►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting April 28, 2020
Whole Meeting
trt 3:24:00
B
Evening
and
welcome
to
the
San
Bernardino
meeting
of
April
228
2020.
Obviously
we
are
shelter
in
place,
so
we
are
coming
via
zoom
wanted.
Also
let
you
know
that
we
are
sorry
for
our
delay,
but
we
had
a
closed
session
that
went
a
little
bit
longer
and
then
had
to
switch
to
a
different
zoom
meeting
so
with
that
it
called
it
to
order
and
roll
call.
Please
city
clerk
council.
C
B
D
B
A
You
if
any
members
of
the
public
who
are
in
the
meeting
would
like
to
speak.
You
can
please
raise
your
hand
at
this
time.
It's
a
button
at
the
bottom
of
your
screens.
I,
don't
see
that
we
have
any
people
calling
in
to
the
meeting,
so
you
should
see
a
button
on
the
bottom
of
your
screen.
That
says,
raise
your
hand.
It's
a
blue
icon
and.
B
My
alright
we're
going
to
move
on
to
announcements
and
presentations
item
a
2020
census,
paper
versions
of
the
2020
census
questionnaires
are
being
mailed
to
all
residents
who
have
not
yet
responded.
It
is
not
too
late.
You
can
submit
your
census
by
visiting
my
2020
census,
dot
gov
or
by
calling
1-800
four
three
three
Oh
2020
or
mailing
in
your
paperless
version.
Folks,
every
vote
does
count
and
what
we
do
get
is
kind
of
a
scenario
of
how
we're
doing
within
the
county
week
to
week.
B
So
the
good
news
is
for
San
Mateo
County
this
last
week
it
became
first
surpassing
Santa
Clara
in
the
state
for
responses,
which
is
great
at
sixty
two
point:
nine
percent
San
Bruno.
Unfortunately,
out
of
the
twenty
jurisdictions
we're
in
16th
place
when
it
comes
to
responding
back,
we
have
surpassed
the
sixty
percent.
B
However,
we
obviously
the
sixty
one
point
for
the
good
news
is,
as
we
went
up
three
point:
nine
percent
from
the
prior
week,
which
puts
us
in
second
as
far
as
increasing
our
number
within
a
week's
time.
So
that's
the
good
news,
but
the
important
news
is
that
we
need
to
get
counted
it's
important,
there's
various
options:
phone
mail,
computer,
etc.
So
the
important
thing
is
to
take
the
time-
please
it's
very
simple,
but
we
really
need
to
all
be
counted.
This
is
how
we
get
funding.
B
This
is
how
this
county
is
going
to
get
its
resources,
that
an
n
will
help
our
community
so
I.
Very
much
encourage
all
of
us
to
do
that.
Next
item
be
contractors
working
for
the
San
Francisco
Public
Utilities
Commission
are
replacing
a
water
transmission
pipeline
that
crosses
Crystal,
Springs
Road.
This
essential
construction
work
will
temporarily
temporarily
close
Crystal
Springs
Road
between
Cunningham
way
and
crestmore
Drive
to
all
traffic
except
emergency
vehicles
on
weekends,
between
7
a.m.
and
7
a.m.
and
5
p.m.
at
7
a.m.
and
5
p.m.
between
20th
and
May
29th.
B
Please
allow
additional
transit
time
during
this
period
to
learn
more
about
this
and
other
essential
projects.
Please
visit
San
Bruno
CA
gov
backslash
News
San
Bruno,
CA,
gov,
backslash
news
moving
on
to
item
six
I
mean
item
C
and
apologize
under
five
presentation
by
Caltrans
on
the
Alemany
deck
replacement
project,
and
we
are
very
fortunate
to
have
a
person
that
will
be
giving
that
to
us
and
may
I
ask
miss
Cheryl
chambers
if
she
would
be
so
kind
as
to
go
ahead
and
make
that
presentation.
Good.
A
A
So
let
me
share
my
screen
with
you,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
considered
was
the
fact
that
the
rigid,
the
shelter
in
place
reduced
traffic,
forty
to
sixty
percent.
Our
goal
had
been
in
July
when
this
was
originally
scheduled
to
seek
a
30
percent
reduction
by
doing
some
of
the
things
that
we're
doing
now,
asking
people
to
telework
asking
more
people
to
get
out
of
their
cars
and
use,
transit
and
just
not
be
on
the
roads,
and
so
with
this
reduction.
A
The
city
of
San,
Francisco
and
also
the
contractor,
was
able
to
accelerate
the
plans.
So
we
started
construction
on
the
deck
on
last
Friday
and
I'll
show
you
some
photos
of
where
we're
going,
but
because
of
the
freeway
impacts.
We've
also
had
local
detours,
but
not
as
many
I
will
go
through
some
of
the
specifics.
But
for
those
of
you
who
have
been
driving
north
on
101,
we've
been
diverting
traffic
onto
northbound
280,
and
so
many
of
you
have
seen
the
following.
A
Following
detour,
you
find
it
apologies,
so
many
of
you
have
seen
as
detour,
which
is
taking
you
on
to
280,
either
downtown
or
over
to
Daly
City,
and
so
a
couple
of
days
ago
we
were
able
to
move
from
the
northbound
deck
and
I'll
share
with
you
our
website,
where
you
can
get
a
lot
of
information,
and
so
this
is
101
Alemany
project,
comm
website
and
so
on.
This
website
we've
got
daily
updates
where
you
can
find
out
what
the
work
is.
A
That's
going
on
and
one
of
the
neat
resources
on
this
site,
and
hopefully
to
work
for
me-
is
we've
got
a
live
streaming
camera,
so
the
southbound
traffic.
That's
coming
on
101.
As
of
yesterday,
we
detoured
that
traffic
you're
seeing
right
now
a
live
shot.
Those
cars
are
going
on
the
new
rebuilt
101,
so
that's
southbound
traffic.
A
A
A
We've
got
a
hotline
for
people
that,
if
there
are
have
any
concerns,
we
address
that
for
three
times
a
day
and
we've
been
monitoring
the
noise
so
to
the
extent
where
we're
hoping
to
get
this
done
in
the
next
few
days,
with
the
Dec
they're
still
going
to
be
night
work
for
the
residents,
but
for
those
of
you
that
will
be
coming
out
of
the
shelter
in
place
at
the
end
of
May.
We
won't.
We
don't
want
to
be
in
your
way
and
have
the
deck
done
at
that
time.
A
E
B
A
F
Know
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
public
works
director,
Jimmy
tan
I'm,
here,
to
provide
a
brief
update
on
the
crestmore
Canyon
project.
As
mentioned
in
the
previous
update
on
April
14,
the
majority
of
the
major
construction
work,
foot
installation
of
the
wall
structure
has
been
completed
and
since
this
last
council
meeting
staff
has
already
completed
the
discussions
with
the
contractor
hillside
role
in
regards
to
the
change
orders
and
the
total
change
orders
is
approximately
94
thousand
dollars.
The
installation
of
the
guardrails
and
removal
and
replacement
work
for
the
sidewalks
are
also
complete.
F
If
you
drive
by
there
you'll
notice
those
items
know
in
place.
Currently,
the
staff
is
waiting
for
the
fence
contractor
to
install
the
cable
fence.
That's
supposed
to
be
on
top
of
the
the
wall
structure
that
was
recently
build.
So
certain
components
of
these
cable
fences
needs
to
be
galvanized,
so
it's
would
take
approximately
one
to
one
and
a
half
weeks
to
get
that
completed
and
we
anticipate
this
cable
fans
to
be
installed.
You
know
in
within
about
two
weeks
time
frame,
so
once
that's
completed,
the
remaining
work
will
be
to
no
pay
view.
F
B
Questions
from
Council
and
then
here:
okay,
seeing
no
hands
either
either
on
the
screen
or
in
the
air
I'll
go
ahead
and
thank
you
very
much
Jimmy
for
the
update.
We
appreciate
it
we'll
move
on
to
item
e.
Can
you
save
update
on
Kovac,
19
response
efforts
and
preliminary
financial
impacts,
city
manager.
D
D
D
So
an
update
on
statistics.
As
of
yesterday
total
cases
in
our
county
is
1099.
There
are
a
total
number
of
deaths
of
48
and
the
best
resource
that
we
continue
to
point
the
community
to
is
the
San
Mateo
County
Health
Department,
and
they
have
created
a
dedicated
coronavirus
website,
and
that
is
on
the
screen.
D
So
everyone
over
all
of
the
forty
eight
deaths
have
been
individuals,
50
or
older.
Just
wanted
to
provide
a
highlight
on
to
statistics.
Remember
everything
we
are
doing
with
our
shelter
in
place.
Order
is
aimed
at
lowering
the
bell
curve.
This
is
the
total
number
of
cases
by
day,
and
so,
as
you
saw
in
the
prior
statistics,
it's
currently
at
one
thousand.
D
D
D
D
So
we
have
been
providing
a
number
of
graphics
to
remind
the
community
of
this
on
all
of
our
social
media
platforms
and
the
graphic.
On
the
left
hand.
Side
is
what
is
in
our
city
offices.
That
apparently
has
my
picture,
but
that
of
some
of
our
other
staff,
just
reminding
people
that
are
working
here
as
essential
workers
that,
when
they're
within
six
feet
of
each
other,
they
need
to
wear
masts.
D
The
community
also
received
I
received
mine,
the
Saturday
in
my
mail
and
I
think
most
of
the
community
received
their
special
kovat
19
resource
guide
in
the
mail.
It
is
a
wealth
of
information
developed
by
your
very
own
city
of
San
Bruno
employees
on
kovat
19.
The
guide
is
a
veil
on
our
website
in
Spanish,
as
well
as
nearly
any
other
language
and
can
be
translated
using
the
Google
Translate
feature
and
so
to
go
online.
You
go
to
our
normal
web
address,
San
Bruno,
CA,
gov,
slash,
COBIT,
19
guide
and
on
the
bottom.
D
You
can
translate
that
into
nearly
any
language,
but
I
really
just
want
to
take
a
moment
to
congratulate
our
staff
on
taking
the
initiative
to
put
this
Mellor
together
and
actually
repurposing
funds
that
were
going
to
be
used
for
our
Spring
recreation
guide.
That,
unfortunately,
was
cancelled
due
to
the
cancellation
of
our
recreation
programs,
so
kovat
19
testing
still
remain
something
of
primary
interest
to
our
residents.
D
Testing,
unfortunately,
is
still
limited
and
it
is
limited
based
on
screening
criteria.
The
best
site
is
still
very
calm
for
our
community.
If
you
are
experiencing
kovat
19
system
symptoms
or
you
would
like
to
go
on
just
to
see
if
you
are
eligible,
the
eligibility
requirements
will
change
over
time,
but
the
free
testing
in
our
county
is
available
at
barely
comm.
There
are
a
number
of
other
private
testing
facilities
the
best
way
to
access
that
is
through
your
primary
care
physician
on
the
screen.
D
One
of
the
things
that
we
also
want
to
provide
the
community
as
a
resource
is
for.
We
know
that
there
is
a
lot
of
stress
with
regard
to
kovat
19
in
the
shelter
in
place.
Order
and
chorus
support.
Dot-Org
is
an
amazing
resource
and
we
encourage
anyone
in
the
community
that
may
be
experiencing
abuse
or
is
just
overwhelmed
to
go
to
Cora.
Their
number
is.
D
1-800-308-3515
a.m.
so
for
the
little
kiddos
just
before
naptime,
hopefully,
and
that
is
put
on
by
very
own
city
of
San,
Bruno
library,
Small
Business
Assistance.
There
was
a
major
milestone
just
yesterday
with
San
Mateo
County
strong,
launching
their
application
process
for
the
SMC
strong
initiative,
and
there
is
over
1
million
dollars
in
grants
available
countywide
through
the
small
business
grant
program,
and
we
encourage
any
small
business
to
go
to
S&C
strong
and
apply
for
those
funds.
D
Sam
Sita
and
Roseann
frost
was
at
the
April
14th
City
Council
meeting
and
provided
the
City
Council,
with
a
amazing
update
on
everything
that
Sam
seed
is
doing
to
help
strong
business
or
small
small
business
in
San
Bruno.
This
can
be
accessed
through
the
city
of
San,
Brunel's,
kovat,
19
homepage,
and
we'll
talk
about
that
in
one
second.
D
Really,
when
we
activated
on
March,
16th,
working
and
thinking
about
ways
to
support
the
San
Bruno
business
community
and
without
further
ado,
adhering
to
the
shelter
in
place,
has
been
a
topic
of
significant
discussion
and
as
the
community
knows,
we
have
developed
a
number
of
public
safety
announcements
and
we
wanted
to
take
a
moment
to
show
the
community
the
latest.
And
let
me
click
play.
G
G
First,
I'd
like
to
take
just
a
quick
moment
to
stress
my
level
of
how
impressed
I
am
with
the
way
this
community
has
responded
to
these
really
difficult
circumstances.
I
think
that
we've
had
a
very
high
level
of
compliance
with
some
difficult
requirements
in
the
shelter
in
place
order
and,
as
a
result,
we're
starting
to
maybe
start
to
see
a
little
light
at
the
end
of
the
tunnel,
which
is
pretty
exciting
and
it
my
hats
off
to
all
of
you,
for
the
part
you've
played
in
doing
that.
G
In
these
difficult
times,
I
will
say
that
the
posture
of
the
police
department,
as
it
pertains
to
enforcement,
has
not
changed,
which
is
that
we
believe
strongly
that
the
right
way
to
handle
these
circumstances
is
through
a
posture
of
persuasion
and
education
of
the
public
as
to
what
the
orders
are
and
the
importance
of
following
them.
Rather
than
taking
a
posture
of
strict
enforcement
of
the
orders,
which
can
be
challenging
and
also
probably,
is
not
necessary,
given
the
way
that
things
work
in
our
community.
G
G
To
be
quite
frank,
there
are
a
number
of
violations,
the
shelter-in-place
order
that
we
would
like
the
public's
help
in
reporting,
so
that
we
can
address
them,
but
these
are
the
more
egregious
violations
that
are
a
little
bit
easier
for
us
to
take
on
as
a
police
department,
with
all
the
other
things
that
we
have
going
on.
Some
examples,
of
course,
would
be
large-scale
gatherings
in
public
places.
You
know
big
big
parties,
parks
and
things
of
that
nature
are
certainly
concerning.
G
You
know
large-scale
construction
projects
that
involve
big
crews
of
people
and
appear
to
be
non-essential
or
unnecessary.
These
are
the
kinds
of
things
that
we
would
like
for
you
to
call
and
notify
your
Police
Department
about.
Another
example
might
be
an
essential
business
like
a
restaurant
or
a
grocery
store
in
which
really
there's
just
no
regard
for
the
social
distancing
parameters
at
all
and
where
you
really
need
the
police
departments,
help
to
kind
of
get
these
businesses
on
board
and
helping
to
protect
us
all
while
staying
open.
G
However,
there
are
some
examples
of
things
that
well,
you
will
see
them
day
to
day
really.
There's
there's
no
point
in
reporting
to
the
police
department
either,
because
the
violations
are
very
minor,
difficult
to
prove
or
because
they
are
just
a
real
drain
on
resources
because
of
their
volume
or
the
transitory
in
nature
and
difficult
for
us
to
come
across.
Some
examples
of
this
would
be
calling
in
people
who
aren't
wearing
masks.
G
Quite
frankly,
there
are
some
specific
terms
under
which
people
are
not
required
to
wear
masks
under
this
children,
place
order
and
so
calling
in
to
report.
Seeing
someone
on
the
street,
who
wasn't
wearing
a
mask
really
doesn't
serve
very
much
purpose.
It
can
be
a
real
drain
on
resources.
Also
calling
in
you
know,
people
who
you
believe
from
your
observations
simply
do
not
appear
to
be
complying
with
the
shelter-in-place
order,
meaning
that
they're
they're
out
and
about
for
what
doesn't
appear
to
be
essential
business.
G
This
is
obviously
really
really
difficult
to
prove
and
very
difficult
for
us
to
respond
to.
Most
of
those
folks
will
in
fact
be
out
for
some
essential
or
legitimate
business,
such
as
exercise
or
obtaining
supplies,
and
so
we
really
would
prefer,
if
you
not
bother
reporting
those
things
to
us.
So
if
you
see
these
more
egregious
violations-
and
you
want
to
report
it
to
the
police
department
so
that
we
can
help
take
care
of
all
of
us,
the
right
way
to
do
that
is
to
call
our
non-emergency
phone
number.
G
That's
at
six,
five:
zero,
six,
five,
six,
seven
one
zero
zero,
as
opposed
to
reporting
it
through
any
other
medium.
That
will
give
us
the
most
prompt
response
and
the
best
ability
to
handle
it
appropriately.
So
I'll,
just
close
by
kind
of
saying,
on
a
little
bit
of
a
more
emotional
note,
I've
been
with
your
Police
Department
for
about
15
years,
and
that
means
that
I've
been
here
in
the
city
through
a
number
of
try,
time's
right,
we're
no
stranger
to
challenge
and
we're
no
stranger
to
tragedy.
G
I
worked
here
as
a
detective
during
the
pipeline
explosion.
I
also
worked
here
at
the
active
shooter
incident
at
you
too,
but
the
shooting
incident
at
San
Fran
and
countless
other
critical
incidents
that
we
faced
together
as
a
community
and
in
each
case
I've
been
nothing
short
of
awed
and
inspired
by
the
resiliency
of
this
community
and
by
its
ability
to
get
through
these
times
by
bonding
together
and
taking
care
of
one
another
and
I'm
extremely
confident
that
this
will
be
no
exception
to
that.
G
So
again,
please
don't
hesitate
to
report
the
egregious
violations
to
us,
but
instead,
let's
try
to
put
our
primary
focus
on
how
we
work
together.
Take
care
of
one
another
encourage
each
other
to
comply
with
the
orders
and
get
through
this
sooner
rather
than
later.
So
thanks
so
much
for
taking
a
few
moments
to
watch
this
video
I
hope
it
was
helpful
and
you'll
be
hearing
from
me
again
soon.
Thank
you.
Stay
healthy.
D
H
B
H
I
just
wanted
to
thank
the
city
management
for
the
presentation.
I
think
that
was
great
I
wanted
to
comment
on
the
Chiefs
video
I
think
he's.
Definitely
a
natural
I
feel
like
I
was
watching
an
episode
of
cops
I'll.
Just
I
could
hear
the
music
in
my
head.
That
was
really
good.
Thanks
for
putting
that
together,
I
think
it's
important
to
get
those
message.
Your
self.
B
E
E
I
I've
done
this.
I've
done
this
I
I
got
to
hear
somebody
who
was
a
medical
provider
in
New
York,
just
share
very
heartfelt
concerns
and
everything
we
do.
We
we
cross
the
line,
we're
definitely
endangering
our
health
care
providers
and
so
don't
be
selfish,
really
stay
home.
Take
care
of
yourself.
Wear
your
mask.
Keep
your
distance
and
wash
your
hands
I
get
a
report
that
I
know
that
there's
some
concerns
from
the
council
members
that
water
rates
are
going
up
or
their
water
usage
has
gone
up
and
actually
the
contrary.
E
Water
usage
is
declining
in
San,
Mateo,
County,
I,
assume.
That
would
be
the
same
in
our
city
that
we
really
are
being
conservative
at
home,
so
you're,
washing
your
hands
and
we're
being
conservative
and
I
think
you
gotta
love
Stan
Berman,
who
does
care,
because,
if
you're
not
giving
back,
find
a
great
organization
a
great
fun
to
give
back
to,
because
there
are
many
people
that
are
in
need
thanks
so
much.
I
Are
you
sure,
mayor
this
isn't
this
is
a
difficult
time
and
we
just
have
to
kind
of
we
have
to
wear
it.
Wear
it
out
you
have
to.
We
have
to
just
keep
on
doing
what
we're
doing
the
numbers
are
low,
but
let's
not
try
to
be
creative
and
getting
around
the
social
distancing.
I
mean
it's
terrible
to
I
mean
for
myself.
It's
terrible
that
baseball
season.
Council
exam
Bruno
right
we
found
out
yesterday,
but
that's
the
reality.
You
want
to
take
care
of
this
problem
so
continue
doing
all
the
good
things.
I
B
J
B
B
Also,
it's
affecting
all
of
us
not
just
within
here
some
some
interesting
news
that
I
did
not
know,
but
on
Cal
Tran,
we're
noted
for
the
seventh
largest
system
within
the
county
of
the
country
and,
however,
we
usually
have
a
ridership
of
65,000
it's
down
to
1100
around
as
of
today,
which
is
down
98%.
So
we've
gone
from
92
trains
to
42
trains
according
to
the
CEO
and
manager.
Speaking
to
the
SFO
director
this
morning.
B
It
was
interesting
that
last
year,
at
this
time
who
was
around
85,000
people
that
went
through
the
airport
and
today
it's
around
1,800
down
97%.
So
it
truly
is
affecting
everybody
in
many
places
and
as
noted,
the
results
for
the
testing
are
going
to
come
out
in
in
zip
codes,
they're
hoping
by
the
end
of
this
week.
But
it's
also
important
that
the
county
wants
it
not
to
you
know:
there's
gonna
hopefully
be
backup
data
to
that,
because
the
thing
is,
for
example,
Foster
sitting
in
San
Mateo's
share
a
zip
code.
B
So
if
you
see
that
number-
it's
not
just
to
say
it's
from
one
city
to
another,
but
these
numbers
have
a
lot
of
purpose
behind
them.
They
really
need
to
be
looked
at
before
making
an
assumption
or
where
should
I
go
or
not?
Also,
I
told
the
or
talk
to
the
next,
the
Pacific
Amer
told
her
I
would
mention
that.
B
Still
this
last
weekend
they
had
a
lot
of
folks
traveling
to
that
city
and
they
were
out
in
force
and
then
checking
IDs,
and
it
was
just
quite
a
fun
quite
a
few
folks
that
were
not
from
the
area
and
so
they're
still
asking
again
they
understand
is
challenging.
But
again
it's
supposed
to
be
five
miles
and
so
I
told
her
a
feature
that
I
would
pass
that
on
and
just
for
some
person.
You
know
who
had
asked
me
about
PG&E,
and
you
know
what
happens
when
we
get
to
you
know.
B
The
emergency
services
Council
met
Thursday
and
I've,
asked
for
them
and
us
as
a
County
based
group
to
meet
May
21st,
which
we're
going
to
meet
again,
but
the
other
jurisdictions
are
very
on
top
of
this,
because
we
know
what
that
would
bring
to
a
community
so
I
want
to
let
you
know
that
on
the
county
level,
and
then
with
my
colleagues,
everybody
is
working
diligently
and
to
the
staff.
The
magazine
is
something
that
I
know
this
council
very
much
is
working
on
this
year's
communication,
getting
information
out
having
resources
available.
B
So
I
want
to
thank
the
council
for
that.
I
think
we're
unanimous
on
that,
but
also
we
want
to
thank
the
staff.
That
is
a
great
publication
and
I've
heard
things
about
very
positive,
a
lot
of
information
and
resource
and
all
the
other
things
that
they're
doing
so.
As
you
know,
it
starts
at
the
ground
and
it
starts
with
the
staff
that
are
providing
the
services
and
ensuring
that
this
community
still
works
so
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
that
as
well.
B
E
B
B
I
I
B
B
Stumped
got
ahead
of
myself.
What
I'm
gonna
do
is
we're
gonna
go
through
F,
G
and
H,
and
then
we'll
take
them
as
a
as
a
collection.
So,
first,
let's
start
with
Marty's
item,
which
was
AB
resolution:
accepting
the
project
design,
accepting
the
Susan
Drive
intersection
improvement
project
as
complete
Martin.
Yes,.
I
I
brought
this
up
because
it's
been
an
ongoing
issue
up
in
that
area
and
I
know
that
it
went
through
the
TSP
see
and
it
came
back
to
Council
and
staff
were
able
to
get
the
swab
done
I
believe
effectively,
but
I
wanted
to
also
allow
the
allow
staff
to
kind
of
give
a
quick
little
rundown
off
on
it,
because
it
is
a
more
of
a
unique
project
that
we've
done.
That
I
was
I,
have
not
seen
done
before
here
in
Sandburg.
F
Afternoon,
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
I
can
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
project.
It
is
unique,
it's
something
that
we
haven't
done
before.
Initially,
when
we
were
looking
at
this
sight,
distance
issued
staff
brought
the
item
to
council
with
the
recommendation
of
installing
bulb
outs
at
these
intersections,
but
the
cost
of
those
were
of
concern.
So
staff
was
requested
to
look
into
other
different
measures.
F
You
know
to
have
some
similar
effect
at
these
intersections,
so
with
that
staff
came
back
to
console
to
to
propose
the
installation
of
these
curb
extensions
with
these
rubber
bumpers
and
then
with
some
painted
black
curves
at
these
intersections
and
then
also
the
installation
of
these
high
visibility
crosswalks.
So
four
intersections
were
completed
as
part
of
this
project.
Now,
a
fast
Minh,
Drive
and
Susan
Drive
Jeffery
drive
as
Susan
as
well
as
Summit
Road
and
an
Austin
Drive.
F
So
this
leaves
a
remaining
budget
of
eighteen
thousand
dollars
which
would
be
returned
back
to
measure
a
so
the
thought
is
for
the
improvements
to
allow
the
cars
that
are
at
the
you
know
these
side
streets
when
they're
approaching
Susan
Drive
to
be
able
to
move
closer
to
student
Drive
so
that
they'll
be
able
to
see
the
oncoming
traffic
from
both
directions
where
additional
records
and
then
devolve
outs
would
be
able
to
help
with
that
and
with
those
visibility
issues.
So
with
that
I
can
answer
any
other
questions
that
you
may
have.
Thank
you.
Mari.
F
I
H
F
Sure
the
the
device
that
we
installed,
the
SP
sensor,
the
radar
feedback
signs
that
we
started
those
along
Susan
Drive,
but
there's
one
of
them.
Susan
Drive,
is
capable
of
providing
some
data,
and
so
we
can
take
a
look
at
that.
It
couldn't
download
the
information
and
take
a
look
at
whether
there's
any
speeding
that
that's
stretch
it
is.
You
know
it
is
a
down
hill
towards
College
Drive
from
Susan,
and
there
are
too
many
stop
signs
within
those
intersections,
so
people
do
tend
to
go
a
little
bit
faster
than
their
normal.
H
F
B
Okay,
also
I
am
toggling
back
and
forth
what
I'm,
seeing
mr.
Stephen
Seymour
I
see
a
hand
up
and
I
believe
that
you're
asking
to
speak
in
regards
to
item
F
on
the
consent,
so
city
clerk,
if
you
can,
if
you
need
to
unmute
and
see
if
mr.
Seymour
I've
got
them
right
on
the
item
that
he
wanted
to
speak
on.
G
B
B
B
B
You
yep
okay,
if
not
anything
else,
Marty
good
okay.
So
why
don't
we
go
on
to
item
G
under
consent,
which
is
a
DR
resolution?
This
is
improving
the
design
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
execute
a
construction
contract
with
the
American
asphalt,
repair
and
resurfacing.
Company
Inc
for
FY
1920,
slurry
steel
project
and
approving
the
construction
comes
the
contingency
and
appropriating
55,000
from
measure
a
fund
balance
Laura.
E
E
Why
is
that
the
neighbor
or
the
street
around
the
corner
getting
paved
and
why
my
street
not
getting
paved,
and
so
I
just
you
know
a
couple
things
so
here
we've
got
a
$500,000
project
and
this
project
is
really
only
to
slurry,
a
handful
of
streets
in
San,
Bruno
and
Jimmy.
One
of
the
questions-
I,
don't
know
if
you
know
this
offhand,
but
what
percentage
of
streets
is
this
one
project
less
than
10%
of
our
streets
and
slurry
is
not
grinding
them
up
and
repaving
them
like
a
lot
of
streets
needed?
E
E
But,
more
importantly,
you
live
on
the
street.
It
hasn't
been
paved
in
many
years.
You
want
to
know
when,
where
do
I
fall
and
so
I
don't
know,
it's
at
some
point
that
we
can
look
at.
You
know
a
five-year
plan
and
what
which
trees
can
possibly
make
it
to
the
list.
Maybe
you
know
it's
what
we
it's
you
can't
hold
us
to
it,
because
things
can
change
and
funding
changes
as
well,
but
this
isn't
expensive.
It's
an
expensive
item
for
just
slurry.
E
It's
only
a
handful
of
streets
and
I
just
think
that
residents
care
and
want
to
know,
which
is
why
I
wanted
to
actually
kind
of
talk
about
it.
Aside.
There's
a
map,
that's
included,
and
a
list
of
streets
ring
included
with
this
presentation.
So
if
you're
logged
in
and
you
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
agenda,
it's
a
good
opportunity
to
see
which
streets
are
on
the
list.
Thank
you.
I
I
I
I
My
comments
on
this
project
specifically
are
I
was
curious.
How
at
the
Merrimac
development,
the
whole
interior
of
that
development
is
being
slurry
and
then
on
the
marisol,
it
isn't,
and
I
and
I'm
I
could
already
imagine
how
somebody
who
lives
just
on
that
other
part
of
that
Street
in
that
development.
It's
gonna
say
why
not
mine
and
that's
pretty
common,
but
because
everybody
wants
their
Street
to
get
a
treatment
and
I
was
wondering
if
what
was
the
thought
behind
that
and.
I
Just
that
I
think
it'd
be
important
to
share
that
information
as
we're
going
forward
to
know
how
much
percent
of
the
streets
are
being
done
currently
and
with
the
next
set
of
years
of
planning
of
how
much
money
we're
going
to
spend,
which
is
going
to
be
a
lot,
because
just
on
this
one
little
project
it
it's
it's
very
expensive.
So
I'll
leave
I'll
leave
those
questions
with
with
the
staff
and
thank
you.
B
D
On
duty,
Madison
yeah,
why
don't
I
just
take
the
latter
question,
which
is
how
long
will
it
take
us
to
pave
all
of
our
streets
when
we
went
out
for
measure
G
and
we
developed
the
factual
information
around
it?
One
of
the
things
we
knew
is
that
even
in
a
good
year,
which
we
know
we're
not
in
now
measure
G
was
estimated
to
bring
four
million
dollars
a
year,
and
even
if
all
of
that
went
to
Streep's,
it
would
not
solve
our
problem.
I
believe
the
number
is
depending
on.
D
Roles
plus
and
so
I
think
it's
important
to
know
that
that
we
have
a
fiscal
sustainability
issue
and
it's
gonna
take
a
multi-pronged
multi-year
solution
to
get
to
where
we
need
to
be
for
roads
and
other
other
other
items.
I
do
want
to
turn
it
to
the
public
works
director
to
address
the
point
specifically
on
this
item.
F
Sure
a
good
evening,
actually,
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
regards
to
the
selection
of
the
streets,
the
city
actually
uses
program,
software
costs,
tree
savers
and
to
select
the
streets
and
the
B,
which
program
actually
provides
an
output
of
what
the
recommendations
are.
So
no
staff
don't
arbitrarily
go
ahead
and
select.
You
know
certain
streets
within
the
street
network
to
be
able
to
repave
or
resurface.
F
You
know
in
the
future
so
or
else
we'll
end
up
spending
more
money
to
reconstruct
these
streets
in
the
future.
So
it
is,
you
know
these
there's
a
project
I,
don't
but
customer
Dave
is
mentioned
or
inquired
how
many
miles
of
this
right
now
other
list
of
streets
I
don't
have
that
number
on
top
of
my
head.
F
We
know
we,
as
mentioned
in
staffing
borders,
there's
a
total
of
89
Center
miles
within
our
street
network
I,
don't
know
what
the
percentage
is
in
relation
to
this
project
is
no
relation
to
the
total
Lane
miles
so
yeah.
It
is
very
expensive.
You
know,
and
previously,
when
I
first
started
in
in
San
Bruno.
F
How
much
the
entire
need
there's
a
there's,
a
backlog
of
you
know
if
we
only
do
certain
streets
a
year.
No,
these
deferred
maintenance
cost
will
start
to
escalate,
is
in
the
order
of
40
something
million
dollars,
and
then
the
next
know
10
years.
If
we
don't
do
anything,
you
know
in
these
four
these
streets.
So
no
no
funding
is
an
issue
and
I
know
measure.
F
B
J
People
are
quite
vocal
about
having
their
streets
repaired
and
it
would
be
great
just
to
have
net
I.
Don't
want
to
take
too
much
time,
but
a
really
brief
report
on
the
different
levels
of
street
repair.
And
then
it
sounds
like
the
works
already
been
done
around
that,
where
the
streets
fall
within
those
levels
so
like
how
many
streets
are
within.
J
You
know
they
need
a
total
replacement,
how
many
streets
fall
within
the
slurry,
and
maybe
we
can
just
start
there,
because
I
agree
with
council
member
Davis
that
we
really
do
need
to
have
plans
for
these
larger
initiative
and
then
I'm.
Looking
at
my
math
right
now
so
trying
to
remember
a
street
and
I
believe
it
was
7th
Avenue
that
was
just
I
mean
that
Street
just
desperately
needs
to
be
redone
and
I'm
wondering
if
we're
better
off
I
using
the
term
slurring
these
streets.
D
That
is
come
as
we
talk
about
all
of
the
streets
that
we're
planning
to
address
that
year
with
the
budget
within
the
budgeted
resources
that
we
have
and
we
talk
about
the
various
treatment
types,
Lurie
sill
grind
and
overlay
complete
reconstruction,
and
so,
as
we
begin
the
capital
budgeting
process
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year,
FY
2021,
we
will
certainly
have
that
conversation
and
give
the
City
Council
a
full
overview
of
the
different
treatment
types
and
why
we're
planning?
What
we're
planning
I.
Think
to
your
luck,
your
latter
question
about.
D
Would
we
potentially
be
better
off
with
not
slurry
selling
these
streets
and
going
forward
with
maybe
a
street
that
is
more
further
degraded?
One
of
the
things
that
the
street
saver
program
does
and
that's
the
program
that
director
tan
mentioned
is
that
it
takes
a
look
at
the
PCI
of
all
of
our
roads
and
it
does
the
calculation
based
on.
Where
is
the
most
appropriate
place
for
you
to
utilize,
your
limited
dollars,
and
actually
sometimes
that
works
out
to
be
slurry
selling?
D
The
road
that
is
in
let's
say,
moderate
condition
is
actually
more
cost
effective
because
you
want
to
protect
that
road
and
you
may
not
have
enough
money
to
address
that
role.
That
is
very
significantly
degraded
and
that
could
potentially
be
exponentially
more.
And
so,
when
you
have
limited
resources,
sometimes
the
program
and
decisions
are
made
to
slurry
sill
rolls
to
protect
them.
D
So
they
do
not
degrade
further,
because
a
fully
degraded
role
is,
let's
say,
not
getting
a
lot
more
worse,
waiting
in
another
six
months
or
another
year,
but
it's
important
to
protect
the
integrity
of
a
role
that
has
started
to
develop
that
that
alligator
cracking
and
have
a
penetration
in
the
service
surface,
because
you
do
not
want
the
water
to
patrut
to
penetrate
down
and
further
degrade
the
sub
base.
And
so
all
of
that
is
taken
into
account
with
the
engineers
when
these
recommendations
and
funding
allocations
are
made.
J
J
But
my
concern
is
that
if
the
streets
like
in
the
avenues
are
in
such
bad
condition
that
they're
not
gonna
have
their
turn
and
because
we're
spending
all
of
our
money
trying
to
just
keep
these
other
streets
from
getting
in
worst
condition,
so
I
guess
I'm
just
trying
to
balance
out.
When
will
when
will
there
be
a
balance
of
everyone
having
their
streets
redone?
Is
that
being
considered.
D
The
question
when
we
do
the
capital
budgeting
process
and
when
we
look
at
where
can
we
best
utilize,
the
dollars
we
have
and
director
tan?
You
can
probably
articulate
a
little
bit
of
sort
of
the
exponential
cost
when
you're
looking
at
road
reconstruction,
for
example.
This
is
a
a
project
at
about
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
when
you
really
look
at
reconstructing
a
roadway
you're,
a
binning,
significant
length,
you're
talking
about
a
lot
more
than
five
hundred
thousand
dollars,
director
Tam
yeah.
F
So
know
a
while
back
ago,
you
know
street
paving
is
always
it's.
You
know
a
hot
topic
right,
because
you
know
a
lot
of
people.
You
know
do
feel
that
their
streets,
it
needs
to
be
paved
if
the
city
I
actually
has
has
done
as
a
study
session
with
the
council
a
while
back
ago
to
you
know,
and
maybe
that's
something
that
is
worthwhile
doing
to
kind
of
share
some
of
their.
Our
information
regards
to
you
know
when
these
trees
need
to
be.
No.
F
You
know
the
graphs
shown
when
the
preventive
maintenance
should
become
performed
and
an
overall
cost
of
the
construction,
rehabilitation
and
story
shield,
because
you
know
you
go
down
the
line,
there's
three
different
treatments
right.
No,
the
preventative
maintenance
is
the
most
cheapest,
which
is
this
slurry
seal.
You
can
cover.
You
know
what
the
half
admin
on
the
horrors
it
could
cover
multiple,
multiple
miles,
many
miles.
F
You
know
within
the
city,
but
if
you're
gonna
do
a
reconstruction,
where
you
have
to
dig
into
the
the
base
layer
of
the
the
streets,
it
tends
to
cost
a
lot
more,
so
maybe
a
block
a
thousand
feet
could
be
about
as
high
as
number
three
or
four
hundred
thousand
dollars.
You
know
to
do
that,
and
but
if
you're
doing
just
a
me
landfill,
it
could
be
maybe
half
as
bad
for
a
thousand
feet.
F
So
we
do
have
those
you
know
estimated
numbers
and
then
there's
not
have
all
these
no
presentation
slides
that
we
prepare
for
on
previous.
You
know
study
sessions
that
we
can
share
with
the
council
again
to
let
you
know
well
done
so
recently.
We
came
back
I
think
that
last
council
meeting,
we
came
to
counsel
for
the
sp1
funding
and
that
was
I
know.
A
subcommittee
was
was
derived
in
order
for
us
to
use
the
sp1
money
for
these
failed
Street
locations.
F
Because
that's
what
the
council,
the
subcommittee,
wanted
to
do,
because
those
failed
streets
caused
a
lot
of
money
to
reconstruct.
But
you
can't
really
just
take
no,
your
$800
a
thousand
dollars
or
a
million
office
or
whatever
money
that
you
have
and
just
focus
on
the
field
streets
was.
What
happens
is
that
then
your
good
Street
will
end
up
failing
and
those
are
a
potential
alum
or
percentage
of
good
streets
within
the
city
that
will
potentially
start
to
fail.
Then
you
never
catch
up
to
be
able
to
go
ahead
and
start.
F
You
know
reconstructing
them,
because
the
cost
of
reconstruction
is
just
exponentially
really
a
lot
higher
than
prevented
remains
is
so
we're
always
trying
to
to.
You
know
to
try
to
do
a
threat,
preventive
maintenance,
to
try
to
make
sure
that
these
good
streets
don't
end
up
feeling
at
a
you
know
a
faster
rate
and
I'm,
so
we
can
always
take
whatever
the
money.
That's
left
over
to
be
able
to
focus
on
other
streets
within
the
the
street
network.
That.
J
I,
hunt
and
I:
don't
I,
don't
I
appreciate
the
answer,
but
I
don't
I,
don't
feel
bad
that
there
was
an
answer
given
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
when
we're
balancing
the
amounts
of
the
repaving,
that's
occurring,
which
I
respect
that
and
understand
what
you're
saying
that
they're
you
know,
preventative
maintenance
is
crucial
to
not
having
to
expend
even
more
money
at
a
later
time.
I
guess.
My
question,
though,
is
when
you
look
at
certain
streets
like
even
off
Rosewood
I.
J
Remember
seeing
this
little
portion
of
the
street
that
just
has
holes
all
over
it
right
I
mean
that
would
prime
guessing
that
would
probably
need
to
be
repaved.
It
wouldn't
need
to
be
slurry,
but
if
we're
spending
all
of
our
money
on
the
preventative
maintenance-
and
that
means
being
said
you
know,
and
that
in
and
of
itself
we're
really
only
focusing
on
the
areas
that
essentially
are
already
in
pretty
good
condition.
J
Whereas
you
have
streets
that
I
was
told
by
many
people
they,
since
the
time
they
moved
in
they've,
never
had
their
Street
repeat
so
I
guess
my
question,
going
back
is
when
you're
saying
we'll
put
some
money
aside
of
whatever's
left
over
I.
Don't
know
that
whatever's
left
over
will
ever
be
enough
to
really
truly
initiate
and
repaving
certain
streets
that
have
never
been
repaved
and
so
I
guess.
J
My
question
is
really
like:
how
do
you
get
to
that
to
the
streets
that
truly
needs
to
be
repaid
so
that
they
can
be
part
of
the
preventative
maintenance
program
in
the
next
15
years
right,
I
get?
This
is
a
very
long-term
plan,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone's
gonna
get
to
have
nice
streets
at
some
point.
D
Jimmy,
let
me
take
that
Linda
I
think
the
best
way
to
do
that
is
through
more
funding
and
when
we
educated
the
community
around
measure
G.
One
of
the
sort
of
fortunate
statistics
out
there
is
that
many
of
our
roads
had
not
had
a
major
reconstruction
in
the
last
30
years,
and
that
is
a
sad
fact,
based
on
the
amount
of
funding
that
we
have
in
total
guilty'
road
maintenance
and
road
maintenance
is
one
thing
where
you
sort
of
every
year
have
to
do
a
little
bit
of
both.
D
D
Does
a
little
bit
of
both
because
you
really
want
to
if
you
only
focused
on
all
of
your
money
on
reconstruction
of
failed
robes,
your
total
backlog
and
your
the
total
financial
burden
would
increase,
because
you
need
to
do
some
protection
of
those
robes.
They
really
just
need
a
slurry
seal
to
stop
the
water
penetration,
and
so
it's
a
very
complicated
process
that
has
gone
through
and
there's
a
lot
of
data.
Be
that
backs
up
all
of
the
recommendation
of
how
we
do
the
treatment.
I.
Think.
D
The
unfortunate
answer
is
the
reason
why
we
have
a
PCI
in
the
60s
and
most
of
our
streets
having
not
had
a
major
road
repair
in
the
last
30
years,
as
unfortunately,
as
a
city,
we
have
not
had
the
money
to
devote
significant
sums
to
paving
reconstruction,
and
that
has
mission
now,
where
we
need
approximately
eight
million
dollars
a
year,
just
to
get
our
average
PCI
280
and
that's
on
a
zero
to
100
scale
and
with
measuring.
We
have
four
million.
A
I
Yeah
I
could
tell
my
colleagues
here
that
it
is
a
funding
problem
when
I
first
got
on
the
count,
so
I
believe
the
number
was
three
million
a
year
to
get
us
up
to
a
respectable
piece.
I
and
I'm
support
of
this
project.
Specifically,
I
think
it's
a
good
practice
to
spend
money
to
do
the
preventive
maintenance.
I
I
My
question
regarding
that
the
mayor
Marysol,
is
that
that,
if
they're
in
that
contingency,
if
you
could
see
to
utilize
that
his
salaries
don't
have
as
big
of
a
unforeseen
condition
than
regular
paving,
were
you
milling
into
the
ground
and
hit
a
soft
spot?
These
streets
aren't
already
in
a
good
shape.
So
if
you
can
find
a
way
to
spread
that
within
that
full
development,
so
you
don't
need
to
come
back
to
it
and
then
do
a
couple
swirly
streets.
That
would
be
great
I.
I
Do
recommend
that
we
do
have
a
study
session
on
on
paving
just
to
advise
the
public
on
why
it
really
is
a
fine
balancing
act,
but
if
you
don't
have
the
funds
which
we
don't,
we
can't
get
we're
barely
we're,
barely
scratching
the
surface
right
and
that's
why
I
fully
supported
measure
G
and
I'm.
Looking
forward
to
having
that
discussion
of
letting
our
public
know.
This
is
when
you
can
expect
your
street
to
get
paid
on
this,
this
level
of
work
product
that
we're
going
to
be
spending
every
year.
So.
B
I'm,
just
real,
quick
and
Jimmy,
please
correct
me:
I
forget
now
it
was
an
sp1
when
we
received
extra
revenues,
which
was
determined
to
go
to
failed
streets,
that's
correct,
so
this
is
a
sp1
when
that
came
into
effect.
A
subcommittee
which
went
to
the
council
may
all
concurred
was
hey.
Let's
those
EPS,
the
monies
which
the
city
was
not
normally
of
going
to
receive,
let's
make
sure
they're
dedicated
to
those
failed
streets,
not
just
slurry,
so
council
did
take
action
before
for
those
those
dollars
to
go
toward
that.
B
There
was
a
time
before
too,
as
we
were
getting
reimbursed
from
the
trust
from
the
pipeline
explosion
that
we
had
three
million
dollars
combat
for
staff
time,
which
is
already
expended
through
the
normal
budget
process,
which
we
had
a
million.
The
council
concurred
a
million
each
year,
which
I've
asked
it
to
be
diverted
to
keep
our
PCI
up,
which
it
helped
it
to
maintain.
But,
as
Marty
has
said
too,
it
is
costly
there
also
incorrectly
director
tan.
B
There
is
a
system
in
which
the
all
the
streets
are
looked
at
ranked
and
try
to
figure
the
dollars.
So
it's
not
about
one
side,
the
other
side,
it's
kind
of
a
more
of
a
global
look
at
the
community
and
to
see
where
has
been
and
I
know
that
I
had
asked
in
the
past
that
hey
when
we're
having
these
proposed
streets
to
come
up.
Let's
also
know
the
last
time
they
were
done.
B
B
So
I
think
it's
important
that
we're
all
in
this
together
and
then
we
all
have
that
information,
because,
obviously
no
matter
where
you
go
in
this
community
you're
going
to
find
somebody
who
has
a
street
or
a
concern
legitimate.
That
feels
that
their
street
should
have
been
next.
So
I
appreciate
all
the
good
conversation.
If
there's
nothing
else,
I
don't
see
hands,
I'm
gonna,
move
on
to
item
age,
that's
okay,
and
that
is
adopted.
B
That
up
was
just
as
a
point
that
this
was
a
grant
that
was
sought
after
in
early
2019
from
CKD
went
through
that
process,
and
this
city
was
awarded
that
grant,
and
the
great
news
is,
is
that
there
is
no
local
matching
funds
necessary
or
required
from
the
city
of
San
Bruno
in
order
to
accept
this,
so
that
is
a
big
plus
for
San
Bruno
and
an
asset
to
have
and
I
want
to.
Thank
staff
for
their
efforts
because,
obviously
they
did
the
work.
B
H
Make
a
motion
to
approve
those
would
also
wanted
to
just
say:
there
was
a
question
about
where
people
could
find
out
about
where
their
streets
are
go
to
the
city's
website
and
just
they
search
on
city
of
San
Bruno
PCI.
There
is
information,
that's
been
updated
as
of
March
of
2020.
That
shows
their
ranking
of
all
the
streets
in
the
city
and
some
people
think
their
streets
are
bad.
H
G
B
I
A
J
J
J
I
think
it
just
says
it
just
said
something
like
the
council
agreed
to
move
forward
with,
like
the
intent,
but
I
think
it
should
be
clear,
since
it
was
part
of
the
resolution
that
the
council
did
not
agree
to
ward
the
$45,000
contract
to
a
consultant,
consulting
company,
so
yeah
I'm
not
sure
what
the
process
would
be.
But
I
would
just
say
if
the
record
could
reflect
that
in
a.
B
Let's
proceed
on
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
with
counsels
indulgence,
I'd
like
to
just
go
ahead
and
open
up
for
public
comment,
I'd
like
to
call
on
mr.
Seymour
and
and
if
there
are
any
other
persons
that
had
wanted
to
speak.
That
night,
you
can
I
have
the
list
of
who
was
there
at
the
beginning,
but
that
wanted
to
speak.
If
you
could
raise
your
hand.
But
mr.
Seymour
appreciate
your
patience
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
open
up
the
mic
for
you
and
if
you
get
on
move
yourself
and
please
go
ahead.
G
B
G
G
Today
we
delivered
a
number
of
these
masks
to
an
anesthesiologist
who
is
on
the
front
lines
who
her
job
is
to
put
people
to
sleep
when
they
can
no
longer
breathe,
and
it
was
a
very
emotional
meeting
with
her,
but
we
delivered
200
of
these
to
her
we've
been
delivering
them
to.
Today
we
have
orders
for
Kaiser.
We
delivered
orders
to
Palo
Alto,
Medical,
Foundation
and
tomorrow,
we'll
be
delivering
some
to
our
fire
department.
We've
been
delivering
them
to
fire
departments
throughout
the
Bay
Area
and
I
just
want
people
to
know
that
this
group
exists.
G
It's
a
group
of
companies
that
are
located
in
Sausalito
and
they've
turned
over
their
manufacturing
to
manufacturing
PPE.
All
of
this
is
being
delivered
and
made
free
of
charge.
If
you
go
to
this
Facebook
site,
there's
an
order
form
and
there's
also
a
form
where
you
can
do
where
you
can
donate,
because
this
is
costing
a
lot
we're
shipping
throughout
the
country
FedEx
and
it's
it's.
A
lot
of
us
are
extending
not
only
our
personal
time
but
also
our
money
to
do
this,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
share
that.
G
I
want
people
to
know
that
there
are
groups
out
there
like
we're,
trying
to
fill
the
void
and
again
it's
Moran
ship,
emergency,
medical
manufacturing
group.
It's
a
Facebook
page!
If
you
could
go
onto
that
page.
If
you
are
a
medical
facility,
fire
department,
a
police
department
and
then
also
Laura,
we
have
your
shields,
but
the
maybe
you
could
call
me
so
that
we
could
figure
out
exactly
where
to
deliver
them.
That
would
be
great.
Thank
you
very
much.
G
B
A
A
C
Good,
yes,
yes,
all
right!
So
tonight
we're
going
to
take
a
couple
of
minutes
and
look
through
title
five,
which
is
part
of
the
city's
municipal
code
revision
process
and
our
agenda
tonight
is
we're
going
to
go
over
just
a
bit
of
a
background,
we're
going
to
discuss
the
policy
issues
around
title
five
and
request
some
direction
from
all
of
you
and
then
go
over
next
steps.
C
So
here's
the
background
you've
seen
this
before
for
our
prior
municipal
code
amendments,
and
so
we
started
this
process
in
late
2018
and
the
primary
focus
for
the
City
Council
was
to
review
these
chapters
of
the
municipal
code
for
internal
consistency
and
to
make
sure
they
are
consistent
with
current
law
and
in
addition
to
that,
the
City
Council
has
also
had
a
policy
discussion
for
those
required
revisions
about
a
number
of
provisions
in
each
of
those
chapters.
So,
for
example,
in
October
of
2018,
we
looked
at
title
1
in
title
2.
C
C
So
then
in
November
the
City
Council
adopted
revisions
to
title
1
and
title
2,
and
then
in
July
there
was
a
discussion
of
title
2
and
the
rest
of
title
3
again
with
some
policy
direction
on
a
couple
of
key
items
and
then,
finally,
most
recently
last
month
you
adopted
revisions
to
title
four
licenses
and
regulations
and
again
also
there.
There
were
a
number
of
policy
revisions
for
consistency
with
state
law
and
issues,
for
example
such
as
vending
in
city
parks.
C
So
that's
where
we've
been-
and
this
slide
shows
where
we're
going
tonight
and
in
the
next
couple
of
meetings.
So
title
five
has
eight
chapters
and
the
title
of
the
title
is
nuisances.
So
this
is
an
important
chapter
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
go
through
any
and
all
of
your
questions
that
you
have
about
it
before
we
bring
it
back.
C
So
these
eight
chapters
have
to
do
with
what's
a
nuisance,
talking
about
enforcement
and
then
talking
about
particular
kinds
of
nuisances
like
weeds,
graffiti
unruly
gatherings,
alcoholic
beverage,
sales
for
businesses
that
have
already
been
approved,
maintenance
of
distressed
properties
and
then
finally,
registration
or
foreclosed
and
abandoned
properties.
So
all
of
these
things
are
part
of
title
five,
which
is
what
the
city
does
to
regulate.
Basically,
the
look
and
feel
of
the
community.
C
So
this
is
an
important
chapter
and
there
are
a
number
of
policy
questions
that
we're
going
to
go
over
tonight
and
before
we
do
that,
I
want
to
just
give
you
a
very
brief
preview
of
what
we're
going
to
be,
focusing
on
so
we'll
mostly
focus
on
chapter
five
point:
zero
four,
which
is
the
definition
of
a
nuisance,
and
so
the
important
thing
here
is.
We
want
to
look
to
make
sure
that
this
section
is
consistent
with
the
newly
amended
zoning
ordinance
regarding
parking,
so
we'll
spend
a
few
minutes
talking
about
that.
C
Make
sure
that
we
take
a
pause
to
discuss
any
other
desired
amendments
about
parking,
and
this
is
by
the
way
on
private
property,
not
on
public
property,
because
that's
what
nuisances
are
addressing
on
public
excuse
me,
private
property
and
then
finally,
we
want
to
take
some
time
to
discuss
any
new
provisions
about
other
topics
that
maybe
aren't
currently
covered
in
in
the
chapter.
So
let's
take
just
a
minute
and
review
the
chapters
where
we're
proposing
only
minor
amendments.
There
are
some
of
those
in
5.08
which
is
enforcement,
nuisance
abatement
and
cost
recovery.
C
C
If
we
go
back
to
nuisances
in
general
and
I
think
it's
important
this.
This
was
in
the
staff
report,
but
I
want
to
display
the
entire
portion
of
the
staff
report,
because
I
think
it's
important
for
the
City
Council
and
the
public
to
understand
that
title
five
has
really
been.
Has
really
been
proven
proved
to
be
both
comprehensive
and
sufficient
to
address
by
code,
many,
if
not
virtually,
all,
of
the
code
enforcement
issues
in
the
city.
If
somebody
might
say
well,
that's
surprising,
because
we
still
have
code
enforcement
issues
in
the
city.
C
How
can
that
possibly
be?
And
the
answer
is
because
difficult
code
enforcement
cases
are
usually
not
the
result
of
inadequate
ordinances.
We
are
going
to
talk
about
some
potential
changes
to
the
ordinance
tonight,
but
for
the
most
part
you'll
see
if
you
read
through
the
ordinance
carefully,
as
both
the
staff
did
in
our
preparation
is
and
as
I
did
as
well,
that
most
of
the
nuisance
conditions
are
covered
in
the
ordinance.
C
Why
is
code
enforcement
often
so
difficult?
And
there
are
a
few
reasons
for
that.
The
first
thing
is
to
understand
the
distinction
between
a
public
and
a
private
nuisance
and
I
have
that
definition
in
the
staff
report
and
I
just
want
to
indicate
that
a
city
and
in
its
nuisance
ordinance
that's
designed
to
address
public
nuisances.
Private
nuisances
are
those
things
that
might
affect
one
neighbor
to
another,
but
don't
affect
the
entire
neighborhood
or
the
entire
community.
That's
the
definition
in
the
civil
code
at
section,
34
80,
so
for
public
nuisance
you
need
the
neighborhood.
C
You
need
a
considerable
number
of
persons,
that's
what
so
that's
different
than
a
private
nuisance,
which
might
be
one
neighbor
might
be
complaining
about
what
another
neighbor
is
doing
on
their
property.
There
might
be
somebody
who's,
you
know
passing
through
the
neighborhood
and
might
see
something
that
they
might
consider
to
be
a
nuisance
to
them,
but
the
neighborhood
isn't
complaining
about
it.
C
Another
reason
why
code
enforcement
is
often
challenging
is
because
some
of
the
violations
that
are
most
difficult
or
transitory,
so
these
are
things
that
the
person
might
be
complaining
about
it
and
it
might
be
a
valid
complaint.
But
then,
by
the
time
the
code
enforcement
officer
shows
up
it's
not
there
anymore.
C
So
those
are
those
are
difficult
to
deal
with,
because
in
order
to
prosecute
a
code
enforcement
case,
the
staff
has
to
personally
either
observer
from
the
violation,
and
you
would
see
that
if,
if
we
took
the
residents
word
for
it-
which
of
course
we
believe
them.
But
if
that's
all
we
had
that's,
that's
not
really
going
to
hold
up
in
a
court
to
justify
a
city
sanction
against
somebody
where
the
only
testimony
is.
Somebody
else
says
that
they
heard
or
saw
it.
C
Another
reason
why
code
enforcement
is
sometimes
difficult
is
violations
might
be
hard
to
confirm.
So
a
good
example
of
this
is
individuals
who
might
be
operating
a
business
out
of
their
home,
either
without
a
business
license
or
without
a
permit
from
the
Community
Development
Department.
The
only
way
to
confirm
that
is
to
go
into
the
house,
get
consent
to
do
that
and
basically
search
the
premises
for
evidence
of
the
business.
C
So
those
are
very
difficult
violations
to
confirm,
and
then
finally-
and
this
is
I-
think
what
occurs
most
often
is
residents
who
are
engaging
in
behavior
that
might
violate
our
code
can
be
resistant
and
they
can
be
resistant
to
changing
their
behavior.
Even
if
there's
a
sanction
imposed
like
a
fine
and
often
irrespective
of
what
the
amount
of
a
fine
is.
So
why
is
that?
Why
don't
most
people
just
follow
the
rules,
and
one
reason
is
that
there
might
be
circumstances
outside
of
their
control,
that
they
can't
do
anything
about.
C
Another
reason
is
there
might
be
a
dispute
between
neighbors
that
kind
of
underlies
the
issue?
It's
not
really
the
nuisance,
but
it's
something
else,
and
so,
if
you
don't
resolve
that
underlying
issue,
you're
not
going
to
ever
resolve
the
deep
sense.
Another
common
reason
why
these
things
are
difficult
to
rectify
is
it's
expensive.
So,
for
example,
if
you're
telling
somebody
they
have
to
take
down,
you
know
half
of
their
house
or
they
have
to
down
a
shed.
C
They
built
that
they're,
storing
their
tools,
and
these
are
expenses
that
the
property
owner
will
will
want
to
avoid,
incurring
and
then
finally
related
to
that
there's
some
advantage
to
the
property
owner
to
retaining
the
condition.
Sometimes
it's
an
economic
advantage,
but
sometimes
there
are
other
advantages
that
are
non-economic,
and
so
these
are
things,
for
example,
where
a
property
owner
we
had
a
code
enforcement
case
many
some
years
ago
in
which
there
was
a
the
property,
was
very
distressed.
C
The
property
owner
didn't
do
anything
about
the
property,
but
we
found
out
the
reason
was
there
was
a
disturbing
event
that
occurred
in
the
property
to
the
property
owner
and
they
really
couldn't
go
back
there,
so
they
just
let
it
fall
into
disrepair.
So
once
we
found
that
out,
we
were
able
to
work
with
property
owner
to
list
the
property,
and
it
was
eventually
rectified.
So
those
these
are
all
reasons
why
some
code
enforcement
cases
are
difficult.
C
So,
with
that
background,
what
did
we
do
before?
Embarking
on
a
revision
proposed
revision
of
chapter
5?
Well,
the
first
stop
was
the
community
development
department
in
requesting
staff
input
and
what
we
are
staff
is
what's
missing
from
the
code.
What
do
you
wish
you
had
in
the
code
to
deal
with
nuisance
conditions
that
you
have
seen
out
in
the
field
where
you
would
say
to
yourself
gosh?
If
only
the
code
said
X,
then
we
could
address
this.
That
was
the
question
we
asked
staff.
So
staff
came
up
with
a
couple
of
things.
C
Surprisingly,
not
very
many.
That
was
interesting.
I
thought.
Maybe
there
might
be
more,
but
there
weren't
there
were
only
a
few,
and
the
first
thing
they
mentioned
was
parking
and
I.
Think
this
is
an
interest
of
the
community
and
an
interest
of
the
City
Council.
So
let's
spend
a
couple
of
minutes
talking
about
how
the
issues
are
surrounding
parking
are
relating
to
title
12.
C
So
here's
the
challenge
with
parking
and
parking
on
private
property
and
I
usually
don't
like
to
read
my
slides.
But
let
me
read
this
one,
because
I
think
this
is
important
that
we
all
are
on
the
same
footing.
So
the
challenge
with
addressing
parking
private
property
is
that
in
some
neighborhoods,
the
built
environment
is
really
not
adequate
to
accommodate
the
number
and
types
of
operable
and
inoperable
vehicles
that
residents
own
and
operate
in
those
neighborhoods.
C
That's
what
a
number
of
years
of
research
and
data
and
analysis
has
uncovered
and
that's
a
very
difficult
problem
for
cities
to
solve,
because
we
can't
really
change
the
built
environment
very
easily
and
we
can't
make
residents
change
the
built
environment,
not
the
rel.
So
that's
our
challenge
with
with
parking
and
I
think
once
articulated
I
think
well,
we'll
all
realize
that
this
really
satisfies
all
of
the
criteria.
C
In
the
last
slide
for
a
difficult
code
enforcement
matter,
you
know,
there's
an
advantage
to
the
property
owner
to
having
the
cars
parked
on
his
or
her
property,
it's
expensive
to
either
register
them
or
to
get
rid
of
them
or
to
store
them
somewhere.
There's
a
reasons
why
they
want
to
have
the
car
close
by
they
don't
want
to
have
it
far
away
might
be
circumstances
outside
of
their
control.
For
example,
they
might
be
living
with
the
number
of
people
in
the
household,
and
so
therefore
those
people
might
have
vehicles.
C
So
there's
all
kinds
of
things
that
make
parking
on
are
dealing
with
parking
on
private
property
of
a
real
challenge.
So
what
has
the
city
done
in
response
to
community
interest
in
parking?
Well,
they've
done
three
things.
The
first
thing
the
City
Council
did.
Is
it
adopted
a
residential
permit
parking
program
and
the
purpose
of
that
one
of
the
purposes
was
to
limit
overcrowding
in
the
street,
so
in
other
words,
the
theory
was
we
don't
want
to
have
these
cars
competing
for
scarce
parking
spaces
on
the
street?
C
Let's
have
the
neighborhood
agree
if
they
wish
to
have
a
permit
parking
program
to
limit
the
number
of
bars
that
are
parked
in
on
the
public
street,
so
that
that
way,
when
you
come
home
from
work
or
in
the
evening
or
whatever
or
come
home
in
the
morning,
you
have
a
place
to
park,
or
at
least
a
larger
opportunity
to
find
a
place
to
park.
So
that
was
the
first
thing
that
the
City
Council
did
in
response
to
community
interest.
C
So
that
was
done
for
a
period
of
time
and
then
the
final
thing
the
City
Council
just
recently
did-
is
they
adopted
new
zoning
regulations
that
allow
or
incentivize
or
make
easier
the
creation
of
additional
off
street
parking
on
non-conforming
private
property?
What
does
that
mean?
What
that
means?
Is
that
if
you
have
a
property
that
has
a
substandard
garage
or
maybe
only
a
one
car
garage,
and
maybe
the
car
doesn't
even
fit
in
the
garage
or
a
driveway
that
is
substandard?
It's
not
long
enough,
so
you
can
hardly
park
a
car
in
it.
C
C
Now.
It's
important
to
note
that
the
purpose
of
the
zoning
code
is
really
to
address
required
parking
for
residential
uses.
The
zoning
code
is
which
is
chapter
12
title
12
is
not
a
mechanism
to
determine
whether
we
should
or
shouldn't
have
certain
kinds
of
vehicles
or
certain
kinds
of
personal
property,
or
whether
it's
a
public
nuisance
to
display
those
things
on
private
property,
all
the
zoning
code.
C
Does
it
says
if
you
have
a
private
property,
you
have
to
have
a
certain
amount
of
required
parking
and
in
cases
where
your
neighborhood
is
impacted
or
your
property
is
impacted.
The
city
is
going
to
make
it
easier
for
you
to
park
vehicles
of
whatever
type
they
might
be
on
your
property,
so
that
they
can
be
gotten
off
the
street.
That
was
the
reason
for
the
zoning.
C
Conversely,
title
five,
which
is
what
we're
dealing
with
tonight
sorry
only
addresses
conditions
that
are
a
public
nuisance.
So
title
five
doesn't
talk
about
if
you
own
a
single-family
home
how
many
off
street
parking
spaces.
Do
you
need
what
title
five
talks
about
is,
if
you
own
a
single-family
home,
really
don't
want
you
to
be
putting
ugly
things
out
on
the
driveway.
So
let's
talk
about
what
those
things
are
under
the
current
definition
in
title
five.
C
So
under
are
the
zoning
code
that
the
City
Council
just
adopted,
what's
allowed
I'm
going
to
display
a
couple
of
these
things
at
the
same
time,
so
under
the
zoning
code
for
your
required
parking,
you
can
park
a
motor
vehicle,
an
operable
motor
vehicle
on
a
garage
apron.
So
that's
the
section
in
front
of
the
garage,
a
driveway
or
in
an
adjacent
side
yard
with
certain
conditions.
C
So,
for
example,
in
your
driveway,
you
can
have
a
motor
vehicle
like
a
Honda,
Civic
and
then
right
next
to
it,
you
can
have
a
trailer
with
a
with
a
camper
on
it,
for
example,
and
the
reason
for
for
this
rule
is
because
the
city
has
determined
that
we'd
rather
have
your
trailer
with
the
camper
on
it
on
your
private
property,
as
opposed
to
on
the
street,
taking
up
one
and
a
half
or
two
parking
spaces
regarding
inoperable
vehicles.
The
zoning
code
is
pretty
clear.
C
It
says
you
can't
park
them
in
the
visible
front
or
side
yards,
so
no
inoperable
vehicles
if
they're
visible
in
the
front
and
side
yards
all
right.
What
is
title
five
in
comparison,
allow
all
right
well,
operable
vehicles,
you
can
park
a
boat,
a
trailer,
a
camper
or
an
RV.
Only
one
of
those
things
in
the
garage.
That's
fine!
We
don't
care
what
you
park
in
your
garage,
particularly
because
you
can't
see
it
or
on
a
city
approved
driveway.
C
What
is
title
five
say
about
inoperable
vehicles?
Well
again,
similarly
to
the
zoning
code,
if
they're
in
your
front
or
side
yard,
we
don't
want
to
see
them,
they
have
to
be
either
screened
or
otherwise
allowed
by
the
zoning
code.
Well,
they're
not
allowed
in
the
zoning
code.
So
there
you
are
so
again
both
the
amended
zoning
code
that
the
City
Council
adopted
recently
and
the
current
version
of
title
five
are
pretty
consistent.
C
Sorry
have
to
flip
my
screen
over
here,
campers
or
RVs.
You
can
have
one
of
those
well,
it's
within
the
city
council's
policy
discretion
to
change
that.
If
they
want
to,
they
could
say
you
could
have
none
of
those.
You
can't
park
any
of
those
on
private
property
or
they
could
say
you
know
what
you
can
park,
two
of
them
on
private
property
or
more
because
if
you
know
it
lets
you
park
to
on
private
property.
Well
you're
gonna
park
it
on
the
street,
and
that
might
be
an
issue.
C
The
second
policy
question
is
you
could
decide
that
the
prohibitions
for
inoperable
vehicles
aren't
quite
strong
enough,
and
you
could
say
you
know
what
we
don't
like
the
look
of
these
inoperable
vehicles
and
we
like
them
so
little
that
we
don't
want
any
of
them
park
anywhere
on
your
property,
where
it's
visible,
even
if
it's
screened.
So
even
if
you
have
a
fence
around
it
or
it's
behind
a
gate
in
your
side
yard.
C
If
you
can
see
that,
whether
you
can
see
it
or
not,
we
don't
want
you
to
park
it
on
your
property,
so
immediately,
you'll
notice
that
we
have
a
difficulty
with
enforcement
on
that,
because
if
somebody
decides
to
violate
that
code,
which
they
very
well
might,
then
a
warrant
might
be
required
to
get
into
private
property
if
it's
covered.
So
that
would
be
a
very
difficult
thing
to
prohibit.
C
So
those
are
the
the
possible
the
really
the
two
issues
that
came
up
when
we
were
reviewing
the
code
is
two
possible
changes.
The
City
Council
could
make
either
change
the
number
of
allowed
boats,
trailers,
campers
or
RVs
from
1
to
something
different
or
prohibit
any
inoperable
vehicle
parking,
but
again
there's
some
enforcement
problems
with
that.
So
related
to
this
and
sort
of
the
final
topic
in
parking
has
to
do
with
the
question
of
we'll
just
call
them
tarps
or
coverings,
and
this
has
come
up
on
a
number
of
occasions.
C
So
that's
that's
the
conundrum
and
I
suppose
it's
possible
that
people
in
the
community
may
have
differing
views
about
what's
less
attractive.
Some
people
might
say:
well,
you
know
if
you
have
that
old
inoperable
car
that
you've
always
been
waiting
to
work
on.
Frankly,
it's
a
good-looking
car
I'd,
rather
look
at
that
than
a
tarp,
but
other
folks
might
have
the
opposite
opinion.
They
might
rather
see
look
at
a
tarp.
C
So
that
concludes
the
parking
topics
that
we
think
are
worthy
of
some
discussion
under
the
title
5
of
the
code.
But
there
are
just
a
couple
of
other
things
that
you
might
want
to
consider.
One
of
the
suggestions
that
our
staff
made,
which
we
thought
was
a
great
idea-
is
to
prohibit
feeding
of
wild
animals,
and
this
has
become
a
public
nuisance
in
some
areas,
especially
the
downtown
where
you
have
individuals
that
may
be
associated
with
some
businesses
feeding
pigeons
and
they
create
a
public
nuisance.
C
So
that's
something
that
that
I
think
the
council
should
definitely
consider
exploring
the
other
thing
that
staff
recommended
both
building
department
and
code
enforcement
is
some
wording.
Amendments
throughout
the
code
to
conform
with
state
law
and
those
are
reflected
in
the
draft.
That's
attached
to
your
staff
report
and
unless
you
have
questions
about
them,
I'm
not
going
to
go
over
them
in
detail
right
now.
C
So
what
are
the
next
steps?
Is
we're
looking
for
some
direction
and
particularly
on
those
two
issues
parking
in
an
tarps
and
then
we
would
be
ready
to
introduce
and
adopt
amendments
at
a
subsequent
meeting,
and
the
schedule
at
the
moment
anyway
remains
on
track
to
complete
all
11
chapters,
hopefully
by
2021.
If
we
complete
chapter
five
in
the
next,
you
know
a
month
or
two
we'll
be
will
be
a
little
less
than
half
done,
and
the
the
other
chapters
should
should
come
in
due
course.
B
Thank
you
mark
for
the
presentation
and
for
for
the
public
as
well.
It's
also
that
one
of
the
things
the
council
at
asking
City
Attorney,
was
going
through
each
of
the
chapters
in
the
Municipal
Code
and
again
reviewing
them,
bringing
it
up
to
date,
making
sure
they're
consistent
with
the
other
chapters,
and
so
they
all
they
all
flow
in
or
in
sync,
and
appreciate
that
do
we
have
any
questions
of
marks
on
specifics
to
his
this
presentation
that
he
gave
hands
up
there.
B
C
All
right
we're
having
an
audio
difficulty,
that's
a
good
question
I,
so
I
don't
actually
get
any
complaints.
Those
complaints
all
go
to
the
code
enforcement
department
and
they're
they're
tracked
and
logged,
so
I
don't
have
an
answer
to
that,
but
it
it
was
apparently
enough
of
them
or
complaints
were
sufficiently
persistent
that
the
code
enforcement
officers
sort
of
put
this
at
on
their
list
as
something
that
they're.
You
know
that
they
occasionally
or
at
least
more
than
occasionally
encounter.
C
G
J
C
City
Council
tonight
and
then
at
the
next
meeting
we
would
bring
the
ordinance
back
for
introduction,
look
in
the
City
Council
to
comment
on
the
ordinance
and
then,
if
there
are
comments,
we
could
bring
it
back
again.
If
there
are
major
revisions
or
revisions,
those
revisions
can
be
made.
You
know
at
the
time
and
it
can
factor
an
option.
There's
two
more
meetings
to
answer
your
question:
okay,.
J
B
What
I
thought
is
ring?
We
do
any
quick
questions
I'm,
seeing
that
we
do
have
one
member
of
the
public
that
wishes
to
speak.
So
you
know
I'm
free
to
do
it.
If
we
want,
we
can
take
the
member
of
the
public.
If
that's
okay
and
then
we
can
come
back
to
us
and
then
Linda
I
can
start
back
with
you
and
then
we'll
just
go
down
the
list.
Is
that
all
right
perfect?
Thank
you?
Okay,
all
right,
so
I'm
seeing
one
hand
up
and
I'm
seeing
mr.
B
G
G
We
have
all
sorts
of
other
medication
issues
that
we
could
take
into
consideration
and
that
is
through
the
permitting
process.
Unfortunately,
the
permitting
process
that
we
have
right
now
is
very
cumbersome,
but
there
are
many
city
is
who
have
permitting
processes
that
would
allow
us
to
ensure
that
people
don't
basically
collect
cars
in
the
only
reason
people
would
have
to
park
in
their
front
lawn
is
to
collect
Park
in
any
city.
G
That
wants
to
decide
to
say
that
it's
okay
in
there
city,
ordinance
to
park
cars
on
their
front
lawn,
is
a
city
that
I
don't
know.
I'm
really
concerned
with
I
have
to
live
in
that
city,
whose,
if,
if
I
understand
this
correctly,
is
considering
that
option
and
I,
don't
think
that's
an
option
that
we
can
should
consider.
I
think
that
San
Bruno
lends
itself
to
a
city
that
should
be
basically
put
higher
on
a
pedestal
or
right.
G
G
It
doesn't
seem
right
and
if
you
can
do
it
down
here
for
those
of
you
who
are
up
on
the
hill,
if
you
can
do
it
down
here,
if
we
make
this
something,
that's
okay
and
it
alleviates
some
of
the
pressure
on
on
I
hate
to
say
this,
because
I
don't
like
to
divide
the
city.
I
think
that
and
I'm
not
trying
to
divide
the
city.
I
think
that
we
are
living
in
different
neighborhoods
in
our
neighborhood
on
the
east
side
is
more
congested,
then
on
the
west
side.
G
But
if
it
can
happen
here,
then
it
can
happen
all
throughout
the
city
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
something
that
we
want
in
San
Bruno
and
if
we
have
staff
and
legal
who
are
trying
to
push
this
through
I
think
you
can.
You
should
consider
whether
or
not
they
should
be
the
staff
and
legal
that
you
hold
and
have
because
there
are
others
who
would
protect
our
communities
and
I
know
that
my
wife
wants
to
talk.
So
maybe
we
could
reset
the
clock.
B
G
G
I
think
just
with
the
line
issue
I
think
we're
really
coming
at
this.
From
a
defeatist
point
of
view,
it's
like
we're
almost
looking
like
how
not
to
do
things
better,
just
kind
of
throwing
our
arms
up
in
the
air-
and
you
know
we've
heard
before
that-
it's
the
culture
of
the
neighborhood.
Well,
if
you
do
any
less
enforcing
than
you're
doing
now,
our
culture
is
going
to
get
a
lot
worse
and
I.
G
G
So
you
know
it
should
only
be
considered
if
it's
within
the
neighborhood
well,
a
lot
of
people
are
very,
very
uncomfortable
to
call
on
their
neighbors,
so
what
they
do,
they
call
someone
else
from
outside
the
neighborhood
and
have
them
call
in
because
unfortunately,
too
often,
we've
heard
that
code
enforcement
might
have
told
them
who
called
being
their
neighbors
and
they
stopped
calling
10
20
30
years
ago,
they're,
just
they
don't
feel
safe
about
it.
So
that's
one
thing
to
consider
another
to
consider
is
the
only
reason
we're
here.
G
Thinking
about
parking
on
lawns
is
because
we
haven't
been
consistent.
We
have
not
been
consistent
in
enforcing
the
rules
and
I.
Just
really
think
we
could
do
a
lot
better
and
when
it
comes
down
to
it,
I
have
a
small
driveway.
So
you
know
I
have
the
luxury
of
being
able
to
get
a
car
that
fits
within
back
and
we
went
down
from
two
cars
to
one.
G
I
think
that's
where
the
burden
is
it's
on
me
to
follow
the
regulations,
and
you
know
if
I
was
holding
on
to
somebody's
junker
for
20
years,
I
I
think
the
city
should
have
the
right
to
say
you
know
what
you're
bringing
this
neighborhood
down
and
also
in
the
long
run.
We
don't
know
what
tomorrow
holds,
but
if
people
are
parking
on
bare
lawns,
my
house
value
is
gonna,
go
down
as
it
is.
We
already
confirmed
earlier
today
that
we're
at
the
bottom
of
the
list,
forgetting
our
streets
fixed.
So
we
have
broken
down
streets.
G
We
have
cars
blocking
sidewalks,
you
add
a
card
to
lawns.
I,
don't
know
that
this
is
a
place.
I
would
want
to
consider
living
in.
Possibly
it's
just
the
standard
keeps
dropping
instead
of
trying
to
keep
it
up
and
plan
and
be
proactive,
look,
the
bar
gets
lower
and
lower,
and
we
could
do
a
hell
of
a
lot
better
than
the
best.
Thank
you.
B
G
About
boats
and
RV's
who
in
fin
the
neighborhood
they
should
not
be
allowed
to
park
and
I
know.
Other
cities
have
ordinances
that
don't
allow
these
in
the
neighborhoods,
especially
where
I
live
or
where
our
family
lives
and
some
of
our
friends
live.
There
very
impacted
when
a
boat
RV
is
parked
in
the
neighborhood,
and
you
know
they
only
use
these
vehicles
do
not
move
because
they're
recreational
vehicles,
they're
seasonal
vehicle
they're
only
used
maybe
two
or
three
months
out
of
the
whole
year.
G
G
I
like
to
see-
and
that's
impacting
the
neighborhood
to
everybody
uses
at
that
area
to
park
that
lives
on
that
strip
of
the
road.
So
I
would
like
to
see
that
you
know
cleaned
up
and
enforced
and
and
also
to
reiterate
blocking
the
sidewalks,
and
that
is
a
big
issue
regarding
you
know:
blocked
inside
work
for
pedestrians
have
the
right-of-way,
that's
what
the
sidewalks
are
made
for.
People
you
know
have
in
strollers
have
difficulties
getting
around
it's
a
safety
issue.
They
have
to
go
into
the
street
to
get
around
the
vehicle,
so.
G
B
You
Tim
I'm,
seeing
no
other
hands
lissa
City
Clerk,
see
something
I.
Don't
then
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
end
any
public
comment
and
bring
it
back
to
Council
as
we
bring
it
back
to
Council
I
want
to
they
just
want
to
clarify
for
all
of
us
is
that
in
reading
the
staff
report
I
did
not
see
or
unless
I
overlooked
it.
B
My
colleagues
can
correct
me
that
it
was
proposing
for
somebody
to
park
on
their
lawn
in
the
front,
so
I'm
gonna
ask
the
city
attorney
to
and
I'm
sorry
colleagues
I,
just
kind
of
want
to
ant
address
that,
because
that's
not
what
I
kind
of
was
reading
so
I
want
to
make
that
clear.
I
also
want
to
make
it
clear
the
process.
B
This
process
is
for
guidance,
and
this
process
is
for
feedback
from
Council,
so
our
legal
counsel
or
our
city
manager
does
not
make
policy
the
council
does,
but
they
do
have
to
bring
it
to
us
after
getting
staffs
input
and
give
us
what
they
know
and
we
give
them
direction
to
how
we
want
to
see
it
molded
so
to
to
feel
that
somebody
is
pushing
their
their
desire
on
us.
I.
B
C
Mr.
mayor,
thank
you
so
gosh
I
sure
hope.
I
didn't
give
anybody
the
impression
that
either
the
staff
report
or
the
presentation
or
the
PowerPoint
or
anything
that
staff
is
suggesting,
suggests
that
people
can
park
their
cars
on
the
law.
And
the
answer
is
that
they
can't
do
that
now
and
there's
nothing
in
the
proposed
changes
to
the
ordinance
that
they
would
be
able
to
do.
C
D
D
It
is
not
a
buy
right.
It
still
has
to
go
through
a
discretionary
approval
process
through
staff,
and
so
certainly
all
of
the
aesthetic
concerns
that
I
think
are
inherent
with
additional
parking
on
private
property.
In
the
front
of
the
house
will
certainly
be
looked
at
when
those
requests
are
made.
I
think
the
other
thing
that
I
want
to
say
as
a
follow-up
to
Mark's
presentation
is
that
the
City
Council
is
aware
of
that.
We
are
looking
into
code
enforcement
and
ways
to
improve
our
code
enforcement.
D
D
And
that
really
wasn't
the
thrust
of
tonight's
conversation,
that
the
thrust
of
tonight's
conversation
was
to
keep
with
this
process
of
going
systematically
through
the
Municipal
Code
and
make
adjustments
for
consistency
and
get
feedback
from
Council.
On
anything
that
you
feel
that
we
should
be
looking
at.
B
Okay
appreciate
those
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
a
council
understands
because
I
don't
want
anyone
to
get
that
impression
that
the
standard
is
dropping
and
that's
we
want
people
to
park
on
their
lawns.
I,
don't
think!
That's
what
staffs
in
scene
way
I,
don't
believe
the
council
but
wants
to
see
that
either.
So
with
that
Linda
did
we
want
to
go
back?
Did
you
want
me
to
go
back
to
you?
Would
you
like
me
just
to
go
around
I
can
hit
on
everyone
whatever
you
wish?
Oh.
B
I
I
I
I'm
fine
with
it
remaining
the
same
I
think
I've
seen
there's
more
of
a
problem
with
inoperable
vehicles
than
that
in
quantity
than
more
than
one
camper,
and
there's
no
need
to
change
that
I'm
I'm!
Happy
with
that.
Mr.
mayor,
do
you
want
me
to
continue
going
through
the
list
or
we
want
each
person
to
kind
of
shot
at
each
item?
Mark.
B
I
You
sure
it
wasn't
noted
this
question
I
do
have
is
the
tiny
up
on
vacant
properties.
There
are
a
number
of
them
that
have
remained
in
a
certain
degraded
State
I'm,
looking
at
I,
believe
it'll
be
codes,
5:24
and
526
to
have
those
kind
of
match
each
other
a
little
bit
better.
I
remember
when
a
lot
of
properties
were
being
foreclosed
and
the
code
enforcement
department
had
to
arrange
a
an
agreement
with
the
property
owner
to
to
have
somebody
maintain
those
properties.
I
If
I'm,
correct,
I
think
that's
something
that
we
should
be
doing
with
these
vacant
properties
that
are
in
high
visible
areas
on
El
Camino,
where
the
weeds
just
get
to
be
super
high,
and
then
eventually
somebody
has
to
go
out
there
and
code
enforcement
gizmo
notice,
and
they
they
cut
it.
But
it's
those
vacant
property
should
be
on
a
maintenance
program
that
was
similar
to
the
abandoned
properties
for
the
foreclosures
to.
If
from
that's
my
comment,
I'm
I'm
in
favor
of
making
sure
the
inoperable
stay
off,
driveways
I,
don't
think,
there's
a
place
for
them.
I
They
should
be
out
of
view
entirely
and
those
vehicles
that
need
to
put
a
tarp
on
for
a
temporary
basis,
that's
understandable,
but
to
leave
a
vehicle
in
a
driveway
with
the
tarp
on
and
now
we
can't
tell
if
it's
if
it's
actually
operable
I
think
maybe
perhaps
the
solution
there
is
to
have
the
license
plate
displayed
with
that
type
of
tarp,
so
that
it
could
be
determined
that
that
vehicle
is
operable
or
inoperable
without
having
to
get
a
search
warrant.
My
last
question:
our
clarification
is
for
feeding
of
wild
animals.
C
I
There
are
a
number
of
people
that
actually
try
to
save
these
cats.
I
have
a
bigger
heart
for
the
kitties
than
for
the
pigeons,
so
I
think
getting
some
feedback
and
there's
a
couple
groups
that
could
be
contacted.
That
can
give
you
actually
what
they're
trying
to
do
I
think
they're
also
trying
to
catch
them
and
and
trying
to
find
homes
for
them.
So
one
way
to
get
to
get
them
to
you
is
to
actually
feed
them.
I
J
C
J
I
think
if
we
can
get
that
and
then
the
numbers
I
mentioned
earlier
around
the
campers
and
like
how
big
of
a
problem
is,
is
that
would
be
great
since
we're
approving
all
of
five
I
wanted
to
go
to
page
94
in
the
packet?
It's
section
five
point:
zero.
Eight
point:
zero,
four:
zero,
the
administrative
fine.
It
says
that
the
amounts
of
the
fine
imposed
pursuant
to
this
article
shall
be
set
forth
in
a
schedule.
Fines
established
by
resolution
of
the
City
Council.
J
C
Good
question,
so
those
are
part
of
the
master
fee
schedule
which
the
City
Council
does
approve
each
year
and
I
think
the
the
amounts
are
hundred
two
hundred
and
five
hundred,
although
I'm
not
a
hundred
percent
sure
of
that
so
five
hundred
for
the
third
offense,
but
the
City
Council
is
welcome
to
review
those
at
during.
You
know
the
master
fee
schedule
process.
We
usually
don't
like
to
put
them
directly
in
this
ordinance
because
it's
it's
easier
to
adopt,
remember
resolute
than
it
is
to
amend
an
ordinance.
J
Okay,
okay,
so
then
the
next
part
is
page
294
also
it
says
payment
of
fine
and
it
says
that
fine
payment
shall
be
mailed
or
tender
to
the
city,
clerk
of
San,
Bruno
and
I.
Just
wanted
to
I,
don't
know
if
that's
the
process.
I
had
not
heard
that,
and
so,
if
that's
what's
happening
great,
if
it's
not
happening,
maybe
we
just
need
to
corrected
I.
Don't
our
fines
being
sent
to
the
city
clerk
Martin
you've
got
on
you
within
15
calendar
days,
yeah.
C
J
J
C
J
J
J
So
this
says
that
the
deadline
is
stated
in
the
City
Council's
resolution
and
so
I
guess
my
question
around
the
abatement
is
I.
Imagine
that
that's
not
part
of
the
master
fee
schedule.
This
is
a
separate
resolution
and
how
can
we
review
that
because
I
know
some
of
these
abatements
have
been
going
on
for
a
long
time
and
I'm
wondering
if
the
City
Council
will
have
an
opportunity
to
shorten
that
period
of
time,
though,.
C
This
is
probably
worth
taking
a
quick
look
at,
but
I
think
the
resolution
that's
being
referred
to
here
is
the
resolution
that
the
City
Council
would
adopt
in
the
event
of
an
abatement.
So,
for
example,
there
aren't
abatement
resolutions
that
are
just
pending
and
waiting
to
be
used.
It's
a
resolution
that's
adopted
in
a
particular
circumstance
when
an
abatement
is
required,
because
in
order
to
have
an
abatement
you
you
have
to
go
to
court,
you
can't
enter
private
property
without
a
warrant
or
without
some
sort
of
court
order.
C
So
what
happened
in
the
past
is
that
there
has
been
a
problem
on
the
property.
The
city
goes
to
court.
We
get
an
order
in
case
I'm.
Thinking
of
the
gentleman
appealed.
There
was
a
resolution
that
says
resolution
to
abate
it,
and
then
he
didn't
abate
it.
So
then
the
city
had
to
pay
to
abate
it,
and
then
that
amount
has
been
reported
now
against
the
property.
So
that's
usually
how
the
process
works.
Okay,.
J
J
Regarding
weed
removal,
I'm
just
curious,
I,
don't
know
anything
again.
This
is
new
to
me
from
a
municipal
standpoint,
but
as
far
as
the
sidewalk
goes
and
the
weeds
on
the
sidewalk
I
know,
we
have
some
weeds
right
now
that
I
will
get
to,
but
in
some
areas
it
just
looks
a
little
in
dire
need
of
some
TLC
and
I'm.
Just
wondering.
Is
there
anything
that
we
can
place
in
here
or
anything
that
is
alright?
C
So
that's
an
interesting
question
so
remember
this
title
deals
with
things
on
private
property,
not
on
public
property,
so
weeds
in
the
sidewalk
er
on
public
property,
and
the
provisions
of
weeds
in
here
are
really
designed
to
address
not
just
nuisance
conditions,
but
mainly
fire
hazards,
all
right
with
respect
to
weeds
in
the
sidewalk
there's
another
section
of
our
code,
which
is
in
an
upcoming
chapter,
I'm.
Sorry
I,
can't
remember
which
one
it
is
that
talks
about
the
requirement
for
adjacent
property
owners
to
maintain
the
sidewalk
in
front
of
their
homes
right
so
I.
C
J
Is
it
I
think
just
to
make
sure
that
there
can
bear
cohesive?
Is
this
a
good
place
to
put
place
it
where
it
would
balance
it
out
as
a
nuisance,
or
would
you
recommend
waiting
until
we
cover
that
code
and
I?
Don't
know
if
we're
gonna
cover
that
code
cause?
It
sounds
like
that's
a
whole
different
section,
yeah.
A
J
C
J
J
J
J
C
Slightly
confusing
thanks
for
for
asking,
so
the
original
code
said
that
if
your
alcohol
establishment
was
approved
before
the
old
zoning
code,
which
I
think
was
2003,
then
those
activities
are
based
on
a
different
set
of
standards,
in
other
words
they're,
legally
non-conforming,
and
they
can
continue.
So
the
only
thing
I
wanted
to
make
sure
is
that
by
amending
this
code,
you
didn't
suddenly
extend
that
day
to
2020
right.
So
now
everything
between
2003
and
2012
on
conforming.
No,
we
want
to
just
keep
that
2003
date.
J
J
C
J
Guess
another
question
is:
would
it
be
possible
and
I
guess
the
problem
would
be
from
an
administrative
standpoint,
is
how
you
actually
enforce
it,
but
I'd
be
curious
to
know
if
it
would
be
possible
to
somehow
add
if
we're
talking
about
you
know,
individuals
who
can
have
cars
of
n
number
of
cars
or
inoperable
vehicles.
Is
there
any
way
to
add
to
the
definition
of
nuisance
people
who
are
parking
their
cars
to
go
to
the
airport?
J
C
So
that
is
a
difficult
problem
to
solve,
and
it's
a
problem
that
is
I
think
best
addressed
by
the
residential
permit
parking
program,
that
sort
of
exactly
what
that's
designed
to
address,
where
there's
an
influx
from
an
external
source
of
individuals
parking
and
taking
up
street
parking
that
should
be
able
to
be
used
by
the
neighborhood.
The
the
difficulty
with
with
having
it
in
in
this
title
or
any
other
title
is
again.
C
This
is
private
property,
only
not
public
property,
but
the
the
difficulty
is
yes,
of
course,
with
respect
to
enforcement,
you
know
it's
it's
not
a
nuisance
if
the
same
car
any
word
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
find
out.
Why
are
you
parking
there?
So
we
can't
ask
people:
why
did
you
park
your
car?
And
yes,
we
know
there
are
reports,
of
course
people
parking
in
in
neighborhoods,
so
they
can
go
to
the
airport.
We've
seen
people
through
it.
We
know
that's
happening
best,
address
I,
think
by
a
residential
permit
parking
program.
Okay,.
C
I
see
it
I
understand
yeah.
So
this
this
was
added
to
be
consistent
with
new
California
laws
having
to
do
with
building
and
plumbing
codes,
and
the
only
thing
of
course
relating
to
cannabis
is
making
sure
that
there's
evidence
if,
if
there
is
cannabis,
being
grown
on
the
property
which
is
allowed
under
state
law,
that
the
agreement,
the
rental
agreement,
if
it's
a
problem
that
prohibits
it.
So
it's
it's
not
something
that
normally
staff
would
enforce.
C
So
that's
that's
a
good
question,
probably
something
we
might
want
to
check
with
the
police
department
about
I.
Don't
know
that
the
city
can
require
additional
registration
of
private
property
over
and
above
what
the
state
requires
and
I'm
taking
a
guess
at
this.
So
I
apologize.
If
if
it
turns
out
to
be
wrong
because
I've
never
been
asked
that
question,
but
probably
that's
a
preemption
issue
in
that
the
state
occupies
the
field
of
vehicle
registration
and
it's
I
think
it's
unlikely
that
at
least
there
might
be
a
problem
with
that.
B
E
Hey
you
know,
I,
think,
just
on
that
point,
I
think
that
and
I
know
you
haven't
gone
through
this
process
before
a
lot
of
these
things,
councilmember
Mason
but
I
think
sending
an
email
to
mark
prior
to
these
meetings.
Good
thing,
you
have
a
lot
of
great
questions,
a
lot
of
details
that
he
might
be
more
prepared
for
some
answers,
or
at
least
be
able
to
give
you
someone's
answers.
I
know,
that's
always
found
very
helpful
and
I
enjoy
Vaughn
I
appreciate
this
statement.
E
E
I'm,
a
very
Claire
know
on
allowing
additional
boats,
RVs
or
trailers
and
somebody's
property
I.
Think
the
more
we
allow,
the
more
the
residents
go
out
and
buy
and
I
understand
the
need
it's
expensive
to
store
a
boat
or
trailer
somewhere
else,
and
if
you
happen
to
have
the
few
properties
in
San
Bruno
that
have
a
luxury
of
being
able
to
have
a
nice
white
space
to
be
able
to
store
that
that's
great
but
I.
E
Think
it's
more
of
a
an
eyesore
disty
more
that
on
your
property,
any
inoperable
vehicle
I,
don't
think
it
should
be
screamed,
I!
Think!
Oh,
yes,
yes,
I'm,
fun!
Prohibiting
any
inoperable
vehicle
from
being
screened,
I
think
it
just
takes
I.
Could
they
should
just
shouldn't?
Be
there
I
think
it
just
takes
away
from
our
authority
to
do
anything
and
I
guess
I
guess
the
question
I
was
gonna
have
is
what
is
the
definition
of
screened?
Is
it
anything
that
sort
of
go
ahead?
Mark.
C
That's
that's
also
a
good
question,
so
some
of
those
definitions
are
really
in
the
zoning
code
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
we
didn't
have
time
to
do
before
tonight's
meeting
is
check
to
understand
with
the
Development
Department.
What
does
that
really
mean
and
I
think
from
a
practical
standpoint?
It
certainly
means
a
fence.
It
could
be
a
hedge
that
is,
is
tall
enough,
that
you
can't
see
it
from
the
public
right-of-way.
But
this
is
one
of
those
areas
where
it's
really
goal
is
to
not
see
it
from
the
public,
right-of-way
and
so
oftentimes.
C
C
It's
an
involved
due
process
because
you're,
essentially
taking
away
somebody's
private
property
and,
and
so
other
cities
have
done
that
at
some
significant
expense.
But
that
is
something
that
the
city
can
do
from
an
operational
standpoint.
It's
a
matter
of
time
and
resources.
So
if
we
do
put
that
in
the
code,
I
think
it's
important
to
understand
that
we
need
the
staff
will
need
with
resources
to
engage
program
to
abate
those
vehicles
on
private
property.
E
Maybe
the
problem
is
I
I've
seen
several
vehicles
now,
there's
one
up
in
the
Glen
View
neighborhood,
there's
one
in
fact,
in
the
backyard
of
the
house,
fire
on
rosewood
of
these
inoperable
vehicles
and
I
would
hate
living
next
door.
Knowing
that
you've
got
a
vehicle
parked
in
the
backyard,
it
probably
has
some
sort
of
gasoline
in
the
tank
and
it's
just
a
hazard
and
so
I
think
when
they're
unseen
we
just
we
have
that
potential
for
a
hazard
and
with
that
house.
E
Fire
on
rosewood
that
had
to
be
I
know
not
had
to
be
I,
know
very
scary
for
the
neighbors.
This
runni
neighbors
tarps
I
think
it
just
creates
a
another
problem
in
the
community.
I
think
it
should.
The
tarp
looks
good
for
about
the
first
month
and
then
the
San
Bruno
winds
and
the
elements
tear
it
up
and
before
you
know
it,
it's
just
right
at
tarp
and
I
think
that
just
again-
and
it
leads
for
more
problems
when
you
can't
see
what's
going
on.
E
But
you
know,
I
mean
the
goal
here
and
I
think
I
know
for
the
few
residents
who
spoke.
We
want
to
be
proud
of
our
city,
we
want
it
to
be
a
beautiful
city.
We
don't
want
something
where
we
allow
for
additional
for
people
to
just
leave
inoperable
vehicles
on
a
driveway
somewhere,
where
you
know
the
weeds
are
growing
underneath
the
tires
and
underneath
the
vehicle,
and
it
just
it's
it's
it's
not
it's
unsightly
and,
and
that's
not
a
neighborhood
that
I
want
to
live
in.
Thank
you.
H
Thanks
mark
for
for
the
study,
I
think
we're
doing
really
great
I'm
revisiting
all
these
things
and
getting
everything
aligned
with
our
zoning
and
getting
the
principal
code
up-to-date.
So
really
appreciate
you.
Staying
on
task
with
this
I
had
yeah
I'm,
looking
in
the
report
on
the
definition
of
inoperable
vehicle,
and
it
was
one
of
the
conditions
that
could
render
it
they
could
define
an
in
an
operable
vehicle
is
lacking.
A
current
registration
and
there
are,
the
DMV
does
allow
people
to
register
a
vehicle.
It's
not
operational.
H
It
doesn't
mean
that
it
doesn't
that
can't
that
it
doesn't
run.
It
just
means
that
they
are
not
planning
on
using
it
on
the
road
and
and
they
don't
get
a
new
tag
and
they
are
still
compliant
basically
with
the
state
regulations
on
the
vehicle.
So
if
we
designate
those
vehicles
that
are
basically
compliant
with
the
state
as
inoperable
as
well
based
on
this
definition
with
those,
then
also
run
afoul
of
our
ordinance
and
being
able
to
have
those
in
a
driveway.
C
That's
an
interesting
point,
and
you
know
the
what
we
want
to
try
to
figure
out
is:
what
is
the
issue
that
we're
trying
to
solve
and
clearly
it
it
doesn't
matter
to
to
anybody
who
lives
in
the
neighborhood
or
any
member
of
the
public,
whether
the
vehicle
has
a
tag
on
it?
That's
expired
or
not.
Expired
right
that
that's
not.
The
point
point
is
the
appearance
of
the
vehicle
and
the
fact
that
vehicles
that
are
not
operational
are
more
likely
to
appear
as
a
public
nuisance.
That's
what
we're!
C
What
we're
trying
to
get
at
so
the
fact
of
are
they
registered
or
not,
or
do
they
have
a
certificate
or
don't
they
is,
is
probably
not
the
way
to
address
the
light
of
inoperable
vehicles,
but
that
is
something
we
can
look
into
and
talk
to
the
police
department
about.
We
did
discuss
these
sorts
of
issues
with
them
regarding
parking
on
streets,
which
is
another
topic
because
they're
you,
the
registration,
has
to
be
expired
for
more
than
six
months
or
you
can
tow
the
vehicle
as
I
recall.
C
So
there
are
lots
of
restrictions
in
terms
of
towing
vehicles
go
and
you
can
cite
them,
but
then
people
don't
pay
and
and
then
so
what
the
vehicle
is
still
there.
So
if
we
really
want
to
address
the
problem,
it's
really
the
appearance
of
it
or
saying
that
you,
you
can't
have
these
on
on
private
property,
but
I'll.
Look
at
that
the
definition
and
look
at
the
in
a
non
operational
registration
to
see.
If
that's
something
that
we
could
look
at.
H
And-
and
it's
curious
that
that
aesthetics
becomes
an
issue
here,
because
I
can
have
a
really
nice-looking
car
with
no
engine
in
it,
it's
inoperable
and
I
can't
use
it.
It's
sitting
there
just
taking
up
space,
but
if
it
looks
nice
and
nobody
complains
about
it,
then
it's
okay
that
could
have
just
an
old
rust
bucket.
That's
my
daily
driver
and
it
completely
deteriorates
everybody's
property
values,
but
it
runs
and
I
Drive
it
every
day
and
it's
parked
on
the
street
and
that's
okay.
So
that's
where
I
kind
of
have
some
some
problems.
H
This
is
where
we're
trying
to
define
these
things
based
on
a
problem
and
and
I
understand.
The
problem
is
that
there
are
some
ugly
cars
that
don't
drive
that
people
have
complained
about,
but
at
the
same
time
you
know
if
we
do
this
blank
sort
of
statement
is
that
anything
that
doesn't
run
can't
be
there,
and
you
know
you
said
on
the
street.
They
won't
tow
it
for
six
months,
but
you
know
so.
How
long
is
it
six
months
sitting
in
a
driveway
where
it's
deemed
a
problem
or
is
it?
H
You
know
one
month
in
the
driveway:
is
it
a
year
in
the
driveway
multiple
years
you
know:
do
we
wait
until
there's
weeds
growing
under
the
thing
before
we
say
it's
an
issue,
so
you
know
I'm
I
feel
like
we
really
need
to
have
a
little
bit
more
definition
and
guidance
for
people
to
know
what
what
is
appropriate
if
we
are
going
to
make
any
changes,
I
mean
I.
Think
right
now,
there's
enough
in
what
I'm
seeing
here.
Well,
we
could
definitely,
with
with
complaints
from
enough
neighbors,
take
action
on
some
of
these
things.
H
So
I
don't
know
that
we
need
to
necessarily
change
a
lot
of
that
and
then
just
regarding
tarps,
but
are
we
using
the
term
tarp
and
car
cover
interchangeably?
Because
again,
that
could
make
a
big
difference
right.
You
could
have
a
very
nice
car
cover
on
a
very
nice
car
parked
out
there
and
do
that
now
the
those
cars
now
get
categorized
along
with
the
ones
that
are
using
tark's
to
disguise.
C
You
put
your
finger
on
another
problem,
a
potential
problem
with
what
saying
we're
going
to
eliminate
all
tarps
is:
how
do
you
define
that
and
you're
you're
right
council
member
Davis
indicated
the
tarp
or
whatever
it
is,
or
cover
might
look
good
in
a
certain
period
of
time
and
maybe
not
later
so
we
do
have
parts
of
the
nuisance
of
title
five
to
talk
about
things
that
are
dilapidated.
So
that's
a
word
that
it's
used
and
obviously
that's
a
judgment
call.
C
So
that's
a
situation
where,
if
the
tarp
or
cover
whatever
it
is,
is
dilapidated,
we
could
say
no
you've
got
to
get
rid
of
it.
But
the
answer
to
that
isn't
going
to
be
we're
going
to
take
your
car
from
you.
The
answer
is
you're
going
to
get
a
new
tarp
for
it
right
or
a
new
cover.
So
so
it's
the
the
potential
penalty
has
to
match.
What
is
what
is
it,
that's,
creating
the
nuisance,
and
if
the
nuisance
is
created
by
an
ugly
cover,
then
the
solution
to
that
nuisance
is
getting
a
new
cover.
C
H
H
The
pigeons,
yeah
I
think
that
that's
definitely
a
problem
for
most
things
and
listening
the
mortgage
concerns
about
the
cats
you
know.
I
get.
You
know,
cats
actually,
feral
cats
do
provide
a
service
in
that
they
eliminate
some
vermin
that
are
loosing
the
art.
But
if
people
aren't
careful
about
how
they
how
they
feed
them,
they
could
also
potentially
attract
other
undesirable
animals
like
raccoons
and
skunks
foxes
and
those
those
animals
then
attract
coyotes
and
mountain
lions
and
probably
don't
want
to
attract
those
things
into
our
neighborhoods.
H
B
B
H
F
B
C
So
normally
what
would
happen
is
there's
a
complaint
from
somebody
in
the
neighborhood
says
you
know
he's
had
his
his
camper
shell
out
there
for
six
years
and
hasn't
done
anything
about
it.
Code
enforcement
would
go
to
the
person
and
say
have
you
had
it
out
here
for
six
years
and
the
person
says
yes.
Well,
probably
that's
an
unreasonable
amount
of
time.
C
I
think
the
the
intent
of
that
is
to
allow
people
to
use
their
their
camper
shells
during
the
year
during
camping
season,
whatever
that
might
be,
or
if
they're
retired,
maybe
throughout
the
year,
but
not
to
have
it
as
a
storage
place
for
for
those
shells.
So
the
distinction
is
that
the
the
property
is
being
used
by
the
resident
as
opposed
to
it's
just
a
place
to
store
it,
and
that
is
hard
to
determine
you're
right.
Mr.
mayor
is
that
it's
not
well-defined.
We
can
certainly
take
a
look
at
that.
Okay,.
B
C
B
C
I
mean
so
so
there
is
a
definition
in
the
code
about
what
constitutes
operability
and
I.
Don't
have
it
at
hand,
but
I
know
there's
a
number
of
factors
that
staff
would
use
to
determine
that
again.
It's
not
an
easy
thing
to
do.
The
person
doesn't
have
to
allow
you
to
turn
it
on.
The
person
doesn't
have
to
comply
with
the
request
to
turn
it
on
to
see
if
it
is
operable
so
really
that
determination
has
to
be
made
in
the
worst-case
scenario,
from
the
public
right-of-way
visually
by
the
code
enforcement
officer.
C
B
And
I,
let
go
of
some
of
the
comments
my
colleagues
made
about
you
know
additional
RV
or
boats
I
agree,
keep
in
mind
what
had
happened
years
ago
from
my
memory
was
that
an
initiative
was
placed
to
not
allow
any
of
those
on
the
side
of
the
street
Street
I
think
it
was
a
very
close
vote,
maybe
64
saqib
of
the
65
votes,
but
it
did
cause
quite
a
stir
in
the
community.
Some
folks
believed
it
was.
You
know
what
you
couldn't
good
to
have,
and
you
know
your
your
how
your
home
is
your
castle.
B
The
other
thing
is
on
the
aspect
of
graffiti.
Most
of
that
has
been
kept
and
was
expanded
some
years
ago,
as
far
as
making
sure
things
were
locked
up,
making
sure
how
it
was
quantified
and
defined
as
as
times
have
changed,
but
are
we
still
under
the
same
premise
as
far
as
mitigation
is
concerned,
whether
it's
24
hours
for
gang
or
profanity,
and
it's
under
the
72-hour
notice,
if
it's
other
than
that
to
businesses
or
residential?
Yes,.
C
B
Has
been
a
big
help,
but
I
do
know
that
one
a
place
continues
it
and
again.
If
folks
can
go
back
in
time
on
what
it
was
like,
it
was
horrific
here,
but
they
are
told
they
have
to
take
cautions,
whether
its
lighting,
whether
its
vegetation
or
something,
and
then
they
will
be
assessed
that
money.
So
I
appreciate
that
I
think
I'm
good
for
now
mark.
Is
there
any
more
information
or
have
we
provided
you
enough
too
much
it's
great
until.
C
Well,
this
is
very
helpful.
I
think
I've
got
all
the
comments.
Written
down,
I'll
go
over
them
with
our
staff
in
the
coming
days
and
we'll
bring
backup
staff
report
and
with
some
more
some
of
the
information
you
know,
that's
been
requested
and
then
provide
some.
Those
changes
to
the
ordinance
that
reflects
your
direction.
Okay,.
B
A
C
C
So,
as
you
know,
on
March
16th
of
this
year
there
is
a
shelter-in-place
order
in
an
emergency
Proclamation
by
both
the
county
and
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
and
on
that
same
date,
the
governor
issued
an
order
authorizing
local
jurisdictions
to
adopt
residential
and
commercial
moratoria
on
evictions,
and
so
that
was
an
authorization.
It
wasn't
a
requirement
to
do
so.
The
state
left
it
up
to
individual
entities
such
as
cities
and
counties
so
on
the
23rd
of
March.
C
The
county
did
adopt
a
moratorium
on
residential
evictions
covering
the
entire
county,
so
in
other
words,
all
residential
evictions
everywhere
in
the
county,
cities
or
unincorporated
areas
are
now
covered
by
that
moratorium
and
I
believe
that
the
Board
of
Supervisors
also
just
recently
enacted
with
respect
to
that
particular
moratorium.
A
rent,
freeze
and
I'm.
Sorry,
I
don't
have
all
the
details
of
that
at
hand,
but
that's
an
action
that
the
the
Board
of
Supervisors
recently
took.
C
If
memory
serves
on
April
7th,
the
board
of
supervisor
Supervisors
adopted
a
moratorium
on
commercial
evictions,
but
covering
only
the
unincorporated
areas.
So
in
this
one,
unlike
the
residential
eviction
ordinance,
they
chose
not
to
include
all
of
the
cities
in
the
in
the
order.
So
it
only
covers
unincorporated
areas.
C
So
let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
the
policy
rationales
for
such
an
ordinance
might
be.
I
think
the
first
one
is
obvious:
we're
currently
in
a
pandemic,
resulting
in
a
severe
and
unpress
it
economic
and
social
dislocation,
so
in
cities
and
the
county
do
have
a
public
interest
in
small
businesses
remaining
open
because
those
businesses
provide
essential
services.
C
Another
issue
that
was
raised
is
that
some
landlords
might
actually
qualify
as
small
businesses.
So
in
other
words,
you
have
a
small
business
tenant,
but
you
might
also
have
a
small
business
landlord,
and
so
that's
just
something
to
consider
in
terms
of
each
individual
community
and
then.
Finally,
the
thing
to
keep
in
mind
is
that
the
printer
or
basically
closed
to
eviction
cases
they're
not
going
to
be
hearing
any
of
them
until
90
days
after
the
shelter
order
lifted.
C
So
there
will
not
actually
be
any
evictions
at
the
earliest
until
90
days
after
the
shelter-in-place
order
is
actually
quite
it'd,
be
after
that,
because
on
day,
91
is
the
loss,
who
can
actually
be
sir
and
then
there's
cancer.
There's
the
cover,
so
lawsuits
regarding
commercial
additions
are
unlikely
to
proceed
any
any
time
in
the
near
future.
So
what
would
be
the
legal
basis
for
an
ordinance
prohibiting
commercial
evictions
at
this
time?
C
Well,
the
government
code
does
give
you
the
opportunity
to
adopt
an
urgency
ordinance,
protect
the
public
peace,
health,
safety
and
welfare,
that's
very
general,
but
for
an
urgency
ordinance.
You
really
need
some
detailed,
factual
findings
and
you'll
see
those
factual
findings
in
a
variety
of
expressions
in
both
county
ordinance
and
in
the
city
ordinances
that
have
been
adopted
that
I
attach
to
your
staff
report.
The
good
news
about
those
findings
is
that
the
courts
will
generally
defer
to
the
City
Council's
findings.
C
So
if
the
City
Council
says
something
is
an
urgent
problem,
the
courts
usually
aren't
going
to
second-guess
that
unless
there
are
some
sort
of
overriding
either
a
constitutional
or
other
state
law
issue
that
the
court
identifies
urgency,
ordinances
which
are
adopted
at
one
meeting,
you
don't
need
two
readings
like
most
other
ordinances.
Do
require
a
4/5
vote
of
the
council,
so
we're
not
asking
you
to
vote
on
anything
tonight,
but
we
are
looking
for
some
direction
about
whether
you're
interested
in
adopting
such
an
ordinance.
C
So,
let's
talk
just
for
a
few
minutes
about
what
such
an
ordinance
might
contain
and
the
basic
goal
of
the
ordinance
is
to
prohibit
steps
being
taken
toward
commercial
evictions.
Well,
what
does
that
mean?
And
so
normally
that
means
that
before
you
can
evict
a
tenant,
you
have
to
send
them
a
notice.
It's
either
a
three
day
notice,
pay
or
quit,
or
it's
a
30
day
notice.
If,
if
that's
what's
allowed
by
the
lease
says
that
we're
we
want
to
evict
you
based
on
either
non-payment
of
rent
or
for
some
other
reason.
C
So
what
these
ordinances
do
that
the
county
and
other
cities
have
adopted?
Is
they
say
that
if
the
tenant
can't
pay
for
a
reason,
that's
directly
related
to
kovat
19
conditions,
then
the
ordinance
prohibits
the
landlord
from
evicting
them
under
certain
circumstances,
and
so
you'll
see.
If
you
look
at
the
ordinances
that
there's
a
sort
of
a
large
number
of
conditions
that
might
qualify
for
this
loss
of
income,
you
know
gross
receipts,
medical
bills
and
expenses.
Maybe
the
business
was
closed.
C
Obviously,
that's
going
to
be
a
problem,
but
it
has
to
be
related
to
code
19.
It
can't
just
be
the
business
was
failing
before
and
and
now
it's
it's
really
failed
and
it's
not
related
to
kovat
19,
and
so
what
this
requires,
or
what
these
ordinances
uniformly
require
is
the
landlord
before
they
serve
any
sort
of
notice.
C
So
the
rent
isn't
forgiven.
It
still
remains
due
and
it
remains
due.
However,
after
the
ordinance
expires
and
all
of
the
ordinances
that
we've
got
for
you
this
evening,
they
all
expire
on
May,
31st
and
I
think
that
date
was
selected
as
the
current
outside
date
of
when
the
shelter
in
place
orders
might
be.
In
effect,
it's
certainly
possible.
They
would
be
extended
and
you
could
extend
this
ordinance
as
well,
if
you,
if
you
wanted
to
or
we
adopt
a
new
one,
but
the
ones
that
are
in
your
package
are
all
expire
on
the
31st.
C
So
these
are
the
provisions
that
are
essentially
common
to
all
ordinances.
So
what
are
some
of
the
differences
in
the
ordinances?
Well,
let's
talk
about
those
well.
The
first
question
is:
what's
the
definition
of
a
small
business
and
it's
a
small
business
who
gets
the
benefit
of
the
ordinance,
so
there's
a
couple
of
different
definitions,
there's
three
of
them.
C
Actually
so
the
county
and
Menlo
Park
and
Pacifica
say
that
if
you
have
gross
receipts
of
less
than
two
and
a
half
million
dollars,
you're
a
small
business
and
the
basis
for
that
was
because
that
is
the
same
definition
of
a
small
business
used
by
Sam,
Sita,
apparently
and
they're.
The
grantor
loan
programs
that
they're
facilitating
Millbrae
decided
to
say
to
cover
businesses
that
have
gross
receipts
of
up
to
five
million
dollars.
C
So
obviously
that
would
cover
more
businesses
than
if
it
was
two
and
a
half
million
and
the
cities
of
San
Mateo
and
South
San
Francisco,
said
25
million,
again,
obviously
covering
by
quite
a
bit
many
more
businesses.
So
the
question
for
San
Bruno
is
what's
what's
the
right
number
and
that's
a
policy
decision
for
you,
and
so
we
did
a
little
research.
Thank
you
to
the
finance
department.
We've
got
about
2900
businesses
that
pay
a
business
license
and
little
over
4%
have
gross
receipts
of
more
than
5
million
a
little
over
7%.
C
C
You
capture
everyone
below
that
threshold,
so
in
other
words
it
would
be
the
seven
point,
one
the
16%
and
then
everybody
that's
less
than
a
million
dollars,
which
is
quite
quite
a
few
of
our
businesses,
as
you
can
tell
so
that's
one
policy
decision
or
the
city
to
make,
and
don't
worry
we'll
summarize
these
at
the
end,
so
you
don't
have
to
keep
them
in
mind.
So
the
next
question
is:
what's
the
date
that
the
ordinance
is
effective
and
most
of
them
have
made
it
deviate
of
adoption.
C
But
there
is
an
option
that
we've
discussed
where
the
ordinance
could
be
made.
Retroactive
to
the
date
of
non
expired
notices
of
eviction.
So,
for
example,
if
I'm
a
tenant
and
I've
already
received
a
notice
of
eviction,
but
it
hasn't
expired,
yet
the
ordinance
could
be
made
applicable
to
them
all
right.
What
are
the
other
issues
that
we
might
want
to
look
at?
So
the
next
question
is:
how
much
time
do
you
have
to
pay
after
the
ordinance
expires?
And
again
we
have
a
little
variation.
C
Pacifica
said
basically
90
days
and
the
other
said,
a
total
of
100
and
debate
of
80
days
180,
but
some
of
them
in
increments.
So
in
other
words
you
get
90
up
front,
and
then
you
get
30-day
increments
as
long
as
you
can
prove
that
you're
still
having
a
problem,
so
that's
Paul's
to
decision
account
for
the
City
Council.
You
want
to
go
for
shorter
now
and
then
provide
increments
or
you
want
to
just
say
180
days
or
something
in
between
another
policy
question
is
whether
the
ordinance
should
have
a
hardship
waiver
for
the
landlord.
C
What
is
that
and
what
that's
referring
to
is
if
the
landlord
could
come
in
and
say,
wait
a
second,
you
know
maybe
I'm
a
small
business
too
and
I
don't
get
this
rent
I'm
going
to
go
out
of
this
and
to
waiver
that
the
street
manager
in
these
ordinances
law
and
County
and
San
Francisco
the
city
of
salad.
He
said
no
we're
not
going
to
put
that
in
the
ordinance
others,
iam
and
I
asked
well.
Why
was
that?
C
C
And
in
the
final
topic
of
discussion
and
direction
is
whether
you
want
to
include
an
option
for
the
city
to
enforce
the
ordinance
and
the
student
said
no
will
allow
that
to
the
private
parties
and
the
other
said
yes
without
an
option.
City
enforcement
I
think
it's
an
open
question
about
how
the
city
would
enforce
it
to
be
difficult
and
to
preserve,
because
the
city's
getting
involved
in
the
commercial
relationships
between
commercial
landlords
tendinous.
C
So
it's
not
clear
that
we're
we're
really
set
enough
to
do
that,
but
most
of
these
did
include
the
option:
utley
subsidy
enforcement,
which
is
the
favorite
way
to
enforce
it.
Sorry,
the
questions
for
tonight.
Do
you
want
to
have
an
expiration
date
of
the
third
first,
everybody
hust?
What's
your
definition
of
a
small
business?
Should
it
be
a
million
two
and
a
half
five
million?
C
E
H
I
C
Probably
mitigate
your
risk,
the
most
is
to
include
a
hardship
waiver
for
the
landlord
to
include
that
provision.
It's
not
really
clear
to
me
why
why
other
cities
didn't
include
it
I
know
there
are
a
couple
of
other
cities
that
are
either
deciding
or
have
decided
in
the
last
day
or
two
and
I
don't
have
that
information,
but
that's
important,
because
that
means
that
it's
harder
for
a
landlord
to
do
what's
called
a
facial
challenge
to
the
ordinance.
In
other
words,
the
ordinance
on
its
face
is
somehow
illegal
or
unconstitutional.
C
So,
if
you're
evicted
from
your
house,
well,
you
can't
shelter
in
place
so
now
you're
in
a
catch-22
you're
violating
the
the
order
when
it's
a
commercial
eviction.
Presumably
those
folks
have
a
place
to
live
they're,
not
really
violating
the
order,
so
I
think
they.
They
looked
at
that
and
thought
well,
if
you're
the
county,
you
can
take
on
the
first
risk
they
didn't
want
to
take
on
the
second
one.
Having
said
that,
most
cities
on
the
peninsula,
or
either
considering
or
have
adopted
this.
B
G
City
of
45,000
people,
so
it
would
be
nice
if
others
contributed,
but
so
the
best
I
understand
here
is
this
is
for
commercial,
but
I
also
think
we
need
to
talk
about
residential
and
I'll.
Leave
that
aside,
you
guys
can
discuss
that
on
the
small
business.
I
would
say
it
would
be.
You
know
anything
below
2.5
million
and
and
that's
what
out
credentials
are
knowledge
to
suggest
that,
but
just
based
on
the
information
that
was
just
given
time
to
pay
I
think
you
know.
G
Once
we
get
through
this,
it's
unreasonable
to
ask
people
to
pay
within
30
or
90
days,
I
mean
they
haven't
made
any
money.
The
180
is
even
an
issue
and
I'd
like
to
think
that
we're
a
community
of
commercial
entrepreneurs
and
and
business
folks,
who
might
forgive
those
who
can
forgive
the
fact
that
that
that
the
payment
would
even
be
need
to
made,
need
to
be
made
landlord
hardship.
I
agree
with
that.
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
landlords
out
there
who
are
in
the
same
position
that
their
tenants
are.
G
B
J
You
know
I
think
that,
as
it
counsel,
everybody
has
expressed
concern
over
our
small
business
community
and
how
we
can
help
and
as
covin
nineteen
has
really
evolved
and
paralyzed
our
economy
here
in
timber.
Now
it's
been
really
hard
to
figure
out
how
we're
gonna
help
small
businesses,
because
other
cities,
I
believe
Burlingame,
you
know
practically
overnight,
was
able
to
come
up
with
over
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
help
with
their
small
business
community.
J
So
I
think
this
is
one
way
that
we
can
help
our
small
business
community,
because
we
don't
have
the
money
that
other
cities
have
and
I
think.
This
is
really
an
appropriate
step
for
government
to
come
in
and
really
help
it
small
business
community
and
we're
not
taking
anything
from
the
landlord's
where
we're
gonna
ensure
that
landlords
get
a
paid,
we're
not
requiring
you
know
anything
to
not
be
paid,
we're
just
saying
hey.
We
need
to
give
our
small
businesses
an
opportunity
to
get
back
on
their
feet.
J
So
with
that
that
I
would
advocate
for
a
180-day
period.
I
would
advocate
for
the
small
business
definition
to
be
I.
I
didn't
write
it
down
mark,
but
you
had
a
slide
where
you
actually
laid
out
all
the
different
small
business
allocations.
So
maybe
we
can
go
back
to
that.
But
let
me
let
me
go
down
the
rest
of
this
list.
Okay,.
J
J
Okay,
effective
date
and
I
think
it
should
be
retroactive.
This
cut
a
lot
of
people
who
buy
surprised
the
coven
nineteen
shelter
in
place,
so
the
retroactive
to
the
date
that
the
declaration
of
emergency
was
also
retro,
actively
placed
by
resolution
time
to
pay
180
days,
landlord
hardship,
waiver,
yes,
I-
think
the
landlord
should
have
a
hardship
waiver
and
then
the
option
of
the
city
of
enforcement.
I,
don't
think
the
city
should
be
the
enforcement
branch
for
this
particular
this
direction
that
we're
gonna
bet
we
hopefully
will
take.
J
E
I
This
is
gonna,
be
very
difficult
for,
for
people
to
get
out
of
this
hole,
I
mean
there's,
no
forgiveness
of
loans
are
of
any
kind.
It's
it's.
Looking
pretty
bleak
hearing
from
Jackie
Spears
comments
at
a
conference
call
about
the
number
of
restaurants
that
are
likely
not
to
reopen
in
the
50
percent
range
and
that's
really
really
scary
and
and
will
have
consequences
and
in
all
across
California,
so
I'm
in
support
of
all
this,
the
five
million
is
fine
and
everything
else
that
Linda
said
that
was
I'm.
Fine
with
that.
G
H
H
Rent
so
I
wouldn't
say
that
it's
not
without
any
risk
to
the
landlord,
so
I
believe
the
hardship
waiver
may
allow
them
some
some
way
out
of
this
they're.
Given
that
the
state
has
already
decided
that
their
protection
is
going
to
extend
90
days
past
the
the
shelter-in-place
order,
which
is
as
yet
undefined
that
number
could
you
know
it
could
go
on
for
a
while.
H
Markey
said
that
the
other
cities
are
going
to
provide
some
sort
of
enforcement,
but
maybe
can
you
explain
a
little
bit
more
about
what
that
might
look
like
for
us.
I
know
we're
definitely
not
equipped
to
do
that
now.
But
do
you
have
any
indication
about
what
the
other
cities
are
going
to
do
and
if
there's
anything
that
we
could
do
to
emulate
if
they're
doing
I
yeah.
C
That's
a
good
question:
I
I,
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
I
do
know
that
I,
don't
think
any
of
the
city
said
that
they're
going
to
enforce
it.
What
they've
done
is
they
just
included
the
standard
provisions
in
their
ordinances?
That
say,
the
city
is
authorized
to
enforce
so
they're,
not
promising
to
enforce
that
they're.
C
I'm,
sorry,
it's
sort
of
the
opposite
of
what
how
the
ordinances
are
written,
but
that's
the
data
that
we
that
we
had
so
with
those
rapidly
the
percentages
represented
the
businesses
that
are
making
more
than
that
particular
number.
So
the
way
our
business
license
tax
works
is
that
if
it's
up
to
a
certain
amount,
you
pay
X.
If
it's
between
x
and
y,
then
you
pay
more.
If
it's
between
y
and
z,
then
you
pay
more,
and
those
thresholds
are
a
million
two
and
a
half
and
five
million.
C
So
the
only
people
over
five
million
dollars
are
128
businesses,
4.4
percent,
so
yeah.
So,
therefore,
if
the
threshold-
let's
just
say
for
sake
of
argument-
were
two
and
a
half
million
that
would
be
not
including
about
twelve
percent
of
the
businesses,
but
you
would
be
including
everybody
other
than
those
twelve
percent,
so
it's
eighty-eight
percent
at
two
and
a
half
million
and
90s
about
96
percent
at
five
million.
So.
I
C
B
Within
for
me,
it
seems
like
we're
pretty
much
all
on
the
same
page.
You
know-
and
this
is
something
that,
when,
when
the
San
Mateo
County
mayor's
met
with
the
county-
and
they
established
a
global
coverage
for
the
whole
county
when
they
took
action
in
regards
to
residential
as
they
took
action
this
morning,
which
is
a
little
off
the
topic,
but
they
did
a
residential
for
residential
freeze
on
a
moratorium
on
rent
increases,
but
that
will
cover
the
whole
county.
So
that's
already
been
enacted
as
of
today's
action
by
the
Board
of
Supervisors.
B
But
what
they
didn't
want
to
do
by
their
legal
counsel
was
take
on
this
topic.
They
were
willing
to
do
it
for
the
unincorporated
areas,
but
not
for
the
rest
of
the
county,
and
that
was
their
legal
counsel,
saying
that
there
was
risk
that
they
didn't
want
to
blanket
us.
So
I
think
the
risk
is
at
this
point,
because
the
courts
are
closed
and
everything
else
nominal,
but
I
think
it's
significant
and
important
enough
that
we
need
to
also
do
what
we
can.
B
It
is
just
something:
I've
always
told
people.
You
know,
as
we
welcomed
in
220,
could
we
ever
imagine
we'd
be
sitting
here
going
through
this
today?
Nothing
that
we
had
thought
of,
but
it
sounds
like
were
marked
from
my
knowledge-
is
that
we're
talking
180
days
we're
talking
up
to
5
million
gross
receipts,
we're
talking
retro
back
to
the
emergency,
we're
talking
to
landlord
waiver
and
and
to
go
back
to
the
emergency?
Does
that
give
us
any
more
risk
or
problem
for
us
as
a
city
than
it
would
if
it
if
it
wasn't
retro
I.
C
Think,
finally,
more
risk
than
what
I
indicated
in
my
presentation.
So
what
I
was
talking
about
in
my
presentation
is
retroactivity
to
the
date
of
any
unexpired
notice
of
eviction,
so
that
may
or
may
not
be
back
to
the
effective
date
of
the
shelter-in-place
order.
So,
for
example,
if
if
I
got
a
notice
of
eviction
2
weeks
before
the
shelter-in-place
order,
that
was
a
30-day
notice.
Well,
that's
already
expired,
and
so
that
that
eviction
was
occurring
beforehand.
C
So
I
was
not
necessarily
recommending,
although
it's
a
policy
decision
for
you
that
this
reach
back
that
far
I
was
recommending
that
it
reached
back
to
the
point
of
any
notices
of
eviction
that
have
not
yet
expired.
In
other
words,
the
the
small
business
owner
got
a
notice,
and
it's
still
within
that
30-day
period
or
it's
within
some
extension
of
that.
B
C
B
C
I
actually
have
one
one
other
question
on
180
days:
that's
something
that
the
City
Council
wants
to
do
in
increments.
You
know
most
of
the
cities
did
90
and
then
you
know
90
for
sure,
and
then
you
get
three
30-day
extensions.
If
you
can
prove
that
you're
still
having
a
problem
is,
is
that
the
intent
or
are
you
interested
in
just
doing
a
hundred
eighty
days
right
out
of
the
gate.
C
B
I
know
the
county
is
doing
the
30
days
with
the
review
on
the
residential
rent
increases
because
of
state
law
and
and
the
governor's
and
all
of
that,
but
I
am
in
favor
of
the
90
days
with
the
30-day
extension
because,
obviously
we
don't
know
where
it's
going.
What
have
you
so
I'm?
Okay
with
that
as
well?
So
that's
just
my
my
thought.
Aggron
I
agree.
C
J
C
J
B
I
Have
a
little
trouble
signing
the
erase
hand
thing
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
everybody's
efforts.
You
know
staff,
my
colleagues,
our
residents,
you
know
this
is
this
is
this?
Is
tough
I
also
wanted
to
thank
in
a
volunteer,
a
donor
who
wanted
who
wished
to
remain
anonymous?
Who
gave
a
twenty
five
boxes?
I
think
it
was
of
gloves
of
the
nitrile
gloves
that
I
donated
to
our
Community
Development
Department,
and
that's
just
what
I
love
about
our
community.
I
B
Okay,
any
other
council
member,
if
not
also
just
want
to
enclosing,
want
to,
of
course
thank
staff
for
the
communication.
The
PSAs,
the
other
elements
that
they've
been
putting
out
there
and
trying
to
keep
everybody
informed
it
is,
it
is
obviously
I
did
think.
People
were
looking
forward
to
me
and
I.
Don't
know
that
they
all
still
feel
the
same
way
about
me.
B
But
with
that
said,
I
still
remind
folks
because-
and
this
was
for
essential
needs,
but
I
mean
going
to
the
post
office
last
Thursday
to
turn
in
my
passport-
no
I'm,
not
traveling
anywhere,
but
it
was
gonna
expire.
Three
people
without
face
masks
going
into
Walgreens
to
get
the
picture
taken
to
people
without
face,
masks
being
close
together,
so
I
think
again.
B
But
yes,
patience
is
key.
Finally,
for
PG&E,
I
lured
alluded
to
that
earlier
and
I
think
it's
important
that
the
PG&E
Public
Safety
power
shut
off.
It's
not
to
scare
anyone,
but
obviously
we
went
through
this
before
I
I
want
to
assure
you
the
emergency
services
Council.
They
made
it
very
clear
to
that
staff
in
the
county
or
PG
need
to
be
mindful
and
understanding.
We
know
that
people
have
stocked
fridges,
they
have
their
medications,
so
they
need
to
be
diligent
and
they
need
to
be
succinct
in
what
they
do
and
not
just
turn
off.
B
More
than
they
need,
but
what
is
important
is
to
update
your
contact
information,
and
you
see
here
the
website,
as
well
as
the
contact
phone
number,
and
that
is
so.
They
can
call
you
that
they
have
a
method
to
call
you
to
say
there
may
be
a
disruption
and
sometimes,
as
I,
had
a
person
on
crestmore
that
a
poll
was
going
to
be
replaced
and
there
was
going
to
be
a
disruption.
Well,
when
we
looked
into
it,
there
was
not
going
to
be
a
disruption
to
power,
but
there
was
just
a
miscommunication.
B
So
if
they
have
your
information,
they
can
reach
out
to
you
directly
so
I
leave
that
that's
up
there
for
us
to
pass
it
on,
and
so
I
appreciate
it
and
with
that
we're
gonna
go
ahead
and
adjourn
back
to
to
finish
up
the
public
employee
performance
evaluation
pursuant
to
code
five,
four,
nine
five
step
with
that.
We'll
adjourn
to
the
next
regular
City
Council
meeting
to
be
held
on
April
28
to
20
I'm.
Sorry,
that's
the
wrong
one!
May
12
2010.