►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting April 14, 2020
7. Council Comments
A
So
we'll
move
on
to
item
seven
comments
from
Council
members.
This
one
will
take
a
first.
That
would
be
if
that's,
okay,
so
discussion,
potential,
November,
2020
ballot
measures
suggested
by
Marty,
Medina
cannabis,
fireworks,
rotational
mayor
charter,
City,
Fire,
District,
Hotel,
packs
term
limits.
So
my
I
want
to
turn
it
over
to
you
and
if
you
could
cover
your
items,
take
the
time
you
need
sure.
B
Thank
You,
mayor,
Medina
and
I
first
want
to
start
by
thanking
our
city
manager
for
creating
this
new
process
to
agendize
council
topics,
and
this
is
the
verr.
This
is
the
very
first
first
step
in
actually
having
a
public
discussion
on
on
whatever
item
it
is
that
a
council
member
wants
to
put
on
the
agenda
to
discuss
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
jump
in
on
April
30,
30th
2018,
the
council
held
a
revenue
option,
study
session
and
various
items
were
reviewed
and
and
implemented.
B
So
the
council,
we
did
increase
the
parking
citation
amount.
We
did
do
that.
We
placed
a
sales
tax
measure
on
the
2019
ballot
measure
G
and
it
passed.
We
heard
tonight
that
council
is
proceeding
with
regulating
Airbnb
zand
and
having
them
pay
the
transient
occupancy
tax,
and
we
also
learned
that
the
staff
is
continued
forward
with
the
2020
ballot
measure
to
increase
the
hotel
tax.
So.
B
Those
were
some
of
the
revenue
options
that
were
discussed
in
in
2018
and
and
we're
moving
forward
with.
There
were
some
other
ones
that
were
identified
in
2018
that
we
haven't
yet
talked
about,
and
after
tonight's
financial
updated,
it
is
extremely
clear
that
we
will
be
facing
even
more
budget
challenges
in
the
immediate
future.
So
the
first
one
is
cannabis.
I
understand
this
is
a
highly
controversial
subject.
B
B
We
could
make
an
informed
decision
on
whether
we
should
allow
our
voters
to
make
that
decision
to
have
legal
cannabis.
Businesses
operating
the
Sandburg
dress
number
one
I
know
that
council
councilmember
Mason
is
also
interested
in
the
subject.
So
I'll
pause
now,
if
that's
okay
with
you
and
so
we're
people
get
tired
of
me
talking
for
more
than
a
few
minutes.
So
if
that's
okay
with
you.
B
There's
not
too
many
open
fields
to
grow
it
and
there's
a
lot
of
problems
with
putting
these
grow
warehouses
with
the
odors
and
so
forth.
So
having
it
open,
more
open
to
talk
about
the
whole
industry
is
my
intent,
but
I'm.
We
can't
talk
about
it
too
much,
but
I
could
put
that
request
forward.
So
I.
Thank
you
for
that.
No.
A
B
I
I
could
do
it,
however,
makes
most
sense
it
seems
like
I
was
thinking
that
if,
if
I
brought
it
forward
that
at
some
point
where
we
would
make
a
decision
to
agendize
it,
so
it
would
be
important
that
each
council
member
either
says
yes
or
no.
We
should
agendize
it
and
then
it
can
go
to
the
next
one
so
that
it
kinda
has
performs
a
process.
One.
B
A
I'm,
hoping
to
over
what
I'm
hoping
is,
you
can
go
through
your
items
because
what
I
wanted
to
do
is
to
is
also
open
it
up
to
the
public,
and
so
they
don't
have
comments
on
that.
Okay!
Well,
they
can
make
their
comments
because,
like
you
have
hotel
tax,
but
now
that
may
not
be
since
it's
moving,
for
you
may
say:
okay
well
skip
that,
so
that
that's.
C
But
I-I
thought
we
were
gonna,
go
through
each
one
and
then
take
an
take
action
based
on
the
instructions
that
were
sent
as
to
whether
the
council
agrees
that
these
are
areas
that
we
would
like
the
staff
to
further
research
and
bring
back
with
an
agenda
topic
that
we
take
action
on
whether
to
place
on
the
ballot
or
approve
as
an
ordinance
and
so
in
an
effort
not
to
take
away
from
the
public's
ability
to
comment
by
putting
them
all
together.
You're
only
giving
somebody
an
opportunity
to
speak
for
three
minutes
on
every
single
item.
C
That's
agendized
together,
so
I
would
request
respectfully
that
we
take
each
item
individually
and
I'd,
be
happy
to
take
cannabis
and
make
my
comments
now.
So
we
don't
have
to
go
back
to
it
again
when,
when
I
guess,
my
discussion
item
comes
up,
but
I
do
think
that
each
item
should
have
its
own
public
comment.
Just
to
make
sure
the
public
has
an
opportunity
to
speak
on
the
item.
A
E
Well,
I
I
would
concur
that
it
makes
most
sense
if
there
are
duplicates
between
the
two
lists
that
we
address
each
each
of
those
items
together
and
then,
of
course,
if
there
are
comments
from
the
public
I
suppose
that
we
could
give
them
time
to
address
each
topic
as
we
cover
them.
So
I'm,
okay
with
doing
that
as
well.
A
Good
points
so
well,
okay,
why
don't
we
start
to
walk
down
happen,
then
we'll
see
how
we
go
from
here.
So
why
don't
we
take
the
Canopus
one
since
there's
duplications,
as
was
indicated?
Why
don't
we
touch
on
that
and
then
see
if
we
start
to
find
ourselves
that
we've
only
gotten
through
three
and
you
know
we
find
ourselves
not
making
the
progress
on
it
then
we'll
maybe
adjust,
but
for
right
now?
Why
don't
we
take
the
Canopus
one
so
Linda,
since
it's
on
those
lists?
Why
don't
we
do
that?
Thank.
C
You
so
I
echo
councilmember
Medina's
comments,
just
thinking
the
city
manager
and
the
council
for
getting
to
this
point
where
we
can.
We
have
a
process
to
initiate
policy.
We're
in
a
multi-million
dollar
deficit
and
development
may
be
the
only
way
to
assist
us
in
getting
out
of
this
hole,
but
what
if
development
slows
down
or
halts,
especially
given
the
presentation
that
we
just
had?
C
It's
at
this
point
in
history
with
this
pandemic
that
Warren,
since
cannabis,
has
become
legal
in
California,
with
an
approval
rate
of
I
believe
a
bit
over
60%
in
San
Bruno,
the
city
of
San
Bruno
really
should
research,
the
industry
and
its
impact
in
other
locations
to
determine
what
the
benefits
and
drawbacks
would
be
to
allowing
a
dispensary
in
San
Bruno.
Those
who
are
in
favor
of
cannabis
are
balanced
with
those
who
have
expressed
concerns
that
San
Bruno
will
be
overrun
by
cannabis,
dispensaries
or
cultivation.
C
This
is
really
an
opportunity
for
the
council
in
the
public
to
learn
more
about
these
possibilities.
For
example,
can
the
council
limit
the
number
of
dispensaries
to
one
or
maybe
two
downtown
through
zoning,
which
models
have
been
successful
throughout
California
now
that
it
has
been
a
couple
of
years
and
cities
have
implemented?
This
of
this
law
around
cannabis
is
cultivation,
something
that
San
Bruno
even
wants
to
consider.
What
are
the
financial
benefits
to
allowing
a
cannabis
dispensary?
C
These
are
all
questions
that
will
inform
our
decision,
not
only
if
we
agree
that
it
will
benefit
San
Bruno
to
at
least
be
fully
informed
of
of
this
option.
Neither
of
us
can
solely
direct
staff
to
spend
time
researching
this,
but
three
of
can
we
just
need
three
votes
to
get
data
to
then
make
a
fully
informed
decision.
I
hope
that
all
of
my
fellow
council
members
will
support
this
fact-finding
request
to
determine
the
benefits
of
cannabis
in
San,
Bruno
and
the
adverse
impacts.
C
A
D
I
I'm
very
interested
and
I
think
that
other
council
members
on
this
council
concur
when
we
talked
about
this
I
think
it
was
two
years
ago
at
least
where
we
were
sort
of
pinta
devolved
into
making
a
last-minute
decision
so
that
we
could
not
get
ourselves
in
any
type
of
situation,
and
we
didn't
have
really
the
time
to
invest,
to
investigate
and
to
understand
the
options.
I
am
very
interested
in
bringing
it
back
to
see
what
kind
of
opportunities
we
could
have
in
San
Bruno.
So
that's
it
and.
A
Then,
on
mine,
I
was
gonna
say
when
we
again
we
passed
it
in
October
a
ban
completely
because
we
really
didn't
have
many
options.
January
was
taking
effect
with
the
state
and
therefore,
if
we
didn't
do
something,
we
would
lose
all
local
control
to
do.
What's
we
wanted
for
our
community
and
have
no
options.
So
that's
why
the
council
unanimously
took
the
vote
at
that
time.
A
I
remember
at
that
time,
even
when
it
came
to
research
with
the
five
of
us
that
were
there,
then
all
agreed
that
that
was
something
that
people
were
open
minded
to
and
wanting
to
re-examine.
So
obviously,
there's
there's
a
new
person,
but
I
think
that
is
something
that
there
was
concurrence
on
with
the
council
back
then,
but
in
essence,
I
can
tell
you
from
where
I
were
I
said.
A
Personally,
you
know
if
we
were
going
to
have
this
question
asked
to
me
it
would
be
decided
by
the
people
of
this
community,
not
by
me
being
105
I.
Think
it's
important,
you
have
it
straight,
as
people
have
reminded
me.
Yes,
prop
64.
My
name
is
correct
when
it
passed
its
through
the
state
out
of
the
people
that
voted.
Let's
say:
60%
of
San
Bruno.
Some
people
have
said
well,
yes,
I'd
be
in
favor,
but
yes,
I
didn't
vote.
I
voted
yes,
but
it
wasn't
to
say
yes
vote
for
dispensaries
in
chamber.
A
No
I
voted
on
the
state
initiative
for
recreation,
so
we
have
to
be
quantified
with
with
that.
But
that's.
Why
also
to
me,
do
you
really
get
the
figures
right?
So
in
San,
Jose
scales
like
what
you
were
singling
that
they
only
allow
X
number
within
the
community
and
again
just
app.
It
would
be
so
are
you
just
gonna
say
up
or
down
yes
or
no
to
dispensaries
or
it's
going
to
be
more
quantified?
Is
it
going
to
be
quantified
as
to
a
number
like
there's,
a
number
of
gun
shop?
A
Do
it
because
now
we're
gonna
have
a
concern
of
where
we
do
so
I
think
it
needs
to
get
more
of
that
in
a
study
session
that
was
indicated
so
that
those
things
are
worked
out
and
it's
just
not
a
yes
or
no
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
there's
all
this
coming
back
to
a
Council
of
five,
whoever
they
are
in
saying
you
know
now,
let's
work
out
the
details,
so
that's
just
one
side
note
for
me
on
that
and
Michael
did
you
have
anything
before
I
open
to
the
public?
You.
E
Know
I'm
hearing
I'm
hearing
a
couple
of
different
things
from
from
both
you
Rico
and
from
Marty,
and
that
you're
saying
on
one
hand,
I
want
to
know
the
facts
and
the
other
hand
you're
saying
the
voters
should
decide.
So
if
the
voters
should
decide
what
facts
do
you
really
need
to
know
other
than
let's
leave
it
up
to
the
voters
to
decide?
Now,
if
you're
saying
I
need
more
facts
now,
you're
saying
I
want
to
decide.
I
want
to
decide
whether
we
should
put
it
on
the
ballot
so
which
is
it
I.
C
Think
correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong,
this
is
the
first
time
I
think
we're
all
doing
this,
that
my
understanding
and
speaking
with
I
think
it
was
the
manager
crow
again
was
that
today's
vote
is
just
to
then
agendize
it
to
vote
on
putting
the
ballot
and
that
in
the
meantime,
that
staff
would
be
providing
us
with
a
staff
report
with
information
requested.
That's
my
understanding
and.
E
That
is,
and
that
is
that's
the
way-
I
understand
it
as
well,
but
what
what
well?
If
we
decide
today,
that
we
want
to
sign
this
to
staff?
That
means
that
we
are
making
a
commitment
for
them
to
do
research
and
bring
it
back
to
us
to
make
a
decision
on
whether
or
not
we
want
to
put
it
on
the
ballot
based
on
what
staff
decides
now.
E
First
of
all,
we've
already
heard
that
we're
gonna
be
constrained
this
coming
year,
and
so,
if
we
want
to
get
something
on
November's
ballot,
that
means
that
we
have
to
cram
this
in
somehow
into
their
workload
and
I'm
wondering
where
we
don't
even
have
any
facts
to
justify
whether
this
is
gonna
be
a
good
thing,
a
bad
thing,
whether
it's
going
to
generate
revenue,
whether
anybody's
even
interested
in
coming
to
San
Bruno.
We
want
to
dedicate
staff
resources
now
to
investigating
that,
and
do
it
within
that
time
frame
of
between
now
and
November.
E
Is
is
it
really
that
urgent
do
we?
Do
we
absolutely
need
to
get
it
on
the
November
ballot?
Is
this
something
that
we
can
allow
staff
to
work
in
to
something
you
know
that
they
can
accommodate
more
comfortably,
given
everything
else
that
they're
doing
or
is
it
something
that
we
want
to
and
then
I
think
that
that
really
becomes
the
big
decision
that
we
have
to
make
tonight
is?
E
B
Well
said:
hey
guys,
this
is
a
great
discussion
right,
we're
finally
talking
about
it
and
the
next
step
and
and
is
having
a
study
session
right
and
to
get
more
information,
and
if
we
needed
to
get
a
subcommittee,
we
can
do
that
too.
But
if
the
mayor
allows
it
to
refine
that,
but
I'll
tell
you
that
I
was
surprised
somewhat,
that
this,
how
it
was
agendized
that
it
is
just
for
the
ballot,
if
that's
how
that's
the
language
to
put
a
ballot
measure
yeah.
E
B
Wanted
to
just
talk
about
it,
it's
gonna
lead
down
to.
If
we
have,
can
we
talk
about
it,
whether
or
not
we
pursue
a
ballot
measure
because,
like
like
one
of
the
other
things
that
I
have
on
my
list
to
your
charter
cities,
we
don't
have
enough
time
for
my
understanding
to
do
a
charter
city,
but
we
have
we
got.
We
have
to
we're
doing
things
different
in
San
Bruno
right
for
the
better
of
everybody,
and
we
need
to
have
discussions
about
these
things
and
not
be
so
reactive
to
things
right.
B
We
have
unprecedented
unprecedented
financial
crisis
and
we
have
to
look
at
other
ways
of
operating.
So
my
interest
is,
is
is
to
have
the
study
session
to
become
more
informed
and
then,
if
it
doesn't
happen
this
ballot
measure,
then
it
could
happen
the
following
year.
You
know,
but
we
need
to
start
talking
about
this
because.
B
B
I
can't
be
a
helicopter
parent
for
all
my
life,
so
us
talking
about
this
is
the
first
step
of
other
decisions
that
we
need
to
make
and
and
I'm
glad
we're
talking
about
it
this
far
and
if
we
need
to
refine
what
that
study
session
is,
then
we
could.
We
could
do
that,
but
we
have
to
at
least
start,
and
maybe
we
can
ask
staff
in
the
next
few
minutes
on
what
they
proposed
and
what
they
think
they
could
take
on,
because,
yes,
this
is
too
much
to
try
to
do
in
this
amount
of
time.
B
But
this
is
the
new
process
that
we
have
guys
and
we
didn't
have
this
way
of
agendize
inking.
We
were
interested
in
it.
It
just
never
was
formalized
so
again,
I
think
we're
making
huge
progress
tonight
on
a
zoom
meeting.
Talking
about
agendize
topics
for
our
council,
so
I
don't
know
if
we
need
where
we
need
to
go
from
here.
Mr.
mayor
well,.
A
I
appreciate
your
comments,
but
Mari
I
appreciate
you
quantifying
that,
because,
even
with
eight
different
things
between
the
two,
my
thought
was:
that's
why
I
was
maybe
wanting
to
make
it
in
the
group
because,
as
it
listed
on
the
agenda,
it's
this
November.
Well,
there's
no
in
my
world
in
the
reality,
there's
no
way
to
say
here:
staff,
here's,
a
double
they're
gonna
say
we're
not
in
the
middle
that
you're
the
policy
makers.
You're
gonna
tell
us
what
to
do
and
we're
gonna
have
to
try
to
find
a
way
to
get
it
done.
A
That's
not
the
most
efficient
but
there's
eight
different
items,
but
I
appreciate
what
you're
saying,
which
is
Noriko
I'm,
not
saying
all
these
go
on
the
ballot.
I'm
just
saying
have
a
discussion
or
have
a
study
session,
and
if
it
works,
it
works.
If
it's
21
or
22,
then
that's.
Okay,
too,
is
that
I
don't
want
to
put
words.
You
mom
know.
B
That
that's
accurate
if
there's
something
that
could
be
done,
you
know
the
the
the
advantage
that
we
have
now
compared
to
a
year
ago
or
two
years
ago,
is
that
we
have.
We
have
seen
what
other
cities
do.
We
don't
need
to
reinvent
the
wheel
entirely
right.
So
that's
where
I'm
at
I
just
want
to
be
able
to
have
that
discussion.
Awesome.
A
C
E
C
Okay,
great
so
so
with
that
said,
I
I
do
have
to
say
that
I
think
and
give
our
financial
situation
tinge
I
actually
do
believe
that
we
want
to
get
the
information.
We
have
the
discussion
and
we
want
to
make
it
turn
whether
to
place
this
on
the
ballot
this
year.
I,
don't
think
that
we
can
wait.
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
things
that
are
waiting.
We
got
development,
that's
waiting,
we're
looking
into
the
t,
ot
tax
I,
don't
know
how
long
that
has
been
that
has
been
on
the
burner.
C
We
have
measure
K
funds
that
have
been
kind
of
hit
and
miss
for
the
last
year,
even
though
they've
been
available
for
years,
we've
got
I
mean
we
have
some
pretty
serious
issues
and
I
think
that
if
you
look
at
the
city
of
San
Carlos,
if
you
look
at
the
city
of
Palm
Springs,
they
all
have
had
public
discussions
around.
This
they've
all
had
a
series
of
meetings
around
this,
the
including
the
zoning
and
where
the
zoning
would
go
for
dispensaries
or
cultivation
and
to
mr.
Medina's
point.
C
There
are
a
number
of
cities
that
have
already
adopted
this,
so
we
should
be
able
to
learn
from
them.
I.
Don't
think
that
we
should
wait.
I
mean
I,
wouldn't
say
this
for
every
item,
but
I
do
think.
Given
our
financial
situation,
this
is
not
an
item
that
I
think
we
should
just
have
a
discussion
on
and
then
move
on
to
another
election
cycle.
I
do
think
we
need
to
make
a
decision
whether
to
place
this
on
the
November
ballot
or
not
to
truly
help
our
city
out
and
let
the
let
the
voters
decide.
G
Javon
broken
city
manager,
I
I,
don't
want
to
express
an
opinion
on
any
of
these.
That
council
would
like
the
direct
staff
to
look
into
I,
just
wanted
to
provide
a
little
clarity
on
why
they're
on
this
agenda
in
this
fashion,
and
so
ordinarily,
ideas
like
this
would
go
on
the
City
Council's
priority-setting
process,
where
you
give
staff
direction
on
what
strategic
initiatives
you
would
like
us
to
look
into
and
put
into
the
work
program.
G
These
are
again
dies
because
council,
member
Medina
and
councilmember
Mason
had
specific
ideas
that
they
would
like
to
be
placed
on
the
November
2020
ballot
and
to
have
that
conversation
really
need
to
happen
sooner
because
our
priority
setting
process
has
been
delayed.
So
that's
why
we're
talking
about
these
visa?
Be
then
November
Mallett.
Now,
if
there's
anything
on
here,
that
council
wants
to
look
into
and
and
have
more
information,
you
don't
feel
that
you
have
to
direct
staff
to
do
that
now.
G
That
can
be
done
during
the
priority
setting
process
and
built
into
the
regular
work
plan.
These
are
here
because
the
two
council
members
wanted
to
talk
about
them,
and
so,
if
there
are
any
items
that
you
guys
think
that
should
occur
on
the
November
ballot,
it's
sort
of
tonight
give
staff
direction.
So
we
can
begin
working
on
that
and
then
come
back
to
you
with
the
information
and
all
the
various
policy
decisions
and
study
sessions
that
have
to
happen.
G
I
think
the
other
thing
that
I
want
to
say
is
there's
a
lot
on
the
work
plan,
we're
in
an
unprecedented
public
health
crisis.
We
have
a
budget
shortfall
that
we
that
we
have
to
solve.
Now
we
have
the
budget
shortfall
that
we
have
to
solve
for
next
fiscal
year
and
we're
in
a
new
normal,
and
so
just
think
about
that.
G
As
you
say,
what
items
that
you
really
want
us
to
look
into
for
this
November
20
2011,
because
that
it's
a
lot
of
work
and
we
can
work
to
put
some
things
off
the
plate
and
and
half
staff
work
on
them.
But
if
you
just
want
to
look
into
something,
but
not
have
it
go
this
this
fiscal
year,
I
think
there's
a
time
where
we
can
slot
that
in
and
do
that
analysis
that
isn't
sort
of
connected
to
all
the
other
things
that
we're
working
on
now
with
the
budget
in
the
public
health
crisis.
F
H
When
do
I
start
right
now,
okay,
so
I
just
want
to.
Thank
you
all
for
having
this
conversation
and
I
really
like
what
I'm
hearing
and
if
we're
talking
about
a
budget
shortfall.
Cannabis
is
one
way
that
you
can
help
mitigate
that
we're
talking
about
cannabis,
but
we
have
alcohol
in
our
city.
We
have
it
on
all
around
our
downtown.
You
can
go
and
buy
anything.
You
want.
H
But
a
few
years
ago
I
went
to
a
Half
Moon
Bay
City
Council
meeting,
and
they
decided
in
that
civic
City
Council
meeting
to
put
several
things
on
the
ballot.
They
put
dispensaries,
clothes,
delivery
and
I.
Think
that
may
be
it.
There
were
three
things
so
I,
really
like
what
Mike
Salazar
had
to
say
what
lyndie
had
to
say
and
really
what
you
all
had
to
say.
But
I
think
this
is
something
that
you'd
put
out
and
you
let
us
vote
on
it.
H
There's
a
lot
of
people
who
are
at
home
there,
LA
and
we've
got
people
are
sheltering
in
place.
They
may
have
issues
that
they're
dealing
with,
because
they're
not
able
to
get
out
and
cannabis
is
something
THC
is
something
that's
widely
subscribed
to
people
who
have
depression
and
other
medical
issues.
So
I
really
like
the
way
this
discussion
is
going,
but
I
really
think
you
need
to
move
quick
on
this.
H
I
Hi,
thank
you
all
for
having
this
conversation.
This
is
really
just
wonderful.
We've
been
talking
about
this
there's
too
many
years
and
I
just
wanna
just
remind
you
where
we
are
at
in
the
Bay
Area.
We
were
right
next
to
the
San
Francisco
Airport
and
I
bring
this
up
every
single
time.
If
somebody
wants
to
take
advantage
of
an
opportunity
of
getting
it
suspensory,
what
is
better
than
close
to
an
airport?
It's
your
very
first!
I
Stop
you
get
off
the
plane,
you
get
what
you
need
and
you
move
on,
and
maybe
you
just
hang
out
and
have
dinner
or
lunch
downtown.
But
then
torna
thing
is
it's
just
making
it
available
to
residents.
That's
the
most
important
thing
just
to
have
a
little
humanity
it
we
shouldn't
have
to
leave
our
cities.
Veterans
shouldn't
have
to
leave
our
city
handicapped
people
shouldn't,
have
to
leave
our
city
and
take
our
tax
money
elsewhere,
make
sure
we
can
order
online,
but
a
lot
of
people
don't
want
people
knocking
on
their
door.
I
A
lot
of
people
like
myself
want
to
go
to
the
dispensary,
see
the
product
and
have
a
consultation
with
the
people
working
there.
So
it's
just
overdue.
It's
nonsensical.
Cannabis
has
been
deemed
an
essential
product,
a
legal,
essential
product
and
in
San
Bruno
we're
doing
tonight.
Something
is
essential
in
other
areas,
so
yeah
put
it
on
the
ballot.
Please.
Thank
you.
Thank.
F
F
A
F
J
Rookie
I
mean
okay,
thank
you.
Do
I
start
now
or
yes,
yeah,
okay,
hi!
Thank
you,
City,
Council
and
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
members
willing
to
speak
on
this
topic
of
cannabis.
I
wanted
to
really
focus
on
what's
happening
kit
with
what's
happening
with
khova
dried
now,
I
know
on
dr.
Albert
Rizzo,
a
pulmonary,
a
pulmonary
doctor
and
chief
medical
officer
of
the
American
Lung
Association
explained
on
the
CNN
recently.
J
Why
am
occasionally
rowana
smoking
can
increase
a
person's
risk
of
suffering
severe
complications
from
co19
I
do
want
to
link
that
up,
because
a
lot
of
people
aren't
understanding,
because
a
lot
of
people
understand
that
cover
19
is
a
respiratory
disease
and
infection
and
viral
things
going
on,
but
also
that
if
you
do
start
smoking
or
have
like
a
cigarette
and
cannabis,
especially
with
THC,
you
do
increase
your
risk
of
catching
Cova.
19
also
I
want
to
talk
about
the
youth
component
when
it
comes
to
cannabis
products.
J
We
do
know
that
they
are
in
schools
nowadays
through
either
the
vape
pen
like
paraphernalia,
but
also
that,
if
it
is
more
likely
to
be
in
the
community,
say
a
store.
You're
gonna
have
a
higher
likelihood
of
people
using
fake
ID
cards
to
get
in
and
buy
THC
products.
I'm,
not
saying
that
adults
shouldn't
have
their
rights
to
buy
cannabis
products,
because
it
is
legal
in
the
state
of
California.
J
However,
I
think
something
for
the
council
members
to
think
about
is
prevention
measures
in
terms
of
how
you
can
protect
youth
from
actually
accessing
it
earlier
at
a
younger
age.
Because
do
we
know
the
brain
isn't
fully
developed
until,
on
average,
the
age
of
25
and
THC
has
been
proven
in
studies
that
can
affect
brain
development?
That
being
said
during
the
shelter-in-place
order,
that's
happening
right
now.
A
lot
of
people
are
dealing
with
secondhand
smoke.
J
This
includes
not
just
from
cigarette
smoke
but
also
marijuana
smoke,
and
it
can
actually
be
affecting
a
lot
of
people
in
multi-unit
housing,
especially
for
people
who
already
have
pre-cum
this
pre-existing
conditions
like
asthma
or
like
blood-borne
diseases
where
they
have
a
deficiency
in
their
blood.
That
actually
goes
for
the
oxygen
to
carry
oxygen
throughout
their
body
and
that's
what
I
wanted
to
talk
about
and
also
that
bringing
certain
cannabis
businesses
definitely
we've
seen
disproportionate
amount
of
cannabis
businesses
being
open
in
more
low-income
areas.
So
another
thing
for
y'all
to
think
about.
J
K
K
Try
and
just
comment
on
like
the
measures
in
general,
specifically
on
the
issue
of
cannabis
dispensaries,
it
seems
like
this
is
going
to
be
a
relatively
simple
measure
to
come
up
with
and
put
on
the
ballot,
and
since
it
sounds
like
we're
sort
of
budget
constrained
in
terms
of
how
much
time
and
time
is
money
that
that
staff
has
I,
think
that
this
would
be
one
of
the
measures
to
to
focus
on
for
this
year.
I
know
I,
don't
feel
like
speaking
about
whether
I
personally
am
in
favor
of
dispensaries
or
not
is
relevant.
K
So
we're
really
talking
about
is
creating
the
ballot
measure.
I.
Think
that's
a
good
idea!
There's
a
couple
of
other
items
on
there
that
seem
to
me
like
there
are
not
a
lot
more
complicated
I'm,
definitely
in
favor
of
going
forward
with
something
like
a
charter
City
at
some
point,
but
I
think
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
details
to
work
out
about
about
what
actually
to
put
on
the
ballot,
and
that
might
be
something
where
we
could
start
talking
about
it.
But
that's,
probably
gonna
need
to
be
put
off
until
another
time.
K
There's
a
number
of
other
measures
that
I
don't
really
know
the
details
about,
because
we
haven't
spoken
about
yet
them
yet
but
I.
Just
my
general
message
is,
you
know,
prioritize
putting
things
on
the
ballot
this
year
that
are
simple
and
straightforward
and
leave
more
complicated
things
to
later
things.
Thank.
A
F
F
B
Done
I
illumines
guess
a
little
repetitive
that
having
this
first
council
to
agendize
the
subject
with
the
intent
that,
if
it,
if
it's
doable,
that
that
we
should
put
it
on
the
ballot,
but
we
have
to
hear
from
staff.
You
know
like
it
like
councilmember
Salazar
said
you
know.
What's
the
capacity
and.
B
We
don't
need
to
put
all
seven.
You
know
that
was
kind
of
the
whole
idea
of
the
prioritization,
meaning
that
we
were
gonna
have
earlier,
that
kind
of
got
bounced
around
Dudek
ovid
that
we
weren't
able
to
talk
about
it.
So
this
is
probably
the
highest
priority
and
probably
get
get.
You
will
give
you
the
the
easiest,
perhaps
maybe
got
it,
because
other
cities
are
have
already
done
it
and
the
the
biggest
return
that
you
would
get
in
our
financial
crisis.
So
is
that
good
enough,
mr.
B
A
I
think
that
you
know
we're
all
last
people
to
is
that
that's
kind
of
what
I
want
to
go
through
all
these
things,
because
if
it
was
truly
for
the
ballot,
then
can
we
really
do
all
eight
or
nine?
Probably
not
right,
we'll
be
realistic.
So
then
the
count
with
the
prioritize
now
granted
to
they
were
meeting
I.
Believe
it's
been
confirmed
for
a
study
session
to
discuss
particle,
so
that
would
help
us
unless
you
know,
there's
interest
staff
is
aware
of
it.
A
We
can
bring
it
up
than
the
strategic
studying
unless
the
manager
doesn't
want
that,
because,
obviously
there's
a
cost
involved,
all
right,
there's
a
time
element
involved
and
I
think
those
need
to
be
attributed
to
and
then
the
prioritization
of
it.
That
was
never
spoken.
If
you
just
said
to
local
charter
city,
that
is
probably
a
very
complicated
map
that.
A
That's
not
what
I
wanted
to
go
through
all
these
in
there,
no
sorry
get
staff.
If,
if
we're
wanting
to
see
you
know
study
session
in
or
ballot
and
but
like
you
said,
we're
meeting,
Tuesday,
so
I
think
I
think
staffs
heard
us
about
canvas
I
think
they
they
know.
We
don't
want
a
study
session.
You
know
about
time.
More
factual
data,
I
think,
is
what
I'm
hearing
and
rolling
that
I've
heard
from
some
council
that
that
might
be
a
prioritization
of
putting
it
up
close
to
you
know
the
top.
C
I'm
saying
this
is
just
maybe
a
clarification
in
the
process,
but
and
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
this
doesn't
get
actually
any
of
the
items
tonight,
and
this
is
really
process.
Question
gets
shovel.
It
gets
kind
of
dug
into
the
priority
meeting,
which
has
hunted
like
hundreds
of
things
on
there
I
buy
under
standing
was.
C
A
But
on
these
items,
what's
going
to
be
but
they've
already
heard
about
a
study
session,
you've
already
heard
I
think
at
least
the
majority
of
the
council,
then
one
of
them
is
forward
for
a
study
session.
Some
have
a
priority
that
they
wanted
on
this
November,
but
we
still
need
to
have
to
bring
it
back.
Yes,
but
I
think
we
need
to
incorporates
what
we
have
here
with
what
they're
doing
Tuesday
as
well
right
we're
gonna
balance
it,
but
some
things
are
gonna
rise
to
the
top
and
need
to
be
top
priority.
C
So
the
so
the
council
right
now
is
saying
the
majority
want
this:
to
go
back
to
staff,
to
research
and
to
bring
back
to
us.
My
understanding
was
going
to
be
within
one
or
two
meetings
with
some
research
and
then
a
vote
as
to
whether
to
put
places
on
the
ballot
or
not.
That
was
that
was
my
recollection.
Let's.
A
G
And
then
we
will
launch
into
that
work
with
the
goal
of
bringing
you
back,
everything
you
need
put
on
the
ballot
and
for
some
of
the
items
we
may
have
additional
study
sessions
in
April
or
May
or
June,
as
we
tackle
the
various
policy
considerations
and
develop
the
ballot
language
and
so
we'll
have
various
check-ins.
But
tonight
us
and
say:
what
do
you
guys
interested
in
potentially
having
staff
prioritize
for
the
November
20
ballot
and
then
we'll
return
with
the
level
of
effort,
analysis
and
then
step
through
all
the
other
policy
considerations.
Thereafter,.
C
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
that,
but
I
want
to
throw
that
out
there
and
I
also
just
didn't
want
to
move
on
without
acknowledging
Evelyn's
comment.
You
know,
I
understand
everything
that
Evelyn
said
and
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
when
the
city
does
its
research,
that
some
of
the
comments
that
she
brought
up
our
address
as
well
specifically
I
would
definitely
be
interested
around
any
statistics
relating
to
many
dispensaries
around
children,
low-income
communities
and
what
the
impacts
have
been
on.
Those
I
think
that
those
are
all
very
valid
concerns.
B
Sorry
about
that
into
another
controversial
subject:
right
fireworks
sales
were
last
approved
by
65%
of
the
voters
in
2005.
I
enjoy
safe
and
sane
fireworks.
More
now
with
my
young
son
than
ever,
we
gather
with
neighboring
friends
and
responsibly
like
them.
I
am
a
member
of
couple
organizations
that
sell
fireworks.
I
understand
the
cost
benefit
that
our
organizations
have
and
in
raising
a
lot
of
money
in
a
short
amount
of
time.
Yet
I'm
also
aware
that
I've
heard
numerous
complaints
about
the
noise
and
fire
safety
involved
with
fireworks,
so.
B
I
think
15
years
is
a
pretty
decent
amount
of
time
to
check
in
back
with
our
residents
and
it.
This
is
not
a
this
isn't
as
high
as
a
priority,
but
it's
still
important
that
that,
if,
if
it
could
be
quickly
put
together
that
we
get
a
check
in
with
our
residents
to
find
out,
if
do
we
do,
we
still
want
to
be
in
the
fireworks
business?
That's
a
community
so
to
have
a
study
session
on
that
to
look
into
the
possibility
of
putting
on
the
ballot
depending
on
capacity
of
staff
and
interest.
B
A
D
A
E
Already,
we've
already
placed
the
same
item
on
a
ballot
before
we've
just
dust
off
the
language
from
the
last
winter
and
put
it
back
out
there.
That
could
be
an
easy
one.
So
so,
in
terms
of
asking
for
a
study
session,
that
would
just
be
curious.
You
know:
are
there
specific
data
points
that
that
would
help
you
and
in
formulating
whether
or
not
to
move
it
forward
or
if
it's,
if
it's
a
no-brainer,
can
we
just
say
yeah?
Let's
just
you
know
get
it
on
there
as
long
as
hey.
B
Right
so
so
I
believe
we
would
need
our
city
attorney
to
help
out
a
little
bit
there,
since
we
do
have
something
that
was
approved
by
the
voters
we
would
need
with.
We
would
need
their
approval
to
change
it
and
to
change
it
would
be
basically
outlining
it,
so
it
would
probably
be
easier
to
just
do
that,
but
I'll
leave
it
at
that
and
I
remove
the
city
attorney.
If
you
can,
please
correct
me
on
any
of
that.
No.
E
I
I
mean
I
think
there's
a
could
be
a
general
view
that
some
of
these
ballot
measures
are
easy
and
some
of
them
are
hard
and
it
actually
turns
out
that
even
if
other
cities
have
done
them-
and
we
have
forms
to
look
at,
it
turns
out
that
that
really
doesn't
change
the
level
of
effort
required
on
a
on
a
staff
basis,
and
for
that
is
because
we
can't
just
copy
an
ordinance
and
say
well
here,
take
this
one,
let's
put
it
on
the
ballot.
The
question
always
will
be
from
the
City
Council.
E
What
is
it?
What
does
that
really
mean?
That's
going
to
be
on
the
ballot,
and
you
know
for
cannabis.
You
have
zoning,
you
have
number
you
have
what's
the
tax
rate,
how
is
it
going
to
be
taxed
all
kinds
of
details
that
are
specific
to
you
know
to
the
city
of
San
Bruno
in
to
the
City
Council?
So
if
I
seem
simple
or
somebody
might
say,
oh
well,
this
is
an
easy
one,
but
actually
each
ballot
measure
does
have
a
certain
amount
of
complexity
for
fireworks
and
for
many
of
the
other
ones.
E
You
also
want
to
ask
yourself:
are
we
really
just
doing
an
advisory
measure,
or
are
we
asking
the
public
to
vote
on
something
and,
if
they're
asking
we're
asking
them
to
vote
on
something?
What
are
we
asking
them
to
vote
on
and
what
are
those
implications
so
for
fireworks?
For
example,
we
could
say:
shall
this
ordinance
be
repealed
or
you
could
say
I
mean
that's,
that's
the
alternative,
because
we
already
have
an
ordinance
allowing
it.
E
So
if
you
want
to
put
it
in
front
of
the
voters,
you're
not
gonna
ask
them,
should
we
keep
it
the
way
it
is.
It
already
is
the
way
it
is
you're
going
to
ask
them.
Do
you
want
to
repeal
it?
So
these
are
the
sorts
of
questions
that
you
know.
We
have
to
give
a
lot
of
thought
to
and
make
sure
that
ballot
measures
are
clear.
So
the
voters
know
what
they're,
what
they're
voting
on.
E
So
there
are
no
easy
answers.
Thank
you.
Girls,
work
on
whatever
you
ask
us
to,
but
these
these
are
really
quite
time-consuming
and
complicated
things.
You
know
you
know
to
work
on
and
it
will
displace
other
priorities
I'm
virtually
certain.
We
can't
come
back
to
you
by
the
next
meeting
with
a
report
on
on
cannabis.
The
staff
reports
are
due
tomorrow
on
that,
so
we're
unlikely
to
I
think
to
be
able
to
do
that,
and
that's
also
a
cross-departmental
effort.
So
we
have
myself.
E
E
C
And
me
myself
and
my
still
media
okay
I
would
just
be
curious
to
know,
because
I
think
that
fireworks
of
all
the
priorities
is
one
in
my
opinion
that
can
wait.
I'd
like
to
know
more
information
about
the
issue
at
hand.
If
it's
a
safety
issue
how
many
accidents
or
how
many
safety
issues
have
occurred
in
the
last
five
years,
I'd
like
to
know
enforcement,
so
how
many
arrests
were
made,
how
many
illegal
fireworks
have
been
confiscated
before
we
go
down
a
path
of
just
even
putting
it
on
the
ballot?
C
What
is
what
is
the
true
concern
there
and
I?
Think
that's
one,
and
just
in
my
opinion
that
can
wait
as
far
as
priorities
go
I'll
respect
the
council.
If
the
council
seems
to
want
to
move
forward
I
will
you
know,
respect
that
and
support
it,
but
I
do
think
that,
as
far
as
priorities
go
I
don't
have
enough
information
on
this
to
really
make
a
determination
on
one
way
or
the
other.
A
A
Anything
else
council
hands,
so
you
know
I'm
also
something
that
Laura
had
said
to
this
is
why
I
kind
of
wanted
to
hear
everything,
because
that
was
my
concern
as
we're
taking
each
one
and
I
know
when
we
went
past
mid
midnight.
Another
time
that
was
not
well
received,
so
I
want
to
be
mindful
time
and
we're
gonna
have
every
where
I'm
speakers
on
everything
so
I'm
gonna
ask
again
Marty.
Is
it
possible
just
to
go
through
the
list?
Yeah
sure,
okay,.
A
E
C
Sorry
guys
I
know
it's
getting
late,
but
I
do
just
want
to
say
I.
Think
in
the
spirit
of
allowing
people
to
have
comments.
I,
don't
know
about
I,
don't
think
feed
the
rest
of
them
are
gonna.
Be
that
long,
just
from
what
I'm
seeing
but
I
do
want
to
make
sure
we
get
people
and
up
for
the
comment.
Yes,.
B
Rotational
mayor,
San
Bruno
is
the
only
city
in
San,
Mateo
County
that
elects
mayor
all
of
the
other
19
cities
rotate
based
on
my
council
experience,
San
Bruno,
San
Bruno
would
benefit
with
each
council
in
remember
having
their
turn
as
mayor
I
believe
it
would
create
a
more
collaborative
environment
since
the
city
is
pursuing
district
elections.
It's
timely
to
ask
the
voters
if
they
think
having
the
elected
mayor
is
filled
their
preference
I'm.
In
no
rush
to
do
this,
so
we're
gonna
have
districts
figured
out
by
2022.
B
B
B
This
was
one
of
the
revenue
topics
discussed
in
the
April
2018
meeting
and
the
California
Constitution
provides
charter
cities
with
a
variety
of
tools
to
construct
local
policy
and
address
local
concerns,
and
probably,
most
importantly,
to
raise
revenue
of
the
482
cities
in
California
100.
20
of
them
are
charter
cities
at
some
point
in
the
future,
having
a
study
session
to
look
into
it
since
I
believe
it's
a
pretty
comprehensive,
timely
process
and
I'll
leave
it
at
that
fire
districts.
Another.
B
Sam
Brunelle
is
blessed
with
open
spaces,
but
these
spaces
have
liabilities
and
have
been
identified
identified
in
fire
mitigation
studies,
which
cost
a
lot
of
money
to
take
care
of
having
a
fire
mitigation
district
would
provide
a
guaranteed
revenue
source
to
assist
in
properly
maintaining
these
open
spaces.
These
funds
could
not
be
used
for
any
other
purpose.
B
That's
gonna
take
time
as
well
kind
of
like
a
stormwater
thing,
that's
kind
of
aligned
so
going
from
there
later
on
I'm.
Alright,
with
that
having
the
discussion
at
some
time.
Some
point
is
important.
Number
six
is
the
hotel
tax,
which
staff
has
already
went
ahead
and
they're
moving
forward
with
looking
at
increasing
the
t,
OT
I
I,
wasn't
informed.
I
wasn't
contacted
on
the
survey
that
was
conducted,
but
is
my
understanding
that
the
public
was
contacted
for
that
survey.
B
Using
yeah
terminal
term
limits.
Basically
this
is
a
an
acknowledgement
of
this
past
election
and
listening
to
council
member
Mason's
call
for
term
limit
term
limits.
I
appreciate
the
interest
and
I
and
I'm
in
favor
of
this
topic
and
gendai.
So
we
can
openly
discuss
it.
It's
a
it's,
not
a
high
priority
for
me.
So
I
think
with
the
time
that
we
have
for
2024
2020
that
this
would
be
something
that
I'm
willing
to
allow
to
not
take
a
staff
time.
A
G
Sure
I
think
councilmember
Medina
was
absolutely
right.
A
charter
city
is
a
very,
very
significant
endeavor
to
go
through
all
of
the
various
ideas
and
policy
options
before
the
City
Council.
When
this
was
talked
about
before
it
was
also
talked
about
as
a
potential
revenue
item,
because
you
have
the
ability,
as
a
charter
city,
to
charge
a
real
estate
transfer
tax
and
that's
a
tax
on
the
sale
of
real
estate,
not
just
homes
but
also
commercial
property,
all
property.
And
so
when
we
talk
about
what
would
have
the
most
significant
revenue
impact
of
the
ideas?
G
It's
actually
the
real
estate
transfer
tax
of
these,
the
VA
charter,
Dean
a
charter
City.
Now
it
is
possible
to
become
a
charter
city
and
have
that
be
the
main
policy
decision
that
the
City
Council
is
looking
at
visa,
be
a
charter
City.
There
are
some
other
decisions
that
have
to
be
made.
I
think
the
challenge
with
that
is
once
you
start
talking
talking
about
a
charter
city,
you
go
very,
very
broad,
and
so
if
the
council
could
limit
themselves
to
real
estate
transfer
tax,
that
that
could
be
potentially
one
thing.
A
F
F
Terry,
can
you
hear
us?
Yes,
I
can
hear
you
guys
good
evening.
You
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
you
guys
are
the
diehards
with
these
late-night
meetings.
My
hat
goes
off
to
you.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak.
Those
are
all
important
topics
and
I'm
really
grateful
and
glad
to
hear
that
many
of
the
topics
will
probably
go
to
the
voters
to
decide.
I
think
that's!
That's
a
great
stance
to
take
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
term
limits,
because
often
we
have
two-year
term
limits
or
four-year
term
I'm.
Sorry,
not
terminus.
F
Sorry
often
we
have
a
position,
a
government
position
that
which
is
a
two-year
limit,
a
two-year
term
or
a
four-year
term,
but
every
time
that
the
person
is
termed
every
time
the
term
ends
they're
either
going
to
be.
If
they
choose
to
run
again,
then
they
will
be,
they
could
be
reelected
or
they
could
not
be
re-elected.
So
my
in
my,
in
my
opinion,
if
you're
elected
to
a
four-year
term
every
four
years,
it's
kind
of
like
your
term,
it's
not
term
limit,
but
every
four
years
you're
letting
the
the
voters
decide.
F
Do
you
want
to
have
this
person
reelected,
or
do
you
not
want
to
have
them
reelect,
just
so
I
actually
feel
like.
We
should
just
let
the
voters
continue
to
to
to
elect
our
electives
every
whether
it's
a
four-year
term
for
City
Council
or
in
school
board,
or
whether,
whether
it's
a
two-year
term
for
the
mayor
or
whatever
it
is
I'm
just
kind
of
wondering
what
do
other
cities
do
in
San
Mateo
County?
Do
they
have
term
limits
for
their
City
Council's?
F
A
L
L
My
public
comments
just
very
briefly,
well,
first
off.
Thank
you
very
much
for
being
here
this
being
here
this
late.
You
guys,
as
Terry
said
you
guys
are
the
diehards
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
quick
comment
on
the
cannabis.
Dispensary
I
probably
could
have
waited
I'm
sorry,
Melissa
I
sent
her
a
lady
mail
city.
Clerk
I
am
also
in
favor
of
bringing
it
to
the
November
ballot.
I
think
I've
spoken
on
publicly
on
my
support
of
a
cannabis
dispensary
in
said
burner
before,
although
I
am
in
support
of
bringing
it
to
the
voters.
L
I
do
believe,
however
I.
If
the
city
is
interested
in
researching
this
as
well
and
their
study
session,
that
it
might
be
in
the
city's
interest
to
look
on
how
to
approve
this
or
how
to
regulate
it
and
administer
it
to
get
ahead
of
a
potential
ballot
measure
in
in
in
the
idea
that
it
provides
more
flexibility
to
the
city
to
the
council
to
readjust
whatever.
L
F
C
So
I'm
sorry
I
want
to
just
make
sure
that
our
process
is
really
clear.
Are
we
going
item
by
item
item
and
then
getting
consensus
from
the
council
cuz?
That
was
one
of
the
issues
that
had
been
previously
brought
up
and
I
just
want
the
record
and
the
minutes
to
be
very
clear
on
where
one
where
we
are
or
are
we
having
a
discussion
right
now
and
all
the
items
discussion.
A
C
So
for
a
charter,
City
Utley
support
the
Charter
City
I
would
ask
Council
for
information
as
to
whether
there's
any
benefit
and
whether
it's
possible
to
prioritize
that
for
this.
For
this
year,
I
I
do
understand
and
I
heard
a
new
manager
Grogan.
But
the
reason
I
think
this
also
may
be
an
immediate
need
is
because
of
the
districting
and
so
will
the
Charter
City
impact
the
choices
for
districting.
C
So
I'd
also
like
to
know
what
the
impact
of
becoming
a
charter
City
would
be
in
development
if
any.
But
if
there's
an
immediate
need,
then
we
really
should
be
trying
to
prioritize
that
this
year
and
and
I
would
leave
that
to
Council.
So
it's
just
some
questions
that
I
would
have
for
staff
which
it
would
be.
What
are
the
benefits
to
becoming
a
charter?
City
financial
development
and
legal
meaning
leap
when
I
say
legal
I
mean?
Are
there
additional
immunities
or
protections
for
being
a
charter
City?
C
C
That's
regarding
Charter
City
for
rotating
mayor
San
Bruno
is
the
only
city
in
San,
Mateo
County,
who
elects
their
mayor.
Are
there
any
benefits
to
remaining,
as
we
are,
or
to
transitioning
to
a
rotating
mayor
model?
Should
San
Bruno
move
towards
district
elections?
Are
there
any
benefits
to
retaining
a
mayor
that
is
elected
at-large
prior
to
the
districting
I,
actually
fully
supported
the
rotational
mayor
and
now
with
the
districting
I
am
curious
to
know
whether
there
are
benefits
to
having
an
elected
mayor.
It
would
be
helpful
to
know
from
other
cities
which
have
elected
mayors.
C
My
understanding,
it's
just
us,
but
I
would
like
that
confirmed,
which
have
switched
over
to
district
elections
and
maintain
their
their.
You
know
rotational
mayor
and
what
is
the
cost
to
the
city
of
San
Bruno
to
maintain
a
separate
ballot
for
the
mayor?
So
we
elect
the
mayor
every
two
years.
Do
we
pay
an
extra
charge
to
have
that
on
the
ballot
and
what
is
that
cost
to
the
city
of
San
Bruno
term
limits?
C
So
we
do
not
have
term
limits
in
San
Bruno,
but
the
President
of
the
United
States
has
term
limits.
The
state
senator
has
term
limits.
Many
city
councils
in
the
San
Mateo
County
have
term
limits.
Their
supervisors
have
term
limits.
Our
City
Council
is
elected
to
four-year
terms,
and
our
mayor
is
elected
to
two-year
terms,
I
think
the
key
that
a
lot
of
the
public
misses
is
the
word
limit.
We
have
terms,
but
we
don't
limit
how
many
times
that
you
can
be
in
your
term
the
amount
of
time
in
office
if
elected
is
indefinite.
C
As
long
as
you
continue
being
elected,
you
may
continue
to
serve.
It
is
most
efficient
to
allow
individuals
to
continue
running
when
one.
We
are
aware
that
incumbents
have
advantages
that
include
financial
contributions
endorsements
because
relationships
have
already
been
established
and
a
name.
They
have
name
recognition
that
is
very
hard
to
come
up
against
and
it's
hard
to
replace.
Statistically
all
of
these
make
it
difficult
to
attract
new
candidates
who
are
interested
in
government
and
who
want
to
serve
their
community.
C
Various
City
Council's
require
rotating
out
after
a
certain
number
of
years,
I
believe
Redwood
City
is
after
16
years.
You
can
rotate
out,
but
then
you
have
to
then
you
can
run
again,
but
you
do
have
to
rotate
out
various
City
Council's
require
the
rotating
out
of
the
cities
and
the
peninsula.
The
questions
I
would
have
is
which
have
term
limits.
What
are
those
term
limits?
Can
an
individual
who's
been
termed
out
run
again
and
what
are
the
drawbacks
and
benefits
to
this
model?
I.
Do
think
that
this
is
really
an
equity
issue.
C
F
D
A
C
Okay
sure
so
local
purchasing
I
just
want
to
state
that
I
apologize.
If
it
was
my
my
error
or
it
wasn't,
it
may
have
been
interpreted
wrong,
but
these
two
don't
need
to
be
on
the
ballot.
These
are
items
that
we
can
I.
That
I
would
actually
like
to
be
immediate,
but
I
don't
believe
they
need
to
be
on
the
ballot.
I
believe
they're
ordinances,
so
the
local
purchasing
policy
is
a
non
ballot
initiative.
San
Bruno
does
not
require
its
city
to
purchase
locally.
C
C
This
also
includes
any
of
our
emergency
workers
who
can
go
to
the
grocery
stores
and
Trader
Joe's
in
Millbrae
and
support
other
grocery
stores
that
are
not
providing
any
tax
revenue
for
the
city,
while
a
broader
local
purchasing
policy
may
be
asked
for
at
a
later
time,
I
wanted
to
start
with
the
request
for
information
on
the
benefits
or
drawbacks
to
any
local
purchasing
policy
for
food,
including
restaurants
and
groceries.
This
request
is
not
meant
to
lead
to
a
bagent
budget
initiative,
but
instead
a
policy
that
I
would
hope.
C
My
fellow
councilmembers
will
support,
especially
at
this
very
difficult
time
in
our
history,
when
businesses
are
suffering,
so
that's
the
local
purchasing
policy
and
then
for
the
San
Bernardino's
reform
this
past
election
cycle.
My
first
was
an
insider
view
of
money
and
politics.
After
reviewing
years
of
campaign
spending,
the
average
San
Bruno
election
cost
between
seven
and
ten
thousand
dollars
per
candidate,
some
years
even
less.
When
candidates
ran
unopposed
in
this
last
election
cycle,
the
candidates
combined
to
spend
approximately
$125,000
with
one
candidate
spending
over
$75,000.
C
What
are
the
benefits
and
what
are
the
drawbacks
to
an
initiative
such
as
campaign
finance
reform?
Cities
have
found
various
ways
to
address
the
concerns
of
money
in
politics.
In
Belmont,
for
example,
the
City
Council
passed
an
ordinance
limiting
financial
contributions
years
ago.
Their
ordinance
begins
as
follows.
C
Furthermore,
under
the
direction
of
Assemblyman
Kevin
Mullin,
the
state
of
California
has
new
rules
and
regulations
that
will
be
implemented
shortly.
However,
these
limitations
for
a
city,
the
size
of
San
Bruno,
are
still
high.
This
election
cycle,
we
have
three
of
our
five
seats
up
for
election,
provided
our
last
election
spending
and
campaigning
this
one
is
likely
to
be
charged
as
well.
C
I
want
to
note
that
this
is
not
about
the
candidates,
not
their
moral
characters,
not
whether
they
were
qualified
to
be
in
office.
This
is
really
about
whether
money
should
be
in
politics.
This
is
about
how
much
money
we
want
in
our
local
politics.
Is
this
what
we
want
for
our
elections,
the
residents
of
San
Bruno
overwhelmingly
said
no
and
I
hope.
We
all
heard
that
running
for
office
and
knocking
on
so
many
doors
truly
made
me
wonder
if
San
Bruno
is
still
invested
in
the
American
Dream
that
is
invested
in
democracy.
C
I
cannot
tell
you
how
many
homes
I
knocked
on.
That
would
say,
good
luck,
but
you
won't
win.
San
Bruno
always
elects
the
same
people
and
the
same
families
or
whoever
those
family
support
had
San
Bruno
become
an
oligarchy,
while
I'm
here
to
the
shock
of
many
I,
am
here
because
I
with
so
many
others
works
day
and
night,
including
myself,
to
actually
meet
our
neighbors
by
going
door-to-door
all
of
the
items
before
you
tonight.
C
Our
results
of
questions
asked
or
requested
by
individuals
whose
doors
I
knocked
on
while
I
may
not
ultimately
support
all
of
the
initiatives.
The
public
has
the
right
to
be
represented
by
individuals
who
will
listen
to
all
of
their
concerns
and
put
them
to
action
every
year,
not
just
during
a
sneers.
These
items
here
tonight
are
all
of
your
constituent
requests.
Moving
towards
district
elections
was
supported
by
the
three
council
members
present
today.
All
four
of
you
supported
the
intent
to
move
to
district
elections
in
2022.
C
District
elections
are
intended
to
ensure
representation
of
all
groups,
a
better
chance
of
being
represented
on
the
City
Council.
That
vote
would
be
counterintuitive
if
this
item
is
not
supported
tonight,
by
limiting
the
amount
of
money
one
can
spend
on
a
campaign,
we
are
intentionally
making
all
candidates
meet
their
neighbors
and
constituents
instead
of
spending
time
raising
money
in
a
city
that
so
desperately
needs
it
and
replacing
the
human
contact
with
mailers
and
campaign.
C
D
D
Get
where
you're
coming
from
well,
like
we've,
got
to
put
a
list
of
things
out
there
next
week
figure
out
what
we
want
to
prioritize
and
then
talk
further
on
it,
but
we
could
be
here
till
two
o'clock
in
the
morning
if
each
of
us
want
to
come
forward
with
our
passion
and
our
issues
so
I
understand
where
you're
coming
from
when
I
hear
you
but
I,
think
this
agenda
item
tonight.
Our
council
comments
is
simply
of
these
eight
items.
D
What
does
council
agree
to
move
forward
to
the
ballot
this
year
and
ask
staff
to
please
start
working
on
it?
I
think
it's
the
only
thing
we
should
be
talking
about
right
now,
I
think
that's
the
most
important
thing,
and,
and
frankly,
there's
so
much
on
here.
We've
got
to
really
decide
what
we
want
staff
to
work
on
with
limited
staff,
with
limited
resources
and
with
limited
funding.
So
we
got
to
figure
out
it
together
of
these
eight
items,
I
think
that's
most
important
and.
A
F
F
H
I
put
my
hand
up.
It
was
for
some
one
of
the
other
things,
because
you
guys
were
looting.
What
are
the
topics
but,
first
of
all,
I
think
term
limits
is
a
good
discussion
to
have
local
purchasing
just
makes
sense.
I
mean
why
shouldn't
we
support
in
fact
I'm
stunned,
that
we're
buying
products
from
other
cities
when
we
should
be
keeping
our
tax
dollars
in
San
Bruno,
because
there
are
more
than
enough
businesses
here
to
support
the
needs.
H
I'd
also
like
to
say
that
I
was
a
little
taken
back
by
the
conversation
that
just
happened.
Yes,
it's
late,
it's
11:15,
I'm,
still
up
and
I'm
sure
that
others
are
watching
this
as
well
and
I.
Think
this
conversation
on
campaign
finance
is
a
very
important
one,
because
I
do
think
that
we
should
level
the
playing
field,
and
so
Linda
I
want
to
thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward
in
terms
of
a
comment
or
turn
to
the
conversation
and
I
questioned
whether
or
not
well.
H
You
know
what
the
motive
is
of
pushing
a
further
down
the
road
but
I
I
I'm
in
favor
of
term
limits,
or
at
least
the
discussion
thereof,
because
I
want
to
know
what
the
benefits
are
and
what
the
and
and
and
what
they
aren't.
I
believe
that
we
should
be
purchasing
from
our
own
vendors,
those
who
are
in
San
Bruno.
We
shouldn't
be
giving
our
tax
dollars.
I
can't
believe
that
the
city
would
be
giving
tax
dollars
to
other
cities
for
goods
that
they
could
buy
here
and
I
do
think
this
campaign.
H
Finance
thing
is
something
that's
extremely
important
at,
but
both
are
at
the
national
level
at
the
state
level,
at
all
levels
and
in
politics,
so
Linda.
Thank
you
very
much
for
bringing
it
forward
and
I'd
like
to
see
a
conversation
go
forward
so
that
we
can,
you
know,
maybe
for
a
level
playing
field
for
anyone
who
wants
to
run
for
office
in
the
future
and
then
Sandra's
up
to
say
so.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
reset
the
clock
or
if
she'll
just
use
what
kind
we
have
laughter
plus
some.
A
I
It's
late,
but
not
lady
enough,
for
such
important
topics.
I
would
go
to
3
in
the
morning.
These
are
the
issues
that
were
brought
up
that
Linda's
talking
about
by
thousands
of
residents.
We
all
heard
that
I'm
Linda
walked
out
there
Marty.
We
all
did
I
think
she
should
be
applauded
for
taking
the
time
to
present
this
I.
Don't
think
she
should
be
scolded
and
demean
for
it.
I
just
mean.
Why
would
you
at
any
time
not
say
yeah?
We
should
know
about
finances.
I
When
people
are
running
for
office,
we
should
know
possible
motives
for
running
for
office
and
I.
Just
I.
Just
don't
understand
for
why
you
wouldn't
want
that.
Laura
I'm,
just
I,
just
don't
understand
that
if
you
could
just
give
me
your
reasoning
behind
that
why
this
I
just
don't
understand
I'm
done.
Okay,.
K
Hi
yeah,
this
is
actually
Plymouth
again.
Do
you
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
hi,
so
like
we're
relatively
quickly
just
on
on
the
issue
of
term
limits,
specifically
III
really
appreciate
Linda's
passion
and
all
of
the
comments
about
you
know
the
effort
that
it
took
for
her
to
you
know,
unseat
a
long
term,
a
long
serving
councilmember
I
think
it
should
take
that
level
of
that
for
a
chance
eat.
K
Somebody
I
think
that
existing
people,
like
experience
and
long-term
experience,
is
valuable,
and
you
know
existing
council
members
who
are
doing
a
good
job
should
be
given
the
benefit
of
the
doubt
that
they,
you
know,
are
going
to
continue
to
do
a
good
job
and
simply
rotating
in
new
people,
not
because
those
people
have
done
anything
wrong
and
are
not
expressing.
The
will
of
the
voters
is
really.
K
It
is
not
really
good
for
democracy,
and
you
end
up
with
this
kind
of
like
rotating
door
effect.
Where
you
know,
people
don't
have
a
large
amount
of
experience
and
I
hope
that
Linda
continues
to
do
a
great
job
job,
and
if
she
does
that
the
voters
will
also
continue
to
elect
her.
For
for
many
years,
so
thank
you.
Thank.
F
F
A
D
Just
to
clarify
and
I
appreciate
the
public
comments,
I,
don't
think
that
any
of
Linda's
priorities
are
not
important.
That's
not
my
point
and
I
think
that
they
aren't
important
I,
just
think
that
we
as
a
council
or
given
an
opportunity
at
a
strategic
setting
to
bring
our
issues
forward
and
then,
as
a
council
at
that
point,
to
discuss,
for
example,
development
in
San
Bruno.
We
need
to
educate
the
community
about
development.
We
just
can't
have
a
Mills
Park
development
come
forward
where
somebody's
got
to
hear
about
this
development
attending
a
party
in
Pacifica.
D
So
there's
a
list
of
things
that
I
have
that
I've
been
holding
off,
that
I've
been
wanting
to
come
forward
to
I
brought
him
to
my
meeting
last
year,
but
we
can
only
tackle
so
many.
So
I
just
think
that
Linda,
your
items
need
to
be
added
to
our
list.
We
as
a
council
come
forward.
We
together
figure
out
a
plan
to
move
forward,
but
tonight
was
only
about
items.
We
want
to
be
brought
forward
to
the
ballot
for
2020
and
I.
Think
anything
else
should
not
have
been
brought
forward
tonight
to
have
that
discussion.
D
So
maybe
it's
just
a
matter
of
communication,
it
was
missed
because
that's
what
was
my
understanding?
My
understanding
was
simply
that
this
agenda
item
is
only
to
discuss
those
things
you
want
to
put
on
the
2020
ballot.
Local
purchasing
I
mean
it
I
mean
I.
Do
I
think
you
can
have
a
10-minute
conversation
with
the
city
manager
about
the
importance
of
that
and
I
think
that
could
be
changed
if
there
is
in
fact
things
that
are
happening
in
the
city
where
they're
purchasing
things
they
could
be
purchased
in
San
Bruno.
D
Well,
there
are
a
lot
of
details
that
go
behind.
Why
somebody
purchases
something
in
one
city
versus
another
city,
those
again
not
to
say
that
those
are
not
important
issues.
It
just
has
to
be
prioritized
amongst
all
the
other
things
that
are
already
out
there
and
that
we
all
have
on
our
list
as
well.
E
Nothing
else
really
to
add
other
than
you
know.
My
priorities
are
and
will
continue
to
be,
the
city's
fiscal
stability
and
those
are
the
items
that
I
will
prioritize,
bringing
forward
and
anything
else,
political.
You
know
legendas
whatever
I'm,
not
really
interested
in
promoting
any
of
that.
At
this
point,
I
really
think
we
need
to
focus
on
our
finances.
So
that's
that's.
It.
F
C
C
I
think
the
lack
of
interpretation
was
that
these
were
all
ballot
items
and,
like
I
said
I,
don't
know,
I'll
have
to
look
at
my
email,
I'm,
looking
at
the
email
that
was
sent
from
staff
directing
us,
so
I,
don't
know
where
the
confusion
occurred,
but
I
do
believe
that
as
a
policymaking
board,
we
should
be
initiating
policies
and
I.
Think
these
two
are
very
important
policies
campaign
finance
reform
in
the
immediate
future
that
will
impact
our
campaign
in
November
of
this
year
and
as
far
as
the
local
purchasing.
C
We
all
know
that
there's
money
that's
being
expended
in
outside
facilities
outside
of
San
Bruno
on
a
regular
basis.
So,
while
a
conversation
with
the
city
manager
has
been
had
I
think
as
a
policymaking
board,
it's
our
responsibility
to
look
out
for
the
best
interest
of
San
Bruno,
which
may
include
initiating
and
approving
a
policy.
C
So
I
know
it's
late,
but
I
don't
believe
that
the
instruction
was
vague,
I
believe
that
what
I
prepared
and
I
prepared
what
I
did
out
of
respect
for
all
of
you
and
out
of
respect
for
the
public,
to
be
clear
that
this
is
not
just
some
whim.
This
is
not.
These
are
really
important.
Matters
that
have
been
brought
up
over
and
over
by
the
public
and
I
think
that
it's
respectful
to
prepare
before
bringing
an
item
up
to
the
council,
so
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
forth.
B
B
It
is
a
little
late
and
that
and
that's-
and
that's
fine
too
so
I
I
haven't
commented
on
the
local
purchases
and
and
I
do
see
lowest
point
that
at
some
point
at
the
at
the
priority-setting
meetings.
That's
where
that
would
fit
best
and
I
do
still
want
to
say.
I
I
am
in
favor
of
that
I
think
it's
kind
of
like
a
common
sense
that
we
would
want
our
expenditures
to
remain
in
San
Bruno
as
much
as
possible.
B
B
A
So
well,
I'm,
gonna,
say
something
since
I've
been
patient
too
I
think
we
we've
gone
over
the
cannabis
I
believe
you
know
on
some
of
the
items,
I
think
the
hotel
tax
we've
already
talked
about.
You
know
my
first
inclination
on
term
limits
is
that
you
have
three
people
that
sit
on
this
body
today
that
defeated
an
incumbent.
A
So
it
does
happen.
This
is
probably
in
as
far
as
people
the
length
of
time
serving
that
has
been
the
youngest
shall
we
say,
I'm
I,
think
I'm,
the
oldest
technically,
but
I
mean
youngest
as
far
as
years
of
service
collectively
then
has
been
for
for
a
few
decades.
So
I
don't
know
that
that's
my
top
thing,
the
local
purchasing
I,
think
that
that
is
something
that
can
be
done
at
that
level
of
a
policy.
A
Of
course,
I
think
we
have
to
balance
it
in
the
sense
of
do
we
and
that's
a
council
and
staff
decision.
If
we
can
get
it
from
here
and
spend
30
percent
more
than
what
we
can
get
it
for
in
South
City.
How
do
we
balance
that
I
know?
The
one
item
that
was
kind
of
raised
was
food
purchasing
for
the
senior
program
and
there
is
some
purchasing
that
is
done
for
the
meal
program
that
has
to
meet
County
nutritional
of
criterias
and
stuff.
Like
that.
A
Our
city
I
think
everybody
has.
We
just
need
more
data,
I
think
Linda.
You
would
make
some
good
points
about
trying
to
balance.
Where
do
we
gain?
What
do
we
gain
and
is
that?
Is
it
worth
that
time
going
through
something
just
out
of
point
of
information
on
the
rotational
mer
happen?
They
went
to
districts
and
they
will
be
having
a
directly
elected
mayor,
so
we
will
not
be
the
only
ones
if
it
continues
and
I
think
you
know,
I
can
go
on,
but
I
know
I.
Think
on
the
campaign.
A
Finance
I
think
that
there's
I've
taught
my
head
for
cities
in
the
county
that
have
some
type
of
limitations
for
individual
contribution
and
or
organizational
contribution,
usually
I
know
San
Mateo
off
top.
My
head
is
500
individual
$1000
in
organization,
so
you
know
is
that
something
to
discuss
potentially
but
I.
Think
a
stiff,
Dziedzic
study
session
is
is
best
so
I'll
stop
at
that.
To
keep
my
comments
short
anything
else
from
counsel
me,
Marty,
I,
I
think
what
what
was
being
asked
for
again
is
you
know.
A
Cannabis
is
something
that
we
were
seen
as
a
potential
item
that
we
want
staff
to
go
back.
We
want
staff
to
see
if
this
is
something
that
is
viable
for
November
ballot.
If
that's
the
decision
of
the
council,
I
think
and
correct
me,
the
local
purchasing
in
campaign
finance
could
be
something
that
maybe
is
discussed
when
they
can
correct
me
and
the
Tuesday
strategic
meeting,
and
then
that
leaves
like
the
fireworks
and
I
know.
Marty
you
had
said
hey.
A
Some
of
these
are
you
know,
hey,
not
not
an
immediate
need
of
a
prioritization
like
right
now
for
this
November,
you
know
so
I'll.
Take
it
from
Council
I
mean
that's
kind
of
the
summaries
I
had
heard
the
Charter
City
was
not
like
at
this
November
Fire
District
was
not
this
November
rotational
Mayor
was
not
distal
but
I'm.
A
Just
going
by
my
my
checks
here,
cannabis
was
something
potentially
for
the
2020
campaign,
finance
local
purchasing
for
Tuesday
strategic
meeting
other
things,
and
then
maybe
we
can
just
say:
do
you
want
to
just
let
every
council
member
go
and
say
what
item
items
do
you
think
are
a
prioritization
for
this
November
that
you
want
to
see
brought
forward
that
have
been.
You
know
this
is
this
is
where
we're
at.
If
that
makes
sense
with
that
said,
I'm
going
to
open
it
back
up
to
counsel,
so
we
can
make
that
determination.
A
A
B
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
something
that
if
the
Charter
City
was
specifically
limited
to
the
real
estate
transfer,
that
seems
like
it
could
be
a
lot
more
doable
in
the
time.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
heard
it
correctly,
because
if
not
then
then
it's
a
really
wide
subject.
That
correct
yep
is
that
city
manager
Grogan
said
that
or
was
that
that.
G
I
think
the
question
is:
if
we
are
only
looking
at
the
transfer
tax,
that's
one
thing,
I
think
just
by
the
questions
that
we
heard
from
councilmember
Mason
for
her
items
that
she
would
like
information
on
on
a
charter.
It's
a
very,
very
broad
envelope
and
it's
a
long
conversation
and
cities
dedicate
many
many
months
to
that
conversation
of
a
charter
city.
G
That's
a
decision
for
council
to
make
on
what's
appropriate
for
for
staff
to
look
into
or
November
2020
and
will
come
to
you
with
the
level
of
effort,
analysis
and
then
a
lot
of
work
will
begin
and
we're
in
the
midst
of
dealing
with
the
budgetary
shortfall
and
the
public
health
crisis,
but
certainly
anything
that
counsel
would
like
us
to
direct
to
look
into.
We
will
do
a
level
of
effort
analysis
on
put
aside
other
priorities
and
work
on
that.
G
B
G
Know
honestly,
every
topic
that
has
been
talked
about
takes
time
for
us
to
formally
come
back
to
you
and
tell
you
whether
we're
not
right,
Frank
and
so
I
know
that
a
charter
city
will,
if
the
City
Council
wanted
to
implement
a
real
estate
transfer
tax
would
raise
revenue,
but
just
judging
by
the
conversation
that
you
guys
had
tonight
on
just
the
concept
of
a
charter,
all
of
the
various
questions
and
policy
considerations
are
gonna.
Take
a
lot
of
time.
C
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
for
the
local
purchasing
and
for
the
finance
reform
that
we're
also
gonna
take
an
action
on
that
and
whether
we
want
staff
to
come
back
to
us
with
more
information
and
maybe
city
attorneys.
Efron--Oh
can
step
in
because
I'm
looking
at
the
email
that
was
sent
with
our
instructions
and
I
do
believe.
I
followed
the
instructions
to
have
a
vote
tonight
as
to
whether
to
have
staff
look
into
this
item.
These
items
more.
E
So
I
don't
know
about
the
email.
I'm
not
gonna,
take
a
position
on
that.
I
think
it's
up
to
the
council,
how
they
want
to
conduct
their
policymaking
business
and
whether
they
want
to
prioritize
those
things
tonight
or
wait
until
next.
Tuesday
for
to
you
know
to
discuss
the
level
of
effort
on
the
two
ordinances
that
you
suggested.
Okay,.
A
Okay,
all
right,
so
what
we'll
do
is
again
what
I'm
going
to
say
on
the
last
two
that
you
Linda
you
just
mentioned:
we're
going
to
ask
because
you're
not
talking
about
ballot,
we're
talking
about
its
I
would
say:
council,
you
would
answer
in
yes
to
go
forward
to
have
something
brought
back
now
or
two.
You
would
answer
Tuesday
and
that
would
be
then
bringing
it
up
into
Tuesday
to
teach
accession
that
fair,
okay,.
F
A
B
C
A
A
F
F
A
A
F
A
C
A
A
A
Thanks
Laura
Tuesday,
Marty,
Tuesday,
Michael,
Tuesday,
I'm,
gonna,
say
Tuesday.
Okay,
I
appreciate
everybody
like
it
has
been
indicated.
This
is
the
first
time
having
this
discussion
and
having
our
community
a
part
of
it.
Like,
hopefully,
city
clerk
has
got
enough
data
and
information
and
I'm
gonna
share
too
I.
Think
we
came
well
in
the
sense
of
realizing
staff
has
a
lot
the
prioritization
and,
as
Michael
said
to
bottom
line.
We
got
to
make
sure
this.
A
The
budget
balances
in
our
staff
is
reflected
and
driven
and
focused
on
that
main
and
Denver
for
all
of
us.
We
can't
we
don't
borrow
here.
We've
got
the
balance,
so
we're
not
the
federal
government
with
that
I
want
to
move
around
to
any
additional
off
this
topic,
please
to
council
comment
from
any
of
our
council
members.
F
B
D
Laura
just
Thank
You
Melissa
for
coordinating
I
know
this
is
complicated
and
challenging,
and
I
I
really
like
that.
We're
getting
public
comments
that
are
getting
posted
on
our
website
I
think.
That's
awesome
and
I'd
like
to
see
that
moving
forward,
so
that,
if
the
comments
are
coming
in
on
an
agenda
items
or
public
comments
that
they
want
to
have
they
four
items
on
the
agenda
that
you're
posting
those
under
one
document
on
the
website.
I
think
it's
awesome,
I
love
it
so
continue
it.
I
E
Agree
with
Laura
definitely
on
that
definitely
appreciate
everything.
Staff
has
done
to
get
us
up
and
running
on
this
and
I
think
it's
great
I
also
wanted
to
thank
both
Marty
and
Linda
for
bringing
this
up.
It's
been
I.
Think
we've
been
discussing
this
for
a
couple
of
years
now
and
how
to
bring
things
forward.
So,
even
though
I
don't
agree
with
everything
you
guys
brought
forward,
I
think
having
the
conversation,
it's
definitely
important.
E
C
My
a
my
no
not
me
no
I
just
wanted
to
thank
everyone
for
the
discussion
and
tonight
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
were
able
to
initiate
policy.
I
just
actually
had
a
quick
comment,
maybe
maybe
a
question
but
I
think
the
city's
been
doing
an
excellent
job
on
the
social
media
posts.
The
PSA
announcement
and
I
was
wondering
if
it
would
be
possible
to
do
some
posts
around
some
of
the
essential
services.
C
I
know
that
some
of
the
questions
I'm
getting
or
like
this
one
I
brought
up
before
I,
don't
think
I'm
this
meeting
but
like
as
far
as
what
you
know
is
gardening.
Our
gardening
gardeners
essential
workers.
Construction
are
the
essential
workers,
but
maybe
we
could
do
little
posts
that
come
directly
from
the
order.
C
Saying
like
this
is
an
essential
worker
and
we
I
mean
you
know:
governor
Newsom
came
out
today
and
apparently
now
they're
working
on
a
plan
to
open
up
business
again,
but
in
the
meantime,
people
are
still
wondering
if
they
can
work,
especially
if
they
have
their
own
business.
So
just
just
a
suggestion.
A
You
and
again
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
the
the
good
dialogue
and
again
I
think
we
were
reasonable
and
staying
out
of
all
of
these,
we
have
one
item
that
we're
asking
I'm
correct
one
specific
item:
asking
staff
to
bring
back
whether
I'll
use
of
your
words
Marty.
Like
a
study
session
fact-finding,
you
know,
but
doing
it
more
expedited
to
make
a
determination
for
the
2020,
so
at
least
we've
given
direction,
we
haven't
overwhelmed
and
I
think
that's
reasonable
on
all
of
us.
Two
items
obviously
will
come
up
in
the
Tuesday
session.
A
So
what
I'm?
You
know
what
I
want
to
end
with
is
that,
as
there
are
tough
and
challenging
times,
there
was
something
last
night
that
I
was
asked
to
go
by
and
or
at
least
told
I
could
I
was
given
permission
to
leave
the
house
and
what
it
was
was
on
the
100
block
of
poplar
and
what
they
decided
to
do
was
to
basically
earlier
and
throughout
that
was
to
go
out
and
write.
A
A
So
with
that,
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
their
time
and
staff
for
your
presentation
and
your
diligence
and
we're
going
to
adjourn
this
meeting
to
the
next
regular
City
Council
meeting,
which
will
be
held
on
March
28th.
And
yes,
what
would
be
right
back
here
on
zoom'
everybody
enjoy
be
safe,
be
healthy,
be
strong,
good
night.