►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting November 23, 2010 10a. Local Emergency re Glenview Fire
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting November 23, 2010 10a. Local Emergency regarding the Glenview Fire
A
B
B
However,
it
does
remain
important
to
continue
this
procedure
for
the
near
term,
as
we
would
like
to
at
least
get
through
the
first
major
part
of
the
rainy
season
in
order
to
evaluate
any
required
activities
to
secure
the
glenview,
the
damaged
area
in
the
Glen,
View
neighborhood,
and,
more
specifically,
those
Lots
that
have
been
that
the
homes
have
been
removed.
So
there
is
a
great
deal
of
open
area
in
immediate
blast
vicinity.
B
There
is
also
a
condition
of
property
that,
in
the
crestmore
canyon,
at
the
mouth
of
the
crestmore
canyon,
which
is
immediately
adjacent
to
the
blast
site.
That
needs
our
continuing
attention
in
order
to
assure
that
the
rainy
season
does
not
create
additional
damage.
That
again,
would
need
immediate
attention.
B
For
that
reason,
we're
asking
your
action
tonight
to
continue
to
continue
the
local
emergency
and
I
failed
to
mention
earlier
the
proclamation
or
the
day
resolution
that
you're
being
else
to
approve
tonight
would
allow
continued
action
without
for
the
for
the
city
to
enter
into
contracts,
as
it
might
become
necessary
without
utilizing
the
competitive
bidding
process,
which
is
called
foreign
state
law
again.
I.
Don't
expect
additional
need
to
utilize
that
authority,
but
would
like
your
action
in
order
to
make
that
possible,
should
it
become
necessary
any.
B
B
You
I
had
a
thank
you
for
your
action.
I
I
also
wanted
to
respond
to
a
question
that
is
generally
within
this
topic
area.
That
was
asked
at
a
previous
meeting
when
we
discussed
a
the
continuation
of
the
of
the
disaster
circumstances,
and
that
was
what
have
been
the
expenditures
that
the
city
has
incurred
today
in
response
to
the
glenview
fire
emergency.
B
As
the
city
council
is
I'm
sure
well
aware,
there
have
been
in
substantial
expenditure
of
time,
particularly
related
to
immediately
necessary
disaster
response
and
initial
recovery
action
items
that
has
been
undertaken
by
staff
during
normal
work
hours,
in
other
words,
without
incurring
additional
actual
costs
for
the
city,
but
causing
the
deferral.
Let's
say,
of
other
programs,
projects
and
activities
and
or
more
fully
absorbing
your
limited
staff
time
resource
so
that
those
costs
do
not
show
on
this
page.
This
page
only
addresses
the
costs
that
are
above
budget
and
are
directly
attributable
to
the
disaster
incident.
B
Specifically,
those
costs
total
two
million
125,000.
I
would
call
to
your
attention
one
additional
item,
and
that
is
that
we
have
attempted
to
break
these
out
in
general
categories
of
the
initial
response
period
and
the
recovery
effort
well
you'll
see
that
the
initial
response
is
particularly
identified
as
representing
that
period
from
thursday
evening,
September
9th
through
September
11th
a
period
of
just
about
48
hours.
That
is
how
the
state
disaster
response
programs
categorized
the
initial
response
period.
B
As
you
see,
there
are
approximately
or
just
over
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
costs
that
are
directly
attributable
to
overtime
and
supplies
related
to
that
effort.
The
vast
majority
of
the
cost
that
the
city
has
incurred
has
occurred
since
that
immediate
response
period
and
is
generally
categories
categorized
as
related
to
the
recovery
effort.
B
You'll
see
in
the
list
that
we've
provided,
that
the
majority
of
those
recovery
costs
relate
to
contracted
activities
that
have
previously
been
in
front
of
the
City
Council
for
construction
and
design
related
actions
to
stabilize
and
ensure
the
continuing,
stable
stability
of
the
crestmore
canyon.
You'll
also
note
that
these
costs
we've
captured
in
one
summary
format,
costs
that
have
both
actually
been
expended
and
costs
that
have
been
approved,
but
yet
not
yet
expended
in
those
are
referred
to
as
encumbered
costs.
So
again,
the
two
million
dollar
cost
is
roughly.
B
This
chart
shows
only
those
costs
that
have
occurred
since
the
incident
on
sep,
tember,
ninth
and
continuing
essentially
through
today,
but
I
think
it
gives
you
an
idea.
The
magnitude
of
the
types
of
things
that
have
incurred
costs
for
the
city
and
I
would
say,
will
continue
to
be
significant
cost
items
for
the
city
going
forward,
along
with
variety
of
things
that
remain
unknown,
but
also
those
items
that
are
continuing
to
emerge
and
to
be
more
important
as
we
as
we
move
down
the
path
towards
full
recovery
of
the
neighborhood
and
of
our
community.
I.
B
Don't
know
if
it's
the
council's
interest
and
I'm
not
really
prepared
tonight,
but
in
just
in
anticipating
a
possible
question
that
you
might
have
as
to
how
much
of
these
costs
are
directly
recoverable
under
the
disaster
reimbursement
formulas.
And
at
this
point
I
will
only
say
that
we
are
actively
involved
through
the
finance
department
and
with
the
assistance
of
expert
consultants
who
are
assisting
us
in
a
value
assembling,
documenting
and
evaluating
the
costs
that
we
have
incurred
related
to
the
state
and
the
federal
agencies,
cost
recovery
programs
and
reimbursement
procedures.
B
A
B
The
debris,
the
demolition
and
debris
removal
activities
that
were
undertaken
by
under
the
jurisdiction
of
San
Mateo
County
are
not
included
in
here.
There
is
a
you'll
see
there
is
a
one
item,
I
believe
its
$25,000,
that's
associated
with
debris
removal,
but
that
was
a
very
small
ancillary
activity
associated
with
that
general
activity.
B
My
understanding
that
the
county
had
entered
into
a
previous
agreement
prior
to
undertaking
the
work
they
have
a
letter
agreement
with
pge
that
it
at
least
my
understanding
and
again,
the
part
of
the
city,
is
not
a
party
to
that
agreement
or
to
the
costs
or
the
the
activities
or
the
relationship
between
the
county
and
PG&E
related
to
this.
But
it
is
my
understanding
that
there
is
an
arrangement
with
by
which
PG&E
will
directly
reimburse
the
county
for
those
costs.
So.
B
It
we're
not
anticipating
any
documentation
it
it.
It
is
clear
in
the
relationship
that
was
entered
in
before
the
work
began
between
the
county
and
pge
and
then
subsequently
between
the
county
and
the
individual
residents
that,
when
the
city
is
indemnified
for
activities
that
are
related
to
the
demolition
and
debris
removal
and
that
that
activity
is
being
was
completed
under
the
jurisdiction
and
and
through
the
county
in
its
relationship
with
contracted
services,
there
I.
B
C
B
B
B
C
B
C
B
B
I
would
I'm
anticipating
it's
a
very
large
number.
Obviously
we
had,
as
you
indicated,
over
400
first
responders,
that
does
not
include
the
people
who
responded,
who
assisted
in
the
EOC
and
in
other
activities.
I
can
tell
you
that
the
our
estimate,
at
the
current
time
for
regular
salaries
that,
for
example,
your
department
directors
who
responded
many
of
whom
worked
throughout
the
night
and
who
have
continued
to
devote
substantial
portions
of
their
daily
activities
to
this
response
and
recovery
effort.
B
Regular
salaries
that
are
not
accounted
for
in
this
list
are
estimated
in
the
two
hundred
thousand
dollar
range
benefit.
Costs
attributable
to
those
salaries
would
add
additional
costs
so
and
I
guess
I
would
say
as
well
and
I
think
you
alluded
to
it
in
your
comments.
Councilman
Rivera,
that
the
financial
impact
does
does
really
not
begin
to
express
the
significance
of
the
response
in
the
effort
that
has
been
applied
primarily
by
your
city
staff,
but
literally
by
hundreds
of
people
throughout
the
county
in
the
state.