►
From YouTube: Development Review Committee 11-12-2021
Description
Development Review Committee 11-12-2021
A
B
If
you
want
to
give
him
a
call,
that'd
be
great
just
so
he
knows
that
that's
you
know
direction
directly
from
you.
Okay,
yeah.
B
B
C
C
A
C
C
Motion
carries
unanimously
application
reviews.
We
have
quite
a
few
on
here.
They
are
all
essentially
the
same
for
the
same
product
but
various
pieces
of
the
puzzle.
So,
mr
mccarty,
if
you
could
pull
up
that
first
presentation
for
the
annexation,
so
this
is
ax
03,
20,
2021,
ordinance
of
the
city
of
pentagorda
florida
annexing
within
the
corporate
limits
of
the
city
property
addressed
at
9511
mack
street,
our
mcgeorge
street.
C
Excuse
me:
it's
approximately
well
two
pieces,
approximately
2.65
acres
of
land,
they're
contiguous
to
the
city
boundaries
and
do
not
create
an
enclave.
The
city,
the
urban
design
division
did
find
this
project
to
be
consistent
with
the
city
of
punaward's
comprehensive
plan
and
does
recommend
approval.
Do
we
have
any.
C
Questions
or
concerns
from
the
fpc
committee,
otherwise
we
have
the
applicants
here.
If
they
have
any
comments.
C
Unless
you
need
to
hear
anything
okay,
if
we
do
not
have
any
discussion
looking
for
a
motion
to
for
the
drc
committee
to
recommend
a
portfolio.
A
C
C
That
this
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
recommends
that
the
amendment
be
approved
and
transmitted
to
the
department
of
economic
opportunity
and
related
reviewing
agencies.
So
if
we
have
any
discussion,
questions
concerns
cover
those
barring
none.
Looking
for
a
motion
to
recommend
approval
of
this
conference
plan,
amendment.
C
C
D
This
was
at
one
point
in
the
future:
a
mobile
home
park.
There
are
remnant
lines
from
when
that
was
the
case
we
have
reached
out
to
fp
now
we're
pretty
certain
that
we
will
either
be
able
to
remove
them
or
more
likely,
we'll
enter
into
some
sort
of
a
development
agreement
with
them,
because
when
this
is
redeveloped,
all
the
lines
are
going
to
have
to
be
relocated,
consistent
with
the
plan
that
we
have,
so
that
is
in
process
with
fpl,
we're
very
confident
that
we'll
be
able
to
work
something
out
with
them.
D
C
C
Okay,
so
urban
design
staff
does
recommend
approval
of
the
vacation
contingent
upon
the
applicant,
resolving
the
issues
with
florida
power
and
light.
So
with
no
further
discussion.
Looking
for
a
motion
to
recommend
approval.
C
C
A
E
A
C
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
burning
in
a
discussion.
All
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
opposed
like
same
sign
motion,
carries
unanimously
all
right
moving
right
along.
We
have
planned
development,
village,
03
2021,
so
this
is
the
site.
Approximately
86
acres
are
proposed
for
240
single
family
lots
with
all
of
the
associated
amenities
contingent
upon
a
new
subdivision
of
the
city
of
ponegor
or
the
urban
design.
Division
has
found
that
this
proposed
development
is
compatible
and
consistent
with
the
city
of
con
ponegorda's
comprehensive
plan.
C
Can
you
go
to
the
next
slide?
Sorry,
urban
design
staff
does
recommend
approval
of
the
proposed
plan
development
with
the
following
conditions.
C
C
C
So,
barring
any
questions,
concerns
or
discussions,
we're
looking
for
a
motion
to
approve
with
those
conditions.
Oh,
do
we
have
a.
D
Yeah
we
there's
a
potential
problem
here.
You've
got
that
the
that
it's
86.78
acres.
The
survey
did
not
include
the
rights
of
way
that
were
being
vacated
because
they
weren't
vacated.
Yet
so
the
survey
couldn't
show
that,
but
we
did
provide
a
sketch
and
description
in
the
application
of
the
overall
pd
and
on
the
pd
concept
plan.
It
indicates
the
correct
acreage
one
which
is,
which
is
what's
87
87
87.10
87.
D
I
want
to
bring
that
out
now
because
we're
looking
at
at
hearings
coming
up,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
advertising
is
correct,
go
back,
I'm
pretty
certain.
It
was
correct
in
how
we
put
everything
together.
If
not,
then
I
apologize
for
that,
but
we
did
notice
that
that
there's
that
discrepancy
here-
and
so
we
want
to
be
sure
that
that
is
corrected
so
that
as
it
moves
forward
and
is
advertised
that
we
are
advertising
the
correct
acreage,
because
that
could
be
problematic.
C
Okay
city
staff
will
double
check
those
numbers
on
on
the
advertising
and
and
make
sure
that
the
application
that
the
staff
reports
and
presentations
are
updated
for
the
correct
acres.
Thank
you.
D
C
C
C
So
there
is
a
cross-access
easement
agreement,
that's
necessary
and
required
from
these
two
parcels
that
have
been
split.
C
E
Steve
adams
utilities,
we
did
issue
an
email
to
the
engineer.
We
have
a
plan
in
our
office
from
07.
That
shows
how
the
water
and
sewer
is
connected
from
maynard
to
the
existing
bank
building,
and
I
think
the
engineer
would
want
to
see
that.
Unfortunately,
we
won't
be
able
to
send
it
via
the
internet,
but
it's
available
in
our
office.
E
So
we
can
coordinate
that
at
any
time.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
we
probably
have
some
records
that
would
be
helpful,
showing
how
the
sewer
and
water
are
located
on
the
site,
and
then
we.
F
For
the
record,
gary
vayne
with
southwest
engineering
yeah,
this
was
just
a
a
in
addition
where
that
drive-through
was,
and
so
we
were
looking
to
see
if
there
was
no
additional
utilities
bathrooms
being
installed
or
anything
like
that
everything.
But
we
will
confirm
that
we're
not
in
conflict
with
the
rearranging
of
the
parking.
Now
one
of
the
things
mitchell
that
we
had
was
we
had
the
next
to
the
building
on
the
west
side,
the
parking
that
was
perpendicular
to
the
driveway.
I
know
that's
not
in
it's.
F
The
on
the
other
side
is
angled
park
and
the
reason
that
is
is
because
we
have
the
coastal
car
wash
to
come
in
and
they
have
perpendicular
parking.
So
we're
trying
to
you
know
accommodate
their
needs
as
they
come
forth
through
their
design.
But
if,
if
it's,
if
it's
not,
if
it's
not
acceptable,
we
can
change
it
back
to
it
angle
and
then
rip
out
the
parking
lot
when
close
the
car
wash
comes
in,
but
we
were
trying
to
you
know.
C
Yeah
so
there's
there's
a
code
conflict
that
correct
prohibits
parking
to
be
at
different
angles:
correct
yeah
within
the
same
parking
lot.
So
that's
that's
the
the
challenge
there
and
I
think
it's
really
the
timing
of
the
two
developments,
because.
C
F
F
One
of
the
things
that
was
one
of
your
comments
was
about
the
lot
split
and
the
survey
didn't
there's
actually
two
parcels
here,
however,
because
to
satisfy
the
two
different
parties
owners
that
property
line
has
moved
over
about
15
20
feet
to
the
west,
so
we
will
provide
new
legal
descriptions
of
that
property
and
do
a
lot
split
that
way.
So
that
will
accommodate
that.
C
F
C
Okay
sounds
good.
Anybody
else
have
any
questions,
concerns
on
that
one,
okay,
we'll
get
that
one
resolved.
C
And
moving
on
next
item
is
mvo2
2021.
This
is
a
motor
vending
permit
for
127
carmelita
street
for
replacement
of
food
truck,
and
the
site
plan
is
on
screen.
C
This
is
between
us
41
and
taylor.
Okay,.
B
A
B
Francois,
okay,
so
I
we
recently
just
did
a
a
license:
a
city
business
license
for
a
food
truck
in
that
same
parking
lot
on
the
other
side.
Is
this
the
same
food
truck
we're
just
moving
it
or
in
addition,
it's.
A
B
Okay,
so
the
only
issues
for
fire
is
that
we
have
to
make
sure
that's
10
feet
from
property
lines
and
10
feet
from
any
other
ignition
sources
which
you
have
southern
oxygen,
just
on
the
opposite
side
of
where
this
food
truck
is
going
to
be
located
and
they
store
flammable
fuel
containers.
So
we
need
to
make
sure
you're
maintaining
at
least
10
feet
distance
from
that
property
line.
A
A
C
All
right,
let's
see,
I'm
not
sure
if
I
need
any
action.
A
I'm
sorry,
if
you
got
an
agreement
with
the
business
owner
for
the
use
of
this
restroom.
Well,
yes,
okay,
because
it's
the
same
the
same
people,
the
same
owners.
Okay,
that
should
be
your
guess.
Okay,.
C
No
just
technical
review
and
comments
so
we're
good.
Any
other
comments.
Questions,
okay,
we're
in
good
shape,
then.
Thank
you
very
much.
C
Yes,
yes,
any
staff
comments
need
to
say
anything.
Speak
now
forever
hold
your
peace.
We
are
adjourned.
Thank
you.