►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting July 10, 2012 8a. Amend the Master Fee Schedule 2012-13
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting July 10, 2012
8a. Amend the Master Fee Schedule for 2012-13
A
Item
never
ate
public
hearings
we
have
to
this
evening.
The
first
one
is
hold
a
public
hearing
and
adopt
a
resolution
amending
the
master
fee
schedule
for
2012-2013
establishing
fees
for
municipal
services
and
the
second
one
is
hold
a
public
hearing,
an
adopted
resolution
adopting
a
groundwater
management
plan
for
the
southwest
side
basin.
B
Thank
you,
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
this
item
before
you.
The
master
fee
schedule
is
a
compilation
of
City
Council
approved
fees
for
city
services
offered
to
members
of
the
community.
The
city
is
allowed
to
set
fees
in
a
manner
that
allows
for
reasonable
recovery
of
costs
incurred,
providing
services
and
programs
to
the
public
departments,
conduct
periodic
review
of
their
fees
to
ensure
cost
recovery
is
being
achieved
and
proposed
changes
to
fees
in
those
instances
where
costs
of
to
provide
a
service
has
increased.
B
The
proposed
changes
to
the
master
fee
schedule
that
is
being
presented
to
you
tonight
are
limited
to
three
chapters
to
the
master
free
schedule.
The
first
change
is
to
the
library
which
is
chapter
6.
No
changes
to
fees
are
being
proposed
in
sections
one
and
two
simply
sub
to
the
wording
for
purposes
of
providing
greater
clarity,
and
then
section
3
includes
the
addition
of
fees
associated
with
the
rental
of
the
recently
renovated
community
room
at
the
library.
The
proposed
fees
mirror
the
rates
charged
by
the
Recreation
Department
for
those
similar
facilities.
B
The
next
chapter
work
changes
are
being
proposed,
is
chapter.
Eight,
the
public
services
department-
again,
some
minor
verbiage
changes
are
being
proposed
for
for
the
purpose
of
providing
greater
clarity
and,
in
addition,
at
an
hourly
rate
for
a
Public
Works
inspector
is
being
added
to
the
hourly
rates
section.
It's
not
a
new
fee
or
new
rate.
It
already
exists
in
the
master
fee
schedule
in
conjunction
with
encroachment
permits.
However,
it
is
the
hourly
rate
that
is
used
for
all
site
visits
and
inspections.
So
that
is
the
reason
for
including
a.m.
B
and
this
section
and
finally,
chapter
9
of
the
masterpiece
schedule
Parks
and
Recreation
fees.
There
are
a
number
of
changes
to
those
fees,
staff
performed
and
analysis
of
costs
associated
with
providing
programs
and
classes
and
have
recommended
a
number
of
changes
due
to
the
increased
costs
of
staff,
time
and
supplies
associated
with
offering
those
programs
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
detail
about
the
individual
changes.
B
Although
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions
on
those,
if
any,
if
you
have
any
finally
out
just
to
add
on
the
Parks
and
Recreation
fees,
all
those
fuse
did
go
before
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
and
more
improved
in
May.
One
final
change
with
the
Parks
and
Recreation
fees
is
in
section
6,
which
adds
the
option
of
a
15
gallon
tree
for
tree
replacement,
in
conjunction
with
the
tree,
removal
permit,
in
addition
to
the
24
inch
box.
So
that
summarizes
all
the
proposed
changes
to
the
2012-13
master
fee
schedule.
B
The
third,
whereas
was
changed
for
vital,
but
our
clarity
of
the
intent
of
these
feet
Ainge's
and
has
been
rewarded
to
state
that
the
City
Council
has
directed
that
fees
for
certain
city
services
should
be
set
at
an
amount
to
recover
the
cost
of
delivering
the
service,
and,
in
addition,
the
verbiage
of
state
constitution
was
added
following
the
article
references
in
the
fourth
and
fifth.
Whereas.
C
On
the
Parks
and
Recreation
had
questions
under
the
after
school
summary
day
camp
sessions,
you
have
items
number
13
and
14.
We
have
a
playground
program
which
is
free,
so
I'd
like
to
have
clarification
of
what
what
that
is.
I
remember
from
my
day,
but
obviously
things
evolved
quite
a
bit
since
I've
left
to
know
what
that
is,
and
if
it's
free
we're
trying
to
recoup
costs.
Second,
is
the
leader
in
training?
I
didn't
quite
know
what
that
was,
but
I
learned
at
the
dedication
at
City
Park.
C
We
had
some
young
people
that
are
leaders
in
training
and
those
are
volunteers,
so
they're
not
paid
by
the
city,
but
they
are
it's
another
aspect
for
them
to
be
involved
and
volunteer
their
time.
However,
there
for
I'm
sure
they're
not
paying
on
their
parents
or
somebody
else,
some
nice
person
fifty
dollars
a
session,
and
how
long
is
this
session?
And
what
are
we
currently
charging?
Meaning
is
a
thirty-five
dollars
as
of
today
and
it
will
go
up
or
it
has
it
been
fifty
dollars.
B
So
to
answer
just
that
question
on
the
dollars,
the
thirty-five
dollars
is
the
rate
that
is
being
charged
today.
The
proposed
rates
would
not
go
into
effect
until
the
fall.
They
would
not
be
in
effect
for
the
summer
programs
or
classes,
so
those
rates
are
not
in
effect
right
at
this
time.
I
believe
does
that
answer
your
question
on
that
and.
D
D
C
C
Think
we
have
young
people
and
I
think
it
might
be
an
economic
burden
to
some
folks
who,
as
you
say,
are
looking
to
try
to
engage
them
in
some
leadership,
qualities
and
skill
set
and
also
have
a
safe
place
to
go
during
the
summer
time,
and
that
might
be
prima
if
it's
fifty
dollars
a
week
and
you
want
it
for
a
month.
It's
two
hundred
dollars
and
obviously
summer
is
not
just
one
month
so
and
that's
I'm.
Sorry,
that's
that's
kind
of
where
my
my
concern
trying
to
understand.
Then.
E
I
understand
the
question
regarding
the
leader
in
training
program,
and
I
think
that
the
assistant
director
has
has
articulated
what
we
know
about
it.
I
believe
that
the
per
session
is
consistent
with
the
weekly
program
period
and
that
that
is
likely
a
weekly
fee,
why
it
is
why
it
is
identified
as
session
as
opposed
to
week.
I
don't
know-
and
I
think
that
we
are
unable
to
answer
that
question
precisely
tonight,
so
you
have
a
couple
of
options.
E
One
would
be
too
remove
this
particular
fee
from
any
action
that
you
take
and
ask
for
subsequent
clarification
in
action
on
that
item
or
to
take
some
action
on
it,
pending
clarification
or
or
the
response.
That
is,
that
best
satisfies
the
concern
that
you're
addressing.
In
other
words,
if
that,
if
session
means
the
entire
summer,
which
I
believe
is
not
correct,
you
could
you
could
make
that
azz
as
part
of
your
determination
tonight
regarding
the
playground
program
and
the
designation
of
that
program
being
free.
E
My
only
observation
would
be
that
it
begs
the
question
of:
why
is
it
doesn't
show
up
in
the
fee
schedule
if
there
is
in
fact
no
fee
for
it?
But
this
program,
in
my
understanding,
is,
is
a
different
program
than
the
summer
day,
camp
or
other
type
of
more
structured,
supervised
programs.
So
I'm
not
really
entirely
certain.
C
C
But
it's
free,
so
I
understand
like
in
the
leader
in
training
it's
because
they
have
to
be
supervised.
Well,
I'm
sure
in
the
playground
program
somebody
Newsnight
provides
them.
They
need
to
be
paid.
So
it
begs
the
question:
how
can
one
be
free
and
the
other
one
costs
the
volunteer
right
so
to
me
an
excellent
point
about
then:
why
is
it
so
that
I
I.
E
Understand
the
question
my
short
answer,
obviously,
we
would
like
to
be
able
to
get
you
some
additional
information
about
this.
The
the
short
answer
is
that,
as
the
council
probably
knows,
these
fees
do
not
actually
represent.
For
the
most
part,
one
hundred
percent
cost
recovery
on
the
programs
that
they
are
charged
for
there
is.
This
is
a
most
of
the
cost
is
covered
for
the
for
most
of
these
programs,
but
there
is
a
balancing
act
that
goes
into
determination
of
fees.
E
That
starts
with
a
understanding
of
what
cost
of
delivering
the
program
or-
and
these
are
typically
individual
services.
So
there
is
a
policy
articulated
here
that
says:
tax
revenues
are
not
being
used
to
for
them
for
the
most
part,
to
provide
a
service
that
is
consumed
on
an
individual
basis
for
the
benefit
of
an
individual
and
and
not
shared
generally
by
the
public
as
a
whole.
The
that
said,
the
that
is
part
of
that's
part
of
the
evaluation.
What
is
what
services
should
be
considered
for
cost
recovery?
E
Next
level
evaluation
goes
to
what
is
the
cost
of
the
service?
Additional
evaluation
occurs
based
on.
Where
are
the
other
venues?
Where
the
service
might
be
provided
in
other
cities,
for
example,
provide
private
providers
and
what
is
our
comparative
cost?
How
do
we?
How
do
we
stack
up?
How
do
we
assure
that
there
are
an
adequate
number
of
participants
to
make
the
program
viable
and
cost-effective?
E
So
there
are
a
number
of
things
that
we
evaluate
as
part
of
the
as
part
of
the
cost
and
the
cost
recovery
of
the
program.
A
playground
program
very
typically
is
offered
for
the
purpose,
providing
an
alternative
and
is
generally
viewed
as
something
that
should
be
supported
by
normal
general
fund
revenues,
and
so
that
it,
philosophically
that
is,
is
how
cities
typically
look
at
some
of
their
parks
and
recreation
programs
and
my
understanding
of
the
supervision
that
has
provided
the
limited
amount
of
supervision
that
is
provided
in
a
playground
program.
E
E
Would
what
I
don't
know
at
this
point
and
would
like
to
be
able
to
get
you
more
information
about
it's
a
little
bit
more
detail
about
how
that
program
actually
operates
when
and
where,
and
how
does
it
compare
to
the
level
of
support
and
cost
that
is
provided,
for
example,
to
the
day
camp
program?
Yes,.
F
Going
to
jump
in
here
if
I
could
I've
got
I
got
a
real
issue
with
a
lot
of
these
increases
and
actually
there's
one
major
decrease.
The
whole
camp
sting
is,
is
being
increased
in
many
cases
by
six
dollars
and
the
only
the
only
explanation
is
that
the
increase
in
prices
reflects
increase
in
the
cost
to
run
the
camps,
so
I'm
sure
that
the
park
and
recreation
commission
got
a
fairly
detailed
presentation
on
a
lot
of
these
items.
I'm
assuming
I
don't
feel
comfortable
just
agreeing
with
that.
F
Without
any
background,
information
I
think
this
council
has
challenged
some
of
the
master
fee
increases.
You
know,
as
far
as
regarding
this
facility
and
I
think
if,
if
these
fees
are
not
going
to
be
realized
until
next
year,
I
think
I'd
feel
more
comfortable
reviewing
you
know
what
the
actual
increase
are.
Even
what
what
sort
of
discussion
happened
at
the
park
and
rec
Commission?
You
know,
maybe
there
was
more
of
an
increase
and
they
they
backed
it
up.
F
I
mean
those
are
sort
of
things
that
I
think
we
should
take
in
consideration,
but
I
you
know
this
is.
It
seems
easy
to
just
say:
yes,
okay,
that's
that's
understandable,
but
I
mean
what,
if
it
comes
back
again
next
year-
and
it
goes
another
six
dollars
up
in
everything
and
all
of
a
sudden.
You
know
the
community
starts
screaming
that
you
know
this
used
to
be
a
great
program.
Now
it's
unaffordable
so
and
I,
don't
like
the
excuse
that
it's
still
comparable
with
neighboring
cities
that
shouldn't
even
be
a
factor.
F
G
The
chair,
michael
I
wanted
to
chime
in
my
son,
was
actually
in
the
L
IT
program.
So
I
can
answer
part
of
your
question
so
the
session
the
way
of
the
sessions
are
defined.
It's
it's
a
week
at
a
time
and
they
have
to
sign
up
for
at
least
a
while.
I
think
three
sessions
in
order
to
participate,
and
I'm
pretty
sure-
because
I
wrote
the
check
this
year-
that
it's
already
at
fifty
dollars
a
week
because
we
signed
up
for
four
weeks
and
those
two
hundred
dollars.
G
C
A
A
F
F
C
E
G
I
Again,
honorable
mayor
and
council
member
good
evening,
I
have
here
with
me
Jim
blanky,
who
is
the
project
manager
for
the
project.
I
will
summarize
for
you,
the
history
of
the
project
and
also
the
purpose
of
the
project,
and
I
will
let
Jim
to
take
you
through
the
specific
recommendation
and
the
finding
of
the
plan
itself
and
then
at
the
end,
you
will
have
opportunity
for
clarifying
questions
and
comments.
I
You
here
takes
long.
I
will
keep
talking
and
hopefully
had
the
slides
will
show
up.
They
are
not
that
critical
and,
as
you
are
aware,
the
city
provides
drinking
water
to
our
residents,
health,
and
here
it
is
a
health
of
the
water,
is
provided
through
surface
water
through
the
Hetch
Hetchy
system
and
SFPUC
managed
and
provided
water
for
us.
He'll
help
of
the
water
comes
from
well
production
and
from.
I
The
groundwater
reason
why
maintaining
and
sustaining
the
quality
and
the
quantity
of
this
critical
resource
is
very
important
for
the
long-term
health
of
the
serum
reason.
Why
back
in
2007
and
the
city
took
the
leadership
role
and
us
lead
agency
and
requested
a
grant
from
the
water
resource
board,
in
collaboration
with
daly
city
and
Cal
water,
who
are
partners
in
this
in
the
management
of
the
basin
and
also
in
the
application
for
the
grand
in
2009
you.
I
This
issue
came
against
before
you
and
you
approved
a
contract
for
prime
to
manage
the
development
of
this
groundwater
management
plan
and
also
the
end.
This
item
became
came
back
for
your
considered
asian
in
2010,
when,
after
a
public
hearing,
you
expressed
your
intent
to
develop
a
grandmother
management
plan.
I
A
H
So,
as
Clara
mentioned,
you
know,
we
began
the
stakeholder
process
and
we
begin
the
document
itself
with
developing
a
common
technical
understanding
of
the
condition
of
the
groundwater
basin.
And
one
of
the
one
of
the
basic
questions
is
well
how
much?
How
much
can
we
pump?
How
much
can
we
pump
sustainably,
and
so
we
looked
at
as
far
as
sustainability
is
concerned?
H
You
can
see
here
we
have
recharged
of
8600
acre-feet
per
year,
and
we
can
compare
that
with
our
recent
pumping
and
we
can
see
that
those
those
numbers
are
pretty
close
and
balanced.
So
it's
showing
that
we're
able
to
maintain
our
current
levels,
pumping
over
the
long
term
with
and
maintain
their
current
groundwater
levels,
and
we
took
that
information
and
and
plugged
it
back
into
the
model
for
a
more
robust
analysis
where
we
can
look
at
different
management
techniques
and
and
and
how
those
management
techniques
can
change
our
groundwater
levels
and
looked
at.
H
What's
really
the
maximum
amount
of
groundwater,
we
can
pump
and
maintain
zero
change
and
groundwater
elevations
and
we're
able
to
confirm
that
that
8600
acre-feet
per
year
is
really
there
that
level
we
defined.
That
is
our
base
and
capacity
yield
and-
and
that
is
again
very
close
to
our
current
production
of
about
85
64
acre-feet
per
year,
and
so
that's
the
basin
wide
number
so
we're
pretty
much
imbalanced
there
and
is
showing
their
current
conditions
are
going
to
be
able
to
maintain
the
groundwater
levels
for
years
to
come.
H
The
next
step
we
did
was
we
looked
at
the
the
2010
urban
water
management
plans
that
were
developed
by
all
the
agencies
in
the
basin
and
those
quaint
and
urban
water
management
plans
provide
projections
of
future
groundwater
production
through
2030.
Some
of
them
through
2035-
and
we
added
them
all
together
and
looked
at
what
those
increases
over
time
we're
going
to
do
to
our
groundwater
basin
and
what
it
shows
is.
It
shows
a
slight
increase
in
groundwater
production
over
time
to
about
eighty
nine
hundred
acre
feet
per
year.
H
So,
based
on
that
technical
understanding,
the
common
technical
understanding
that
we
came
to
with
the
stakeholders,
we
developed
a
management
framework
to
manage
the
basin
moving
forward,
and
we
did
this
through
a
wetter
term
to
basin
management
objectives
and
the
basin
management
objectives
basically
takes
our
overall
goal
and
splits
it
up
into
more
manageable
pieces
that
are
that
are
measurable
and
you
can
define
triggers
and
then
define
actions
that
you're
going
to
take
if
those
triggers
are
passed.
So
we
looked
at
five
different
areas.
H
The
first
one
is
maintaining
acceptable
ground
water
levels,
and
we
said
our
thresholds
is
the
historical
minimum
ground
water
levels
in
our
wells,
and
so
we
said,
is:
if
water
levels
go
below
that,
that's
something
we
want
to
look
at,
and
so
we
want
to
have
kind
of
line
there.
So
it
goes
below
that
the
document
lists
a
series
of
actions
that
could
take
place
in
kind
of
a
toolbox
for
the
for
the
agencies
to
use
at
that
time
of
things
that
they
could
do.
H
None
of
them
to
prescribe
there's
no
actions
that
have
to
be
taken.
We
want
to
leave
the
flexibility
there
because
Titan,
you
know,
conditions
change
over
time,
they'll
be
different
knowledge,
different
conditions,
since
they
want
to
be
able
to
be
flexible
on
how
to
react
if
those
thresholds
are
passed.
H
Similarly,
for
the
groundwater
quality,
we
want
to
maintain
or
improve
groundwater
quality,
and
we
focused
on
on
two
different
constituents.
Chloride
and
nitrate
chloride
is
an
indicator
of
seawater.
Intrusion
and
nitrate
is,
is
a
nutrient
that
we've
seen
war
in
the
more
towards
of
the
north
and
the
in
the
south,
san
francisco
daly
city
area,
and
we
set
the
chloride
threshold
at
ten
percent
above
the
historical
maximum.
We
want
to
keep
an
eye
on
our
chloride
levels
and
make
sure
that
we
don't
see
any
evidence
of
seawater
intrusion.
We
haven't
seen
any
yet.
H
We
want
to
make
sure
we
continue
to
monitor
that
and
be
aware
of
the
conditions
that
are
basin
and
then
for
nitrate.
We
set
that
eighty
percent
of
the
MCL,
the
maximum
contaminant
level
that's
set
by
dph.
So
if
we
see
rising
nitrate
levels,
we
want
to
focus
it
on
those
wells
and
think
of
and
try
and
understand
why
those
are
increasing
if
they
are
and
what
kind
of
management
measures
can
be
taken
to
try
and
reduce
that
impact.
H
We
also
looked
at
limiting
the
impact
of
point
source
contamination,
so
these
are
the
United
Airlines
facility,
gas
stations,
dry
cleaners
that
may
have
leaking
underground
storage
tanks
and
there's
no
there's
no
quantitative
measure
for
this.
It's
mainly
just
making
sure
we
organize.
We
coordinate
with
the
with
the
lead
agency
for
those
cleanup
activities,
whether
that's
the
regional
bore,
the
EPA
or
the
San
Mateo
County.
We
also
looked
at
lance's
land
subsidence
monitoring,
land
subsidence,
hasn't
been
an
issue
in
the
San
Bruno
area
like
it
has
been
in
the
southern
part
of
the
bay.
H
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
stay
on
top
of
that
and
see
if
that
becomes
an
issue
in
the
future,
and
we
also
looked
at
managing
the
interactions
of
our
groundwater
with
our
surface
water
and
see,
if
there's
opportunities
to
maybe
increase
recharge,
more
surface
water
courses
and
make
sure
that
the
groundwater
isn't
causing
a
problems
with
our
surface
water
courses
and
so
based
on
those
basin
management
objectives.
We
have
a
series
of
items
in
the
plan
that
will
help
us
meet
those
objectives.
H
First
and
foremost
is
maintaining
our
collaborative
approach
and
working
with
the
other
agencies
and
stakeholders
in
the
base
and
through
the
groundwater,
Task
Force,
which
is
established
largely
through
our
advisory
committee,
we're
looking
to
pursue
additional
grants.
The
groaner
management
plan
was
funded
through
a
be
three
or
three
clamp
from
the
Department
of
Water
Resources.
If
you
recall,
the
city
received
a
previous
ad
three
or
three
grant
to
help
us
install
seawater
intrusion,
monitoring
wells
along
San,
Francisco
Bay.
So
it's
been
a
good
program
and
it
continues.
H
We
want
to
potentially
look
at
analyzing
shallow
groundwater
conditions
in
the
basin
and
how
we
might
be
able
to
improve
recharge
and
increase
our
ability
to
produce
groundwater
and
going
back
to
the
collaboration
framework.
We
want
to
be
able
to
continue
to
share
our
hydrogeological
knowledge
and
operational
information
so
that
all
the
stakeholders
can
benefit
from
all
that
knowledge
continue.
Monitoring
and
reporting
of
groundwater
conditions,
continue
our
meetings
with
stakeholders
and
update
the
plan
when
and
if
additional
information
is
available.
I
It
is
our
recommendation
for
you
to
approve
the
groundwater
management
plan
and
we're
being
our
intent,
also
to
come
back,
probably
next
meeting
to
make
a
recommendation
for
you
to
support
the
grant
amplification
for
the
project.
What
Jim
just
was
referring
to
you
for
the
shallow
water
monitoring
and
also
update
of
the
flow.
My
flow
monitoring
program.
Thank.
A
J
Clara
toward
the
end
for
implementation,
it
talks
about
that
the
administration
of
this,
but
it
doesn't
really
name
who
or
what
agency
is
the
lead
agency
on
this
is
so
does
each
agency
that's
listed?
Is
each
agency
that's
listed
in
here,
accepting
the
same
ground
management
proposal
or
do
they
each
have
their
own
and
then
we're
still
getting
together
and
collaborating
or
I
I
didn't
quite
understand
how
it
actually
physically
works.
This.
I
I
They
are
supporting
everything
in
this
plan.
This
was
developed
in
collaboration
with
them
and
is
my
assumption
and
this
time
that
they
will
approve
this
plan.
How
is
presented
to
you
tonight,
of
course,
I,
cannot
guarantee
that,
but
certainly
based
on
the
information
today,
they
are
supportive
of
the
plan,
and
is
that
intend
to
implement
the
plan
now
in
the
plan
itself,
they
are
included.
I
Many
possible
means
how
you
can
implement
this
management
plan
from
the
most
flexible
one
to
the
most
stringent
one
entering
in
joint
power
agreements
was
a
recommendation
at
this
time,
based
on
the
fact
that
this
will
be
the
first
ground
water
management
plan
approved
for
this
basin
and
the
information
level
can
be
further
improved
at
this
time
over
more
flexible
approach.
Managing
the
basin
through
a
collaborative
means
would
be
the
most
recommended
at
this
time
later
on.
I
J
G
I
Now
the
city
was
the
lead
agency,
for
the
development
of
the
plan
will
be
our
intent
to
have
those
task
force
meeting
ongoing
basis
and
will
be
established
by
joint
agreement
by
that
group.
How
often
would
be
useful
to
have
those
ongoing
meetings,
maybe
later
on,
doesn't
necessarily
San?
Bruno
has
to
be
always
the
agency
who
will
call
on
those
meeting,
but
maybe
those
can
be
rotate
between
those
partners
and
agency,
but
everything
will
be
based
on
the
recommendation
and
the
proposal
in
these
plans.
I'm.
I
J
That's
I.
I
I've
seen
plans
and
I've
been
a
party
to
plans
where
we,
the
great,
we
ask
all
the
questions
and
they
sit
on
the
shelf
and
people
forget
about
them.
So
this
is
I.
Don't
want
that
to
happen.
I'm
I
know
you
wouldn't
let
it
happen,
but
just
making
sure
and
then
the
other
question
I
have
to
say.
Whoever
put
this
together
every
time,
I
had
a
question
I
kept
reading
in
the
next
page
answered
the
question
so
so
my
list
was
very
short
now.
J
It
talked
in
here
about
united
airlines
being
concerned
partner,
but
I
don't
understand
why
the
airport
as
a
whole
isn't.
I
know
they're
part
of
san
francisco,
PUC
and
I
understand
all
that,
but
not
so
much
that
water
use,
because
that's
different,
but
the
contamination
part
I'm
very
concerned
that
they
as
a
whole
may
not
be
as
aware
or
as
stringent
watching
out
as
stringent
lee
as
they
could.
If
they're
not
more
a
part
of
this,
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
feasible
or
out,
you
know
out
the
door
or
what.
I
You
are
absolutely
right,
and
probably
was
my
mistake
not
to
lease
them
as
stakeholder
here,
but
certainly
they
were
invited
to
participate
in
the
development
of
the
plan
and
they
were
included
in
in
the
task
force,
and
they,
if
I
remember
right,
they
attended
the
first
meeting.
They
expressed
some
interest,
they
were
informed
they,
basically
all
of
the
information
was
sent
to
them.
I
Also
they
were
more
silent,
but
they
were
participant
in
the
process
and
I
am
assuming
at
their
present,
stronger
presence
will
be
needed
based
on
their
history,
in
the
collaboration
on
this
project
would
tell
me
that
they
would
be
willing
to
come
to
the
table
ab.
That
would
be
advisable
to
have
a
stronger
presence.
Okay.
D
J
A
G
F
K
Tobin
culture,
arts,
commission
I,
have
some
of
my
fellow
commissioners
here:
Tammy
Parker,
Pamela,
gambled
and
Carolyn
living
good
we'd
like
to
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
and
thank
you
for
your
continued
support
to
the
Commission.
After
listening
to
fees
and
expenses,
and
it's
nice
to
have
something.
That's
just
about
culture
and
arts.
K
So
the
purpose
of
the
Commission
were
responsible
for
promoting
the
artistic
development
of
the
community
and
preserving
San
Bruno's
diverse
cultural
heritage.
The
Commission's
goals
include:
acquiring
and
maintaining
an
inventory
of
public
art,
sponsoring
programs
and
events
that
enhance
the
quality
of
life
for
the
residents
and
improving
the
image
and
character
of
the
community.
K
K
Our
news,
Commissioner
who's,
not
with
us
this
evening,
is
Pamela
Madden
and
June
was
her
first
meeting,
so
we
are
excited
to
have
some
new
blood
on
our
Commission.
The
recognition
sculpture
project
was
a
joint
process
with
the
parks
and
recs
Commission.
Over
two
years
we
selected
aside
solicited
proposals
selected
an
artist's
and
brought
to
life
the
council's
vision
of
a
recognition
sculpture
to
honor
those
who
have
served
San
Bruno,
we're
very
proud
of
this
joint
effort.
The
results
is
produced.
K
The
art
exhibition
policy-
the
goal
of
this
is
to
encourage
local
artists
and
appreciation
of
art
in
the
community
to
provide
a
space
in
the
community
for
the
public
to
view
a
wide
variety
of
art.
The
policy
was
approved
in
April
of
2012,
and
a
call
for
artists
was
issued
in
this
past
June.
Our
first
exhibition
will
be
mounted
in
September
of
this
year
and
the
library
our
annual
event
movies
in
the
park.
What
we're
probably
most
known
for
is
sep
tember
and
friday
nights.
We
show
movies
in
the
park.
K
It's
coordinated
one
evening
with
the
family
overnight
in
the
park,
and
we
have
an
average
of
150
attendees
/
friday
night.
We
have
a
group,
you
use
activity
group
that
comes
in
cells,
treats
and
snacks,
and
everybody
has
generally
good
time.
The
weather
for
the
most
part,
still
holds
in
September
the
little
chilly,
but
everybody
bundles
up
and
has
great
time.
K
We've
also
have
Shakespeare
in
the
Park.
Usually
in
October
last
year
the
weather
was
unbelievable.
Everybody
came
in
shorts
and
t-shirts.
It
wasn't
as
well
attended
as
we'd
like
it
to
be,
but
hopefully
in
the
coming
years
it
will
catch
on,
and
people
will
start
to
realize
that
October
for
us
as
Shakespeare
the
park,
the
projects
that
we
have
proposed
for
this
upcoming
year,
of
course,
movies
in
the
park.
K
Family
movie,
we
won't
do
it
on
the
overnight,
but
is
a
family
movie,
and
we
do
plan
again
to
host
shakespeare
in
the
park
to
have
our
first
art
exhibit
and
to
continue
with
the
art,
exhibit
it's
a
12-month
program
and
we're
going
to
rotate
local
artists
every
quarter.
And
then
we
have
some
suggestions
for
future
projects,
which
we
of
course
will
bring
to
the
council.
We
have
something
to
bring
with
you
in
August
for
the
consent
calendar
some
of
our
ideas
for
future
projects.
K
The
commission
would
like
to
return
to
the
council
later
this
year
to
present
some
of
our
suggestions.
These
are
a
few
of
the
ideas.
We're
exploring
and
would
be
interested
in.
Any
feedback
council
has
to
offer
on
sneath
lane.
The
Commission
has
developed
a
list
of
potential
project
art
sites
after
reviewing
them
to
determine
land
ownership,
visibility,
project
type.
We
feel
the
retaining
walls
along
sneath
lane
west
of
280
are
good
possibility
because
the
property
is
city-owned.
K
It's
on
the
west
side
of
town,
where
there
currently
is
no
public
art
and
is
highly
visible
location,
performing
art
possibilities.
We've
discussed
partnering
to
bring
some
community
theater
poetry
or
possibly
having
life
classical
music
during
lunchtimes
at
the
Blake
Bay
Hill
area,
to
promote
relationships
with
our
business
community,
and
that
is
what
I
have
short
and
sweet
council
have
any
questions.
Any.
J
K
Are
open
to
partnerships
and
one
of
what
we
do
is
we
try
to
partner
with
other
community
of
its
we've
actually
had
someone
come
and
do
a
presentation
to
us
about
the
hundredth
anniversary
of
the
school
system
and
that
we
are
looking
for
the
hundredth
anniversary
of
the
city,
and
we
will
we
will
be
doing
something
if
it
is
definitely
something
we
will
put
on
our
agenda.
We
are
here
to
do
at
your
direction.
K
F
Can't
agree
with
you
more
of
it,
but
with
all
of
this
controversial
type
of
decision
making
we
make
here
it
is
a
nice
nice
relief
to
you
know
to
review
you
know
of
public
art
and
things
and
I
I,
give
it
all
to
her
we've
been
on
here
many
years
and
didn't
think
that
it
was
that
that
important
back
then,
but
Irene
kept
kept,
bringing
board
and
so
I'm
proud
of
her
for
that,
and
thank
you
for
that.
I'm
I'm.
F
Looking
for
more
involvement
with
kids
and
I,
think
I
and
I
believe
the
culture
and
article
commission
got
sort
of
got
involved
with
the
fire
department
with
the
fire
prevention
posters,
big
response
from
all
the
schools,
and
that-
and
I
think
maybe
you
know
we
can
expand
on
that,
because
kids
are
the
future
and
you
know
they're,
very
artistic
and
they're
very
creative.
You
know-
maybe
you
know
some
component
with
that,
because
I
see
her
exhibition
going
towards.
You
know
very
talented,
maybe
older
individuals
yeah
older
than
kids,
okay,
we.
K
K
One
of
the
something
that
we
have
going
coming
to
us
is
we've
reached
out
to
east
palo
alto
has
a
music
and
art
program
that
we've
asked
them
to
come
and
do
a
presentation
to
us
and
it's
it's
sort
of
youth
art
kind
of
I
believe
it
started
with,
may
be
tagging
and
turning
that
into
an
art
form.
So
we've
asked
them
to
come
and
give
us
a
presentation
to
see
how
they've
managed
to
get
their
young
people
involved
in
public
art
in
a
positive
manner,
instead
of
a
destructive
manner.
A
Well,
as
I
always
say,
the
boards
commissions
and
committees
of
the
city
or
the
lifeblood
of
the
city,
because
it's
all
volunteer,
it's
a
lot
of
times
a
lot
of
work,
but
it's
a
lot
of
fun.
So
I
can't
say
enough
on
behalf
of
the
entire
city
of
san
bruno.
Thank
you
very,
very
much.
You've
accomplished
a
lot
and
I
go
along
with
everything
you
said.
As
long,
you
don't
show
jaws
at
the
hundredth
anniversary
movies
in
the
park,
but
thank
you
very
much.