►
Description
San Bruno Special City Council Meeting
April 6, 2021
Whole Meeting
trt 2:14:55
A
A
Here
we're
going
to
move
on
to
item
three
and
I'm
just
going
to
take
a
moment
to
pause.
This
is
for
public
comments
for
items
not
on
the
agenda.
So
if
your
desire
is
to
speak
on
the
study
session
tonight,
which
is
a
continuation
of
the
storm
drainage,
this
is
not
the
time
that
you
would
want
to
have
your
hand
up
and
speak.
This
is,
if
it's
other
than
that
topic
on
the
agenda.
I
would
ask
if
you
would,
please
put
your
virtual
hand
up,
and
we
will
call
upon
you
so
de
clark.
C
B
A
Not
be
nosy
at
all,
that's
great!
Thank
you
for
being
here.
Okay,
see
no
other
hands
up,
we
will
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
item
number
four,
which
is
the
study
session.
This
is
to
hold
the
continued
public
hearing
to
consider
protests
and
testimony
regarding
the
storm,
drainage,
flood
protection
fee
and
consider
resolution
submitting
storm
drainage
and
flood
feed,
the
property
owner
mail
ballot
election
and
what
we
again
this
is
a
continuation
from
the
march
23rd
meeting.
A
What
we're
going
to
do
is
we're
going
to
turn
it
just
so
we
have
some
idea
we're
going
to
turn
it
over
to
the
city
manager
and
his
team
they're,
going
to
give
a
slide,
show
presentation
some
similar
information
from
the
last
time
and
some
new,
and
that
could
be
about
an
eta
of
about
30
minutes.
I'm
going
to
then
ask
the
council
if
they
have
any
immediate
question
before
we
turn
it
to
the
public,
and
then
I'm
going
to
ask
for
all
of
you
through
the
presentation.
A
D
Good
evening,
mayor
and
city
manager,
my
name
is
javon
grogan
and
I'm
just
I'm.
Gonna
have
the
pleasure
of
serving
as
the
city
manager
for
the
city
of
san
bruno,
I'm
here
tonight
to
provide
a
presentation
on
the
proposed
storm,
drainage
and
flood
protection
fee
I'll
be
joined
tonight
by
jimmy
tan.
Our
public
works
director
who
will
be
participating
from
another
location.
D
D
As
the
city
council
and
the
public
will
remember,
we
did
have
a
first
public
hearing
on
march
23rd.
We
had
a
number
of
public
comment
and
protests
that
were
received
at
that
meeting,
and
this
is
the
continuation
you
know.
I
will
also
apologize
to
any
members
of
the
public
that
attended
that
march
23rd
public
hearing,
but
unfortunately,
due
to
the
late
hour
or
due
to
the
technical
difficulties
we
had
at
the
beginning,
were
not
able
to
give
their
public
comment.
D
We
did
take
the
step
in
mailing
out
a
postcard
to
every
pr
property
in
san
bruno
for
this
meeting.
So
hopefully
you
have
the
opportunity
to
share
your
comments
and
I
know
we
received
a
number
of
them
by
mail,
so
the
agenda
for
tonight
is
we'll
provide
an
overview
of
our
water
utilities,
we'll
discuss
the
storm,
water
funding
challenges
and
our
stormwater
fund,
the
health
of
it
we'll.
D
D
But
we
have
some
new
members
of
the
public
likely
attending
today
and
so
we'll
we'll
give
the
full
presentation
first
off
here
in
the
city
of
san
bruno,
your
city
maintains
and
operates
three
water-related
utilities
on
your
behalf,
the
first
one
is
our
potable
water
system
or
a
drinking
water
system.
That's.
F
D
A
D
And,
lastly,
there's
our
storm
water
system,
and
that's
the
system
we're
talking
about
tonight
that
collects
rain
water
drop
rain
water
runoff
and
conveys
it
to
the
creek
prior
to
discharging
it
into
the
bay
that
water
is
not
treated
prior
to
discharging
into
the
ban.
We'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
and
with.
D
So,
first,
let's
talk
about
our
long-range
financial
forecasts
in
the
storm
in
our
stormwater.
Unfortunately,
what
we
know
and
what
we
talked
to
the
city
council
about
when
we
adopted
our
1920
budget
was
that
the
fund
is
projected
to
go
negative
and
it's
projected
to
go
negative
in
our
21
22
fiscal
year.
That
will
begin
in
july
of
this
year,
and
so
that's
really
one
of
the
main
thrusts
of
why
we're
having
this
conversation,
because
there
is
a
fiscal
imperative
for
a
stormwater
system.
D
Unfortunately,
the
annual
charges
are
not
covering
o
m
operations
and
maintenance.
Nor
is
it
recouping
enough
revenue
to
cover
capital
improvement
projects
and,
as
the
director
will
talk
about,
we
do
have
a
list
of
needed
capital
improvement
projects.
The
first
list
is
approximately
30
million
dollars
that,
as
you
can
see
from
this
slide
with
revenues
exceeding
expenditures,
it's
really
just
not
the
resources
to
to
pay
for
those,
and-
and
that's
been
that
way
for
quite
some
years
now.
D
The
current
stormwater
fee
that
every
property
in
san
bruno
pays
has
not
been
increased
since
1994..
That
rate
is
for
most
properties,
actually
all
properties
under
11
000
square
feet.
So
it's
the
vast
majority
of
our
of
our
parcels.
There's
a
one-time
payment
of
46
a
year
that's
paid
on
on
the
property
tax
bill.
The
system
is
aging
as
you're
hearing
a
little
bit
from
our
public
works
director.
D
This
next
slide
I
want
to
present
this
is
our
current
fee
structure.
So,
as
I
said
before,
it's
an
average
of
46
dollars
per
parcel
per
year
for
all
for
parcels
over
11
000
square
feet.
This
again
has
been
the
structure
since
1994..
That
is
true
for
all
properties,
except
agriculture,
vacant
or
condominiums.
Those
are
charged
at
a
slightly
different
rate.
On
average.
The
minimum
for
those
parcels
is
twenty
three
dollars
and
eight
cents,
but
the
vast
majority
of
our
parcels
are
paying
forty
six
dollars.
D
D
Some
of
the
those
notable
failures
include
the
crestmoor
canyon
landslide,
that
I
know
members
in
the
community
will
remember,
because
we
were
forced
to
close
a
lane
on
san
bruno
avenue
for
that
slide.
That
began
in
december
of
2019.
That
slide
was
actually
caused
by
a
storm
drain.
Pipe
that
runs
south
to
north
under
san
bruno
avenue
and
water
would
come
out
of
the
storm
drain
pipe
and
eventually
erode
at
the
hillside.
D
The
next
project
was
a
drain
covert
that
you'll
see
a
picture
from
the
public
works
director's
presentation
that
was
discovered
in
january
of
2020
and
that
cost
approximately
450
000
to
repair
that
that
pipe
and
we
are
still
working
on
a
repair
to
the
hillside
that
may
cost
another
350
000.
have
an
undersized
pipe
on
spyglass.
D
D
And
then
we
embark
on
the
218
process
after
communicating
the
need
to
the
city
council,
and
so
that
process
really
begun
in
earnest
in
march
of
this
year,
and
it's
projected
to
go
through
june
of
2021,
pending
the
outcome
of
tonight's
public
hearing.
So
next
I'll
turn
it
over
to
director
jimmy
tan.
That
will
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
stormwater
infrastructure
in
detail.
H
So
here's
a
quick
overview
of
the
city
storm
system,
as
the
city
manager
mentioned.
You
know
the
system's
over
100
years
old.
It
was
installed
originally
back
in
the
1900s,
and
the
system
consists
of
you
know,
drainage,
which
captures
distort
the
surface
water
from
the
roadways
and
convey
the
water
into
underground
pipelines.
You
know
as
large
as
72
inches
in
diameter
and
eventually
into
large,
concrete
box
covers,
and
some
of
these
box
cover
structures
are
as
large
as
eight
to
ten
feet
wide
and
five
to
eight
feet.
H
High
and
the
picture
on
the
bottom
right
hand
of
the
the
slide
shows
an
example.
What
the
box
code
for
looks
like
the
storm
system
flows
by
gravity
from
west
to
east,
and
this
charges
into
the
chamber
channel,
which
is
located
behind
the
residential
properties
on
the
east
side
of
7th
avenue
and
near
cupid
road
and
within
the
city.
There
are
two
pump
stations
which
were
built
back
in
the
1960s.
H
Both
are
owned
and
operated
by
and
maintained
by
the
county
of
san
mateo.
The
city
completed
the
stormwater
master
plan
back
in
2014,
and
it
has
recommended
recommending
recommendations
for
capacity
improvements,
totaling
more
than
26
million
dollars
in
2014
estimate.
Since
there's
inadequate
funding,
none
of
these
projects
have
been
implemented
next
slide.
Please
here's
a
map
from
the
stormwater
master
plan
that
shows
the
various
watersheds
and
color
along
the
along
with
the
the
stormwater
system
that
were
modeled.
There
are
six
different
watersheds.
H
You
know
shown
in
different
colors
in
order
to
determine
the
capacity
deficiency
in
the
stormwater
system,
a
hydraulic
analysis
or
monument
was
performed
and
the
model
included
the
main
trunks
in
each
of
these
watersheds.
That
forms
the
the
backbone
of
the
system
and
those
you
know
lines
you
see
you
know
within
each
watersheds
are-
are
considered
the
the
backbone
or
the
trunk
lines
that
were
modeled.
The
model
indicated
that
flooding
occurs
in
all
of
the
the
six
watersheds
during
the
25
years.
H
So,
as
we
know
you
know,
flooding
can
happen
anywhere
in
the
city.
The
slide
shows
a
sample
of
various
flooding
events
that
happened
in
the
city.
As
you
can
see,
the
flooding
location
can
be
located
either.
You
know
either
at
the
east
or
west
of
el
camino.
One
area
that
flight
has
occurred
in
the
past
in
the
east
of
el
camino
is
along
huntington
avenue
that
the
city
has
experienced
multiple
flooding
locations
on
the
west
of
el
camino
as
well
such
as
you
know,
valleywood
drive
san
bruno
avenue.
H
Therefore
you
know
the
flooding
events
can
occur
regardless
of
whether
where
we
live,
if
the
system
is
unable
to
convey
the
flow
during
the
storm
events,
so
next
slide,
please
so
here's
just
some
pictures
of
various
flooding
that
happened
throughout
the
city
back
in
2014
and
and
then
also
in
2017
storm
events.
So
you
see,
on
your
left
hand,
side
or
there's
some
crescent
drive
as
you're
driving
up
south
along
crestwood
drive.
H
You
know,
as
you're
heading
over
to
the
intersection
of
from
roanoke
drive
and
then
also
you
see,
seminole
avenue.
On
the
right
hand,
side
near
is
the
easterly
direction.
Along
san
bruno
avenue,
near
bay
hill,
those
locations
flooded
in
2014
next
slide.
Please
and
here's
a
picture
that
shows
the
flooding
event
back
in
2014
along
huntington
avenue.
H
H
H
So,
since
the
master
plan
was
completed
in
2014,
there
were
only
minimal
improvements
that
were
made
to
the
storm
system,
and-
and
most
of
these
were,
you
know,
were
brought
to
council
due
to
the
need
for
emergency
repair
resulting
for
from
the
failed
storm
pipeline
to
mitigate
any
erosion.
So
the
first
is
the
crescent
canyon
project
which
the
city
manager
mentioned.
H
There
was
a
local
emergency
declared
due
to
a
soil
erosion
in
the
canyon
back
in
december
2019,
and
we,
the
city
precursor
services
of
a
contractor,
to
assist
in
the
design
and
construction
of
the
wall
to
stabilize
the
the
the
roadway,
as
well
as
to
prevent
further
erosion.
So
the
total
cost
of
that
project
is
over
a
million
dollars
and
the
second
project
which
the
city
manager
also
mentioned
in
regards
to
the
erosion
and
the
pipeline
around
christmas
springs
road.
H
H
This
project
was
a
result
of
a
storm
event
that
happened
in
2014,
which
damaged
the
the
box
over
the
two
damage
box.
Cover
top
slabs
were
removed
and
replaced
as
part
of
this
work,
and
one
at
mason
and
the
other
one
is,
and
the
dakota
cost
was
about
920
000
dollars
and
then
last
year.
Lastly,
you
know
there
was
a
lot
of
us
stormwater
of
spot
repairs
that
were
performed
on
these
storm
drain
pipelines.
As
you
know,
the
city
begins
to
televise
our
strong
great
pipelines.
H
We
find
all
these
defects,
so
we
you
know
from
2017
and
2019.
We
spent
over
800
thousand
dollars
for
these
us
spot
repairs
with
the
storms
system.
Next,
so
just
some
pictures
of
the
various
projects
that
were
completed
again,
this
christmas
canyons
project-
I
don't
know
that
was
that
included
the
construction
of
the
wall.
This
is
the
location
is
across
from
the
northeast
and
just
adjacent
to
the
san
bernardino
avenue.
Next.
H
Thanks
massambox
cover
this
is
the
one
that
you
know
the
top
slab
had
to
be
removed
and
replaced.
You
know,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
top
left
corner,
you
see
the
the
box
covert,
basically
uplifted
the
entire
roadway,
and
then
it
basically
had
to
be
removed
and
replaced
so
that
you
see
all
the
pictures
of
the
restoration
that
was
being
done
for
the
box
cover
replacement
project.
H
H
So,
besides
those
projects,
you
know
what
else
have
we
completed
just
a
list
of
our
various
future
unfunded
projects?
The
first
is
the
spyglass
storm
day,
project
notice,
location,
the
neighborhood
experiences
flooding
during
severe
storm
events
due
to
pipeline
capacity
issues
and
staff
has
been
on
site
every
year,
replacing
every
year
placing
and
removing
sandbags
and
multiple
properties.
You
know
within
the
neighborhood
and
the
design
has
already
commenced
and
we're
at
the
final
100
design
stage,
and
the
total
project
cost
is
estimated
to
be
about
100
4.5
million
dollars.
H
We
actually
submitted
a
hazard
mitigation
grant
a
while
back
for
this
project,
and
the
city
was
recently
made
aware
that
we
were
successfully.
We
will
receive
the
grant
in
an
order
of
about
1.6
million
dollars.
So
therefore,
we
would
need
to
pay
about
25
of
the
costs
for
this
project.
So
it
shows
that
you
know
the
city
share
is
now
approximately
400
000
for
this
project.
There's
the
there's
the
capacity
projects
that
were
identified
in
the
storm
master
plan
and
none
of
those
projects
have
commenced.
H
The
total
cost
is
approximately
30
million
dollars
in
today's
cost,
and,
as
previously
mentioned,
the
storm
master
plan
didn't
include
any
condition
assessment,
so
the
replacement
costs
based
on
storm
system
conditions
is
estimated
to
be
about
23
million
dollars
as
well,
and
in
addition,
there
are
also
the
municipal
regional
permits
requirements
that
all
agencies.
You
know
that
needed
need
to
comply
by
installing
green
infrastructure
or
implementing
regional
stormwater
capture
systems
and
the
cost
for
those
installing
green
infrastructure.
H
Is
it's
currently
unknown
next
slide,
please
so
just
some
pictures
of
the
storm
system
that
was
captured
using
this
using
the
city's
cctv
camera.
The
top
two
pictures
are
of
the
failed,
corrugated
metal
pipelines.
You
know
the
picture
on
the
upper
left
shows
holes
and
voids
in
the
pipeline
and
upper
right
shows
the
the
collapsed
pipeline
and
the
bottom
picture
shows
the
condition
of
the
existing
box
covert.
H
These
box
covers
again
are
concrete
structures
that
convey
a
large
amount
of
water
and,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
the
picture
at
the
bottom
left
on,
the
reinforcement,
bars
or
steel
bars
are
exposed
and
corroded
on
the
bottom
right.
A
picture
shows
more
concrete
that
have
fallen
apart
from
the
ceiling
of
the
box
cover
structure
so
and
none
of
these,
the
box
covered
locations
have
been
repaired
because
their
city
doesn't
have
any
no
funding
to
to
replace
or
or
rep
on
rehab
on
all
these
large
locations.
D
D
If
our
storm
drain
system
is
going
to
flood
and
impact
their
business.
It's
also
unsightly
and
the
picture
in
the
bottom
right
hand
corner
is
the
business
next
door
to
it,
a
dry
cleaner
that
has
their
sandbags
inside
and
as
jimmy
and
I
are
going
on
various
presentations
around
the
community
articulating
about
the
challenges
with
our
storm
water
system.
D
This
slide
just
really,
or
these
pictures
of
my
needs
really
stuck
out
to
us,
because
it's
it's
the
reality
of
our
system,
where
we,
frankly
just
don't,
have
enough
funds
to
maintain
it.
So
we're
not
unduly
impacting
our
businesses
and
so
now,
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
stormwater
feed
price
study
and
the
results
of
that.
H
Sure
thank
you
city
manager,
so,
in
regards
to
the
proposed
stormwater
fee,
the
city
acquired
the
service
of
wildan
financial
services
to
assist
in
developing
a
methodology
for
charting
stormwater
costs
in
a
fair
and
equitable
manner
across
all
properties
in
the
city.
Since
all
properties,
discharge
stormwater,
you
know
to
the
city's
stormwater
system.
You
know
all
properties
within
the
city
uses
the
storm
drain
system.
So
therefore
both
fees
are
proportional,
but,
to
you
know,
each
partial
is
fair
sure
of
the
annual
cost
of
improvements.
H
So
this
slide
shows
the
difference
between
impervious
and
previous
surfaces,
the
impervious
area
of
a
partial
is
the
portion
of
the
partial
that
is
like
covered
by
a
rooftop,
walkway
patio
driveway
or
any
other
harsh
surfaces
that
are
either
that
either
prevents
water
into
the
soil,
causes
water
to
run.
You
know
off
the
surface.
The
purpose
air
is
on
lawns
dirt
or
landscaping
areas
where
water
is
allowed
to
enter
into
soil.
So
the
calculation
of
the
proposed
stormwater
fee
is
based
on
the
impervious.
H
So
this
slide
shows
that
the
median
fee
for
various
zoning
category-
the
the
residential
you
know
r1
zone-
has
the
most
number
of
parcels
in
the
city
with
approximately
you
know,
over
8
700
parcels.
So
with
that
you
know
the
fee
for
the
single
family,
residential
cell
is
calculated
to
be
approximately
154
dollars,
which
is
about
100
higher
than
existing
residential
parcel
stormwater
fee
of
46.16,
and
then
the
median
fee
for
the
commercial
parcels
is
estimated
to
be
about
25
100
next
slide,
please!
H
So,
let's
see,
I
recently
conducted
a
proactive
review
of
the
residential
commercial
properties
that
have
large
parcels.
Since
the
initial
analysis,
you
know
did
not
actually
assess
the
previous
square
footage,
so,
under
the
fee
study
provided
by
woeden
and
presented
to
council
back
in
january,
you
know
to
sixty
percent
of
the
service
area
for
the
residential
parcels,
which
are
residential.
H
This
is
presumed
to
be
impervious
area,
because
some
of
these
you
know
back
portions
of
these
portions
is
you
know,
are
unapproved
and
sixty
percent
standard
would
overstate
these
impervious
areas
of
these
usually
large
torsos.
Therefore,
we
went
back
in
and
reassessed
these
partials
and
we
identified
or
willed
in
a
staff
identified
approximately
270
parcels
throughout
the
city
for
re-evaluation.
H
H
So
the
final
study
presented
to
the
council
with
the
staff
report,
has
been
modified
to
apply
a
lower
percentage
purchase
surface
for
these
parcels,
and
the
fee
has
been
modified
to
reflect
changes
as
well.
For
those
effective
property
owners,
staff
will
send
a
letter
to
the
owners
of
each
effective
parcel
explaining
the
change
and
the
reduction
in
this
proposed
storm
drainage
fee
at
a
later
time.
D
D
You
know
one
truth
about
san
bruno
is
san
bruno
has
been
a
under-resourced
city
for
decades,
and
the
reality
is
that
san
bruno
has
a
revenue
problem,
not
a
spending
problem
and
in
one
slide
I
hope
to
make
that
point
to
you
annually.
The
city
must
make
very
difficult
decisions
on
what
general
services
and
capital
projects
that
we
have
the
ability
to
find
it.
D
D
D
The
reality
in
san
bruno
is
the
needs,
always
outstrip
the
resources,
and
so
this
is
the
slide
that
we
provided
to
the
city
council
when
we
adopted
our
19
our
2021
budget,
and
it
was
a
look
back
at
some
other
cities,
and
so
this
shows
our
annual
revenue
per
per
capita
per
resident,
and
so
just
looking
at
our
neighboring
cities.
San
bruno
is
the
second
to
the
lowest
second
to
the
lowest
only
next
to
daley
city,
and
so
we
have
a
revenue
problem.
D
D
We
kicked
off
this
project
in
november
of
2018,
with
the
project
scoping,
we
identified
resources,
we
first
identified
the
problem,
and
so
let's
talk
about
some
of
the
completed
initiatives
that
we
have,
because
they
have
not
all
been
tax
revenues,
and
so
initially
in
in
february,
we
adopted
a
comprehensive
set
of
development
impact
fees
we
did
not
have.
We
did
have
a
few
development
impact
fees,
namely
affordable
housing,
but
we
did
not
have
a
comprehensive
set
that
was
really
on
par
with
our
neighboring
jurisdictions
and
we
didn't
want.
D
Inexpensive
place
to
build
nor
the
cheapest,
but
we
want
it
to
be
on
par,
and
so
we
increased
our
development
impact
fees.
So
new
development
can
pay
their
fair
share.
They
can't
pay
for
all
of
our
needs
by
law,
but
they
can
pay
for
their
fair
share.
We
did
that.
We
developed
a
long
range
financial
forecast
to
tell
us
what
the
what
the
trajectory
is
where
our
revenue
is
going.
Where
are
our?
D
That
was
a
pre-coveted
revenue
number
this
year
is
projected
to
bring
in
2.5
million,
and
the
community
in
the
council
really
wanted
that
that
revenue
to
go
to
another
significant
need
in
our
city
and
that's
our
rules.
We
need
to
be
spending
approximately
eight
million
dollars
a
year
on
our
roads
and
measure
g
at
four
billion
dollars.
A
year
was
intended
to
be
a
significant
push
in
the
right
direction.
D
D
D
Next
was
the
mills
park
community
benefits
and
we
negotiated
a
10
million
community
benefit
package
with
mills
park
that
when
that
development
occurs,
we'll
contribute
community
benefits
to
help
offset
some
of
the
needs
in
san
bruno
toward
the
middle
and
late
latter
part
of
2020,
we
negotiated
a
sales
tax
participation
agreement
with
walmart.com
a
25-year
agreement.
That's
projected
to
bring
in
approximately
3.6
million
dollars
a
year,
that's
great
news.
D
Unfortunately,
one
of
the
challenges
is
that
we
began
that
process
with
nearly
a
four
million
dollar
structural
deficit,
and
so
while
those
funds
are
are
an
excellent
contribution.
Unfortunately,
in
large
measure
those
funds
will
will
not
be
available
to
address
the
need
here.
We're
talking
about
here.
D
The
next
faq
is
is
with
regard
to
the
san
bruno
community
foundation
and
the
50
million
dollars
for
a
large
community
project,
and
so
the
question
is:
why
isn't
the
city
using
that
50
million
dollars
towards
the
stormwater
effort?
But
it's
worth
pointing
out
that
the
use
of
the
the
50
million
pg
e
restitution
funds
really
was
a
community-wide
effort
that
began
in
2015
with
listening
sessions
and
engagement
sessions
and
dot
exercises
where
the
community
really
assessed
where
those
funds
should
go
and.
D
Was
replacement
of
our
recreation
and
aquatic
facilities
as
the
most
desired
use
of
those
funds
as
a
part
of
that
endeavor,
when
the
design
team
looked
into
various
options
with
regard
to
replacing
the
rec
center?
One
thing
that's
not
widely
known
is
that
they
looked
at
a
reuse
option
and
but,
unfortunately,
there
are
significant
structural
deficiencies
with
the
current
recreation
center,
and
if
the
determination
was
that
it
is
cheaper
to
replace
that
building
than
to
retrofit
it,
and
so
we
we
embarked
on
fully
designing
a
project.
D
We
received
construction
bids
within
the
last
two
weeks
and
we're
waiting
on
our
permission
and
planning
a
ground
breaking
for
that
building.
It
will
have
a
new
gymnasium,
an
indoor
aquatic
center,
potentially
an
outdoor
aquatic
center,
a
beautiful
fitness
room,
a
community
hall
where
the
communities
can
have
gatherings
large-sized
gatherings
the
the
type
of
facility
that
we
currently
don't
have
as
well
as
well
as
other
classrooms
and
recreation
amenities.
And
so,
since
2015,
the
engagement
session
and
the
community
engagement
really
set
the
tone
for
what
this
building
will
be.
D
In
order
to
do
that,
because
again,
the
general
fund
is
the
backstop
and
those
projects,
as
the
public
works
director
mentioned,
were
initially
projected
at
26
million
and
now
they're
they're
they're,
at
approximately
30
million,
and
in
addition,
there
are
other
improvements
in
our
stormwater
system
for
condition.
Improvements
and
those
are
currently
estimated
at
22.9
million.
So,
yes,
absolutely,
the
city
has
and
will
continue
to
apply
for
grant
funds.
D
Recently
we
received
over
three
million
dollars
in
grant
funds
for
one
the
the
spy
blast
project
that
you
heard
about
earlier
today,
as
well
as
planning
money
to
begin
planning
on
a
regional
stormwater
detention
project,
a
retention
facility
in
the
city
of
san
bruno
and
that
to
this
state
has
been
nearly
entirely
funded
by
grant
funds,
and
so
we
will
continue
to
seek
grant
funds.
We
are
absolutely
paying
attention
to
the
the
new
infrastructure
bill
and
the
potentialities
of
that
and
we're
also
constantly
scanning
for
opportunities
to
leverage
funds
here
in
san
bernardino.
D
But
in
many
ways
our
enterprise
utility
is
our
is
our
problem
and
the
effort
that
has
been
analyzed
and
being
presented
today
is
an
effort
to,
unfortunately,
at
this
moment,
increase
the
fee.
But
but
do
it
at
a
level
where
we're
not
raising
30
million
dollars
immediately
we're
raising
enough
revenue
to
cover
the
o
m,
the
operations
and
maintenance
and
enough
revenue
to
take
out
debt.
So
we
can
pay
back
that
30
million
dollars
over
a
30-year
cycle,
and
so
now
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about.
I
D
D
We
have
done
dedicated
mailings
to
both
our
local
and
out-of-state
property
owners.
This
is
a
property
owner
election
and
so
where
we
have
individuals
that
live
outside
of
town,
we
have
acquired
those
addresses
and
and
sent
a
notice
to
them.
We
have
given
community
presentations
to
various
organizations
and
condo
associations.
G
D
And
this
effort
really
begun
in
december
of
2020
and
we
anticipated
continuing
through
april
21.,
so
community
feedback,
the
the
cover
of
the
survey,
should
look
familiar
to
the
community.
We
received
over
400
responses
and
they
were
all
similar
things
that
you
could
probably
imagine
right.
Repairing
our
deteriorating
pipes
and
infrastructure
is
important.
It
prevents
system
failures.
D
We
should
undertake
these
projects
to
reduce
pollutants
that
flow
into
the
bay
because,
again,
storm
water
is
not
treated.
It
flows
from
your
roof,
but
into
the
storm
drain
pipes
out
until
out
into
the
creek
and
then
into
the
san
francisco
bay
directly
re
doing
these
projects
and
caring
for
our
stormwater
system
reduces
costly
repairs
on
businesses
and
homes,
and
also
preventing
flooding
is
important
because
it
may
potentially
obstruct
residents
and
law
enforcement
and
emergency
response.
D
So
we
are
here
tonight
for
the
continued
protest
hearing
the
way
the
218
protest
process
works.
It
is
a
two
phase
process
where
the
first
phase
is
a
what's
called
a
majority
protest,
and
so,
if
there
are
a
majority
of
property
owners
that
protests
that
stops
this
effort
in
its
tracks,
and
so
there
need
to
be
a
little
bit
over
6
000
protests
in
order
for
that
to
occur,
and
so
what's
on
the
screen,
as
of
yesterday,
we
had
received
318
protests
and
I
just
got
word
as
of
the
close
of
business.
D
Today
we
have
received
357
protests,
and
so
we
are
well
under
the
required
threshold
in
order
to
proceed
to
phase
two.
Should
the
city
council
direct
staff
to
do
so
and
as
I
mentioned
before,
there's
a
two
phase
process
we
are
currently
in
the
majority
protest
hearings.
The
next
phase
would
be
a
property
owner
election.
The
detailed
schedule
is
up
there.
I
will
not
go
through
it
in
its
entirety,
but
subject
to
city
council
action
tonight,
staff
would
send
out
the
ballots.
D
D
If
we
embark
on
it
between
essentially
may
1
and
july
31st,
we
have
targeted
the
ballots
to
go
out
on
may
1,
with
the
first
day
to
begin
receiving,
ballots
and
close
that
process,
I'm
sorry
the
final
day
for
ballots
being
june
june
15
and
then
the
tabulation
and
all
of
the
detailed
work
that
needs
to
occur.
In
order
for
us
to
submit
the
property
tax
rule
to
the
county
by
july
31st.
D
Should
the
effort
be
successful,
the
new
fee
will
go
on
the
tax
rule.
Should
the
effort
not
be
successful
the
existing
fee
again
that
averages
approximately
46
a
year
will
go
on
the
tax
roll,
the
new
fee
on
average
for
most
residential
homes,
as
the
public
works
director
mentioned,
is
approximately
150
a
year,
one
time
paid
on
property,
tax
bills,
and
so
that
concludes
our
presentation.
We
are
happy
to
take
any
questions
from
the
city
council
and
any
questions
from
the
community.
Thank.
A
You
thank
you,
city
manager
and
director
tan
for
your
report.
We
can
stop
sharing
the
screen
and
folks,
if
you're
in
the
audience.
This
would
be
the
time
in
which
to
put
up
your
virtual
hand,
in
order
to
speak
on
this
topic
and
we'll
see
who's
in
the
queue
and
then
we'll
ask
for
last
time
and
then
we'll
announce
how
many
speakers
we
have
and
then
we'll
begin
with
those,
but
first
as
people
are
raising
their
hands
to
speak,
and
that
would
be
the
time
to.
Please
do
that.
A
Specifically,
okay,
I'm
everybody's.
Looking
that
no
okay,
thank
you
for
the
no
that's
helpful,
the
virtual
nods!
So
right
now
I
see
we
have
five
speakers
total
and
so
right
now
and
those
that
are
calling
in
if
you're
on
the
a
landline
or
a
cell
phone
or
what
have
you
star.
Nine
is
how
you
would
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand
that
is
star
9
for
those
on
a
phone
device
other
than
that.
A
This
is
now
the
time
to
please
put
up
your
hands,
because
once
we
go
through
this
list
that
we
will
then
bring
it
back
to
the
council
for
discussion
and
deliberation,
and
at
this
time
one
two
three
four
five:
I
have
six
persons
wishing
to
speak
from
the
audience
and
why
don't
we
start
the
city
clerk?
Please.
B
I
live
at
1861
donner
avenue
here
in
san
bruno,
I'm
here
tonight,
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
san
mateo
building
and
construction
trade
council,
comprised
of
25
unions,
16
000,
highly
skilled
men
and
women
tonight
we're
asking
that
when
this
fee
goes
through
that
you
consider
a
community
workforce
agreement
for
these
projects,
the
community
workforce
agreements
offers
benefits
back
to
the
community
by
hiring
local
contractors.
Local
workers,
local
apprentices
and
returning
military
veterans
through
a
national
program
called
helmets
to
hard
hats.
B
We
see
this
as
a
good
policy
for
the
city
to
create
to
mitigate
wage
theft
in
the
prevailing
wage
market.
Wage
theft
is
the
number
one
crime
against
construction
workers
in
the
prevailing
wage
market.
Today,
we'd
like
to
see
that
our
tax
dollars
whenever
tax
dollars
are
utilized
for
a
project
prevailing
wage
is
implemented
by
creating
a
community
workforce
agreement.
B
You
avoid
wage
theft
from
these
construction
workers.
We
currently
have
project
labor
agreements
or
community
workforce
agreements
all
through
the
area,
including
the
san
mateo
wastewater
treatment
plant,
which
is
being
constructed
right
now.
We
also
have
the
youtube
project
here
in
san
bruno,
which
is
a
private
project
being
done
under
a
project
labor
agreement,
community
workforce
agreement,
san
bruno
elementary
park,
school
district
has
a
project
labor
agreement,
community
workforce
agreement
for
their
86
million
bond,
86
million
dollars
worth
of
bond
work
for
allen
elementary
school,
which
will
get
constructed
soon,
the
millbrae
rec
center.
B
We
have
a
project
labor
agreement
on
that
the
city
council
of
millbrae
directed
their
staff
to
negotiate
a
pla
with
the
building
trade
council,
and
that
has
happened.
So
we
hope
that
we
can
meet
with
your
city
manager
here
soon
and
start
those
discussions
way
ahead
of
time.
So
when
this
work
and
measure
g
work
starts
that
we
will
be
included,
I'd
like
to
thank
jovan
and
public
director
tam
for
their
presentation.
It
was
a
very
good
presentation,
very
informational.
B
Our
sewer
systems
is
cr
are
crumbling
and
we
want
to
ensure
to
build
them
right.
The
first
time
on
time
on
budget.
When
people
ask
me
what
a
union
is,
I
say
it's
working
families
standing
together
and
we're
here
to
ask
you
if
you
will
stand
with
our
working
families.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
tonight.
B
B
Hello,
mr
mayor
council
members,
my
name
is
david
delatore.
I
live
on
the
900
block
on
hensley
street.
You
know,
since
this
storm
drain
system
has
been
installed,
we've
we've
sam,
the
city
san
bruno
has
experienced
you
know:
population,
growth
and
and
with
population
comes
development,
both
residential
and
commercial,
making
this
the
the
current
system
just
obsolete.
B
You
know
I
understand
that
everybody's
each
individual's
economic
situation
differs
if
we
could
just
get
this
past
this
economic
hurdle
and
discussions
and
get
this
work
going.
I
would
strongly
encourage
this
council
to
sit
down
with
the
building
and
construction
trades
council
james
ray
gomez
and
come
up
with
some
community
workforce
agreement.
The
building
trades
have
the
most
qualified,
highly
skilled,
highly
trained
the
the
contractors
have
the
capacity
and
are
the
most
ethical
out
there.
B
B
Tim
o'brien
also,
maybe
reyna
burgos,
just
one
moment
yes
good
evening.
Yes,
it
is
reina
speaking
and
thank
you
so
much
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
I
have
to
say
I
have
one
question,
and
one
thing
is:
the
city
manager
has
not
responded
to
my
question
previously
when
I
asked
how
come
san
bruno
has
not
approved
cannabis
business
inside
in
our
city,
when
we,
the
the
the
residents
already
approved
this,
we
should
be
getting
revenue
from
that
to
put
towards
this
issue
that
we're
having.
B
B
I
mean
it
is
unthinkable
to
think
that
that
we're
gonna
have
a
beautiful
recreation
center,
but
our
everything
is
falling
apart,
underneath
when
did
when
this
was
approved.
Okay,
we
already
had
issues
with
this
storm
drainage,
the
piping.
Why
would
the
money
was
not
allocated
to
that
to
take
care
of
this,
rather
than
put
it
on
the
on
the
residence?
So
I
would
like
my
I
want
those
answers
to
be
those
questions
to
be
answered.
Please
thank
you.
A
F
Unlike
last
time,
we
stayed
here
until
midnight
if
you
would
set
this
as
a
president
president
and
talk
about
the
public
issues
right
up
in
the
in
the
beginning,
so
everyone
could
have
time
to
have
their
say
and
to
listen
to
the
reports
as
you've
presented
it
today
and
then,
if
people
want
to
stay
and
listen
to
the
rest
of
your
meeting,
that's
up
to
them.
Instead
of
being
forced
to
stay
anyway,
appreciate
that
if
this
passes-
and
I
said
this
before
it
should.
F
Not
be
a
never-ending
charge,
the
storm
order
fees
should
stop
once
project
is
completed
on
a
time
schedule
and
completion
date,
not
an
open-ended
time
schedule.
Also,
this
thing
passes.
You
can
there's
a
lot
of
people
out
here
who
are
on
limited
incomes
retired,
as
a
lot
of
people
have
already
made
comments
about
that.
If
it
passes
they
should
either
be
exempt,
or
maybe
their
fees
be
reduced
by
50
percent
or
whatever,
so
it
wouldn't
be
a
burden
on
these
people
who
are
retired
and
have
a
minimum
amount
of
income
to
work
with.
F
F
Maybe
you
won't
have
a
lot
of
suits,
but
if
you
for
some
reason
there
are
a
lot
of
problems
with
flooding
still
even
after
this
is
done,
you
are
going
to
open
the
pandora's
box
for
a
lot
of
people
a
lot
of
residents
to
go
ahead
and
sue,
because
here
they
are
paying
for
all
this
to
be
fixed
and
they're
still
getting
water
damaged.
Somehow,
anyway,
that's
all.
B
Yes,
whenever
you're
ready,
okay,
thank
you.
It
seems
futile
to
discuss
why
past
councils
didn't
address
this,
and
now
we
find
ourselves
in
this
situation,
but
in
regards
to
revenue,
I'd
like
to
know
why
the
short-term
rental
hasn't
been
set
up.
Yet
we
own
a
vacation
rental
in
another
state,
a
very,
very
small
state,
and
every
month
we
send
in
hundreds
of
dollars
of
tax
money
to
that
state
to
cover
the
short-term
rental
tax.
B
It
seems
ridiculous
that
we
have
don't
have
that
here
in
san
bruno
and
in
california.
It's
a
great
revenue
stream
for
the
state
and
the
city,
and
it
should
it
should
be
happening
here.
There
just
seems
to
be
a
big
delay
in
doing
it,
and
also
we
urge
you
to
make
to
move
on
the
cannabis
dispensary
issue.
That's
another
revenue
stream
that
we're
overlooking.
B
G
G
G
G
I
think
I
said
this
last
time
I'll
say
it
again.
I
think
the
tax
revenue
is
needed.
It's
pretty
obvious.
The
the
presentation
today
made
a
very
good
case
for
it
so
I'll
be
voting
for
it.
I
feel
badly
for
people
who
are
going
to
be
inconvenienced
and
it's
too
bad.
This
wasn't
initiated
earlier.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
F
F
H
D
B
A
B
B
Hello
hi
there
you
are
whenever
you're
ready,
hi.
Yes,
I
was
up
until
midnight
on
the
last
meeting
to
try
to
to
speak,
and
there
was
a
question
that
I
did
have
regarding
this
matter.
So
when
why
now-
and
when
was
this
brought
up,
are
you
able
to
answer
questions
right
now
or
is
this
something
you
would
answer
at
the
end.
B
Okay,
so
the
question
is:
whose
idea
was
it
why?
Why
was
this
brought
up
and
why
weren't
we
using
the
funds
from
the
pg
e
settlement,
and
especially
since
this
is
infrastructure?
Obviously,
infrastructure
should
come
first,
that's
why
pg
e
had
their
failure,
because
they
reappropriated
funds
and
they
waited
too
long,
and
then
we
had
these
disasters
so
now
it
seems
that
san
bruno
is
doing
the
same
thing,
even
though
we've
got
the
money
from
pg
e
from
this.
B
Instead
of
I
think,
if
someone
one
person
put
a
champagne
budget
on
the
the
new
center,
we
should
downsize
that
and
use
these
monies
for
infrastructure
items
such
as
this
another
person
brought
up
in
the
last
meeting.
When
will
this
end?
Is
this
going
to
be
an
ongoing
thing
where
we
continue
to
increase
this
tax
fund?
I
think
that's
another.
I'm
good
question
also.
Another
caller
from
the
last
meeting
brought
up
the
fact
that
there's
other
cities
that
are
trying
to
address
this
in
a
more
sensible
way.
B
Instead
of
just
building
bigger
pipes,
permeable
land,
I
see
a
bunch
of
construction
going
on
businesses
in
san
bernardino
right
now
off
of
380
and
looks
like
a
lot
of
concrete.
Doesn't
look
like
you
know.
They're
doing
you
know
things
that
will
promote
the
permeable
surfaces,
parking
lots,
they're
building
talked
about.
B
I
think
in
the
last
meeting
the
el
camino
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
other
alternatives
that
we
should
be
looking
at
before
we
just
start
building
bigger
pipes,
and
we
should
address
our
infrastructure,
whether
it's
this
or
other
issues
with
the
city
instead
of
building.
You
know
fancier
structures.
We
should
be
taking
care
of
what's
already
in
place
and
making
sure
that
it
works
for
everybody
and
last.
A
A
C
C
A
A
D
I
think
one
of
the
questions
we
had
was
essentially
a
version
of.
Why
now?
Why
are
we
talking
about
this
now
and
the
answer?
Is
the
city
launch
day
comprehensive
project
to
take
a
look
at
all
of
our
fiscal
challenges,
not
just
storm
water
but
citywide,
and
it
is
a
financial
imperative
that
we
address
this
now
our
stormwater
fund
is
to
project
is
projected
to
be
negative
next
fiscal
year.
D
D
There
was
a
another
question
similar
to
that,
which
is
essentially
revolves
around
using
other
funds
for
other
city
funds
to
support
stormwater
stormwater,
it's
important
to
note,
is
an
enterprise
fund.
An
enterprise
fund
in
government
speed
means
that
the
revenues
typically
cover
the
expenditures
and
you
do
not
impact
other
funds
also
for
enterprise
revenue.
You
cannot
use
enterprise
revenue
for
other
things,
so
we
would
never
be
able
to
use
stormwater
revenue,
whether
it's
the
existing
revenue
or
the
new
revenue
for
something
else.
D
It
has
to
go
for
stormwater,
and
so
there
is
the
ability
to
use
general
fund
revenue,
and
we
have
done
that.
So
when
we
pass
the
immediate
repairs
or
when
we
needed
to
pull
from
our
reserves
to
address
the
need
we
absolutely
have
to,
but
typically
enterprises,
revenues
and
expenditures
either
match
or
expenditures
exceed,
because
you
put
up
revenues
exceed
because
you
put
a
little
bit
in
the
bank,
so
you
can
pay
for
your
capital
improvement
projects.
D
So
so
that's
the
answer
to
that
question.
There
was
another
question
with
regard
to
other
development
and
that
there's
being
seen
other
development
happening
around
town
and
we
shouldn't
just
solve
the
problem
by
building
bigger
pipes.
It's
important
to
note
that
new
development
actually
has
to
retain
the
new
stormwater
runoff
that
they
create
and
new
development
does,
that
by
creating
retention
basins
and
other
groundwater
injection
features
in
the
new
development.
D
And
so
it's
important
to
note
that
the
need
for
the
capital
improvements,
we're
talking
about
and
the
funding
of
o
m
is
not
really
driven
by
the
new
developments
that
you
see
going
up.
It's
driven
by
our
system
is
100
years
old,
it's
aging
and
it
was
actually
never
built
for
the
size
of
the
community
that
we
are
today.
D
There
was
a
question
about
the
marijuana
tax.
Absolutely
the
city
council
directed
staff
to
put
the
ability
to
tax
marijuana
businesses
on
the
november
20
ballot
that
was
done
and
it
was
approved.
The
next
step
in
that
process
is
actually
to
do
the
detailed
work
to
go
through
marijuana
to
develop
marijuana
regulations,
and
I
know
the
city
council
has
talked
about
that
at
their
retreat
this
year
and
we
have
not
concluded
those
discussions,
but
should
the
staff
receive
direction
from
from
the
city
council
on
what
marijuana
businesses
that
we
should
write
regulations
around?
G
G
D
There
was
a
question
of:
if
does
the
new
storm
drain
and
flood
protection,
see
additives,
or
would
it
supplant
the
existing
fee?
The
latter
is
true,
it
would
supplant
the
existing
fee,
and
so
there's
currently
a
fee
on
average
properties
are
paying
46
a
year
that
will
be
replaced
by
the
new
fee.
That
is
based
on
the
unique
characteristics
of
your
parcel
and
how
much
impervious
square
feet
is
on
the
parcel.
D
D
D
D
There
was
a
comment,
and
I
think
a
question
about
city
is
the
flooding
just
in
certain
areas.
The
answer
is
no.
The
flooding
happened.
Citywide
there
was
a
question
about
short-term
rentals.
The
city
council
has
passed
and
extended
our
hotel
room
or
transient
occupancy
tax
to
short-term
rentals
and
staff
is
in
the
process
of
implementing
that
that
revenue
is
approximately
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year.
D
D
That
this
is
a
enterprise,
a
utility
that
hurts
that
has
perpetual
costs,
and
so,
as
we
mentioned
before,
we
know
that
there
are
30
million
dollars
of
of
infrastructure
work
that
is
needed
to
the
backbone
system.
The
fee
model
projects
raising
enough
revenue
to
bond
for
that
and
pay
that
back
over
a
30-year
cycle.
There
are
actually
three
bond
series
that
are
part
of
this,
and
so
the
third
bond
series,
the
first
two
bonds
are
roughly
15
million
15
million.
D
The
financial
model
goes
out
to,
I
think,
as
far
as
20
62
and
that's
because
the
need
never
goes
away,
and
so
there
is
no
sunset
provision
contemplated
in
this
because
it's
intended
to
pass
a
fee
that
is,
let
me
say,
put
forward
a
fee
that
is
intended
to
recoup
enough
revenue
to
cover
o
m
and
capital
and
there's
a
backbone
system.
There's
a
distribution
lines
that
are
is
estimated
at
20
million
dollars,
and
so
throughout
the
report.
D
What
it
envisions
is
that
we
will
cover
o
m,
which
will
go
up
over
time
of
course,
and
then
you
will
also
bond
for
various
infrastructure
needs
and
pay
those
back
over
a
longer
term
horizon,
and
I
believe
that
is
all
of
the
questions
that
were
asked.
If
I
have
missed
any
feel
free
to
counsel.
Let
me
know.
A
A
I
I
E
E
I
A
C
Do
you
have
some
questions
and
then
I
will
follow
my
colleagues
with
comments.
Let
me
just
pull
up
my
questions,
so
my
first
question,
I'm
so
sorry
my
screen
just
disappeared.
Okay,
I
didn't
want
to
ask
one
of
the
questions
that
had
been
asked
to
me
for
director.
Tan
is,
if
you
could
explain
a
little
bit
and
I
did
see
it
on
the
slide,
but
maybe
simplify
it
even
further
the
fairness
or
the
equity
around
what
apartment
owners
are
being
charged
versus
those
who
own
single
family.
H
Homes
sure
I
can
you
know,
do
my
best
to
do
that,
and
then
we
also
have
our
consultant
on
board
here
to
help
answer
any
questions,
so
chris
from
wildan
is
available
to
answer
the
questions
as
well.
Okay,
so
so
with
the
apartments,
you
know
the
apartments
fall
into
what
you
know.
The
category
is
the
r4
zoning
category,
so
it
was
assigned
a
previous
percentage
of
85
percent.
C
Well,
I'm
thinking
of
like
the
apartment
owners
of
the
location
across
the
street
from
tanferen
right.
Are
they
that's
a
huge
development?
I
think
I
would
imagine.
Most
developers
have
to
already
provide
brand
new
infrastructure
when
they're
building
something
like
that
anyway,
but
if
not
for
a
larger
property
owner
or
like
the
location
right
now
in
el
camino
and
san
mateo
avenue.
H
Yeah,
so
they
will
be
paying
a
lot
higher
because
the
percentage
is
a
lot
higher
because
it's
based
on
the
square
footage
of
the
lot
right.
So
you
know
the
apartment
complex
will
end
up
paying
a
lot
higher.
You
know,
based
on
this
fee
comparison
to
the
single
family
home.
So
but
chris,
you
know
if
you
can
come
in
here
and
it
can
add
on
to
whatever
I
mentioned,
to
clarify
the.
A
F
Thank
you,
mayor
staff
members.
This
is
chris
fisher
from
wild
and
financial
services,
so
jimmy
covered
it
pretty
much.
The
the
difference
is
that,
with
a
the
residential
parcel
that
that
estimated
at
65
percent
impervious
area,
they
have
more
more
land
and
yard
and
areas
that
are
not
considered
impervious,
in
other
words,
areas
that
will
absorb
water.
Water
will
not
run
off
with
apartment
complexes
that
fall
into
that
higher
density
that
are
for
high
density
category.
That
jimmy
mentioned
those
types
of
properties.
F
Have
you
know,
lots
of
parking,
sports
courts,
sidewalks
and
typically
less
green
area
or
or
permeable
area
previous
area
areas
that
will
accept
water
and
not
have
it
run
off.
They
typically
have
far
less
of
that
type
of
area
than
a
single
family
parcel.
So
that's
why
they
have
a
a
rate
of
85
percent,
meaning
85
of
their
total
parcel
area.
F
G
G
C
Okay,
okay,
so
okay,
my
next
thank
you
for
that.
It
did
help
to
clarify
that,
so
the
property
owners
of
some
of
these
complexes
may
be
paying
more,
but
they
may
also
be
using
more
water.
That
may
put
more
pressure
on
the
systems
because
you
have
more
population
within
those
buildings
is
that
is
that.
C
Thank
you,
one
of
the
questions
that
I've
been
asked
recently.
A
lot
is:
how
will
the
biden
infrastructure
plan
potentially
impact
the
our
ability
to
obtain
any
funds,
considering
that
this
is
a
need?
Now
it's
been
a
need
for
a
while.
Is
there
any
possibility
that
san
bruno
would
receive
any
of
these
funds
that
can
be
applied
to
the
stormwater
enterprise.
H
D
The
property
I.e
how
many
residents
is
in
a
given
property
has
no
bearing
on
the
storm
water
feed,
either
in
the
old
model
or
the
current
model.
It's
based
on
the
characteristics
of
the
of
the
parcel.
How
much
is
essentially
grass
and
how
much
this
covered
area
that
does
not
percolate
into
the
ground,
and
so
it's
not
based
on
on
residential
or
density
at
all.
D
With
regard
to
the
potential
biden
infrastructure
plan,
the
nearly
two
billion
dollar
plan
that
is
being
discussed
should
any
of
those
funds
be
available
to
offset
our
stormwater
infrastructure
need,
we
will
certainly
apply
for
that.
It
is
currently
a
proposal
that
has
been
that
is
being
talked
about.
As
we
know
in
washington,
there
are
a
few
details
available.
We
have
what
we
do
have
details.
F
D
Is
the
ara
the
american
rescue
act,
which
was
nearly
two
and
two
billion
dollars
in
and
of
itself?
1.9
billion
there's
actually
a
carve
out
where
it
actually
appears
that
storm
water
is
not
an
allowable
use.
Water
and
sewer
projects
and
broadband
projects
are
but
not
storm
water,
and
so
that's
an
important
nuance.
And
so
it's
also
important
to
note
that,
with
this
two
billion
dollar
abiding
infrastructure
plan,
the
specifics
will
really
be
known.
C
Thank
you.
I
wanted
to
ask
whether
it's
possible,
I
mean
the
increase
is
so
stark
provided
where,
where
we
are
economically
right
now,
is
it
possible
to
phase
we?
Don't
we
don't
know
yet
if
it's
going
to
pass
or
not
right,
so
if
should
it
pass,
would
it
be
possible
to
phase
in
that
increase
so
33
of
the
increase
one
year
33
the
next
year
and
then
the
last
33
percent
the
third
year?
Just
so,
that's
not
such
a
hard
hit
in
the
in
the
first
year.
If
it
passes.
D
D
Will
maintain
full
discretion
over
this
feat
annually,
not
just
in
the
initial
rollout
phase,
but
throughout
the
life
of
the
fee.
It
essentially
sets
a
maximum
that
we
can
charge
and
annually.
When
the
city
council
authorizes
the
tax
roll
that
we
submit
to
the
county,
you
have
the
ability
to
reduce
that.
D
H
D
D
H
You
know,
field
pipelines
and
box
covers
so
that
we
can
actually,
you
know,
make
them
new
again
and
that
just
costs
money
it's
just
similar
to
the
water
system
and
sewer
system
that
we're
rebuilding.
So
you
know
there
is
a
need
for
the
stormwater
system
as
well,
and
so
you
know,
funding
is
something
that
is
needed
in
order
for
us
to
go
ahead
and
to
be
able
to
allow
us
to
do
that
right.
H
But
you
know
if
there
isn't
any
funding
yeah,
you
know
the
funding
sources,
some
other
additional
funding
sources
will
need
to
be
looked
at,
but
I
don't
think
grant
is
you
know
something
that
is
sustainable?
You
know.
There's
just
no
guarantee
that
the
city
can
continue
to,
we
can
apply
for
grants,
but
there's
no
guarantee
that
we'll
get
any
of
the
grants
that
we
will
apply
for
it's
very
rare
that
you
know
we'll
be
100
every
single
time
that
we
submit
an
application
for
grants.
H
So
I
just
think
that
you
know
I
totally
understand
you
know
the
the
concerns
regarding
costs,
but
it
is
again
you
know
every
agencies
are
dealing
with
this
as
well.
Cemetery
is
doing
the
same
thing
right
now,
because
every
agencies
are
looking
at
their
stormwater
because
it's
been
neglected
over
the
years.
Unlike
the
water
and
sewer
system.
C
C
Just
a
couple,
a
little
bit
more
a
couple,
more
questions
we
heard
tonight
from
some
of
our
building
trade
council
partners
and
I'm
just
curious
to
know
the
work
that's
done
is
this:
is
this
work
that
would
be
done
by
our
staff?
Would
it
be
a
mix
of
our
staff
and
contractors,
and
I
think
it
was
answered
in
a
previous
meeting,
but
I
just
wanted
to
be
answered
again
for
the
public
that
is
listening
tonight.
A
And
councilmember
can
we?
Why
do
they
go?
Can
we
expand
upon
that?
Because
there
were?
There
were
a
couple
of
folks
that
did
ask
about
community
benefit
or
known
as
pla,
and
also
there
was
also
another
one
that
I
thought
of
the
liability
and
it
was
answered
the
last
meeting.
But
what
happens
if
it
passes
in
the
liability
of
the
city?
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
expand
that
yep
city
staff.
G
D
Who
will
undertake
the
work,
and
so
part
of
the
work
will
be
done
by
our
city
staff?
A
portion
of
the
work
will
be
contracted
out.
The
larger
capital
improvement
projects
that
we
are
talking
about,
30
million
projects,
those
will
nearly
all
be
contracted
out,
and
so
the
city
is
required
to
pay
prevailing
wage.
D
We
as
a
city
have
not
entered
into
project
labor
agreements,
but
that
is
at
the
discretion
of
the
city
council.
Should
we
be
so
directed.
We
will
embark
on
that
process
and
return
to
the
city
council,
with
a
full
complement
of
recommendations
and
analysis
on
what
the
cost
implications
for
the
capital
improvement
projects
will
be.
Will
they
cost
more?
Will
it
be
neutral,
et
cetera?
There
are
a
number
of
factors,
and
that
is
a
significant
policy
conversation
that,
while.
D
Question
there
is,
I
think,
the
statement
from
the
community
member
was.
If
we
embark
on
this
process,
we
will
have
full
liability
for
any
flooding
that
occurs
and
what
you
heard
from
your
city
attorney
at
the
last
meeting,
I
believe,
was
that
undertaking
this
fee
does
not
change
the
liability
implications
that
we
have
for
our
storm
water
system.
C
Okay,
can
I
please
please
thank
you,
so
the
other
question
that
I
have
is
actually
something
that
somebody
sent
me
and
I
would
imagine
with
the
funds
we've
spent
on
the
mailers
so
far,
can
can
the
city
provide
a
return
envelope
with
postage
with
the
ballot
it
just
seems
like
it
would
really
encourage
people
to
to
vote.
Make
it
a
little
bit
easier.
D
Off
the
top
postage
is
roughly
three
thousand
dollars
for
city
wide
miller.
We
can
look
into
doing
that.
I
believe,
with
these
type
of
elections.
Typically,
it's
not
done
because
people
are
given
the
option
to
drop
off
the
ballot
at
city
hall
for
free
we
can.
We
can
certainly
look
at
doing
that
and
the
city
attorney,
I
think,
just
just
joined
so
he
can
open
if
there
are
any
legal
issues
with
doing
that
or
not.
But
I
think
it's
something
that
we
can
look
into
right.
C
Okay,
yeah,
I
think
that
would
be.
That
would
be
a
courtesy
to
the
residents
okay.
So
my
other
question
is:
I
know
that
you've
addressed
the
sunset
issue
and
I
spoke
with
the
city
manager
about
this
too.
Just
because
I
I
am,
I
think,
torn
on
on
the
issue,
because
I
think,
where
I
do
understand
that
the
needs
are
going
to
be
there
and
that
they're
going
to
continue
and
with
inflation
the
cost
is
going
to
grow.
C
I
also
think
that,
as
a
governing
board,
we're
also
making
sure
that
there's
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
say
we
are
happy
with
what
you've
been
doing
for
the
last
30
years
and
we're
going
to
support
it
or
the
opposite.
We're
not
because
if
I
just
feel
like
without
a
sunset,
the
accountability
factor
is
almost
lost.
D
So,
as
we've
said
before,
there
is
no
sunset
planned
for
this
and
the
detailed
study
that
you
have
projects
out
costs
as
far
as
2062
and
the
costs
don't
go
away,
but
this
is
a
a
perpetual
need,
which
is
why
there
was
no
sunset.
You
know
I
just
turned
to
one
page,
and
this
is
one
thousand
twenty
nine
of
or
27
of
the
package,
but
it
shows
the
on
costs
projected
for
2047.
B
H
A
D
D
D
Two
of
the
there's,
all
five
of
you
guys,
you
guys
are
the
elected
representatives
for
this
community
and
the
fee
sets
a
maximum
that
can
be
charged
if
we
ever
get
to
a
point
where
that
fee
needs
to
be
lowered.
It's
like
our
debt
limit.
We
have
a
high
debt
limit,
but
we
don't
just
take
on
excess
debt,
and
so
the
council
does
have
the
ability
to
lower
that
fee.
D
As
we
mentioned
earlier
and
another
accountability
mechanism,
is
this
property
tax
based
assessment
for
the
enterprise?
All
of
the
revenue
has
to
be
spent
on
storm
water?
We
can
legally
not
spend
a
dime
outside
of
caring
for
our
storm
water
system,
so
this
cannot
be
the
slice
fund
for
taking
care
of
building
the
a
new
aquatic
center
in
30
years.
That's
not
what
these
funds
could
ever
be
used
for,
and
so
that's
important
for
people
to
know,
because
there
is
accountability
built
in
into
how
this
fee
is
configured.
C
D
C
D
When
staff
and
the
consultant
teams
sat
down
to
analyze
this,
it
was
really
looking
at.
Let's
not
just
look
at
the
immediate
problem
in
front
of
us,
because
then
we'll
we'll
have
that
other
problem
that
we
didn't
pay
attention
to,
and
so
this
effort
is,
is
geared
toward
ensuring
that
as
a
community
we
have
a
well-maintained
stormwater
system.
That's
not
flooding,
that's
not
threatening
the
health
of
the
general
fund.
That's
not
impacting
residents
and
businesses
and
developing
a
structure,
a
financial
mechanism
around
to
do
that
and
to
do
that
in
perpetuity.
C
Okay,
so
I
I
have
a
comment
but
I'll
hold.
My
comment
I'd
like
to
hear
some
I'd
like
to
hear
from
some
of
my
fellow
council
members
on
on
how
they
feel
about
it.
Since
it
sounds
like
that
decision
does
have
to
be
made
tonight,
and
it
also
sounds
like
some
we
may
we're
hearing
from
from.
I
think
one
resident
already
tonight,
but
I
know
I've
heard
from
other
residents
that
that's
a
deal
breaker
for
them,
so
I
would
like
to
hear
some
of
their
council
members.
Thank
you.
I
C
E
E
E
You
know
if
you
know
if,
if
needed,
I
I
that
that
makes
a
lot
more
sense
than
just
cutting
it
off,
because
what
will
happen,
we
would
be
doing
what
the
1994
council
is
doing
did
to
us,
which
is
kicking
a
terrible
decision
down
the
road
and
then
now
all
of
a
sudden
they're.
Getting
the
only
way
that
they're
going
to
be
able
to
fund
that
future
council
will
be
able
to
fund
the
storm.
The
stormwater
system
is
to
come
back
to
the
voters
and
do
this
whole
process
again.
E
So
it's
not
it's
not
apples
and
it's
not
apples
to
apples
for
me
for
the
the
sunset
just
going
into
my
other
comments.
One
thing
that
I
I
think
got
a
little
bit
lost
was
the
fact-
and
I
thought
maybe
it
wasn't
lost.
I
think
it
was
addressed,
but
I
want
to
I
want
to
hit
that
point
again.
Is
that
the
the
30-year
horizon
for
this?
Where
we're
we're,
not,
as
I
said
before,
we're
not
we're
not
funding
a
30
million
dollar
project
that
we're
going
to
embark
on
immediately.
E
E
E
I
learned
about
this
this
issue
with
the
stormwater
in
my
very,
very,
very
first
city
meeting
or
my
first
interaction
with
the
city
after
after
being
elected
and
before
being
sworn
in,
and
it
was
like
a
kick
to
the
face-
it's
like,
oh,
my
god,
really
right
out
of
the
gate.
Okay
and
looking
back
at
past
councils
and
past
council
actions
and
past
city
manager,
actions
in
in
1994
and
then
again
in
in
2014.
There
was
a
study
session
that
didn't
have
any
action
items.
E
So
there
was
nothing
for
confirmed
council
at
that
time
to
vote
on.
But
you
know
this.
This
problem
was
presented,
but
then
it
never
came
back
and
that
was
a
massive,
miss
and
back
in
1994.
Putting
this
putting
the
fee
in
place
and
having
no
growth
structure
built
into
it,
not
even
for
simple
inflation
or
cost
of
living
increases,
nothing
just
having
that
be
flat
and
then
allowing
it
to
just
sit
there
for
27
years
and
become
this
inadequate
over
all
that
time.
E
Yeah,
that's
terrible,
and
but
with
all
that
said,
none
of
that
changes
where
we
are,
we
no
matter
where
the
where
the
blame
goes
or
whatever
we
can
argue
about
that
until
the
cows
come
home,
but
it
doesn't
change
where
we
are
and
I
don't
want
to
have.
I
don't
want
this.
I
don't
think
any
of
the
five
of
us
want
this.
I
don't
think
staff
wants
this.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I'm
going
to
check
in
with
I'm
just
going
to
make
one
quick
question
or
comment.
I'm
sorry
and
then
see.
If
mr
salazar
then
I'll
go
to
vice
mayor,
just
to
make
sure
everybody
has
an
opportunity
to
speak
or
if
they
wanted
to
address
anything
to
mr
hamilton
made
a
lot
of
great
points.
A
I
always
think
of
a
neighboring
city
of
ours
that
passed
a
fire
assessment
and
they
did
a
sunset
they've
been
out
three
times
now,
because
nobody
wants
to
reduce
services
in
that
community,
but
then
in
essence
they
do
it
for
five
years
and
then
you
have
to
go
back
to
keep
doing
that.
So
that's
just
something
from
a
neighboring
community,
but
anyway,
mr
salazar,
do
you
have
anything
at
this
moment
other
than
I'm
going
to
move
over
to
the
vice
mayor.
G
I'll
I'll,
chime
in
and
agree
that
this
need
is
not
going
to
go
away
and
we're
essentially
not
funding
a
project,
not
a
single
project,
but
we're
funding
an
enterprise,
and
you
know
it's
been
almost
a
decade
ago
that
we
set
out
to
properly
fund
the
other
two
critical
enterprises
and
we've
reaped
the
benefit
of
that.
Where,
as
a
decade
ago,
we
were
seeing
massive
sewer
overflows
all
over
the
city,
those
have
been
completely
dealt
with
and
we're
not
seeing
those
ssos
anymore,
and
it
was
that
was
a
big
thing.
G
When
I
first
got
on
the
council,
we've
addressed
it
and
back
then
there
was
a
lot
of
opposition.
There
was
some,
you
know
very
vocal
opposition
to
to
raising
those
fees,
and
you
know,
after
you
know
several
years
of
those
fees
and
steady
increases,
we're
at
a
point
where
we're
comfortable
enough
that
we
can
throttle
back.
But
it
was
a
council
decision
this
time
around
to
throttle
back
on
this
final
increase,
and
I
think
some
future
council
will
probably
be
able
to
make
the
same
decision
here.
G
If,
if
we
get
to
that
point,
but
we're
so
far
behind-
and
I
know
even
back
then
we
we
wanted
to
address
a
storm
back
then
at
the
same
time,
but
it
was,
it
was
a
lot
to
put
on
the
ratepayers.
At
that
time
we
chose
the
one
that
was
most
critical
at
the
time,
the
one
that
was
most
pressing
and
really
focused
on
on
sewer
and
water
at
that
time,
and
it
was
one
that
we
had
a
little
bit
more
control
over
because
it
didn't
have
to
go
on
a
tax
property
tax.
G
G
We
deferred
a
lot
of
projects,
but
you
know
we
weren't
forecasted
to
go
negative
right
away,
but
now
we're
at
that
point,
and
so
the
timing
is
critical
and
you
know
if
we
don't
do
this
now.
We
are
going
to
be
negative
in
that
in
that
enterprise
and
that's
something
we
really
can
allow,
and
so
I'm
you
know
I'm
going
to
be
voting
in
favor
of
moving
forward
with
this.
You
know,
we've
had
some
good
input,
I
believe
from
the
public.
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
C
So
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
the
comment
earlier
that
I
I
think
that
council
is
already
taking
a
huge
step
forward
by
starting
this
process,
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
don't
think
it
would
diminish
any
any
opportunities
to
move
this
forward
by
having
any
kind
of
sunset.
Just
because
the
concern
that
I
have
is
actually
losing
the
opportunity
to
move
forward,
because
there's
no
sunset
versus
the
emergency
needs
that
we
have
now
to
address
the
problems,
because
all
residents,
I've
spoken
to
believe
we
need
storm
water
repair.
C
C
My
you
know,
I'm
not
even
two
years
in
office,
this
council
hasn't
made
the
decision
as
it
pertains
to
water
and
sewer
for
the
12
plus
years
that
the
rates
have
been
increasing.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
it's
really
easy
to
say.
I
think
it's
a
different
thing
to
actually
to
actually
do
with.
That
said,
I
think
for
me,
what
really
sold
me
on
moving
forward
with
the
ballot
is
one
that
we
won't
be
making
this
decision.
C
It's
the
the
owners
of
properties
that
are
actually
making
this
decision
on
what
they're
going
to
pay,
but
it's
this
quick
letter
that
I
just
want
to
share
with
the
public
that
I
think
is
really
eye-opening.
It
was
very
eye-opening
for
me
and
it's
a
letter
from
the
city
of
san
bruno
to
a
resident
who
had
submitted
a
complaint
about
some
flooding,
and
it
says
thank
you
for
your
letter,
dated
november
27
1982
outlining
the
need
for
some
drainage
improvements.
C
Our
city
engineer
has
made
a
preliminary
investigation
of
the
situation
and
has
also
reviewed
the
city's
earlier
storm
sewer
adjustments
mentioned
in
your
letter.
His
conclusion
is
that
some
drainage
improvement
is
needed.
Please
be
advised
that
we
will
study
the
problem
further
to
determine
the
best
solution.
C
One
solution
might
be
a
culvert
to
the
parking
lot
as
suggested
this
potential
project
will
be
medium
priority,
one
and
probably
will
be
submitted
for
funding
as
part
of
the
1983-1984
budget.
In
the
meantime,
rest
assured
that
I
have
reminded
city
crews
as
to
the
critical
nature
of
this
flooding
to
your
driveway
and
garage.
We
have
increased
our
street
sweeping
effort
in
your
area
where
seasonal
leaf
concentration
hampers
these
older,
less
efficient
storm
drain
inlets.
I
suggest
that
you
and
your
neighbor
keep
a
few
sandbags
handy
through
the
winter
as
an
additional
precaution.
C
A
And
in
closing,
yes,
I
am
going
to
supported
as
well.
You
know
when
I
was
a
kid
growing
up
on
san
antonio,
when
I
came
home
from
school.
That
was
fun
for
a
kid
had
to
take
off
the
shoes
and
socks
roll
the
pants
legs.
That's
how
got
home
the
last
stretch
of
the
way
up
into
the
house
the
apartment,
and
that
was
because
it
obviously
didn't
drain
correctly.
A
Obviously,
a
lot,
that's
obviously
many
decades
ago
and
there
have
been
improvements,
but
there
are
still
other
improvements
that
need
to
be
had
and
we
get
emails
from
residents
who
experienced
in
that
in
the
avenues
in
other
areas.
That
is
still
very
challenging,
and
I
do
believe
in
our
ability
to
do
the
bonding
and
not
utilize
the
general
funds,
because
those
are
going
through
essential
services
that
I
think
this
whole
community
wants
delay
it.
I
don't
think,
will
farewell,
because
everything
does
go
up.
A
We
have
to
meet
state
standards,
and
I
just
want
to
know
that
the
city
staff,
you
know,
are
all
the
other
agencies
together
on
this,
the
army
corps
of
engineers,
the
regional
board,
all
those
folks
that
are
part
of
this
process.
That
need
to
be
on
board
too,
for
what
we're
going
to
embark
upon.
You
know
we
have
to
work
in
unison
and
we
have
to
all
make
sure
we're
hitting
the
mark.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
that
backwards.
E
E
D
A
E
I
I
I
apologize
for
not
thinking
of
this
earlier,
but
the
one
thing
I
want
to
reiterate
for
for
folks
listening
regarding
this
whole
process,
with
the
the
protest
first
and
then
the
and
then
the
ballots
going
out
and
all
of
that,
because
I
I
just
it
just
struck
me
when
you're
when
the
city
attorney
was
brought
that
up.
Some
of
the
comments
that
I
that
I
have
seen
seem
to
indicate
that
there's
that
people
were
thinking
that
the
city
made
up
this
process
arbitrarily
and
that's
not
true.
E
This
we're,
following
proposition
218
state
mandated
process
for
how
to
conduct
this
entire
operation
in
terms
of
the
and
that
that
that
goes
to
not
just
the
how
we're
doing
it,
but
the
thresholds,
and
all
of
that.
This
is
all
state-mandated
process
that
we're
following.
That's.
Why?
I
don't
think
that
was
brought
up
tonight.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
to
reiterate
that.
Thank
you.
A
I
think
that's
a
great
point
and
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up,
because
I've
seen
an
email
or
two,
so
this
is
a.
This
went
on
a
state
initiative
ballot
that
was
passed
by
the
voters
of
the
state
of
california
and
so,
therefore,
the
cities,
all
city
municipalities,
must
follow
this
process
and
the
guidelines
set
forth
by
the
state
that
measure
that
was
passed
in
prop
218..
So
thank
you,
council,
member
hamilton.
A
G
G
A
And
I
have
it
down
as
a
5-0
vote
and
the
resolution
passes.
Thank
you
to
city
staff.
Thank
you
to
the
public
for
being
with
us
this
evening
as
well.
Appreciate
your
comments
and
your
participation
city
manager.
Is
there
anything
else,
that's
needed
in
regards
to
our
study
session
and
special
meeting
tonight.