►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 01-16-19 Part 2
Description
Description
A
And
staff
has
put
together
some
suggestions
now,
there's
no
question
that
these
suggestions
are
based
on.
If
counsel
wants
to
consider
the
West
Henry
Street
property
I
mean
that's
pretty
obvious,
because
we
have
on
the
suggestion
that
if
you're
going
to
consider
that
property
you
may
want
to
include
somebody
from
the
library
you
need
somebody
from
district
2.
You
need
people
from
district
1
because
that
particular
site
borders,
while
it's
in
the
historic
district
1
excuse
me
in
district
1,
historic
district,
it
borders
district
2,
so
you
need
to
have
representation
from
both.
A
You
probably
want
some
people
from
the
pickleball
community.
These
are
again
our
suggestions.
If
you
want
to
look
at
other
sites
in
the
city,
then
we
would
probably
have
to
realign
the
composition
of
the
committee.
Whatever
we
do
the
committee
since
it's
gonna
report
back
to
City
Council
with
recommendations,
it
would
be
a
open
committee.
We
would
have
to
advertise
the
public
meetings
take
minutes
and
the
public
would
be
invited.
B
I
would
like
to
just
say
that
I
am
adamantly
opposed
to
putting
it
on
Henry
Street
I
have
been
deluged
with
district
2
people
who
feel
that
we're
moving
from
one
residential
district
to
another
residential
district
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
what
we
wanted
to
do
at
all
and
if
you
insist
on
considering
the
Henry
Street
property,
then
I
would
want
to
have
at
least
two
people
from
district
2
on
the
committee
so
that
at
least
their
voice
is
heard.
Okay,.
C
D
I
think
that
it's
a
paramount
that
we
do
form
a
formal
committee
and
this
committee
should
be
open-minded
to
all
locations,
keep
in
mind
that
the
Henry
Street
property
is
was
an
eight
or
ten
acres.
There's
a
huge
part
of
there
and
anything
that
we
do
at
any
location.
We
would
be
able
to
engineer
from
scratch
with
keeping
noise
abatement
in
mind,
so
what
I
believe
is
is,
and
there's
been
other
properties
that
have
been
mentioned
to
me.
D
Some,
like
the
triangular
piece
I
wouldn't
want
to
go
to,
but
but
we
still
should
be
an
open
mind.
We
should
look
at
from
a
much
higher
level,
looking
down
onto
the
community
in
general,
where
a
good
location
would
be
would
be
an
appropriate
occasion
and
and
also
to
evaluate
the
financial
aspect
of
that
location.
You
know
the
ideal
location
might
be
just
for
the
behind
the
the
tank
in
Henry
Park.
That
might
be
the
ideal
location,
but
it
might
be
a
three
million
dollar
project.
Well,
that
would
certainly
not
be
something
we
did
entertain.
D
So
what
we
would
want
is
a
committee
that
would
look
at
a
number
of
potential
solutions
or
alternatives
and
also
add
some
economic
criteria
to
it
and
data,
including
not
only
what
its
cost
would
be,
but
what
its
potential
ROI
would
be
revert
or
return
on
investment,
and
then
investment
might
be
in
terms
of
dollars.
The
debt
investment
might
be
in
terms
of
quality
of
life
or
a
combination
of
both,
but
they
should
be
all
encompassing
holistically,
not
rule
out
any
but
specific
location
anywhere
in
the
city.
D
E
C
E
E
Right
the
comments
that
I've
received
are
that
all
districts
should
be
represented
on
this
committee,
because
it
is
something
that
the
citizens
of
the
city
will
own.
All
people
on
the
committee
must
be
City
residents
and
that
they
should
apply
for
the
position
on
the
committee
just
like
any
other
board
or
committee,
and
that
the
library
rep
may
not
be
necessary
based
on
whatever
is
decided.
However,
they
could
be
a
consultant
to
the
committee,
but
they
don't
necessarily
need
to
be
an
appoint
to
each
of
the
committee.
E
F
C
C
G
E
D
D
E
C
G
E
D
I
would
just
like
the
what,
in
the
description
of
what
the
committee
is
supposed
to
be
about,
I
would
also
hope
that
the
committee
would
also
be
cognizant
of
not
in
any
way
interfering
with
the
development
of
pickle
plots,
but
rather
whatever
we
do,
should
also
encourage
the
development
of
pickle
plots
that
we
should
keep
them
to
segregated
items,
but
also
keep
in
mind
that
we
don't
want
one
to
have
a
negative
effect
on
the
other.
That's.
C
C
E
A
G
E
E
D
C
G
C
F
C
F
I
I
I
B
Yes,
ma'am
I
have
a
question,
is
the
is
the
Gilchrist
Park
pickleball
group
organized
enough
that
could
choose
their
representatives
to
this
committee
so
that
we
would
know
that
those
two
people
spoke
for
that
contingency
of
the
pickleball
community
and
then
it
wouldn't
really
matter
whether
anybody
else
play
pickleball
or
not.
We
wouldn't
have
to
get
into
the
weeds
with
that
I'm.
Just
asking.
C
B
The
ones
at
Gilchrist
Park
that
seemed
to
be
semi
organized
to
keep
it
in
the
park.
Would
they
would
it
behoove
us
to
have
them
as
the
pickleball
representatives,
and
then
we
wouldn't
have
to
worry
about.
You
know
if
district
one
had
two
people
that
played
pickleball,
but
they
were
both
from
district
1
and
they
were
both
good
candidates.
D
I
want
to
play
devil's
advocate
for
a
second
I.
Don't
think
we
should
ask
them
where
they
play.
We
want
people
to
come
in
with
an
open,
mind.
Mm-Hmm
then
one
could
could
make
an
argument
that
if
they're
playing
a
Gilcrest
park
and
unorganized,
we
have
two
people
from
Gilcrest
park.
One
could
make
an
argument.
They
should
recuse
themselves
because
they're
already
prejudiced
that
they
want
to
keep
in
Gilcrest
Park.
We
don't
want
to
have
that
type
of
class.
D
I
understand
exactly
what
you're
saying
and
I
take
that
respectfully,
but
I
don't
think
we
want
to
they.
We
may
have
two
people
that
play
in
Gilcrest
Parker
that
we
accept
on
the
committee,
but
I
don't
think
that
should
be
part
of
that
criteria.
I
think
we
want
to
keep
this
as
holistically
in
the
community
as
possible.
B
C
C
A
Do
you,
for
instance,
look
at
the
weekly
report.
Do
you
go
on
our
website
and
see
the
various
documents
that
the
city
has
on
there
and
do
you
look
at
them
when
we
asked?
Are
you
aware
of
our
strategic
plan
and
do
you
follow
along
our
strategic
plan
and
all
the
action
items,
and
we
only
saw
maybe
three
or
four
hands
get
raised
when
we
asked
them?
Have
you
ever
seen
our
action
register
and
do
you
follow
along
on
our
action
register,
because
we
post
the
action
register
on
our
website
every
week?
A
Our
comment
at
the
time
was
well,
then
we're
not
doing
our
job,
because
the
public
is
not
aware
or
we're
not
doing
enough
to
sort
of
emphasize
that
we
have
these
documents
on
our
website
and
we
want
people
to
follow
along
to
check
our
progress
and
to
see
how
well
we're
doing
or
how
well
we're
not
doing
so
on
the
agenda
today.
We're
not
going
to
go
over
all
the
items,
but
our
our
point
is
to
emphasize
that,
for
instance,
the
strategic
plan.
A
We
have
a
number
of
action
items
in
our
strategic
plan
that
we
want
to
try
and
accomplish
this
fiscal
year,
and
we
have
the
dates
of
when
we'd
like
to
accomplish
them,
and
we
we
do
to
progress
reports,
January
and
we'll
do
another
one
in
May,
because
then
we
put
out
the
annual
budget
and
we
do
a
new
strategic
plan.
So
what
you
have
in
front
of
you
on
our
agenda
today
is
the
January
progress
report.
It
is
also
on
our
website
and
through
our
five
priority
areas.
A
We
have
a
number
of
action
items
and
we
have
in
there
a
status
of
where
we
are
with
those
action
items.
So
I
encourage
everybody
to
take
a
look
at
that.
If
there
are
blank
spaces
on
some
of
those
action
items,
it's
because
we
haven't
gotten
to
them,
yet,
that's
not
to
say
we
won't
get
to
them,
but
our
plan
is
to
get
to
them.
A
The
other
item
that
we
have
on
there
we'll
have
our
communications
manager
get
up
and
talk
about
the
action
register
and
they
some
of
its
similar.
Some
of
it
is
similar,
but
there
are
some
projects
on
the
action
register
that
are
not
in
our
strategic
plan
and
that's.
Some
of
them
are
more
internal,
but
we
also
have
some
progress
reports
on
those
and
then
we
follow
them
along.
So,
on
the
strategic
plan,
again,
I'm
not
gonna,
go
over
all
these
items
they're
there
for
public
scrutiny.
A
Will
get
more
involved
in
the
budget
process
coming
up
in
February
when
we
present
the
long-range
financial
plan,
we
will
highlight
some
budget
issues
with
City
Council.
At
that
time
we
will
schedule
some
community
meetings
or
a
meeting
on
the
budget
to
get
budget
input
the
master
plan
process
well
underway.
We
will
continue
to
publicize
that
we've
already
settled
the
fishermen's
village
land
sale
and
our
special
use
fund.
A
A
A
No,
that's
that's
moving
forward
eventually
soon
you'll
be
getting
your
financial
plan
for
the
septic
to
sewer
and
our
automated
meter.
Reading
the
project
is
88%
complete,
so
they're
they're
moving
along
there
again
I
don't
really
want
to
get
into
all
of
the
statuses.
The
point
is
it's
on
our
website.
It's
for
public
scrutiny
follow
along
we'll
do
another
one
in
May.
G
J
Morning,
Melissa
good
morning,
Melissa
Reichert
communications
manager
for
the
city
of
Punta
Gorda.
The
action
register
is
one
of
the
documents,
as
Howard
has
mentioned,
that
we
publish
every
week.
It
goes
out
every
Thursday
and
it's
really
kind
of
the
step
by
step
analysis
of
what
happens
in
a
city
project.
J
That
information
will
be
there
and
published
every
single
Thursday.
It'll
it'll
tell
you
the
project
when
that
project
was
supposed
to
be
done,
and
what
the
most
recent
action
step
was
on
that
project.
You
go
to
our
website
and
you
go
under
government
click.
The
government
tab
city
manager,
city
communications
and
then
action
register
and
they're
there.
You
can
look
back,
probably
three
four
years
at
least
and
see
all
of
the
steps
that
have
been
taken
on
the
various
projects.
J
E
You
have
a
question.
Well,
she
answered
part
part
of
my
question
the
issue
about
the
land.
Closing
yesterday
I
received
a
citizen
email.
It's
obvious
people
are
reading
the
action
register
because
I
got
an
email
that
said
I
see
that
you're
supposed
to
be
closing
on
the
land
today
did
it
happen.
I
was
able
to
answer
that
question
after
I
signed.
E
K
K
E
A
K
A
That's
a
big,
that's
a
big
movement,
because
there
was
an
article
in
the
paper
I
think
it
was
last
week
that
said,
cities
and
counties
throughout
the
state
of
Florida
are
not
getting
reimbursed
for
Hurricane
Irma
and
for
I
mean
Michael
was
a
lot
sooner
than
me.
Yes,
that
goes
all
the
way
back
September
of
2017
and
we
haven't
got.
We
haven't
seen
one
penny,
yet
we
fronted
all
the
costs.
So
the
fact
that
we
now
have
the
state
agency
who
funnels
the
money
getting
a
little
better
slowly.
A
K
With
FEMA,
well,
it
kind
of
came
through
the
state.
We
sent
it
back
to
FEMA
because
when
FEMA
sent
it
on
to
the
state
again
it
was
the
overtime
issue,
so
we
sent
that
back.
We
refused
to
sign
it
at
that
point.
With
the
incorrect
dollar
amounts
cuz,
it
was
a
large
amount
that
they
took
off.
So
we
hoped
the
next
one
that
will
actually
see.
First
is
our
seawalls.
Oh
ok,.
A
So
we
may
get
seawalls,
but
the
point
is
that
cities
and
counties
need
to
have.
This
is
a
budget
plug
need
to
have
some
sufficient
reserves
on
hand
in
order
to
pull
yourselves
through
until
you
start
getting
reimbursed?
Yes
on
larger
ones,
we
have
to
finance,
we
have
to
take
a
loan,
but
a
good.
A
good
reserve
will
help
you
get
through
some
of
these
periods,
because
you're
fronting
dollars
till
you
get
reimbursed
these
reimbursements
take
time.
D
Just
like
to
add
to
this
and
also
compliment
our
staff
in
general,
also
in
my
meeting
in
Tallahassee.
This
type
of
item
was
also
talked
about,
particularly
what
relative
to
Michael
those
communities
like
Mexico,
Peach,
et
cetera,
they've
blown
through
their
reserves
and
are
in
a
very
difficult
situation.
D
There's
also
concerned
at
this
juncture
that
may
or
may
not
come
to
fruition,
but
there
was
considerable
concern
that
FEMA
funds
may
be
deployed
in
a
different
direction
for
a
while.
Those
are
legitimate
concerns
they
haven't
happened.
They
may
not
happen,
but
those
discussions
have
been
occurring
at
the
federal
level.
D
That
would
have
an
impact,
probably
from
a
timing
standpoint
for
us,
so
even
in
the
case
of
we're
still
working
on
and
the
folks
from
Michael
I
may
get
ratcheted
back
even
further
as
we
might
if
those
issues
come
fruition,
so
it
it
has
been
our
fortune
to
have
good
financial
management
in
this
city
and
I
want
to
commend
staff
for
that.
Even
though
I
am
on
record
and
still
AM,
that
I
would
like
to
see
more
reserve
and
I
won't
budge
from
that,
particularly,
but
this
this
exemplifies
it.
D
C
And
staff
has
been
doing
a
tremendous
job
at
working
hand-in-hand
with
FEMA
to
make
sure
we
address
every
issue
that
comes
up
so
that
it's
and
that's
been
my
response
to
residents.
When
they
question
you
know,
will
we
get
the
money?
Well,
you
know
we're
working
with
FEMA
and
we've
had
no.
We've
got
received
no
indication
for
FEMA
that
there's
not
an
intent
to
pay
it's
just.
We
have
to.
K
K
I
On
the
your
December
23rd
meeting,
there
was
discussion
about
establishing
a
policy
of
not
taking
action
on
non-agenda
items.
There
was
a
policy
adopted
many
years
ago
by
resolution
to
take
action
on
or
to
allow
the
addition
of
items
to
a
published
agenda
if
they
met
certain
criteria.
So,
rather
than
tying
your
hands
and
saying
you
don't
want
to
take
any
action
on
anything,
that's
not
on
the
agenda.
I
E
I
C
You
know
I
thought
about
that,
and
there
have
been
times
when
I
know.
I
may
have
issue
with
something
and
nobody
else
might
have
thought
about
it
and
I
brought
it
up
at
a
council
meeting.
So
there
it
seems
to
be.
You
know,
I
know,
I
know
what,
if
controversy
is
the
right
word,
but
you
know
agreement
and
I
and
I
think
that
I've
observed
that
as
well,
where
I
didn't
particularly
have
an
issue
with
something
but
another
council
member
did
so
and.
C
C
B
For
instance,
two
weeks
ago
we
discussed
sound
abatement,
gilchrist
Park
and
when
we
cut
it
from
eight
courts
to
four
courts,
there
was
this
huge
outcry
that
that
wasn't
on
the
agenda
and
what
I
would
ask
the
public
to
remember
is
that
we
don't
get
to
talk
about
anything
before
we
come
up
here,
and
so,
if,
in
the
in
the
nature
of
discussing
something
like
sound
abatement
at
Gilchrist
Park,
somebody
comes
up
with
an
idea
like
that.
I
think
we
have
to
be
allowed.
B
The
variance
you
know,
because
otherwise
we'd
be
putting
things
on
the
agenda
for
the
next
six
years
and
I
I.
Just
think
that
there's
this
lack
of
understanding
of
what
we
can
and
cannot
talk
about
and
I
would
hate
for
this
to
be
seen
as
limiting
us
to
line
items
on
the
agenda
to
have
an
action
as
opposed
to
general
conceptual
things.
Do
does
that
make
sense.
Yes,.
C
I
understand
what
exactly
what
you're
saying
and
I
had
a
conversation
with
Howard
as
well,
that
you
know,
perhaps
staff
needs
just
to
consider
in
the
writing
of
these
items
to
put
as
such
as
adding
language
that
provides.
This
is
an
example
of
what
could
be
so
that
we're
it's
really
showing
that
it's,
but.
B
E
So,
while
it's
very
broad
and
its
appearance
when,
in
the
conversation,
it
was
all
in
an
effort
to
try
to
get
control
of
this,
the
sound
and
the
noise
over
there,
so
you
know
it
technically,
that
was
within
our
rights
to
discuss
it
and
you're
right
I
mean
we
need
to.
We
need
to
have
people
understand
that
we
have
to
be
able
to
have
a
very
broad
open
conversation
about
what
options
do
exist
out
there
in
cyberspace.
E
C
H
Is
a
distinction
to
be
made
between
items
for
discussion
and
items
upon
which
you're
going
to
take
a
vote?
So
if
you
have
a
discussion
item,
you
can
expand
the
topic
as
long
as
it's
related
without
running
afoul
of
the
policy
that
the
public
needs
to
be
aware
of
what
you're
going
to
discuss
and
have
an
input
on.
H
But
if
that
discussion
item
is
going
to
evolve
to
a
vote,
then
that
is
going
to
be
on
another
agenda
so
that
the
opportunity
is
available
for
the
public
to
chime
in
on
what
you're
going
to
take
a
vote
on.
On
the
other
hand,
if
you've
got
something
that's
identified
on
the
agenda,
that's
gonna
clearly
require
a
vote.
You
cannot
deviate
from
that
to
expand
what
this
is,
what
the
topic
is
going
to
be
in
any
great
degree.
Theoretically,
you
know
if
you're
gonna
vote,
if
you're
going
to
consider
a
matter,
let's
just
say
pickleball.
H
F
That
said,
going
back
to
the
example
that
Debbie
gave
again,
it
comes
down
to
perception
because
I
mean
obviously,
if
they're
less
courts,
there's
less
noise.
So
isn't
there's
a
noise
abatement
measure,
and
so
it
may
not
be
perceived
as
that
because
it
wasn't
a
technology,
but
it
was
a
measure.
So
it's
within
the
bounds
of.
H
H
It's
within
the
scope
of
what
was
advertised
and
that's
why
we
see
if
I
can
use
this
as
an
analogy
when
we
advertise
a
play
and
ordinance,
the
title
is
supposed
to
be
fairly
specific
as
to
what
is
going
to
be
voted
on
and
adopted
as
ordinance.
If,
if
you
were
going
to
take
an
action
that
was
going
to
go
beyond
the
scope
of
the
title,
that
would
not
be
permissible
because
it's
a
published
title
and
and
you're
kind
of
restricted
there.
H
On
the
other
hand,
if
you're
going
to
take
a
vote,
that
may
be
more
restrictive
than
the
subjects
that
would
cover
in
a
title
and
you
are
allowed
to
do
that
without
having
to
advertise.
So
as
long
as
there's
a
general
relationship
between
what
it
is
that
you're
going
to
vote
on
like
like,
if
you're
going
to
vote
on,
relocating
the
courts
and-
and
you
were
gonna
read
as
part
of
that,
the
discussion
of
the
vote
item
or
the
discussion
item
that
was
going
to
rely
gonna
be
voted
on
was
just
relocation.
H
H
If
you
went
from
relocation
to
elimination,
that
might
be
something
that
would
be
beyond
the
scope
and
I'll
also
point
out
that
you
know
quite
frankly
the
clarification
that
the
court
has
presented
with
respect
to
the
proposed
resolution
that
you
consider
adopting
is
helpful
and
may
even
be
an
improvement
and
be
an
improvement
over
the
the
previous
resolution
resolutions
don't
expire
unless
there's
an
action
of
the
City
Council.
So
quite
frankly,
this
1998
resolution
is
still
in
effect
and
should
be,
and
should
be,
governing
the
the
way
that
the
City
Council
conducts
itself.
H
C
H
If
it
was
important
enough
to
be
adopted
without
being
placed
on
a
regular
agenda
item,
there
would
be
an
emergency
quality
to
it.
Otherwise
the
appropriate
action
would
be
to
defer
consideration
even
of
the
non-controversial
one
to
the
next
agenda,
because
what
may
be
non-controversial
to
somebody
may
be
controversial
to
somebody
else.
So
you
may
be
opening
the
door
to
further
unnecessary
debate.
H
To
add
that
non-controversial,
add
on
the
cork
I
suggested,
although
from
an
administrative
perspective
there
may
be
times
when
it
is
necessary
to
bring
something
to
your
attention
in
order
to
meet
a
deadline
or
whatever
that
wasn't
known
or
couldn't
be
put
on
the
agenda
and
time
for
the
regular
agenda
and
again,
I
would
consider
that
to
be.
If
the.
If
the
majority
majority
plus
one
considered
that
to
be
an
exigent
circumstance,
an
emergency
circumstances,
then
you
would
not
run
afoul
of
the
policy.
J
H
Are
some
items
that
are
purely
discussion
items
and,
and
we
may
be
seeking
staff
may
be
seeking
direction
and,
and
so
a
consensus
would
be
all
that
would
be
necessary
to
give
the
direction.
That's
that's
needed.
There
are
some
items
that
may
be
on
the
on
the
on
the
agenda
as
a
discussion
that
may
require
some
sort
of
formal
action
that
might
affect
a
budget
or
whatever
that
go
beyond.
In
my
view,
just
a
discussion
item
and.
E
H
That
would
be
helpful
sometimes,
as
the
discussion
evolves,
it
becomes
apparent
that
there
needs
to
be
a
vote
in
order
to
commemorate
the
action
that
was
decided
at
the
City
Council.
The
concern
is
not
necessarily
the
formalities
of
that
procedure.
It's
to
introduce
a
totally
unrelated
issue
that
the
public
would
not
have
been
given
adequate
notice
to
chime
in
on
absolutely.
C
D
I
just
want
to
be
clear
if
the,
if
I
understand
the
logistics
of
it.
An
item
comes
up
at
10
o'clock
in
the
evening.
The
day
before
we
meet
in
Council,
so
we
would
really
have
to
vote
on
twice.
We'd
have
to
voted
once
where
we'd
have
to
have
three
plus
one
to
rather
and
then
we
would
discuss
the
item.
Yes,
okay,
so
we
already
have.
Then
we
have
a
a
safety
net
of
going
down
a
primrose
path
when
we
should
be
going
down
someplace
else.
D
H
Know
what
you
would
you
this
is
a
discussion
item
and
so
we're
asking
for
direction.
Would
you
like
to
consider
a
resolution
of
this
nature?
Would
you
like
to
simply
maintain
the
existing
resolution,
knowing
that
it's
in
place
and
if
you'd
like
to
consider
adopting
the
resolution
that's
been
proposed
by
by
the
city
clerk,
which
you
certainly
have
the
prerogative
to
do?
It
will
come
before
you
at
an
appropriate
as
an
appropriate
agenda
item
at
a
advertised
meeting
of
the
City
Council
I'd
like
to
go
forward
with
this,
but.
E
D
C
C
A
L
L
You
know
what
the
project
cost
is
going
to
be
proposed
assessment
and
those
are
the
decisions.
Council
will
be
making
on
that
resolution.
In
the
event
you
make
those
decisions
and
move
forward.
That's
when
the
actual
mailings
will
go
out
to
individual
property
owners
as
to
the
water
access
units
we
have
assigned
in
the
amount
they're
going
to
be
assessed,
they
will
have
20
days
to
provide
comment
back
to
the
city,
and
then
they
were
also
be
noticed
of
a
April
3rd
public
hearing
on
the
final
resolution
of
intent.
L
A
That
we
anticipate
we'll
have
a
couple
of
people
there
for
that
meeting,
also,
possibly
on
the
agenda.
We
may
have
the
long-range
financial
plan
depending
on
how
many
other
items
we
have
on
there.
If
we
have
to
move
that
to
the
second
meeting
in
February,
we
will.
But
that
starts
our
fy2008
discussion.
C
A
H
One
involving
the
BSI
and
PGI
Canal
maintenance
assessments,
one
challenging
a
decision
by
the
city's
code
enforcement
board
that
was
affecting
emerald
point
condominiums
and
one
involving
the
building
board's
action
regarding
a
contractor.
So
I've
got
a
number
of
people
involved
in
my
office
and
that's
including
which
it
goes
which
has
been
ongoing
for
a
while
before
closure.
Regarding.
C
H
H
C
H
C
H
I
Yes,
the
first
thing
I
have
is
just
confirmation
of
a
reappointment
of
mr.
Brad
gamblin
by
the
Historic
Preservation
Advisory
Board
to
the
donation
review
committee
just
requires
councils,
confirmation
of
that
they're
recommending
that
he
be
reappointed.
His
term
expired
and
the
bylaws
require
him
to
be
reappointed.
So
that's
all
this
is
doing.
C
H
Let
me
come
back
to
clarify
something
because
you
may
be
asking
this:
the
the
city
has
a
separate
law
firm.
That
also
represents
the
building
board.
They
are
the
ones
that
are
going
to
be
handling
the
litigation
involving
the
building
board
because
they
actually
participated.
They
know
familiar
they're
more
familiar
than
I
would
be
great.
Thank.
I
Karen,
okay,
moving
on
with
the
boards
and
committees
under
vacancies,
we
have
a
three
year
term
as
an
alternate
on
the
Board
of
Zoning,
Appeals
and
unexpired
term.
As
an
alternate
on
the
building
board.
One
unexpired
term
is
an
alternate,
and
one
unexpired
term
is
a
regular
member
on
the
code
enforcement
board.
We
have
receipts
just
so
now.
We
have
to
receive
some
applications,
so
we'll
be
filling
some
of
those
vacancies
soon
great
okay.
Moving
on
to
nominations,
we
have
a
three-year
term
on
the
vsi
Canal
Advisory
Committee.
We
do
have
one
eligible
applicant.
I
C
C
We
got
an
email
yesterday
from
the
Florida
League
of
Cities
regarding
the
the
League
of
Cities
legislative
action
days
in
March,
March,
27,
26
and
27
I've
already
let
the
Gerry
Paul
know
that
that
was
the
dates
coming
up,
but
the
Florida
League
of
Cities
didn't
really
have
any.
They
didn't
know
what
they
were
going
to
do
at
when
I
spoke
with
him.
C
So
if
any
of
you
want
to
participate,
I'm
going
to
go
so
if
anybody
else
would
like
to
go,
if
you
would,
let
me
know,
I
will
I
want
to
let
Jerry
know
how
many
of
us
are
going
to
go
and
and
then
how
we
coordinate
that
with
the
Florida
League
of
Cities,
because
he
wants
to
coordinate
it
with
the
Florida
League
of
Cities.
So
I
want
to
give
him
this
information
for
him
to
work
with
us
to
give
us
some
I
want
to
do
that
quickly.
So,
okay,
okay,.
C
And
that's
all
I
had
I
owe
and
I
want
to
congratulate
everyone
that
was
involved
with
journey
to
the
Future.
What
a
great
event
that
was,
so
it's
hard
to
single
out
one
individual
I,
know
Melissa,
you
kind
of
spearheaded
things
on
behalf
of
the
city.
I
know
that
the
team,
Gorda
and
many
organizations
and
participants
was
a
wonderful
event
and
I'm
looking
forward
to.