get
to
that
right.
Well,
we've
seen
an
uptick.
If
you
look
at
the
group
that
is
on
the
rise,
it's
that
that
you
know
young
working
crowd,
the
24
to
40
year
old
and
so
well.
We
haven't
seen
the
uptick
at
the
same
percentage
at
all.
Maybe
it
has
to
do
with
our
demographics,
where
we
haven't
got
a
large
24
to
40
year
old
population
across
the
state
we
have
seen
an
uptick.
So
though,
is
certainly
have
so.
K
Let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
hospitals
and
and
we're
working
with
that
hospitals
are
running
anywhere
about
60
to
70
percent
at
their
census.
Well,
within
their
capacity.
So
there's
not
you
know,
they're,
not
into
search
protocols
or
anything
of
that
matters,
so
things
are
working
out
well
with
them
testing
so
from
the
Department
of
Health.
Testing
remains
the
priority,
and
so
we've
been
involved
with
the
testing
with
the
Health
Department.
Over
the
last
couple
of
weeks,
we've
used
Cooper
Street,
a
rec
center
at
Cooper
Street,
and
it's
worked
out
very
well.
K
Don't
I
continue
so
not
at
Cooper
Street,
not
at
the
rec
center
logistic
logistics
ly.
Logistically
there
was
a
bit
of
an
issue
with
just
the
roads
and
driving
and
MOT,
and
it
was
kind
of
resource
heavy
they're,
moving
it
across
the
street
to
South
County,
it's
my
understanding.
So
it's
still
going
to
happen
and
there's
lots
of
testing
sites
available.
In
fact,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
you
can
still
get
tested,
walk
up
at
Port
Charlotte
crossing
Monday
through
Friday
and
Port
Charlotte
and
Charlotte
Harbor.
It's.
B
G
G
K
Relevant
information
we'll
be
sure
to
do
it,
and
I
can
tell
you
so
we're
gonna
skip
Thursday
we're
gonna
skip
tomorrow
as
they
kind
of
regroup
and
set
up,
but
my
understanding
is
starting
next
week
and
again
the
Tuesday
Thursday
model.
It
will
be
at
South,
County,
Park,
but
we'll
be
sure
and
put
that
out
on
the
website.
If,
as
we
get
the
accurate
information
but
testing
still
that's
still
the
plan
and
the
priority
forum,
like
I,
said
really
big
numbers
and,
interestingly
enough
I
I,
think
I
discussed
with
some
folks.
K
You
know
when
you
look
at
the
demographics
and
people
that
are
being
tested.
There
are
folks
coming
from
Arcadia
Murdock
wherever
it
is,
and
it's
it's
almost
as
that.
You
know
folks,
get
nervous
and
and
I
want
to
test
and
I
need
it
today.
We're
gonna
get
it
so
then
they'll
drive
to
get
the
tests
so
they're,
not
just
all
our
residents.
K
So
as
a
city,
how
are
we
doing?
We've
got
a
few
employees
that
have,
you
know,
have
had
some
exposures,
whether
they
be
you
know,
kind
of
direct
contact
or
next
or
you
know
second
generation
kind
of
stuff.
Overall
we're
doing
very
well.
We've
got
a
few
still
working
from
home
just
to
reduce
those
exposures,
we're
encouraging
our
employees
to
remain
vigilant
about
their
hand-washing,
socially
distancing
and
wearing
masks
when
they
can't
stay
socially
distant,
particularly
in
the
workplace
right
again,
as
a
community.
K
K
You
know
we
haven't
seen
that
huge
spike
that
you've
seen
across
the
state
in
in
Charlotte
County
and
specifically
in
the
three
three
nine
five.
Oh,
so
why
is
that?
Again?
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
demographic
being
a
little
less
than
the
group.
That's
on
the
uprise,
but
also
I,
think
our
folks
are
doing
they're,
making
good
decisions,
they're,
they're,
staying
at
home,
they're
there
protecting
themselves,
good
hand,
washing
and
wearing
masks,
and-
and
so
overall,
it's
not
quite
as
dismal
as
some
of
the
other
numbers.
K
And
even
if
you
look
at
those
those
numbers,
the
last
few
days
have
been
much
lower
than
the
previous.
So
you
know
again
it's
about
education
and
testing
and
all
of
that
one
of
the
things
we've
done
so
there's
a
push
to
make
masks
available.
You
know
countywide,
so
I
know.
Personally,
we
have
picked
up
about
8,000
masks
and
we're
distributing
them.
500
went
out
on
Monday,
just
through
City,
Hall
and
and
just
everywhere.
We
can
in
fact
I
think
you
all
should
have
had
some
in
your
mailbox
right.
K
You
said
the
idea
to
make
them
to
get
them
out
where
folks
again,
if
they
don't
have
one
or
they
they
once
sent,
you
know
just
want
a
little
supply.
Then
we
can
do
that.
We're
looking
at
through
our
point
of
entry
at
City,
Hall
working
with
faith-based
groups
and
some
of
the
food
pantries.
Where
folks
will
will
come
in
so
we
can
hand
out
some
masks
to
make
them
available,
and-
and
that's
where
we
are
any
questions.
D
So
we'll
probably
need
the
police
chief
in
here
when
we
start
talking
about
mandating
masks.
That's
what
we're
gonna
talk
about
right
now,
we're
not
here,
you're
not
going
to
be
making
any
decisions
today,
because
we
have
nothing
in
front
of
you
to
make
a
decision
on
I
want
to
present
the
topic,
because
it's
becoming
more
prevalent
throughout
the
state
and
even
in
the
area,
Southwest
Florida.
That
communities
are
starting
to
look
towards
mandating
masks,
and
you
see
the
headlines.
D
The
headlines
on
the
news,
media
city
of
Sanibel
mandated
mass
city
of
Sarasota
mandating
masks,
but
you
got
to
read
between
the
headlines
to
see
what
they
really
did
or
what
they
really
didn't
do
before
we
decide.
If
we
want
to
enact
such
an
ordinance
or
not
it'll
be
in
an
emergency
ordinance.
If
we
do
it,
let
me
talk
to
you
about
what
Sarasota
did
just-
and
this
is
all
just
within
the
past
week
or
so.
D
So
as
long
as
your
social
distancing
six
feet
apart
anywhere
I
guess
you
don't
have
to
learn:
ask
persons
for
whom
a
face
covering
would
cause
impairment
due
to
an
existing
health
condition,
persons
who
work
alone.
They
don't
have
any
interactions
with
another
person,
persons
working
in
a
business
or
profession
who
maintain
social
distancing
from
another
person.
So
if
you're
working
in
an
office,
environment
or
or
or
a
retail
environment
or
whatever,
and
you
can
socially
distance,
you
don't
have
to
wear
a
mask.
D
D
D
There
they're
wearing
a
mask
every
person
over
two
years
of
age
who
was
away
from
his
or
her
place
of
residence,
should
carry
a
face
covering
every
person
over
to
who
was
away
or
from
his
or
her
residence
should
wear
a
face
covering
went
closer
than
six
feet
to
another
person.
So
here
again,
if
you
could
stand
or
be
a
six
feet
or
more
apart,
I
guess
you
don't
have
to
wear
a
face
mask.
D
D
Individuals
obtaining
service
from
a
barbershop
beauty,
salon
or
other
type
of
service
involving
header
face
where
you
have
to
remove
the
mask
to
perform
the
work
individuals
gauged
in
work,
wear
use
of
a
face
covering
will
not
be
compatible
with
duties
of
the
profession.
I,
don't
know
what
that
means.
That's
subjective.
There
was
something
I.
H
D
Owners
are
workers
in
an
area
of
a
business
or
other
place
of
public
accommodation
that
is
not
open
to
customers
patrons
or
the
public,
provided
that
six
feet
of
distance
exists
between
any
owners.
So
again,
that's
six
feet:
exemption
again
guests
in
a
hotel
room,
motel,
room,
vacation
rental
unit,
that
type
of
thing
and
individuals
worshipping
in
a
religious
institution.
D
D
D
We
have
some
drafts
from
some
other
places
that
we
could
use
and
with
David's
help
or
city
attorneys
help
craft
something,
but
we
would
be
doing
something
not
in
sync,
with
Charlotte
County.
At
this
moment
we've
tried
to
do
everything
in
sync,
with
Charlotte
County,
because
we're
a
small
County.
We
have
only
one
city.
Some
of
these
other
places,
like
Lee
County,
has
like
five
or
six
cities.
Seven
cities,
maybe
large
place.
D
G
D
L
M
Unaware
of
a
violation
and
didn't
enforce,
we
were
unaware
of
any
more
than
we
would
be
liable
for
failing
to
stop
someone
for
speeding
that
we
didn't
see
speed
and
they
were
involved
in
some
sort
of
fatal
crash.
So
I'm
not
worried
so
much
from
the
standpoint
of
liability
regarding
enforcing
what
we
see
and
not
being
able
to
enforce
others
and
relying
upon
enforcement
things
of
that
nature.
I'm
not
worried
about
liability.
G
C
Yeah
be
oh
one
of
the
ways
that
I
would
like
to
look
at.
This
is
I
have
heard
from
some
of
our
small
business
people
that
they
don't
think
they're
getting
the
foot
traffic
that
they
would
be
getting
normally,
because
people
are
afraid
to
go
in
because
they
can't
make
people
wear
masks
and
if
we
made
it
an
ordinance,
they
would
then
have
the
power
of
the
city
to
say
no,
you
can't
be
in
here
without
a
mask
on
and
from
that
stamp.
C
You
know,
I
just
want
to
just
want
to
throw
that
out
there
that
that's
one
of
the
things
that
I've
heard
the
managers
of
some
of
the
bigger
stores
they're
like
I,
can't
make
them
you
know,
and
so,
as
a
result,
a
lot
of
people
just
aren't
shopping
right
now,
and
you
know
if
they
need
us
to
start
spending
our
money
they
need.
We
need
to
feel
safe,
mm-hmm
and
I.
Don't
think
that
if
you
ask
most
people
from
the
CDC
or
the
scientific
community,
they'll
tell
you
that
the
six
feet
is
the
whole
game.
H
Then
I
totally
agree
with,
what's
been
said
already:
I
I
think
that
it's
not
about
taking
people's
liberties
away.
This
is
about
keeping
people
safe
and
healthy
and
alive,
and
it's
very
real.
It's
not
getting
better
and
it's
proven
since
we
started
opening
things
up,
the
numbers
have
skyrocketed
again
and,
and
that
and
the
mean
average
age
has
gone
down
by
over
20
years.
It
was
61
years
of
age
was
the
average
age
of
the
testing
positive
cases
to
three
weeks
ago
and
it's
down
to
40.
H
As
of
yesterday,
I,
don't
know
what
it
is
today.
Cuz
I
haven't
seen
it
yesterday,
but
that
means
to
me
you
know
the
younger
people
are
going
out
more,
obviously
because
they
can,
and
and
and
not
only
that
but
they're
meeting
with
people
who
then
go
to
work
the
next
day
or
they
go
to
home
and
they're,
connecting
with
people
at
all
different
age
brackets
and
the,
and
these
cases
are
popping
up
everywhere.
I
talked
to
dr.
Klein
yesterday
and
he
said
they're
even
getting
pregnant
people
coming
in
with
kovat,
so
I
mean
that's
scary.
H
It's
very
scary
and
I
think
I
think
we
need
to
do
something
that
is
proactive
and
shows
our
business
community
and
our
residents
that
we
are
trying
to
keep
them
safe
and
and
I
guess.
If
that
requires
a
mask
ordinance,
then
I
guess
we
need
to
do
it
I
think
we
need
to
move
it
forward,
but
it
you
know,
I
see
both
sides
of
it.
H
It's
feel
they're
uncomfortable
telling
people
they
have
to
do
something,
but
at
the
same
time,
if
we
don't
do
that,
it's
never
going
to
happen
and
and
I
agree
with
what
debbie
said
about
the
businesses.
I
know
that
to
a
certain
extent
they
feel
like
the
law
is
not
behind
them,
even
if
they
put
the
sign
on
the
door.
That
says
no
shoes,
no
shirts,
no
mass,
no
service,
but,
to
a
certain
extent,
they're
they're
going
to
get
people
really
rebelling
about
that.
If
it's
an
ordinance,
then
they
they
don't
have
any
say-so.
I
Think
that
Sarasota's
construct
is
one
I,
think
that
maybe
we
can
look
at
I'll
be
thinking.
The
exceptions
are
enough:
that
they're
actually
like
realistic,
like
being
able
to
eat
and
drink
etcetera,
but
also,
if
you're,
basically
coming
into
a
place
and
you're
not
doing
that
and
you
just
around
people
I
think
it's
reasonable
to
have
mass.
Where
and
I
know,
mm-hmm.
B
Yeah
I
was
trying
to
bring
theirs
up
on
line
and
that's
what
happened
when
it
brought
it
up
on
line
this,
this
video
started
playing
and
it's
like
oops,
but
I
don't
want
to
have
to
tell
anybody.
You
know
that
you
need
to
be
doing
this
I
feel
like
that's
something
people
need
to
just
take.
Take
to
heart
and
we've
been
we've
been
really
telling
people
this
and
we've
been
putting
it
out
every
week
and
you
know,
but
it's
it's
yeah
and
I
see
both
sides
of
this.
B
You
know
on
the
same
side
of
it,
I
think.
As
Debbie
said,
the
business
community,
some
people
feel
like
they're
not
getting
as
much
business
as
they
could,
because
people
are
afraid
to
go
shop.
So
you
know,
there's
a
side
that
says
well:
I,
don't
want
to
wear
a
mask:
I'll
go
shop
elsewhere.
Okay,
that's.
B
O
So
yeah
some
of
the
enforcement
issues,
a
I
agree
the
outside
we're
not
seeing
issues
there.
At
least
me
personally
anecdotally,
but
as
far
as
enforcement,
almost
like
I,
don't
I,
haven't
read
the
ordinance
Howard
was
talking
to
me
about
it
yesterday
and
signs
need
to
be
posted
at
these
businesses.
That
say,
you
cannot
enter
without
a
mask.
That
will
help
a
lot.
O
I
mean
it's
gonna,
be
tough
it,
but
basically
you
can't
enter
unless
you
know
about
masks
that'll
be
helpful
as
far
as
when
we
get
there,
we
can
say:
okay,
you
know
you
need
to
leave,
but
it
needs
to
be
something
where
we
can
easily
and
it
needs
to
be
easy
for
us
to
enforce
it.
I
guess!
That's
why
I
don't
like
the
outside
thing
cuz!
O
We
could
be
called
all
day
long
to
go
in
to
do
things
with
the
outside,
but
I
think
as
far
as
the
businesses,
my
daughter
works
for
a
business
up
in
Port
Charlotte
that
it's
a
store
and
if
they
have
a
sign
on
there
right
now
that
says
you
can't
enter
their
business.
Even
though
it's
not
an
ordinance
and
people
are.
Are
adhering
to
it
so
I
think
that
would
be
a
big
help.
I.
K
Don't
know
what
I
can
add
quite
a
thing
to
the
conversation
other
than
I
mean
we
can
discuss,
you
know
do
do
masks
work
right.
Obviously
they
do.
We
were
all
taught
as
young
children
to
cover
your
cough
and
sneeze
into
a
handkerchief
or
or
do
any
of
those
things
that
certainly
does
work
to
reduce
exposures.
I
think
we
would,
we
would
all
prefer
at
least
one
side.
K
You
know
the
the
argument
that
folks
just
be
responsible
and
make
good
decisions,
and
you
know
based
on
their
own
risk
factors
and
all
of
those
things,
but
there
is
a
compelling
side
from
the
biz
community
and-
and
you
know
to
to
help
facilitate
folks
coming
in
you
can't
deny
whether
or
not
it
will
work
to
help
reduce
exposure.
It
certainly
does
the
increased
numbers
yeah.
We
can
throw
a
lot
of
data
at
it
and
look
at
it
and
say:
what's
what's
you
know
what
does
attribute
to
the
increase
in
numbers?
K
You
know,
there's
a
tremendous
amount.
More
testing
testing
is
way
more
available.
There's
you
know
and
then
the
other
you
hear
the
argument
that
well,
the
fatalities
are
actually
decreasing
versus
you
know.
Well,
this
is
on
an
uptick
and
so
treatment
has
improved
and
so
there's
a
there's.
You
know
we
it's
all
over
the
place
again.
I
think
we
would
all
agree
that
we
we
would
like
folks
to
be
very
responsible
and
make
good
decisions
based
on
their
own
risk
factors
and
I
will
say
for
the
most
part
they
are.
K
O
L
L
L
D
D
People
are
comfortable,
I
guess,
I
are
getting
comfortable
in
in
the
grocery
stores.
Publix
is
yeah.
There
were
a
few
more
people
that
had
mass,
but
there
were
many
that
did
not
mm-hmm
one.
With
this
first
started,
you
had
a
lot
of
people
were
a
mess,
not
so
much
anymore.
So
it's
I
think
it's
probably
time
where
we
do
something
so
I
do.
B
D
H
L
G
H
D
G
M
D
M
Thoughts-
this
is
a
quick,
quick
read
of
the
Sarasota
city
of
Sarasota
ordinance,
I,
don't
believe
it
was
required
for
the
businesses
to
put
signs
up
I,
think
that
is
not
necessary,
not
necessary.
That's
the
value
of
adopting
an
ordinance,
everyone
is
presumed
to
know,
law
I'm.
Sure
it's
going
to
be
well
publicized.
I
suspect
that
if
they
store
person
sees
customers
that
are
not
wearing
masks,
the
first
step
is
a
good
business.
M
Person
is
to
let
them
know
that
there
is
a
an
ordinance
here's
a
mask
if
they
refuse
to
put
the
mask
on
it
would
be
to
the
discretion
of
the
store
owner
to
ask
the
police
to
come
in
and
force
the
ordinance.
Hopefully
that
won't
be
necessary,
but
I'm
I
was
going
to
not
say
anything
until
I
saw
what
the
consensus
was.
But
I
will
make
this
observation.
M
M
Some
of
them
seem
to
be
exceptionally
vague,
which
would
not
make
the
ordinance
enforceable
for
that
provision.
I
will
do
my
best
to
limit
the
exceptions
and
try
to
write
them
as
they
can
be
written
and
taking
it
from
just
indoors,
as
opposed
to
indoors
and
outdoors
I
think
he
simplifies
my
task
a
little
bit.
It.
G
M
M
Think
we're
trying
to
say
well,
I,
will
say
and
I
don't
know
how
representative
she
is
of
that
age
group,
but
I've
heard
similar
comments
elsewhere,
a
lot
of
his
politic
driven
now
number
one
and
number
two
there
is
this
belief
that
the
situation
is
a
hoax.
She
was
calling
it
a
plan
Demick
that
there
is
a
conspiracy
out
there
that
we're
all
hooked
on
and
they're
smarter
than
we
are.
They
always
are
smarter
than
we
are
and
that's
why
there's
no
need
for
them
to
wear
masks.
B
I'm
sure
that
we
will,
because
of
that,
we
are
going
to
be
generating
a
lot
of
having
a
lot
of
emails
generated
this
week,
both
pro
and
con
and
I
will
say
of
the
the
residents
that
I've
talked
to
this
week
about
this
agenda
item
I
had
those
that
were
adamant
that
we
shouldn't
stay
the
course
that
we've
been
on
probably
had
more.
That
said,
no,
maybe
it's
time
to
do
something
so,
but
I
will
tell
you
what's
it's
divided
from
the
people
are
taught
to
so
not
everybody
is
on
the
same
page.
So.
M
D
B
D
So
the
last
item
on
this
topic
is
the
way
we
have
set
up
city
hall
of
the
council
chambers.
We
could
add
more
folks
into
the
meetings
if
we
wanted
to
right
now.
My
recommendation
is
to
leave
it
the
way
it
is.
We
feel
a
little
more
comfortable,
every
three
seats
there's
one
person,
so
that's
17
and
then
the
five
of
you
and
then
we
count
as
17
mm-hmm.
G
C
G
B
Way
we
had
this
setup
and
even
the
pickleball
team,
when
I
said,
I
really
thought
that
would
be
important
to
have
some
of
the
representatives
come
today
and
they
said
well,
I'll
be
allowed
in
and
I
said,
I
said:
yeah,
there's
room,
it's
it's
okay!
You
know
it's
so
I
think
that
you
know
that
I
think
the
residents
it
respected,
especially
when
it's
working
our
live
streaming,
is
really
been
great
and
I've
also
found
that
the
live
streaming
that
we
have
is
not
all
communities
do
this.
B
D
F
Thank
goodness,
some
pro
audio
could
come
and
fix
that
for
us
and
it
was
related
I,
don't
know
if
they
told
you,
but
it
was
related
to
the
power
surge
this
morning,
all
right
just
a
couple
of
quick
things
under
boards
and
committees.
So
first
thing
under
vacancies.
We
have
two
three-year
terms
on
the
building
board:
one
contractor
and
one
consumer
advocate
and
under
nominations.
We
have
an
unexpired
term
for
an
alternate
on
the
building
board.
We
have
one
eligible
applicant.
B
It's
been
a
nomination
in
a
second
all
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
motion
carries
unanimously.
It's
all
I
had.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
okay,
so
we
get
to
policy
and
legislation.
I
just
want
to
remind
everyone
that
it's
watching
that
hour.
We
will
have
a
council
meeting
next
Wednesday,
the
second
Wednesday
of
July.
It's
coming
up
quickly,
and
that
will
be
our
second
meeting
in
July.
We
will
not
have
any
more
meetings
in
July
and
we
will
not
have
a
meeting
the
first
Wednesday
in
August.
B
We
will
have
a
meeting
on
the
third
Wednesday
in
August,
which
is
August
19th,
so
we
will
have
an
actual
six-week
break
in
from
between
the
8th
of
July
to
August,
19th
I'm
sure
that
city
staff,
as
well
as
all
of
our
council
members,
are
enjoying
the
break
and
and
I
wish
everyone.
A
very
safe
4th
of
July
it'll
be
a
very
different
one,
but
I
hope
everyone
has
an
enjoyable
one.
So
my
comments
counts
time
for
council
member
comments.