►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting December 8, 2020
5. Consent Calendar
A
Let's
move
on
to
item
number
five
consent
calendar
all
items
are
considered
routine
or
implemented
by
earlier
council
action
and
or
may
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
There
will
be
no
separate
discussion
unless
requested.
Are
there
any
items
that
my
colleagues
want
to
pull
for
a
separate
vote
not
seen
any?
How
about
any
that
we
want
to
have
some
additional
questions
or
commentary
on
councilmember
mason.
B
A
A
Thank
you.
Anyone
else
for
council,
okay,
let's
start
taking
the
thank
you.
Let's
start
taking
those
on
one
by
one.
First,
we're
going
to
go
to
item
c
approve
the
regular
meeting
minutes
for
the
meeting
of
november,
the
24th
2020.
councilman
mason.
B
Yeah,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
minute
to
reflect
the
question
that
was
asked
in
regards
to
the
abc
article
with
the
police
department
that
one
is
the
information
accurate
and
then,
if
not,
that
we
request
a
redaction
I've
already
spoken
with
the
clerk
and
the
clerk
is
making
those
changes.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
clear
that
those
changes
will
be
made.
She
did
go
back
and
listen
to
the
recording
to
ensure
that
it's
accurate.
A
Okay,
just
just
for
clarity,
so
I
I
understand
you
made
those
comments
in
regards
to
an
something
that
was
done
in
218,
so
your
notation
in
the
minutes
is
to
have
that
noted,
but
you're
also
saying,
then
you
want
it
retracted
and
then
so
it
sounds
like
we're
giving
directions
to
staff
through
the
minutes
or
how
are
you
interpreting
this.
B
So
that
we
should
look
into
retraction
if
it's
not
accurate,
so
I
can
the
clerk
might
want
to
speak
to
it,
because
I've
spoken
with
her
and
the
city
manager
the
the
minutes,
the
way
they're
written
right
now,
it's
just
too
broad,
and
there
were
there-
was
going
to
be
a
correction.
So
I'd
be
happy
to
call
her
call
her
or
call
on
melissa
as
well.
C
Yes,
this
is
melissa,
thurman
city
clerk.
There
was
a
request
by
councilmember
mason
to
add
additional
language
to
her
comments
under
council
comments.
At
the
last
meeting,
the
minutes
that
were
presented
to
council
in
the
packet
say,
linda
mason,
spoke
regarding
a
news
article
regarding
biases
in
relation
to
enforcement
of
curfew,
violations
and
council
member
mason
also
spoke
with
social
media
sites
with
holiday
things,
and
she
wanted
more
detail
added
on
to
that
and
the
city
manager
reviewed
the
video
and
the
suggested
language
to
change
too
is
linda.
C
Mason
spoke
regarding
a
news
article
that
alleged
potential
biases
in
relation
to
police
arrest.
Council
member
mason
asked
that
the
matter
be
looked
into
and
if
the
numbers
are
accurate,
the
city
should
state
how
we
are
addressing
it.
If
not,
we
should
request
a
retraction.
She
then
wished
everyone,
a
safe
holiday.
A
So
I
just
want
to
make
clear
because
minutes
to
me
are
a
and
please
correct
me,
but
minutes
are
taken
by
the
minute
taker
on
the
interpretation
of
what
stated-
and
I
forget
I,
I
honestly
you
know
where
it
was
at
on
the
agenda,
but
it's
not
an
action
and-
and
I
think
because
each
one
of
us
can
have
something
stated
in
the
minutes-
modify
it
and
we
we're
expecting
staff
to
have
action.
I
don't
want
to
give
that
false
expectation.
A
I
know
on
the
2018
report,
you
know
I
know
sometimes,
should
we
bring
things
up
and
I
always
would
hope
that
gets
a
heads
up
to
it
so
that
maybe
we
can
respond,
because
I
know
I
got
two
phone
calls
saying
what
was
that
about
and
why
didn't
somebody
say
something.
B
Medina
staff
was
informed.
I
did
I
informed
the
chief
and
I
also
informed
the
city
manager
ahead
of
time
and
they're
both
on
the
call-
and
I
also
understand
what
you're
saying
in
regards
to
the
minutes,
but
I
believe
that
that's
a
conversation
we're
having
around
the
city
council
processes.
I
did
read
that
the
minutes
are
part
of
the
discussion
we'll
eventually
have
and
how
we
want
those
minutes
written
how
descriptive
we
want
them
written.
B
But
I
do
believe
that
the
minutes
in
this
particular
area
at
this
time
in
our
country's
history,
our
local
history,
do
need
to
reflect
what
you
know
that
the
city
does
take
these
actions
seriously
and
when
something
like
this
comes
to
the
attention
of
the
city
council,
we're
not,
we
can't
sit
by
and
just
say,
okay.
This
was
an
article
that
came
out
and
we're
not
gonna
address
it.
B
We
have
been
proactive,
we've
initiated
as
a
council,
a
third
party
audit-
that's
going
to
be
starting
soon,
and
this
is
part
of
that
entire
conversation
and
to
leave
that
entire
section
out
of
minutes,
I
think,
doesn't
do
justice
to
what
we
as
a
council
have
been
trying
to
do
and
what
our
chief
has
been
trying
to
do,
which
is
really
frame.
The
conversation
around
what
is
happening
in
san
bruno
with
the
police
department,
with
bias,
and
if
there
are
any
issues,
how
we're
addressing
them.
A
Okay,
now
I
can
appreciate
that
and-
and
I
I
appreciate
that
you
had
given
them
a
heads
up,
because
the
way
I
heard
you
articulated
it
was
if
it's
not
accurate,
based
on
an
email
that
we
received.
It
is
not
accurate
and
then
I'm
sure
staff
had
already
said
that
to
you
and
in
your
commentary
I
didn't
get
that
impression
that
it
was
an
if
and-
and
our
chief
has
basically
said,
it
is
not
correct.
So.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
I'd
have
to
refer
to
the
attorney
that
piranha,
if
we
want
to
have
a
whole
discussion
now,
because
I
think
we're
going
into
an
entire
discussion
around
you
know
what
was
said
via
email,
that
the
public
hasn't
seen
and
what
wasn't
said.
I
don't
believe
that
the
email
said
whether
it
was
accurate
or
not.
It
actually
gave
other
hypotheticals.
B
That
would
be
similar,
but
I
want
to
just
go
back
to
the
minutes.
If
the
council
doesn't
want
to
accept
the
amended
minutes,
we
can
vote
on
them,
but
I
do
think
that
this
topic
is
very
important.
I
believe
that
we're
addressing
it
and
I
believe
the
minute
should
reflect
closer
to
what
was
said
than
a
very
broad
statement.
A
Thank
you
for
your
explanation
and
bringing
that
forward,
and
yes,
I've
I've
support
them
there
and
then
and
now
why
don't
we
move
on
unless
there's
any
other
comments
on
item
c,
the
d
and
that's
approved
the
city
of
san
bernardino
response
letter
to
the
san
mateo
county,
civil
grand
jury
report,
titled
ransomware,
it
is
not
enough
to
think
you
are
protected.
B
Yeah,
so
on
page
and
two
of
the
item,
the
city's
response,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
that
we
are
approving
the
item
as
it
is.
I
noticed
that
numbers
one
and
two
were
not
answered
in
the
response
by
the
city,
and
I
wasn't
sure
if
that
was
just
if
that
was
just
an
oversight
or
not.
D
Now
those
recommendations
have
been
implemented
as
of
november
30th
2020..
What
the
council
member
is
pointing
out
is
under
r1.
The
response
is
actually
listed
at
the
top
of
page
three
of
three
and
that
response
is
a
response
to
r.1.1,
r.1.2
and
r.1.3,
and
so
that
is
for
all
of
those
sub
bullets.
So
it
is
there.
The
response
is
correct.
It's
probably
just
a
pagination
that
throws
off
the
interpretation.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Let's
move
on
unless
there's
anything
from
council,
let's
move
on
to
item
f,
adopt
resolution
declaring
property
owned
by
the
city
of
san
bruno
in
the
crossing
development
on
admiral
court
as
surplus
land
mason.
B
Yeah,
so
this
has
been
a,
I
mean,
this
property
has
gone
kind
of
to
a
hotel
deals
and
not
a
hotel
deal
than
a
hotel
deal,
and
now
not
a
hotel
deal
again,
so,
instead
of
putting
it
on
consent,
this
has
been
such
a
public
discussion
around
this
land
and
this
piece
of
land
and
so
tonight's.
B
Tonight's
agenda
item
is
really
just
a
designated
surplus,
and
I
didn't
know
if
the
city
manager
or
any
other
city
council
wanted
to
say
anything.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
the
public
is
aware
that
we
are
not
approving
a
sale
of
the
property.
What
we're
doing
is
we're
just
establishing
it
as
surplus.
D
Again,
javon
groban
city
manager,
council,
member
mason,
yar
correct
the
title
of
the
report
is
adopt
a
resolution
declaring
the
property
owned
by
the
city
of
san
bruno
in
the
crossing
development
on
admiral
admiral
court
at
surplus
land.
That
is
the
action
that
the
city
council
has
taken
there
is
is
proposed
to
be
taken.
D
There
is
no
action
tonight
to
sell
the
property
declaring
its
surplus
is
in
compliance
with
state
law,
and
it
is
a
step
before
the
property
can
be
sold,
and
so
the
action
tonight
will
set
about
that
process
where
the
property,
if
council
says
yes,
will
be
declared
surplus,
there
is
a
60-day
period
where
it
must
be
offered
to
affordable
housing
developers
and
then
a
90-day
period
after
that.
If
anyone
raises
their
hands,
and
so
we
will
of
course
comply
with
the
state
law.
D
There
is
a
very
long
history
behind
potential
hotel
sales
that
currently
are
not
active
due
to
the
columbic
night
19
economic
downturn,
and
so
the
city
is
looking
at
other
options
and
the
city
council
will
have
closed
sessions
to
discuss
those
options.
And
of
course
we
will
have
public
reports
and
a
public
presentation
of
any
of
the
results
that
come
out
of
those
closed
sessions
to
transact
this
property.
E
Yes,
mr
mayor
and
thank
you
city
manager
grogan
for
for
that
response,
because
this
this
has
been
ongoing
for
for
a
number
of
years,
and-
and
I
I
do-
I
do
also
I'm
interested
in
hearing
more
and
then
it
being
on
consent,
and
I
understand
that
there's
plenty
of
discussion
that
will
be
coming
forward.
I
wanted
to
note
that
in
the
discussion
in
page
two
of
two
of
this
report
that
mentions
the
city
recently
received
an
offer
for
the
purchase
of
the
site
as
an
automobile
dealership.
E
A
Okay,
see
no
other
hands
or
comments,
and
we
just
went
over
items
c
d
and
f
on
consent.
We
have
a
through
f.
Is
there
action
to
approve.
B
A
A
Okay
motion
made
and
second
city
clerk
roll
call.
Please.