►
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting July 19, 2011
Whole Meeting
D
A
B
A
C
Items
first,
I'd
like
to
welcome
councilmember
Salazar
to
the
audience
he
is
serving
as
your
council
liaison
this
year.
So
he's
here
for
was
actually
a
pretty
full
agenda
of
different
types
of
Planning
Commission
items.
So
it's
actually
a
good
night
for
you
to
be
here
and
get
it
taste
of
what
goes
on
at
the
Planning
Commission.
So
welcome
feel
free
to
ask
any
questions
if
you
have
any
throughout
the
meeting.
The
second
is
our
normal
announcement
that
this
whole
packet
is
online
at
san
bruno
CA
gov
in
the
planning
section.
C
A
E
B
A
Eye
agenda
item:
3
is
public
comments
on
items
not
on
the
agenda.
This
is
the
opportunity
for
any
members
of
public
to
address
the
Planning
Commission
on
items
that
are
not
agenda
is
tonight
and
hearing
none
I'll
move
on
to
item
number
4
announcement
of
conflict
of
interest
are
any
of
the
members
having
a
conflict
of
interest
on
any
business
item
side.
B
C
Through
through
the
chair,
yeah
I
mean
Commissioner
Marshall.
He
should
be
here
on
his
way
for
the
item
and
I
know
this
from
the.
When
this
item
was
at
the
Architectural
Review
level,
he
does
have
a
conflict
at
560
san
mateo
Avenue,
as
marshall
realty
handled
the
leasing
of
the
space.
So
he
will
go
to
himself
from
the
side
very.
A
Good.
Thank
you
very
much
agenda
item.
5A
is
1716
canes
Avenue,
which
is
a
request
for
a
use
permit
and
construction
for
construction
of
an
addition
which
increases
the
gross
floor
area
of
the
existing
home
by
greater
than
fifty
fifty
percent
and
to
allow
an
addition
to
exceed
1825
square
feet
of
living
space
with
a
one-car
garage
for
sections,
12
230
B,
1
and
12
230
B
5
of
the
San
Bruno
Municipal
Code
staff
report
play
thank.
F
You
good
evening,
commissioners,
the
item
before
you
is
a
request
for
a
use
permit
for
a
second
story
in
first
story,
addition
to
an
existing
single-story
residential
home,
as
indicated
by
the
chair,
there's
two
items
before
you.
As
far
as
the
use
permit
one
is:
the
expansion
is
greater
than
fifty
percent
and
the
other
item
is
with
the
expansion.
The
home
will
be
over
1825
square
feet
with
a
single
car
garage,
so
that
does
also
require
the
use
permit.
F
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
construct
an
865
square
foot
first
and
second
story
addition
to
the
existing
residence.
The
addition
will
be
located
to
the
rear
of
the
home
and
would
accommodate
a
new
stairway
reconfigured
lower
floor
and
then
a
new
master
bedroom
and
bathroom.
On
the
second
story.
The
existing
home
is
1406
square
feet
area
and
with
the
865
square
foot
addition,
the
total
home
would
be
2271
square
feet
in
area
and
that
does
include
the
253
square
foot
single
single
car
garage.
F
The
proposed
addition
is
set
back
approximately
seven,
a
little
over
seven
feet
from
the
left
side
and
twenty
feet
from
the
right
side.
Property
line
is
I,
indicated
the
staff
report
during
the
courtesy
notice
period
prior
to
the
art
review.
We
did
receive
a
call
from
one
of
the
neighbors
that
neighbor
expressed
some
concern
with
the
second-story
addition.
I
tried
to
you
know
meet
with
the
neighbor
see.
F
A
G
Only
thing
I
would
like
to
just
tonight:
Commission
is
the
that
you
can
the
eco-friendly
initiatives
that
we're
incorporating
in
the
building
of
the
house.
We
are
using
prefab
forms
for
the
foundation.
We're
engineered,
lumber,
metal
studs
will
be
used
for
the
framing.
So
we
know
newton
trying
to
keep
the
minimum
down
on
the
kind
of
cutting
new
wood.
I'm
a
conservation
at
heart,
as
I
mentioned
before
in
our
last
discussion,
so
where
we
can
save,
is
always
good
for
me.
G
In
fact,
we
also
incorporated,
in
the
last
discussion
on
the
conduits,
build
to
incorporate
solar
eventually
after
the
build,
so
those
are
some
of
the
primary
ones
that
were
we're
focusing
on.
We
do
currently
have
energy-saving
lighting
inside
the
house
and
we're
going
to
plan
to
use
that
it's
throughout
the
house
as
we
second
floor.
Thank.
A
A
H
Thank
you
and
good
evening,
as
stated,
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
construct
an
addition
that
would
exceed
the
forty-four
percent
lock
coverage
requirement.
The
site
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
Oakmont
drive
between
marion
drive
and
berkshire
drive
and
is
currently
developed
with
a
one-story
single-family
dwelling
that
single-family
dwelling
consists
of
1840
square
feet
of
living
area,
and
it
has
a
two-car
attached
garage.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
construct
a
562
square-foot
one
story
addition.
H
The
project
specifically
calls
for
the
remodel
of
the
first
floor
plan,
which
would
expand
the
three
existing
bedrooms
on
site.
Additionally,
a
new
office
in
bedroom
are
also
proposed.
As
a
result,
the
addition
would
would
result
in
2,400
to
square
feet
of
living
area.
The
project
was
heard
at
the
jun
2011
architectural
review
committee
meeting
at
that
meeting.
The
architecture
review
committee
forwarded
the
project
on
to
the
Planning
Commission,
with
staff
recommendations
regarding
all
regarding
overall
landscaping
and
the
on-site
impervious
surfaces.
H
Since
that
time,
the
applicant
has
incorporated
additional
landscaping
on
site
and
has
reduced
the
overall
amount
of
impervious
surfaces
on
the
site
to
be
less
than
the
eighty
percent,
which
is
permitted
by
the
Municipal
Code.
In
regards
to
the
entitlement
requests
to
exceed
the
forty-four
percent
law
coverage
requirement,
staff
does
find
that
there
is
a
significant
amount
of
open
space
still
on
the
lot.
Specifically,
the
front
yard
setback
would
vary
between
sixteen
feet
and
twenty-two
feet
and
the
rear
yard
setback
would
be
between
10
feet
and
17
feet.
H
As
stated,
the
applicant
also
will
be
incorporating
landscaping
in
the
front
yard,
side,
yard
and
rear
guard
as
well.
Regarding
performance
with
the
residential
design
guidelines,
we
do
find
that
it
is
consistent
with
the
residential
design
guidelines.
The
proposed
roofline
will
match
the
existing
roof
lines
and
all
proposed
exterior
matale
materials
will
match
the
existing
home,
specifically
they'll
utilize,
vertical
wood,
siding
for
the
front
elevation
and
stucco
finish
for
the
sides.
H
Staff
did
Senate
courtesy
notice
to
the
immediately
adjacent
property
owners
and
the
required
300-foot
notice
to
all
property
owners,
and
we
did
not
receive
any
comments
from
concerned.
Neighbors
overall
staff
is
in
support
of
this
project
and
would
recommend
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
use
permit
request,
subject
to
findings
of
fact,
one
through
seven
and
conditions
of
approval.
One
through
23
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
Thank
you
any
Commission.
G
A
I
My
name
is
best
Rihanna
and
I'm,
the
applicant
for
mr.
Fernandez,
our
residential
house,
with
in
regards
to
our
landscape
words.
That
would
be
now
a
part
of
the
major
renovation
of
the
improvement
of
the
project.
The
the
green
building
measures
implementation
are,
we
will
be
I
would
be
recommending
to
the
owner
a
drought
resistant
soils
by
using
our
more
of
much
on
the
loan
and
sorry.
B
I
D
A
J
A
A
H
You,
as
stated
the
applicant,
has
applied
for
use
permit
to
allow
alcohol
sales
in
conjunction
with
an
existing
restaurant
located
at
699
san
mateo
avenue.
The
La
Paloma
restaurant
is
located
on
the
corner
of
san
mateo
avenue
and
canes
avenue
in
downtown
san
bruno
and
is
part
of
a
larger
5,000
square
parcel.
The
existing
hours
of
operation
are
nine
a.m.
to
9pm
may
serve
breakfast
lunch
and
dinner
on
site.
There
are
a
total
of
forty-six
seats
on
site.
The
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
essentially
reestablish
alcohol
sales
at
the
subject
site.
H
One
thing
that's
important
to
note
is
that
the
La
Paloma
restaurant
was
operating
with
a
type
40
liquor
license
from
1991
to
2009
that
type
40
liquor
license
allowed
the
sale
of
beer
in
conjunction
with
the
existing
restaurant.
One
thing
I
would
like
to
point
out
is
prior
to
2003.
A
conditional
use
permit
was
not
required
for
the
sale
of
alcohol
in
conjunction
with
the
restaurant.
These
uses
were
allowed
by
right
and
are
considered
legal
non-conforming
uses
and
those
legal
non-conforming.
Restaurants
are
subject
to
performance
standards
within
the
Municipal
Code.
H
Non-Conforming
uses
are
allowed
to
be
to
continue
as
long
as
they
re-established
within
that
six-month
time
period.
In
this
particular
case,
the
business
operator
did
not
reapply
for
an
ABC
license
between
in
that
six-month
time
period.
Therefore,
they
are
subject
to
today's
standards,
which
require
a
conditional
use
permit
for
all
new
restaurants
wanting
to
serve
alcohol.
With
that
stated,
staff
does
not
anticipate
any
negative
effects
in
conjunction
with
alcohol
sales.
With
the
existing
restaurant,
the
hours
of
operation
will
remain
the
same
9am
29
p.m.
H
additionally,
the
police
has
reviewed
the
project
and
has
placed
the
standard
conditions
of
approval
on
the
project.
Staff
would
recommend
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
this
project
subject
to
findings
affect
one
through
five
and
conditions
of
approval.
1
through
14
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have
any.
D
H
A
A
K
I'm
representing
mr.
Casten,
he
knows
my
name
is
Jose
raw,
fresh
and
I'm
with
my
girlfriend
here:
Sergio
casinos
and
the
other
sofa
699
Summit
Avenue,
and
thank
you
for
giving
us
a
time
being
here
and
basically
that
match,
except
for
that
we
apply
here
for
the
bay
license.
You
know
my
great
friend
he's
only
managing
operator
of
business
for
about
13
years
a
moving
through
this
process
for
the
last
past
two
years.
You
know
through
our
ups
and
downs
in
the
business,
but
up
that's
basically,
sir.
A
A
J
A
C
A
A
L
You
and
good
evening
the
subject
site
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
san
mateo
avenue
it's
2,500
square
feet,
you're,
probably
familiar
with
it.
It
was
previously
occupied
by
lullaby
Lane
and
is
immediately
adjacent
to
the
public
walkway
that
goes
from
San
Mateo
Avenue
into
the
parking
lot
in
the
back.
The
applicant
is
proposing
a
coin-operated
laundry
business
at
that
location,
and
that
is
a
conditional
use
in
the
central
business
district
zoning.
The
Apple
ken
has
also
applied
for
an
architectural
review,
permit
and
facade
improvement
funding,
and
those
things
were
heard.
L
Just
last
Thursday
July
fourteenth
before
the
Architectural
Review
Committee,
the
Architectural
Review
permit,
was
approved
and
the
facade
improvement
funding
was
approved
as
well.
The
plans
and
the
color
rendering
from
that
Architectural
Review
permit
were
included
in
your
packet.
Although
it's
a
separate
entitlement,
it
does
play
into
our
analysis
and
thought
about
the
project.
So
you
have
the
color
in
front
of
you
for
your
review
as
we're
discussing
here
tonight.
L
I
also
like
to
point
out
that
the
improvements
that
were
approved
as
part
of
the
architectural
review
permit
would
be
required
to
be
completed
before
business
operation.
So
the
conditional
use
permit
before
you
tonight
does
have
a
condition
of
approval
that
says
all
improvements
from
the
architectural
review
permit
would
have
to
be
completed
prior
to
operation.
L
So
in
a
little
bit
more
detail
now,
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
full-service
laundry
business,
so
that
includes
coin
operated,
washers
and
dryers,
and
these
are
described
to
staff
and
in
the
statement
as
being
sort
of
modern
and
up-to-date
equipment,
and
so
they
are
more
water
efficient.
They
are
more
energy
efficient
and,
as
I
understand,
it
also
complete
the
washing
and
drying
cycles.
More
quickly,
so
hopefully
gone
are.
The
days
are
standing
at
the
laundromat
for
many
many
hours.
L
But
as
we
know,
many
members
of
our
community
do
rely
on
the
coin-operated
laundry
I'm
to
meet
their
basic
needs.
They
also
propose
to
have
a
wash
and
fold
service,
as
well
as
a
dry
cleaning
pick
up
and
drop
off
and
the
cleaning
itself
would
be
done
at
another
site.
Their
proposed
business
hours
are
fairly
long
at
7am
to
11
p.m.
seven
days
per
week.
They
have
also
said
that
they
would
always
have
an
employee
on-site
to
provide
service
and
maintain
kind
of
safety
and
security
in
a
presence
in
in
the
storefront.
L
They've
also
proposed
cameras
at
the
entrances
to
increase
security
and
reduce
vandalism,
as
the
Commission
has
discussed
in
the
past,
and
we've
talked
about
security
cameras
and
locations
that
may
not
have
enough
lighting
to
make
sure
that
the
cameras
are
picking
up
everything
that
they're
intended
to
see.
We
talked
about
that
at
the
st.
L
Vincent
DePaul
application,
so
we
have
revised
our
condition
language
that
we
use
for
security
cameras
to
say
that
if
the
lighting
is
not
sufficient
for
the
cameras
to
work,
then
the
lighting
would
also
have
to
be
improved
for
the
cameras
to
function
properly.
For
those
of
you
that
you
were
at
the
architectural
review
committee
meeting
and
we
did
discuss
and
add
a
little
bit
of
additional
exterior
lighting
on
the
project,
the
staff
is
confident
at
this
time
that
the
lighting
will
be
sufficient
and
incurable
of
safety
I'm.
L
Considering
those
hours
that
go
into
the
evening
steps
in
a
courtesy
notice
on
jun
29th,
as
well
as
a
legal
notice
on
july
eight,
we
have
not
received
any
comments
on
as
of
time,
staff
does
support
the
project
for
several
reasons.
So
to
summarize,
the
project
includes
modern
equipment
that
saves
water
and
energy
includes
a
on-demand
hot
water
system,
and
so
this
is
really
the
latest
technology.
That's
available
for
this
type
of
business.
L
There,
including
dramatic
improvements
to
the
site,
including
a
new
storefront,
so
the
actual
window
storefront
system
is,
is
proposed
and
approved
to
be
replaced.
A
new
sign,
they've,
also
included
sort
of.
I
would
describe
it
as
a
whimsical
mural
feature
across
the
front
elevation
that
really
reinforces
that
use
of
a
laundry
mat,
but
I
think,
also
could
be
described
as
family-friendly
and
attractive
to
children
as
they're
in
the
area
they're
also
proposing
what
is
really
a
significant
investment
in
a
building.
That's
remained
essentially
unchanged
for
decades,
and
finally,
it
is
a
needed
service.
L
People
need
a
place
to
do
their
laundry
and
this
business
would
be
new
and
up-to-date
and
would
have
a
high
quality
appearance.
So,
therefore,
staff
does
recommend
approval
of
use,
permit
11,
0
10,
based
on
findings
of
fact,
1
2,
3
and
subject
to
the
conditions.
Approval
in
the
staff
report
and
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
B
E
L
That's
because
of
the
timing,
in
the
turnaround
so
to
update
the
rest
of
the
Commission.
There
was
quite
a
bit
of
discussion
at
architectural
review.
The
apple
has
expressed
an
interest
in
having
some
seating
opportunities
in
the
back
of
the
building.
There's
some
empty
io
called
empty
space,
there's
an
old
ramp
or
two
old
ramps
that
are
there
now
the
ramp
will
have
to
be
compliant
with
a
DA
requirements,
but
they
would
like
to
use
that
rear
area
as
some
benefit
to
their
customers.
L
What
to
have
our
the
architect
work
with
staff
to
come
up
with
a
design
review
that
for
a
DA
compliance,
but
then
also
help
the
applicant
implement
some
best
practices
that
would
be
very
comfortable
and
friendly
for
their
customers,
but
not
necessarily
untracked
attract
a
undo
number
of
folks
that
may
just
be
hanging
out
in
the
neighborhood,
but
not
customers.
So
staff
is
familiar
with
some
best
practices
for
that
and
we'll
work
with
the
applicant
driggett.
J
Commissioner
of
yourself,
you
can't
ask
my
question:
I,
just
can't
take
a
little
bit
further,
just
so
I'm
clear
what
you're
talking
about
the
rear
in
the
ramp
were
specifically
talking
about
the
back
of
the
buildings
in
the
area
that
they
want
to
use
it
isn't
properly
being
used
right
now.
Is
that
that
adjacent
area
outside
of
the
actual
building
itself?
Yes,.
B
L
J
That's
you
know,
I,
guess
you
guys
hash
it
over
at
our
friend.
Am
I
concerned
I'll
just
voice?
It
now
would
be
anything
that's
going
to
be
too
nice
in
the
back
there
and
don't
get
me
wrong,
but
benches
or
anything
like
that.
It
could
possibly
end
up
attracting.
Just
you
know:
non-customers
like
you're,
stating
and
or
maybe
undesirable,
non-customers
I
guess
would
be
the
pc
way
of
putting
it.
I
don't
know,
and
how
would
that
lighting
and
safety
affect
the
patrons
and
the
staff
that's
going
to
be
working
there.
J
L
I
think
the
applicant
can
speak
to
some
of
the
details.
What
I
would
add
from
a
staff
point
of
view
is
we
talked
about
it
architectural
review
committee,
but
changing
to
more
of
a
glass
storefront
style
door,
so
the
employees
would
have
some
visibility
to
the
outside.
I
think,
from
an
operational
point
of
view,
they
would
probably
want
to
consider
when
they
make
seating
available
in
the
back.
You
probably
don't
want
to
have
seating
until
eleven
o'clock
at
night,
a
good
portion
of
the
year,
so
I
think
they
would.
L
G
J
A
B
A
B
J
Couple
questions
number
one
as
I
just
stated,
you
know
the
at
that
rear
area.
You
know
my
concern
is
the
safety
of
patrons
are
going
to
be
their
hand,
staff
right
and
if
it's
going
to
be
as
a
rear
door,
going
to
be
open
for
the
whole
entire
time
that
businesses
is
open
or
do
you
possibly
plan
on
closing
you
know
just
having
the
front
entrance
say
like
after
I
don't
know
ten
o'clock
or
well.
B
J
B
J
B
Excellent
skill
and
worried
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
haven't
been
there
late
at
night.
I
can't
to
answer
that
question
how
safe
it
is
or
not,
but
we're
going
to
have
a
camera
and
we're
going
to
have
couple
of
attendance
and
based
on
that
will
make
a
decision
whether
to
open
until
ten
o'clock
or
eleven
o'clock.
So.
J
A
D
Did
serve
on
the
Architectural,
Review,
Committee
and
and
for
just
information
for
my
colleagues
here,
commissioners
I
really
felt
that
the
committee
really
thoroughly
explored
all
the
details
of
the
safety,
the
deal
details
of
lighting
all
pacific's.
There
was
a
lot
of
compliance
on
the
on
the
applicants
part
and
as
far
as
the
hours
I
feel
that
having
it
to
eleven
o'clock,
it's
not
unreasonable,
recognizing
that
it's
not
uncommon
for
families
by
the
time
they
put
down
their
children
and
and
just
go
on
with
their
day
to
day
it's
about
time
to
get
a
laundromat.
D
It
is
nine
o'clock.
By
the
time
you
get
all
everything
done.
So
eleven
o'clock
is
not
unreasonable.
However,
I
certainly
would
like
to
leave
it
in
the
and
the
department
hands
that,
if
something
you
should
come
up,
that
they
would
have
the
direction
to
make
those
decisions
on
adjusting
those
hours
should
they
need
to
do
that.
J
J
J
A
0
second,
second
Richard
via
Sade,
is
the
second
I'd
like
to
mention
that
I
had
a
discussion
with
staff
about
the
video
recording
and
suggested
staff
incorporate
some
thinking
about
how
to
review
whether
the
recording
is
actually
working
or
not.
We've
had
several
applications
in
the
last
couple
months
that
have
video
surveillance,
but
the
idea
of
record
checking
to
see
if
the
recording
is
actually
happening.
So
it
can
be
used
as
been
up
into
question.
So
with
that
I'd
like
to
call
for
the
question,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
all.
A
Moving
on
to
application,
excuse
me
agenda
item
5
e
890
elcamino
riyal,
a
request
for
conditional
use,
permit
an
architectural
review
permit
to
allow
the
expansion
of
an
existing
skilled
nursing
facility
for
chapters
1296
110
c
and
12
10
8
10
of
the
san
bruno
municipal
code
staff
report.
Please
thank.
L
You,
as
stated
the
applicant,
is
proposing
an
expansion
to
the
existing
skilled
nursing
facility.
It's
located
at
the
corner
of
el
camino,
real
in
euclid,
and
those
are
narrow
blocks
at
that
location.
So
it's
also
bounded
by
hensley.
On
the
other
side,
the
site
is
approximately
thirty
thousand
four
hundred
square
feet.
The
existing
building
is
900
I'm,
sorry
9908
square
feet
and
was
built
in
1962.
L
There's
been
very
few
changes
to
the
building
since
that
time
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
services
that
they
do
provide
there,
since
this
type
of
use
is
not
before
us
very
often,
in
fact,
I'm
not
sure
if,
in
any
time
since
nineteen
sixty
two
we've
seen
an
application
like
this,
they
provide
nursing
care
and
they
provide
physical,
occupational
and
speech
therapy.
So
we
did
have
a
discussion
with
them
early
on
about.
Is
it
a
hospital
because
their
name
includes
that
word
hospital,
but
based
on
the
services
that
they
provide?
L
So
I'll
ask
the
applicant
to
do
that
as
he's
more
of
an
expert
in
that
area,
but
it
does
influence
how
the
design
has
been
laid
out
as
well
as
the
site
I'm.
So
the
edition
includes
capacity
for
six
new
beds,
as
I've
mentioned,
a
physical
therapy,
room
offices,
conference
room
and
a
new
nurse's
station.
So
the
application
is
really
about
keeping
up-to-date
with
the
needs
of
the
people
that
they
are
serving,
as
well
as
doing
on
a
small
increase
in
capacity.
L
So
as
such,
it's
designed
is
a
one-story
stucco
building
with
the
tallest
point
being
17
feet,
6
inches,
which
is
similar
to
the
height
of
some
of
the
houses
that
are
one
story:
split-level
and
two-story
in
the
adjacent
neighborhood
they're
proposing
aluminum
windows
that
do
have
some
architectural
detail
in
the
size
and
proportion
of
those
windows
and
those
windows
are
also
recessed
quite
deeply
in
most
cases.
So
that
does
provide
some
light
in
shadow
in
a
building
that
otherwise
is
somewhat
simple.
In
its
architectural
appearance,
they've
included
some
decorative
lighting
as
well
with
the
project.
L
They
would
change
the
parking
lot
configuration
somewhat.
They
would
close
the
curb
cut,
which
is
on
euclid
avenue.
It
is
substandard
today
and
not
not
well
used
in
steps
observation.
They
would
propose
a
new
curb
cut
on
hensley
that
would
be
compliant
with
today's
code.
They
would
also
have
they
would
actually
reduce
the
number
of
parking
spaces,
but
they
are
proposing
18
fully
compliant
spaces.
L
The
spaces
that
have
been
out
there
in
the
dr
aisles
are
not
fully
compliant
with
the
code
today
and
it
would
include
new
landscaping
around
the
addition,
which
has
quite
a
bit
of
architectural
interest
in
and
in
the
rendering
that
you
received
it,
does
reflect
the
plant
choices
and
kind
of
the
color
and
scale
of
that
landscaping.
The
architectural
review
committee
reviewed
the
project
on
june
sixteenth.
The
staff
had
made
minor
recommendations.
Those
have
been
implemented
in
the
plans
that
you
have
in
front
of
you
in
large
part,
so
we'll
just
go
over
those
briefly.
L
We
recommended
as
a
new
sign
at
the
entrance
on
the
South
elevation,
because
it's
kind
of
a
new
main
entrance
to
the
building.
They
have
included
that
on
the
revised
plans,
we
asked
them
to
explore
the
possibility
of
a
monument
sign
towards
the
corner,
because
people
will
be
coming
around
the
corner
and
will
need
to
know
that
this
is
the
place
to
turn
in.
They
have
included
that
on
the
plans
as
well
as
landscaping
that
will
emphasize
the
new
front
entrance
they've
agreed
to
repaint
the
entire
existing
building
as
well.
L
There
was
some
discussion
and
architectural
review
about
lighting
and
about
some
green
building
measures.
The
applicant
has
requested
that
we
defer
those
two
items
to
the
time
of
building
permits.
The
middle
staff
does
feel
comfortable
with
that,
because
those
are
items
that
would
normally
be
considered
at
the
time
of
construction
detail,
and
so
what
we've
asked
them
to
do
is
to
create
a
lighting
plan,
a
photometric
plan
that
will
show
the
parking
lot
in
exactly
where
the
lights
will,
how
big
they
will
like
the
parking
lot.
L
We
want
to
ensure
that
the
parking
lot
is
safe,
but
also
not
over
like
the
project,
since
there
are
residential
houses
directly
across
the
street,
so
staff
would
be
reviewing
that
at
the
time
of
building
permits
the
middle,
we
also
had
a
request
that
they
consider
the
possibility
of
installing
solar
panels
on
the
site.
There
are
some
limitations,
construction
limitations
on
installing
them
on
the
existing
building,
so
the
request
to
consider
them
on
the
new
building.
L
So
staff
will
be
asking
the
applicant
to
prepare
some
materials
and
to
submit
those
to
us
at
the
time
of
building,
permit
submittal
to
explain
why
or
why
not.
Solar
panels
may
be
feasible
at
that
location,
so
that
takes
care
of
the
architectural
review
committee
recommendations.
It
was
an
overall
favorable
recommendation
forward
to
the
full
Planning
Commission.
L
Stop
sonic
courtesy
notice,
two
adjacent
neighbors
on
May
twenty-third,
as
well
as
a
legal
notice.
On
july
eight
we
did
receive
one
phone
call
from
a
property
owner
just
today,
and
he
reported
to
staff
that
sometimes
he
does
notice
that
employees
park
on
the
street
instead
of
always
in
the
parking
lot.
L
So
staff
would
like
to
add
a
condition
of
approval
tonight,
a
new
condition
number
nineteen
requiring
that
employees
park
in
the
parking
lot
and
not
in
the
public
street,
and
since
this
business
operates
at
multiple
hours
of
the
day,
and
they
have
a
range
of
the
kinds
of
professionals
that
work
there,
and
perhaps
some
of
those
employees
may
turn
over
more
frequently
some
of
the
aides
and
assistance.
We
would
like
to
add
to
that
condition
that
they
make
it
a
requirement
as
part
of
their
new
employee
training,
so
whatever
packet
they
gave
to
new
employees.
L
We
would
like
there
to
be
a
statement
in
there
that
employees
should
park
in
the
parking
lot
instead
of
on
the
public
street,
to
anticipate
the
fact
that
this
use
could
be
there
for
quite
some
time
and
we
don't
want
to
create
any
problems
over
the
years.
I'm
staff
would
also
like
to
point
out
a
unique
aspect
of
this
project
as
a
skilled
nursing
facility.
L
It
is
like
a
hospital
in
that
it
is
not
subject
to
our
local
building
code
Authority,
so
medical
buildings
are
subject
to
a
state
authority
for
building
code,
and
that
is
the
office
of
statewide,
Health,
Planning
and
Development
OSH
pod,
so
we've
heard
of
it,
but
we
haven't
frequently
seen
it
implemented
in
our
projects.
So
what
that
means
is
that
OSH
pod
will
do
the
plan
check
the
building
inspections
and
the
certificate
of
occupancy,
not
our
own
building
division.
L
So
this
is
unique
for
us
because,
as
you
well
know,
our
conditions
of
approval
are
normally
tied
to
the
building
permit
and
to
the
final
inspection
of
the
building
permit
and
their
certificate
of
occupancy.
So
considering
that
we
do
have
several
unique
conditions.
I'm
related
to
this
project,
so
I
would
like
to
go
over
those,
since
those
are
different
than
what
we're
used
to
seeing
so
conditions
of
approval
are
on
page
seven
and
starting
with
condition
number
three.
This
is
quite
unique.
L
We
are
requesting
that
the
applicant
make
a
deposit
of
five
thousand
dollars
to
the
Community
Development
Department
to
ensure
that
all
conditions
of
approval
are
met.
The
use
permit
in
Architectural
Review
permit
would
not
be
valid
until
this
deposit
is
made
once
the
project
is
complete
and
all
the
conditions
are
met.
The
Community,
Development
Department
would
refund
this
deposit
in
full
to
the
applicant.
So
this
is
insurance
if
you
would
to
make
sure
that
they
comply
with
all
the
conditions
of
approval
number,
for
this
is
somewhat
obvious,
but
a
new
condition
for
us.
L
Considering
this
current
project,
they
must
comply
with
all
ash
cloud
requirements,
condition
number
six.
They
still
must
secure
a
building
permit
for
the
work
that
is
not
covered
by
osh
pod
review.
So
staff
has
been
in
contact
with
the
OSH
pod
staff
and,
as
we
understand
that
OSH
pod
will
review
all
elements
of
the
actual
building
footprint
things
that
are
attached
to
the
building
that
are
used
for
medical
purposes.
Other
aspects
of
the
site
still
fall
into
our
purview
and
review,
so
they
would
need
to
get
a
building
permit.
A
L
A
L
A
L
L
Problem,
we're
expecting
them
to
do
kind
of
a
concurrent
review
and
that's
the
way
we've
we've
listed.
The
conditions
of
approval
I
do
understand
that
the
Potter
review
can
be
quite
a
bit
longer
than
ours.
So
we've
tried
to
structure
the
conditions,
knowing
that
that's
going
to
drive
the
timeline
and
not
our
review
process.
B
L
Other
thing
I
wanted
to
note:
is
that
condition
number
seven.
As
you
know,
we
always
have
a
pre-construction
meeting
for
commercial
and
residential
projects.
What
we've
requested
that
they
do
is
that
once
they've
gotten
through
their
OSH
pod
plan,
check
review
to
then
come
back
and
schedule
a
meeting
with
us.
Look
at
the
plans
that
are
approved
by
osh
pod
and
make
sure
that
everything
is
lining
up,
so
the
building
permit
required
from
us
the
building
permit
required
from
osh
pod
the
conditions
of
approval
from
the
Planning
Commission.
L
L
So
in
conclusion,
after
all
of
that
staff
does
recommend
approval
of
the
project.
We
find
that
the
project
would
provide
a
needed
service
in
this
community
demographically.
The
needs
of
these
kinds
of
services
are
increasing
in
our
city
and
and
everywhere
because
of
demographic
shifts.
The
project
is
designed
to
transition
into
the
adjacent
residential
neighborhood
and
is
considerate
of
those
residential
neighbors.
It
does
meet
the
parking
requirements
of
the
Municipal
Code
and
increases
the
appearance
of
the
rear
parking
lot
and
the
landscaping
adjacent
to
the
residential
neighbors.
L
So
we
recommend
approval
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
ten
and
the
conditions
of
approval
1
through
18
in
the
staff
report,
with
the
addition
of
the
new
condition
19
that
I
discussed
about
employees
parking
on
site
and
including
that
information
and
training
materials.
So
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Any.
L
B
L
J
I
think
I
sounded
that
arc
review
meeting
as
well.
If
memory
serves
me
right
out
or
maybe
I'm
wrong,
but
I
thought
that
the
applicant
told
us
that
that
the
fence
and
whatever
the
signage
in
the
front
was
not
a
their
purview.
You
know
my
my
mistaken
on
that.
I
thought
we
had
that
discussion.
I
and
maybe
I'm
thinking
of
something
different,
but
I
thought
we.
L
Had
two
related
discussions
at
architectural
review,
so
there's
limitations
about
making
changes
to
the
physical
building,
so
the
applicant
can
address
that
in
his
presentation.
In
regards
to
the
fence,
we
did
talk
about
making
some
changes
to
the
fence
and,
as
I
recall,
the
discussion
the
applicant
rightly
pointed
out,
then
in
their
initial
submitted
to
us,
they
had
a
dramatic
change
to
the
fence
and
to
the
landscaping
and
in
working
through
the
design
staffed,
not
ultimately
recommend
approach
to
the
fence
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
but
we
did
talk
about
changes
along
the
way.
J
A
E
My
name
is
Steve
Kiki
I'm,
the
architect
with
MSW
any
services,
the
addresses
3551,
Pegasus,
Avenue,
Bakersfield,
California,
Thank,
You
Commission
for
hosting
us
tonight,
and
hearing
my
project
I've
gone
through
the
staff
report
and
want
to
thank
Laura
also
for
the
hard
work
she's
done
over
the
course
of
this
project,
and
we
have
no
exceptions
to
the
staff
report
and
I'll.
Just
take
this
opportunity
to
clarify
a
couple
of
things.
E
Commissioner
chase
I
think
one
of
the
issues
was
a
defense
which
actually
there
is
an
item
in
one
of
the
conditions
dealt
with
graffiti
and
I,
think
that
was
what
was
actually
mentioned.
There
was
one
little
bit
of
graffiti
on
the
north
face
along
euclid
on
the
fence.
Otherwise
the
fence
is
not
in
terrible
repair,
but
it
does
occasionally
get
a
little
bit
of
graffiti.
E
One
of
the
other
issues
that
was
mentioned
was
the
delicacy
of
adding,
in
addition
to
a
building
that
was
built
in
nineteen,
sixty
two
and
has
to
meet
oz
pod
requirements.
Obviously
the
seismic
and
wind
and
all
kinds
of
regulations
have
changed
since
nineteen
sixty
two,
so
the
problem
we
face
today
is
if
we
were
to
do
anything
to
that
building
built
in
1962
or
to
any
degree
it
would
all
have
to
be
brought
up
to
current
code.
There's
really
not
much
of
a
way
to
do
that,
except
to
scrape
it
and
start
over.
E
So
the
only
way
we
make
this
project
work
is
to
completely
structurally
stand
off
of
the
existing
building
with
our
new
buildings,
so
there'll
be
a
two
or
three
or
four
inch:
seismic
separation,
whatever
the
structural
engineer
determined.
So
the
corridors
in
the
circulation
system
will
connect
it'll
work
like
one
building,
but
from
a
structural
and
physical
and
am
building
apartment
view.
E
At
this
point,
as
well,
I've
talked
to
several
different
solar
companies
about
the
panel
situation
on
that
roof
and
the
one
thing
the
one
hiccup
or
uncertainty
at
this
point
is
any
facility
like
this.
We
have
emergency
power,
so
when
you
know
the
big
storm
hits
and
the
power
goes
out
like
that,
our
type
of
facility,
the
power
has
to
come
on.
Just
like
that
as
well.
E
So
that's
the
issue
right
now
with
the
solar
panels,
is
how
we
interface
a
solar
panel
use
with
a
building
that
is
completely
dependent
on
emergency
power
at
times
and
how
we
do
the
switching
over
and
the
the
segregating
so
that
we
don't
end
up
with
a
situation
where
the
soulers
functioning
and
feeding
and
WHAM.
We,
you
know,
switch
to
emergency
power.
They
aren't
just
they're,
not
really
certain
of
that.
Yet
so
we're
doing
the
homework
and
will
submit
the
study
prior
to
get
a
building
permit,
getting
a
building
permit
outside
of
that
I.
D
E
D
E
The
design
of
the
building
as
it
stands
now
the
building
kind
of
tucks
in
at
the
corners.
So
there's
really
a
good
opportunity
and
I
think
staff
are
recommending
it
to
put
a
monument
sign
on
that
corner
that
will
kind
of
sit
at
a
45.
So
it
can
be
seen
from
just
about
every
direction
and
we
have
room
for
it
so
we're
you
know
we'll
certainly
certainly
participate
in
the
design
of
that
sign
and
making
sure
that's
architectural
e
compatible
with
the
other
things
we're
doing
well.
D
A
E
Not
in
this
particular
facility
but
I'm
doing
nine
other
different
projects
for
the
same
ownership
group
and
they
own
I,
don't
know
seven
or
eight
in
the
Bay
Area,
most
of
them
in
the
east
bay.
They
owned
several
in
Southern
California
and
developing
some
new
ones,
we're
currently
in
the
planning
loop
in
fremont,
with
a
four-story
62
bed
very
high-end
facility.
Of
the
same
nature.
I
wish
you
were
the
planning
commission
in
fremont.
E
E
It's
on
the
various
different
websites
that
rate
these
places
and
and
that
one
is
a
state-run
website,
so
they
just
relate
their
infractions
and
their
write
ups
for
this,
and
that
and
things
like
that,
others
are
using
your
user
oriented
websites
where
it's
families
and
and
people
that
are,
you
know
commenting.
So
it
is
very
refreshing
to
see
a
group
that,
because
so
many
of
these
I
mean
that
the
majority
of
them,
it's
mostly
negative
comments
and
report.
A
E
A
I
E
Dates
to
09-
and
you
know
I,
don't
remember
the
exact
wording
of
that
I
would
say
just
based
on
what
I
know
about
simple
wood
frame
structures
that
it
you
have
pretty
good
sections
of
solid
wall.
And
then
you
know
the
windows
are
kind
of
large,
but
they
aren't
extra
large
in
the
ratio
of
wall
to
window.
There's
a
lot
more
wall
than
there
is
window
so
being
a
simple
wood
frame
structure.
E
I
would
say
that
that's
probably
going
to
in
one
story:
that's
going
to
be
pretty
sound
in
an
earthquake,
that's
not
to
say
built
in
62.
It
probably
didn't
have
all
the
hold
downs,
all
the
hardware,
all
the
the
tie-ins
from
the
wall,
to
the
roof
structure
that
and
that's
really
where,
where
it's
just
substandard
and
there's
just
no
way
to
really
calculate
it.
You
know
for
for
what
was
done.
You
know
what
sits
there
today,
I'm
sure
the
engineer
that
designed
it
then
calculated.
E
A
What
I
would
like
to
recommend
to
you-
and
this
is
I'm-
not
recommending
this
as
a
condition
but
as
a
practical
matter,
I'm
sure
you
would
be
able
to
do
termite
work
without
opening
it
up
to
a
review
by
osh
pion
and
I'd
like
to
remit,
recommend
that
very
heartily
to
you
simply
because
number
one.
It's
highly
likely
that
there
are
some
issues
there
and
whatever
issues
you
find.
When
you
do
that
remedial
work,
it
will
make
the
structure
that
much
better
able
to
stand
and
earth
cuz.
A
I
agree
with
you-
is
from
my
structural
knowledge,
single-family
or
single
storey.
Buildings.
Wood
frame
do
a
good
job
of
standing
on
foot.
The
other
observation
I
have
would
apply
both
to
the
existing
and
the
new,
and
that
is
since
you're
going
to,
and
this
is
an
energy
potential
energy
savings.
I
suspect
you
could
do
it
two
ways
you
could
do
it
with
regular
glass
encoding
or
you
could
do
it
with
energy.
A
The
new
energy
glass
set
reduces
the
transmission
of
heat
and
ultraviolet
light.
I
suspect
that
it
would
both
save
you,
energy,
by
reducing
the
heat
load
on
that
building
and
also
make
it
easier
on
your
staff
and
patients,
because
anytime
people
are
in
the
in
the
Rays
of
the
Sun,
they
can
get
pretty
warm,
then
you'd
either
have
to
keep
them.
A
A
D
There
is
no
further
discussion,
I'm
happy
to
make
a
motion,
because
the
Planning
Commission
approve
views
from
at
ten
dash
005
an
architectural
review
permit
to
1000
three
based
on
the
findings
of
facts,
one
through
ten
and
subject
the
condition
of
approval
1
through
18.
Were
there
any
additional
219,
that's
room
19,
and
that
condition
was
that.
A
B
A
J
C
A
C
A
C
C
As
you
know,
there
were
38
homes
that
were
destroyed
as
part
of
this
we've
now
issued
permits
for
four
of
those
homes
for
the
complete
rebuilds.
If
you
haven't
driven
by
that
area
in
a
while,
it's
within
the
last
month
really
gone
from
a
disaster
area
to
construction
area.
So
I'd
suggest
that
you
just
drive
through
there
that
the
homes
are
building
quickly.
The
contractors
we
have
on
these
jobs
are
above
average.
C
I
mean
the
really
good
contractors
that
that
had
been
hired
here
and
they're
building
quickly
for
their
clients
of
that's
great
to
see
so.
There's
four
that's
been
issued.
I
think
there
will
be
about
another
two
issued
over
about
the
next
week
or
so
so
we'll
be
up
to
six
and
by
the
end
of
summer
I
would
say,
will
probably
be
end
up
to
about
10
or
12
homes
that
are
under
construction.
C
There's
a
total
of
twenty-four
homeowners
right
now
that
are
either
under
construction
or
in
some
stage
of
design
or
about
to
hire
an
architect.
Several
other
homeowners,
I've
already
sold
their
homes
to
pge
or
will
or
are
in
the
process
of
negotiating
with
PG&E
for
their
home
sales.
So
it's
good
to
see
this
neighborhood
is
starting
to
rebuild
and
I'd
suggest
going
through
the
neighborhood
17
homes
that
were
damaged
to
the
point
that
they
no
longer
could
be
occupied.
C
They
were
referred
to
as
the
homes
that
were
yellow
tagged
by
our
building
division
immediately
after
the
fire.
Four
or
four
of
those
homes
have
now
have
been
prepared
to
the
point
that
people
were
living
inside
them
and
all
but
I
believe
three
of
them
are
under
construction
and
those
ones
that
haven't
been
under
construction
and
I
think
are
in
the
negotiating
process,
with
PG&E
to
sell
to
PG
Neiman.
Hopefully,
PG&E
will
go
and
quickly
and
make
the
repairs
and
get
those
homes
occupied.
Once
again.
What.
C
That's
something
that
they're
going
to
still
have
to
propose
to
us.
They
haven't
come
to
us
the
formal
proposal
right
now
and
you
know,
then
that's
something
that
we're
going
to
have
to
take
to
the
neighborhood
to
see
what
the
neighborhoods
in
the
neighborhoods
vision,
whether
or
not
you
know,
could
range
from
anything
to
to
selling
the
homes,
to
sinking
individual
homeowners,
to
rebuild
home,
to
build
homes
there
to
selling
them
to
a
single
developer.
C
A
A
C
I
mean
this
is
something
that's
going
to
be
driven
by
the
residents
and
something
that's
going
to
be
led
by
the
city.
So
yeah
I
agree
completely,
but
one
thing
I
forgot
to
mention
too,
is
on
the
27th
in
it
and
about
a
week
from
now
we'll
be
having
a
neighborhood
infrastructure
meeting
for
the
neighbors.
So
that's
something
that's
going
to
be
held
for
the
neighbors
to
say
you
know
where
we're
at
in
terms
of
rebuilding
the
roads,
rebuilding
the
side,
sidewalks
and
rebuilding
the
sewer
water
and
storm
water
systems.
B
C
A
Oh
I,
don't
really
have
any
comparison
to
make,
but
it
seems
to
me
this
is
a
really
quick
schedule
for
recovery
of
that
area.
If
I
imagine
some
other
area
in
another
city,
philadelphia
or
LA
or
something
then
area
could
stay
there
bird
down
for
three
years
and
nothing
happened,
it
is,
do
you
have
any
comparisons?
No.
C
Not
really
I
mean
I've
been
actually
I,
mean
I.
Think
it's
number
one
I
think
the
residents
there
have
shown
a
lot
of
resolve
to
want
to
rebuild
and
want
to
rebuild
quickly
and
they've
they've
been
the
driver.
You
know
the
Planning
Commission,
the
City
Council
has
made
the
right
decisions
in
terms
of
creating
an
expedited
permit
process,
expedited
planning
process
to
facilitate
that.
But
it
really
has
been
the
neighbors.
They
are
saying:
hey
we
want
to
rebuild.
We
want
to
go
back
into
the
neighborhood,
so
maybe
that's
not
there.
C
A
It's
I
think
it
reflects
very
favorably
on
the
city
staff,
the
council
and
other
parties
that
have
participated
in
enabling
this
process,
because
it
could
take
a
long
time
if
it
were
standard
review
periods
and
so
on.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
next
item
on
the
agenda.
Unless
there's
some
more
city
staff
discussion,
that's.
C
C
A
Any
other
comments
and
I
agree
with
Commissioner
chase
I'm
sure
the
Commission
does.
My
experience
over
a
number
of
years
has
been
that
staff
reports
have
been
improving
consistently
with
time,
but
the
past
five
years
or
so
they've
been
really
quite
excellent
and
I
think
your
initiation
to
come
up
with
standard
conditions
that
you
can
use
and
select
rather
than
reinvent
the
wheel,
but
within
every
application,
I
think
it
goes
a
long
way
towards
a
actually.
C
Razi
is
back
he's
not
here
tonight
because
he
didn't
have
any
items
but
he's
been
hired
primarily
to
concentrate
on
the
glenview
rebuild.
He
had
been
working
for
the
Alameda
County
redevelopment
agency,
but
you
know
he
has
ties
to
san
bruno
and
became
here
and
helped
us
in
the
days
after
the
fire,
and
he
wanted
to
come
back
and
help
us
with
the
glenview
firework.
So
he'll
be
here
throughout
the
the
rebuild
process,
helping
us
out
with
those
application,
as
well
as
some
general
planning
stuff.
Okay,.