►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 06-05-19 Part 3
Description
Description
A
B
C
A
B
A
Okay
and
that
you
have
been
sworn
you
would
address
your
comments
to
the
council
as
a
whole
and,
as
you
know,
when
we
have
our
meetings
here,
we
it's
very
respectful
and
because
we
know
that
there
are
people
who
are
agree
or
disagree,
but
we
have
a
respectful
conversation.
So
we
do
not
apply,
we
do
not
cheer
and-
and
we
respect
each
other
so
that
we
can
have
it.
We
want
to
hear
everyone
if
you
are
reiterating
and
other
speakers
comments.
A
Please
acknowledge
that
and
just
say,
I
agree
with
the
other
person
that
has
spoken
before.
We
want
to
make
sure
we
give
everyone
an
opportunity
to
speak,
and
if
you
have
any
supporting
documents,
then
you
can
provide
a
copy
to
the
clerk
during
that
such
time
and
we
will
not
answer
impromptu
questions.
This
is
public
testimony
to
the
to
the
council
as
a
whole,
so
and.
B
I
wish
to
add
that
your
testimony
will
be
provided
under
oath.
So
if
you
haven't
yet
been
sworn
but
decide
to
speak
and
now's
the
time
to
rise
and
be
sworn
by,
the
city
court
also,
you
will
be
subject
to
cross-examination
by
both
the
representative
of
the
intervener
and
the
applicant.
If
they
choose
to
do
so,
so
anybody
that
wants
to
speak
that
hasn't
been
sworn.
Please
rise
to
be
at
this
time,
just
warning
by
the
city
clerk.
D
E
B
A
F
Minutes
sworn
in
my
only
concern
with
the
thing
is
right
now,
because
I'm
out
every
morning
and
I
live
right
on
the
block.
Is
employees
are
staying
there
right
now?
Who
are
renovating
impact?
It's
it's
in
and
out.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
property
is
a
bed-and-breakfast
and
doesn't
become
a
employee
facility
for
Fisherman's
Village.
That
would
be
a
main
concern
having
having.
Obviously
people
come
from
out
of
town
and
staying
or
or
doing
that
is
a
completely
different
housing
situation
than
having
people
who
are
employed
by
fisherman's
village.
Staying
there.
G
G
H
H
Have
been
sworn
in,
I
for
a
full
disclosure.
I
am
NOT
a
resident
of
the
designated
area,
I'm
speaking
kind
of
as
a
private
citizen,
because
I
feel
that
I
do
I
have
to
also
disclose
that
I
do
go
by
there
all
the
time,
because
that's
the
route
I
like
to
take
to
go
home
so
I'm,
very
familiar
with
the
property
and
I
have
to
say
when
I
get
off,
Port,
Charlotte
and
I
get
into
that
neighborhood
I,
look
around
and
I
see
the
harbor
and
the
children
and
look
over
here
and
they're.
H
H
They
would
have
tours
going
to
look
at
these
houses,
but
we
just
feel
like
well,
you
know
somebody
who
wants
it
and
you
know
we're
gorgeous,
so
we
better
do
something,
because
there's
developers
and
stuff
and
I
really
feel
that
people
have
lost
some
some
of
the
input
into
decisions
that
are
being
made
to
say.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Any.
B
E
B
I
I
live
in
PGI,
so
I'm
not
directly
affected.
By,
what's
going
on,
there,
I
have
a
home
in
my
neighborhood,
that
is,
for
all
intents
and
purposes,
a
and
Airbnb
and
I
went
out
to
the
City
Council
because
it
advised
to
go
along
this
route,
but
keep
in
mind
come
here
are
coming
for
vacation
and
they
bring
they
bring
their
toys.
They
bring
their
trailers,
they
bring
their
ATVs
on
trailers.
If
you're
gonna.
I
J
My
name
is
Dennis.
Mark
I've
been
sworn
I'm.
I've
lived
here
for
about
26
years
now,
so
I've
seen
a
lot
of
changes.
I
watched
a
residential
area
grow
out.
It's
something
we
should
be
proud
of
and
cherish
I've
been
on
both
sides
of
the
thing
of
having
rental
houses,
I
built
and
so
and
I
have
a
rental
next
door
to
me,
and
so
there's
some
things
that
I've
learned
one
is
that
if
you
live
in
a
$300,000
house,
you
expect
to
have
people
of
that
caliber
next
door
to
you.
J
If
you
live
in
a
$600,000
house,
you
expect
to
have
people
at
that
caliber
next
door.
You
expect
to
have
people
of
that
caliber.
So
one
of
the
things
is,
if
you
subdivide
it,
you
don't
have
that
caliber
person
next
door,
B
anymore,
so
you've
really
degraded
the
caliber
of
neighbors
that
you
have
that's
the
first
lesson,
so
I
think
that's
kind
of
a
non-starter.
J
Secondly,
in
doing
the
rentals
I
learned
and
also
with
the
rentals
next
door
to
me,
if
we
bring
in
people
and
they're
there
for
less
some
teenagers
I
know
on
the
East.
Coast
are
now
saying
no
nothing
less
than
six
months
personally.
I
never
did
less
than
30
days.
I
did
it
once
for
a
wedding,
and
it
was
a
disaster
for
the
neighbors
next
door
and
for
me,
so
there
should
be
a
limit
on
how
short
a
rental
can
be
daily.
Rentals,
don't
work,
they
come
to
party
they're,
not
part
of
the
neighborhood.
J
They
don't
care,
okay,
so
in
a
residential
area
it
doesn't
make
sense.
The
third
thing
that
I
learned
was
that
some
property
become
a
nuisance.
There
ought
to
be
some
kind
of
thing.
I
have
the
police
come
constantly
to
the
house
next
door,
because
the
code
violations
or
other
things?
So
if
there's
here's
my
recommendation,
if
there's
five
code
violations
or
five
police
requests
in
a
year,
the
license
should
be
full
so
that
property
can't
be
run
is
a
business
in
a
residential
area.
So
the
three
things
I
learned,
don't
subdivide,
don't
be
great.
J
The
caliper,
the
neighbors
that
you
have
don't
make.
The
rentals
too
short
daily,
is
a
non-starter,
probably
not
less
than
30
days.
There's
other
communities
now
that
we're
learning
from
the
Airbnb
experience
not
less
than
60
days,
six
months
and
three,
if
it's
a
nuisance
property
or
how
to
have
something
in
place
to
tell
them.
No,
you
lose
your
license.
You
can't
have
that
business.
Thank.
A
J
K
To
given
I've
been
sworn
I'm,
a
resident
of
the
National
Register
district
I've
lived
in
district
1,
both
on
the
east
side,
downtown
on
the
west
side
for
35
years,
I've
never
lived
anywhere,
but
district
1
I
was
the
chair
of
these
sort
preservation
by
through
Ward
for
over
a
decade
and
a
mom-and-pop,
then
in
breakfast
is
what
was
always
what
we
were
looking
for
in
Punta
Gorda.
That
is
an
historic
structure
in
the
National
Register
district
owner-occupied.
There's
a
tipple
typical
tourist
that
wants
that
kind
of
experience
that
real
experience
with
them.
K
There
we've
had
to
go
gilchrist
bed
and
breakfast
and
the
virginia
house,
and
that
was
the
late
80s
to
the
90s.
The
Gilcrest
is
now
the
price
house
at
the
history
park,
so
we
haven't
had
I
can't
find
that
we've
ever
had
I
talked
with
Frank
Desmond.
If
we've
ever
had
really
a
B&B
before
those
two
I
mean
I'm
trying
to
go
back
to
the
20s
or
30s
Punta
Gorda
was
not
a
place.
People
came
to
vacation
at
it
was
really
a
small
town.
You
know
the
people
didn't
have
money,
they
weren't
they
weren't
flocking.
K
Here
we
didn't
have
a
beach,
so
this
is
unusual
in
that
that
this
is
doesn't
meet
the
requirements,
our
requirements
for
a
B&B.
It
just
doesn't
what
concerns
me.
The
most
is
not
that
part
of
it.
The
part
that
concerns
me,
the
most
is
that
John
Lear
more
has
tried
to
hide
the
ownership
of
this
from
the
beginning
that
only
came
out
the
Planning
Commission
he
he.
This
is
a
commercial
use.
K
He
is
looking
and
he's
made
offers
on
property
all
along
Russ
red
astronaut,
and
that
means
it
makes
total
sense
if
you're
a
guy
wanting
to
run.
You
know
a
business
in
our
prime
area,
you
can't
buy
on
the
park
side.
We
all
know
that
that's
in
perpetuity
in
perpetuity
for
the
city,
by
tribute
when
we
first
incorporated
Punta
Gorda.
So
what
can
you
do?
You
can
buy
right
there
across
the
street.
You
got
the
beautiful
view
and
it's
probably
a
really
good
investment,
but
that
is
commercial
encroachment.
K
What
we're
talking
about
is
a
zoned
neighborhood
district,
ten
residential.
Now
someone
said
to
me:
what
about
Carmela's?
Well,
those
Street
that
street
that
runs
down
on
the
other
side
of
Cross
Street
for
I,
don't
know
how
long
wait
before
I've
been
here
was
always
zoned
for
two
kinds
of
uses.
It
wasn't
just
residential,
so
people
are
under
the
assumption
that
well
what
happened
over
there?
Well,
that
was
never
that
was
zoned
for
forever.
That
far
as
I
know,
to
have
some
commercial
use
in
with
residential.
This
would
be
a
precedent
and
I
know.
K
Special
exceptions
are
supposed
to
not
create
precedent,
but,
as
we
all
know,
you
know
you
go
down
that
road.
You've
got
the
camels
nose
under
the
channel,
so
I'm
just
saying
this
is
commercial
encroachment
in
a
residential
neighborhood
and
it
will
affect
our
property
values
and
our
quality
of
life.
Thank
you.
Hey
cross.
E
L
K
F
M
Esplanade,
their
1980
and
I've
been
there
since
then
raised
my
two
boys
there.
That
Street
has
just
gotten
more
and
more
busy
they
park
on
that
side
of
the
street
along
sides
of
my
driveway
as
it
is,
and
they
go
out
in
those
boats.
Lately
they've
been
parking
across
the
street,
it's
not
as
much
but
ever
since
my
boys
were
there,
they
rode
their
bikes
on
that
Street.
They
played
on
that
Street
and
it's
gotten
to
be
where
I'm
glad
they're
big,
because
that's
dangerous.
They
come
around
that
corner
fast.
There's
parking
on
both
sides.
M
M
At
that
place
that
place
gets
full
enough
noise
across
the
street
with
cars
early
in
the
morning.
They
bring
their
dogs
yapping
in
there
banging
those
cars.
They
start
them
up
without
mufflers
half
of
those
guys,
and
it's
just
it's
real
busy,
already
really
really
busy
I,
don't
know
it's
really
changed.
I
was
there
before
the
house
was
Kim's
house
was
built,
I,
remember
the
house
that
was
there,
so
everything's
really
changed.
You
know,
and
it's
just
gotten
to
be
I-
think
it's
dangerous
myself.
You
know.
E
B
E
E
The
language
is
what
is
found
in
paragraph
six
put
that
up
on
the
screen.
That's
back
on
page
one
in
addition
to
the
covenants
and
agreements
made
in
the
security
and
instrument
ie,
the
mortgage,
the
borrower
and
the
lender,
which
is
Regions,
Bank
and
regions.
Mortgage
covenant
and
agree
that
section.
Six
and
eight
of
the
security
agreement
are
deleted
and
replaced
by
the
following
paragraph:
six
occupancy
borrower,
751
west
red
Esplanade
LLC,
a
Delaware
LLC
by
our
Katara
in
Arizona
LLC
by
mr.
Jonathan
M
lairmore.
E
Shall
occupy
and
shall
only
use
the
property
and
the
property
is
defined,
set
forth
above
s,
751
west
red
house,
Punta,
Gorda,
Florida,
three,
three:
nine:
five:
zero
as
borrowers.
Second
home
borrowers,
shall
keep
the
property
available
for
borrowers
exclusive
use
and
enjoyment
at
all
times
and
shall
not
subject
the
property
to
any
time
sharing
or
other
shared
ownership
arrangement
or
any
rental
pool
or
agreement.
The
requires
borrower
to
either
rent
the
property
or
give
management
for
any
other
person
any
control
over
the
occupancy
or
use
of
the
property.
E
E
So
with
that
being
said,
I
want
to
address
just
a
couple:
a
couple
of
comments:
I'm
gonna,
wrap
up
beep
and
be
very
brief.
This
special
exception
application
is
not
you
deal
with
that
all
the
time.
This
is
not.
This
is
a
proposed
hotel
by
the
owner
of
Fisherman's
Village.
Make
no
mistake.
He
set
up
all
the
different
little
LLC's
and
the
shelves
he
wants
to
this
is
the
owner
of
Fisherman's
Village.
She
wants
a
hotel.
I
want
to
expand,
I
need
a
hotel.
I
can't
get
I,
can't
build
a
hotel.
E
I'm,
not
gonna,
get
approval
to
build
a
hotel,
so
hey
how
about
a
bed-and-breakfast?
Let
me
buy
this
property
and
let
me
try
to
go
through
the
process
to
get
a
bed-and-breakfast.
This
is
not
a
bed-and-breakfast,
it
is
an
inn.
No,
not
a
better
breakfast
inn.
It's
an
end
and
you
can't
say
Alakazam
bibbidi-bobbidi-boo
and
wave
a
wand
and
make
a
hotel
a
bed-and-breakfast
in
now
you
can
go
back
and
you
can
change
your
ordinances.
E
Okay,
let's
deal
with
the
city,
go
back,
publish
it!
Consider
it
first
reading
secretary
we're
going
to
change
the
definition
of
what
a
hotel
slash,
motels,
slash
in
is,
and
we're
going
to
change
the
definition
of
what
a
bed-and-breakfast
in
is
and
then
possibly
the
City
Council.
Can
grant
this
type
of
use
on
this
property,
but
as
it
stands
today,
you
can't
not
do
it
because
you
can't
ignore
disregard
or
waive
those
restrictions.
The
district
regulations.
That's
a
black
and
white
us
in
your
ordinances.
E
You
cannot
ignore
disregard
or
waive
the
approval
criteria
and
the
approval
criteria,
sites
back
and
says
it
has
to
comply
with
all
of
the
criteria
in
the
district
regulations
and
I've
gone
through
the
list
of
eight
and
they
don't
and
and
again
respectfully
your
city
attorney
and
I
haven't
have
a
pretty
short
disagreement
in
owner-occupied
and
what
that
means.
Just
because
it's
an
LLC,
this
might
not
mean
you
could
just
have
an
employee
okay.
So,
as
the
one
gentleman
said
you
know
his
concern
and-
and
this
is
not
I'm
not
saying
that
they
are
okay.
E
This
is
argument.
Let
me
be
clear,
but
the
gentleman's
concern
is
wait,
a
minute
one
of
it's
being
used
for
employee
housing,
okay
and
he
hires
these
guys
and
they're
coming
in
and
turning
over
and
they're
like
construction,
guys
that
he's
sticking
in
there
wink
wink
nudge,
nudge
nod,
nod:
okay,
you
don't
know,
there's
nobody
control,
that
the
city
can't
control
that
code
enforcement.
Can't
control
that
nobody's
gonna
know
my
clients.
Gonna
suffer
y'all,
don't
know!
That's
why
you
can't
do
it.
It
has
to
be
owner-occupied
who's.
The
owner.
E
E
D
E
E
I
didn't
intend
to
be
the
future
land-use
element
for
the
residential
neighborhoods,
specifically
talks
about
this,
to
protect
it,
to
protect
the
character
of
your
residential
neighborhoods
and
to
stop
I
think
the
term
that
they
that
the
citizen
used
was
commercial
creep
and
the
degradation
of
the
neighborhood.
This
is
the
first
step,
it's
not
in
a
historic
neighborhood.
This
is
not
I've
stayed
in
probably
three
dozen
bed-and-breakfast
in
New
Orleans
and
Savannah
I
love
that
going
to
historic
cities
and
staying
in
historic
homes,
love
it.
E
It's
one
of
my
pleasures
that
my
wife
and
I
have
that's
a
fact.
This
is
not
okay.
This
is
not
that
so
we'll
wrap
up
with
that.
We
ask
that
this
be
outright
denied,
not
conditions
placed
on
this
approval.
You
can't
I
said
yesterday
talking
to
two
Jeffrey
they're,
asking
you
all
to
take
a
chimpanzee
and
call
it
a
cheetah.
Okay,
you
can't
do
it.
E
A
L
L
Again,
Jason
green
engineering
first
I
want
to
do
this
in
a
couple
parts.
If
you
don't
mind,
the
first
part
is
address
some
of
the
the
public's
comments
and
partially
I
want
to
address
them
in
this
order,
because
I
just
want
the
public
to
hear
response
to
that
may
be
I
know,
there's
some
emotional
and
some
personal
opinions
that
filter
into
these
things.
L
But
technically
those
items
brought
up
by
the
public
are
not
part
of
the
criteria
for
which
year
to
review
and
are
not
part
of
the
substantial
competent
evidence
that
has
been
presented
to
you.
So,
first
and
foremost,
is
the
the
quality
of
the
neighbor
I.
Don't
think
I
have
to
say
much
about
that.
We
don't
get
to
pick
our
neighbors.
L
District
somebody
suggesting
that
we
should
aspire
to
a
higher
standard
or
richer
neighbor
or
whatever
they
were
alluding
to
it.
Scott
the
nuisance.
The
staff
has
already
testified
and
your
codes
say
that
you
have
the
opportunity
ability
as
a
council
to
revoke
the
special
exception.
If
there's
substantial
nuisances,
I
think
that
could
be
dealt
with
to
that
process.
L
There
was
comments
about
the
danger
of
this
street
and
a
danger
of
Dolly
and
Barry
and
West
red
as
blood
I
would
object
to
that
assessment.
I
bring
my
kids
down
dolly
and
Barry
on
a
regular
basis.
We
go
to
the
park
and
I
feel
it's
a
very
safe,
Street
and
safe
neighborhood
to
walk
through
and
I
do
walk
more
than
a
block
to
the
commercial
district.
L
The
main
things
I
want
to
get
to
are
the
I
think
the
critical
part
of
this
is
there
they're
basing
their
case,
which
is
factually
inaccurate?
There
is
misleading
statements
about
how
these
codes
apply
and
what
I
want
to
start
with
is
four
point.
Eight
conditions
that
ties
into
conditions
of
approval
for
the
special
excuse
me
for
the
bed
and
breakfast
as
a
conditional
use,
but
it's
an
administrative
approval.
It
is
not
tied
to
and
does
not
apply
to
the
special
exception
criteria.
The
16.8
and
talks
about
the
criteria
are
two
different
articles.
L
Article
16
related
to
the
special
exception
process
is
different
than
article
four,
which
is
related
to
conditions
of
approval.
The
only
condition
the
only
requirement
of
the
list
that
applies
is
that
it
was
within
the
definition
of
your
bed
and
breakfast
that
they
have
shown
and
stated
that
they
will
comply
with
the
other
conditions
in
practice.
Yes,
it's
nice
to
consider
whether
those
are
applicable
to
the
special
exception
process
and
applicable
to
this
use.
You
are
not
required
to
apply
those
conditions
to
this
use,
so
it
is
up
to
your
judgment.
L
My
conditions
were
otherwise
to
apply
those
that
criteria
so
I
think
discussing
this
Nita.
It
just
needs
to
be
clear
that
you
do
have
the
ability
by
your
code,
whether
people
like
or
not,
to
consider
the
special
exception.
You
do
have
the
ability
to
condition
it
for
the
safeguard
of
the
public,
what
you
deemed
to
be
necessary
again:
public
health
safety
and
welfare.
L
Offered
conditions
to
do
help
limit
those,
whether
the
time
for
the
pool
and
frankly,
they
have
an
interest
in
making
sure
that
their
fellow
within
their
structure
are
happy
also,
otherwise
you
don't
get
people
coming
back.
We
all
know
the
day
of
social
media
doesn't
take
very
long.
Do
you
have
a
negative
review.
L
So
in
closing,
I
just
want
to
summarize
that
as
an
expert
planner,
which
I
don't
believe,
I've
heard
any
testimony
from
any
expertise
on
whether
it's
traffic
planning
architecture,
Landscape,
Architecture
engineering
or
any
other
professional
criteria
that
has
testified
as
to
any
substantial,
competent
evidence.
This
does
meet
your
criteria,
especially
with
the
conditions
that
we
hope
that
you
apply
to
this
project.
L
I
know,
there's
nervousness
about
new
uses
and
new
things
coming
to
neighborhoods.
Frankly,
this
is
a
character
of
this
project,
the
character
of
this
property,
and
we
are
surrounded
by
non
residential
uses.
We
have
a
brand
new
library,
my
back
door,
that
is
not
residential,
but
it's
part
of
the
residential
fabric
and
character
of
our
historic
district.
We
have
restaurants,
hotels
within
walking
distance.
You
have
title
companies
that
are
operating
out
of
residential
structures
just
down
the
street.
In
this
project,
you
have
attorneys
CPAs,
that
is
part
of
the
fabric
of
this
community
approve
this.
C
Have
three
actually
is
the
applicant
willing
to
stipulate
as
a
criteria
for
approval
that
you
would
only
allow
passenger
cars
on
the
property
and
not
any
other
vehicles
of
any
kind,
such
as
boats,
trailers,
RVs
and
that
sort
of
thing?
Yes?
Is
there
going
to
be
any
strip
relation
on
minimum
length
of
stay
at
the
property.
L
C
C
L
C
C
B
L
Personally,
I,
don't
think
it
matters,
I,
think
that
you
or
not
it's
not
your
role
as
a
council
to
implement
rules
and
regulations
on
a
mortgage
or
other
document.
A
special
exception
has
not
taken
place,
obviously
we're
here
and
it
won't
take
place
and
won't
be
occupied
as
a
bed-and-breakfast
until
such
time
as
there's
modifications
remodeling.
At
that
time,
the
owner
has
to
address
their
conflicts
or
issues
with
their
mortgage.
N
A
N
L
B
B
Part
of
your
deliberation
I
will
because
it
seemed
like
there
was
a
look
in
my
direction
regarding
the
the
second
home
writer.
Mr.
green
is
correct.
This
is
a
private
agreement
between
the
owner
and
the
lender.
The
city
does
not
enforce
private
agreements,
irrespective
of
what
character
it
is.
You
know
we
don't
we
don't
enforce
private
deed
restrictions,
and
so,
if
this
rider
is
not
changed,
the
applicant
may
have
a
problem
with
the
lender,
but
it
would
be
the
lenders
duty
to
enforce.
So
while
this
is
a
very
interesting
document,
it
should
not.
B
It
should
not
figure
into
your
deliberations
and
decision.
In
this
case,
I've
asked
I've
asked
to
put
on
the
on
screen
the
four
criteria
that
are
applicable
to
special
exceptions.
All
all
criteria
must
be
met
in
order
to
qualify
for
a
special
exception.
I
have
a
suggested
motion
either
way
that
you
wish
to
go,
but,
and
so
at
the
moment,
you'll
have
the
opportunity
for
deliberation,
and
then,
when
you
want
some
assistance
and
drafting
the
motion,
I
would
be
happy
to
do
so.
N
All
right
from
from
the
standpoint
of
the
one,
the
adverse
effects
that
are
coming
on
to
the
neighborhood
at
this
time,
which
we
actually
all
can
see
from
all
directions
and
from
the
the
very
reasonable
fear
the
residents
have
about
just
the
variable
things
that
can
happen.
I
have
to
say-
and
this
is
this
is
from
having
considerable
experience
with
B&BS
around
the
world
and
knowing
that
they're
specifically
placed
resident
to
neighborhoods
for
the
purpose
of
cementing
the
residential
nature
value.
N
I
feel
this
is
the
most
comfortable,
controlled
manner
that
the
city
can
do
in
order
to
preserve
this
I
feel
that
that
other
things,
this
very
variable,
I
I,
just
I,
with
all
the
forces
that
are
facing
the
neighborhood
now,
especially
things
about
happening,
occurs.
Park
I,
wouldn't
want
to
see
something.
That's
not
regulated
in
that
space
and
so
I
feel
most
comfortable
with
the
B&B.
A
O
O
There
are
those
types
of
issues,
and
some
and
some
people
and
PPG
I
have
also
had
issues
where
short
term
renters
have
gotten
rather
rambunctious.
I
see.
This
is
a
potential
like
I
say
to
maintain
this
in
a
tempered
way.
I
don't
know
if
they
choose
I've
used
bed-and-breakfast
in
business,
it's
just
much
more
pleasant
when
you're
in
the
middle
of
Texas
or
or
Iowa.
Or
what
have
you
then
to
have
to
deal
with
the
local
Marriott
and
want
to
chill
out
and
have
a
good
hearty
breakfast
in
the
morning
in
Tehran
on
with
business?
O
One
thing
that
would
concern
me:
I,
think
that
it
was
a
one
of
the
local
residents
it
mentioned
is:
is
the
idea
that
they
would
not
want
it
to
see
become
a
construction
residence
for
for
people
that
are
doing
construction
so
forth.
It
certainly
would
be
their
criteria
to
pay
the,
because
these
are
as
I
recall.
O
These
are
gonna,
be
relatively
high,
nightly
rental
things,
so
it
certainly
would
be
up
to
an
employer
if
he
wants
to
spend
four
or
five
hundred
dollars
a
night
to
a
house
over
overnight,
but
I
would
think
that
probably
wouldn't
be
the
most
economical,
prudent
way
to
do
it,
but
that
could
be
a
concern
I
think
in
the
long
term.
But
the
way
the
house
is
right
now,
there's
probably
no
reason
why
it
can't
be
used
for
that.
C
It
will
allow
the
owner
to
keep
some
semblance
of
order
on
the
property
and
make
sure
that
code
enforcement
is
being
accomplished
that
all
the
the
property
is
being
managed
and
maintained
the
way
it
needs
to
be
in
the
community
and
that
and
that
you
know
there
there
are
controls
that
can
be
kept
in
place
to
prohibit
the
police
from
having
to
be
there
for
24
hours
a
day
so
of
all
the
uses
that
a
rental
property
could
entail.
This
would
certainly
be
the
most
beneficial
for
the
property.
C
The
way
I
see
it
I
understand
the
neighbors
concerns,
but
I
honestly
have
to
say
in
all
the
years
that
I
travelled
for
my
business.
I
stayed
in
bed
and
breakfast
all
over
the
place,
including
over
in
Europe
and
they're,
all
very,
very
nice
properties
and
they're
very
well
and
highly
maintained
and
regulated.
So
I
I
think
that
this
makes
the
most
sense
for
this
property
at
this
time.
I
do
think
we
have
to
put
some
criteria
approval
on
on
this
on
the
list
and
not
the
least
of
which
is
what
I
stated
earlier.
C
I
want
full
time
on
that
on
that
list,
and
I
also
want
to
see
regulation
of
only
passenger
vehicles
being
allowed
on
the
property
to
be
marked
on
the
property
unless
it
is
a
service
vehicle,
doing
maintenance
for
the
house.
Of
course,
that
would
be
a
different
situation,
but
other
than
that
I've
seen
no
reason
for
denial.
I.
Don't
think
that
there
is
going
to
be
the
level
of
hysteria
that
is,
that
has
been
expressed
and
I
mean
not
to
say
it
won't,
but
we
always
have
the
opportunity
to
revoke
if
there's
a
problem.
N
A
Having
listened
to
all
of
this
and
I
have
met
with
miss
Devine
I
have
to
publicly
state
that
in
the
past,
I
have
met
with
mr.
larmor,
but
not
in
regard
to
this
property.
I
have
met
with
over
the
phone,
had
conversation
with
mr.
Ivey
and
under
to
clearly
understand
the
comments
that
are
being
made
clearly
understand
the
issues
people
feel
about
their
neighbors
or
what
they
want
in
the
house
next
door.
A
Unfortunately,
we
can't
control
who
purchases
homes
next
door
and
we're
all
subject
to
that
kind
of
thing.
I've
seen
people
who
have
a
gorgeous
sunset
view,
and
then
somebody
tears
down
the
house
across
the
canal
and
they
build
a
10,000
square
foot
home
and
now
they
have
no
sunset
view
and
you
there's
just
certain
things.
You
cannot
control
and
so
I
also
feel
I
understand
that
you
know
that
fisherman's
village
has
been.
A
You
know
in
our
newspaper
and
things
like
that,
but
I
have
to
say
that
we
have
to
to
do
what
we
feel
is
appropriate
for
the
property
and
and
because
this
is
quasi
judicial
public
hearing.
It's
based
on
the
testimony
that
we've
received
today
and
putting
a
lot
of
restrictions
or
that
on
the
property,
makes
the
most
sense
so
that
it
it
is
as
controlled
as
possible,
because
you
are
right
by
state
statute.
We
cannot
control
what
happens
with
Airbnb
and,
as
you
advise
me
or
Matthews,
as
indicated,
we
see
the
reports
we
see.
A
You
know,
issues
that
may
pop
up
and
get
emails
from
residents
about
those
properties
and
what
happens
or
the
the
house
down
the
street,
that
everything
is
changing
all
the
time
and
the
people
are
partying
all
day
night,
all
day,
all
night
and
kind
of
whatever
it
is
that
we
have
no
control
over.
So
I
would
also
say
putting
some
kind
of
penalties
in
place
to
make
sure
that
this
is
that
we,
it
is
maintained,
as
we
have
indicated
so
that
if
things
get
lacks,
we
have
some
way
of
of
controlling
the
situation.
So.
C
B
Yeah
I
mean
I
believe
that
when
a
property
is
owned
by
entity,
the
entity
can
be
represented
by
a
full-time
employee
who
is
required
to
reside
full-time
at
the
facility.
The
same
way
as
if
it
was
owned
by
an
individual
I,
see
no
distinction
between
an
entity,
employee
or
an
individual,
provided
that
they
are
required
to
function
in
the
same
capacity
so
I
would
we
would
be
requiring
a
full,
a
a
full-time
live-in.
B
There's
been
litigation
over
the
years
regarding
exactly
what
constitutes
of
a
passenger
vehicle.
I.
Think
I.
Think
if
I
understood
really
what
the
concern
was:
it's
not
so
much
the
vehicle
itself,
but
that
it
it's
the
trailers
and
the
other
things
that
may
be
associated
with
it,
and
an
RV,
perhaps
would
also
not
be
classified
as
a
passenger
vehicle.
So
I
think
you
would
be
better
off
to
put
as
a
condition
that
no
trailers
or
RVs
may
be
parked
on
the
premises.
D
C
B
Staff
presented
several
conditions
that
they
would
recommend
for
approval
and
the
applicant
also
recommended
or
proposed
several
conditions
that
they
would
want
to
have
as
part
of
the
special
exception.
Those
will
need
to
be
included
in
your
motion.
Lisa.
If
you
want
to
put
that
on
the
screen.
As
a
reminder,
I.
B
P
That
all
state
and
local
licenses
are
obtained
prior
to
operation
of
the
bed-and-breakfast
in
any
food
service
is
limited
to
guests,
purchasing
lodging
at
the
bed-and-breakfast
in
and
shall
not
be
advertised
to
the
general
public
as
a
restaurant.
The
only
permitted
signage
is
a
building
marker
sign
based
on
the
Punta
Gorda
code.
The
bed-and-breakfast
in
will
be
limited
to
a
maximum
of
eight
guestrooms.
P
These
special
exception
use
is
limited
to
the
current
structures
as
they
exist
in
exterior
configuration
at
the
time
of
approval,
with
the
exception
of
the
pool,
deck
and
cage
which
can
be
expanded
with
proper,
permitting
hours
of
operation
for
the
pool
be
limited,
an
employee
of
the
property
must
reside
on-site
and
we
can
add
full-time.
No
special
events
open
to
the
public
are
permitted,
and
then
no
trailers
or
RVs
or
boats.
G
B
P
Events
are
defined
in
the
code
by
open
to
the
public
advertise
to
the
public.
Things
like
that,
but,
like
small
weddings,
I
could
have
a
wedding
at
my
house.
Everybody
could
have
a
wedding
reunion,
the
reunion
at
their
house.
So
that's
why
we
didn't
put
in
specific
types
of
events.
It
would
be
up
to
council
if
they
would
want
to
modify.
B
A
O
With
a
guest,
a
unregistered
guest
of
a
guest
be
considered
public
or
a
guest,
a
guest
okay.
So
if
you,
if
you
were
to
have
a
family
that
would
rent
the
house,
they
might
rent
all
the
rooms
and
they
might
have
12
people
stay
in
the
room.
They
might
also
have
another
12
guests
for
the
small,
tiny
wedding,
okay.
P
These
were
provided
by
the
applicant,
the
operations
being
check-in
time,
2
p.m.
checkout
time
11
a.m.
late
arrivals
after
7:00
p.m.
we'll
need
pre-approved
special
requests.
The
home
will
be
an
indoor
outdoor
smoke-free
environment,
minimum
age
is
21,
full
hours
will
be
limited
to
8
a.m.
to
10
p.m.
we
will
have
policies
in
place
with
the
demise
property,
so
not
to
disturb
other
guests
within
the
B&B
policies
and
procedures
for
the
B&B
will
be
developed
for.