►
Description
Agenda:
Regular Meeting (TBD)
REMOTE VIA ZOOM or TELEPHONE
Zoom Link: https://sanbruno-ca-gov.zoom.us/j/85042371038
Phone Line: 1-646-558-8656
Webinar ID: 850 4237 1038
Webinar Password: 225877
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Is
there
anybody
just
to
make
sure
that
there's
nobody
here
in
the
audience?
Okay,
with
that,
we
will
move
on
to
item
number
five
announcements
and
presentation.
The
first
item
is
item.
A
the
San
Bruno
city
council
will
hold
a
special
meeting
on
November
the
15th
2022
at
6
pm
to
provide
a
public
hearing
on
the
proposal
to
increased
Solid
Waste
rates.
A
Item
B
Proclamation,
declaring
November
26
2022,
a
small
business
Saturday
in
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
there's
a
proclamation
declaring
November
the
26
2022,
a
small
business
Saturday
in
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
whereas
in
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
celebrates
our
local
small
businesses
and
contributes
they
make
to
our
local
economy
and
community
and
whereas,
according
to
the
United
States
small
business
administration,
there
are
32.5
million
small
businesses
in
the
U.S.
Small
businesses
represent
99.7
of
firms
with
paid
employees.
A
Small
businesses
are
responsible
for
62
percent
of
net
new
jobs
created
since
1995
and
small
businesses
employ
46.8
percent
of
the
employees
in
the
private
sector
in
the
United
States
and
whereas
the
city
of
San
Bruno
supports
our
local
businesses
that
create
jobs,
boosts
our
local
economy
and
preserve
our
communities
and
whereas
advocacy
groups
as
well
as
public
and
private
organizations
across
the
country
have
endorsed
the
Saturday
after
Thanksgiving
a
small
business
Saturday.
Now,
therefore,
I
Rico
e
Medina,
mayor
of
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
to
hereby
Proclaim
November,
26
2022,
a
small
business
day.
A
With
that
we
will
move
on
to
a
you
know
what
I'm
going
to
do.
I'm
going
to
take
D
first
and
just
read
that
announcement.
There
will
be
a
Veterans
Day
observance
at
Golden
Gate,
National
Cemetery,
which
is
located
at
1300
sneeth
Lane
on
Veterans
Way
on
Friday
November,
the
11th
2022
at
11
A.M
to
honor
our
veterans
with
the
band
concert,
beginning
at
10
30.
presented
by
the
Avenue
of
flags
committee.
A
And
now
we
will
move
on
to
item
C
we're
going
to
adopt
a
resolution
for
David
Nigel
as
the
2020
recipient
of
the
recognition
of
the
extraordinary
service
award
and
adopt
a
resolution.
Honoring
Dennis
Amit
as
a
2021
recipient
of
the
recognition
of
extraordinary
service
award
and
with
that
I
would
like
to
turn
it
over
to
the
Community
Services
director.
C
So
this
evening,
I'm
introducing
this
item:
honoring
two
recipients
of
San
Bruno's
extraordinary
service
award
in
2020.
The
city
received
a
nomination
from
the
Rotary
Club
of
San
Bruno
and
San
Bruno
Lions
Club
for
this
award
for
long
time,
San
Bruno
resident,
David,
Nigel
Mario
recognition
subcommittee
is
comprised
of
six
City
commissioners
and
they
convened
this
past
July
to
review
these
nominations.
The
committee
members
included
culture
and
arts
Commissioners
Pamela
Madden
and
Gene
George
Parks
and
Rec
Commissioners,
Mike,
Palmer
and
Tom,
and
planning
Commissioners,
Marco,
dorazo
and
Gerard
Madden.
D
Good
evening,
honorable
mayor
Medina
and
members
of
the
city
council
city
of
San
Bruno's,
extraordinary
service
award
joining
me
at
the
podium
tonight
is
Marco
derazo
from
the
Planning
Commission
I
will
be
presenting
the
recommendation
for
David
Nigel
to
be
the
2020
recipient
of
the
city's
extraordinary
service
award
and
Mr
durazo
will
be
presenting
the
recommendation
for
Dennis
salmon
to
be
the
20
twins
of
both
of
these
gentlemen.
With
the
council's
permission,
I
would
like
to
add
a
couple
of
brief
comments
about
David
Nigel.
D
D
Earlier
this
year
the
California
Association
of
Parks
and
Recreation
Commissioners
and
board
members
named
its
annual
scholarship
in
his
honor.
It
is
now
the
David
Nigel
scholarship.
On
behalf
of
my
colleagues
on
the
memorial
recognition
subcommittee.
It
is
truly
my
honor
and
privilege
to
be
able
to
recommend
to
the
city
to
durazel
we'll
say
a
few
words
about
Dennis
salmon.
E
Good
evening,
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
city
council,
as
a
resident
of
San
Bruno,
I'm
honored
to
business
Pacific,
it
was
a
civic-minded
business
owner.
He
served
on
various
committees,
helped
develop
San,
Bruno's,
75th
Anniversary
guide
and
served
on
the
Centennial
anniversary
committee.
His
involvement
in
support
of
various
Lions
activities
is
exhaustive.
E
Posey
parade
holiday
food
baskets
operation
of
Santa
Claus
are
just
a
few
that
I
have
time
to
highlight
tonight.
The
Lions
could
not
have
had
the
same
impact
and
served
as
many
families
in
our
community
without
his
support
really
ask
that
you
move
to
support
recognition
and
his
honor
tonight.
Thank
you.
A
You
both
Mr
durazo
and
Mr
Palmer
at
this
time.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
speak
on
this
item?
This
is
going
to
be
an
action
item
by
the
council,
and
I
also
will
ask
if
there
are
any
Council
comments
prior
to
the
vote,
but
any
members
of
the
public
so
hold
on
no
other
members
in
the
audience
and
no
other
on
Zoom.
Okay,
with
that
said
comments
from
colleagues
in
regards
to
the
two
resolutions:
council,
member
Salazar,.
G
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
one
thing
that
was
not
mentioned
by
Mr
Summit
by
Mr
drawso,
is
that
what
I
found
really
interesting
and
commendable
about
Mr
Sama,
whom
I
don't
know
and
did
not
know,
is
that
every
time
I
would
speak
with
one
of
their
employees.
He
is
loved
and
respected
by
his
employees
when
the
pandemic
came
and
they
closed
that
their
employees
continued
to
receive
benefits
and
he
continued
to
pay
those
benefits.
G
They
have
one
of
the
highest
retention
rates,
one
of
the
larger
they're,
actually
one
of
the
largest
employers
in
San
Bruno
and
as
a
planning
commissioner
I
approved
the
back
addition
to
artichoke
Jones,
which
was
requested
not
because
they
wanted
to
expand
their
gambling.
It
was
because
they
wanted
to
give
staff
in
the
kitchen
more
space
to
be
able
to
cook,
and
so
I,
don't
think
you
can
find
somebody
who's
willing
to
invest
in
their
staff
in
that
way,
more
commendable
and
then
for
Mr,
Nigel,
I,
don't
think
I've
ever
met.
G
H
I
just
think,
it's
fantastic
that
we're
we're
back
to
honoring
some
of
some
of
our
members
of
our
community
and
and
you
couldn't
do
what
a
great
great
time
to
start
with,
with
Dennis
Abbott
and
and
Mr
Nigel
I.
Think
it's
just
fantastic,
so
I'm
really
glad
we're
doing
this
and
and
providing
that
honor.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
and
and
I
do
appreciate
this.
Coming
back,
it's
been
a
while,
but
obviously
covet
has
prohibited
us
from
coming
together
and
acknowledging
and
honoring
our
residents
and
people
that
have
truly
given
back
for
decades
and
what's
more
impressive,
is
that
not
only
has
I.E
with
Mr
Nigel
52
years,
maybe
53
on
the
park
and
rec
commission
Maybe
54.?
A
But
it's
truly
just
not
here
in
San
Bruno,
it's
throughout
the
state.
It's
throughout
the
county,
he's
very
proud
of
the
scholarship
program
and
the
engagement
and
the
involvement
he
has
in
this
community
going
to
the
events
and
sharing
his
wisdom
and
knowledge
and
love
and
his
passion
and
with
Mr
samet.
There
are
so
many
other
things
that
aren't
said
because
they
can't
be
said
because
he
just
did
it
and
he
didn't
want
to
plaque.
He
didn't
want
to
be
acknowledged.
A
It
just
happened
when
there
was
a
need
there
arose
whether
it
was
after
the
explosion
or
anywhere
in
between
then
and
now.
The
salmon
family
and
Dennis
salmon
himself
have
been
there
for
this
community.
When
I
worked
in
parks
and
rec,
the
lights
we
have
at
Diamond,
3
are
thanks
to
him
and
there's
many
other
things
in
this
community,
but,
like
I
said
it
wasn't
always
to
get
an
Accolade.
A
It
was
just
to
give
back
and
to
do
the
right
thing
so
with
that
I
think
this
is
one
thing
tonight
that
all
that
sit
up
here
and
with
Mr
Hamilton
will
being
concurrence
to.
This
is
a
good
thing
and
a
right
thing
with
that
I'd
like
to
take
each
resolution
separate
and
first
I'd
like
to
start
with
the
resolution:
honoring
David,
Nigel
and
councilmember
Hamilton.
I
Thank
you
very
much,
I'm
very,
very
happy
to
make
make
this
motion
given
all
of
Mr
Nigel's
contributions
to
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
which
are
legendary
and
I.
I
concur
with
every
kind
comment
said
here
tonight
about
about
him
and
about
Mr
samet.
So
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution.
Honoring
David
Nigel
as
the
2020
recipient
of
the
recognition
of
extra
extraordinary
service
award.
A
We
have
a
motion
Hamilton
second
Salazar,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
aye,
aye
aye
many
opposed.
It
is
unanimous.
The
resolution
has
been
approved
and
adopted,
so
congratulations,
Mr,
Nigel
and
at
this
time
I
understand,
though
he
may
be
believe
it
or
not,
not
here
in
this
room,
but
he
still
is
here
and
he
is
via
zoom
and
we'd
like
to
bring
him
in
at
this
time.
A
J
Can
hello,
okay,
I
lost
my
picture,
so
I'm
I'm,
very
humbled
and
and
honored
to
receive
this
recip.
This
special
award
I'm
3000
miles
away
in
Housatonic
Massachusetts
with
lifelong
friends
and
they're
all
listening,
and
they
were
all
smiling
and
I'm,
so
honored
I
love,
San,
Bruno
and
I'm
I'm,
not
looking
for
the
recognition
but
receiving
it
is
really
special
to
me.
Thank
you
very,
very
much.
A
Thank
you
for
all
that
you've
done
and
I
can
remember
even
being
on
staff,
and
you
were
a
park
and
rec,
commissioner,
and
you
are
one
person
that
treats
everyone
with
kindness,
compassion
and
support,
and
I've
known
you
for
decades
and
I've
been
honored
to
know
you
and
see
all
that
you've
given
to
our
community.
So
once
next
I
would
like
to
have
action
on
the
next
resolution.
Honoring
Dennis,
Summit.
A
I'll
go
ahead
and
move
to
introduce
the
resolution.
Honoring
Dennis
Ahmet
second
motion,
Rico,
Medina
seconded
Salazar,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
aye,
any
opposed
motion
carried
5-0
resolution
has
been
adopted.
Mr
salmon
is
now
the
2020
Mr
Terraza
Mr
Palmer
for
being
here,
and
your
words
I
want
to
thank
also
other
Danielle
and
Chris
and
Stephen
and
Lori
that
are
here
also
and
announcements.
Thank
you
very
much.
You
don't
have
to
stay.
You
can
go
watch
the
results.
A
L
Yes,
so
We've
put
out
a
variety
of
recruitments
for
the
peak
with
recruiters
to
see
if
they
can
help
us
at
the
last
budget.
At
the
last
budget
cycle,
we
requested
to
upgrade
the
position
from
an
associate
engineer
to
a
senior
engineer
to
try
to
call
to
attract
a
more
qualified
season
candidate
and
we
are
currently
going
through
the
recruitment
process
itself
for
the
position,
and
we
are
hopeful
that
we
may
be
able
to
get
a
viable
candidate
out
of
that
that
recruitment.
L
A
G
A
Any
opposed
five
zero,
unanimous
items
on
the
consent
through
J
to
be
approved
with
the
recusal
by
Rico
Medina
on
F.
Now
we'll
move
to
item
k,
adopt
a
resolution
approving
cost
of
living
adjustment
colas
or
the
unrepresented
assistant
city
manager,
position
of
six
percent
in
calendar
year
2022
and
three
percent
in
calendar
year.
2023.
G
M
M
K
K
G
K
G
A
B
A
Thank
you
very
much.
What
we're
going
to
do
is
hear
from
the
interim
Finance
director
go
through
the
whole
presentation,
we'll
bring
it
to
colleagues
for
questions
on
the
presentation.
Then
I'll
ask
for
any
public
input
and
then
we
will
bring
it
back
to
council
for
further
discussion
deliberation
and
our
action
interim
Finance
director.
N
N
N
The
general
fund
revenues
so
far
I'll
draw
your
attention
specifically
to
that
Center
column.
There
I
recognize
a
couple
of
these
slides
are
fairly
busy,
but
the
revenues
are
currently
pacing
about
where
we
would
expect
at
this
time.
During
the
year
as
the
council
knows,
revenues
tend
to
not
come
in
on
an
equal
basis.
Each
month
revenues
come
in
at
different
times
during
the
year,
and
so
typically
in
the
first
quarter,
somewhere
between
16
and
20
percent,
which
you'll
see
between
last
year
and
this
year
that
that's
very
common.
N
That
is
about
what
we
would
expect
after
year.
Again,
if
you'll
take
a
look
at
that
Center
column
there
currently
we're
at
about
32
percent
of
budget
expenditures
for
this
year.
That's
exactly
where
we
were
last
year,
very
common
to
see
those
types
of
numbers
after
the
first
quarter
and
the
Enterprise
funds
in
a
similar
fashion.
They
are
also
tracking.
According
to
budget.
We
don't
have
any
significant
concerns
at
this
time
on
the
general
fund
expenditures
nor
the
Enterprise
funds,
each
one
of
the
Enterprise
funds
are
listed.
N
Internal
service
funds,
including
the
Central
Garage
building
and
Facilities
maintenance,
self-insurance
and
Technology
once
again,
tracking
right
on
Pace.
This
is
good
news.
For
us.
Everything
we've
seen
across
the
board
is
is
pretty
much
what
we
would
expect
at
this
time
during
the
year
again,
I'll
draw
your
attention
to
the
percentage
of
budget.
Those
are
numbers
that,
among
each
one
of
these
funds,
we
would
expect
to
see
at
this
time
during
the
year.
N
And
so
a
highlight
on
the
on
the
first
quarter
actual
so
the
general
fund,
Revenue
receipts
are
actually
a
little
bit
higher
than
the
previous
year.
Well,
as
I
mentioned,
the
expenditures
are
consistent
with
what
happened
last
year,
so
whether
the
general
fund
revenues
continue
to
come
in
at
a
higher
rate
is
unknown.
N
At
this
time,
right
I
can
tell
you
is,
is
that
there
has
been
a
little
bit
of
an
increase
when
we
compared
last
year's
first
quarter
to
this
year's
first
quarter,
and
so
we'll
have
a
little
bit
better
understanding
of
where
the
city's
revenues
will
be.
When
we
come
back
with
the
mid-year
report,
the
water
and
wastewater
funds
are
very
consistent
with
the
previous
year.
N
Insurance
premiums
on
across
the
board
for
for
all
of
the
city's
insurance
premiums
have
been
increasing
over
the
last
few
years,
and
we
do
con
expect
that
Trend
to
continue.
That
is
something
that
that
everyone's
all
cities,
I
should
say,
Statewide
are
are
experiencing,
as
insurance
costs
continue
to
rise
exponentially.
N
N
There
are
some
recommended
budget
amendments
for
the
first
quarter
and
I'll
walk
you
through
each
one
of
these.
So
the
first
request
is
for
thirty
three
thousand
dollars,
which
is
for
increased
expenditures
for
a
lawnet
messaging
switch.
We've
been
working
with
the
police
department,
as
well
as
the
city's
I.T
department
on
this
switch.
The
switch
is
fairly
old
at
this
point.
N
The
second
and
third
item
for
785
thousand
dollars
is
actually
the
best
way
I
can
term.
This
is
it's
an
accounting
thing?
So
what
this
item
is
is
currently
the
city
receives
funds
from
Developers
for
plan
check
services,
and
it's
seen
as
a
pass-through
item
where
the
money
is
taken
in
by
the
city
and
immediately
passed
off
onto
a
third
party
to
provide
the
plan
check
services.
N
This
is
something
that,
when
I
first
arrived
here
a
few
months
ago,
the
previous
Finance
director
had
flagged
and
and
I
tend
to
agree
with
her
that
a
a
more
transparent
way
to
do
this
would
be
for
the
city
to
actually
receive
the
money
and
then
pay
the
money
out.
So,
if
that
any
in
the
future
any
specific
or
given
transaction
somebody
wanted
to
research
it,
it
would
be
easier
for
them
to
find.
So
really,
this
is
just
an
accounting
function.
These
activities
are
happening
right
now.
N
The
city
is
currently
handling
this
money
and
paying
the
developers
out,
and
so
the
request
is
to
allow
us
to
actually
receive
the
money
me.
It
hits
the
city's
books
and
then
pay
it
out
of
the
city's
books.
So
there's
no
change
in
in
level
of
effort.
It's
really
just
a
change
in
in
the
way
the
accounting
is
handled
for
that
the
twenty
six
thousand
dollars
in
general
fund
money
for
the
library
system
is
for
self-checkout
machines
and
security
gates.
N
These
are
required
as
part
of
the
mou,
and
what
I
will
say
is
that
the
city
has
received
a
grant
to
partially
offset
some
of
these
costs,
and
so
now
would
be
an
appropriate
time
to
to
consider
the
additional
forty
two
thousand
dollars
that
is
not
coming
from
the
general
for,
even
though
it's
treated
as
a
general
fund
dollar
I
will
highlight
that
that
is
not
we're
not
requesting
that
comes
out
of
the
general
fund,
Reserve.
That
would
actually
be
coming
out
of
the
equipment
Reserve.
N
So
money,
that's
already
been
set
aside
for
these
types
of
activities,
and
the
final
item
on
here,
that's
being
recommended-
is
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
So
this
side,
the
slide,
is
a
summary
in.
In
summary,
the
general
fund
here,
the
net
impact
to
the
general
fund,
as
you
can
see,
is
actually
only
about
sixty
thousand
dollars,
because
the
the
other
money
that
is
related
to
the
accounting
transaction
is
currently
being
received.
We're
just
putting
this
on
the
books.
Now
that's
that's
kind
of
the
point
between
behind
that.
N
I
would
like
to
take
forth
a
significant
amount
of
effort
in
in
creating
these
figures
and
numbers,
and
especially
to
Esther
yerbe
Fernandez,
who
assisted
me
with
putting
the
report
in
the
the
staff
report
and
the
council
member
together.
So
with
that
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
council
may
have.
F
The
report
regarding
the
request
for
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
the
the
landscape
architecting
from
the
diff
for
that
project.
It's
coming
from
the
day,
those
dollars
so
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
we're
starting
to
spend
some
of
that
without
having
had
I,
did
want
to
say
a
concern
there
that
you
know
we.
K
Short
woman
impact
fee
is
right:
I'm
an
impact
fees
to
take
a
look
in
the
object,
is
goldfields
walking,
trails
Etc
will
be,
and
that
process
takes
some
time,
and
so
there
will
be
objected
to
come
from
the
community
facilities
impact
fee
portion
of
diffs,
which
does
at
the
not
advancing
or
loaning
funds
where
which
bucket?
For
that.
G
N
Sure
thank
you,
mayor,
Medina
and
vice
mayor
Mason,
so
the
way
that
these
requests
report
to
to
send
those
up
for
consideration,
and
so
there's
a
number
of
people
that
look
at
these
types
of
things
and
decide
whether
the
the
department
had
who's
making
the
request
a
number
of
different
people.
It's
your
requests,
but
what
I
can
tell
you
is
is
for
the
first
quarter
request.
This
is
the
item
that
was
received
and
it
is
being
recommended
to
be
funded
fully.
G
N
You,
yes,
this
is
an
accounting
mechanism
as
really
all
this
expenditure
expending
the
money
in
order
to
be
more
transparent.
With
what
we're
doing,
we
would
need
appropriation
authority
to
make
that
accounting
adjustment.
It's
really
just
an
accounting
thing.
There
is
no
additional
expenditures.
There
is
no
additional
Revenue.
All
of
these
activities
are
currently
happening.
It's
just
a
mechanism
that
we're
asking
to
change.
I
In
the
question
regarding
the
the
development
impact
fees
and
and
the
discussion
after
that,
those
were
book.
Those
were
most
of
my
questions,
but
then
I
I've
come
up
with
a
new
one
which
is
I
put
the
city
in
any
Jeopardy,
given
that
one
of
one
of
the
items
is
related
to
crestmore,
from
which
I
am
accused.
N
A
A
A
B
Authorizing
the
creation
of
a
parking
fund
authorizing
transfer
of
331
thousand
dollars
from
the
Downtown
parking
program,
Capital
Improvement
project
into
the
parking
fund
to
parking
enforcement.
Following
the
conclusion
of
the
meet
and
confer
process
for
the
memorandum
of
understanding
entered
into
between
police
and
the
City.
K
Thank
you,
mayor
Rico,
Medina
and
Council
Javon,
Grogan
city
manager,
I'll
just
give
a
very
quick
introduction.
We're
really
happy
to
bring
you
both
an
update
on
these
City's
efforts
to
move
forward
with
installing
parking
meters
and
also
tonight
respond
to
you
your
request
to
look
into
splitting
the
project
and
having
a
phase
one.
K
Just
know
that
we
are
here
tonight
to
provide
you
with
information,
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have,
and
certainly
there
are
a
number
of
Alternatives
in
the
staff
report
that
if
the
city
council
would
like
us
to
align
phase
one
with
phase
two
and
increase
parking
enforcement,
when
we
do
the
meter
program,
we're
happy
to
do
that
as
well.
But
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Chief
Johansen.
O
Listening
at
home,
and
here
in
the
room,
my
name
is
Ryan
joints
and
I'm.
The
chief
of
police
here
in
the
city
of
San
Bruno
and
as
city
manager,
Javon
Grogan
mentioned
I'm
here
tonight
to
present
to
you
a
bit
of
an
update
on
a
project
that
has
been
underway
for
quite
some
time
in
enhancing
parking
enforcement.
City-Wide
and
looking
at
a
metered
parking
program
for
downtown
in
terms
of
the
agenda.
I
will
Begin
by
providing
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
of
background
information.
O
As
previously
stated,
the
project
has
been
underway
in
a
variety
of
forms
for
quite
some
time.
It's
like
to
set
some
context
there
with
background.
We
will
then
have
a
discussion
of
the
potential
partnership
with
LAZ
Parking
that
we're
presenting
to
you
as
part
of
phase
one
this
evening,
we'll
discuss
the
fiscal
impact
of
not
only
that
phase
one,
but
also
the
incorporation
of
phase
two
and
how
the
two
work
together
and
then
finally,
some
recommendations
and
Alternatives
and,
of
course,
some
time
to
take
questions.
O
In
terms
of
the
background,
this
all
sort
of
kicked
off
in
January
of
2019,
with
the
San
Bruno
Downtown
parking
study
and
emerge
with
a
final
parking
management
plan
that
is
still
available
through
the
city's
website
and
I've
placed
the
link
here
on
this
Slide.
The
key
takeaways
pertinent
to
our
conversation
this
evening
from
that
were
that
business
owners
and
residents
find
the
current
conditions
in
the
downtown
Corridor
regarding
parking,
unacceptable.
O
The
parking
issues
at
that
time
were
intensifying
and
I.
Think
most
of
us
at
least
anecdotally,
would
agree.
They've
continued
to
intensify
since
then,
and,
quite
frankly,
the
parking
demand
exceeds
the
supply
is
the
core
of
the
issue
experienced
by
merchants
and
residents
alike.
The
relevant
recommendations
from
that
report
were
that
there
should
be
increased
enforcement,
especially
in
the
heavy
use
evening
period,
and
we
will
talk
about
some
of
the
difficulties
with
that,
based
on
current
models,
also
the
installation
of
parking
meters
for
short-term
zones,
and
that
was
all
about
creating
some
parking
turnover.
O
O
This
project
was
then
undertaken
by
the
police
department
in
late
2021.
This
made
a
lot
of
sense
because
the
police
department
obviously
was
already
responsible
for
parking
enforcement,
and
so
any
solution
implemented
would
obviously
involve
and
need
to
be
integrated
with
existing
Police
Operations.
O
So
why
did
we
put
enhanced
parking
enforcement
in
Phase
One?
Well,
first,
it
was
largely
based
upon
your
requests
and
feedback
to
staff.
We
were
asked:
how
can
we
improve
parking
through
enhanced
enforcement
in
the
immediate
as
quickly
as
possible,
knowing
that
installing
meters
is
something
that
will
take
some
time
both
from
staff
and
from
potential
partner
contract
partners?
And
so
what
could
be
done
in
the
immediate
is
a
question
that
was
asked.
O
I
think
we
can
also
all
agree
that
there
were
long-standing
public
complaints
about
parking
in
this
area,
and
there
is
also
an
underlying
belief
that
more
consistent
enforcement
would
improve
those
parking
complaints
or
the
problems
that
underlie
them.
We
also
are
receiving
a
number
of
new
enforcement
requests
in
the
past
couple
of
years,
including
a
focus
on
blocked
sidewalks
to
create
greater
access
for
pedestrians,
folks
using
Wheelchairs
and
strollers,
as
and
also
expansion
of
our
existing
street
sweeping
enforcement
to
city-wide
and
also
some
interest
in
wrong
way
parking
enforcement.
O
So
some
violations
that
historically
were
not
thoroughly
enforced
by
the
police
department,
and
there
were
some
asks
to
begin
doing
so.
Additionally,
metering
will
only
work
with
adequate
enforcement.
If
you
install
meters-
and
you
don't
enforce
the
need
to
pay
them,
people
will
quickly
learn
that
they
can
park
without
paying
and
then
the
revenues
and
the
benefits
we
assume
to
realize
from
metered
parking
will
quickly
disappear.
O
In
March
of
2022
there
was
a
staff
report
delivered
by
Lieutenant
Gene
Wong
from
the
police
department
to
city
council,
providing
really
just
kind
of
an
overall
update
on
staff's
progress
regarding
the
two
phases
of
this
project.
It
also
highlighted
some
of
the
challenges
and
limitations
to
our
existing
enforcement
efforts,
which
I
will
I
will
go
over
again
this
evening.
O
Those
were
limited,
Staffing,
legal
restrictions,
which
there
has
been
some
development
in
and
I,
will
discuss
shortly
and
some
technological
limitations
in
terms
of
the
current
technology
possessed
and
the
more
applicable
technology
to
proper
enforcement,
and
at
that
time
we
did
notice
staff
notice,
counsel,
I'm,
sorry
of
staff's
intention
to
ultimately
recommend
some
sort
of
contracted
partnership
for
enforcement
Services,
which
is
why
I'm
in
front
of
you
this
evening
in
November
of
2021
and
in
March
of
2020
2022
I'm.
Sorry,
we
also
held
meetings
with
down
a
downtown
Merchants
focus
group.
O
The
idea
here
was
to
begin
sort
of
discussing
the
idea
of
meters
and
increased
enforcement
downtown
and
get
a
better
feel
for
how
the
merchants
in
that
area
felt
about
it.
We
discussed
both
enhancement,
enhanced
enforcement
and
the
metering
program
with
overwhelming
support
from
this
group.
For
both
of
those
initiatives,
they
were
very
clear
that
timed
parking
enforcement
is
essential
to
their
effective
operations.
They
need
parking
turnover
in
the
downtown
Corridor
in
order
to
ensure
that
they
can
get
enough
customers
through
the
business
throughout
the
day
to
be
profitable.
O
Quite
frankly,
and
in
addition
in
an
effort
to
serve
the
community,
it's
we've
all
probably
experienced
the
difficulty
of
going
to
one
of
our
favorite
downtown
businesses
only
to
be
frustrated
by
the
lack
of
available
parking
and
maybe,
in
some
cases,
to
find
an
alternative.
And
so
there
was
a
great
deal
of
interest
from
the
merchants
in
doing
whatever
we
can
to
eliminate
that
from
happening.
Some
of
the
key
questions
that
came
from
the
merchants
at
that
time
were
about
parking
for
owners
of
businesses
and
their
employees.
O
This
is
something
that
will
certainly
be
part
of
what
we
bring
back
to
council
as
we
discuss
policy
and
a
potential
ordinance
surrounding
metering
downtown.
They
also
discussed
the
desire
for
increased
loading
zones
and
questions
about
how
their
deliveries
would
get
to
the
businesses
if
everything
was
metered.
O
So
these
are
all
things
that
we'll
need
to
ultimately
be
addressed
as
we
move
into
phase
two
in
terms
of
these
existing
enforcement
challenges,
because
the
simple
question,
if
we
talk
about
the
possibility
that
increased
or
more
adequate
enforcement,
could
improve
these
problems
in
the
downtown
corridors,
why
don't
you
just
do
more
enforcement
and
I
really
truly
wish?
It
was
that
simple,
but
one
of
the
major
hindrances
to
that
is
simply
limited.
Staffing.
O
There
are
currently
two
full-time
and
three
part-time
csos
in
the
general
fund
budget
for
the
police
department
to
handle
all
parking
enforcement
activities
Citywide.
So
any
kind
of
parking
enforcement
that
needs
to
be
conducted
all
over
the
city
of
San
Bruno
is
to
be
conducted
by
these
two
full-time
and
three
part-time
individuals
and
I
think
that
past
practice
will
show
us
that
just
enforcing
parking
adequately
in
the
downtown
Corridor
could
take
that
many
personnel
quite
easily.
O
Generally,
there
is
no
Community
Service
Officer
coverage
after
2
30
PM
each
day
and,
as
I
earlier
mentioned,
that
2019
study
made
it
clear
that
we
need
increased
enforcement
in
the
impacted
evening
hours
and
currently
we
do
not
even
have
staff
here
to
conduct
that
enforcement.
Additionally,
csos
are
critical
for
other
police
department
operations.
It's
not
simply
that
they
can
go
out
and
enforce
parking
all
day
long.
We
rely
on
them
heavily
to
provide
other
critical
services
to
this
community,
including
taking
cold
crime
reports.
O
This
means
crime
reports
that
do
not
involve
suspect
information
and
do
not
require
a
high
level
of
Investigation,
but
are
primarily
documentary
in
nature.
They
handle
non-injury
traffic
collisions,
which
is
a
service
we've
continued
to
provide
in
San
Bruno
While.
Most
cities
have
moved
away
from
providing
that
to
their
community
members,
I
think
it's
an
important
service
because
for
those
of
us
who've
been
in
a
collision
even
non-injury,
we
know
that
it
can
be
quite
stressful
and
can
create
a
lot
of
liability
in
the
back
end
and
I.
O
So
then
that
may
I
beg
the
question:
why
not
just
hire
more
csos
and
again
I
wish
it
was
that
simple
as
well
consistently
Staffing
our
existing
CSO
positions
has
proven
to
be
extremely
difficult.
There
are
a
number
of
reasons
for
this.
One
is
certainly
the
waning
interest
in
law
enforcement
in
general
over
the
last
few
years.
O
Typically,
these
positions
are
staffed
by
aspiring
police
officers
and
or
dispatchers
who
are
either
not
old
enough
to
be
police
officers
yet
or
do
not
meet
the
education
requirements
or
trying
to
finish
their
school
first,
and
so
they
will
come
accept
a
position
as
a
CSO
while
they're
working
towards
that
end
and
with
the
waning
interest
in
law
enforcement
in
general.
There
obviously
are
fewer
people
interested
in
those
early
Stepping
Stones
to
that
career.
O
Additionally,
these
positions
require
mandatory
background
checks,
and
this
is
because
they
are
accessing
a
clutch
system
that
enables
them
to
run
registration
on
vehicles
and
other
critical
records,
and
not
everyone
is
able
to
pass
those
background
checks,
so
we're
taking
the
potential
pool
of
candidates
for
this
job
down
even
further
and
then
compensation
levels
are
always
a
challenge.
The
csos
are
are
not
compensated
commensurate
with
many
of
the
other
agencies
in
our
area,
and
so
it's
competitive
and
difficult
to
attract
the
mayor.
O
One
of
the
other
challenges
with
existing
enforcement
is
legal
restrictions,
and
we've
talked
about
this
a
number
of
times
at
prior
meetings,
I
think
Council
and
the
Public's
probably
heard
me
talk
many
times
about
the
sixth
Circuit
Court
decision
in
2019
that
essentially
put
us
on
notice
that
we
can
no
longer
chalk
the
tires
of
cars.
This
was
extremely
relevant
in
San
Bruno,
because
that's
the
methodology
we
relied
upon
to
conduct
all
of
our
timed
parking
enforcement
here,
so
whether
it's
a
two-hour,
Zone
Downtown
a
five
hour
lot
downtown
or
a
72-hour
abandoned
vehicle
ordinance.
O
There
were
lawsuits
in
San,
Francisco
and
San
Leandro,
just
to
name
a
couple
in
2021
regarding
continuing
to
chalk,
despite
this
notice
from
the
sixth
circuit
and
here
in
San
Bruno,
in
an
abundance
of
caution,
we
halted
nearly
all
of
our
timed
parking
enforcement.
In
response
to
this
potential
liability.
O
Now
I
will
say
that
very
recently
there
was
a
ninth
circuit
ruling
and
the
ninth
circuit
has
jurisdiction
over
us,
not
the
sixth
circuit
that
contradicts
this
sixth
circuit
ruling.
The
ninth
circuit
essentially
ruled
that,
yes,
this
is
a
search
under
the
Fourth
Amendment,
but
that
that
search
qualifies
for
exception
to
the
search
warrant
requirement,
because
it
is
Administrative
in
nature
and
involves
a
vehicle
which
is
a
mobile
conveyance
and
so
without
getting
in
depth
into
the
case
law
that
stands
behind
it.
O
We
are
currently
left
in
a
state
of
limbo
as
to
which
Circuit
Court
would
Prevail
if
we
were
called
on
the
carpet,
so
to
speak,
for
continuing
to
chalk
tires.
So
my
recommendation
at
this
point
in
time
is
to
take
no
action
and
to
continue
not
chalking
tires
until
we
get
greater
Clarity,
because
I
don't
want
to
expose
the
city
to
unneeded
liability,
and
then
we
have
technology
needs
automated
license
plate.
Readers
are,
quite
frankly,
essential
for
efficient
and
effective
parking
enforcement.
They
are
completely
required
for
Time
parking
enforcement.
O
In
my
opinion,
based
largely
upon
the
fact
that
we're
not
supposed
to
be
chocking
tires.
They're
also
required
for
metering
enforcement,
especially
in
a
plan
like
ours,
where
we
plan
to
meter
based
upon
license
plates
not
based
upon
parking
stalls,
and
so
you
need
to
have
some
sort
of
a
system
to
catalog
who
has
and
has
not
paid
and
to
look
at
license
plates
as
a
way
to
determine
where
you
will
conduct
enforcement.
O
They
are
also
far
more
efficient
than
conventional
methods
for
almost
all
other
forms
of
parking
enforcement,
including
permit
parking.
You
can
imagine
driving
down
the
street
in
a
vehicle
and
attempting
to
look
on
the
rear,
bumper
or
in
the
rear
windshield,
to
see
if
there's
a
parking
permit
as
opposed
to
a
license
plate
reader
automatically
reading
plates,
as
you
go
down
the
street
and
immediately
notifying
a
CSO
as
to
the
presence
of
a
plate
that
is
not
currently
permitted,
far
far
more
efficient
same
thing
with
restricted
zones.
O
This
allows,
as
I
just
sort
of
described,
drive
by
enforcement,
which
makes
it
much
more
efficient
and
much
more
effective.
Additionally,
alpr
technology
integrates
with
our
existing
enforcement
platforms
or
digital
citation
issuing
platform.
Our
back
end
Cad
and
RMS
systems
that
track
these
citations
and
presently
the
San
Bruno
Police
Department
does
not
have
any
alpr
enforcement
capabilities.
O
Well,
we
spend
a
great
deal
of
our
time
on
street
sweeping
we
do
selected
areas
based
upon
the
needs
conveyed
by
Public
Works
this
time
of
year,
for
example,
as
we
head
into
the
rainy
season,
we
have
to
double
up
the
Personnel
assigned
to
street
sweeping,
because
clearing
out
the
drains
is
very,
very
important
for
flood
management.
This
is
actually
quite
a
large
undertaking.
O
It
requires
two
csos
about
two-thirds
of
their
work.
Time
is
strictly
handling
street.
Sweeping
enforcement
to
support
the
street
sleeping
efforts
of
the
city
abandoned
vehicle
abatement
is
another
huge
time
suck.
The
reality
is
I
reported
prior
to
Council
on
this.
Is
that
there's
a
high
volume
of
reports
of
abandoned
vehicles
or
what
is
commonly
referred
to
as
a
72-hour
ordinance,
but
a
very
low
level
of
enforcement,
because
only
about
11
percent
of
those
vehicles
are
actually
in
violation
of
being
abandoned
and
needing
to
be
enforced.
O
So
a
tremendous
amount
of
time
is
spent
by
csos
going
out
responding
to
allegations
that
vehicles
are
abandoned
or
parked
illegally.
In
this
regard,
most
those
complaints
tend
to
be
people
who
are
upset
about
Vehicles
parked
in
front
of
their
home
that
they
wish
were
not
there,
and
so
they
report
them
as
abandoned
when
they
are
not
in
fact
abandoned.
O
Additionally,
we
spend
a
lot
of
time
in
registration
violations,
because
if
we
don't
enforce
it,
nobody
will.
That
means
ticketing
vehicles
with
expired
registration
and
towing
those
that
are
expired.
More
than
six
months,
we
spend
a
significant
amount
of
time
on
blocked,
driveways
other
vehicle
Hazard
reports
like
double
parking
and
sign
violations.
What
all
this
means
is
very
little,
if
any
time
at
all
for
timed
parking
enforcement,
which
is
of
critical
interest
to
the
downtown
merchants
and
residents
and
minimal
widespread
proactive
enforcement
of
almost
all
other
violations.
O
This
would
include
all
of
the
efforts
on
blocked,
sidewalk
enforcement,
wrong
way
parking
enforcement
simply
not
much
time
to
conduct
those
activities
on
a
widespread
basis,
and
so
in
the
discussion
here
we
come
to
talk
about
a
potential
partnership
with
LAZ
Parking
Las
parking
has
provided
the
police
department
with
a
proposal
to
deliver
the
following
and
there's
a
couple
of
slides
here
to
go
over
the
different
things
that
are
part
of
their
current
proposal.
They
will
provide
four
full-time
parking
enforcement
officers.
O
They
call
them
peos
that
would
fill
the
role
of
our
current
csos
in
terms
of
parking
enforcement.
This
would
provide
coverage
Monday
through
Saturday
from
8
A.M
to
6
p.m.
Two
to
four
parking
enforcement
officers.
Working
each
day.
It
will
ensure
the
later
enforcement
hours
that
were
recommended
in
the
2019
report
and
all
of
these
peos
will
be
equipped
equipped
with
turbo
Data
Ticket
Pro
electronic
citation
writers.
These
are
the
citation
writers
we
already
use
at
the
police
department,
so
they
are
completely
prepared
to
integrate
with
our
standing
existing
systems.
O
Additionally,
Laz
will
provide
city-wide
parking
enforcement
coverage
to
include
responding
to
reported
violations.
Timed
parking
enforcement,
as
we've
been
talking
about
a
great
deal
this
evening
street
sweeping
enforcement
and
other
saturated
parking
enforcement
as
directed
by
staff.
Parking
complaints
will
also
be
routed
to
Las.
They
will
provide
a
dedicated
phone
number
for
complaints.
They
will
also
integrate
with
the
San
Bruno
response
app.
What
we
at
the
city
call
Acela
and
calls
to
the
PD
will
be
routed
to
Laz
when
they
pertain
to
activities.
Laz
has
been
contracted
to
provide.
O
Also
in
this
proposal
they
will
provide
one
project
manager
and
one
regional
manager.
They
will
provide
four
alpr
equipped
parking
enforcement.
Vehicles
Las
will
be
responsible
for
all
of
the
maintenance
and
the
insurance
in
those
vehicles.
The
alpr
system
will
be
equipped
to
continually
read
parked
vehicles
to
provide
that
drive
by
enforcement.
I
previously
described,
and
quite
simply,
the
system
will
alert
the
peo
every
time.
O
There's
a
vehicle
that
needs
to
be
cited
and
they'll
be
able
to
take
more
Swift
action,
allows
will
also
lease
an
office
space
within
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
from
which
to
conduct
their
operations.
That
will
essentially
be
for
the
supervisor
to
be
housed
for
employees
to
take
breaks
and
to
park
and
to
come
back
to
submit
reports.
O
This
partnership
with
Labs
will
immediately
enhance
Citywide
parking
enforcement,
which
was
one
of
the
components
of
the
Strategic
initiative
from
from
Council.
There
will
be
regular,
consistent
patrols
for
a
wide
array
of
violations,
and
this
will
present
us
with
the
immediate
ability
to
resume
the
time
parking
enforcement
that
has
been
so
critical
to
these
downtown
businesses
and
residents.
O
Enforcement
of
metered
parking
will
be
immediately
available
when
installed
with
this
partnership
with
Laz
again
metered
parking
cannot
be
implemented
without
a
consistent
alpr
based
enforcement
mechanism,
or
the
metering
will
not
generate
the
adequate
revenue
and
will
not
provide
the
benefits
expected
last.
This
partnership
with
Laz
will
also
provide
us
with
the
capability
to
manage
and
enforce
permit
parking
programs
which,
while
there
are
no
current
residential
permit
parking
programs
in
place
in
the
city.
This
again,
the
police
department
is
charged
with
overseeing
those
and
enforcement
would
be
critical
to
them
being
effective
when
implemented.
O
Some
parking
related
activities
will
still
need
to
be
handled
by
csos
and
not
by
last
parking
under
this
agreement,
mostly
those
requiring
kletz
clearance,
meaning
running
any
kind
of
registration
records
in
the
kletz
databases.
Mostly,
this
will
be
registration
violations,
the
72-hour
parking
ordinance
and
there
are
a
few
others.
O
O
So
why
last
parking?
Among
the
many
reasons,
a
few
that
I
can
discuss
here,
one-
is
that
they're,
a
national
company
with
offices
all
over
the
United
States
reputable
they've,
been
operating
for
a
long
time
and
I
think
we
can
depend
on
them
to
be
around
as
a
long-term
partner
they're.
Also
a
member
of
the
national
Cooperative
purchasing
Alliance,
which
is
to
say
that
a
competitive
analysis
of
their
services
and
the
rates
have
been
conducted
and
they're
accepted
in
a
GSA.
O
O
So
we
do
not
have
to
buy
any
new
systems
for
the
police
department
in
order
to
work
with
them
and
they
have
a
great
connection
with
multiple
meter
vendors,
but
among
them
is
T2,
which
at
present
would
be
the
vendor
that
if
we
were
to
come
to
council
with
a
recommendation
today
would
be
the
recommendation
of
staff.
This
provides
some
pricing
benefits
to
us,
as
well
as
some
integration
benefits.
O
O
Additionally,
Laz
has
an
approach
that
they
call
their
creating
a
culture
of
compliance,
a
fair
and
consistent
parking
enforcement
approach.
That
is
aimed
at
increasing
compliance
over
time,
because
that
is
their
ultimate
goal:
they're,
not
so
much
revenue,
driven
as
they
are
driven
by
consistent.
The
idea
that
consistent
enforcement
increases
compliance
which
increases
quality
of
life
in
the
corridor
where
they're
enforcing
they
also
provide
a
number
of
value-added
services
to
the
community
they're
listed
here.
O
I
will
not
go
through
them
one
by
one,
but
I
will
highlight
one
of
critical
importance
to
me
as
the
police
chief
in
San
Bruno,
which
is
that
these
are
additional
eyes
and
ears
on
the
street
for
other
criminal
activity.
Very
very
important,
really,
as
I've
discussed
many
times,
policing
flat
out,
is
a
partnership
between
the
community
and
the
police
department.
We
cannot
be
omnipresent.
We
cannot
witness
all
crime.
O
We
cannot,
unfortunately,
be
there
to
thwart
all
crime,
but
the
more
people
we
have
out
there
operating
as
eyes
and
ears
who
willingly
report
things
to
the
police
department
when
they
see
them
and
can
function
as
good,
Witnesses,
the
more
effective
we
are
as
a
department.
This
will
deploy
another
two
to
four
peos
each
day
that
are
well
trained
to
report
properly
to
the
police
when
they
see
activity
that
they
should
not
take
action
on
and
in
addition,
I
like
the
fact
I
think
Laz
takes
a
very
service
oriented
approach.
O
They're
focused
on
providing
brochures
like
we've
done
public
education
campaigns.
We've
queued
up
new
enforcement
here,
like
the
sidewalk,
the
blocked
sidewalk
enforcement,
they're,
very
good
about
getting
out
with
that
public
Outreach.
They
will
participate
in
public
meetings
and
provide
this
sort
of
all-inclusive
parking
enforcement
approach.
O
Briefly,
an
update
on
phase
two,
mostly
because
it
becomes
critically
important
to
the
next
section,
which
is
the
fiscal
sort
of
analysis
of
this
project.
A
staff
is
still
completing
work
for
the
second
phase
of
this
project,
which
is
establishing
metered
parking
downtown.
We
will
certainly
bring
specific
recommendations
on
phase
two
to
Council
in
a
separate
report
when
ready
and
largely
based
upon
your
direction
in
terms
of
timing.
O
As
we
finish
up
tonight,
the
second
phase
will
include,
but
not
be
limited
to
creating
and
adopting
a
city
ordinance
that
will
be
necessary
to
authorize
metered
parking
and
its
enforcement
in
the
area
and
and
the
fine
amounts
in
the
areas
where
we
decide
to
put
meters.
It
will
include
installing
approximately
84
T2
Cosmo
pay
stations,
kiosks
for
approximately
839
metered
spaces.
O
It
will
include
deploying
a
cloud-based
meter
and
permit
monitoring
system
developing
a
branded,
wayfinding
and
other
signage
design
solution
to
ensure
that
we
can
direct
people
to
the
most
available
parking
and
to
ensure
that
we
can
enforce
permanent
park
or
I'm
sorry
metered
parking,
because
we
have
at
least
provided
appropriate
signage
that
you
must
pay
in
order
to
Park,
which
is
very
important.
It
will
include
removing
current
timed
parking
signage
and
installing
compliant
signage,
installing
branded
wayfinding
signage
all
over
downtown
and
has
an
estimated
implementation
time
of
six
to
nine
months
from
contract
date.
O
So
just
to
bear
in
mind
that
from
the
day
we
decide
to
sort
of
pull
the
veritable
trigger
on
metered
parking,
downtown
and
sign
a
contract
with
a
vendor.
I
think
we're
still
looking
at
a
minimum
of
six
to
nine
months
for
installation
staff
has
worked
very
hard
to
identify
a
vendor
that
has
relatively
minimal
installation
requirements.
They
really
vary
a
great
deal
specifically
in
an
effort
to
create
a
shorter
turnaround
time
to
get
meters
installed
when
Council
makes
a
decision
about
Direction
in
that
regard.
O
Yeah,
so
also
the
report
tonight
requests
or
suggests
recommends
establishing
a
parking
fund.
The
reason
for
this
is
that
we
identify
it
as
a
critical
component
to
both
phase
one
and
phase
two.
First,
it
will
enable
the
city
to
fund
the
initial
costs
of
entering
into
this
contract
with
Laz
in
phase
one,
which
is
obviously
important.
O
But
it
does
not
compel
either
party
to
actually
agree
to
the
terms
it
is
just
to
meet
and
make
sure
that
these
items
are
discussed
prior
to
moving
forward
with
them.
I
will
tell
you
that
I
have
met
directly
with
the
San
Bruno
Police
Association
president
Tony
Perkins
I
shared
all
the
details
of
this
proposal
with
him.
He
then
took
the
details
back
to
the
membership,
which
includes
community
service
officers.
Obviously
the
group
most
impacted
by
this
decision
and
the
San
Bruno
Police
Association
adamantly
supports
this
proposal.
O
I
think
that
is
largely
because
it
does
not
involve
the
elimination
of
any
staff
positions
and,
in
fact,
we'll
afford
more
time
for
csos
to
support
the
critical
activities
of
police
officers
and
therefore
it
is
endorsed
currently
by
The
Police
Association
I
do
know
that
the
association
president
communicated
this
to
teamsters
and
that
there
will
eventually
be
a
communication
that
qualifies
as
meet
and
confer
between
the
city
and
Teamsters
that
has
not
yet
occurred.
But
human
resources
is
committed
to
completing
that
process.
O
So
the
first
question
right
is
what
can
offset
some
of
these
expenses
in
the
first
thought.
Is
Citation
revenues
can
I
think
that
it's
important
to
note
that
over
the
past
five
years,
the
the
police
department
has
averaged
a
little
under
55
000
per
month
in
citation
revenues.
So
when
you
look
back
at
the
previous
slide
and
you
see
what
the
projected
monthly
costs
are
from
Laz
and
you
look
at
55
000
of
Revenue,
it
looks
like
this
is
relatively
cost
neutral
right
out
of
the
gate.
O
Of
course,
it
is
impossible
to
predict
exact
revenues
period.
What
I'm
trying
to
do
this
evening
is
to
present
to
you
what
we
think
are
some
reasonable
proposals
or
some
reasonable
estimates,
so
that
you
can
make,
as
educated
as
a
decision
of
a
decision
about
this
matter
as
possible.
So
this
chart
provides
a
little
bit
of
a
conservative
but
a
reasonable
projection
of
increased
citation,
Revenue
expectations
against
the
estimated
monthly
cost
of
the
program
phase.
O
One
of
the
program,
I
should
say
over
the
five-year
contract
term,
and
what
you
see
here
at
the
far
right
is
that
in
the
first
year
we
expect
a
net
positive
again
because
there's
a
big
spike
in
increased
revenues
due
to
the
spike
in
enforcement
and
as
we
drop
from
that
big
increase
here,
one
to
this
40
to
50
percent
increase
in
years.
Two
through
five,
we
see
that
revenues
decrease,
but
the
costs
continue,
and
so
we
see
that
a
net
negative
or
a
cost
to
the
city
to
maintain
this
program
again.
O
O
So
this
next
slide
will
demonstrate
that
the
average
cost
each
year
to
the
city,
if
there's
no
additional
Revenue
sources.
Beyond
what's
projected
here-
is
about
twenty
two
thousand
dollars,
given
the
current
enforcement
levels
again,
I
do
believe
that
these
projections
are
notably
low.
But
again
we
are
attempting
to
be
relatively
conservative
coming
into
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
with
a
very
low
level
of
enforcement,
and
immediately
ratcheting
up
to
city-wide
parking
enforcement
for
a
variety
of
violations
and
restarting
Time
parking
enforcement
on
day.
O
One
should
produce
very
substantial
increases
in
citation
Revenue
I
think
it's
important,
however,
to
look
at
the
program
as
a
whole,
because,
ultimately,
as
Council
you'll
be
tasked
with
with
the
entire
program
meaning
phase,
one
of
enhanced
enforcement
in
phase
two
of
installing
meters
and
when
both
phases
are
complete,
staff
expects
substantial
net
positive
revenues
for
the
city.
There
will
be
an
initial
Capital
Improvement
expense
to
install
the
meters,
of
course,
which
we
currently
estimated
about
one
million
dollars
parking
meters
are
expected
to
generate
substantial
revenue
for
the
city.
O
A
survey
of
other
cities
shows
between
225
dollars
per
month
and
309
dollars
per
month
per
metered
space.
Again
there
are
839
proposed
metered
spaces
within
the
area
that
we're
currently
looking
at,
which
should
provide
between
188
000
and
change
and
259
000
in
change
of
Revenue
per
month
from
the
meters
that's
between
2.6
million
and
3.1
million
annually.
O
Now
again,
these
projections
are
based
on
survey
averages
only,
and
it
really
is
unknown
at
this
point
in
time.
How
they'll
compare
to
what
will
actually
happen
in
San
Bruno,
there
are
a
number
of
moving
Parts
still
that
will
come
before
Council,
like
the
rates
that
we
choose
to
charge
for
the
different
metering
areas
and
all
of
those
circumstances
will
have
an
effect
on
what
these
revenues
are
and
we'll
set
attempt
to
set
some
context
here.
O
So
the
annual
fiscal
impact
of
this
program,
using
the
meeting
of
the
estimated
meter
Revenue
range
from
the
previous
slide,
would
be
about
2.6
million
positive
for
the
city
per
year
again
in
year.
One
here
we're
estimating
zero
metering
Revenue
because
it
will
take
probably
at
least
that
year
to
get
the
meters
installed.
So
when
you
look
at
this
chart,
you
see
no
meter
Revenue
in
year,
one,
but
still
a
net
fiscal
impact
positive
due
to
the
spike
in
enforcement
and
in
the
subsequent
years.
O
Of
course,
the
million
dollar
question,
or
maybe
several
million
dollar
question
here-
is
well
what,
if
the
meter
revenues
in
San
Bruno
are
less
than
those
surveyed
estimates
which
certainly
is
possible.
So
what
I've
done
with
this
particular
slide
is
said.
How
much
less
do
we
think
we
might
be
50
percent
less
in
revenues
than
what
the
surveyed
Seven
Cities
were?
O
In
which
case
you
can
see
the
numbers
here
in
terms
of
the
net
fiscal
gains
which
I
only
included
for
years,
two
through
five,
because
again
we're
projecting
no
Revenue
in
year,
one
and
you're
still
looking
at
right
around
a
million
dollars
of
positive
revenue
for
the
city
per
year.
When
phase
one
and
phase
two
are
both
implemented
in
this
program,
so
it
will
enable
us
to
significantly
enhance
parking
enforcement,
hopefully
resolve
a
number
of
the
parking
issues
in
that
area
and
still
create
a
new
Revenue
stream
for
the
city
going
even
further.
O
An
additional
appropriation
will
be
required
to
do
so.
I
think
that's
part
of
a
larger
discussion
that
was
alluded
to
earlier
this
evening
regarding
some
of
the
spending
of
development
revenues,
and
when
this
appropriation
is
made,
we
will
be
ready
to
begin
phase.
One
is
being
recommended
prior
to
phase
two
again,
based
largely
upon
council's
prior
recommendations,
public
sentiment
and
the
desire
to
try
and
address
the
mounting
parking
enforcement
problem
as
quickly
and
as
effectively
as
possible.
O
So
moving
forward
with
phase
two.
What
does
it
look
like
about
again
about
a
839
spaces
that
includes
all
of
the
current
timed
parking
restricted
zones
in
the
downtown
Corridor
and
all
of
the
public
parking
lots,
as
well
as
the
city
hall
lot.
One
stretch
that
often
gets
overlooked
that
is
Time
parking
restricted
is
the
stretch
of
El
Camino
from
Crystal
Springs,
all
the
way
down
to
Keynes.
This
will
include
that
stretch
and
the
metering
would
be
pay
by
plate,
not
by
space.
O
There
will
be
approximately
82
kiosks
needed
in
order
to
meet
industry
standards
for
not
having
to
walk
too
far
from
your
parking
space.
In
order
to
pay
the
city
would
own
these
kiosks.
The
expected
lifespan
of
those
kiosks
is
10
to
15
years.
The
contract
would
include
spare
parts
and
service
from
the
vendor.
O
O
Council
will
also
have
to
approve
a
new
city
ordinance
just
to
authorize
the
metering
and
to
authorize
enforcement
of
new
sections
based
upon
metering,
which
again
staff
is
prepared
to
bring
before
you
funding
of
the
startup
parking
fund.
So
I
alluded
to
earlier
the
desire
to
create
a
parking
fund
to
track
not
only
the
expenditures
but
the
revenues
that
come
in
through
these
per
this
program.
How
are
we
going
to
fund
it?
Well,
there
is
an
existing
CIP,
a
capital
Improvement
project
for
the
Downtown
parking
program.
O
A
city
council
has
previously
allocated
331
thousand
dollars
to
that
fund.
Those
funds
were
from
a
Centrum
settlement
settlement,
I'm,
sorry,
which
I
believe
pertained
to
some
impacts
created
by
the
FedEx
site.
That
is
actually
in
South
San
Francisco
on
San
Mateo
Avenue,
but
which
impacts
San,
Bruno,
obviously,
use
of
those
funds,
I'm
told
from
our
finance
director
are
unrestricted,
so
we
are
able
to
use
them
for,
however,
Council
sees
fit.
A
staff
is
recommending
the
transfer
of
that
331
thousand
dollars
in
the
CIP
into
the
newly
established
parking
fund.
O
This
is
an
effort
to
cover
the
expenses
expected
in
fiscal
year.
2223
associated
with
possibly
executing
his
contract
with
Laz
increased
citation
revenues
are
likely
to
offset
the
entirety
of
this
expense
in
year,
one
as
I've
previously
Illustrated,
but
those
funds
are
deposited
not
in
real
time
right.
O
We
realize
those
over
time,
as
we
continue
to
issue
citations
and
folks
continue
to
pay
those
citation
fees,
and
so
it's
important
to
fund
an
account
that
ensures
that
we
are
viable
for
at
least
the
first
year
of
this
contract
with
Laz
staff
will
recommend
further
Appropriations
in
fiscal
years
in
the
future,
certainly
in
23-24,
and
hopefully
those
will
be
based
on
real
numbers
at
that
point
in
time,
we'll
actually
be
able
to
look
at
the
increased
citation
revenues.
We'll
have
a
proposal
before
you
regarding
the
meters.
O
So
in
closing
summary,
the
Downtown
parking
study
called
for
enhanced
parking
enforcement
in
meters
city
council
prioritized
these
items
as
strategic
initiatives.
Council
has
requested
that
staff
develop
a
plan
to
improve
parking
enforcement
in
the
immediate
based
on
the
substantial
need
in
the
immediate.
The
PD
has
developed
a
two-phased
approach
in
response
to
a
desire
for
that
better
enforcement,
an
existing
CSO
Staffing
levels
cannot
provide
the
desired
level
of
enforcement,
so
expanding
CSO
Staffing
is
also
not
a
particularly
viable
solution,
because
it's
costly
and
as
I
described
earlier,
it
is
difficult.
O
A
contract
partnership
with
Laz
will
provide
the
immediate
enhancement
that
is
desired,
as
well
as
critical
capabilities
for
meter
enforcement
and
enforcement
of
permit
parking
programs
in
the
future.
There
is
a
funding
source
available
to
start
this
program.
Additional
funding
will
be
required
for
phase
two,
the
installation
of
meters
phase
two
revenues
will
be
critical
to
the
long-term
fiscal
viability
of
this
plan.
O
So
the
recommendation
of
staff.
Is
it
okay
for
me
to
say,
as
read
by
the
city,
clerk
I'm,
pretty
sure
I'll
stumble
all
over
this
one,
but
as
read
by
the
city
clerk
as
the
action
in
terms
of
Alternatives?
Certainly
Council
can
take
no
action
and
we
can
pause
phase
one
of
this
project
until
the
implementation
of
meters
in
phase
two.
You
can
also
direct
us
not
to
execute
a
contract
with
Laz
and
instead
to
identify
an
alternative
vendor
or
to
consider
a
staffing
plan
to
bring
this
in-house.
I
O
I
Got
it
okay,
thank
you.
So,
regarding
way
finding
signage,
it
was
it's.
It's
obvious
that
this
is
a
critical
part
of
the
meter
program,
but
considering
that
that's
going
to
come
at
a
later
stage,
that's
likely
more
than
a
year
away,
given
that
once
we
even
approve
stage
two,
there
would
be
a
six
to
nine
month,
lead
time
for
the
meters.
Is
it
possible
for
us
to
do
a
much,
simpler
way,
finding
sign
project
just
to
increase
the
invisible
the
visibility
of
our
existing
Lots?
I
But
there
are
existing
signs,
but
they're,
really
not
sufficient
and
I
know
that
that
the
you
know
the
the
permanent
signs
that
we
will
get
at
the
at
the
end
of
the
project
of
phase
two
would
be
more
elaborate
because
they're
going
to
have
to
have
all
the
the
meter
information
on
them,
but
just
some
simple
parking
and
a
parking
signs
with
arrows
in
better
places
than
we
have
them
today
and
replace
Replacements
of
other
ones.
That
are
probably
missing.
K
Sure
I'll
take
that
council
member
Hamilton,
your
city
manager.
Yes,
so
the
parking
enforcement
portion
of
this
project
is
being
operated
by
the
police
department
installing
and
designing,
and
managing
wayfinding
is
being
handled
out
of
our
public
works
department.
So
I
can't
provide
an
answer
to
you
tonight
on
that
question
it
it
definitely
deals
with
resource
allocation
of
personnel
to
advance
that
project
and
so
I
understand
the
question.
Unfortunately,
I
I
I
don't
want
to
say
offhand
that
we
can
certainly
advance
that
at
this
point.
I
Okay,
just
before
I
go
to
my
third
question,
the
camera
is
off
for
the
for
the
room,
at
least
at
least
for
me.
So
just
I
can
hear
everybody
just
fine,
but
there's
no
I'm,
not
seeing
any
of
you
and
then
so.
My
last
question
is
understanding
that
it
it's
going
to
take
time
to
execute
the
agreement
and
for
it
and
for
last
to
be
ready
to
provide
services
for
San
Bruno,
If
This
Were,
to
be
approved
tonight.
What
isn't
a?
O
Also,
a
good
question:
I
think
that
the
benefit
one
of
the
benefits
of
working
with
Laz
is
that
they
have
a
presence
in
the
area
already
we've.
They
have
alluded
to
being
able
to
staff
almost
immediately
at
least
two
of
the
four
positions
from
there.
It
will
probably
be
phased
in
to
a
large
degree,
so
the
enforcement
will
sort
of
ramp
up
over
time.
O
But
the
turnaround
times
they're
suggesting
to
us
are
more
in
that
90-day
timeline,
not
in
you
know
years,
and
that
is
what's
been
experienced
in
both
San
Mateo
and
Palo
Alto,
that
the
ramp
up
was
quicker
than
they
expected.
It
will
probably
take
a
little
bit
longer
for
some
of
the
infrastructure
pieces
like
for
them
to
get
an
office
space
in
San
Bruno
and
to
queue
up
some
of
those
moving
Parts,
but
again,
because
the
Integrations
are
already
in
place
for
the
systems
we're
using
at
the
PD.
O
I
A
F
O
K
Absolutely
council,
member
Salazar,
so
the
police
department's
budget
for
22-23.
on
a
go
forward
basis
with
phase
two
that
allows
for
better
tracking
now
at
a
budgetary
time,
given
that
the
program
is
projected
to
be
Cash
Plus.
If
there
is
net
positive
Revenue
in
there
Council
would
allocate
Police
Department
uses
would
be
one
of
the
allocations
out
of
the
parking
fund
each
year,
but
there
would
be
netpop
funds,
so
we
can
have
a
better
accounting.
O
F
And
again,
those
are
the
kind
of
assumptions
that
I
was
concerned
about
when
we
saw
those
meters
occupied
for
about
nine
hours
a
day
every
day
of
the
of
us
that
that
low
water
mark,
so
that
we
know
where
we
might
end
up
and
I
noticed
that
in
their
in
The
Proposal
from
Laz,
they
included
equipment
cost
for
the
license
plate.
Readers,
so
I'm
wondering
is
that
a
cost
that
we
would
incur
or
do
they
over.
O
F
H
H
G
K
Back
then,
we
we
would
with
your
authorization.
There
are
still
some
contract
terms
that
need
to
be
signed,
and
we
would
negotiate
that
that
contract
and
with
approval
from
the
city
manager,
we
can
certainly
bring
that
contract
back,
but
what
the
T,
what
the
city
council
typically
does
with
your
contracts?
Is
you
authorize
the
city
manager
to
to.
O
O
O
G
This
process
and
while
I
have
been
following
San
Mateo's,
it's
been
the
newspaper
that
I
think
when
they
first
initiated
this
and
then
again-
and
you
know
up
to
five
years,
for
example
City.
We
just
did
this
with
Recology,
where
there
was
a
four
to
one
vote
for
a
position
that
also
had
mentioned
an
entire
program
at
this
point.
That
also
has
not
really
begun
the
mean
Comfort
process.
If
I'm
reading
between
the
lines
and
the
staff
are
being
that
there
hasn't
been
an
actual
meet
and
confer
yet
correct.
O
I
think,
maybe
being
said,
the
the
approval
by
the
membership
body
has
been
conveyed
to
teamsters
and
they
have
reconved
that
they're
not
going
to
contest
based
upon
the
wishes
of
that
particular
bargain
unit.
That
says,
we
want
to
move
forward
with
this
authorization
pending
completion
of
that
meet
and
confer
process
or
enter
into
the
contract
without
concluding
that
meet
and
confer
process
was.
G
The
union
invited
to
tonight's
meeting
and
I
just
want
a
clarification.
There
was
a
so
I
would
just
go
back
to
a
hesitation,
I
think,
once
again,
I'm
wondering
you
and
established
you
I,
wouldn't
ask
for
the
pret
Teamster
Partners,
especially
considering
the
fact
that
we
just
approved
a
20-year
contract
really
with
no
mean
confer
process.
G
O
G
I'm
not
sure
if
any
other
council
members
have
questions,
but
I
would
request
a
continuance
of
the
item
to
that's.
Probably.
Obviously,
support
would
be
nice
to
know
because
they
do
represent
our
employees
here
in
San
Bruno,
but
I
I
don't
want
to
walk
all
over
the
relationships
and
the
Partnerships
that
have
taken
a
long
time
to
grow.
Thank
you.
A
K
Thank
you,
mayor
Medina,
a
meet
and
agree
typically
will
will
require
the
Union
on
a
whole
host
of
operational
matters
that
never
come
before
various
actions
that
will
require
a
meeting
confer
and
before
staff.
It's
a
little
a
step
further
in
that
meet
and
confer
which
is
already
required
per
the
mou,
and
so
I
do
think
that
it's
important
just.
K
P
P
The
second
thing
is
who's
going
to
retain
or
will
the
San
Bruno
Police
Department
retain
the
authority
to
tow
cars,
or
will
this
contract
to
be
able
to
do
that
if
they
violate
the
law?
Birth
of
cars
are
parked
in
violational
law
and
then
I
may
have
missed
this.
But
what
is
the
difference
between
a
kiosk
and
the
meter
and
who
is
responsible
for
the
maintenance
and
operation
of
the
meters?
A
B
R
R
My
second
question
is:
what's
the
retention
in
regards
to
the
data
that
they
are
collecting
from
the
alpr
readers?
Is
that
information
that
the
city
keeps
that
last
keeps
or
is
that
deleted
after
a
short
period
of
time
may
also?
My
third
question
is
what
happens
to
lies
if
they
don't
have
proper
minimum
Staffing
for
the
day
is
there?
Is
there
Financial
repercussions
for
them,
because
we
are
losing
Revenue
due
to
ticketing
throughout
the
metered
parking
areas?
R
What
is
their
form
of
communication
with
the
police
department
if
they
have
issues
dealing
with
people
while
they
are
trying
to
ticket?
Are
they
having
to
call
into
9-1-1
or
do
they
have
radio
communication
through
our
Police
Department?
So
we
can
get
help
for
them
in
a
quick
amount
of
time?
That's
all.
Thank
you.
A
O
Yeah
but
I
might
have
to
have
you
walk
me
back
through
some
of
them.
There
were
quite
a
few.
The
last
speaker,
first
I,
can
speak
to
some
of
the
alpr
questions,
so
there
was
a
question
from
Mr,
wapinski
I,
think
about
disabled
placards
and
plates,
so
the
alpr
technology
can
determine
if
there's
a
disabled
designation
on
a
license
plate.
It
obviously
can't
and
doesn't
read
for
placards
and
windows.
It's
not
typically
used
for
enforcement
of
handicap
parking.
O
There
is
still
a
mechanism
here
where
there's
a
human
being
that
issues
a
citation.
So
if
the
concern
here
is
that
a
LAZ
Parking
Enforcement
officer
might
drive
by
a
vehicle
that
is
parked
in
a
handicap
stall
and
that
the
License
Plate
Reader
made
a
handicapped
spot
now,
where
it
can
come
into
play,
is
with
the
handicap
placard
in
the
state
of
California,
you
can
essentially
park
anywhere,
except
where
parking
is
prohibited,
all
record.
So
that's
where
the
human
element
comes
in
the
the
peo
has
to
get
out
and
issue
the
citation.
O
If
they
see
a
placard,
they
know
not
to
issue
a
site
license
plates.
It
is
a
technology
that
essentially
takes
up
King
enforcement.
It's
simply
reading
that
plate
once
as
it
goes
by
and
then
reading
it
each
time
the
off
station,
it's
not
providing
any
kind
of
records,
and
no
such
data
has
ever
run
an
association
with
alpr.
Nor
is
it
retained
well
by
the
police
department
and
then
automatically
perched
so.
O
To
make
sure
that
everything's
in
order
with
that
toe,
so
those
will
start.
However,
double
parking
is
a
real
problem
downtown,
as
we
all
know,
a
separate
section.
Besides
the
parking
violation,
and
we
would
tend
to
lean
towards
the
ladder,
because
it's
a
better
enforcement
mechanism
to
gain
or
a
parking
enforcement
officer
would
need
to
be
issued
by
a
police
officer,
coupled
with
the
fact
that
those
interactions
are
often
going
to
involve
actually
contacting
a
person.
O
G
O
A
I
So
yeah
I
just
have
a
comment.
I'm
I'm
very,
very
pleased
to
see
this
come
back
before
us
and
it
reinforces
my
the
decision
to
focus
first
on
enhanced
enforcement
first,
given
that
a
large
percentage
of
the
problems
that
we're
seeing
downtown
can
be
addressed
with
enforcement,
including
double
parking,
including
you
know,
especially
by
the
the
delivery
service
drivers
and
and
also
this
with
cars
being
parked
on
San
Mateo
Avenue
all
day
or
even
several
days.
I
I
G
K
A
city
manager
sure
I
understand
that
there's
a
desire
to
continue
the
item
to
the
next
regularly
skip
I,
don't
know
that
the
meeting
process
could
actually
occur
and
be
concluded
by
December
13th,
there's
a
number
of
probably
certain,
but
instead
just
direct
staff
to
come
back
after
the
meet
and
confer
process.
If
that's
your
design.
M
F
G
F
A
I
The
only
thing
I've
got
is
just
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
setting
all
the
extra
stuff
up
for
me
on
Zoom
tonight.
I
appreciate
it
I
would
have
rather
have
been,
if
they're
in
person
than
being
here,
hitting
mute
while
reaching
for
my
tissues.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
to
staff
for
supporting
me
being
able
to
attend
remotely.
Thank
you.
G
G
And
then,
just
that,
as
a
city,
we
can
really
do
a
better
job
in
streamlining.
Our
business
license
issuance
process,
I'm,
hearing
significant
complaints
about
the
delays
and
hold
events
downtown
like
flea
markets,
where
surrounding
small
businesses
will
have
traffic
that
they
may
not
have
on
a
regular
range
I
hope
we
look
at
the
broader
picture,
not
just
encouraging
people
to
shop
downtown.
Thank
you.