►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting June 28, 2011
10c. Sneath Lane Pavement and Bicycle Lane Improvement Project
B
The
construction
contract
with
this
payment
and
bicycling
improvement
project
was
the
water
in
april
2011
to
payment
treatment.
Alternatives
were
included
in
the
contract
bid
document
alternative
one
was
too
smart
repair
and
slurry
seal
alternative
to
was
to
mill
and
overlay
the
less
expensive
alternative.
One
was
recommended
to
city
council
and
it
was
approved
based
on
two
factors.
First,
was
the
design
engineers
premiun
assessment
and
limited
project
budget
as
appropriate
in
CIP.
B
Pre-Construction
field
work
in
order
to
reach
a
agree
upon
square
footage,
work
and
payment
to
for
the
contractor
staff
feel
mark
the
areas
requiring
base
repair
and
the
fuel
work
result
indicates.
Eighty-Five
percent
of
the
roadway
require
space
repair.
The
alternative
to
originally
including
the
bit
documents
is
a
more
expensive
payment
treatment
method.
However,
this
it
is
a
more
appropriate
method.
B
Due
to
the
field
findings
contractors
submitted,
the
price
were
alternative
to
was
two
hundred
and
two
thousand
two
hundred
using
the
contract
bid
price
alternative
to
plus
the
increase
ask
for
quantity
and
the
additional
work.
The
price
would
have
been
approximately
two
hundred
twenty
thousand,
however,
the
negotiator
cost
for
the
work
is
212
thousand
and
seven
hundred,
which
that
determined
to
be
a
reasonable
based
on
the
extent
of
work
and
the
cost
of
asphalt.
B
The
contract
was
awarded
in
an
amount
of
144
thousand
four
hundred
seventy
five
dollars
in
order
to
perform
the
modifier
world
work,
a
change
order
of
six.
The
8200
is
necessary,
star
consulted
with
the
sea
attorney
and
confirmed
that
the
change
water
is
in
compliance
with
public
contract
co.
If
the
City
Council
approved
the
construction
costs
are
in
july,
two
thousand
eleven
and
could
be
completed
by
August
2011,
with
this
staff
request
city
council's
consideration
to
approve
and
to
authorize
the
city
manager
to
execute
the
change
water.
The
contractor.
C
B
Grant
funding
was
I
believe
we
have
a
butt
burn
fund
budget
of
75,000
and
some
changes.
Initially
we
had
aspect
City
Council
to
approve
appropriation
of
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
on
the
street
rehab
I'm
CIP
project,
this
the
sum
or
the
change
increase
of
thirty
some
thousand
dollars
I'm.
We
are
hoping
that
it's
going
to
be
appropriate
on
the
CIP
project
for
the
street,
rehab
and
I
believe
there's
a
we
are
under
budget
for
the
cycle,
one
paving
project
as
well,
so
we're
hoping
the
final
number.
We
can
balance
that
the.
E
Rico,
seventh
Avenue
I'm,
just
a
little
concerned
on
you,
said
initially
that
it
was
the
city's
determination
at
twenty
or
twenty-five
percent
of
the
roadbed
needed
to
be
fixed
and
then
later
we
find
that
it's
a
much
greater
number.
Did
we
miss
something
or
we
are
we
learning
from
this
next
time?
Hopefully
we'll
come
in
closer
to
maybe
what
actually
needs
to
be
done
like?
Why
is
there
such
a
big
difference
in
what
we
thought
and
they
are
saying
that
needs
to
be
done?
D
It
is
obvious
that
something
was
missed
and
you
need
to
correct
direction
as
you
go.
Bus
a
bus
way
was
a
very
typical
assessment
made
by
the
design
engineer
during
the
design
during
the
field,
discovery
became
obvious
that
the
subsurface
of
this
road
is
different
than
what
was
the
assumption.
In
essence,
over
a
old,
concrete
pavement
was
a
fabric
laid
down
and
then
paved
over.
D
C
D
C
D
Certain
is
all
intent
to
learn
from
any
project
and
the
learning
process
will
being
incorporated
in
our
following
projects.
I
just
bit
like
I
just
feel
I
will
just
add
that
I
cannot
make
the
commitment
that,
on
all
of
our
projects,
will
be
everything
known
by
us
before
any
project
will
start.
It
is
a
reality
that,
during
the
construction
project,
you
sometimes
will
have
unforeseen
field
condition.
It
is
our
commitment
to
do
our
due
diligence
and
to
try
to
minimize
and
to
prevent
as
much
as
possible.
F
When
we
inspected
the
street
and
came
up
with
our
initial
analysis,
it
was
probably
I'm
assuming
a
visual
inspection
only
and
what
did
the
contractor
then
do
to
get
a
more
accurate
analysis
of
the
condition
have
they
started,
tearing
tearing
it
up
and
they're
actually
looking
at?
What's
underneath
actually.
D
Wasn't
a
contractor
was
us
before
the
contract
work
started.
Staff
went
to
the
side
to
really
mark
the
payment,
her
exactly
those
heard
the
base
has
to
be
repaired
and
during
that
work
was
the
staff
conclusion
and
not
the
contractor
conclusion
that
this
is
a
change
situation
and
the
best
approach
would
be
to
recommend
a
difference.
Application
for
this
section.
Okay,.
F
D
Tina
shank
alluded
to
in
the
beginning,
in
the
beginning
of
her
presentation
that
how
this
project
was
built
from
the
beginning
was
a
combined
bid
award.
That
means
both
of
those
alternatives
were
included
in
oadby
document,
and
the
combination
of
those
two
alternative
was
the
award
dollar
how
the
project
was
awarded
to
the
contractor.
That
means
that
this
alternative
already
was
included
in
our
bid
abort
process
and
was
no
reason
than
for
us
to
go
out
for
and
to
repeat
the
process,
knowing
that
this
was
the
low
country
the
low
bid
received.