►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 11-15-17 Part 2
Description
Description
A
Their
access
issues
to
the
harbor,
so
we
started
from
that
particular
point
in
our
market
analysis.
Obviously
in
dealing
with
real
estate
you're,
doing
comparables
or
comps
in
terms
of
what
types
of
property
values
are
there
with
with
people
in
certain
areas
and
others.
In
this
particular
case,
we
looked
at
those
areas
that
had
direct
access
to
the
harbor
already,
and
then
we
look
compare
that
to
the
benefit
area
that
we're
talking
about
here.
A
One
of
the
things
that
we
looked
at
was
looking
at
vacant:
lots
the
reason
for
vacant
lots
over
houses
is
that
there's
too
many
variables
you
have
the
size,
your
materials
as
well
as
location
with
vacant,
lots
it's
dirt
so
that
we
were
able
to
compare
direct
with
direct
the
other
issue.
There
was
we
compared
three
particular
areas,
as
you
can
see
in
the
green
and
toward
the
lower
right
area
is
the
benefit
area
that
was
established.
Originally,
the
area
to
the
west
of
that
is
what
we're
calling
area
two.
A
That
is,
the
one
that
has
a
direct
access
to
the
harbor
area.
Three
is
in
a
purple.
It
has
access
to
the
north
to
the
harbor.
There
want
to
make
sure
that
when
we
compared
properties,
there
are
properties
in
area
three
that
are
directly
on
the
bay
in
harbor.
They
were
not
included
because
they
are
not
comparable.
A
So
we
looked
at
two
different
things.
The
first
one
was
the
property
appraiser
and
we
looked
at
what
is
called
certified,
just
value
that
they
list
and
they
make
sure
that
they
they
compare
properties.
They
compare
both
the
vacant
lot
and
the
house,
if
there's
a
house
in
this
particular
case.
So
what
we
see
is
that
there
are
three
different
values
and
area
one
which
is
the
benefit
area
designated
in
this
study
is
the
lowest
area
which
has
the
direct
access
is,
is
significantly
higher
in
terms
of
the
just
value
of
that
particular
property.
A
One
of
the
things
that
we
also
have
to
note
that
most
of
those
lots
are
slightly
bigger.
It's
about
ninety
seven
hundred
and
square
feet
in
area,
one
about
ninety
nine
hundred
in
area
two,
so
you
have
to
adjust
for
the
square
footage
as
well.
We
looked
at
both
just
the
empty
lots:
the
values
if
there
were
some
improvements,
because
there
are
some
vacant-
lots
that
have
docks
on
them
already,
and
we
also
looked
at
what
the
vacant
lot
are.
A
One
does
not
have
the
access
we
also
looked
at
just
because
you
list
a
price
for
a
certain
value,
doesn't
mean
you're
going
to
get
it.
So
we
looked
at
what
the
discount
or
the
reduction
was,
going
to
be
obviously
very
want
area,
one
that
has
the
worst
access
has
the
largest
reduction
or
deduction
of
it,
because
they
they
people,
agree
on
a
price
less
than
a
listing
price.
A
So
we
looked
at
square
footage.
We
looked
at
the
different
issues
there
to
look
at
where
the
values
would
lie.
Okay,
the
conclusion
on
the
market
portion
the
economic
evaluation.
If
we
look
at
just
the
certified
just
value
from
the
property
appraiser,
it's
over
fifteen
thousand
dollar
increase
again
when
we
adjust
for
square
footage.
If
we
look
at
the
listing
prices,
including
a
discount,
it's
over
eighty
one
thousand
dollars
difference
that
so
that
this
shows
that
there
will
be
a
benefit.
A
A
A
They
also
would
receive
benefit
from
this
cut
and
there's
been
some
preliminary
discussions
that
would
acquire
an
interlocal
agreement
and
that
could
come
about
as
well.
So
we
couldn't
go
with
city
code.
On
those
we
looked
at
County
code,
which
is
even
more
confusing,
but
luckily
enough
we
were
able
to
find
that
condominium
documents
because
they
are
more,
they
rule.
On
that
point
they
said
how
many
units
you
can
put
on
that
property,
so
we
looked
at
that
is
the
guiding
source.
So
we
mentioned
about
adding
some
boundaries
here
in
the
northwest
corner.
A
That's
the
city
property
there,
where
the
fire
station
and
a
park
is
located.
That
was
not
in
the
original
area,
but
it
does
have
some
benefit
and
we'll
talk
about
that
in
a
little
more
detail
later
and
the
reason
is,
is
you'll
notice
on
the
east
side
of
that
there's
a
frontage
on
the
canals,
so
there
will
be
access
to
the
waterway.
The
other
area
was
is
in
the
lower
corner,
the
southeast
corner,
which
are
in
that
sort
of
yellowish
color
gold
color.
Those
are
the
Lots
in
unincorporated
area.
A
A
A
So
we
have
multiple
types
of
properties
again
based
on
code.
Part
of
the
issue
is
how
much
footage
that
you
have
in
terms
of
the
canal.
The
other
is
the
width
of
the
canal,
so
you'll
see
we
broke
multifamily
into
four
different
categories,
because
the
calculation
process
is
a
little
bit
different
in
each
one,
whether
it's
over
85
feet
of
seawall
and
greater
than
120
feet
of
canal
width.
So
we
looked
at
each
of
those
properties
individually.
A
A
A
The
other
special
case
is
a
city
property
you'll,
see
that
yellow
line
on
the
east
side
of
the
property.
That
is
the
frontage
and
there's
already
a
one
dock
there,
but
that
is
the
frontage.
So
could
the
city
put
in
more
docking
space?
The
answer
is
yes,
they
could,
and
you
also
notice,
because
the
canal,
which
differs
it's
wider
on
the
northern
end
than
the
southern
end,
we
had
to
break
it
into
different
categories
to
make
the
analysis
of
it.
A
A
The
issue
with
this
particular
property.
Is
it's
not
wide
enough
to
build
anything
on
it?
So,
in
terms
of
being
able
to
put
something
there
that
can
be
used,
it
doesn't
qualify
from
that.
We
also
double-check
to
look
at
what
other
evidence
there
might
be
about
its
value
or
lack
of
value,
and
we
looked
at
the
property
appraisers
data,
this
property,
that
entire
piece
is,
has
a
taxable
value
of
$10,
which
means
they
do
not
believe
that
anything
can
happen
with
that
particular
property.
A
So,
based
on
that,
we
would
recommend
no
zero
water
access
units
for
that
particular
property,
the
unincorporated
Lots
again,
they
will
have
access,
in
fact,
better
access
than
many
people
to
the
channel
cut.
It
will
take
an
interlocal
agreement.
The
one
property
on
the
southern
end
is
a
large
property,
but
based
on
setbacks
and
codes
from
from
Charlotte
County,
we
have
assigned
to
water
access
units
to
that
property.
A
Okay,
the
number
of
water
access
units
I
think
you
may
be
aware
that
the
engineers
had
did
some
preliminary
numbers,
but
he
didn't
go
to
the
detail
of
the
the
codes
that
we
felt
was
absolutely
necessary.
There
are
two
thousand
nine
hundred
ninety
five
water
access
units,
also
just
for
the
record
to
make
sure
there
are
six
Lots
on
Turtledove
that
have
no
water
access.
They
would
receive
zero
water
access
units
because
they
have
no
ability
to
get
to
the
water.
A
So
that
means
that,
based
on
the
initial
cost,
which
is
estimated
at
one
and
a
half
million
dollars
that
would
give
a
water
access
unit
assessment
of
five
hundred
and
one
now,
if
that
number
goes
up
because
of
other
issues
that
come
about,
the
water
access
assessment
will
increase
as
well,
but
for
based
on
the
knowledge
we
have
today.
That
is
the
answer.
A
Okay,
now
we
looked
at
gave
you
some
samples,
because
we
know
some
people
will
be
looking
at
what
these
numbers
will
be
for
multifamily,
because
they
range
all
over
the
place.
We
just
gave
you
an
average.
The
average
of
the
multifamily
units
is
fifteen
point
two:
nine
water
access
units-
this
is
an
average,
but
for
all
the
water
access
units
on
this
assessment,
roll
they're
whole
numbers.
We
rounded
down
you
can't
round
up
because
they
can't
put
half
a
water
access
unit
and
you
can't
go
up
to
the
higher
level
because
you
violate
code.
A
So
this
is
just
an
estimate.
Number
for
the
single
family
lots
over
85
feet.
Well,
you
can
put
two
units
in
it's
about
it's
a
little
over
a
thousand
dollars,
the
less
than
eighty
five
feet.
It's
about
five
hundred
dollars
that
church
property
is
thirty,
two
access
units.
If
council
decides
to
waive
that
fee
and
cover
it
from
the
city,
that's
your
estimate
there
of
about
sixteen
thousand
dollars.
Okay,
the
city
will
need
to
your
portion,
which
is
for
the
city
property,
which
is
forty
access
units.
That's
about
twenty
dollarz,
the
unincorporated
lots.
A
A
Twenty-One
water
access
units
approve
the
assessment
methodology
and
in
the
documentation
we
didn't
put
it
in
the
reports
but
was
sent
to
the
manager,
is
what
we
call
it:
an
assessment
role,
it's
every
property
listed
by
their
ID
number
and
how
many
units
it
is
and
what
the
number
is,
if
that
one
and
a
half
million
dollars
increases,
is
the
spreadsheet
just
change
that
number
everybody
recalculates
and
then
pursue
with
the
plan
and
the
assessment.
That's
our
recommendations
and
certainly
we're
open
to
whatever
questions
you
might
have.
B
Before
we
get
into
the
economic
study,
this
is
based
on
a
project,
an
estimated
cost
of
1.5
million.
That's
all
we
have
right
now.
It's
an
estimate
that
number
could
go
up
or
down
depending
on
when
we
go
through
the
final
permitting
and
all
all
the
rest
of
it.
Part
of
it
includes
a
land
cost,
the
cost
of
the
Macqueen
property,
which
is
part
of
the
access.
B
The
estimate
of
1.5
million
includes
$400,000
for
the
purchase
of
the
property
and
the
property
owner
that
number
from
the
property
owner
a
couple
years
ago,
and
he
stands
by
that
number.
That's
what
the
McQueen's
feel
the
property
is
worth,
and
that
is
their
bottom
line
number
now
that's
their
number,
but
included
in
that.
They
also
feel
that
the
city
should
deed
over
to
them.
B
A
city-owned
property
on
Taylor
Road
across
from
Creekside
will
strip
a
property
there
by
the
creek
that
we
don't
use
anymore
of
years
and
years
and
years
and
years
and
years
ago,
was
a
water
supply,
but
anymore,
because
the
McQueen's
own
property
around
it.
So
they
would
like
their
bottom
line
number
we
finally
have.
It
is
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
the
price
of
the
land,
which
is
included
in
that
1.5
million
dollar
estimate,
plus
the
property
on
Taylor
Road
across
from
Creek
side.
B
We
have
done
no
assessments,
no
excuse
me
no
appraisals,
and
before
we
would
even
consider
that
our
recommendation
is
that
we
need
to
go
into
the
appraisal.
I
are
affirm
to
do
an
appraisal
to
find
out.
If
is
that
accurate
or
not,
because
we
don't
know,
but
at
least
we
now
know
what
the
property
owner
is
asking.
C
B
D
D
Would
also
I
think
if
we
were,
if
we
were
to
consider
giving
away
land
that
we
would
consider
adding
in
that,
if
or
when,
that
land
becomes
contiguous
to
the
city
that
they
would
annex
into
the
city.
Mr.
Macqueen
has
had
a
propensity
not
to,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
people
across
the
street
from
our
property
that
Creekside
that
are
interested
in
actually
becoming
a
part
of
the
city,
and
so
in
the
event
that
that
mr.
McQueen's
property
would
become
contiguous.
That
would
be
a
way.
B
Right
there
look
there,
you
go
b11
I,
can't
that
area
in
there.
So
we
you
know
it
took
us
a
long
time
to
finally
get
there
McQueen's
bottom
line.
We
have
it.
However,
we
don't
know.
If
that's
the
number
we
need
to
find
out
through
an
independent
appraisal.
B
D
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
in
one
way
absolutely
especially
for
hours
out
on
Taylor.
On
the
other
hand,
if
the
McQueen's
have
said
this
is
the
number,
despite
what
the
appraisal
says,
we
can
come
back
and
say
well,
that's
way
over
what
the
appraised
value
is,
but
if
that's
the
number
that
they
want,
then
that's
the
number
and
you
know
I
I,.
F
C
F
Of
the
questions
I
think
we
might
want
to
ask-
is
if,
but
with
him
owning,
that
parcel
of
land
does
that
affect
the
value
of
the
parcels
he
has
surrounding
it?
Probably
yes,
yes
and
there's
what
kind
of
positive
effect
of
that
does
that
help
if
there
has
a
I'm
just
taking
crazy
enough,
if
it
has
a
three
million
dollar
value
to
it,
I
have
to
take
the
extreme
other
ways.
People
take
me
seriously:
okay,
okay!
Well,
then,
we
should
know
that,
okay,
because
then
he
has.
He
has
a
dog
and
hunter
why?
A
F
F
A
B
C
A
A
Would
have
because
the
issue
is,
you
know
the
old
line
about
location,
location,
location,
okay,
so
do
you
have
access
to
the
deep
water,
the
people
in
area
one
do,
but
it's
a
longer
route
with
a
cut
that
they
would
have
that
reduced
significantly.
So
that's
why
we're
trying
to
compare
our
best
comparison
is
area
one
in
area
two
in
terms
of
access
to
deep
water.
So,
basically.
A
C
D
Improvements
in
you
know
impacts
so
that
you
know,
because,
as
across
the
canal,
is
on
one
side
of
the
canal,
people
will
be
assessed
on
the
other
side
of
the
canal.
People
will
not,
but
obviously
they're
so
close,
that
that
I
would
imagine
that
those
those
lots
across
the
canal
will
receive
some
benefit,
and
so
it's
like
and
maybe
even
a
few
canals
down
and
so
I
was
expecting
your
report
to
come
back
and
give
some
degrees
of
variability.
This
is
pretty
cut-and-dried.
D
I
went
through
the
data,
I
understand
the
data,
I
get
the
calculations
and
all
that
kind
of
thing,
I
expected
something
a
little
bit
more
sophisticated.
That
would
actually
show
it
more
of
a
degree
of
variability
so
that
we
may
have
an
ABC
level
of
assessment
in
different
areas,
because
it's
providing
multiple
avenues
for
people
to
access
the
harbor.
Okay,
we.
A
Relied
on
two
particular
analyses
that
occurred
prior
to
us
coming
on
board.
One
was
the
engineers
assessment
in
terms
of
the
benefits
derived
for
travel
to
the
deep
water,
water
quality
and
those
particular
issues.
We
did
not
give
an
opinion
on
those,
because
those
were
that's
not
our
area.
The
other
document
was
looking
at
the
assessment
methodology
that
the
attorneys
put
together
and
the
area
in
terms
of
comparison
was
limited
to
that
particular
point,
and
our
contract
was
a
limited
to
that
particular
point.
F
A
point
of
information,
so
I
live
in
the
area,
three,
okay,
and
that
was,
in
your
analysis,
the
higher
a
lot
values.
But
when
you
do
that,
if
you
take
that
whole
area
over
almost
two-thirds
of
that
is
not
accessible
because
of
bridge
it's,
the
northwestern
corner
is
the
only
part,
that's
really
directly
accessible.
When.
A
A
E
G
E
E
Yes,
well
we're
talking
about
on
La
Costa,
Island
Court,
where
the
the
big
loop
in
the
brown
section
there,
where
the
big
loop
is
that's
landlocked
by
the
golf
course,
so
that
does
not
have
water
access
at
all,
so
I
think
that's
what
his
question
is,
but
part
of
the
street
is
water
and
part
of
it
isn't,
but
one
side
of
the
street
has
been
included
in
the
assessment
district
and
the
and
the
west
side
of
the
loop
is
not
included.
That's
what
everybody's
questioning.
G
I
would
think
where
they're
doing
it
there
they
find
a
specific
benefit
to
those
properties.
Not
those
properties
and
I
think
see
we're
viewing
this
as
a
boat
thing,
and
it's
not
a
bad
thing.
It
really
is
a
specific
value
to
the
property
itself
and
it's
not
a
general
benefit.
It's
actually
a
specific
benefit.
I
think
that's
why
it's
limited
to
this
specific
area,
but.
E
D
D
E
H
If
you
really
want
to
get
to
that
level,
you
know
the
person
who
lives
immediately
next
door
to
the
southeast.
They
have
a
slightly
greater
benefit
with
the
bird
cut
opening,
but
their
travel
distance
is
only
slightly
less
than
it
would
be
going
out,
Ponce
de
Leon
Inlet,
and
that
occurs
as
you
keep
moving
further
southeast.
So
there
is
a
sort
of
gradation
and
that
could
get
in
to
an
infinite,
isn't
complicated
assessment
methodology.
D
C
That,
okay,
as
far
as
when
you
went
to
determine
your
water
access
units,
a
lot
of
special
permits
have
already
been
granted
in
different
scenarios
around
PGI.
Did
you
take
those
the
special
permits
into
account
of
the
existing
special
permitted
cases
that
may
exist
out
there
that
are
outside
of
what
our
code
normally
allows?
Did
you
take
those
into
consideration?
Well,.
A
A
We
looked
at
every
single
property
because,
as
you
notice
that
they
vary
based
on
whether
they're
more
or
less
than
85
feet
and
the
width
of
the
canal
and
then
some
of
those
properties
have
different
canal
Wis
across
from
them.
So
we
went
through
each
of
those
individually
so
that
we
would
be
able
to
account
for
each
of
those
at
point.
A
C
C
A
Okay
and
that's
in
the
methodology
reported
by
the
attorneys
that
they
must,
in
fact,
originally
their
methodology,
said
that
the
city
property
should
be
included.
Okay,
in
our
analysis,
we
came
across
the
church
as
well
and
we
asked
the
question
very
specifically:
do
they
have
to
receive
an
assessment
or
not?
And
the
answer
is
yes,
so
my.
C
Question
would
be
if
we,
if
we
do
exempt
them.
If
the
city
pays
the
assessment,
is
there
any
way
to
lien
that
property
of
the
church
to
say,
or
whatever
mechanism
eken
ISM
for
the
city,
to
put
some
kind
of
stipulation
on
that
piece
of
property?
Should
it
ever
turn
back
into
multifamily?
The
city
could
be
in
reimburse
for
the
assessment
that
it
paid
I.
I
J
Heather
and
snow
so
with
neighbors,
Giblin
and
Nickerson
under
state
law,
churches
and
other
similarly
situated
nonprofit
type
property
uses
are
exempt
from
ad
valorem
taxes,
but
there's
also
Florida
Supreme
Court
precedent
that
they
are
not
exempt
from
special
assessments.
You
can
craft
a
local
special
assessment
exemption
policy,
but
what
you
cannot
do
is
then
take
the
cost
that
would
otherwise
be
allocated
to
that
property
and
push
them
under
the
other
property
owners.
So,
in
order
to
keep
your
assessment
equitable,
you
would
have
to
absorb
those
costs.
J
I
think
what
your
question
is
is
whether
you
could
establish
some
sort
of
a
springing
assessment
that
would
come
to
life
in
the
future.
In
the
event,
the
property
ever
no
longer
would
qualify
for
the
exemption
that
you
had
established
and
we
have
done
that
before.
It
is
possible,
it's
tricky
and
you
have
to
deal
with
time
periods
and
useful
life
of
the
project
and
things
like
that.
But
there
is
a
possibility
to
do
that.
If
the
city
wants
to
explore
that.
C
J
You
would
have
and
you'd
have
a
process
to
monitor
it,
and
you
know
it
may
not
be
the
entire
assessment
do
based
upon
the
useful
life
of
the
project,
but
some
sliding
scale,
but
there
are
ways
to
get
at
what
I
think
you
are
looking
at
is
which,
as
far
as
an
equitable,
if
you're
gonna
pay
this
now
and
next
year,
they
become
a
multi-family
development.
You
don't
want
to
be
left
holding
the
the
bag
right.
I
J
Is
not
a
legal
necessity,
they
for
those
individual
properties
participate
in
the
assessment,
but
the
costs
that
are
allocated
to
those
properties
need
to
come
from
some
other
revenue
source.
You
cannot
push
those
on
to
the
property
owners
within
the
city
as
far
as
the
assessment,
so
if
the
county
wants
to
pay
it
or
the
city
can't
work
it
out,
and
they
really
want
this
to
go
forward.
You
use
other
legally
available
revenue
sources
that
would
that
would
be
acceptable
to
get
your
project
done.
I
B
C
J
J
The
district
you
establish
is
going
to
be
limited
to
what's
within
your
city
limits.
What
you
can't
ignore
is
sort
of
the
cost
allocation
to
those
properties.
They're,
clearly
going
to
be
benefited.
They
are
going
to
be
actually
closer
to
the
new
access
point
than
even
the
properties
within
the
city.
I
think
it
would
create
a
potential
vulnerability
in
your
assessment
process.
If
you
ignore
those
I
have.
F
D
Well
and
just
a
comment
relative
to
the
church,
when
I
first
saw
that
I
thought
as
a
small
congregation,
that's
quite
a
chunk
of
change
to
fit
into
a
skip
to
a
a
budget.
On
the
other
hand,
they're
not
gonna
pay
that
over
in
one
year,
so
in
a
multi-year
arrangement,
whatever
that
depends,
it
depends
on
what
the
multi-year
arrangement
is.
It
still
could
be
palatable
and
I.
Think
that
you
know
if
something
were
to
happen
in
the
church,
closed
and
sold
the
property
there's
a
benefit
there,
so
I
mean
you
know
we
have
to.
E
E
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
you
came
up
with
32
water
access
units
for
the
church
property,
because
part
of
this
that's
highlighted
appears
to
be
the
area
where
the
aqui
esta
project
plans
to
put
their
their
lay
along
dock
and
also
their
yacht
basin.
In
this,
what
would
be
this
top
right
hand?
Green
big
L,
shape
right
vacant
space,
but.
J
A
A
E
A
A
A
E
A
C
C
E
I
I
D
E
I
mean
there's,
there's
really
no
other
option,
but
if
he
can't
even
build
docks,
its
has
no
value
and
and
what
I
mean
I'm
confused
when
you
mentioned
the
issue
about
the
unincorporated
properties,
if,
if
the
county
and/or,
those
property
owners
are
unwilling
to
participate,
you
said
that
the
cost
cannot
be
passed
on
to
the
people
that
are
in
the
assessment
district.
That.
J
This
that's
correct
one
of
the
fundamental
tenants
of
special
assessment
laws
that
people
can
only
be
charged
for
the
amount
of
benefit
that
they
receive
when
you
have
a
defined
there's.
Numerous
special
assessment
programs
are
on
the
state
where
you
have
a
special
benefit,
but
you
have
some
portion
of
the
project
costs
that
are
providing
benefits
outside
of
that
area
or
providing
general
benefit.
For
example,
and
in
that
case,
you
do
need
to
split
up
the
project
costs
and
there
needs
to
be
another
funding
source
in
the
event
that
these
properties
don't
participate.
I.
E
Asked
the
question,
because
I
have
a
feeling:
we're
gonna
have
a
major
issue
with
that
part
of
the
project:
I,
don't
foresee
anybody
in
that
particular
area
of
properties
that
would
be
agreeable
to
this
and
I
and
I.
Don't
think
they
even
understand
that
they
may
be
assessed
for
this
project.
That's.
J
E
D
C
D
Alligator
Creek
I've
already
talked
with
the
person
who
heads
up
the
alligator
coop
waterway,
and
they
said
that
any
one
who
has
access
to
alligator
Creek
is
going
to
be
a
part
of
our
our
waterway,
so
that
could
be,
since
you
are
going
to
get
benefit
from
all
of
its
a
good
point.
If
you're
going
to
get
benefit
from
an
additional
number
of
properties
are
going
to
be
paying
into
the
alligator
Creek
waterway,
then
we
need
to
have
this
exchange,
so
it
could
be
a
way
to
get.
It
could
be
the.
D
C
I,
don't
see
that
as
a
deal
breaker,
if
we
don't,
you
know
we'll
just
have
to
see
how
those
negotiations
go.
If
that's
a
good
point,
though
yeah
yeah,
we
would
have,
they
would
have
to
come
to
an
agreement
on
that
side
of
it,
and
we
would
have
to
come
to
an
agreement
on
this
side
of
it
yeah,
and
it
really
is
only
a
boundary
issue.
Mm-Hmm.
D
You
know
I
have
a
question
who
came
up
with
20
85
feet
number
the.
A
A
B
We're
gonna
do
an
appraisal.
We
know
that
we
have
the
economic
report
at
some
point
in
time.
City
Council
needs
to
either
approve
or
not
approve
the
methodology.
Now
the
methodology
we
got
from
a
legal
firm
that
can
support
a
special
assessment,
so
I
mean,
if
you're
ready
today
to
approve
a
methodology.
We
can
that's
another
step
in
the
process,
we're
trying
to
move
every
step
of
the
way.
Slowly.
We
will
not
be
doing
an
assessment
on
next
year's
tax
bill.
B
B
C
F
I
think
we
should
go
further
forward.
Whatever
methodology
we
picked
nothing's
ever
going
to
be
perfect,
I
think
this
sounds
reasonable.
It
was
based
on
a
quantitative
fact
of
the
linear
feet
to
get
from
point
A
to
point
B.
The
economic
report
shows
that
all
those
involved
in
this
will
have
a
positive
impact
economic
impact
as
far
as
the
value
of
their
property
goes
by
a
significant
margin.
There's
a
multiple
ROI,
so
I
at
this
point,
I'm
inclined
to
say
that
we
go
forward
with
the
methodology,
so
I
could
so
move.
E
E
F
B
B
B
D
I
realized
that
the
previous
councils
have
said
we
had
enough
people
show
up
at
the
at
the
event
center
and
express
opinions,
but
it's
not
the
whole
area
and
I
think,
given
what
I
have
experienced
in
burnt
store,
aisles
I
think
it
would
be
it
just
would
be
good
for
us
to
do
that.
It
so
that
all
everyone
feels
that
they've
been
included,
because
that's
the
message
I
get
is
everyone
wants
to
be
included
in
those
decisions
at.