►
From YouTube: CC052411 10b Approve Water Plant Plan
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
The
plant
is
owned
jointly
by
city
of
san
bruno
and
south
san
francisco,
and
the
plant
is
operated
by
the
city
of
south
san
francisco
in
order
for
us
to
assure
the
real
reliability
of
our
treatment
plant
and
also
to
meet
the
expectation
of
the
set
expectation
by
the
regional
board.
Jointly
with
south
city,
a
consultant
was
hired
corolla
engineering
to
develop
a
long-term
facility
plan,
that's
a
plan
that
will
be
presented
to
you
for
your
consideration
tonight.
B
B
The
difference
between
the
change
in
the
resolution
just
clarify
the
intent
that
what
you
will
approve
the
request
tonight
for
you
to
approve
the
facility
plan
and
that
staff
will
come
back
as
a
follow-up
action,
with
a
detailed
cost
allocation
for
specific
project
and
before
inclusion
of
those
costs
in
our
CIP
and
to
allocate
costs
for
those
projects.
I
will
I
have
here
a
terabyte,
the
public
volt
director
for
South
City
and
my
return
from
Corolla
and
Lydia
Holmes.
Who
will
take
you
through
the
facility
plan
itself?
B
D
Then
we
also
needed
to
address
the
state
water
board's
discharge,
permit
compliance,
mandates
to
control,
wet
weather
flow
discharges,
and
then
we
also
were
asked
to
consider
green
energy
opportunities.
So
I'm
going
to
step
you
through
our
major
findings
under
for
each
one
of
these
key
areas,
so
starting
with
critical
reliability
and
replacement
projects.
What
we
found
is
that
we
needed
to
do
some
work
on
the
digesters
and
their
support
facilities.
These
are
facilities
that
handle
the
solids
and
they
are
between
40
and
60
years
old.
These
three
digesters
there's
an
emergency
generator.
D
This
is
when
there's
a
power
outage.
They
need
to
have
emergency
power
and
it's
not
been
always
reliable
when
that
power
goes
out,
there's
some
electrical
system,
safety,
improvements
that
are
required,
seismic
improvements
to
a
blower
building
and
head
works
and
storm
water
improvements.
So
these
are
all
the
major
findings
that
we
found
on
needing
to
do
some
reliability
and
replacement
projects.
So,
moving
on
to
the
permit,
the
treatment
plant
currently
discharges
the
treated
effluent
at
two
locations
depending
on
rainfall.
So
down
here
in
the
left
corner.
D
You
see
the
plant,
you
can
see
the
tanks
here
so
during
dry
weather,
the
discharge
is
two
of
secondary
effluent
to
San
Francisco
Bay
during
wet
weather
and
the
plant
is
allowed
to
discharge
a
combination
of
primary
and
secondary
effluent
to
the
bay
and
this
primary
and
secondary
is
in
reference
to
level
of
treatment.
So
during
wet
weather,
it
is
a
lower
level
of
treatment
that
is
being
discharged
because
there's
so
much
wet
weather
that
comes
into
the
plant.
D
The
plant
gets
overwhelmed
and
can't
doesn't
have
the
capacity
to
discharge
all
secondary
treated
during
extreme,
wet
weather
discharge
events,
and
they
need
to
discharge
to
coma
Creek,
which
you
can
see
right
here,
adjacent
to
the
plant.
This
happens
when
the
outfall
that
you
can
see
goes
up
and
over
to
the
Bay.
When
that
capacity
succeeded,
then
they
have
a
if
more
water's
coming
into
the
plant,
then
that
outfall
capacity,
then
that's
when
it
triggers
a
discharge
to
the
creek.
So
the
state
water
board
discharge
permit
has
some
mandates
in
it.
D
In
2008,
the
plant
received
a
new
permit
which
required
controlling
wet
weather
flow
discharges
in
two
different
parts.
They
wanted
to
have
minimizing
blending
of
the
primary
and
secondary
treated
wastewater,
which
is
what
I
referred
to
the
two
different
levels
of
treatment,
and
this
is
a
national
policy,
that's
being
pushed
actually
to
minimize
blending
and
then
the
second
thing
was
they
wanted
to
eliminate
those
near
shore
discharges,
tacoma
creek.
D
So,
for
this
project
we
were
tasked
with
looking
at
what
are
the
projects
that
would
be
needed
to
minimize
the
blending
and
eliminate
the
coma
Creek
discharge.
So
this
shows
a
close-up
of
the
treatment
plant,
and
so
the
first
project
to
minimize
blending
would
be
to
improve
and
increase
the
secondary
treatment
capacity
and
we're
showing
here
that
we
would
be
doing
modifications
to
their
aeration
basins,
which
are
the
primary
way
you
do
secondary
treatment
and
adding
a
new
secondary
clarifier
to
increase
that
secondary
treatment
capacity.
D
The
next
project
would
be
to
see
if
we
can
obtain
a
permit
for
that
near
shore
discharge.
The
reason
they
are
saying
you
have
to
eliminate
the
discharges,
because
it's
not
currently
permitted,
so
we
would
have
to
go
through
the
steps
of
working
with
the
regulators
to
get
an
authorized
permit,
which
would
require
some
water
quality
studies
and
dilution
studies
in
the
creek.
Then
the
third
project
would
be
to
build
a
new
wet
weather
storage
facility
to
be
able
to
hold
the
water.
D
If
we
aren't
allowed
to
discharge
tacoma
creek
when
I
as
I
mentioned
when
the
water
coming
into
the
plant,
is
more
than
that
outfall
capacity
you'd
have
to
store
it.
This
project
would
be
as
a
last
resort
if
we
cannot
succeed
in
getting
a
new
discharge
permit
for
the
occasional
discharges,
tacoma
creek,
okay.
So
moving
on
to
the
third
area
of
our
plan
on
green
energy,
the
plant
already
produces
about
one
third
of
its
own
power
demand
with
bio
gas,
that's
produced
on
site
from
the
solids
and
and
it's
taken
through
engines.
D
So
for
the
critical
rehabilitation
we're
showing
over
11
million
dollars
of
projects
that
need
to
be
done
in
the
next
five
years
and
we
have
deferred
an
additional,
nearly
16
million
for
the
discharge.
Permit
compliance
we're
showing
9.6
million
in
the
next
five
years
to
improve
that
secondary
treatment
capacity
that
I
mentioned,
and
to
try
to
get
a
new
permit
for
the
coma
Creek
discharge.
D
We
are
deferring
that
wet
weather
storage
Basin
out
beyond
the
five
year
CIP,
as
you
see
here,
to
try
to
provide
time
so
that
we
can
see
if
we
can
get
that
discharge
permit
for
the
green
energy
opportunities,
while
they're,
worse
and
very
interesting
ideas
too,
in
promising
technologies
to
produce
more
power
on
site
for
the
fuel
cell,
it
comes
at
a
much
higher
cost,
so
we
have
deferred
that
and
instead
went
with
the
lower
cost
solar
panels.
At
this
point,
so
we're
showing
a
twenty
two
point:
six
million
dollar
five-year
CIP
for
the
plant.
D
The
next
steps
are
to
have
City
Council
approval.
South
san
francisco
has
already
approved
the
facility
plan.
Then
the
projects
need
to
be
incorporated
into
the
city's
cips
and
we
need
to
meet
with
the
regional
board
to
talk
about
the
permit
issues
and
the
plan,
and
then
staff
would
need
to
move
forward
with
implementing
these
projects,
and
with
that
I'm
ready
to
take
any
questions
you
may
have
any.
C
A
C
A
E
B
The
soul,
or
can
be
reached
the
agreement
f,
depending
on
your
desire
and
comfort
level,
how
much
participation
you
want
to
have
for
that
project
and
how
soon
f
will
be
no
clear
agreement
between
your
direction
and
Siri
of
South
San
Francisco
intend
to
implement
some
of
those
green
energy
project
sooner
then.
How
soon
is
your
desire
to
implement
then
a
they
can
fund
entirely
themselves
without
any
cost
sharing
by
us
or
whatever
percentage.
You
will
feel
comfortable
agreeing
to
participate
in
that
project.
B
C
So
I
did
I
did
key
in
on
that
one
paragraph
and
that
near
the
end
of
the
staff
report
and
and
I'm
sure
that
this
plan
was
developed,
knowing
what
our
right
structure
was
and
what
kind
of
funding
you
can
get.
You
know
for
capital
projects,
so
it
says
in
2009
we
adopted
our
latest
rate
model
in
the
key
part
of
the
states
that
it
is
not
expected
to
significantly
impact
the
right
model.
So
what
can
you
tell
me
about
that?
You.
B
Reason
why,
at
that
time,
both
of
us
agreed
to
start
to
develop
this
facility
plan
to
define
exactly
what
improvements
we
will
need
to
happen
in
the
same
time
was
a
so-called
placeholder
place
or
in
our
rate
model,
and
all
the
placeholder
is
very
close
to
the
final
possible
cost
share.
What
the
city
of
several
hope
you
have
to
pay
for
this
investment,
so.
B
Five
years,
what
would
support
you,
but
I,
just
I
will
remind
you
that
the
financial
projection
was
for
ten
years
and
you
approved
a
rate,
a
rate
structure
for
three
years
and
that
will
be
up
next
year
for
further
decision.
But,
yes,
you
know
tenure
great
model.
This
cost
was
anticipated
and
was
included
in
all
a
dream.
E
Thank
you,
one
more
question:
I've
heard
this
presentation
think
four
or
five
times
down
so
slowly.
It's
seeping
in
one
thing
I
was
thinking
about
Claire
I
think
you
explained
to
me
that
the
reason
we
have
these
these
overflows
or
that
this
over
capacity
is
because
our
sewer
systems
are
essentially
broken,
and
so,
when
it
rains
water
gets
into
the
ground
and
that
gets
into
the
sewer
system
and
ends
up
at
the
facility.
Is
that
fairly
accurate,
I
hope.
B
I
didn't
say
that
our
sewer
system
is
broken.
I
wouldn't
say
that
that
certainly
is
a
like
with
many
of
older
sewer
system
use
a
challenge:
the
difference
between
dry
weather
flow
and
wet
weather
clock
during
a
high
rain.
Even
the
infiltration
is
still
very
high
in
our
system
is
not
isolated
enough.
All
of
the
pipes
in
the
ground.
B
They
are
not
really
they
will
they
be
let
the
water
drain
water
to
infiltrate
and
then
that
our
system
then
has
to
carry
a
much
higher
volume
to
the
treatment
plan,
and
that's
you
see
from
for
those
improvement
recommended
for
permit
compliance.
Those
are
really
focused
on
wet
weather
compliance
that,
during
the
peak
rain
event,
how
how
then
that
increased
demand
can
be
managed
a
bit
how
to
discharge
and
pollutant
to
the
bay
from
the
plant
as
much
as
possible
and.
E
So
what
I
was
really
thinking?
Is
you
know
here
we
have
a
system
that
were
perhaps
if
we
invested
the
money
instead
in
repairing
everything,
that's
in
the
ground.
Now
we
wouldn't
have
nearly
the
demand
at
the
treatments
plant,
because
the
water
wouldn't
be
getting
in
there
and
I.
Probably
this
investment
is
very
modest
compared
to
what
it
would
take
to
do
that,
but
it's
still
at
I'm
wondering
you
know
if
we
were
to
divert
some
of
these
funds
toward
that
project,
which
I
think
ultimately
we
do
want
to
do
anyway.
B
Cause,
remember
you
were
not
here,
and
you
had
you
didn't
have
the
benefit
being
part
of
the
discussion
for
the
tenured
financial
model,
for
the
sewer
system
was
a
certain
level
of
service
agreed
on
was
part
of
the
policy
assumption
developing
that
model
and
one
of
the
policy
assumption
on
which
our
ten-year
plan
was
based
was
replacing
in
a
timely
manner
or
system
our
sewer
mains.
But
of
course
our
hold
the
system
is
most
is
older
than
60
year
old.
B
Then
we'll
take
us
at
least
many
many
years
to
be
able
to
do
that
and
the
short
answer
to
your
question.
You
have
to
devote
to
a
certain
degree
to
be
able
to
really
manage
the
environmental
protection
in
meantime
until
you
will
be
able
to
improve
our
system
to
a
level
when
that
will
make
a
big
difference
and
that
weather
flow
will
be
lowered.
Substantial
enough
that
you
will
not
need
any
major
capacity
improvement
down
at
the
plant,
the
same
policy.
B
What
was
and
I
don't
want
to
speak
in
south
san
Francisco's
name,
but
they
made
pretty
much
the
same
policy
decision
if
you
years
back
and
they
started
to
invest
a
in
their
sewer
main
replacement
to
minimize
the
dead,
I
and
I.
And
that
is
our
is
all
intent.
And
that
is
in
our
plan
also
to
minimize
I&I
to
replace
our
system
in
a
reasonable
pace
that
you
cannot
just
replace
in
two
years
or
two
years
out
of
our
system
is
not
practically
possible
financially
and
even
from
a
practical
reason.
Okay,.
E
F
In
the
near
term,
you
are
doing
what
needs
to
be
done
at
the
plant
and
you're
doing
what
needs
to
be
done
in
the
collection
system
and
hopefully
over,
as
director
indicated
over
what
will
probably
be
a
fairly
long
period
of
time,
but
incrementally
move
to
a
point
where
you're
capturing,
hopefully
as
much
as
avoiding
as
much
as
possible,
I
and
I,
and
and
then
allowing
the
sustained
efficient
operations
of
the
plant
once
improved.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
A
A
Improvements,
but
in
the
meantime,
alongside
of
that,
we're
trying
to
improve
our
infrastructure,
because
the
worst
thing
is
to
treat
rainwater
and
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
increase
capacity
so
that
we
can
bypass
some
of
those
some
of
those
problems.
We've
been
having
it's
going
to
take
a
lot
longer
to
do
the
stuff
under
the
street
and
a
lot
and
take
a
lot
more
money
to
do
it.
Then
it
will
be
too
in
fact
improve
capacity
and
and
improve
the
you
know.