►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting May 25, 2021 5. Consent
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting May 25, 2021
5. Consent Calendar
A
We're
going
to
move
on
to
consent,
calendar,
that's
item
5..
All
items
are
considered
routine
or
implemented
in
earlier
counsel
action
and
may
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
There
will
be
no
separate
discussion
unless
requested.
So
at
this
time
are
there
any
items
that
we
want
to
pull
for
a
complete
staff
report
and
separate
vote.
A
C
B
A
Okay,
thank
you
see
no
others.
I'm
gonna
start
at
the
top
and
we'll
work
our
way
down.
If
that's
okay,
so
we'll
start
with
item
f
as
in
frank,
appoint
rico
and
michael
to
the
city,
council
subcommittee
or
ad
hoc
committee
to
review
fireworks
stand,
permit
applications
in
preparation
for
the
sale
of
state
and
saying
fireworks
in
san
bruno
and
again,
it
is
supposed
to
say,
and
the
process
mason.
B
So,
based
on
the
question
that
I
asked
of
staff
and
the
response
I
got,
it
would
be
good
to
better
understand
or
better
or
give
more
opportunities
for
others
to
actually
have
a
stand.
So
for
those
members
of
the
public,
there
was
a
question
that
was
sent
earlier
around.
Who
was
noticed
of
the
opportunity
to
have
a
fireworks
stand.
B
Nine
in
nine
groups
are
grandfathered
in
and
then
nine
groups
are
eligible
to
have
an
additional
stand
and
the
noticing
from
the
answer
that
the
council
received
is
that
they
noticing
of
the
opportunity
for
these
stands
only
went
to
those
who
had
stands
the
previous
year,
and
so
I
do
just
want
to
ask
how-
and
maybe
this
is
a
question
for
the
city
attorney.
But
how
can
we
ensure
that
the
noticing
is
more
public?
B
Maybe
the
parks
side
parkside
has
a
number
of
different
organizations
that
are
made
up
of
parents.
These
could
greatly
help
our
public
schools
in
san
bruno.
The
education
foundation
may
be
interested.
I
have
not
spoken
with
any
of
them.
They
just
came
right
when
I
looked
at
the
applications.
I
noticed
that
those
were
all
missing
and
I
don't
know
what
other
nonprofit
organizations
might
be
in
the
city
that
might
be
interested
in
having
a
stand
and
so
without
actually
giving
notice
to
anybody
outside
of
those
who
applied
the
year
before.
A
E
I
see
you
yes,
sorry.
I
was
having
trouble
finding
my
unmute
button,
you
you'd
think
after
a
year
and
a
half
of
this
we'd
know
where
the
button
is,
but
apparently
I
don't
so.
Certainly
if
the
city
council
wishes
to
direct
staff
to
provide
additional
notice,
they
could
certainly
do
that.
There's
no
legal
requirement
to
a
provided
notice,
nor
any
legal
prohibition.
Why
addition
on
the
notice
couldn't
be
provided.
B
It
I
mean,
I
think
the
rules
do
say
that
there
has
to
be
notice.
I
think
it
just
doesn't
provide
who
the
notice
has
to
be
provided
to
right.
So
is
this:
is
this
something
that
would
have
to
be
agenda
is
at
a
later
time
for
next
year,
since
this
process
is
already
we're
already
in
june
or
practically
in
june,.
E
So
I'm
understanding
from
the
city,
clerk
and
melissa,
please
feel
free
to
speak
up
that
the
nonprofits
and
I
see
the
city
manager
has
a
his
hand
up
as
well
that
it
staff
doesn't
know
who's
interested
in
who
isn't.
And
so
in
the
past
it's
been
incumbent
upon
the
non-profits,
who
were
generally
familiar
with
the
fact
that
san
bruno
has
fireworks
and
you
can
have
firework
stands
to
come
to
the
city
and
request
that,
and
we
do
know
that
has
happened
in
the
past.
C
Correct-
and
I
do
want
to
add
I'm
sorry-
this
is
melissa,
thurman
city
clerk.
I
do
want
to
add
that
in
years
past
we
have
had
some
school
non-profit
groups
interested
in
parkside.
Did
it
for
a
couple
of
years
and
eventually
pulled
out.
We
post
this
notice
on
channel
one
so
that
the
public
is
that
watches
our
channel.
One
slides
is
aware
that
they
can
come
in
and
get
an
application
if
they
so
choose.
Yes,
it
would
be
pretty
hard
for
us
to
know
who
was
interested.
F
Simple
issue,
so
I
think
what
we
have
is
a
request
to
expand
the
noticing
subsequently,
and
we
can
certainly
do
that.
What
occurred
this
time
is
that
the
notice
was
posted
on
channel
one
as
the
city
clerk
said,
as
well
as
sent
to
all
of
the
groups
that
have
participated
in
the
fireworks
stands
in
the
past,
and
what
I
hear
council
member
mason
articulating
is:
let's
just
broaden
that
next
year,
expanded
out
doing
a
more
general
notice
that
can
pick
up
non-profits.
F
That
may
not
have
participated
in
in
the
process
before
or
non-profits
that
we
don't
know
about,
and
so
we
can
certainly
do
that
and
do
more
of
a
general
citywide
noticing,
whether
it's
putting
it
in
the
city.
Manager's
newsletter
posting
it
on
social
media.
What
have
you
I
think
we
can
get
the
word
out.
So
I
think
it's
a
fairly
simple
request
to
do
and
still
noted
and
staff
will
be
directed
to
do
that.
Okay,.
B
Great
thank
you
and
I,
and
just
because
I
don't
know
how
this
happened
in
the
past,
since
covid
was
last
year
as
far
as
just
inviting
organizations
to
come
and
speak
about
their
organization,
it
does.
It
says
in
the
policy
that
or
the
procedure
that
was
in
the
staff
report,
that
the
council
can
request
this.
B
So
same
thing,
I
don't
know
if
that
would
be
something
that
the
ad
hoc
committee
would
request
that
we
direct
the
ad
hoc
committee
to
do
or
if
it's
been
done
before
I
I
did
see
the
notice
that
it
doesn't
sound
like
it
had
been
done
in
recent
years,
but
I
would
love
to
hear
from
some
of
these
organizations.
I
think
it
would
just
be
really
beneficial
for
the
council
and
the
public
to
hear
about
what
they
do
and
and
how
they
benefit
the
san
bernardino
community.
B
F
That
was
a
new
hand
raised
to
address
council
member
nation's
latest
comment,
and
so
my
recommendation
would
be.
The
ad
hoc
committee
discusses
that
in
a
process
to
invite,
I
would
say,
a
select
group
to
provide
a
report
out
one
of
the
things
that
is
a
challenge
with
our
business
meetings
as
council
knows
that
they
begin
at
seven
o'clock
and
so
the
more
announcements
and
presentations
we
have
means
the
later
we're
getting
to
the
business
items.
F
G
A
Expound
upon
that,
the
reason
I
want
I
want
and
and
process
on
there
was
for
some
of
these
questions,
because
the
resolution
goes
back
to
2008.
It's
also,
the
fact
of.
Is
it
necessary
to
have
an
ad
hoc
committee
of
the
council
review
the
applications
which
have
been
reviewed
by
the
city
clerk
and
maybe
we're
just
having
another
layer
that
isn't
necessary
or
required,
and
so
that
is
also.
A
I
was
hoping
to
examine
that
as
well,
because
if
there's
not
a
need,
then
I
must
not
duplicate
efforts,
and
so
I
know
mr
salazar
has
had
some
experience
on
this.
Did
it
last
year
for
the
first
time,
so
I
just
was
trying
to
get
someone
that
walked
through
it
before
and
then
go
ahead
and
then
bring
back
the
council
on
some
of
those
questions
that
have
been
raised
but
also
about
the
process
is:
does
it
need
these
ad
hoc
committee
because
they
have
applications?
A
B
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
ask,
I
think,
for
more
so,
for
the
benefit
of
the
public.
There's
been
so
much
discussion
around
downtown
and
the
status
of
downtown,
and,
as
we
know,
this
111
huntington
is
going
to
bring
you
right
into
our
downtown.
I
would
actually
consider
a
part
of
our
downtown,
so
I
just
wanted
to
ask
from
a
very
high
like
of
high
level,
if
staff
can
provide
a
quick
overview
on
what
the
maintenance
agreement
is
and
what
it
looks
like.
H
A
D
F
F
So
there
are
three
questions:
one
question
from
council
member
medina
about
the
maintenance
agreement
and
then
two
questions
from
council
member.
I'm
sorry,
one
question
from
council
member
mason
about
the
maintenance
agreement
and
then
two
questions
from
council
member
medina,
one
about
the
permitting
status
and
another
with
regard
to
the
residential
apartment
program.
F
Before
we
answer
those
three
questions,
I
want
to
ask
our
interim
public
works
director,
taylon
ritchie,
to
give
a
very
brief
overview
of
the
project,
because
it
seems
like
we're
going
to
get
into
a
little
nuance
about
the
project
and
I
think
it's
important
for
the
public.
That's
watching
to
have
a
little
background
on
what
we're
talking
about
with
that
said,
mr
mayor,
it
seems
like
councilmember
mason
may
have
another
question.
B
I
I'm
sorry
just
I
might
as
well
group
them
in
together,
but
when
you
talk
about
the
maintenance
agreement,
I
love
that
you
talked
about
weeds
and
garbage,
and
so
can
you
just
make
sure
you
address
the
time
frame
that
the
city
will
be
providing
to
the
owner
to
actually
remedy
the
situation.
Thank
you.
H
H
H
H
H
Help
to
answer
some
people,
the
questions
so
council,
member
mason,
you
had
asked
about
the
maintenance
agreement.
What
those
what
that
includes
is
so
as
part
of
the
improvement
agreement,
there
will
be
various
improvements
off-site,
so
that's
within
the
public,
right-of-way
and
those
were
listed
as
in
the
previous
slide.
So
what
the
maintenance
agreement
does
is
ensures
that
the
project
improvements
will
be
maintained
to
city
standards
for
various
facilities,
and
so
what
that
does
allow
for
is
enhanced
maintenance
of
public
improvements
by
the
private
property
owner.
H
They
are
they're
a
few
pending
permits
for
city
review,
which
include
the
shoring
building
encroachment
permit
for
public
improvements.
The
permit
plans
for
public
implements
are
near
complete.
However,
there
are
a
couple
items
that
require
some
additional
coordination
between
the
applicant
and
the
city
before
the
encroachment
permit
for
the
public
improvements
can
be
issued,
and
so
there's
last
you
know
few
remaining
items
to
be
worked
through,
but
it
is
very
close.
I
I
think
this
item
tonight.
F
F
F
With
this
project,
thus,
we
are
not
allowed.
We
are
not
able
to
get
that
as
a
concession,
a
negotiated
concession
if
the
developer
property
owner
is
not
willing.
I
did
contact
the
developer
today
and
confirmed
that
they
are
comfortable
with
the
documents
as
presented
to
council
and
not
supportive
at
this
time
of
excluding
the
project
from
a
future
residential
parking
program.
J
F
A
Okay,
so
I
I
believe
the
questions
were
answered.
There
might
be
some
follow-up
to
it.
I
also
want
to
be
able
to
open
it
up.
We
have
somebody
from
the
community
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item
again.
This
is
in
regards
to
the
property
at
111,
san
bernardino,
avenue
and
761
767
huntington
ave,
the
city
clerk.
If
you
can
bring
in.
C
I
C
I
I
So
we're
very
happy
we're
very
excited.
We
want
to
thank
you
for
the
time
that
you've
spent
listening
to
us
in
various
presentations
and
various
neighborhood
meetings.
Thank
you
again.
As
far
as
the
parking
is
concerned,
I'd
like
to
say
that
the
amount
of
space
available
for
parking
is
extremely
limited.
I
We
are,
we
have
a
very,
very
expensive
parking
system.
It
is
three
high.
It
goes
down
on
the
ground
and
comes
back
up.
It
requires
the
availability
of
of
a
credit
card
type
thing
for
each
resident
to
to
to
operate,
and
I
think
that
we
have
enough
to
satisfy
all
our
residents,
so
I
don't
know
about
possibly
participating
in
other
programs
if
it's
possible.
I
A
F
K
All
right,
I
just
wanted
to
it's
exciting
that
this
project
is
moving
forward.
The
property
has
been
vacant
for
so
long
it'd
be
nice
to
have
neighbors
there.
I
do
want
to
express
my
concern
that
the
property
is
going
to
be
able
to
or
is
not
taken
out
of
what
might
be
a
residential
parking
permit
program
in
and
around
the
area
and
my
biggest
concern
there
too.
K
K
K
K
G
G
The
at
that
time.
One
of
my
co-committee
members
just
made
a
comment.
We
were
not
voting
on
whether
there
was
that
was
enough
parking
in
this
building,
because
that
was
not.
That
was
not
before
us
and
there
wasn't
any
decision
to
be
made
about
that.
But
one
of
my
committee,
fellow
committee
members,
commented
that
she
did
not
believe
there
was
enough
parking
in
this
building
and
the
mr
dinar
was
at
that
meeting
and
spoke
at
length
about
that.
G
D
D
If
there
was
a
parking
permit
program,
the
residents
at
this
location
wouldn't
participate
in
it
and
why
this
is
so
important
is
that
we
know
currently
parking
anywhere
near
that
building
is
extremely
difficult,
so
legally
I'd.
The
question,
then,
would
be
to
the
city
attorney.
This
is
not
what
we're
voting
on
right
now
of
that
part,
the
students
has
already
passed
to
approve
the
project
and
we
didn't
have
that
in
there.
A
Yeah
and
the
only
thing
that
I
would
suggest
is
so
that
it's
really
documented,
I
think
when
it
goes
to
the
process
and
if
we
find
ourselves
in
in
this
unique
situation
to
where
it
is
one
of
those
larger
developments,
that's
within
a
neighborhood
area
that
it's
that
is
stipulated,
yay
or
nay,
but
it's
on
there.
People
are
agreeing
to
it.
The
process
is
going
through
and
therefore
there's
there's
nobody's.
You
know
if
it's
they
said
five
years
ago
six
years
ago,
that
it's
hard
and
folks
change.
A
A
A
Thank
you
vice
mayor.
I
just
had
one
quick
question
to
city
manager,
because
I
know
the
personnel
board
used
to
deal
with
the
the
list
when
I
say
list
captains
list,
etc
and
and
as
far
as
their
battalion
chief
list
and
how
long
it
would
stay
out,
there
would
go
to
the
personnel
board.
They
would
have
input
whether
to
extend
the
list
or
not
and
go
out
for
another.
So
how
is
that
going
to
be
facilitated?
Now.
F
So,
mr
mayor
medina,
in
response
to
your
question,
that
responsibility
will
be
assigned
to
the
chief
people
officer
or
assistant
city
manager
to
make
that
decision,
so
it
has
been
delegated
to
staff
through
the
through
the
action
that
is
before
you
tonight,
and
so
it
is
no
longer
a
response,
a
decision
of
the
board
or
of
the
city
council,
and
what
that
is
is
we
have
eligibility
lists
after
we
run
a
recruitment,
typical
administrative
hiring
process,
you
establish
a
qualified
list.
If
no
one
is
hired
off
that
list.
F
A
Okay
and
there
will
be
a
process
in
place
as
when
that
time
comes.
Okay,
hey
anything
else
from
my
colleagues
for
item
h,
not
seen
any.
Let's
move
on
to
item
j
adopt
resolution,
accepting
the
short
term
plan
to
activate
centennial,
plaza,
deposit
improvement,
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
implement
plaza
improvements
and
appropriating
eighty
thousand
dollars
from
the
park
and
lou
fee
fund.
D
D
F
J
Thank
you,
so,
just
just
in
terms
of
you
know,
changes
and
adding
things
as
a
project
manager.
I
got
to
tell
you,
scope
creep
is
one
of
those
things
that
just
makes
me
cringe
and
when
we
start
you
know
we
kind
of
agreed
to
some
quick
improvements
and
a
budget.
I
I'd
like
to
see
us
stay
as
close
to
that
as
possible.
F
F
A
Yeah
I
wanted
to
also
you
know:
that's
one
thing
that
I
know
in
the
past
that
some
commissioners
were
not
pleased.
Shall
we
say
that
that
topic,
not
that
they
the
the
money,
but
we
do
bring
those
things
by
them
to
get
their
input.
They
have
it
on
their
agenda
for
the
public.
The
other
thing
is,
is,
I
know
I
know
you're
having
just
to
kind
of
throw
something
out
now,
but
to
go
to
from
80
to
150
almost
doubling
it.
It
concerns
me
a
little
bit.
A
I
mean
it
was
125.
I
know
it's
like
eureka.
What's
25
thousand
dollars,
but
just
doubling
it
at
a
at
a
moment's
notice
does
concern
me
a
little
bit,
and
I
know
I
think,
city
manager.
My
assumption
would
be
that
you're
kind
of
obviously
having
to
just
kind
of
think
about
what
what
it
could
cost
not
really
knowing.
F
Us
as
soon
as
possible,
so
you
can
implement
this
project
and
so
that
that
is
why
it
is
before
you.
In
fact,
the
direction
is.
We
were
going
to
include
the
funding
in
the
proposed
budget
that
would
be
adopted
in
late
june
and
available
july.
1.
and
council's
direction
was
frankly
bring
it
to
us
sooner.
So
we
can
get
these.
These
improvement
improvements
implemented
downtown
as
soon
as
possible,
and
so.
F
It
is
to
you
this
soon
and
yes,
the
recommendation
to
increase
to
80
to
150
was
not
an
attempt
to
sort
of
double
the
budget.
It
was
sort
of
to
provide
enough
funds
to
get
the
job
done
and
again,
any
funds
that
are
not
spent
will
be
returned
to
the
park
and
loot
fund,
and
we
will
certainly
take
the
final
design
and
the
concept
of
the
part
and
rec
commission
and
then
move
forward
expeditiously.
A
G
So
might
I
suggest
that
you
know
I
I
want
to
see
improvements
here
as
well,
but
I
also
don't
like
to
see
the
the
budget
go
up
by
this
much
without
knowing
exactly
what
we're
getting
for
it
and
all
of
that,
and
and
and
also
don't
want
to
put
staff
on
the
spot
to
have
to
try
to
guess
at
that.
Could
a
viable
option
be
that
we
approve
the.
G
We
approve
the
80
000
as
is,
and
then
as
the
as
the
final
design
is
put
put
forth,
staff
would
be
able
to
tell
us
that
it
would
cost
x
x
thousand
more
to
put
in
lighting
or
whatever's
this.
You
know
specific
approach
proposal
so
that
we
can
add
to
it
later
if
we
so
choose
but
approve
this,
so
we
can
get
started
on
it
for
all
the
reasons
that
the
city
manager
just
outlined.
That's
what
I
will
recommend
for
today.
F
We
can
absolutely
bring
another
staff
report
and
a
appropriation
request
back
to
the
city
council,
and
what
that
would
mean
is
that
we
would
not
be
able
to
enter
the
contract
for
the
full
amount.
We
would
attempt
to
give
the
vendor
a
an
initial
task
order
for
the
work
that
we
have
budgeted
and
then
bring
another
staff
report
back
to
the
city
council
as
well
as
go
through
the
park
and
recognition,
and
so
it
may
it
may
have
a
timing
impact
it
may
not.
F
I
literally
don't
know
right
now,
but
if
we
would
like
to
increase
the
work
that
we're
doing
is
certainly
going
to
come
at
it
at
an
additional
cost.
If
that
cost
exceeds
80
000
we'll
come
back.
If
that's
council's
desire
or
you
can
provide
additional
allocation
now,
knowing
that
staff
would
go
to
the
parking
rec
commission
and
any
funds
that
are
not
spent
would
be
returned
back
to
the
parking
lot.
A
K
J
I
I'm
just
concerned
about
what
I
just
heard:
if
you
have
a
budget,
that
means
you've
already
planned
and
did
cost
estimates
and
just
throwing
out
numbers
and
shotguns
is
not
a
way
to
do
business.
We,
if
you're,
going
to
update
the
budget
to
150,
that's
fine,
but
you
should
have
some
justification
behind
it.
It's
really,
you
know
it's
the
taxpayer
money
and
it's
just
saying
that
we'll
return,
what
we
don't
spend
you
know,
government
usually
doesn't
give
money
back
so
they're
gonna
spend
what
you
give
them.
I
A
D
D
D
A
A
Okay,
you
know
I,
and
I
know
it
does
stay
short
term,
and
I
will
tell
you
I
remember
the
day
that
it
was
wells
fargo.
I
remember
the
day.
It
was
a
lot
with
a
fence
that
collected
weeds
and
newspapers
that
blew,
and
I
think
our
intent
is
short
term,
but
in
all
honesty
I
think
the
short
term
will
become
something
longer.
Everybody
has
a
definition
of
what
short
term
and
long
term
are,
but
I
believe
the
intent
is
for
short
term.
A
However,
with
no
fault
to
the
staff
or
anyone
else,
and
I
go
back
to
when
it
is
what
it
is
today,
it
was
done
in-house
with
what
was
currently
at
its
disposal
when
I
say
its
disposal
what
parks
had
to
put
that
together.
So
it
was
a
very
nominal
cost
and
that's
why
it
was
done
because
it
was
to
be
temporary.
Well,
obviously,
we
know
that's
it's
not
temporary.
So
anyway,
I
just
wanted
to
remind
folks
of
that.
So
with
that
said,
we
are
concluded
with
item
j.