►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 07-03-18 Part 1
Description
Description
A
B
B
Now,
who
are
the
perfection
of
love,
harmony
and
beauty,
the
lord
of
heaven
and
earth
open
our
hearts
that
we
may
hear
thy
voice
which
constantly
comes
from
within
disclose
to
us
thy
divine
light
hidden
in
our
souls
that
we
may
know
and
understand
life
better.
Most
merciful
and
compassionate
God
share
with
us
thy
great
goodness.
Teach
us
that
Living
forgiveness
raise
us
above
the
distinctions
of
differences
which
divide
us,
send
us
the
peace
of
thy
divine
spirit
and
unite
us
in
all
thy.
Perfect
being
all
those
things
amen,.
A
B
A
Okay,
today,
we
have
no
proclamations
and
presentations.
That's
kind
of
unique,
so
now
would
be
the
time
if
your
name
is
in
the
running
for
a
board
or
committee
position,
and
you
would
like
to
introduce
yourself
now
would
be
the
time.
Please
take
the
podium
ears
state
your
name
and
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
yourself
and
what
border
committee
you're
my.
C
A
D
D
A
Like
to
call
the
CRA
meeting
to
order,
let
the
record
reflect
that
all
Commissioners
are
present.
First,
on
the
CRA
agenda,
we
have
citizens
comments
on
CRA
agenda
items
only
which
would
be
the
project
status
report,
the
approval
of
the
minutes,
those
two
items.
If
anybody
would
like
to
speak
on
those
two
items,
that
would
be
the
time.
D
D
D
D
F
For
the
record,
John
LeBeau
urban
design
manager
staff
met
with
on-site
with
the
contractor,
the
installer
and
they're,
getting
together
a
game
plan.
We
have
asked
that
they
repair
the
entire
areas
that
are
damaged
with
no
seams,
which
is
one
of
the
requirements
we
had
when
we
made
the
contract
and
we're
waiting
to
hear
back
from
them.
How
they're
than
a
proceed.
G
F
G
G
H
D
I
D
A
E
H
H
I
A
D
A
Okay,
we
are
back
in
session
as
the
City
Council
and
we
do
not
have
any
public
hearings
or
quasi-judicial
public
hearings
this
morning,
but
we
do
have
one
two
three
second
readings:
za
0
2,
1,
8,
za,
0,
7,
1,
8,
+,
pd,
0,
1,
1
8.
If
you
would
like
to
speak
on
those
one
of
those
three
items
now
would
be
the
time.
Please
come
to
the
podium
to
my
right.
A
L
And
this
is
the
second
reading
of
an
ordinance
which
I'll
read
by
title:
only
an
ordinance
of
the
City
Council
of
the
city
of
Punta,
Gorda,
Florida,
rezoning,
0.9,
0,
plus
or
minus
acres
generally
described
as
units
1
through
12
of
Isles
colony,
condominium
apartments,
number
Roman
rule
a
condominium
according
to
the
Declaration
of
condominium
required
recorded
in
our
book,
182
page
4,
1,
8
and
all
exhibits
and
amendments
thereof.
Public
records
of
charlotte
county
florida
from
general
multi-family,
15
years
per
acre
to
neighborhood
center,
providing
for
conflict
and
severability
and
providing
effective
date.
L
Is
the
second
reading
of
an
ordinance
which
are
RIBA
title
only
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Punta
Gorda
Florida
amending
chapter
26,
land
of
element,
regulations
by
order
code,
article
3
regulating
district
section,
3.1
0hc,
highway
commercial
district,
subsection
F
to
allow
permanent,
canopy
shade
structures
as
a
use
permitted
by
special
exception,
an
amending
section,
4.3
9,
to
provide
for
conditions
and
specifications
relating
to
permanent
canopy,
shade
structures
providing
for
conflict
and
severability
providing
effective
date.
Any.
A
One,
which
is
the
upland
software
contract-
yes,
okay,
anybody
else
have
anything
they
want
to
pull
citizens
comments
on
consent
agenda.
Would
anybody
like
to
speak
on
any
of
the
items
on
the
consent
agenda?
Now
would
be
the
time
okay,
seeing
none
I'll
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
agenda
without
c1.
A
G
So
I
questioned
why
there
was
such
a
disparity
on
the
numbers
and
I
had
Brad
shooty
run
some
numbers
for
me
yesterday
and
there
are
actually
two
contracts
that
run
contiguously
with
one
another,
and
one
of
them
was
not
actually
accounted
for
in
the
in
the
document
about
the
22,000.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
everybody
understands.
We
have
the
regular
software
contract
with
which
is
now
owned
by
upland
software,
and
that
has
increased
since
to
2016
it
has
increased
$10,000.
G
The
original
contract
amount
was
somewhere
around
24,000,
it's
now
thirty,
four
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
and
we
also
have
a
simultaneous
contract
with
empower
for
the
cloud
work
flow
that
they
use
to
allow
people
to
access
the
website
and
access,
email
and
so
forth,
and
that
contract
is
is
basically
a
separate
contract
and
that
crossed
$12,500
a
year.
So
that
is
somewhere
around
the
number
that
they're
referring
to
with
50
thousand
plus,
but
I
would
like
to
see
something
a
little
more
accurate
in
the
future,
because
I
think
that
this
was
very
misleading.
G
I
would
like
to
see
numbers
that
reflect
more
accurately
what
the
real
number
is
for
these
contracts,
because
I
think,
if
we're
approving
all
these
budget
items,
we
need
to
know
exactly
what
we're
dealing
with
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
to
everybody's
attention
that
these
are
basically
two
separate
contracts
that
work
together
with
one
another.
But
even
the
total
amount
is
less
than
what
they're.
Anticipating
expenditure
is
and
I,
don't
like
open-ended
numbers,
where
there's
a
plus
sign
after
it
either
I
think
that's
that's
kind
of
misleading.
G
So
with
all
that
said,
I
mean
I
think
we
should.
We
should
approve
an
amended
number
if
we're
going
to
approve
a
contract
based
on
what
was
told
to
me
yesterday,
okay,
so
it
comes
out
to
forty-seven
thousand
dollars
for
calendar
year.
Nineteen
and
I
would
be
I'm
more
comfortable
with
with
approving
an
exact
number.
If
that's
what
we're
really
going
to
spend,
rather
than
fifty
thousand
with
an
open-ended
plus
sign
at
the
end
of
it
and
I,
would
make
a
motion.
To
that
extent,.
M
For
the
record,
Mary
and
pace
procurement
manager,
this
process
was
blanket
notice
of
intended
decision
to
single-source
when
we
initially
went
out
for
the
notice
of
intended
season.
That
was
the
estimated
annual
cost,
so
that
was
within
Howard's
purview
to
approve
that
amount
for
the
award
while
we're
going
through
and
we're
renewing
some
of
these
contracts
like
well
wait
a
minute.
We
may
go
over
the
next
threshold
of
fifty
thousand
dollars
on
a
single
source
purchase.
M
That
then
requires
the
city
council
to
approve
these
prizes
will
be
going
up
and
flexible
throughout
the
term
any
given
fiscal
year.
Excuse
me,
depending
on
the
services
that
were
acquiring
so
basically,
what
this
was
to
do
was
to
get
Council's
approval
to
continue
the
blanket
notice
of
intended
so
were
within
our
procurement
policy
requirements
for
the
appropriate
level
of
award
authority.
G
I
am
very
concerned
with
some
of
the
budget
numbers
we're
looking
at
right
now
and-
and
this
was
one
of
those
I
just
thought
that
it
was
misrepresented
in
the
agenda
package
and
I
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
everybody
else
understood
what
I.
What
I
was
told
yesterday,
because
we're
still
looking
at
fiscal
year
2019
at
$47,000.
So
are
we
going
to
be
doing
this
every
year
or
what
kind
of
period
of
time
always
are
we
agreeing
to
with.
M
A
M
It
would
be
you
know
it's
just
for
future
years,
so
that
work,
we
have
the
correct
award
authority
approving
these
purchases
for
the
embedded
technology.
We
don't
know
I
I,
don't
have
any
information
as
far
as
what
next
year's
cost
are
going
to
be
so,
like
I
said
we
were
just
trying
to
be
proactive
catch
it
so
that
we
can
issue
appeal
without
having
to
rush
it
back
to
Council.
D
E
Guess
I
take
Lin's
points
very
pointedly.
I
also
see
the
reason
that
you
would
want
the
flexibility.
I
would
say,
I
think
that
if
there
was
clarity
in
the
way
it
was
expressed
and
the
need
for
the
flexibility
that
also
there
should
be
a
cap
and
what
that
flexibility
should
be
before
it
comes
back
to
us
at
50,000,
plus
I.
Don't
want
to
have
$100,000
at
50,000,
plus
60
thousand
dollars.
E
I
would
I'd
want
to
see
some
cap
where
you
would
understand,
we
would
where
you
came
to
us
and
say:
okay,
we
want
our
certain
amount
of
flexibility
because
of
all
the
good
reasons
that
you
just
gave
us,
but
I
still
want
to
see
some
cap
on
that
flexibility,
so
that
we
would
still
have
Final
Solution
if
it
went
a
little
bit
awry.
Does
that
make
sense?
Yes,.
G
M
That's
just
like
our
Superion
contract
they're,
a
single
source,
that's
our
HDL
or
financial
software
nav
align.
We
have
the
same
type
of
notice
of
intended
decision
approved
by
City
Council,
because
it
was
going
to
be
every
year
50,000
over
50,000
as
well
into
like
a
hundred
thousand.
So
if
you
want
to
establish
a
cap,
that's
fine.
We've
reached
that
cap.
We
would
bring
it
back
to
you
you
to
notify
you
that
we've
reached
the
cap
for
that
annual
expenditure.
I'd.
D
A
H
D
A
Okay,
that
takes
care
of
the
consent
agenda
and
next
we're
moving
into
the
regular
agenda.
So
now
would
be
the
time
for
citizens
comments
on
anything.
That's
remaining
in
the
meeting
today
the
appropriation
of
the
additional
funds
for
the
meter
meter
project,
the
award
to
Sidra
for
GIS
study
and
design
fiscal
year.
H
A
Then
we
have
the
the
scope
of
work
for
the
city,
wide
master
plan,
RFP
RFQ
actually,
and
then
we
have
the
fisherman's
village
litigation
update.
So
now
would
be
the
time
for
anyone
to
speak
on
any
one
of
those
items.
Please
you
could
take
that
podium
there,
sir
state,
your
name
please,
and
that
you
have
you
have
three
minutes:
okay,.
A
N
My
name
is
Jonathan
Miller
I've
lived
here
for
ten
years.
I
have
an
association
with
Punta
Gorda
going
back
25
years.
I
have
a
grave
concern
that,
with
the
Sunseeker
development
happening
across
the
bridge
and
with
the
restrictions
that
we
continue
to
put
on
people
investing
capital
into
Punta
Gorda
that
our
town
center
is
going
to
end
up
being
over
the
bridge,
because
we
are
putting
restrictions
in
the
pace
of
private
commercial
investment
which
I
don't
understand.
I
understand
the
redevelopment
master
plan,
I'm
an
urban
estate
manager.
N
Just
so
you
know,
I
have
the
highest
level
of
property
qualification
in
the
world.
I'm
a
charters.
Are
there
I'm
a
member
of
the
Royal
Institution
of
Chartered
Surveyors
and
in
the
time
that
we're
going
to
take
to
develop
a
master
plan,
our
master
plan
will
happen
over
the
bridge.
The
basis
of
capitalism
and
I
believe
that
both
both
political
sides
understand
that
you
need
private
investment
for
anything
to
happen,
because
the
city
can't
do
it.
If
we're
putting
restrictions
on
capital
investment,
we're
stopping
our
town
centre
from
recovering
it's
been
15
years.
N
Since
Hurricane
Charley
took
away
the
little
bit
we
had
and
if
we
take
our
time
developing
what
we're
calling
a
master
plan,
it's
going
to
happen
over
the
bridge
now
and
it's
going
to
be
too
late
and
we
keep
and
forgive
me
for
saying
this
I'm
going
to
upset
a
lot
of
people.
It
seems
very
hypocritical
to
me
that
we
don't
allow
certain
people
into
Punta
Gorda,
but
we
are
developing
Jones
loop
and
annexing
each
project
as
it
comes
ahead
to
get
some
tax
revenue.
That
is
not
a
comprehensive
understanding
of
how
real
estate
works.
N
It's
the
city,
cherry-picking
to
increase
revenue
where
it
needs
it
and
I'm.
Sorry,
I,
don't
mean
to
be
rude
and
I
don't
mean
to
upset
anybody,
but
if
we
wait
and
we
develop
a
master
plan,
master
plans
are
about
redevelopment
they're
about
zoning
areas
that
don't
work
they're
about
areas
that
are
falling
into
disrepair,
because
they're
no
longer
needed
they're,
not
about
arguing
whether
or
not
we
need
a
50-story
or
a
hundred
storey
building.
That
is
what
the
market
determines
and
that
should
be
looked
at
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
N
We've
got
a
hotel
that
doesn't
work
properly
being
built
already
because
there
are
rooms
on
the
ground
for
in
the
hotel
industry
and
I've
worked
for
the
largest
hotel
here
in
the
UK.
That
is
an
unsustainable
and
unsafe
operation
that
we've
allowed
to
have
them.
The
people
in
those
rooms
are
at
risk
of
being
attacked
in
their
rooms.
Punta
Gorda
is
very
safe.
It
won't
happen
here.
N
I
believe
that
what
you
should
be
doing
is
allowing
the
people
who
want
to
invest
into
Punta
Gorda
to
come
in
and
to
put
forward
their
development
suggestions,
and
they
should
be
considered
on
the
commercial
merit.
If
we
don't
have
the
tax
base,
we
won't
have
the
community
if
there's
not
a
single
millennial
in
this
room,
and
there
should
be
because
they
should
be
having
jobs
here.
They
should
want
to
live
here.
They
don't
they're
going
to
leave
because
we're
not
getting
ready
for
them.
Sorry,
I
don't
mean
to
sound
patronizing.
N
This
is
something
that
I've
been
watching
for
a
very
long
time
and
I'm,
seeing
a
lot
of
people
trying
to
protect
our
community
in
what
they
believe
is
the
right
way,
but
in
the
long
term
they're
going
to
damage
it.
If
Sunseeker
goes
ahead,
our
town
center
will
be
over
the
bridge
and
we
won't
recover
from
that.
Thank.
A
A
A
D
M
Morning,
Mary
Hayes
procurement
manager
for
the
record
when
we
were
evaluating
the
final
best
and
final
offers
and
trying
to
decipher
what
each
little
component
was,
we
we
did
go
back
to
them
and
with
for
towlines,
enter
and
sent
them
a
letter
saying.
Ok,
this
is
the
total
price
to
cover
everything
and
they
said.
Yes,
it
was,
and
we
also
they
also
signed
the
agreement.
However,
there
was
one
little
portion,
that
of
which
was
that
the
there
was
two
parts
there
was
the
mi
U
and
then
like
the
repeater.
M
That
would
go
on
to
the
retrofit
units,
those
centers
that
we
were
retrofitting
well,
one
portion
of
it
was
in
another
category
and
they
didn't
realize
that
when
they
were
signing
that
that
that
was
left
out
of
the
best
and
final
or
the
the
contract
price,
but
it
was
included
in
the
best
and
file
when
we
selected
them
as
the
lowest
bidder.
So
they've
requested
us
to
increase
the
com,
the
PIO,
to
include
that
missing
component
and.
M
O
H
H
D
G
O
E
M
When
we're
trying
to
identify
the
actual
components
now
that
we
were
going
to
be
retrofitting
designers,
because
they
they
were
the
only
one
who
submitted
a
proposal
for
retrofitting
and
trying
to
go
through
and
clarify
all
those
items
it
wasn't
caught
through
there
that
you
know
they
say
no.
You
need
to
put
that.
Add
that
item
back
in,
because
how
we
have
the
list.
It
was
like.
Okay,
if
you're
gonna
retrofit,
then
this
gets
deducted
and
everything
like
that
and
they
should
have
said
in
the
beginning.
No,
that
does
not
get
deducted
and.
E
K
E
I'm
gathering
this
was
an
honest
mistake
that
if
we
don't
correct,
then
the
the
vendors
not
going
to
be
able
to
complete
the
project
properly
because
he's
just
not
going
to
be
able
to
have
the
revenue
to
get
the
part.
So
we
really
need
to
work
with
them
on
that
respect
and
we're
still
getting
good
value
for
what
we
were
asking,
and
this
is
not
coming
out
of
general
fund.
This
is
coming
out
of
the
revenue
funds
from
the
water
department.
Okay,
at.
G
C
D
D
O
Gonna
I'm
gonna
holler
for
Brad's
help
to
come
in,
but
their
main
function
is
to
lay
out
a
framework
or
a
blueprint
for
how
we
map
and
transition
from
our
paper
maps
into
electronic
mapping.
Mm-Hmm
they're
gonna
tell
us
the
best
and
most
efficient
and
cost-effective
way
to
do
that,
because
we
have
drawers
and
drawers
and
drawers
over
a
hundred
years
worth
of
paper
maps
that
say
the
water
line
is
here.
The
sewer
line
is
here
or
the
valve
is
here:
how
do
we
digitalize
those
the
best
way,
the
most
effective
way?
O
If
you
talk
to
nine
GIS
people
they'll
give
you
nine
different
ways
to
do
that.
We
need
a
firm
that
specializes
in
that
to
give
us
a
blueprint
going
forward
and
Brad
if
I've
said
anything
incorrectly.
Please
help
me
out
with
that.
We've
already
met
with
I
t's
GIS
specialist.
He
is
plugged
into
this
project.
He
will
be
attending
the
meetings
going
forward.
O
So
that's
the
first
step
and
then
they
will
also
help
us
with
how
we
move
forward
and
a
framework
for
how
we
collect
new
information
from
projects
that
are
turned
over
to
the
city
or
projects
that
we
developed.
How
those
are
digitized
and
standardized
to
fit
with
our
GIS
system
that
Brad's
staff
is
building.
Okay,.
O
H
E
I
just
want
to
say
just
a
couple:
quick
comments:
Tom
and
I've
had
this
conversation
since
the
very
first
day
that
he
gave
me
a
tour
at
the
water
plant,
and-
and
this
is
something
that,
in
my
my
career
have
been
very
much
involved
with
customers
to
the
years
as
plants
got
older.
Only
one
person
remember
where
available
was
I.
Have
two
questions,
one
comment
and
then
one
quick
question.
One
comment
is
regard
to
why
we
do
need
this.
Is
we
have
about
20%
less
staff
than
we
had
in
about
2006?
E
So
the
good
news
is
is
that
our
staff
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
fat
in
it.
It's
just
got
really
good
meat
in
it.
This
is
a
project
that
needs
some
extra
meat
to
get
the
project
done,
and
it's
going
to
have
a
positive
ROI
over
the
years.
I
assume
that
in
this
project
we're
also
not
only
going
to
be
mapping
these
hundred-year-old
pieces
of
paper,
but
also
updating,
what's
really
still
there
and
what
has
been
abandoned
and
so
forth.
Absolutely.
O
Going
forward
a
big
effort
on
our
part
after
we
get
this
blueprint,
developed
will
be
ground
truthing,
because,
just
because
we
have
a
paper
map
that
says
a
valve
is
here
or
a
line
is
here.
We
need
to
verify
that
before
we
put
it
into
the
system,
we
find
the
best
efforts
to
measure
and
get
these
things
accurate.
This
will
verify
and
correct
that.
Yes,.
E
So
that's
where
the
ROI
is
gonna
come
as
down
in
the
future
as
we
have
to
replace
infrastructure
and
also
add
new
infrastructure,
etc.
We
don't
have
to
go
chase
our
tail
to
find
out
where
we
need
to
go.
We're
gonna
already
have
the
roadmap
and
where
we
want
to
add
the
next
intersection,
so
to
speak.
So
it's
a
very
good
and
important
project
so.
E
K
Share
one
thing
sure
III
met
with
a
drone
company
based
a
Babcock
Ranch
yesterday
and
they're
willing
to
give
you
a
free
demo
in
terms
of
doing
let's
say:
50
acres
of
map
of
mapping
and
or
marketing,
but
is
whatever,
but
basically
one
can't
reduce
them
to
you,
because
they
can
maybe
help
when
you're
doing
the
GIS
to
be
able
to
do
that,
and
they
they
offer
that
impressive
construction
service.
You
should
tell
these
things
like
that,
so
I'll
introduce
you
to
them
and
see
where
that
goes
very
good.
Thank
you.
So.
A
J
Good
morning
Kristin
Simeone
interim
finance
director,
we
are
gonna,
give
you
an
update
since
the
May
16th
meeting
of
where
we're
at
for
the
general
fund.
So
some
of
the
approved
changes
that
happened
on
5/16
were
and
since
then
were
the
SRO
contract
to
increase
the
revenue
two
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars
and
the
approved
positions
that
were
made
at
that
particular
time
were
for
the
dispatch
or
Community
Engagement
officers
and
again
that
one
was
only
a
quarter
of
a
year,
not
the
full
year.
J
An
EMS
training
chief,
a
computer
support
specialist,
and
we
only
put
the
general
fund
share
in
this
particular
slide.
And
then
the
school
resource
program
and
I
just
want
to
point
out.
The
the
program
is
311
120.
The
contract
with
the
school
board
was
for
260,
and
that
was
because
the
sheriff's
off
we're
gonna
really
do
it
a
little
bit
less
in
the
city,
and
so
we
said
we
would
match
that.
J
So
again,
this
is
just
a
recap
of
the
SROs
and
we
want
to
point
out
that
currently
the
new
SR
Rose
will
use
vehicles
that
would
have
been
auctioned.
They
are
older
vehicles,
so
that's
a
short-term
solution.
At
this
time
the
school
board
will
not
contribute
funding
towards
the
vehicles,
so
we
will
have
to
look
at
that
in
the
future
budget
year
of
how
we're
going
to
fund
those
vehicles
through
either
general
fund
capital,
outlay
or
1%
sales
tax.
J
This
slide
just
shows
you
where
we
were
on
5/16
as
well
as
then
the
approved
changes
and
then,
in
the
meantime,
we've
also
looked
at
the
revenues
again,
as
things
have
been
coming
in
and
adjusted
some
revenues.
So
our
current
use
of
operating
reserves
are
seven
hundred
thirty,
three
thousand
four
hundred
eighty
dollars
for
this
current
budget.
J
J
We
wanted
to
bring
you
again
based
on
all
those
decisions
where
we
are
with
the
estimated
ending
reserves
available.
This
is
after
the
minimum
required
balance,
so
we
were
at
1
million
about
a
million
and
a
half
for
reserves.
There
are
some
additional
council
actions
that
affect
those
available
reserves
that
are
in
fiscal
year
18,
and
that
was
the
412
Allen
Street
tax
payments
and
demolition.
J
We
do
hope
to
receive
some
revenue
if
we
can
sell
that
property
and
in
the
first
quarter
of
the
three
additional
SR
rows
again,
that's
a
timing
difference
but,
of
course,
the
timing.
Difference
doesn't
really
until
the
program
ends.
So
with
those
two
changes,
our
revised
estimated
enemy
reserves
are
1
million.
Four
hundred
and
forty
five
thousand
approximately.
J
Some
item
is
not
currently
in
the
proposed
fiscal
year
19
budget,
but
with
recent
information
we
have,
we
will
have
to
include
some
of
these
items
and
others
are
still
up
for
discussion,
but
we
did
get
the
7
July
first
appraisers
estimated
tax
value
and
that
effect
is
approximately
an
additional
150
thousand
dollars
in
revenue
that
the
CRA
tax
about
taxable
value
also
increased
slightly.
So
that
increases
our
transfer
that
is
required
to
the
CRA
by
nineteen
thousand
four
hundred
dollars.
J
We
do
have
a
new
actuary
requirement
or
I
should
say
a
Gatsby
requirement
for
the
other.
Post-Employment
benefits
it'll
be
similar
to
the
pension
plan
and
we
have
to
the
actuaries,
have
to
do
the
calculations
that'll
be
put
into
our
annual
financials,
so
we're
estimating
approximately
fifteen
thousand
dollars
needed
for
that
project
is
that
every
year
going
it
will
be
ongoing.
I
think
we
can
do
it
every
two
years,
but
I'll
have
to
double-check
the
requirement.
Okay,
our
health
insurance.
We
did
get.
We
originally
had
an
estimate
of
six
percent.
J
J
We
did
get
some
bids
back
for
the
sick
building
security
systems,
so
those
estimates
are
approximately
one
hundred
and
ten
thousand
for
the
general
fund.
It's
a
higher
amount,
but
this
is
the
portion
that
we
would
allocate
to
the
general
fund.
Other
funds
we'll
also
be
taking
a
share
for
the
building
securities.
J
We
have
a
classification
and
compensation
recommended
implementation.
This
excludes
the
non-bargaining
and
excluding
Public
Safety
command
staff.
That
effect
would
be
approximately
forty,
nine
thousand
for
the
general
fund
and
again,
finance
would
reckon
recommend
use
of
reserves
with
system
balancing
fiscal
year.
2020
of
seven
hundred.
Ninety
eight
thousand.
H
C
D
H
J
When
we
have
provided
information
in
the
past,
we've
always
looked
ahead
a
year
in
Council
has
sometimes
in
many
cases,
made
the
decision
to
set
those
funds
aside,
knowing
there's
a
future
problem.
So
if
it
were
part
of
this
process,
it
does
affect
the
amount
of
available
balance.
You
would
have
for
fiscal
year.
19
we've.
H
Okay,
because
every
year
I
that
I've
been
on
council,
we
always
start
the
budget
process
with
a
gap
and
we
always
narrow
the
gap
or
we
work
through
it
and
to
me
and
I've
been
in.
You
know,
business
planning
for
a
long
time,
and
this
just
muddies
the
waters
it
just.
You
know
we're
talking.
2019
I
get
what
you're
saying,
but
that
should
be
shown
separately.
Okay,
we
will.
J
Citywide
master
plan
is
still
to
be
determined.
It
unfunded
project
needs
still
unknown
at
this
time.
Pending
legislation
for
increased
homestead
exemption
for
fiscal
year
2020
again
looking
ahead,
there
would
be
possibly
reduced
ad
valorem
revenue
in
a
future
year.
The
three
patrol
vehicles
for
SROs,
again
funding
to
be
determined
approximate
one
hundred
and
thirty,
five
thousand
and
two
patrol
vehicles
for
the
community
engagement
unit
would
be
approximately
90,000
and
again
that
would
probably
be
in
a
future
year,
as
they
will
continue
to
use
older
vehicles.
That
would
have
been
optioned.
J
This
particular
slide
is
again
showing
the
items
that
we
think
would
move
forward
at
this
time
again.
It
was
still
based
on
discussion,
but
so
this
number
can
change,
so
that
would
be
the
assumed
Reiser
assumed
ending
Reserve.
If
these
particular
items
were
approved
here
is
the
additional
slide
that
we
were
talking
about
that
just
shows
fiscal
year.
Nineteen
impacts
that
could
happen.
I.
J
D
D
L
A
L
G
L
J
Two
more
slides,
so
currently
we
want
to
let
you
know,
what's
currently
in
the
proposed
budget,
was
the
maintaining
the
millage
rate
of
three
point:
one:
nine,
six,
nine,
but
you
know
looking
at
all
the
items
that
are
still
pending
and
everything
like
that.
We
just
want
to
let
you
know
what
the
value
of
a
point
one
Mills
would
generate,
so
that
would
generate
approximately
two
hundred
ninety
eight
thousand
and
that's
based
on
our
July
first
taxable
value
estimate
and
I'm.
Sorry
I
didn't
update
that
slide.
J
So,
basically,
on
the
current
rate
of
the
three
point,
one
nine,
six,
nine
with
and
again
I'm
sorry
I
kind
of
rushed
to
get
these
slides
updated
for
the
July.
One
number
that
just
come
in
is
nine
million
five
hundred
twenty
eight
thousand,
with
ad
valorem
and
again
with
an
increase
of
a
point,
one
meaning
the
millage
rate
would
be
three
point:
two
nine
six,
nine
that
would
generate
nine
million
eight
hundred
and
twenty
six
thousand.
So
there's
the
difference
of
the
two
hundred
ninety
eight
thousand.
So.
D
To
frame
the
discussion,
we're
going
to
have
on
July
11th
you're,
going
to
set
a
not
to
exceed
military,
do
that
every
year
not
to
exceed
we've
been
working
on
the
goal,
the
objective
since
the
get-go
to
not
increase
the
military,
to
keep
it
the
same
again
and
we're
willing
to
do
that.
We
are
willing
to
do
that.
J
D
A
E
My
comments
aren't
to
direct
numbers,
but
rather
philosophically
relative
to
the
the
asset
that
we
have
for
potential
use
to
the
for
the
fish
bill.
Sale
I
feel
strongly
that
any
monies
that
come
out
of
that
should
not
be
something
that's
used
to
kicking
a
can
down
the
road
in
some
of
our
budget
items.
I
certainly
have
no
issue
when
it
comes
to
adding
security
to
a
building
or
refurbishing
a
durable
building
that
has
a
durability,
durable
value
to
the
asset
of
the
city.
E
I
just
would
want
us
to
be
cautious
to
not
think
in
terms
of
that
also
bails
out
as
I've
expressed
previously.
My
concern
of
not
meeting
minimum
standard
for
operating
budget
reserve
I
would
prefer
to
see
us
since
we
are
an
affluent
community
to
see
us
much
above
standard
in
that
regards
and
I
would
hope
that
we
would
philosophically
not
think
in
the
back
of
our
heads
that
that
that
those
assets
that
we
have
from
the
fish
field
sale
would
be
used
for
that
type
of
type
of
expenditure.