►
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting Oct. 20, 2009 6D. 2102 Crestmoor Drive
A
B
You
good
evening
the
application
is
for
a
use
permit
and
a
parking
exception
to
allow
a
dentist
office.
It's
at
the
corner
of
crestmoor
in
san
bruno
avenue,
I'm
sure
you're
familiar
with
it.
It's
where
7-eleven
is
located.
You
also
probably
know
that
this
location
has
been
vacant
for
quite
some
time.
Over
two
and
a
half
years,
staff
has
talked
to
quite
a
few
different
proposed
tenants
during
that
time
and
for
a
variety
of
different
reasons.
None
of
those
really
fit
into
that
situation.
B
So
now
we
do
have
an
applicant
that
staff
finds
will
be
a
fitting
use
at
that
location.
I
would
have
liked
to
make
one
correction
to
the
staff
report.
Please.
In
several
places
we
say
that
there
are
11
existing
parking
spaces
when
in
fact
there
are
12
existing
parking
spaces,
so
that
does
not
actually
directly
infect
our
entitlement
for
the
number
of
spaces
that
we're
asking
for
the
parking
exception.
But
we
certainly
would
like
that
to
be
corrected
in
the
record.
B
So
the
current
applicant
has
had
had
a
long-standing
dental
office
at
the
sky,
crest
shopping
center
before
it
was
redeveloped,
and
so
he
moved
out
of
town
and
then
he
has
been
looking
for
another
location
to
move
back
into
san
bruno.
That
has
good
visibility
and
to
serve
many
of
his
patients
that
followed
him
to
that
other
location,
they're
proposing
to
be
open
from
monday
through
friday,
from
8am
to
5pm.
It
is
a
relatively
small
office.
They
would
have
three
employees
and
expect
to
serve
only
about
six
patients
per
day.
B
So
this
is
a
relatively
small
number
of
places
and
certainly
came
into
the
analysis
when
we're
considering
whether
the
parking
exception
would
work
at
that
location.
So
it's
not
a
very
intensive
use
for
that
location,
but
it
does
have
quite
visibility
for
them.
Staff
does
not
anticipate
really
any
conflicts
with
the
7-eleven.
They
they
typically
have
a
quick
turnover
and
their
peak
times
are
a
little
bit
different
than
the
dental
office.
So
that's
also
supports
the
project.
The
surrounding
area
includes,
as
you
know,
the
gas
station
highway
280
residential
uses.
B
Even
though
this
is
a
neighborhood
commercial,
we
do
find
that
the
dentist
office
would
be
appropriate
and
complimentary
to
those
uses
again
in
regards
to
the
parking
exception.
The
previous
video
store
required
nine
spaces.
The
dental
office
requires
11,
so
the
parking
exception.
The
entitlement
tonight
is
for
two
spaces.
B
The
difference
between
the
existing
and
proposed
so
staff
does
support
that
parking
exception
because
of
the
relatively
low
intensity
of
the
dental
office,
only
three
employees
and
about
six
patients
per
day,
the
quick
turnover
of
the
7-eleven
customers
and
the
different
peak
demand
between
those
two
uses.
It
really
is
a
good
shared
parking
arrangement
which
we
seek
to
do
to
really
maximize
our
parking
and
those
resources
that
are
available
to
us
and
also,
as
you
know,
that
that
site
is
very
constrained.
B
It's
very
steeply
sloped,
and
so
there
are
very
limited
opportunities
to
really
change
the
configuration
of
the
parking
lot
and
no
opportunity
at
all
to
add
additional
parking
there.
We
notice
the
neighbors
consistent
with
our
noticing
requirements.
We
have
not
received
any
comments
from
neighbors
on
the
project
and
so
staff
would
recommend
approval
of
the
project
based
on
findings
1
through
5
and
subject
to
conditions
1
through
20
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
C
You
through
the
chair,
actually
general
question:
you
know
Laurie,
you
mentioned
the
parking
and
how
many
spots
there
are
12
that
I'm
not
on
that
graph
or
on
the
whatever.
We
want
to
call
it
there.
The
grid
via
whatever
has
you
know
the
previous
use
of
16.6
is
what
was
required.
Ok
and
down
on
the
new
proposed.
One
who
has
18.7
would
be
the
required
space
and
I
understand
we're
going
for
the
parking
exception,
but
a
teen
or
tween
on
12-18
is
six
not
to
at
least
last
time.
C
B
Let
me
take
you
through
it.
This
table
includes
the
parking
requirement
as
of
today's
Municipal
Code
and
as
you're
aware,
the
perking
there
is
grandfathered
in
so
it
is
somewhat
deficient
already
and
so
under
today's
code,
the
total
number
of
spaces
that
would
be
required
in
the
actual
math
is
sixteen
point,
six
parking
spaces,
and
then
our
code
requires
that
we
round
that
up
to
17
and
then
in
the
proposed
condition.
Again.
According
to
the
municipal
code
requirements,
it's
18.7
spaces
and
then
we
round
up
to
19,
and
so
the
difference
there
is
19-7.
B
C
D
Correct,
I
would
say
a
majority
of
majority
of
developments
that
were
built
in
the
40s
50s
and
60s.
There
was
a
lower
parking
requirement
at
that
time,
so
that
most
of
them
do
have
deficient
parking.
So
that's
why
we
have
this
process
now
to
kind
of
take
a
look
at
these
older
properties
that
have
deficient
parking
and
say:
will
this
modern
business
work
within
with
work
within
the
existing
site
plan
right.
C
I
understand
and
that's
and
that's
great,
so
the
only
thing
that
just
as
I'm
reading
this
you
know
it
just
doesn't
look
as
clear
as
how
it's
being
explained.
If
you
will,
you
know,
because
I'm
looking
at
19
and
there's
12
and
it's
you
know,
seven
and
overall
I
mean
in
general
just
no
matter
what
business
was
in
there.
It
had
insufficient
parking
for
today's
current
parking
requirements.
Correct.
D
A
Alright,
you
can
imagine
a
chase,
they
do
have
a
question
because
it
is
a
tricky
place
to
get
in
and
out
you
don't
have
owned.
You
only
have
one
one
entrance
and
exit
and
I
know
that
you
can't
make
a
request
or
requirement
to
park
on
the
street
and
it
is
a
stiff
DPL
and
if
we
are
going
to
you
know
if
it
is
going
to
be
recommended
to
use
to
use
up
that
space,
it's
going
to
be
tricky
to
get
people
in
and
out
and
so
I
guess.
A
This
is
the
question
for
the
applicant
as
well,
but
parking
heading
down
the
hill
I,
don't
recall:
I
was
up
there,
but
don't
recall
there
was
curb
parking
and
it's
not
utilized
I
mean
it's
been
it's
bacon,
almost
all
the
time
it
passed
by
their
daily.
So
is
that
something
that
could
be
painted
out
that
it
would
be
for
commercial
use?
Is
there
any
the
consideration
of
being
creative
around
that
in.
D
Terms
of
the
street
parking
yeah:
typically,
we
don't
restrict
anything
for
commercial
use
and
if
it
does,
it
goes
through
the
traffic
and
safety
and
parking
committee
tsp
sea,
and
then
they
make
recommendations
to
the
City
Council.
But
usually
it's
just
open
for
public
parking,
and
since
it
seems
that
no
one
from
the
residential
areas
parking
there,
if
the
parking
lot
was
full,
you
know
could
be
used
by
a
customer,
but
they
needed
to.
Although.
A
It's
tricky
to
make
that
turn.
You
know
your
walk.
Will
your
driving
up
that
hill?
You
have
to
make
a
u-turn
at
one
point
and
it
does
create
a
danger
point.
Maybe
it's
premature
to
be
having
this
conversation
in
advance
of
Commission
discussion
at
the
end
of
this,
this
we've
got
hold
those
questions
until
the
end.
Okay,
thank
you.
The.
C
C
So
and
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
because
I
mean
I
would
think
that
you
know
the
parking
deal
with
parking
in
front
of
7-11.
As
you
mention
it's
a
quick
turnover
you
know,
are
they
going
to
have?
Is
there
going
to
be
assigned,
you
know
dedicating
the
first,
whatever
three
stalls
or
whatever
7-eleven
only
and
you
know
for
the
existing
business?
That's
that's
in
there
has
that.
Has
there
been
any
consideration
along
those
lines
or
did
I
just
miss
it
in
the
staff
report?
We.
D
And
through
the
chair,
we
typically
leave
that
up
to
the
building
/
owner
to
designate
spaces
if
they
want
to
designate
a
sis.
But
if
the
Planning
Commission
wanted
to
put
some
type
of
restriction
on
the
site
to
say
you
know,
spots,
9,
10
and
11
are
required
for
the
dental
to
be
painted.
That
way,
you
could
also
put
some
type
of
condition.
You.
C
Know
it's
not
that
I
want
to
put
a
you
know
a
restriction
on
it
and
that's
why
I
was
asking
if
the
properties,
the
subject
properties
are
owned.
By
the
same
you
know,
by
the
same
owner.
That
way
can
figure.
I
mean,
though,
hopefully
be
able
to
figure
that
out,
but
if
there
were
two
different
owners
of
the
buildings
you
know,
then
it
might.
You
know,
be
in
our
best
interest
at
that
point
in
time
to
look
at
doing
something
as
you
just
spoke
about
air,
but
thank
you.
A
E
Good
evening
my
name
is
Alan
William
architect,
staff
did
an
excellent
job
in
presenting
the
project.
The
only
thing
that
I'd
like
to
add
is
that
there
are
no
proposed
external
structural
changes
to
the
building,
so
the
building
square
footage
remains
the
same
and
I
think
mr.
chase
was
suggesting
that
there
was
multiple
buildings
on
the
site,
there's
actually
one
building
with
a
partition
that
pretty
much
splits
the
building
in
half
and
so
and
again
that
your
question
was
answered
it.
It's
all
under
one
ownership.
Mr.
E
F
E
F
F
E
F
F
Just
don't
like
when
people
Amy
when
the
business
comes
in
says
we're
only
going
to
do
so
much
business
because
we
all
want
to
do
more.
Business
I
wanted
more
business
too.
So
the
base
our
findings
in
facts
on
seeing
three
to
six
patients
a
day
I
think
should
be
stricken
from
the
the
staff
report.
Unless
we
can
review
it
if
they
see
Morton's
yeah
that
many
patients
a
day.
A
D
To
be
something
something
that
you
base
your
findings
on,
it
actually
wasn't
included
in
the
finalists
for
approval
and
that's
the
reason
we
didn't
include
in
the
findings
her
approval.
It
was
just
more
of
a
matter
of
fact
it
related
to
the
current
business
operation,
but
you're
right
I
mean
if
they
expand,
I
mean
I
don't
have
to.
F
D
F
C
You
through
the
searching
I
mean
it
doesn't
say
it
starts
off
with
on
average,
I
mean
so
right.
There
you're
pretty
much
given
a
disclaimer
stew,
that's
the
average.
The
average
is
the
average.
It
could
be
eight,
it
could
be
four.
Then
you
have
an
average
of
what
six.
So
you
know,
I
think
we're
kind
of
covered
there.
What's
up?
Okay,
you
like
the
math
I'm
done
and
thank
you
thank.
A
A
C
Through
chair,
I
will
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
use,
permit
0920
26
and
the
parking
exception,
0900
five
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
five
conditions
of
approval
1
through
20,
with
the
minutes
to
reflect
the
conversation
we
had
about
the
average
people
that
are
being
in
attendance
at
the
dental
office
per
day.
Correct.