►
From YouTube: San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting August 20, 2013
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting August 20, 2013
whole meeting trt 1:01:45
A
A
B
A
A
Nope:
okay,
with
that
we'll
move
to
public
hearings.
First
one
is
675
seater
its
request
for
a
use
permit
to
a
while,
in
addition,
which
increases
the
gross
floor
area
ratio
of
an
existing
home
by
greater
than
fifty
percent
per
section,
12
230,
B
1
or
the
San
Bruno
Municipal
Code
Laura.
Please
thank.
E
You
and
good
evening
the
subject
site
is
on
Cedar
Avenue
near
the
corner
of
Kane's
Avenue.
The
lot
is
5000
865
square
feet.
It's
currently
developed
with
a
split-level
home
and
a2
card
tandem
garage.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
add
1659
square
feet
for
a
total
floor
area
of
2790
square
feet
that
corresponds
to
a
floor
area
ratio
of
point
5
1,
which
is
beneath
the
floor
area
ratio
threshold.
So
the
entitlement
tonight
is
just
for
greater
than
fifty
percent
expansion.
The
project
does
comply
with
all
other
development
standards
in
the
Municipal
Code.
E
The
addition
would
be
located
to
the
rear
of
the
existing
home.
The
applicant
has
indicated
to
staff
that
the
ceiling
heights,
the
design
and
the
window
placement
we're
all
specifically
designed
to
accommodate
an
artist's
studio,
so
two
artists
actually
reside
in
the
home
and
the
space
was
designed
to
help
accommodate
that
that
practice
that
they
have.
Although
the
addition
would
remain
at
one
story,
it
would
be
slightly
more
visible.
On
the
left
hand,
side,
the
site
does
have
some
cross
slope.
E
So,
on
the
right
side,
it
has
that
appearance
of
a
customary
one-story
home
on
the
left
side
because
of
the
cross
slope.
It
is
a
little
bit
taller
than
we
often
see,
and
so
staff
did
work
with
the
applicant
both
on
the
roof
lines,
as
well
as
the
window
designs
to
try
to
help
integrate
that
addition
into
the
existing
home.
So
the
plans
that
are
in
front
of
you
today
reflect
a
couple
of
different
revisions
that
the
applicant
has
made
to
try
to
incorporate
that
addition
into
the
existing
house.
E
The
exterior
materials
and
colors
would
match
the
existing
that
are
on
the
house
today.
The
project
was
reviewed
at
the
July
architectural
review
committee
meeting.
At
that
time,
the
committee
members
made
a
couple
of
minor
recommendations
and
staff
asked
for
just
a
couple
of
clarifications
on
the
plan.
They
did
make
the
change
of
the
architectural
review
committee
recommended
and
that
was
to
add
a
back
door,
basically
from
the
media
room
to
provide
access
to
the
rear
yard
steps
on
a
courtesy
notice
and
the
require
required
legal
notice.
E
We
received
one
written
comment
today
and
that
has
been
provided
to
the
Planning
Commission
today
on
paper,
it's
available
as
well
here
in
the
room
for
any
members
of
the
public
that
might
wish
to
access
it.
The
public
comments
were
related
to
two
of
the
standard
conditions
of
approval,
so
just
as
confirmation
for
the
Planning
Commission
and
for
members
of
the
public.
E
The
question
the
first
question
was
in
regards
to
the
curb
gutter
and
sidewalk
and
city
staff
does
do
an
inspection
of
the
curb
gutter
and
sidewalk
to
ensure
that
this
condition
of
approval
is
met.
So
the
authority
over
this
condition
rests
actually
with
our
engineering
staff
or
development
review
engineer
or
with
our
Public
Works
and
engineering
inspectors,
and
so
they're
the
ones
that
oversee
this
and
get
condition,
but
they
are
required
to
meet
the
condition
before
the
building.
Permit
can
be
final.
E
The
second
comment
from
the
member
of
the
public
and
was
in
regards
to
the
tree-planting
requirement.
The
city
does
have
a
strong
preference
for
planting
the
street
tree
instead
of
paying
the
in
Luthi.
So
the
the
member
of
the
public
wish
to
express
that
preference
for
planting
the
tree
instead
of
just
paying
the
fee,
and
that
is
the
city
standard
policy.
There
are
some
cases
when
there's
a
conflict
in
terms
of
the
design
or
perhaps
utilities
where
the
payment
of
the
fee
is
made
instead,
but
that
is
somewhat
rare.
E
That's
a
standard
requirement,
but
with
the
adoption
of
the
newest,
one
staff
has
become
aware
of
an
faa
notification
process
so
for
smaller
projects
such
as
this,
we
would
not
expect
that
notification
project
process
to
result
in
any
changes
to
the
design.
So
it's
we
consider
it
our
senses
that
for
a
small
project
like
this,
it's
not
too
significant.
It
should
not
impact
the
design
or
anything
that
would
affect
the
discretionary
review
that
you're
considering
tonight,
as
I
mentioned,
the
rest
of
the
conditions
of
approval
are
standard
for
this
project.
E
Staff
does
find
that
it
meets
the
residential
design
guidelines
and
it's
in
compliance
with
all
of
our
development
standards
and
again,
is
only
before
you
because
of
the
fifty
percent
expansion.
So
staff
would
recommend
approval
of
the
project
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
seven
and
subject
to
conditions
of
approval
1
through
26
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
D
D
D
Have
this
preference
that
when
a
member
the
public
or
the
applicant
reads
this
that
they're
able
to
understand
and
readily-
and
that
would
be
grammatically
correct?
This
is
not
a
sentence.
It's
a
fragment
of
a
sentence,
but
the
real
problem,
I
believe,
is
that
the
beginning
says
that
any
proposed,
single-family
or
two-family
dwelling
conforms
that
that's
stilted
and
it
and
gives
me
the
feeling
that
it's
extracted
from
another
document
and
I
wondered
if
there
would
be
any
problem
with
changing
it
to.
D
E
I
think
from
a
staff
perspective,
even
if
the
language
perhaps
could
be
improved,
I
think
we
would
prefer
to
stay
with
the
language
that
is
within
the
municipal
code,
as
we
make
the
legal
findings
but,
as
you
know,
we're
undertaking
the
zoning
code
update
at
this
time,
and
so
that
would
certainly
be
something
we
could
look
at
to
improve
the
language.
At
the
time
of
the
zoning
code
update
well.
E
D
B
B
Finding
I
do
think
that
that's
a
good
location
to
provide
the
clarification
that
you're
looking
for
because
seems
to
me
that
you
want
to
make
sure
that
the
applicant
and
that
the
attendees
here
tonight
and
those
viewing
really
have
a
clear
understanding
that
this
particular
project
does
conform
in
certain
ways
with
this
required
finding.
So
if
we
need
to
modify
our
staff
language,
we
could
certainly
do
that
and
could
incorporate
your
your
suggestion.
Well,.
B
B
D
To
do
that,
that's
that
you're
missing.
My
point,
my
point
is
that
the
bolded
material,
even
if
it's
made
into
a
sentence,
is
so
vague
as
to
appear
not
to
not
to
recognize
that
the
there
is
a
specific
application
under
consideration
and
what
and
the
characteristics
of
some
application
are
that
it's
a
single-family
dwelling.
B
We're
not
necessarily
disagreeing
with
you
in
terms
of
that
language,
that's
bolded!
We
can
look
it
up
dating
that
in
terms
of
our
municipal
code,
we'd
be
happy
to
do
that,
but
in
terms
of
this
particular
item
before
you
tonight,
we
can
take
the
language
you're
suggesting
and
put
that
directly
into
the
staff
analysis
below
so.
B
We're
simply
saying
is
that
it's
directly
from
the
Municipal
Code,
it's
our
practice
to
use
that
language.
If,
if
we're
going
to
modify
it,
we
should
probably
go
through
a
formal
modification
process.
I,
don't
think
we're
disagreeing
with
you.
It's
just
in
terms
of
timing,
we're
hearing
what
you
say,
we'd
be
happy
to
take
that
under
advisement
and
and
modify
this
language
as
needed.
No
problem
with
that,
but
for
tonight
we
can
certainly
take
your
language
and
put
it
under
the
staff.
D
I
wouldn't
be
opposed
to
having
a
citation
of
what
the
invisible
Code
section
is
right
in
a
trollface
language.
My
point
is
that
it's
vague
and
misleading
the
way
it's
stated
and
I
think
part
of
the
engine.
Part
of
the
objective
is
to
have
the
findings
of
fact
be
understandable
and
directly
religious.
The
project
and
I'll
drop
it
with
that.
I
can
see
you're
fixed
on
this
language
I'll
just
close
by
saying,
I
think
it's
vague
and
misleading
and.
F
E
When
the
applicant
comes
in
to
pull
their
building
permit
for
a
project
such
as
this
discretionary
application
at
that
time,
when
they
pay
their
permit
fees,
they
also
pay
a
deposit
for
the
tree
planting,
and
so
they
actually
pay.
What
could
be
considered
kind
of
like
the
in
lieu
fee
at
the
time
of
the
building
permit
issuance
at
the
end
of
the
project
is
typically
when
the
tree
is
planted
and
that's
in
coordination
with
our
parks
staff.
E
A
A
G
The
reason
of
the
extension
is
my
debt
is
his
our
artists
and
he
lived
with
me
and
our
he
is.
You
know
his
of
his
p
have
a
lot
of
paintings
that
we
acquired
a
higher
ceiling
for
for
him
to
paint.
That's
the
reason
why
we
just
the
reason
wife
we
saw
me
for
this
project
and
also
like
I,
did
talk
to
informed
that
you
talk
to
my
next
door.
Nate
neighbors,
you
know
dr.
G
A
D
D
C
A
A
H
A
F
F
E
My
interpretation
of
the
discussion
of
the
motion
was
to
add
a
statement
at
the
beginning
of
the
finding
to
read
the
application
for
the
proposed
single-family
dwelling
reasonably
conformed
to
the
basic
design
principles
of
the
residential
design
guidelines.
I
would
then
go
on
to
include
the
remainder
of
the
language,
with
the
specifics
and
finding
a
fact:
number
seven
staff
analysis,
but.
A
40
and
the
item
is
approved
and
there's
a
10-day
appeal
period:
Thank
You,
congratulations,
fine,
I'm!
Sorry,
okay,
okay!
Okay!
Next
item
is
131
cabrillo
away.
This
is
a
request
for
a
use
permit
to
allow.
In
addition,
it
exceeds
the
point.
Five
five
FA
are
guidelines:
construction
of
a
second-story
with
a
transparent
window,
second-story
deck
adjacent
to
an
abutting
property
has
a
side
yard
of
10
feet
or
greater
per
section.
12
230,
B,
2,
12,
230,
B,
3
and
section
12
240
be
one
of
the
same
brand
new
municipal
code
staff.
Please
thank.
I
You
and
goodie
I
stated
the
applicant
has
applied
for
it.
Use
permit
to
remodel
the
existing
home
at
131.
Cabriolet
site
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
cabrillo
way
is
currently
developed
with
a
one-story
single-family
dwelling,
the
existing
home
contains
three
bedrooms:
two
bathrooms
a
living
room
kitchen
and
a
large
two-car
garage.
I
The
application
calls
for
a
first
and
second
story.
Addition
to
the
existing
home.
The
first
floor
will
be
expanded
by
232
square
feet
to
accommodate
an
interior
rii
bottle
of
the
first
floor.
The
second
floor
will
be
553
square
feet
and
will
contain
two
bedrooms
in
one
bathroom.
Combine
the
home
will
have
five
bedrooms
three
bathrooms
and
will
have
2162
square
feet
of
living
area
with
a
two-car
garage.
The
project
was
reviewed
by
the
July
at
that
July
architectural
review
committee
meeting.
I
At
that
meeting,
the
architecture
view
committee
forwarded
the
project
on
to
the
Planning
Commission
with
free
staff
recommendations.
Those
recommendations
were
to
include
a
landscaping
plan
to
incorporate
clear
story.
Windows
in
the
second
story,
left
side
elevation
and
to
incorporate
consistent
window
trim
on
all
exterior
elevations.
The
plans
have
been
updated
to
incorporate
landscaping
plans.
Additionally,
clear
story
windows
have
been
incorporated
along
the
second
story
of
left
side.
I
Elevation
staff
has
included
a
condition
of
approval
requiring
all
existing
and
proposed
window
trim
to
match
at
the
time
of
building
permits
milk,
as
proposed
the
project
requires
three
separate
entitlements.
A
use
permit
is
required
for
exceeding
the
point
five
five
FA
our
threshold
I
would
like
to
point
out.
It's
only
exceeding
this
threshold
by
three
square
feet,
however,
use
permit
is
still
required.
I'm
staff
finds
that
the
addition
is
consistent
with
the
residential
design
guidelines.
The
second
story
is
incorporating
setbacks
from
the
first
story
below
which
is
a
common
comment.
I
I
Additionally,
a
use
permit
is
required
for
exceeding
the
forty-four
percent
block
coverage
threshold,
the
proposal
mass
to
forty-nine
percent.
As
far
as
lot
coverage
is
concerned,
the
intent
of
this
requirement
is
to
ensure
that
there
is
still
active
open
space
on
the
lot.
In
this
particular
case,
staff
finds
that
there
is
still
a
significant
amount
of
open
space,
specifically
there's
going
to
be
a
rear
setback,
ranging
between
12
feet
and
33
feet.
Additionally,
the
home
will
maintain
the
existing
16
foot
front.
I
Setback
I'd
also
like
to
point
out
that
there
is
a
large
front
porch
that
measures
six
and
a
half
feet
deep.
Lastly,
a
use
permit
is
required
for
constructing
a
second-story
with
transparent
windows
adjacent
to
an
abutting
property
that
has
a
side
yard
greater
than
10
feet.
Homes
in
San
Bruno
typically
have
a
setback
in
the
three
to
five
foot
range.
I
I
Staff
sent
a
courtesy
notice
in
the
required
300-foot
legal
notice
to
property
owners
staff
received
one
comment,
and
those
are
written
comments
that
we
received
today
that
have
since
been
distributed
to
the
Planning
Commission.
There's
two
specific
concerns
that
were
mentioned.
There
is
one
heritage
tree
located
on
site.
The
concerned.
Citizen
is
requesting
that
staff
inspect
the
Heritage
free
prior
to
granting
a
building
permit
and
to
its
inspect
that
heritage
tree
once
construction
is
complete
to
ensure
that
that
tree
has
not
been
damaged.
Staff
typically
does
not
inspect
trees
prior
to
permit
issuance.
I
I
Another
issue
that
was
brought
up
was
the
citizen
was
concerned.
The
potential
impact
construction
related
activities
could
have
on
adjacent
properties
due
to
the
site
being
located
on
the
cul-de-sac,
and
this
particular
citizen
is
requesting
that
staff
further
send
out
another
mailer
to
the
surrounding
property
owners.
Informing
them
of
this
project.
I'd
look
to
point
out
that
we
did
send
a
courtesy
notice.
I
We
did
send
a
300-foot
notice
and
we
did
not
receive
any
phone
phone
calls
or
concerns,
except
for
the
written
proposal
or
written
to
Adams
address
tonight
that
are
before
us
staff
will
in
or
encourage
the
property
owner
to
inform
adjacent
property
owners
of
the
construction
during
our
normal
pre-construction
meeting
that
we
have
just
prior
to
the
building
permit
be
an
issue,
though.
Overall
staff
is
supportive
of
this
project.
We
do
recommend
that
the
Planning
Commission
approve
the
project
subject
to
findings.
I
C
I
The
tree
were
diseased
at
first,
we
would
probably
want
to
read
want
to
get
a
professional's
opinion,
so
we
would
rely
on
an
arborist
report
to
make
that
official
determination.
If
it
were
disease
in
the
artist,
was
recommending
that
it
be
removed.
We
would
we
would
request
that
the
applicant
or
the
homeowner
follow
that
are
versus
recommendation.
Thank
you.
D
D
I
A
J
My
name
is
Kathleen
Morgan
Clark
and
the
only
reason
we're
doing.
The
addition
is
that
my
elderly
mother
in
law
has
been
taken
in
by
my
husband
and
myself,
as
well
as
my
19
year
old
sons,
best
friend,
who
recently
became
homeless.
So
we
now
have
five
people
living
in
a
three-bedroom
home.
Two
of
the
bedrooms
are
pretty
small,
and
so
we
need
extra
space
since
there's
five
of
us
living
there
now
and
we
love
San
Bruno
my
husband's
been
here
since
he
was
11
and
we'll
both
62.
J
So
he
doesn't
want
to
move
and
I've
been
here
since
we
got
married
20
years
ago,
and
I
don't
want
to
move
so
we've
temporarily.
Well,
not
temporal
bought
a
house
up
in
the
monteverdi
area
of
san
bruno
to
stay
in
while
we
hopefully
get
approved
for
this
edition,
because
we
love
living
on
cabrillo,
it's
great
street.
We
know
all
of
our
neighbors
we've
actually
spoken
with
I
would
say
almost
every
neighbor
on
the
block
about
the
addition
and
the
one
concern
with
the
people.
J
On
the
left,
hand,
side
and
we've
agreed
to
have
the
clear
story
windows
so
that
they
don't
feel
impacted
by
our
addition.
In
addition,
the
tree
I
think
that
they're
talking
about
is
most
likely
our
pear
tree,
or
maybe
we
have
a
pear
tree
to
plum
trees
and
a
peach
in
the
back,
none
of
which
were
going
to
take
out
and
make
jam
from
them
every
year.
So
the
trees
aren't
going
anywhere
and
we
did
have
I,
don't
know
if
they
call
the
Heritage
tree
or
not.
J
J
D
A
K
My
name
is
Jim
evangelist.
I
live
at
105
to
soda
white
in
san
bruno
and
I
have
three
points
that
I
wanted
to
make
em
to
regarding
the
flyer
that
was
given
to
us
one
being
that
in
your
description,
although
I'm
sure
it's
accurate
according
to
building
code
and
her
principal
code
is
required,
I
I
think
that
it,
it
wouldn't
hurt
to
put
a
layman's
interpretation
below
if
it's
legally
allowed,
so
that
people
would
really
understand
what
this
says.
K
The
second
point
is:
there's
no
plan
view
of
the
footprint
of
the
lot
and
how
the
house
is
actually
going
to
be
impact.
The
overall
lot
size
when
you
just
throw
numbers
out
there
it
just
it's
hard
for
people
to
visualize,
and
so
I
would
suggest
it
if
you
can
incorporate
that
on.
Even
if
you
required
another
piece
of
paper,
a
plan
view
of
it
and
then
the
final.
My
final
comment
is
really
just
my
personal
opinion
about
the
development.
That's
going
on.
I
do
applaud
what
you're
doing
to
help
your
family.
Very
admirable.
K
I've
lived
there
for
35
years,
I
like
the
community
as
well.
I,
like
the
style
of
the
community,
that
I
moved
into
35
years
ago,
single-family
dwellings,
mostly
single
level
ranch-style
homes
and
what
I
see
happening
is
everybody
wants
to
elevate
their
homes
and
I
understand
the
rationale
behind
it:
either
increase
the
value
and
stuff.
It's
just
that
I
moved
there.
For
this
specific
reason
of
the
the
look
of
the
neighborhood,
the
feel
of
the
neighborhood
and
the
more
the
abyss
continues
to
happen
throughout
the
city.
K
It
changes
the
nature
of
all
the
neighborhoods
and
the
way
it
works
now
is
I
would,
if
all
my
neighbors
had
to
wanted
to
increase
the
levels
of
their
homes,
I
would
have
to
go
in
and
fight
every
enough
fight,
but
make
comments
on
every
home.
It
seems
that
I
don't
know,
there's
I
know,
there's
no
solution
to
this
right
now
or
anything.
It
just
seems
like
when
they're,
when
individuals
are
coming
in
to
change
the
nature
of
an
existing
neighborhood.
K
It
seems
to
me
that
they
should
have
more
than
to
deal
with
than
just
a
few
people
who
have
decided
to
take
the
time
to
preserve
the
look
of
the
neighborhood
that
they
should
have
to.
You
know,
go
a
little
further
and
get
the
agreement
from
everybody
there
that
we
allow
two-story
buildings
instead
of
the
single
store,
like
we
do
in
our
community.
Okay,
thanks.
A
C
Want
to
comment
that
over
the
20-plus
years,
as
a
commissioner,
one
of
the
things
that's
well
first
I
would
acknowledge
your
comments
and
understand
being
a
seminal
resident
of
36
years.
That
there
are,
there
are
changes
to
communities
and
neighborhoods
that
take
place.
Some
are
impacted
really
positively
another's.
Sometimes
we
wish
they
didn't
take
place.
A
C
It's
not
always
necessarily
for
the
an
individual
person,
but
because
something
might
be
blighted
or
there
might
be
other
issues
taking
no
disease,
Daria's,
just
things
that
need
attention,
but
particularly
when
there
are
community
workshops.
I
would
encourage
when
that
takes
place,
and
none
on
the
cable
television
they
do
provide.
The
information
of
those
in
your
input
would
be
very
valuable
to
hear
those
pieces,
and
you
know
thank
you
for
your
comments.
C
I
do
know
that
as
a
commissioner
and
as
a
resident
and
as
one
who
has
done
some
remodeling
myself,
that
there
were
very
valid
reasons.
You
acknowledge
you
acknowledge
the
applicant
towards
that,
and
you
know
it
would
be.
Probably
a
very
difficult
process
to
think
that
that
everyone
would
be
an
agreement
with
someone's
choice.
C
There's
different
projects
that
take
place
that
change
communities
you
up
on
the
skyline
and
various
ones
are
not
Camino,
and
so
your
input
would
be
very
valuable,
but
when
those
workshops
are
taking
place,
it
sounds
like
you
have
a
bigger
picture
view
about
a
community
and
I
think
that
your
comments
would
be
warranted.
So
I
would
encourage
you
to
do
that.
Alright,
thanks.
A
A
D
D
K
C
C
D
F
Then
my
second
comment
was
that
I,
your
three
comments,
I
agree
with
the
first
to
the
third
I,
don't
agree
with
personally
yeah,
but
I
think
the
way
for
you
to
get
an
agreement
or
actually
have
that
be
valid
of
a
statement
would
be
to
establish
an
HOA
or
some
sort
of
a
body
like
that
which
governs
the
architectural
style
in
that
specific
area.
I
see
all
right
without
that
sort
of
agreement.
K
I
get
that
it's
a
it's
like
comparing
a
dell
web
development,
where
everything
is
spelled
out
to
you
or
in
a
town
like
Hillsborough,
where
they
they
make
sure
everything's.
They
don't
leave
too
many
things
open
in
our
community.
Here,
it's
more
of
a
Wild
West
situation,
or
there
is
some
standards,
but
there's
not
as
many
as
some
of
the
other
more
planned.
F
K
H
L
Hi,
my
name's,
our
home
and
I
reasonable
to
the
house
just
mixed
you
there,
the
house,
one
on
131
cap
rollin
way
and
then
so
I
just
saw
the
plan
and
filled
in
such
a
small
block.
The
ratio
is
to
is
to
be,
and
from
this
information
from
the
information
from
this
file,
the
ratio
is
exceeds.
You
know
the
0.55
fa
are
and
the
lander
the
Lord
coverage
is
over
here.
Forty-Nine
percent,
which
is
you
know,
it's
is
exceeded
a
forty-four
percent
of
their
kind
line.
L
So
I
don't
know
whether
this
this
world,
you
know,
will
be
a
permit,
admit
it
or
not.
I
understand
that
my
Labor's
and
leads
them
the
big
space
part
of
it
in
such
a
small
space
as
the
lot,
and
they
asked
that
the
house
areas
is
quite
big.
It's
reaches
to
you
know,
he's
excited
that
the
building
code,
so
that's
one
thing
I
concern
about,
and
so
whether
you
were
concerned
about
that
and
I
say
you
dishing.
You
know
the
when
I
bought
this
house,
er
I.
L
Really
I
like
my
house,
because
a
part
of
a
reason
like
my
house
is-
and
it's
a
private
yard
so
I
feel
to
want
the
once
the
new
Beauty
edition
is
added
up.
I
were
lost.
My
privacy
privacy
backyard,
so
yeah
I
suggested
that
in
the
second
floor
they
are
the
transparent
windows
in
a
side
in
a
sidewall.
So
she
I
suggested
to
use
a
change.
The
transparent,
the
window
from
the
yellow
to
the
semi-transparent
window,
so
I
can
still
have
spot
of
the
private
backyard.
A
A
D
D
So
if
those
are
exceeded,
it
doesn't
mean
they're
not
permitted,
but
they
have
to
be
reviewed
and
considered,
and
a
decision
has
to
be
made
typically,
the
Commission
level
as
to
whether
they're,
acceptable
and
I
I
appreciate
your
comments
and
as
far
as
the
windows
go
I
hadn't
thought
about
that
when
I
looked
at
it,
but
I
think
that
that's
a
very
common
situation
that
neighbors
are
concerned
about
windows.
On
the
second
floor,
that
look
on
to
their
high
property-
and
it
looks
to
me.
A
B
C
L
D
A
I
I
F
H
L
L
F
Personally,
don't
agree
with
changing
the
window
out
to
a
semi-transparent,
because
it
says
it
says
the
president
precedents
for
us,
which,
if
a
property
is
on
a
slope
and
naval,
complains
that
that
window
is
looking
into
the
yard.
We're
gonna
have
to
change
all
our
windows
to
semi-transparent
windows
or
fully
blocking
this
is
this
is
an
end,
so
I
would
not
entertain
a
motion
such
as
that
I.
Don't
think
the
ability
to
look
out
of
a
window
and
look
into
someone's
face
is,
unless
you
big
a
build,
a
big
box
or
18-foot
fences.
F
A
C
Why
do
support
the
I'm
in
agreement
with
Kapil
Mishra
and
not
for
a
bit
of
a
different
reason?
One
is
there's
18
feet.
There's
a
carport
in
between
there
was
enough
space
in
that
area,
and
typically
windows.
I,
don't
have
the
opportunity
of
going
into
the
neighbor's
backyard.
I
typically
try
to
look
in
those
areas.
They
didn't
go
into
chi
Rebecca,
to
look
at
those
specifics
and
certainly
not
suggestion
to
continue
something
I'm
on
this
nature.
I
would
not
turn
down
the
project
because
of
it.
I
would
not
vote
against
it
because
of
it.
C
Non
transparent
and
so
we're
looking
at
this,
you
know
the
site
subjects
and
you
know.
Certainly
this
is
a
picture
you're
not
there
in
reality,
you're,
not
looking
all
the
components
and,
in
all
fairness
to
the
neighbor
I'm,
not
I,
might
able
to
see
all
those
components.
However,
I
I,
don't
support
are
changing
the
windows.
C
H
D
D
A
B
A
F
I
I
recently
looked
at
my
building
permit
that
I
have
opened,
and
I
noticed
that
there
were
two
fees
on
there,
which
one
is
the
tree
fee,
the
in
luffy
and
then
the
other
one
is
the
recycling
fee.
Nowhere
in
that
fee,
it
actually
says
that
it's
refundable
there
for
encouraging
me
to
actually
follow
a
recycling
plant
or
submit
my
recycling
manifest
or
actually
plant
a
tree,
because
it
really
doesn't
encourage
me
to
do
anything
because
of
the
language
on
there.
It
says
it's
a
fee.
F
F
Fee
and
then
the
recycling
and
demolition
feet
or
believe
it's
called
a
fee
and
doesn't
indicate
that
it's
actually
a
fundable.
Oh,
we
can
work
with
that
language.
The
second
one
I
had
was
that
about
four
months
ago
we
had
ish.
We
were
tracking
some
issues,
they're
open,
such
as
what
was
it
taken
into
consideration
for
the
Whiteman
way
or
so
the
one-way
street,
and
we
were
tracking
a
bunch
of
issues
at
the
beginning
of
the
year.
There
were
about
four
issues,
and
now
that
they've
dropped
off
the
discussion.
F
D
D
B
We
did,
and
I
was
going
to
report
back
to
you
this
evening
on
that
I
could
do
that
right
now,
if
you'd
like
oh,
did
I
jump
ahead.
No,
it's
it's
not
actually
here,
but
I've
got
the
the
research
and
was
going
to
share
that
with
you.
Oh
great,
it's
not
actually
on
the
agenda,
but
let
me
go
right
to
that
right
now.
So
the
address
is
a
160
170,
el
camino,
real,
it's
the
property
right
adjacent
to
the
prudential
realty
building
right
and
the
background.
Many
of
you
know
this.
B
The
background
is
that
remediation
began
in
about
the
year
2001.
The
remediation
project
was
required
because
there
were
approximately
11
underground
fuel
tanks
on
that
property
which
have
been
removed.
There
was
both
soil
and
water
contamination
on
the
site,
which
is
led
to
the
remediation
project
over
this
number
of
years.
What
you've
noticed
out
there
more
recently
is
that
some
of
the
piping
that's
been
above
ground
is
being
dismantled
and
actually
in
talking
to
the
project
manager,
about
this,
a
man
by
the
name
of
Paul
Dotson
who's,
the
project
manager
for
the
remediation
effort.
B
B
So
you
know
he
was
reluctant
to
say
you
know:
is
that
going
to
be
within
six
months
or
a
year,
but
they're
clearly
moving
forward
toward
closure?
That
report
is
due
to
go
in
over
the
next
couple
of
weeks
and
within
six
weeks
they
should
hear
back
from
the
county.
The
above-ground
piping
is
being
dismantled,
so
I
think
that's
good
news
and
in
terms
of
the
actual
reuse
of
the
property
that
could
take
some
while
it
could
take
some
time
to
actually
get
to
that
point.
D
B
D
D
Thank
you
very
welcome.
Oh
through
the
chair.
Please
I
forgot,
as
Commissioner
Johnson
earlier
this
evening
was
commenting
on
looking
on
the
cable
TV
for
various
schedules
or
planning
documents,
and
so
on
being
able
to
see
the
meetings.
There
are
a
substantial
number
of
people
who
can
no
longer
look
at
cable
TV
to
see
Planning,
Commission
meetings,
calendars,
City,
Council,
because
they've
changed
cable
providers
and.
D
I
can
tell
you
that
south
san
francisco,
just
as
an
example,
south
san
francisco
and
millbrae,
both
provide
a
feed
to
AT&T.
Okay.
I
should
also
in
the
interest
of
full
disclosure,
say
that
I
asked
the
cable
TV
office
and
they
wrote
me
a
letter
back
after
some
eight
or
nine
months,
saying
that
my
request
for
now
providing
a
feed
to
AT&T,
cable
TV
was
was
dismissed,
that
they
had
taken
it
to
a
cable
TV
committee
who
rejected
it.