►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 07-03-18 Part 3
Description
Description
B
C
C
D
C
E
D
C
F
G
Okay,
this
is
a
resolution
which
I'll
read
by
title:
only
a
resolution
adopting
a
tentative
levy
of
annual
special
assessment
for
the
first
or
Iles
canal:
maintenance
assessment
district
for
fiscal
year,
2018
2019
setting
a
date
time
and
place
for
public
hearing
to
consider
final
adoption
of
the
assessment
and
providing
an
effective
date.
So.
F
Previously
we
had
come
to
you
with
the
BSI
canal,
meetin's
assessment
pro
formas
and
this
particular
fund
would
maintain
the
single-family
residential
assessment
rate
of
555
dollars,
which
is
the
operating
assessment
of
460,
and
then
the
judging
project
is
a
assessment
of
95
dollars
for
fiscal
year,
2019
and
again,
just
to
remind
everyone.
The
are
these
current
rates
and
this
current
assessment
assumes
the
federal
and
state
assistance
for
Hurricane
MO
repairs.
H
F
F
C
V
2018
at
501,
yes,
okay!
This
is
a
public
hearing
on
the
BSI,
Canal
maintenance
fund
assessment
or
555
dollars.
If
anybody
would
like
to
speak,
come
to
the
podium
to
my
right,
you
have
three
minutes.
The
SI
Canal
maintenance
assessment
for
2019
of
555
last
call
for
anybody
to
speak
on
this
assessment
for
BSI
canal
moved.
C
We've
motion
a
second
to
close
the
public
hearing,
all
in
favor
aye
opposed
carried
unanimously,
so
we
need
approval
okay.
So
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
to
approve
the
$555
assessment
for
BSI
canal
maintenance,
correct
all
in
favor,
aye
opposed
carried
unanimously;
okay,
we
will
recess
and
we
will
reconvene
now
as
the
Punta
Gorda
Isles
Canal
maintenance,
assessment,
district
and.
F
Okay,
so
for
the
Punta
Gorda
Isles
Canal
maintenance
fund,
there
is
a
proposal
to
increase
this
single-family
residential
assessment
rate
to
$650.
That's
the
operating
assessment
of
$550
in
an
additional
assessment,
a
hundred
dollars
for
repayment
of
debt
service
on
the
hurricane
Irma
repairs
and
currently
in
a
Performa.
That
assessment
is
scheduled
from
fiscal
year
nineteen
to
fiscal
year
2022,
even
though
we're
only
considering
nineteen
at
the
moment
and
again,
it
assumes
the
federal
in
assist
state
assistance
for
hurricane
mo
repairs.
C
Is
a
public
hearing
if
you
would
like
to
speak
on
the
PGI
canal,
maintenance
assessment
for
fiscal
year
2019
of
$650
now
would
be
the
time.
Would
anybody
like
to
speak
on
the
punta
gorda
isles
canal,
maintenance
assessment,
district
assessment
for
2019
last
call
for
anybody
on
the
PGI
canal,
maintenance
assessment
for
2019
of
650
dollars
closed.
C
F
C
I
C
C
G
E
And
our
goal
as
urban
design
presents
to
you
our
thoughts.
These
are
just
our
thoughts.
Our
goal
today,
if
possible,
is
that
we
agree
on
a
scope,
a
process,
so
we
can
put
it
out
on
the
street
because
by
the
time
we
do
all
of
that
go
through
the
whole
process
and
select
a
firm
we're
talking
about
not
having
a
firm
selected
at
the
earliest
November.
J
We're
still
morning,
good
morning,
Mitchell
Austin
for
the
record
of
urban
design.
So
briefly,
I
wanted
to
go
through
this
presentation
to
discuss
what
staff
feels
is
appropriate
in
terms
of
a
citywide
master
plan,
and
this
is
based
on
the
request
for
qualifications
document
that
you
have
in
your
agenda
packages.
J
So
generally,
what
is
the
master
plan?
We're
looking
at
a
future
vision
and
policy
guide
for
the
city
where
this
is
a
long-range
policy
document,
typically
more
than
five
years
up
to
20
years?
This
is
a
public
policy
document
that
should
be
comprehensive
in
scope
and
really
looks
at
all
aspects
of
the
community's
development.
J
Why
a
master
plan?
Don't
we
already
have
a
plan?
We
do
have
a
plan
as
required
by
Florida
law.
We
do
have
a
comprehensive
plan.
We
also
have
many
other
plans
that
support
that
document.
The
Parks
and
Rec
master
plan
alternative
transportation
plan.
We
also
have
very
comprehensive
land
development
regulations,
but
if
you
look
back
at
the
sort
of
vision
documents
that
guide
those
policies,
those
vision
documents
are
getting
quite
old,
they're
from
2005.
J
The
timing
of
that
planning
process
is
really
dependent
on
upon
the
the
fiscal
and
social
capacity
of
the
community.
How
much
money
are
we
willing
to
spend
to
get
it
done?
How
much
agreement
or
disagreement
is
there
in
the
community
that
we
need
to?
You
know
to
figure
out
and
and
to
come
together
over
a
single
vision
for
our
community,
so
staff
proposes
a
three-part
solution
for
getting
there
as
we
see
here,
the
first
part
of
that
is
really
an
analysis
piece
that
happens.
J
This
is
really
a
budgetary
and
economic
analysis
to
figure
out
where
we're
at
as
a
community
and
what
the
the
baseline
is
for
understanding.
The
next
phase,
which
is
the
actual
master
plan,
we're
proposing
a
shred
process
which
is
the
actual
community
engagement
piece
to
help
Creek
craft.
That
vision
and
the
third
piece
is
after
we've
created
division,
we'll
have
a
policy
document,
but
the
actual
force
of
law
is
contained
in
other
documents,
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
land
development
regulations
specifically.
J
So
in
terms
of
an
economic
and
budgetary
analysis,
what
are
we
really
talking
about?
And-
and
there
are
three
major
components
that
we
need
to
look
at,
given
the
characteristics
of
our
community,
the
FERC,
the
primary
of
those
is
demographic
changes.
We've
we've
been
the
beneficiaries
here
in
Florida
of
a
retirement
state,
and
here
in
Southwest
Florida
particularly
were
a
retirement.
J
Rich
area
and
the
baby
boomers
have
been
retiring
during
this
period.
That
I've
been
in
Florida
since
the
early
2000s,
and
there
are
big
generation
they're
just
a
lot
of
them.
There
aren't
as
many
Gen
Xers
so
we're
about
to
hit
a
window
where
there
won't
be,
as
many
people
retiring
those
people
that
do
retire,
we
have
to
figure
out
how
to
attract
them
here
in
terms
of
the
economic
conditions,
there
are
a
lot
of
things
affecting
the
city,
everything
from
climate
change
to
the
the
uber
thing
of
e-commerce,
I
mean
we
all
talk
about.
J
Well,
it
would
be
nice
to
have
this
store
that
store
in
Punta
Gorda.
Retailers
are
closing
stores
throughout
the
country,
so
attracting
them
to
markets
to
open
new
locations
is,
is
a
tremendous
challenge
and
budgetary
conditions.
We
talked
a
lot
about
the
budget
today,
so
I
don't
need
to
rehash
those,
but
we
do
have
an
aging
infrastructure
and
we
need
to
be
prepared
to
fix
that
infrastructure
and
as
well
as
continue
to
prove
parts
of
it,
and
we
need
to
deal
with
potential
shrinking
tax
base.
J
So
the
next
piece
of
the
puzzle
after
we've
done
all
of
that
analysis-
and
we
have
this
baseline
data
of
this-
is
where
we're
at
as
a
community.
That
data
is
really
informing
the
process
of
of
a
design
shred.
So
what
is
the
Charette?
It's
a
brief
and
intense
design
workshop.
What
is
your
shred
shred
is
a
French
word
for
cart
at
the
Ecole
des
beaux-arts
in
Paris
in
the
1900s,
and
that's
the
School
of
Fine
Arts.
J
So
the
the
primary
piece
of
of
a
threat
is
that
is
us.
It's
stakeholders,
it's
interested
citizens.
It's
the
people
of
the
community
that
will
be
directly
impacted
and
input
is
provided
through
this
process
at
the
very
earliest
stages
of
planning
and
design.
So
it's
really
designed
to
create
the
maximum
value
of
that
public
input.
It's
dead
public
input
of
somebody
saying
something
in
a
meeting.
It's
a
living
public
input
that
actually
drives
the
process.
J
There
are
various
ways
to
get
that
input.
Usually
you
see
a
lot
of
interactive
exercises.
You
see,
interviews
with
stakeholders
and
topic
experts.
You
have
public
meetings,
focus
groups,
they're
great
tools
on
the
internet
for
actually
facilitating
this
process.
Now
it
didn't
exist
back
in
2005.
The
last
time
our
community
undertook
this
process.
J
I'd
like
to
point
out
this,
this
little
diagram
down
here
at
the
bottom.
It
says:
concepts,
public,
review,
alternatives,
public
review,
refinement,
public
review.
You
end
up
with
a
plan.
The
public
is
critical
to
making
a
design
charrette
work.
It's
critical
to
making
this
master
plan
process
work.
It
is
part
and
parcel
the
way
that
staff
sees
this
occurring
is
through
the
public's
input.
J
Why
should
we
our
consultant?
We
have
planning
staff,
we
have
professional
planning
staff,
that's
well
versed
and
how
to
do
all
of
these
things.
We
understand
these
things
but
as
as
was
brought
up
earlier
in
the
payin
classification
study,
we're
a
very
lean
organization,
there's
not
a
lot
of
fat
here.
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
free
time
to
sit
around
and
do
these
these,
this
type
of
intensive
planning
exercise,
our
jobs
are
primarily
consumed
with
making
sure
the
trains
run
on
time.
J
E
E
By
putting
out
the
request
for
qualifications,
the
prospective
planning
firms
will
be
evaluated
based
on
their
qualifications
and
whether
they
address
the
scope,
and
we
have
outlined
a
scope
for
you
as
well,
and
once
that
evaluation
is
done,
you
will
come
up
with
three
to
five
firms.
You
might
want
to
interview
you,
you
some
decide
how
many
we're
not
talking
dollars
yet
and
then
you
go
through
the
interview
process
and
you
rank
them
and
then
you
sit
down
and
you
negotiate
a
contract.
C
One
glaring
omission
that
I
see
is
review
and
evaluation
of
the
2005
master
plan,
because
in
conversations
with
citizens
and
from
what
we've
heard
is
that
some
of
it
worked
and
some
of
it
didn't
and
we
need
to
really
hone
it
have
the
have
the
new
firm
or
the
firm,
whoever
it
is
evaluate
all
that
and
see
you
know
what
what
worked?
What
didn't?
What
are
the
pain
points?
What
are
the
things
that
were
adopted
that
maybe
should
go
away
and
what
are
the
things
that
weren't
adopted?
That
should
maybe
make
a
comeback.
C
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
in
there
when
a
B,
some
of
the
stuff.
That's
in
there
is
that's
vague.
Maybe
it
could
be
refined
to
be
brought
back
again.
Those
things
so
number
one
I
would
definitely
like
a
and
I
don't
know
if
it
should
go
under
plan
objectives,
review,
2005
city
master
plan
and
evaluate
it
professionally
and
give
us
a
feedback
on
what
worked.
And
what
didn't?
The
other
thing
that
I
didn't
see
in
here
that
I
would
like
to
pull
in.
C
Somehow
is
Florida
Building
Codes
Florida
Building
codes
have
changed
since
2005,
so
how
do
Florida
building
codes
affect
buildings
that
the
city
of
Punta
Gorda?
Has
we
heard
about
the
hotel
earlier
and
from
what
I've
been
told?
You
could
not
build
a
wyvern
today
you
have
to
build
a
hotel
at
base
flood
elevation,
so
the
florida
building
codes
have
changed,
and
thus
the
buildings
that
you
see
in
downtown
and
all
over
florida
have
changed
as
well.
C
K
Guess
to
two
other
components
would
be
one,
so
we
don't
operate
in
a
bubble.
I
think
we
need
to
include
how
Punta
Gorda
is
going
to
benefit
from
developments
in
the
county.
I
think
that
that
piece
of
a
if
we
do
Punta
Gorda,
just
as
Punta
Gorda,
then
we're
literally
not
doing
anything
because
we
do
live
in
a
greater
you're
gonna
be
ecosystem.
Secondly,
we
need
a
firm
that
actually
can
do
analysis
of
our
kefir.
Our
capper
is:
is
our
report
card
on?
Actually,
whether
or
not
we
actually
are
effective?
K
What
we're
doing
and
I
think
is
very
important
that
anyone
who
does
the
economic
side
they
need
to
relate
to
past
present
and
future
how
our
capper
is
gonna,
get
to
this
objective
of
having,
like
you
know,
the
basic
in
terms
of
the
government.
Finance
managers.
Basic
is
17.5%
reserves
as
basic
and
we
live
in
a
hurricane
zone,
so
I
think
in
in
terms
of
how
we
design
this.
We
need
to
design
this
so
that
our
capper
can
get
us
to
the
7.5
minimum,
really
25,
30
percent.
To
be
honest,
I
mean
Northport.
K
They
have
as
a
base
20
and
they
have
up
to
35
percent
reserve
and
I.
Think
just
sorry
and
I
think
that's
a
good
peer
pressure
model
for
us
that
we
need
to
shoot
a
little
higher
than
that
and
I
think
they
would
this
plan
the
capper
is
our
report
card
on
whether
or
not
we're
actually
doing
this
or
whether
we're
just
living
in
an
imaginary.
C
Along
that
line
financially
I
mean
we've
had
the
20
75
25
we're
ninety
ten.
Now
is
that
really
you
know:
we've
had
that
in
the
strategic
plan,
the
75
residential
25
percent
commercial?
Is
that
really
really
the
number
is
that
really
and
and
how
will
that
affect
the
city
overall,
if
we
did
get
to
the
25
or
more?
How
does
that
really
impact,
because
some
people
say
well,
you
know
we're
doing
fine
at
ninety
ten.
Why
do
we
need
to
change?
So
we
need
to
consider
that
as
well
in.
K
Regard
to
that
part
of
how
that
number
came
out
to
the
public
knows:
I
I
met
with
our
past
my
name's
manager,
David
rhew,
and
ask
him
Donna's
questions
before
I
got
on
council.
What
do
we
need
to
have
so
that
our
taxes
are
equal
to
the
cost
of
services
and
his
number
was
25%
commercial?
So
that's
where
you
select
people
know
that's
where
a
number
comes
from,
but
again.
This
is
why
the
cap
are
so
important
in
terms
of
that
being
a
component
that
we
can't
do
this
simply
as
an
aesthetic
exercise.
D
I
would
also
like
to
specifically
ask
them
who
they
will
be
using
on
their
staff
to
do
the
project
when
it
comes
time
to
do
it,
because
some
companies
made
up
to
hire
college
students
to
come
in
and
and
do
the
project
where
we
would
want
professionals
at
that
company
to
be
the
assigned
people
to
do
what
we
need
to
have
done.
If
we're
hiring
a
firm
and
we're
gonna
pay
all
this
money,
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
the
best
qualified
people
working
on
it
that
we
can
possibly
have
so
I
would.
D
I
would
like
to
see
this
incorporated
the
scope
incorporated
into
the
actual
qualifications
and
have
everything
filed
at
one
time,
and
it
will
save
us
a
whole
step
in
between,
because
I
don't
think
we
should
it
right
now.
It
appears
to
me
that
it's
a
two-tiered
process
and
I
don't
think
that
that's
the
way
we
want
to
go
about
it.
We
might
be
able
to
save
some
time
and
a
lot
of
effort
if
we
get
all
the
information
at
one
time.
A
I
agree
with
that:
we
need
to
have
a
the
economic
impact
of
what
these
recommendations
might
be,
but
I
don't
think
tie
it
to
the
kafir'
is
is
where
we
need
to
go.
That's
getting
down
into
a
granular
piece,
I
think
some
of
these
well,
but
some
of
these
things,
like
the
amount
of
reserves,
is
a
policy
decision
and
something,
but
what
we
do
want
this
to
do
is
drive
economic
impact
so
that
we
have
the
money
to
make
those
decisions.
A
K
Makes
kind
of
sense,
but
the
problem
is,
is
that
we
we
can
be
aspirational,
but
the
evidence
of
our
effect.
That
was
even
up
until
now.
We
look
at
our
capper.
We
can
tell
how
well
we're
actually
doing
how
are
not
mean
we
can
view
ourselves
in
a
certain
positive
way,
but
our
capper
tells
us
how
we're
actually
doing,
and
that's
what
I'm
saying
it's
important,
that
we
not
forget
that
our
finest
department
is
they
really
that's,
who
keeps
us
honest,
we
they're
having
to
juggle
bubbles.
You
know.
A
K
Explain
it
more
clearly
it
basically,
this
is
gonna
tell
us
how
much
commercial
activity
we're
gonna
actually
need
to
have
in
town
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
looking
commercial
taxes
that
we're
gonna
have
to
look
at.
Are
we
supposed
to
continue
to
rely
like?
We
are
right
now
on
resolute
taxes,
or
should
we
actually
change
our
code,
so
the
more
there
can
be
more
core
selectivity
so
that
we
can
achieve
what
we
need
to
to
be
a
viable
city
and
not
be
so
vulnerable
financially,
we
are
now.
L
I
Secondly,
in
this
general
discussions
that
we
have
and
I
would
like
and
I
that
I
take
issue
with
that,
I
would
like
somebody
that
were
to
help
us
develop
a
citywide
master
plan.
Is
we
always
just
talked
about
downtown?
We
don't
talk
about
our
service
area.
We
don't
talk
about
the
weave
I
mean
we
made
a
resolution
that
if
you
touch
us,
you're,
going
to
incorporate
into
us
as
etc,
but
we
do
supply
these
people
with
city,
water
and
city
sewer
and
those
services
and
there
those
are
areas
that
have
the
potential
for
light.
Industrial.
I
I
We
talk
about
the
commercial
and
we
do
have
this
blighted
piece
of
real
estate
that
could
have
great
potential
in
downtown
and
also
along
41
to
the
save
more
and
we
and
then
out
towards
the
the
the
hospital
and
we
don't
want
to
ever
DM
ffice
eyes
that.
But
we
also
have
all
this
other
potential
real
estate
that
we
would
want
to
incorporate
into
our
city,
whether
it's
five
years
from
now
or
50
years
from
now.
I
But
it's
our
service
area
that
can
also
contribute
to
the
overall
economic
viability
and
sustainability
of
our
community
and,
at
the
same
time,
help
us
maintain
our
lovely
lifestyle
in
the
Isles
and
in
the
historic
district
and
the
other
historic
districts,
etc.
So,
I
think
that
we
need
to
take
the
title.
I
C
Think
to
your
point,
well-taken
about
I
think
where
the
2005
plan
fell
short
was,
it
was
not
reviewed
and
you
know
team
handed
the
city
at
that
point.
It
probably
should
have
been
spelled
out
who's
going
to
do
what
in
the
future,
so
I
think
this
plan
should
definitely
like
you
said,
have
some
have
a
recommendation
from
this
firm
on
how
to
keep
it.
A
living
document,
like
you
said,
and.
A
I
reflect
on
what
was
going
on
back
then
I,
don't
disagree
with
what
you're
saying
when
it
was
gifted.
It
really
was
not
accepted
with
open
arms
and
so
I
think
at
this
point
in
time
and
when
we
went
to
Delray
Beach
and
saw
what
they
did
the
same
consultant
Jaime
Correa
led
their
community.
I've
said
this
before
on
the
development
of
their
master
plan
that
was
funded
by
the
city,
and
so
it
was
a
whole
different
process.
A
This
one
was
funded
by
the
the
the
community
and
because
we
were
experiencing
angst
about
certain
things,
and
that
was
the
that
was
the
issue,
so
I
think
I
think
we're
in
a
different
time
in
space
and
we're
going
to
be
able
to
rectify
that.
Okay,
yeah
and
I
think
that
the
knowing
the
citizens
master
plan
to
the
2005
master
plan.
It
does
talk
to
the
communicator
community.
It
does
talk
to.
I
We
do
is
we
fund
this
thing
and
then
we
get
it
and
we
see
oh
wow.
This
is
great
and
we're
gonna
do
this
and
we
even
do
a
checklist
and
we
start
checking
things
off
and
three
years
later
we
haven't
reluctant,
because
it
is
very
obvious
that
things
are
dynamic.
Okay,
if
we
were
having
this
conversation
two
years
ago,
Sunseeker
wouldn't
have
been
part
of
the
equation.
I
Okay,
the
gentleman
that
spoke
earlier
about
the
fact
that
you
know
that's
gonna
have
an
impact
on
what
Punta
Gorda
is
that's
what
maybe
that
should
be
Town
Center
and
we
should
be
both
hitchbot
ich
Center
or
whatever,
but
we
should
allow
it
to.
It
will
affect
how
we
define
ourselves,
but
we
shouldn't
let
it
dictate
how
we
define
ourselves
and
that's
really
what
we
need
and
then
we
need
to
live
it
and
change
it.
Just
as
we
change
in
our
own
lives
into.
C
F
C
L
C
K
Something
Gary
just
said
right
now:
III
met
with
John
Redman
last
weekend
and
part
of
it
he
offered
to
participate
with
us
in
this
process
and
I
think
it's
very
important
that
when
we
talk
about
stakeholders,
those
parties
who
are
in
the
county
who
are
doing
projects,
we
need
to
be
with
them
the
entire
time
we're
doing
this
over
again
we're
not
operating
in
a
vacuum.
Secondly,
I
do
think
it's
important
that
we
also
have
a
firm
that
has
experience
in
either
Southwest
Florida
or
Central
Florida,
so
they
know
our
environment.
K
M
Variance
procurement
manager
I
would
love
to
do
that.
But,
however,
if
we're
gonna
be
requiring
any
services
from
the
engineer
as
part
of
the
team
or
architect
Landscape
Architect
are
serving,
we
must
comply
with
to
eighty-seven
point.
Oh
five,
five,
which
is
the
consultants
competitive
negotiations,
act
because
we
are
it's
requiring
those
special
folks
to
participate
in
the
project,
and
because
of
that,
we
cannot
ask
for
prices
upfront.
We
can
only
evaluate
them.
I.
D
M
D
That
they
plan
to
do
for
the
city
I
just
think
that
that's
really
important
and
I
think
that
it'll
save
us
a
second
step.
I
also
think
is
extremely
important.
That
City
Council
be
the
people
that
interview
all
these
firms.
We
talked
about
this
a
number
of
times,
I,
don't
think
that
this
should
be
left
up
to
the
procurement
department
to
handle.
This
is
something
that's
really
important
to
me.
Specifically.
G
M
Basically,
just
terminology:
a
request
for
qualifications
is
basically
when
we're
asking
for
their
qualifications,
we're
asking
for
them
for
their
proposed
scope
of
work
them
to
submit
their
qualifications
on
the
entire
on
the
team
that
has
proposed
their
timeline
their
deliverables,
but
we
don't
ask
for
any
prices
so
that
the
RFQ
process
is
basically
for
the
engineers
and
architects.
In
our
terminology,
a
request
for
proposals,
the
whole
thing
to
where
you
you
ask
on
scope,
you
get
the
price
you
get
this
you
get
that.
M
The
only
thing
that's
different,
that
you
don't
get
between
the
request
for
proposal
and
request
for
qualifications
and
there's
some
middle
packages
is
anything
related
to
price.
So
it's
basically
what
you're
requesting
it's
just
the
the
terminology
that
we're
not
getting
price
in
the
RFQ,
but
we
will
get
everything
else.
I
would.
D
C
It
true
Marian
that
the
RFQ
does
give
them
some
flexibility,
so
if
they
did
see
something
that
they
said
well,
maybe
you
don't
need
that
you
might
need
this.
It
would
give
them
an
opportunity
instead
of
us
saying
we
want
this.
We
want
that
this
gives
them
the
flexibility
to
pick
and
choose
and
maybe
massage
it
to
their
firms.
Experience
and
okay
build
that
into
it.
I
I,
just
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
our
expertise
isn't
this
other
than
two
individuals
that
I
can
think
of
specifically,
and
that
I
would
want
anybody.
They
would
come
to
us
to
also
be
able
to
suggest.
Well,
you
know
you
really
might
want
to
look
at
it.
This
kind
of
way
for
you
know
and
give
us
their
idea
that
our
scope,
we
think
we
know,
but
maybe
they
may
know
how
to
tweak
it
a
little
bit
better
for
our
purposes,
particularly
as
they
get
to
know
us.
They.
D
C
A
L
A
E
A
A
E
E
M
Question
just
to
make
sure
when
I'm
preparing
the
solicitation,
we
do
lots
of
times
we'll
do
special
projects
for
special
topics
as
a
Master
Agreement,
which
you've
seen
in
the
past,
where
will
establish
a
term
contract
for
a
master
agreement
with
just
selected
firm
and
like
the
first
phase,
would
be
a
specific
authorization
that
way,
if
six
years
down
the
road.
If
you
need
to
do
something
else,
you
need
to
update
a
component
or
what
have
you
it
gives?
You
allows
you
to
be
able
to
go
back
to
that
same
company.
C
A
When
does
whatever
have
to
happen,
and
when
does
counsel
have
to
have
this,
you
know
so
that
we
can
send
it
out
and
I
think
that
that's
gonna
dictate
good
point
when
this
needs
to
be
done
because
I'm,
fearful
of
us,
taking
our
good
old
time
and
we're
gonna,
go
on
break
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
we're
going
to
find
ourselves
behind
the
8-ball
and
we're
going
to
shortchange
we're
taking
more
time
in
we're
going
to
shortchange
the
time
that
the
consultant
needs
to
do
what
they
need
to
do.
And
so
I
would.
A
D
L
G
G
M
G
Specifically
identified
professionals
in
the
act
that
require
compliance
with
the
Act
if
you're
hiring
those
kinds
of
professionals
I,
don't
necessarily
agree
that
the
professionals
that
we
would
be
hiring
for
this
process
are
covered
by
the
act.
It
may
include
some
of
those
professionals
like
an
engineer
or
a
surveyor,
but
but
not
all
of
the
professionals
that
might
be
qualifying
or
this
proposal
would
be
covered,
so
I
kind
of
look
at
it.
G
What
we're
asking
for
us
kind
of
a
hybrid
and
in
an
abundance
of
caution
I
have
no
real
heartburn
if
we
follow
the
provisions
of
the
statute.
However,
as
I
understand,
and
that's
why
I
asked
earlier,
the
difference
between
a
request
for
qualifications
and
a
request
for
proposals
is
that,
with
the
request
for
proposal
where
price
is
a
concern,
you
identify
the
scope
of
work,
and
then
you
have
people
kind
of
say
what
will
that
cost
us
with
the
request
for
qualifications?
G
G
G
Methodology
more
than
someone
who
might
appear
to
be
more
qualified
on
paper
that
that
necessarily
accomplishes
the
objectives
of
the
of
the
act
so
I'm
just
asking
Marin.
Are
you
comfortable
that
if
we
make
the
methodology
as
important
to
consideration
it's
not
even
an
equal
consideration
to
the
qualifications
that
we
won't
run
afoul
of
the
statute
when
we
make
a
selection
based
to
a
large
extent
on
the
methodology
that's
proposed
normally.
M
In
the
RFQ
process,
they
are
to
provide
their
methodology
or
their
project
approach
for
providing
us
that
are
meeting
the
scope
of
service
there
to
expand
on
how
they're
going
to
do
a
B
and
C
all
the
objectives.
They.
We
also
develop
an
evaluation
criteria,
weight
that
for
like
four
or
five
different
criteria,
and
then
they
usually
a
city
staff
from
whoever
it
puts
the
weight
to
it.
So
if
the
methodology
is
quite
frequently,
methodology
is
sometimes
more
than
their
qualifications.
G
Doesn't
happen
because
if
we
couldn't
hire
somebody
based
on
what
we
believe
to
be
the
better
methodology
and
the
statute
required
us
to
put
more
weight
on
qualifications,
I
might
then
advise
you
that
we
don't.
We
shouldn't
be
following
the
statutory
requirements
and
do
it
so
so
it
suits
our
purposes.
But
if
Marion
is
saying
that
we
can
accomplish
what
we
need
to
accomplish
the
statutory
I'm.
Okay
with
that
I
just
needed
to
bring
that
out
as
a
for
discussion,
I.
K
C
C
C
A
C
H
C
L
H
H
H
C
Okay
policy
and
legislation,
I
just
have
one
update
about
the
Florida
League
conference
home
rule
alley.
We
have
a
home
rule
rally
Friday
at
one
o'clock,
I
believe
so
you'll
be
hearing
more
from
me
about
that.
We're
representing
obviously
the
Southwest
Florida
region,
but
they're
really
trying
to
make
it
a
big.
A
big
deal
so
I
think
I
mentioned
it
before
and
will
be,
will
be
decked
out
in
some
gear
so
more
to
come
on
that.