►
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting June 18, 2013
Whole meeting trt 46:35
F
A
A
G
You
good
evening,
the
application,
as
mentioned
is
for
a
use
permit
for
an
expansion
of
greater
than
fifty
percent
at
101
Balboa
way,
the
project
does
meet
all
other
development
standards
of
the
r1
zoning
district.
The
site
is
located
on
a
col
de
sac
at
the
southern
city
limits.
Doesn't
everything
sound
okay
for
everybody
out
there?
Okay,
great
the
site,
has
an
irregular
shape
and
in
a
lot
size
area
of
five
thousand
five
hundred
and
eighty
seven
square
feet,
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
two-story
addition
to
the
existing
one
story,
home
specifically
the
first
floor.
G
Addition
would
be
to
the
right
side
of
the
existing
home
and
towards
the
rear.
You
can
see
on
your
plans
that
the
site
on
the
cul-de-sac
has
angled
property
lines,
and
the
applicant
has
designed
the
garage
to
follow
that
angle.
Property
lined
for
a
section
of
the
garage
to
maximize
the
storage
area
there
in
the
garage.
The
second
floor
would
be
located
on
top
of
the
first
floor
edition
so
to
the
far
right,
rear
corner
of
the
house
as
proposed.
The
first
floor
would
have
1400
three
square
feet
of
living
area.
G
The
second
floor
would
have
418
square
feet
of
living
area
and
they
also
proposed
quite
a
large
one
car
garage.
So
the
total
square
footage
would
be
two
thousand
two
hundred
and
twenty
square
feet,
which
is
a
point
for
one
fa
are
so.
As
you
know
that
is
well
below
the
threshold
of
point
five
five
fa.
Our
staff
is
supported
supportive
of
the
design
of
the
house
and
find
that
it
is
consistent
with
the
residential
design
guidelines.
Specifically,
the
second
floor
is
set
back
to
the
rear
and
is
integrated
into
the
roof
lines
below.
G
This
helps
to
reduce
the
mass
of
the
house.
Additionally,
the
exterior
materials
are
carried
throughout
the
home,
so
the
existing
materials
that
are
around
today,
the
sighting
and
the
window
trim
and
the
cells
are
proposed
to
remain
and
be
added
to
the
addition
as
well.
I'm
staff
has
also
worked
with
the
applicant
to
add
some
architectural
details
to
the
house
I'm
right
now.
It
has
a
relatively
simple
architectural
style
and
they
would
like
to
add
a
few
things
to
add
some
kind
of
visual
appeal.
G
So
we've
worked
with
them
and
in
a
manner
to
be
consistent
with
the
house
and
add
some
additional
architectural
interest.
The
project
was
reviewed
at
the
May
sixteenth
architectural
review
committee
meeting.
At
that
time
the
committee
forwarded
the
project
with
a
positive
recommendation
and
very
minor
comments,
and
those
comments
have
been
implemented.
They
included
a
landscaping
plan
showing
the
laundry
and
also
including
the
summary
of
green
building
measures.
So
those
items
are
in
the
plans
that
you
have
before
you
tonight.
G
Staff
sent
a
courtesy
notice
to
immediate
neighbors
on
may
seven
and
the
required
legal
notice
was
sent
on
june
seventh
and
we
did
receive
one
email
requesting
the
full
set
of
plans
we
sent
via
PDF,
which
we
did
send.
The
neighbor
did
not
express
any
specific
concerns
to
staff
as
follow-up
to
that
email.
So
staff
would
recommend
approval
of
the
project
based
on
findings
of
fact,
137
and
subject
to
conditions
of
approval.
One
through
twenty-four
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
A
F
A
F
F
B
A
Opposed
motion
passes
there's
ten
day
appeal
period:
good
luck,
okay,
item
being
1999,
Earl
Avenue
in
syndrome.
This
is
request
for
a
vision
for
revision
to
previously
approved
temporary
use
permit
to
allow
the
expansion
of
an
offside
construction
staging
area
within
the
crust.
More
neighborhood
per
section,
12
84
030
resume
brio
Municipal
Code
staff.
Please.
C
Commissioner
bsod
and
planning
commissioners.
This
application
actually
originally
came
to
you
in
april
of
this
year,
April
sixteenth,
that
you're
planning
commission
meeting
and
at
that
time
you
looked
at
two
proposed
sites
for
staging
for
construction
in
the
crestmore
rebuild
area.
Presently,
what's
going
on
is
that
the
city
of
san
bruno,
along
with
contractors
it's
hired,
is
in
the
process
of
rebuilding
infrastructure
within
this
neighborhood
that
sustained
the
explosion
and
fire
in
in
2010.
As
part
of
this
work,
it's
necessary
to
have
staging
areas
for
construction,
materials
and
construction
vehicles.
C
At
your
April,
sixteenth
meeting,
you
actually
approve
to
such
staging
areas.
In
the
meantime,
our
staff
has
been
working
with
a
contractor
jmv
construction
who's
now
been
hired
and
they've
determined
that
they
need
a
larger
area
for
staging
for
their
construction
activities.
These
activities
involved
replacing
and
repairing
underground
infrastructure
such
as
the
storm
drain
lines,
water
lines,
sewer
lines
within
this
neighborhood
and
then
also
rebuilding
and
repairing
sidewalk
streets
and
streetlights.
C
One
of
the
sites
you
looked
at
it
approved
was
a
Caltrans
site
and
the
Caltrans
site
was
at
the
corner
of
san
bruno
avenue,
west
and
Glen
View
Drive.
At
that
time,
you
approved
an
area
that
was
about
11,000
square
feet
and
and
given
the
need
for
more
staging
area,
the
request
tonight
is
to
expand
that
area
for
staging
of
materials
and
construction
vehicles
to
about
40,000
square
feet.
C
This
Caltrans
property
is
about
seven
acres
in
size
and,
as
staff
has
looked
at,
the
staff
is
recommending
that
there
be
a
30
foot
setback
for
the
staging
of
materials
on
this
property
30
feet
from
the
sidewalk
on
Glen,
View,
Drive
and
also
30
feet
from
nearby
residential
properties.
Staff
is
also
recommending
that
there
be
a
chain-link
fence
with
slats
and
that
slats
be
anti-graffiti
in
terms
of
their
coding.
C
So
we're
suggesting
that
that
condition
be
added
I
would
also
like
to
point
out
that
there's
a
condition.
Seven.
The
condition
seven
indicates
that,
in
the
event
that
there
may
be
dust,
that's
blowing
to
nearby
residential
properties,
the
contractor
would
be
responsible
for
cleaning
those
those
homes,
washing
windows
etc.
C
The
condition
reads:
the
applicant
shall
remove
all
equipment
and
materials
and
thoroughly
clean
the
staging
area
and
any
immediate
properties
affected
by
dust
or
debris
within
14
days
of
the
contract,
notice
of
substantial
completion
and
then
finally,
I'd
like
to
add
a
condition
that
is
not
listed
in
the
staff
report.
We
indicate
in
the
staff
report
that
there
should
be
a
30
foot
setback
to
residential
properties
and
then
also
to
the
to
the
rear
of
the
sidewalk
on
glenview,
and
so
the
additional
condition
would
read
as
follows.
C
So
with
that,
our
recommendation
tonight
is
to
to
go
forward
and
for
the
Planning
Commission
to
approve
this
revision
to
the
tup.
The
temporary
use
permit
that
you
approved
in
April,
subject
to
the
findings
of
fact
in
the
staff
report
1
through
3
and
the
conditions
of
approval
1
through
10,
plus
the
additional
condition
I
just
read
into
the
record.
I'd
be
happy
to
respond
to
any
questions
you
may
have.
Thank
you.
Thank.
H
C
H
H
H
C
H
Now,
if
we're
going
to
giving
them
an
extra,
you
know
40,000
square
feet
or
whatever
it
is
I
mean,
do
they
even
need
to
glenview
air
and
by
the
fire
house?
That's
good!
I'm
it's
right!
Next
time
at
I
brought
the
question
of
last
time.
You
have
it
intrusive
on
the
name.
You
know,
there's
a
house
right
next
door
to
that
right.
C
C
C
C
H
H
I
would
like
to
put
in
here
that,
if
we're
going
to
grant
them
this
extra
square
footage
at
the
fence
posts,
I'd
say
why,
if
we're
going
to
grant
in
this
extra
storage
space
that
we
make
them
put
a
fence
on
the
firehouse
fire
department
site,
also
we're
going
to
I'll
just
be
I,
don't
want
to
tell
some
neighbors
it's
okay
to
make
a
mess
in
friend
your
house,
another
neighbor
say
no
we're
going
to
hijack
protect
you.
It.
C
Is
a
tup
it's
a
temporary
use,
permit
revision
so
that
does
open
up
the
tup
the
temporary
use
permit.
So
if
it's
your
desire
to
ask
for
fencing
on
the
other
site,
you
can
certainly
do
that
and
we
would
work
with
the
contractor
to
assure
that
that
happens.
So
the
tup,
the
temporary
use
permit,
is
open
with
this
request.
So
if
that's
your
desire
and
direction,
we
would
go
forward
with
that.
Thank.
H
D
H
D
B
The
chair,
please,
the
condition
of
approval
number
ten.
The
applicant
shall
comply
with
all
best
practice,
best
management
practices
for
stormwater
prevention,
for
small
water
pollution
prevention
was
the
intent
here
to
reference,
the
npdes
standard
or
what?
What
standard
of
your
referencing?
Those
are.
The
standards
that
we
work
with?
Yes,
so
should
should
we
add
that
in
here
we're.
B
C
E
Is
that
not
kind
of
perhaps
maybe
lend
itself
to
and
I
understand
the
fencing
thing,
but
that
you
know
after
vandalism,
I
mean
it's
considerably
larger
than
obviously
the
fire
station
area
corrects
obviously
less
occupied.
If
you
will
so
how
is
a
security
actually
going
to
be?
You
know,
monitored
I
mean
they
are
they
going
to
have
somebody
there?
Are
they
can
have
material
on
site?
That's
worth.
You
know
worth
somebody
going
in
there
and
stealing,
or
you
know
what
I'm
saying
this
makes
it
well.
C
The
site
will
be
fenced
in
in
that
way,
secured
they're
not
intending
as
far
as
I
know,
to
have
24-hour
security,
the
property
you
know,
as
so
many
properties
in
this
community.
If
they're,
there
is
an
issue,
there
could
be
a
police
call
to
come
to
the
site
if
there's
any
indication
of
vandalism
or
perhaps
breaking
into
the
property
at
this
time,
there's
not
the
intent
to
have
24-hour
security
at
the
property.
If
I
would
presume.
C
It's
a
staging
area,
I'm,
not
anticipating
that
there
would
be
a
jobsite
trailer.
It's
the
intent
is
that
during
the
work
week,
825
there'd
be
construction
activities
on
the
streets
and
then
after
hours,
the
vehicles
and
materials
that
would
be
used
for
the
construction
in
this
area
would
be
stored
on
this
property
and
also
at
the
fire
station
property.
E
D
The
chair,
just
as
a
point
of
just
a
comment
or
richer
information,
I
live
in
that
area
and
I
co-pi
it
many
many
times
throughout
the
day
and
and
there
is
that
area
has
been
used
for
a
variety
of
different
storage
units
and
lots
of
different
projects,
and
it's
certainly
have
not
checked
in
to
police
records.
But
I
have
certainly
it's
your
Gorean
up
and
Anna
would
be
of
interest
to
me
to
know
if
there
was
any
issues
going
on,
but
I've.
D
Never
in
my
36
years
of
living
era
have
observed
any
vandalism
of
major
issues.
I
think
part
of
it
is
it's
not
conducive
for
ahead.
Go
around
area
due
to
the
weather
and
the
conditions
that
are
up
there,
but
it
has
not
been.
It
doesn't
mean
that
it
wouldn't
be
in
the
future,
but
just
is
if
it
eases
ne
ne.
As
with
any
questions,
I
have
never
to
this
day
been
informed
of
any
issues
nor
have
I
observed
in.
J
J
C
A
F
Good
afternoon
leo
martinez,
I'm,
a
owner
and
resident
at
181
estates,
drive
I
support
the
off-site
storage,
but
the
only
thing
I
request
is
that
the
30
foot
setback
be
pushed
further
back
into
the
back
of
this
of
the
Caltrans
locked.
We
have
already
have
an
eyesore
from
the
upper
lot
with
the
cyclone
fence.
F
As
you
turn
off
the
san
bruno
avenue
on
to
glenview,
there's
already
an
eyesore
there,
we
don't
want
another
or
I,
don't
I
would
not
prefer
another
bigger
ice
or
just
30
feet
right
off
the
sidewalk,
as
as
visitors
as
owners,
proud
owners
in
this
case,
drive
down
glenview
and
see
this
temporary
fencing
and
construction
lay
down
site,
I.
Think
the
neighborhood,
the
neighborhood
has
gone
through
enough
and
again
the
ice
or
more
of
a
quality
of
life.
This
is
what
I
see
every
time.
F
I
turn
turn
off
a
san
bruno
having
you
on
to
glenview
and
just
see
that
temporary
construction
still
there
they
fence
and
that's
on
the
smaller
upper
lot,
and
here
we're
talking
about
the
larger
lower
lot.
So
that's
all
that
I
ask
construction.
Companies
do
need
to
do
their
job
and
get
the
neighborhood
back
in
the
shape,
but
as
a
courtesy
to
the
neighborhood,
if
it
can
just
be
pushed
off
into
the
back
and
create
less
of
ice
or
thank
you.
I
Believe
me,
my
name
is
the
no
han
han
and
upon
1
11
states
and
right.
So
I
believe,
but
the
30
feet
to
be
left
is
not
enough
room
I
tariff.
It
is
right,
you
know
my
kids
when
they
go
play
outside
I
mean
we
can
have
all
the
noise
and
we're
going
to
have
on
that
mess.
I
want
to
see
if
it's
possible
to
have
more
than
30
feet
like
Leo
suggests
or
and
are
we
can
have
any
flammable
products
in
there
on
the
site
it
to
be
used.
C
I
C
Through
the
chair,
the
the
intent
again
is
to
to
store
vehicles,
equipment
and
some
materials
for
construction,
reconstructing
the
utilities
in
this
area,
storm
drains
water
lines,
etc.
So
there
will
be
pipe
in
materials
like
that
stored
here.
Our
objective
would
be
to
make
this
site
safe.
The
site
really
would
be
quiet
evenings
and
weekends.
It
would
be
used
typically
825
during
our
standard
construction
hours
monday
through
friday,
so
evenings
and
weekends
the
site
would
be
generally
quiet
only
by
special
permit
from
the
public
utilities
or
public
services
department.
C
A
H
I
E
Tom
man
I
live
on
ruling
would
drive.
I
use
my
wife
and
I
used
the
san
andreas
trail.
The
county
exercise
trail
twice
a
day.
We
walk
it
in
the
morning
when
there's
a
lot
of
senior
citizens,
retired
people
up
there,
and
then
I
go
back
and
run
it
in
the
afternoon,
and
I
just
saw
the
rather
negative
news
sign.
It
was
stuck
in
the
parking
area.
E
Seen
private
property
cars
will
be
towed,
blah
blah
blah
that
parking
like
it's
a
lot
of
use
and
I
heard
I'm,
not
sure
what
his
naming
to
say
that
he
was
sure
that
the
city
would
would
accommodate
the
people
in
the
parking
I'd
like
to
know
what
accommodations
are
going
to
happen
first
and
then
close
it
off
to
the
public.
That's
a
public
area,
it's
I
believe
its
state
land
and
the
people
that
people
that
use
it.
What
I
have
guaranteed
parking
and
I
want
to
know
where
we're
supposed
to
park.
Lunardi's
parking
lot.
C
G
So
the
property
is,
is
owned
by
Caltrans
and
is
has
a
long-term
lease
with
Church
of
the
Highlands,
and
our
understanding
is
there's
a
long-term
agreement.
That
church
of
the
Highlands
has
to
provide
just
kind
of
with
the
community
to
provide
that
parking
as
a
public
benefit
and
I
think
everybody
agrees
that
it
has
been
a
public
benefit.
There's
not
a
proposal
tonight
under
this
revision
to
use
that
area
closest
to
san
bruno
avenue.
That's
customarily
used
as
parking
to
use
that
for
staging,
and
so
it's
a
little
bit
confusing.
G
G
So
if
everybody
can
visualize
that
that's
the
existing
construction
staging
lot,
that's
been
there
moving
a
little
bit
further
north
from
that
towards
towards
the
crest,
more
neighborhood
towards
the
state's
drive.
That's
the
area
that
is
proposed
under
this
revision
to
be
used
for
construction
staging.
So
it's
not
the
absolute
southernmost
section
up
against
san
bruno
avenue,
but
it's
the
southernmost
section
of
what
people
refer
to
as
the
upper
lot.
H
To
the
chair,
I
think
and
I
think
we're
selling
public
comment,
but
would
it
be?
We
could
add
a
condition
that
the
existing
parking
for
church
of
the
highlands
in
trailhead
would
would
remain.
I
mean
we've
probably
talked
about
his
ender
pi
mean
I'm.
Just
kind
of
trying
to
answer
may
be
that
the
public's
comments
I'll
bring
that
up
during
that
when
it
comes
back
to
the
Planning
Commission,
but
they
could
think
about
the
wording.
For
that
meantime,
maybe.
C
A
D
A
C
C
A
J
30
feet
is
about
from
me
to
the
other
side
of
that
podium
to
people
from
the
public
mentioned.
They
thought
that
was
insufficient
buffer
area
and
I'd
like
to
ask
staff
if
it
would
be
a
problem
if
it
were
changed
to
45
feet,
would
that
create
a
an
untenable
situation,
or
would
it
be
possible
to
work
with
that.
C
The
45
feet
should
work,
it's
going
to
reduce
the
area
to
some
extent,
but
but
perhaps
what
can
happen
is
that
the
storage
area
can
expand
further
away
from
the
homes,
the
nearby
homes
and
also
glenview.
So
it
could
probably
shift
somewhat
on
the
site
and
perhaps
maintain
about
about
the
same
amount
of
overall
area,
which
is
about
40,000
square
feet,
but
provide
the
setback
that
you're
suggesting.
B
D
B
A
H
J
Through
the
chair,
mr.
Pearson
I
move
the
Commission
approved
revision
to
the
temporary
used
for
mid
thirteen
dash,
two
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
three
conditions
of
approval,
one
through
ten
and
he
added
conditions
11
about
the
45
foot,
setback
and
12
about
maintaining
the
existing
trailhead
parking.
As
remaining.
C
A
J
A
C
A
H
C
Up
like
that,
that's
our
understanding,
okay,
the
idea
is
not
you
know
to
be
clear.
Hopefully
this
is
your
recommendation.
We're
not
talking
about
removing
you
know,
live
vegetation
necessarily,
but
we're
talking
about
weeds
debris
and
making
sure
that
the
45
foot
setback
buffer
is
fire
safe
from
now
tracking,
about
removing
trees
or
other
live
plant
material,
correct,
I
think.
A
A
A
H
C
Sure
we
be
we'd
be
happy
to.
As
you
recall,
the
Malacca
restaurant
was
removed
at
that
location
and
one
of
the
conditions
for
removal
was
that
they
remove
all
materials
from
the
site
and
then
provides
some
perimeter
landscape
treatments
to
soften
site.
We're
expecting
that
the
property
may
be
left
in
a
more
vacant
state
for
some
period
of
time.
There
is
a
for
lease
sign
on
the
property,
so
GW
Williams
company
is
trying
to
lease
the
property,
but
in
the
meantime
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
property
would
would
look.
C
Would
look
nice,
aesthetically
pleasing.
We
were
concerned
about
there
being
just
a
fence,
put
around
the
property
and
left
that
way
for
some
extended
period
of
time.
So
the
understanding
is
there
would
not
be
that
chain-link
fence
around
the
property.
Instead,
they
would
clear
the
site
and
put
in
perimeter
landscaping.
C
So
right
now,
they've
taken
out
some
concrete
they're,
creating
a
planter
area
along
the
perimeter
sides,
san
bruno
west
and
also
camino
plaza,
and
so
the
next
step
will
be
to
actually
plant
install
the
plant
materials
and
irrigation
system
in
that
area
and
we're
expecting
that
to
be
completed
in
july
and
then
subsequently
they'll
try
to
lease
the
property
in
some
manner.
But
in
the
meantime
there
would
be
the
benefit
of
having
the
landscape
treatment.
Heavy.