►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting January 22, 2013
Whole Meeting
A
A
A
Item
number
three
announcements:
we
have
a
few
announcements
this
evening.
The
city
will
hold
a
crestmore
neighborhood
meeting
tomorrow
evening,
wednesday
january,
twenty
third
at
7pm
right
here
at
the
Senior
Center
and
the
council,
City
Council
will
hold
a
study
session
to
discuss
the
formation
of
the
not-for-profit
entity,
call
for
in
the
settlement
agreement
between
the
city
and
pge
on
Tuesday,
februari,
5th,
2013,
7
p.m.
right
here
at
the
Senior
Center,
and
one
more
announcement.
A
B
B
D
A
A
Tuesday
January
29th,
starting
at
five-thirty
p.m.
at
the
city's
recreation
center
and
at
approximately
7
p.m.
the
committee
will
host
a
very
uplifting
presentation
by
a
cancer
survivor.
Now,
therefore,
I
Jimmy
Wang,
mayor
of
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
do
hereby
proclaim
Tuesday
January,
29
2013
as
relay
for
life
san
bruno
kickoff
day.
I
further
urge
all
san
bruno
residents
to
recognize
and
participate
in
this
anti-cancer
campaign
event
and
I'll
asked
can
I
bear.
Would
you
present
this
for
me,
please?
Mr.
D
D
While
they
assemble
up
there,
I
just
want
to
say
every
every
single
community
suffers
from
cancer,
either
it's
directly
from
a
loved
one
or
friend,
or
they
know
someone
so
San
Bruno
for
the
last.
This
is
our
fourth
year
our
fourth
year,
and
it
is
really
it's
really
come
on
strong
and
I'm
so
proud
to
be
a
part
of
it.
B
Is
fantastic?
My
name
is
Diana.
Nation
has
Ken
mentioned,
and
I
am
an
employee
of
the
American
Cancer
Society
I
was
associated
with
the
committee
last
year
and
really
getting
it
off
the
ground
in
san
bruno,
and
this
really
means
a
lot
personally
and
professionally,
and
san
bruno
is
a
phenomenal
community
and
I
am
so
thankful
and
proud
to
be
working
with
all
of
you.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
making
this
a
huge
success.
B
B
A
Item
number
5
review
of
the
agenda.
If
there's
no
objection,
I
would
like
to
move
item
number
11,
the
annual
report
of
the
Personnel
Board
to
right
after
number
8
public
hearings,
any
other
changes
on
the
agenda,
all
right,
krupal
of
a
minutes
of
the
regular
city
council
meeting
of
january,
two
thousand
thirteen
any
are
structured,
Corrections
emissions,
seeing
them
they'll
extend
approved
as
submitted
consent,
calendar
all
items
are
considered
routine
or
implemented
early
accounts
of
action
and
may
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
A
A
A
E
You
the
wording
and
the
discussion
is
a
little
confusing
and
I'm
asking
for
clarification
or
I'll
present
the
clarification
and
asked
to
be
voted
on
that
part.
It's
a
four
year
term,
if
you
are
a
member
of
the
City
Council
or
not,
and
the
way
this
is
worded,
it
says
if
I
do
not
run
or
get
reelected
in
2015,
then
I
would
be
off
of
this
committee,
but
in
essence
it's
a
four
year
term
and
it
doesn't
matter
if
you're,
only
Council
or
not
so
I
would
request
that
I
melissa's
the
pleasure.
F
A
F
Barreiro
we
can
take
hnin
seriously,
but
both
I
wanted
to
thank
and
acknowledge
the
two
individuals
that
served
on
these
committees
and
knowing
that
we
had
already
just
interviewed
and
gone
through
a
process.
I
was
hoping
that
we
could
maybe
quickly
move
forward
and
revisit
this
to
a
point
to
these
two
vacancies.
Sooner
than
later,
good.
A
F
D
A
H
H
People
and
the
city
were
hired
by
Miss
Jones,
and
she
has
that
wealth
of
information
and
that
value
to
the
to
the
Personnel
Board
to
my
left
is
mr.
Joe
Roberts
is
one
of
the
personal
board
for
what
it's
about
three
years
and
lacking
as
part
of
our
team.
Is
it
Commerford
who
cannot
make
it
this
evening
has
also
been
part
of
the
personal
board.
I
would
say
for
over
five
years.
H
Ours
are.
I
also
want
to
introduce,
of
course
you
know
tammy
tammy,
our
staff
liaison
and
provides
us
with
great
support,
answering
all
our
questions,
providing
us
with
concise
minutes
and
helping
us
through
a
lot
of
the
issues
that
we
that
we
tangle
with
that
that's
our
membership
this
year,
our
accomplishments,
included
and
continue
to
include
reviewing
the
city
job
descriptions.
H
As
you
know,
there
was
a
lot
of
reconfiguration
this
year,
a
lot
of
reorganizations
a
lot
of
mergers
of
services
with
different
cities,
so
provided
us
with
that
extra
flavor
and
that
extra
endeavor
that
we
had
to
overcome
understanding
how
everything
fits
together
and
we
made
it
through
so
far,
we've
done
last
year,
we
did
13
for
the
City
Council
I
many
of
y'all.
Many
of
those
have
come
to
you
for
final
approval.
H
In
addition
to
the
13
job
descriptions,
we
also
recommended
extensions
of
the
maintenance
worker
eligibility
list
for
the
public
services
department.
That's
the
only
one
has
come
through
for
2012.
This
is
a
function,
the
Personnel
Board
does
eligibility
list
are
usually
active
for
a
couple
years
after
the
recruitment,
and
we
review
every
every
single
one
if
in
fact
they
do
need
to
be
expanded
after
that
time
period.
And,
lastly,
our
city
and
attorney
gave
us
some
training
is
a
very
valuable
training,
a
very
eye-opening
training
on
conflicts
of
interest.
H
We
appreciate
that
and
appreciate
you
coming
to
our
board
and
giving
us
that
in-depth
knowledge
in
the
future.
We
will
continue
to
review
the
status
of
recruitment
eligibility
list
compliance
reports.
We
do
review
the
EEO
report
that
we
submit
once
every
two
years
to
ensure
we're
imbalance
with
the
with
the
demographics
of
our
varsity
will
continue
to
evaluate
effective
recruitment
processes.
H
If
there's
a
particular
recruitment
that
needs
a
review.
We
ask
a
staff
member
Tammy
to
present
us
how
and
what
process
was
used
to
fill
the
job.
On
occasion,
we
are
asked
to
prompter,
the
written
exams
and
evaluation
tests
for
some
of
the
candidates
that
do
come
through
and,
lastly,
we
will
continue
to
review
the
city's
job
descriptions
as
they
come
to
us
throughout
the
year
and
I
believe
that
that's
it
and
thank
you
very
much
for
keeping
us
active
and
alive
and
being
and
putting
us
in
position
to
be
able
to
serve
the
city.
H
A
Thank
you.
Any
questions
of
the
Personnel
Board
right
under
the
surface
of
this
whole
city
or
the
Commission's
boards
and
committees
which
actually
make
this
place
run
as
well
as
it
does,
and
so
we
can't
thank
you
enough.
It's
a
it's
a
lot
of
time,
especially
the
Personnel
Board,
sometimes
weekends,
and
it's
it's
a
lot
of
stuff,
a
lot
of
paperwork,
a
lot
of
reading
and
but
it's
very
very
important,
because
personnel
would
make
up
this
whole
city.
So
we
can't.
Thank
you
enough.
Thank
you
very
much
very.
H
A
Item
number
9
public
comment
and
items
not
on
the
agenda
is
the
council's
policy
reform
matters.
Raisin
is
formed
a
staff
for
investigation
interaction
where
appropriate.
The
Brown
Act
prohibits
the
council
from
discussing
Arachne
upon
any
matter,
not
agendized
pursuant
to
state
law.
But
anyone
like
to
address
the
council
on
under
public
all
right
move
right
under
on
to
conduct
of
business.
First
item
is
10a.
We
can
receive
an
oral
update
report
on
the
implementation
of
changes
to
the
schedule
for
street
sweeping.
I
Honorable
mayor
councilmembers
good
evening,
I
have
it
me
Gina,
Queen
the
service
manager
for
streets
in
order,
in
order
to
address
concern
raised
by
residents
in
the
November
Mearing,
you
directed
step
to
modify
the
street
sweeping
program
in
the
residential
area.
The
modification
will
be
implemented
in
February,
starting
on
the
fourth
of
februari
next
month
in
reduce
new
modified
schedule
in
the
residential
area.
The
city
to
sweeping
will
happen-
italy
at
least
one
hour
later,
but
not
before
nine
o'clock
a.m.
I
D
I
J
Thank
you
and
good
evening
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
this
evening,
the
city's
audited
financial
statements
for
the
fiscal
year
ending
june
30
2012
are
presented
for
your
recruit,
review
and
approval.
This
includes
the
consolidated
annual
financial
report,
the
audit
of
measure,
a
funds,
the
transportation
development
at
compliance,
as
well
as
a
single
audit
of
federal
awards.
K
The
main
report
that
you
see
over
here
is
the
comprehensive
annual
financial
report
with
an
opinion
on
the
financial
statements
included
within
the
comprehensive
annual
financial
report,
alongside
with
it
you're
going
to
see
a
measure
a
which
is
also
a
report
that
is
derived
from
the
financial
statements
as
well.
So
all
these
supplemental
reports
that
you
see
in
your
package
over
here
we're
all
derived
from
that
thick
big
report
that
you
see
in
here,
which
is
the
comprehensive
annual
financial
report.
K
K
Alongside
with
that
you'll
see
because
your
government,
we
are
required
to
look
at
the
internal
control,
we
are
required
to
report
to
you
whether
we
noted
any
deficiencies
in
internal
control
of
material,
non
compliance
with
the
laws
and
regulations
and
open
and
above
that,
there's
a
requirement,
because
the
city
is
a
recipient
of
the
Transportation
Development
Act.
It's
a
grant
that
you
receive
I
believe
from
them
MTC
they
are
required
us
to
go
in
and
two
ought
to
do.
An
audit
on
that
particular
funding
source
that
the
city
received.
K
But
again,
the
main
report
that
you
see
is
that
this
big
report,
which
is
the
comprehensive
annual
financial
report
that
shows
the
financial
health
of
the
city,
it
shows
what
they
have
in
assets,
what
they
have
in
my
abilities-
and
these
are
the
same
financial
information
that
you
receive
from
the
city
and
prior
meetings.
What
we
do
is
we
go
back
in
and
we
make
sure
that
whatever
financial
information
that
is
included
in
the
general
ledger
or
included
in
these
financial
statements
that
has
been
previously
presented
to
you
are
fairly
stated
in
more
material
respect.
K
So
we
go
out.
We
confirm
the
balances
we
can
confirm
cash,
we
confirm
receivables,
we
vouch
all
these
account
balances
to
what
we
call
an
external
evidence.
Making
sure
that,
whatever
has
been
previously
presented
to
you
and
also
presented
to
you
in
this
report
is
fairly
stated
in
on
material
respect.
K
We
are
required
by
our
board
of
accountancy
to
issue
a
financial
opinion
or
an
audit
opinion,
and
it
ranges
from
a
clean
opinion
to
an
adverse
opinion
and
we
issued
a
clean
opinion
on
the
financial
statements
and
the
same
is
applicable
as
it
relates
to
these
supplemental
reports.
Again
they
are
derived
from
that
main
report.
K
Over
and
above
you
see
a
federal
compliance
audit
report,
I
don't
want
to
make
this
too
long,
but
again
they
have
very
strict
requirements
as
to
what
the
city
and
how
the
city
is
supposed
to
expand
those
funds.
You
know
this
requirements
are
related
to
davis-bacon,
Act
prepaying,
prevailing
wage
procurement
requirements
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
K
The
way
that
we
do
the
audit
again,
as
I
mentioned
before,
we
verify
the
account
balances
by
vouching
them
to
external
evidence,
because
you're
the
government
you're
subjected
to
what
we
call
government
auditing
standards.
We
are
required
to
look
at
the
internal
control
and
look
at
the
report
to
you
whether
we
noted
any
non-compliance
with
the
laws
and
regulations
and
with
the
fact
that
we
look
at
the
internal
control.
K
We
like
to
see
segregation
of
functions
in
duties
we
like
to
see
people
holding
the
assets
are
different
than
the
people
that
keeping
records
of
the
assets.
We
look
at
the
design
and
implementation
of
these
internal
controls.
Specifically,
we
look
at
your
cash
receipts.
We
look
at
your
cash
disbursements
and
we
look
at
your
HR
function.
We
look
at
your
accounts
payable
function.
K
We
look
at
your
payroll
function
and
we
like
to
see
those
functions
properly
segregated
and
the
internal
control
over
these
functions
properly
designed
and
implemented,
and
we
noted
no
deficiencies
or
findings
related
to
those
items.
The
silly
issues,
what
we
call
the
comprehensive
annual
financial
report,
which
is
one
step
ahead
of
a
basic
financial
statements
and
is
submitted
to
an
association
called
government
finance
officer
Association,
and
they
review
these
financial
statements
to
ensure
that
they
are
in
compliance
with
government
auditing.
K
We
are
because
your
government,
we
are
required
to
tell
you
whether
we
had
any
deficiencies
in
the
internal
control
and
we
noted
no
deficiencies
in
the
internal
control.
We
are
also
required
to
let
you
know
if
we
adjusted
the
financial
statements
from
what
they
have
been
initially
presented
to
you,
and
we
had
no
adjustments
to
the
financial
statements
and
we
encountered
no
difficulties
in
the
performance
of
the
audit.
In
fact,
management
has
been
one
step
forward
in
making
sure
that
we
get
all
the
financial
information
that
we
needed
from
them.
K
K
We
moved
all
the
cash
and
all
the
other
assets
related
to
those
redevelopment
agencies
from
the
city,
funds
and
the
city
created
another
trust
fund
on
the
financial
statements
that
had
our
accumulated
all
these
assets
that
are
to
be
either
liquidated
or
dispersed
back
to
the
County
of
San
Mateo,
significant
accounting,
pronounced
pronouncements
are
coming
out.
One
is
impacting
everybody
related
to
pension,
it's
it's
a
reporting
requirement
and
a
recording
requirement,
and
it's
not
a
funding
requirement.
You
are
a
participant
of
tension
with
CalPERS
and
CalPERS.
K
Has
this
gigantic
pension
liability
for
every
participant
in
it
and
they
calculate
this
pension
liability
and
amortize
it
over
a
30-year
period?
And
they
tell
you
what
your
contribution
requirements
every
single
year
based
on
the
amortization?
Now
the
new
accounting
standard
is
requiring
you
to
record
that
liability
on
the
financial
statements
and
that's
going
to
impact
you
sometime
in
2016
fiscal
year,
there's
a
similar
one
coming
out
related
to
health
benefits
and
or
what
they
call
other
post-employment
benefits.
It's
not
yet
a
standard,
so
it's
not
yet
required
to
be
implemented
in
any
given
year.
K
K
F
The
cherry
coke-
maybe
it's
to
you,
sir,
to
staff
but
I-
wanted
to
bring
up.
We
handed
within
the
report
of
the
OBE
OPEB.
We
have
a
I'm,
sorry
page,
73
74
is
when
I'm
looking
at
the
lord's
book
and
on
74
we
have
a
accrued
liability,
46
million,
where
I
know
it's
only
done
every
two
years
and
so
two
years
ago
was
at
41
million.
So
it's
a
five-million-dollar
increase.
F
K
F
Order,
it's
not
a
direct,
but
what
I
wonder
is
from
two
years
from
now,
when
it
sorry
revisited,
is
there
going
to
be
an
additional
five
million
dollar
increase
to
this?
So
this
grows,
and
so
it
is
a
liability
that
is
outstanding.
It
grows
continuously
and
I
know
it's
a
bigger
conversation
needs
to
have
in
regards
to
health
and
welfare,
but
I'm
wondering
in
your
travels.
Do
you
see
this
type
of
scenario
in
other
cities
and
it's
this
kind
of
amount
that
you
see
here?
Yes,.
K
And
again,
one
of
the
items
that
I
mentioned
is
an
exposure
draft
about
recording
other
post-employment
benefits,
alongside
with
pension
and
in
the
industry,
just
go
just
about
to
any
other
governmental
agency.
Everybody
is
talking
about
that
discount
rate,
because
this
is
the
future
liability,
and
that
number
that
you
see
on
the
financial
statements
is
today's
dollar
amount
or
the
june
30
2012
dollar
a
now
and
the
new
standards
that
are
coming
out
is
restricting
them
the
manner
that
you
estimate
that
discount
rate
in
order
for
you
to
calculate
that
amount.
K
So
we
see
that
fluctuating
quite
a
bit
and
what
we've
seen
in
the
past
two
or
three
years
is
everybody
was
thinking.
Hey
investments
have
been
making
about
7%
throughout
the
past
30
or
40
years.
But
if
you
look
at
the
past
four
or
five
years,
investment
rate
of
return
on
many
of
these
investments
have
gone
down
two
one:
two
and
three
percent.
K
These
are
estimates,
and
these
are
just
future
benefits
that
we're
going
to
be
paying
and
what
we're
doing
here
is
recording
the
estimated
present
value
of
those
future
benefits
with
the
new
gas
be
coming
out
with
the
new
standard
coming
out,
it's
even
restricting
these
investment
discount
rates
even
further
more
but
with
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
and
with
what
we've
noticed
as
to
what
the
actuarial
had
used
in
terms
of
discount
rates.
It's
probably
gonna
line
up,
most
probably
it
will
line
up
with
what
the
new
standards
is
saying.
K
So
the
city
is
using
a
conservative
discount
rate
for
those
liabilities.
The
reason
that
you
have
a
significant
revision
is
again
a
lot
of
these
actuaries
are
estimating
these
liabilities
the
same
or
maybe
it's
seven
percent
was
too
high.
77
think
it's
seven
and
three-quarters
right
now.
A
lot
of
them
are
going
back
and
revisiting
that
this
can
rate,
causing
that
liability
to
go
up.
Thank.
F
K
This
liability
right
now
the
40
million
dollars
over
what
is
it?
46
million
dollars
is
not
recorded
on
the
financial
statements
it's
disclosed,
so
you
went
to
the
right
page
as
to
where
its
disclosed,
but
what
we're
doing
is
we're
amortizing
that
liability
over
the
30-year
period
and
we're
finding
that
amortisation
every
single
year.
K
If
we
underfunded
that,
then
we
record
the
liability,
which
is
typically
not
the
case
now,
when
the
new
standard
comes
out,
we're
going
to
have
to
put
this
on
the
balance
sheet
of
the
city
of
San
Bruno,
but
that's
applicable
to
all
government
nationwide,
and
that's
what's
going
to
happen
with
a
new
standard
when
it
comes
out.
I
appreciate.
F
That
detail
and
I
think
that's
something
that
we
need
to
be
conscientious
and
concerned
about
this
coming
up
into
15
costs
for
health
and
welfare,
for
both
current
and
retired
employees
has
a
lot
of
variables
because
of
the
unique
situation
we're
in
and
I
think
that's
something
we
need
to
keep
our
eye
on
as
this
gets
closer.
Mr..
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
A
J
You
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
assembly,
bill
1600,
regulates
how
public
agencies
may
collect,
maintain
and
spend
impact
fees
imposed
on
developers
for
the
purpose
of
differing
costs
of
public
facilities.
The
report
that
is
before
you
for
consideration
this
evening
complies
with
the
AV
1600
requirements
by
fulfilling
the
accounting
and
reporting
requirements
and
making
findings
for
any
fees
that
are
unspent
after
five
years.
This
report
provided
includes
five
fees,
water
and
sewer
capacity
charges
are
the
first
two
fees.
J
These
are
charges
that
are
collected
on
new
connections
to
the
water
and
sewer
system,
water,
meter
upgrades
as
well
as
new
connections
to
the
system.
These
costs
cover
the
costs
associated
with
increasing
the
system's
capacity
to
meet
this
increased
demand.
In
addition,
the
third
fee
is
a
traffic
and
development
impact
fee.
We
do
not
have
a
general
traffic
and
development
impact
fee,
but
rather
this
was
a
fee
that
was
specifically
negotiated
with
the
developer
related
to
the
improvements
on
el
camino,
real
and
smith
during
the
tanforan
remodel
the
amount
at
jun,
30
2012
is
zero.
J
The
next
to
fees
are
the
parking
Luffy's
and
the
below
market
rate,
housing
fees
which
are
actually
exempt
from
the
a
B
1600
reporting
requirements.
However,
we've
included
them
in
this
report
just
for
informational
purposes,
exhibit
a
to.
The
report,
provides
the
revenues,
expenses
and
fund
balance
for
the
five
fees
and
demonstrates
that
the
three
impact
fees
that
our
subjects
a
be
1600
have
all
utilized.
The
funds
received
in
fiscal
year,
two
thousand
seven
and
eight
meeting
that
five
year
reporting
requirement
and
therefore
have
no
five
you're
reporting
at
this
time.
D
A
A
I
Always
was
the
expectation
of
the
city
to
incorporate
on
the
east
side
in
this
project,
a
gateway
to
mark
the
entrance
in
our
community
to
in
our
downtown
when
the
construction
for
the
project
started,
the
city
entered
in
agreement
with
JPB
to
jointly
develop
a
design
concept
for
this
gateway
on
the
east
side
of
the
project,
the
design
concept
was
developed
and
presented
to
you
and
you
are
proved
in
November.
The
concept
design
for
the
archway,
with
some
with
some
expectation
to
have
some
follow-up
changes.
I
I
I
Recommendation
is
to
fund
this
project
project
using
457
thousand
dollar
from
one
time
property
tax
fund
it
received
as
the
result
of
the
redistribution
of
the
former
redevelopment,
a
cash
balance
font
and
to
use
for
the
remaining
of
147,000
general
fund
reserve,
or
have
you
wish
to
use?
Also
the
city's
arts
or
font,
which
has
a
existing
balance
of
120,000
mark
Simon,
would
like
to
make
a
few
comments
and
both
of
us
will
stand
for
any
question
you
might
have.
L
Mr.
mayor
members
of
the
council,
on
behalf
of
the
caltrain
staff
I'd
like
to
join
the
city
staff
in
asking
you
consider
approving
this
proposal,
it
is
the
result
of
extensive
amount
of
work,
as
the
two
members
of
the
subcommittee
and
the
council
itself
all
know
worked
very
hard
to
arrive
at
the
best
estimate
we
can
I
should
emphasize.
It
is
an
estimate
we
do
acknowledge
the
council
last
that
the
WB
revisited
as
some
other
sort
of
architectural
feature
and
I
can
promise
you.
L
That
will
be
the
case
that
will
direct
the
final
design
to
be
something
other
than
the
Big
W.
The
other
question
to
ask
is
whether
or
not
you
still
want
colored
glass
in
the
elevator,
but
those
details
aside.
This
is
a
very
carefully
negotiated
end
result
and
we
hope
that
the
council
will
improve
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Good.
A
A
E
I'd,
like
the
discussion
about,
should
the
money
come
from,
the
general
fund
reserve
or
the
city
or
fund
and
I
am
putting
my
two
cents
worth
in
to
not
use
the
city.
Art
fund,
the
city,
that
my
mind
is
which
the
culture
and
arts
commission
was
not
privy
to
any
of
this
planning,
and
they
already
have
plans
for
this
money.
It's
their
budgeted
and
I
think
it
would
be
unfair
and
to
take
away
their
money
without
any
consultation
through.
F
Come
through
us
for
final
approval,
but
they
they
certainly
give
us
good
recommendations.
They
weren't
privy
to
this
and
weren't
involved
in
this
discussion
or
dialogue
and
I.
Think
that
that's
in
that
aspect
that
doesn't
seem
fair.
They
should
have
been
born
on
board
in
the
beginning,
but
but
again
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
cool.
It
clarify
that
one
point
at
this
moment:
okay,.
G
My
comments
it
gets
her
along
the
funding
as
well.
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
public
support
and
really
strong
support
on
the
council
for
this
project
and
I
know
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
iterations
on
this
to
even
appease
those
of
us
that
were
unhappy
with
the
original
design.
But
it
is
a
large
amount
of
money
and
whether
it's
one
time
pockets
of
money
that
we're
targeting
for
funding
this
or
just
general
fund
funds
in
general.
G
But
I
do
like
the
idea
of
looking
at
funds
that
wouldn't
necessarily
be
available
for
other
projects,
and
if
we
talk
about
you
know
the
the
excess
money,
that's
in
the
general
fund
that
money
could
go
to
pay
a
street
or
to
accelerate
a
sewer
project
or
do
some
abatement
work
along
that
that
same
streak.
That
would
help
to
beautify
and
better
represent
the
city,
so
I
mean
I.
Think
I
have
a
little
bit
of
problem
with
the
funding.
G
It
is
a
lot
of
money,
I
think
when
we
initially
talked
about
this,
the
figure
was
a
lot
smaller
we're
definitely
getting
a
quality
quality
project,
but
at
the
same
time
I
don't
think
anyone
anticipated
that
it
would
cost.
But
what
it's,
what
it's
going
to
cost
I
you
know
I,
acknowledge
that
the
JPB
was
very
generous
and
accepting
half
of
the
cost
and
a
lot
of
people
have
been
making
concessions
along
the
way,
but
remains
to
be
a
very
large
amount
of
money
and
I'm
wondering.
G
Maybe
we
can
go
back
and
look
at
other
other
sources
back
when
the
lions
field
project
came
up,
I
mean
that
was
another
very
large
dollar
item
and
we
were
able
to
use
the
park
and
LU
funds
there,
and
in
that
case,
that
money
had
to
be
used
for
something
Park
related
couldn't
do
anything
else
with
it.
So
I
was
a
lot
more
comfortable
with
dedicating
that
large
amount
of
money
to
that
project.
G
D
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
I
can
appreciate
the
concerns.
The
funding
of
clara
started,
her
presentation,
saying
that
this
project
was
ten
years
old
and
mayor,
and
I
have
overseen
this
project
from
conversation
to
now,
renderings
and
in
a
past
halfway
construction
of
a
great
separation
with,
with
the
first
and
foremost
priority
of
safe
safety
in
our
community.
D
This
is
just
icing,
and
yes,
I
know
that
the
city
has
spent
some
money.
The
community
has
spent
some
money
in
over
these
ten
years,
but
I
have
to
say
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
This
is
by
far
the
largest
expenditure
for
this
project.
For
this
multi-million
dollar
project
that
caltrain
and
jpv
is
is
bringing
bringing
to
our
community.
D
This
is
probably
a
once-in-a-lifetime
deal.
This
is
something
that
we
have
corrected
a,
I
would
say,
a
flaw
in
our
community
as
far
as
circulation
and
transportation,
trains
and
pedestrians
and
cars
don't
mix,
and
it
took
us
nearly
a
hundred
years
to
you
know
to
figure
that
out
so
I
I
feel
that
the
the
funding
is
is
is
appropriate,
I
feel
we
have
the
money
for
this.
D
I
think
it's
never
going
to
be
that
type
of
expenditure
that,
if
we
didn't
have
the
cooperation
of
the
JPB
would
have
been
million
dollars
more
I
think
we
are
getting
a
lot
for
the
six
hundred
thousand
dollars.
I
think
this
community
deserves
this
after
10
years
or
more
of
designing
it
and
and
being
a
part
of
it
and
I
do
agree
that
we
could
find
a
you
know
the
right
appropriate
funds,
reserved
reserve
funds
or
whatever
appropriate
funds,
to
find
find
the
balance,
but
I
think
we
need
to
move.
B
Robert
Rico,
seventh
Avenue
I'm
concerned
a
little
bit
about
taking
general
fund
money,
but
looking
up
the
bigger
picture
or
outside
the
box,
or
whatever
downstream
the
the
agency
that
we
have
set
up
to
replace
redevelopment
to
utilize.
The
ad
the
PG&E
money
pge,
the
millions
of
dollars
were
to
serve
support
all
of
the
people
of
San
Bruno,
and
one
would
think
that
possibly
a
small
portion
of
that
could
could
be
appropriated
as
a
backfill
for,
if
you
temporarily,
borrow
from
from
one
fund
or
whatever.
B
F
The
chair,
yeah,
the
cost,
is
a
concern
to
me
how
we
pay
for
it
is
of
concern.
I
have
no
problem
with
the
first
suggestion
when
we
come
into
the
general
reserve
funds.
Those
those
to
concern
me
I,
understand
councilmember
salazars
comments.
This
weekend,
I
walked
in
the
avenues
on
the
east
side.
The
west
side
of
the
tracks
walked
up
to
the
arch
where
it
would
be
drove
the
car
tonight
coming
to
the
meeting
and
was
trying
to
understand.
Visualize
I
have
concerns
too,
because
I
look
at
that
kind
of
investment.
F
Looking
at
the
roads,
I'm
looking
at
the
500
block
of
4th
Avenue
that
this
poor
gentleman
has
been
emailing
and
asking
us
for
years
to
pave
it
there's
other
areas
I
can
point
out,
and
yes,
I
was
over
on
Susan
drive
and
and
so
they're
everywhere
that
I
wonder
if
these
monies
could
be
used
to
help
other
areas
in
our
community.
But
then
there's
another
side
of
me.
That
also
sees
this
as
a
one-time
opportunity.
F
A
matching
contributor
at
this
time,
which
honestly
I,
don't
know
that
if
we
pass
this
up,
will
it
be
around
as
we
go
down
this
path
again.
If
we
revisited
in
a
few
years
from
now,
I
also
know
that
that
area
that
community
those
neighborhoods
through
the
bart
construction
through
the
great
separation
have
dealt
with
a
lot,
and
we
are
also
supposed
to
be
leading
by
example,
as
we
did
with
the
dirt
lot
of
Wells
Fargo,
that
used
to
be
chain-link
fence
and
I
was
always
saying.
F
We've
got
a
lead
by
example:
we've
got
to
clean
up
our
area
in
order
to
ask
others
to
do
the
same
and
invest
in
the
community.
We
call
home.
This
is
an
area
that
do
we
want
it
just
to
be
like
in
San
Carlos,
where
it's
just
an
overpass,
or
do
we
want
to
have
some
signature
on
it
in
hopes
that
that
helps
evolve,
other
type
of
things.
F
So
when
you
drive
past
the
arch
that
maybe
there
aren't
vacant
properties
that
may
be,
there
are
people
that
want
to
invest
and
see
the
opportunity
for
the
future.
So
I'd
like
to
see
what
we
can
do
about
the
funding,
but
I
also
do
believe
that
this
may
be
the
only
opportunity
to
take
this
opportunity
for
us
and
to
have
something
there
for
the
future
and,
honestly,
those
folks
down
there.
A
Thank
you,
Oh
mr.
I
Berra
said
started.
You
know
good
ten
years
ago,
it
started
longer
than
that.
Well
farther
back
than
that
when,
when
Shane
Bree
are
actually
solicited
the
gentleman
mr.
Howard
good
and
said
by
the
way
we
want
to
get
on
board
with
you
to
make
this
town
a
lot
safer,
because
we
for
some
reason
had
some
some
grief
with
with
caltrain
over
the
years
and
that
started
the
process.
A
This
great
separation,
along
with
the
arch,
is
making
a
statement
that
this
is
an
anchor
for
our
downtown.
This
is
an
anchor
for
a
large
portion
of
a
city
that,
in
fact,
with
our
our
new
planning
process
or
new
plan
and
all
of
the
stuff
that
we're
planning
on
from
El
Camino
to
San
Mateo
avenue
to
theatres
to
all
different
kinds
of
things.
A
This
will
be
an
anchor
and
it
will
be
an
anchor
shortly,
not
one
that's
a
pipe
dream
on
a
piece
of
paper,
but
some
people
can
go
up
and
touch
and
feel
I
do
agree
that
sure
we
can
always
spend
the
money
on
something
else.
I
mean
there's
a
there's,
a
huge
bucket
of
things
that
need
to
be
done
in
this
city
and
we'll
never
have
enough
money
to
do
it
all.
A
But
I
think
we
have
to
prioritize
some
of
these
things
and
say,
since
we
do
have
the
money
to
take
care
of
it
and
I
am
in
favor
of
taking
it
from
other
other
sources
of
sources
other
than
the
culture
and
arts,
because
they
worked
too
hard
for
that
and
that
that
money
should
should
go
for
maybe
some
more
specific
projects
that
they
designate
and
we
approve
but
I'm
all
for
it.
I
know
it's
like
I
said
it's
tough,
you
can.
A
You
can
spend
six
hundred
thousand
bucks
in
a
wink
in
the
city
without
even
thinking
about
it
and
not
see
the
results
but
I
think
with
this
money
here
and
the
approval
of
this
arch
we're
going
to
see
the
results,
we're
going
to
see
them
very
shortly
and
boy
I
sure
look
forward
to
us,
cutting
that
ribbon
under
that
arch
pretty
soon
so
I
think
you
know
I
feel
about
it.
Anyone
else
they're
asking
for
a
resolution
or.
G
M
Mayor
Simon
I,
drew
I
would
like
to
just
call
to
the
council's
attention
that
there
will
need
to
be
a
small
correction
to
the
resolution
that
you
have
just
adopted
to
clarify
that
there
will
be
no
use
of
the
culture
and
arts
funds
which
I
understand
to
be
the
direction
of
the
City
Council.
Based
on
your
discussion
tonight.
Okay,.
A
M
To
clarify
and
add
to
just
add
a
quick
comment
to
your
comments
that
the
council
mate:
there
are
no
restricted
funds
that
are
otherwise
available
to
the
city
and
the
reason
that
staff
proposed
the
funding
source
that
we
did
is
we
thought
it
was
the
best
available
match
of
one-time
funds
that
are
not
otherwise
designated,
so
that
is,
we
will
clarify
the
resolution
as
to
your
action
and
utilize.
The
revenues
as
outlined
in
the
staff
report
understood.
F
M
L
As
I
walked
by
Robert
Reich
illicit
tomorrow,
we're
actually
prepared
to
begin
building
the
foundation
for
this
almost
immediately
because
it
is
on
a
critical
path
for
the
construction
of
the
whole
grade
separation
that
it's
right
outside
with
the
area
where
the
footings
will
be
there's
some
underground
work.
We're
actually
prepared
to
begin
literally
tomorrow.
L
What
you'll
see
is
probably
going
to
be
a
few
months
away.
We
still
have
to
give
final
design
beyond
the
concept
we
have
to
get
some
real
construction
costs.
I
mean
this
is
an
estimate
that
we
had,
but
we
can
certainly
report
back.
We'll
continue,
of
course,
to
work
very
closely
with
the
city
staff
to
report
all
along
the
way,
not
only
if
their
insistence,
but
also
out
of
our
desire,
so
we'll
come
back
and
report
on
the
progress
that
we're
making
okay
great.
L
M
Mr.
mayor
I
wanted
to
just
check
in
with
the
council
mr.
dean
peterson,
the
director
of
County
Environmental
Health
Services,
is
attending
other
meetings
tonight
on
this
topic,
but
was
intending
to
be
here,
however
late
mr.
Wyman
Wong
from
that
same
department
is
here,
but
I
wanted
to
give
you
the
choice
of
either
switching
that
the
order
of
the
last
two
items
on
your
agenda
tonight,
giving
mr.
Peterson
the
opportunity
to
arrive
for
pet.
Your
option
simply
perceiving
I.
J
Honorable
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council,
the
proposed
reserve
policy
is
before
you
this
evening
in
response
to
previous
discussions
that
occurred
during
the
development
of
the
2012-13
budget,
in
which
we
begin
discussions
on
the
creation
of
a
reserve
policy.
I
would
like
to
be
clear
that,
from
the
start,
that
this
is
what
I'm
viewing
as
a
starting
point
for
the
creation
of
a
reserve
policy
I'm
viewing
this
as
a
step-by-step
process
and
tonight.
J
What
I'd
like
to
do
is
walk
through
the
proposed
policy
and
hear
your
thoughts
and
receive
some
direction
on
this
policy.
Adoption
of
the
resolution
this
evening
is
not
necessary.
We
can
come
back
at
a
later
date
if
the
Council
of
desires
or
we
can
move
forward
tonight
with
a
first
step,
knowing
that
we
will
come
back
and
continue
to
add
and
revise
this
policy
over
time
as
we
collect
more
information.
J
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
start
by
going
into
you.
What
are
the
current
reserve
funds
that
we
have?
Just
because
we
don't
have
a
reserve
policy,
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
we
don't
have
reserve
funds
at
this
point
in
time
we
have
what
choose
separate
funds
that
are
undesignated
general
fund
reserve
funds,
those
are
the
general
fund
reserve
and
the
one-time
revenue
reserve.
Both
of
these
funds
have
been
funded
over
time
as
a
result
of
one-time
monies
we've
received,
as
well
as
any
type
of
budget
surplus
that
might
have
occurred
in
years.
J
Past
would
also
be
absorbed
into
a
general
fund
reserve,
and
so
these
neither
of
the
two
funds
have
a
dedicated
ongoing
funding
source.
They
have
been
funded
over
time
through
one-time
monies.
The
second
to
the
latter,
two
items
the
self-insurance
fund
and
the
equipment
reserve
fund
are
both
reserved
internal
reservist
reserve
funds
that
are
currently
funded
through
the
operating
budget.
Each
year
we
look
at
what
the
need
is
in
each
of
those
departments
and
we
fund
based
on
allocation
from
departments.
So
those
are
reserve
funds
that
are
in
place.
J
The
polo's
proposed
policy
that
is
before
you
this
evening
does
not
include
a
discussion
on
the
self-insurance
fund
or
the
equipment
reserve
fund
only
because
those
funds
are
currently
established.
They
currently
have
a
funding
source
and
what
we'd
like
to
do
is
do
further
research
and
get
more
information
before
we
come
back
and
have
another
discussion
on
what
the
appropriate
fund
balance
levels
might
be
of
those
funds.
J
So
to
start,
why
do
we
have
a
reserve
policy?
What's
the
point
of
establishing
one?
It's
really
a
financial
management
best
practice.
It
allows
an
agency
to
be
prepared
to
deal
with
uncertainty
and
the
unexpected
financial
reserves
demonstrate
the
financial
stability
in
strength
of
an
organization.
They
allow
an
agency
to
maintain
good
standing
with
credit
rating
agencies,
and
we
actually
saw
this
firsthand
recently
in
early
December.
J
We
had
a
cui
did
a
credit
rating
presentation
for
the
issuance
of
the
pension
obligation,
bonds
with
Standard
&
Poor's,
and
one
thing
that
we
discussed
quite
a
bit
and
that
they
looked
at
where
our
current
reserve
balances
they
wanted.
Those
assurances
that
the
city
could
deal
with
an
unexpected
event,
so
strengthened
financial
reserves.
I
feel
was
a
major
factor
in
us
being
able
to
secure
it
double
A
rating.
J
General
fund
reserves
are
typically
set
up,
as
they're
typically
established
as
a
percentage
of
overall
general
fund
expenditures
that
what's
that
was
what
you
will
see
in
most
agencies.
The
geophone
recommends
that
an
agency
have
a
minimum
of
two
months.
Sixteen
point:
six
percent
of
general
fund
reserves
a
set
aside.
That
said,
it
can
range
from
anywhere
from
that
fifteen
percent
level
to
as
high
as
forty
fifty
percent
and
above
so.
What
do
you
look
at
and
beginning
to
determine?
What
is
the
appropriate
level?
You
would
first
start
by
looking
at
the
risk
factors.
J
The
risk
of
disaster
is
the
first
item
that
I'd
like
to
discuss
and
the
city
of
San
Bruno
sits
on
the
San
Andreas
Fault,
and
therefore
the
risk
of
earthquake
is
fairly
significant,
so,
as
we
have
learned
through
the
one
of
the
takeaways
as
from
what
occurred
with
the
glenview
pipeline
disaster,
is
the
financial
repercussions
in
the
financial
implications
of
a
disaster
are
significant.
Just
a
the
mutual
aid
costs.
J
To
begin
with,
for
those
first
few
weeks
in
response
to
the
glenview
fire
were
in,
excess
is
six
million
dollars
in
a
situation
in
which
there
isn't
a
hundred
percent
recovery
reimbursement,
the
city,
the
agency,
could
be
liable
for
up
to
twenty
five
percent
of
those
costs,
so
those
are
some
things
to
keep
in
mind.
The
next
item
to
think
about
is
revenue
volatility.
J
San
Bruno
is
fortunate
to
have
a
stable
and
diverse
revenue
base.
We
don't
recurrently,
have
our
highest
single
revenue
source
the
sales
tax
at
just
about
twenty
percent,
so
we
are
well
diversified.
However,
that
said
any
major
retailer
leaving
the
city
would
have
a
major
impact
on
the
budget,
so
nobody's
immune
from
revenue
volatility.
However,
we
do
have
a
somewhat
stable
base,
so
it's
something
to
keep
in
mind.
J
The
next
item
is
to
evaluate
the
potential
for
loss.
What
is
the
potential
for
current
liability
claims
outstanding,
and
is
there
any
potential
liability
for
us
and
not
recovered
for
those
situations?
The
self-insurance
fund
that
I
mentioned
earlier
currently
has
a
balance
of
2.1
million
dollars.
That's
cash
balance
of
2.1
million
dollars
and
that
amount
is
actually
sufficient
to
cover
the
calculated
liability
of
our
claims
at
this
point
in
time.
So
well,
we
can't
say
that
it
is
the
right
level
with
certainty.
J
Additional
considerations
include
the
size
of
the
city.
You
tend
to
see
smaller
cities
having
larger
reserves
because
they
may
be
more
dependent
on
just
one
or
two
revenue
streams,
budget
practices.
If
a
city
is
if
the
city's
approach
to
budgeting
is
to
include
contingencies
or
a
lot
of
one-time
monies
makes
them
susceptible
to
economic
changes.
However,
the
city's
approach
has
been
a
very
conservative
approach
to
budgeting
and
finally,
looking
at
debt
levels,
we
have
a
very
very
low
debt
levels.
J
J
Beyond
determining
the
reserve
level,
some
thought
needs
to
be
given
to
the
guidelines
for
the
use
of
reserve
funds.
Typically,
you
want
to
find
the
appropriate
balance
between
language
that
provides
flexibility
for
those
anticipated
situations,
but
also
ensures
that
the
reserves
will
be
there
during
the
times
they
are
intended
for
what
we
attempted
to
do
with
this
policy
is
addressed
this
by
establishing
two
separate
general
fund
reserve
funds.
J
The
guidelines
for
the
use
of
the
general
fund
reserve
in
the
proposed
policy
would
be
in
situations
in
which
there
is
a
decrease
in
revenues
in
excess
of
five
percent
of
total
expenditures,
or
excuse
me
in
total
revenues
in
one
year
now,
keep
in
mind.
Five
percent
equates
to
1.5
million
dollars,
so
that
is
a
very
significant
amount,
and
so
that
said
something
to
keep
in
mind
of
whether
or
not
that's
a
reasonable
number
or
if
something
smaller
or
larger
may
be
more
comfort.
J
The
next
would
be
in
a
situation
in
which
there's
a
loss
of
revenues
from
another
government
entity,
and
the
first
thing
that
comes
to
mind
here
is
another
region
similar
to
redevelopment
in
which
we
have
a
devastating
loss
of
revenue
to
the
city.
This
policy
would
allow
the
general
fund
reserve
to
be
utilized
in
those
types
of
situations.
J
Finally,
as
it
also
allows
the
flexibility
to
utilize
the
general
fund
reserve
for
one-time
non-recurring
initiatives
of
the
city
council
that
are
important,
so
it
allows
that
flexibility
to
fund
one-time
projects
that
may
have
no
other
funding
source
second
fund
that
we
are
proposing
to
be
established
would
be.
It
was
called
a
general
fund,
contingency
reserve,
and
this
would
have
a
goal
of
maintaining
a
target
from
balance
of
1.5
million
dollars.
And
this
what
this
one
would
have
no
restrictions
on
its
use.
J
J
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
perspective
of
what
some
of
the
general
fund
reserve
policies.
The
ranges
are
in
other
cities
in
San,
Mateo
County,
and
you
can
see
they
very
pretty
widely
bellmount
at
twenty
percent
brisbane
at
six
million
dollars,
although
I
don't
have
a
percentage
of
their
budget
there,
but
they
are
smaller
agency
and
I
would
expect
them
to
have
a
far
higher
percentage
of
their
expenditures
reserved
for
men.
J
J
So,
moving
on
from
the
discussion
on
the
general
fund
reserve
funds,
the
proposed
policy
includes
some
discussion
on
the
development
of
additional
reserve
funds.
The
first
of
those
would
be
the
creation
of
an
emergency
disaster
reserve
fund
with
a
goal:
initial
goal
of
3
million
dollars,
funding,
target
balance,
and
this
fund
would
be
reserved
only
for
those
situations
in
which
a
declaration
of
emergency
were
declared,
and
then
those
funds
would
be
the
go-to
source
of
funds
for
that
situation.
The
capital
next
one
would
be
the
establishment
of
a
capital
improvement,
one-time
initiative
fund.
J
We
currently
do
not
have
a
dedicated
funding,
source
or
fund
for
general
capital
improvement
projects
similar
to
the
archway.
Earlier
we
have
any
types
of
improvements
to
city
facilities,
whether
they
be
maintenance,
painting
projects
so
on
also
any
type
of
capital.
Improvements
to
city
parks
currently
have
no
dedicated
funding
source,
and
so,
as
a
first
step
towards
addressing
those
needs.
The
policy
recommends
establishing
a
capital
improvement,
one-time
initiatives
fund
with
a
target
balance
of
five
million
dollars
beyond
those
two
funds.
J
It
also
addresses
of
the
policy
to
have
a
25-percent
reserve
in
our
internal
service
operating
funds,
and
that
includes
the
central
garage
building,
a
facilities
fund
and
Technology,
and
why
these
funds
are
included
this
evening
is
really
because
these
are
also
critical
departments
that
need
to
be
able
to
continue
operating
in
an
emergency
situation.
So
therefore,
it
would
be
appropriate
to
have
twenty-five
percent
minimum
twenty
five
percent
Reserve
balance
in
those
funds.
J
Until
we've
met
those
obligations
as
target
gold
balances
in
those
funds,
but
the
language
is
flexible
in
that
it's
unbudgeted
fun.
So
this
isn't
to
say
that
the
establishment
of
a
reserve
policy
would
limit
the
City
Council's
ability
to
utilize
certain
one-time
revenues
to
balance
the
budget
if
appropriate.
It
is
simply
going
beyond
that.
If
it's
not
included
in
the
budget,
the
thought
would
be
to
put
it
in
one
of
the
reserve
funds.
J
So
that
all
said,
I
wanted
to
summarize
what
it
would
look
like
if
the
proposed
policy
that
is
before
you
this
evening
were
to
be
implemented.
So
where
we
would
end
up,
is
with
a
general
fund
reserve
at
twenty
percent
of
general
fund
expenditures
or
6.5
million
dollars,
we
would
have
a
general
fund
contingency
fund
of
1.5
million
dollars.
We
would
have
an
emergency
disaster
reserve
fund
of
3
million
dollars.
J
Although
I
would
just
bring
to
your
attention
of
that
6.3
million
dollars,
2.9
million
of
that
is
in
the
form
of
a
receivable
from
the
former
redevelopment
agency.
You
might
recall
that
the
loan
that
was
made
from
the
city
to
the
redevelopment
agency
to
fund
the
initial
startup
costs
many
years
ago
was
from
the
equipment
reserve
fund,
and
so
the
outstanding
amount
of
2.9
million
is
from
the
equipment
reserve
fund.
We
do
believe
that
money
will
be
repaid
over
time.
J
However,
one
caveat
to
that
is:
twenty
percent
of
it
will
have
to
go
towards
low
and
moderate
income
housing
initiatives
per
the
legislation,
so
we
will
not
see
the
entire
2.9
back
in
there,
but
that's
for
another
discussion,
so
that
just
summarizes
where
we
would
be
at
the
end
of
the
day
with
this
policy.
So
with
that
I'd
like
to
hand
it
over
for
discussion
and
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
any.
D
J
I
I
mean
I
I
would
say
that
the
fund
at
this
point
in
time,
I,
was
uncomfortable
and
I
think
it's
sufficient
for
now
to
at
the
balance,
because
it
is
sufficient
to
cover
what
is
our
calculated
liability.
However,
it
would
make
sense
in
wood
for
us
to
look
at
that
further
and
see
if
that
reserve
is
sufficient,
if
we
need
to
consider
reserving
for
any
additional
potential
losses,
and
that
would
be
the
plan
would
be
to
come
back
and
discuss
that
further
in
addition
to
the
equipment
replacement
fund
at
some
point
in
time,.
B
G
Now
I've
seen
this
a
few
times,
but
yeah
I
did
have
one
question
about
the
building
and
facility
reserve
fund.
The
buildings
and
facilities
that
are
addressed
in
that
fund
are
what
we
would
consider.
General
fund
facilities,
not
Enterprise
facilities
and
the
enterprise
facilities
would
be
funded
by
an
Enterprise
Fund.
Is
that
correct?
Well,.
J
The
building
and
facilities
fund,
it
does
include
an
allocation
from
some
of
the
enterprise
funds
and
what
this
building
and
facilities
reserve
fund
I
want
to
be
clear
that
this.
This
is
really
the
operating
fund
for
the
ongoing
maintenance
of
city
facilities.
It
is
not
a
replacement.
It
isn't
currently
set
up
to
be
a
serve
as
a
replacement
fun
for
the
facilities,
but
rather
to
ensure
that
they
can
be
maintained
on
an
ongoing
basis,
and
so
because
it's
an
operating
department
and
it
does
serve
all
the
enterprise
funds
as
well.
G
D
Yeah
so,
for
example-
and
this
is
I
mean
I-
think
it's
a
lot
clearer
if
you
give
an
example
of
what
we
would
use
it
for,
if
we
didn't
have
funding
to
paint
City
Hall,
would
that
would
would
that
be
the
first
reserve
fund?
And
if
we
had
the
building
of
facilities
reserve
fun?
Would
that
be
the
first
one
we
may
consider
so.
J
The
building
and
facilities
fun
does
not
have
any
restrictions
on
it
at
this
time,
it's
funded
through
an
internal
allocation
from
all
the
user
departments,
so
that
includes
not
only
general
fund
departments,
but
it
includes
the
enterprise
fund
departments,
but
the
money
that
is
sitting
in
the
building
facilities
fund
can
be
utilized
for
projects
such
as
the
painting
projects.
There's
no
restrictions
on
those
funds.
M
Let
me
see
if
I
could
address
what
it
might
be
a
little
bit
of
confusion
here.
The
building
and
facilities
fund
is
an
operating
fund
and
it
is
the
allocations
from
the
various
departments,
including
the
enterprise
funds,
are
made
in
an
amount
which
is
intended
to
cover
basic
operating
costs,
and
that
would
include
pretty
minor
types
of
normal
repair
and
maintenance
of
those
buildings.
M
It
would
not,
for
example,
include
what
might
be
considered
a
more
major
type
of
repair
or
maintenance
projects
such
as
a
roof
replacement
such
as
exterior
building,
painting
of
say,
City
Hall,
one
of
our
larger
buildings.
Nothing
of
a
significant
dollar
amount
is
intended
to
be
funded
through
the
building
facilities,
operating
fund.
So
I
think
to
answer
your
question.
Council,
member
Salazar
or
precisely
a
major.
M
You
know
some
of
the
more
significant
dollar
value,
a
capital,
repair
maintenance
or
replacement
cost
for
a
general
fund,
a
non
Enterprise
facility,
City
Hall,
the
rec
center
parcs.
Those
types
of
things
would
not
be,
has
no
dedicated
funding
source,
and
would
it
would
be
the
general
intent
of
this
policy
to
fund
or
to
have
funds
limited
amount
of
funds
available
through
the
capital
reserve
in
order
to
be
able
to
at
least
have
some
money
available
to
go
to
for
those
types
of
issues.
I
hope
that
helps.
G
Yeah,
it
definitely
helps
in
the
amount
Justine.
It
seemed
that
it
seemed
low
to
me
and
even
if
it
only
covers
minor
things,
I
think
as
the
plant
ages
I'm
sure
that
the
yearly
expenses
of
keeping
things
running
it's
actually
going
to
increase
I,
would
imagine
just
because
you
have
to
fix
more
things.
Things
start
falling
apart,
you're.
M
Talking
about
the
building
of
facilities
fender
so,
for
example,
if
there's
a
repair
needed
to
a
sink
or
a
a
you
know,
a
tile
comes
off
of
the
wall
in
the
restroom
it
those
types
of
really
pretty
simple
and
inexpensive
repairs
are
generally
captured
in
day-to-day
activities
funded
by
the
building
in
facilities
reserve
or
the
building
facilities.
Fun.
M
Where
the
city's
main,
I
would
say,
exposure
to
cost.
It
really
comes
at
those
bigger
ticket
items
for
our
major
facility.
This
building,
for
example,
that
many
city
facilities
that
we
rely
on
on
an
everyday
basis
for
normal
activities
should
they
need,
and
they
we'll
need
at
some
point,
all
of
them
major
repairs
and
replacement.
G
F
To
chair,
this
is
one
thing
that
is
some
good
news
and
I
think
it's
a
policy
we
need
to
establish.
I
also
know
that
this
is
something
that
we
can
modify
and
change
over
time.
This
is
just
embarking
upon
some
foundations
of
groundwork.
I
would
you
know
I
know
when
I
came
in
it's
not
just
yesterday
anymore.
In
06,
you
know
we
had
maybe
about
five
little
under
five
point:
nine
million
in
reserves.
F
With
this,
it's
always
better
to
have
and
worried
about
having
too
much
they're,
not
having
enough
I
believe
that
we
should
bring
this
back
up
at
the
budget
study
session
to
review
those
documents.
We
see
where
we're
at
today
we're
at
then
where
we
should
be
going
forward,
so
we
can
review
it
and
I
know
you're
looking
at
it
forward
to
budget
it's
just
around
the
corner.
So
anyway,
those
are
my
thoughts,
good,
okay,.
D
Yeah
with
all
that
said,
I
I
think
it
I
agree.
It's
it's
it's
great
to
have
the
nest.
Egg
say
is
that
we
we
really
don't
know
you
know
the
status
of
a
lot
of
our
facilities.
We
don't
know
what
things
we
may
have
to
anticipate
I.
Think
that's
something
that
we
not
necessarily
nuts
and
bolts,
but
I.
Think
we
need
to
hear
from
you
know,
have
some
sort
of
updated
report
as
to
where
we
are
in
certain
things
and
I
was
speaking
to
the
manager
earlier
and
I
know.
D
D
Roofs,
roofs
are
always
deteriorating
and-
and
it's
not
cheap,
because
we
have
some
large
facilities
and
it's
just
the
sheer
volume
so
I
think.
If,
if
we
have
an
idea
of
where,
where
we
are
in
the
life
of
some
of
our
facilities,
then
we
can
sort
of
gauge
or
establish
our
priorities
on
something
like
a
capital
improvement.
You
know
one
time
fun,
so
I
think
that's
all
success
to
be
part
of
the
dialogue
in
in
establishing
these
funds.
D
E
The
track
Carrie,
thank
you,
I,
agree,
I,
think
it's
very
prudent
of
what
we're
doing.
I'm
encouraged
that
you've
put
so
much
thought
the
staff
has
put
so
much
thought
into
what
you've
done
here.
I
would
like
us
to
also
hold
off
and
re-examine
this
during
the
budget.
Time
I
think
one
of
the
things
I'd
like
to
see
is
some
mechanism
or
some
thought
given
to
how
to
allocate
for
just
the
things
that
the
rest
of
the
council
has
been.
Speaking
of
so
this
building
has
going
to
need
a
new
roof.
E
It's
probably
going
to
cost.
Generally,
you
know
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
say
so
in
and
say
it's
going
to
be
in
10
years.
So
should
this
facility
put
aside
X
amount
of
money,
you
know,
above
and
beyond
what
we're
doing
some
way
to
allocate
from
each
facility
to
do
to
fund
the
things
that
are
going
to
happen.
E
E
A
E
Just
just
on
that
comment,
that's
a
we
had
no
culture
and
arts
commission
and
we
had
no
culture,
not
just
Commission
money
until
we
established
that
and
established
how
to
fund
it,
which
was
totally
separate
from
the
general
funds.
So
that
was
I.
Think
some
good
thought
went
into
doing
that
and
I
think
it
was
a
very
positive
thing
and
I
think
and
pretty
painless
to
the
residents
of
San
Bruno.
So
I
think
we
can
keep
on
doing
that.
Just
like
the
technology
fund.
That
was
added
to
the
cost
for
the
different
permits
and
the.
A
Was
the
second
member
of
that
committee
with
councilmember
Salazar,
and
this
is
definitely
some
some
good
stuff
going
forward?
It's
always
good
to
know
what
you
have,
especially
if
you
don't
know
what's
coming
after
so
this
is
good.
It's
great
and
a
lot
of
work
went
into
this
with
Kim
and
her
staff
too.
So
I
appreciate
that
once
again,
so
we
have
received
a
report
and
they're
asking
for
a
resolution
to
be
adopted
this
evening,
with
the
understanding,
of
course,
that
we're
gonna
fine-tune
it
as
we
go
forward.
B
F
D
A
Right
we're
gonna,
revisit
item
10
e
se.
Mr.
mr.
dean
peterson
has
joined
us,
so
that
is
a
way
of
a
second
reading
and
adopt
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
san
bruno,
adding
chapter
10.2.
Five:
reusable
bag
ordinance
to
regulate
the
distribution
of
single-use
carryout
bags
by
retail
establishments
to
title
10
municipal
services
of
the
san
bruno
municipal
code,.
N
Thank
you.
The
city
council
is
January
eighth
meeting
introduced
the
reusable
bag
ordinance
and
since
that
meeting
staff
has
hosted
an
informational
meeting
for
retailers,
as
well
as
an
informational
meeting
for
residents.
Several
business
representatives
attended
that
retail
informational
meeting
and
unfortunately,
we
did
not
have
any
residents
and
attend
the
community
informational
meeting
the
question
that
staff
has
received
from
the
business
owner,
mostly
clarifying
the
ordinance
trying
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
the
exemptions,
as
well
as
the
applicability,
very
specific
questions.
How
does
this
ordinance
apply
to
my
business?
Specific?
N
N
Staff
will
continue
to
outreach
to
residents
with
an
informational
flyer
in
the
utility
bill
insert
as
well
as
hosting
an
additional
informational
meeting
on
March
21st
in
the
evening.
Just
want
to
point
out
that
believe
two
copies
of
the
ordinance
were
inadvertently
included.
You
only
need
to
adopt
one
copy
of
this
ordinance.
Dean
peterson
as
well
as
women
long
are
here
from
the
county,
environmental
health
department
and
together
we
would
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
any
of
your
questions.
Any.
D
N
Not
heard
directly
from
the
larger
retail
establishments,
I
have
spoken
with
a
number
of
the
smaller
stores.
I
spoke
with
the
gentleman
at
a
shoe
store,
for
example,
and
he
had
some
questions.
We
did
have
Molly
stones
representative
attend
the
meeting
and
they
were
very
kind
of
up
to
speed
and
ready
to
implement
the
ordinance
but
I
think
dean.
Peterson
has
spoken
with
some
other
larger
retailers
and
can
maybe
also
answer
your
question.
Okay,.
N
D
N
D
And
I've
heard
from
retailers
day
think
that
that's
going
to
be
a
security
nightmare
because
people
are
going
to
walk
into
their
stores
with
their
own
bags
and
I
and
I
go
in
a
grocery
store
now
with
a
reusable
bag
and
I
load,
my
groceries
in
it
and
then,
when
I
come
to
the
checkout
stand,
I
I'm,
unload
they're
going
to
have
to
put
they
don't
have
to
put
alarms
on
socks.
You
know
on
little
things
now,
because
people
are
just
I
mean
you're.
It's
open
themselves.
C
Through
the
mayor,
if
I
may
address
that
concern,
obviously
shoplifting
is
a
concern
of
all
retailers
at
any
time
whether
you
have
a
backpack,
where
the
other
purse
you're
able
to
put
two
items
into
that.
We've
heard
from
target
we've
heard
from
retailers
in
san
jose
in
LA
and
also
in
san
francisco.
They
have
not
had
an
issue
and
they
have
not
seen
an
increase
in
shoplifting,
but
again
that
is
going
to
be
something
that
they
will
need
to
continue
to
be
wary
of,
as
they
are
in
any
our
businesses.
C
D
C
F
Yeah
I
have
one
question
of
staff,
but
wasn't
sure
at
the
podium,
so
don't
keep
coming
up
and
down.
I
also
went
to
a
small
retailer
and
I
was
asking:
did
you
were
you
notified
answer?
Was
yes,
then
I
said.
So
how
are
you
planning
to
keep
the
records
for
three
years?
Unaware
of
that
I
said:
okay,
well,
you
know
yeah,
you
need
to
charge
the
customer
cuz
I'd.
Ask
that
question.
F
If
you
don't
charge
a
customer
for
the
the
bag,
you
can
be
fine,
didn't
know
that
either
so
I
don't
know
if
that
was
clearly
known
within
the
documents
that
went
out
to
the
retos.
But
this
is
just
an
example.
So
then
interesting
left
we
talked
about
bags.
So
another
question
came
up.
Why
are
we
charging
a
dime
I
said?
Well,
they
say
it's
a
I
guess:
behavior
modification
is
a
great
term
and
then
it
goes
up
to
25
cents,
because
then
people
become,
as
you
had
said,
the
dime
doesn't
seem
that
relevant.
F
F
Didn't
know
that-
and
this
is
for
a
500
of
this-
for
him
it
is
a
one
point:
four
cents
for
this
bag,
one
point:
seven
cents
for
this
Bank
one
point:
nine
cents
for
this
Bank
for
the
plastic
bag
that
he's
not
on
one
favor
of
this
I
think
he
told
me
it
was
two
point
seven.
So
in
essence
it's
cheaper
here,
but
his
question
to
me
is
Rico
out
I
charge
people
a
dime,
one
doesn't
cost
me
two
cents.
F
F
Why
are
we
making
money
off
the
consumer
and
who
is
making
that
money?
Is
that
the
business
then
another
part
part
of
it
came
up?
Well,
if
somebody
comes
in
here
and
spend
75
dollars
for
whatever
they
buy,
I,
don't
want
to
charge
him
for
the
bag.
Mom
you
have
to.
You
could
be
fined
hundred
dollars
for
giving
customer
service,
so
he
wants
to
know
if
I
at
me
who
owns
the
business
I
hate
it
I.
Don't
he
does
man
he
wants
to
do
that.
F
C
C
Slightly
more
expensive,
when
we
looked
at
that
I
mean
without
getting
into
a
full
rate
schedule
and
identifying
what
bags
were.
We
did
take
an
average
and
we
are
looking
at
the
larger
paper
bags.
The
number
48
or
the
86
is
I
used
to
be
a
bad
boy
years
ago.
So
I
remember
that
from
back
in
the
day,
these
types
of
bags
would
really
be
considered
more
of
a
protective
bag.
Something
you'd
put
a
bottled
wine
in
or
another
glass
container
to
keep
it
from
bumping
in
and
going.
C
Those
likely
would
not
be
part
of
what
you
would
be
looking
at
for
the
cost.
It's
the
larger
paper
bags
with
the
handles.
They
are
more
expensive
because
they
are
forty
percent
post-consumer,
one
hundred
percent
recyclable
and
those
on
the
market
are
slightly
more
expensive.
We
took
a
look
at
an
average
and
we
got
this
number
from
the
grocery
sociation,
depending
upon
the
bulk
in
which
you
can
buy
those
bags
range
anywhere
from
eight
cents
to
fifteen
cents,
some
little
more
elaborate
it
with
writing
on
it
can
get
more
expensive.
C
It
was
chosen
to
go
with
a
10-cent
minimum
charge,
but
you're
correct.
The
ordinance
does
not
allow
for
special
promotions
for
businesses
simply
to
give
away
the
bag.
This
ordinance
is
is,
is
more
overall
looking
at
getting
society
back
to
a
reusable
type
society,
getting
away
from
a
single
use
or
a
limited
use
society
where
we
use
one
something
once
or
twice,
and
we
simply
throw
it
away
with
a
number
of
people
in
the
Bay
Area.
We
simply
cannot
afford
to
have
that
as
a
sustainable
option
and
that's
the
decision
we
went
with.
F
M
C
And
that's
something
that
may
not
have
been
completely
well
thought
out,
but
again,
without
getting
into
a
full
rank
schedule
which
we
felt
would
be
really
over
encumbering
and
everyone
trying
to
figure
out
this
size
of
bag.
Is
this
much
the
size
of
bags
that
much
we're
here
at
a
minimum
charge
of
ten
cents?
It's
to
change
behavior?
What
they're
finding
in
san
jose
in
los
angeles
around
the
world
are
implementing
this.
C
F
I
appreciate
and
I,
maybe
I
would
do
the
same,
but
but
it's
at
the
same
time.
You
know
everybody
has
a
unique
situation
or
maybe
they're
there
have
young
young
children's
are
tending
to.
Maybe
they
have
some
issues
that
require.
That
may
be
that
this
is
a
more
helpful
tool,
so
I
want
to
help
the
environment
and
I
want
to
help
move
things
forward
in
and
take
care
of
things.
You
know
interesting
enough
at
where
I
was
I
said.
F
Well,
it's
the
same
thing
like
you
raised
a
cigarette
tax
and
he
says
no
Reeko
marlboro
now
has
a
cigarette
called
maverick.
So
in
essence
it's
cheaper.
So
people
don't
stop
smoking
they're,
just
smoking
a
brand
or
quality
that
is
not
as
great
same
thing
with
alcohol.
They
can't
afford
whatever
a
grade.
Sometimes
they
go
down.
F
I
know
it's
about
going
and
checking
records
during
normal
business
hours,
so
my
question
staff
was
who's
normal
business
hours,
the
proprietor,
the
shop
owner
or
the
county.
It's
the
county,
so
I
know
you
there's
a
stipulation
to
make
some
mutual
agreement.
But
you
know
when
you
want
to
get
buy-in,
you
got
to
go
forward
and
work
with
the
people.
They're
running
a
business
or
paying
the
bills
paying
people,
salaries
and
adding
value
to
our
community
went
into
trader
joe's
millbrae
asked
hey.
How
is
this?
How
is
this
going?
F
C
Absolutely
and
I
understand
that
and
again
the
commitment
on
the
county's
part,
like
all
the
ordinances
that
we
implement.
It's
a
very
soft
rollout,
we're
there
to
work
with
the
businesses,
we're
there
to
figure
out
what
works,
we're
not
going
to
be
punitive,
and
we
need
to
identify
all
these
issues
as
we
go
through
and
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
right
now
so
I
appreciate
your
comments.
K
B
A
Anyone
else
I
think
we
had
a
similar
discussion
and
there
was
a
lot
more
lively
when
we
talked
about
the
takeout
containers.
We
had
a
pretty
good
sized
group
of
people
here
a
number
of
times
and
it
was
complaints,
and
we
can't
do
this
and
it's
going
to
cost
me
this
and
won't
work,
and
we
can't
do
this.
We
haven't
heard
a
word
and
it
works
for
the
most
part
in
san
bruno
and
that's
in
bruno,
and
this
is
a
county
wide.
A
So
I
think
is:
is
this
a
real
good
thing
for
the
environment
going
forward?
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
doubt
about
that
and
I
think
when
people
get
used
to
it,
just
like
we
did
in
San
Brenda
when
we
started
recycling
a
huge
recycling
effort
here
many
years
ago
you
can
see
the
street
corners
tonight
and
how
much
Recycling's
being
done
and
the
same
thing
with
san
francisco.
San
francisco
now
have
very
small
garbage
cans
because
they're
recycling
all
of
their
wet
waste,
all
of
their
driveways
to
all
kinds
of
things.
A
So
yeah
we're
going
to
hit
some
bumps
in
the
road
and
I
think
as
long
as
it's
revisited
periodically
to
you
know,
meet
the
level
of
what
the
cooperation
what's
going
on
in
the
future.
It's
a
good
thing
so
overall
sure
there's
always
going
to
be.
You
know
little
questions
here
or
there
and
we'll
have
to
work
through
that,
but
I
think
in
the
bigger
picture.
This
is
the
right
way
to
go
so
I
definitely
support
this
yeah.
F
Into
the
chair,
even
though
I
wanted
to
do
some
homework
to
better
understand,
I'm
in
favor
of
this,
but
I'm
also
in
favor
of
doing
it
the
right
way-
and
I
know
it's
me-
it's
not-
it
was
a
one
size
fit
all
fits
all
and
and
I
just
really
want
to
be
mindful.
Just
like
the
automatic
25
sending
to
go
automatically.
There's
no
I
want
to
revisit
it.
I
want
when
these
questions
are
asked
to
me
and
where,
let's
just
argument
sake,
say
it's
three
sets:
where
does
the
extra
money
going?
F
C
C
My
board
of
supervisors
is
asking
the
same
question
and
they
want
to
make
sure
that
when
this
is
getting
ready
to
go,
25
cents
and
I
can
be
there
proving
that
we
have
to
do
it
and
unless
I
have
that
proof,
we're
not
going
to
do
it
so
yeah
so
and
yeah,
and
we
want
to
in
fact
tonight
I
was
down
in
Menlo
Park,
one
of
their
council
members
had
a
very
good
suggestion
for
looking
at.
You
know
future
changes
to
the
ordinance
as
we
look
at
this,
and
so
we
definitely
need
to
do
this.