►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting July 26, 2011
10d. Water and Wastewater Budgets 2011-12
B
Getting
me
mr.
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
edmondson
finance
director
on
jun
28
staff
presented
the
city
county,
manager's,
recommended
2011-12
water
and
wastewater
operating
budget
for
City,
Council
consideration
and
approval
in
order
to
provide
additional
time
for
City
Council
review
and
consideration
of
the
these
budgets
were
postponed
and
reschedule
at
a
later
date
within
30
days
tonight,
and
bring
forth
these
budgets
for
your
consideration.
The
2011-12
War
revenues
budget
include
the
third
year
of
the
three-year
rate
program
that
was
approved
by
council
in
2009.
B
The
operating
expended
expenditures
also
include
funding
for
a
great
model.
Update
that
would
just
talk
about
for
your
consideration
for
this
year
in
the
wastewater
budget.
Included
in
the
revenues
are
also
again
the
third
year
of
the
three
rating
program,
and
also
in
terms
of
the
expenditures
and
the
wastewater
budget
costs.
B
The
costs
were
complying
with
the
babe
keepers
and
the
Regional
Water
Quality
board
settlement
agreements
again
something
you
just
talked
about,
have
also
been
included.
These
are
just
the
operating
budget
costs
and
not
the
CIP
costs
if
I
can
point
out.
So
with
that,
my
staff
recommendation
is
for
the
City
Council
to
consider
the
11-12
water
and
wastewater
budget
and
I'm
available
to
take
any
questions
you
have
on
these
two
budgets.
The
questions.
B
C
The
chair
we
go
first
I
want
to
thank
the
council
staff
for
allowing
us
more
opportunity
and
time
in
which
to
review.
This
I
also
know
that
I
have
a
very
high
standard
and
I
appreciate
the
extra
time
that
staff
is
spent
and
answering
the
questions
and
getting
me
further
information
when
it
comes
to
these
items,
as
I
indicated
before
yeah
I
think
it's
important.
C
As
the
mayor
said,
we
had
some
criticism
for
the
rates
increases,
but
it
was
to
help
the
infrastructure
and
try
to
maintain
the
system
and
what
I
hope
and
wish,
and
in
return
is
that
we
owe
it
to
the
community
that
we
represent
as
the
elected
officials
as
well
as
to
the
ratepayers
that
we
diligently
go
through
and
do
our
appraisal
assessment
and
give
our
commentary
and
recommendations
in
order
to
know
that
the
dollars
being
spent
wisely
in
going
over
some
of
this
information
with
staff.
These
are
some
things
that
you
know
that
stands
out.
C
That
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
in
the
future
that
when
we
have
the
misses
from
the
staffs
information,
when
we
have
a
water
rate,
comparison
with
other
other
jurisdictions,
Cal
water
is
at
47,
I'm,
sorry
4973
for
an
average
monthly
bill
and
we're
at
62,
12
I.
Think
it's
the
right
thing
to
do
to
ask.
Why,
and
what
can
we
do?
C
I
know
when
we
have
the
cmms
system
that
has
an
annual
support
of
sixteen
thousand
one
hundred
and
thirty
dollars,
and
those
are
the
things
are
supposed
to
help
manage
that
the
system
and
what
the
operations
are
when
we
had
it.
The
first
time
come
up
in
July
of
210.
It
was
an
annual
cost
of
6500,
divided
by
four
divisions.
When
we
had
the
item
come
up
back
and
I
was
seven.
The
initial
there's
a
almost
an
eight
thousand
dollar
annual
cost
that
wasn't
really
specifically
spelled
out
in
the
staff
report.
C
Now
correctly
would
just
logically,
you
would
assume
that
there
is
some
ongoing
maintenance
costs
for
these
programs,
but
I
think
these
are
things
that
we
need
to
think
about
in
the
bigger
picture
and
make
sure
that
we're
taking
the
time
and
the
diligence
to
make
sure
again,
things
are
being
spent
wisely.
We're
going
to
be
hiring
a
management
analyst
that
the
position
has
been
open
now
we're
going
to
fill
it
because
it
obviously
has
a
need
at
this
time
and
that
part
of
that
person's
position.
C
/
staff
is
going
to
be
helping
to
manage
the
system
that
we
initiated
back
in
2007
I.
Think
we
need
to
be
able
to
make
sure
when
we're
investing
in
these
things,
when
we're
going
forward
that
we
think
of
the
big
picture
about
staffing
implementation
and
an
effective
timetable.
So
I
know
staff
brought
up
to
my
attention
that
under
publications
and
subscriptions
the
central
garage,
there's
$1,500
that
hasn't
been
utilized
in
the
last
two
years.
C
Those
are
the
type
of
things
that
I'm
saying
that
I
wish
us
to
do
our
due
diligence
to
lead
by
example,
and
if
it's
not
needed
than
it
needs
to
be
reviewed
and
withdrawn
for
the
budget.
The
director
has
said
that
I
can
be
withdrawn
from
the
budget
since
it
hasn't
been
utilized
in
the
last
two
years.
C
I
don't
want
to
go
on
and
on
I
want
to
say
that
I'm
appreciative
again
at
the
staffs,
diligence
and
effort
and
I
know
that
they
have
a
more
full
understanding
and
I
have
a
lot
of
my
questions
answered
and
so
I
am
going
to
support
and
vote
yes
for
this.
That
might
surprise
them,
but
I'm
going
to,
but
going
forward.
C
Also,
when
we
have
these
items
coming
up
about
equipment
purchases
head
count
or
budgetary
items,
I'm
hoping
that
the
information
they
some
of
the
items
that
I
brought
up
the
detail,
thinking
forward,
making
the
right
decisions
and
recommendations
to
this
council
by
staff
is
really
thought
of
and
thoughtful
for
the
community
that
we
all
serve.
Thank
you.