►
From YouTube: San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting 3/15/16
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting 3/15/16
trt 22:25
A
A
B
There
is
only
one
one
specific
communication
I'd
like
to
bring
to
you
tonight
and
that's
that
in
our
audience
tonight
is
Madeline.
Lopez
and
Madeline.
Is
our
new
executive
assistant
in
the
community
development
department
and
she's
been
with
us
for
approximately
six
to
eight
weeks
and
she's,
been
a
terrific
help
and
like
you
to
to
welcome
her
to
our
department
into
our
community
very.
A
Good,
thank
you
welcome.
Thank
you
for
coming
this
evening.
Okay,
all
right
item
three
public
comment:
this
is
a
section
of
the
meeting
where
you
can
speak
on
things
that
are
not
on
the
agendas
or
anything
that
anyone
wants
to
bring
to
the
Commission.
Okay.
Public
comment
is
closed
item
for
conflicts
of
interest
you
having.
A
E
Good
evening,
commissioners,
michael
smith,
planning
department
staff,
the
subject
property
848
sixth
avenue-
is
located
in
the
bell
l
park
subdivision
the
subject,
lot
measures
6,800
square
feet
and
is
currently
developed
with
a
one-story
single-family
dwelling
that
was
constructed
in
1944
and
has
three
bedrooms
and
two
full
bathrooms
within
1148
square
feet
of
gross
floor
area.
With
one
car
garage
immediately
adjacent
to
the
subject.
Property
are
single-family
dwellings.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
construct
a
1695
square-foot
two-story
addition
at
the
rear
of
the
building,
which
would
extend
its
depth
by
approximately
30
feet.
E
The
addition
would
add
three
bedrooms:
two
full
bathrooms
and
one
car
garage
tandem
garage
space
to
the
existing
dwelling.
If
approved
and
constructed,
the
residents
would
become
a
five-bedroom
four-bathroom
home
with
a
total
of
twenty
385
square
feet
of
habitable
area,
not
including
the
garage.
The
project
requires
a
use
permit
because
it
would
increase
the
floor
area
of
the
existing
residents
by
more
than
fifty
percent
127
percent
to
be
exact,
and
it
would
expand
the
garage
to
646
square
feet
where
600
is
square
feet
is
permitted.
E
The
project
also
requires
a
minor
modification
to
continue
the
existing
three
foot,
three
inch
side
yard
on
the
south
side
of
the
building,
where
the
code
requires
five
beat
and
there's
a
request
for
a
parking
exception
to
provide
a
tandem
parking
garage
instead
of
two
independently
accessible
garage
spaces.
The
attic
bedroom
would
be
converted
back
into
storage.
E
The
architectural
review
committee
reviewed
the
project
at
its
februari
11
2016
meeting
and
forward
the
project
to
the
Planning
Commission,
with
several
recommendations
which
have
already
been
incorporated
into
the
plans
before
you.
The
department,
mailed
hearing
notices
to
the
neighbors
within
300
thief
of
the
subject,
property
and
no
comments
were
received.
Staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
use.
E
Permit
requests
based
on
findings
1
through
9,
the
subject
to
conditions
of
approval
one
through
27
and
also
approve
the
minor
modification
and
the
parking
exception
staff
finds
that
the
design
of
the
addition
complies
with
the
residential
design
guidelines.
Although
it
is
large
in
size
both
of
the
adjacent
buildings
that
are
existing
right
now
adjacent
to
the
subject,
property
are
much
deeper
than
the
existing
building,
so
the
added
building
depth
would
be
in
keeping
with
the
depths
of
those
two
buildings.
E
D
A
C
F
C
A
D
G
D
A
E
Again,
Michael
Smith
planning,
department
staff,
the
subject
property
is
located
at
1745
holly
avenue
in
the
mills
parks
for
subdivision
the
subject:
lot
measures
5,000
square
feet
and
is
currently
developed
with
a
two-story
single-family
dwelling
that
was
constructed
in
1949
and
has
three
bedrooms
and
two
and
a
half
bathrooms
and
approximately
1838
square
feet
of
living
space.
With
a
217
square
foot
garage
immediately
adjacent
to
the
building
our
single-family
dwellings.
E
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
add
two
54
square
feet
of
living
area
to
the
front
entryway
and
to
the
rear
of
the
ground
floor
of
the
home,
to
convert
the
rear,
37
square
feet
of
the
existing
garage
into
habitable
space
for
the
kitchen
area
and
to
expand
the
footprint
of
the
garage
by
61
square
feet
by
enlarging
it
in
the
towards
the
street.
There
are
no
proposed
changes
to
the
upper
floor
of
the
building.
The
primary
purpose
of
the
addition
is
to
enlarge
the
kitchen
and
the
dining
room.
E
The
project
requires
a
use
permit
because
it
would
provide
one
parking
space
where
the
code
would
require
to
the
architectural
review
committee
review
this
project
at
its
january,
fourteenth
2016
meeting
and
forwarded
the
project
to
the
Planning
Commission,
with
several
recommendations
which
have
been
incorporated
into
the
plans
before
you.
The
most
notable
recommendation
involved
increasing
the
size
of
the
interior
garage
parking
space,
the
department
melt,
hearing,
notices
to
neighbors
within
300
feet
of
the
subject
property
and
has
not
received
any
comments
to
the
project.
E
Staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved,
use,
permit
requests
based
on
findings
one
through
six.
So
that's
different
thing
to
the
staff
report.
So
that's
once
again,
findings,
one
through
six
and
conditions
of
approval.
What
12,
27
staff
finds
that
the
design
of
the
addition
complies
with
the
residential
design
guidelines,
because
it
would
be
well
integrated
with
the
existing
single-family
dwelling
using
materials
that
match
the
existing.
E
Furthermore,
the
addition
would
be
readily
visible
would
not
be
readily
visible,
because
a
majority
of
it
is
towards
the
rear
of
the
building
and
regarding
the
parking
request,
the
addition
would
add
common
living
area,
not
changing
the
number
of
bedrooms
or
four
bathrooms.
Therefore,
staff
believes
that
the
addition
would
not
result
in
additional
occupants
which
is
generally
associated
with
the
greater
parking
demand.
This
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions
or
comments.
Thank.
F
E
F
A
A
A
B
David
gr,
bsod
and
planning
commissioners.
This
item
is
before
the
Planning
Commission
tonight,
because
the
city
of
San
Bruno
has
indicated
its
desire
to
consider
the
sale
of
property
it
owns
within
the
crossing
development
near
highway,
380
and
El
Camino
Real.
This
property
measures
about
1.5,
two
acres
in
area
it's
currently
vacant
and
the
site
has
been
designated
since
2001
in
the
Navy
site
and
its
environment,
specific
plan
for
hotel
use
because
the
city
is
considering
sale
of
this
property.
B
It's
required
by
state
government
code,
section
65,
402
that
the
local
agency,
in
this
case
the
Planning
Commission
report
to
the
agency
representative,
that
handles
disposition
of
properties.
In
this
case
the
City
Council,
on
whether
the
proposed
sale
is
in
conformance
with
the
city's
general
plan
and
the
focus
really
is
the
purpose,
location
and
extent
of
the
proposed
use
on
this
property.
B
Since
2001,
when
the
Navy,
citing
the
environment
specific
plan
was
adopted,
there
have
been
changes
to
market
conditions
and,
as
this
commission
knows,
there
have
been
changes
to
land
use
activities
within
the
specific
plan
area.
For
example,
the
El
Camino
Real
commercial
strip
development
was
approved
and
developed,
and
the
original
5.5
acres
site
for
this
hotel
use
has
been
reduced
to
about
1.5
acres
in
size.
B
That
indicates
that
these
plans
are
consistent
with
the
adopted
specific
plan
in
terms
of
being
able
to
place
a
high
quality
hotel
that,
as
described
in
the
specific
plan,
would
be
about
152
rooms
in
size,
have
3,000
square
feet
of
meeting
space
and
have
parking
to
support
these
uses.
So
the
specific
plan
has
been
adopted
with
benefit
of
a
specific
plan.
The
city
has
been
working
with
a
prospective
buyer.
Who's
submitted
plans
that
are
consistent
with
a
specific
plan.
B
Therefore,
staff
has
prepared
a
resolution
for
your
consideration
this
evening,
and
our
recommendation
to
you
is
to
go
forward
tonight,
find
the
proposed
sale
of
this
property
consistent
with
the
city's
general
plan
and
adopt
the
resolution
attached
to
your
staff
report.
That
concludes
my
staff
report.
I'd
be
happy
to
respond
to
any
questions.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Do
it.
F
Yes,
with
with
the
staff
report,
it's
not
a
half
scalar,
it
seems
to
be
quarter
scale,
but
I
can
see
pretty
much
what's
going
on,
but
the
one
thing
that
I
am
familiar
with
there
is
I
I
go
to
some
of
the
businesses
in
this
area.
Does
that
currently
use
parking,
yes,
which
will
be
now
occupied
by
a
hotel,
correct.
A
F
Other
hotels
in
san
bruno
have
the
benefit
of
street
parking
for
people
who
come
to
the
hotel
to
visit
a
gas,
for
example.
Yes,
but
there's
almost
no
I
think
there's
actually
no
street
parking,
if
not
going
to
be
less
street
parking,
because
Jack's
can't
rent
that
space
anymore
and
I
wondered
if
you,
if
there
was,
am
I
missing
some
parking.
Is
there
some
parking
available?
That's
like
on
street
parking.
B
In
terms
of
the
project
specifics,
the
specific
specifics
of
the
project
will
come
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
as
you
consider
entitlements,
and
we
would
expect
that
to
occur
after
the
City
Council
works
with
the
developer
and
execute
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement.
So
we
wouldn't
expect
to
go
into
details
about
a
project,
a
specific
project
until
after
the
council
negotiates
and
execute
of
purchase
and
sale
agreement
with
the
prospective
buyer.
B
So
when,
when
appropriate,
this
project
will
come
back
for
specific
discussion
about
details
and
there
will
be-
and
this
is
required
as
part
of
the
supplemental,
a
ir
a
transportation
demand
management
plan.
So
at
this
time,
what
you're
focusing
on
really
is
is
the
purpose
location
and
extent.
It's
a
proposed
hotel
use
of
152
rooms
and
with
3,000
square
feet
of
meeting
space
at
a
future
date,
assuming
execution
of
the
purchase
and
sale
agreement.
The
specifics,
including
the
transportation
demand
management
plan,
would
come
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
for
consideration.