►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting February 14, 2012
6. Approval of Minutes
A
B
B
B
Historically,
if
somebody
would
read
this,
they
would.
It
would
look
like
we're
reimbursing
artichoke
Joe's
for
their
police
investigative
services
and
that's
not
what
what
was
told
and
then
we
go
down
to
the
question
of
council
member
where
it
says,
council
member
Salazar
asked
how
the
Staffie
would
work.
B
His
says,
police
chief
Telford
said
one
of
our
existing
officers
would
be
taken
off
the
street
and
put
into
artichoke
Joe's
and
then
open
a
detective
slot.
Well,
that's
rather
confusing
and
I
would
say
something
such
as
police
chief,
such
telford
actually
said
in
that
he
said.
One
of
our
existing
officers
would
be
taken
off
the
street
and
a
detective
position
would
be
created.
A
C
Yes,
the
written
document
that
you
have
in
front
of
you
tonight
is
the
official
record
in
as
the
historical
document
that
route,
that
is
the
formal
record
of
the
city
council's
meeting
discussion
and
its
actions
and
I,
would
respond
to
mr.
lucky's
comments
in
two
men
in
two
ways.
First
of
all,
the
comment
regarding
the
resolution
that
you
adopted
on
the
agenda
at
the
January
10th
meeting
was
presented
to
you
in
the
way
that
it
is
captured
in
the
minutes
and
it
your
action
is
accurately
reflected
in
these
minutes.
C
C
Take
that
into
consideration
on
a
going-forward
basis,
so
I
would
not
recommend
that
you
make
any
change
and
it
would
be
improper
for
you
to
do
so
as
to
chief
telford
response
to
councilmember
Salazar's
comment
that
is
within
your
purview
to
clarify
or
correct
the
language
that
is
in
front
of
you
tonight
and
again.
This
is
the
official
document
of
your
meeting
and
as
long
as
what
you
say
is
that,
in
wanting
the
minutes
is
actually
consistent
with
what
was
said
at
the
meeting
you're
free
to
make
modifications
two
minutes
before
you
adopt
them.
Okay,.