►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council November 27, 2012 10h. Dry Weather Flow Monitor at 7th Avenue Project
Description
San Bruno City Council November 27, 2012
10h. Dry Weather Flow Monitor at 7th Avenue Project
B
Initial
investigation
of
the
staff
revealed
that
the
solid
waste
and
d'bries
been
accumulated
within
certain
sections
in
the
in
the
pipe
with
time
the
solid
piled
up
higher.
Consequently,
the
water
level
became
at
higher
level,
which
the
bottom
line
resulting
in
inaccurate
major
but
overblown
numbers.
B
Now
the
city
shares
the
cost
estimate
to
operate
the
plant
with
sub
sirak,
largely
on
the
floor.
The
totally
flow
into
the
plant
now
currently
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
pays
based
on
estimate
of
the
total
of
law
at
shower
rod.
Pump
station
after
deducting
the
portion
of
the
South
San
Francisco
flow
staff
believes
that
it
is
important
for
some
Runa
to
have
an
accurate
reading
12.
B
Alternatives
with
first
estimates
were
provided
with
recommendation
of
the
lowest
cost
to
replace
segments
of
the
pipe
and
two
to
replace
the
existing
flow
meter,
but
install
it
at
the
higher
level.
Both
will
take
care
of
the
backup
and
the
reading
respectively.
As
for
the
temper
on
the
finding
was
that
the
existing
seems
empir
stored
perfectly
and
the
readings
is
an
accurate
reading,
the
recommendation
was
not
to
do
anything
leave
it.
As
is.
However,
it
was
reported
that
there
is
a
side
stream
I
pass.
B
B
C
C
D
C
Thus
pushed
up
the
water
level
and
the
flow
in
it
and
all
those
things
I
get
what
I'm
getting
back
to
is
our
Regan
Ock's?
How
are
we
going
to
avoid
the
similar
problems
to
the
other
new
lines
that
we're
proposing
to
put
in
with
it
we
just
approved
putting
in
I
mean
is
that
it
is
that
kind
of
problem
going
to
happen
again
somewhere
else,
or
is
this
just
like
the
one
time
and
the
one
place
that
it
would
occur.
B
The
investigation
did
not
the
reason
you
would
have
a
high
point.
Two
reasons
we
can
think
of.
One
is
settlement
happened
after
construction
or
it
was
constructed
with
an
offset
alignment
and
was
unforeseen
for
the
staff
they
oversee
it
when
it
was
done
in
2002.
However,
in
the
entire
investigation
and
the
study
that
they
did,
there
was
no
concrete
evidence
to
one
or
the
other.
There
was
no
cracks
or
separation
in
the
manhole,
but
also
they
don't
know
whether
it
was
installed.
B
D
B
A
B
The
$300,000
consists
of
the
ninety-five
thousand
dollars
that
were
requesting
tonight
for
the
design
and
the
construction
support
by
with
litter,
shed
the
construction
estimate
of
about
173
plus
thousand
dollars
contingency
of
about
twenty-five
thousand
dollar,
and
we
estimated
that
the
staff
time
throughout
the
design,
the
inspection
and
the
construction
and
the
clothes
out
to
be
about
55.
That's
all
the
350
thousand
dollars
was
established.
D
Is
our
assumption
at
this
time
that
how
much
the
city
paste
paid
during
this
time
is
very
close
to
the
flow
itself,
and
it's
hard
to
know
after
this
new
flow
meter
will
be
installed,
then
the
result
will
tell
us
exactly
based
on
our
best
estimate.
The
city
was
paying
very
close
to
how
much
paid,
but
still
after
the
flow
measurement.
The
conclusion
can
be
that
the
city
will
pay,
even
maybe
slightly
higher
than
how
much
pace
now
or
lower
can
go
either
way
nobody
can
guarantee,
but,
based
on
our
best
estimate,
is
very
close.
A
B
I
may
elaborate
on
that
one
well,
I
I
lived
in
the
bay
area
for
30
years.
South
city
typically
has
more
cold
weather
and
rain
than
san
bruno
by
having
the
flow
meters
there,
which
is
the
most
important
and
the
crucial
point
of
it,
is
to
measure
the
rain
water
that
goes
into
the
system.
So
that
could
be
substantially
higher
law
depends.
When
do
you
look
at
it?
What
here
what
time
so,
but
in
staffs
opinion
it
will
reduce
the
shares
of
sample.