►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
So
thank
you
to
everyone
attending
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
this
evening.
The
Planning
Commission
will
continue
to
hold
its
meetings
remotely
via
Zoom
until
such
time
that
it's
determined
that
it's
safe
to
meet
in
person.
Please
know
that
we
want
to
hear
from
you
if
you
are
in
the
audience,
and
you
would
like
to
address
the
commission
during
public
comment
for
an
item
on
the
agenda.
Please
use
the
raise
your
hand
button
typically
at
the
bottom
of
your
Zoom
screen.
B
When
it's
your
turn
to
speak
planning
staff
will
call
your
name
unmute
you
and
you
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
address
the
commission
if
you
join
us
by
telephone.
You
also
May
address
the
commission
during
public
comment
by
pressing
star
9
staff
will
address
you,
possibly
just
by
your
telephone
number
and
unmute
you.
You
also
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
address
the
commission.
Please
note:
anyone
in
attendance
may
only
speak
once
per
agenda
item
and
are
we
having
lsao
calling
role
this
evening
or
Christy?
C
C
Let
me
I'll
just
start
by
saying:
I
just
wanted
to
introduce
you
all
to
Christy
Wu
she's,
one
of
our
new
assistant
planners
and
her
and
LSA
were
both
hired
at
the
same
time
and
they're,
alternating
the
Planning
Commission
meetings,
and
so
LSA
did
last
month
and
Christy
was
kind
of
in
in
the
background
doing
some
training
last
month.
But
now
this
evening
Christy
will
be
running
the
meeting.
So
I'll
just
turn
it
over
today.
Miss.
A
Right,
Pierre,
Harmon.
B
B
C
C
B
Second,
can
we
call
a
vote.
A
B
Thank
you
very
much
all
right
at
this
time.
We
welcome
public
comments
on
items
not
on
the
agenda.
If
anyone
is
in
attendance
who
wishes
to
address
the
commission
for
three
minutes
on
an
item
not
on
the
agenda,
please
raise
your
hand
at
this
time.
B
Okay,
does
that
is,
is
Staff
also
seeing
No
Hands,
okay,
I.
Think
that's
right,
alrighty
item
number
six
on
our
agenda
would
be
announcement
of
conflicts
of
interest.
Do
we
have
any
conflicts
today.
B
D
Are
you
guys
able
to
see
the
screen?
Yes
all
right,
great
well,
good
evening
the
mission,
my
name
is
Elisa
Maya
assistant
planner,
so
the
item
I
will
be
presenting
to
you.
All
today
is
11
53
and
11
55
San,
Mateo,
Avenue
conditional
use,
permit
up22-002
and
it's
a
request
to
convert
the
existing
land
use
to
an
auto
related
use,
which
is
conditionally
permitted
in
the
industrial
district
per
section
12.96.150
of
the
municipal
code.
D
Right
so
quick
background
about
this
location.
It
is
located
in
the
M1
District,
which
is
the
industrial
district
of
San
Bruno.
It
is
located
on
San,
Mateo
Avenue
in
between
Atlantic
Avenue
and
Scott
Street,
and
it
is
north
of
I-380
the
lot
measures
5
000
square
feet
and
for
this
location
our
code
has
a
maximum
permitted
lot
coverage
of
three
thousand
square
feet
so
existing
conditions.
The
lot
coverage
for
this
site
is
3516
square
feet
and
it
has
a
gross
floor
area
of
4046
square
feet.
D
3516
square
feet
is
for
the
first
floor
and
the
second
floor
has
square
footage
of
530
square
feet.
The
location
has
two
office
spaces
so
one
on
the
first
floor.
One
on
the
second
and
three
bathrooms
and
lastly,
the
exist.
The
current
land
use
for
this
site
is
manufacturing
and
distribution,
given
that
the
previous
use
was
for
windows
and
door
Manufacturing.
D
So
what
is
the
proposed
project?
We
received
an
application
on
June
6
2022
from
No
Ordinary
business
Auto
Center,
and
they
want
to
operate
as
an
auto
repair
and
maintenance
shop,
so
they
are
proposing
to
convert
the
land
use
since
it's
been
13
years
since
this
site
has
been
used
for
an
auto
related
use
and
it
has
passed
the
the
six
month
period.
So
there
isn't
an
existing
conditional
use
permit
that
the
business
was
able
to
you
utilize
to
operate
legally.
So
that's
why
we're
here
today
and
some
quick
context
about
the
site.
D
The
first
floor
will
be
primarily
used
for
the
vehicle
repairs.
They
have
five
car
lifts
at
the
location.
The
first
floor
also
has
storage,
Office,
Space,
Two
washrooms
and
a
waiting
room.
What
they
propose
to
provide
to
customers
is
serious
for
oil
changes,
vehicle
diagnosis,
electrical
air
conditioning,
wheel,
alignments,
brakes
suspensions
and
other
mechanical
Replacements.
The
second
floor
of
this
site
will
be
utilized
for
additional
Office,
Space
Storage
and
a
washroom.
D
So
I
will
now
present
the
floor
plans
that
were
submitted
by
the
applicant.
So
you
can
see
here.
This
is
the
lower
level.
This
is
large
warehouse
space
where
they
will
do
most
of
the
vehicle
repairs
and,
as
we
can
see
here,
they
have
offers
and
the
washroom
space
I
mentioned
five
car
lifts
earlier.
This
is
the
layout
as
you
can
see,
they
have
three
in
the
back
and
two
near
the
garage
doors.
D
However,
this
one
is
not
in
place,
yet
they
are
proposing
on
implementing
a
six
car
lift
soon.
So
for
now,
it's
these
five
right
here.
This
is
the
upper
level
floor
plan,
the
additional
office,
space,
washroom
and
closet.
D
So
one
key
thing
with
the
site
is
it's
on-site
parking?
It
is
parking
compliant,
so
our
Municipal
Code
requires
eight
parking
spaces.
They
meet
this
parking
requirement
by
offering
11
off
street
parking
spaces,
five
exterior
and
six
interior
parking
spaces,
and
one
of
the
conditions
that
we
put
in
the
staff
report
is
that
the
business
shall
only
accept
appointments
from
customers
that
they
could
service
inside
the
shop
or
temporarily
park
in
its
five
off-shade
parking
spaces.
D
If
any
customer
vehicles
are
required
to
stay
overnight,
it
will
be
stored
inside
the
facility,
and
the
reason
why
we
put
this
condition
is
because,
as
you
guys
may
know,
the
industrial
district
already
has
an
ongoing
on-street
parking
issue.
It's
pretty
hard
to
find
parking
and
we
don't
want
the
applicant
contributing
to
that
issue.
So
we
put
this
condition
in
there.
D
D
So
some
Key
conditions
that
we
receive
are
that
from
other
departments,
Public
Works
building
and
that
we
also
are
posing
to
the
applicant
include
the
following.
So
currently
they
have
Banner
signage
and
we
want
the
applicant
to
upgrade
to
wall
signs
that
they
could
securely
mount
to
the
wall
and
the
applicant
shall
apply
for
assigned
permit
application
and
they
are
responsible
for
paying
the
fees
associated
with
this
sign
permit
application.
D
The
applicant
shall
also
apply
for
a
building
permit
for
the
car
lifts
that
way
they
could
ensure
it
is
code
compliant
with
building
and
the
property
owner
is
responsible
for
sidewalk
repair
in
the
frontage.
This
is
a
condition
we
received
from
public
works
and
the
last
two
are
from
the
building
department,
so
garage
ventilation,
so
Repair,
Garage,
Shelby,
mechanically,
ventilated
and
repair
garages
shall
also
be
equipped
with
automatic
sprinkler
systems.
D
So,
after
conducting
our
analysis,
we
concluded
that
it
is
consistent
with
the
general
plan,
since
it's
located
north
of
I-380,
which
is
an
industrial
Corridor.
So
it
is
consistent
with
neighboring
businesses.
Since
most
businesses
there
are
either
Warehouse
or
Auto
related
uses.
It
is
consistent
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
like
I
mentioned,
and
it
will
not
be
detrimental
to
public
health,
safety
and
Welfare.
D
So,
for
this
reason,
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approves
the
use
permit
up
22-02
based
on
findings,
one
through
three
and
I
do
want
to
mention
that
Planning
Commission
is
the
final
approval
body
and
since
the
application
has
been
in
our
queue
for
quite
some
time,
if
the
Planning
Commission
grants
that
approval,
we
will
approve
their
business
license
application
and
afterwards
the
applicant
will
schedule
Fire
and
Building
Inspections
to
finalize
their
BC
permit,
and
that
is
all
for
me.
B
Thank
you,
Mr
Amaya.
Are
there
any
clarifying
questions
from
the
commission
at
this
time.
E
E
Okay,
so
that
floor,
lift
where
they
have
a
depression
in
one
of
the
photos.
Building
department
is
going
to
look
at
that.
D
B
I'm
not
seeing
any
other
questions
at
the
moment,
so
I
believe
we
should
open
the
floor
for
public
comment.
Are
there
any
commenters
on
this
project.
F
Commissioners
committee,
Robert
Barnett
Mills
Park
area,
just
one
thing
that
I
need
to
to
somewhat
understand.
Several
years
ago.
F
A
auto
repair
owner
was
basically
kind
of
forced
out
of
his
building,
and
this
person
service,
San,
Bruno
Community
for
almost
to
15
to
20
years
on
the
corner
of
201
and
265
in
with
the
muffler.
That
place
was
closed.
Who
knows
how?
Many
years,
when
this
owner
approached
the
City
in
regards
to
doing
automotive
repair,
which
that
was
going
on
before
it
became
vacant
and
the
city
informed
him
that,
because
of
the
time
frame
that
had
passed,
that
the
zoning
ordinance
roll
back
to
not
being
able
to
do
automotive
repair.
F
F
Yes,
sir,
that
was
on
the
the
corner
of
201
I,
believe
201
faces
San
Bruno
Avenue,
but
that
whole
corner
there
inclusive
another
part
of
that
building
is
when
they
did
automotive
repair.
Sir.
B
C
Yes,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
the
question
so
when
the
city
updated
the
zoning
and
in
2021
to
implement
the
transit
oriented
districts
which
are
all
along
San,
Bruno,
Avenue,
El,
Camino,
Real
and
San
Mateo
Avenues
and
then
the
the
zoo
I'm.
Sorry,
the
zoning
that
was
put
into
place
does
not
allow
any
auto
related
uses,
sales,
repair
or
other
uses.
C
And
then,
when
you
couple
that,
with
our
our
non-conforming
use
section
of
the
code,
which
allows
for
a
a
re-introduction
of
the
use
only
within
a
six
month
period
And,
if,
if
the,
if
the,
if
it
was
an
auto
related
use-
and
someone
did
not
move-
would
move
back
in
within
six
months,
then
the
the
use
ceases
and
then
defaults
to
the
zoning.
So
I
I
believe
that
when
the
prior
to
2021,
all
of
the
zoning
was
commercial
which
allowed
auto-related
uses
all
as
conditional
use
permits.
C
So
we
have
had
that
issue
with
many
many
businesses
on
El
Camino
Real
in
particular,
that
that
are
that
you
know
were
previously
Auto
uses
but
cannot
be
reoccupied
because
of
the
the
vacancy
period,
the
other,
the
other
Factor
I'm,
not
sure.
If
this
property
is
part
of
the
Mills
Park
property,
but
Mills
Park
zoning
is
a
planned
development
and
that's
actually
much
more
restrictive,
because
the
zoning
is
site-specific
and
only
addresses
the
uses
that
would
go
into
the
approximately
8
000
square
feet
of
space
within
the
Mills
Park
project.
C
So
until
that
gets
the
Mills
Park
project
gets
built,
the
only
allowed
uses
are
are
basically
any
type
of
retail
restaurant
or
service
uses,
and
we
do
have
one
Auto
use
that
will
be
reoccupying,
a
auto
dealership
on
the
Mills
Park
property,
because
it's
been
less
than
six
months
but
there's
another
site
that
cannot
be
reoccupied.
C
So
hopefully
that
explains
the
dynamic
and
then
so
so
really,
the
M1
zone
is
the
only
Zone
remaining
in
this
city
that
allows
for
auto
related
uses
with
a
conditional
use
permit
and
then
the
rest
are
all
considered
legally
non-conforming
and
are
allowed
to
continue.
D
F
F
A
B
I
do
see
the
the
commenter
has
his
hand
up,
but
I
I
mean
we.
We
typically
only
allow
we
got
you
get
your
three
minutes.
I
don't
know.
Are
there
any
other
commenters.
A
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
among
the
commission
or
do
we
have
a
motion
at
this
time.
D
Yeah
chair
our
commissioner
Morgan,
so
egress
was
a
condition
that
was
also
requested
by
Darcy
Asha,
the
Chief
Building
official.
It
is
condition
number
10
on
page
11
of
the
package.
It
says
means
of
egress
plans,
so
they
are
requesting
that
the
applicant
provides
that.
A
In
that
case,
I
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
a
use,
permit
number
22-002
for
the
property.
C
C
B
All
right,
thank
you
for
your
time
this
evening,
Mr
Neri.
B
If
anybody
wishes
to
appeal
this,
you
can
contact
within
10
days
planning
at
San,
bruno.ca.gov
or
650-616-7074
to
file
an
appeal
to
the
city
council.
There
may
be
a
cash
fee
associated
with
that,
possibly
up
to
500
dollars
all
right.
Moving
on
to
our
next
agenda
item.
B
We
have
2101
sneath,
Lane
I
think
this
is
just
an
informational
presentation.
C
Yes,
chair
Harmon,
the
staff
presentation
will
be
given
by
Nick
Hamilton
from
good
City
company
who's.
Our
contract
planner
for
this
item
he'll
also
be
introducing
others
that
will
be
joining
him
and
explaining
the
scoping
meeting
process.
G
Good
evening,
thank
you,
members
of
the
commission,
members
of
the
public
and
interested
parties
for
joining
this
discussion
this
evening
and
your
participation
in
this
project
introducing
here
a
project
for
2101
Smith
Lane,
which
is
the
eighth
former
Engvall
School
site,
and
current
and
San
Bruno
driving
range
off
Smith
Lane.
G
I'd
like
to
introduce
some
of
the
individuals
who
will
be
presenting
this
evening
as
well
as
introduce
the
applicant
who
is
present
to
answer
any
questions
this
evening
again:
I'm
Nicholas,
Hamilton
senior
planner,
with
good
City
working
staff,
extension
for
the
community
and
economic
development
department.
G
Our
environmental
impact
report,
sequa
consultants
for
this
project
are
David
J
powers
and
Associates
represented
by
akoni
Danielson
and
Natalie
Noyes,
who
will
be
presenting
shortly
a
little
more
and
again
ulti
homes
is
the
developer
for
this
project
and
James
Sullivan
is
available
to
answer
any
questions
a
commission
may
have
so.
G
I
would
like
to
suggest
a
purpose
and
format
for
for
this
agenda
item
and
discussion,
the
purpose
of
this
scoping
meeting
for
the
NOP
of
the
eir,
which
is
which
we
will
spell
out
all
of
those
acronyms
in
great
detail
in
appropriate
details
soon.
G
But
for
this
meeting
the
purpose
is
focused
really
in
really
quite
focused.
It's
not
a
general
discussion.
The
focus
of
this
is
on
the
scope
of
the
environmental
impact
report.
The
focus
is
to
explore
topics
to
be
analyzed
as
part
of
the
environmental
impact
report.
Alternatives
to
be
analyzed
in
the
environmental
impact
report.
Alternatives
is
an
important
part
of
the
eir
process
in
the
state
of
California,
feasible
mitigation
measures
if
any
potential
environmental
or
related
issues
are
raised
through
this
analysis
process
and
environmental
issues,
in
fact
affecting
the
project
site.
G
So
that's
from
the
outside
that
might
affect
the
the
in
the
the
actual
future
use
of
the
setup,
not
only
the
future
use
of
the
site
and
how
it
might
affect
outside
of
the
site.
I
want
to
really
underscore
that
separate
hearings
will
be
held
on
the
merits
of
the
project
and
the
focus
of
this.
The
purpose
of
this
meeting
is
to
produce
the
best
possible
environmental
impact
report,
the
best
possible
environmental
analysis
to
fully
understand,
explore
and
analyze
the
environmental
dimensions
of
this
project.
G
So
again,
this
is
about
setting
the
scope
for
the
environmental
review
process
moving
forward
and
not
to
discuss
the
merits
of
the
project.
So
first
I
will
give
a
very
brief
overview
of
the
project
itself.
Then
it
will
pass
the
Baton
to
Natalie
Noyes
and
who
will
present
in
a
little
greater
detail
around
the
Environmental
impactment
report
and
the
process
associated
with
that.
G
G
G
G
San
Bruno
is
you
know
here
on
the
peninsula,
or
can
you
all
see
my
cursor
in
this
format?
Okay,
so
San
Bruno
and
the
project
site
is,
is
right
here,
adjacent
to
280,
very
close
to
SFO
airport
kind
of
right
in
the
center
of
of
of
the
peninsula,
and
the
site
itself
is
off
Smith
Lane,
which
connects
from
Skyline
to
280
to
101
and
is
a
significant
thoroughfare
running.
It's
kind
of
nominally
East-West,
but
of
course
it's
actually
closer
to
a
45.
G
and
and
and
where
Bart
is
also
intercepted
in
a
parking
lot
is
intersected
off
sneak
flame.
The
set
itself
is
adjacent
to
280
and
sneak
flame
in
this
pie
shaped
this
pie
shaped
area
at
the
base
of
crestmore
Canyon,
where,
where
it
then
kind
of
intersects
with
with
280
a
piece
of
local
trivia,
is
the
the
so-called
Bridge
to
Nowhere.
G
When
380
was
supposed
to
connect,
all
the
way
to
the
to
the
West
is
very
close
to
the
site,
and
that
would
have
come
along
the
far
side
of
the
canyon
had
that
had
that
been
built
as
envisioned
the
applicant
again
is
Pulte
Homes,
the
San
Bruno
Parks
school
district
is
the
owner
of
the
site.
The
land
use
in
the
general
plan
is
low
density,
residential,
the
zoning
is
R1
single
family
residential
and
we
believe
a
vesting
tentative
map.
G
A
planned
unit
permit
and
an
Architectural
Review
permit,
as
well
as
a
conditional
use
permit,
are
the
appropriate
entitlements
for
this
project
and
those
have
been
applied
for
by
the
applicant,
as,
in
addition
to
SQL
review
and
later
stages
of
the
project,
there
will
be
additional
building
permits.
Demolition
permits
fire.
You
know
various
administerial
permits
of
that
nature
as
well.
G
The
overall
project
proposal
is
to
demolish
the
existing
golf
golf
facilities
on
the
site,
the
driving
range,
the
small
building,
there's
also
a
School
District
maintenance
facility,
which
is
currently
on
the
site
near
the
entrance
to
the
site
at
the
bottom
of
the
hill.
The
bottom
of
this
of
the
of
the
site
around
this
area.
That
was
also
proposed
to
be
demolished,
as
well
as
surface
Berry,
surface
parking
installations
that
are
on
the
site
and
to
construct
118
single-family
homes.
G
67
of
them
would
be
three-story,
51,
two-story
detached
single-family
homes,
the
maximum
height
on
many
of
those
is
35
feet
and
15
of
those
for
sale
units
would
be
required
to
be
below
market
rate
in
accordance
with
the
municipal
code
or
to
comply
with
the
city's,
affordable,
housing
ordinances,
alternatives,
foreign,
the
overall
site
planning
approach
clusters,
the
the
homes
in
the
main
part
of
the
site,
leaving
some
of
the
more
steeply
sloped
periphery
of
the
site,
less
Disturbed
than
if
one
were
to
you
know,
spread
those
out
into
larger
Lots
across
that
entire
site.
G
This
is
what
this
is:
a
function
of
the
planned
unit
permit
or
pup
that
the
Commissioners
would
be
very
familiar
with,
but
for
any
interested
parties
or
members
of
the
public.
This
is
a
tool
in
San
Bruno
code
that
allows
for
the
clustering
of
sites
in
exchange
for
the
preservation
of
open
space
or
other
similar
types
of
public
amenities
and
benefits.
G
The
main
access
to
the
site
would
be
through
a
regraded
angle,
port
or
a
wall
Road,
as
it's
variously
known,
which
would
be
wider
than
it
currently
is,
and
a
little
less
steep
than
it
currently
is
especially
at
the
top.
So
it
would
be
re-graded
throughout
it
would
it
would
turn
a
little
differently
than
it
currently
does
a
little
earlier,
which
yields
this
space
here,
which
we'll
discuss
shortly.
G
A
second
potential
emergency
vehicle
access
has
been
discussed
and
would
would
potentially
exit
the
site
and
connect
to
the
280
off-ramp
off
over
here.
Those
conversations
are
are
ongoing.
The
applicant
is
pursuing
pursuing
that,
and
the
city
is
supporting
that
and
pursuing
that,
as
well
is
everyone's
intention
to
to
proceed
with
that.
If
it's
possible-
and
there
are
some
challenges
that
that
will
be
explored
in
the
environmental
impact
report.
G
Additional
improvements
that
this
project
will
will
include
include
storm
drain
improvements
both
on
and
off
site,
two
new
perks,
improved
access
to
crestmark
Canyon
for
emergencies,
so
that
fire
May,
Fire,
Department,
May
access
this
site
for
maintenance,
the
public
works
and
other
maintenance
activities
can
access
this.
This
site
there's
an
important
storm
drain
infrastructure
in
this
vicinity
and
Recreation
purposes.
G
This
crestmore
Canyon
is
informally
actively
used
by
members
of
the
community
and
there
are
opportunities
to
explore
formalizing
that
and
improving
that
over
time,
as
well
as
Trailhead
amenities
that
set
and
adjacent
to
it,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
is
notable
about
this
project
is
the
introduction
of
this
area
that
could
be
perhaps
dedicated
to
the
city
to
serve
as
a
pocket
park.
A
Jade
and
Trailhead
amenities
adjacent
to
crestmore
Canyon,
which
is
immediately
off-site
to
the
South
I,
want
to
share
as
well.
G
Some
of
the
examples
of
some
of
the
architecture
that
is
proposed
at
the
top.
You
can
see
some
of
the
renderings
and
elevations
of
the
three-story
homes
and
below
are
some
of
the
two-story
homes.
This
is
just
an
example
of
some
of
the
architectural
designs
that
have
been
submitted.
There
are
additional
ones
that
were
that
are
also
part
of
their
their
actual
formal
submittal
packages,
foreign.
G
At
this
point,
I
would
like
to
pass
the
floor
to
Natalie
Noyes
David
J
Powers
is
Natalie
on
the.
H
Next
slide,
the
main
purposes
of
sqweb,
the
California
Environmental
Quality
act
or
sequa
establishes
the
process
by
which
this
environmental
impact
report
or
eir
is
being
prepared.
The
purpose
of
sequa
is
to
inform
decision
makers
and
the
public
about
the
Project's
potential
environmental
effects.
Engage
the
public
in
the
environmental
review
process,
disclose
potential
impacts
of
the
project
and
identify
ways
to
avoid
or
reduce
potential
impacts
of
the
project
with
Alternatives
and
or
mitigation
measures.
H
The
city
issued
a
notice
of
preparation
for
this
project
on
August
30th,
the
NOP
provided
a
general
description
of
the
project
and
identified
possible
environmental
impacts
that
could
result
from
implementation
of
the
project.
The
NLP
will
be
distributed
for
a
30-day
public
review
period.
During
this
time,
the
public
has
encouraged
to
send
comments
on
the
project.
H
H
H
H
H
Consistent
with
the
requirements
of
sqa,
the
eir
will
evaluate
20
environmental
factors
to
determine
whether
the
project
would
result
in
potentially
significant
impacts.
Technical
studies
will
be
prepared
to
address
specific
areas
such
as
air
quality,
biological
resources,
cultural
resources
and
transportation.
H
Under
sequa,
economic
and
social
effects
are
not
considered
significant
effects
on
the
environment.
Sql
analysis
focuses
on
physical
changes.
Economic
and
social
effects
do
not
require
analysis
under
sequa,
except
to
the
extent
that
there
is
substantial
evidence
to
support
a
finding
that
there
that
they
would
result
in
physical
environmental
effects
or
that
they
are
the
result
of
the
Project's
physical
environmental
effects.
H
Sequagram
requires
that
an
eir
identify
alternatives
to
a
project,
as
it's
proposed.
The
SQL
guidelines
specified
that
the
eir
should
identify
Alternatives,
which
would
feasibly
attain
most
of
the
basic
objectives
of
the
project,
but
would
avoid
or
substantially
lessen
any
of
the
significant
effects
of
the
project.
The
purpose
of
the
alternative
discussion
is
to
determine
whether
there
are
alternatives
of
design,
scope
or
location,
which
was
substantially
lessen,
significant
impacts.
H
An
ear
must
include
a
range
of
reasonable
alternatives
to
the
project.
It
is
anticipated
that
the
eir
will
include
at
a
minimum.
You
know,
project
alternative
and
identify
an
environmentally
Superior
Superior
alternative
under
the
no
project
alternative,
the
site
would
either
remain
as
it
currently
exists,
developed
with
the
San
Bruno
Golf
Center,
or
it
is
also
reasonable
to
assume
that
if
the
proposed
project
were
not
approved,
a
similar
residential
development
would
be
proposed
consistent
with
the
site's
General
plan.
H
Designation
and
zoning,
an
environmentally
Superior
alternative
would
be
developed,
based
on
the
conclusions
of
the
technical
studies
to
be
prepared.
The
purpose
of
this
alternative
would
be
to
avoid
or
substantially
lessen
any
of,
the
significant
effects
of
the
proposed
project
and
Achieve
most
of
the
basic
project
objectives.
G
Thank
you
Natalie
at
this
point,
I
think
it
would
be
appropriate
to.
That
concludes
our
presentation,
chair.
B
Thank
you
and
what
were
you
going
to
say
that
we
can
do
the
questions
and
comments
from
the
commission
at
this
time
or
yes,
okay,
all
right.
Do
we
have
any
members
of
the
commission
that
wish
to
make
inquiries.
B
B
Any
hands
from
my
fellow
commissioners
I
had
a
couple
of
thoughts.
Myself.
I
had
actually
been
intending
to
ask
about
the
single
access
issue,
because
the
the
primary
access
actually
crosses
the
fall.
So
if
you
had
an
event
like
a
an
earthquake
that
takes
out
the
road
combined
with
a
fire
having
that
secondary
access
seems
really
critical,
but
I'm
glad
to
hear
that's
already
being
discussed.
B
Let's
see
the
second
issue
that
I
was
interested
in
was,
it
seems,
like
I
mean
it's
hard
to
tell
from
the
diagram
so
because
it
is
sort
of
schematic,
but
it
does
seem
like
we
have
the
structures
kind
of
backing
directly
into
the
tree
line,
and
it's
it's
at
least
sort
of
environmental
adjacent.
The
relationship
of
structures
to
to
Fire
and
I
I
wasn't
sure
whether
that
sort
of
question
about
defensible
space-
and
you
know
this-
this
was
a
topic-
that's
been
presented
on
it
I.
B
You
know,
planning
I
went
to
a
couple
of
planning
seminars
at
which
they
were
discussing
the
sort
of
bringing
structures
more
in
and
creating
defensible
space
for
for
safety
with
not
having
the
structures
propagate
fire.
G
That's
a
very
good
question.
Thank
you
for
that
question.
I
think
there
I
would
point
out
two
two
things
and
I
might
also
ask
the
the
representative
from
the
developer
Jim
Sullivan,
to
to
add
on
to
my
answer.
G
I
I
believe
if
you
go
to
the
site
presently,
you'll
see
that
in
the
last
few
months
the
California
Conservation
Corps,
in
conjunction
with
the
fire
department,
has
actually
done
a
substantial
amount
of
thinning
and
creating
a
defensible
space
in
this
area.
Obviously,
customer
Canyon
and
this
this
part
of
the
city
are
are
a
very
sensitive
area
in
crestmore.
Canyon
has
has
some
areas
and
that
will
absolutely
be
studied
in
the
in
in
the
eir.
That
is
one
of
those
areas
that
gets
studied
as
well.
G
You
know
again,
this
is
a
great
way
of
kind
of
framing
what
this
purpose
of
this
meeting
is
for
and
not
it
absolutely
is
perfect
to
bring
up
things
that
might
be
have
an
environmental
impact,
and
it
is
also
true
that,
later,
when
staff
review
the
plans,
there
will
be
additional
opportunities
for
staff
from
all
the
Departments
and
reviewing
agencies
to
provide
comments
and
provide
conditions
to
ensure
safety,
and
ever
all,
all
codes
and
laws
are
being
followed.
G
That
would
clearly
include
the
fire
department
and
and
all
of
the
interface
to
the
to
the
tree.
You
know
areas
where
there
are
trees
and
and
that
interface,
if
Jim
has
been
promoted
to
to
panelists
I
would
I
would
invite
Jim
to
add
on
to
that
making
wishes.
B
Is
it
James,
Sullivan,
I'm,
sorry.
I
James
I
was
waiting
for
my
anti-mute
button
to
to
flash
up.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
chair
and
Nick
great
presentation,
as
well
as
Natalie
I,
think
explaining
the
the
sequel
process.
I
Mr
chair
the
with
regard
to
the
access
that
was,
you
know,
one
of
our
major
concerns
and
I
and
I'm
I
want
to
appreciate
express
my
appreciation
to
the
city
we've
reached
out
to
Caltrans,
we've
actually
engaged
with
Senator
Becker's
office,
because
we
want
to
provide
what
we
think
is
going
to
be
the
safest
alternative
for
the
future
residents
right
now
for
those
people
that
don't
that
haven't
been
around
for
a
long
time,
actually
the
golf
site,
that's
been
there
for
30
something
years:
it's
actually
a
middle
school
before
that
and
I
think
the
middle
school.
I
You
know
kind
of
closed
up
in
the
60s,
so
this
was
almost
an
excess
piece
that
School
owned
I
I
just
have
one
comment
to
make
with
regard
to
the
defensible
space,
because
you
know
in
looking
at
the
environmental
Superior
alternative
I
think
that
with
polti
homes
trying
to
basically
not
utilize
the
entire
site,
but
to
shrink
the
developable
window,
but
it
just
so
happens
that,
in
order
for
us
to
do
that,
we're
doing
smaller
than
the
5
000
square
foot
minimum
lot
sizes,
which
would
be
you
know
completely
in
an
R15
Zone
I-
will
say
that
the
GP
allows
up
to
eight
units
per
acre.
I
So
theoretically
it
could
be
160.
You
know
units
on
the
site
and
meet
the
general
plan
requirements.
We
think
that
the
project
that
we're
proposing
the
inclusion
of
two
good
sized
parks
and
one
smaller
little
pocket
park
together
with
minimizing
the
grading,
is
going
to
be
a
great
project
for
for
San
Bruno
in
in
the
future
and
looking
forward
to
working
with
both
the
Planning
Commission
city
council,
as
well
as
staff
and
and
David
J
powers.
To
to
look
at
everything
that
that
SQL
will
require
us
to
look
at.
B
Oh,
if
you
bring
things
together
more
like
you
know,
the
sort
of
reductio
at
absurdum
of
that
would
be
a
sort
of
corbusier
tower
in
the
park,
but
our
our
zoning
I
guess
it
actually
does
raise
a
question
of
whether
the
Alternatives
that
can
be
considered
for
SQL
assume
the
existing
zoning
I
mean
because
I
appreciate,
like
you've,
done
sort
of
units
that
are
on
a
smaller
footprint
and
taken
them
to
three
stories,
which
is
what
the
zoning
allows,
rather
than
doing
sort
of
a
more
spread
out.
B
So,
like
you
definitely
like
clearly,
there
is
an
effort
already
to
meet
this
sort
of.
You
know
the
sort
of
pressure
of
maintaining
that
defensible
space,
But,
I
I,
don't
know
whether
a
potential
environmentally
Superior
alternative
might
include
sort
of
like
a
further
clustering
into
like
you
know
where
you
actually
move
to
Joint
structures
like
you
know,
four-story,
four
plexes
or
something
or
whether
that
would
be
ruled
out
by
the
the
zoning
yeah.
I
It's
my
understanding,
Mr
chair,
that
because
we
did
think
you
know
I
mean
polti,
you
know
they're
a
national
Builder
and
and
have
a
lot
of
different
product
types.
Everything
up
to
you
know
50
60
units
per
acre.
It
was
important
for
us
to
that
the
city,
however
long
ago,
looking
at
it
as
low
density,
housing
number
one
and
I
appreciate
saying
you
can
still
do
low
density.
Just
you
know
on
on
the
tighter
window,
but
we're
also
trying
to
achieve.
I
We
have
the
quail
Point
homeowners
association,
that's
located
nearby,
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
didn't
exceed
that
35
foot.
You
know
height
limit.
That
seems
to
be
a
pretty
important
thing
in
San
Bruno.
So
obviously
we
want
the
four
stories
or
higher.
You
know
we
would
be.
You
know,
kind
of
facing
that
which,
which
you
know
was
not
our
intent
to
do.
I
I
do
want
to
add
as
well
that
I
think.
On
a
couple
of
occasions,
we've
we've
been
out
with
the
fire
marshal
looking
at.
I
You
know
the
widening
of
in-ball
road
to
make
that
as
safe
as
possible,
and
there
will
be
tree
removals.
Both
on
Along
on
our
side
of
the
property,
any
dead,
trees
or
trees
that
the
fire
marshal
deems
to
be
potentially
hazardous
from
a
fire
standpoint,
as
well
as
the
other
side,
I.
Think
of
invol
road,
which
is
partly
owned
by
the
city
and
I.
Think
as
you
come
closer
up
to
sneith,
is
owned
by
the
quail
Point
homeowners
association.
So
we
are
gonna.
I
B
Yeah
I
know
and
that
that
I
forget,
if
it
is
a
35
foot
limit,
but
there
there
is
a
there's,
a
three-story
limit,
which
is
it's
an
it's
a
numbered
ordinance
which
was
adopted
and
and
in
order
to
change
it,
you'd
have
to
actually
go
through
a
full
Citywide
initiative,
so
I
mean
I
would
assume
that
going
higher
than
this
is
basically
impractical,
but
but
no,
this
is
I.
I
thought
this
was
a
very
attractive
project.
B
Given
the
location,
you
know
it's,
it's
not
super
close
to
our
downtown.
So
one
assumes
the
you
know:
you're
gonna
have
your
two
cars.
You're
gonna
have
a
decent
number
of
vehicle
miles,
traveled
I,
guess
I
would
I
would
hope
that
there's
some
exploration
of
some
sort
of
Transit
linkage
and
Alternatives,
but
it
is
given,
given
the
location,
that's
pretty
tricky,
but
yeah
I.
Think
that's
the
last
of
my
comments.
B
I
The
only
thing
that
I
would
add
and
I
hope
I'm
not
overstepping
my
bounds
Nick,
but
it
was
my
understanding
that
both
the
VMT,
which
is
now
the
California
standard
to
be
looked
at
from
SQL
standpoint,
I,
believe
also
the
city
wanted
the
traffic
engineer
to
look
at
you
know
Los,
which
is
the
level
of
service
which
was
kind
of
the
previous
standard.
That
was
looked
at,
at
least
for
you
know
the
intersection
right
where
invol
and
sneeth
is
so
I.
I
Think
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
emphasis
in
study
done
from
a
traffic
standpoint.
D
A
B
All
right,
oh
I,
see
Vice
chair
Madden's
hand.
E
Yeah
I
assume
this
will
all
be
studied,
but
just
wanted
to
point
out
a
couple:
things
I
had
a
giant
list
on
the
screen
earlier,
but
I'm
assuming
storm
water
management.
This
being
kind
of
a
low
spot
is
going
to
be
a
big
deal
here.
E
E
And
where
it's
supposed
to
go
and
then
does
there
need
to
be
any,
you
know
you
have
that
off
ramp
or
on-ramp,
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
to
280
along
the
northeast
side
there,
because
you're
going
to
need
to
be
any
kind
of
walls,
builds
either
side,
walls
or
Collision,
preventative
walls
or
barriers.
Due
to
the
you
know,
if
a
car
goes
over
the
side,
it's
going
to
go
down
the
hill
and
into
the
either
park
or
the
the
homes
there.
I
Yeah
Nick:
is
it
all
right
if
I
respond,
sure
sure?
So
thank
you.
Mr
Vice,
chair
the
with
regard
to
the
storm
yeah,
there's
a
there's,
a
large
there's,
a
72-inch
storm
line
right
now
that,
essentially,
you
know
crestmore
Canyon,
there's
a
creek
that
runs
up
and
then
it
funnels
into
this
six
foot
wide
storm
drain
line,
and
so
that
essentially
handles
the
hundred
year
flood
because
we're
changing
and
having
to
put
streets
here
we
will
be
creating
a
new
storm
line
that
picks
up
that
water
and
I.
I
Think
that
one
of
Nick's
messages
that
he
had
put
up
earlier
talked
about
off-site
storm.
There's
an
issue.
The
city
had
created
some
time
ago,
kind
of
an
overflow
basin.
We've
looked
at
that
that's
kind
of
being
utilized
right
now,
I
think
is
a
little.
You
know
State
Park!
I
If
you
will
the
there's
going
to
be
some
improvements,
that
we
will
be
doing
to
that
to
basically
take
care
of
the
water
and
unless
my
civil
engineers
are
also
on
this
call,
either
Christopher
Psy
or
Alex
Azar
I,
don't
believe
that
we
have
any
pump
stations
that
are
planned
for
the
site.
I
So,
which
means
everything
will
be
flowing
if
you
will
towards
the
right
kind
of
in
that
northeast
corner
just
to
the
right
of
the
park,
there's
an
existing,
that's
where
the
72-inch
line
comes
out
and
that's
where
it
will
remain
and
I
believe
that
we
have
positive
flow
that
goes
from
every
corner
of
the
site.
You
know
into
that
72-inch
storm
drain
line
with
regard
to
noise,
certainly
the
fence
will
be
will
be
fenced.
I
I
know
that
I
think
it's
illingworth
and
rodkin
as
a
noise
consultant
that
that
David
J
Powers
will
be
employing
to
take
measurements
and
any
requirement
for
noise
mitigation.
We
will
address
and
obviously
the
safety
of
the
future
residences
is
Paramount
on
polky's
mind
as
well.
So
thank
you
for
your
comments.
H
E
I
G
To
flash
answer
this
underneath
a
portion
of
this
second
pocket
park
are
also
some
detention
cells
that
are
underneath
the
bark
that
will
detain
water
in
a
in
a
large
large
water
event
to
defray
some
of
the
impact
on
the
system,
as
currently
designed
and
again,
SQL
will
analyze
all
of
this
further
exactly.
I
One
of
the
one
of
the
things
also
going
back
to
the
vice
chairs,
and
this
is
kind
of
getting
into
the
weeds
a
little
bit,
but
besides
the
bio
retention,
you
know
we
have
biofiltration,
you
know
when
new
projects
you
know
nowadays
kind
of
come
through.
We
have
to
adhere
to
State
Water
Resources,
Regional,
water,
quality
control,
board
standards,
so
water
as
it
comes
either
off
the
street
or
off
of
a
rooftop.
You
basically
treat
it
through.
I
E
Slap
on
grades
so
there's
no
crawl
space
or
steps
up
to
the
front
door,
so
I
guess
as
long
as
your
system
can
handle
the
hundred
year
flood
or
you
know,
which
is
every
year.
We
have
global
warming,
it
gets
worse
and
worse.
I
guess:
you're,
not
planning
on
designing
these
houses
with.
E
Protection
with
a
crawl
space,
but
I
guess
that's
also
in
his
leads,
so
all
right.
Thank
you.
There.
There.
G
G
A
B
I
I'm
I'm
sorry,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
there
is
typically
it
is
slab
on
grade
foundations,
but
there's
always
will
be
a
slope
and
there
will
always
be
a
step.
You
know
the
the
so
the
finished
floor.
Elevation
will
typically
be
anywhere
from
18
inches
to
24
inches
higher
than
say
like
the
curve,
and
we
do
plan
on
adhering
to
a
hundred
year.
Flood
storm
events.
B
Yeah
I
had
been
sort
of
thinking
from
Vice
chair,
Madden's
question
about
the
the
fact
that
there's
probably
a
significantly
more
Hardscape
than
the
current
use.
Although
I
assume,
when
it
was
a
school,
there
would
have
been
more
Hardscape
as
well
with
a
parking
lot
on
the
school
itself,
and
so
I
would
think
that
the
storm
water
and
I
imagine
that
will
all
get
thoroughly
analyzed
and
in
the
SQL
process.
But
I
was
going
to
mention
the
possibility
of
BIOS
whales
and
whatnot,
and
then
you've
already
said
it's
already
planned.
B
So
that's
delightful
I
did
wonder
if
pervious
Pavements
might
be
considered
for
some
of
those
back
alleys.
I
mean
you
typically
wouldn't
do
that
for
a
main
road,
but
potentially
for
sort
of
driveway
alley
space.
It
might
be
considered.
B
All
right
shall
we
move
on
to
public
comment.
Then?
Is
there
anyone
from
the
public
that
wishes
to
comment
or
ask
a
question.
B
All
right
well
seeing
none
should
we
have
a
motion
to
close
our
public
comment
on
this
issue.
G
A
B
All
right,
thank
you,
and
there
is
on
the
screen
you
can
see.
There
is
an
opportunity
to
submit
written
comments
on
the
issue
to
it,
looks
like
in
Hamilton,
n
h
a
m.
I
l
t
o
n
goodcitico.com.
B
G
B
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you
for
your
presentation.
I
look
forward
to
seeing
the
environmental
analysis.
It
does
look
like
a
great
project
moving
on
do
we
have
any
comments
from
staff.
C
And
none
other
than
to
again
request
your
assistance
with
selecting
three
members
to
staff
the
October
13th
architecture,
Review
Committee,.
C
And
commissioner
dorazo.
C
I
appreciate
that
and
we
can
also
check
with
Mary
Jo
as
well.
B
All
right
do
we
have
any
comments
from
our
members.
B
I'll
just
again
say
you
know,
welcome
Christy,
you
know.
Lsao
has
been
with
us
for
a
couple
of
meetings
already
so
good
to
have
support
from
the
city
staff
for
our
work.
If
there
is
no
other
comment
from
a
member
I
think
we
have
reached
the
end
of
our
agenda.
B
Our
next
regular
meeting
will
be
held
on
September
20th
2022
at
7
pm.
Thank
you
to
the
staff
and
the
presenters
this
evening
from
the
various
applicants,
and
we
will
see
you
later.
Okay,.