►
Description
Agendas:
Special Meeting (6pm) https://www.sanbruno.ca.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_10112022-1687
Regular Meeting (7pm) https://www.sanbruno.ca.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_10112022-1688
Hybrid Meeting (In-Person/Zoom)
San Bruno Senior Center
Webinar or Meeting ID: 820 2383 6228
Webinar or Meeting Password: 582836
Zoom Phone Line: 16465588656 (s
B
Investigation
and
our
action,
where
appropriate,
the
brown
act
prohibits
the
council
from
discussing
on
or
acting
upon
any
manner
down
agenda
is
pursuant
to
state
law.
Is
there
anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
I
see
one
hand
raised
I
will
bring
in
Mary
Beth
I
apologize
if
I
mispronounce
your
name
Bikowski.
B
B
Since
2019
we've
met
with
more
than
25
000
people
in
40
counties
and
held
60
events
to
specifically
hear
concerns
around
both
the
availability
and
affordability
of
homeowners
insurance
in
January
of
2022,
the
insurance
commissioner
Ricardo
Lara,
and
the
state's
emergency
response
and
Readiness
agencies.
They
created
the
safer
from
wildfires
wildfires
framework.
So
it's
a
consistent
approach
to
reducing
the
risk
with
the
list
of
achievable
certifiable
and
effective
actions
to
help
make
existent
homes
and
businesses
safer.
This
ground-up
approach
for
Wildfire
resilience
has
three
layers
of
protection
at
CBI.
B
A
You
well
informed
of
the
actions
you
can
take
to
harden
your
homes
and
Community.
You
can
see
our
entire
list
of
specific
actions
on
our
website
insurance.ca.gov,
but
I'm
sure
you
know
them
and
I
don't
need
to
go
into
them
here.
So
by
making
homes
and
businesses
safer,
we
can
bring
the
risks
down
and
bring
the
costs
down
as
well.
The
commissioner's
actions
are
focused
on
safety
and
transparency.
His
new
regulations
do
this
in
three
ways:
he
is
requiring
the
insurance
companies
to
incorporate
the
framework
into
their
pricing.
So
now
insurance
companies.
D
Will
have
to
submit
new
rate
filings
that
recognize
safety.
Consumers
will
receive
their
property's
Wildfire
risk
for
and
the
reasons
for
it.
In
the
past,
this
information
was
considered,
proprietary
and
CDI
will
have
oversight,
and,
thirdly,
consumers
will
be
able
to
appeal
their
risk
determination
when
they
have
done
the
work,
so
public
input
was
critical
to
ensure
we
were
on
the
right
track.
We
held
a
hearing
on
April
13th
that
accepted
public
comments.
D
We
evaluated
all
of
the
input
and
submitted
the
new
regulations
to
the
office
of
administrative
law,
and
we
expect
to
have
these
regulations
back
any
day
now,
and
the
new
rate
filings
by
early
2023
I
also
want
to
remind
you
that
Senator
Josh
Becker
is
hosting
a
fire
and
flood
insurance
Town
Hall
tomorrow
at
4
30.
joining
him
will
be
the
insurance
commissioner
and
experts
from
FEMA
and
the
fire
safe
Council.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
D
If
any
of
your
constituents
need
any
help
of
any
problems
or
Insurance
questions,
they
can
go
to
insurance.ca.gov
or
call
our
hotline
at
800-927-4357,
and
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Next
speaker,
please,
I.
Do
not
see.
C
Have
worked
out
actually
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone
on
Zoom
can
see
the
video
image
from
this
room.
I'm
not
seeing
that,
and
if
we
need
to
take
a
five
minute
break
I
think
we
should
take
a
five
minute
break
to
work
out
the
technical
issues
before
starting
the
presentation.
E
E
E
C
C
Which
we're
on
conduct
of
business
on
item
sure
thank
you,
mayor
Medina,
members
of
the
city,
council
and
members
of
the
public.
My
name
is
Javon
Grogan
and
I
will
be
presenting
a
brief,
PowerPoint
and
supporting
the
city
council
through
a
discussion
tonight
on
the
interview
and
appointment
process
for
your
various
advisory
commissions,
boards
and
committees.
F
Presentation
will
have
six
parts.
One
will
provide
a
little
background.
We
will
discuss
the
cbcs
as
we
commonly
refer
to
them,
your
commission,
boards
and
committees.
We
will
talk
about
the
appointment
of
members.
We
will
go
through
a
summary
of
the
current
terms
and
the
applications
that
you
have
on
file
and.
G
C
You,
the
governing
body
for
the
city
of
San,
Bruno,.
E
Have
a
number
of
advisory
commissions,
boards
and
committees?
You
have
actually
a
total
of
10
of
them
with
a
total
of
69
volunteers
and
and
we'll
see
that
in
a
little
bit,
the
the
bodies
range
from
nine
to
seven
to
five
members.
They
are
standing
bodies
which
are
distinguished
from
ad
hoc,
meaning
that
they
have
a
regular
meeting
schedule
and
they
advise
you,
as
the
governing
body.
Members
typically
serve
four-year
terms,
I,
say
typically,
because
there
is
one
committee
that
does
not
have
a
four-year
term
because
they
are.
E
It
is
our
rack
advisory
committee
set
up
for
the
construction.
F
Of
the
rack
and
to
advise
on
that
process
at
present,
there
are
total
number
of
30
open
seats
as
of
October
31st.
This
includes
both
positions
that
are
currently
vacant.
E
So,
as
the
city
council
knows,
staff
conducted
a
robust
recruitment
process
for
the
advisory
bodies
and
the
10
are
listed
in
detail.
F
G
Emergency
preparedness
committee,
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
that
has
eight
Members
Plus
One
youth
appointee
that
youth
appointee
does
not
have
a
four-year
term
when
they're
appointed
they
serve
until
they
graduate
high
school.
So
hopefully
it
is
a
maximum
of
four,
but
depending
on
when
they're
they're
appointed,
it
could
be
less
than
that
Planning
Commission,
seven
members,
your
Recreation
and
Aquatic
Center
advisory
committee,
eight
members,
citizens,
Advisory
Board,
seven
and
traffic
and
safety
parking
committee,
five.
G
C
Have
the
full
board
turning
over
recruitment
to
fill
the
seeps
occurs?
Your
city
clerk's
office
will
conduct
a
recruitment
process.
Council
will
recall
the
last
time
you
asked
for
a
more
robust
recruitment
process
and
we
certainly
conducted
that
and
had
more
applications
here
tonight
than
you've
had
in
Prior
years
likely
due
to
the
success
of
that
route,
that
recruitment
process
and
I
know
your
own
individual
Outreach
to
members
in
the
community.
F
C
I
So,
where
are.
C
We
so
you
have
a
total
of
30
seats
on
eight
commission
boards
and
commissions
that
will
be
open
at
at
the
end
of
this
month.
That
breaks
down
in
as
follows:
18
members
have
submitted
an
application
for
reappointment.
Two
current
members
have
asked
not
to
be
reappointed.
C
Four
members
are
actually
in
the
process
of
being
asked
and
we
are
seeking
their
desire,
and
then
you
have
six
positions
that
are
vacant.
In
addition,
you
have
19
new
applicants
and
11
applications
on
file,
and
so
for
those
30
seats.
You
have
a
number
of
individuals
to
choose
from
on
many
bodies.
Sometimes
there
are
only
members
that
have
served
asking
to
be
reappointed,
but
oftentimes.
You
have
both
new
applications
on
file
or
you
have
new
applicants
and
applications
on
file.
I
Two
and
I
would
just
step
through
each
body.
You
have
your
bicycle
and
pedestrian
advisory
committee.
Again,
a
body
of
seven
corn
being
four.
You
have
three
members
that
are
expiring,
plus
one
vacant
position,
so
that
is
a
total
of
four
seats
on
that
board
that
are
open
and
you
have
two
members
wishing
to
continue
service.
You
have
six
new
applications
and
three
on
file:
your
citizens,
crime
prevention
committee.
You
have
the
exact
same
number
of
members
for
Quorum,
three
expiring,
plus
one
vacant.
I
So
that's
the
total
number
of
four
seats
open
on
that
body
and
three
members
continuing
to
serve
and
one
new
applicant
citizen,
Revenue
committee,
seven
people
on
the
board
four
Quorum
for
expiring
for
open
seats.
That
is
the
body
where
staff
is
currently
querying
the
members
to
determine
their
desire
to
be
reappointed,
and
you
have
one
new
application
and
one
on
file
for
your
culture
and
arts
committee.
You
have
seven
seats,
four
Quorum,
four
expiring.
I
That
includes
two
positions
that
are
vacant
and
so
in
the
detailed
table
we
provided
you
with
the
year
of
expiration,
and
so
sometimes
the
expiring
seat
may
be
vacant
or
sometimes
a
seat
that
may
expire
in
24.
2024
is
vacant.
So
a
total
of
four
sweeps
on
that
body.
Two
continuing
and
that's
a
really
good
example
of
you,
some
of
your
bodies.
I
You
have
more
than
a
quorum
of
the
seeps
that
will
be
vacant
as
of
October
31st,
and
so
it's
important
that
the
city
council
consider
that
and
reappoint
members
in
an
expeditious
fashion,
so
that
you,
you
maintain
Quorum
on
those
bodies,
emergency
preparedness
committee,
five
total
three
of
the
Quorum.
You
have
two
expiring
and
both
mem
both
of
the
two
current
members
are
asking
to
be
reappointed.
You
also
have
one
new
application:
Park
and
Recreation
Commission,
a
total
of
nine
five
is
a
quorum.
I
You
have
four
expiring,
plus
one
vacant,
so
that's
a
total
of
five
open
sleeps,
and
so
you,
you
also
have
four
members
that
are
currently
serving
asking
to
be
reappointed
for
that
body.
I
You
do
have
a
total
of
four
applications
on
pending
three
new
one
on
file
for
your
Planning
Commission,
as
we
all
know,
a
very
important
body
of
a
city,
seven
members
on
that
body,
four
Quorum
for
expiring
for
open,
only
three
asking
to
be
reappointed,
but
you
do
have
one
new
application
and
three
on
file
for
your
Recreation
and
Aquatic
Center
advisory
committee.
This
one
is
an
easy
one.
You
have
eight
members
on
that
board.
A
quorum
is
five,
but
none
of
those
terms
are
expiring.
I
At
this
point,
and
as
you
know,
members
of
that
Bodywork
Point
appointed
for
the
two-year
construction
cycle,
then
you
have
your
senior
citizens,
Advisory
Board,
seven
members
on
that
board
a
quorum
is
four,
but
you
have
no
members
with
expiring
terms
in
22
and
then.
Lastly,
you
have
your
traffic
safety
and
parking
committee.
Five
members
on
that
body
three
is
a
quorum.
I
So
with
that
Council
consideration,
we
are
asking
for,
through
tonight's
conversation,
to
receive
Direction
on
the
interview
and
appointment
process
that
the
city
council
desires
there.
As
we've
noted
our
number
of
bodies
that
need
an
appointment
to
maintain
a
quorum,
and
you
have
30
vacancies
and
several
candidates
to
consider
for
many
of
the
positions,
and
so
we
outline
two
options
with
a
third
as
a
alternative
that
we
may
come
up
with
tonight.
I
And
let's
accomplish
that
by
the
end
of
this
month,
option
b
is
to
direct
staff
to
schedule
the
appointment
and
or
interviews
for
only
those
commission
boards
and
committees
that
will
lose
a
quorum
when
existing
member
terms
expire
in
October,
31st
and
then
direct
staff
to
schedule
all
other
interviews
and
appointments
after
the
seating
of
the
new
city
council
that
is
elected
on
November,
8,
2022
and
then
again
any
other
direction,
and
so
with
that.
That
concludes
our
presentation.
I
Certainly,
the
staff
report
provides
additional
detail
and
then
we
can
have
discussion
around
what
are
those
bodies
that
are
losing
Quorum?
Should
the
city
council
want
to
only
act
on
those
before
the
end
of
this
month?
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
city
manager,
for
your
report.
Are
there
any
members
in
on
Zoom
watching
that
you
can
see.
I
Yes,
mayor
bedidia
Medina,
there
are
a
few
members
of
the
public.
Okay.
Let
me
ask
you
this
time:
if
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
speak
on
this
topic,
that
they
just
heard
the
report
I'd
like
to
start
with
the
public,
so
at
least
that
they
can
be
heard
in
case
they
need
to
do
something
else.
There
are
no
remote
hands
raised
via
zoom
and
no
members
of
the
public.
Thank
you,
and
this
will
have
that
opportunity
to
come
to
council.
I
Foreign
council
member
Hamilton,
so
which
I
I
I
am
sorry
if
I
wasn't
following
closely
enough
which
which
of
the
bodies
will
lose
a
quorum
at
the
end
of
at
the
end
of
October
sure.
So
there
are
a
total
of
four
cultural
and
arts
committee
Park
and
Recreation
Planning
Commission
and
the
bicycle
and
pedestrian
committee.
Okay,
thank
you.
I
Councilmember
Medina,
thank
you.
Mr
Mayor
I
think
that
we
should
be
going
forward
with
the
first
recommendation
if
I
get,
that
right
is
to
to
I,
know
we're
all
busy,
but
I
think
it's
important
that
we
go
ahead
and
fill
these
seats
and
schedule.
The
interviews.
I
The
questions
or
comments
from
colleagues
vice
mayor
Mason,
thank
you
so
in
reading
the
packet
is
the
process
going
to
be
what's
in
the
draft
policies
and
procedures
that
is
up
to
the
city
council,
so
we
are
meeting
in
a
retreat
to
hopefully
finalize
your
draft
policies
and
procedures.
We
have
talked
about
Section
8,
a
number
of
times
and
I
do
believe.
That
was
one
of
the
sections
that
was
flagged,
that
there
was
more
or
less
agreement
on,
and
so,
if
the
city
council
desires
to
adjust
that
process,
staff
will
certainly
support
you.
C
J
I'm
comfortable
with
the
process
I
just
want
to
know
if
it's
going
to
be
applied
in
this
this
round.
Yeah.
Thank
you
that
is
staff's
intention
is
to
follow
your
your
draft
policies
and
procedures
for
this
round,
and
I
would
support
council
member
Medina
in
his
proposal
to
go
with
alternative
one
or
option
one.
J
Council
member
Salazar,
thank
you
just
given
the
number
of
openings.
J
C
I
I
I
would
definitely
be
in
favor
of
of
filling
the
ones
that
are
expiring
and
try
to
expedite
those
above
the
others.
But
it
does
seem
like
a
a
very
big
task
to
try
to
push
into
a
very
small
window
yeah.
I
It
is
a
total
of
48
people
if
you
include
the
18
people
that
are
requesting
to
be
reappointed,
the
19
new
applications
on
file,
the
19
new
applications
and
the
11
that
are
on
file,
and
so,
if
so
directed,
we
will
certainly
attempt
to
schedule.
All
48
I
do
think
that
that
will
be
a
a
heavy
lift.
Given
given
the
time
and
council's
schedules,
we
can
certainly
prioritize
the
four
bodies
that
will
have
expiring
terms.
J
Thank
you.
We
have
a
normal
process
as
far
as
when
we
have
a
vacancy
and
we
tried
to
streamline
that
instead
of
bringing
it
before
the
council
and
then
have
it
go
out.
So
have
we
been
advertising?
Has
this
been
an
ongoing
where
we
should
have
been
already
maybe
interviewing
for
some
of
the
vacancies
that
we
know
that
are
not
relevant
to
the
expiring
terms?
J
Yes,
so
there
has
been
a
ongoing
recruitment
process.
I
know
the
city
clerk's
office
has
been
recruiting
for
these
positions
for
quite
some
time.
Their
I.
Don't
have
it
in
front
of
me,
but
I
know.
A
number
of
the
new
applications
came
in
for
the
in
the
August
to
September
time
frame
that
we
did
a
robust
recruitment
cycle
and
I
know
provided
that
information
to
council
members
and
asked
council
members
to
you
know
encourage
people
to
apply,
but
certainly
you
do
have
a
a
number
of
expiring
positions.
J
If
I
I
do
not
believe
that
there
was.
J
J
C
Be
interviewed,
they
can
choose
if
they
wish
to,
and
then
they're
brought
before
the
body
that
was
then
what
I'm
hearing
now
is.
We
would
take
those
individuals.
They
would
need
to
know
that
they
should
want
to
interview,
because
in
the
past
there's
been
discussion
of
well,
they
didn't
show
up
whoever
they
are,
and
then
you
also
have
anybody.
Who's
currently
has
a
desire
to
serve
on
a
body
would
also
be
interviewed,
which
brings
the
number
to
the
total
that
you've
said.
C
So
it
is
changing
the
process
to
those
that
have
been
on
committee
commissions
or
boards
that
it
has
now
been
modified.
As
council
member
Salazar
said
it's
within
20
days
and
we're
trying
to
schedule
all
these
people
within
20
days
have
a
special
meeting
of
the
city
council
or
by
the
25th
regular
meeting
I.
Believe
it's
the
25th
to
have
a
meeting
to
make
appointments,
I
just
I'm
trying
to
look
at
the
logistics
of
that
and
then,
if
we're
doing
it
in
person,
it's
going
to
make
it
more.
C
C
That
was
very
clear,
that
you
wanted
to
interview
all
candidates
and
actually
break
from
your
prior
tradition
of
reappointing
existing
candidates
without
interviews,
and
so
that
process
you
know,
leads
us
to
a
little
bit
of
today,
where
you
have
a
total
of
18
candidates,
that
I
think
you're
right
would,
in
Prior
years
oftentimes
be
reappointed
without
an
interview
process.
C
But
then
there
are
more
vacancies
as
well,
and
so
you
have
30
seats
to
fill
this
year.
I
agree
that
the
timing
is
impacted,
which
is
why
staff
provided
the
alternative
to
a
point.
Members
of
the
bodies
that
will
have
that
will
lose
a
quorum
but
delay
the
others
and
I
do
see
that
the
priorities
should
be
given
to
those
that
are
not
going
to
have
the
Quorum,
because
we
have
a
deadline
that
we
we
need
to
meet
in
order
for
the
bodies
to
function.
C
So
to
me
that
needs
to
be
the
first
and
foremost
of
a
priority,
and
then
there
can
be
a
secondary
and
if
it
doesn't
meet
that
we
can
continue
that
after
but
councilmember
Hamilton.
Thank
you.
C
So
one
alternative
I
don't
see
is:
would
we
have
the
option
of
moving
moving
quickly
to
up
to
interview
and
appoint
for
those
boards
that
are
ex,
that
have
that
will
lose
a
quorum
at
the
end
of
October,
but
then
continue
and
do
the
rest
in
November,
because
the
other
option,
the
the
other
option
that
was
listed
here,
was:
if
we
don't
do
it,
then
then
we
have
to
wait
until
after
we
see
after.
K
So
I
think
that
would
make
the
most
sense,
because
you
know
I
I,
agree
that
trying
to
interview
that
many
people
in
the
next
three
weeks
is
is
difficult,
but
if
we
we
can
give
ourselves,
you
know
most
of
another
month,
there's
of
course,
there's
the
Thanksgiving
holiday
in
November,
but
I
think
we
should.
It
seems
reasonable
that
we
could.
We
could
do
them
all
in
October
and
November
with
obviously
prioritizing
the
ones
that
are
expiring
for
October.
K
That's
what
I
would
recommend
Mr
Mayor,
councilman,
Medina,
yeah
I,
think
that
makes
the
most
sense
that
we
do
the
ones
that
we
need
to
do
first
and
then
we
can
do
the
rest
later.
K
Any
other
comments
from
colleagues,
council,
member
Salazar,
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
you
know
I'm
not
in
favor
of
not
reappointing
sitting
committee
and
commission
members
that
have
gone
through
the
process
and
forcing
them
to
reinterview.
It's.
G
Causing
part
of
this
issue
where
we
now
have
this
huge
number
of
people
that
need
to
be
reappointed
where
we
have
people
that
have
been
through
the
process,
they've
been
vetted
and
they've
been
sitting
on
these
committees
and
Performing.
Well,
so
why
make
them
go
through
that
process
and
just
make
more
work
for
them
for
staff
and
for
ourselves.
G
Go
ahead,
I'm,
sorry,
councilmember,
Hamilton
speaking
as
someone
who's
on
two
committees
before
sitting
with
the
rest
of
you,
I
always
found
it
odd
that
I
could
just
be
reappointed
in
perpetuity
without
being
interviewed.
I
was
found
on
that
to
be
odd,
and
if
there
aren't
any,
if
there
aren't
any
others
vying
for
that
seat,
then
of
course
that
makes
sense,
and
if
there's
no
there's
no
need
to,
then
there
wouldn't
be
any
need.
But
if
there
are
other
citizens
who.
E
L
That
committee
I
think
they
should
have
the
opportunity
to
do
so,
and
the
only
way
to
have
that
be
fair
would
be
to
to
you
know,
interview
everyone
who's
who
is
who
wants
you
know
to
serve
on
that
next
term
and
I.
L
Think
we've
we've
had
this
discussion
already
as
part
of
the
policies
and
procedures
and
I'm
still
in
favor,
of
what
we
decided
during
that
process
and
and
I
would
say
for
somebody
who
also
served
since
high
school
on
a
committee
commissioner
board,
you
did
have
the
option
to
come
and
be
reinterviewed.
L
That
was
an
option
that
was
given
I,
remember
doing
that
for
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
to
see
if
he
wanted
that
to
re-engage
to
have
that
face
time
with
the
city.
Council
was
not
a
requirement
again
similar
to
Mr
council
member
Salazar.
As
far
as
they
are
volunteers,
they
give
up
their
time.
We
obviously
have
seen
them
and
unless
we're
as
a
council
having
concerns
or
feeling
that
something's
not
working
I
understand
that.
But
again
with
this
short
short
time
frame
too
I
can't
see
dealing
with
anything
other
than
the
priority
committee.
L
Commission
is
a
board
that
lose
their
Quorum,
but
I
have
some
same
sentiment:
council
member
Salazar,
anyone
else
through
the
chair
I
just
additionally
I,
you
know,
I,
do
serve
on
some
boards
outside
of
the
city
of
San,
Bruno
and
I.
Don't
think
it's
uncommon
to
allow
sitting
members
of
bodies
at
the
very
least
first
ride
of
refusal
to
continue
serving
or
not
so
I,
don't
think
we're
out
of
the
norm
in
doing
that.
L
Any
other
comments
or
questions
from
colleagues
councilmember
Hamilton
if
there
aren't
any
other
comments,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion,
but
I
don't
want
to
cut
anyone
off
if
they
have
comments
now
go
ahead.
Councilmember
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
direct
staff
to
schedule
the
appointment
and
enter
and
or
interviews
for
only
the
cbcs
that
will
lose
a
quorum
when
an
existing
member
terms
expire
in
October,
dirt
and
schedule
those
for
October
as
soon
as
possible
and
then
direct
staff
to
schedule.
All
other
interviews
and
appointments
for.
C
November
of
2022.,
one
second
I'm
going
to
say,
was
a
motion
by
Hamilton
and
seconded
by
vice
mayor,
and
is
it
the
motion
clear
to
okay
roll
call,
please,
council,
member
Hamilton,
aye
aye
aye
vice
mayor
Mason,
hi,
mayor
Rico,
Medina
hi
motion
passes,
5-0,
stop
oh
yeah
to
city
manager,
sure
I
think
your
direction
is
very
clear.
F
I,
just
wanna
confirm
one,
maybe
two
things,
so
we
will
certainly
move
forward
with
scheduling
the
four
bodies
that
will
lose
Quorum
in
October,
but
then
continue
with
an
interview
process
into
November
in
early
December
for
the
others.
We
will
invite
all
current
members,
as
well
as
new
applications
and
individuals
on
file
to
those
interviews.
F
Some
may
not
choose
to
be
interviewed,
others
may
not
be
available,
but
when
we
return
to
the
appointment
we
will
bring
you
all
of
those
applications,
even
the
individuals
that
were
not
interviewed
with
this.
Thank
you
was
there
any
disagreement
to
what
city
manager
said
that
that's
what
I
intended
with
my
motion?
Thank
you.
Do
you
have
one
question?
Please
Vice.
Just
do
we
take
attendance
of
all
the
Committees
and
the
committee
members
yeah?
Yes,
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
those
attendance
records.
F
Thank
you
goodbye
sure
we
can
provide
those.
Would
these
be
only
in-person
interviews?
Would
they
be
be
a
zoom
since
we're
trying
to
do
everything
in
a
short
period
or
is
it
can
it
be
Zoom.
F
From
a
staff
perspective,
I
think
we
should
try
Zoom,
given
the
impacted
time
both
for
the
candidates
and
Council
I
would
concur
with
you.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
all
the
colleagues
are
on
the
same
page
so
that
we
don't
walk
away
from
here
and
it's
like
well,
no,
no,
no,
the
other.
The
other
thing
too
is
I.
Think
it
really
needs
to
be
communicated
to
those
that
are
on
current
committee
commissions
and
boards
that
the
process
has
been
changed
to.
G
G
More
about
the
process,
sure
I
think
we
would
use
the
term
mayor
you're
being
invited
to
interview
for
export
and
provide
times,
and
we
certainly
won't
say
that
it's
required,
but
we
will
also
be
clear
that
the
process
has
has
changed.
Yeah
I
think
that's
the
important
factor,
any
other
questions
from
colleagues.
G
J
J
J
J
J
G
G
G
J
I
I
I
G
J
I
F
C
F
F
F
H
F
H
H
H
G
G
I
I
Regular
meeting
of
October,
the
11th
2022
meeting
has
been
called
to
order
roll
call,
please,
council,
members,
South,
I'm,
sorry,
councilman,
councilman,
Hamilton,
here,
council
member
Marty,
Medina
here,
council
member
Salazar
here
vice
mayor
Mason,
here
mayor
Rico
Medina,
here
next
we'll
move
to
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
What
I
am
going
to
do
is
ask
for
council
member
Hamilton
who's.
Technically.
This
is
his
first
city
council
meeting
live
and
in
person
since
before
he,
when
he
was
sworn
in,
it
was
via
zoom
and
there's
been
via.
G
Thank
you,
council
member
Hamilton
item
number
four
public
comments
for
items
not
on
the
agenda.
Individuals
will
be
allowed
up
to
three
minutes.
It
is
the
council
policy
to
refer
matters
raised
in
this
form
to
staff
for
investigation
and
our
action
where
appropriate.
The
brown
act
prohibits
the
council
from
discussing
or
acting
upon
any
matter.
Not
agenda
is
pursuant
to
state
law.
Are
there
any
speakers
for
this
evening.
G
F
Whenever
you're
ready,
you
may
begin.
Thank
you.
I'd
just
like
to
remind
the
council
again
that
the
city
net
Services
report
is
still
not
been
presented
and,
according
to
the
reconciliation
of
the
general
ledger,
which
is
item
6C
on
the
consent
calendar
it's
over
15
million
in
the
red
for
a
city.
That's
always
looking
for
money.
I'd
expect
this
would
be
a
top
priority
to
fix
this
failing,
Enterprise
I,
don't
know,
maybe
I'm
wrong.
Time
doesn't
help
by
putting
off
bad
news
and
hard
decisions.
C
Then
I
hope
that
the
next
council
meeting
this
Adam
will
be
addressed.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Next
speaker,
please.
K
I
see
no
other
hands
race.
Thank
you.
We're
going
to
move
on
to
item
five
and
just
for
point
to
the
council
and
to
the
community.
What
I'm
going
to
be
doing
is
under
public
comments.
If
the
person
is
here
in
the
room
I'm
going
to
give
priority
to
that
person,
that
is
here
physically
and
then
we
will
go
to
zoom,
just
so,
people
understand
and
as
well
as
there
are
speaker
cards
that
are
needed
to
be
filled
out.
If
you
are
in
person
on
which
item
you're
going
to
speak
on,
let's.
H
Move
on
to
item
five
announcements
and
presentations,
we're
going
to
take
them
out
of
order,
we're
going
to
go
to
Item
B
first
issue:
Proclamation
declaring
October
23
2022
through
October
31st
2022
as
Red
Ribbon,
Week
and
I
will
read
a
little
here,
whereas
Red
Ribbon
Week
offers
citizens
the
opportunity
to
demonstrate
their
commitment
to
drug-free
Lifestyles
and
whereas
Red
Ribbon
Week
will
be
celebrated
in
communities.
Across.
The
Nation
on
October
23rd
through
October
31st,
and
whereas
all
those
who
reside.
H
K
October
23rd
through
October
31st
as
red
Ribbon
Week,
and
encourages
all
to
participate
in
drug
prevention,
education
activities
not
only
during
Red,
Ribbon
Week,
but
also
throughout
the
year,
making
a
visible
statement
that
we
are
strongly
committed
to
a
drug-free
lifestyle.
And
this
will
be
the
first
time
in
probably
over
two
years.
I
have
the
privilege
of
presenting
a
proclamation
to
our
police
chief.
K
K
C
G
E
G
New
cases
of
male
breast
cancer
will
be
diagnosed
in
2022,
and
the
survival
for
men
is
similar
to
the
survival
for
women
and
whereas
screenings
early
detection
and
prompt
treatment
can
significantly
reduce
suffering
and
deaths
caused
by
this
disease
and
whereas
monography
an
x-ray
of
the
breast
is
recognized
as
one
of
the
single
most
effective
methods
of
detecting
breasts
changes
that
may
be
cancer
long
before
physical
symptoms
can
be
seen
or
felt.
Now.
G
G
No
hands
are
raised?
Thank
you.
Do
we
know
if
the
superintendent?
Okay?
Now
it
is
we're
going
to
go
to
item
a
which
is
receive
a
general
update
from
the
San
Bernardino
Park
School
District,
new
superintendent,
Matthew
Duffy,
who
has
been
here
and
hitting
the
ground
rolling
with
Allen
Elementary
School
with
the
ribbon
cutting
and
everything
else
that
he
has
walked
into,
and
we
have
asked
him
to
be
here.
We
welcome
you,
congratulations
and
please
the
floor.
Is
yours.
G
G
I
brought
some
slides
to
share
with
the
council
just
a
little
bit
about
what
we're
doing
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
just
share
my
screen
and
then
talk
to
those,
and
you
can.
Let
me
know
if,
for
some
reason
you
are
not
seeing
my
screen
give
me
a
second
right
all
right.
Can
you
see
my
screen?
Okay?
G
Yes,
we
can
okay,
fantastic,
so
yeah
I,
as
I
said,
it's
just
been
a
fantastic
opening
of
the
year
for
us,
and
it's
just
been
a
great
pleasure
for
me
to
be
here
in
San
Bruno
and
the
community
has
really
welcomed
me
with
open
arms
and
and
I
appreciate
that
deeply
I
had
a
chance
in
the
spring
to
overlap
a
little
bit
with
our
interim
soup,
Mr
Milliken
and-
and
that
was
really
helpful
to
be
able
to
have
a
smooth
transition
into
this
year,
spent
a
lot
of
time
this
summer
working
on
Staffing,
so
we
could
open
as
well
as
we
could
and
and
so
far
we're
doing
really.
G
Well,
it's
been
a
nice
opening,
like
all
organizations
and
like
all
years,
we
have
some
challenges,
but
we've
had
a
really
nice
opening
and
I'm
happy
to
take
questions
at
the
end.
So
during
the
summer,
I
had
a
chance
to
sit
down
with
our
board
and
Retreat
and
really
talk
about
what
we
wanted
to
accomplish
this
year
and
we
set
some
goals
together
as
a
leadership
team
and
a
governance
team
and
wanted
to
share
those
a
little
bit
with
you,
because
that
really
is
the
work
that
we're
digging
into.
C
See
that
happening
pretty
well.
K
So
we've
kept
our
mission,
vision
and
values.
The
same
haven't
made
any
tweaks
to
that
right
now,
and
many
of
you
know
that
we
are
about
2
000
students
with
five
elementaries
and
a
middle
school,
and
you
know
one
of
those
elementaries
is
closing
and
I'll
be
talking
about
that
in
a
little
bit
and
we've
got
a
little
over
200
total
staff.
F
F
We
have
a
quarter
of
our
students
and
maybe
up
to
a
third
when
we
crunch
all
our
data
who
are
English
Learners,
meaning
that
English
is
not
the
first
language
spoken
at
home
and
they've,
yet
to
demonstrate
full
Proficiency
in
academic
English
in
terms
of
listening
speaking
reading
and
writing,
and
once
they
do
they're.
C
C
This
is
the
three
state
priorities
that
were
asked
to
engage
with
as
part
of
our
state
framework,
they're
called
the
conditions
of
learning
student
outcomes
and
engagement,
and
then
we
have
set
five
big
goals
as
a
district
and
they
are
number
one
to
strengthen
and
stabilize
Parkside
Middle,
School
or
Intermediate
School.
Those
terms
sometimes
are
interchangeable,
but
that
has
been
the
deep.
I
Focus
of
the
district
is
to
really
get
after
ensuring
Parkside
is
an
excellent
academic
environment.
It's
safe,
it's
exciting
and
just
really
strengthening
it
and
making
sure
the
community
feels
really
good
about
our
middle
school.
That's
our
number
one
goal
this
year,
followed
by
supporting
our
English
Learners
and.
F
C
Set
of
projects
and
I'm
happy
to
talk
about
this
a
little
more
in
depth,
but
a
big
priority
for
us
is
just
delivering
on
those
projects:
the
closure
of
Rollingwood,
Elementary,
School
and
making
sure
the
students
and
staff
transition
well
the
completion
of
the
Allen
Elementary
school
project
and
with
the
closure
of
Rollingwood,
we
are
re-doing.
The
attendance.
A
Boundaries
across
the
city
so
that
there
will
be
four
Elementary
attendance
areas
instead
of
five
and
we've
have
many
Community
meetings
going
across
the
district
all
fall
all
through
the
fall
to
meet
with
as
many
residents
and
families
as
we
can.
The
next
one
is
just
making.
L
Our
students
are
really
having
a
powerful
educational
experience.
L
So
those
are
our
big,
five
and
I'm
happy
to
share
this
deck
with
you
past.
These
slides
are
a
little
bit
about
what
we're
doing
under
each
one
of
these
goals
and
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
all
of
those
details,
but
it
talks
about
Parkside
and
it
talks
about
our
English
Learners
I
did
want
to
stop
for
a
second
and
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
quality
Community
projects
and
again
just
because
this
really
involves
the
whole
Community.
L
Just
talk
for
a
minute
about
Rollingwood
Elementary,
that
is
a
school.
That's
closing
and
we'll
we'll
close
at
the
end
of
this
year,
we've
met
with
the
community,
the
staff.
We
have
more
meetings
to
go
through
just
trying
to
do
that
with
care,
Grace,
humility
to
make
sure
everybody's
well
taken
care
of,
and
the
students
get
zoned
to
new
schools.
L
The
staff
moves
again
with
care
to
new
placements
and
then
we'll
be
having
a
facilities
study
session,
actually
just
in
two
next
Wednesday
night,
the
19th
to
talk
about
a
number
of
our
facilities,
including
Rollingwood,
and
some
of
the
plans
we're
thinking
about
for
those
facilities
for
next
year
again
the
Allen
project,
thanks
to
you
for
so
many
to
so
many
of
you
who
came
to
the
the
open
house
and
it's
not
the
open
house-
excuse
me
the
ribbon
cutting
it
was
just
a
pleasure
and
a
lot
of
fun,
and
you
know
it's
right
behind
your
offices,
so
we're
looking
forward
to
the
completion
of
the
full
Allen
over
the
coming
year.
L
We're
still
moving
forward
with
the
sale
of
the
Engvall
property
to
Pulte
and
then,
as
part
of
our
facilities
discussion
next
week,
really
discussing
where
some
of
that
funding
will
go
towards
and
some
of
our
priority
projects,
and
we
have
finished
all
of
our
trustee
area
redistricting.
So
we
are
now
in
five
trustee
areas.
So
there's
a
lot
of
projects
going
on
across
the
district
and
we're
hoping
they
all
land
smoothly.
L
What
else?
Just
a
couple
notes
on
metrics:
the
board
was
really
interested
in
like
what
are
we
looking
at
to
know
how
successful
we
will
be?
What
should
we
be
looking
at,
and
so
we're
looking
at
a
few
things
most,
notably,
is
an
increase
in
staff
retention.
It
is
really
tough
to
find
quality
people
across
the
bay
we're
in
a
massive
teacher
shortage,
employment
shortage.
L
So
a
deep,
deep
focus
for
us
is
making
sure
our
staff
want
to
come
back
and
be
with
us,
especially
staff
in
middle
school
and
special
education,
which
are
often
hard
to
staff
areas,
improve
our
reclassification
rates,
really
decreasing
our
suspension
rates
for
all
of
our
students,
but
especially
for
young
men
of
color.
That's
a
group
that
has
a
higher
suspension
rate,
especially
among
our
Latino
boys,
so
really
looking
at
what
we
can
do
to
support
them.
L
Increasing
our
inclusion
opportunities
for
special
education
students,
so
they
don't
get
isolated
or
don't
have
access
to
the
Core
Curriculum
want
to
make
sure
our
state
test
scores
are
improving
and
then
another
big
one
that
our
board
has
called
out
is
taking
a
look
at
how
many
of
our
students
stay
with
us
from
grades
kindergarten
to
first
grade
and
really
from
grades
five
to
six.
L
We
want
to
make
sure,
as
many
of
our
fifth
grade,
students
and
families
choose
Parkside
and
that
we
continue
to
have
a
strong
pipeline
there
so
that
we
have
a
strong
pipeline
to
the
high
school.
So
that's
a
few
of
the
things
that
we're
looking
at
so
I
could
probably
talk
all
night
about
a
lot
of
the
things
we're
doing.
I'll,
stop,
sharing
and
happy
to
turn
it
over.
You
know
to
the
council
for
any
questions.
L
Anything
I
might
be
be
able
to
answer
or
be
helpful
with,
and
I
would
add
that
so
far
it's
it's
just
been.
A
wonderful
partnership
had
a
chance
to
meet
with
both
the
police,
chief
and
fire
Commander
fire
captain
today,
just
about
our
safety
plans.
So
there's
a
lot
of
collaboration
taking
place
and
and
I
really
thank
the
the
city
and
City
staff
for
that,
and
also
have
a
nice
ongoing
monthly
meeting
with
our
city
manager,
which
we've
established
a
Cadence
for
that
for
collaboration.
L
So
that's
also
really
been
positive
as
well,
so
I'll
stop
talking
just
wanted
to
share
a
little
bit
about
what
we're
doing
and
and
again
thanks
for
having
me.
L
Thank
you,
superintendent
and
I
do
appreciate
it
when
we
took
a
walk
when
we
met
and
thank
you
for
reaching
out-
and
you
wish
to
come
here
to
update
the
council,
the
community
and
I
think
that
continues
that
collaboration
and
that
Cooperative,
as
we
were
at
the
ribbon,
cutting
and
all
five
of
us
were
there
I
think
is.
L
One
thing
that
really
stands
out
is
how
the
community
and
the
school
district
came
together
and
the
council
to
have
that
Bond
and
go
forward
to
have
it
passed,
which
that
is
a
result
of
updating
our
Allen
School,
which
is
important
for
our
community's
future.
So
I
do
want
to
thank
you
and
opening
up
to
my
colleagues.
L
If
there
are
any
comments
or
questions,
councilmember
Hamilton,
so
I
just
want
to
Echo
many
of
the
mayor's
comments
and
welcome
you,
superintendent,
Duffy,
to
San
Bruno,
and
we
look
forward
to
to
great
things
in
the
district,
and
you
know
please
count.
Please
count
me
as
one
of
the
the
many
many
folks
rooting
for
your
success
and
how,
however,
we
can
help
please
do
reach
out
to
us.
We
want
to
maintain
a
strong
partnership
with
between
the
city
and
the
district.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you
appreciate
it
vice
mayor
Mason,
thank
you,
so
superintendent
Duffy.
Let
me
first
start
by
thanking
you
for
coming
to
San
Bruno.
We
know
that
we
are
a
trouble
district
and
I.
Don't
think
that
that
is
a
secret
to
anybody
in
this
room
or
anybody
who's
watching
so
I
think,
first
of
all,
just
a
heartfelt
thank
you
for
coming
here
and
taking
on
the
challenge.
Secondly,
thank
you
for
making
the
priority
Parkside.
L
It
is
a
concern
of
many
parents
in
this
district
and
is
I,
think
echoed
and
has
needed
to
be
a
priority
here
for
a
long
time.
So,
thank
you
for
prioritizing
that
the
question
I
did
have
was
around
enrollment
I.
Think
California
in
general
is
talking
a
lot
about
lowered
enrollment
numbers
in
their
Public,
School,
Systems
and
I
was
hoping.
Maybe
you
can
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
that's
impacting
San
Bruno?
L
Absolutely
yes,
it's
it's
really
happening
everywhere.
In
the
last
District
I
led,
we
saw
significant
loss
of
enrollment
I.
Think
95
of
California
school
districts
are
in
declining
enrollment,
so
it
puts
a
lot
of
pressure
on
schools
to
be
able
to
just
be
robust
and
offer
really
robust
programs
and
have
some
flexibility,
especially
when
you
get
so
small
that
you
only
have
one
class
per
grade
and
you're
doing
a
lot
of
combination
classes
at
the
elementary
yeah
we
have
lost.
L
You
know:
I,
don't
have
the
figures
directly
in
front
of
me,
but
some
800
plus
students
over
the
last
decade,
and
that
has
pushed
for
some
of
the
closures
of
the
elementary
schools.
Our
elementary
schools
are
pretty
small.
The
new
Allen
is
built
for
a
capacity
of
500,
so
that
is
bigger.
L
Rolling
excuse
me
Parkside
Middle
School,
you
know,
is
about
50
or
60
students
less
this
year
than
it
was
last
year.
So
we're
continuing
to
see
that
decline.
We
believe,
as
you
just
mentioned,
that
there
are
families
who
have
chosen
out
and
we
you
know
if
we
do
our
work
well,
we'll
have
a
number
of
them.
C
J
Housing
and
and
those
types
of
issues,
so
it's
pretty
rapid,
you
know
and
so
I'm
glad
the
district
has
as
painful
as
it's
been
taking
the
steps
to
to
make
the
closures.
So
that
you're,
not
in
a
position
mission
in
five
years
to
have
to
close
a
lot
of
schools.
So
I
think
we
should
be
in
good
shape
and
that
should
be
it
in
terms
of
closures.
And
we
should
probably
settle
right
in
at
four
elementaries
and
and
one
middle.
But.
L
We
really
do
have
to
to
keep
an
eye
on
it,
so
that
we
can
make
sure
we're.
A
B
That
and
in
dual
immersion
programs,
you
know
I
was
fortunate
enough
to
be
able
to
start
a
couple
throughout
my
career,
both
Spanish
and
Mandarin,
and
my
both
of
my
kids.
Actually,
all
three
of
them
are
in
dual
immersion
schools,
even
preschool,
so
it's
important
to
us
as
a
family
as
well.
On
a
personal
note,
so
we
have
started
those
discussions
and
tomorrow,
at
tomorrow,
night's
board
meeting.
B
One
of
the
items
that
we'll
be
discussing
is
some
sort
of
future
looking
ideas
for
some
things
that
we
want
to
do
to
support
our
students
and
families,
and
we
will
be
talking
about
dual
immersion
and
how
we've
begun
to
explore
that
and
what
some
of
our
next
steps
might
be.
B
B
B
Any
other
comments
or
questions.
Councilman
Medina.
Yes,
thank
you,
superintendent,
Duffy,
for
being
here
for
for
choosing
to
be
here
in
San
Bruno
you,
the
district
has
been
a
wonderful
Community
partner
with
Second
Harvest.
The
food
distributions
at
Bel
Air,
where
up
to
230
families
are
getting
groceries.
B
I
was
hoping
you
could
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
employment
and
volunteer
opportunities
at
the
district,
especially
around
noontime
yard,
Duty
supervision,
absolutely
I'll.
Just
first
say
you
know.
That
is
a
really
nice
partnership
with
Second,
Harvest
and
I
know
you
all
have
done
a
lot
in
conjunction
with
other
community
organizations.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
that
yeah.
B
We
are
very,
very
fortunate
right
now
that
we
are
fully
staffed
in
our
on
our
teaching
side,
but
we
still
need
support
in
many
of
our
what
we'd
call
support
positions,
sometimes
they're
known
as
classified
positions,
so
we
do
have
active
postings
that
you
can
find
on
our
website
and
I'm
happy
to
follow
up
with
the
the
council
with
all
of
those
email
addresses.
B
A
The
yard,
you
know
we're
looking
for
folks
for
who
have
a
few
hours.
This
is
paid
positions,
of
course,
with
good
benefits
who
may
want.
M
To
work
in
our
kitchen
and
support
our
students
that
way
we
have
a
few
maintenance
openings,
a
few
driver
openings.
So
we
have
some
positions
for
folks
and
we
think
you
know
it's
a
great
place
to
work
and
I'm,
certainly
enjoying
it
very
much
and
building
that
camaraderie.
So,
yes,
please
spread
the
word
and
you
know
I'm.
M
This
is
the
most
important
thing
that
we
have
great
people
on
our
team,
as
you
all
know,
so,
I'm
happy
to
really
talk
with
anybody
personally
about
opportunities
within
our
district,
so
please
don't
hesitate
to
even
make
a
personal
email
connection
I'll
either
take
it
or
direct
them
to
to
the
right
folks,
so
I
hope
that
helps
yes.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
There
a
question
that
council
member
Salazar.
M
Thank
you
also
wanted
to
add
my
thanks
for
being
here
and
presenting
this
data.
The
demographics
are
definitely
interesting
and
it
sounds
like
you
have
a
pretty
solid
plan
for
addressing
our
needs
in
the
community.
I
served
on
a
Finance
advisory
committee
for
the
district
a
few
years
ago,
and
so
I
was
pretty
familiar
with
a
lot
of
the
challenges.
M
The
district
was
facing
and
you
know
we
continue
to
see
a
very
large
percentage
of
our
population
designated
socially
disadvantaged,
there's
still
a
significant
number
of
students
with
disabilities,
which
carries
its
own
challenges
and
definitely
additional
expenses,
so
definitely
glad
to
see
that
you're
approaching
this
from
a
scientific
standpoint,
understanding
the
the
issues-
and
it
sounds
like
you've-
got
some
good
plans
in
place,
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
see
your
seeing
your
contributions.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
appreciate
it
and
I'll
just
note.
Speaking
of
you
know,
Financial
oversight.
M
You
mentioned
you
served
on
one
of
our
committees.
You
know
the
district
is
also
in
just
a
really
solid
financial
position
right
now,
and
that's
something
I
think
this.
This
city
and
community
members
should
be
aware
of
so
that's
nice,
that's
not
something
that
I
have
to
worry
deeply
about
right
now.
We
have
to
obviously
keep
ourselves
in
a
good
good
position,
but
financially
we're
we're
doing
well.
M
So
the
work
of
the
last
number
of
years
to
just
make
sure
the
ship
is
sailing
right,
has
been
done
well,
so
I
I
really
appreciate
that,
and
that's
just
good
news
for
our
community
as
well.
Thank
you
any
other
questions
or
comments
and
any
members
of
the
public
man,
please.
You
have
a.
C
N
Able
to
speak
at
the
earlier
public
comment:
I
would
have
gone
over
how
I
made
it
my
mission
at
the
beginning
of
this
year
to
attend
every
single
city
council
meeting
to
prove
that
I
can
dedicate
myself
that
I
can
make
I'm.
Sorry
excuse
me,
excuse
me
right
now.
We
are
under
announcements
and
presentations
and
we
are.
We
received
a
general
report
update
from
the
superintendent
and
it's
this
would
be
in
regards
to
the
presentation
and
or
comment
in
regards
to
the
school
district.
N
Okay,
fantastic,
fantastic,
because
if
we
were
talking
about
the
us-101
toll,
lands
we'd
have
a
much
longer
conversation.
My
name
is
Jeremy
sarnicki
and
I'm,
a
member
of
the
community,
who
cares
very
deeply
about
the
quality
of
our
schools
and
the
quality
of
the
education
Services,
provided
in
fact
it's
what
made
me.
N
So
I
know
we
have
some
board
members
that
are
very
adamant,
that
they
cannot
relitigate
a
previous
vote
and
so
I
see
that
as
a
shame,
because
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
I'm
trying
to
make
sure
that
the
community
knows
that
I
am
fully
committed
to
keeping
Rollingwood
a
school
for
future
Generations.
That
I
was
offered
the
rationale
for
designating
Rollingwood
Elementary
School
Surplus
property
does
not
take
into
account
the
future
growth
that
the
city
just
committed
to.
A
N
So
your
additional
comments
or.
N
Of
you
may
begin
whenever
you're
ready
hi.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you
hi
good
evening.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
so
much
superintendent,
Matthew
Duffy
for
the
information
that
we've
shared
today.
I
am
a
lifelong
resident
of
San
Bruno
I'm,
a
public
school
product,
as
are
my
children
and
I'm,
glad
to
see
that
you're
trying
really
hard
to
keep
our
school
district,
viable
and
vibrant
and
a
great
learning
environment
for
our
children.
I
did
want
to
make
one
suggestion.
N
Maybe
that
would
it
would
include
maybe
a
partnership
between
the
school
district
and
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
and
that
we're
having
a
lot
of
new
housing
developments
that
are
being
proposed
and
I'm
going
to
be
built
in
our
city,
as
well
as
the
circle
School
properties
that
are
being
spoken
about
for
housing.
I
would
really
like
to
see
there
be
a
collaboration
and
a
serious
thought
into
making
a
lot
of
that
housing
or
some
a
good
portion
of
red
housing
available
to
our
Stu.
N
Our
teachers
I
think
that
would
help
up
with
keeping
good
quality,
Educators
and
administrators
here
in
our
city.
If
we
provide
them
with
affordable
housing,
and
so
I
would
like
to
to
request
that
between
school,
district
and
city
that
be
a
priority,
so
that
we
can
retain
our
Educators
and
our
community,
because
that
again
serves
the
well-being
of
all
of
our
children.
Thank
you
for
all
the
hard
work
that
you're
doing.
Teachers
are
angels.
My
grandmother
was
a
lifelong
educator
and
so
I
know
what
a
great
service
you
bring
to
our
community.
N
N
I
apologize,
we
are
having
technical
issues
and
I
am
unable
to
unmute
Jennifer
Blanco.
If
you
could
give
me
one
moment,
I'll
go
on
to
the
next
speaker
and
I'll,
see
if
I
am
able
to
bring
Jennifer
Blanco
in
after
next
speaker
is
Claudia,
ing,
partying
and
maybe
begin
whenever
you're
ready,
hi
Juan.
Thank
you
for
saying
my
last
name
correctly.
Let's
take
a
look
at
that
wrong.
N
So
I
appreciate
that
it
was
not
my
original
thought,
but
after
hearing
the
first
Speaker
I
would
second
that
if
we
could
do
something
to
help
our
our
faculty
with
the
assisted
housing
in
some
regard,
that
would
be
I
would
I
agree
that
that
is
a
helpful
method
with
a
continuing
rise
of
the
cost
of
housing,
at
least
in
the
Bay
Area.
N
So
I
am
one
of
those
parents
that
is
I.
You
know
I
moved
here,
knowing
wanting
to
set
routes
here,
I.
C
A
Of
the
current
rating
of
the
middle
school
I
am
myself
a
product
of
public
schooling
in
San,
Francisco.
E
M
M
Am
interested
in
learning
more
as
to
what
is
actually
being
done
or
since
it's
still
in
the
process
like
how
might
I
keep
up
to
date?
Is
it
purely
by
attending
school
board
meetings?
That
is
something
that
I'm
unsure
about
and
just
trying
to
learn
a
little
bit
more
so
yeah,
if
you
could
illuminate
me,
I,
would
appreciate
that
foreign.
M
I
apologize,
I
am
remember,
same
error
message:
Jennifer
Blanco.
If
you
would
like
you
could
go
ahead
and
send
an
email
to
the
city
clerk's
office
email
address
is
city
clerk
at
San
bruno.ca.gov
and
we
would
be
happy
to
forward
the
email
to
superintendent,
superintendent,
Duffy
and
the
council
and
the
Council
of
course,
are
there
any
other
speakers?
There
are
no
other
speakers,
okay,
superintendent,
again
as
I
and
my
colleagues
and
on
behalf
of
the
council
in
the
city.
We
wish
we're
all
in
this
together.
M
Right,
we
all
say,
served
the
city
of
San
Bruno
in
some
capacity
and
I
just
want
to
see.
If
there's
any
final
thoughts
you
want
to
leave
us
with
before
you
go
off
and
hopefully
get
dinner
and
get
some
rest
for
tomorrow.
Thank
you,
no
I
think.
As
you
said
it,
it's
definitely
a
partnership.
I
think
to
some
of
the
speakers.
You
know
I'm
happy.
You
know
if
you
email
me
and
want
to
talk
further
about
Parkside
or
any
of
those
things.
M
We
are
just
two
major
municipalities
that
serve
the
community
and
I'm
eager
to
build
Bridges
with
you
and
and
make
sure
we
do
this
together
so
that
we
feel
like
our
our
schools
and
city
is,
you
know
safe
and
the
quality
of
education
is
high,
so
yeah
I'm,
looking
forward
to
it
and
again,
thanks
for
having
me
thank
you
again
and
appreciate
your
time
and
the
presentation
and
enjoy
the
rest
of
your
evening.
A
D
Unless
requested,
first
I
would
like
to
ask
the
City
attorney,
make
a
statement
in
regards
and
she'll
go
ahead.
Thank
you,
mayor
Medina,
as
required
by
the
brown
act
I'm,
going
to
give
a
brief
summary
of
the
amount
to
the
city
managers
contract
item
6i
on
the
consent.
Calendar
provides
an
amendment
that
increases
the
salary
10
percent
to
284
000
24,
effective
July
1
2022
and
provides
for
a
7
500
dollar
each
month,
contribution
to
deferred
compensation
and
increases
the
professional
development
budget
from
one
thousand
to
fifteen
hundred
dollars
annually
appropriate.
D
C
Annually
prorated
paid.
A
On
a
pay-period
basis,
thank.
C
C
You're,
the
mayor
vice
mayor
item
G
item.
J
Seeing
none,
why
don't
we
go
to
item
f,
adopt
a
resolution
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
execute
a
four-year
contract
with
West
Coast,
arborist
Inc
for
the
annual
pruning
and
polling
if
I
said
it
right
of
Street
trees
and
Street
removal
related
to
Fire
and
Hazard
mitigation
in
the
amount
not
to
exceed
one
million?
Ninety
three
thousand
eight
hundred
and
sixty
five
vice
mayor.
J
Thank
you.
I
I
just
wanted
to
understand
a
little
bit
better.
The
history
of
this
particular
role,
I
I
thought
at
some
point
tree
trimming
was
in-house
and
then
it
was
outsourced
and
I'd,
just
like
to
better
understand,
was
their
main
confer
process.
J
What
what
did
that
look
like?
Thank
you
sure,
vice
versa,
I'll
introduce
Dan
Venezia
to
provide
an
answer.
Sir,
so
could
you
step
closer
to
the
mic?
Please!
Thank
you
how's.
That
can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
thank
you
Mr
Mayor
and
council
members,
so
we
have
been
in
a
contract
prior.
This
is
our
second
contract
we're
going
out
for
the
tree
annual
tree
premium.
Pollarding
was
done
in-house.
We
have
the
city
split
up
on
a
there's
four
grids
throughout
the
city.
J
J
So
we
still
do
have
individuals
who
work
and
do
tree
trimming
correct
and
so
how's
that
work
split
up.
So
there
are
a
lot
of
Resident
requests.
There's
a
lot
of
work
in
our
Parks
work
done
around
the
city
on
a
year-round
basis
that
the
current
tree
crew
takes
care
of
year
round,
okay
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
go
back
to
my
original
question.
What
was
the
meet
and
confirm
process
with
the
Union
when
this
was
originally
contracted
out,
and
was
it
continuous
meaning?
J
Were
we
supposed
to
go
back
again
after
the
first
contract?
Why
don't
we
hold
that
on
then?
Maybe
the
city
manager,
I'm,
sorry
I,
do
know
that
they
were
all
the
required
mou
processes
did
take
place
and
it
was
clearly
a
ongoing
process.
So
we
did
a
four-year
contract.
We
are
renewing
that
four-year
contract,
while
I
don't
have
the
stats
here
today.
I
know
that
when
this
issue
has
been
discussed
in
the
past,
there
has
been
a
precipitous
decline
in
the
number
of
maintenance
staff
at
the
city.
J
They
do
park
parks
work
over
the
years
and
so
turning
this
service
to
a
contracted
service
actually
helped
to
provide
additional
capacity
for
our
current
staff
to
do
other
work
while,
as
our
park
services
manager
did
say,
work
is
continuing.
They
also
continue
to
do
work
on
trees,
but
this
level
of
work
we're
not
able
to
do
in-house.
J
J
So
in
essence,
now
that
we
have
the
fire
and
they're
also
do
the
fire
and
Hazard
mitigation,
the
four-year
contract
is
coming
up
this
the
tree
trimming
was
outsourced.
I
did
not
support
the
Outsourcing
of
the
tree.
Trimming
I
was
the
one
on
the
council,
but
also
I,
know.
I
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
vice
mayor?
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Ma'am
Medina,
just
a
quick
question.
Just
then
about
the
existing
employees,
so
their
jobs
are
not
at
risk
here
at
all.
This
is
completely
separate.
They
have
enough
work.
Correct,
okay,
I
just
want
to
be
clear
and
they're
clear
on
that
as
well.
Oh,
absolutely!
Okay!
Thank
you.
I
Thank
you.
There's
nothing
else
on
item
F,
which
was
just
again
for
comments.
Then,
right
now
we
had
two
items
that
we
did:
pull,
which.
J
I
C
This
is
a
5-0
vote.
It
threw
me
because
I'm
used
to
saying
roll
call
because
we'd
be
in
Zoom
okay.
Now,
let's
bring
that
back
to
consent
and
let's
go
on
the
two
items
that
were
pulled
item
e
wave
the
second
reading
and
adopt
the
following
ordinance
of
the
city.
C
To
authorize
commercial
cannabis,
retailers,
storefront
sales
in
the
transit
corridor,
plan
area,
CBD,
mxrtod-1,
tod2
and
PD
zones
and
in
the
PD
zones
for
the
shops
at
Tanforan
and
cannabis
distribution
facilities
in
the
M1
Zone
and
making
a
finding
exemption
under
sequa.
An
ordinance
of
the
city
of
San,
Bernardino
amending
title
III
revenue
and
finance
of
the
municipal
code
to
lower
the
tax
imposed
on
the
Cannabis.
A
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
apologize
for
making
you
read
all
that
second
thing
is
I
forgot
how
awkward
it
is
to
try
to
talk
on
this
dice
to
my
colleagues
while
talking
into
a
microphone
and
hopefully
not
turning.
My
back
on
the
members
of
the
public
or
the
side
of
my
head.
A
So
two
items
here
and
I:
don't
usually
pull
things
from
consent,
especially
when
it's
a
second
reading
but
I
believe
these
items
are
very
important
not
just
to
myself
but
to
the
community
and
I
did
want
to
have
another
opportunity
to
just
to
bring
this
up
in
discussion
and
I.
Do
believe
that
this
topic
is
is
divisive
to
our
community
and
I.
Know
that
we've
spoken
before
in
various
forums
and
we've
we've
all
agreed
that
we
should
make
an
effort
to
avoid
things
that
divide
the
community.
A
Sometimes
they're,
inevitable
and
I
know
that
there
is
a
good
amount
of
public
support
for
this.
But
there
is
also
a
good
amount
of
people
that
oppose
it,
and
so
the
steps
we're
taking
tonight
are
in
some
ways
permanent.
A
It
will
be
difficult
to
turn
back
what
we're
what
we're
imposing
and
especially
once
businesses
are
in
place.
We
certainly
can't
pull
back
or
change
the
rules
on
them
and
we'll
sort
of
be
stuck
with
them,
and
so
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
taking
every
effort
to
think
through
everything
that
we're
doing
and
think
about.
A
Maybe
if
there
are
ways
that
could
make
the
solution
more
more
inclusive
and
including
some
of
the
comments
that
we've
heard
from
people
that
are
opposed
to
doing
this
at
all,
I
I
would
really
look
forward
to
finding
a
solution
that
everybody
feels
more
comfortable
with
than
what
we're
proposing
and
I
realize,
and
it
was
pointed
out
to
us
that
you
know
a
change
at
this
point
would
require
another
first
reading,
because
there
are
some
significant
changes
that
I
think
we
should
revisit
for
the
first
one
being
just
the
the
number,
the
number
of
shops
that
we're
introducing
and
where
they're
being
introduced
I
in
my
discussions,
early
on
I
got
some
really
good
feedback
from
from
a
member
of
the
community.
C
That
proposed
creating
green
zones
and
really
identifying
not
areas
that
sort
of
fell
into
you
know
minimum
State
Standards,
but
were
rather
well
thought
out
areas
where
Not
only
was
the
public
comfortable
with
having
cannabis
retailers,
but
also
set
the
businesses
up
for
success,
and
in
that
we
we
knew
that
they
were
compatible
with
their
neighbors.
We
knew
that
they
were
accessible,
that
there
wouldn't
be
parking
issues
and
sort
of
identifying
those
things
up
front
so
that
it's
built
into
what
we're
proposing
I,
remember
Marty.
C
In
some
of
the
early
discussions
we
had
with
previous
councils,
we
we
had
all
agreed.
You
know
we'd,
be
willing
to
look
at
specific
types
of
businesses,
non-retail
and
sort
of
introduce
it
slowly
back.
Then
we
were
sort
of
in
agreement
that
downtown
probably
wasn't
one
of
those
areas,
and
now
it's
being
suggested-
and
so
you
know
now
that
we're
talking
about
reprogramming
downtown
and
making
an
effort
to
make
it
a
destination,
and
you.
C
Is
is
a
family
oriented
thing
because
that's
the
kind
of
community
we
are
and
so
by
sort
of
just
smearing,
this
new
policy
over.
L
Our
entire
Transit
corridors,
I
I,
feel
that
there
was
an
opportunity
to
do
something
more
laser,
focused
and
and
not
so
sort
of
General
in
in
the
way
it
was
implemented,
and
also
in
looking
just
a
number
of
facilities.
If
we
were
to
start
with,
perhaps
just
one
retail
and
one
delivery
and
then
prove
to
the
public
that
everything
that's
been
promised
about,
you
know
no
more
crime,
no
more
traffic,
you
know
no
additional
traffic
issues.
No
additional
burden
on
the
community
could
actually
be
demonstrated
and
then
potentially
expand
it.
L
The
the
other
concern
I
have
is
with
with
the
what
we're
proposing
to
do
with
the
tax
and
my
concern
there
is
that,
when
this
was
put
forward
to
the
voters,
we
said
10
and
we
presented
numbers
that
supported
why
we
would
do
that
and
why
we
wanted
to
move
in
this
direction
and
I
believe
that
by
cutting
that
in
half
we're
not
really
holding
up
what
we
promoted
at
that
time
and
I
know
that
we
all
all
five
of
us
here
on
the
dice
held
firm
with
supporting
the
spirit
of
measure
G
and
saying
we
said
in
the
in
the
ballot
measure
in
the
language
that
Rhodes
would
be
a
major
consideration
for
what
we
did
with
Major,
G
and,
and
we
held
to
that
and
I
think
that
it
is
important,
especially
if
you
want
to
maintain
credibility
with
the
public
that
we
we
do.
L
You
know
half
of
the
benefit
of
what
we
could
generate
by
doing
this
and
then
finally,
the
other
piece
I
had
concerns
with
was
the
process
that
involves
having
the
city
council
select,
which
businesses
are
going
to
to
be
allowed
to
to
do
business
in
in
San
Bruno,
and
my
issue
with
that.
Is
that
it's
contrary
to
what
we
would
do
with
any
other
approval
process.
L
L
I,
don't
know
how
to
say
this
gently,
but
I
mean
it
really
opens
us
up
to
to
Corrupt
Practices,
where
an
ambitious
business
could
you
know,
make
very
lucrative
offers
to
council
members
to
you
know,
promote
their
their
business
and
it
may
not
be
in
this
first
round.
L
Maybe
it'll
be
in
some
subsequent
round
of
of
filling
these
positions,
but
I
I
believe
taking
that
process
out
of
something
that's
open
and
structured
and
putting
it
in
the
hands
of
elected
people
is
not
exactly
the
way
we
should
be
doing
it
and
I
believe
it
could
open
us
up
to
litigation
in
the
future.
If
some
somebody
did
get
turned
down
and
they
felt
that
it
was
because
people
on
the
council
either
didn't
like
them
or
preferred
somebody
else.
L
So
those
three
points
I
think,
would
make
moving
forward
on
this.
A
lot
easier
for
me,
I
I,
believe
I
could
support
something
that
was
more
restrained
on
the
initial
approach
and
you
know
giving
it
a
try
like
like
we've
committed
to
do
years
ago,
and
if
it's
successful
as
we
all
hope
it
will
be,
then
we
we
could
expand
it
at
that
point.
So
thank
you.
L
Other
colleagues,
any
questions
or
comments
on
item
e
have
a
councilmember
Hamilton
so
through
the
mayor.
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
your
for
your
your
comments.
Councilmember
Salazar,
on
the
on
the
tax
at
10.
My
understanding
was
well.
First
of
all,
I
mean
it's
not
even
my
understanding
and
there's
a
fact
that
the
that
the
ballot
measure
clearly
stated
that
it
was
a
tax
of
up
to
10.
It
wasn't.
We
are
going
to
do
10.
L
That
was
the
and
my
understanding
was
that
it
was
set
at
that
level,
as
that
would
be
the
absolute
ceiling
that
we
could
ever
go
to
and
because
we-
and
we
can
never
pass
that
ceiling
without
having
to
go
back
to
a
full
referendum
and
a
vote
of
the
people.
So
I
didn't
I,
certainly
didn't
see
it
as
we
will
tax
that
10
and
we
are
promising
you
that
we
will
tax
it
10.
It
was
setting
a
ceiling.
L
I
know
we're
off
Zoom
now,
so
it's
it's
a
little
different,
so
Mr
Hamilton
has
yield
the
floor
council
member
Salazar.
Thank
you,
be
an
official
yeah.
No,
so
I
I
agree
that
the
up
to
10
did
give
us
that
flexibility
to
come
up
or
down
on
that
number.
But
my
point
was
more
to
the
way
it
was
presented
during
all
the
council
meetings
and
leading
up
to
that
point.
L
The
numbers
that
made
it
seem
lucrative
to
do
it
were
based
on
the
10
percent
and
we
weren't
saying
there'll
be
a
range
of
profit.
We
were
saying
we're
going
to
generate
X
number
of
dollars
based
on
this
number
and
you
know
I,
you
know.
Perhaps
somebody
that
was
really
paying
attention
would
have
noticed
that
okay,
so
it
could
be
up
to
that
much,
but
maybe
not
quite
that
much
but
I
I
don't
think
it
was.
L
It
was
clear
and
and
when
we
were
making
the
case
for
doing
it,
that
it
was
going
to
be
something
less
than
what
what
was
proposed
back
to
councilmember,
Hamilton,
okay,
so
I
guess
we'll
just
have
to
agree
to
disagree
on
that.
One.
The
regarding
you
know
changing
the
the
the
the
zoning
I
do
believe.
L
There
was
a
pretty
robust
process
of
choosing
the
the
of
choosing
the
areas
that
was
done
by
staff
and
brought
to
us,
and-
and
you
know,
we
discussed
that
in
in
detail
in
our
in
our
last
meeting
and
we
even
amended
it
to
add
additional
sensitive
uses.
We
discussed
the
possibility
of
that.
You
brought
up
of
of
expanding
the
exclusion
zones
from
600
feet
to
a
thousand
feet,
but
in
practicality
that
would
actually
block
out
all
of
the
areas
that
were
under
discussion
so
that
wasn't.
L
L
If,
if
it
was,
if
it
was
a
majority
of
if
if
there
was
support
for
having
that
final
determination
be
made
by
staff
based
on
the
the
very
robust
and
onerous
process
that
we
have
in
place,
that
these
that
these
operational
need
to
go
through
I
would
be
supportive
of
that
of
of
not
having
that
not
having
that
come
back
to
council
and
I,
guess:
I,
guess
that's
it
from
for
me
for
now.
Okay,
thank
you.
Any
other
questions
or
comments
from
colleagues
seen
and
hearing
none.
L
The
only
thing
I
will
and
also
is
I
know
that
my
understanding
is
the
sensitivity
areas
so,
for
example,
I,
don't
know
for
a
fact
if
St
John's
that's
been
there
over
a
hundred
years,
that
has
a
preschool
and
a
daycare.
That's
been
there
for
47
years,
based
from
what
I
understand
that
should
be
included.
L
I
don't
know
when
we
saw
the
map
if
it
was
but
I'm
understanding
those
would
be
gone
back
and
included
in
the
final
somebody
can
stop
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
if,
if
not,
then
that's
fine
but
I
want
to
make
sure
the
sensitivities,
and
also
it
goes
to
the
pocket
Parks
how
they're
Quantified,
how
they're
defined
what
makes
a
pocket
park
is
Florida
lot
a
pocket
park.
L
I'm
sorry
is
that
a
park,
but
the
Centennial
Plaza
will
not
be
a
part
because
it's
a
pocket
park
is
are
the
other
parks
that
are
with
near
the
zone?
Why
are
they
not
included?
These?
Are
things
I've
brought
up
before
I
also
have
the
tax
I
mean
Pacifica?
Has
six
percent
I,
don't
know
why
we
wouldn't
match?
If
it's
a
competitive
issue
of
we
don't
want
to
be
higher
than
for
trying
to
maintain.
E
Understanding
on
the
up
to
was
because
it
is
correct
that
the
council
can
do
up
too,
but
by
having
that
language
like
in
the
City
of
Pacific
I,
believe
if
they
go
to
five
or
seven,
they
have
to
go
back
to
the
vote
of
the
people.
This
gives
a
Latitude
to
council
to
be
able
to
up
it
or
lower
it
at
its
convenience
and
does
not
have
to
go
back
out
for
a
vote,
even
though
it
is
a
tax
because
of
the
language
and
that's
what
I
believe
is
why
it
was
stated.
E
The
way
it
was
I
also
have
a
concern
with
the
selection
process
coming
to
city
council
city
of
Redwood.
City
does
not
do
that.
City
of
Pacifica
does
not
do
that.
As
you
know,
through
the
permit
process
in
the
beginning
and
for
Redwood
City,
there
was
folks
that
were
not
a
particular
person
or
two
that
were
did
not
agree
with
the
process
or
the
selection.
E
I
think
that
having
electeds
up
here,
making
determination
on
those
uses
and
those
conditions
is
not
in
our
proving
and
I
think
that
it
leads
to
other
matters
when
usually
they're
handled.
E
One
of
the
things
on
the
sales
Towers
was
to
have
it
not
up
here
at
this
level,
but
yet
we're
going
to
take
this
on
and
then
just
determine
which
the
three
out
of
how
many
and
you
know,
we
know
that
I'm
sure
we'd
be
reached
out
to
council
members
would
be
I
mean
so
I
mean
those
are
some
of
the
additional
things.
I
share
some
of
the
comments
that
councilmember
Salazar
said,
but
anyway,
I
think
we
get
to
just
between
my.
L
Comments
any
other
comments
from
colleagues
council
member
I
have
one
other
comment,
but
I
already
went
so
if
other
folks
want
to
go.
Oh
thank
you
I.
Think
given
the
floor
to
Mr
Medina
or
our
vice
mayor,
so
there's
a
very
lengthy
process.
That's
this
decision
that.
C
The
recommended
scoring
gets
finalized
and
determined
by
Council,
so
so
this
is
a
recommendation.
C
A
M
I
think
that
that
explanation,
kind
of
should
alleviate
some
of
the
concern
that
council
members
are
are
going
to
pick
a
favorite
or
some
kind
of
allegation
of
something
that's
inappropriate.
We
are
all
elected
here.
We
have
to
follow
the
law,
so
I
would
like
to
hear
our
from
staff
just
to
kind
of
remind
the
full
Council
of
the
thorough
process
and
the
scoring
mechanisms,
that's
required
to
bring
it
to
council
for
approval
city
manager.
Sure
will
do
thank
you,
council,
member
Medina
you're
exactly
right.
M
There
is
a
very,
very
robust
process
before
the
decision,
as
per
polls
would
come
to
the
city
council
to
decide
which
applicant
gets.
The
operator's
permit.
I
will
I
will
just
say:
both
processes
are
are
totally
appropriate
and
and
legal
and
for
policy
decisions.
Cities
decide
either
way,
and
so
it
is
totally
up
to
the
city
council
and
you
can
decide
to
have
those
decisions
at
the
council
level
or
or
for
various
reasons
you
can
have
them
at
the
staff
staff
level.
M
So
we
we
don't
know
how
many
we
would
get,
but
once
we
receive
the
applications,
we
would
review
them
for
sort
of
the
cursory
items,
signatures
and
filing
fees
and
everything,
and
if
all
the
material
that
we
receive
is
complete,
then
it
moves
on
to
the
next
step
of
review.
Of
all
the
information
that's
submitted
as
part
of
the
application
procedures
and
requirements.
So
there's
a
lot
there.
It's
very
robust
list.
M
It
includes
not
only
such
things
as
property
owner
consent,
but
a
business
plan
for
the
Cannabis
business,
whether
it's
a
retailer
or
a
distribution
facility.
A
labor
and
Community
benefit
plan,
then
a
lot
more
granularity
around
the
actual
location.
So
a
neighborhood
compatibility
plan
and
Odor
Control
plan
a
safety
and
hazardous
materials
plan,
a
security
plan
and
location
and
site
plans.
So
I
can
not
emphasize
that
that's
going
to
be
a
fairly
voluminous.
D
Including
representatives
from
the
police
department,
the
fire
department
and
other
Representatives
as
needed,
so
we
use
the
procedures,
guidelines
and
review
review
criteria,
which
is
actually
a
public
hearing
item
before
you
later
tonight.
But
the
focus
here
is
just
pass
fail.
So
there's
no
ranking,
there's
no
sorting.
O
O
However,
they
reviewed
the
documents,
whatever
they
feel,
is
important
to
their
District
to
the
community,
and
they
make
that
decision.
Is
that
fair?
Yes,
thank
you
vice
mayor.
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
say,
I
appreciate,
councilmember
Salazar's
comments.
He
has
been
steadfast
from
the
beginning
of
this
process
and
I
know
that
they
are
heartfelt
and
very
sincere
and
I.
Think
the
the
comment
I
would
just
make
about
this
item
coming
to
the
council
is
that
you
know
it's
not
unheard
of
that.
O
There's
undue
influence,
also
with
staff
in
the
same
manner,
and
the
one
thing
that
makes
me
feel
more
confident
about
the
item
coming
to
council
is
that
the
public
has
an
opportunity
to
check
out
the
business
prior
to
coming
to
us.
They
have
an
opportunity
to
make
public
comment
on
the
business
prior
to
us
making
a
vote,
and
they
also
have
the
opportunity
to
listen
to
the
presentation
that
I
hope
we
would
receive
from
each
potential
vendor
prior
to
a
vote.
O
I
think
that
I
also
have
concerns
about
you
know
if
it
goes
through
Council
and
not
I
mean
if
it
goes
through
staff
and
not
the
council
I
think
we
have
all
seen
some
businesses
downtown
where
I
don't
know.
But
you
question
like
how
did
that
sign?
Get
approved
and
I
know
I,
remember
with
the
previous
planning
manager,
walking
down
the
street
and
he's
and
I
just
said
how
about
like?
How
does
this
sign
get
approved
and
he
said
that
one
must
have
slipped
by
us,
Linda
and
so
I.
O
Think
the
benefit
of
coming
to
the
council
is
that
it
is
such
a
public
process
that
there's
no
way
but
to
do
what
you
promised
to
do
and
I
would
just
say
that
that
I
know
I,
don't
feel
like
I
would
be
influenced
on
that.
I
have
been
contacted
by
various
vendors
I
have.
C
Not
met
with
any
of
them
about
this
intentionally
and.
J
C
Could
pass
to
increase
it,
but
I
think
your
question
is:
would
you
have
to
redo
the
ordinance
for
the
first
reading
and
the
second
reading
for
item
6E?
We
do
not
believe
that
you
have
to
do
that.
You
could
simply.
K
You
could
still
take
action
tonight
on
the
item.
It
will
be
several
months
before
anyone
goes
through
the
through
the
process
and
is
awarded
a
permit.
So
there
is
certainly
time
should
the
city
council
want
to
increase
the
tax
rate
or
you
could
direct
staff.
Now
you
could
pass
the
item
tonight
and
direct
staff
to
come
back
at
a
later
meeting
to
increase
the
tax
rate.
I
I
do
hear
both
councilmember
Salazar
and.
G
And
I
think
up
to
was
very
clear
in
the
measure,
but
I
would
be
supportive
of
increasing
the
five
percent
to
six
percent.
If
that
is
if
that
would
be
more,
that
would
get
us
to
more
at
least
closer
to
a
yes
from
the
fellow
council.
Members
and
I
do
agree
that
that's
probably
more
in
the
spirit
of
the
up
to
10
and
it's
matching
some
of
the
other
cities.
K
Thank
you,
so
I
would
also
I
would
be
fine
with
with
looking
it
up
being
a
to
six
percent
as
well.
I
would
be
supportive
of
that.
K
I
wanted
to
make
one
other
comment
and
then
go
back
to
the
to
the
the
the
other
topic
of
of
whether
they
it
should
come
back
to
to
to
council.
One
of
the
comments
I
wanted
to
make
was,
regarding
you
know,
having.
C
I
Of
the
past
two
years
since
they,
since
it
was
passed
by
the
voters
and
in
my
in
my.
K
C
A
And
we
heard
from
our
police
chief
at
our
last
meeting
that
the
the
the
problems
that
are
can
sometimes
be
seen
around
dispensaries
tend
to
gravitate
around
the
ones
in
the
second
bucket
and
so
I
would
be.
You
know,
obviously,
supportive
of
of
approving
vendors
who
are
going
to
be
setting
up
a
dispensary
from
the
first
bucket
and
I.
Believe
that
the
that
the.
L
Process
that
we
set
up
and
the
and
and
all
of
that
is
going
to
be
driving
and
and
the
the
preferred
selection
of
those
higher
end
dispensaries,
because
that's
what
you
know
that's
frankly,
what
I
would
want
to
come
to
San,
Bruno
and
I
think
that
would
be
a
a
much
better
fit.
L
We
have
many
other
types
of
non-family
oriented
businesses
in
San
Bruno,
and
that-
and
you
know
those
don't
seem
to
prevent
family
activities
from
from
taking
place
so
I
I'm,
still
okay,
with
having
dispensaries
downtown
back
on
the
the
topic
of
you
know,
who
should
be?
Who
should
have
the
final
approval
assistant
city
manager?
L
You
mentioned
that
in
the
current
process
it
would
simply
be
a
pass
fail
if
we
were
to
direct
staff
to
change
the
approval
Authority
or
at
least
bring
a
proposal
for
changing
the
the
approval
Authority.
Would
that
instead
yield
a
pro?
Could
that
instead
yield
a
process
that
ended
up
with
a
score
with
a
relative
score.
So
instead
of
here's
five,
they
all
pass.
L
And
now
you
know,
potentially,
if
we,
if,
if
we
yielded
the
The
Authority,
then
it
would
be
up
to
staff
to
choose
from
five
equal
ones,
but
if
there
was
a
scoring
system
where
it
was
like
okay,
based
on
all
the
criteria
that
we've
set
up,
you
know
these
are
the
these
are
the
ones
and
then
we
would
just-
and
we
would
pick
the
top
three-
is
that
a
possibility.
L
L
Is
that
may
may
there
be
issues
with
having
a
simple
scoring
system
to
decide?
Who
is
one
two
which
three
operators
get
the
permit?
Yes,
I
do
think
that
there
may
be
components
of
someone's
proposal
that
doesn't
lend
itself
very
nicely
to
a
precise
scoring
rubric.
For
example,
you
may
have
a
cannabis
operator
that
proposes
a
more
robust
marketing
plan
to
attract
people
that
are
traveling
through
San
Bruno
or
come
into
SFO,
which
may
increase
revenue
and
I
know
this.
L
The
council
has
talked
about
that
too,
and
so
how
you
exactly
sort
of
weight,
all
of
the
other
criteria
that
one
piece
may
not
sort
of
bear
out
to
be
one
or
two
or
three
points
more
when
you
sort
of
weight
all
the
other
criteria,
but
it
may
actually
be
a
very
strong
reason
why
a
council
or
staff
may
choose
that
that
operator,
and
so
yes,
there
can
be
a
a
sort
of
scoring
Rubik
rubric.
L
But
I
do
think
that
there
are
various
factors
that
and
I
think
to
avoid
someone
saying
well:
I
scored
a
98
and
they
scored
a
96..
Why
did
they
get
the
permit?
I
think
that
you
can,
by
having
a
pass,
fail
system.
So
you
know
that
you
have
no
matter
who's,
making
the
the
decision,
they've
all
passed,
the
initial
process
and
they're
they're
all
qualified
and
then
can
make
your
decision
based
on
other
factors
that
would
be
articulated.
L
L
We
did
receive
in
our
our
responses
to
agenda
questions
that
we
do
have
the
option
of
adopting
the
ordinance
tonight
and
providing
directive
direction
to
staff
at
a
later
date
to
to
change
the
authority
and
we-
and
we
would
have
plenty
of
time
to
do
that
before
the
the
the
issuance
of
any
permits,
so
I
I'm,
still
supportive
of
of
adopting
this.
This
consent
item
tonight.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Any
other
questions
or
comments.
Council,
member
salazarus.
Thank
you.
L
So
thank
you
to
the
assistant
city
manager
for
the
explanation
on
on
the
process
and
although
it's
been
defined,
which
criteria
might
be
used,
it
does
still
seem
to
me
that
there's
a
lot
of
subjectiveness
in
there
and
we're
not
really
we're
not
really
providing
anything.
L
That's
within
this
ordinance
that
would
prevent
us
from
passing
a
bunch
of
smoke,
shops
versus
a
bunch
of
Apple
stores,
so
I
get
that
there's
a
process,
but
I
don't
know
that
it's
necessarily
going
to
always
yield
what
what
what
the
council
has
envisioned
or
what
the
community
may
have
envisioned
and
if,
if
the
only
recourse,
then
is
that
the
city
council
gets
to
prove
which
one
is
prettier
than
the
others
again.
I
think
that
could
open
us
up
to
some
litigation.
L
If
that's,
if
that's
what
we
end
up
doing
I
know
the
the
city
of
Pacifica,
when
they
first
issued
theirs
that
they
they
did
a
lottery
and
I
think
they
had
a
few
dozen
applicants
and
they
actually
made
money
on
the
whole
deal,
because
people
had
to
pay
to
participate
in
the
lottery
and
it
was
a
a
money-making
Venture
and
it
allowed
more
people
to
participate.
Of
course,
they
were
all
vetted
right.
L
L
They
keep
a
list
of
the
people
that
were
drawn
and
if
there's
openings
or
if
they,
when
they
did
expand
the
number
of
stores
that
they
drew
from
that
same
pool
of
people
that
had
that
had
already
submitted
to
the
lottery,
so
I
think
there
are
better
ways
of
doing
it
than
this
way
and
and
and
I'm
not
thoroughly.
Convinced
that
you
know
pass
fail,
is
really
going
to
be
enough
of
a
filter
to
to
eliminate
what
what
we
were
discussing
so
just
get
some
more
thought.
L
Oh
and
one
other
question,
I
noticed
the
way
this
is
written.
It
says
that
the
council
will
approve
up
to
three.
So
is
that,
like
the
up
to
ten
percent,
where
council
could
pick
zero
or
pick
one
okay?
So
we
have
that
flexibility.
Thank
you,
the
staff,
not
at
affirmative,
a
city
manager.
Thank
you,
mayor,
I,
just
want
to
go
back
to
the
question
of.
L
Can
the
city
council
increase
the
tax
rate
by
resolution?
There's
a
portion
of
one
of
the
ordinances
in
6E
that
says
the
council
May
by
further
action,
increase
or
lower
the
tax
rate,
but
in
no
no
event
shall
the
rate
be
higher
than
10
percent.
The
City
attorney
has
applied
that,
while
it
may
be
able
to
be
done
by
resolution,
it
would
be
more
prudent
to
if
you
adjust
the
tax
rate,
do
it
by
ordinance
and
so
just
want
to
clarify
that.
L
Based
on
that,
we
will
recommend
that
if
Council
does
decide
to
increase
or
change
the
rate,
it'd
be
done
by
ordinance
again.
That
can
be
done
by
Council
direction
to
bring
the
ordinance
that's
before
you.
That
says
six.
Five
percent
back
to
you
as
the
first
reading
for
a
different
number
or
you
could
pass
the
five
percent
and
then
we
would
come
back
at
a
later
date
with
the
ordinance
adjustment
process.
L
One
suggestion
for
future
ordinances
there's
a
lot
packed
into
these
two
ordinances
and
and
not
all
of
them
are
necessarily
that
related,
and
so
my
suggestion
going
forward
would
be
to
split
these
out
and
I.
Think
that
may
allow
us
to
move
certain
items
forward
and
separate
out
things
that
we
don't
agree
with.
For
example,
you
know
we're
talking
about
the
process
and
the
tax
rate
in
the
same
ordinance,
we
could
split
those
two
out
and
maybe
debate
one
longer
than
the
other,
but
allow
the
other
one
to
move
forward.
L
Also,
when
we're
talking
about
the
zoning,
if
we're
packing
that,
along
with
rescinding
the
the
restriction
on
on
cannabis,
maybe
those
two
items
could
have
been
separate,
one
of
them
could
have
moved
forward
and
the
other
one
could
have
been
debated
longer.
So
just
when
there's
this
much
in
there,
I
I
get
it
that
we
want
to
streamline
it,
but
at
the
same
time
it
gives
it
sort
of
ties
our
hands
in
what.
C
We
are
allowed
to
move
forward
absolutely
in
the
future.
We
can
look
into
doing
that.
I
will
say
for
this
item
part
of
the
reason
why
the
ordinances
are
so
comprehensive
because
for
this
particular
item
you
are
removing
the
prohibition
on
retailers
and.
A
C
The
prohibition,
but
you've
not
articulated
the
other
components
of
of
what
the
process
will
be
so
but
but
I
totally
understand.
Council
member
Salazar's
point.
D
City
attorney
will
correct
me.
We
will
need
to
waive
the
second
reading.
So
is
there
any
action
on
that
through
the
through
the
mayor,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
accept
item
six,
even
the
consent
counter
calendar
as
read?
First,
we
need
to
wait
a
second
reading.
Oh
please,
okay,
because
we
pulled
it
got
it.
So
I
would
like
to
make.
C
F
C
We're
not
on
Zoom,
all
those
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye,
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed.
No,
no.
No.
It
passes
three
to
two.
Oh
city
manager.
Thank
you
mayor
just
because
there
was
a
discussion
on
potentially
staff
coming
back.
I
do
want
to
ask
the
council.
Do
you
want
to
provide
any
any
direction
on
those
items
that.
K
You
discussed
either
coming
back
on
adjusting
the
tax
rate
or
coming
back
to
the
city
council,
with
the
adoption
to
change
how
the
permits
are
awarded
either
at
the
council
level
or
at
staff
level.
Just.
C
So
we
have
clear
Direction
so
through
the
mayor,
I
think
I
can't
speak
on
the
the
order,
but
I
would
like
stuff
to
come
back
on
the
six
percent
I'm.
Supportive
of
that.
Thank
you
just
like
intending
okay,
I
think
you
have
the
direction.
Yes,
please!
C
Okay,
with
that
we're
going
to
move
on
to
item
G
and
thank
you
to
the
vice
versa,
long,
it's
not
as
long
G
wave
the
second
reading
and
adopt
an
ordinance.
L
L
Of
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
rescinding
ordinance,
number
1901
and
amending
San
Bruno
Municipal
Code,
section
10.08.020
to
authorize
rates
to
be
set
by
resolution
or
ordinance
vice
mayor
great.
Thank
you.
I
I
just
wanted
to
start
by
saying
that
I
did
speak
with
the
city
attorney
about
this.
So
please
correct
me.
If
this,
what
I'm
about
to
say
is
incorrect
but
as
I
understand
this,
what
we
would
essentially
be
doing
by
approving
this
is
taking
away
the
Public's
right
to
a
public
comment,
one
additional
time.
L
The
the
process
right
now
is
that
through
prop
218,
there's
a
hearing
to
protest
and
in
order
to
actually
protest
these
rates,
you
need
over
50
percent
of
the
households
to
write
in
that
they
don't
agree
with
the
rate
increase
and
I,
don't
think
in
California.
That
has
ever
been
done,
because
that
is
such
a
high
threshold.
It's
completely
unreasonable
and
I.
Don't
know
why
that
was
ever
approved.
L
But
with
that
said,
you
have
a
first
reading
that
likely
happens
the
same
night
of
that
protest
vote
and
there's
a
requirement
of
a
minimum
of
five
days
before
the
second
reading.
So
assuming
the
second
reading
happens
five
days
to
15
days
later,
a
regular
council
meeting.
L
That's
the
next
opportunity
to
actually
make
public
comment,
and
so
there's
an
argument
that
if
you
take
out
the
second
reading,
it
doesn't
really
matter
because
the
decision
has
already
been
made.
The
night
of
the
hearing,
but
I
do
believe
that
oftentimes
individuals
don't
act
until
sometimes
even
after
the
hearing,
because
they
don't
know
they're
late
to
the
to
what's
happening.
We
maybe
haven't
done
a
great
job
of
communicating,
depending
on
on.
What's
going
on,
but
I
do
think.
L
It's
really
important
that
the
public
have
the
maximum
opportunity
to
make
a
public
comment,
whether
the
item
be
on
consent
or
not,
and
whether
it
be
a
second
reading
after
the
fact
that
the
rate
has
been
approved
and
so
I
would
not
support
this
moving
forward.
I
do
think
that
the
public
should
have
maximum
opportunity
to
comment
when
their
rates
are
being
increased
and
especially
I
think
it's
clear
that
I
did
not
support
this
recent
agreement.
G
So
I'm,
that's
my
where
we
are
and
that's
why
I'm
requesting
a
second
vote,
and
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
any
of
that
City
attorney
mayor
Medina
and
vice
mayor
Mason,
one.
The
one
clarification
that
I
probably
should
have
pointed
out
before,
is
that
the
change
does
not
say
that
you
can't
use
an
ordinance
in
the
future.
It
just
provides
the
flexibility
to
do
it
by
ordinance
or
resolution
So.
Currently,
the
municipal
code
requires
rates
to
be
set
by
ordinance.
This
adds
the
ability
to
set
by
resolution
as
well.
G
G
Thank
you.
Is
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
colleagues
through
the
chair
council
member
Salazar?
G
Can
staff
sort
of
refresh
me
on
why
we
wanted
to
go
this
route?
Is
it
just
because
we
we
want
to
move
the
process
along
more
efficiently,
City
attorney,
mayor
Medina
and
council
member
Salazar?
G
G
It
it's
worth
noting
that
I
think
before
2017.
There
was
some
ambiguity
in
the
law
that
suggested
maybe
rates
needed
to
be
set
by
ordinance
the
legislature
since
modified
that
to
clarify
it
could
be
rate
or
resolution
or
ordinance.
So
this
kind
of
follows
that,
but
definitely
if
the
city
council
is
going
to
hold
a
prop
218
proceeding.
F
The
current
agreement
and
the
ability
to
have
rates
in
place
in
time
under
the
current
agreement,
because
the
hearing
is
going
to
be
on
the
15th
I
believe
the
next
meeting
after
that
is
in
December,
so
the
rates
actually
wouldn't
become
effective
until
later
in
January,
and
the
current
agreement
has
approved
by
the
city
council
at
the
last
meeting
provides
that
the
rates
would
be
effective.
January
1.
K
Either
have
a
study
session
or
a
meeting
of
the
city
council
when
you
receive
your
your
rapes
so,
for
example,
water
sewer
rates.
We
do
a
study
there's
a
meeting.
We
just
don't
go
straight
to
the
prop
218
process
and
I
do
believe
that
that
is
the
case
as
well.
Some
cities,
because
you
have
a
franchise
agreement
that
that
says
that
there
will
be
a
prop
218
process
and
you
have
to
if
the
proposed
rapes
are
valid
and
in
line
with
the
franchise
agreement.
K
Some
cities
go
straight
to
the
prop
218
process
and
then
all
of
the
meetings
about
the
potential
rates
are
around
the
prop
218
process.
Here
in
San
Bruno.
It
has
been
and
will
continue
to
be,
the
practice
there's
no
proposed
to
change
that
is
to
bring
those
discussions
to
the
city
council.
So
the
city
council
can
authorize
the
prop
218
process,
and
so
we
do
that
for
our
water
sewer
and
garbage
grapes.
G
Of
how
we
do
this
absolutely-
and
it
includes
a
mail
notice
to
every
every
address,
okay,
so
I
I
agree
with
the
vice
mayor
that
you
know
we
an
opportunity
to
be
transparent.
It
seems
like
we
don't
want
to
take
that
away
from
the
public,
and
it's
been
my
experience
that
the
complaints
start
coming
in
the
day
that
people
get
the
postcard
saying
it's
happening
right,
and
so
it
seems
like
if
we
kick
that
off
and
then
never
discuss
it
again
in
public.
G
J
Is
affected
right?
So
if,
if
we,
if
we
have
a
meeting
people,
don't
notice
it
but
they're
going
to
notice
when
they
get
the
thing
in
the
mail
that
says
your
rates
are
going
up
and
I
think
that's
the
very
beginning
of
the
of
the
process.
Correct
your
manager.
Yes,
I
do
want
to
clarify,
though,
that
the
adoption
of
the
rates
by
ordinance
that
that
process
or
that
sort
of
second
reading
that
we're
talking
about
happens
after
the
notices
are
mailed
and
you
have
the
public
hearing
right.
I
And
there's
the
noticed
hearing
I
do
think
you're
right
that
that
is
when
people
oftentimes
show
up
that
process
will
will
continue
that
that
meeting
would
continue.
It's
that
second
meeting
that
may
not
occur
because
you're
allowing
the
rates
to
be
adopted
by
resolution.
I
will
also
say
that,
typically,
that
second
reading
is.
C
A
consent
item,
and
in
my
experience
there's
that's
really
not
a
a
process
where
people
come
it's
that
first
meeting.
That
is
the
prop
218
meeting.
Okay,
thank
you.
C
Any
other
comments
or
question
vice
mayor
I
did
leave
one
point
out,
which
is
that
you
also
in
addition
to
the
second
reading,
have
lose
the
30
days
where
the
public
can
come
during
general
public
comment
to
also
make
comments
if
they
disagree
with
the
rate
increases
or
any
part
of
the
contract
so
effectively
we're
really
taking
quite
a
bit
of
opportunities,
whether
it
be
one
person
or
more
to
inform
the
Council
of
their
opinion
on
the
on
the
increases
they're
not
going
to
be
lowered
there,
we
know
now
they're
all
going
to
be
increases,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
made
that
point
too.
C
This
item
was
pulled
so
if
there
is
I'm
sorry,
it's
quite
all
right,
I
apologize,
we're
used
to
zoom
and
I
was
trying
to
push
the
button
to
get
my
hand
up
and
it
didn't
work.
But
I
appreciate
the
comments
about
the
transparency
and
the
additional
time
and
and
we're
doing
this
for
our
convenience
right.
So
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
it
seems
like
it
needs
to
happen
for
the
Recology
contract,
but
it
doesn't
need
to
happen
in
the
future.
C
Like
is
that
right,
because
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
that
part
with
the
current
mayor,
Medina
and
council
member
Medina,
with
the
way
the
current
Recology
agreement
is
set
up,
the
rates
are
supposed
to
go
into
effect.
January,
1st
and
I.
Don't
believe
that.
G
We
could
have
the
the
rates
adopted
in
time
by
ordinance
yeah,
because
the
first
reading
would
take
place,
November,
15th
and
then
the
second
reading
would
take
place
at
the
meeting
in
December
and
so
30
days
after
that
is
going
to
be
after
January
1.
right
and
then.
The
consequence
of
that
is
what.
C
C
Within
the
contract
agreement,
so
I'm
kind
of
open
to
to
hearing
our
options
here
of
of
that
we
in
a
way
we
don't
really
need
to
change
it
other
than
for
this
instance,
and
and
it's
a
scheduling
thing
in
the
future
and
and
it
does
give
us
flexibility.
But
it's.
F
Not
necessarily
required,
and
we've
been
able
to
do
it
this
way
for
for
many
many
years,
so
I'm
I'm
kind
of
like
don't
see
it
being
broken
and
need
to
be
fixed
and
need
to
be
changed.
But
I
see
where,
as
we
came
to
this
one
contract,
that
we
need
to
do
something
there
and
I
don't
have
enough
information
from
staff
to
be
able
to
say
well,
okay,
we're
going
to
require
the
second
reading
right.
F
It's
kind
of
like
I
need
to
have
that
and
to
understand
that
and
I'm
interested
in
what
my
colleagues
think
about.
Let
me
ask
to
staff
to
City
attorney
city
manager
or
other
way
around
or
whatever.
Would
it
be
at
all
helpful?
If
we
took
a
five
minute
break
to
look
in
to
the
document
or
to
get
any
of
the
answer
that
obviously
no
one's
supposed
to
have
on
the
top
of
their
head?
That
was
asked.
F
I
think
with
this
with
this
issue,
we
we're
we're
able
to
continue
going
without
a
break.
I
think
that
we
can
provide
a
few
recommendations
and
respond
to
council
member
Medina's
question.
Okay,
so
please
to
councilmember
Medina's
question:
councilmember
Medina!
F
No,
you
said
it
right:
okay,
council,
member
Medina,
mayor
Medina
in
regard
to
council
member
Medina's
question,
so
you
are
correct
that,
based
on
the
timing
and
Cadence
of
the
Recology
agreement,
adopting
the
rates
by
ordinances
so
that
they
could
take
effect,
January
1
is
needed
and
that's
been
the
Cadence
we've
been
on.
It
is
also
true
that
the
recommendation
to
change
the
process
from
a
ordinance
based
process
to
a
resolution-based
process-
it's
not
solely
because
of
the
Recology
agreement.
Many
cities
do
it
by
ordinances.
Other
cities.
F
Do
it
by
resolution,
similar
to
our
prior
conversation
for
various
policy
reasons
of
City
to
choose
either,
but
both
are
totally
valid.
I
would
say,
though,
that
operationally
there
are
times
where
you
may
want
to
be
able
to
adopt
rates
by
resolution.
That
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
you
are
limiting
public
comment,
for
example
with
the
Recology
contract.
You
have
a.
F
If
you
passed
it
by
resolution,
the
thing
that
the
ordinance
process
gives
you
and
I
think
vice
mayor
Mason
mentioned
this-
is
that
that
30-day
period
is
also
called
a
referendum
period
And.
So
there's
a
referendum
process
where
I
10
of
Voters
can
sign
a
referendum
to
prevent
an
ordinance
going
into
effect,
how
that
would
actually
work
with
a
rape
setting
process
that
has
been
duly
approved
by
a
prop
218
process
and
is
subject
to
your
franchise
agreement.
The.
J
Agreement
having
gone
through
the
dually
notice
prop
218
process,
so
I
do
think
that
that's
sort
of
the
saying
that
setting
in
particular
the
franchise
rates
by
by
ordinance
may
actually
be
more
complicated.
J
That
said,
the
resol,
the
ordinance
changed
to
change
the
process
from
an
ordinance
to
a
resolution,
actually
provides
the
city
with
the
option,
and
so
you
could
pass
the
ordinance
as
drafted,
set
Recology
rates
This
Time
by
by
resolution.
You
may
actually
decide
in
the
future
to
set
those
by
resolution,
but
you
could
also
direct
staff
to
for
other
rates
like
your
water
and
sewer
rates,
to
set
those
by
ordinance
and
provide
that
direction
again.
The
the
item
that
is
before
you
today
provides
the
option.
J
It
does
not
say
that
that
will
be
the
the
the
absolute
certain
case.
J
K
When
is
that
decision
made,
so
we
will
have
the
study
sessions,
we
always
have
the
study
session.
So
at
the
study
session
we
would
be
making
that
we
would
be
offered
to
make
that
decision.
Yes,
whether
or
not
it's
resolution
so
from
we
could
just
continue
continually
decide
to
go
forward
with,
with
with
an
ordinance
and
the
council.
Each
time
gets
to
make
that
decision
in
a
study
session.
Yes
in
a
study
session
or
the
meeting,
so
there's
there's
kind
of
that
flexibility
all
right,
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
colleagues.
K
Is
there
any
action?
I'm,
sorry
vice
mayor.
Thank
you.
I
would
just
say
that
if
it
wasn't
clear
last
time
that
it
is
concerning
to
me
that
we
receive
the
Recology
contract
for
the
first
time,
the
night
that
we
were
requested
to
approve
it,
it's
a
20-year
total
contract
and
now
we're
being
essentially
told
that
we
need
to
approve
this
in
order
to
ensure
that
the
rate
increases
are
effective
at
the
appropriate
timeline
and
I
I.
K
Don't
believe
that
the
council
should
be
put
in
that
position,
I
will
not
be
approving
this
tonight.
I
can't
speak
for
my
counsel,
my
colleagues
obviously,
but
we
need
we
need
more
time
and
more
notice
in
the
future
and
I
would
say
on
the
contract.
It's
not
a
full
20-year.
K
It's
with
options,
but
I
think
also,
what's
in
here
as
well,
is
that
there's
a
measurable
and
accountable
plateaus
that
need
to
be
made
in
order
for
the
consideration
for
the
extension,
which
I
think
is
a
positive
to
have
within
the
agreement,
any
other
question
or
yeah
question
or
comments
from
colleagues
any
action.
If
there
is
action
it
would
be
to
waive
the
second
reading
and
adopt
the
ordinance.
C
Okay
through
the
chair,
yeah,
so
council,
member
Salazar,
so
I'll
just
say
that
I
Echo
the
vice
mayor's
comment
about.
We
need
more
time,
especially
when
we
have
large
contracts
that
are
significantly.
We
absolutely
need
more
time
to
study
those
in
the
future,
but
I
will
make
a
motion
now
to
waive
the
reading
and
approve
this,
or
is
this
one
an
ordinance,
an
ordinance?
C
This
motion
on
the
floor
is
there
a
second
I'll
second
motion
Salazar?
Second,
at
Hamilton,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
aye
aye,
all
opposed
no
four
one
approved
and
I
will
also
Echo
the
vice
mayor
and
council
member
salazarus
on
the
time
needed
for
important
documents
as
such
with
that.
That
concludes
consent.
C
F
Good
evening
again,
honorable
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
members,
I'll
be
making
the
presentation
tonight
on
the
public
hearing
on
the
commercial
cannabis
operators
permit
and
the
application
procedures
and
guidelines
I'm
joined
tonight
by
the
city's
planning
and
housing
manager.
Michael
Laughlin
who's
done
a
huge
amount
of
work
on
this,
and
the
planning
team
will
be
leading
the
effort
to
really
spin
up
this
whole
new
program.
F
C
F
So
this
all
started
actually
with
the
ballot
in
2020,
but
this
has
been
a
busy
year
and
in
February
8th
there
was
a
study
session
where
Direction
was
provided
to
prepare
the
regulations
which
were
just
on
the
consent,
calendar
and
discussed
the
two
zoning
ordinances,
two
ordinances,
sorry,
one
of
which
is
zoning
and
one
of
which
is
more
General
municipal
code
amendments
and
on
September
27th.
There
was
a
public
Hearing
in
action
to
introduce
those
two
ordinances
and
earlier
tonight
there
was
adoption
of
the
ordinances.
G
G
The
distribution
facility
is
a
little
different.
It's
a
facility
that
procures
cannabis
from
licensed
cultivators
and
manufacturers
for
sale
to
licensed
retailers.
So
again,
whatever
they
hand
it
off
to
those
retailers,
I
was
talking
about
earlier,
there's
no
retail
sales
at
all
at
this
location,
it's
sort
of
essentially
a
warehouse
if
you
will-
and
it's
only
allowed
in
the
city's
M1
or
industrial
Zone,
which
is
north
of
I-380
.,
so
again
that
new
Municipal
Code
chapter
4.70,
establishes
the
Cannabis
operators
permit
requirements
and
the
review
processes.
G
So
this
is
a
lengthy
multi-step
process
which
would
start
with
the
filing
of
those.
The
city
staff,
which
is
a
larger
team,
would
pre-screen
them
and
then
proceed
to
city,
council,
review
and
selection
and
then
there's
another
step
with
the
filing
of
a
conditional
use.
Permit
it's
a
more
traditional
planning
entitlement
or
zoning
tool
used
to
regulate
specific
uses,
specific
locations,
and
that
would
be
subject
to
both
playing
commission
city
council
action
at
a
public
hearing.
G
If
that's
approved,
then
the
final
step
would
be
the
city
issuance
of
those
two
permits,
but
I'll
dive
into
a
little
bit
more
depth
with
this
commercial
cannabis
operators
permit.
As
I
mentioned
previously,
the
applications
are
filed
with
the
city
during
a
set
filing
period.
We
have
not
set
that
yet
because
we
want
to
get
everything
approved
first
and
there's
again
a
lot.
They
have
to
submit
balloon
many
many
pieces
of
documents
that
are
spelled
out
in
that
that
procedures
and
guidelines
list
in
a
lot
more
details.
G
So
if
you're
following
along
you're
wondering
what
is
that
business
plan
or
what
is
that
labor
and
Community
benefit
plan?
That
sounds
interesting.
If
you
flip,
to
exhibit
a
of
the
resolution,
attach
your
staff
report
you'll
see
what
that
means
in
a
lot
more
detail
and
I
won't
take
time
to
dive
into
the
details,
but
there's
a
lot
of
information
here
that
will
allow
the
city
team
and
ultimately
the
council
to
review
it.
As
I
said,
we
anticipate
having
an
initial
open
filing
period,
it's
possible.
G
As
you
know,
we
get
more
than
three
and
then
they'll
be
reviewed
and
proceed
with
a
pass
fail
rating
and
there
will
be
a
mandatory
criminal
history.
Background
check
won't
get
into
a
lot
of
details
because
it's
pretty
self-explanatory,
but
the
past
applications
proceed
to
the
city
council,
review
and
again
important
to
note
only
up
to
three
retail
businesses
and
up
to
one
distribution
business.
G
The
city
council
may
decide
they
want
to
actually
reopen
the
application
process
to
allow
for
additional
applications
and
the
city
reserves
the
right
to
award
a
lesser
number
of
permits
or
none
at
all
and
that
is
codified
in
the
ordinance
foreign.
So
if
an
operator
permit
or
permits
is
approved,
then
again
I
mentioned
that
then
the
next
step
is
the
conditional
use.
Permit
which
is
codified
in
the
zoning
code,
which
was
adopted
previously
tonight
and
then
would
proceed
for
issuance
really
important
to
note,
there's
an
annual
review
that
does
not
return
to
council.
G
That's
done
at
the
staff
level.
There's
also
revocation
procedures
Etc,
and
these
aren't
the
only
permits
the
state
has
a
very
robust
licensing
process,
and
then
we
have
our
typical
City
business
license:
that's
required
for
anyone
operating
a
business
in
San
Bruno,
so
quick,
summary
of
fees.
These
are
just
the
application
permit
fees,
so
why
do
we
need
them?
Well,
as
we
mentioned
previously,
this
is
a
whole
new
type
of
permit
whole
new,
app
program
regulatory
program.
G
F
Forty
five
dollars
and
again
the
exhibit
a
to
the
resolution,
shows
how
we
came
up
with
that
and
our
fully
burdened
staff
hourly
rates
for
all
the
different
review,
divisions
and
departments
and,
again,
that's
an
estimate
but
consistent
with
the
city
council
policy
to
maximize
cost
recovery
for
anything
development
related
the
staff
time
spent
in
processing
these
types
of
permit
application,
as
we
do
for
all
of
our
other
development,
related
planning
applications.
We
track
our
time
on
an
hourly
basis
and
we
charge
it
against
the
deposit.
F
It's
just
like
it
sounds
a
deposit,
sometimes
there's
a
refund
that
we
give
back.
Sometimes
we
go
over.
We
have
to
invoice
for
more,
but
we
start
with
a
as
accurate
initial
deposits.
We
can
get
we
charge
all
direct
costs.
What
that
means
is
you
would
be
surprised
how
much
legal
notices
cost
but
I
guarantee
you
that
our
city
clerk,
clerk's
office
runs
those
bills
and
processes
them,
and
they
really
like
to
be
able
to
charge
them
to
development
projects
because
again,
they've
gotten
very
expensive,
any
mailing
costs.
G
It's
pretty
customer
for
all
customary
for
all
the
cities
and
counties
that
do
allow
these
cannabis
businesses
to
have
fees
like
this,
so
tonight's
recommended
action
and
closing
is,
at
the
city
council,
hold
this
public
hearing
to
adopting
to
consider
adopting
the
two
resolutions
that
I
summarized.
That
concludes
the
staff
report.
Happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
have.
G
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
presentation
this
evening,
questions
on
the
presentation
from
colleagues
and
then
we
will
move
it
to
the
public
hearing
and
bring
it
back
for
Council,
further
Council
discussion,
Liberation
and
our
action
council
member
Hamilton.
Thank
you.
G
So
thank
you
to
staff
for
including
the
the
the
fee
study
summary
as
part
of
our
packet,
and
so
it's
it's
really
clear
as
to
you
know
how
these
fees
were
arrived
at
were
were
the
these
resulting
fees.
Did
we
did
we
check
to
see
if
they're,
relatively
in
line
with
our
with
neighboring
jurisdictions
that
have
that?
Allow
cannabis,
are
they
yeah,
we
checked,
most
cities
do
do
a
deposit-based
system,
and
these
are
there's
actually
a
pretty
big
range,
but
I
would
say
we're
in
the
middle
okay.
K
K
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you
okay!
Thank
you.
My
name
is
anavia
Lobos
I've
spoken
at
previous
meetings
good
evening,
Mary
Medina
and
council
members
and
City
personnel
I
am
still
adamantly
against
the
permitting
of
cannabis
dispensers
in
our
city.
Many.
G
Times
it's
been
alluded
to
the
fact
that
we
voted
in
2020
for
this
type
of
business,
the
realities
we
were
posed
with
a
taxation
question.
We
were
never
given
the
privilege
to
vote
on
whether
or
not
we
wanted
this
business
in
our
city.
I
did
not
become
aware
of
this
proceeding
forward
to
be
accepted
as
permitted
until
I
received
a
notice
in
the
mail
back
in
I
believe
it
was
end
of
July
by
the
Planning
Commission.
Only
1400
notices
were
sent
out.
G
The
entire
city
of
San
Bruno
was
never
notified
that
this
was
actually
happening
and
being
voted
upon.
This
evening
you
spoke
of
sending
notices
out
to
everybody
regarding
the
increase
in
Recology
fees
and
I,
find
it
completely
disconcerting
that
notices
were
not
sent
out
to
the
entire
population
of
San
Bruno,
because
we
all
should
have
a
right
to
vote
on
this.
This.
J
Process
that
would
allow
all
of
us
to
really
participate
in
this
decision.
This
proposal
should
be
a
measure
placed
on
the
ballot
for
everyone
to
vote
on
this
evening.
We
also
heard
from
the
superintendent
from
the
elementary
Park
School
District.
He
mentioned
that
31
percent
of
our
students
are
socioeconomically
disadvantaged
26.8
percent
of
them
are
English.
Learners
and
11.9
have
disabilities
I'm
going
to
Advocate
on
behalf
of
these
families
because
they
don't
know
what's
going
on.
They
have
not
had
a
voice
in
this
process.
J
Their
children
are
the
most
vulnerable
to
this
type
of
issue
of
drugs
coming
into
our
community.
They
even
mentioned
our
young
Latino,
males
which
I
am
Latin.
Are
you
know
highly
vulnerable
and
are
having
lots
of
issues
I
think
bringing
drugs
into
our
community
is
the
worst
decision
that
our
city
could
do,
especially
into
our
downtown
business
district.
J
That's
finally,
making
a
turn
for
the
positive
and,
lastly,
I
find
it
ironic
that
you're
talking
about
Red,
Ribbon,
Week
and
then
you're,
proclaiming
that
you
know
at
a
week
that
that
tries
to
you
know,
demonstrate
our
commitment
to
a
drug-free
Lifestyles,
and
yet
we
are
allowing
drugs
to
come
into
our
community
completely
contradicting
what
we're
trying
to
do
and
to
promote
for
our
children
and
our
youth.
So
I'm
asking
please
please
put
this
to
the
voters.
We
should
have
a
right
to
vote
on
this
decision.
J
J
F
The
previous
speaker,
we
did
have
a
vote
of
the
people
to
bring
a
tax
measure.
This
was
not
a
vote
on
any
specific
ordinance
to
bring
X
number
of
dispensaries
into
San
Bruno.
F
G
G
P
We
will
not
be
going
back
to
the
public.
Please
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
I
will
not
be
bringing
in
Von
Gregory
Bond
whenever
you're
ready.
You
may
begin.
P
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you.
Thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
My
name
is
Von
Gregory
and
I'm,
a
San
Bruno
resident
and
I'm
here
again
once
again
to
request
that
the
city
reject
the
two
cannabis
related
ordinance
ordinances
and
still
bewildered
that
the
transit
oriented
district
has
been
chosen
as
a
location
of
choice
for
cannabis
sales,
in
spite
of
the
600
foot,
sensitive
area
status
being
given
to
schools
not
only
only
to
some
youth
oriented
sites
and
some
parks.
P
Many
borders
of
the
transit-oriented
district
are
also
connected
to
homes.
If
San
Bruno
residents
want
to
welcome
cannabis
use,
then
it
should
welcome
it
in
all
neighborhoods,
not
primarily,
this
District
I
call
on
all
council
members
who
are
willing
to
approve
cannabis
sales
near
my
home
to
also
state
that
they
would
approve
of
a
cannabis
establishment
in
their
neighborhood
on
their
block
or
on
a
lot
of
joining
their
home
where
their
children
live
and
play.
P
Would
you
honestly
welcome
cannabis
in
your
own
backyard
and
if
that's
the
case,
why
have
you
eliminated
the
areas
of
Bay
Hill
commercial
areas
in
the
top
of
San
Bruno?
Avenue
at
Lunardi's,
the
San
Bruno
town
center
and
most
of
Tanforan
I
also
think
it's
ironic
that
the
month
of
October
holds
Red
Ribbon,
Week
and
National
Substance
Abuse
Prevention
month.
This
recognition
highlights
the
dangers
of
Youth
and
teen
use
of
drugs
and
alcohol,
and
the
likelihood
that
people
who
are
exposed
to
drugs
at
an
early
age
are
more
likely
to
become
addicted.
P
You
can
check
the
CDC
website
for
the
negative
effects
of
of
teen
marijuana
use
the
National
Institute
on
drug
abuse
reports
that
17
percent
of
people
who
use
marijuana
will
become
dependent
on
it.
When
news
begins
at
younger
ages,
such
as
teenagers,
that's
good
news,
if
you're
a
cannabis
retailer
who
wants
lifetime
customers,
but
it's
a
tragic
reality
for
families,
while
the
potential
cannabis
retail
stores
would
be
restricted
from
selling
cannabis
to
anyone
under
21.
The
vision
that
only
over
21
year
olds
will
be
using
cannabis
from
these
Newfound
dispensaries
is
misguided.
P
There's
no
stopping
parents
of
young
children
or
teens
from
dropping
in
to
purchase
their
own
cannabis
and
heading
on
home.
Trust
me.
If
parents
have
it
in
the
house,
the
kids
will
find
it
onto
the
taxes.
The
voters
of
San
Bruno
authorized
a
cannabis
tax
of
up
to
10
percent
City
staff
report
recommended
a
lower
rate
and
I
applaud
you
for
increasing
that
rate
to
six
per
trying
to
increase
it
to
six
percent
tonight.
P
P
It
was
approval
of
the
tax,
not
approval
of
sales
and
closing
I'm
asking
council
members
if
they
will
demonstrate
their
commitment
to
the
city's
Red
Ribbon
Week
Proclamation
for
promoting
drug-free
Lifestyles
for
everyone
in
San
Bruno
and
once
again,
I'm
asking
you
to
reject
proposals
for
cannabis
operations
in
the
city
of
San
Bruno.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Next
speaker,
please,
next
speaker
is.
P
B
Alicia
n,
when
I
get
ready,
you
may
be
maybe
hi
good
evening.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
hear
in
here.
Yes,
I
wanted
to
basically
review
the
factors
about
the
pocket
parks.
P
One
of
the
things
that
is
important
is
to
make
sure
that
we
see
the
pocket
parks
should
be
included
in
the
category
of
sensitive
areas,
not
just
some
of
the
bigger
parks.
For
example,
Forest
Lane
has
a
Park
area
and
growing
up
in
San
Bruno.
We
were
there
every
day
playing
basketball.
All
the
kids
would
be
over
there.
So
it's
important
to
focus
on
the
pocket,
Parks
being
included
and
not
just
the
the
larger
Parks,
especially
in
the
areas
on
the
east
side
of
El
Camino.
P
We'd
like
to
hear
briefly,
if
possible,
from
each
of
the
council
members
as
to
why
the
parent
was
put
before
the
horse
when
we
did
not
vote
for
allowing
marijuana
dispensaries
first
before
actually
voting
for
attacks
on
marijuana
dispensaries,
it's
really
disconcerting
to
have
seen
this
situation
play
out
the
way
it
has
because
it's
caused
a
lot
of
conflict
and
negativity
for
residents
here
in
San.
Bruno
I've
never
seen
a
division
like
this.
P
This
is
like
really
unfortunate
that
we've
had
this
play
out
the
way
it
has
and
I'm
not
really
hearing
anything.
It
seems,
except
for
a
couple
of
people
who
were
on
the
on
the
on
the
council
as
far
as
bringing
that
up,
but
it
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
hear
from
the
councilman
members
as
to
why
they
actually
did
it
the
way
they
did
it
shouldn't.
F
How
you
know
what
their
feedback
is
on?
Why
that
happened?
The
way
it
did.
Second,
another
thing
was
keep
in
mind
where
there's
drugs
in
Cash
There's
crime,
that's
a
fact,
and
regardless
I've
talked
to
peace
officers
with
a
lot
of
seniority,
and
that's
like
the
one
of
the
main
things
that
they
keep
talking
about.
F
As
far
as
you
know,
this
this
topic,
and
also
we
voted
pertaining
only
to
the
tax,
not
on
having
a
marijuana
dispensary
here
in
San
Bruno
and
the
will
of
the
people
was
only
pertaining
to
attacks
and
I.
Keep
hearing
that
comment.
The
will
of
the
people
was
only
pertaining
to
tax.
It
was
not
pertaining
to
bringing
in
marijuana
dispensaries.
F
Please
clarify
that
when
we
hear
it
because
it's
you
know
it's
causing
communication
issues,
but
thank
you.
Thank
you.
P
Riley
Gibbons,
whenever
you're
ready,
May
begin
hello.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you
hear
you,
hello,
I
just
want
to
address
a
couple
of
things
that
people
mention
and
it's
really
the
same
stuff
about.
You
know
all
these
people
that
seem
to
have
voted.
Maybe
for
the
taxation,
that's
up
to
10
percent,
and
you
know
I
do
agree
that
it
would
be
fair
to
raise
it
up
to
six
percent.
Nothing
wrong
with
that.
But
for
people
to
say
you
know.
Well,
we
didn't
know
that
a
storefront
was
going
to
be.
P
You
know
like
a
possibility.
My
biggest
thing
is:
what
are
you
supposed
to
tax
if
there's
nothing
if
there's
no
store
or
no
sales
where's
the
tax
coming
from
and
another
thing
about
crime,
whether
it's
drugs
there's
cash
I,
don't
know
if
you
saw
the
news,
but
cannabis
will
be
decriminalized
very
soon
and
Apple
stores
are
getting
to
hit
up
every
other
day.
They
don't
have
any
drugs
there
and
cannabis.
Certainly.
F
P
Disappointing
to
hear
people
you
know
throw
shade
at
it.
You
know
they've
never
used
it.
I
know
people
that
use
it
every
day
for
medicinal
purposes.
Cbd
I
take
CBD
for
my
anxiety.
I
do
not
smoke
but
I'm
all
for
cannabis,
because
it
will
help
benefit
people
in
many
ways
and
I
really
really
ask
every
person
as
against
canvas
just
to
go
to
a
store
and
check
it
out.
You
know:
there's
not
people
sitting
there,
injecting
their
arms
and.
C
There's
not
cash
on
the
floor
or
anything.
It's
very
professional.
Like
council
members
have
said
they
do.
Look
like
Apple,
Stores,
they're,
very,
very
clean.
You
know
you
don't
smell
anything
for
the
most
part
and
it's
you
know,
it's
very
professional
I
think
just
be
open-minded
about
it,
because
if
we
don't
make
a
change,
then
San
Bruno
is
going
to
be
how
it's
been
the
last
x
amount
of
years
and
it's
time
to
really
just
move
forward
and
just
see
the
progression.
G
Next
speaker
is
Marcel
Valdez
Marcel,
whenever
you're
ready,
you
may
begin
hi
good
evening,
mayor
Miko,
Medina
and
city
council
and
staff.
My
name
is,
and
I
spoke
at
the
last
city
council
meeting
about
these
cannabis
policies
being
written
and
I
guess
I
can
be
kind
of
in
the
middle.
The
middle
I,
just
I
think
again
would
like
to
urge
that
city,
council
and
staff
really
consider
the
previous
points
I
made
and
furthering
prevention
efforts,
especially
for
our
youth.
When
it
comes
to
setting
up
these
dispensaries.
G
Two
major
I
guess
regulations
I
suggested
were
making
sure
that
each
retailer
provides
its
customers
with
educational
materials
about
cannabis
that
explain
both
negative
and
positive
effects.
You
know
of
the
drug
to
prevent
overuse
of
it
and
as
well
as
the
allocation
of
the
cannabis.
It's
tax
revenue
going
to
prevention,
efforts
to
Community
Education,
so
I
do
support
the
the
higher
the
six
percent
tax
and
other
people
did
point
out
that
the
city
San
Bruno,
is
supporting
the
upcoming
ribbon
weekly
or
this
month.
G
So
I
I
guess
just
like
involved
focus
on
you
know
like
like
Ribbon
Week,
is
doing
reading
communities
that
support
prevention
efforts
and
Community
Education.
That's
all.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Next
speaker,
please,
there
are
no
other
hands
raised.
Okay.
This
is
the
last
call
for
any
members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
speak
because
we're
going
to
bring
it
back
to
the
council.
We
will
be
closing
the
public
hearing
if
there
are
any
other
speakers.
G
No
other
speakers
are
visible.
Thank
you.
Is
there
any
action
from
Council
to
close
a
public
hearing?
Please
so
moved
Mr
second
motion
made
Hamilton.
Second,
in
Medina,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
I
have.
C
A
5-0
vote
to
close
public
hearing
now
we'll
bring
it
to
council
for
comments,
action
and
or
Etc
council
members.
E
N
Respond,
but
it's
come
up
several
times
tonight,
the
the
ques,
the
the
question
of
whether
we
should
have
been
considering
cannabis,
considering
that
it's
divisive
and
the
the
reality
of
it
is
at
least
based
on
my
direct
experience
of
you
know:
I
received
many
many
many
messages
and
calls
about
this
topic
over
the
past
several
months
and
and
in
fact,
since
being
elected
and
and
I've
been
tracking
them,
because,
oh
that's
my
job
and
to
see
what
the
what
the
people
want
and
the
the
reality
of
it
is
that
for
every
person
who
who
very
passionately
and
very
articulately
laid
out.
N
Why
they're,
why
they're
that
they
object
to
allowing
cannabis
sales
in
San
Bruno
there
for
every
one
of
those
there
were
two
people
who
told
me
to
please
support
it,
so
I
I
agree.
That
is
that
this
is
a,
and
this
was
the
same
ratio
that
we
got
in
the
public
comments
in
the
last
meeting
when
we
had.
You
know
many
many
public
comments
on
on
this
and
we
and
we
had
had
the
the
major
vote
on
in
the
last.
In
our
last
meeting,
the.
C
C
Be
considered
controversial
with
you
know
if
enough
people,
if
enough
people
oppose
it,
and
that
doesn't.
F
Need
to
be
anywhere
close
to
a
majority
if
we
say
well,
you
know
what
there's
you
know.
30
of
the
people
really
don't
like
this,
so
let's
just
not
consider
it
now,
you're
ignoring
the
will
of
this
of
the
the
70.
Maybe
I
should
have
used
the
real
numbers
here,
which
are
60
64.,
which
was
the
the
the
percentage
of
people
who
voted
for
the
for
the
the
tax
in.
K
2020.
I
agree
that
that
I
was
not
on
Council
when
that
was
placed
on
the
ballot.
I
in
fact
spoke
at
public
comment
during
during
2020,
when
that
was
being
when
it
was
being
debated
to
be
put
on
the
on
the
ballot
and
I
I.
Actually,
since
I
read,
my
comment
like
like
many
folks,
do
on
Zoom
I
still
have
it
and
I'm
going
to
read
it
again
and
I
said.
Lastly,
please
consider
that
including
the
regulatory
measure
would
settle
the
question
of
what
the
citizens
want.
K
Something
like
should.
San
Bruno
allow
the
operation
of
retail
cannabis
businesses
to
be
taxed
at
a
rate
of
up
to
X
percent,
with
the
location
and
number
of
which
to
be
regulated
by
the
city
council
through
Republic
process.
That
was
my
suggestion.
As
a
citizen
of
how
that
measure
should
have
been
read.
K
That
was
not
what
council
put
on
the
ballot.
They
put
only
the
tax
on
the
ballot
which
has
led
to
this
confusion
here,
but
I
would
Echo
what
one
of
the
speakers
tonight
said
and
has
been
echoed
throughout
the
this
process,
that
if
64
percent
of
Voters
said
yes
to
a
cannabis
tax,
what
were
they
tax?
What
would
we
be
taxing
if
we
didn't
allow
the
sale
of
cannabis
they
just
it?
It
simply
doesn't
follow
so
I'm
still
supportive
of
this,
and
but
I
felt
that
it
was
important
to
articulate.
Why?
K
Thank
you
other
questions
or
comments
from
colleagues,
councilmember
Salazar.
Just
one
quick
comment,
and
just
regarding
the
question
about
what
would
be
taxed,
I'll
point
back
to
what
Half
Moon
Bay
did.
They
approved
a
tax
but
did
not
approve
the
retail
sale
of
cannabis.
They
approved
the
cultivation,
but
not
the
large-scale
growth,
so
they
actually
turned
down
several
versions
of
it
approved
only
once
it
was
very
narrowly
defined,
so
there's
at
least
the
potential
that
the
outcome
could
have
been
different.
Had
it
been
placed
on
a
ballot.
K
It
like
it's
just
a
quick
response,
just
want
to
point
out
that
Half
Moon
Bay
has
Farms
where
things
can
be
cultivated.
We
don't
have
any
any
kind
of
open
space
where
Farms
could
be
done
or
large
Parcels,
where
indoor
growth
could
be
done
at
any
at
any
level.
Council
member,
just
one
more
clarification.
What
they
approved
was
actually
the
growth
of
the
seedlings
and
not
the
actual
growth
of
the
plant,
and
so
they
even
turned
down
the
actual
growth
thing,
even
though
they
have
the
fields
they.
K
Other
questions
or
comments
from
other
colleagues
hearing
and
seeing
none
is
there
and
public
hearing
has
been
closed.
This
is
an
action
item
if
there.
C
Is
to
adopt
a
resolution
through
the
mayor
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
adopt
the
resolutions
in
item
7A
as
read
by
the
clerk.
K
K
Hamilton
second,
in
Medina,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye,
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
say
no.
No!
No!
So
it
was
a
three
two
with
the
two,
the
sense
of
our
Medina
and
Mr
Salazar.
I'm
saying
this
at
the
end,
because,
with
our
masks,
it's
hard
for
the
clerk
to
decipher.
So
let's
make
note
with
that
we're
going
to
move
on
to
Item
B.
G
I
think
we're
all
pausing
just
to
admire
your
reading
of
the
public
hearing
item
before
we
begin
what
I
do
want
to
do
is
go
back
to
consent
calendar.
G
I
G
Resend
number
1901.
F
Code
section
and
two
authorized
rates
to
be
by
resolution
or
ordinance
I
wanted
to
make
sure
if
there
were
any
members
of
the
public
that
had
wanted
to
speak
to
have
spoken
on
those
two
items
which
was
e
and
G.
That
they'd
be
given
that
opportunity.
Now
before
we
proceed
to
the
assistant
city
manager
on.
C
C
I
mean
again
honorable
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
member
Darcy,
Smith
assistant
city
manager.
I
will
be
making
the
majority
of
this
presentation,
but
there
will
be
an
appearance
for
one
slide
by
Gage
slice,
City,
Fire,
Marshal,
so
I
don't
steal.
The
show
tonight
and
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
point
out:
Darcy
Asha
the
city's
Chief
Building
official,
who
assisted
in
writing
all
those
10.
F
Ordinances,
which
I
will
not
read
into
the
record
because
then
we'd
be
here
well
past
midnight,
but
I
think
this
speaks
volumes
literally
to
the
work
that
has
been
done
by
the
city's
new
Chief
Building
official,
and
she
was
really
excited
to
work
on
this
project.
So
I'll
keep
this
brief
and
we'll
cover
a
lot
of
the
material
quickly.
I'll
cover
the
objective,
the
background
overview
of
those
10
ordinances,
tonight's
recommended
action
and
we'll
have
time
for
questions.
F
This
is
a
public
hearing
where
you
will
read
by
title
only
and
have
the
option
of
adopting
these
10
ordinances
as
read
by
the
city
clerk.
You
might
recall
about
a
month
ago
on
September
13th,
the
council
introduced,
read
by
title
only
and
waived
for
the
reading,
but
set
the
public
hearing
for
tonight.
I
know
it
sounds
a
little
bit
backwards.
Normally
we
start
with
the
public
hearing,
but
there's
a
very
unique
provision
in
the
California
state
government
code,
where,
if
a
local
municipality
is
adopting
State
codes
by
reference,
we
do
it
backwards.
F
Don't
ask
me:
why
confuses
a
lot
of
us
every
three
years
when
this
comes
up?
We
have
to
dust
off
the
books
and
remind
ourselves
that's
why
you're
here
tonight,
with
a
public
hearing,
you
already
adopted
a
resolution
on
September
13th,
making
very
explicit
findings
related
to
local
climatic,
geological
and
topographical
conditions,
which
support
the
local
amendments
and,
while
I
find
those
really
really
interesting.
Since
you
already
adopted
the
resolution,
I
won't
delve
into
the
details
there
and
no
changes
have
been
made
to
the
ordinance's
sense
introduction.
F
However,
on
September
13th
council
member
Hamilton
suggested
one
modification
which
has
been
Incorporated
tonight
and
as
a
requirement
that
the
site
information
signage
on
construction,
fencing
which
I'll
show
you
later.
What
that
looks
like
include
the
building
divisions,
contact
information
in
addition
to
the
applicants.
Sometimes
they
call
us
with
questions
and
we'd.
You
know
love
to
help
answer
those
questions
when
they
call
us.
So
these
are
the
the.
If
you
thought,
10
ordinances
was
a
lot
wait
until
you
see
these
binders
there's
11
binders,
because
one
of
the
codes
is
so
big.
F
Yes,
we
still
have
hard
copies
because
sometimes
when
we
talk
to
customers,
so
it's
a
little
more
sort
of
there's
a
little
more
presence
if
we
bring
out
the
binders,
but
if
you're
really
curious,
they're
online
at
the
California
building,
Standards
Commission
webpage
and
then
our
local
ordinances,
which
are
before
you
tonight
serve
the
the
reference
those
we
have
on
our
website
on
our
Municipal
Code,
so
important.
F
To
note
we're
not
alone
in
this
there's
over
500
cities
and
counties
that
are
doing
this
exact
same
thing,
although
sometimes
they
wait
a
little
bit,
but
they
apply
basically
designing
construction
standards
for
all
construction
and
occupancies
throughout
the
state.
So
everyone
follows
the
state
which
actually
I
think
is
a
great
thing,
because
there's
uniformity
around
the
building
trades,
the
requirements
I
won't
go
into
detail
about
them
because
I
think
in
this
in
this
sentence,
you'll
understand
wow,
that's
a
lot.
C
K
Adopted
the
resolution
for
at
our
last
meeting
so
there's
a
lot
of
codes
that
the
state
adopts
that
just
work
for
us.
We
don't
necessarily
have
any
local
climactic,
topographical
or
geological
conditions
or
any
special
administrative
needs
that
would
warrant
amending
these
codes.
So
these
codes,
which
are
listed
here,
various
basic
codes,
Mechanical
plumbing
energy,
historical
building
codes,
we
don't
need
to
amend,
there's
five,
that
we
have
local
amendments
with.
K
We've
been
doing
some
of
those
local
amendments
for
years,
especially
related
like
SFO
airport,
noise
and
other
City
requirements,
but
the
Amendments
before
you
tonight
are
fairly
simple,
All,
Things,
Considered
and
most
of
the
changes
in
2022.
This
probably
wouldn't
be
a
surprise
but
they're
around
being
more
sustainable,
having
better
air
quality,
especially
relative
to
major
air
quality
issues,
we've
had
around
fires
and
so
on,
and
then
increased
electric
vehicle
charging
requirements,
and
so
I'll
talk
about
those
a
little
bit
more
under
the
next
public
hearing.
K
The
Sustainable
Building
reach
codes
item,
but
the
state
over
the
years
have
been
has
definitely
been
been
very
aggressive
in
terms
of
being
a
leader
around
new
sustainability
requirements
in
new
electrical
vehicle.
Chariting
requirements
again,
all
local
projects
are
required
to
use
these
new
codes.
The
building
division
web
page
has
been
updated
with
an
announcement
informing
the
public
with
links
to
resources
the
city
last
week
and
in
the
future
we'll
provide
public
announcements
to
spread.
The
word
to
the
community
and
City
staff
will
go
to
training
the
good
thing
about
these
again.
K
The
state
released
them
in
July
and
they
get
the
word
out
to
all
the
architects
who
are
licensed
by
the
state,
all
the
other
design
professionals
who
work
on
them.
The
licensed
contractors.
So
because
a
lot
of
those
design,
professionals
and
contractors
work
throughout
many
jurisdictions,
it's
a
little
bit
less
work
on
the
local
side
to
implement
those
so
quick
overview
of
those
10
ordinances.
K
They
again
mainly
allow
for
adoption
of
the
state
codes
with
our
local
amendments.
Our
local
amendments
are
coordinated
with
building
Chief,
Building
officials
and
Fire
Marshals
in
other
jurisdictions,
who
have
actually
fun
lunches.
If
you
believe
this
reviewing
all
those
11
binders,
they
bring
them
and
mark
them
up.
F
And
talk
about
them
and
discuss
you
know
what
should
we
have
locally
because
again,
there
are
a
lot
of
similar
topographic,
geologic
and
climactic,
or
just
administrative
needs
locally,
and
these
amendments
are
not
expected
to
be
particularly
burdensome
one
of
them.
This
is
actually
my
personal
favorite
relates
to
the
size
of
emergency
escape.
Windows.
Surprisingly,
the
state
actually
reduced
the
size
of
that,
but
in
San
Bruno,
as
you
know,
we
have
some
steep
topography.
F
We
sometimes
have
very
narrow
side
setbacks
for
older
construction
three
feet
and
we
also
have
fog,
so
we
just
want
to
retain
what's
the
existing
size
requirement
that
you
see
here,
minimum
5.7
square
feet
to
allow
both
our
emergency
response,
Personnel
or
occupants
of
buildings.
As
you
see
this,
this
child
escaping
a
window
to
easily
evacuate
and
again
this
is
an
odd
thing
where
we
can't.
We
can't
really
understand
why
the
state
reduced
it.
We
think
it
works
well.
F
This
is
an
example
where
we're
asserting
our
local
authority
to
adopt
our
own
standard.
Another
one
is
around
site
addresses
again
we
have
fog
here
and
we
need
sort
of
special
illumination
to
make
sure
First.
Responders
can
find
those
addresses
if
they
need
to
another
new
one,
which
again
was
brought
to
our
attention
by
our
chief
building
officials,
around
construction,
fencing.
So
on
the
top,
you
can
see
what.
G
That
mesh
doesn't
really
provide
much
security;
it
doesn't
really
help
minimize
theft.
Obviously
it
doesn't
minimize
debris
dust
from
blowing
up
and
whipping
around.
We've
had
a
lot
of
complaints
over
this.
So
again
we
have
the
ability
to
adopt
local
sort
of
administrative
code
requirements
that
help
us
ensure
that
construction's
safe.
So
this
is
really
unique
and
it's
only
required
for
residential
houses
that
are
not
habitable
during
construction.
G
G
G
What
folks
do
they
fence
up
their
site
with
a
chain
link
fence
with
screening,
and
it
will
be
through
our
code
required
to
be
maintained
in
place
and
kept
in
good
order
for
the
length
of
construction
and
again,
signage
requirements
really
important,
especially
address
signage
for
those
First
Responders,
because
sometimes
the
address
is
obscured
from
the
street.
With
this
fencing
and
then
posted
with
contact
information.
So
again,
the
top
picture
is
the
what
we
don't
want
to
happen,
because
not
only
is
it
security
issue,
but
debris
dirt
dust
blows
around.
G
The
bottom
is
the
ideal
what
we
will
be
requiring
with
this
construction
Pepsi
last
fire
code,
amendments
where
Fire
Marshal
schleiss
will
make
a
surprise,
appearance,
special
guest,
Fire,
Marshal
honorable
mayor
vice
mayor
councilman,
the
fire
marshal
gauge
slice.
Some
of
our
amendments
are
becoming
more
apparent.
G
Just
a
couple
weeks
ago
we
had
a
a
energy
storage.
Just
in
the
cotton
fire
only
a
few
miles
down
the
road,
it
was
a
lithium
battery
fire
at
a
PG
e
facility
in
Lost
Landing.
So
some
of
the
Amendments
we've
been
making
is
making
it
safer
for
firefighters
and
people
to
get
out
in
case
a
lithium
battery
catches
on
fire.
G
So
in
parking
garages,
particularly
we're
increasing
the
sprinkler
density
to
the
maximum
allowed.
It's
just
stepping
up
one
actually
degree
from
extra
Hazard
one
to
extra
Hazard,
two
automatically
one
of
the
SEC
other
things.
We're
doing
is
continuing
our
our
mobile
food
permit
or
food
truck
permit
process.
G
G
The
mobile
vendors
are
have
proper
fire
safety,
so
it
helps
protect
them
and
actually
the
people
that
shop
at
their
trucks
and
the
last
one
we've
been
trying
to
do
is
improve
the
reduction
of
false
alarms
in
doing
so,
making
sure
that
people,
when
they
install
fire,
alarms,
they
install
them
correctly
and
making
sure
they're
actually
updated
throughout
the
years
to
maintain
good
work
in
order
so
to
prevent
the
false
alarms,
because
we
want
to
be
available
for
those
really
emergency
calls
and
not
be
running
false
alarms
all
the
time.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you.
So,
in
closing,
tonight's
recommended
action
is
to
hold
the
public
hearing
read
by
title
only
and
adopt
the
10
2022
California
building
code
related
ordinances
as
read
by
the
city
clerk.
That
concludes
my
staff
report,
I'm
available
to
answer
any
questions
along
with
Fire
Marshall
schleiss
and
Chief
Building
official
Asha.
G
G
G
First,
speaker
is
Dasha
Leeds
Dash
Elites.
You
may
begin
whenever
you're
ready
hello.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
Dasha
weeds
I'm,
the
conservation
organizer
for
the
Sierra
Club
Lima
Prieta
chapter
we're
in
strong
support
of
electrification
updates
to
get
rid
of
new
gas
infrastructure,
and
this
is
critical.
So
we
appreciate
San
Bruno
moving
forward
with
the
reach
code.
Today.
G
To
be
frank,
we
think
the
code
could
be
stronger,
but
it's
important
to
move
forward
and
I
think
this
is
an
important
step.
I
think
we
have
a
lot
to
do
to
get
rid
of
gas
infrastructure
and
it
really
is
a
menace
and
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
pipelines
tonight.
The
current
code
has
some
blanket
exemptions
in
there
for
non-residential
kitchens,
for
Jay
to
use
and
for
affordable
housing,
and
the
code
also
contains
a
in
feasibility
exemption,
so
it's
in
in
that
sense
a
little
redundant.
G
Unfortunately,
in
that
it
allows
for
building
for
buildings
to
have
gas
pipelines
installed
in
situations
where
it's
actually
optimal
to
install
electric
devices.
An
example
is
the
affordable
housing
blanket
exemption.
We
know
that
indoor
gas
cooking
causes
asthma
in
homes.
There's
a
significant
amount
of
data
on
this,
and
children
living
in
gas
homes
have
an
increased
risk
of
asthma
along
the
range
of
30
percent
and
I
think
it
is
frankly
inequitable
to
have
our
affordable
housing
with
gas
infrastructure.
Where
they're
burdened
with
the
negative
Public
Health
impacts
of
the
gas
appliances.
G
Their
homes
so
I
think
we
could
actually
get
rid
of
blanket
exemptions
in
the
future
and
just
keep
that
hardship
exemption
for
those
cases
where
there
is
a
building
use
that
absolutely
needs
gas,
and
they
can
prove
that
to
the
city.
Then
they
would
fit
in
through
that
exemption
and
get
that
use,
but
I
think
going.
C
A
Decarbonize
existing
buildings,
Palo
Alto
recently
just
adopted
their
sustainability
and
climate
action
plan,
key
goals
and
actions,
and
it
started
a
pilot
program
to
decarbonize
existing
buildings.
So
there's
a
lot
of
movement
here,
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
with
the
passing
of
the
inflation
reduction
act,
the
CC
the
cpuc's
move
to
end
subsidies
for
the
expansion
of
gas
lines.
The
writing
is
kind
of
on
the
wall.
A
J
Name
is
Crystal
Hernandez
I
am
an
ASAP
student
program
manager
for
octera
and
I
wholeheartedly
support
agenda
7B
on
the
update
of
electrification
and
building
codes,
not
only
for
our
health
but
for
the
climate
and
Equity
as
well.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Next
speaker,
please.
J
Hi,
thank
you.
My
name
is
Jeff
Mann
I'm,
a
physician
I'm,
a
lifelong
Bay,
Area
resident
and
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
San
Francisco
Bay
Physicians
for
social
responsibility.
Our
organization's
goal
is
to
protect
the
health
of
all
of
us,
and
air
pollution
is
one
of
the
biggest
Health
impacts
our
local
population
faces.
For
this
reason,
I
am
in
favor
of
the
strong
reach
code,
ordinance
for
all
electric
new
construction.
That's
being
proposed,
so
I
want
to
talk
about
some
of
the
health
effect
impacts
of
gas
stoves
and
furnaces.
J
So
they
are
large
sorts
of
toxic
air
pollutions
in
homes.
One
of
these
pollutants
is
called
particular
matter
and
that's
a
very
tiny
particle
in
long-standing
exposure
to
particular
matter
has
the
potential
to
lamp
to
damage
the
respiratory
system,
the
heart
and
cause
many
other
health
problems.
Gas
stoves
also
produce
carbon
monoxide,
and
if
this
isn't
properly
vented,
this
can
lead
to
carbon
monoxide
poisoning
that
unfortunately,
results
in
thousands
of
emergency
room
visits
and
several
hundred
deaths
a
year.
As
one
of
the
previous
speakers
noted
children
living.
G
In
homes
with
gas,
stoves
stoves
have
a
32
percent
increased
risk
of
having
asthma
or
developing
it
at
some
point
in
their
lives
and
Asthma
is
a
lifelong
disease
and
there's
another
study
that
showed
that
children
who.
J
G
J
To
pollution,
when
they're
very
young
from
Sierra.
G
Age,
zero
to
four
appear
to
have
lower
cognitive
function
as
well,
and
children
of
color
and
lower
income
income.
Households
are
at
higher
risk
of
exposure
to
these
pollutants.
G
Natural
gas
is
also
a
public
safety
hazard
because
it's
highly
flammable
and
unfortunately,
as
this
community
knows
all
too
well
in
the
past
10
years-
has
been
about
9
000
gas
explosions
in
the
United
States.
This
issue
also
hits
home
for
me
because
I
have
a
large
gas
pipeline,
that's
about
100
feet
from
my
house
and
they
are
constantly
doing
work
on
that.
So
it'll
be
nice
to
Envision
the
future,
where
we
don't
have
to
worry
about
these
pipelines
and
also
the
health
dangers
I
have
outlined.
G
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
I
urge
the
city
council
support
of
the
reach
code
proposal
to
help
me
and
my
organization
protect
the
health
of
our
citizens.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Next
speaker,
please,
I
am
not
seeing
any
other
hands
raised.
Okay.
This
is
the
last
opportunity
once
we
close
public
hearing
we'll
not.
G
C
C
K
Comments,
deliberation
and
our
action
councilmember
Medina
I.
Excuse
me
just
want
to
really
thank
staff
for
this
work.
It's
it's
something
that,
as
a.
C
Member
of
the
board
of
directors
for
peninsula,
clean
energy,
it's
something
that
many
of
our
cities
are
have
already
conducted
and
completed
and
knowing
how
much
work
this
took.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
expressed
the
appreciation
to
staff
for
getting
this
work
done
a
very
well
very,
very
good
job,
and
thank
you
very
much.
H
K
Said
a
number
of
members
of
the
public
as
well
as
council
member
Medina,
mentioned
wage
codes,
which
is
actually
the
next
item
assistant
city
manager
presented
on
item
7B,
which
is
the
public
hearing
on
building
fire
codes.
K
Maybe
I
should
mess
up
somewhere,
Mr
Mayor
I
apologize
for
that
I
got
so
excited
about
reach
codes
because
it
was
really
something
that
we've
been
trying
to
to
get
here
and-
and
you
know
I'm
so
used
to
like
trying
to
be
patient
and
I
couldn't
be
patient
anymore.
So
thanks
staff
also
for
for
all
the
work
done
on
the
building
codes.
Fire
codes
just
wanted
to
just
clarify
that
so
I
apologize.
Consider
it
clarified.
Thank
you
very
much.
K
Let's
you
know,
because
after
we
had
that
long
reading
of
7B,
we
want
to
make
sure
we
stick
to
that.
So
is
there
any
other.
G
G
Okay,
now
we
will
move
on
to
item
C.
Please
much
shorter
7c
hold
public
hearing
read
by
title
only
and
adopt
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
San
Bruno
amending
chapter
11.06
energy
code
of
Title,
11,
Buildings,
Construction
and
fire
protection
of
the
San
Bruno
municipal
code
and
adopting
by
reference,
the
2022
California
energy
code
and
amending
chapter
11.07,
Green
Building,
Code
of
Title
11,
building
construction
and
fire
protection
of
the
San
Bruno
municipal
code
and.
H
Adopting
by
reference,
the
2022,
California,
Green,
Building,
Code
assistant
city
manager,
yeah
good
evening
again,
honorable
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
members,
yes,
I'm
back
with
another
exciting,
maybe
the
most
excitement
tonight,
because,
as
you
know,
we
this
has
been
something
that
the
city
and
you
have
been
working
on
for
many
years,
so
I'll
be
making
this
presentation.
Darcy
Smith
assistant
city
manager,.
I
Has
been
working
very
hard
on
these,
but
with
that
in
mind,
I'll
launch
into
the
presentation
covering
the
objective
for
this
item
quick
background.
How
we
got
here
tonight's
recommended
action
have
time
for
questions.
I
So
this
is
also
a
public
hearing,
but
we
only
have
one
ordinance
which
actually
accomplishes
two
things:
amending
Municipal
Code
chapter
11.06,
the
energy
code
and
chapter
11.07,
the
Green
Building
Code
and
adopting
by
reference
estate
codes,
because,
as
I
mentioned
previously,
the
state
code
has
actually
shown
a
lot
of
leadership
in
this
area
and
we
were
sort
of
waiting
for
the
2022
codes
to
be
adopted
to
see
what
exactly
we
wanted
to
do
to
be
more
stringent.
E
I
I
So
again,
reach
codes
are
local
building
code
amendments
tailored
to
our
local
needs
and
preferences
that
reach
beyond
the
state
minimums
and
again
the
state
has
become
more
more
assertive
in
this
area,
but
reach
codes
go
back
many
many
years,
some
cities
that
have
shown
a
lot
of
leadership
in
this
area
across
the
state
and
have
been
a
model
for
other
cities
to
use.
They
mainly
address
energy
use
in
building
design
and
construction.
I
I
So
again,
reach
codes
have
a
lot
of
other
benefits.
As
some
of
the
speakers
alluded
to
cleaner
air,
it
can
actually
contribute
to
affordable
housing.
That's
why?
Actually,
we
see
a
lot
of
housing.
Affordable
housing
providers
usually
use
all
electric
for
various
reasons.
It
can
also
result
in
safer
buildings
such
as
an
earthquake.
All
electric
buildings
are
not
exposed
to
fires
from
Gas
Pipe
breaks,
and
it
can
also
have
improved
Public.
Health
again
is
when
the
previous
speaker
stated.
F
Actually
link,
even
you
know
when
you
don't
think
they're
leaking
stoves
can
link
leak
and
those
leaks
can
lead
to
respiratory
issues
like
asthma,
so
it
goes
Way,
Beyond
sustainability.
If
you
look
at
a
lot
of
different
issues,
but
now
I'll
talk
about
like
what
does
this
really
mean
so
again,
as
I
mentioned
previously,
the
state
energy
code
requires
all
new
construction
to
be
electric
ready.
That's
honestly
kind
of
a
hard
time
term
to
understand
so
I'll
break
it
down
in
further
detail.
F
Our
local
reach
codes
will
require
all
new
construction
to
be
all
electric
with
a
few
exemptions.
Again,
those
exemptions
are
in
line
with
what
other
jurisdictions
has
have
done
like
that
would
be
fun
to
show
you.
What
are
we
talking
about?
So
here's
a
really
cool
electric
stove,
much
easier
to
clean
than
a
gas
stove.
I.
Much
must
note.
I
have
one
a
tankless
electric
water
heater.
F
These
are
also
very
cool
because
they're
very
slim,
and
if
you
ever
had
a
had
a
garage
where
you're,
like
always
where
you're
going
to
run
into
the
water
heater.
This
solves
your
problem
because
it
goes
on
the
wall.
It's
very
tiny
and
my
personal
favorite,
an
electric
fireplace
because
it's
still
cool
to
look
at
Flames.
Even
if
you
don't
want
that
log
burning.
C
And
there's
electrical
panel
Branch
circuits
and
a
transfer
switch
for
battery
storage
and
then
guess
what
there's
more
circuits
and
panels
to
convert
from
natural
gas
to
electric
in
the
future.
So,
honestly,
there's
still
a
lot
of
money
being
invested,
but
nothing's
actually,
electric.
So
that's
why
this
local
code
would
be
all
electric
have
all
those
electric
appliances.
I
showed
you.
J
So
what
would
this
really
mean?
Well,
all
new
single-family
homes,
all
adus
and
all
multi-filmate
buildings
would
use
electric
for
space,
heating,
water,
heating,
cooking
and
clothes
dryers.
There
will
be
a
tiny
little
exception
for
natural
gas,
for
fine
type,
Central
furnaces,
fireplaces
pool
heaters
and
spa
heaters,
and
then
all
new
non-residential
buildings
would
be
built
all
electric
for
again
the
same
things:
I
mentioned
heating,
cooking
and
clothes
dryers.
They
do
get
an
exception
for
natural
gas,
cooking
appliances
for
restaurants
and
food
services.
J
That's
one
area
where
the
industry,
the
restaurant
industry,
is,
has
lobbied
hard
to
keep
that,
and
so
that's
typical.
But
all
new
buildings
must
still
be
electric
ready
if
they
use
those
Natural,
Gas
Appliances.
So,
for
example,
a
restaurant
that
puts
in
the
gas
stove
through
the
exception
would
still
have
to
be
electric
ready,
which
I
mentioned
is
just
a
bunch
of
wires
and
other
things.
J
Another
thing
we're
doing
in
addition
to
all
electric
is
electric
vehicle
charging
requirements.
If
you've
read
the
news
in
the
last
three
months,
I
think
you
know
there's
a
big
push
nationally
and
at
the
state
level.
So
our
reach
codes
requirements
are
more
stringent
than
the
state
code,
which
again
has
become
more
demanding
over
time.
It
requires
more
EV
spaces
and
EV
Chargers.
This
is
where
it
gets
a
little
technical,
so
there's
three
levels
of
EV
Chargers
slow,
medium
fast.
If
you
will-
and
so
there's
one
two
and
three.
K
Is
again
sounds
nice,
it's
like
electric
ready
right,
it's
just
a
bunch
of
conduit
and
capacity
in
the
system,
but
you'd
actually
have
to
pay
a
bunch
of
money.
If
you
had
an
EV
capable
space
to
bring
a
licensed
electrician
out
to
complete
the
circuit,
sometimes
that
presents
a
barrier.
K
So
what
would
our
code
do
well
again
for
most
residential
uses,
the
smaller
uses
that
would
be
required
to
install
one
level,
two
EV
ready
space
and
one
level
one
EV
ready
space.
So
that's
a
lot
if,
for
some
reason,
a
dwelling
only
had
one
parking
space
we'd
go
with
again,
like
the
faster
charger
at
the
level
two
and
then
for
multi-family
dwellings.
The
requirements.
I
Multi-Family
dwellings,
with
less
than
or
equal
to
20
units,
it
would
be
like
30
percent
of
the
level
2
evse
25
percent
of
the
level
2
EV
and
10
of
the
level
to
EB
charging
station,
which
again
I
know,
is
very
technical,
but
these
all
are
just
slight
variations
on
the
same
thing
for
larger
multi-family
dwelling
projects,
those
are
the
big
more
than
20
units.
They
would
have
more
of
these
requirements
and
exemptions.
We
talked
about
those
a
little
bit,
but
there
will
be
a
few
exemptions.
I
I
will
say
that
this
is
one
thing
where
sometimes,
as
I
mentioned,
with
affordable
housing
and
also
we've
seen
sort
of
large
office
tenants-
and
it's
also
true
of
life
science
Builders.
They
actually
want
to
go
all
electric,
that's
just
part
of
their
either
their
corporate
Mission
or
for
the
affordable
housing
providers.
They
should
there's
a
long
time
where
they're
getting
a
lot
of
Grants
to
be
sustainable
and
again
they
they
like
to
be
sustainable.
I
So
it's
hard
to
know
at
this
point
who
would
take
advantage
of
these
exemptions
if
they
would
even
come
into
play,
but
this
is
something
we
could
track
and
report
back
to
you.
If
too
many
people
are
using
the
exemptions.
C
But
I'll
just
say
they
may
not
use
them,
except
for
some
of
the
ones
that
follow
state
law
like
the
junior
adus
I,
think
you
know
that's
when
you're
taking
part
of
your
house
and
building
kind
of
a
little
suite,
and
it
could
be
hard
to
meet
these
so
tonight's
recommended
action
and
closing
is
to
hold
the
public
hearing
read
by
title
only
and
adopt
the
ordinance
for
the
city's
building
reach
codes
as
read
by
the
city
clerk.
That
concludes
my
staff
report.
Happy
to
answer
any
questions.
C
C
I
do
not
see
any
hands.
Oh
lunch,
just
went
up,
just
went
down,
no
hands
are
raised.
Okay.
This
will
be
the
last
opportunity.
Once
we
do
close
public
hearing,
we
will
not
be
going
back
and
we
will
be
keeping
it
at
the
council.
There
is
a
member
of
the
public.
Please
go
ahead.
First,
Speaker
Crystal,
Hernandez
I
will
now
bring
you
in
Crystal.
Whenever
you're
ready,
you
may
begin
hi
there.
C
My
name
is
Crystal
Hernandez,
I'm,
resident
of
San,
Mateo
County
and
a
ASAP
program
manager
with
octera
and
I
wholeheartedly
support
agenda
7c
for
the
electrification
of
multi-family
homes,
and
thank
you
very
much
for
presenting
this
item
tonight.
C
A
Salazar
second
M
Medina
to
close
the
public
hearing
novels
and
papers,
say
aye
aye,
aye,
aye,
502,
unanimous
on
closing
public
hearing,
we'll
bring
it
back
to
colleagues.
K
D
Really
great
so
I'd
be
honored
to
introduce
the
item
as
read
a
second
I'll.
Second,.
E
Motion
Marty
Medina
seconded
Salazar,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye,
aye
aye
all
is
opposed.
I
have
a
five
zero
in
favor
item,
a
development,
downtown
update
and
guess
who's
coming.
It
is
the
assistant.
Oh
sorry,
sorry
thank
you
vice
mayor.
So
that's
why
that's
why
the
vice
mayor
sits
to
the
right
development.
Town
Hall
update,
now
we're
going
to
have
our
assistant
city
manager,
who
we
yeah?
Yes,
please
and
mayor
vice
mayor
council
members
I,
don't
have
a
PowerPoint
because
I
know
it'd
be
sort
of
late.
E
I
can
say
most
development,
Town
Hall
update,
which
is
just
an
informational
report
for
discussion
and
direction.
At
the
council
meeting
on
September
11th,
the
council
considered
an
agenda
item
placed
on
the
council
to
discuss
directing
staff
to
schedule
an
in-person,
Town
Hall
Town,
Hall
style
meeting
with
a
focus
on
development
projects,
and
we
evaluated
and
the
purpose
of
this
town
hall
would
be
to
meet
in
person
in
this
room.
E
This
very
room
and
share
information
with
the
public
about
current
status
of
major
development
projects
in
the
city
and
is
further
described
in
the
staff
report
and
in
that
attachment
one.
The
city
has
approved
a
number
of
private
development
projects.
Over
the
last
few
years,
we've
had
a
variety
of
residential,
commercial
and
mixed-use
projects.
The
projects
are
in
various
stages
of
activity.
Right
now.
The
big
one
under
construction
is
the
YouTube
offices
at
Bay
Hill,
and
there
are
other
projects
that
have
not
proceeded
not
submitted.
E
Building
permits
at
this
time,
so
we're
just
waiting
on
some
of
those
and
the
city
provides
status,
updates
about
these
projects
on
the
planning
division
website
and
in
the
summary
that
was
attached
to
staff
report,
so
the
town
hall
would
be
an
in-person
event.
We've
had
these
in
the
past,
I
went
to
one
on
parking
a
few
years
ago.
This
one
would
be
a
little
bit
different
in
that
we'd
like
to
present
on
each
project,
include
information
about
it
and
really
serve
to
educate
the
community
about
these
projects
and
provide
time
for
questions
and
answers.
E
However,
right
now
the
city
does
have
a
vacancy
in
the
position
of
the
community,
an
economic
development
director
and
we're
we're
going
to
open
the
recruitment
for
that
soon
and
hope
to
have
it
filled
by
early
next
year.
So
it
would
be
ideal
to
wait
until
that
director
is
on
board
and
give
us
adequate
time
to
plan
for
the
in-person
event
and
provide
adequate
notice.
E
It's
getting
a
little
busy
getting
close
to
the
holidays,
but
I
funny
how
people
who
are
seem
really
busy
around
the
holidays
then
come
out
in
January
February
in
droves,
wanting
to
re-engage
and
attend
events.
So
that's
when
we'd
recommend
it,
but
we're
looking
for
Council
Direction
on
that
tonight,
so
we
can
meet
your
needs.
So
that
concludes
my
staff
report.
Happy
to
answer
any
questions.
E
Thank
you
very
much
assistant
city
manager
and
I'd
like
to
hear
from
the
city
manager
sure
thank
you
mayor
and,
and
thank
you
Darcy
Smith,
for
that
just
want
to
add
interesting
enough
staff
has
a
monthly
meeting
with
members
of
the
San
Bruno,
Community,
Foundation
and
unprompted,
and
actually
unconnected
to
the
conversation
we're
having
here
tonight.
Members
of
the
foundation
mentioned
that
when
they
sent
their
recent
mailer
to
the
community
that
had
a
picture
of
our
Recreation
and
Aquatic
Center
Aquatic
Center
under
construction,
they
received
a
few
calls
about
it.
E
In
the
executive
director
reported
that
she
had
a
really
good
conversation
with
with
a
member
of
the
public
that
mentioned
boy.
There's
a
lot
of
things
going
on
in
San,
Bruno.
There's
the
Allen
School
construction.
There
is
the
improvements
at
cappuccino,
and
so
we
we
had
a
discussion
today
about
ways
to
collaborate.
That
was
very
much
in
line
with
the
city
council's
discussion
and
desire
to
have
a
town
hall
in
development
and,
as
you
all
know,
I've
said
before
more
absolutely.
E
I
think
that
a
town
hall
format
can
be
a
good
one
and
we
just
need
to
think
about
it
and
and
have
all
the
right
players
and
and
execute,
and
so
you
have
a
brief
report
from
the
assistant
city
manager.
I
will
also
say
that
one
of
the
challenges
with
the
town
hall
was
actually
getting
people
to
come
out
and
attend
the
meeting
and
no
matter
how
much
robust
Outreach
we
we
do.
E
We
may
not
reach
the
full
complement
of
constituents
that
I
know
is
desired,
and
so
other
mediums
should
be
looked
at
and
one
of
the
things
that
we've
talked
about
internally
is
even
producing
a
video
sort
of
a
short
snippet
that
could
be
on
social
media,
but
that
could
also
double
as
a
Economic
Development
video
just
to
highlight
both
projects
under
construction
projects
approved
and
other
pending
projects,
city-wide,
and
so
just
know
that
staff
is
thinking
about
ways
in
addition
to
a
town
hall,
to
get
the
word
out
about
the
projects
and
things
that
are
happening
in
San
Bruno
and
a
number
of
the
projects
that
you
have
already
approved,
even
if
they
haven't
Broken
Ground.
E
Thank
you.
We've
heard
the
report
and
we
have
a
staff
report
here.
I
know
there
wasn't
any
slides,
but
thank
you
very
much
because
of
the
hour
as
well.
That's
helpful
comments
from
colleagues.
This
is
not
an
action
item.
This
was
to
receive
an
update.
Any
comments
vice
mayor.
Thank
you.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
this
back.
I.
E
Think
I
would
just
request,
selfishly
of
course,
that
this
bee
had
maybe
the
first
week
of
December
if
possible,
I
did
make
this
request
and
I
will
no
longer
be
on
the
council
after
December,
so
it
would
be
wonderful
to
have
at
least
one
town
hall
meeting
in
over
a
little
over
three
years
and
I
think
this
is
the
right
topic
to
have
it
as
a
community.
So
that
would
be
my
request,
but
I
am
one
council
member.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
other
comments
from
our
colleagues
councilmember
Medina.
E
I
I
think
there
is
just
so
much
going
on
that
when
I
talk
to
different
people
they're
like
really
surprised
that
so
many
things
are
going
on
and
so
depending
on
the
area
of
their
contacts,
don't
I
actually
ran
into
somebody
that
didn't
know
how
far
along
the
rec
center
was
was
going
right
and
it's
like
well
did
you
did
you
drive
by
or
no
no
I
just
haven't
been
able
to
get
up
there?
Is
it
still
going
on?
And
it's
like?
E
Oh
yeah,
it's
still
going
on
it's
on
schedule,
it's
on
budget
and
we're
really
really
excited
and
the
fact
that
you
brought
up
cappuccino
of
the
amount
of
work.
That's
going
on
over
there
I
mean
there's
so
many
construction
projects
and
it
seems
like
the
pipeline
still
will
be
flowing
with
projects
that
are
coming
in
so
Is
it
feasible
for
December.
It
seemed
like.
E
City
manager,
you
you
know,
my
classic
answer
is
certainly
if
Council
directs,
we
can
adjust
the
workload
of
City
staff
and
executing
in
December.
I.
E
There
it
is
I
would
be
in
favor
of
at
least
trying
to
see
you
know
if,
if
we
can,
if
it's
possible
to
get
the
the
players
from
the
from
the
from
the
high
school
district
in
the
school
district-
and
you
know
if
it's,
if
it's
feasible
to
do
it
in
December,
let's
do
it
and
if
it's
not
feasible
for
these
reasons,
then
then
we
can't
do
it.
But
I
think
it's
worth
at
least
trying.
E
Council
member
Salazar
I
I
was
gonna
piggyback
on
what
council
member
Hamilton
says.
I
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
might
have
to
be
reprioritized,
but
if
we
could
have
a
look
and
if
there
are
things
that
could
be
moved
to
accommodate
it,
it
would
be
nice
that
the
vice
mayor
did
get
hit,
or
this
project
done
within
her
her
term
on
Council.
E
If
possible,
I
would
also
say
that
you
know
I'll
go
as
well
as
what
councilmember
Hamilton
was
saying
if
it
can
be
done
successfully
and
well
advertised,
but
just
to
disrespect,
but
just
to
do
it.
So
we
get
it
done
and
then
a
room
like
this
that
doesn't
help
it
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
hybrid
do
a
hybrid
also
here,
so
that
it
can
open
the
audience
to
to
more
opportunity
and
folks,
but
so
and
I
and
and
some
of
these
projects
too
I
mean
they
may
be
very
quick.
E
It's
like
okay,
it's
up
for
sale.
Now
they
haven't
pulled
a
permit,
so
I
I,
don't
know
how
much
more
detail
you
go
in.
So
maybe
we
also
focus
on
those
that
are
relevant
that
are
occurring
and
if
folks,
you
know,
maybe
there's
a
handout
that
says
yeah,
there's
some
Lots
here,
but
here's
their
status
I'm,
just
trying
to
think
of
ways
to
focus
the
interest
that
might
bring
folks
out
I.
E
Think
city
manager
had
a
great
point
when
he
said
you
know
hey
with
a
cappuccino
or
the
the
Allen
or
this
I
think
people
are
interested
in
that
that
might
bring
folks
out
to
get
a
a
well-rounded
update
of
what
really
is
happening
now,
because
I
think
if
we
say
at
Tanforan
Mall
which
people
are.
Let
me
tell
you
that
will
be
the
questions.
You'll
get
Tanforan
Mall
Tanforan
Mall.
Are
they
closing
up
what's
happening
with
Target
I?
E
E
By
the
end
of
this
week,
the
preliminary
plants
or
tan
friend
will
be
out
there
in
the
community,
and
certainly
that
will
be
known
and,
of
course,
any
town
hall
on
development,
tan
Brandon,
Town
Center
and
our
other
Central
Business
areas
will
be
a
key
Focus,
so
we
will
certainly
be
prepared
if
we're
able
to
pull
it
off
in
December,
so
and
I
would
agree
if
it
can
be
done
and
I
think
you
know
what
works
what's
best.
E
Then
I
would
concur
in
honor,
the
vice
mayor
and
and
the
colleagues
in
the
community,
so
anyone
else
city
manager
does
and
assistant
city
manager.
Does
that
give
you
enough.
E
E
I
am
not
seeing
any
hands
raised.
Okay,
thank
you
with
that
that
will
conclude
that
we'll
move
on
to
item
nine
comments
from
council
members
and
we
will
start
with
council
member
I'm,
sorry
vice
mayor,
Mason
and
we'll
start
with
item
a
request
to
invest
Artichoke
Joe's
fund
into
downtown
for
implementation
of
the
streetscape
plan.
Vice
mayor
I
just
wanted
to
I.
E
Think
start
by
saying
that
this
this
discussion
item
is
not
meant
for
in
in
perpetuity
of
the
agreement,
but
it
is
really
to
have
an
open
discussion
because
the
funds
from
Artichoke
Joe's
we've
we've
already
been
asked
as
a
as
part
of
the
budget
season.
As
I
recall,
we
approved
the
assistant
city
manager
position
and
the
HR
director
position
and
the
only
way
we
were
able
to
get
a
community
development
manager
was
to
take
it
from
the
Artichoke
Joe's
funds,
and
that
was
not
a
guarantee
that
that
was
going
to
be
always
right.
E
That's
this
year,
because
that's
what
we
had
to
do
to
be
able
to
get
that
position,
but
I
think
before
the
funds
start
being
placed
into
different
areas.
It
would
be
really
good
to
say
you
know
the
first,
as
a
council
start
strategizing
around
what
projects
we
want
to,
invest
it
in
and
before
we
even
spend
any
of
it.
You
know
one
idea
was
to
just
commit
the
first
two
years
to
Posey
park,
because
we
know
that
that's
a
park
that
needs
to
be
fixed.
E
We
know
that
supervisor
Pine
has
already
committed
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
it
and
we
know
that
it's
an
eyesore
and
it's
been
an
eyesore
for
quite
some
time
in
San
Bruno
that
that's
one
idea,
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
come
to
a
conclusion
today,
but
I
did
want
to
agendize
it.
E
So
we
can
have
an
open
discussion
without
any
brown
act
violations,
because
if,
if
we
don't,
it
may
come
to
us
at
a
later
time
in
a
different
format
and
ideally
when
I
initially,
you
know
supported
this
the
whole
idea
of
trying
to
get
additional
funds
from
AJ's,
which
we
hadn't
done
in
many
years.
It
really
was
as
a
method
to
try
to
fulfill
promises
that
this
Council
has
made
over
the
last
20
plus
years.
E
I
was
actually
watching
a
video
from
2013
and
it
was
around
the
Centennial
Park
and
how
Centennial
Park
was
a
promise
even
back
then
to
be
done,
and
that's
already
been
10
plus
years,
and
that
was
actually
before
we
had
purchased
Florida
Park,
which
is
also
on
my
mind
and
also
something
that
we
need
to
accomplish.
But
as
far
as
just
looking
at
what
is
outstanding,
what
can
we
start
tackling?
E
E
Pleasure
you
were
asking
if
it
could
be
agendas
for
a
future
meeting.
It
can
yeah
I
mean
I,
think
we
can
have
a
conversation
right
now.
If
that's,
if
the
council
is
open
to
having
a
larger
conversation
around
it,
we
don't
need
to
have
an
hour
conversation.
Everybody
can
think
about
think
about
what
the
intent
was
behind
this
topic.
But
you
know
I
do
think.
We
need
to
have
that
conversation
because
there's
in
that
2013
meeting,
they
were
talking
about
how
the
first
streetscape
plan
was
done
around
2002..
E
So
this
is
now
the
second
streetscape
plan.
Without
Really,
now
we're
starting
I'm
glad
with
Centennial
Park
and
we're
really
moving
in
the
right
direction.
But
how
can
we
keep
that
momentum
and
how
can
we
reinvest
the
funds
that
we've
worked
so
hard
as
a
council
to
get
into
fulfilling
this
new
newer
streetscape
plan,
because
before
we're
on
to
the
Third
Street
skate
plan?
E
Hopefully
we
don't
have
a
third
Escape
Plan
comments
or
questions
from
Council
councilmember
Hamilton,
then
councilmember
Medina,
so
I
don't
think
it's
any
secret
that
I
would
be
in
favor
of
investing
downtown.
E
It
is
a
passion
project
of
of
mine
and
I
I
think
there
are
there's
lots
of
needs
down
there
as
as
we
all
know-
and
obviously
this
is
something
that
would
you
know
we
would
obviously
need
to
address
during
during
budget
season.
As
the
as
the
vice
mayor
said,
and
as
long
as
I'm
here
in
this
seat,
I
will
be
advocating
for
directing,
as
you
know,
funds
as
possible
to
our
downtown
to
continue
the
revitalization
I.
Think
we've
made
a
lot
of
good
progress.
E
It's
still
just
it's
still
just
a
baby
step
that
we've
done
so
far,
but
at
least
we're
moving
in
the
right
direction
and
I
think
it's
all
about
momentum
and
I
and
I
I
would
absolutely
be
in
favor
of
looking
for
not
only
at
the
Artichoke
Joe's
funds
but
other
other
means
of
funding.
The
the
downtown
streetscape
plan.
E
I
think
this
is
an
obvious
one.
The
timing
of
it
when
it
comes
to
budget
is,
is
probably
the
most
appropriate
time
so
somehow
we're
in
there
of
actually
setting
the
money
aside
and
budgeting
for
it,
because
this
this
city
wants
a
nicer
downtown
I'm
happy
to
serve
on
the
downtown
Improvement
committee
with
councilman
Hamilton
here
and
we're
having
a
meeting
next
week
with
with
the
business
owners
and
kind
of
to
hear
from
them.
E
What
is
the
next
step,
and-
and
this
is
kind
of
dovetailing
with
with
our
vice
mayor
of
let's
look
at
the
funding.
Let's
have
the
discussion,
maybe
it's
time
to
to
have
a
survey
on
a
a
larger
survey
of
what
not
only
our
businesses
want,
but
what
our
residents
want.
E
It
took
many
many
years
for
our
downtown
to
get
into
the
shape
that
it
is
now,
and
it's
going
to
take
us
time
to
to
make
improvements
to
it.
I
think
we've
done
more
as
with
this
Council
that
has
been
done
in
a
long
time
and
having
that
discussion,
I
think
is
worthwhile,
so
I
do
support
the
discussion
figuring
out
how
we
we
put
aside
our
budget
more
time
to
talk
about
it
during
the
budget.
Seasons,
probably
where
that
should
happen.
E
We
are
waiting
for
a
number
of
different
funds
to
come
in
with
with
YouTube's
contribution,
development
impact
fees
and
development
agreement.
I
think
it's
definitely
something
that
a
council
will
have
to
address
so
I'm
in
favor.
E
Any
other
comments
on
this
and
then
I
would
just
think
budget
I
think
is
the
appropriate
time.
In
addition,
even
Centennial
Plaza
there
is
going
to
be.
You
know.
Obviously
you
know
500
000
is
given
from
the
found
if
of
course,
there's
still
like
268
or
86
000.
That's
still
needed.
I
also
think
you
know
in
something
like
that.
That's
specified
that
has
long
lasting
effect.
E
Even
under
choke
Joe's
and
the
salmon
Foundation
may
desire
to
have
an
improvement
down,
they
may
want
it
closer
to
their
end
of
the
business,
maybe,
but,
but
but
at
the
same
time
I
still
think
they
would
like
to
see
some
some
of
their
dollars
at
work
into
where
they
have
been
for
over
100
years.
So
I
think
budget
time
is
the
appropriate
time
for
looking
at
the
picture
globally
holistically
and
not
just
so.
E
You
know
we
have
to
pay
for
a
police
officer,
so
you
know
we
have
to
decide
where
all
these
monies
come
from
so
anyway
is
there.
Is
there
anything
else?
Okay,
let
me
see
if
there's
any
members
of
the
public
that
we
should
speak
on
this
item.
E
Let's
move
to
Item
B
a
request
staff
to
provide
the
city
of
the
council
with
the
number
of
crossing
guards
hired
by
the
city
of
San
Bruno
and
their
assigned
locations
vice
mayor,
so
I
have
been
driving
by
Crystal,
Springs
and
Donner
for
quite
some
time,
because
my
it's
my
way
home
after
dropping
off
the
kids
and
I
did
notice
that
there
is
a
crossing
guard
that
had
been
previously
at
Donner
and
Crystal
Springs
and
had
been
moved
over
to
the
essentially
the
front
of
the
park
and
the
front
of
St
Roberts.
E
And
so
it
really
begged
the
question
for
me,
because
I
passed
Parkside
every
morning
why
the
city
is
funding
a
crossing
guard
in
front
of
St
Roberts
when
there
has
been
Express
concern
around
the
traffic
at
Parkside
that
has
over
700
kids
and
is
the
only
Middle
School
in
our
city
and
so
with
B
I
would
say.
B
and
C
are
kind
of
really
together
and
if,
through
the
mayor,
I'd
like
to
just
kind
of
address
both
of
them.
Sure
please.
Thank
you.
E
E
But
it
was
concerning
to
see
that
our
tax
dollars
are
not
being
considered
for
our
own
Public
Schools,
especially
the
schools
that
we
already
know
have
issues
with
traffic,
and
so
the
request
was
really
to
ask
staff.
You
know
how
many
crossing
guards
are
hired
and
I
think
tied
to
that
is.
How
has
it
determined
where
those
crossing
guards
are
going
I?
Don't
support
removing
the
crossing
guard?
That's
at
St
Roberts!
E
That's
a
very
traffic
infested
location
right
now,
especially
with
all
the
construction
going
on,
but
I
also
don't
support,
not
considering
another
school
that
we
have,
that
is
truly
truly
impacted
and
really
needs
a
crossing
guard
is
I
would
say
sooner
rather
than
later.
So
how?
What?
What
is
the
number
of
crossing
guards
hired
and
what
are
the
assigned
locations
and
then
tied
to
that
is?
Can
we
get
an
update
on
the
traffic
concerns
that
had
been
previously
raised
at
Parkside,
Middle,
School.
E
Any
same
manager
did
you
or
before
I
asked
colleagues
sure
so,
Siobhan
Grogan
city
manager,
mayor
Medina
and
council
members,
I
know
you
know
the
process,
but
I'll
repeat
it
for
members
of
the
public.
That
may
not
be
aware,
under
the
comments
from
Council
Members
section
of
the
agenda,
a
council
member
Kenneth
lindeyes
any
topic
of
their
choice
to
bring
a
topic
before
the
city
council.
E
In
doing
so,
staff
has
not
researched
or
analyzed,
or
even
you
know,
spent
much
time
on
the
on
on
the
particular
topic,
and
so
it's
really
a
time
for
Council
to
discuss
and
and
provide
Direction
and
there's
a
process
where
staff
can
come
back
in
this
particular
issue.
E
So
a
number
of
things
were
mentioned.
It
was
mentioned
that
the
city
is
providing
a
crossing
guard
to
Saint
Robert
school.
That
is
absolutely
not
true.
The
city
is
not
providing
a
crossing
guard
to
Saint
Robert's
school.
It
is
absolutely
true
that
the
city
had
a
crossing
guard
at
Crystal,
Springs
and
Donner
for
Parkside
Middle
School.
It
is
also
true
that
that
crossing
guard
was
moved
to
Crystal,
Springs
and
Oak.
That
was
done
by
the
police
department,
based
on
a
conversation
with
the
school
Parkside,
with
how
kids
actually
travel
to
there
there
was.
E
That
Oak
and
I
believe
that
this
was
due
to
Parkside
closing
their
rear
entrance,
and
so
the
in
Communications,
with
the
school
of
the
police
department,
made
the
decision
to
move
the
crossing
guard
to
Crystal,
Springs
and
Oak,
and
those
of
you
that
are
familiar
with
this
area
knows
that
St
Robert's
School
actually
happens
to
be
at
Crystal,
Springs
and
Oak,
but
while
the
crossing
guard
is
there,
it
certainly
has
sort
of
ancillary
benefits,
because
a
number
of
kids
across
there
that
that
go
to
St
Andrews.
E
But
it
is
that
city-funded
crossing
guard
is
not
there
for
Saint
Andrews.
It
was
actually
move.
One
block
St
Roberts,
I'm,
sorry,
why
do
I
keep
saying
St
Andrews,
because
I
just
had
a
conversation
with
them
about
a
totally
different
matter,
but
but
that
crossing
guard
is
not
there
because
of
Saint
Roberts.
It
is
actually
there
because
it
is,
and
has
historically
been
the
crossing
guard
for
Parkside
Middle
School.
E
E
We
can
also
provide
the
city
council
with
the
city's
crossing
guard
contract
that
we
fund,
but
I
want
to
be
clear
that
you
know,
while
of
course,
I
think
it
is
a
policy
decision
where
the
city
funds
crossing
guard
services
to
the
city
has
historically
funded
them
in
connection
to
public
schools,
and
we
are
not
using
public
dollars
exclusively
to
benefit
Saint
Roberts
and
in
fact,
while
the
crossing
guard
is
there,
it
is
not
placed
there
for
the
benefit
of
Saint
Roberts.
E
It
is
placed
there
and
has
historically
been
placed
in
that
area
because
of
Parkside
Middle,
School
and
I
know
that
this
contract
is
ran
by
the
police
department
and
I,
see
the
police
chief
as
an
attendee,
and
he
can
let
me
know
if
he
has
anything
in
addition
to
add
to
that.
But
we
are
happy
to
support
the
city
council
in
any
inquiry
or
document
request
or
agenda's.
E
Any
other
questions
or
comments,
vice
versa,
just
say
this
I
got
the
contract
yesterday,
so
the
it
was
after
this
item
and
item
haven't
even
agendized,
and
the
conversation
started
quite
some
time
ago
with
without
a
response
right
away,
which
is
why
it's
agendized
and
I
think
it's
really
important
again
that
we're
looking
out
for
all
of
our
kids.
So
even
though
St
Roberts
is
getting
the
benefit,
I,
don't
support
removing
the
crossing
guard
there.
That
is
an
incredibly
busy
street,
but
I
also
want
to
understand
better.
E
Why
we're
not
looking
at
the
other
locations
where
we
also
have
a
number
of
our
youth
crossing
the
street
on
a
regular
basis,
and
the
answer
that
we
were
just
provided
doesn't
seem
sufficient
to
me
to
understand
why
we
are
not
looking
at
parks
without
hearing
I
guess
from
something
a
little
bit
more
official
meaning
I'd
be
curious
to
know.
Is
there
an
analysis
that
has
been
done?
Is
there?
E
Sure
to
the
mayor
again
consistent
with
your
process,
the
city
is,
staff
is
happy
to
have
a
conversation
agenda.
Is
this
item
so
that
staff
can
do
the
appropriate
research?
We
could
have
the
City
personnel
here
that
directly
administer
that
contract
and
can
answer
any
and
all
questions
I
just
wanted
to
make
clear
that
the
city
has
not
placed
a
crossing
guard
at
Crystal,
Springs
and
Oak
for
the
benefit
of
a
private
school
I.
E
E
Middle
School
I
know
that
those
conversations
over
the
last
several
years
have
been
very
much
apparent
and
and
been
ongoing
and
actually,
as
we
all
know,
concerns
increased
during
covet
because
it
appeared
that
more
people
were
actually
being
drop,
dropped
off
than
than
actually
walked
to
school
and
in
several
conversations
were
had
at
various
levels
in
the
city
organization,
with
people
at
the
school
district
and
that
there's
a
desire
to
agendaize
a
conversation
on
that.
I
think
that
is
certainly
possible.
E
E
City
manager
just
wanted
to
make
sure
and
that
within
the
safe
route
to
school
study,
you
I
would
think
that
there
would
be
some
analysis
on
improvements
to
the
safety
and
part
of
the
Improvement
to
safety
would
be
putting
crossing
guards
at
the
appropriate
locations
that
that
is
true.
They're
existing
safe
routes
to
Schools
project
that
was
open
to
all
schools
in
San,
Bernardino
I
think
it's
important
to
know.
But
again
you
know,
there's
a
larger
conversation
to
be
had
because
safe
routes
to
schools
is
really
about
long-term
projects.
E
When
we
talk
specifically
about
Parkside,
there
was
immediate
things
that
could
be
done:
mid-term
things
and
long
term.
I
would
say
for
opposite
schools
and
in
the
long-term
category,
but
I
certainly
know
that
there
were
some
initial
conversations.
I
will
note
that
the
police
chief
is
available
and
is
raised
in
his
hand,
and,
if
we'd
like
to
to
recognize
him,
he
can
add
a
little
bit
more
clarity
to
anything
that
I've
said
tonight.
E
Councilmember
Hamilton
I
just
want
to
make
a
a
comment
on
on
the
the
traffic
concerns
at
Parkside.
I
think.
Obviously,
there
are
many
concerns,
especially
at
the
at
the
front
of
the
school,
during
during
drop
off
and
pickup.
E
Unfortunately,
many
of
those
of
the
current
issues
are
the
result
of
the
architecture
of
the
school.
So
when
the
when
the
when
Parkside
was
redone
was
remodeled,
there
was
a
major
remodel
about
10
years
ago
now,
I
think
it
I
think
it
is.
It's
been
a
while
and
when
they
were
planning
that
at
this
I
was
on
the
tsbc
at
the
time,
and
we
begged
begged
the
district
to
come
and
talk
to
us,
and
they
would
not.
E
We
have
no
jurisdiction
over
their
property,
but
they
ended
up
building
a
one-lane
drop-off
Lane
across
the
front
of
the
school,
and
that
is
the
that
is
the
the
Crux
of
most
of
the
problems,
because
that
means
and
I
know
this,
because
I
set
my
son
there
through
three
years
of
it
and
I,
would
I
would
drop
him
off
in
the
neighborhood
because
and
not
even
approach
the
school,
because
it
was
just
impossible
to
get
through
because
with
a
single
Lane.
That
means
the
entire.
E
The
the
entire
line
of
cars
is
waiting
for.
The
slowest
kit,
because
you
can't,
even
if
your
kid
gets
in
the
car
while
you're
in
the
line
you
can't
get
out
until
the
cars
in
front
of
you-
have
picked
up
their
kids
that
is
going
to
be
in
a
very
expensive
fix
if
the
and-
and
we
can't
compel
the
school
district
to
make
that
fix.
E
But
I
would
you
know
I
would
absolutely
want
us
to
since
there's
been
so
many
there's
lots
of
administration
changes
over
there
to
reiterate
that
suggestion
to
that
to
them.
I
already
have
it's
not
on
the
books
yet,
but
I'm
planning
to
meet
with
the
superintendent
and
I'll.
Let
him
know
my
concerns.
You
know
personally,
but
I
think
that's
a
position
we
as
a
city
might
want
consider
taking
just
you
know.
Obviously
we
can't
compel
the
school
to
do
any
architecture
on
their
property,
but
we
can
at
least
suggest
it.
E
I
will
say
that
the
the
school
district
did
consider
it.
We
were
invited
to
a
community
meeting
years
ago
when,
right
after
the
construction
had
happened,
and
they
had
placed
two
million
dollars
aside
to
essentially
recreate
that
whole
section
to
improve
traffic
and
then
for
superintendents
later
we
have
not
heard
anything
more
about
that
plan,
so
so
I
I
mean
I
would
just
say
with
this,
with
the
school
district
prioritizing
Parkside
and
having
a
council
that
is
interested
in
the
school's
well-being
and
what
our
part
is
in
that
well-being.
E
Part
of
that
is
really
ensuring
that
traffic
is
safe,
with
or
without
the
architecture
that
we'd
like
to
see,
and
these
are
areas
that
we
do
have
a
say
in
and
we
do
have
control
over
so
I
I
guess.
The
request
is
really
to
get
more
information
on
our
all
three
crossing
guards.
I
know
that
there
are
stations
that
they're
supposed
to
be
stationed
at
certain
locations.
Are
there
three
crossing
guards
at
those
locations?
Now?
E
What's
the
possibility
of
an
extra
crossing
guard
to
be
placed
at
Parkside,
I
I,
just
I
I
mean
I,
don't
just
seeing
it
every
morning.
I
have
a
hard
time,
believing
that
there's
no
need
for
a
crossing
guard
at
Parkside.
I
just
have
a
really
hard
time,
believing
that
and
seeing
St
Roberts
every
morning.
I
have
a
hard
time
believing
they
don't
need
a
crossing
guard
either.
But
I
think
that
there's
if
the
city
is
paying
for
crossing
guards,
we
should
really
be
looking
at
paying
for
one
at
Parkside.
E
If
that's,
if
that's
a
possibility
and
I'm
not
sure
what
the
next
steps
for
that
would
be,
and
to
councilman
Bernardino's
point:
if
the
safe
routes
of
school
comes
out
in
December,
when
would
that
actually
be
implemented?
I
don't
know,
but
if
it's
possible
to
have
a
crossing
guard
sooner
or
rather
than
later,
that
would
be
ideal.
E
E
Absolutely
All
Those
Questions
have
answers.
I
do
want
to
recognize
the
police
chief
that
raised
his
hand,
because
I
I
know
that
councilmember
Hamilton
also
mentioned
the
drop-off
area,
and
while
the
safe
routes
to
schools
and
some
other
projects
are
long-term
projects,
I
am
knowledgeable
that
there
have
been
recent
projects
about
what
the
school
can
do
in
the
interim
by
routing
more
of
the
traffic
through
their
through
their
yards,
and
so,
if
we
can
bring
the
police
chief
in
I
think
he
is
available.
E
Yes,
thank
you.
Mr
Mayor
members
of
the
council.
Just
a
couple
points
of
clarification.
I
think
that
city
manager
Grogan,
did
an
excellent
job
of
explaining
the
overall
situation
regarding
the
crossing
guards
and
the
interaction
with
the
police
department
and
planning,
but
just
to
make
it
clear
as
to
how
that
kind
of
process
goes
and
to
also
clarify
what
preceded
the
movement
of
the
Crystal
Springs
Donner
crossing
guard
to
the
Crystal
Springs
and
Oak
intersection.
E
First
of
all,
the
process
of
deciding
where
these
crossing
guards
go
well,
it's
paid
for
out
of
the
police
department's
budget
under
the
general
fund
and
the
police
department
is
engaged
in
a
process
of
determining
where
those
crossing
guards
go.
We
do
not,
by
any
stretch
the
imagination
dictate
where
those
crossing
guards
go.
That
is
determined
in
collaboration
with
the
schools
and
the
school
district,
now,
typically
in
Full
full
disclosure
year
to
year.
What
that
means
that
missing
guards
last
year.
E
Do
you
have
any
reasons
or
thoughts
as
to
why
you
might
want
to
change
the
placement
of
these
crossing
guards?
And
the
answer
conventionally
is
no.
That
was
true
this
year.
Prior
to
the
start
of
the
school
year,
what
happened
is,
as
the
school
year
was
underway,
the
concerns
about
Crystal,
Springs
and
Oak
versus
Crystal,
Springs
and
Donner
were
actually
brought
to
the
attention
of
our
school
resource
officer
by
the
crossing
guard
working
that
intersection.
E
So
this
SRX
actually
went
out
into
the
field
observed
this
same
thing
being
true
and
then
approached
the
administration
at
Parkside.
Asked
them
hey.
Have
you
closed
the
rear
entrance
and
are
you
in
fact,
seeing
all
your
kids
coming
to
the
front
of
the
school
instead
of
Oak
and
then
Niles?
They
said
yes
and
then
in
agreement
decided
to
move
this
crossing
guard
to
the
Oak
intersection,
the
best
interest
of
the
kids
attending
Parkside.
E
There
was
no
conversation
with
or
any
interest
in,
moving
that
crossing
guard
in
order
to
better
accommodate
St
Roberts,
although,
admittedly,
it
is
an
ancillary
benefit
of
that
move.
For
sure
there
are
plenty
of
students
of
St
Roberts
using
that
intersection
to
cross
and
go
to
school
from
across
on
City
Parkway,
and
now
we
have
a
little
bit
more
security
for
those
students
as
well,
so
just
in
terms
of
movement
and
kind
of
the
collaboration.
E
That's
how
that
goes
as
the
city
manager
mentioned,
provided
a
little
bit
more
time
to
prepare
I'm
sure
that
I
can
look
a
little
bit
deeper
into
the
past
and
figure
out
specifically
what
analyzes
went
into
determining
some
of
these
locations
when
they're
originally
determined,
but
suffice
it
to
say
that
every
year
we
revisit
this
prior
to
the
start
of
the
school
year
and
prior
to
renewing
the
contract
with
the
crossing
guard
Services
as
to
where
those
crossing
guards
should
go
as
far
as
more
crossing
guards.
Really.
This
is
just
a
budgetary
consideration.
E
I'm
sure
the
school
district
and
I
just
had
a
meeting
with
the
superintendent
this
afternoon
on
another
topic,
but
we
got
to
talking
a
bit
about
crossing
guards
would
love
to
have
crossing
guards
at
probably
a
number
of
other
locations
that
have
kids.
You
know
Crossing
those
areas
at
this
point
in
time
the
amount
budgeted
for
the
crossing
guards
is
based
upon
what
the
contract
was
for
the
year,
and
that
was
three
crossing
guards.
E
So,
in
the
event
that
we
want
to
add
crossing
guards,
I
think
it
would
be
as
simple
as
bringing
to
council
either
in
a
quarterly
update
or
whoever
the
city
manager
directs
some
information
about
what
that
would
cost
and
then
certainly
discussions
about
where
those
crossing
guards
could
go
would
be
open
to
that
same
process
between
the
police
department,
the
school
district,
the
schools
and,
of
course,
happy
to
take
direction
from
Council
on
that
as
well.
E
I
will
say
that,
as
far
as
the
traffic
issues
at
Parkside,
which,
as
stated
here,
are
long-standing
and
significant
I
appreciate
council
member
Hamilton's
comments
that
this
is
largely
an
environmental
design.
Problem
I
also
appreciate
the
vice
mayor's
comments
that,
regardless
of
what
underlies
the
cost,
this
is
something
that
we
all
have
an
obligation
to
take
on.
We
can't
just
allow
there
to
be
unsafe
conditions
in
front
of
the
school.
E
I
will
say
that
I
think
that
a
crossing
guard
in
terms
of
the
issues
actually
being
experienced
at
Parkside,
which
are
not
so
much
Street
crossing
and
cross-guard
safety
issues,
as
they
are
parking
enforcement
issues.
They
are
double
parking
parking
in
red
zones,
backing
up
the
street
for
blocks
because
they're
waiting
to
get
their
turn
into
the
parking
lot
to
pick
up.
Kids,
it's
more
of
a
traffic
congestion
issue.
That's
not
ideally
going
to
be
resolved
by
having
a
crossing
guard
there.
E
While
a
crossing
guard
can
make
it
a
bit
safer
for
kids
crossing
on
Niles
there.
It's
not
really
going
to
make
it
it's
not
going
to
alleviate
the
traffic
problem.
E
I
will
say
that
every
single
year
we
meet
with
every
school,
our
traffic
sergeant
and
our
motor
officer
meet
with
every
school
to
discuss
their
Traffic
Safety
plan
for
not
just
keeping
kids
safe,
but
for
moving
cars
and
parents
in
and
out
from
the
from
the
school
based
on
the
current
environmental
design,
and
that
includes
making
all
sorts
of
suggestions
to
the
school
for
measures
that
they
can
take
in
order
to
optimize
the
flow
of
traffic
at
Parkside.
That's
where
it's
always
the
biggest
challenge.
E
This
year
we
made
a
number
of
recommendations
to
the
school
which
the
school
chose
at
the
time
not
to
implement.
I
know
that
a
lot
of
that
comes
down
to
Staffing
and
whether
or
not
they
have
the
people
to
provide
direction
to
parents
and
traffic
control
and
those
sorts
of
issues,
but
suffice
it
to
say
that
the
police
department
certainly
does
not
have
the
resources
to
post
one
or
more
officers
at
Parkside
every
single
day
at
the
start
and
end
of
school,
and
so
at
every
school.
This
regular
traffic
direction.
E
It
does
come
from
school
staff
and
and
needs
to
to
a
certain
degree,
absent
resources
to
do
it.
Otherwise,
even
if
those
resources
are
in
place,
it's
going
to
be
a
challenge
based
on
the
environmental
design
there,
but
nonetheless
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that
can
be
done
and
in
fact,
we're
done
a
couple
of
years
ago
and
created
great
improvements
in
the
flow
of
traffic
there
at
the
start
and
finish
the
school,
but
that
are
not
currently
being
done.
E
Thank
you
Chief
vice
mayor.
Thank
you
just
a
question.
Just
a
follow-up
question
on
that,
so
I
I
always
questioned
Don.
The
Donner
and
Crystal
Springs
location
anyway.
I
think
the
location
the
crossing
guard
is
at
now
does
make
more
sense,
with
the
the
number
of
kids
that
are
crossing
the
street
again,
whether
it's
St,
Roberts
or
not,
I
guess
might.
Let
me
be
really
clear.
My
question
is:
why
is
there
not
a
crossing
guard
at
Niles?
E
You
know
there
was.
There
was
a
time
where
the
principal
would
come
out
and
they
acted
as
the
crossing
guard,
and
that
was
probably
the
safest
year
at
Parkside
that
I've
seen
in
the
entire
time.
I've
lived
there.
Just
one
person,
literally
acting
as
a
crossing
guard
I
know
in
our
elementary
school.
Our
principals
out
there
every
single
morning
directing
traffic
yelling
at
cars
that
don't
make
the
you
know,
make
the
right
turn
and
if
it
wasn't
for
our
principal,
we
probably
would
be
in
a
different
situation.
E
I,
don't
know
that
Parkside
has
that
that
ability
right
now,
given
the
the
amount
of
work,
that's
being
done
there,
but
I
I,
guess
I
I.
Just
am
not
understanding
why
Niles
is
not
a
priority
area.
E
E
That's
a
time
where
we
would
be
really
looking
for
them
to
make
that
sort
of
a
suggestion
or
request.
Admittedly,
I
think
we
know
enough
about
the
problems
in
front
of
Parkside
that
it
could
be
argued.
It
would
be
appropriate
for
us
to
make
that
suggestion
to
them,
rather
than
simply
waiting
for
them
to
say
hey.
E
We
think
we
need
this
in
front
of
Parkside,
but
but
if
they
did
make
that
suggestion,
we
certainly
would
bring
that
back
in
the
budget
process
to
request
the
additional
funds
required
to
put
that
crossing
guard
out
there
and
I
think
that
all
things
considered
in
the
amount
of
safety
that
crossing
guards
have
been
shown
to
create
and
the
literature
is
pretty
clear
on
that
they
come
in
a
relatively
low
cost.
And
so
it
really
would
be
an
intelligent
thing
for
for
us
to
think
about.
E
So
then
Chief.
What
would
you
recommend
that
the
council
does
at
this
point
to
to
assist
in
in
that
process?
E
I
think
that
I
would
defer
to
the
city
manager's
Direction
here,
but
certainly
it
would
be.
You
know,
within
the
purview
for
us
to
come
back
either
at
a
quarterly
update,
or
you
know,
through
some
other
means
in
the
meantime,
to
request
funding
to
add
that
crossing
guard.
E
If
it's
believed
to
be
necessary
and
I
think
it'd
be
smart,
I'm
fairly,
certain
I
know
what
the
answer
would
be,
but
to
at
least
liaise
would
is
what
school
on
this
make
sure
that
they
they
do
believe
that
it's
necessary
and
that
that's
the
best
placement
if
we
can
afford
one
more
crossing
guard
and
I'm
gonna
turn
into
city
manager,
but
I
also
do
want
to
be
mindful
that
that,
as
as
was
reminded,
this
is
to
just
to
see
if
there
is
the
desire.
E
If
there
are
three
members
for
this
yeah,
this
is
what
we
were
not
wanting.
I
mean
we
had
some
answers
and
I
appreciate
those
answers
being
given.
But
it's
also
not
to
have
us
go
back
and
forth
with
the
staff,
but
to
have
an
agenda
is
or
looked
into
and
reported
back
to
us
in
some
form.
Maybe
it
doesn't
need
to
be
genderized,
maybe
it's
data
that
we
need
so
city
manager,
sure
I'm
going
to
try
and
step
up
on
the
balcony.
E
With
that
comment
and
say,
one
I
think
we
all
agree
that
safety
of
kids
is
extremely
important
and
a
conversation
around
where
cars
crossing
guards
are
are
placed.
How
many
how
they're
funded
really
deserves
a
complete
and
thorough
level
of
analysis
and
I
would
always
suggest
that
the
city
council,
Avail
themselves
of
completed
staff
and,
while
I
totally
believe
the
chief
and
I
think
he's
responding
that
you
know
a
crossing
guard
at
Niles
and
maybe
appropriate.
E
I
would
also
say
that
there
might
even
be
other
locations
that
are
more
appropriate
at
other
elementary
schools,
and
so
you
know
I
wouldn't
want
to
sort
of
step
into
a
conversation
of
you
know.
We've
had
a
discussion
tonight
and
you
know:
when
can
we
bring
back
a
crossing
guard
at
Niles?
I
think
that
the
city
has
embarked
on
a
safer,
opposite
schools
process
I
think
that
we've
historically
funded
three
crossing
guards.
E
It
is
completely
possible
that
that
is
too
few
and
other
locations,
maybe
maybe
more
appropriate,
and
also
worth
noting
that,
while
in
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
we
have
historically
paid
for
three
crossing
guards,
crossing
guards
are
actually
not
always
funded
by
the
local
city,
they're
they're,
oftentimes,
funded
by
schools
or
by
by
by
grants,
and
so
again
we're
talking
about
a
very
important
policy
item.
That
I
think
was.
E
You
know
duly
brought
up
under
a
council
member
comment,
but
I
think
the
appropriate
way
to
sort
of
vet
and
have
the
conversation
would
be
to
allow
staff
to
go
back
and
come
back
with
to
the
city
council
at
a
later
date,
with
with
information,
analysis
and
recommendations
that
that
would
be
my
my
recommendation.
E
Other
comments
from
council
members,
because
also,
let
me
see,
if
there's
any
members
of
the
public
that
want
to
speak
now,
we
put
B
and
C
together,
and
so,
if
there's
any
members
of
the
public,
let
me
make
sure
I
touch
base
with
those
folks
I
see.
Terry
Chavez
has
raised
their
hand.
E
You
can
bring
her
in
please
Terry
Chavez
whenever
you're
ready.
You
may
begin.
Oh
thank
you.
Thank
you!
So
much.
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you.
Oh
thank
you
good
evening.
Well,
I!
Guess
it's
almost
good
night
Mr
Mayor
and
city
manager
and
members
of
city
council.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak.
E
This
has
always
been
an
issue,
as
many
of
you
had
already
stated
about
the
traffic
issue
of
Parkside
during
the
back
to
school
night
that
I
attended.
Recently,
a
few
parents
came
up
to
me
and
did
actually
discuss
the
drop-off
situation,
and
they
also
mentioned
their
concern
for
safety.
They
said
they
saw
cars
parked
in
the
crosswalks
in
the
morning.
E
Blocking
driveways
and
I
was
thinking
about
a
few
years
ago,
when
former
trustee
marinos
and
myself
used
to
stand
out
there
at
Parkside
almost
every
day
about
80
percent
of
the
time,
because
we
were
dropping
off
our
own
Stu,
our
own
kids
and
we
went
out
there
and
we
helped
direct
traffic
to
the
drop-off,
make
things
smoother
faster
to
get
to
get
things
rolling
and
then
you're
right,
I
think
it
was
councilmember,
Mason
or
Hamilton,
who
said
Sometimes
the
principal
used
to
go
out
there
and
help
as
well.
E
But
parkside's
been
a
little
hectic
lately.
So
I
know
the
principal
is
really
busy.
So
I
did
want
to
mention
that
we
have
a
couple
of
paid
security
guards
at
Parkside
and
perhaps
I
went
on
my
meeting.
My
next
meeting
with
the
superintendent
and
I
can
ask
or
I.
We
can
have
a
board
discussion
about
this
as
well
School
Board
discussion.
E
Perhaps
one
of
the
one
of
the
paid
security
guards
can
help
in
the
morning
out
there
with
the
traffic
issue
just
to
help
not
not
direct
traffic,
because
that's
not
really
our
role
but
to
help,
of
course,
with
the
safety.
So
it
is
very
near
and
dear
to
everyone
on
our
school
board
the
safety
of
all
the
students
at
Parkside.
So
thank
you
for
having
this
as
a
discussion
and
I
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Next
speaker,
please,
there
are
no
other
hands
raised.
Thank
you
bringing
it
back
to
council
for
or
vice
mayor,
you
can
finish
up.
I
guess
I
would
refer
to
council
member
Medina
because
he's
been
a
lot
closer
to
the
safe
routes
program.
So
is
this,
but
something
that
we
should
wait
until
December.
E
E
Is
one
driver
to
kind
of
do
something
idiotic
and
so
to
understand
that
the
scope
of
the
safe
route
to
school
program
there's
the
engineering
side
of
it
that
they
could
try
to
change
how
things
are
being
done,
but
operationally
I'm,
not
sure
if
that's
within
this
scope,
and
would
it
be
part
of
their
recommendation
that
you
should
have
a
crossing
guard
now?
If
that
is
part
of
their
scope
of
work,
then
yeah.
We
should
wait
for
that
analysis
to
get
done.
E
But
if
it's
not,
then
we
have
to
figure
out
at
some
point
Who's
going
to
do
that
study
and-
and
it
goes
back
to
I-
think
with
the
schools
and
and
when
the
chief
of
police
made
it
clear
that
every
year
they're
meeting
with
the
school
will
there's
a
turnover
there.
So
they're,
probably
all
saying
well
I'm
only
speculating
we'll
do
what
we
did
last
year:
okay,
yeah,
it's
all
the
same
and
I
went
to
Parkside
a
few
times,
and
that
is
the
I
guess.
E
I,
don't
know
why
it's
just
probably
because
it's
engineered
improperly
and
they
didn't
listen
to
the
city
and
and
Implement
what
the
tspc
wanted
to
do,
or
even
to
meet
with
them,
and
and
perhaps
with
it
being
older
kids
that
it's
maybe
not
as
dangerous
or
meet
the
need
to
have
a
crossing
guard
somewhere
else.
I,
don't
know
enough
I
believe
there's
a
crossing
guard
over
on
San
Bruno
Avenue
on
Third,
Avenue
I
know,
there's
it's
a
crossing
guard
at
City
Hall
by
IHOP
right.
E
So
the
third
one
probably
is
the
one
over
there
I'm
satisfied
with
hearing
the
explanation
of
especially
if
it's
coming
from
the
crossing
guard,
because
it's
generally
the
people
that
are
doing
the
work
that
know
the
most
right.
So
this
is
something
that
we
haven't
talked
about
before
at
other
schools
and
and
seeing
what
we
can
do
and
and
from
hearing
what
the
chief
said,
the
crossing
guard
is
not
going
to
solve
the
problem.
E
It's
the
it's,
the
poor
choices
that
parents
or
people
who
are
dropping
the
kids
off
that
they're
making
every
day,
and
we
can't
afford
to
have
a
police
officer
there.
But
probably
you
know
what
changes
people
be
people's
behavior
is
is
the
consequence
and
there's
no
consequence
if
there's
no
enforcement
but
I'm
sure
if
people
started
getting
more
tickets,
there
they're
going
to
complain
to
us
they're
going
to
explain
to
the
school,
but
that
is
probably
the
price
that
people
have
to
pay
in
order
to
change
their
behavior.
E
So
so
it
sounds
like
the
question
is:
is
the
crossing
guard
component
going
to
be
part
of
the
safe
routes
to
school
and
and
I
saw
some
head
shaking
over
there?
So
I
think
I
got
the
answer
and
this
time
in
Zoom
I
could
I
don't
need
Zoom
to
kind
of
see
the
head
shaking.
So
there
is
a
benefit
of
meeting
in
person.
E
I'm
just
kidding,
I'm,
just
teasing
I'm
just
teasing
this
late,
so
I
I
think
what
the
vice
man
was
asking
about:
the
safe
route
to
schools
and
whether
it
should
be
waited
till
December.
She
was
asking
you
because
of
your
involvement.
Are
we
deferring
over
to
the
manager
yeah
just
so
I'm
following
Mr
Mayor
yeah?
The
question
was
directed
towards
me.
E
What
I've
seen
The
Limited
times
that
I've
been
able
to
be
at
at
Bel
Air
is
a
big
Improvement,
because
we
have
parents
that
are
dropping
off
kids
on
one
route
and
other
kids
getting
dropped
on
this
other
route.
So
therefore,
you're
splitting
up
the
load
and
people
are
getting
through
and
dropping
off
their
kids,
so
they
can
go
to
work
or
whatever
else
and
at
Parkside.
E
E
So
then
I
would
just
motion.
I
know,
I'm,
not
sure.
As
far
as
how
how
much
time
this
would
take,
but
I
would
just
mention
them
that
there
are
traffic
concerns
on
Parkside.
How
can
the
city
assist
in
their
mitigation
through
the
use
of
crossing
guards
and
to
come
back
with
a
recommendation
and
I
would
specify
specifically
to
the
Parkside
Community,
because
that
is
the
only
Middle
School
in
the
in
the
city
and
I
believe
it
has
the
largest
population
of
all
of
our
elementary
schools.
E
First,
let's
see
if
there's
a
second,
then
I'm
gonna,
maybe
ask
for
some
clarity
on
that.
Well,
I
I
actually
wanted
to
get
some
clarity
before
potentially
seconding
it.
That
seems
to
be
in
line
with
the
recommendation
that
the
city
manager
made
earlier
is
that
is
that
how
you
heard
it
as
well?
City
manager,.
E
With
a
recommendation
just
a
little
bit
ago,
just
recommending
that
we
hear
you
sure,
when
you're
on
the
balcony,
the
only
reason
why
I
pause
is
because
I
think
we're
picking
the
solution
without
truly
understanding
the
problem
and
I
right
now.
Sitting
here
today
am
not
sure
that
a
parking,
a
additional
crossing
guard
would
improve
the
pickup
drop
off
congestion
potential
safety
issues
at
Parkside,
and
so
I
I
in
general
would
recommend
that
you
not
through
your
very
brief
discussion
tonight,
pick
the
solution,
but
instead
be
broader
and
vice
mayor.
E
I
think,
given
the
issues
that
you
have
brought
up,
I
think
the
next
prudent
step
would
be
to
ask
staff
to
take
a
look
at
the
congestion
and
safety
concerns
around
Parkside
and
have
conversations
with
the
school
district
as
well
as
our
transportation
or
Traffic
Engineers,
and
should
there
be
solutions
that
require
city
council
action,
bring
those
before
the
city
council
in
a
expeditious
fashion,
but
also
inform
the
city
council
with
an
update
at
the
conclusion
of
that
analysis,
foreign
copy,
that
with
emotion
so
request
for
analysis
on
the
Parkside
traffic
congestion
and
ask
staff
to
discuss
with
the
district
and
then
bring
back
the
recommendation
before
city
council.
E
If
I'll
put
that
motion
on
the
table
to
direct
staff
to
do
so,
I'll.
Second,
that
there's
a
motion
and
second
and
does
everybody
understand
the
motion,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye,
all
the
all,
those
opposed
five
zero
to
the
motion,
which
was
the
second
time
with
that
motion.
Yeah
the
right
motion.
E
Okay,
all
right,
let's
move
on
to
d,
please
request
update
on
staff
efforts
to
hold
Recology
accountable
for
their
contractual
obligation
to
host
a
fundraiser
for
local
schools
in
2022
and
direct
staff
as
needed
to
ensure
contract
compliance
for
the
specific
provision
that
has
not
been
met.
Vice
mayor,
okay,
thank
you,
so
I
I
guess
we'll
just
start
by
saying
that
we
just
awarded
Recology
a
10-year
contract
with
two
options
to
extend
five
years
for
up
to
20
years.
E
I
was
not
in
support
of
this
agreement
for
many
reasons
that
this
council
is
aware
of.
But
one
of
the
areas
that
is
worth
noting
is
that
we
did
award
a
multi-million
dollar
contract
to
a
company
had
not
that
had
not
yet
provided
a
fundraiser,
as
contracted
in
their
last
24-year
agreement
to
our
schools,
and
so
the
question
that
I
ask
of
this
council
is
whether
we
expect
our
contractors
to
perform
and
what
our
expectation
is
of
them
when
they
don't
perform,
especially
when
the
victim
of
the
non-performance
or
our
public
school
kids.
E
So
I'm
going
to
tell
this
Council
a
little
bit
about
how
our
kids
in
public
schools
get
supplies.
Every
year,
our
our
kids
get
a
list
of
supplies,
and
parents
go
out
that
can
and
purchase
the
supplies
for
the
classroom
for
the
entire
year.
Those
supplies
include
Kleenex.
They
include
paper
towels,
they
include
Clorox
bleach,
they
don't
even
bring
their
supplies
in
a
pencil
box.
E
The
school
classroom
uses
this
as
their
ongoing
supplies
and
then
they'll
request.
Additional
supplies
course
bleach
hand
sanitizer
throughout
the
year
as
needed.
Field
trips
at
our
schools
are
funded
at
our
school
through
PTA
fundraisers.
So
if
there's
no
funds
through
PTA
fundraisers,
then
there's
no
field
trips.
E
Our
physical
conditions
of
schools
are
falling
apart
as
many
know,
and
sports
programs
are
in
need
of
funds.
In
short,
the
funds
any
and
all
are
desperately
needed,
whether
they're,
small
or
great.
So
my
question
to
my
fellow
colleagues
who
are
responsible
for
directing
the
city
manager
on
actions
to
take
is
what
are
we
going
to
do
to
ensure
that,
in
the
final
couple
of
months
of
this
24-year
contract
that
this
Provisions
adhere
to?
E
It
was
somewhat
insulting
at
the
last
meeting
when
asking
our
consultant
whether
substantial
compliance
of
nothing
and
I
specifically
asked
about
the
provision
of
fundraising
was
considered
substantial
compliance
and
if
you
watch
the
video,
the
answer
is
yes
and
I
specifically
say
so.
Nothing
is
substantial
compliance
and
the
response
was
yes.
E
E
But
it
would
seem
and
I
can
only
base
from
my
experiences
when
there's
somebody
who's
responsible
as
a
as
an
inspector.
My
job
is
to
see
that
the
project
has
done
a
certain
way
so
who,
in
the
city
is
responsible
to
make
sure
contracts
are
being
conducted
and
being
complied
with?
And
what
is
the
mechanism
that
should
trigger
a
letter
or
request
to
to
comply
and
and
I
think
you're
right?
E
So
those
are
kind
of
my
my
thoughts
on
that
I.
Think
that's
some
other
question
to
staff
in
there
like
and
just
wanted
to
be
sure
that
if
we're
asking
for
compliance
is,
is
that
really
the
council's
job
or
shouldn't
that
be
somebody
on
staff's
job
to
say,
hey
they're,
not
in
compliance?
So
therefore,
do
you
want
to
take
additional
action,
yeah
and
I
and
I
would
just
respond
to
that
through
the
mayor.
I
would
just
respond
to
that
that
this
has
been
an
issue
since
2020..
E
Nothing
has
been
done
to
take
action.
I
have
requested.
I
have
actually
asked
the
city
manager
in
a
previous
discussion.
Whether
there's
going
to
be
a
letter
sent
out.
E
Is
there
an
alternative
since
recycling
isn't
big
but
was
big
24
years
ago,
but
it
didn't
it
doesn't
matter,
because
we
can't
find
any
evidence
of
compliance
anyway
and
then
because
nothing
was
done,
I'm
bringing
it
now
back
to
the
council,
there
was
a
review
of
the
contract,
but
there
was
nothing
done
to
send
a
letter
or
anything
to
say
what
is
going
to
be
the
compliance
for
this
particular
provision,
and
it's
not
my
ability
to
direct
the
city
manager
anyway
to
send
a
letter
on
behalf
of
the
city
on
behalf
of
the
council,
but
as
we
are
getting
as
we've
approved
a
new
contract-
and
we
have
three
months
left
time
is
of
the
essence,
and
so
we
either
make
make
a
decision
to
try
to
say:
okay,
maybe
recycling
isn't
big
now,
but
what
is
an
alternate
that
will
be
provided
for
24
years
of
non-compliance
or
do
we
just
say
we're
moving
into
our
new
contract
and
we're
going
to
ignore
that
this
was
even
here
which
I,
which
I
obviously
don't
support.
E
E
It
is
also
true
that
when
we
went
out
for
a
full
contract
review,
this
issue
was
discussed
at
lent
at
the
city
council
and
because
of
that
discussion
we
put
in
the
scope
of
work
for
the
city's
consultant
to
analyze.
Compliance
with
the
contract.
I
do
not
believe
that
it
is
a
accurate
statement
that
the
program
and
the
program
we're
talking
about
is
the
Cash
For
Cans
program.
E
One
section
of
the
franchise
agreement
that
the
contractor
was
to
offer
and
run
was
not
provided
for
the
24
year
year.
Length
of
of
of
the
contractor
I
going
back
that
far
to
determine
absolutely
is,
is
not
possible,
but
I
have
heard
from
a
number
of
individuals
that
the
program
was
provided
in
the
past.
E
E
City
council
has
been
told
that
this
program.
Actually
over
the
last
years,
it's
been
discussed
a
number
of
times
at
the
city
council
and
the
contractor
actually
provided
a
number
of
responses
to
the
city
council
and
the
program
was
it
appears,
provided
at
some
point.
In
the
past.
The
vendor
has
said
that
they
offered
the
program
to
the
city,
I'm,
sorry
to
schools
and
schools.
One
no
longer
wanted
to
elect
to
participate
in
the
program.
In
addition,
the
program
was
funded
based
off
of
money
from
recycling.
E
The
your
consultant
that
we
hired
to
look
into
this
determine
that
out
of
all
of
the
terms
in
the
contract
that
Recology
was
substantially
compliant
with
the
contract.
It
is
true
that
over
the
last
X
number
of
years,
this
one
provision
of
the
program
where
they
were
to
offer
a
fundraiser
for
the
schools
was
not
provided.
We
have
no
records
on
if
that
program
was
in
fact
offered
or
if,
in
fact
it
was,
schools
actually
did
not
want
to
participate.
E
Legally
liable
for
not
providing
that
one
Community
benefit
portion
of
the
contract
is
challenging
and
I
do
not
think
that
this
is
the
venue
to
discuss
that.
I
also
believe
that
in
other
staff's
interpretation,
that
Recology
has
been
substantially
compliant
with
all
the
terms
in
the
contract.
Even
if
we
accept
that
this
one
provision
to
offer
a
fundraiser
for
the
school
was
was
not
provided,
the
the
vendor
has
provided
Counsel
on
numerous
occasions
with
rationales
on
why
that
program
was
not
provided.
E
I
do
not
I
know
for
a
fact
in
the
franchise
agreement
there
is
not
language
to
say:
should
the
schools
elect
to
not
participate,
or
should
you
not
offer
the
program
you
are
to
provide
X
in
lieu?
It
was
essentially
a
cause
in
the
contract
that
says
that
the
vendor
will
offer
a
cash
for
camps
program
to
support
recycling
education
and
as
a
fundraiser
for
the
schools.
Again,
the
City
attorney
has
applied
to
the
city
council
in
a
confidential
attorney-client.
Privileged
memo
on
the
challenges
with
these
Community
benefit
portions
in
franchise
agreements.
E
E
E
I
was
not
here
24
years
ago
when
that
contract,
what
was
it
was
negotiated
and
I
I
I
I
I
very
much
agree
with
that,
which
is
why
staff
did
not
recommend
it
to
be
in
the
new
franchise
agreement
and
I'm
going
to
call
on
council
member
Hamilton
next,
but
I
mean
I'm
sorry,
but
I'm
going
to
pause
just
in
case
there
is
anyone
at
home
that
wants
to
speak
on
item
D.
Let's
give
that
courtesy,
I
see
a
hand
up,
I
will
be
bringing
in
Jennifer
Blanco.
E
I
apologize,
it
I
am
not
allowed
to
bring
the
speaker
into
the
room,
Jennifer
Blanco,
if
you
could
please
provide
your
public
comment
to
the
city
clerk's
office
email
address
is
city
clerk
at
San,
bruno.ca.gov.
E
And
we
will
share
the
email
with
the
council
as
well
as
staff
I
apologize,
councilmember
Hamilton.
So
my
these
are
my
thoughts
on
this.
So
the
I
completely
agree
that
Provisions
like
for
any
any
provisions
that
involve
the
school.
Don't
belong
on
our
contract
because
Recology
has
their
own
contract
with
the
school
and
that's
where
those
things
belong.
E
E
Just
like
there
was
a
provision
in
the
contract
that
had
we
not
renegotiated
for
this
year
that
we
would
have
had
a
29
increase
on
January
1..
That
was
a
provision
in
the
contract
that
we
would
have
had
to
abide
by
because
it's
a
contract
now
having
Recology
go,
provide
a
Cash,
For
Cans
program
now
makes
no
sense
because
we
I
think
we
all
agree
that
such
a
program
is
not
viable,
but
I
do
think
it's
reasonable
to
explore
whether
you
know
what
what
could
be
done
in
loop.
E
I
think
that's
so
I
because
that's
I
mean
as
poorly
thought
out
as
it
was
to
to
have
Provisions
in
the
in
the
contract
that
involved
the
school
in
the
city
contract
when
those
should
have
been.
You
know,
between
Recology,
and
the
schools
in
fact
remains
that
it
was
in
the
contract.
So
that's
why
I
would
be
in
favor
of
let's
at
least
look
at
to
see
if
we
can,
if
we
can
find
a
way
to
settle
it.
E
Through
the
mayor,
yes,
city
manager,
please
I
would
say
that
that
would
need
to
take
place
in
a
different,
a
different
form.
Venue,
I
I,
do
think
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
you
suggest
those
options
here.
Fair
absolutely
not
I
do
think
that
it's
important
to
remind
the
city
council
of
something
that
the
vendor
did
say.
E
I
want
to
say
almost
a
year,
maybe
two
years
ago,
when
this
very
topic
was
brought
up
at
a
at
a
meeting
and
that
over
the
years
there
were
a
number
of
things
that
the
city
asked
the
vendor
to
do
that
were
not
in
the
contract
as
well,
and
things
were
added
like
it's
not
in
the
contract
to
provide
a
bulky,
pickup
services
to
Apartments.
E
Can
you
do
that,
and
so
I
do
think
that,
should
we
embark
on
this
process,
I
just
want
counselor
to
know
that
I
don't
think
that
it's
a
easy
process,
I'm,
not
saying
don't!
Do
it
I'm
just
saying
that
it
is
a
the
ability
to
it
will
be
a
very
significant
process
and
I
think
it
should
take
place
in
a
different
form.
Thank
you.
City
manager
and
I
I.
E
Had
some
comments
but
I'm
going
to
refrain
from
comments
because
I
think
the
city
managers
now
and
I
don't
see
the
attorney
stopping
the
comments
has
said
twice
now.
This
should
be
in
a
different
venue
and
so
I
believe
it
should
be
in
a
different
venue
and
I.
Think
the
last
City
manager's
remarks
in
addition
to
the
email
that
we
had
received
should
have
Merit
and
we
we
should
be
taking
that
under
advisement,
councilmember
Medina,
true
I,
think
I
should
said,
asked
about
that.
But
what
amount
is
this?
E
What
is
in
question?
Is
it
I
can't
imagine
it
being
very
substantial
again:
I
and
I
I
want
the
city
manager
to
stop
me
or
correct
me,
and
you
have
that
is
that
I
think
this
is
not
the
venue
because
I
don't
know,
I'm
concerned
that
we're
going
down
past
now
that
has
been
asked
twice
about
in
a
different
venue,
yeah
and
so
I.
Don't
know
how
much
more
the
city
manager
can
advise
us
and
or
the
attorney
and
I.
So
this
is
my
opinion.
E
E
Would
you
vice
mayor
Mason?
Can
you
can
you
rephrase
the
question
that
you're
looking
for
councilmember
Medina?
Can
you
please
repeat
the
question
you're
looking
for
an
answer
to
staff?
Have
an
estimate
of
what
this
amount
would
be
yearly,
what
it
has
been
in
the
past
because
I'm
guessing
that
if
it
was
recycling
as
it
got,
there
was
a
certain
number
and
it
made
sense,
and
then
it
started
being
less
money,
less
money
and
then
at
some
point
I
can
imagine
could
imagine
that
both
parties
said
hey.
E
You
know
it's
not
worth
it,
but
it's
you
know
was
there,
you
know
it
always
comes
down
to
documentation
in
a
contract
right.
Did
you
agree
to
this
change?
Did
they
we
didn't
agree
to
this
change?
It's
in
the
contract?
It's
not
our
fault
that
it
was
in
the
contract,
but
we
fixed
that
for
the
next
contract.
So
if
you
have
a
contract,
you
should
probably
fulfill
it,
but
the
question
is
ooh
how
much?
How
much
was
it
like?
Are
we
just
curious?
That's
all!
E
If
you
knew
it,
then
you
know
what,
if
you
don't,
then
you
don't
it's
cool!
Here's
a
roundabout
answer
to
say:
I,
don't
know
the
last
time
this
program
was
provided
was
several
years
ago,
I
believe
more
than
seven
to
ten
years
ago.
E
It's
a
cash
for
camps
program
that
would
be
a
fundraiser
in
the
schools,
so
it
would
go
something
like
Recology
would
organize
a
fundraiser
kids
would
collect
cans
and
recyclables.
Do
they
collect
25
worth
of
recyclables
fifty
dollars
worth
of
recyclables?
How
much
were
recyclables
worth
in
2007
right?
The
city
has
had
knowledge
that
this
program
was
not
provided
for
several
years.
E
You
know
what
are
their
provisions
and
how
far
can
the
city
go
back
even
if
there
is
a
way
to
have
a
mitigated
amount
again,
I,
don't
think
that
it
is
a
quick
or
simple
analysis
and
I
think
the
City
attorney
has
opined
in
a
different
form
the
legal
challenges
with
these
provisions.
E
Mayor
Medina
I,
would
just
add
that
you
know
any
sort
of
analysis
about
whether
there
was
for
specific
perform.
There
was
adequate
performance
and
you
know
what
the
legal
remedies
all
of
that
could
be
done
in
a
confidential
legal
memorandum
to
the
city
council.
But
of
course
that's
going
to
take
time
and
resources
to
put
something
like
that
together.
E
Any
other
council
member
salzer
yeah
I
was
just
thinking
back
when
I
used
to
actually
save
cans
and
put
them
in
the
back
of
the
car
and
take
them
up
to
the
Bay
Hill
shopping
center
to
the
little
kiosk
there
to
get
money
for
them
and
a
whole
trunk
load
was
worth
about
a
couple
of
dollars.
So
it
was,
it
wasn't
significant.
It
was
more
hassle
than
it
was
than
it
was
worth.
E
So
you
know,
I
I,
don't
think
we
I
agree
with
with
council
member
Medina
that
I
don't
think
we're
talking
about
a
lot
of
money
and
that
may
have
led
to
the
comment
about
being
substantially
compliant
because
it
wasn't
a
huge
deficit
and,
as
a
city
manager
pointed
out,
Recology
over
the
past
couple
of
years
has
stepped
up
to
provide
a
lot
of
additional
uncontracted
services
without
charge,
including
the
event
we
had
was
that
last
weekend
or
Saturday
yeah,
and
then
we
I
mean
I
personally
helped
fill
a
bunch
of
dumpsters
and
that
was
definitely
out
of
cost
to
Recology,
but
not
to
the
city
and
and
that
was
provided
without
charge
to
the
residents.
E
So
I
I'm
I'm
pretty
sure
that
if
we
were
to
sort
of
you
know,
fill
out
the
the
pro
column
with
the
con
column
that
we
would
probably
come
out
ahead
and
thinking
back
to
the
days
when
we
used
to
do
clean,
sweep
I
know
we
used
to
round
up
a
lot
of
trash
and
Recology
was
always
there
to
haul
it
away
and
provided
a
lot
of
support
for
what
we
were
doing
then
so
I
yeah
I,
don't
feel
that
this
is
a
I.
E
Don't
think
it's
a
huge
item
and
it
wasn't
the
contract
I
get
it,
but
I
I
really
don't
think
it.
It
should
have
been
there
and,
in
my
conversations
with
a
couple
of
the
trustees
from
the
school
board,
they
haven't
raised
it
as
a
as
a
big
issue,
either
so
I
don't
think
that
they
were
feeling
substantially
wronged
by
the
contract
and
as
councilmember
Hamilton
pointed
out,
you
know
they
have
their
own
contract
and
they
they
should
certainly
look
at
getting.
E
You
know
whatever
benefits,
they
think
they
can
generate,
and
you
know
the
the
information
you
provided
about,
the
you
know,
people
having
to
provide
the
supplies
and
everything-
that's
certainly
true
it
was
you
know
we
heard
from
the
superintendent
that
they
are
doing
financially
better
than
they
have,
but
I'm
sure,
there's
still
always
room
for
for
more
Improvement,
but
I
I.
Don't
think
that
it's
that
we
would
be
able
to
justify
any
significant
contribution
going
down
this
Avenue.
E
Vice
versa,
so
I
don't
want
to.
If
there
I
mean
I,
think
that
I'll
say
what
I
said
to
the
city
manager
when
they
started
working
on
the
abandoned
waste
program.
Unless
it's
in
writing
that
it's
the
alternative
for
the
fundraiser,
then
it's
still
a
provision
in
the
contract
and
it's
not
being
met
and
so
I
think
that,
given
the
enormous
contract
that
we
have
provided,
that
will
likely
now
go
43
years.
E
You
know
I
think
if
we,
if
we
don't
just
want
to
go
around
I,
would
just
motion
to
have
a
closed
session
on
this
particular
item
and
we
can
have
a
brighter
discussion
around
the
legality
of
it
on
the
table.
There's
a
motion
made
to
have
it
in
a
different
form,
closed
session.
Is
there
a
second
a
second
motion
made
by
smear
second
at
Hamilton?
Oh
all,
those
in
favor,
hi,
hi
I,
was
opposed.
No,
no.
It
is
three
two
with
no's
from
our
Medina
and
Salazar.
E
Thank
you
very
well.
Oh
any
other
things.
Oh
okay.
The
vice
Mayors
concluded
under
Council
comments.
Is
there
any
other
council
members
council,
member
Hamilton
I,
have
a
couple
a
couple
quick
items.
First,
as
I
was
leaving
to
come
here
tonight,
I
checked
my
mailbox
and
I
had
my
ballots.
E
Well,
sorry,
my
ballot
and
my
wife's
ballot.
Sorry
and
so
I
just
want
to
remind
everyone
how
important
it
is
that
you
vote,
regardless
of
of
where
you,
where
you
fall
on
the
political
spectrum
and
what
you
support
and
what
you
believe
in.
It
is
incredibly
important
that
all
of
us
vote
there
are
significant
portions
of
the
world
where
people
do
not
have
that
right
and
we
should.
If
you
have
that
right,
you
should
never
waste
it.
So,
please
be
sure
to
vote.
E
The
second
and
last
comment.
I.
Rarely
take
my
comments.
Out
of
the
borders
of
San
Bruno,
but
I'm
doing
so
tonight,
I
want
to
acknowledge
the
news
out
of
Los
Angeles
that
many
of
us
learned
this
week
and
take
a
moment
to
condemn
the
hateful
speech
that
was
caught
on
tape
being
made
by
Los
Angeles
city
council
president
Nuri
Martinez,
council
members,
Gil
sedillo
and
Kevin
De,
Leon
and
former
labor
president
Ron
Herrera
in
an
incredibly
short
period
of
time.
E
This
group
somehow
managed
to
be
disgustingly
offensive
to
an
amazingly
broad
array
of
groups.
These
officials
actions
make
them
wholly
unfit
for
public
office
and
I
joined
the
growing
group
of
reasonable
Californians
in
demanding
that
they
resign.
Thank
you
any
other
accountable
comments.
Council,
member
Martin,
Medina,
yes,
I,
have
a
way
more
positive
comment
than
that.
E
E
In
summary,
they
did
a
fantastic
job
and
the
thanks
for
the
20
parents.
That
really
was
behind
the
team
to
make
it
happen,
and
people
may
not
know
this.
But
I
was
in
ninth
grade
marching
band
in
Salinas
California.
So
that
is
really
interesting.
It's
it's
it's
a
great
thing
and
it's
a
great
accomplishment
and
it's
his.
They
made
history.
So
it's
fantastic,
so
good
job,
cappuccino,
council,
member
Salazar!
E
Thank
you!
So
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
the
fact
that
we're
back
in
the
senior
center
for
the
first
time
in
almost
three
years
of
being
remote
and
I,
wanted
to
take
the
opportunity
to
both
congratulate
and
thank
our
city
manager
and
his
team
for
not
only
pivoting
us
at
the
beginning
of
this
to
get
us
on
zoom
and
get
us
to
a
place
where
we
could
continue
to
conduct
business
and
and
for
the
effort
that
it
took
to
get
us
back
here
tonight.
E
I
know
it
wasn't
a
small
feat:
there
was
a
lot
of
moving
parts.
There
was
a
lot
of
Staff
involved,
but
clearly
it
was.
It
was
a
very
successful
evening.
I
think
there
may
have
been
a
little
bit
of
a
glitch
there
in
the
beginning,
but
nobody
noticed
nobody
noticed
so
I
I
did
want
to
acknowledge
the
amount
of
effort
that
goes
into
doing
something
like
this
and
and
the
fact
that
it
was
it
was
successful.
So
thank
you
to
all
of
the
staff.
That's
here
tonight.
E
Everybody
who's
not
here,
but
had
a
hand
in
setting
it
up.
I
definitely
appreciate
that
effort
and
thank
you
for
getting
us
back
home
and
I
had
quite
a
I
had
a
lot
of
the
list
from
last
time,
but
it
is
late
and
so
I
wanted
to
say
that
I
can
say
more
than
what
council
member
Salazar
said
because
he
knows
it
because
of
his
profession.
So
he
understands
the
intricacies,
but
I
do
appreciate.
Also
the
staff
who's
was
prepping
us
to
go
through.
E
Do
we
want
to
come
here
early
to
make
sure
getting
a
phone
call
on
how
to
run
the
meeting?
I've
done
one
of
these
hybrids
for
the
at
the
district
office,
but
Transit
District,
but
not
here.
So
it
has
not
been
I'm,
sure
easy
and
there's
a
lot
of
new
equipment
here
and
investment
of
time
and
energy
and
everybody
trying
to
get
shall
we
say:
they're
banned
in
sync,
using
Marty's
analysis
with
cappuccino
to
March
and
succeed.
E
So
I
just
want
to
thank
all
the
staff
too,
because
I
know
that's
not
easy.
The
only
thing
staff
may
say
is
I'm
glad
we're
back
I
always
hear
that
from
our
city
manager.
You
know
it's
important
to
be
back,
but
they're,
probably
saying
yeah
and
I
went
to
11
30.,
so
so
there's
good
and
there
could
be.
Maybe
we
can
improve
that
too.
E
So,
with
that
said,
we
are
going
to
go
into
closed
session,
the
city
council
and
that's
in
regards
to
conference
with
legal
counsel,
anticipated
litigation,
significant
exposure
to
litigation
pursuant
to
government
government
code,
section
54956.9,
D2,
there's
one
case:
there'll
be
no
reportable
action,
and
so
we
will
not
be
returning
and
from
there
we
will
adjourn
to
the
next
regular
city
council
meeting,
which
will
be
held
on
October
25th
2022
at
7
pm
right
here
at
the
San
Bruno
Senior
Center,
and
also
you
can
view
at
home.
Thank
you
good
night
me
adjourned.