►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 02-21-18 Part 2
Description
Description
A
B
The
restroom
facilities
that
that
we
don't
have
there
and
I
have
gotten
I,
can't
even
tell
you
how
many
I
mean
yet
people
do
like
it
too
I
get
that,
but
but
when
you
have
so
many
people
still
out
there
vocally,
sharing
negativity
and
they're
still
all
over
next
door
about
it,
I
mean
it's
I
I
monitor
the
site,
I,
don't
post
on
the
site,
but
I
read
a
lot
of
the
things
that
are
in
there
and
there's
still
a
whole
lot
of
negativity.
We're.
C
Not
gonna
solve
that
I
mean
that's,
not
gonna
change
until
their
actual
residues
get
done
and
and
people
are
gonna
comment
and
they're
gonna
comment
incorrectly.
We
know
that
because
it
happens
every
day
and
some
things
we
just
cannot
control
and
I
feel.
As
you
said,
jaha
you
know
you
can
use
our
new
communications
director
to
help
put
information
out
there,
correct
information
and-
and
we
can
put
out
put
it
out
and
our
weekly
newsletters
or
weekly
communication.
A
D
And
with,
as
job
pointed
out
with
communication,
we'll
get
our
message
out
better,
but
the
restrooms
were
not
built
initially,
because
the
bids
that
we
got
were
not
fiscally
prudent
for
this
city
to
proceed
without
having
them
redesigned,
and
we
did
this
for
the
long
haul.
This
is
a
short-term
issue
that
we,
as
a
council,
I,
think
approached
prudently
and
our
addressing
at
this
point.
People
just
need
to
understand
that
it's
it's
not
a
permanent
situation.
It's
a
temporary
situation.
E
A
F
A
F
F
A
D
Brought
this
to
the
agenda
and
thank
you
very
much
I
just
want
to
say
that
we
have
discussed
this
previously.
The
last
time
Lin
had
brought
it
forward.
I
have
voted
against
us,
always
with
reluctance
and
I
want
to
commend
Lynn
when
she
kept
the
conversation,
but
I
just
wasn't
ready
to
go
yet
because
of
issues
that
really
didn't
have
to
do
with
this,
but
there
were
surrounding
communities
have
have
been
stepping
forward.
D
A
recent
study
done
by
the
American
Academy
of
pain,
medicine,
has
finished
a
study
over
several
states
that
have
approved
medical
marijuana
in
the
past
over
a
long
period
of
time
since
2010,
and
they
have
shown
that
an
approximately
25
percent
decrease
in
opiate
overdose
occurs,
and
this
is
because
marijuana
is
often
a
good
substitute
for
pain
management
when
the
the
opiate
is
no
longer
really
prudent
to
continue
on
in
a
long
term
basis
for
the
individual.
That's
also
not
there's
also
been
when
they
took
out
those
numbers.
D
There
was
also
a
55%
decrease
in
deaths
from
the
overdose
with
people
that
were
opiate
overdose
related
to
people
that
were
on
prescription
drugs,
and
that
would
be
particularly
the
in
our
state,
the
1,100
people
worth
1,000
people
from
the
oxycodone
type
of
opiates,
the
prescription
drugs
that
the
doctors
give
for
pain
management.
There
is
talk
now
that
they
want
to
limit
them
out,
though,
in
the
state,
the
the
length
of
time
a
person
can
receive
a
prescription
frequently
one
person,
a
person
does
have
chronic
pain.
D
They
go
to
a
certain
point
and
the
doctors
no
longer
relieve
that
prescription.
There
is
evidence
to
indicate
that
these
some
of
these
individuals
often
go
to
the
street
and
they
are
also
requiring
acquiring
heroin
and
fentanyl
to
to
self-medicate
in
those
situations
when
the
medical
standard,
medical
procedures
are
not
allowed
to
afford
them
that
these
are.
These
are
real
things.
This
is
also
not
to
play
down.
The
other
uses
for
medical
marijuana
and
I
want
to
point
out
the
medical
marijuana
usage
and
the
way
it's
being
proposed
in
our
state.
D
It's
not
just
getting
some
weed
rolling
up
a
joint
and
sitting
on
the
corner
and
having
a
gay
old
time,
there's
a
number
of
constituents
of
marijuana
that
have
been
identified
to
have
medicinal
value
for
various
types
of
maladies,
THC,
CBD,
CBN
and
th,
for
example,
and
you
can
I
think
the
point
was
a
boutique.
You
can
actually
go
to
these
things,
and
this
can
be
blended
just
as
a
way.
D
In
addition
to
the
typical
cancer
person
who
has
to
fight
a
loss
of
appetite
nausea,
these
various
constituents
can
help
alleviate
and
temper
them
without
having
the
same
dangers
as
opiates.
I
do
understand
the
federal
government
list
marijuana
as
a
schedule
1
it's
it's
arbitrary.
From
my
perspective,
there's
sufficient
evidence.
I
believe
the
show
that
this
is
beneficial.
D
That's
not
what
we're
talking
about
here,
we're
talking
about
applied
scientific
medicine
under
the
supervision
of
a
doctor
in
a
controlled
quality,
controlled
substance,
and
for
that
reason,
I
think
that
the
I
would
rather
and
and
the
politics
of
the
Home
Rule
objections
that
I
had
seemed
to
have
sorted
themselves
out
around
so
surrounding
communities.
So
we're
not
going
to
be
the
mecca
the
only
one
in
the
Southwest
Florida,
that's
going
to
have
it,
and
that
was
one
of
my
concerns.
There
are
going
to
be
others.
C
I
happen
to
agree:
I
actually
went
to
the
Sir
Tara
dispensary
up
in
North,
Port,
very,
very
professional.
You
can
drive
up
41
and
you
would
never
know
where
it
is:
it's
in
a
strip
shopping
center,
but
it's
on
the
side
of
the
building.
I'm
extremely
professionally
done,
they're,
actually
just
distributing
or
dispensing
the
products
and
they
actually
steam
distill
the
aromatic
compounds
out
of
the
plant
and
then
prepare
the
the
products,
and
you
can
go
online
and
see
what
the
products
are
that
are
offered
and
I
don't
have
any
problem
with
it.
C
It
wouldn't
be
a
detractor
in
any
part
of
our
community.
Actually
I
was
concerned
about
that
initially,
which
was
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
was
opposed
to
it.
But
after
we've
studied
it
I
think
that
and
saw
what
this
one
was
like
up
in
Northport.
It
would,
you
know,
fit
right
into
the
community.
No
more
would
now
and
the
people
that
were
in
there
were
people
like
us.
B
I
would
agree
with
all
that
I
am
in
touch
with
one
of
the
North
port
commissioners,
who
was
instrumental
in
getting
it
approved
in
North
Port,
and
she
said
to
me
that
they
absolutely
that
was
opened.
In
fact,
people
are
very
supportive
of
it
and
you're
absolutely
right,
they're
very
nondescript.
You
would
never
know
from
the
street
that
with
what's
inside,
that
building
is
what's
in
there
and
they're
not
going
around
selling
recreational
marijuana.
B
They're
selling
medicinal
marijuana
that's
prescription
and
there
are
a
number
of
people
in
our
communities
that
have
asked
for
it
who
voted
for
it
over
a
year
ago
and
I
understand
the
home
rule
situation,
but
I
don't
see
that
changing
in
this
legislature,
so
I
think
we
owe
it
to
the
citizens
that
voted
in
favor
of
it
to
move
forward
with
it
and
lift
the
ban.
I.
E
Am
I
would
be
in
support,
but
I
have
a
I
would
ask
that
we
wait
the
two
weeks
and
three
days
until
the
session
is
over.
I
say
this,
for
this
reason
is
that
marijuana
is
actually
in
discussion
right
now
to
legislature.
I
mean
it
took
until
now,
but
it's
there
and
I
say
this,
because
there
the
I
mean
of
course,
they've
issued
with,
with
the
have
a
choice
of
all
or
nothing,
but
for
me
even
greater
than
that,
there
are
two
issues.
E
One
is
that
they
cut
the
funding
for
for
the
actual
study
of
it,
even
though,
ideally
there's
an
idea
that
there's
formulations
there's
no
framework
whatsoever,
a
doctor
knows
as
much
as
you
do
about
how
much
to
put
in
because
there
there
is.
There's
no
science
on
that,
and
so
Moffat
actually
has
this
as
a
center.
For
the
study
of
this,
which
was
supposed
to
be
finding
which
they
took
out
of
this
funding
to
my
worryin
and
again,
I
I,
don't
oppose
having
one
here,
but
the
politics
of
it.
E
E
My
worry
with
this
law,
as
tends
is
that
it
allows
one
to
obtain,
but
it
does
buzz,
but
but
it
still
doesn't
make
it
legal
to
consume,
and
so
it's
a
very
big
issue
that
if
someone
is
in
the
workplace-
and
you
take
this
despite
you
have
any
health
condition,
you
are
violating
the
Florida
drug
be
workplace
Act,
which
means
you
are
actually
technically
an
illicit
drug
user.
Secondly,
if
you're
someone
who's
did
someone
with
disabilities-
you
take
this
this
will.
E
This
will
disallow
you
from
being
able
to
be
considered
a
disabled
person,
and
so
it's
one
of
those
things
where
I
think
that
we
owe
it
to
our
citizens
that
we
give
them
the
very
best
chance.
We
can
at
least
let
this
session
end
before
we
do
this
only
because
I
have
no
issue.
What
does
having
one
here,
but
I
find
that
that
these
are
really
untenable
issues.
Iii
think
that
for
someone
have
to
choose
between
health
and
their
livelihood
is,
is
terrible
and
I.
E
Think
just
it
just
that
truly,
if
you
have
a
law
of
which
it's
very
deceptive
in
a
public.
My
thing
is
that
if
the
public
season
in
there's
paper
ban
lifted
the
assumption
is,
it
is
legal
to
take
and
it's
not
in
Florida,
there's
no
employer
or
employee
protections
an
employer
if
your
employee
was
to
take
this
and
there
was
some
workplace
internet,
unlike
if
someone
was
on
a
prescription
medicine,
there
are
no
protections
you're.
Just
you
have
an
employee's.
Using
an
illicit
drug
who's
now
caused
a
problem,
the
same
thing:
the
person
again
themselves.
E
They
very
easily
can
lose
an
employment
unless
the
employee,
unless
the
employers
very
specifically
says
that
I
changed
this
policy,
and
so
I
would
ask
that
we
move
this
to
the
next
meeting,
only
to
least
give
legislature.
Lisa
I
mean
if
they're
gonna
do
what
they're
gonna
do.
If
they
don't
do
anything
they'll
do
anything.
We
did
our
best
try,
but
I
I
would
say.
If
we
do
this
now,
we
are
actually
breaking
from
the
herd.
In
terms
of
our
fellow
cities
and
counties
that
have
concerned
about
the
actual
larger
legal
issues,.
A
D
All
due
respect
two
weeks
week
and
a
half
I
think
it's
time
to
go
forward
in
some
respects.
I
wish
I
would
have
gone
forward
sooner
but,
like
I
said,
I
want
to
see
what
the
surrounding
communities
have
done.
It's
going
to
be
available.
If
somebody,
if
a
cancer
patient,
it
needs
help
with
an
appetite
and
pain
management
if
a
person
with
severe
chronic
pain
and
is
wanting
to
reduce
their
opiate
use
or
will
soon
not
have
their
opiate
use.
These
things
are
available.
D
I
understand
the
point
that
you're
making,
but
that's
only
one
piece
of
the
total
pie
of
the
patients
that
would
benefit
from
from
this,
even
though
it
is
ELISA
and
I
think
that
it's
still
time
I
think
it's
time
to
go
forward.
Despite
this,
unfortunately,
despite
all
this
craziness,
that's
going
on
in
Tallahassee
I
am
on
record,
saying
that
I
do
agree
that
it's
a
bad
law
I,
don't
like
what
they're
doing
up
there
as
Home
Rule
people
feel
offended
by
that.
D
A
A
B
A
G
H
D
H
H
D
A
F
I
For
the
record,
this
is
my
first
council
meeting.
I
want
to
apologize
for
jumping
the
gun
there,
but,
yes,
we
are
a
medical
facility,
just
like
any
other
doctor's
office.
Okay,
we
do
the
recommendation
portion
for
the
patients.
We
simply
educate
the
patients
on
what
they
need
for
their
specific
disease,
a
debilitating
condition
from
PTSD
to
cancer.
Okay,
epilepsy
MS,
als
we're
seeing
rare
cases
of
things
that
I've
never
seen
before.
I
I've
been
in
the
medical
field,
almost
10
years,
pain
management,
everything
you
said
about
the
opiates,
the
fentanyl,
the
everything
and
that's
all
really
happening.
It's
been
happening
for
a
very
long
time.
I've
lost
friends,
family
patients
to
this
garbage
medication.
Yes,
it
can
help
the
patients,
you
know
short
term
but
long
term,
it'll
kill
them
quicker.
So,
to
answer
your
question:
yes,
we
are
the
doctor
portion
of
it.
We
get
the
patient
through
this
very
cumbersome
system
of
Tallahassee
because
they
again
have
made
it
extremely
difficult
for
patients.
Losing
paperwork.
I
I've
been
waiting
for
a
phone
call
which
I
received
yesterday
for
about
two
and
a
half
weeks
for
a
manager
at
the
you
are
in
what
we
thought
was
Tampa,
which
is
now
Jacksonville,
so
they're
called
in
Jacksonville
and
where
they
process
apps
are
in
Tampa,
but
all
of
the
stuff
that
happens
in
who's
interested
is
in
Tallahassee,
so
to
try
and
get
a
hold
of
somebody
nearly
impossible.
Even
for
the
patients.
You
know,
they're
calling
me
ten
times
a
week,
hey
what's
going
on,
I
can't
get
ahold
of
anybody.
I
I
They
have
to
wait
for
approval
from
the
state,
which
takes
a
very
long
time.
It
could
take
two
weeks
I've
seen
patients
get
it
in
two
weeks
to
about
eight
nine
weeks,
I'm
still
having
patients
from
December
the
30th
waiting
for
their
cards
because
they
got
lost
in
the
shuffle,
which
is
not
acceptable.
You
know
the
patients
that
are
actually
dying
stage
for
liver
failure
stage
for
kidney
failure.
Everything
you
know
are
calling
me
saying:
hey
I'm
dying
like
can
you
can
you
help
me?
J
J
There
are
several
the
conical
zone.
There's
a
couple
different
zones
out
there
again,
the
purple
hat
or
the
purple
area
is
the
entire
area.
The
conical
zone
will
have
height
limits,
which
are
well
above
what
we
allow
anyway
150
feet
above
the
airport
height
and
the
inner
boundary
to
350
feet
at
the
airport
height
at
the
outer
boundary.
J
C
C
J
J
That
is
correct
and
the
only
thing
we
would
limit
residential
density
will
be
limited
in
this
area
to
what
is
existing
now
they
could
not
transfer
density
units
to
that
area.
They
could
transfer
from
it.
It
could
be
a
sending
site,
not
a
receiving
site,
because
you
don't
want
high
density
and
they
approach
them.
So
that's.
A
C
C
The
other
concern
that
I
had
as
I
read
through
all
of
this
was
is:
will
all
of
the
processes
for
someone
who
wants
to
build
a
home
or
start
a
business
within
this
area
remain
the
same
that
are
in
the
city
limits
or
is
now
FDOT
and
the
FAA
going
to
have
to
insert
themselves
into
the
approval
process.
It's.
J
Going
to
depend
exactly
on
what
they're
proposing
and
where
they're
proposing
it,
because
there
are
some
limitations
like
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
hazard
areas
where
it's
creating
with
the
stormwater
retention
pond,
where
you
have
excess
number
of
wildlife,
birds
and
things
that
could
be
in
that
approach
zone.
But
that's
something
I
believe
that
could
be
mitigated
pretty
easily
through
those.
That's.
C
C
Any
citizen
this
impacts
exactly
I.
Some
of
it
is
on
the
east
side,
which
would
be
in
jaha's
area
district
I'm
just
concerned
about
more
red
tape
or
some
resident
who
buys
a
property
and
then
wants
to
build
a
home
and
they're
in
the
process
and
all
of
a
sudden
and
then
discover,
there's
something
that
the
FAA
or
the
RFP
ot
and
I
just.
D
K
For
the
record,
Mitchell
Lawson
or
the
designed
to
address
some
of
that
concern
within
the
context
of
building
heights
within
the
context
of
our
existing
zoning
code,
there's
very
limited
pieces
of
the
puzzle
that
this
would
affect,
because
our
own
encode
height
limits
are
significantly
lower
than
these
totals
in
regards
to
stormwater
management
areas.
What
they're
really
talking
about
is
wet
ponds,
yeah.
F
K
At
the
scale
of
development
that
we
have
within
the
approach
zone
within
the
current
city
limits,
you're
not
going
to
be
creating
stormwater
management,
wet
ponds,
because
the
lot
structures
are
so
small.
You
need
at
least
an
acre
to
have
a
stormwater
management
wet
pond,
and
most
of
the
Lots
are
smaller
than
an
acre.
So
you
wouldn't
have
that
scale
of
development.
This
is
that
that
one
stormwater
management.
C
K
Within
the
purple
circle,
but
they,
the
stormwater
management
limitations,
are
only
related
to
this.
The
approach
zone,
which
is
the
actual
flight
path
in
so
it's
this
red
hatched
area,
the
only
affected
commercial
properties
would
potentially
be
those
along
41,
including
the
current
side
of
muscle-car
city,
so
in
terms
of
wet
storm,
water
management
ponds,
they're
expensive,
to
produce
to
maintain
in
comparison
to
dry
ponds.
K
C
C
G
H
E
What
we're
doing
with
this,
my
question
would
be
in
dealing
with
the
county.
Are
you
dealing
with
the
county
up-to-date
or
lead
only
knows
what
my
question
is
like
the
county
right
now.
It
realizes
that
its
particular
rules
are
not
serving
it
well
and
to
the
point
where
they
just
changed
the
rule
to
allow,
let's
say,
extended,
stay
hotel
I
mean
some
of
the
rules
against
residential
and
all
this
ultimately
they've
they've
made
it
so
that
the
airport
industrial
park
does
not
have
been
able
to
develop.
J
For
the
record
Lisa
Hannon
again,
we
did
meet
with
the
up
manager,
Ron
Ridenhour
at
the
airport.
We
went
over
this
I
think
it's
about
six
months
ago,
six,
eight
months
ago,
we
went
over
it
this.
This
is
mirrored
after
regular
state
statute
as
well
as
Charlotte
County.
So
these
are
the
FAA
and
FDOT
regulations,
not
just
Charlotte
counties
regulations.
E
More
is
that
they
and
I
don't
know
where,
within
their
code,
they
they
were
able
to
do
this.
But,
like
I
know
as
of
the
last
month,
they
had
make
changes
because
they
desire
to
have
they
see
since
day
hotel
by
the
airport,
which
wasn't
permissible
under
let's
say
the
code
six
months
ago
and
I
I'm
gonna
I,
guess
make
sure
that
our
code
matches
the
the
recent
adjustments
that
the
counties
made
so
that
we're
not
so
that
we're
not
more
restrictive
in
the
county
right.
J
B
K
So
to
address
Tucker's
grade
Tucker's
grade
is
outside
of
the
airport
protection
overlay
area.
So
it's
it's
a
mute
point
for
that
interchange.
As
far
as
development
potential
within
the
the
loop
area
are
the
gens
loop
wrote
of
interchange
area
within
the
context
of
our
existing
code.
These
regulations
essentially
would
have
no
effect
because,
under
our
existing
codes,
you
can
go
to
about
60
feet
and
height
through
a
plan
development
process.
So
but.
B
K
The
density
at
the
at
the
loop
property
is
limited
by
virtue
of
the
airport
of
the
in
a
local
agreement
between
the
city
and
the
county.
So
if
the
loop
property
there
they're
not
within
the
approach
zone,
their
entire
property
is
outside
of
the
approach
zone,
so
the
density
limits
would
not
take
effect,
I'm
trying
to
get
a
cursor
when.
K
Yes,
this
this,
this
red
hatch
on
the
purple,
that's
where
they're
the
density
limitations
would
occur.
So
if
the
developer
of
this
property
wanted
to
try
to
buy
density,
transferred
of
density
units
from
someplace
else
in
the
county
or
the
city
and
transfer
them
to
that
property,
they
could
do
so.
They
could
do
so
under
this
proposed
ordinance
because
they
do
not
fall
within
this
approach.
So.
K
C
I
realize
we
can't
control
the
state
statute,
I'm,
just
bringing
an
issue
up
just
to
be
aware,
because
I
just
am
concerned
that
you
know
something
could
happen
and
I
just
AM
expressing
that
I
I
don't
want
to
see
something
happen
where
we
start
to
layer
on
red
tape.
So
when
that
starts,
if
that
should
start
to
occur,
that
will
be
something
we
need
to
really
well.
C
F
A
J
J
The
sort
of
shaded
area
right
now,
that
is
the
current
city
limits
for
that
area.
This
is
potential
to
change
this
for
to
the
interchange,
commercial
zoning
district,
and
then
this
would
be
the
future
annexation
of
what
would
would
or
could
fall
under
the
interchange,
commercial
zoning
district,
and
this
would
be
to
offer
this
option
we.
Currently
the
loop
has
come
in
under
the
highway
commercial
zoning
district.
J
We
can't
change
their
zoning
without
them,
requesting
a
zoning
change,
even
the
upcoming
annexation
and
comp
plan
and
rezoning
so
other
than
that
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
hybrid
between
the
highway
commercial
and
the
old
commercial
general
from
the
code
prior
to
2005
and
we're
up
for
any
changes.
We
comments.
B
K
So
that
is
what
staff
has
provided
for
here,
as
there
is
currently
no
area
in
the
city,
that
is,
the
zoning
classification
and
individual
property
owners
would
have
to
consent
or
come
in
for
rezoning.
You
could
end
up
with
a
situation
if,
if
we
allow
this
to
be
present
on
those
other
sites
that
you
would
end
up
with
a
spot
zoning
scenario
here
we
have
the
good
fortune
of
having
a
one
single
large
parcel
owner
for
a
substantial
portion
of
this
property,
so
that
would
not
be
a
spot
zone.
K
K
D
So
the
question
is
I.
Think
I
want
to
piggyback
then
is
if
40,
if
these
parcels
that
is
referring
to
would
be
a
meaning
able
to
annexing
into
us.
If
we
were
to
proactively
do
something
similar
to
what
we're
doing
here.
That
might
encourage
development
of
that
area,
with
the
intent
for
them
to
annex
into
right,
but
the
Gorda
right.
B
And
I
guess
my
one
concern
is
you
know
the
new
mobile
station
with
the
7-eleven
I
think
it
looks
absolutely
horrible.
We
all
we're
looking
at
is
the
back
of
a
building
on
41
and
it
looks
absolutely
horrible.
Had
this
been
applicable
to
them,
they
could
have
built
it
so
that
it
faced
the
street
and
looked
like
all
the
rest
of
the
businesses
that
are
already
in
that
corridor.
I.
Just
think
that
we
it
to
be
proactive,
I
think
very
stated.
I
think
this.
C
I'm
not
disagreeing
with
what
you're
saying
there,
but
all
this
my
take
on
this
slide.
Is
this
just
an
example
when
somebody
anacs
is
in
or
if
somebody
wants
to
choose
to
rezone,
they
could
come
to
the
city
and
say
I'd
like
to
rezone
I
mean
so
when
somebody
annexes
they
work
with
staff
to
pick
what
is
the
most
appropriate
zoning
classification,
we
just
don't
have
that
classification
at
this
point
in
time.
B
B
D
I
understand
basically
with
Lynn,
saying
she's,
just
saying
that
maybe
proactively,
we
should
put
a
template
out
there
for
future
considerations.
Yeah,
that's
my
point
and
she's
and
she's
just
and
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
that
maybe
that's
what
we
should
be
doing
is
if
we
get
a
consensus
to
direct
staff
to
come
up
with
an
idea
for
the
further
the
forty
one
quarter.
Is
that
what
we're
talking
about.
B
K
A
But
then,
if
you
go
down
on
their
special
exception,
the
sales
and
display
and
other
than
completely
enclosed
buildings
of
any
merchandise,
but
that
saves
it
otherwise
allowed
as
permitted
as
use
that
would
save
that
it
wouldn't
be
allowed
to
have
like
I'm
thinking
of
the
trailer
place.
Right
now,
that's
on
the
corner.
Obviously
they
have
stuff
outside,
but
they
have
an
enclosed
building
as
well.
So
would
they
they
would
be
able
to
work
with
this
if
they
decided
that
they
wanted
to
come
in
correction.
Okay,
what
is
a
sports,
marina
sports
marinas.
K
A
K
H
H
G
F
H
C
C
But
we
can't
rezone
can't
you're
talking
about
actually
rezoning.
This
is
just
it
all.
This
is
is
just
to
establish
the
classification.
That's
all
we're
talking
about
today.
We're
not
talking
about
I
mean
I,
get
what
you're
saying
and
totally
agree
with
you,
but
we're
not
the
conversation
isn't
about
rezoning,
something
that's
already
existing.
It's
just
establishing
this.
H
C
F
C
H
A
F
H
There
was
a
discussion
not
that
long
ago
word.
It
was
brought
out
that
our
code
has
a
two-year
limitation
on
special
exceptions,
meaning
that
they
have
to
be
in
use
within
the
two
years
from
the
date
of
approval.
Otherwise
it
expires
and-
and
it
was
brought
to
your
attention
that
some
of
the
projects
that
require
special
exceptions
have
to
go
through
a
series
of
of
governmental
approvals
that
may
end
up
taking
longer
than
the
two
years
that
we
would
allow
and
the
City
Council
understood
the
reasonableness
of
having
the
opportunity
to
extend
that
deadline.
H
But
unfortunately,
under
our
code
there
was
no
opportunity
to
do
that.
So
the
suggestion
was
made
to
consider
an
ordinance
that
would
allow
for
an
extension
of
the
original
two-year
limitation
based
on
factors
that
you
would
consider
demonstration
of
good
faith
efforts
to
obtain
the
approvals
etc.
And
the
suggestion
would
be
that
in
addition
to
the
two
years
that
they
already
get,
that
they
could
get
up
to
an
additional
three
years
for
a
maximum
of
five
years
from
the
date
of
approval,
which
is
more
or
less
consistent
with
the
codes
that
I'm
familiar
with.