►
From YouTube: San Bruno Special City Council Meeting July 30, 2020
Description
San Bruno Special City Council Meeting July 30, 2020
Whole Meeting
trt 1:11:08
B
A
So
I
think
staff
is
good
and
I
think
we're
waiting
on
linda
so
we'll
give
a
minute
or
so
more.
If
that's,
okay
and
then
we'll
begin.
D
D
A
No
worries,
okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
all
right,
so
why
don't
we
go
ahead
and
let
me
know
when
you're
ready,
melissa.
A
B
C
A
Okay,
if
we
can,
if
we
could
please
rise,
and
mr
vice
mayor,
would
you
mind
as
to
lead
us
okay,.
B
A
Thank
you.
Why
don't
we
move
on
to
public
comments
for
items
not
on
the
agenda?
A
If
anybody
wishes
to
have
anything
to
say
that
is
not
on
the
agenda,
we'll
give
just
a
moment
and
see
if
any
hands
go
up,
I'm
not
seeing
any
at
this
time,
but
just
give
it
another
moment
or
two
okay.
A
I
am
seeing
none
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
item
number
four
study
session
status,
update
on
the
community
benefits
program
for
the
bay
hill,
specific
plan
options
for
council
consideration,
and
at
this
time
I
am
going
to
recuse
myself
from
this
study
session
on
topic,
though
interest
and
I
will
be
listening,
I'm
going
to
turn
the
meeting
over
to
the
vice
mayor
and
the
reason
for
the
recusal
is
my
close
proximity
to
the
bay
hill
specific
plan
where
my
home
and
where
I
live.
A
C
B
All
right
so
we'll
move
right
on
to
item
four
study
session
and
tonight's
topic
is
an
update
on
the
community
community
benefits
program
for
the
bay
hill,
specific
plan
and
options
for
council
consideration.
So
I
will
turn
it
over
to
the
city
manager.
F
Good
afternoon,
council
and
members
of
the
public
javon
grogan
city
manager
for
the
city
of
san
bruno-
and
it
is
my
pleasure
to
provide
you
with
a
update
on
the
bay
hill
specific
plan
and
the
youtube
phase
one
project.
As
many
of
you
know,
the
bay
hill
specific
plan
begun
when
youtube
approached
the
city
in
2016.
F
The
work
on
the
plan
kicked
off
in
2017
and
it
calls
for
a
vision
for
youtube
and
other
property
owners
to
expand
the
allowable
office.
Potentially
residential
and
retail
square
footage.
Within
the
plan
area,
tonight's
presentation
will
be
printed
will
be
presented
by
in
large
part,
darcy
smith,
our
community
and
economic
development
director
and
supplemented
by
jason
moody,
who
is
a
principal
at
eps
who
has
been
supporting
the
city
as
a
key
member
of
our
consultant
team,
the
agenda
for
tonight
we
will
go
over
the
objective.
We
will
talk
about
the
specific
plan
background.
F
We
will
give
an
update
on
the
eir
the
environmental
impact
report.
We
will
then
talk
about
two
phases
that
are
components
within
this
specific
plan.
One
is
what
is
called
youtube
phase
one
a
project
within
the
bay
hill
office
park.
The
next
phase
is
outside
of
the
bay
hill
office
park,
but
within
the
boundaries
of
the
specific
plan-
and
that
is
commonly
referred
to
as
901
cherry
phase
2,
and
we
will
provide
an
overview
and
an
update
on
that
project.
F
We
will
next
have
a
presentation
of
community
benefits
and
various
options
for
the
city
council
to
consider
next
steps,
council
action
and
then
questions
again.
A
overview
of
our
objectives
for
tonight
really
is
to
give
the
city
council
an
update
on
where
we
are
both
with
the
specific
plan
and
its
components
of
the
eir
and
youtube's
planned
projects
within
the
planning
area.
We
want
to
present
to
you
two
options
with
regard
to
a
community
benefits
program.
F
Just
as
a
reminder,
there
is
a
robust
team
that
has
been
supporting
the
development
of
this
plan
and
working
with
youtube
and
other
property
owners
led
by
myself.
The
city
manager,
city
attorney,
mark
zapparano,
darcy
smith,
our
community
and
economic
development
director
jimmy
tan,
the
public
works
director
and
someone
to
get
a
lot
of
credit
for
all
of
this.
The
principal
planner
matt
newbomber
who's,
doing
a
lot
of
hard
work
behind
the
scenes
and
several
consultants.
F
I
will
really
only
introduce
three
because
they're
here
tonight
and
ready
to
assist
the
city
council
in
any
with
any
questions.
One
is
elaine
costello
from
management
partners.
She
has
served
as
a
project
manager
with
dan
marks
also
of
management
partners,
and
then
we
have
ed
shaper,
a
principal
with
burke
williams
consortium,
sorensen,
a
land
use
attorney
that
represents
the
city
on
a
number
of
land
use
items
and
actually
a
fourth
person,
jason
moody,
the
principal
from
eps
who
I
talked
about
before
so
with
that.
F
I
would
like
to
turn
it
over
to
darcy
smith,
our
community
and
economic
development
director
for
the
beginning,
part
of
the
presentation.
G
Thank
you,
see,
manager,
grogan,
so
I'll
start
this.
With
a
little
bit
of
background,
we
may
have
some
new
audience
members
tonight
who
just
need
a
quick
background
and
refresher,
since
this
is
the
first
time
we've
been
before
you
at
a
public
meeting
for
almost
one
year.
So
a
specific
plan
is
a
long-range
plan.
It's
nested
under
our
city's
general
plan,
which
provides
the
blueprint
for
growth
in
the
city,
but
the
specific
plan
is
sort
of
like
a
child,
and
the
general
plan
is
apparent,
and
this
is
a
focused
area.
You'll
see
covers.
G
Specific
plans
cover
the
same
range
of
topics
that
the
city's
general
plan
covers
in
that
document.
They're
called
elements,
but
here
in
the
specific
plan,
there's
a
chapter
that
covers
the
land
uses
and
the
development
program
which
is
expressed
in
terms
of
square
footage
or
units
which
I'll
cover
later
there's
focus
design
guidelines
for
this
area,
and
there
are
other
topics
that
get
addressed
here
too.
G
So,
as
city
manager
grogan
pointed
out,
we're
really
sort
of
four
years
into
this
conversation
with
youtube
for
campus
expansion.
That
was
again
laid
out
in
the
general
plan,
which
was
adopted
in
2009,
and
the
city
had
conversations
with
youtube
about
participation
in
the
specific
plan
to
provide
this
comprehensive
plan.
G
These
buildings
shown
here
are
youtube's
global
headquarters
and
the
bay
hill
specific
plan
vision
is
laid
out
for
a
build
out
of
about
15
to
20
years
and
well
I'll
talk
a
lot
tonight
about
office
space.
I
just
want
to
emphasize
that
the
bay
hill
shopping
center
would
be
maintained
with
the
current
retail
square
footage.
G
It
served
that
neighborhood
and
the
broader
san
bruno
community
very
well
that
retail
would
not
change
and
the
only
provision
there
would
be
allowed
to
would
be
to
allow
extra
housing
and
the
plan
would
also
allow
for
new
or
expanded
hotel
uses,
which
is
the
city
council
knows,
is
a
really
important
land
use
to
provide
important
transit,
occupancy
tax
revenue
for
the
city
and
based
on
feedback.
We
received
from
you
that
I'll
recap
we
would
allow
for
housing.
Housing
is
very
important,
especially
when
jobs
are
added
and
important
to
note.
Housing
is
not
allowed
now.
G
D
G
This
process
in
2017.
I'll
just
remind
you
what
we
accomplished
largely
based
on
your
direction.
In
2018,
we
had
two
really
critical
study
sessions
where
you
selected
the
preferred
alternative
that
I'll
talk
about
tonight.
That's
been
analyzed
in
the
draft
environmental
impact
report
and
you
gave
us
policy
direction
on
those
land
uses
that
I
mentioned,
such
as
housing,
and
you
know
it
was
almost
a
year
ago
to
the
day
that
we
were
here
back
before
you
with
an
update
and
we've
been
working
on
it
every
day.
G
Since
then,
and
you
can
see
the
this
is
a
long
process.
This
is
ultimately
going
to
be
a
four-year
process,
and
here
we
are
tonight
and
again
we're
getting
really
close
to
releasing
that
draft
specific
plan
and
environmental
review.
But
we
need
your
input
on
a
key
policy
issue.
G
G
So,
as
I
mentioned
la
in
2018,
you
selected
the
preferred
alternative
and
the
amount
of
potential
net
new
square
footage.
That's
office
space
is
2.46
million,
but
important
to
remind
you
that
you'll
be
able
to
consider
the
full
range
of
environmental
impacts
which
are
disclosed
in
that
environmental
impact
report
and
the
mitigations
for
the
maximum
amount
of
build
out,
and
because
this
is
a
legislative
action.
Ultimately,
that's
before
the
council,
in
the
form
of
a
general
plan,
amendment
a
zoning
ordinance
amendment
and
this
plan
that
you
have
maximum
discretion
in
deciding
what
levels.
G
So
here's
the
draft
eir
preferred
alternative
land
use
plan
and
just
important
to
focus
on
those
hatched
areas
which
have
a
residential
mixed
use,
overlay
for
the
bay
hill
site
and
properties
along
san
bernardino
avenue,
which
is
the
most
logical
place
to
put
the
housing
along
san
bernardino
avenue,
because
it's
a
great
corridor
down
to
our
caltrain
station
and
we've
also
seen
interest
in
housing
on
the
transit
corridor
sites
in
the
miss
sandy
of
that.
G
G
So
again
your
policy
direction
that
you've
given
us,
which
we
followed
as
we
developed
the
plan,
is
to
maintain
the
shopping
center,
allow
for
hotel
uses
which
again
are
very
attractive
for
the
city
for
the
revenue
and
allow
housing
other
policy
direction
that
you've
provided
over
the
years.
That
I'll
just
recap
quickly
is
open.
Space
is
important,
that's
publicly
accessible,
but
privately
owned
and
maintained
that
relieves
a
burden
on
the
city's
general
fund
to
maintain
those
parks
and,
as
you
know,
we
prioritize.
G
We
have
other
priorities
for
parks
such
as
florida
park
and
the
recreation
aquatic
center,
which
is
the
focus
of
the
city's
revenue
and
then
keep
cherry
avenue
open
and
all
and
treat
it
like
a
complete
street
so
improve
the
pedestrian
crossings.
Improve
the
bike
connections
here
and
a
great
deal
of
work
has
gone
into
designing
those
streets
with
those
sort
of
new
complete
street
modeling
in
line
to
accommodate
not
just
vehicles
but
bikes
and
pedestrians
or
state
of
the
art.
G
Things
like
bike
lanes
that
are
that
are
buffered
from
traffic
and
the
crosstals
that
you
see
here
with
the
rectangular
rapid
flashing
beacons.
One
of
my
favorite
terms,
so
we've
done
a
lot
of
work
and
what
I
want
to
pause
here
and
just
emphasize.
Is
that
all
analysis?
G
To
date,
all
the
studies
we've
done
have
indicated
preliminarily,
that
with
appropriate
mitigations
and
the
payment
of
the
city's
development
impact
fee,
which,
as
you
know,
that
program
was
developed
last
year
to
provide
a
revenue
stream
for
really
essential
city
capital
facilities
and
infrastructure
that
that
level
of
development
could
be
accommodated.
With
the
typical
statement
of
overriding
considerations
done
with
the
environmental
impact
report
and
then
appropriate
mitigation
measures.
And
this
shows.
G
On
for
over
a
year
now,
so
why
can
the
city
support
this
level
of
growth?
Should
the
council
choose
to
support?
It
is
because
what
we
saw
through
these
studies
is
that
youtube
and
also
other
office
tenants
have
very
aggressive
and
successful
tdm
programs
that
take
cars
off
the
road
and
and
create
other
options
such
as
getting
folks
on
caltrain
and
bart,
and
that's
been
very
successful.
G
I
realized
I
would
pause
here
and
say
that
with
covet
19,
it's
sort
of
unknown
exactly
how
that
will
continue,
but
I
will
say
that
there
are
ways
to
still
accommodate
shuttle.
Buses
with
social,
distancing
and
and
caltrain
is
still
running
and
bart
is
still
running
and
they're
adapting
their
services,
also
bay
hills
already
a
developed
office
park,
and
so
it
can
be
modernized
and
it's
expanded.
G
As
you'll
see
when
I
review
the
plans
for
phase
1
and
901
cherry,
so
the
current
status
is
the
graph
specific
plan
and
eir
are
now
substantially
complete
and
again
we're
here
tonight,
because
we
need
your
policy
decision
on
a
major
outstanding
item,
which
is
the
community
benefits
approach
that
was
delayed
as
a
request.
A
result
of
a
request
from
youtube
to
release
the
plan
without
that,
but
we
want
to
engage
that
conversation
now
and
have
proposed
the
alternative
formulae.
Community
benefit
model
that
we
would
recommend
be
included
in
that
draft
plan.
G
G
You
can
see
that
here
again
the
phase
one
project
site
which
it
would
be
proposed
to
break
ground
in
2022
or
sorry,
would
break
ground
in
2021
and
then
hopefully
be
occupied
by
2022
is
shown
here
and
those
again
on
the
parking
lots
of
900
000
cherry
behind
the
existing
office
buildings.
That
would
remain
and
then
you
can
see
that
the
project
build
out
kind
of
moves
from
280
down
to
el
camino
real
and
there's
five
phases
all
the
way
through
2035.
G
So
that's
shown
here
and
again,
we've
been
evaluating
that
concurrently
with
this
specific
plan
development,
they
were
submitted
in
2019
and
deemed
complete
earlier
this
year
and
that's
for
the
new
buildings,
two
of
them
at
440
000
square
feet
and
they
conform
to
ordinance
1284,
which
requires
a
maximum
of
three-story
buildings.
With
completely
underground
parking
garages,
other
improvements
that
are
proposed
as
part
of
this
project
would
be
a
multimodal
hub
that
provides
a
centralized
locations
for
those
shuttles
which.
G
Here's
another
rendering
of
the
building
which
you
can
see
as
a
contemporary
design
here
with
steel
wood
and
a
lot
of
glazing
to
keep
open
up
the
buildings
for
a
lot
of
light.
Here's
another
rendering.
This
also
shows
this
neat
feature
a
sustainable
building
feature
that
shows
the
green
wall,
which
is
a
cool
thing
and
then
a
bike
lane
on
grundy.
G
So
now
I'll
move
on
to
901
cherry
phase
2
as
city
manager
grogan
mentioned.
That
project
is
moving
forward
too
currently
and
you'll
see
those
sites
here,
they're,
tucked
away
kind
of
just
south
of
380
and
behind
901
cherry,
so
they're
kind
of
hidden,
hidden
sites
right
now,
but
you'll
see
them
here
on
this
map.
G
But
to
emphasize.
Under
that
development
agreement,
no
additional
community
benefits
are
required
and
the
current
status
update
a
trade
removal
permit
was
submitted
and
issued
effective
july
27th.
That's
the
first
series
of
permits.
There's
additional
permits
currently
under
review
by
the
city,
including
encroachment
permits
demolition
permits,
utility
relocation
permits
and
youtube,
has
informed
the
city
that
they
anticipate
submitting
additional
permits
for
the
garage
excavation.
E
G
A
large
underground
garage
here
because
again
with
ordnance
1284,
there's
no
above
ground
garage,
is
allowed
here
and
then
we
anticipate
later
applications
for
the
vertical
building
permits
for
those
two
with
restored
buildings.
I
Thank
you
darcy
and
again,
my
name
is
jason
moody,
I'm
a
principal
at
economic
and
planning
systems.
I've
been
working
on
this
process
for
well,
since
it
started
so
just
quickly.
I
want
to
give
a
big
overview
of
community
benefits
and
then
talk
a
little
bit
how
it
might
apply
here.
Community
benefits
is
a
kind
of
a
it's
a
term
of
our
thing.
I
It's
a
common
practice
increasingly,
particularly
in
the
peninsula
of
san
francisco
and
the
bay
area
to
to
account
for
how
cities
might
capture
some
of
the
value
that
they
provide
by
creating
new
entitlement
or
new
zoning,
and
typically
a
community
benefit
is
a
voluntary
exchange
in
which
the
in
return
for
entitlement,
the
developer
will
provide
some
community
benefits
to
to
the
city
that
will,
and
it's
a
voluntary
change
that
obviously
the
developer
doesn't
necessarily
get
the
free
entitlement
for
free.
I
They
can
still
do
what
they
currently
do,
but
in
a
community
benefit
they
they
agree
to
provide
something
extra.
In
return
for
the
return
for
the
entitlement
in
santa
bruno,
the
notion
of
community
benefits
is
kind
of
premise
on
the
idea.
This
is
a
very
big
project.
It
will
have
a
very
big
impact
on
the
city,
positive
and,
and
some
kind
of
environmental
and
traffic
type
impacts
as
well.
I
So
the
idea
is
that,
in
exchange
that
communities
can
get
some
benefit
from
that
community
benefits
are
not
typically
the
same
as
required.
Mitigations
and
they're
not
the
same
as
the
types
of
things
that
impact
fees
cover,
impact
fees
cover
required
infrastructure,
so
community
benefits
are
different
because
they're,
not
something
that
is
necessarily
required
for
the
project
in
order
to
go
forward
and
but
at
the
same
time,
there's
some
ambiguity
between
these
terms
and
we
kind
of
show
it
here
in
the
general
interlapping
circles
here.
I
I
Foot
and
your
project
mitigations
are
about
11.7
million
for
the
entire
site,
as
mentioned
earlier,
the
the
community
benefits
contributions
have
yet
to
be
determined,
but
we
are
recommending
a
35
square
foot
amount,
so
these
numbers
are
again
quantified
here.
This
is
all
based
on
the
1.8
million
square
feet
of
net
new
office
space.
The
exact
amounts
will,
you
know,
be
determined
at
the
time
of
permit.
These
are
just
estimates,
so
it's
not
clear
how
much
will
actually
be
generated.
This
is
best
estimate
at
this
time.
I
As
mentioned,
we're
now
recommending
a
35
additional
benefit
contribution
of
35
square
foot,
which
at
full
belt
out,
would
be
63
about
63
million
for
youtube
and
another
4.7
million
for
non-youtube
space
office
space,
and
this
is
on
office
only
so
obviously,
if
some
of
those
sites
were
developed
for
residential,
that
would
be
different
numbers
here.
This
is
just
the
office
scenario.
I
We
would
say
that
the
residential
community
benefit
requirement
has
not
been
identified
or
determined,
yet
it
would
most
likely
be
significantly
less
than
the
dollars
a
square
foot,
because
the
office
I
mean,
because
residential
typically
cannot
cannot
support
that
type
of
burden
and
still
be
developed
in
a
financially
feasible
manner.
I
I
That,
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
has
did
not
has
not
come
to
pass
at
this
point.
So
we
are.
We
decided
that
more
expedient
route
would
just
be
define
a
formulaic
approach
to
community
benefits
and
definitely
include
it
in
the
specific
plan.
So
it's
very
clear
to
everybody
involved
what
the
requirements
are.
I
So
the
two
options
before
us
at
this
point
in
time
is
one
to
establish
this
formulated
community
benefit
and
we'll
talk
a
little
more,
how
we
got
there
or
to
defer
publication
of
the
specific
plan
and
eir
until
the
specific
community
benefits
are
negotiated.
For
the
youtube
parcels
only
wouldn't
apply,
and
each
community
would
therefore
be
a
negotiated
agreement
which
can
be
a
relatively
protracted
process,
so
that
would
certainly
delay
the
process
a
little
bit
with
option
two.
I
So
again,
the
formulae
benefit
approach
would
basically
be
focused
on
the
1.9
million
of
additional
square
feet
that
are
being
authorized
by
the
by
the
specific
plan.
Now
the
total
development
specific
plan
has
indicated
is
going
to
be
more
than
1.9
million,
but
some
of
that
is
already
is
already
allowed
under
current
zoning.
I
There's
really
no
leverage
for
the
city
to
acquire
that,
and
it
doesn't
happen
just
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
we
came
up
with
the
35,
a
square
foot
and
I
will
kind
of
say
that
off
the
bat
that
there's
really
no
science
behind
this,
that
we've
studied
community
benefits
and
participated
in
community
benefit
agreements
throughout
the
bay
area,
and
they
are
all
over
the
map.
Here's
a
kind
of
a
quantification
as
best
we
could
of
somewhere
as
low
as
13
per
square
foot
as
high
as
86
square
foot.
I
But
again
you
need
to
remember
that
there's
a
lot
of
factors
involved
in
terms
of
what
a?
How
do
you
monetize
these
benefits?
What
else
do
developers
have
to
pay?
What
are
they
getting
in
return?
So,
what's
the
underlying
market
conditions
that
prevail?
All
those
things
will
affect
what
a
a
realistic
or
a
fair,
so-called
fair
community
benefit
is
and
and
because
all
those
factors
differ
on
a
project
by
project
basis.
I
It's
really
hard
to
do
an
apples-to-apples
comparison
between
one
place
and
another
place.
So
that's
a
very
important
caveat,
but
we
kind
of
looked
at
everything,
as
you
know,
all
these
factors
and
came
up
with
our
best
estimate
as
what
would
be
a
fair
number
at
this
time.
One
particular
proposal
that
we
looked
at
our
pr
approved
project
is
a
very
recently
approved
project.
The
google
landings
project
in
mountain
view,
which
was
just
approved
very
recently,
and,
as
you
can
see,
they
they
have
a
full-in
amount.
I
The
dark
blue
is
their
community
benefit
obligation.
The
the
like
ray
is
their
impact
fees
and,
and
we
weren't
able
to
quantify
their
other
mitigations
for
this
project
because
they
were
not
quantified
very
easily,
so
we
haven't
included
those.
There
are
some
numbers,
we're
not
sure
of
this.
This
compares
to
the
left
on
what
what
san
bruno's
total
all-in
would
be,
which
is
we're
recommending
the
35..
Now
you
can
see
it's
significantly
lower
than
the
google
landings,
but
I
do
want
to
stress
that
it's
hard
to
compare
apples
to
apples.
I
One
thing,
for
example,
in
in
here
in
san
bruno,
is
that
you
have
a
underground
parking
requirement
and
underground
parking
is
very,
very
expensive
and
we
just
kind
of
did
a
quick
quantification
and
so
underground
parking
in
a
sense
can
be
viewed
as
community
benefit
in
itself
and
and
the
the
three
spaces
per
thousand
square
feet
is
a
higher
parking
standard
that
is
in
than
the
mountain
view.
One
has
google
landings
this
alone
accounts
for
about
a
65
per
square
foot
additional
cost,
that's
imposed
on
bay
hill.
I
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
can't
just
they
all
going
to
go
exactly
with
what
they're
doing
in
mountain
view.
There's
other
factors
too
and
then
mountain
view's
office
market
is
a
little
bit
stronger,
so
they
can
command
higher
rents
on
the
finished
product.
There
too,
so
there's
a
bunch
of
factors
involved
again
making
direct
comparisons
difficult,
but
so
we
think
the
35
is
a
fair,
fair
number
at
this
time.
I
So
how
would
this
work?
How
would
the
existing
community
benefit
work?
You
have
a
tier
one,
which
is
your
existing
base
level
on
site.
What
you
currently
are
allowed
to
do-
and
tier
two
is
everything
above
that
so
the
community
benefit
would
say
if
you're
gonna
go
to
tier
two,
you
have
to
participate
in
this
formulaic
process.
It's
a
very
clear
process.
I
We
know
what
the
number
is.
There
are
ways
in
which
you
can
maybe
get
a
credit
for
your
35
dollars.
A
square
foot
and
we've
outlined
that
in
the
staff
report,
there's
a
number
of
ways
of
providing
a
credit
against
that
amount.
But
the
the
monetary
approach
is
very
simple
and
clear
and
allows
us
to
pull
the
money
and
use
it
for
important
community
community
facilities
that
that
we
would
use
the
money
for
so
here
quickly.
A
I
G
G
This
summarizes
the
completion
path
for
the
specific
plan
and,
what's
required
for
the
council's
final
action,
the
specific
plan,
the
eir
and
the
associated
general
plan
and
zoning
code
amendments,
and
this
shows
the
completion
path
for
the
phase,
one
project,
which
includes
a
variety
of
planning,
applications
and
entitlements.
That
would
ultimately
go
to
council
for
approval
with
the
specific
plan
and
draft
dir,
and
this
shows
all
the
steps
it
looks
like
a
lot
but
on
large
development
projects
that
go
to
council.
G
These
are
pretty
much
the
common
steps
where
they
go
to
the
airport,
land
use
commission
and
the
bicycle
and
pedestrian
advisory
committee,
the
architectural
review
committee,
the
traffic
safety
and
parking
committee
planning,
commission
and
then
ultimately,
the
city
council,
who
has
the
final
decision-making
authority
and
just
important
to
note
that
we
would
also
engage
the
community.
G
As
the
council
knows,
we've
expanded
our
community
engagement
efforts
through
modernized
mailings
like
our
postcards
and
website
outreach-
and
I
will
say
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
we've
been
very
successful
with
on
this
virtual
platform.
Is
that
we're
able
to
engage
a
lot
of
variety
of
the
community
and
stakeholders,
and
so
that's
really
important
part
of
this
process
to
get
the
community
input
and
the
total
time
is
estimated
about
six
months.
G
So
under
the
california
environmental
equality
act,
there
are
mandated
review
periods
for
sqa
that
we
can't
alter,
and
there
is
some
some
there's
a
long
process
to
get
for
all
these
hearings
and
meetings.
So
just
in
brief
I'll
summarize
the
current
fiscal
impact
just
so
the
council
is
aware.
I
just
want
to
emphasize
that
there's
no
direct
fiscal
impact
to
the
city
for
preparing
these
documents,
as
the
city
will
ensure
that
we're
reimbursed
for
all
costs
to
finalize
the
documents
by
the
applicant.
As
is
customary
with
the
development
project
and.
B
Thank
you
for
that
report.
That
was
a
lot
of
information
and
I
really
appreciate
I
appreciate
you
getting
it
getting
us
through
all
that
very
quickly.
That
was
a
lot
of
information,
but
it
was
a
very
useful
refresher
and
I
understand
from
staff
that
the
applicant
has
a
representative.
B
That
would
also
like
to
add
some
comments
under
under
public
comment,
and
so
I'm
going
to
ask
the
council
to
hold
their
questions
as
we
go
to
public
comment
and
allow
the
applicant
and
any
other
commenters
to
to
address
the
council
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
council
for
any
questions
or
clarification.
So
I
will
turn
it
over
to
the
city
clerk
to
handle
our
public
comments.
D
E
Thank
you
good
evening.
Everyone.
My
name,
is
global,
real
estate
and
workplace
for
youtube.
Over
four
years
ago,
I
had
the
privilege
of
standing
in
a
room
full
of
san
bruno's
at
the
senior
center
and
sharing
with
the
community
at
that
time.
E
Honorable
honorable
mayor,
jim
rohan,
the
city
council
and
city
staff
that
youtube
wanted
to
continue
to
call
san
bruno
home,
and
I
shared
a
vision
that
we
wanted
to
work
together
with
san
bruno
to
develop
a
project
that
wouldn't
just
build
new
buildings,
but
would
create
a
place
where
san
bruno
could
thrive
as
youtube
grows
and
that
night
long
before
2016
together,
we
initiated
the
bail
specific
plan
and
if
I
could
see
all
the
attendees
on
this
virtual
call
right
now,
I
would
probably
recognize
many
familiar
faces
who
have
been
on
this
multiple
year
journey
with
us
and
to
those
members
of
the
community.
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
participation
in
the
many
workshops
hosted
by
city
staff
and
the
constructive
feedback
you
gave
to
improve
the
project
over
these
past
years
to
city
staff
under
the
leadership
and
guidance
of
city
manager,
jovan
grogan.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
your
thousands
of
hours
of
work
on
the
daily
specific
plan,
the
honorable
mayor,
rico,
medina
vice
mayor,
salazar
and
the
esteemed
members
of
city
council.
Thank
you
for
your
leadership
to
ensure
that
what
was
important
to
this
community
was
always
in
clear
focus
on
behalf
of
youtube.
E
We
support
the
formula
that
city
staff
have
proposed
in
the
staff
report
and
in
this
evening's
presentation
you
know,
as
noted
by
city
manager,
grogan
and
community
development,
director
darcy
smith,
and
we
have
some
work
to
do
to
finalize
that
formulaic
framework.
But
youtube
is
ready
and
excited
to
do
that
work.
You
know.
Most
importantly,
I
said
at
the
beginning
of
this
process
over
four
years
ago
that
youtube
was
committed
to
community
benefits,
with
the
completion
of
the
bay
hill
specific
plan
and
in
the
future.
E
These
are
unprecedented
times
and
our
communities
are
only
more
important
as
we
support
each
other
through
this
public
health
crisis
and
one
day
I
look
forward
to
competing
in
person
with
all
of
you
again
when
we
reach
the
finish
line
on
the
mail
specific
plan
until
then
be
safe,
be
well
and
take
care
of
each
other.
Thank
you
for
the
time
this
evening.
D
Yes,
I'm
trying
to
bring
in
it
a
warner.
J
It's
gonna
give
me
a
little
trouble
here,
just
one
moment,
mr
warner,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
ms
warner,
can
you
guys
hear
me?
Yes,
whenever
you're
ready
great?
Thank
you,
hello!
Vice
mayor
city,
council
members,
I'm
allison
warner
vice
president
of
investment
and
regency
centers.
I
believe
that
past
meetings
I've
been
able
to
speak
to
most
of
you
on
behalf
of
regency
centers,
who
owns
the
bay
hill
shopping
center.
J
I
would
like
to
start
with
thanking
everyone
for
their
hard
work
on
the
many
years
that
have
gone
into
this
specific
plan,
I'm
very
happy
to
see
the
progression
and
the
direction
that
has
moved
specific
to
our
property,
we're
very
excited
about
the
potential
of
a
long-term
mixed-use
opportunity
and
also
happy
to
see
that
the
youtube
proposed
development
is
still
moving
forward.
As
mr
sherwood
just
mentioned,
these
are
definitely
unprecedented
times
and
when
I
saw
this
staff
report
come
out
and
that
youtube
was
perhaps
requesting
a
pause
in
the
specific
planning
process.
J
I
admittedly
was
concerned
that
perhaps
it
was
re-evaluating
future
paths
in
light
of
kovid,
as
we
all
have
seen
that
the
way
we
work
in
the
spaces
within
which
we
work
could
very
likely
change
in
response
to
covid.
J
J
However,
this
particular
property
is
very
much
benefited
by
the
great
mix
of
both
daytime
and
residential
population
that
we're
surrounded
by
we're
very
excited
about
the
potential
growth
of
the
office
park
around
us
as
potential
growth
is
what
attracts
new
and
great
tenants
as
businesses
ebb
and
flow
and
come
and
go
grocers
love
to
see
growth
as
that
allows
their
business
to
grow
as
well.
J
So
what
I
would
like
to
particularly
comment
on
at
this
moment
is
if
a
pause
in
a
specific
plan
is
the
right
thing
to
do
to
further
and
better
evaluate
the
community
benefits
both
of
the
office
as
well
as
the
residential,
because
I
believe
it
makes
sense
to
have
that
full
picture
laid
out
in
concert
with
each
other.
We
would
be
fully
supported
at
especially
if
that
allows
901
cherry
to
proceed
forward,
to
allow
youtube
to
start
construction
in
the
near
future.
J
That
opportunity
for
immediate
growth
around
us,
as
I'm
sure
you
can
understand,
would
provide
a
tremendous
amount
of
positive
outlook
for
our
retailers
as
they
come
out
of
covet
as
they
try
to
rebuild
their
businesses
as
we
reopen
in
safe
manners
having
that
additional
office
space,
those
additional
workers
just
across
the
street
from
us,
we
really
think
we'll
just
further
the
community
building
within
the
bay
hills
office
park
and
the
entire
specific
plan.
So
with
that,
I
will
leave
my
comments
there
again.
D
I
see
one
just
popped
up:
okay,
it's
for
moises
fellaini,
I'm
sorry!
Just
one
moment,
while
I
bring
you.
C
I'm
also
a
field
representative
for
carpenters,
union,
local
217
in
san
mateo
county
here
on
support
of
these
projects.
The
carpenters
are
fully
in
support
of
this
projects.
Youtube
has
made
a
written
commitment
that
these
projects
will
be
built
with
all
union
labor.
B
Okay
and
we'll
wait
just
a
second
to
see
if
anybody
else
raises
a
hand
right
now,
I'm
not
seeing.
B
Okay,
thank
you
all
right,
and
so
then
we
will
bring
this
back
to
the
council
for
questions
and
comments
and
any
suggestions
on
moving
forward.
So
members
of
the
council.
B
Okay,
I'll
call
on
councilmember
medina
first.
C
Thank
you
vice
mayor
salazar.
So
how
close
are
we
to
having
the
eir
specific
plan
completed
and
is
the
intention
still
to
pause
on
that
as
we
move
forward
and
concentrate
staff's
time
on
the
phase
two
at
901
cherry?
That's
my
first
question.
F
Councilmember
medina
javon,
groban
city
manager,
based
on
where
we
are
now
and
what
we
heard
from
the
applicant
youtube.
I
think
we
need
to
have
further
conversations
posted
tonight
on
how
we
proceed,
but
it
does
appear
that
we
will
be
continuing
to
proceed
forward
with
the
specific
plan
with
regard
to
the
path
forward
to
release
the
draft
specific
planning
eir
with
incorporating
the
formulaic
model.
F
We
do
project
less
than
two
months
before
that
document
can
be
released,
the
full
path
to
approval
and
all
of
the
public
meetings
and
bodies
that
the
community
and
economic
development
director
went
through
still
very
much
need
to
occur
in
round
terms.
That
is
typically
a
six-month
process
given
where
we
are.
We
will,
of
course,
try
and
expedite
that
as
fast
as
possible
and
but
have
the.
H
Thank
you,
god,
I'm
so
excited
about
this
project,
and
I
you
know
kobe
does
make
you
question
whether
or
not
businesses
are
going
to
want
to
continue
to
develop
and
grow.
I
mean
we
see
the
number
of
facebook
sites
that
have
burlingame
mountain
view,
and
yet
a
lot
of
businesses
are
talking
about
working
from
home.
H
Just
today
I
heard
18
months
of
covet
we're
looking
through
june
of
next
year
and
so
to
think
about
sort
of
putting
a
little
bit
of
a
pause
on
this
and
focusing
on
the
901
to
really
shovel
ready
by
next
year,
where
our
economy,
our
local
community,
which
is
full
of
all
labor
from
electricians
to
carpenters,
to
plumbers,
et
cetera,
be
able
to
provide
job
opportunities,
is
really
an
exciting
thing
and
something
to
really
boost
our
economy
in
san
bruno,
and
so
I
understand
that
process.
H
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
you
know,
what's
the
process,
do
you
typically
negotiate
a
community
benefit
at
this
point
in
the
game,
or
is
this
something
that
you
typically
wait
for
longer
or
is
this
it's
to
the
right
timing
of
that.
F
Councilmember
davis,
yes,
we
do
believe
it's
the
right
time
with
regard
to
the
typical
process
for
various
developments.
Why
don't
I
turn
that
to
jason
moody
from
eps
and
then,
if
we
need
additional
information,
we
can
reach
out
to
some
of
our
other
consultants
that
are
on
board
as
well.
I
Yeah
so
there's
the
the
community
benefits
are
usually
on
a
spectrum
between
negotiated
and
formulaic
and
sometimes
a
little
bit
of
both,
but
I
would
have
emphasized
again
that
you
have
to
have
the
community
benefits
defined
before
the
specific
plan
is
finished,
because
if
the
specific
plan
is
finished,
then
everybody
has
their
entitlements.
It's
a
voluntary
agreement.
So
once
you
have
your
entitlement,
you
no
longer
need
to
participate
in
the
community
benefit
package
if
it
hasn't
been
defined
in
a
specific
plan,
so
it
has
to
be
defined
at
some
point.
We
we
see
it
generally.
I
If
you
want
to
do
a
negotiated
approach,
you
can
negotiate
it
and
then
approve
it.
All
in
one
big
council
meeting
where
the
negotiations
are
all
completed
and
the
council
approves
the
the
d.a
and
the
specific
plan
at
the
same
time-
and
that's
happened,
for
example,
falco.
That's
a
pretty
big
heavy
lift
to
do
all
at
once,
but
it
happens.
I
The
other
way
that
we
see
it
quite
a
bit
is
that
you
have
these
formulaic
approaches
built
into
the
specific
plan
itself,
which
does
create
a
little
more
cleaner
process,
and
you
also
have
in
in
that
you
always
have
the
option
to
do
a
da
afterwards.
So
and
in
this
particular
case,
I'm
sure
we
would
say
you
know
that
this
is
the
formula.
This
is
the
starting
point,
but
if,
if
you
guys
want
to
go
to
a
da
and
do
something
else
a
da,
it
basically
opens
up
everything
again.
I
H
F
Yes,
so
35
dollars,
a
square
foot
is
for
office
users
and,
as
was
mentioned
in
the
slide,
the
youtube
total,
given
the
amount
of
property
that
they
own
within
the
office
park
in
the
planning
area,
amounts
to
approximately
63
million
dollars
and
there's
another
4.7
million
dollars
of
additional
enhancement
of
net
new
office
within
the
planning
area.
H
Thank
you,
I'm
happy
to
hear
the
staff
and
youtube
were
able
to
come
to
an
agreement,
and
I
can
only
imagine
the
amount
of
back
and
forth
that
had
to
occur
to
get
us
to
this
point.
These
aren't
easy,
easy
discussions.
These
are
long
discussions
over
many
many
months,
and
so
I
appreciate
the
work
that
everybody's
done
to
get
us
to
this
point.
H
I
think
that
this
this
development
is
really
important.
I
look
forward
to
the
next
phases
of
this
project.
I
know
the
community
does,
but
I'm
really
excited
to
get
some
shovel
ready
projects
in
the
ground
and
and
the
support
of
union
labor
in
san
to
to
build
this
development.
So
thank
you.
B
D
Thank
you.
I
wanted
to
see
the
slide
that
was
put
up
earlier
that
compared
what
mountain
view
was
getting
versus
what
san
bruno
was
getting
for.
The
community
benefit,
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
can,
we
could
dig
into
that
a
little
bit
more.
I
know
I
mean
mountain
view,
probably
when
google
first
started
wasn't
getting
these
amounts,
and
I
think
it's
important
that
we
understand
why
why
the
amount,
why
there's
such
a
difference
in
these
amounts-
and
hopefully
maybe
the
consultant-
can
go
into
this
a
little
bit
more.
I
Yeah,
okay,
so
some
of
the
differences
here
are
just
related
to
the
different
site
characteristics,
for
example
the
mitigations
that
we
have
we've
identified.
Those
are
mitigations
you
just
kind
of
have
to
have
those
done.
The
other
part
is
the
existing
impact
fees
that
already
exist,
and
google
landings
is
part
of
the
the
north
bay
shore
specific
plan
area,
and
they
have
very
very
high
impact
fees
in
that
area
which
pay
for
a
whole
bunch
of
things.
I
I
actually
did
the
impact
program
for
them,
so
I
know
what
it
covers,
but
there's
there's
a
lot
of
specific
infrastructure
requirements
that
are
needed
to
make
development
occur
in
that
area
which
are
much
higher
than
you
would
have
than
you
have
here
and
most
of
that
impact
the
is
the
specific
area
impact
fee
in
in
the
in
that
north
bay
shore
area.
So
that's
why
that
number
is
so
high.
As
for
the
100
100
community
benefits.
I
On
top
of
that,
I
think
you
kind
of
hit
that
nose
on
the
head.
With
regard
to
the
the
number
one
I
mentioned,
the
parking,
which
I
think
the
parking
is
like,
I
said,
the
difference
in
parking
requirements
and
parking.
The
build
of
underground
parking
space
is
a
neighborhood
of
65
000
of
space,
so
your
parking
standard
is
three
spaces
per
thousand.
I
So
when
you
get
in
the
in
the
google
landings
parking
standard
is
two
spaces
per
thousand,
so
you
have
a
one
space
per
thousand
increase
in
your
parking
standard
here,
and
you
also
have
to
do
with
subterranean
underground,
so
that's
really
equivalent
to
about
65
dollars
a
square
foot
of
additional
costs.
So
when
you
add
that
in
you
kind
of
are
getting
closer
to
the
two
numbers
are
starting
to
get
closer
to
each
other,
the
total
all-in
amount.
I
So
I
think
that's
how
I
would
describe
it.
I
would
again
emphasize
that
there's
a
lot
of
differences
between
you
can't
make
apples
to
apples
comparisons,
because
the
market
context
is
always
different
between
two
places.
You
know
certain.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
you
have
a
building
and
some
places
you
can
sell
the
building
for
more
than
other
places,
and
so
that
does
go
into
the
calculus
of
a
developer
who's.
Trying
to
understand
you
know:
what's
it
worth
them
to
participate
in
this
community
benefit
program.
I
So
that's
something
that's
really
hard
to
quantify
it's
more
of
an
intangible
and
we
didn't
try
to
quantify
it
here.
The
staff
report
does
mention
the
65
per
square
foot
and
parking
costs,
but
again
that's
an
on-site
requirement.
So
we
didn't
add
it
to
this
because
that's
that's
part
of
the
building
itself
and
that's
not
typically
included
in
a
community
benefit
calculation.
F
And
I'll
add
to
that
within
the
staff
report,
there's
an
attachment
that
talks
about
other
community
benefit
packages
that
we
looked
at
and,
as
jason
said,
an
apple
samples.
Comparison
is
difficult
due
to
the
unique
factors
on
each
site,
but
we
did
take
a
hard
look
at
the
apple
park
and
cupertino
the
facebook
expansion
in
menlo
park,
moffett
field
towers,
2
in
sunnyvale
and
the
malcolm
projects
in
cupertino,
which
are
highlighted
in
the
project
and
others
that
we
we
we
looked
at
through
sort
of
hours
and
weeks
of
research.
D
Okay
and
then
can
we
talk
about
oh
and
then
on
the
35.
If
we're,
if
this
is
the
formula
for
the
whole
plan,
is
that
something
that
can
be
changed
at
a
future
date?
Let's
say
that
nothing
is
built
for
15
years
on
part
of
this
plan
I
mean
the
amount
might
be
higher,
it
might
be
lower.
I
don't
know,
but
how?
F
So
35
dollars
a
square
foot
if,
if
approved,
will
be
with,
will
be
what's
approved
in
the
specific
plan.
There's
always
the
option
for
a
property
owner
to
have
a
negotiated
amount
due
to
unique
circumstances
in
the
future
and
in
theory
there
is
always
amount.
There
is
always
the
ability
to
amend
a
specific
plan
and
later
on.
F
Typically,
that
does
not
happen,
because
when
you
want
to
provide
a
certainty
to
property
owners
and
developers
when
you
essentially
undertake
this
at
this
point
for
your
effort
to
identify
what
the
full
build-out
will
be
in
the
area
over
20
years
by
going
through
this
process
and
then
the
subsequent
public
processes
through
all
the
various
bodies,
it
really
provides
a
level
of
confidence
for
ownership
and
investment,
and
so
typically,
you
do
not
see
these
type
of
plans
amended
over
time.
E
D
So
the
other
I
had
another
question
about
the
jobs.
One
of
the
speakers
said
that
it'll
bring
local
jobs.
I'm
actually
really
happy
to
hear
that
youtube
is
going
to
be
hiring
union
labor.
My
question
is:
will
there
be
a
program
set
up
for
san
bruno
residents?
D
F
So
at
this
point,
when
we
are
doing
a
specific
and
a
specific
plan
and
really
talking
about
entitlements,
those
conversations
are
not
had
once
projects
are
proposed
is
typically
when
a
property
owner
may
mention
a
local
hire
program
or
something
to
that
nature.
But
we
have
not
had
those
conversations
right
now,
because
what
we
are
really
talking
about
is
allowable
entitlements,
the
allowable
square
square,
footage
that
could
be
built
in
in
a
specific
area.
D
And
is
that
something
that
that
that
is
being
entertained,
I
guess
by
by
youtube
or
by
the
unions,
or
has
that
conversation
even
started
at
all?.
F
So
the
best
person
to
answer
that
question
would
be
the
applicant,
and
so,
if
they
are
available,
we
can
go
to
the
applicant
for
a
response
to
that
question.
That's
great
and
it
looks
like
we
have
drew's
hand
raised
so
melissa.
Will
you
bring
him
in.
E
B
While
we're
waiting
for
druid,
it
gets
squared
away
there.
I
I
just
I'd
like
to
ask
that
we
stay
focused
more
on
the
topic,
that
that
is
really
a
discussion
today,
which
really
has
to
do
with
the
benefits
package
and
not
get
too
into
the
weeds.
On
the
other
things.
Those
things
will
be
coming
back
to
us
as
we
move
farther
along
in
the
project,
so
we
can
just
try
to
keep
it
focused.
I
would
appreciate
it
all
right
so
drew.
Are
you
with
us.
E
B
C
It's
regarding
the
35
dollar
square
foot
and
is
that
price
tagged
along
with
the
cpi,
as
as
inflation
goes
up
that
it
automatically
goes
up,
and
we
don't
have
to
keep
on
coming
back
and
trying
to
change
it
with
inflation.
F
Yes,
it
does
have
a
cpi
inflator
attached
to
it.
B
Okay
and
and
I'm
sorry,
council
member
mason
still
had
the
floor.
She
was
waiting
for
an
answer
to
her
question.
So
I'll
recognize
her
again
and
if
drew
can
respond
to
her
question
and
if
we
still
don't
have
him,
then
I
will
ask
council
member
mason
to
perhaps
move
on
to
any
other
questions.
E
I'm
hoping
that
you
can
hear
me
now,
yes,
excellent,
I
might
work
for
a
technology
company,
but
I'm
in
real
estate,
not
in
tech
support.
So
thanks
for
bearing
with
my
problems
so
to
first
just
to
speak
to
to
linda's
questions.
You
know
we
are
we're.
We're
really
proud
of
some
of
the
initiatives
we've
been
able
to
undertake.
Over
the
last
few
years,
we've
strengthened
our
partnership
with
san
bruno.
E
You
know:
we've
done
extensive
work
with
this,
with
not
only
the
san
bruno
school
district,
but
also
skyline
college,
with
events
like
portrait
of
a
graduate
where
we've
really
worked
it,
helping
to
work
with
the
local
school
community
at
all
levels
to
to
help
people
cultivate
skills
and
talents
that
prepare
them
for
for
the
future
jobs,
and
not
only
the
tech
economy,
but
for
other
aspects
of
that
economy
being
able
to
participate
in
resume
reviews
and
doing
mock
interviews
up
at
skyline
college.
E
E
D
Andrew
well,
I
think,
while
you're
on,
I
think,
there's
a
discussion
about
law,
pausing
and
we've
had
this
whole
meeting
is
about
you
can
just
hopefully
moving
forward
with
the
community
benefits.
I
was
hoping
you
can
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
youtube
is
framing
kovid19
space
for
the
future.
E
Yeah,
absolutely,
I
totally
understand
the
question
and
it's
and
it
comes
from
it
comes
from
the
right
place,
and
you
know
I
think
at
this
point
you
know
projecting
what
the
future
may
be
with
such
a
dynamic
public
health
crisis
that
we're
facing.
You
know
I
I
can't
project
when
we're
going
to
be
able
to
return
to
the
office.
You
know
we
took
a
very
early
step
in
transitioning
to
work
from
home
for
a
number
of
reasons,
and
obviously
one
of
those
was
to
keep
our
staff
safe.
E
But
additionally,
we
knew
that,
since
we
had
the
capacity
to
enable
work
from
home
that
if
our
staff
remains
safe,
that
we
would
not
overburden
and
overwhelm
a
public
health
system
that
does
have
capacity
constraints
and
when
we
looked
out
at
essential
workers
and
then
public
health
workers
that
were
going
to
be
absolutely
critical
to
supporting
us
all.
Through
this
crisis,
we
in
no
way
wanted
to
contribute
to
hospital
capacity,
challenges
or
other
elements
that
would
that
would
really
hurt
our
response
in
our
community's
response
to
this
crisis.
E
So
we
did
transition
early
to
a
work
from
home
posture.
You
know,
but
that
said
like
we
are
a
culture
that
believes
in
the
power
of
space
and
the
power
of
our
office,
environments,
to
drive
innovation
and
collaboration
and
trust
me
every
day
I
hear
from
our
population
wondering
when
are
we
going
to
be
able
to
return?
E
And
you
know
that
question
is
only
answered
by
when?
Is
it
going
to
be
safe
to
return?
Since
you
know,
unfortunately,
kova
drives
the
schedule
and
not
the
desires
of
us
coming
back
to
the
office.
So
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
answer
that,
but
this
current
status
is
just
way
too
dynamic
for
us
to
predict,
but
we
all
look
forward
to
being
able
to
come
back
and
and
use
our
office
spaces
to
drive
continued.
You
know
collaboration
and
innovation
in
the
future.
D
Thank
you
aside
from
that,
thank
you
for
the
report
to
staff
and
for
the
pretty
detailed
and
thank
you
for
youtube
just
for
working
with
the
city
through
this
process,
and
I
would
support
option
two
as
far
as
our
direction
to
to
our
city
manager.
D
D
B
And
so
I
council,
member
medina,
I
I
don't
know
if
you
had
anything
else,
I
I
lowered
your
hand,
but
I'm
gonna
give
you
the
floor
back
in
case
you
had
anything
else
to
add
sure.
C
I
I
I
thank
you
for
that.
Vice
mayor
salazar,
I
too
am
in
support
of
option
two.
I
do
appreciate
all
the
work
that
has
been
spent
over
over
the
years
to
to
get
us
to
this
point,
and
I'm
glad
that
we
were
able
to
to
work
out
an
option
that
enables
this
to
go
forward
and
as
an
additional
bonus
it.
C
It
says
a
lot
that
youtube's
willing
to
work
with
labor
in
this
pandemic.
San
bruno
is
moving
forward.
San
bruno
is
perfectly
positioned
to
be
so
attractive
to
to
businesses
and
and
and
development.
So
we
will
be
mindful
of
development
and
through
this
process,
with
with
the
specific
plan
of
the
eir,
that's
that's
will
assure
it
so
I'm
in
favor
of
moving
forward
with
this.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you
so
much.
I
just
want
to
make
a
couple
points,
and
that
is
that
you
know
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
two,
because
the
opportunity
for
cappuccino,
students
and
skyline
students
to
participate
in
their
internships
has
always
been
I've
always
been
there.
I'm
sorry,
apprenticeships.
H
I've
always
been
there,
and
so
I
can
only
imagine
that
will
continue
and
become
better
and
and
grow
further
and
and
then
the
other
comment
I
want
to
make
is
that
you
know
youtube's
always
been
about
reaching
out
to
san
bruno,
to
ask
what
can
we
do
for
you,
the
city
versus
us,
trying
to
reach
out
to
them,
and
so
they
have
done
a
number
of
things
for
our
community
and
will
continue
to
do,
and
so
you
know,
although
this
is
one
specific
agreement
on
this
development
they're
here
long
term,
and
I
hope
they
continue
to
stay
here
long
term
and
we
really
appreciate
the
things
that
they've
done
and
have
given
back
to
our
community
that
touch
all
of
us
in
so
many
ways.
B
I
I'm
not
going
to
repeat
everything
we've
heard,
but
I
agree
that
this
this
whole
project
is
it's
very
important
to
the
city
and
strengthening
the
partnership
that
we
have
with
youtube
is
also
important.
So
I
am
glad
that
we
were
able
to
come
to
a
resolution.
That's
mutually
agreeable
to
everyone
glad
to
hear
that
our
our
friends
in
labor
are
on
board.
That's
also
very
important.
Not
all
of
our
projects
run
that
smoothly
with
that
level
of
support.
B
So
it's
nice
to
hear
that
we
have
that
in
this
case,
I'm
also
supportive
of
staff's
recommendation
on
this.
I
see
council
member
medina.
You've
raised
your
hand,
so
I
will
recognize
you.
C
Yes,
I
apologize,
I
I
said
the
number
two
in
the
option,
but
but
the
idea
is
with
the
staff's
recommendation
with
the
with
the
formulaic.
That's
an
interesting
word,
formulaic
process,
so
that
that's
what
I'm
in
favor
of
them.
I
apologize
for
the
was
speaking
earlier.
No.
B
I
and
I
I
appreciate
the
clarification
so
with
that
it
looks
like
we
have
unanimous
support
from
the
council
to
move
forward
with
staff's
recommendation,
so
city
manager
any
further
direction
or
questions
from
you
or
your
staff.
F
No
vice
mayor
salazar,
just
to
clarify
council
member
mason,
said
option
two
and
then
council
member
medina
clarified,
option
one.
So
why
don't
I
bring
that
up
on
the
screen?
Just
so
we
can
have
a
clarification,
because,
if
we're
unanimous,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
all
saying
the
same
thing.
F
So
option
one
is
to
establish
a
formulaic
community
benefit
approach
and
incorporate
it
as
an
integral
part
of
the
specific
plan
based
on
a
set
dollar
amount,
and
the
staff
recommendation
is
35
dollars
per
square
foot,
which
we
heard
from
youtube
today
that
they
are
in
agreement
with
option.
Two
is
deferred
publication
of
the
specific
planet
and
eir
until
a
specific
community
benefits
program
is
negotiated,
and
that
may
or
may
not
include
a
formulaic
model.
F
It
may
include
something
else,
and
so
where
what
the
staff
recommendation
is
to
proceed
with
option
one
I
think
given
where
we
are
now,
we
will
have
subsequent
conversations
with
youtube
and
proceed
forward
with
the
901
chariot
entitlements,
as
well
as
finalizing
the
bay
hill,
specific
plan
and
beginning
the
release
of
the
draft
documents
and
those
public
meetings.
So
with
that,
I
want
to
make
sure
where
all
council
members
are
on
option
one
and
option
two
and
again
option.
One
is
the
recommended
approach.
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that
clarification.
I
I
did
misspeak
there
so
so
I
I
think
we
got
a
clarification
from
council
member
medina
that
he
is
favoring
staff's
recommendation
council,
member
davis
you're
also
in
favor
of
a
staff's
recommendation
and
council
member
mason.
You
said
option
two,
so
are
you
in
support.
D
B
Thank
you
for
clarifying
that,
okay,
so
city
manager,
grogan,
you
have
your
direction.
Thank
you,
okay,
and
being
that
that
was
our
only
item
for
discussion
tonight.
Unless
there
are
other
comments
from
the
council.