►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 02-06-19 Part 2
Description
Description
B
C
Morning
for
the
record,
Mikael
Finkel
care,
illegal
and
exact
sistent
to
the
city
manager,
I,
guess
I,
don't
need
the
history.
Why
we're
all
here
for
the
Buckley's
cut?
What's
on
your
agenda
today?
Is
the
resolution
that's
needed
for
the
initial
imposition
of
a
capital
assessment
for
the
project.
The
process
is
laid
out
in
city
code
as
to
how
this
goes.
If
you
kind
of
think
of
this,
when
your
typical
budget
cycle
attentative
you're
setting
the
tentative
right,
as
has.
C
They've
stated
the
methodology
chosen
for
this
or
the
preferred
methodology
was
the
water
access
units.
After
reviewing
the
properties,
Stef's
come
up
with
a
total
of
2700
and
it's
eighty
four
point:
seven,
seven
water
access
units-
it's
rounded
up
here,
that'll,
be
assessed
across
2112
accounts
tax
accounts,
as
you
can
see,
the
water
access
unit
is
defined
as
a
dock
boat
slip,
boat,
lift
or
some
other
structure
for
receiving
vessels
that
can
be
constructed
on
the
property
by
right
under
the
current
code.
C
When
you
get
into
the
multifamily,
the
code
gets
a
little
bit
more
complicated
with
more
factors,
including
lot
size
canal
with
the
number
of
units
like
condos
or
duplexes
multifamily,
that's
constructed
on
the
property
and
then
also
we
have
vacant
lots.
So
staff
has
gone
in
and
looked
at
what
is
existing
on
the
property.
We've
used
software
to
help
us
to
determine
for
those
what
could
be
built
on
the
property.
C
C
This
is
a
new
based
on
the
opinion
and
cost
from
the
engineer.
We
got
the
construction
information,
so
the
capital
costs
under
the
resolution,
the
two
million
seven
hundred
thirty
seven
thousand
one
hundred
ninety
three
takes
into
account
construction,
the
money
that
we've
already
spent
upwards
of
eight
hundred
thousand
on
design,
permitting
legal
services,
the
economist,
the
land
purchase
and
then
what
would
be
required
for
the
public
noticing
and
such
going
through
the
special
assessment
process.
C
In
the
resolution,
there
is
a
definition
of
the
total
project
cost
that
not
only
takes
into
account
the
capital
cost,
but
if
the
project
isn't
prepaid,
then
we
have
interest
costs
on
the
inter
fund
loan.
We
have
the
collection
cost
for
it
to
be
on
the
tax
bill
and
and
those
other
costs
are
taken
into
consideration.
C
D
Morning
record,
my
name
is
Hans
Wilson
I'm,
the
professional
engineer
responsible
for
this
project,
mostly
the
permitting
and
engineering
design.
As
you
are
well
aware,
the
cost
was
increased,
but
again
it's
an
opinion
of
probable
cost
and
having
been
slayed
before
in
a
situation
with
an
MS
bu,
where
the
cost
came
in
higher
than
the
engineer's
opinion
of
cost
and
having
to
go
back
out
to
the
population
for
a
revote.
It's
a
very
uncomfortable
situation
to
be
in
so
the
numbers
are
you
looking
before?
D
You
is
a
very
conservative
number
and
it's
more
since
we
first
proposed
the
project
in
the
workshop.
That
was
that
the
county
center
there
I
think
we've
got
some
graphics
that
show
what's
changed.
The
we
first
started
with
2015
with
a
with
a
project
that
we
had
designed
or
kind
of
conceived
for
the
Punta
Gorda
boaters
alliance.
It
was
a
1.5
million
dollar
estimate.
It
was
a
basic
project
that
was
taking
advantage
of
an
existing
alignment.
It
was
a
squared
off
90-degree
turns
dredge.
D
Material
handling
site
was
located
right
on
buckin,
the
Queen's
property,
and
it
was
basically
the
stripped-down
version
of
what
you
could
build
there
of
a
channel
width
was
50
foot
wide
and
the
water
depth
was
5,
feet
mean
low
water
and,
subsequent
to
that,
we
have
permitted
a
much
larger
project.
Part
of
the
reason
for
that
is,
I
can
permit
a
bigger
project
and
build
less
I,
can't
permit
a
smaller
project
and
build
more.
D
So
what
you're
looking
at
today
is
the
outcome
of
a
number
of
variables
that
been
adjusted
based
on
input
from
the
residents
from
the
permitting
agencies
and
a
number
of
factors
that
have
gone
into
revising
the
design.
A
number
of
things
and
I
went
through
and
just
kind
of
did,
a
quick
assessment
council
has
seen
and
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
has,
but
I'll
go
through
this
very
briefly.
The
mobilization
cost
when
we
first
did
the
estimate
on
this
for
the
Punta
Gorda
boaters
Alliance
project
in
2015,
we
estimated
$25,000
for
mobilization
and
contractors.
D
We've
got
a
number
of
qualified
contractors
locally
able
to
do
this
project.
However,
subsequent
impacts,
marcaine
irma,
have
created
a
situation
where
we
may
not
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
those
local
contractors
to
do
this
work
and
there
may
be
outside
equally
qualified
contractors
that
are
going
to
have
a
higher
mobilization
rate.
So
we
bumped
that
to
$100,000,
so
that
was
basically
a
seventy-five
thousand
dollar
increase
in
the
cost.
Clearing
and
grubbing
the
actual
area
has
increased.
I
think
the
graphic
that
you
saw
before
showed
the
difference
is
in
the
channel.
D
The
channel
is
now
designed
at
60
foot
wide
vertical
sea
walls
on
each
side,
as
you
traverse
the
mangrove
system,
all
right,
that's
to
maximize
navigable
operating
with
four
vessels.
Now,
there's
not
a
not
a
boat
or
engine,
that's
going
to
be
running
right
next
to
the
pilings
that
are
being
set
to
fend
them
off
from
the
mangrove
fringe.
So
we
effectively
have
a
50
foot
working
within
the
center
of
this
channel
that
cuts
through
the
mangrove
system.
So
we've
we've
permitted
a
wider
channel
at
60
feet.
D
That
means
more
vegetation
impacts,
more
volume
of
excavation,
and
the
other
thing
is
when
we
first
did
the
project
for
Punta
Gorda
boaters
Alliance
the
county
only
had
permitted
a
channel
to
minus
five
feet,
continuing
to
the
Charlotte
Harbor
area.
Subsequently,
the
county
received
permits
and
constructed
a
channel
that
was
designed
to
minus
six
feet:
hey
hey,
because
I've
been
receiving
input
from
the
public
saying.
Why
can't
we
have
six
feet?
I
could
not
permit
that
with
the
agencies.
D
If
my
downstream
depths
were
five
feet
so
with
that
increase
to
minus
six,
that
allowed
us
to
increase
our
channel
depth
to
minus
six,
we're
not
obligated
to
build
six
we're
not
obligated
to
build
sixty
foot
wide
channel.
Some
other
things
that
have
gone
into
changes
in
the
design
has
to
do
with
the
material
handling
the
dredge
material.
We
originally
proposed
the
dredged
material
to
be
handled,
bucking,
tweed,
site
and
and
driving
it
through
that
community
in
trucks.
We
received
a
lot
of
opposition
from
the
neighbor
HOA
in
that
community.
D
That
said,
we
really
don't
want
trucks
coming
through
our
neighborhoods.
So
what
we're
now
doing
is
utilizing
material
transfer
locations.
Dredge
material
transfer
sites
that
are
controlled
by
the
city
and
there
are
a
number
of
locations
around
the
city
and
relatively
close
proximity
that
we
can
get
that
dredge
material
to.
But
the
reality
is
that
we've
got
to
put
it
on
a
barge
we've
got
to
barge
into
that
site.
You
have
to
offloaded
onto
that
site.
D
The
other
thing
that
we
had
in
terms
of
the
alignment
and
I
don't
have
a
pointer
here,
but
if
you
notice
the
original
alignment
came
straight
down
and
then
turned,
and
we
received
a
lot
of
input
from
boaters
saying
we
don't
want
90-degree
turns
we've
got
some
navigational
issues
with
Ponce
Inlet
in
terms
of
90-degree
turns
that
required
us
to
trim
mangroves.
We
also
had
some
concerns
with
the
to
property
owners,
assessment
and
McGrath.
They
didn't
want
to
chain
right
next
to
their
properties,
so
we
ended
up
shifting
that
channel
over
to
the
west.
D
We
also
ended
up
curving
it
more.
So
there
was
less
of
a
navigational
conflict
with
the
boaters.
We
also
had
Bucky
McQueen's
interest
in
being
able
to
put
docks
on
his
property,
so
we
shifted
the
channel
up
into
the
mangroves
on
the
the
north
west
side
to
maintain
that
60
foot
access.
So
all
those
adjustments
to
accommodate
concerns
over
boating
navigational
access,
neighbor
concerns
have
all
resulted
in
an
increase
and
an
impact.
D
So
that's
part
of
what's
happened
and
then
of
course
the
last
thing
is
the
seawall
construction.
When
we
do
this,
when
we
do
this
original,
did
this
original
project
did
the
original
design?
We
had
no
core,
boring
or
soils.
Information
at
all
and
soils
are
very,
very
important
when
it
comes
to
seawall
design,
we've
gone
in
and
finally
got
some
core
borings.
We
don't
actually
have
any
core
borings
on
the
subject
property,
but
we
have
three
borings
on
Bucky
McQueen's
property
because
we
had
access
that
are
indicative
of
what's
occurred
in
this
whole
area.
D
If
you
know
your
history,
this
was
all
basically
mangrove
wetlands
adjacent
to
alligator
Creek
that
have
been
basically
cut
and
filled.
So
once
we
cut
through
the
first
couple
feet
of
the
property,
the
soils
on
mcqueen's
lot,
we
got
down
to
a
soil
condition
that
was
indicative
of
what's
on
the
other
side
of
the
canal
and
those
soil
conditions
are
terrible
from
an
engineering
design
standpoint,
the
penetration
values
or
single
digits.
So
that
means
that
we
don't
have
good
soils
to
work
in
that
dries.
What
the
seawall
design
is.
D
We
originally
anticipated
doing
some
sort
of
a
cantilever
design.
Maybe
a
steel
sheet
piling
design
I'm,
not
a
fan
of
steel.
It
looks
like
we're
gonna
be
able
to
get
away
with
a
vinyl
panel
design
that
uses
a
subterranean
earth
anchor
where
the
earth
anchors
go
into
the
soil
beneath
the
mangrove
fringe.
So
there's
no
impacts
to
the
mangroves.
D
So
the
other
thing
that
we
did
is
we
modify
the
Punta
Gorda
plan
to
eliminate
vertical
concrete
seawall
on
the
upland
portions,
because
those
are
being
converted
into
mangrove
wetland
areas
and
instead
went
to
riprap,
which
was
actually
a
lower
cost.
So
the
bottom
line
is
that
we've
had
physical
changes
to
the
configuration
we've
had
conditional
changes
in
the
permitting
we've
had
conditional
changes
relative
to
available
of
our
contractors
and
in
my
opinion
it
is
an
opinion.
F
D
E
Interject
since
I
live
in
Brent
store,
aisles
and
I
and
I.
There
are
a
number
of
people
here
that
in
the
audience
that
also
live
in
brinstar
Alice,
we
pay
into
the
alligator
Creek
waterway
and
it
was
permitted
to
minus-6
and
dredged
2-6.
A
couple
of
years
ago
there
has
been
some
shoaling
because
of
our
MOU
and
those
I
know
they're
working
on
addressing
those
issues,
but
you
have
to
go
through
a
permitting
to
take
care
of
all
that,
but
they're
working
on
that
so,
and
that
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
birth
star
Isles.
F
C
B
B
E
F
And
one
last
question
is
since
we're
we're.
The
record
has
already
stated
that
we
have
contractors
that
are
not
readily
available
right
now.
If
we
were
to
wait
until
the
contractors
are
a
little
bit
more
freed
up.
How
is
that
going
to
change
the
overall
cost,
I'm
very
concerned
with
the
fact
that
this
project
has
gone
crazy,
price-wise
I'm,
very
concerned
about
that
and
I'm
getting
a
lot
of
heat
on
it?
It's
in
my
district,
so
I.
D
D
If
there's
contractors
that
want
to
do
this
project,
they're
gonna
come
in
with
some
numbers:
they're
not
going
to
come
in
with
the
price.
That's
going
to
match
your
opinion
of
cost,
but
they're
gonna
come
in
with
pricing
to
get
their
work,
so
you
might
be
surprised
two
bids
on
this
and
where
they
come
from
again
I'm
just
hedging
bets
out
of
concern
about
the
availability
contractors.
That's
all
Gary.
E
G
So
in
discussions
I
had
and
was
also
pointed
out
with
citizens
comments
just
to
add
a
little
bit.
It's
my
understanding
that
about
the
approximate
time
that
we'd
want
to
start.
This
project
is
about
the
approximate
time
that
some
of
the
seawall
contractors
that
we
have
will
already
have
equipment
in
place
who
have
already
had
their,
and
they
may
be
able
to
see
this
as
a
quick
pickup.
So
we
may
actually
be
in
a
very
strong
bidding
situation.
We
really
won't
know
until
we
actually
bid
it.
G
So
we
may
have
three
very
hungry
contractors
sitting
right
in
our
canal
before
whatever
the
number
is
right
now
to
be
able
to
get
some
good
aggressive
bids.
Also
we
haven't,
we
do
have
the
possibility.
You
know
we
were
to
be,
are
gonna,
be
applying
for
grant
as
I
understand,
and
we
may
get
some
some
relief
in
that
respect.
Also,
so
we,
you
know
kind
of
have
to
keep
that
kind
of.
In
our
mind,
we're
seeing
numbers
that
don't
have
any
of
those
aspects
on
it.
G
I
would
like
to
say:
I
don't
want
to
see
this
project
go
through
we're
gonna
talk
about
how
to
hash
it,
to
pay
for
it
and
so
forth,
but
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
have
a
very
strong
feeling
personally,
that
we
should
not
burden
any
nonprofit
religious
organizations,
even
if
it
means
that
we
have
to
eat
that
number
ourselves
as
a
city
I,
think
that
would
be
inappropriate
in
this
case.
It's
going
to
be
some
25,
26,
27
thousand
dollars
whatever
it
is.
G
E
Like
to
make
a
comment
about
that,
while
I
understand
I've
been
very
active
in
a
church
before
and
understand
in
a
small
faith
community,
this
is
a
significant
number.
There
are
also
churches,
though,
that
once
they
may
decide
to
not
be
a
church
any
longer
and
the
property
becomes
available
for
sale
that
that
that
property.
E
G
Fully
understand
it,
that's
why
I'm
saying
it
in
our
discussion.
We
should
look
hopefully
for
a
way.
There
may
be
a
way
that,
if,
upon
future
sale
of
that
property,
there
would
be
some
reinterment
renumeration
to
the
city
and
those
are
for
a
not
necessarily
even
a
forgiveness,
but
a
postponement
until
such
time
that
the
property
was
used
for
another
purpose
and
then
that
new
owner
would
have
to
take
ownership
of
that
value.
At
that
current
value.
G
G
They
have
their
service
and
so
forth,
but
I
am
very
much
aware
of
their
many
of
their
community
outreach
programs
and
actually
involved
in
such,
and
it
would
be
its
very
saddened
if,
in
the
process
of
doing
this,
for
the
greater
good
of
the
community,
we
we
created
a
burden.
That
would
also
have
a
negative
impact
for
those
that
really
have
nothing
to
do
with
this
at
all,
so
I
would
hope
there
would
be
some
type
of
solution
that
we
could
work
out.
H
One
thing
I
wanted
to
share
with
the
public:
is
that
there's
no
precedent
being
set?
This
is
state
law.
Assessments
cannot
pay
for
things
that
are
for
general
benefit;
they
can
only
pay
for
benefits
to
property.
This
is
why
there's
a
PGI
maintenance
area
in
a
vsi
meet
in
this
area.
Bsi
residents
cannot
pay
for
PGI
canals,
as
PGI
people
cannot
pay
this.
This
is
why
there's
a
separation,
it's
not
that
we're
separated
I
community
to
PGI
BSI
is
that
by
law,
assessments
can
only
be
assessed
to
places
that
actually
benefit
property
itself.
H
I
think
we've
allowed
our
resonance
for
too
long
to
assume
that
we
can
break
state
law.
We've
not
been
forthright
in
terms
of
really
articulating
very
clearly
the
law
in
Florida
States.
That
assessments
can
only
benefit
property,
not
general
in
this
week.
There's
no
way
around
this
unless
you
wishing
to
go
to
court
with
the
state
on
this
card.
H
Another
thing
is
that
we
with
this
said
the
only
way
we
can
actually
do
a
benefit
area.
We
have
to
have
an
economist.
Do
a
proper
analysis.
This
analysis
was
done.
It
came
out
that
about
$80,000
benefit
is
is
perceived
for
each
resident.
This
is
first.
This
reason
is
why
it's
justified,
but
this
is
the
benefit
area.
I
just
feel
that
we
we
have
to
be
genuine
with
our
population
and
not
just
say
things
to
appease
people's
feelings.
We
have
to
be
really
real
state
law
requires.
This
is
no
way
around
this.
H
We
have
no
option
on
this.
Assessments
can
only
pay
for
property
benefit,
not
just
doesn't
matter
how
many
people
use
the
canal.
It
has
no
nothing
to
do
anything.
What
it's
the
properties
themselves,
their
benefit
if
they're
going
to
drain
benefit
economically.
Those
are
the
people
to
get
assist
just
in
this
regard,
I
think
we
have
to
be
mindful
when
you
talk
about
spending
money
when
we
make
decisions,
then
delay
them.
We
are
wasting
stash
time.
H
You
want
I
mean
with
that
that
cost
money
we
actually
cost
money
when
we
actually
make
a
decision-
and
we
say,
go
forward
with
something
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
we
mall
over
it.
Whenever
made
a
decision,
we're
not
actually
being
responsible,
because
the
staff
could
have
been
doing
other
things.
So
we
have
to
be
mindful
that
it
actually
cost
money
to
be
indecisive
as
well.
E
B
This
project
has
been
around
for
over
20
years,
never
had
any
steam
because
all
of
the
City
Council's
since
over
20
years
ago
and
the
community
could
never
come
to
grips
with
how
to
pay
for
a
project
like
this,
let
alone
get
a
permit
in
March
of
2015,
the
Punta
Gorda
boaters
Alliance
at
a
meeting,
a
public
meeting
at
the
Isles
Yacht
Club,
with
over
400
people
in
attendance,
and
they
they
proposed,
along
with
our
engineering,
consultant,
an
assessment
area.
The
assessment
area
is
very
close
to
what
is
being
proposed
here.
B
They
were
at
the
Events
Center
one
of
those
meetings
we
had
over
800
people
there
and
the
whole
thing
was
laid
out
again.
It
was
going
to
be
an
assessment
area.
We
heard
from
many
many
people,
people
from
the
rest
of
the
Punta
Gorda
Isles
canal
maintenance
district
who
are
not
in
the
assessment
area.
We
heard
from
people
in
the
assessment
area
we
heard
from
people
from
burnt
star
Isles.
We
heard
from
people
from
alligator
the
alligator
Creek
MSP
you
who
didn't
reside
in
burn
star
house
outside
the
city.
B
B
It
was
March
of
2015
when
the
Punta
Gorda
boaters
Alliance
proposed
an
assessment
area.
That's
how
we
got
this
project
going
to
where
it
is
today.
Yes,
there
are
other
ways
to
do
this,
but
that's
how?
Finally,
the
community
came
together
back
then
and
said:
let's
move
this
forward,
so
we
every
step
of
the
way.
B
We
accomplished
over
it's
now
what
almost
four
years
in
order
to
do
an
assessment,
you
have
to
have
a
legally
valid
methodology.
Our
legal
council
is
here
today
and
it's
been
presented
before
that
this
particular
project.
This
is
not
the
same
as
a
regular
burn,
store
aisles
or
Punta
Gorda,
Isles
Canal
main
as
project.
This
is
different.
This
is
a
navigational
channel
and
the
legally
valid
methodology
that
our
legal
counsel
came
up
with
and
they
do
assessments
all
over.
The
state
of
Florida
was
to
use
water
access
units.
B
B
B
You
will
be
getting
in
the
mail.
Your
assessment
you'll
actually
see
the
number
and
we
will
be
scheduling
a
public
hearing
on
the
matter,
April
6th
right
now.
The
resolution
has
in
there
that
the
hearing
will
be
at
the
regular
council
meeting
in
here
and
council
chambers
on
April
6.
We
don't
have
to
have
it
at
that
time.
We
don't
have
to
have
it
in
here.
You
can
decide
as
a
council
to
schedule
the
public
hearing.
Let's
say
it.
B
B
The
prepayment
amount
is
for
those
who
want
to
pay
it
off
up
front
and
not
incur
any
financing
costs.
Any
handling
costs
and
it'll
never
show
up
on
your
tax
bill
for
those
who
take
out
a
loan,
not
alone,
who
take
the
option
of
just
paying
it
in
installments,
it'll
show
up
on
your
November
of
2019
tax
bill,
I.
B
As
stated
before,
if
we
do
not
assess
them,
the
city
will
have
to
pay
the
costs.
The
city
has
a
property
in
the
assessment
area
that
is,
has
ten
water
access
units.
There
are
no
docks.
There
are
no
boats
on
it,
its
Nature
Park,
so
he
doesn't
intend
to
put
any
docks
on
it.
The
city
doesn't
intend
to
put
any
boats
on
it.
However,
it's
allowed
by
purr
to
have
ten
water
access
units
at
nature
park.
We're
going
to
assess
ourselves
for
those
units,
we're
obligated
to
do
that.
B
I
Thank
you,
mr.
city
manager,
the
issue
of
whether
you
can
assess
a
church
or
another
non-profit
is
settled.
You
can
do
that,
but
you
do
have
the
local
option
to
craft
an
exemption
or
nonprofits,
which
would
include
Church
properties.
If
that
is
the
wall
of
the
council.
Now
to
do
that,
you
would
have
to
pay
that
amount
on
their
behalf.
You
cannot
take
their
amounts
and
spread
it
amongst
everybody
else,
because
that
would
present
a
legal
issue
for
the
city's
assessment
program.
I
I
B
G
E
G
E
D
E
Opining
today-
and
we
really
are
taking
that
in
to
consideration
everyone's
concerns
when
we
first
started
this
process
a
long
time
ago
and
I
know
those
of
us
that
live
in
burns
trials,
we
were
concerned
about
the
navigational
channel
of
burnt
start
of
the
alligator
Creek
and
some
of
the
narrowness
of
the
channel,
but
recently
I've
had
shown
Michaela
and
Gary.
Disher
showed
me
that
the
barometric
study
or
about
the
metric
study
of
alligator
Creek
showed
that
the
channel
actually
is
has
been
widened,
or
it
is
wider
when
we
they
were
showing
me
this.
E
D
Correct
we
mapped
the
water
depths
of
alligator
Creek
up
to
the
site.
They
made
a
determination
that
there
was
enough
navigable
waterway
within
the
downstream
component
of
alligator
Creek
that
we
did
not
to
do.
We
did
not
to
do.
It
did
not
need
to
do
any
additional
dredging
beyond
what
Charlotte
County
was
pursuing.
B
D
Area
that
was
critical
was
the
junction
with
the
CH
Canal
Buckley's
pass
with
alligator
Creek
in
that
location.
We
actually
feathered
the
width
of
the
channel
out
to
allow
for
two
things
to
maintain
at
least
a
50-foot
navigation
channel
through
that
section,
as
well
as
created
a
settling
Basin
on
the
up
drift
side,
because
it
is
a
settlement
area
so
that
channel
there,
where
it
intersects
there
was
a
graphic
that
I
had
created
and
sent
in
yesterday,
is
probably
not
in
this
group.
E
Okay,
thank
you
appreciate
that.
Well
and
while
you're
there
are,
we
going
to
be
able
to
then
move
the
slow
speed
or
back
down
to
after
the
where
boats
will
come
in
because
I
know
the
slow
speed
marker
got
moved
back
up
the
alligator
Creek,
so
boats
are
coming
down
now
it
on
plane
past,
where
boats
will
be
coming
in
well.
D
D
The
portions
of
the
ordinance
apply
to
the
the
city
limits.
Yes,
not
all
of
alligator
Creek
is
in
the
city
limits.
It
doesn't
matter
anyways,
because
the
only
agency
that
can
really
regulate
slow
speed
zones
is
the
Florida
Fish
and
Wildlife
Conservation
Commission.
Okay.
So
if
there's
the
will
to
move
that
speed
zone
further
up
to
the
junction
here,
which
would
make
a
lot
of
sense
for
for
the
majority
of
the
voters
is
certainly
there's
people
that
would
be
anxious
to
get
out
there
and
want
to
go
up
on
playing
speed
very
quickly.
D
The
I
would
look
to
the
FWC
to
grant
that
sort
of
a
modification
of
the
speed
zone.
The
other
advantage
is
slowing.
The
boats
down
through
this
intersection
here
is
simply
reducing
the
boat
wake
which
stirs
up
the
sediments,
which
then
deposits
in
the
lower
parts
of
the
dredge
channel.
So
it's
really
a
long-term
maintenance
advantage
to
move
that
speed
zone
up
further
past
the
intersection
who.
E
D
E
G
E
J
J
I
had
serious
issues
about
the
way
it
was
being
handled
presented
and
once
I
got
on.
Council
I
had
the
ability
to
start
asking
questions
of
the
people
who
had
made
the
decisions
and
for
those
of
you
who
are
concerned,
and
rightly
so,
because
you
don't
like
the
process
or
you
don't
like.
The
mechanisms
that
have
been
used.
J
I
feel
like
the
City
Council
did
their
due
diligence
and
has
followed
state
laws
has
followed
recommendations
from
the
people
who
supposedly
know
and
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is
I,
don't
think
anybody's
ever
gonna
be
a
hundred
percent
happy
and
yes,
I
still
have
regrets
with
the
way
some
of
this
proceeded.
But
after
having
done
my
due
diligence
I
feel
like
we
need
to
proceed,
even
though
it's
gonna
be
painful
for
some
people,
yeah
and
I'm
really
I'm
saying
that
from
the
bottom
of
my
heart,
I
feel
like
for
the
last
six
weeks.
F
I,
just
don't
like
the
fact
that
there's
been
so
much
turmoil
surrounding
it
and
the
cost
has
just
kept
going
up
and
up
and
up
and
I
would
really
really
like
for
us
to
do
whatever
we
can
to
keep
the
cost
as
low
as
we
can
for
whatever
the
rest
of
the
project
entails
and
and
if
it
means
we
wait.
Two
or
three
months
till
a
contractor
is
readily
available.
E
B
E
G
B
F
B
F
B
D
B
B
J
H
E
F
E
F
F
E
E
E
B
G
E
A
Think
that
you
heard
from
Heather
and
I
when
the
thought
first
was
discussed,
agreed
that
perhaps
an
agreement
as
a
deferral
agreement
would
be
the
more
appropriate.
You
might
want
to
hear
some
input
now
that
you're
giving
consideration
through
the
church
for
Heather
to
give
you
her
opinion
as
to
the
better
way
of
handling
this
either.
You
know
what
Hans
had
suggested
or
Heather
suggested
Heather's
your
attorney,
so
you
might
want
to
hear
how
she
would
recommend
what.
I
I
A
Having
an
easement,
which
would
be
subject
to
future
council's
discretion
as
to
whether
to
release
or
not
may
affect
the
marketability
of
the
church's
property,
so
I
think
just
a
standard
agreement
with
a
deferment
that
identifies
what
would
be
paid
and
when,
if
and
when
the
church
properties
is
not
used
for
that
purpose,
it
would
be
the
simplest
way
to
approach
it.
The
city
was
considering
that.
I
I
E
I
Include-
and
we
could
do
this
at
the
in
your
final
resolution
with
that-
you
will
consider
on
April
3rd
because
hopefully
you'd
be
able
to
get
that
agreement
in
place
and
then
have
the
exemption
and
for
that
property
included
in
the
April
3rd.
Is
this
the
only
sort
of
nonprofit
property
in
this
area?
Yes,.
B
I
E
F
I
Currently
drafted
pre
payments
are
final.
Obviously
you
guys
can
change
that.
If
you
want
to
start
tracking
pre
payments
and
issuing
refund
checks,
you
can
do
that
that
there
is
not
a
legal
prohibition
to
doing
that.
It's
just
typically.
We
set
it
up
where
pre
payments
are
final.
Anyone
who's,
gonna,
pay
annual
assessments.
You
always
have
the
ability
to
come
down,
but
not
go
up
from
the
maximum
amounts
that
are
looted
in
here.
So
you
can't
accommodate
those.
If
you
choose
to
do
the
same
thing
with
those
that
prepay
that
can
be
done
as
well.
J
E
I
just
felt
like
you
know,
to
be
really
truthful
and
aboveboard
I
just
felt
because
I
know
you
know
in
our
imprint
store
aisles
where
we
have
gone
through
assessments.
The
final
assessment
has
been
Trude
up
so
that
we
know,
as
as
costs
have
changed,
that
we
aren't
assessing
the
full
amount
and
so
I
I'm
thinking.
You
know
we.