►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting June 26, 2012
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting June 26, 2012
Entire meeting
A
A
A
Announcements
this
evening,
I,
do
have
a
very
short
update
on
the
crest.
More
neighborhood
work
is
continuing
in
the
crust
more
neighborhood
to
begin
final
decommissioning
line
132
the
pipe
installed
in
1948
pge
is
extracting
and
testing
the
liquids
remaining
in
the
old
pipe
work
is
expected
to
be
completed
by
the
end
of
this
week.
There
are
some
road
closures
and
detours
associated
with
PG
nice
work,
as
well
as
with
the
underground
infrastructure
replacement
work
being
done
by
the
city.
A
We
appreciate
the
community's
patience
as
we
continue
this
critical
work
and
we
will
continue
to
update
you
as
things
arise.
Thank
you
very
much
presentations.
This
evening
we
will
receive
a
presentation
from
Scott
Lawrence
superintendent
of
Santo
union
high
school
district
on
the
district's
facility
planning.
C
C
I
was
hired
here
in
San
Mateo
three
years
ago,
and
if
you
can
remember
three
years
ago,
one
of
the
first
things
that
we
had
to
deal
with
was
that
the
school
district
had
about
75
million
dollars
in
what
were
called
copd
certificates
of
participation
that
were
weighing
very
heavily
on
our
general
fund.
The
pain
off
in
the
phasing
of
those
things
created
a
situation
where
we
were
looking
at
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
could
find
that
sort
of
money
to
pay
off
the
debt.
C
So
we
could
put
the
money
back
into
the
school
district.
Well,
one
of
the
things
that
we
started
to
look
at
was
what
we
could
do
with
one
of
our
assets
and
one
of
our
assets
was
the
peninsula
crestmore
site,
and
so
we
went
through
the
7-11
committee
and
I
actually
walked
into
the
middle
of
that
and
spent
a
number
of
meetings
up
here
in
the
San
Bruno
area,
with
people
sharing
their
thoughts
about
what
we
should
do
with
the
crest
moisture
site
or
not
to
do
with
the
crestmore
site.
C
Well,
instead
of
going
through
and
falling
through
with
the
idea
of
what
we
could
do
with
that
asset,
we
went
in
a
different
direction
and
we
passed
we
would
put
on
the
ballot.
We
pass
bond
measure
called
measure
0
and
in
that
what
happened
was
is
that
we
were
able,
through
the
generous,
donate
our
vote
of
our
community.
We
were
able
to
get
the
money
for
that.
75
million
dollars
of
co-pays
and
pay
it
off,
and
since
that
point
in
time,
we've
really
not
had
to
worry
too
much
about
debt,
we're
an
excellent
physical
shape.
C
The
district
is
very
easily
prepared
to
face.
What's
going
to
come
up,
we
think
in
the
next
few
years,
as
far
as
a
state
budget,
but
one
of
the
other
things
that
we
did
in
measure
0
is
we
decided
that
it
was
also
time
to
do
the
last
two
big
projects.
As
far
as
the
district
was
concerned,
over
the
last
about
10
years,
we've
put
almost
six
hundred
million
dollars
of
investment
into
the
various
different
schools
in
our
school
district
and
I.
C
So
a
lot
of
positive
things
are
going
on,
but
the
last
two
projects
and
the
last
two
things
that
we
kind
of
said
we
were
going
to
do
was
we
were
going
to
try
to
find
an
alternative
site
for
the
peninsula
students.
Crestmore
is
very
nice
and
as
a
location,
but
the
actual
buildings
are
starting
to
fall
apart
and
we
haven't
put
much
into
them
over
the
course
of
the
last
know
20
30
years.
C
The
other
thing
that
we
decided
we
were
going
to
do
is
is
the
last
big
thing
where
superintendents
kind
of
go
to
get
fired
is
to
rebuild
our
our
facilities.
Are
our
district
office
facilities
or
maintenance
operations
technology
all
those
things,
and
we
can
do
it
because
we're
effectively
at
the
end
of
our
at
the
end
of
our
construction
program
across
the
entire
district?
Well,
the
board
is
coming
up
with
some
of
the.
C
The
board
is
looking
towards
considering
three
basic
options
as
far
as
the
district
office
facilities
and
the
peninsula
high
school.
The
first
one
is
the
first
goal
is
we
would
like
to
move
the
peninsula
site,
if
possible,
to
more
centrally
located
location
on
the
peninsula.
It's
a
challenge
with
about
two-thirds
of
the
students
that
come
to
peninsula
being
from
effectively
the
san
mateo
Burlingame
millbrae
corridor
right
along
el
camino,
rollins
road
in
that
area
and
down
toward
san
mateo
high
school.
C
So
there's
a
large
group
of
students
and
later
on
in
the
PowerPoint
presentation
and
some
other
documents
I
sent
you,
you
can
see
the
concentration
of
where
the
students
are
so
it's
difficult
for
the
students
to
get
up
to
peninsula
and
we
bus,
but
if
it
rains
will
lose
forty
percent
of
the
students
on
a
daily
basis.
Just
because
it's
difficult
for
the
students
to
get
up
there,
most
of
them
don't
drive,
and
so
it's
it's
a
challenge,
especially
since
we
don't
have
public
transportation
that
goes
up
there.
C
Another
one
of
the
options
is
is
that
we
can
purchase
property.
We
do
have
it
in
our
bond
fund
that
we
can
purchase
properties
some
place
in
a
more
centrally
located
area
and
build
a
one,
two
or
three
that
we
don't
have
to
put
it
all
together
on
one
site,
we
can
build
a
bus
yard
technology
center
district
office,
one
place.
C
We
can
build
peninsula
in
another
place,
so
we
have
the
options
of
putting
it
all
together
in
one
complex,
we're
separated
out
and
putting
it
into
two
or
three
different
sites
we
can
upgrade
crestmore
or
the
entire
site
that
would
entail
is
probably
tearing
down
some
of
the
buildings
in
building
a
you
know:
low
cool
and
putting
our
facilities
back
up
there,
or
we
can
build
it
on
one
of
the
other
locations
that
we
currently
own,
which
is
one
of
our
comprehensive
sites.
All
three
of
those
options
have
pros
and
cons.
C
All
three
of
those
options
have
costs
that
are
like.
If
we
purchase
property,
that's
20
million
dollars,
30
million
dollars
that
we
couldn't
put
into
our
you
know
renovating
some
of
our
other
other
sites,
putting
it
on
a
comprehensive
site.
There
are
pros
and
cons
and
I'm
sure,
you've
heard
it's
been
in
the
paper
for
the
last
few
months
that
there
are
concerns
about
putting
it
on
the
comprehensive
sites.
Building
up
at
building
up
in
crestmore
is
a
long-term
commitment
of
the
school
district.
C
As
far
as
you
know,
that
means
that
we're
going
to
retain
that
property
for
a
long
long
time.
So
there's
pros
and
cons
to
everything
that
we
that
we
do
and
the
board
was
meeting
with
its
interest.
You
have
more
people
here
than
we
do
at
it
at
a
normal
school
board
meeting.
We
only
have
two
or
three
and
they
send
the
back
of
the
room
and
they
kind
of
nod-
and
we
were
doing
this
in
january-february-
have
actually
been
working
on
this
for
about
18
months
january-february.
C
We
were
all
looking
around
going
we're
heading
towards
a
decision
and
nobody
knows
we're
even
talking
about
it.
So
I've
been
going
out
with
my
staff
to
everywhere
that
I
can
possibly
find
a
gathering
and
explaining
what
is
going
on
in
from
the
board,
and
you
know
we
can.
Democracy
can
be
messy
and
we
have
generated
a
lot
of
comments
over
the
course
of
the
last
two
months.
We
feel
better
for
it
because
at
least
now
people
are
engaged.
C
They
know
we're
trying
to
do
and
the
decisions
that
are
sitting
in
front
of
the
board
so
I
can
go
into
great.
Like
I
said,
I
can
go
into
great
detail.
I
can
go
through
the
pros
and
cons
in
great
detail
of
all
the
various
different
things,
but
if
you
had
a
chance
to
look
at
some
of
the
material
I'm
here
to
actually
listen
answer,
some
questions
have
staff
answer,
questions
and
I
think
that
might
be
a
good
use
of
our
time.
So.
A
C
Looking
at
one
of
three
options
as
far
as
upgrading
the
peninsula
facilities,
one
of
the
options
is
just
rebuilding
where
it's
at
right.
Now
again,
it
was
pros
and
cons
to
that
buying
property
is
another
one
or
putting
it
on
a
comprehensive
site.
We
also
want
to
consolidate
all
of
them,
we're
scattered
all
over
the
place
as
far
as
our
maintenance
yard
or
much
yards
or
facilisis
illa
tease
our
technology.
So
we
do
want
to
consolidate
as
much
of
that
as
we
possibly
can
doesn't
have
to
be
with
pen.
A
C
Currently,
the
board
right
now
has
not
talked
since
we
figured
out
how
to
defuse
75
million
dollars
in
co
PS.
We
just
look
at
it
as
an
asset,
a
long-term
asset.
There
have
been
no
conversations
about
doing
anything
with
it
actually
because
we
don't
anticipate
the
need
to
have
the
need
to
have
to
do
anything
with
it,
and
so
I
would
say.
Unless
something
comes
up,
that
we
can't
anticipate,
we've
been
trying
to
trying
to
find
a
tenant.
I
mean
we've
been
trying
to
find
you
know.
Charter
school
has
come
in
their
private
schools.
C
We've
been
actively
going
out
looking
for
tenants
to
rent
the
property,
and
that
I
would
say
is
about
as
far
as
a
long-term
commitment.
We
have
to
make
this
decision,
and
then
it
will
be
three
to
five
years
before
it
can
actually
come
to
fruition.
So
that's
about
how
far
out
we've
looked
as
far
as
you
know.
What's
going
to
go
on
for
the
next
five
years,
I'm
begin
again
I'm
using
that,
knowing
how
long
against
how
long
it
takes
things
to
get
through
construction
and
design,
and
all
that
is
we're.
C
E
Come
to
the
chair,
I
was
at
one
of
those
meetings
at
the
little
theatre,
a
cappuccino,
so
you
I
still
recall
so
I'm
sure
you
still
do
because
you
were
in
front
of
the
stage
some
of
the
concerns
of
the
residents.
As
what
the
mayor
indicated,
we
do
get
calls
its
assumption
that,
with
the
measure,
oh,
that
asked
that
the
you
would
be
clearing
out
of
the
site
eventually,
which
seems
to
be
on
that
path.
In
order
to
actually
get
rid
of
that
surplus
property
and
to
sell
it.
E
And
then,
of
course
that's
where
the
residents,
especially
in
that
neighborhood
in
the
area,
are
have
great
concerns,
as
you
heard
that
night
as
I
did,
the
other
thing
is
is
that
we've
had
throughout
the
times
mr.
Johnson
Sam
Johnson,
who
stood
there
and
my
former
principal
cap
and
I
said
you
know:
is
this
gonna,
be
it
as
far
as
coming
back
and
asking
for
another
measure,
another
partial
tax?
You
know
the
answer
was
yes,
but,
however,
something
else
came
up,
so
I
guess,
I'm,
wondering
and
I
know
I
get.
E
This
question
is
so
they
move,
they
get
property
and
they
go
down
the
path
again.
Are
they
going
to
be
coming
back
to
us
asking
for
more
and
yes
I've
been
to
cap,
and
it
certainly
is
a
different
school
than
when
I
was
there
and
it's
it's
beautiful.
It
took
a
little
bit
a
couple
measures
to
get
it
accomplished.
It
was
some
cost
overrides
honestly,
it
didn't
accomplish
it.
E
C
Say
that
we've
gone
through
three
measures:
mr.
d
measure
em
and
now
we're
in
measure
0.
What
you're
seeing
right
now
is
so
measure
d
happened
well
before
I
was
here
and
the
cost
overruns
that
you
were
talking
about
it,
especially
if
Sam
was
standing
up
you're
talking
about
it.
That
was
a
long
time
ago
for
us
in
the
board,
and
boards
actually
turned
over
quite
a
bit
since
that
point
in
time.
Because
of
some
of
the
issues
that
happened
with
measured
d
measure,
em
has
been
amazing.
C
We
have
been
able
to
do
so
many
more
things
than
we
actually
even
said.
We
were
going
to
do.
We
put
solar
that
has
created
a
boon
for
our
general
fund.
We've
we've
been
able
to
generate
revenue
streams
out
of
this
bond
measure,
and
we've
done
so
much
more
than
we
actually
anticipated
at
the
head
of
measure.
Em
we're
thinking
that
measure
o
finishes
it
off.
That's
that's
our
goal.
C
That's
our
belief
in
if
things
keep
going,
the
way
that
things
are
going,
I
would
say
that
that's
a
fairly
strong
statement
that
we
won't
be
looking
to
go
out
again.
Unless
something
happens
in
the
economy
that
we
need
to
go
up
or
parcel
tax,
but
we
have
no
there's
no
anticipation
now
to
go
out
for
anything
at
all.
F
C
It's
a
possibility
so
having
been
in
education
for
over
30
years
and
having
seen
properties,
be
sold
off,
it
has
assets
because
of
the
time
you
don't
think
you
need
it
or
whatever
we've
been
actually
as
a
staff
been
pushing
that
it
would
not
make
sense
for
us
knowing
that
we're
facing
growth
to
sell
off
an
asset.
What
we
do
not
want
to
have
happen,
those
they
have
an
asset
not
be
used
in
something.
C
We
look
for
revenue
streams,
every
place
we
possibly
can
and
again
that's
why
we've
been
going
out
trying
to
find
somebody
that
would
be
willing
to
rent
the
property,
because
there's
a
lot
of
extra
empty
space
up
there
and
this'll
only
takes
up
a
small
portion
of
it.
So
we've
been
actively
trying
to
find
other
renters
to
go
into
it,
and
that's
that's
where
we're
at
is
that
I,
don't
believe,
there's
a
long-term
plan
again
I'm
speaking
for
myself,
not
the
school
board,
because
I
can't
do
that
there.
C
F
C
E
F
C
Dawn's
catan
on
the
principal
Peninsula
high
school
right.
Thank
you
in
just
I
would
like
to
say
honey
is.
It
has
been
work.
We
have
a
good
working
relationship
and
feel
comfortable
calling
and
talking
to
each
other
and
I
really
want
to
make
sure
that
you
understand
we're
trying
to
do
outreach.
So
people
don't
get
surprised
by
what
we're
what's
going
on
in
any
comments
that
you
have
or
that
you
want
to
forward
to
us
from
your
community.
Please
do
so.
We
look
forward
to
that
and
I
will
share
that
with
the
board.
Will.
A
A
Item
number
5
review
of
the
agenda.
We
have
a
couple
of
changes
this
evening.
First
of
all,
I
would
like
to
move
without
objection.
Item
number
12,
which
is
the
annual
report
of
the
Planning
Commission
to
right
after
item
to
rate
public
hearings,
and
it
looks
like
with
the
suggestion,
at
the
suggestion
of
our
city
attorney,
we're
going
to
remove
from
this
evenings
agenda
items
10,
B
and
item
11,
which
both
have
to
do
with
redevelopment
successor
agencies
and
he's
informed
us
that
without
the
five
of
us
here
to
have
to
be
recused
anyway.
A
A
Approval
of
the
minutes.
0,
the
regular
City
Council
meeting
of
jun,
12
2012
and
city
council
closed
session
of
jun
12
2012
the
errors
Corrections
emissions,
seeing
none,
they
will
be
approved
as
submitted
and
a
consent
calendar
all
items
are
considered
routine
or
implemented
earlier
council
action
too
may
be
enacted
by
one
motion.
There
will
be
no
separate
discussion
unless
requested
by
the
council,
member
citizen
or
staff
action
on
the
consent
calendar.
If.
I
Mr.
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
part
of
our
presentation
tonight,
although
abbreviated
will
be
repetitious
of
the
two
study
sessions
that
the
City
Council
conducted
on
june
sixth
and
june
thirteenth,
we
want
to
provide
an
opportunity
for
members
of
the
public
who
might
not
have
been
able
to
either
view
or
attend
the
study
session
meetings
to
have
a
general
idea
of
about
the
organizing
principles
that
are
incorporated
into
this
budget.
Before
I
moved
to
the
actual
detailed
budget
comments.
I
I
wanted
to
make
a
couple
of
comments
on
items
that
were
discussed
by
members
of
the
public
who
did
take
the
opportunity
to
attend
the
study
sessions
on
june
sixth
and
jun
13.
Particularly.
There
were
two
comments
that
I
wanted
to
respond
to
tonight
and
provide
additional
information
for
the
city
council
and
for
the
public.
I
24
hour
shifts
the
concern
that
was
articulated
by
a
member
of
the
public
had
to
do
with
whether
there
was
a
safety
problem
when
apparatus
and
firefighters
are
out
of
their
normal
assigned
district
or
territory,
and
although
the
police
I'm
sorry,
the
fire
chief
answered
that
question
that
night
I
want
to
answer
it
again,
man
to
make
sure
that
that
information
is
not
left
unresponsive
to
in
in
the
public
domain.
The
short
answer
to
that
issue
of
that
question.
I
That
comment
is
that
the
firefighters
are
allowed
to
take
care
of
that
at
normal
business
during
their
assigned
work
shift,
in
addition
to
shopping
for
groceries,
as
as
they
do
very
quickly.
They
are
also
taking
the
opportunity
of
being
in
the
in
the
public
arena
to
discuss
and
disseminate
fire
prevention
information
to
members
of
the
public,
and
they
do
that
routinely
as
part
of
their
assigned
responsibilities.
I
But
beyond
that
in
terms
of
responding
to
calls
as
the
council
as
well
aware,
we
operate
under
a
boundary
dot
and
joint
deployment
program
countywide
within
San
Mateo
County.
Under
this
system,
fire
apparatus
are
dispatched
from
the
nearest
location,
whether
or
not
they
are
assigned
specifically
to
that
particular
locale
or
district,
and
the
public
safety
is
not
compromised
by
a
particular
apparatus
being
either
out
of
district
or
out
of
service.
I
Typically,
what
is
what
happens
when
a
fire
apparatus
is
not
in
its
assigned
location
for
any
reason,
and
that
could
include,
because
firefighters
are
on
mandated
training,
whether
they
are
performing
other
assigned
functions.
The
next
available
apparatus
may
be
required,
whether
it's
not
it's
in
the
same
jurisdiction
or
not.
For
example,
in
our
case
apparatus,
out
of
South
City
might
need
to
move
up
and
be
positioned
in
order
to
take
that
next
call.
I
So
again,
there
is
no
deficit
to
public
safety,
and
the
regional
deployment
program
is
deliberately
intended
to
provide
for
those
kinds
of
situations
that
may
arise
for
a
variety
of
different
reasons
when
apparatus
and
firefighters
are
out
of
their
of
their
normal
territory.
The
second
issue,
and
again
this
is
something
that
I
wanted
to
cover
for
the
benefit
of
public
information
had
to
do
with
the
water
and
wastewater
rates
that
remain
under
consideration
and
final
action
by
the
City
Council.
I
Specifically,
there
was
a
comment
at
your
last
City
Council
meeting
a
at
the
at
the
public
podium
speaker
from
the
public
provided
information
that
suggested
that
the
water
and
wastewater
rates
were
not
on
average
being
considered
at
a
nine
point:
eight
percent
I'm.
Sorry,
the
water
rates
were
not
being
considered
accurately
at
a
nine
point.
Eight
percent
average
increased
level,
but
in
fact
the
rates
might
vary
as
much
as
increase
of
thirty
to
forty
to
fifty
percent.
I
And
so
the
nine
point
eight
percent
is
really
an
average
based
on
water
use,
as
it
is
averaged
out
over
the
entire
customer
base,
but
may
or
may
not
be
specifically
related
to
any
individual
households.
Actual
percentage
increase,
so
I
hope
that
clarifies
those
those
two
items
that
were
raised
during
the
study
session.
I
I
And
then,
lastly,
we
are,
as
the
city
council
is
we're
continuing
in
negotiations
with
all
of
the
employee
bargaining
units,
leaving
a
situation
of
some
amount
of
uncertainty.
As
to
the
final
resolution
of
those
negotiations
in
the
salary
and
benefits
program
for
the
next
period
of
time.
As
such,
this
budget
is
built
around
the
continuing
assumptions
of
the
existing
labor
agreements,
which
call
for,
as
the
council
is
aware,
a
relatively
significant
reduction
in
employee
salary
and
benefit
costs.
I
Fortunately,
in
this
particular
disaster,
the
city
is
not
being
impacted
by
costs
as
a
result
of
the
financial
arrangements
that
we
would
be
able
to
negotiate
with
pge,
but,
among
other
things,
preparedness
for
disaster
and
the
potential
financial
effects
of
that
deferred.
Maintenance
of
city
facilities,
as
well
as
a
variety
of
other
topics
continue
to
in
our
you
know,
are
still
relatively
constrained.
I
Financial
situation
continue
to
be
a
tissue
and
we'll
need
our
attention
over
the
next
12
months
as
we
as
we
address
the
potential
opportunity
to
see
some
improvement
in
revenues,
and
we
continue
to
grapple
with
the
variety
of
issues
that
continue
to
challenge
the
city
organization.
So
with
that
I'll
ask
him
to
give
you
a
more
detailed
review
of
both
revenues
and
expenditures
outlined
in
this
budget.
I
H
What
we've
discussed
since
the
mid-year
budget
review
and
in
anticipation
of
building
this
budget,
we
have
experienced
an
increase
in
taxes
in
the
city,
primarily
in
the
areas
of
sales
tax.
In
transient
occupancy
tax,
we
are
anticipating
a
continued
increase
into
the
1213
fiscal
year.
In
addition,
the
loss
of
redevelopment
will
have
having
a
very
dramatic
impact
on
the
general
fund
and
adverse
impact
on
the
general
fund.
H
There
is
a
small
benefit
that
the
city
will
receive
additional
property
tax
as
a
result
of
the
elimination
of
redevelopment,
so
we
have
factored
in
somic
growth
in
property
tax
as
a
result
of
the
elimination
of
redevelopment,
the
restoration
of
cops
funding
occurred
just
after
the
adoption
of
the
2011-12
there
at
2011-12
budget.
So
the
1213
incorporates
that
that
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
cops
funding
in
lieu
of
motor
vehicle
license
fees
that
we
previously
received.
H
There
was
a
budget
swap
that
essentially
took
away
the
BLF
fees
and
then
provided
us
with
the
cops
fees,
so
those
sort
of
Netta
themselves
out.
We
have
an
increase
in
the
fire
revenues
as
a
result
of
a
shared
meet
the
services
agreement
for
a
shared
mechanic
with
central
county
fire.
We
have
factored
in
the
receipt
of
building
permit
fees
from
the
krecem
crestmoor
rebuilds,
as
well
as
cedar
mills.
So
those
are
all
positives.
H
On
the
revenue
side
on
reduction
side,
we
have
the
factor
of
redevelopment,
the
elimination
of
redevelopment,
there's
a
loss
of
what
used
to
come
into
the
general
fund
as
allocations
the
recovery
of
costs
associated
with
General
Administration
salaries
that
were
budgeted
or
that
were
recovered
from
the
redevelopment
agency.
That
was
a
reduction
of
seven
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars
in
the
budget
for
an
annually,
as
well
as
the
reduction
with
the
city
previously
received
an
interest
payment
from
the
Redevelopment
Agency
for
advances
made
to
the
agency.
That
payment
has
essentially
been
eliminated.
H
As
things
currently
stands,
so,
overall,
a
reduction
of
9,
approximately
nine
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars
to
offset
that
so
the
numbers
as
they
stack
up
the
1213
proposed
budget
in
comparison
to
the
11-12
amended
budget.
As
you
can
see,
even
with
all
the
positives,
the
increases
in
taxes
as
well,
some
of
the
departmental
revenue
increases.
We
had
an
overall
budget.
The
budget
comparison
1213
budget
to
in
comparison
to
the
current
year,
amended
budget,
a
reduction
of
four
hundred
and
twenty
four
thousand
dollars
in
revenues
on
the
expenditure
side.
H
As
we
previously
discussed,
this
has
been
a
hold
the
line
budget
and
that
attempted
to
reduce
costs
without
having
service
reductions
wherever
possible.
There
were
a
number
of
reductions
that
were
made
in
individual
department
budgets
that
were
identified
in
the
course
of
the
budget
preparation
process
that
were
highlighted
during
the
twelve
thirteen
budget
study
sessions,
as
the
city
manager
already
mentioned
at
the
existing
negotiated,
salary
and
benefit
reductions
do
remain
in
effect
in
the
1213
budget
expenditures
in
projections.
H
Given
the
uncertainty
of
those
agreements,
there
are
supplemental
budget
requests
that
have
been
previously
highlighted,
which
include
the
reorganizations
as
well
as
some
other
enhancements
that
result
in
a
net
decrease
of
fourteen
thousand
dollars
for
the
general
fund.
The
11-12,
the
current
year
budget
was
also
the
final
year
of
the
debt
service
payment
for
the
City
Hall
remodel,
so
in
1213
that
debt
service
payment
is
eliminated.
H
And
finally,
another
factor
in
the
1213
budget
was
that
was
the
fact
that
we
no
longer
had
redevelopment
to
allocate
either
staff
salaries
to,
as
well
as
the
programs
that
were
previously
funded
by
redevelopment
now
had
to
find
a
new
home
in
the
general
fund.
So
that
was
another
factor
that
we
had
to
take
into
account
as
we
develop
this
budget.
H
H
Those
were
presented
during
the
second
but
budget
study
session
is
part
of
the
equipment
purchase
section.
Those
account
for
ninety
thousand
dollars
when
you
factor
in
all
those
changes
where
we
end
up
is
a
change
in
fund
balance.
A
positive
change
in
fund
balance
without
the
use
of
one-time
reserves
or
revenues
to
balance
the
budget
of
just
over
fifteen
thousand
dollars.
H
Very
quickly,
I'd
like
to
just
touch
upon
there's
two
items
that
are
two
action
items
before
you
tonight,
the
first
being
the
approval
of
the
budget.
The
second
item
is
the
approval
of
the
Gann
limit.
I
just
want
to
very
quickly
walk
through
what
the
Gann
limit
is
in
1979.
The
voters
approve
what
was
called
proposition
for
refer
to
as
again
limit,
which
essentially
creates
say,
restriction
on
the
amount
of
tax
revenue
that
can
be
appropriated
every
year.
H
Essentially,
what
it
does
is
it
took
a
base
expenditures
from
1978,
1979
and
you're
able
to
adjust
that
every
year
by
index
of
cost-of-living
adjustment,
as
well
as
the
population
growth
factor
that
is
provided
to
us
by
the
State
Department
of
Finance.
So
the
revenues
that
are
subject
to
the
Gann
limit
are
just
tax
generated
revenues
which,
for
San
Bruno,
are
four
categories:
property
tax
sales,
tax,
transient
occupancy
tax
and
business
tax.
H
When
you
add
up
all
those
proceeds
of
taxes
in
make
adjustments
for
some
exclusions
that
are
allowed
under
the
Gann
limit
calculation,
we
end
up
with
a
proceeds
of
taxes,
dollar
amount
of
just
19
million.
Just
over
19
point.
Eight
million,
when
we
do
our
calculated
Gann
appropriation
limit,
we
end
up
with
a
number
of
30
2.3
million.
So
what
this
is
saying
is
that
we
are
well
the
city
of
San
Bruno
is
well
below
the
big
an
appropriations
limit.
I
Wanted
to
add
this
is
a
gin
dice
as
a
public
hearing
item.
We
would
ask
that
the
City
Council
open
and
then
close
the
public
hearing
before
you
take
action
on
the
budget.
We're
recommending
the
budget
for
approval
tonight
just
call
to
the
council's
attention
the
item
in
the
agenda
packet
that
was
transmitted
to
you
electronically,
that
transcribes
and
then
answers
all
of
the
questions
that
we
received,
or
at
least
all
of
the
ones
that
we
recorded
receiving
at
the
study
sessions
in
and
subsequent
to
the
study
sessions.
I
A
Questions
of
staff
before
we
open
the
public
hearing
all
right
this
time,
we're
going
to
open
the
public
hearing
reading
any
members
of
the
public
like
to
speak
to
the
council
regarding
this
item,
all
right,
if
we
close
public
hearings
preclude
you
from
not
talking
about
the
side
again,
action
move
to
close
pub
hearing.
Second,.
J
E
Couple
things
with
we
just
city
manager
to
discussed
about
disaster
and
not
because
eric
is
in
the
audience
that
there
was
go
together,
but
there
was
once
brought
up
about
in
an
IT
as
far
as
having
a
backup
from
all
of
our
computer
and
data
system,
from
what
we
have
at
City
Hall
and
then
I
thought
it
was
to
have
a
backup
system
over
at
the
police.
Station
plaza
has
not
ever
been
accomplished.
H
E
So
one
area
that
I'm
still
having
a
hard
time
to
to
area
specifically
is
one
is
a
cmms
system.
I
appreciate
the
information
that
was
given.
I
went
back
again
as
far
as
this
something
we
started
back
in
07.
The
additional
costs
that
seemed
to
come
up.
Sixty
five
hundred
dollars
was
supposed
to
be
divided
by
four
and
obviously
there's
support.
Now,
there's
going
into
a
different
division,
which
means
more,
which
means
when
we
go
into
another
division,
water,
streets,
etc.
E
There's
going
to
be
again
more
to
that
I,
don't
recall
when
we
went
down
this
path
of
all
these
additional
costs,
we're
talking
about
more
monies
to
help
implement
it.
We
have
an
management
analyst,
that's
going
to
assist
with
it.
So
that's
one
thing.
The
second
thing
is
it's
far
as
a
reorganization
amongst
the
administration
and
community
services
in
light
of
the
Community
Development
Department,
and
that
change
it's
going
to
occur,
should
we
maybe
step
back
for
30
days,
reevaluate
the
whole
structure
of
all
of
that
and
see
what
what
fits
best
going
forward.
E
One
of
my
concerns
is
that
I'm,
looking
to
you
know
we're
talking
about
senior
services
and
library
services
under
one
assistant,
director
and
then
I
get
concerned,
we're
taking
out
a
library,
circulation
manager,
I
believe,
and
then
we're
taking
half
of
that
director
and
bringing
it
to
the
senior
center.
This
is
a
big
task.
This
has
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
special
folks
that
that
are
used
to
a
lot
of
love,
and
I
think
both
both
sides
deserve.
It.
E
I
get
concerned
that,
if
we're
not
going
to
shortchange
senior
services
or
the
library,
as
we
were
told
to
the
study
session,
there's
about
1200
folks
that
go
through
the
library
I
actually
was
walking
through
it
on
Saturday.
It
was
on
my
mind,
I,
don't
know
if
that
fully
addresses
that.
So
that
is
a
concern
also.
I
had
it
just
in
that
restructuring
about
spreading
that
thin
and
whether
there's
adequate
services
to
provide
what
the
community
and
the
residents
expect
in
both
areas.
J
I
only
because,
let
me
see
I
is
Larry
often,
and
so
does
my
family
and
my
understanding
of
how
this
works
and
Brandi
wants
to
add
the
actual
statistics
and
all,
first
of
all,
unfortunately,
the
1200
it
wasn't.
It
was
Miss
stated
it
wasn't.
1200
people
that
go
through
with
1200
items
that
get
checked
in
I'm,
sorry
to
get
checked
out
a
day.
It's
about
700,
sorry,
900,
people
that
go
in
and
out,
which
is
still
a
huge
number.
J
The
part
of
the
physical
aspect
of
the
library,
because
it
is
relatively
small
compared
to
the
size
of
the
city
and
the
population,
is
actually
getting
items
back
on
the
shelves.
So
people
can
use
them
and
get
them
out
again.
So
that
needs
a
physical
body,
picks
them
up
and
put
some
more.
They
go
and
not
to
say
we
don't
want
to
have
the
manager
or
whatever
helping
with
the
program's
themselves
we're
limited
on
what
programs
we
can
actually
do
because
of
the
size
of
the
library.
J
So
if
and
when
we
get
a
bigger
library
and
we
can
have
more
programs,
we
will
definitely
need
a
manager
to
take
care
of
those
things.
So
my
understanding
and
what
I've
talked
to
people
and
staff
and
a
variety
of
other
people
that
the
manager
that
the
money
is
going
into
pages
and
the
pages
actually
physically
pick
up
the
stuff
and
put
them
back
on
the
shelves
where
people
can
go
and
get
them
so
I.
E
Would
say
that
there
are
more
programs.
I
would
say
that
we
have
more
population
in
the
community,
less
staff
in
the
library
that
my
gun
on
the
council
and
you
have
more
programs
and
activities
to
end
cap
accessibility
and
the
programs
that
director
here
and
there's
the
staff
has
implemented
downstairs.
So
I
see
it
as
an
increase
both
as
services
with
less
staff,
yeah
and
a
larger
population.
So.
E
So
my
concern
is:
have
we
thought
it
through
enough
to
where
everything
succeeds
and
we're
not
short
changing?
Because
you
are
talking
about
a
lemon,
not
fulfilling
a
position
and
you're
going
to
take
the
assistant
library
director,
make
them
their
halftime?
And
here
halftime,
it's
not
walking
across
the
street.
It's
coming
up
the
road
here
so
again,
I
just
think
both
areas
need
to
be
serviced
adequately
and
I'm
concerned
about
its
future.
K
K
Freeing
up
a
lot
of
the
upper
administration
time
at
the
library
I
would
foresee
that
the
library
this
isn't
library
director,
especially
initially,
might
be
up
here
at
the
Senior
Center
10
hours
a
week
or
12
hours
a
week.
Learning
the
programs
and
meeting
things
working
a
lot
with
staff.
That's
up
here,
Mary
Susan
Gloria,
the
three
recreation
supervisors
to
get
a
lot
of
the
workload
done.
I
G
I
Don't
have
additional
information
for
the
City
Council
to
address
any
more
specific
issues.
What
I
would
suggest
is
that
I
think
the
interest
is
warranted.
There
is
a
significant
investment
in
this
system
and
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
to
suggest
that
we
bring
this
back
to
the
City
Council
for
a
more
thorough
discussion
of
both
how
it
will
be
deployed
and
what
the
various
cost
components
are.
I
As
we
discussed
at
the
study
session,
there
is
a
change
in
the
support
the
product
lineups
that
the
the
vendor
will
support,
and
we
need
to
address
that
if
we're
going
to
continue
to
utilize
the
system
inis
we
discussed
at
the
study
session,
there
is
a
a
reliance
on
the
system
and
a
high
level
of
utilization
that
is
providing
a
beneficial
service
to
the
waste
water
division.
There
is
a
need
to
bring
the
system
up
into
a
more
functional
capacity
for
the
water
and
potentially
a
stormwater
division.
I
I,
don't
I
don't
see
a
particular
overlap
between
the
communities,
the
reorganization
plan,
that's
proposed
for
the
community
services
department
and
the
pending
vacancy
in
the
community
development
department.
If
that's
that,
if
that's
a
specific
question,
what
I
would
suggest
is
that
the
way
that
reorganization
is
structured
in
the
budget
is
provides
a
financial
plan
and
a
proposed
means
of
addressing
both
organizational
and
operational
needs
and
issues.
I
Additional
information
or
consideration
for
the
City
Council
that
I
would
encourage
you
to
approve
the
budget
tonight,
as
it
is
subject
to
your
further
further
interest
in
understanding
how
the
reorganization
plan
would
be
would
be
implemented.
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is
that
I
don't
see
a
particular
need
to
defer
action,
and
if
the
council
is
interested,
we
can
certainly
bring
back
further
discussion.
E
I
Are
two
resolutions,
one
on
the
budget
and
one
separately
on
me
gann
appropriation
on
the
budget
resolution.
I
would
just
call
your
attention
to
the
fact
that
they're,
a
great
deal
of
detail
articulated
in
the
resolution
that
go
through
each
of
the
enterprise
funds,
special
revenue
funds,
as
well
as
the
general,
as
well
as
the
general
funds.
So
that's
all
combined
into
one
resolution
in.
E
I
B
F
B
A
Just
before
you
do
that,
I
would
just
like
to
say
in
passing
that
the
staff
has
done
a
wonderful
job
in
this
budget
very,
very
difficult,
and-
and
you
know,
we
have
a
couple
of
study
sessions
with
last
number
of
hours,
but
they
put
you
know
countless
hours
into
preparation
of
this.
So
job
well
done.
Thank
you
and.
E
D
As
you
know,
the
Planning
Commission,
the
members
of
the
council,
will
include
myself.
The
Commission
include
myself
last
year
via
sorry,
Commissioner
Marshall,
Johnson,
Jace
Peterson
similar
as
well
as
the
we
have
our
city
council
liaison
cast
member
sahs
are
so
some
students,
significant
activities
in
2011
we've
seen
the
crespo
neighborhood
rebuilding
held
about
eight
special
architectural
review
committee
meetings
and
just
to
highlight
this
allowed
us
to
process
these
applications
through
one
meeting.
Instead
of
doing
the
regular
one
arc
review,
plus
a
planning
commission
meeting.
D
D
As
far
as
the
commercial
and
residential
projects
of
concern
in
2011,
we
had
a
similar
activity
level,
2
2010,
with
with
you
a
fair
number
of
increase
in
residential
projects.
There
were
about
15
commercial
projects
which
went
through
architectural
review
and
use
permits
and
a
total
of
eighteen
residential
use.
Applications.
D
So,
as
far
as
goals
of
2012
concern
will
continue
to
hold
special
architectural
review
meetings
in
order
to
facilitate
the
crestmore
rebuilt
and
as
well
as
complete
the
zoning
code
update,
we
would
like
to
build
upon
the
sustainability
audit
hold
more
joint
City
Council
study
sessions.
We
helped
food
to
last
year,
so
I
felt
that
they
were
really
helpful.
I
learned
a
lot
about
chickens.
D
D
D
It
was
part
of
the
Redevelopment
Agency
project,
but
I
believe
it's
gone
through
the
draft
eia
our
process
and
now
references
to
the
Redevelopment
Agency
is
being
taken
out
for
final
channel
plan,
a
plan
amendments,
and
we
would
like
to
have
a
recommendation
for
food
for
the
city
council.
Approval
on
this.
D
D
We
also
anticipate
in
2012-2013
that
there
will
be
significant.
There
will
be
a
significant
increase
in
development.
There
are
more
developers
moving
into
the
peninsula
and
we
feel
comfortable
that,
as
the
economy
improves,
will
have
more
projects
and
I
hope
we
can
go
back
to
to
Planning
Commission
and
to
arc
review
meetings
like
we
had
in
the
good
old
days.
A
Questions
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
you
and
all
the
members
of
the
Planning
Commission.
We
couldn't
survive
here
in
the
city
without
a
boards
commissions
at
committees,
you
put
in
a
lot
of
time
and
I.
Think
a
number
of
years
ago
I
was
on
the
Planning
Commission
before
I
was
elected,
the
council
I
know
it's,
it's
real,
hands-on
Commission
and
you
visit
site,
Jimmy
people,
you
actually
get
into
the
thick
of
things,
so
it
can
be
difficult,
but
it
can
be
very
rewarding.
So
congratulations
and
thank
all
the
members
for
us.
Thank.
D
A
Item
number:
nine
is
public
comment
on
items
not
on
the
agenda.
Is
the
council's
policy
refer
matters
raised
in
this
forum
to
staff
for
investigation
interaction
where
appropriate.
The
Brown
Act
prohibits
the
council
from
discussing
or
acting
upon
any
matter,
not
agendized
pursuant
to
state
law.
Any
would
like
to
address
the
council
under
public
comment.
Hi.
L
John
Barrow
Lear
san
anselmo
Avenue
I,
received
this
response
from
the
acting
city
attorney
mr.
bear
earlier.
This
acknowledges
your
jun
6
2012
Public
Records
Act
request,
which
the
city
received
on
jun
6
2012,
requesting
a
log
of
all
fire
dispatchers
dispatches
for
2011
with
locations
and
time
of
each
fire
truck
when
it
was
dispatched.
L
In
response
to
your
request,
the
city
of
san
bruno
fire
department
does
not
track
the
location
of
fire
apparatus,
parentheses,
fire
engine
truck
or
battalion
chief
when
they
are
dispatched,
the
general
location
is
considered
to
be
within
their
quote
home
district
or
the
district
to
which
they've
been
moved:
/,
public
safety,
communications
directions
to
maintain
area,
wide
coverage
or
another
assignment,
such
as
for
training
inspections
or
public
education
details.
Therefore,
we
have
no
records
responsive
to
your
public
records
request.
Let
us
know
if
you
have
any
questions.
L
On
january
six
2009
I
presented
to
the
city
council
letter
examining
city
workers,
leisure,
that
is
coffee
time
in
this
another
presentation,
is,
I
put
forth
a
not
so
new
idea
of
installing
a
gps
and
all
city
vehicles.
After
all,
it
makes
good
business
sense
to
know
where
all
your
vehicles
are
at
all
times
where
they
were
and
for
how
long,
especially
when
your
most
expensive
vehicles
cost
nearly
a
million.
L
So
how
many
fire
trucks
the
standard
will
have
x
times
the
cost
of
one,
and
you
have
no
record
of
the
dispatches
a
business
principle.
Neglected
I'll
bet
that
most
businesses
know
even
where
their
computers
are
because
of
your
brief
letter,
I'm
expanding
my
request
to
ask
specifically
where
each
san
bruno
fire
truck
was
located
at
the
exact
time
of
the
crestmore
explosion.
L
L
So
I
have
three
strong
suggestions
again
put
a
GPS
in
each
city
vehicle,
including,
but
not
limited
to
fire
trucks
and
police
cars
initiate
belatedly,
though
it
may
be,
the
practice
of
logging
each
dispatch
from
our
fire
trucks,
including
time
date,
and
upon
return,
the
outcome
of
the
dispatch
number
three
eliminate
the
practice
of
firemen
shopping
on
City
time,
whether
it's
for
the
firehouse
or
otherwise.
You
leave
the
public
vulnerable.
When
you
do
this
shopping
is
necessary
online
necessary.
Do
it
online.
We
would
rather
be
rescued
by
six
firemen.
L
G
10,
mayor
and
city
council
I
want
to
update
you
on
mosquitos
and
goats
Sandberg
happy
to
report.
There's
no
new
mosquito
problems
in
san
bruno,
but
the
goats
have
arrived.
As
you
are
aware,
the
county
recently
confirmed
the
first
West
Nile
virus
positive
and
a
bird
found
in
woodside.
As
of
today.
San
bruno
continues
to
have
recorded
no
positives.
G
The
district
continues
to
remind
the
residents
to
dump
all
standing
water
I
provided
the
city
clerk
with
the
district
flyer,
advising
of
the
upcoming
Mills
field
helicopter
treatments
that
will
start
on
Tuesday,
July,
tenth
to
control
the
possible
breeding
of
mosquitoes
in
the
standing
water
under
the
toolies
in
Mills
feel
as
they've
done
in
the
last
number
of
years.
That
will
be
at
least
four
treatments
on
about
a
every
four
week
basis,
while
providing
a
copy
of
this
flyer
to
the
parks
department.
As
always,
questions
can
be
directed
to
the
district
at
34
4592.
G
I
talked
to
personnel
out
there
earlier
today
and
on
my
way
coming
in
tonight,
the
goats
have
arrived
so
hopefully
they
will
eat
in
the
in
the
right
place
prior
to
the
fourth
of
July,
and
we
will
have
that
extra
safety
buffer
and
on
a
final
note,
farmers
market
is
still
every
Sunday
in
the
tanforan
shopping
center
parking
lot
off
of
El
Camino
right
now,
it's
next
to
where
the
firework
boosts
our
921.
We
hope
everyone
will
attend
and
watch
it
grow.
Thank
you
or
I'll
answer
any
questions.
A
All
right,
continuing
with
cognitive
business
out
of
10
a
which
is
our
last
item,
received
report
and
adopt
resolution
authorizing
the
issuance
of
pension
obligation,
bonds
to
refinance
the
outstanding
side
fund,
obligation
of
the
city
to
the
California
Public
Employees,
Retirement,
Fund
and
authorizing
the
institution
of
judicial
validation.
Proceedings.
H
Being
a
bit
of
a
mouthful
there,
honorable
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council
I
I
touch
on
this
topic
back
at
the
second
budget
study
session,
so
I'm
just
going
to
review
some
of
what
I
discussed
at
that
time.
So
as
you'll
recall
back
in
2003,
CalPERS
combined
retirement
plans
for
those
agencies
that
had
fewer
than
100
employees
in
a
unit
and
two
groups
into
risk
pools
in
an
attempt
to
reduce
the
volatility
of
employer
contribution
rates.
H
Our
safety
pool
our
police
and
fire
was
one
of
those
groups
that
was
merged
into
a
risk
pool
at
the
time
that
that
that
the
police
and
fire
the
safety
unit
was
merged
into
the
risk
pool
a
what
was
called
an
unfunded
liability
was
assessed
at
that
point
in
time,
which
essentially
is
amortized
over
a
25-year
period
to
the
city
for
repayment.
So
at
that
point
in
time
that
the
city
joined
that
risk
pool,
there
was
the
outstanding
amount
that
was
owed
and
that
is
going
to
be
amortized.
That
has
been
advertised
over
25
years.
H
As
of
our
most
recent
pers
actual
evaluation
report
in
october,
two
thousand
eleven
that
outstanding
side
of
funds
stands
at
just
over
13
point:
1
million
that
accounts
for
eleven
point.
Eight
percent
of
our
total
at
the
employer's
contribution
rate,
basically
one-third
the
employer
contribution
rate
for
the
safety
employees
is
just
over
thirty
six
point.
Six
percent
currently
and
of
that
36.6
percent.
11.8
of
that
consists
of
the
repayment
of
the
side
fund,
the
rate
of
interest
that
the
city
is
charged
on
the
side
fund
and
seven
point:
seven:
five
percent.
H
We
do
know
that
that
rate
will
be
lowered,
come
july,
two
thousand
thirteen
to
seven
point
five
percent.
However,
staff
leaves
that
even
at
this
reduced
rate
of
return,
that
there
are
significant
potential,
significant
savings
from
refunding
the
side
fund
through
the
issuance
of
bonds
or
another
form
of
debt
out
of
much
lower
interest
rate
in
order
to
issue
pension
obligation
bonds.
The
city
must
first
attained
what
it's
called
a
judgment:
validating
that
the
CalPERS
side
fund
and
the
debt,
the
issuance
of
the
pension
obligation
bonds,
are,
in
fact
a
debt
obligation
created
by
law.
H
We're
not
going
out
in
issuing
new
debt
that
this
is
a
debt
that
already
exists
and
that
we
are
essentially
just
refinancing
refunding
that
existing
debt,
so
the
action
that
is
being
presented
before
you
tonight
authorizes
the
beginning
of
the
judicial
validation
proceedings
and
it
signifies
the
city's
intent
to
pursue
the
issuance
of
pension
obligation
bonds.
It
does
not
authorize
the
actual
issuance
of
bonds,
that's
not
something
we
were
prepared
to
do
at
this
time.
H
It
essentially
just
gets
the
clock
running
on
obtaining
this
validation,
as
that
process
alone
is
anticipated
to
take
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
90
to
120
days
and
during
this
time.
While
that
validation
process
is
occurring,
the
city
can
work
with
its
outside
financial
advisor,
to
put
together
a
proposed
financing
plan
that
will
be
brought
back
to
the
City
Council
for
further
review.
If
the
city
does
move
forward
with
the
issuance
of
pension
obligation
bonds
at
a
later
date,
all
costs
associated
with
the
issuance
of
that
transaction
would
be
incorporated
into
the
financing.
H
However,
if
the
city
choose
to
choose
not
to
pursue
the
issuance
of
bonds,
the
the
judicial
validation
process,
there
is
a
cost
of
7,500
dollars
involved
with
this
process
that
we
would
have
to
pay.
Should
we
choose
not
to
move
forward
with
the
issuance
of
the
bonds.
So
that
concludes
my
presentation.
F
A
E
The
chair,
hey
and
I,
always
appreciate
residents
coming
up
and
offering
their
view,
suggestions,
stops
and
criticisms.
I
was
gonna,
say
just
as
a
personal
note.
I
was
on
el
camino
just
the
other
day
and
saw
in
san
bruno
fire
station
a
south
san
francisco
fire
truck
and
coming
north
south
going
past
before
even
the
stamina
station
was
in
millbrae
fire
truck,
so
they
are
always
around
going
through
different
areas.
I've
also
done
some
of
my
own.
E
You
know
looking
into
it
further
after
you
brought
it
up
out
of
courtesy
and
respect
to
you,
I
think.
Sometimes,
when
we
look
at
the
global
picture
of
it
and
not
one
nuance
of
it,
you
may
understand
that
maybe
they
do
shop
at
costco
when
it
comes
to
their
items.
When
I
say
they
I
mean
online
or
on
their
off
time.
E
When
it
comes
to
their
common
stuff
that
they
utilize
in
the
refrigerator
or
the
breakfast
foods,
then
maybe
they
are
shopping
one
time
and
they
go
and
they
do
it
for
at
lunchtime
with
also
for
their
dinner
time
or
maybe
there's
also
the
thing
if
somebody
arrives
with
the
food
for
that
night
and
they're
on
a
call
and
there's
nobody
hit
52.
What
do
they
do
so
I
think
before
just
focusing
and
and
doing
that,
I
think
it's
also
helpful
to
see
the
bigger
picture.