►
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting 10-20-09 full meeting
B
C
B
Just
one
in
addition
to
the
YouTube
clips
being
available
online
of
san
bruno
CA
gov
for
each
of
these
agenda
items
if
anyone's
at
home
watching
right
now,
you
could
also
have
the
staff
report,
as
well
as
the
agendas
are
available
on
the
same
website.
So
just
go
to
san
bruno
CA
gov
and
go
to
the
community
development
section.
Ok,.
C
C
A
Was
she
carried
and
next
item
is
public
comment,
and
this
is
for
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda?
So
if
anyone
has
any
items
that
you
wish
to
bring
to
you
to
the
attention,
if
you
can
please
step
to
the
podium-
and
these
are
items
are
not
on
the
agenda-
okay,
here
again,
we'll
move
on
to
12
announcements,
any
conflict
of
interest
from
the
Commission,
ok,.
A
And
the
first
item
that
we
have
are
the
public
hearing
item
and
it's
3180
crust
more
dry,
it's
a
request
for
use
from
there
to
legalize
an
unpermitted
construction
which
increases
the
gross
floor
area
by
greater
than
fifty
percent,
which
is
actually
sixty
percent
cumulatively
and
exceeds
that
forty
four
percent,
like
broad
coverage
requirement
of
fifty
percent
and
that's
for
section
twelve
point:
200.0
30
b,
point
1
and
12
point
200.0,
40
b,
three
of
the
san
bruno
municipal
court
and
the
applicant
donor
is
mr.
kim
and
staff
report.
Please
thank.
D
You
and
good
evening,
as
stated,
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
legalize
an
unpermitted
addition
that
increases
the
floor
area
by
greater
than
fifty
percent
and
exceeds
the
lot
coverage
requirement
of
forty
four
percent.
The
lot
is
located
on
crestmore
drive
and
is
developed
with
a
single-family
dwelling.
A
lot
is
50
feet
wide
by
100
feet
deep.
There
have
been
two
previous
editions
at
the
subject
site.
D
More
recently
in
May
of
2009,
the
app
complied
for
273
second
story
addition
that
building
permit
was
issued,
and
it's
important
to
note
that
that
building
permit
has
not
been
finals
when
the
building
inspection
or
when
the
building
Division
conducted
a
routine
inspection.
It
was
noticed
that
the
homeowner
had
exceeded
the
scope
of
work
and
hadn't
closed
the
deck
on
the
north
side
of
the
property
line
that
is
now
being
utilized
as
a
sunroom.
D
The
sunroom
currently
utilizes
vertical
wood
siding,
which
is
not
consistent
with
the
existing
stucco
finish
of
the
single-family
dwelling,
and
that
was
mentioned
at
the
architectural
review
committee
meeting
as
a
recommendation
to
utilize
stucco
finish,
so
it
would
be
more
consistent
with
the
existent
single-family
dwelling
and
the
applicant
has
agreed
to
do
so.
There
was
a
number
of
other
minor
revisions
that
had
to
be
changed
on
the
plans
which
the
applicant
also
has
taken
care
of
as
well.
The
architecture
review
committee
forwarded
this
project
to
the
Planning
Commission,
with
a
positive
recommendation.
D
Staff
did
receive
one
phone
call
from
a
concerned
neighbor
and
actually
they
they
just
really
want
to
find
out
what
the
project
was
about
once
they
want
Stefan,
informed,
the
applicant
or
what
staff
informed
a
concerned
neighbor,
then
it
was
really
just
involving
the
legalization
of
the
sunroom.
They
had
no
issues
with
the
project
and
supported
the
project
regarding
lot
coverage.
That
is
one
of
the
entitlements
before
us
tonight.
D
Really
when
staff
is
analyzing
lot
coverage,
we
we
look
for
open
space
on
the
site
and
the
whole
intent
of
the
law
coverage
requirement,
so
not
build
completely.
Building
set
back
line
to
building
set
back
line,
and
here
staff
does
feel
that
there
is
enough
open
space
on
site.
There
is
a
20-foot
rear
yard,
with
an
open
deck,
as
well
as
a
19-foot
front
yard
as
well.
D
So
Steph
finds
that
there
is
enough
open
space
on
site
with
that
staff,
does
support
the
project
and
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approve
use,
permit
09,
02
one
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
six
and
conditions
of
approval
1
through
23
I'm
available
for
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
Thank.
A
E
A
You'll
get
the
opportunity
we're
going
to
have
the
applicant
first
state
his
his
project
give
us
information
on
it,
and
then
we
will
be
happy
to
have
you
step
to
the
microphone
and
nicks
and
express
your
your
your
comments.
If
the
applicant
please
step
forward
to
the
microphone
state,
your
name
and
if
you
can
give
us
an
overview
of
your
project,
please
good.
A
E
A
E
E
F
My
name
is
Patricia
Casey.
I
live
at
3151,
crestmore
drive,
I've
I'm,
one
of
the
original
owners,
so
I've
lejon,
the
house
ever
since
the
house
was
built
and
I
was
wondering
why
mr.
cam
was
able
to
build
on
addition
to
his
house
as
last
time
without
permits
from
what
I
understand
he
didn't
get
all
the
permits
for
this
project.
F
F
A
F
F
A
F
When
I
think,
when
a
project
like
that
is
started,
I
think
you
should
be
completed
in
a
reasonable
amount
of
time.
It
has
been
left
there
unfinished
for
a
number
of
of
days
months
and
I
think
that
this
neighborhood,
our
neighborhood
able,
is
going
down
as
it
is
because
of
all
the
renters
I
think
from
the
future.
I
think
if
some
project
is
done
like
this,
perhaps
I
should
give
a
time
limit
when
the
project
should
be
completed.
A
A
E
B
That's
what
I
was
just
going
to
go,
ask
Matt,
but
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago
the
City
Council,
actually
the
Planning
Commission
reviewed
it,
but
the
City
Council
adopted
an
ordinance
to
limit
the
total
time
limit
of
building
permits.
So
we
actually
do
have
a
time
limit
for
building
permits,
depending
on
the
size
of
the
project,
is
generally
a
year
to
18
months
from
the
time
they
pulled
a
building
permit
to
the
time
they
have
the
complete
construction.
D
Regarding
the
second-story
expansion,
the
it's
based
on
the
valuation,
how
long
the
permit
is
good
for
I
believe
in
this
situation,
the
permit
has
a
life
span
of
six
months
in
this
situation.
So
I
I,
don't
know
exactly
how
far
they
are
in
the
building
permit
process,
but
I
know
they
are
close
to
the
end.
C
D
There
was
no
stop
work
notice
and
issued
for
the
second
story,
expansion.
What
the
applicant
will
have
to
do
from
this
point
on
he
will
have
to
submit
plans,
building
plans
to
the
Community
Development
Department
to
legalize
that
sunroom
addition
essentially,
but
construction
was
not
stopped
on
that
second
floor
expansion.
Oh.
D
A
Just
for
the
record,
the
applicant
did
say
to
me
that
the
purpose
of
enclosing
that
was,
he
had
a
wife
with
cancer
and
would
need
it,
warmth
and
didn't
think
through
the
situation,
not
that
I'm
justifying
it
by
any
means.
But
I
didn't
want
to
note
that
he
did
indicate
that
and
I'd
like
to
bring
you
back
to
the
podium
Mr
Kim.
If
you
could
have
a
question
for
you,.
A
E
C
So
if
the
permit
was
issued
in
May
any
finishes
in
November,
that's
for
10
to
six
month
period
it
or
not
correct
correct.
Thank
you.
I
knew
the
answer
so
he's
so
to
let
the
resident
who
had
the
questions
about
how
long
was
going
it
hasn't
been.
You
know,
there's
been
no
extensions
or
anything
like
that
to
the
current
permit.
It's
within
the
reasonable
amount
of
time
that
we
allow
project
of
that
size
to
be
built,
correct,
correct.
C
A
A
Ok.
The
next
item
is
171
Alpine
way
and
that's
a
request
for
use
permit
to
allow,
in
addition,
which
increases
the
gross
floor
area
by
greater
than
fifty
percent,
which
is
currently
at
fifty-six
percent
restriction.
12.2
hundred
030
point
B
one
point:
one
of
the
San
Bernardino
ordinance
staff
report.
Please
we.
B
A
E
A
Motion
carried
annex
item
is
446
a
Mateo
Avenue
and
it's
a
request
for
a
use
permit
to
allow
alcohol
beverage
sales
in
conjunction
with
a
restaurant
and
parking
exception,
to
allow
conversion
from
a
barbershop
to
a
restaurant
without
providing
additional
parking
for
chapter
12
point
296,
120c,
point
12
and
12
point
100.1,
20
of
the
San
bertazzoni
ordinance
and
staff
report.
Please
thank.
D
You,
as
stated
the
applicant,
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
allow
alcoholic
beverage
sales
in
conjunction
with
a
restaurant
and
a
parking
exception
to
allow
the
conversion
of
a
children's
hair
salon
to
a
restaurant.
The
proposed
location
is
located
on
san
mateo
avenue
in
the
400
block.
The
lot
is
20
2,500
square
feet
and
is
developed
with
two
buildings.
The
site
is
kind
of
unique
in
the
fact
and
that
it
has
its
own
parking
on
site,
there's
32
parking
spaces
on
site
which
will
be
shared
with
the
adjacent
paper
moon,
restaurant.
D
The
item
is
before
us
tonight
because
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
relocate
Cleo's
restaurant
from
its
current
el
camino,
real
location
to
this
new
downtown
location.
The
restaurant
will
have
seating
for
a
hundred
and
sixteen
people
and
will
be
open
between
the
hours
of
11am
and
nine
pm
seven
days
a
week
regarding
the
use
permit
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales.
The
police
department
has
reviewed
the
case
and
has
placed
the
standard
conditions
of
approval
on
the
project.
D
Additionally,
if
any
issues
arise
in
the
future,
the
community
development
director
does
have
the
right
to
bring
this
project
back
to
the
Planning
Commission.
Regarding
parking,
the
children's
hair
salon
required
14
parking
spaces
where's.
The
proposed
restaurant
tonight
requires
forty
two
parking
spaces.
This
is
a
net
difference
of
28
parking
spaces.
This
is
a
rather
large
parking
exception
application.
Therefore,
staff
decided
to
conduct
a
detailed
parking
study
and
we
located
four
Lots
in
the
downtown
area,
one
of
which
was
the
private
parking
lot,
as
well
as
three
other
parking
lots.
D
City-Owned
parking
lots
on
mastic
Avenue
all
are
within
less
than
a
block
from
the
from
the
proposed
restaurant.
And
if
you
look
on
page
three
of
your
staff
report,
there
is
a
chart
there
and
it
explains
the
overall
occupancy
rate
of
all
for
all
four
parking
parking,
lots
and
you'll
see
that
Cleo's
restaurant,
the
private
parking
lot,
has
an
overall
occupancy
rate
of
sixty-two
percent
and
that
I
really
want
to
point
out
lot
number
two,
which
is
directly
adjacent
to
the
Clio's
restaurant.
D
It's
just
located
right
to
the
north,
that
has
68
total
parking
spaces
and
the
overall
occupancy
rate.
There
is
fifty-two
percent,
so
there's
a
number
of
vacant
spaces
at
that
site.
So,
in
actual
reality,
if
the
private
parking
lot
is
full,
most
of
the
customers
will
be
parking
in
this
parking
lot
directly
adjacent
to
the
north,
and
we
find
that
there
is
enough
parking
there
to
support
this
use.
D
Essentially
and
really
overall,
staff
does
support
this
project
and
finds
that
it
would
be
a
positive
addition
to
the
downtown
environment
with
that
staff
does
recommend
that
the
Planning
Commission
approve
use,
permit
0902
to
and
parking
exception.
Oh
nine
dash
0400
for
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
seven
and
conditions
of
approval,
one
through
23
I'm
available
for
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
Thank.
G
G
Parking
lot
belongs
that
whole
building
right.
It
does
correct.
So
if
we
can
make
that
imagine
that
they
were
moved
only
open
after
ten
o'clock
at
night,
I
think
so.
If
we
have
them
remove
those
those
chains
and
as
conditioning
system
sciences
for
parking
for
Cleo's
and
paper,
moon
and
I
think
that
would
help
out.
A
E
E
A
H
You
good
evening
the
application
is
for
a
use
permit
and
a
parking
exception
to
allow
a
dentist
office.
It's
at
the
corner
of
crestmore
in
san
bruno
avenue,
I'm
sure
you're
familiar
with
it.
It's
where
7-eleven
is
located.
You
also
probably
know
that
this
location
has
been
vacant
for
quite
some
time.
Over
two
and
a
half
years,
staff
has
talked
to
quite
a
few
different
proposed
tenants
during
that
time
and
for
a
variety
of
different
reasons.
None
of
those
really
fit
into
that
situation.
H
So
now
we
do
have
an
applicant
that
staff
finds
will
be
a
fitting
use
at
that
location.
I
would
have
liked
to
make
one
correction
to
the
staff
report.
Please.
In
several
places
we
say
that
there
are
11
existing
parking
spaces
when
in
fact
there
are
12
existing
parking
spaces,
so
that
does
not
actually
directly
infect
our
entitlement
for
the
number
of
spaces
that
we're
asking
for
the
parking
exception.
But
we
certainly
would
like
that
to
be
corrected
in
the
record.
H
So
the
current
applicant
has
had
had
a
long-standing
dental
office
at
the
sky,
crest
shopping
center
before
it
was
redeveloped,
and
so
he
moved
out
of
town
and
then
he
has
been
looking
for
another
location
to
move
back
into
san
bruno.
That
has
good
visibility
and
to
serve
many
of
his
patients
that
followed
him
to
that
other
location,
they're
proposing
to
be
open
from
monday
through
friday,
from
8am
to
5pm.
It
is
a
relatively
small
office.
They
would
have
three
employees
and
expect
to
serve
only
about
six
patients
per
day.
H
So
this
is
a
relatively
small
number
of
places
and
certainly
came
into
the
analysis
when
we're
considering
whether
the
parking
exception
would
work
at
that
location.
So
it's
not
a
very
intensive
use
for
that
location,
but
it
does
have
quite
visibility
for
them.
Staff
does
not
anticipate
really
any
conflicts
with
the
7-eleven.
They
they
typically
have
a
quick
turnover
and
their
peak
times
are
a
little
bit
different
than
the
dental
office.
So
that's
also
supports
the
project.
The
surrounding
area
includes,
as
you
know,
the
gas
station
highway
280
residential
uses.
H
Even
though
this
is
a
neighborhood
commercial,
we
do
find
that
the
dentist
office
would
be
appropriate
and
complimentary
to
those
uses
again
in
regards
to
the
parking
exception.
The
previous
video
store
required
nine
spaces.
The
dental
office
requires
11,
so
the
parking
exception.
The
entitlement
tonight
is
for
two
spaces.
H
The
difference
between
the
existing
and
proposed
so
staff
does
support
that
parking
exception
because
of
the
relatively
low
intensity
of
the
dental
office,
only
three
employees
and
about
six
patients
per
day,
the
quick
turnover
of
the
7-eleven
customers
and
the
different
peak
demand
between
those
two
uses.
It
really
is
a
good
shared
parking
arrangement
which
we
seek
to
do
to
really
maximize
our
parking
and
those
resources
that
are
available
to
us
and
also,
as
you
know,
that
that
site
is
very
constrained.
H
It's
very
steeply
sloped,
and
so
there
are
very
limited
opportunities
to
really
change
the
configuration
of
the
parking
lot
and
no
opportunity
at
all
to
add
additional
parking
there.
We
notice
the
neighbors
consistent
with
our
noticing
requirements.
We
have
not
received
any
comments
from
neighbors
on
the
project
and
so
staff
would
recommend
approval
of
the
project
based
on
findings
1
through
5
and
subject
to
conditions
1
through
20
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
C
You
through
the
chair,
actually
general
question:
you
know
Laurie,
you
mentioned
the
parking
and
how
many
spots
there
are
12
that
I'm
not
on
that
graph
or
on
those
whatever
we
want
to
call
it
there,
the
Gran
Via.
Whatever
has
you
know
the
previous
use
of
16.6
is
what
was
required.
Ok
and
down
on
the
new
proposed.
One
who
has
18.7
would
be
the
required
space
and
I
understand
we're
going
for
the
parking
exception,
but
18
or
12-18
is
six
not
to
at
least
last
time.
C
H
Let
me
take
you
through
it.
This
table
includes
the
parking
requirement
as
of
today's
Municipal
Code
and
as
you're
aware,
the
perking
there
is
grandfathered
in
so
it
is
somewhat
deficient
already
and
so
under
today's
code,
the
total
number
of
spaces
that
would
be
required
in
the
actual
math
is
sixteen
point,
six
parking
spaces,
and
then
our
code
requires
that
we
round
that
up
to
17
and
then
in
the
proposed
condition.
Again.
According
to
the
municipal
code
requirements,
it's
18.7
spaces
and
then
we
round
up
to
19,
and
so
the
difference
there
is
19-7.
H
C
C
B
Correct,
I
would
say
a
majority
of
majority
of
developments
that
were
built
in
the
40s
50s
and
60s.
There
was
a
lower
parking
requirement
at
that
time,
so
that
most
of
them
do
have
deficient
parking.
So
that's
why
we
have
this
process
now
to
kind
of
take
a
look
at
these
older
properties
that
had
deficient
parking
and
say.
Will
this
modern
business
work
with
in
with
work
within
the
existing
site
plan
right.
C
I
understand
and
that's
and
that's
great,
so
the
only
thing
that
just
as
I'm
reading
this
you
know
it
just
doesn't
look
as
clear
as
how
it's
being
explained.
If
you
will,
you
know,
because
I'm
looking
at
19
and
there's
12
and
it's
you
know,
seven
and
overall
I
mean
in
general
just
no
matter
what
business
was
in
there.
It
had
insufficient
parking
for
today's
current
parking
requirements.
Correct.
E
A
Alright
good
imagery
chase,
they
do
have
a
question
because
it
is
a
tricky
place
to
get
in
and
out
you
don't
have
owned.
You
only
have
one
one
entrance
and
exit
and
I
know
that
you
can't
make
a
request
or
requirement
to
park
on
the
street,
and
it
is
a
sip
DPL
and
if
we
are
going
to
you
know
if
it
is
going
to
be
recommended
to
use
to
use
up
that
space,
it's
going
to
be
tricky
to
get
people
in
and
out
and
so
I
guess.
A
This
is
the
question
for
the
applicant
as
well,
but
parking
heading
down
the
hill
I,
don't
recall:
I
was
up
there,
but
I,
don't
recall,
there
was
curb
parking
and
it's
not
utilized
I
mean
it's
been
it's
bacon,
almost
all
the
time
it
passed
by
their
daily.
So
is
that
something
that
could
be
painted
out
that
it
would
be
for
commercial
use?
Is
there
any
consideration
of
being
creative
around
that
in.
B
Terms
of
the
street
parking
yeah:
typically,
we
don't
restrict
anything
for
commercial
use
and
if
it
does,
it
goes
through
the
traffic
and
safety
and
parking
committee
TS
bc,
and
then
they
make
recommendations
to
the
city
council,
but
usually
it's
just
open
for
public
parking
it,
since
it
seems
that
no
one
from
the
residential
areas
parking
there.
If
the
parking
lot
was
full,
you
know
could
be
used
by
a
customer
that
they
needed
to.
Although.
A
It's
tricky
to
make
that
turn.
You
know
your
walk
when
you're
driving
up
that
hill.
You
have
to
make
a
u-turn
at
one
point
and
it
does
create
a
danger
point.
Maybe
it's
premature
to
be
having
this
conversation
in
advance
of
Commission
discussion
at
the
end
of
this.
Of
this
we've
got
hold
those
questions
until
the
end.
Okay,
thank
you.
The.
C
So
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
because
I
mean
I
would
think
that
you
know
the
parking
deal
with
parking
in
front
of
7-11.
As
you
mention
it's
a
quick
turnover
you
know,
are
they
going
to
have?
Is
there
going
to
be
assigned,
you
know
dedicating
the
first,
whatever
three
stalls
or
whatever
7-eleven
only
and
you
know
for
the
existing
business?
That's
that's
in
there
has
that.
Has
there
been
any
consideration
along
those
lines
or
did
I
just
miss
it
in
the
staff
report?
We.
B
And
through
the
chair,
we
typically
leave
that
up
to
the
building
/
owner
to
designate
spaces
if
they
want
a
designated
spaces.
But
if
the
Planning
Commission
wanted
to
put
some
type
of
restriction
on
the
site
to
say
you
know,
spots,
9,
10
and
11
are
required
for
the
dental
to
be
painted.
That
way,
you
could
also
put
some
type
of
condition.
You.
C
Know
it's
not
that
I
want
to
put
a
you
know
a
restriction
on
it.
That's
why
I
was
asking
if
the
properties,
the
subject
properties
were
owned
by
the
same
you
know,
by
the
same
owner.
That
way
you
can
figure,
I
mean
they'll,
hopefully
be
able
to
figure
that
out,
but
if
there
were
two
different
owners
of
the
buildings,
you
know
that
it
might,
you
know,
be
in
our
best
interest
at
that
point
in
time
to
look
at
doing
something
as
you
just
spoke
about
Aaron,
but
thank
you.
A
E
Good
evening
my
name
is
Alan
William
architect,
staff
did
an
excellent
job
in
presenting
the
project.
The
only
thing
that
I'd
like
to
add
is
that
there
are
no
proposed
external
structural
changes
to
the
building,
so
the
building's
square
footage
remains
the
same
and
I
think
mr.
chase
was
suggesting
that
there
was
multiple
buildings
on
the
site,
there's
actually
one
building
with
a
partition
that
pretty
much
splits
the
building
in
half
and
so
and
again
that
your
question
was
answered
it.
It's
all
under
one
ownership.
Mr.
E
G
E
G
G
E
G
G
Just
don't
like
it
when
people
Amy
when
the
business
comes
in
says
we're
only
going
to
do
so
much
business,
because
we
all
want
to
do
more.
Business
I
wanted
more
business
too.
So
the
base
our
findings
in
facts
on
seeing
three
to
six
patients
a
day
I
think
should
be
stricken
from
the
the
staff
report.
Unless
we
can
review
it,
if
they
see
Morton's
yeah
that
many
patients
a
day.
B
To
be
something
something
that
you
base
your
findings
on,
it
actually
wasn't
included
in
the
finance
for
approval
and
that's
the
reason
we
didn't
include
in
the
findings
her
approval.
It
was
just
more
of
a
matter
of
fact
it
related
to
the
current
business
operation,
but
you're
right,
I
mean
if
they
expand,
I
mean
I.
G
B
G
B
C
C
A
C
Three
chair:
I
will
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
use,
permit
09,
20
26
and
the
parking
exception
0900
five
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
five
conditions
of
approval
1
through
20,
with
the
minutes
to
reflect
the
conversation
we
had
about
the
average
people
that
are
being
in
attendance
at
the
dental
office
per
day.
Correct.
A
Moving
on
to
item
number
E,
which
is
2101
sneath
lane
the
request
for
a
conditional
use
permit
to
construct
a
wireless
communication
facility
within
a
residential
zoning
district
and
to
exceed
the
height
limits
for
the
district
in
which
it
is
located.
Four
sections:
12.2,
20
and
12-point:
84.1
64,
the
san
bruno
toning
ordinance
staff.
Reportedly
thank.
D
You
I
sedated
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
construct
a
new
wireless
facility
within
a
residential
zoning
district
and
to
exceed
the
height
limits
of
that
zoning
district.
The
location
is
located
at
the
same
Bruno
golf
center
and
that's
located
on
the
south
side
of
Smith
Lane.
The
golf
center
consists
of
two
parcels
which
measure
approximately
20
acres
in
size,
the
northernmost
parsh
portion
of
that
parcel.
D
D
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
remove
one
of
the
existing
100
foot
high
poles
and
will
replace
it
with
a
new
one
hundred
foot
high
pole
and
will
play
six
panel
antennas
on
top
of
that
pole,
as
well
as
seven
equipment.
Cabinets
will
also
be
installed
on
ground
level
and
a
new
storage
shed
and
diesel
generator
are
proposed.
The
architectural
review
committee
reviewed
the
project
and
forded
the
project
to
the
Planning
Commission,
with
a
favorable
recommendation,
with
the
understanding
that
the
new
poll
would
match
the
color
style
and
finish
of
the
existing
holes.
D
D
Townhomes
also
expressed
concern
regarding
the
environmental
assessment,
the
term
of
the
lease,
the
level
of
security
at
the
site
and
different
issues
regarding
the
backup
generator.
Since
that
meeting,
steph
has
contacted
the
neighbor
and
sent
a
revised
copy
of
the
staff
report
and
a
revised
copy
of
the
plans
to
that
neighbor,
and
we
have
not
received
any
feedback
from
that.
Neighbor
staff
supports
the
project
and
finds
that
the
application
meets
the
stealth
requirements
with
that
12
inch
offset.
D
Additionally,
a
condition
of
approval
has
been
added,
requiring
the
antennas
to
be
painted
the
same
color
of
that
new
poll.
The
application
also
means
all
federal
regulations
in
regards
to
the
RF
exposure
limits.
Staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
use,
permit
o
8025
based
on
findings
of
fact
1
through
6
and
conditions
of
approval
1
through
16
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank.
C
D
E
A
J
My
name
is
Carrie
Macpherson
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
Verizon
Wireless
I
work
for
bridge
communications,
our
addresses
126,
670,
alcosta
Boulevard
staff
did
a
wonderful
job
describing
the
project.
We
are
replacing
the
pole
to
make
sure
that
the
new
poll
is
structurally
sound.
We
don't
know
the
structural
integrity
of
the
existing
pole
because
it
was
just
designed
to
hold
the
net,
not
the
antennas
and
coaxial
cable
that
goes
up
the
inside
of
it.
So
that's
why
we're
replacing
the
antenna?
J
The
other
concern
that
we
have
is
condition
of
approval
number
10,
which
was
just
referenced.
That
does
say
if
the
driving
range
ceases
to
exist
or
the
poles
are
removed,
the
antennas
and
all
related
equipment
shall
be
removed
from
the
site.
We
would
like
to
end.
It
goes
on
there's
another
sentence
there,
but
we
would
like
to
if
you
guys
would
be
interested
add
to
that
that
the
city
or
the
planning
department
will
help
us
to
relocate
in
an
expedient
amount
of
time.
Verizon
Wireless
does
need
this
additional
site
to
fill
a
gap
in
coverage.
J
B
Don't
it's
hard
to
say
you
know
what
amount
of
time
we'll
be
able
to
process
it
in
the
future.
I
think
they
would
be
given
the
same
opportunity
as
any
provider
if
this
application
ceases
to
exist
and
that
we
have
a
pretty
our
code
is
laid
out.
Well,
that
shows
you
know
where
you
could
go
and
where
you
can't
phone,
if
they
could
demonstrate
that
they
have
a
need
for
an
area.
B
B
A
J
G
J
We
are,
we
are
just
asking
for
you
to
be
in
cooperation
with
with
us
on
this,
so
you're
asking
for
us
to
be
willing
to
remove
our
site.
Should
something
happen
to
the
golf
course,
and
we
can't
really
control
what
happens
of
the
golf
course
if,
for
some
reason,
the
golf
course
or
driving
range
part
of
the
golf
course
ceases
to
exist
or
goes
out
of
business.
We
would
like
you
to
work
cooperatively
with
us
if
we
find
another
site,
try
and
move
it
through
the
process
as
quickly
as
possible
by.
G
J
A
I
I
think
the
Commission
has
said
it
very
well
that
the
city
is
already
under
constraints
to
process
applications
in
a
timely
fashion,
and
that's
the
same
for
all
applicants
and
needn't
be
added
here,
but
in
the
discussion
it
made
me
wonder
if
really
the
issue
with
the
the
requirement
here
is,
it
may
be
the
part
that
you
want
to
think
about.
It's
not
just
if
I
think
the
object
of
it
was
to
require
that
the
equipment
be
removed.
I
If,
for
whatever
reason,
this
operator
could
no
longer
have
their
equipment
there,
which
is
the
issue
between
the
private
owner
of
the
property
and
the
applicant,
and
so
maybe
what
you
can
do
is
just
change
this
to
create
it
too.
If
there's
no
objections
from
staff
to
alleviate
the
concern,
I,
don't
think
that
the
operative
facts
should
be
whether
the
driving
range
ceases
to
exist,
but
if
the
the
applicant
is
no
longer
has
the
authorization
from
the
private
property
owner,
whoever
that
may
be,
whether
it
is
this
owner
or
a
success
or
an
interest.
I
I
A
Also,
a
situation
between
the
leasing
lease
or
that
you
know
typically
in
contracts,
they
give
you
notification,
there's
restrictions
and
what
they
need
to
notify
you
where
your
contracts
would
be
up,
and
that
would
be
between
the
two.
The
two
parties
typically
I'm,
not
sure
what
your
country,
it's
prob,
not
even
relevant
to
to
address
the
issue.
Making
our
planning
director
has
some
comments.
I
think.
B
Pamela
hit
it
right,
though
the
only
other
thing
I
would
say
is
one
of
the
requirements
of
our
code
is
that
their
stealth
design
and
the
reason
that
there's
stealth
design
in
this
case
is
that
there's
a
driving
range
and
there's
driving
poles.
I
knows
you're
driving
range
polls
and
these
become
a
part
of
the
driving
range
poll
and
that's
the
reason
you're
able
to
make
the
finding
for
approval.
B
So
if
the
driving
range
goes
away,
I
mean
you
could
think
that
the
driving
range
polls
would
go
away
and
you're
no
longer
going
to
have
stealth
design
and
if
the
driving
range,
if
just
one
driving
range
poll,
is
up
in
the
air
and
nothing
else
is
there,
it
definitely
isn't
stealth
design.
So
that
was
that
would
be
the
reason
that
we're
requiring
that
it
go
away.
Because,
within
your
findings,
you
were
saying:
there's
a
stealth
design
and
there
would
no
longer
would
be
if
the
driving
range
goes
away.
B
So
that's
why
we
have
to
have
them
go
through
the
process
again,
if
they
could
prove
that
during
the
next
development
that
goes
on
there,
that
they
still
need
to
be
there.
Due
to
the
you
know,
get
me
cell
coverage
there.
They
would
have
to
propose
a
new
self
design
as
part
of
that
development
through.
E
B
G
A
This
I
heard
it
was
a
cooperation
concept
more
than
anything
else,
and
so
I
think
that
in
the
situation,
that
is
what
we
do
as
a
city,
there
are
certainly
guidelines
and
timelines,
and,
and
our
interest
is
to
conduct
good
business
and
support
applicants.
Are
there
any
comments,
additional
comments
or
questions?
You
may
have
you.
J
Know
are
the
comment
that
I
made
regarding
item
number.
10
did
not
have
to
do
with.
We
have
a
lease,
and
so
it
doesn't
have
to
do
with
the
golf
course
making
any
changes
to
to
our
our
lease,
because
we
do
have
a
standard
long-term
lease.
It
was
if,
for
some
reason
they
go
go
out
of
business,
and
you
guys
want
us
to
thank.
A
G
And
Marshall
I
just
may
beat
the
staff
out
off
it's
a
staff
for
or
who
goes
to,
but
that
last
comment,
but
yet
they
have
a
long-term
lease
I
like
to
know
who
is
least
with
the
school
district,
or
is
it
with
the
with
the
golf
course,
because
if
the
golf
course
goes
out
and
they
have
released
their,
we
could
have
been
litigation
problems
by
having
a
poll.
They
referred
the
next
ten
years
with
no
business
operating
there
should
I
be
addressed
or
I
mean
that
our
concern
or.
I
G
C
G
C
A
The
next
item
is
item
F
620,
el
camino
real,
and
it's
a
request
for
use.
Permit
Amendment
and
the
parking
exceptions,
establish
a
specialty
restaurant
and
to
permit
three
additional
hotel
rooms
per
section.
12.9
6.10.
Excuse
me
what
110
point
c,
4
and
12
point
200
point:
120
of
a
Seminole
Municipal
Code
staff
report.
D
Please,
thank
you.
As
stated,
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use,
permit
Amendment
and
parking
exception
to
ace,
establish
a
specialty
restaurant
and
to
add
three
additional
hotel
rooms
at
the
site.
The
hotel
is
located
in
the
600
block
of
El
Camino
Real
every
side
of
the
street.
It's
important
to
go
in
a
little
background
information
here.
The
original
project
was
approved
by
the
Planning
Commission
in
1998,
and
at
that
time
the
approval
was
for
a
36
room,
hotel,
one
manager's
unit
and
36
parking
spaces
over
the
following
years.
D
There
was
a
number
of
revisions
that
were
approved
by
the
architects
review
committee
and
the
Planning
Commission.
The
very
first
one
was
architectural
changes
to
the
northwest
corner
of
the
building.
The
second
revision
was
for
new
exterior
colors,
and
the
third
revision
was
for
a
ramp
at
the
rear
of
the
hotel
in
2008.
D
It
was
discovered
that
the
original
scope
of
work
was
exceeded
by
expanding
the
ground
level
of
the
hotel,
and
specifically
the
breakfast
room
was
expanded,
as
well
as
a
645
square
foot,
commercial
space
was
added
and
three
additional
hotel
rooms
were
also
added
and
the
way
the
three
additional
hotel
rooms
were
at.
It
was
on
site
right
now,
there's
three
suites
and
those
three
suites,
those
three
individuals
which
share
an
internal
common
door
and
when
that
internal
common
door
is
closed
and
locked,
three
additional
rooms
are
created.
D
It
is
important
to
note
that
the
hotel
has
been
operating
with
a
temporary
certificate
of
occupancy,
with
the
ability
to
rent
out
32
hotel
rooms.
Right
now,
the
applicant
has
prepared
a
parking
analysis
which
is
included
as
Exhibit
T
within
your
staff
report,
and
essentially
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
establish
on-site
valet
parking
by
incorporating
on-site
valet
parking.
An
additional
15
parking
spaces
will
be
provided
on
the
below
ground
level.
D
In
a
given
night
staff
all
supports
the
on-site
valet
parking
proposal
and
finds
that
it
will
ensure
that
the
surrounding
residential
neighborhood
would
not
be
negatively
impacted
by
the
added
commercial
space
and
the
additional
three
hotel
rooms
staff
did
send
out
a
courtesy
notice
and
a
required
legal
notice
and
received
two
phone
calls
from
concerned.
Neighbors
both
neighbors
expressed
concern
over
employee
street
parking
and
staff
has
added
a
condition
of
approval
requiring
that
employees
do
not
utilize
street
parking
in
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
D
Overall
staff
does
support
the
project
and
finds
that
the
incorporation
of
on-site
valet
parking
meets
the
project
you
will
meet
the
municipal
code
requirement.
Staff
also
finds
that
by
incorporating
the
specialty
restaurant,
the
hotel
will
create
the
mixed
used
environment,
which
is
supported
by
the
general
plan.
Staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approve
use,
permit
09,
dash
0,
19
and
parking
exception,
Oh
8008,
based
on
findings
of
fact,
1
through
5
and
conditions
of
approval
1
through
13
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
Thank.
D
K
D
G
G
D
G
A
K
My
name
is
james
burke
house,
I'm
the
president
venture
hospitality.
We
were
retained
by
the
Montes
family,
tier
design,
open
hotel,
&
operated,
and
I
can
say
that
what
we
have
today
is
much
superior
to
what
we
would
have
had
three
years
ago
into
the
design.
It
was
going
to
be
attempted
at
that
time.
K
The
property
was
designed
for
the
discriminating
business
traveler
and
the
upscale
leisure
traveler.
We
don't
take
Rupert
or
so
our
clientele
is
upscale
I.
Think
it's
a
very
unique
property.
We
went
to
great
lengths
to
give
it
a
soul
with
lighting
and
fabrics
and
things
that
you
don't
normally
see
in
it
in
a
supermarket
like
this
most
of
our
guests
fly
in.
So
we
really
don't
need
a
lot
of
parking.
It's
rare
that
we
have
our
garage,
half
full.
They
fly
in,
they
take
part
in
to
San
Francisco.
K
K
Our
employees
have
never
parked
on
the
street
and
we
have
we
have
alternatives
for
them.
If
we
need
more
parking
in
that
area,
I
think
it's
a
fine
hotel,
I
think
any
community
would
love
to
have
it
in
their
in
their
market
and
I.
Think
it's
a
great
addition
to
to
san
bruno
and
I'd
like
to
thank
to
staff
for
helping
us
get
through
all
the
issues
which
were
plenty
of
them
and
and
I'm
available
or
any
questions.
Thank
you
are.
E
K
I
K
K
Most
of
the
guests
are
gone
all
day
in
a
downtown
San
Francisco
vitalik.
You
have
a
lot
of
traffic
in
your
lobby
here,
most
of
our
guests
are
gone
all
day
and
appointments
etc.
So
during
the
day
when
our
staff
is
working,
there's
very
few
cars
in
our
in
our
property,
it's
that
night
when
they,
when
they
come
back
from
dinner
that
but
they
have
cars
there
parking
our
line
so.
K
E
K
On
doing
that,
well,
our
vision
of
special
restaurant
would
be
an
upscale
coffee
venue
where
our
guests
can
lounge
and
have
coffee
and
wine
and
beer
have
a
salad
or
a
sandwich
or
a
bowl
of
soup.
No
deep
fryers,
it's
not
it's
not
a
full-blown
kitchen,
most
everything
that
would
be
prepared.
There
would
be
precooked
and
we
would
heat
it
in
a
convection
oven
to
service.
It
was
not
a
restaurant.
The.
E
E
A
A
I'd,
like
just
a
comment
that
I
had
the
opportunity
to
tour
the
property,
Foley
and
I,
do
try
by
there
on
a
regular
basis,
and
today,
anyway,
there
was
one
car
in
that
stall
and
I.
You
had
the
chance
to
tour
every
floor,
including
the
rooms
and
pleased
to
report,
at
least
for
today
that
there
wasn't
a
parking
issue
and
I
hope
that
that
continues
to
be
the
case
and
I.
It
appears
to
be
that
the
way
mr.
bunker
house
of
mr.
A
bug,
sure
I,
say
your
name
correctly
here,
Burke
house
that
how
he
described
it
is
actually
what
I
saw
there
today
and
I
saw
the
the
word.
The
special
special
tea
restaurant
is
going
to
be
placed
and
was
also
opportunity
for
a
large
sort
of
a
conference
area,
the
back
as
well
so
it
is,
it
is
a
it
is
a
lovely
hotel
and
I'm
really
proud
to
think
about
this
as
a
whether
it's
approved
or
not.
G
Maybe
I
question
for
staff
I
Drive
by
it
off
and
two
and
there's
rarely
cars
in
the
property
and
I
drive-bys,
but
the
parking
it's
in
the
back
would
it
be.
It
would
be
okay
to
put
a
condition
in
there
that
that
I'll
have
to
dress
is
a
napkin
to
maybe
that
that
part
can
be
used
last.
You
know
too
right.
Yeah
used
up
underground
parking
before
you
fill
up
the
street
parking
in
the
back,
because
there
is.
That
is
a
tight
alley
in
the
back
and
even
other
legal
parking
spots.
G
B
G
A
E
Reason
I
bring
it
up.
Not
only
is
because
green
important
to
me,
but
also
there's
conditions,
there's
a
considerations
with
people
complaining
about
trash
and
stuff.
So
it's
got
me
thinking
about
taking
a
look
at
what
we're
doing
as
far
as
making
this
new
restaurant
green.
So
maybe
if
we
can
make
that
a
condition
that
as
they
come
forward
with
their
proposal
for
the
restaurant,
we
require
that
green
checklist
to
be
included.
Okay,
we
can
definitely
think.
G
E
B
Was
going
to
do
a
the
current
developments
presentation
tonight,
but
since
we're
missing
three
commissioners
I'll
wait
till
next
month
to
do
it
in
november.
If
you
have
any
questions,
though,
about
any
elements
that
are
going
on
around
town
or
that
you
approve
that
aren't
going
around
right
now,
because
you
could
always
ask
me
or
give
me
a
call.