►
From YouTube: City of Punta Gorda City Council 9-7-16 Part 2
Description
Description
A
C
D
Actually
another
slider,
if
you'd
like
it's,
you
would
clarify
this.
But
what
we
do
is
we
model
all
of
the
land
area
and
we
identify
the
necessary
piping
to
move
that
waste
water
all
the
way
to
the
wastewater
treatment
plant.
And
so
what
we
see
here
is
the
lift
station
63
area
hard
to
see
that
which
is
right
here.
We
know
we
have
to
get
about
a
thousand
gallons,
a
minute
right
there
moving
towards
the
plant
and
we
have
a
and
to
do
that.
We've
in
2006,
we
identified
the
ideal
method
to
do
that.
D
Road
and
north
on
Piper
road
to
what
we
call
the
booster
pumping
facility
and
in
that
location
we
pumped
directly
to
the
wastewater
plant,
so
the
sizing
is
all
based
on
the
amount
of
land
area
that
each
one
of
these
the
lift
stations
contributes,
for
instance,
on
this.
We
call
this
a
lift
station
service
area
and
we
can
calculate
how
many
ER
use
you
residential
units
would
likely
be
developed
or
are
currently
developed
in
a
certain
lift
station
service
area.
Then
we
convert
that
to
a
gallon
per
minute
rate.
D
Then
we
look
at
piping
on
that
segment
by
segment
basis.
So,
as
we
get
closer
and
closer
to
plant
the
lines
sizing
increases,
so
this
would
be.
We
have
a
12
12
inch
line
here
coming
out
of
63,
it's
favorable
to
go
ahead
and
build
this
out
of
14,
because
we're
going
to
you
know
see
considerable
areas:
north
and
south
of
Jones
loop
road
develop
in
the
future.
We've
counted
that
and
assigned
those
values,
and
that
tells
us
you
know
how
much
capacity
we
need
in
at
14.
D
So
we're
expecting
to
see
fifteen
to
sixteen
hundred
gallon
per
minute.
Future
flow
rate
and
then
over
on
the
16,
we're
expecting
to
see
like
a
2000
gallon
per
minute
capacity
in
that
segment.
So
we
took
pretty
close.
Look
at
that
and
we've
been
tracking
now
now
12
year,
I
mean
a
pretty
long
time.
Ten
years
and
it's
it's
really
come
out
on
target
values
are
holding
up
for
us.
As
we
see,
projects
occur,
we're
seeing
really
good
correlation
with
what
we
anticipated
I.
E
B
Discussed
this
before
and
I
see
no
problem
with
the
more
the
only
problem.
I
see
with
this
I
think
it
should
be
done
consistent
with
the
pre
annexation
agreement.
I.
Don't
think
that
we
should
make
this
infrastructure
investment
without
a
way
of
recovering
the
investment
and
I
think
a
pre
annexation
agreement
is
a
way
to
do
that,
so
that,
when
the
properties
do
become
continuous,
they
have
greeted
with
addicts
into
the
city.
F
If
you
want
to
do
that,
go
ahead,
but
we
need
this
for
our
system,
where
we
again
that's
the
difference
here.
The
difference
is
that
for
our,
what
are
the
utility
provider
right
and
as
the
utility
provider,
we
need
to
be
able
to
provide
the
wastewater
capacity
based
on
possible
development,
that's
going
to
occur
and
for
our
systems
or
proper
maintenance
of
our
system.
We
feel
we
need
to
do
the
project
if
they
developer
and
we've.
F
E
G
Would,
as
it
starts
at
all,
there's
there
will
be
incentive
for
the
developers
to
n
xn
to
put
two
gorda
anyway,
as
things
stand
now,
because
their
utility
rates
will
be
lower,
you
know
just
their
part
of
the
county,
yes,
and
they
won't
happen
to
do.
We
need
this.
The
line
need
this
for
what
we
to
maintain
the
asset
that
we
have
now
at
the
function.
G
This
is,
we've
got
a
clogged
artery
Nate
inch
line
is
a
clogged
artery
with
that's,
and
this
is
basically
the
way
to
open
that
flow
up
and
I
just
want
to
be
clear
if
that
I
understand
this.
One
reason
why
you
sighs
lines
specifically
the
way
they
are
is
so
you
can
maintain
a
velocity
in
the
pipe
within
a
certain
window.
Is
that
correct?
A.
A
Also
things
that
we're
concerned
with
and
look
at
is
the
capacity
of
the
pumping
stations
to
increase
pressure
and
head
to
be
able
to
move
volumes
of
water.
Of
course,
as
the
pipe
gets
fuller,
their
their
efficiency
becomes
less
and
you're
absolutely
right.
In
addition,
if
we
add
didn't,
add
a
new
customer
to
this,
which
we
feel
very
certain,
will
we
already
have
people
ready
to
hook
on?
We
would
reconfigure
the
flows
in
this
area
to
make
all
three
of
the
force
means
more
efficient
than
they
are
today.
Is.
A
No
because
we
have
to
go
under
the
interstate
and
they
control
all
of
the
land
under
the
interstate
and
that's
the
big
unknown
in
the
time
and
Steve's
being
very
conservative.
Saying
three
years
is
we
don't
know
how
long
the
permitting
to
actually
drill
under
the
interstate
will
take
us
to
get
those
permits
from
the
state?
Well,.
E
A
C
B
Don't
disagree,
I
think
we
need
to
move
on
a
project
because
I
always
are
this
part
of
our
system,
but
I,
don't
think
that
we
should
stop
concentrating
on
a
pre
annexation
agreement
as
we
go
forward.
The
cost
of
the
utility
service
has
not
been
the
criteria
in
the
past.
Where
has
not
moved
people
to
NX
into
the
city
when,
when
a
development
is
built
like
Creekside
or
what
are
for
the
state's
that's
available,
just
takes
the
cost
of
the
utilities
and
pro
rates,
then,
of
course,
all
the
customers
in
the
area.