►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council November 27, 2012 10b. Street Sweeping Program and Parking Restrictions
Description
San Bruno City Council November 27, 2012
10b. Street Sweeping Program and Parking Restrictions
B
Good
evening
mayor
honorable
councilmembers,
the
City
Council
directed
staff
to
review
current
street
sweeping
operations
and
related
parking
enforcement
initiated
by
a
resident
concerned
about
why
certain
streets
were
subject
to
parking
enforcement
and
why
others
were
not
City
Council
requested
that
staff
review
if
the
current
policy
were
and
related
parking
enforcement
were
still
applicable
today
and
then
meet
with
the
service
infrastructure
subcommittee
to
discuss
alternatives,
staff
to
staff
discussed
alternatives
with
the
subcommittee.
In
addition
to
discussing
that
street
sweeping
is
required
under
the
national
pollutant
discharge
elimination
system
permit
npdes
permit.
B
This
is
a
countywide
permit.
That
requires
a
need
to
remove
debris
and
pollutants
from
the
storm
runoff
before
it
drains
to
the
bay.
This
permit
is
also
part
of
a
broader
requirement
that
san
bruno,
as
well
as
other
agencies,
develop
a
trash
load
reduction
plan
with
the
goal
of
forty
percent
by
2014
Public
Services
Director
Clara
fabry
is
here
to
discuss
the
additional
dirt
alternatives
in
more
detail.
C
Considering
the
objectives
of
the
street,
sweeping
programs
for
alternatives
were
developed
for
the
sub
infrastructure
subcommittee
and
your
consideration.
The
first
alternative
is
to
leave.
The
parking
restriction
was
us.
It
is
right
now.
This
alternative
would
not
address
the
concern
raised
by
the
resident,
and
also
we
need
will
not
require
any
additional
cost
to
implement
alternative
to
would
extend
the
restriction.
C
C
This
alternative
would
require
additional
resources
by
the
police
department
to
person
2.5
ftes.
Also,
this
alternative
would
require
one
additional
investment
of
between
800,000
to
1.2
million
to
install
parking,
the
sixers
side
C
divided.
The
third
alternative
would
be
to
extend
the
parking
restriction
to
very
specific
location,
west
of
el
camino,
heard
the
streets
or
more
narrow
and
lined
with
trees
and
also
is
more
congested
by
part
cars.
This
would
be
between
El
Camino
to
the
east
and
hazel
and
Cypress
to
the
west
and
a
gentleman
to
the
north
and
santa
lucia
to
the
south.
C
C
This
alternative
would
require
between
seventy
thousand
ninety
thousand
investment
for
the
cost
of
parking
restriction
signs
based
on
Police
Department
assessment.
They
would
be
able
to
to
support
this
program
its
existing
resources,
what
they
have.
The
fourth
alternative,
which
is
very
responsive
to
the
concerns
raised
by
the
residents
on
the
impact
of
the
parking
restriction
on
them,
would
modify
the
existing
street
sweeping
program
and
would.
C
This
alternative
would
require
a
24
around
24,000
dollar
investment
to
modify
the
existing
parking
restriction
size
with
changing
the
time
starting
time
in
the
residential
area,
from
the
existing
eight
o
clock
to
the
proposed
nine
o'clock
Gino
queen,
who
developed
actually
this
program
and
this
stone
water
and
three
service
manager
is
here
and
he
will
be
able
to
provide.
He
did
sup
hard
work
and
he
will
be
able
to
provide
you
with
any
detail
answer
on
the
proposed
changes
to
this
program
into
alternatives.
C
D
E
Rees
also
I
think
you
is
there
a
reason
that
we
can't
do
three
and
four
I
mean
it
seems
logical
to
change
the
hours
to
accommodate
people's
work
schedule
and
and
the
things
that
we
have
learned
from
them
about
what
makes
it
difficult
and
extend
this
the
streets
that
we
do
sweep
I
realize
there's
a
cost
cost
involved,
but
we
are
going
to
have
to
step
up
what
we
do
to
to
comply
with
state
laws.
So
was
there
thought
in
doing
both
or
and.
C
Certainly
here
I
would
defer
to
the
infrastructure
subcommittee
and
to
share
dead
discussion,
which
you
are
so
was
my
understanding
that
the
context
how
this
was
all
of
these
alternatives
were
discussed.
Even
with
the
subcommittee,
you
can
use
a
phased-in
approach
that
right
now
is
in
a
very
short
time.
Eternity
for
could
be
implemented,
and
then
alternative
tree
can
be
will
take
some
time
until
public
outreach.
C
More
extensive
public
outrage
will
be
implemented
for
implementation
of
number
three,
and
also
maybe
some
pilot
project
in
before
the
full
implementation
of
alternative
tree
could
be
considered,
and
then
that
would
be
the
next
step
for
the
program
and
was
also
discussed
by
the
subcommittee
was
a
long-term
goal
than
to
implement
number
two
to
extend
C
divided
that,
basically,
you
can
consider
these
as
a
step
phased
in
kind
of
program.
Modification
if
severe
everything
is
possible,
is
up
to
your
decision
and
opinion
at
this
time.
Okay,
thank
you.
Yeah.
F
F
Now
there
has
always
been
a
concern
as
long
as
I've
lived
in
the
city
on.
Why
doesn't
the
west
side
have
streets?
You
know,
have
parking
restrictions,
and
so
now
that
we
have
clarified
the
reasons
why
it
has
been
implemented
on
the
east
side,
that
staff
has
found
that
we
have
similar
situations
on
the
west
side
in
that
wood
that
was
presented
to
the
subcommittee
and
there
is
that
I
guess:
eight
block
eight
square
block
area
on
the
south
side
southwest
side
of
the
city.
Now
that
I,
don't
have
you
know
restricted
parking
and
I.
F
You
know
and
I
feel
for
the
people,
the
residents
that
live
on
the
east
side,
because
you
know
they
have
to
be
you
know-
be
aware
of.
What's
going
on
we're
also
going
to
get
ticketed
I
mean
400
to
500
citations
per
month
is
is
a
lot
of
citations
for
for
our
residents,
and
it's
it's
something
that
has
you
know
if
we're
going
to
have
restrictions,
we
have
to
have
it.
F
So
our
concern
is
that,
even
though
we
have
found
out
that
the
west
side
has
has
a
needed
area
for
street
sweeping
it's,
you
know
it
needs.
We
need
to
implement
some
major
education
to
those
residents
and
let
them
know,
or
else
they're
all
going
to
get
ticketed,
because
I
think
it's
a
you.
It
has
to
evolve
into
a
mindset
of
okay.
This
is
the
day
just
like
when
you
put
your
garbage
out
that
you
have.
F
You
know
that
this
is
when
you
have
to
move
your
car
or
you
have
to
make
sure
your
car
isn't
on
the
street,
but
I
think
we
let
the
cat
out
of
the
bag
it's
if
this
is
now
it
is.
You
know
there
is
a
reason
for
us
to
put
it
on
the
west
side.
So
there
are
no
more
arguments
from
the
East
Side
residents
saying:
why
is
it
on
the
west
side?
Well,
now,
we've
we've
justified
it
so
I,
it's
it.
F
I
believe
it
was
our
decision
that
you
know
we
should
pursue
that
quitting
and
what
time
and
for
how
much
money
and
how
we're
going
to
budget.
A
F
Real
change
and
I
want
I
want.
It
also
say
that
we
we
were
tasked
with
trying
to
make
with
making
a
decision
tonight,
but
we
wanted
to
hold
off
because
we
wanted
to
hear
from
the
residence
we
wanted
to
get
it
out
there.
You
know
and
let
let
the
firestorm
happen.
It's
like,
let
everyone
criticizes
or-
or
you
know,
or
compliment
us
on
what
we're,
what
we're
pursuing
good.
G
My
name
is
Sarah
Glasscock
and
I
live
on
us.
North
san
anselmo
I
think
when
I
first
brought
this
to
the
council.
My
biggest
concern
was
that
living
on
the
street
that
I
live
on
were
subject
to
tickets
and
something
that
I
don't
see
mentioned
up
there
is
that
there
I,
believe
and
I
could
be
wrong
about
this.
Is
that
there's
a
72-hour
limit
to
parking
citywide,
meaning
that
if
you
have
a
trailer
or
a
boat
or
a
vehicle?
G
Don't
they'll,
actually
tow
vehicles
off
of
the
streets
they're
in
my
neighborhood
and
the
neighborhoods
that
are
west
of
of
of
alchemy,
no
they're,
not
subject
to
that
same
72-hour
ordinance
and
I
I
I,
like
the
idea
about
street
sweeping
and
I'm
jumping
subjects.
Here
I
like
the
idea
about
street
sweeping
because
then
there's
the
rationale
of
yes:
our
streets
are
narrow
on
the
east
side
and
those
made
those
streets
that
are
west
of
el
camino,
they're,
also
narrow,
and
so
that
that
makes
sense.
There's
like
a
cohesive
policy.
G
As
far
as
that
goes,
the
streets
aren't
getting
cleaned
in
the
area
by
San,
bernal
park
and
option
3
and
then
and
especially
option
for
I.
Think
our
are
good
ideas,
as
you
had
mentioned,
but
again,
the
the
whole
72-hour
ordinance
is
not
I,
don't
know.
If
that's
even
part
of
the
same
argument,
it's
not
okay,
I
guess,
that's
all
I
have
them
yeah.
G
A
Was
interesting
to
read
the
staff
reports
have
started
30
years
ago
and
why
and
obviously
people
now
have
larger
families
in
a
lot
more
cars
and
so
probably
wasn't
as
big
of
an
issue.
Then
the
other
issue,
of
course,
and
I'll.
Let
the
city
manager
address
it
in
more
detail
as
a
72-hour
parking
restriction,
it
does
exist
and
unfortunately
it's
it's
an
enforcement
issue,
but
we
do
have
a
lot
of
people
that
use
that
have
multiple
cars
on
the
obviously
right
near
st.
Roberts
is
a
really
good
example.
Right.
E
A
Part
for
71
hours
and
they
move
their
car
and
they
park
again
and
its
really
tough
situation
to
try
to
enforce
and
I
know.
The
police
department
is
on
a
lot
of
this,
but
it's
a
situation
that
and
I
believe
its.
If
I'm,
not
if
I'm
not
mistaken
a
Department
of
Motor
Vehicles
situation,
there
too,
but
Connie,
you
were
done.
H
H
The
mayor
is
absolutely
correct
that,
unfortunately,
there
are
a
number
of
instances
where
our
Police
Department
is
effectively
chasing
those
violations,
because
we
are
required
to
post
a
notice
of
in
advance
of
towing
the
vehicle
under
the
72-hour
ordinance.
So
it
gets
to
be
a
little
bit
of
a
if
somebody
is
astute,
shall
we
say
and
is
and
is
watching
carefully.
H
A
I
Miss
me
with
the
Vice,
where
I
said
it
was
on
the
subcommittee
as
well
and
I'm
one
of
those
people
on
the
east
side
that
can
feel
so
sympathy
for
who
does
move.
We
we
deal
with
moving
the
cars.
You
get
very,
very
close-knit
neighbors
when
you
start
knocking
to
each
other's
door
right
before
eight
o'clock,
to
remind
him
if
they'd,
forgotten,
overslept
or
running
a
little
late.
I
I
do
feel
that
option
for
was
something
we
brought
up,
because
I
think
it
has
been
hard
on
those
folks
that
they're
working
or
trying
to
juggle
their
day
get
the
kids
out.
And
what
have
you
and
I
think
that
extra
hour
does
value
and
benefit
them,
and
obviously
the
the
objective
of
I
believe
of
the
city
back
30
years
ago,
was
not
to
penalize
but
to
try
to
keep
the
streets
clean
of
the
vegetation
and
the
debris
not
only
because
it
goes
into
the
sewer
which
is
critical
for
what
we
have
to
focus
on.
I
But
it's
also
as
far
as
the
flooding.
When
the
drain
gets
clogged
and
all
of
a
sudden
the
drainage,
then
we
have
the
flooding,
which
is
another
issue.
It
was
interesting
when
we're
in
the
subcommittee
about
how
much
when
you
say
you
can
pick
up
on
the
street
when
it
is
vacant
of
all
the
cars
versus
going
down
the
center
and
the
numbers
that
were
given
by
genome
were
staggering,
so
it
works.
I
It's
proven
and
a
statistical
data
back
set
up
that
a
clear
street
gets
to
be
a
clean
street
and
it
prevents
those
things
that
at
least
I
believe
I'll
speak
from
my
street.
That
I
live
on
is
would
be
affected
if
we
did
not
have
it.
That
was
why
I
think
we
were
suggesting
going
forward
with
option
for
for
now
option.
I
Three,
though
there
is
legitimacy
in
other
areas
that
were
identified
in
the
staff
report,
it
was
also
about
reaching
out
and
communicating,
because
obviously
just
to
take
action
here
and
not
say
anything
is
not
fair
to
to
others
as
well.
You
know,
I've
lived
on
the
east
and
the
west
and
and
I
know.
I
have
neighbors
that
believe
it's
a
penalty
even
as
perception,
but
they
wouldn't
ever
want
to
see
the
street
sweeping
cease
because
of
its
value
in
its
benefit.
I
So
I
believe
that
the
street
sweeping
needs
to
stay
on
east
side
if
it
wants
to
be
looked
at
in
that
area
of
option
three,
and
eventually
we
may
find
ourselves
where
it
is
required
and
mandated
throughout
this
town
to
reach
reach
those
levels
that
have
were
indicated
in
the
staff
report.
So
that's
kind
of
in
a
summary,
my
thoughts
and.
F
Justin
just
to
add
on
option
for
by
by
by
extending
extending
that
time
one
hour,
it
means
that
the
commercial
and
industrial
areas
will
now
get
streets
week
every
week,
instead
of
twice
a
month.
So
there
is
an
added
benefit
there,
because
the
street
sweepers
now
won't
be
in
a
residential
area
as
early,
but
will
be
able
to
go
through
the
commercial
area
before
going
into
residential.
C
Also,
I
might
add,
was
so
would
plan
included
in
opportunity
for
that
the
parking
lot
parallel
parking
lots
parallel
to
San
Mateo.
They
are
cleaned
once
a
week.
Right
now,
under
this
alternative
would
be
possible
for
us
to
clean
those
twice
a
week.
Instead
of
once
a
week,
we
and
the
city
receive
reasonably
high
number
of
complaints
about
the
cleanness
of
those.
J
Michael
clue
the
charity
I
just
I
was
wondering
when
the
subcommittee
was
discussing
this
was
there
any?
Is
there
an
indication
that
the
streets
are
basically
clear
during
working
hours?
Nine
to
five
is
that
where
the
nine
o'clock
came
from
I'm,
assuming
that
the
thought
process
was
that
by
nine
o'clock,
the
cars
would
be
off
the
street
anyway,
but
is
there
is?
Is
that
really
the
case
to
the
streets
really
clear
out
a
little
bit
during
the
day
or
people
taking
public
transit
and
leaving
their
cars?
There.
I
Did
job
I'll
speak
for
war,
Island
I,
believe
the
eight
o'clock
is
hard
for
residents
trying
to
I'm
just
telling
you
my
straight
then
the
streets
around
me
is
just.
There
is
a
mad
dash
of
x
at
eight
o'clock.
You
know
if,
if
by
chance
you
know
I'm
not
saying
805,
you
get
a
ticket,
but
I
think
it
was.
The
extra
hour
was
for
the
fact
of
people
are
usually
gone
with
the
kids
to
school
gone
to
work
begun
their
day.
I
It
gives
them
that
latitude
and
a
little
bit
of
grace
period
in
which
to
if
something
should
be
running
behind
schedule,
for
example,
they're
not
having
to
run
out
to
the
street
somehow
try
to
find
it
for
the
spot,
get
back
into
the
house
and
then
try
to
get
the
things
back
and
now
they
might
be
not
just
across
the
street
but
around
the
corner
down
the
street,
because
that's
all
there
is
a
parking
that
is
the
nine
o'clock
on
my
area.
I
will
say
when
I
go
around
minimum
lee.
I
F
I
mean
I
was
hoping,
I
was
yeah,
I
was
it's
all
on
you,
I
was
hoping
for
more
public
comment,
but
I
I
do
I
do
believe
that
we
should
should
go
forward
with
with
option
for,
and
that
was
our
recommendation
at
the
subcommittee
level.
Is
we
probably
get
into
some
notification?
If
we,
you
know
this,
council
really
wants
to
go
into.
You
know
option
three
over
on
the
west
side,
but
if
we
go
forward
with
option
for
I,
think
it'll
solve
self
some
issues
and
also
again
the
you
know.
F
A
E
We're
working
up
veget
for
the
following
year:
can
we
ask
that
it
be
that
street
sweeping
for
the
west
side
be
looked
at
and
see
how
much
we
can
do
it?
I
live
on
one
of
the
streets
that
is
in
red
here
and
I
would
be
really
excited
to
have
my
street
cleaned
and
have
the
cars
I
mean
I,
know
it's
clean,
but
have
the
cars
move,
so
it
could
really
be
cleaned.
C
A
Great
and
thank
you
very
much
for
bringing
it
to
our
attention
so
a
lot
of
times.
You
know
it
takes
the
input
of
the
public
to
to
make
some
suggestions
that
aren't
bad
for
everybody.
You
know
this
is
a
good
thing.
Like
I
said
this
was
set
up
30
years
ago,
probably
in
a
totally
different
environment,
and
when,
in
fact
the
Irene
can
tell
you
when,
when
avenues
were
flooding
and
stuff
like
that,
so
we
made
a
big
improvement
there
with
drainage
and
and
stuff,
and
this
is
part
of
it
too.