You and good evening, honorable mayor and city council, as the report states on May nineteenth, the grand jury released support on report on cell towers within San Mateo County, and it's basically focused on two things: number one. To what extent is there public opposition and what can be done to increase the transparency of cell towers within San, Mateo County and the second is to what extent our cities receiving revenue from cell towers, amabella grand jury reports. The city must formally respond to the report attached to the staff report.

You will find the letter responding to this I won't go over all the findings and recommendations in detail, but a couple of the highlights. Overall, they found that, not surprisingly, in every city in San Mateo County, there has been some public opposition to a cell tower application. They also found that not all, but a majority of cities are receiving revenue from leasing public lands for the cell phone towers. A couple of the recommendations to that all highlights the city's recommend.

The grand jury recommended that cities do negotiate, least terns lease terms that generate revenue for public lion. In our response we said: hey we're already doing the right thing. We responded that we currently have seven cell towers that generate about 180,000 dollars annually for the city of San Bruno, and we just entered into a new lease that will generate. Excuse me about eighteen thousand dollars more recommendation. Number five stated the study.

That's stated that city should develop an easy-to-read web page the guides people through the cell tower process and includes all local state and federal regulations. We have some of the information on our website right now, but we intend within the next 90 days, but a more detailed, easy to read one page 1 page sheet that guides people through what all the local state and federal regulations are. So I could take any questions at this time. Any.