►
From YouTube: San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting August 17, 2010
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting August 17, 2010
B
A
C
C
B
B
Also
within
communications
people
at
home,
you
can
find
the
packets
at
planning
at
san
bruno
CA
gov
under
the
community
development
section,
the
packets,
their
staff
reports
minutes.
And
finally,
we
inadvertently
left
off
a
presentation
tonight:
housing
leadership,
chris
moore
from
housing.
Leadership
council
is
here
it's
a
great
group
locally
that
promote
housing
issues
and
affordable
housing
issues
with
in
San
Mateo
County
I've
been
fortunate
enough
to
participate
in
a
couple.
Events
that
they've
had
recently
and
Chris
will
give
a
presentation
of
some
of
the
stuff
that
they're
up
to
okay.
D
A
D
And
headquartered
next
door
in
south
san
francisco,
and
we
have
been
working
for
several
years
on
our
platform
of
policies
that
encourage
housing
development
to
help
serve
our
communities
needs,
and
we
decided
we
spent
all
this
time
crafting
the
wording
of
our
policies.
We'd
like
to
get
out
to
policymakers
than
just
like.
No,
so
just
briefly
about
us,
we
were
founded
in
2001
and
our
mission
is
to
accelerate
the
creation
of
housing
at
all
affordability
levels,
to
increase
opportunity
and
create
a
great
quality
of
life.
D
We
want
to
see
good
projects
come
to
life
and
for
us
it's
not
just
about
quantity,
although
we
believe
we
need
more
homes
on
the
peninsula,
but
it's
also
about
quality
and
creating
livable
walkable
communities,
and
so
some
of
the
things
we
do
are
to
organize
our
membership
base
of
about
a
hundred
organizations
and
about
40
to
50
individuals
who
also
care
about
the
issue,
recruit
and
train
local
leaders
and
promote
the
kind
of
quality
development
we
want
to
see.
We
also
have
a
couple
of
events.
I
want
to
mention
housing
leadership
day.
D
D
We
also
provide
staffing
to
the
housing
endowment
and
regional
trust
heart,
which
is
the
county's
housing
trust
fund.
It's
a
joint
powers
agreement
and
all
20
cities,
including
San
Bruno,
as
well
as
the
county,
our
members
and
that
entity
helped
provide
some
of
the
financing
for
the
village
at
the
crossing
and
we
also
have
a
homebuyer
program.
Our
next
newsletter
is
going
to
feature
one
of
the
home
buyers
who
was
able
to
purchase
a
house
next
to
his
parents
house
he
in
san
bruno,
where
he
grew
up.
D
We
also
endorse
developments
that
meet
our
criteria
and
advance
our
vision,
so
I've
provided
copies
of
the
full
wording
of
our
platform
to
the
Commission.
If
you
want
to
go
through
those
at
your
leisure
I'll.
Just
briefly
summarize
these
things
for
these
purposes
right
now,
one
of
our
goals
is
to
encourage
mixed
income
housing
and
just
a
couple
years
ago,
san
bruno
passed
in
inclusionary
housing,
ordinance
requiring
a
certain
portion
of
new
units
created,
be
set
aside
at
slightly
lower
rates
for
middle
and
lower-income
families
where
appropriate.
D
We
believe
that
single
room
occupancy,
the
smaller
type
of
units
is
an
appropriate
use,
especially
in
denser
downtown
areas,
and
we
believe
each
jurisdiction
has
a
responsibility
to
try
and
meet
its
fair
share
of
the
regional
need
for
housing,
as
determined
by
the
state
of
California
and
Association
of
Bay
Area
governments,
and
the
last
time
that
I
heard
Bay.
Area
Council
gave
San
Bruno
an
a-plus
a
couple
years
ago
because
of
all
the
good
work
you've
been
doing,
especially
with
the
crossings.
Master
plan.
D
You've
really
been
a
leader
in
the
peninsula
for
that
we
support
accessibility
of
housing
for
disabled
people
and
making
sure
that
design
makes
those
units
available
and
accessible
to
people
with
physical
challenges.
Child
care
is
an
important
need
for
families
in
our
community,
and
so
jurisdiction
should
do
what
they
can
to
make
sure
that
the
supply
of
child
care
matches
the
demand,
especially
if
we're
adding
housing
units,
sometimes
there's
a
bit
of
a
conflict
between
housing
preferences
and
housing.
D
Commercial
linkage
fees
are
a
way
that
some
jurisdictions
have
of
addressing
the
need
for
housing
created
by
new
job
growth,
and
we
want
to
keep
the
economy
vibrant
and
get
back
on
track
with
job
growth
and
when
we
do,
of
course,
that
creates
demand
for
housing
and
some
jurisdictions
have
adopted
a
fee
on
commercial
development
that
helps
mitigate
the
impact
on
the
housing
market.
Around
land
use
tax
policy
as
policymakers,
you
know
how
unbalanced
state
and
local
fiscal
relationships
have
been.
D
So
we're
nonprofit
with
a
brief
to
work
across
all
of
San
Mateo
County,
and
this
county
actually
has
a
really
good
practice
of
collaboration
and
cooperation,
starting
with
the
city
county
association
of
governments,
working
on
transportation
policy
and
in
the
last
couple
of
years,
working
on
the
housing
element
in
the
sub
regional
approach
to
the
regional
housing
need
allocation
and
the
21
elements.
Collaboration
I
think,
has
been
an
effective
way
to
leverage
public
resources
and
just
today
in
fact,
there
was
a
tour
that
the
21
elements,
collaboration,
organized
I,
understand,
jackman,
went
on
it.
D
I
referred
earlier
to
commercial
development,
linkage
fees,
but
just
we
encourage
jurisdictions
to
look
at
the
balance
of
jobs
and
housing
to
make
sure
that
not
all
growth
is
concentrated
in
the
commercial
sector,
but
that
the
people
who
work
in
those
jobs
also
have
a
chance
to
live
in
the
community
near
where
they
work.
We
recently
adopted
a
statement
about
our
preferred
pattern
of
development,
which
is
around
livable
walkable
communities.
I
think
that
the
work
you're
doing
around
the
transportation
quarter
and
the
downtown
plan
is
absolutely
what
we're
talking
about
there,
because
you
have
caltrain.
D
You
have
bart
and
trying
to
leverage
that
opportunity
for
a
changing
housing
market
where
elderly
folks
we
had
a
meeting
in
millbrae
just
the
other
night
and
even
during
the
introductions.
One
of
the
older
participants
said:
we've
got
to
do
something
about
us,
older
folks,
living
up
in
the
hills
and
we
can't
drive
as
much
as
we
used
to
and
we
need
a
place
to
be
able
to
go
so.
Obviously,
the
again
the
village
at
the
crossing
is
an
example
of
that.
D
As
part
of
the
housing
element
process,
you
have
to
identify
obstacles
to
development,
and
so
we
encourage
you
to
look
at
streamlining
of
processes
and
make
it
a
little
easier.
Obviously,
regulation
to
protect
quality
of
life
and
our
environment
is
important,
but
at
the
same
time,
are
there
other
things
that
you
can
look
at
to
to
improve
the
process.
Parking
requirements
are
a
big
one.
D
We
go
to
public
hearings
across
the
county
and
always
number
one
issue
is
there's
not
enough
parking
or
it's
going
to
create
traffic
if
you
build
here,
but
especially
when
you're
locating
closer
to
public
transit
like
Cal
training
of
our
study
after
study
by
the
Metropolitan,
Transportation,
Commission
and
others
have
shown,
car
ownership
really
is
lower
in
those
areas.
So
I
think
we
need
to
stay
with
the
data
on
cases
like
that
and
see.
D
If
there
are
times
when
you
could
reduce
the
parking
ratio
and
still
have
a
viable
project,
we
like
to
see
development
go
where
the
existing
public
infrastructure
is.
Obviously
we
don't
want
to
cover
our
beautiful
hills
at
this
point
and
I
fill
in
our
open
space,
so
we're
looking
at
these
more
compact
livable
areas.
So
that
concludes
my
presentation,
presentation
and
I
very
much
appreciate
your
time
and
attention
and.
A
A
A
A
Hearing
then
we'll
go
on
to
the
first
public
hearing,
which
is
sylvan
avenue
at
mastic
avenue,
and
it's
a
request
for
a
temporary
used
from
it
to
allow
an
offsite
construction
staging
area
in
the
city
request
for
a
temporary
excuse
me
in
the
staging
area
in
the
city
parking
lot
located
on
the
southwest
corner
of
sylvan
avenue
and
mastic,
it's
per
section:
12
84
030
and
the
san
bruno
municipal
code,
city
of
san
bruno
and
the
applicant
and
owner
staff
report.
Please
thank.
E
You,
as
stated
the
applicant,
has
applied
for
a
temporary
use
permit
to
locate
an
off-site
construction
staging
area
in
the
city
parking
lot
located
on
the
southwest
corner
of
Sylvan
and
mastic
Avenue.
As
you
know,
the
municipal
code
was
amended
in
2007,
giving
the
Planning
Commission
the
authority
to
approve
off
site
construction
yards
for
a
period
up
to
one
year.
In
this
specific
instance,
the
staging
area
is
required
to
accommodate
the
equipment
associated
with
the
mastic
Avenue
utility
improvement
project,
and
this
project
entails
the
replacement
of
water
mains
and
sewer
mains
on
mastic
Avenue.
E
Additionally,
portions
of
masuk
avenue
will
be
repaved
between
san
felipe
avenue
and
taylor.
Avenue
in
a
slurry
seal
coating
will
be
provided
on
Masek
avenue
between
taylor
avenue
and
angus
avenue.
West
work
is
scheduled
to
begin
in
late
August
and
is
expected
to
last
for
a
period
of
five
city.
Parking
lot
number
three,
which
is
located
on
the
southwest
corner
of
Sylvan
and
mastic.
Avenue
was
chosen
for
a
number
of
different
reasons.
E
The
staging
area
would
be
include
by
be
enclosed
by
a
6-foot
high
chain-link
fence
staff
does
not
really
anticipate
there
to
be
any
parking
impacts,
because
there
is
a
city-owned
parking
lot
directly
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site
on
the
northwest
corner
of
Sylvan
and
mastic
avenue,
and
there's
a
hundred
and
one
available
parking
spaces.
There.
I
would
like
to
point
out
a
few
conditions
of
approval
that
have
been
added,
the
first
being
condition
of
approval
number
three,
which
requires
the
applicant
to
clean
the
site
on
a
daily
basis.
E
Condition
of
approval
number
six
does
not
permit
any
maintenance
of
equipment
on
site
and
condition
of
approval.
Number
seven
requires
that
all
equipment
be
removed.
Fourteen
days
after
the
conclusion
of
the
project,
with
these
added
conditions,
staff
finds
that
there
will
not
be
any
negative
impacts
on
surrounding
residential
neighborhood.
One
thing
I
would
like
to
point
out
is
that
the
project
is
scheduled
to
last
five
months,
which
would
put
the
end
date
somewhere
in
late
January.
E
However,
staff
does
recommend
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
temporary
use
permit
through
April
of
2010
to
or
2011
to
accommodate
any
unexpected
delays.
Overall
staff
is
supportive
of
the
project
and
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
temporary
use.
Permit
requests
subject
to
conditions
of
approval
one
through
seven
with
in
the
staff
report,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
There's.
F
E
F
E
F
E
The
red
line
area
includes
the
entire
lot,
a
big
side
yeah
and
then,
if
you
flip
to
the
next
page
or
two
pages
down,
the
yellow
area
is
the
fenced
off
location
where
the
staging
area
would
be
located.
Okay,.
E
B
G
G
It's
it's
in
very
old
and
decrepit
the
condition
and
it
desperately
require
replacement
and
the
scope
of
this
project
will
replace
the
Sioux
main
with
a
vine
new
8-inch
zooming,
along
with
insulation
of
new
sewer
laterals
from
the
zooming
to
the
edge
of
the
pavement,
and
it
will
also
install
a
12-inch,
doctoral
and
water
main
between
San
Phillip
and
Angus
Avenue,
and
also
water
service,
all
the
way
from
the
water
main
to
the
water
meter,
and
it
will
also
replace
fire
hydrants
Lau's
along
along
the
way
and
the
project.
Again.
G
G
A
C
C
Okay-
and
we
can
bring
this
one
back
up-
okay,
very
good.
My
question
is:
has
anybody
really
seen
the
since
you're
bringing
in
all
this
weight
with
this
equipment?
Have
you
seen
the
condition
of
the
street
on
sylvan
there
between
san
mateo
avenue
and
mastic,
as
anybody
take
a
look
at
that
street,
you.
C
A
H
H
At
my
neighbor's
house
he
has
an
apartment
underneath,
so
his
residence
won't
be
able
to
become
an
in
and
out
if
the
cyclone
fence
covers
that
area
and
the
residential
parking
in
that
area,
I
have
a
red
zone
from
my
place,
will
mastic
from
Angus
all
the
way
down
to
Taylor
is
red,
so
I
have
zero
parking
only
in
my
driveway
and
if
this
staging
area
and
the
work
takes
up
my
one
there
is
no
place
for
my
husband
or
my
daughter
or
my
son
to
park.
There's
a
lot
of
activity
in
that
area.
H
Tuesday
and
sunday
evenings
are
AAA
meetings
at
the
church
and
the
parking
lots
are
full
for
their
that
parking
area.
Then
you
have
day
care
people
come
and
go
in
that
church.
There's
there
they
have
the
korean
services,
which
are
a
few
times
a
week
and
there's
a
handicap
fellow,
I
don't
believe
he's
going
to
be
able
to
get
into
the
church,
and
I
think
also
for
some
of
this
parking.
H
Perhaps
they
won't
be
by
giving
tickets
because
of
the
limited
parking
people
who
work
on
downtown
park
behind,
because
some
of
them
are
five
hour
parking.
I
don't
want
to
have
to
go
up
and
watch
my
clock
and
move
my
car
be
five
hours,
you
know,
or
every
two
hours,
and
also
the
cost
to
the
individual
homeowners.
H
If
they're
upper
lateral
needs
to
be
changed,
what
happens
with
some
of
these
folks
who
cannot
afford
it?
Because
it
does
say
if
it's
damaged
three
days,
their
water
will
be
shut
off.
I
mean
we're
talking
a
lot
of
homes
from
Angus
all
the
way
down
to
San
Felipe,
and
there
I
mean
economic
times
are
bad
for
people,
probably
more
so
than
the
city
and
counties
and
States,
and
how
they
going
to
come
up
with
maybe
two
or
three
or
four
thousand
dollars
to
do
the
upper
lateral.
H
Also,
one
other
thing
right
now:
there's
a
storm
drain,
Sylvan
in
huntington,
there's
no
other
one
in
that
area.
When
the
water
runs
off
when
it
rains,
it
comes
down
behind
the
old
wells,
fargo
parking
lot:
it
comes
down
and
it
goes
north
and
then
it
turns
and
it
goes
down
Sylvan
and
it
collects
down
on
Huntington
and
Sylvan.
Water
comes
up
over
the
curb
constantly
so
while
you're
there,
it
would
be
nice
that
they
did
a
storm
drain,
perhaps
or
it
can
collect
this
water.
That's
it.
A
B
The
one
thing
I'd
like
to
note
that
the
issues
related
to
storm
water
and
the
issues
related
to
cost
for
the
upper
lateral
really
aren't
issues
for
the
Planning
Commission,
as
these
are
cost
issues
for
the
public
works
department,
but
we
should
really
be
focused
on
tonight.
Is
the
land
use
issues
of
using
this
as
a
temporary
use
permit
for
the
temporary
use
permit
so
issues
like
parking?
That's
the
land
use
issue
costs
associated
with
lateral,
the
laterals
and
storm
waters
is
not
is
not
an
issue.
B
G
C
A
A
It's
a
request
for
an
amendment
to
a
developmental
plan,
a
plan
development
permit
and
architectural
review
permit
to
allow
the
construction
of
a
new
recreation
and
leasing,
building
and
conversion
of
the
existing
recreation
building
in
forth
into
four
apartments
for
sections:
12
96.1
9aj,
1296,
190
k
and
12
10
8
of
the
san
bruno
municipal
code
staff
report.
Please.
I
Thank
you
and
good
evening.
The
application
that's
before
you
next
tonight
is
for
changes
to
the
Crystal
Springs
terrace
apartments.
As
you
probably
know,
it's
located
at
2000,
Crystal
Springs
just
down
the
road
from
here.
The
complex
currently
has
433
units.
It
has
four
I'm,
sorry,
628
parking
spaces,
recreation,
building,
a
couple
of
swimming
pools,
significant
landscaping,
spread
throughout
the
site,
and
all
of
this
is
on
over
a
little
over
12
acres
is
the
total
site.
The
complex
was
constructed
in
1972.
I
There
were
changes
approved
by
the
City
Council
and
Planning
Commission
in
1974
in
1989
that
were
a
little
bit
more
significant
and
then
some
minor
things
have
been
changed
there
over
the
years.
So
I
wanted
to
start
by
orienting
you
a
little
bit
to
the
project
site
so
that
you'll
have
some
of
these
locations
in
mind
as
we
move
through
the
different
parts
of
the
project
and
so
moving
from
north
to
south
down
the
site.
I
I've
circled
for
you
and
read
some
of
the
significant
locations,
and
so
the
first
thing
that
circle
there
is
the
existing
recreation
building
moving
down
the
site.
A
little
bit
is
the
existing
main
entrance,
and
so
this
is
what
you're,
probably
familiar
with
if
you've
driven
to
the
site
before
at
that
location
is
where
they
have
a
small
leasing
office.
I
That's
basically
in
a
residential
unit
space
at
this
time,
next,
moving
down
is
that
kind
of
triangular
green
area
in
that
location
is
where
they're
proposing
a
new
parking
lot
and
then
down
at
the
southern
portion
of
the
site
is
where
they're
proposing
a
new
recreation
and
leasing
building,
and
this
is
the
larger
surface
parking
lot
as
it
exists
today.
The
surface
parking
lot
down
at
the
bottom
has
to
existing
driveways
one
is
for
entrance,
and
one
is
for
exit.
I
So
the
project
has
three
major
components
to
it
that
I'd
like
to
go
through
one
at
a
time
for
you
this
evening.
The
first
is
the
new
recreation
and
leasing
building
the
color
rendering
is
included,
as
shown
here
for
you
was
also
included
in
your
packet,
its
proposed
at
that
corner
of
the
existing
parking
lot.
That
I
was
just
discussing
where
the
approximately,
where
the
exit
driveway
is
now
the
remaining
driveway
that's
been
used
as
the
insurance
driveway
would
be
expanded,
so
it
would
accommodate
two
way:
traffic.
I
The
building
itself
is
proposed
to
have
a
little
over
3,000
square
feet
on
the
first
floor
about
23
2,400
square
feet.
On
the
second
floor,
for
a
total
of
five
thousand
four
hundred
and
seventy
square
feet
its
proposed
to
include
a
leasing
office,
fitness
area,
game,
room
and
resident
lounge
area,
so
it
would
consolidate
quite
a
few
different
functions
that
they
have
spread
throughout
the
site
now
and
provide
a
more
sort
of
contemporary
amenity
that
people
have
come
to
expect
from
this
type
of
apartment.
Complex.
I
The
architectural
style
of
the
building
is
really
inspired
by
a
lot
of
buildings
that
we
might
find
in
nature
or
in
the
mountains.
It's
designed
to
complement
the
site
there
at
the
edge
of
the
city
limits
and
by
the
park,
and
the
architect
is
here
and
can
speak
more
to
the
design
a
little
bit
later
on
I'm
its
proposed
to
have
a
stucco
exterior
metal
roof.
You
can
see
the
trellis
and
the
beam
features
really
break
up
that
front
facade
the
kind
of
wood
appearance
of
those
things
really
bring.
Some
warmth
to
the
design.
I
They've
also
proposed
to
recess
the
windows,
approximately
seven
inches,
so
that
will
provide
some
light
in
shadow
around
all
of
those
window.
Openings
they've
also
integrated
the
monument
sign
into
the
design,
which
was
a
request
from
the
Architectural
Review
Committee.
So
it's
presented
here
this
evening
for
you
there's
some
changes
proposed
to
the
circulation
in
order
to
accommodate
the
location
for
this
new
building
and
with
those
changes
to
the
circulation,
some
new
landscape
areas
are
created
and
some
of
the
parking
is
realigned
in
all
the
parking
is
restriped
with
the
project
in
this
immediate
area.
I
They
have
included
a
range
of
plants
that
include
some
that
we
all
know
commonly
lavender,
fountain
grass
and
daylily,
as
well
as
a
significant
number
of
new
trees
in
the
area
of
the
new
building
they're,
removing
the
existing
garbage
and
recycling
area.
In
order
to
accommodate
that
new
circulation
pattern,
and
so
they
have
proposed
a
completely
new
structure
for
trash
and
recycling.
It
is
included
in
your
plan
set.
I
The
architectural
style
is
designed
to
complement
the
new
building
and
it
has
been
reviewed
by
the
Recology
staff,
which
is
formally
san
bruno
garbage,
and
they
do
find
that
the
capacity
will
be
sufficient
and
we've
added
a
condition
of
approval
that
we
just
do.
One
final
site
visit
with
the
Recology
staff
to
make
sure
we've
anticipated
any
potential
issues,
but
we're
not
aware
of
any
at
this
time.
I
The
second
major
aspect
of
the
project
is
the
conversion
of
the
existing
recreation
building
into
four
new
apartments,
and
so
that's
a
little
building
on
the
top
of
this
slide.
Here
it
does
have
a
little
bit
different
architectural
style
than
the
rest
of
the
complex
they're
doing
some
things
to
kind
of
integrate.
I
This
increase
in
density
does
require
an
analysis
of
whether
1284
applies
as
you're.
Well
aware,
that's
a
limit
on
density
throughout
the
city.
The
applicant
has
supplied
their
attorneys
opinion,
which
staff
does
find
to
be
a
reasonable
analysis
of
the
situation.
But
the
final
determination
on
this
issue
will
need
to
be
made
by
the
City
Council,
because
it
is
a
policy
issue,
but
their
memo
is
included
as
an
exhibit
to
your
staff
report,
so
they'll
be
part
of
the
public
information
and
so
that
you
would
be
aware
of
that
process
as
well.
I
The
third
major
element
of
the
project
is
a
new
parking
lot
and
so
I've
included
it
here.
Just
as
a
reminder,
you've
probably
seen
it
in
your
plan
set
its
kind
of
pie
shaped
it's
included
in
one
of
your
landscaping
sheets.
Its
proposed
near
the
southern
end
of
the
site
in
the
area
of
existing
landscaping,
so
overall,
the
project
would
reduce
the
landscaping
from
thirty
percent
of
the
site
to
twenty-nine
percent
of
the
site,
and
so
it
is
a
pretty
small
reduction
in
landscaping
area
in
a
site.
I
That's
quite
large
and
has
a
good
amount
of
landscaping.
The
new
parking
lot
would
accommodate
11
net
new
parking
spaces,
so
some
would
be
reconfigured.
A
couple
would
be
removed
to
provide
access
for
a
total,
11
new
and
again
that's
for
for
residential
units,
so
it
actually
exceeds
the
standard.
That's
in
the
municipal
code
for
multifamily
housing
they've
proposed
to
construct
this
parking
lot
with
pervious
paving,
and
so
this
is
a
pretty
significant
green
building
goal
to
increase
the
amount
of
infiltration
on
site.
I
So
staff
is
very
supportive
of
this
approach
to
the
parking
lot
the
site
there
is.
It
does
have
some
slopes
to
it,
so
there
are
going
to
be
some
retaining
walls
that
close
in
this
parking
area
so
to
mitigate
the
appearance
of
that,
the
applicant
has
agreed
to
include
planting
pockets
and
vine,
so
that
vines
will
be
able
to
grow
up
those
retaining
walls
and
soften
the
appearance
of
the
parking
lot.
I
There
are
also
several
new
trees
in
this
area,
so
a
couple
would
be
removed,
but
then
several
would
also
be
replanted
and
there's
also
one
minor
change
to
the
site.
That
I
had
briefly
mentioned
and
that's
the
conversion
of
the
small
leasing
office
back
into
a
residential
unit.
So
those
are
the
the
summary
of
the
changes
that
are
proposed
and
the
rest
of
the
complex
would
remain
unchanged
with
the
project.
So
I'd
like
to
turn
now
to
the
architectural
review.
I
The
architectural
review
committee
heard
the
project
on
June
tenth
and
there's
a
minor
mistake
in
the
staff
report.
It
was
actually
heard
by
commissioners
biasanya,
mishra
and
chair
chase.
At
that
time
there
were
a
number
of
recommendations.
I've
included
all
of
those
in
the
staff
report,
as
well
as
what
actions
they
have
taken
to
address
those.
But
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
couple
of
highlights.
They
did
implement
recommendations
in
regards
to
trash
enclosure,
signage
and
green
building.
They
updated
the
front
elevation
of
the
new
building.
They
added
some
additional
architectural
detail.
I
Signage
increase
the
length
of
the
trellis,
which
I
think
Jeeves.
The
intent
of
breaking
up
that
front
facade
a
little
bit
more
they've
changed
the
color
of
the
main
building
the
main
body
color.
So
they
proposed
it
to
be
the
off-white
color
that
would
match
the
rest
of
the
complex
in
the
rendering
that
you
have.
The
color
is
a
little
bit
bright
white,
but
they
have
clearly
indicated
to
staff
that
it
would
match
the
residential
buildings,
which
is
a
little
bit
hard
to
replicate
in
the
rendering.
I
So
that
kind
of
summarizes
where
they've
come
from
the
architectural
review
committee
meeting
to
notify
the
public
staffs
and
a
courtesy
notice
and
the
legal
notice
to
all
the
residents
within
300
feet,
we
also
added
the
neighborhood
to
the
northwest
of
the
project
that
is
out
of
the
300-foot
radius,
but
knowing
that
they
may
be
interested
in
the
project
as
well.
We've
received
comments
from
one
neighbor,
since
the
staff
report
was
prepared,
I
have
received
additional
additional
phone
call
from
her.
I
I
So,
in
closing,
staff
would
like
to
note
that
the
applicant
has
worked
with
staff
through
this
process.
It
has
taken
us
quite
a
while
to
get
to
this
point.
They
have
addressed
site
visibility,
fire
lane
access
circulation
and
they
have
made
design
changes
that
we've
requested
through
this
process.
So,
given
all
of
that,
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
adopt
resolutions
2010
dash,
ten
and
2010-11
and
forward
the
project
to
the
City,
Council
and
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
J
Good
evening,
commission
members,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
this
evening
and
there's
just
I
think
that
Laura
did
an
excellent
staff
report.
But
there
are
a
few
things
that
I'd
like
to
add
to
the
comments
that
she
made.
But
the
first
thing
that
I'd
like
to
say
is
that
I
really
want
to
thank
Laura
for
all
of
her
hard
work
on
this
project.
I
think
we
started
this
process
at
a
conceptual
level
back
in.
J
What
we
realized
and
going
through
that
through
that
process-
and
we
realize
pretty
quickly-
is
that
the
intensity
of
all
of
those
multiple
uses,
superimposed
onto
that
building
would
obliterate
the
structure
of
that
building.
So
it
would
end
up
essentially
being
a
teardown,
and
the
other
aspect
of
that
is
that
we
didn't
feel
in
looking
at
it
with
the
owner
that
it
was
necessarily
the
best
place
located
on
the
site
to
have
this
leasing
and
recreational
use
facility.
That
would
accommodate
the
whole
property.
J
It
sort
of
occurs
on
the
on
the
lower
part
of
the
site.
It
doesn't
have
the
best
daylight
exposure
or
the
best
views.
So
we
walk
the
site,
and
we
looked
at
this
at
this
upper
portion
of
the
site
where
we're
representing
the
building.
Today
and
it
just
fit
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
the
first
being
that
it's
on
the
higher
end
of
the
site.
So
it
has
much
better
views
and
visibility
has
much
better
daylight
exposure
and
we
believe
that
it's
situating
it
in
that
location.
J
It
would
serve
as
sort
of
a
visual
anchor
or
a
promontory,
which
would
be
visually
obvious
from
all
different
parts
of
the
site.
So
it
wouldn't
be
sort
of
tucked
away
in
the
same
way
that
the
existing
building
location
is
the
other
important
aspect
to
relocating
and
building
a
new
building
on
the
upper
end
of
the
site
was
that
it
gave
us
the
opportunity
to
take
and
reuse
the
existing.
J
What
is
currently
the
existing
recreational
facility
and
as
Laura
was
describing
convert
that
into
four
new
dwelling
units,
and
we
are
actually
able
to
accommodate
that
within
that
existing
building
with
very
little
structural
change
to
the
building.
In
fact,
the
only
thing
that
we're
doing
to
the
building
on
the
exterior
is
modifying
windows,
because
now
we
have
four
units,
as
opposed
to
a
large
gathering
space
on
the
upper
floor.
J
So
we
think
that
that's
probably
of
all
of
the
green
things
that
we're
doing
I
think
that
that's
probably
the
most
important
piece
in
terms
of
the
the
architectural
style
of
the
new
building
you'll
see
from
the
image
there
that
it
is
a
departure
from
the
from
the
form
and
massing
of
the
existing
residential
buildings.
And
there
was
a
couple
of
good
reasons
for
that.
The
first
being
that,
with
these
common
use,
facilities
and
multifamily
developments,
we
do
want
them
to
be
sort
of
obvious
visual
anchors.
J
We
want
the
we
wanted,
the
structure
to
be
compatible,
but
we
also
wanted
it
to
be
aesthetically
different.
We
wanted
it
to
be
something
that
would
stand
out.
The
other
part
of
that
is
that
the
existing
residential
buildings
are
very
simple
two-story
structures,
with
a
single
Ridgeline
running
across
the
whole
structure.
J
So
you
sort
of
have
two
storey
walls
and
then
one
ridge
line,
this
building
is
a
little
bit
taller
and
in
order
to
impart
that
kind
of
style
on
a
building
that
has
this
much
function
in
it,
it
would
be
it
would
be
a
cumbersome
and
much
more
massive
building,
and
so
we
feel
that
this
configuration
very
much
articulates
the
multiple
uses
that
are
in
the
building.
We
have
steeper
Ridge,
Ridge
or
steeper
roof
pitches,
so
we're
we're
showing
off
the
roofing
material
wears
on
the
residential
buildings.
J
You
have
a
comp,
shingle
roof
that
you
don't
see
very
much
of
the
roof
surface
because
of
its
shallow
pitch
on
this
building,
we're
at
a
what
is
it?
Jimmy
is
seven
and
twelve
or
eight
and
12
pitch
and
we're
using
a
standing
metal
seam
roof.
So
it's
a
much
more
aesthetic
roof,
we
believe
and
also
in
terms
of
its
durability.
J
J
It
wasn't
a
color
that
we
felt
would
be
an
attractive
color
on
this
new
building,
but
we
felt
that
if
we
change
the
body
color
out
in
the
primary
building
color
that
we
could
then
articulate
it
with
trim
colors
that
were
different
than
the
trim
colors
that
you
see
on
the
residential
building.
So
this
is
in
terms
of
the
paint
scheme.
The
one
part
that
that
will
stand
out
this
is
kind
of
a
conscious
way
of
us
trying
to
differentiate
those
two
structures.
J
So
that's
that's
kind
of
in
a
nutshell
and
again,
I
think
that
Laura
did
a
good
job
of
giving
you
a
sort
of
a
snap
picture
of
what
we're
doing.
We're
really
excited
about
the
building.
We
think
it's
going
to
be
a
very
nice
enhancement
to
the
property,
not
to
mention
the
fact
that
we're
also
getting
some
additional
housing
stock
by
converting
the
existing
building.
So
thank
you
for
your
for
your
time.
Listening
and
I'm
here
to
answer
questions.
Thank.
A
A
K
A
A
K
Wanted
to
know
if
there
were,
they
were
going
to
be
sufficient
parking,
because
right
now
is
it
is.
There
are
several
people
from
silver
Terrace
that
come
and
park
all
the
way
up
on
the
top
where
we
live
and
are
using
our
parking
spaces
up
there
I
don't
know
why,
but
they
do,
and
if
this
is
added
on
I
want
to
know.
If
they're
going
to
start
doing
the
same
thing,
we
need
our
parking
spaces
up
there.
They
shouldn't
be
used
by
people
down
below
the
overpass
is
completely
full
of
automobiles
in
the
evening.
K
So
that
takes
care
of
that,
and
neither
could
I
have
one
person
from
silver
Terrace
that
comes
in
parks
around
my
property.
Every
day
he
takes
his
bike
off
the
back
and
takes
off
comes
back
in
the
evening.
It
gets
his
bike
back
on
goes
back
home
on
the
weekends
he
brings
his
car
up
on
Thursday
and
picks
it
up
on
monday.
So
you
know
we
have
people
up
there
that
have
teenage
children
now
they're
getting
cars.
K
A
I
We
have
observed
people
parking
on
the
overpass
of
280
I,
think
it
is
logical
to
assume
that
those
likely
could
be
residents
of
Crystal
Springs.
The
project
proposes
for
residential
units
and
11
parking
spaces.
The
standard
municipal
code
requirement
for
multifamily
units
is
is
two
parking
spaces
per
unit,
so
the
project
is
actually
proposing
to
provide
more
parking
than
would
be
normally
required
by
the
code.
The
project
does
have
an
existing
parking
situation
that
is
less
than
what
we
would
consider
to
be
today's
standard.
I
So
what
was
approved
in
1972
in
1974
is
less
than
what
we
would
normally
see
today.
So
there
is
a
lower
parking
ratio
at
that
location
now
than
the
code,
but
the
new
units
are
going
to
have
greater
than
the
code,
so
the
parking
ratio
at
the
site
will
improve
slightly.
Remember
it's
very
large,
but
it
will
improve
slightly
with
the
project.
I
Also,
we've
worked
with
the
applicant
to
maximize
the
kind
of
usability
of
the
new
parking
spaces,
given
the
constraints
and
we've
also
been
working
with
the
applicant
on
an
overall
parking
management
strategy
that
helps
to
do
things
like
free
up
the
fire
lanes
and
bring
awareness
to
parking
at
the
complex
which
the
applicant
has
made
those
commitments
to
work
with
us
on
some
of
those
items.
So
staff
does
feel
that
the
applicant
has
gone,
maybe
slightly
above
what
would
be
required
for
this.
I
A
A
A
B
B
A
C
B
F
F
You
know
those
double-decker
units,
I,
don't
know
if
that's
even
feasible
on
this
facility,
I
mean
I
for
an
additional
fee,
providing
an
extra
parking
spot
to
pay
for
the
units
in
the
long
term
basis
I
mean
I
don't
know,
if
that's
even
an
idea,
we
can
throw
out
there,
but
I
did
not
want
to
add
it
to
the
last
project,
also
to
evaluate
the
whole
parking
on
the
overpass
I
mean.
Is
that
really
safe?