►
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting May 18, 2010 4a. 4300 Susan Drive
A
We'll
move
right
along
then
to
item
4a,
4300
Susan
drive.
It's
an
environmental
determination
of
mitigated
negative
declaration
request
for
an
amendment
to
the
development
plan
to
allow
to
alternative
design
options,
request
for
a
12
month.
Extension
of
planned
development
permit
five
dash
2,
which
currently
allows
for
the
demolition
of
the
existing
308
unit
apartment
complex
than
the
development
of
510
new
residential
units
and
a
request
for
the
approval
of
planned
development.
A
Permit
ten
dash
1
and
an
architectural
review
permit
to
allow
for
the
renovation
of
existing
308
apartment
units
for
chapter
12
of
the
San
Bruno
Municipal
Code
as
an
alternative
project
design
option
under
the
development
plan
emco
san
bruno
apartment
partners,
limited
partnership
is
the
owner
and
applicant
the
subjects
tonight,
then
our
PDP
five
dash
two
pdp-10
dash
1
and
AR
ten
dash
six
staff
report.
Please
thank.
B
You
good
evening,
commissioners,
as
you
just
introduced,
there
are
several
items
for
your
review
this
evening
relating
to
the
treetops
Pacific
Bay
vistas
project.
As
indicated
in
your
packet,
the
Planning
Commission
is
the
recommending
body,
and
that
would
be
for
the
City
Council
to
take
action
on
the
items
that
are
before
you.
As
the
Commission
will
recall.
In
2006,
the
applicant
obtained
approval
for
a
510
unit,
new
development,
and
that
was
for
510
new
housing
units,
as
well
as
other
landscaping.
B
Improvements
in
2008,
the
city
approved
a
revised
project,
as
requested
by
the
applicant,
contain
the
same
number
of
housing
units,
but
it
was
a
different
design
concept,
as
well
as
a
different
parking
configuration
due
to
the
recent
economic
climate.
The
applicant
is
requesting.
The
city
approve
an
extension
to
that
510
unit
project
that
you
previously
approved,
as
well
as
approve
an
alternative
project,
and
that
project
involves
the
renovation
of
the
existing
308
units
out
the
site.
B
I'll
just
walk
through
each
of
those
items
for
you
and
then
be
happy
to
answer
your
questions
relating
to
the
time
extension
request.
The
previously
approved
plan
development
permit
included
a
conditional
of
approval
that
required
the
applicant
to
commence
construction
no
later
than
24
months
from
the
City
Council
approval.
The
planned
development
permit
is
therefore
valid
through
December
24th
of
2010.
B
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
one-year
extension
of
this
original
project
and
that
would
require
the
applicant
to
start
construction
by
june
twenty-fourth
of
2011.
This
action
is
included
within
your
resolution.
2010
6,
the
applicant
is
also
requesting
that
the
city
approved
an
alternative
design
option
that
would
allow
the
renovation
of
the
308
apartment
units.
This
site
is
currently
zoned
planned
development
and
the
planned
development
ordinance
requires
the
Planning,
Commission
and
City
Council
to
approve
a
development
plan
and
to
approve
a
plan
development
permit
that
isn't
consistent
with
that
development
plan.
B
What
the
applicant
is
asking
you
to
do
is
approve
two
planned
development
permits
consistent
with
the
master
development
plan,
so
to
allow
this
alternative
design
option.
In
addition
to
the
original
project,
the
city
would
need
to
amend
ordinance
1719,
which
would
modify
the
development
plan
for
the
Pacific
Bay
vistas
project,
and
this
action
is
included
in
your
resolution.
2010
dash
five.
B
Finally,
the
applicant
is
requesting
the
city
approved
the
alternative
design
option
for
the
renovation
of
the
existing
308
unit
development.
The
renovation
does
maintain
the
existing
number
of
housing
units.
It
does
include
a
complete
renovation
of
the
interior
and
exterior
of
the
buildings.
The
applicant
proposes
a
new
exterior,
siding
material
Erin.
Could
you
just
move
to
one
of
the
elevations?
B
We
also
have
the
boards
and
I'll
let
the
project
arctic
go
into
more
detail
about
the
architectural
elements.
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
some
of
the
points
for
you,
so
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
new
fiber
cement
board
and
it's
a
combination
of
a
horizontal
siding
as
well
as
a
lopsided
and
they're
going
for
a
cape
cod
design
concept
for
this
property.
The
proposal
also
does
include
some
brick
veneer,
as
well
as
white
trim,
new
balcony
elements
as
well.
B
The
renovation
also
includes
significant
changes
to
the
existing
recreation
center,
and
that
does
also
include
enclosing
the
existing
pool
and
the
project
includes
a
new
two-story
clubhouse
that
would
be
located
at
the
corner
of
sharp
park.
Road
and
skyline
Boulevard
in
the
design
concept,
for
that
building
is
two
storey
with
a
balcony
and
it's
the
same
similar.
B
And
colors
as
the
rest
of
the
property,
the
applicant
also
proposes
significant
landscape
improvements
to
the
site,
and
that
would
be
landscaping
surrounding
the
property,
as
well
as
replacing
the
landscaping
through
the
center
to
create
a
more
pedestrian
friendly
landscape
environment
with
some
seating
areas,
as
well
as
small
barbecue
areas
and
low
level.
Landscaping
is
mostly
drought,
tolerant,
more
appropriate
for
the
site
than
what's
there.
Now.
B
The
opp
can
also
proposes
to
enclose
the
existing
car
parts
to
create
garages,
as
well
as
construct
new
courts
on
the
site
to
create
more
covert
parking
spaces.
The
parking
amount
of
parking
will
remain,
as
is
today,
with
the
additional
parking
associated
with
the
new
clubhouse.
That's
located
on
the
corner,
so
there's
no
reduction
in
parking
spaces.
There
is
a
net
increase.
B
The
applicant
is
also
proposing
a
new
trash
compactor,
be
located
along
the
south
side
of
the
property
and,
as
noted
in
your
staff
report,
the
management
staff
at
Evergreen,
Ridge
Apartments,
has
expressed
some
concern
and
based
on
that,
the
applicant
come
up
with
an
alternative
design
to
move
it
farther
to
the
south.
That
would
place
it
farther
away
from
the
evergreen
apartments,
as
staff
is
supportive
of
this
alternate
design
location
for
the
trash
compactor.
B
The
existing
roadway
will
remain
in
its
current
configuration
and,
as
you
recall,
the
roadway
was
not
formally
accepted
by
the
city.
So
it
is
a
private
roadway,
but
there
has
been
public
through
access
through
the
site.
Obviously,
for
many
many
years
as
a
condition
of
approval,
the
applicant
will
resurface,
Susan
and
Highland
five
and
the
roadway
will
remain
as
a
privately
owned
and
privately
maintained.
C
B
Extension
of
plan
development
permit
for
the
development
of
the
510
unit,
design,
alternative,
adopt
resolution,
2010
7,
recommending
the
City
Council
approved
the
alternative
plan,
development
permit
and
architecture
review
permit
for
the
renovation
design
alternative,
allowing
for
the
renovation
of
the
existing
308
apartment
units.
There
are
several
minor
changes
with
the
documents.
B
I
know
you
have
those
ahead
of
you
and
if
you
have
any
questions
we
can
answer
those
also
we've
been
working
very
closely
with
the
applicant
to
try
to
resolve
any
outstanding
issues
and
hoping
to
come
to
agreement,
but
as
you'll
hear
there,
there
are
some
outstanding
issues
that
the
applicant
has
with
some
of
the
conditions
of
approval.
You
may
want
to
defer
some
of
those
details
to
the
City
Council,
as
it
does
involve
payment
of
fees.
Dedication
of
the
roadway
just
want
to
give
you
a
heads
up
and
one
item.
B
C
D
The
only
two
things
I
like
to
add
is
related
to
the
garbage
situation
on
the
south
side
of
the
property
line.
As
Lisa
indicated,
evergreen
Ridge
still
does
have
a
problem
with
where
the
alternative
garbage
trash
compactor
would
be
located,
I'm
also,
but
we
also
included
a
condition
that
they
more
spell
out
how
the
recycling
section
would
work
they
previously
had
their
their
first
proposed
location,
had
the
trash
and
recycling
in
one
area,
how
they're
showing
it
now
that
too,
would
be
separated,
we'd
like
to
see
how
that
would
work.
We
in
a
typical
situation.
D
We
would
have
them
all
in
one
location
and
the
second
had
to
do
with
the
garage
right
now.
We
have
a
condition
that
there
can
be
no
storage
within
those
garage
garages.
We
would
feel
comfortable
that
incidental
storage
be
allowed
as
long
as
it
does
not
impede
on
the
ability
for
a
car
to
park
within
that
garage
space
area.
So
if
they
put
some
eye
level
cabinets
there
for
storage
or
someone
was
parking,
a
bike
in
their
garage,
that
would
be
fine
as
long
as
a
car
could
still
fit
within
the
garage
area.
B
C
A
B
D
E
E
D
So
the
Planning
Commission
knows
that
is
one
of
the
conditions
that
the
applicant
would
like
to
work
with
us
on
going
forward.
This
is
a
within
the
code
that
you
have
to
plant
one
tree.
However,
there
is
not
room.
We
have
worked
with
other
developers
to
provide
on-site
mitigation
or
mitigation
around
the
neighborhood
that
fulfills
the
same
intent.
A
F
G
G
Thing
that
better,
that's
much
better,
it
was
taller
than
I
was
I
apologize
for
that
anyway,
we
have
our
team
here
tonight
to
present
this
project
to
you.
We
really
thank
you
for
all
your
hard
work
and
interest
over
the
years,
and
certainly
all
the
hard
work
and
interest
of
the
staff
at
the
city.
Who've
just
been
terrific
and
going
through
these
various
proposals.
We.
C
G
Hoping
that
the
third
time
is
a
charm
and
hoping
that
this
is
a
project
that
will
be
built
quickly,
I
know
that's
in
your
interest,
and
certainly
it's
in
our
interest
as
well.
Tonight.
I
have
with
me
our
team
Sean
Finegan
in
bacchum
er,
regional
development,
planner,
Jim,
Van,
Sickle
they're,
all
in
back
of
me,
I,
never
liked
Jim's
up
here,
our
vice
president
developments
got
MacArthur
our
regional
property
management
manager,
Cecily
Barclay,
our
attorney
George
Khoury,
our
other
attorney,
and
then
we
have
architects
as
landscape
folks
who
sean
is
going
to
introduce
later.
G
So
what
are
we
trying
to
do
we're
trying
to
provide
a
major
gateway
to
the
city
of
San
Bruno.
We've
heard
from
all
of
you
that
this
project
up
on
the
hill
is
not
the
most
beautiful
thing,
so
that
is
part
of
our
plan
to
really
upgrade
the
facilities,
as
Lisa
said,
we're,
adding
an
alternative.
That's
consistent
with
previous
zoning
approvals,
we're
looking
to
create
a
well-designed
residential
neighborhood
using
new
architectural
features,
high
quality
landscaping
which
will
describe
to
you
in
a
moment.
We
want
to
take
advantage
of
the
excellent
location
and
views.
G
We
really
do
like
this
property
whenever
I
say
views.
People
say
when
have
you
seen
the
views
every
time
I'm
there
they're
spectacular,
there
is
a
need
to
revitalize
the
neighborhood.
The
properties
obviously
been
empty
for
a
while
and,
as
I
said
earlier,
we
want
to
get
going
and
fill
it
up
and
bring
new
life
and
vitality
back
to
the
neighborhood.
We
want
to
continue
the
partnership
with
the
community
and
neighbors.
We
had
a
very
good
community
meeting
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
G
People
came
and
I
think
we're
excited
about
the
project
and
we
bring
it
to
you
in
the
spirit
of
cooperation
with
the
community,
and
we
want
to
gain
approval,
most
importantly,
for
an
alternative
proposal
that
can
be
actually
financed,
constructed
and
least
in
today's
market.
As
everybody
knows,
the
market
has
been
very
challenging
and
so
we're
looking
again
to
have
a
project
then
kept
built
and
get
built
relatively
quickly
and
be
filled
up.
So
what
is
this
dude?
Just
briefly?
It's
a
major
renovation
of
all
308
apartments.
G
It's
the
total,
complete
renovation
of
all
14
buildings
and
associated
parking,
lots
and
maintenance
buildings.
It's
got
a
new
clubhouse
which
will
describe
in
a
moment
and
a
leasing
center
to
be
built
on
the
vacant
parcel
at
sharp
park.
Road
and
skyline
Susan
drive
will
be
repaid
open
as
a
public
roadway.
G
This
has
been
a
concern
in
prior
hearing,
so
I
wanted
to
highlight
that
the
hillside
will
be
landscaped
using
sustainable
and
more
drought,
tolerant,
plant
material
and
the
units
will
be
I,
believe
sean
is
totally
five
hundred
percent
more
energy-efficient
and
the
appliances
will
be
energy
efficient
as
well.
So
we
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do.
The
recycling
program
will
describe
in
a
moment.
We
think
this
is
a
good
thing
for
the
site.
We
have
many
green
elements
and
I
also
want
to
report
as
mr.
nakos
is
looking
at
me
tonight.
G
H
I
Thank
You
Sean
this
view
of
the
same
as
the
rendering
that's
on
the
poster
here,
and
it
is
the
corner
of
sharp
park
and
it
where
the
new
building
is
going
to
be.
Currently,
that
is
a
vacant
parcel,
and
so
it's
a
two-story
building,
it's
kind
of
a
story
and
a
half
from
this
side.
There's
a
lot
of
glass
area
and
the
reason
for
making
the
building
like
this
is
to
take
advantage
of
the
terrific
views
and
the
location
that
this
project
has
always
had,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
changed.
I
The
name
from
tree
tops
to
Pacific
Bay
vistas
one
for
the
next
slide.
So
here
on
the
site
again
the
top
right
corner
where
it
says
Clubhouse,
that's
the
new
two-story
building,
that's
going
to
be
the
new
leasing
office
and
then
the
other
buildings
are
all
existing
buildings.
The
rec
center
they're
just
below
the
clubhouse,
is
what
is
also
going
to
be
now
an
all
new
building.
It's
in
the
same
place
as
the
current
leasing
office,
but
will
have
really
all
new
everything
new
covered
fool
as
well.
I
This
was
just
some
of
the
imagery
we
took
to
as
inspiration
for
this
project.
We've
looked
at
this
these
buildings
and
we
think
they've
got
some
pretty
good
bones,
some
good
structure
to
them
all
the
buildings
will
remain
exactly
where
they
are
the
size
that
they
are
the
slopes
of
the
roofs.
Everything
will
remain
the
same,
but
we're
going
to
use
that
as
a
base
for
adding
more
detail,
adding
more
interest
in
sort
of
a
seaside
architecture.
I
Coastal
architecture
with
the
colors
that
you
see
here-
muted
grays,
whites
and
such
the
roofing
color-
will
use
the
same
as
is
there
now
so
in
terms
of
what
the
project
will
be.
It's
the
same
size
same
asking.
Is
there
now,
but
with
more
interest
in
more
detail
to
bring
it
up?
So
it
doesn't
look
just
like
a
1980s
project
with
a
new
coat
of
paint.
I
It's
going
to
have
a
lot
more
detail
and
interesting
they're,
just
some
slides
of
how
it
looks
now
this
then
this
one
in
the
next
life
are
pictures
of
the
new
office.
Clubhouse
building
up
the
corners
we
talked
about
there.
You
can
see
a
sort
of
a
story
and
a
half
where
we
focus
some
areas
to
overlook
the
view
towards
the
bay
and
then
keep
the
other
elements
around
the
building
low.
So
it
gives
it
a
more
of
a
residential
appearance.
I
There's
the
clubhouse
views
that
the
side
that
faces
towards
the
view
is
a
double-height
wall
of
glass,
which
is
one
reason
why
we
have
chosen
to
make
the
building
a
little
more
commercial
on
that
side.
It
is
a
commercial
office
building,
but
it
has
a
residential
look
from
the
front,
which
is
the
South
elevation
and
there's
brick
on
there
and
some
posts.
I
But
we
really
wanted
to
focus
on
the
view
and
the
potential
for
people
who
live
here
to
come
and
have
you
know
a
place
to
congregate
and
enjoy
the
view
of
the
San
Francisco
Bay.
This,
then,
is
the
revised
building.
That's
currently
the
office
building
we
essentially
it's
an
all.
New
building
will
have
exercise
equipment,
restrooms
and
a
pool
building
to
the
left
there.
I
It's
just
the
plan
there
and
the
pool
building
also
opens
with
sliding
doors
to
enclosed
patio
for
sunny
days,
and
it
also
is
reflective
of
the
new
kind
of
architecture.
We're
going
with
is
more
seaside
architecture
with
what
appears
to
be
cedar
shakes,
but
actually
it's
all
fiber
submit
materially
fire
resistant,
much
more
durable
material
than
the
wood.
That's
there
now
and
on
the
building's
themselves,
again
we're
keeping
the
architecture
in
terms
of
the
structure
of
it
the
same
we're
improving
it.
I
I
That's
there
now,
on
the
building's,
with
a
slightly
different
color
for
the
office
buildings.
Here's
the
scheme
for
the
e
buildings.
There
are
two
different
color
schemes.
We've
got
going
all
the
buildings
essentially
are
the
same
they're
all
identical
buildings
out
there
now,
but
we
are
going
with
two
different
schemes
of
color,
so
we'll
break
it
up.
Some
and
I'd
like
to
introduce
Paul
Reeve,
the
landscape,
architect.
J
Good
evening,
I'm
Paul
Reed
with
Reed
associates
landscape
architecture,
Sonny
Bill,
looking
at
the
site
plan
here
to
the
there's,
the
three
basic
parts
I
I,
see
to
the
landscaping.
One
is
the
slope
area
to
the
far
left
and
the
second,
the
the
large
central
courtyard,
which
we've
tried
to
incorporate
a
lot
of
usable
area
in
there
and
third
is
the
area
around
the
units
and
also
the
individual
entry
courtyards
to
the
different
building
clusters.
J
This
is
a
part
of
the
this
is
the
main
part
of
the
central
courtyard
and
it
shows
a
central
gas
fire
pit
sitting
area
there
and
also
some
barbecue
areas
with
picnic
tables.
There's
also
three
covered
barbecue
areas
there
so
that
it
can
be
used
in
for
shade
and
also
in
inclement
weather,
also
we're
widening
the
pass
through
the
central
courtyard
and
also
incorporating
all
new
landscaping.
J
This
is
an
example
of
this
is
the
landscaping
around
the
clubhouse
leasing
office.
So
the
part
at
the
top
of
the
plan.
There
is
the
part
that
faces
skyline
and
we're
creating
some
different
textures
and
colors,
using
drought-tolerant
landscaping
and
native
grasses
and
and
non
native
grasses
to
give
a
real,
interesting
look,
but
nothing
that's
high
water.
The
only
so-called
turf
area
that
we
do
have
on
the
project
is
in
the
central
courtyard
and
that's
going
to
be
one
of
the
new
artificial
turfs.
J
That's
a
pervious
type,
turf
that
you
know
rainwater
can
go
through
it,
but
we're
not
using
any
any
real
turf
on
the
project.
This
is
an
example
of
the
upgrade
on
the
right
here.
This
is
the
an
example
of
one
of
the
upgrades
to
the
entry
courtyard
areas
we're
trying
to
create
a
landscape
area.
That's
a
little
bit
more
usable!
That's
there!
Now,
the
the
previous
original
landscapes
were
just
all
planted
with
big
trees
in
there
that
blocked
out
the
light.
They
really
stopped.
J
You
know
from
the
covered
barbecue
area,
which
is
in
the
upper
left
there
and
we're
adding
sitting
areas
and
barbecue
pedestals
and
some
different
different
kinds
of
caving,
we're
using
concrete
pavers
as
the
highlight
paving
and
some
of
the
some
of
the
circulation
areas
within
the
central
courtyard
there's
some
photographs
and
a
list
of
plants
that
we've
proposed
to
use.
And
again
there
are
a
mixture
of
native
and
non-native
plants.
H
G
G
You've
got
several
resolutions
in
front
of
you
and
many
attachments
and
we
know
pulling
all
this
together
was
quite
an
important
feet
and
we
appreciate
that
aznar
effort
to
get
construction
going.
This
fall
and
so
I
just
want
to.
Let
you
know
that
we're
working
on
as
Aaron
mentioned,
trying
to
get
some
credit
for
all
these
trees
that
are
being
built
and
that's
allowed
under
the
ordinance
and
some
language
about
the
garage
and
other
things
that
we
think
are
really
very
simple,
and
we
just
need
to
spend
some
time
doing
that.
G
And
there
is
a
substantial,
factual
question
as
to
whether
or
not
these
roads
and
utilities
were
in
fact
dedicated
and
accepted
by
the
city
and
we're
not
and
sort
of
what
do
we
do
with
them
going
forward
and
right
now,
staff
report
says
they're
private
and
they
should
remain
private.
We
think
they're
public
and
they
should
remain
public.
K
F
H
L
H
H
Correct
the
way
the
compactor
works
is
you
still
have
the
dumpster
locations
there,
a
little
smaller
I
believe
2-yard
containers
they
fill
those
up
and
on
a
daily
basis.
We
will
either
cart
them
or
wheel
them
over
to
the
compact
area,
dump
them
in
there
and
then
weÃll
them
back,
and
the
same
thing
will
happen
with
the
recycle
bins
that
will
also
be
in
those
same
dumpster
areas.
They'll
be
taken
over
to
a
recycle
swapped
out
for
an
empty,
recycle
bin
and
in
place
back
in
these
scattered
around
the
community
dumpster
areas.
The.
H
It's
what
we've
agreed
upon
is
between
the
hours
of
9am
and
noon
is
when
we
would
do
that
operation,
then
the
we
were
going
to
size,
the
compact,
with
Recology,
to
be
picked
up
only
once
a
week.
So,
instead
of
having
a
trash
truck
come
down,
you
know
the
dumpsters
there
for
a
couple
of
hours
or,
however
long
it
takes
them
to
dump
all
the
dumpsters.
If
there's
they're
going
to
come
once
a
week,
pick
up
the
compactor
takes
about
45
minutes
to
swap
out,
and
then
they
bring
it
back
and.
C
H
Met
with
Recology
on-site
and
staff
walked,
it
also
walked
it
with
with
evergreen.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
this
issue
and
we
think
that
we
came
up.
We
submitted
a
plan
that
had
two
alternatives,
along
with
the
first
one
and
its
most
logical
and
due
to
the
circulation
due
to
the
roads,
public-private
the
way
that
they
would
back
in
and
have
to
service
the
compactor
and
have
to
take
our
golf
carts
and
wheel
these
dumpsters
around.
If
you
would
be
doing
them
on
public
roads
or
not.
L
A
H
Do
understand
that
and,
like
I
said,
we
have
studied
a
lot.
We've
met
with
recology
we're
very
comfortable
with
the
operation
of
it,
the
distance
between
our
buildings
and
their
buildings
and
the
wall
that's
going
to
be
in
between
and
it's
we
feel
very
comfortable
with
the
locations
that
we
have
selected.
F
M
D
F
A
So
that's
going
to
happen
every
day
of
the
week,
then
there's
going
to
be
quite
a
large
truck
to
come,
get
the
compactor,
that's
probably
going
to
be
the
lesser
annoying
factor,
but
if
you
have
residents
in
the
neighbor
in
complex
that
are
right
next
to
that,
it's
going
to
be
very
annoying
to
them.
That's
just
my
observation.
A
The
other
question
I
have
in
the
architectural
review
committee
meeting
I
commented
on
the
leasing
office
at
the
corner,
said
I
thought
it
would
make
it
look
more
of
a
pedestrian-friendly
scale
if
the
second
floor
were
moved
back.
A
few
feet
from
the
first
and
I
wondered
if
you
had
considered
that
observation.
Ok,.
I
Yes,
we
did
talk
about
that
at
those
are
fine
right
there.
Thank
you,
the
the
building
itself.
Of
course
it
is,
as
I
said,
it
is
an
office
building,
that's
its
function
and
the
we
intentionally
made
this
side
of
the
building,
a
two-story
room
with
glass
for
gatherings
parties
and
such
and
that
happens
to
be
the
side
that's
facing
towards
the
view
which
is
cross
on
the
street,
and
so
the
majority
of
the
building
is
more
residential
in
appearance
with
a
wraparound
porch
out
front,
the
South
elevation.
I
That's
the
entry
as
you
come
in
from
the
parking
lot
as
you
look
as
you
come
around,
even
towards
the
West
elevation
based
on
the
other
buildings
that
you're
coming
along
sharp
park.
There
is
a
a
more
residential
appearance
to
hip
roof,
but
again
the
whole
reason
for
make
of
the
building
push
towards
the
street.
I
There
was
both
to
have
an
interior
room,
that's
a
double
height
space
and
also
there
are
two
exterior
rooms
on
that
side
as
well
for
gatherings
for
people
to
have
private
parties
or
just
group
gatherings
families
over
something
like
that,
and
so
there's
actually
a
ground
floor
space
and
an
upper
floor,
viewing
deck.
And
so
yes,
we
did
push
the
architecture
on
that
one
side
towards
the
that
side
of
building
an
intent
was
to
make
use
of
and
to
be
able
to
have
viewing
out
on
to
the
fantastic.
I
A
A
I
C
C
M
D
I
think
the
intent
in
the
residential
design
guidelines
was
to
use,
for
instance,
windows
that
not
might
not
be
would,
but
that
appear
to
be
wood
in
when
you're
replacing
a
window.
That
is
a
wood
window,
so
that
when
you
have
these
older,
mid
20th
century
1950s
homes
that
are
built
when
you
have
a
series
of
them.
Looking
the
same
that
you
don't
replace
it
with
something
that
looks
entirely
different,
so
I
don't
think
it
necessarily
applies
for
this
building.
This
is
the
brand
new
building
in
its
own
plan.
D
F
C
Good
evening,
chair,
chaise
and
other
honorable
members,
the
Planning
Commission,
my
name
is
William,
knack
and
I'm
here
this
evening.
Speaking
on
behalf
of
the
Building
and
Construction
Trades
Council
San
Mateo
County,
as
patty
stated
in
our
discussions
with
the
developer,
they
have
reaffirmed
their
commitment
to
the
building
trades
council
that
are
highly
skilled
decently,
paid
construction
workers
receiving
quality
health
care
and
pension
benefits
will
be
employed
to
build
the
Pacific
Bay
vistas
project,
formerly
known
as
the
treetops,
which
includes
renovation
of
the
existing
308
apartment
units,
located
at
four
to
three
hundred
Susan
dry.
C
N
N
The
susan
drive
is
still
an
issue
and
I'd
like
to
see
when
this
new
alternative
permits,
given
if
we
could
have
in
writing
that
this
road
will
be
open,
whether
its
private
or
not,
I
would
like
to
see
if
it's
open
from
from
today
for
workers
that
had
been
a
oversight,
probably
the
last
time
in
25
years
ago
and
I
wasn't
sure
what
what
it
means
when
the
developer
was
saying
that
a
tree
top
circle
is
a
private.
Is
that
outside
of
the
Susan
drive
open
space,
then
I
have
no
issue
with
that.
N
As
far
as
the
the
inspection
on
the
storage
and
to
allow
making
sure
there's
always
a
car
in
died
inside
the
spell
parking
garage,
I'm,
not
sure
how
city
will
enforce
that,
if
started
the
remodeling,
the
old
plan
will
be
will
not
be
adopted
right.
The
old
permit
will
not
be
adopted
and
that
decision
will
be
made
in
October
when
they
either
do
the
remodeling
or
November,
when
they
submit
a
plan
for
the
actual
development
of
the
new
new
buildings.
That's
how
I
understood
it
and
paving
of
the
shower
park
area.
I.
N
Think
I
should
be
included
in
this
development,
because
that
row
had
been
really
bad
lately.
There
are
potholes
everywhere
and
with
the
construction
trucks
coming
through,
it's
going
to
be
really
ruined
and
the
recess
of
the
clubhouse
to
this
Susan
drive
street
I'd
like
to
understand
how
far
it
is
from
it
and
if
there's
enough
walkways
for
pedestrians,
so
actually
for
the
safety
of
the
clubhouse.
N
Lastly,
I
want
to
find
out
what
is
this
parking
ratio
once
this
remodeling
plan
is
completed
right
now,
I
only
see
five
parking
spaces
in
front
of
the
clubhouse.
That's
the
only
additional
Club
spaces
available.
What
is
the
final
parking
ratio,
which
is
a
concern
for
all
the
neighborhoods
and
that's
why
we
pushed
for
2.1
parking
ratio
last
time
with
the
previous
permit
permit.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
F
K
Good
evening,
commissioners
staff,
my
name,
is
annalisa
Leia
needle
I
am
the
property
manager
of
evergreen
ranch
apartments
and,
on
behalf
of
our
community,
you
know.
Over
the
years
we've
been
very
supportive
of
this
construction,
whether
it's
the
complete
renovation
or
a
teardown
as
a
neighbor
community
right
next
door,
we've
been
very,
very
supportive
of
it.
However,
this
new
plan
with
regards
to
the
trash
compactor
we
do
have
an
issue
with.
It
is
a
big
concern
for
us
as
a
community
manager.
K
We
would
like
you
to
know
that
it
is
not
acceptable
we'd
like
to
request
that
it
is
not
put
in
the
treetops
circle
along
that
retaining
wall,
because
it
will
affect
all
of
our
recipes
on
that
side
of
the
retaining
wall,
so
we'd,
like
staff
and
the
Commission
to
please
redress
this
issue
with
ankle
over
the
years
that
the
property
has
been
treated
us
has
been
closed
down.
It
has
affected
us
with
regards
to
our
occupancy.
K
I
mean
in
this
economic
times
it's
challenging
as
it
is
as
patty
had
mentioned,
but
the
fact
that
it
has
been
abandoned.
We've
lost
some
prospects
because
they've
seen
an
abandoned,
building,
they've
turned
around
and
did
not
want
to
come
into
our
property,
so
the
issue
of
having
that
contactor
would
be.
It
definitely
is
a
big
problem
for
my
residents
now
and
we
would
like
to
retain
you
know
as
many
residences
we
have
because
of
this.
You
know
so
we'd
like
for
stopped.
At
least
we
address
the
compactor
issue.
K
K
L
K
K
So
we
have
one
right
over
here
at
the
corner
of
the
deed
and
we
have
one
in
between
the
B
and
C,
and
then
we
have
one
also
in
between
these
two
buildings
right
here
and
we
have
them
one
at
the
other
corner
of
this
building.
This
is
H
and
I,
and
then
we
have
them
in
the
upper
level
of
the
property
which
is
in
the
O&P
building.
We
have
two
other
buildings
on
the
upper
of
fosters
a
drive.
Okay
am.
K
L
K
L
M
You
a
question
before
you
sit
down:
oh
I
have
a
nephew
who
lives
there
and
I
know,
because
we've
moved
furniture
and
out
of
it
there.
If
there's
not
one
there.
Now
there
was
a
dumpster
almost
at
the
same
location
as
the
alternative
site
for
they're
compactor
I
know
because
we
dumped
stuff
in
that
dumpster
and
it
was
there
for
a
while
does
turn
out
of
there.
That.
K
F
L
D
Correct
the
property
line
jogs
in
towards
evergreen,
and
that
was
their
initial
location,
that
they
proposed
the
trash
area
and
our
recommendation
was
to
take
it
further
away
from
the
evergreen
ridge
buildings.
So
the
alternative
site
location
shown
on
the
site
plan
that
lease
is
pointing
to
right
now
takes
it
from
the
initial
area,
was
about
15
feet
away
from
the
nearest
building.
This
is
about
40,
to
44
feet
away
from
the
nearest
building,
so
that
was
one
of
our
initial
recommendation.
D
L
D
A
This
really
isn't
my
subject:
I
researched
something
else,
but
but
I
can't
help,
but
notice
that
this
main
trash
location
is
virtually
immediately
adjacent
to
evergreen
and
quite
a
ways
away
from
treetops
know.
Why
did
staff
consider
asking
treetops
to
put
the
trash
compactor
as
in
a
new
enclosure
attached
to
one
of
their
existing
buildings?.
D
We
asked
them
to
explore
everywhere
on
their
site.
What
we
did
was
met
with
San
Bruno,
garbage
or
Recology,
as
they're
called
now
from
an
operational
standpoint,
the
South
property
line
works
the
best
because
it's
a
straight
shot
down
and
there's
no
turning
needed.
This
I
also
spoke
to
someone
at
recology
today
about
this
type
of
trash
compactor
and
what
effect
it
could
have
on
the
neighbors.
D
They
do
have
similar
trash,
compactors
and
other
multifamily
buildings
within
San,
Bruno
and
they're,
actually
a
lot
closer
to
the
living
units,
and
this
would
be
to
both
evergreen
Ridge
as
well
as
tree
tops.
The
smell
is
minimal
because
it's
an
enclosed
case
versus
an
open
dumpster
that
would
you
know
that
could
obviously
smell
more
in
the
the
pickups
are
less
frequent
once
a
week.
So
our
initial
take
was
you
right.
You
know
when
they
first
proposed
it
as
close
as
they
did.
We
said
you
know
you
have
a
lot
more
opportunities
along
that.
D
D
They
did
not
provide
any
alternatives
within
the
site
other
than
things
along
the
other
than
sites
along
the
South
property
line,
though,
but
after
talking
to
Senate
Recology
about
their
operational
needs,
as
well
as
the
specific
type
of
trash
compactor
we're
comfortable
with
the
alternative
site,
as
we
posed
here
and
there's
also
keep
in
mind,
there's
also
a
tall
retaining
wall
there.
So
it's
not
a
case
where
it
can
be
seen
from
ground
level
as
you
as
you're
walking
in
evergreen
road.
Thank.
M
C
H
L
M
H
One
one
issue
that
is
important
to
understand
about
this
whole
front:
facade
along
skyline
in
Susan,
there's
a
60-foot
easement
public
utility,
easement
and
there's
also
North
Coast
County
Water
District
line
runs
right
here,
so
they
have
an
easement
through
that
whole
area.
We
looked
at
that
whole
entire
length
about
where
we
could
put
and
build
a
structure
there.
The
garages
have
to
do
with
them
either
being
grandfathered,
etc.
But
we,
we
can't
put
anything,
there's
also
a
gas
line
running
through
there
as
well.
So
there's
a
spaghetti
of
easements
running
that
whole
entire
length.
H
L
L
H
Again,
what
we
tried
to
do
is
we
try
to
work
with
recology
and
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
this
issue.
Part
of
it
is
the
operation
of
how
their
truck
has
to
swing
into
it,
how
the
doors
open
up
to
it,
and
just
the
geometry
of
getting
in
and
out
making
that
easy.
These
are
not
small
trucks
but
they're,
also
not
huge
trucks
either.
Well,.
L
If
you
don't
want
to
do
it
just
say
you
don't
want
to
do
it,
but
me
the
first
time
you
said
it
was
because
the
water
main
and
missing
that
now
I
gave
you
a
good
alternative
for
the
water
main
use.
Now
it's
a
garbage
company's
problem
decision,
good,
you
couldn't
put
it
you're,
saying
if
that
was
the
only
spot
to
do
with
the
garbage
company
couldn't
pick
up
their.
L
Existing
garage,
if
you
took
three
of
those
spots
and
put
it
in
that
existing
garage
and
then
where
the
proposed
garbage
areas
turn
that
into
a
carport
or
garage,
then
you
wouldn't
be
losing
any
garage.
Space
you'd
be
moving
the
garbage
away
from
the
neighbors
which
they
would
like
and
I
think
you're,
putting
it
closer
to
the
street,
where
the
garbage
company
could
be
easier.
That.
H
That's
also
at
our
front
door
of
our
project.
We
prefer
not
having
it
right
there
at
the
front
door.
It
is
an
easement
area.
We
would
like
to
preserve
also
as
much
parking
as
possible.
You've
heard
a
lot
of
complaints
about
parking.
We
think
the
location
that
we
have
chosen
is
the
ability
to
not
remove
any
parking
spaces.
There's
an
existing
car
wash
their
that
and
also
a
median
that
will
be
literally
zero
loss
of
parking
spaces
to
be
able
to
put
it
there.
M
M
H
D
H
H
J
H
Could
we
could
feel
free
to
just
continue
discussing
this,
but
we
prefer
it
not
being
at
our
front
door,
prefer
it
not
being
on
right
on
Susan
drive
where
the
public
can
see
it,
and
we
prefer
staying
out
of
utility
lines.
We
prefer
enclosing
it
as
well,
and
that
was
something
we
work
with
staff
on.
Do.
D
So
it
doesn't
have
a
negative
visual
impact
on
that
on
the
treetop
development
and
for
those
to
be
shown
and
proposed
to
the
city
council,
because
my
guess,
my
guess
is
is
the
city
council
did
have
concerns
last
time
with
where
the
trash
area
was
and
actually
added
a
condition
that
it
go
back
to
architectural
review
in
the
long
run.
So
the
Planning
Commission
is
expressing
those
concerns
and
expressing
those
concerns
within
a
recommendation.
F
A
D
D
Yeah,
I
think,
based
on
with
the
Planning
Commission
direction,
to
at
least
explore
an
option
along
the
East
property
line
towards
where
the
garages
are
outside
of
the
easement
areas
or
if
it
is
in
the
easement
area.
We
could
talk
to
the
easement
holders
to
see
if
it's,
okay,
if
a
pad,
goes
down
there,
along
with
whatever
drainage,
needs,
to
connect
to
the
sewage.
A
Is
part
of
the
reason
for
that
that
it's
flat
getting
out
to
that
east
side?
Whereas
if
you
go
to
it
the
north
side,
it
goes
downhill
a
little
bit.
I'm
say
what
I'm
thinking
is.
Why
restrict
the
search
to
the
east
side?
Why
did
I
just
say,
keep
it
at
least
50
feet
away
from
Evergreen
yeah.
That's
fine,
because
I'm
sure
they're,
very
imaginative,
that
I
mean
the
design
they've
done
a
lot
of
work
on
it,
they're,
not
short
on
thinking.
You
just
needed
a
criteria.
M
L
I
mean
maybe
even
just
a
condition
if
they
bring
back
the
drawings
or
what
it's
going
to
look
like
and
maybe
it'll
be
fine
where
it's
at
and
they
have
a
thing.
I
did
notice,
I'm
trying
to
look
at
this
architectural
thing
to
look
at
the
other
sites.
The
Susan
Susan
drive
parking
does
not
jive
with
the
plot
plan.
The
plot
plan
has
two
garages,
and
this
architectural
plan
has
three
carports.
If
you
look
at
el
1.0,
compare
this
to
that
one.
There.
H
Third
garage
was
actually
eliminated
due
to
the
easements
that
are
there
and
North
Coast
County
Water
District
Line.
That
actually
runs
at
an
angle
across
we
were
going
to
do
a
ten-car
garage
there.
So
I
do
apologize
that
when
we
printed
that
set
it
had
that
removed
off
of
there.
So
that's
like--that's
cover
one
is
a
correct
one.
That's
correct!
There's
only
the
two
existing
garages
are
going
to
stay,
we're
not
going
to
build
the
10
car
garage
there.
Okay,
thank.
H
H
H
M
M
Just
a
general,
like
you,
that's
kind
of
twice
you
mentioned
that
you
wouldn't
want
to
tear
something
down
like
the
garage
is
out
on
Susan.
You
said
or
grandfather
density.
They
they
could
stay,
but
you
couldn't
put
anything
adjacent,
any
kind
of
structure
adjacent
to
it
and
you
that
was
kind
of
me
person.
I
got
when
we
talked
about
the
maintenance
building.
Also
so
I'm,
just
asking
I'm
not
trying
to
be
a
jerk
grenadiers
task
in
here.
If
Hurley's
get
torn
down
on
that
particular
site
or
project
will,
could
you
rebuild?
We.
H
Could
rebuild
anything
part
of
the
issue
here
is
getting
a
project:
that's
financially
feasible
if
we
start
tearing
buildings
down,
rebuilding
the
maintenance
building
somewhere
else.
If
we
could
find
another
location,
one
hundred
two
hundred
thousand
dollar
building
easily
that's
an
issue
for
us
financially.
Okay,.
C
Through
the
chair,
can
you
give
me
an
idea
to
compact
or
where
you
have
it
located
on
the
drawings?
Now
it's
smaller
than
that
square,
that
it's
lined
out
to
be
how
far
from
that
building
on
the
was
it
evergreen
your
neighbors
building,
how
far
it
is,
because
a
compact
are
smaller
than
that
square.
So.
C
C
H
L
L
H
L
H
F
K
And
it's
still
about
the
trash
compactor
we're
just
you
know:
I
worked
at
evergreen
tree
tops
I
manage
that
property,
so
I'm,
pretty
familiar
with
the
property.
With
regards
to
the
trash
compactor
there
is,
there
are
spaces
right
behind
buildings,
3,800
or
3,600,
that's
just
within
their
property
line
that
perhaps
the
trash
compactor
could
be
placed.
It's
big
enough
space
for
the
recology
to
actually
be
able
to
back
in
that
type
of
thing.
K
So
you
know
in
that
area
right
there
there's
a
two
car
ports
right
there
and
there's
a
whole
line
of
parking
space
beyond.
You
know
like
right
behind
by
building
36
hundred
and
thirty-eight
hundred
right
along
that
line,
so
I'd
like
to
find
out
if
that's
something
that
perhaps
they
have
already
considered-
and
you
know
maybe
reconsider
putting
that
trash
compactor
in
that
area.
Is
there.
D
I
mean
the
only
thing
I
was
going
to
say:
is
it
probably
better
not
to
go
back
and
forth
on
individual
locations
at
the
plan
unless
the
plan
a
clinician
wants
to
both?
This
is
something
I
think
we
hear
the
Planning
Commission
loud
and
clear
and
I
think
this
is
something
that
we
could
take
back
and
work
with
Dame
code
and
develop
a
plan
prior
to
the
city
council
meeting
as
part
of
your
recommendation,
I
think.
F
A
A
A
proposed
additional
condition
that
I'm
I've
worked
up
because
of
the
way
we
got
to
this
project.
The
fact
that
the
original
structure
deteriorated
within
something
like
15
or
18
years,
to
the
point
that
there
was
no
longer
serviceable
required,
major
reconstruction
to
make
it
serviceable
and
a
condition.
I
I
wrote
it
out
and
then
I
forgot
it,
but
I
can
pretty
much
remember
it
and
I
would
make
it
subject
to
stephs
practical
rewording
to
meet
the
intent.
A
But
generally
it
says
that
the
development
plan
and
subsequent
development
permits
will
be
subject
to
certification
by
the
design,
architect
and
engineer
that
their
contract
documents,
their
plans
and
specifications,
will
produce
a
project
that
protects
the
primary
structural
cavities
of
the
project.
That
is
the
inside
of
the
building
inside
the
envelope
to
last
a
minimum
of
25
years
without
requiring
major
reconstruction,
with
the
exception
of
an
event
such
as
the
6.5
earthquake
or
greater
or
similar
act
of
god.
A
C
F
E
Would
personally
protest
to
the
verbiage
of
that
condition,
asking
anything
above
and
beyond
the
basic
standard
of
care
provided
by
design
professionals
I.
Think
that's
excessive,
though
I
do
understand
that
the
location
does
require
attention
to
detail,
but
I
think
standard
of
care
is
required
by
the
practice.
Act
is
good
enough.
Okay,.
F
A
It
designed
professional
I
can
understand
where
you're
coming
from
I've
been
responsible
for
designs.
As
for
construction,
the
concern
I
have
is
that,
without
specifically
addressing
those
conditions
and
with
the
exigencies
and
pressures
of
the
economy
and
time
that,
without
specific
focus
on
quality
to
resist
weather
and
salt
conditions,
that
is
very
likely
that
the
same
problems
can
reoccur
I
be
completely
open
to
any
other
condition.
F
D
The
chair,
the
I,
had
spoke
to
aim
co
about
this
we'd.
Obviously,
this
is
our
building
official
has
met
with
em
co
and
discussed
this
with
them.
Aimco
has
actually
hired
a
waterproofing
expert
for
building
materials
they're
also
using
a
cement
based
siding
for
this
product.
What
I
would
I
would
feel
comfortable
with,
and
perhaps
that
the
Planning
Commission
could
feel
comfortable
with.
F
Had
to
replace
sliding
glass,
the
whole
entire
sliding
glass
door
system-
and
you
know
siding
and
everything
and
Commissioner
Peterson
brings
a
good
point.
I
mean
it
is
a
micro
clam.
You
get
the
wind,
you
get
the
get
the
rain
you're
going
to
get
intrusion
with
the
water
and
I
think
it'd
be
very
important
to
make
sure
that
we
do
have
protection
there.
F
As
far
as
you
know,
what
are
the
one
of
the
windows
rated
at
you
know
as
far
as
you
know,
when
water
resistance
anything
any
of
the
sliding
glass
doors
or
maybe
on
balconies
those
type
of
things
you
don't
want,
have
to
go
and
replace
anything
like
that.
Ten
years
down
the
road,
so
I
think
the
point
is
well
well
made
their
Commissioner
Peterson
and
personally
I.
Like
the
conditioning
you
know,
let.
A
D
E
Through
the
chair,
I
hate
to
say
this
at
this
point,
but
the
report
will
not
cover
other
factors
that
that
cause
issues
such
as
you
know,
too
dissimilar
materials
being
in
contact
with
each
other
or
a
pinhole
of
causing
cavity
I
mean
I,
understand
where
Commissioner
Peterson
is
going
with
with
this
intent.
But
I
don't
think
the
waterproofing
expert
at
this
point
in
the
project
will
be
able
to
come
up
with
a
you
know.
The
devil
is
in
the
details.
C
H
It
pleases
the
chair,
one
thing
to
keep
in
mind:
I'll,
have
our
architect
explain
the
waterproofing
system
and
what
we're
going
about
here?
This
is
a
50
million
dollar
investment
to
aim
co
were
not
interested
in
doing
something.
That's
only
in
the
last
10
years,
so
I
know
I
can
stand
here
say
that,
but
we
are.
This
is
a
major
investment
for
our
company
and
we
want
things
to
last.
That's
why
we
have
hired
all
these
experts,
and
so
with
that
may
gonna.
Have
the
architect
explain
a
lil
bit
more
in
detail.
Please.
F
I
The
suggestion
of
having
the
waterproofing
consultant
write
a
report
is
a
very
good
one
may
have
in
fact,
already
been
out
on
site
and
walked
the
buildings
and
reported
back
that
in
many
cases
a
lot
of
the
wood
products
that
are
there
have
failed,
but
in
other
areas
the
wood
products
there
are
doing
pretty.
Well.
In
fact,
the
wood
looks
as
if
it's
brand
new,
so
it
depends
on
the
orientation
of
the
building,
the
wind
direction,
etc
and
whether
any
water
ever
got
in
there.
I
A
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
how
the
buildings
were
originally
constructed
and,
as
commissioner
Mishra
said
also,
it
depends
on
whether
there's
openings
and
such
they
have
found
that
there
was
some
pretty
sloppy
construction
back
in
1983-84
ministers
built.
There
are
openings,
there
are
places
where
the
flashing
does
not
lap
properly,
and
so
it's
it's
the
materials,
and
it
is
the
details
and
it
is
entirely
also
be
construction
itself.
I
The
best
details,
the
best
specifications,
won't
help
if
somebody
leaves
a
gap
when
they
build
it,
and
so
one
of
the
requirements
that's
going
to
be
of
the
water
puppet
consultant,
he's
a
consult
from
up
in
this
area.
So
he
knows
about
the
weather.
That's
up
in
here
that
he's
going
to
be
on
site,
along
with
myself,
the
design
architect
we're
going
to
be
reviewing
the
construction
as
it
goes
along
here.
I
Each
building
is
going
to
be
inspected
and
there'll,
be
a
report
written,
so
it
has
more
to
do
with
everything
involved.
Yes,
there
has
to
be
good
drawings
and,
yes,
we
will
design
to
better
than
just
you
know,
industry
standards
we're
also
proposing
that
the
construction
of
the
exterior
walls
be
done
as
a
rain
screen
in
the
northwest,
especially
in
Seattle
and
Portland.
I
There
is
that
there's
been
just
too
tight
of
construction
in
some
areas,
then,
with
gaps
that
lets
water
in
and
it
has
nowhere
to
get
out
so
rain
screen
allows
water
to
come
out
air
to
go
up
dries
things
out.
It's
going
to
be
far
superior
to
what
was
there?
Will
it
absolutely
last
25
years
I
couldn't
say
that
and
there's
no
way
that
we
could
sign
a
document
that
says
that
we
will
build
it
better
than
it
was.
I
We
will
provide
details
that
are
better
than
we're
done
in
the
construction
will
be
observed
far
more
rigidly,
and
we
will
have
reports
that
say
that,
yes,
we
have
seen
it.
Yes,
we
can
certify
that
these
buildings
were
built
according
to
the
documents.
That's
also
going
to
be
a
part
of
our
our
review
would
be
with
the
owners
and
with
HUD.
A
I
Writing
we're
not
making
exhaustive
inspections
of
every
square
inch
of
every
building,
but
we
are
looking
for
how
things
are
constructed
its
instruction
for
the
contractor
to
understand
the
documents
properly
and
that's
a
big
part
of
the
waterproofing
consultants,
job
and
my
own,
to
make
certain
that
the
installers
are
educated
about
how
things
are
supposed
to
be
done
without
the
proper
labs,
the
proper
sealants,
and
really
doing
a
pretty
different
kind
of
application
of
the
materials.
In
the
end,
it
will
look
like
it's
siding
again,
but
there
is
something
behind
that
going
on.
E
F
E
As
part
of
your
recommendation,
mr.
Peterson,
for
you
know,
orderly
drawings,
&
specs
I
would
prefer
to
add
that
during
construction
administration,
that
the
submittals
and
the
approval
of
the
submittals
+
field,
reports
and
photos
be
furnished
to
the
city
if
that's
possible
via
website
or
any
other
way,
so
that
city
officials
can
keep
a
documentation
of
what's
going
on
and.
C
That's
something
I'd
like
to
give
a
little
further
thought
to
it.
Has
the
downside
of
that,
too,
is
to
place
the
responsibility
on
the
city
to
warranty
work
or
to
make
representations
about
the
work
that
we
don't
necessarily
want
to
be
in
the
position
of
making
what
I'd
like
to
think
out
what
the
staff
a
little
bit
is
to
understand
more
about.
C
L
E
L
K
L
Building
codes
and
building
codes
are
for
a
reason,
and
you
know
if
they
want
to
build.
A
building
is
only
going
to
last
10
years.
I
have
to
rebuild
it
they're
going
to
have
to
answer
the
lender
and
their
investors.
More
than
they're
gonna
have
two
answers
in
the
city,
so
I
mean
we
have
building
officials,
we
have
building
inspector,
we
have
yeah,
let
them
decide
how
it's
built
nuttin
at
that.
My
decision
through.
F
A
Had
the
same
building
inspector
intensity
of
presence
on
this
project,
as
we
did
on
the
average
home
remodel,
that
would
probably
be
fine,
but
I
seriously
doubt
that's
going
to
happen
and
what
what
my?
What
I
was
thinking
was
when
I
proposed
this
condition,
which
looks
like
it's
not
going
anywhere.
But
what
I
was
thinking
of
was
trying
to
arrange
it.
So
the
internal
development
team
would
have
people
who
are
more
dedicated
to
a
final
product
that
will
last
a
long
time
and
I.
A
Think
a
waterproofing
inspector
will
certainly
contribute
to
that
at
the
same
time.
Well,
and
they
do
have
an
example
of
what
happens
when
there
is
the
problem,
but
I
still
have
that
concern
and
I
would
hope.
There
were
some
way
to
improve
the
inspection
frequency
inspecting
a
project
of
this
size
twice
a
month
is
not
a
lot
of
inspection
when
you're
talking
about
quality-control
inspection
and
the
determine
to
take
a
minute,
but
I
do
a
quality-control.
A
Inspection
means
that
an
individual
looks
at
the
plans
and
specifications
and
submittals
and
then
checks
in
the
field
to
see
if
it's
being
done,
the
way
it
was
designed.
Typically,
when
that's
done,
it
removes
a
lot
of
the
problems,
but
it
takes
a
fair
amount
of
time
and
I.
Don't
know.
Let
me
ask
the
community
director:
well,
our
inspectors.
Do
we
have
city
staff
who
can
do
that
on
a
regular
basis
for
the
entire
project.
D
On
a
project
of
the
size,
for
instance,
instance
with
SNK
project,
that's
going
on
in
the
crossing
city.
Inspectors
are
pretty
much
on
the
job
site
almost
every
day
throughout
the
construction
process,
and
they
do
exactly
what
what
you
said.
Quality
control.
They
take
a
look
at
the
plans
that
were
approved,
structural
plans
that
were
proved
the
plaintiff
show
finish
materials.
The
plants
is
show
architectural
elements
and
they
make
sure
that
it's
being
built
exactly
how
those
plans
were
approved.
So,
yes,
I
mean
that's,
that's
what
the
building
inspectors
do
and
they
are
outside.
D
They
are
on
there
and
almost
a
daily
basis
on
the
job
of
this
size.
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
would
add
that
our
building
inspectors
are
our
two
building
specters.
We
had
an
hour
some
of
the
most
certified
building
inspectors
that
you'll
find
in
San
Mateo
County,
and
they
also
have
the
luxury
of
experience
inspecting
multifamily
developments,
because
we've
inspected
the
crossing
recently
good
for
you
thank.
L
You
bucher
lost
on
this
unit
only
had
a
question.
Somebody
from
this
book
up
their
ass
about
the
susan
drive
and
it
is
going
to
stay
open.
I
mean
I,
mean
correct
me,
wrong,
Susan
drive
stays
open,
but
the
treetops
circle
is
closed
to
the
public
and
the
only
additional
parking
is
the
five
squads
at
the
at
the
clubhouse.
D
D
Yeah
I
mean
I
mean
that
says:
that's
as
currently
proposed.
/
/,
the
city
council
policy,
as
the
developer
has
mentioned,
that
that
item
is
still
up
we're
just
going
to
be
up
for
discussion
when
it
goes
to
the
city
and
council
of
how
this
road
is
actually
used
in
whether
or
not
it's
a
public
or
private
road.
And
what
is
the
parking
ratio?
The
parking
ratio
is
one
point
the
same
as
it
as,
as
it's
always
been,
which
is
1.66
per
per
unit.
D
One
thing
to
note
is
that
we
do
have
the
condition
that
they
have
to
use
parking
is
as
parking,
and
this
has
been
enforced
with
in
other
developments.
Parking
demand
usually
dictates
that
the
fact
that
they
are
that
they
do
use
it
for
parking,
but
we
have
had
this
condition
and
implemented
successfully
in
other
projects.
I.
L
D
F
D
C
Through
the
chair
having
a
question
for
the
applicant
I,
just
would
like
to
get
a
feel
from
you.
We've
got
two
resolutions
in
front
of
us.
One
is
to
extend
the
510
unit
and
the
other
is
to
rebuild.
What's
existing
I
just
for
my
own
interest,
I'd
like
to
get
a
feel
for
what
it
is.
You
guys
really
intend
to
do
at
this
point
through.
H
The
chair,
commissioner,
the
proposal
and
the
drawings
and
the
amount
of
time
and
effort
that
we've
been
putting
into
is
going
towards
the
308
unit
rehabilitation
project
and
that's
why
we're
bringing
this
one
to
the
forefront
right
now
in
from
the
Planning
Commission
and
staff,
and
working
so
hard
towards
this?
That's
the
applications
that
we're
doing
through
HUD
the
so
that's
the
direction
we're
going.
There
is
a
reason
why
the
510
unit
project
is
not
being
built.
H
F
Okay,
any
other
any
other
questions.
I
do
have
one
for
staff
here,
the
the
attorney
for
the
applicant
was
referring
to,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
conditions
of
approval
56
through
61,
and
that
there
was
still
some
discussion
between
you
and
them.
If
you
will
is
that
correct,
and
if
that
is
then,
how
does
that
play
into
any
possible
vote
on
a
resolution?
If
that's
not,
if
that's
not
satisfied,
yet
you
know
how
do
we
feel
comfortable
addressing
that.
D
Who
what
we
would
recommend
what
we
are
recommending
is
the
conditions
as
they
are
in
the
staff
report
to
the
Planning
Commission
tonight.
What
we
should
always
realize
the
project
of
this
size,
a
project
of
the
scope.
There
can
be
conditions
of
approval
that
are
changed
by
the
City
Council,
especially
as
they
relate
to
policy
level
decisions.
So
these
these
conditions
could
in
theory
change
they
may
not,
but
these
are
the
conditions
that
we
are
recommending
to
you
tonight,
based
on
the
project,
as
it
is
right
now.
Okay,.
D
It
could
be
I
mean
the
other.
The
other
option
would
be
that
they
present
full
architectural
drawings
to
to
the
City
Council
and
the
City
Council
is
not
comfortable
with
them,
and
they
could
they
what
they
did
last
time
when
they
weren't
comfortable
with
them
was
they
created
a
condition
that
come
back
to
arc,
but
there
is
one
additional
level
of
review
if.
L
D
D
C
D
A
A
A
Through
the
shared
lately,
I
move
the
Commission
adopt
resolution
2010
day,
seven
approving
plan
development
permit
ten
dash
one
and
an
architectural
review
permit,
allowing
for
the
renovation
of
the
existing
308
apartment
units
and
associated
improvement.
This
entitlement
will
be
referred
to
as
the
renovation,
design,
alternative
and
collectively
as
the
modified
project.