►
From YouTube: San Bruno City Council Meeting October 26, 2010 8. Public Hearing on Crystal Springs Apartments
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting October 26, 2010 8. Public Hearing on Crystal Springs Apartments
A
Out
of
eight
as
a
public
hearing,
notices
have
been
published,
posted
and
mailed
hold
the
public
hearing
with
the
first
reading
and
introduced
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
San
Bruno
amending
and
restating
the
development
plan
for
Crystal
Springs
terrace
apartments
and
adopt
a
resolution
approving
a
planned
development
permit
and
architectural
review
permit
stat.
Please
we'll
hear
staff.
Please
I'll
open
it
up
to
the
public
in
a
few
minutes.
B
The
application
before
you
is
for
changes
to
the
Crystal
Springs
terrace
apartments
complex,
which
is
located
at
2,000,
Crystal,
Springs,
Road,
I'm,
sure
you're,
probably
aware
familiar
with
the
project,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
couple
of
highlights
and
orient
you
a
little
bit
to
the
project
site.
The
complex
currently
has
433
units
628
parking
spaces,
a
recreation
building,
a
couple
of
swimming
pools,
significant
site
landscaping,
and
all
of
this
is
in
a
little
over
12
acre
site
I'm.
B
It
was
constructed
in
1972
with
changes
approved
by
the
City
Council
and
Planning
Commission
in
1974
and
1989.
So
now
to
orient
you
a
little
bit
with
this
slide.
The
first
red
circle
here
is
the
existing
recreation
building
that
will
be
talking
a
little
bit
about
moving
down
the
slide
towards
the
south
is
the
existing
main
entrance
that
you're,
probably
familiar
with
and
there's
a
small
exist,
existing
leasing
building
that
is
located
there
I'm
sorry,
a
leasing
office,
that's
in
a
formal
residential
unit.
B
So
the
project
right
now
has
three
major
components
that
I'd
like
to
go
over
with
you.
The
first
is
a
new
recreation
and
leasing,
building
its
proposed
in
the
corner
of
the
existing
surface
parking
lot
that
we
were
just
looking
at
down
at
the
south
end
of
the
complex.
The
first
floor
is
proposed
to
be
a
little
over
3,000
square
feet
with
the
second
floor.
B
At
about
2300,
for
a
total
of
five
thousand
four
hundred
and
seventy
square
feet,
they
proposed
to
locate
all
of
their
leasing,
functions
and
recreation
functions
in
one
combined
building,
and
so
that's
a
major
element
of
the
project.
That's
a
good
advantage
to
the
property
owners.
So
it
would
include
a
fitness
area,
game,
room
and
resident
lounge
along
with
the
leasing
function.
The
architectural
style
of
the
building
is
really
inspired
by
buildings
that
we
would
often
find
in
natural
areas
or
in
the
mountains,
and
this
really
complements
the
location
at
the
southern
city.
B
B
During
the
review
process,
the
architectural
review
committee
had
several
comments
which
have
been
implemented
into
the
style
of
the
building,
notably
they've
added
additional
architectural
details
on
the
ground
floor.
They've
integrated
the
monument
sign
into
the
design
of
the
building,
and
also
would
decided
to
paint
the
this
building
to
match
the
rest
of
the
buildings
that
are
in
the
complex
to
tie
it
in
and
to
have
that
unity
be
stronger.
That
was
a
recommendation
of
the
Architectural
Review
Committee
near
this
new
building.
B
The
second
major
element
of
the
project
is
the
conversion
of
the
existing
recreation
building
into
four
new
apartments,
so
the
applicant
would
replace
the
exterior
materials
and
paint
it
to
match
the
rest
of
the
buildings
in
the
complex
and
I
did
want
to
point
out
and
discuss
a
little
bit
since
the
applicant
is
proposing
an
increase
in
the
density.
It
is
appropriate
to
review
in
this
case
whether
ordinance
1284
applies
to
this
project.
So,
as
the
city
council
is
aware,
ordinance
1284
limits
an
increase
in
density
in
certain
circumstances.
B
So
specifically,
it
states
that
density
cannot
be
increased
in
residential
districts.
So
as
part
of
their
submittal
materials.
The
applicant
has
supplied
a
legal
interpretation
of
ordinance
1284,
which
is
included
as
an
attachment
to
your
staff
report,
and
that
says
that
Crystal
Springs
is
in
a
planned
development
district
and
not
a
residential
district,
and
that
those
two
things
are
distinct
and
therefore
ordinance.
1284
does
not
apply.
Staff
has
reviewed
their
interpretation
and
finds
their
interpretation
to
be
reasonable,
really
on
two
different
levels.
B
First,
on
a
technical
or
kind
of
legal
level,
because
a
planned
development
district
is
different,
then
an
r1
or
an
r2
zoning
district.
It
was
at
the
time
the
1284
was
passed
and
it
is
today
as
well.
So
that's
continued
on
and
then
second
really
in
a
practical
sense,
when
ordinance
1284
was
passed,
it
was
really
in
a
reaction
to
sort
of
a
fear
that
single-family
neighborhoods
would
change
and
become
higher
density.
It
wasn't
really
in
reaction
to
existing
apartment
complexes,
which
this
one
was
having
a
minor
increase
of
density.
B
The
final
determination,
however,
on
this
issue
does
rest
with
the
City
Council,
and
so
as
the
ordinance
and
resolutions
that
are
before
you
tonight
were
prepared,
that
increase
in
density
is
included.
So
your
approval
of
the
project
tonight
would
indicate
your
concurrence
with
that
interpretation
that
ordinance
1284
does
not
apply
to
this
project.
B
So
if
I
can
move
on
to
the
third
major
element
of
the
project-
and
that
is
a
new
parking
lot,
that
would
serve
the
new
residential
units,
its
proposed
in
an
area
of
existing
landscaping
and
would
result
in
a
small,
approximately
one
percent
reduction
in
landscaping
on
the
site.
Overall,
it
would
result
in
12
net
new
parking
spaces,
and
so
it's
11
parking
spaces
for
four
new
units,
so
it
actually
slightly
exceeds
today's
standard
for
multifamily
units,
and
so
it
would
be
a
very
ight
improvement
to
parking
in
the
site.
B
Overall,
they
are
proposing
to
construct
the
new
parking
lot
of
pervious
paving.
So
this
is
a
positive
aspect
of
the
project
in
terms
of
environmental
or
green
building.
Goals
that
we
have
the
small
existing
leasing
office
would
be
converted
back
into
a
residential
unit
for
which
it's
always
been
approved,
but
essentially
the
rest
of
the
buildings
on
the
site
would
would
remain
unchanged.
The
City
Council
may
recall
that
the
owners
removed
some
trees
along
Crystal
Springs.
That
was
with
the
Heritage
tree
permit.
It
was
some
time
ago
so.
B
Staff
did
just
want
to
point
out
that
the
trees
on
the
slope
have
been
replanted
and
there
are
a
few
that
remain
to
be
planted,
but
those
are
addressed
in
the
conditions
of
approval
here.
They
will
not
be
double
counted
and
it
will
be
fully
planted
and
those
arrangements
have
been
made,
and
so
in
regards
to
neighborhood
outreach
staff
notified
neighbors
prior
to
the
Architectural
Review
Committee
meeting
planning,
commission
public
hearing
and
the
City
Council
public
hearing.
B
We
did
receive
comments
from
one
resident
of
London
Court,
who
expressed
a
concern
about
the
parking,
but
upon
additional
discussion
at
the
planning
commission
meeting
and
with
staff.
She
did
seem
satisfied
with
the
parking
that
would
be
provided
for
this
project
and
we
have
not
heard
any
additional
concerns
from
her
since
that
time.
When
the
Planning
Commission
reviewed
the
project
in
August,
they
passed
two
resolutions
recommending
that
the
City
Council
approved
the
project.
They
did
not
have
any
additional
changes
or
recommend
any
additional
conditions
of
approval.
So
tonight
there
are
two
items
for
your
consideration.
B
The
first
is
the
ordinance
which
would
amend
the
development
plan,
and
so,
in
summary,
that
would
increase
the
number
of
units
by
four
added.
A
new
recreation
and
leasing
building
decrease
the
landscaping
slightly
and
increase
the
number
of
parking
spaces.
The
second
item
is
a
resolution
which
would
approve
the
plan
development
permit
and
the
architectural
review
permit,
and
so
these
are
the
the
kind
of
the
implementing
tools
to
implement
the
actual
development
plan,
and
this
also
includes
the
conditions
of
approval
that
would
be
placed
on
the
project
so
moving
forward
in
terms
of
next
steps.
B
If
the
City
Council
approves
his
first
reading,
then
the
ordinance
would
return
to
City
Council
on
November
9th
and
then,
of
course,
become
effective.
30
days
later.
In
closing,
staff
would
like
to
highlight
the
fact
that
we
have
worked
very
closely
with
this
applicant
over
a
fairly
Laurant
long
stretch
of
time,
and
they
really
have
worked
with
us
well
and
made
changes
to
the
project
to
make
those
improvements
and,
as
well
as
the
recommendations
made
by
the
Architectural
Review
Committee.
So
staffer
mecha
mends,
that
the
City
Council
introduced
the
ordinance
and
adopt
the
resolution.
C
Questions
was
that
through
the
chair,
I
just
wanted
to
touch
bases
on
ordinance,
12
84,
to
make
sure
that
I
have
a
clear
understanding.
So
if
it
was
in
a
residential
zone
district,
which
is
this
not,
for
example,
an
apartment
building
came
down
and
they
built
it
back
up,
but
they
increased
the
they
increased.
The
units
would
crease
the
density,
which
then
would
activate
ordinance
12
84.
It
would
not
be
allowed
correct.
C
A
E
Correct,
that's
the
way
plan
development
districts,
work
I've
been
dealing
with
them
for
over
30
years.
There
are
an
anomaly:
almost
it's
it's
it's
own,
separate
zoning
district.
You
can
put
anything
you
want
in
a
planned
unit
plan
development
district.
As
long
as
it's
consistent
with
the
general
plan,
one
of
the
interesting
things
about
ordinance,
12
it
is
1284.
Is
that
an
amended?
The
a
diminutive
has
the
requirement
for
residential
districts,
but
it
never
touches
the
general
plan.
It
doesn't
amend
the
general
plan.
E
E
The
opinion
that
the
applicants
attorney
gave
in
my
interpretation
is
a
correct
when
it
also
point
out
that
the
McDonough
Holland
attorneys
from
that
firm
also
gave
it.
They
were
apparently
have
been
involved
in
this
project
before
by
prior
city
attorney,
and
they
given
a
similar
opinion
themselves
and
I
agree
with
it.
It
1284
is,
does
not
have
to
be
amended
for
this
for
this
project.
Thank
you.
Any.
F
Straight
Vera
AB
I
like
to
look
at
the
new
rep
building
a
lot
of
glass,
things
and
I
think
it's
an
appropriate
place,
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
this
conversion.
No
and
I'm,
going
to
I'm
going
to
harp
on
the
Planning
Commission,
because
they're
always
requesting
all
four
elevations
and
I'm
having
a
hard
time
understanding
what
this
building
is
really
going
to
look
like
it's
my
understanding
and
I
haven't
and
I
apologize
for
not
seeing
it
my
understanding
that
it
is
sort
of
set
into
the
hill
or
it's
got
some
retaining
walls
around
it.
It.
F
A
F
F
B
The
what's
today,
the
main
entrance
would
sort
of
be
de-emphasized
with
the
project,
and
so
the
location
in
front
of
the
new
recreation
and
leasing
building
would
kind
of
become
the
new
main
entrance
and
the
circulation
would
change
a
little
bit
there,
but
nothing
that
would
have
an
impact
on
the
city
street.
It's.
B
G
That
picture
it
kind
of
following
up
on
council
and
embarrass
question.
It
kind
of
looks
to
me,
like
the
area
that
the
pie-shaped
area
that
you
said
would
be
the
new
parking
lot,
isn't
quite
accessible,
it's
surrounded
by
buildings.
It
appears
in
that
picture.
How
would
cars
have
access
to
that
area?
There's.
G
G
B
G
My
other
question
was
regarding
the
the
picture
that
was
on
the
on
the
front
of
the
of
the
package.
It
shows
the
new
building
Valon.
Thank
you.
This
new
building
is
somewhat
farther
out
in
into
little
closer
to
Crystal
Springs
and
the
older
buildings
and
I
believe
that
sign
that's.
There
is
also
new
and
I'm
wondering
how
that
affects
visibility
up
and
down
Crystal
Springs,
as
you
pull
out
in
that
driveway.
G
B
Issue
has
been
reviewed
very
closely
by
engineering
staff,
as
well
as
planning
staff,
the
way
that
the
driveway
is
getting
reconfigured.
We
actually
find
that
it
will
be
an
improvement
to
site
visibility
as
you
exit
the
complex
now
you
have
to
you're
coming
out
at
an
angle
and
look
far
over
your
right
shoulder
if
you're
leaving
now
the
driveway
will
be
realigned,
so
it
won't
be
as
far
of
an
angle,
looking
over
your
right
shoulder
and
actually
that's
an
important
point
in
clarification.
B
There's
also
going
to
be
some
tree
removal
to
improve
site
visibility
at
that
corner
and
replanting.
So
all
of
the
plants
will
be
of
a
lower
height
and
a
driver
will
be
able
to
see
over
them,
which
is
not
the
case
currently.
So
we
believe
that
it
will
be
an
overall
improvement
to
site
usability.
Okay,.
G
And
since
you
mentioned
true
removal,
it
also
looks
like
the
new
parking
lot
is
going
to
go
where
there
are
some
trees
currently,
and
you
mentioned
replacing
trees
that
were
removed.
Previously,
you
just
mentioned
some
more
a
tree
removals
and
we're
placing
the
short
one.
Can
you
kind
of
just
educate
me
on
what
the
city's
policy
is
on
when
we
replace
trees?
Do
they
have
to
be
a
similar
size
type?
What
is
that
policy
yeah.
B
There's
two
different
situations
here:
the
first
is
the
trees,
what
were
removed
with
the
Heritage
tree
permit
and
in
general,
that's
a
two-for-one
replacement,
but
there
are
some
specific
technicalities
that
have
to
do
with
the
size
and
that's
implemented
by
the
parks
division
staff.
When
there's
a
development
project
such
as
this
generally,
what
we
do
when
planning
is
to
have
a
reasonable
replacement.
That
is
either
the
same
if
it's
not
a
heritage
tree
or
using
that
double
count,
if
it
is
a
heritage
tree.
B
So
when
this,
in
this
case
no
trees
are
going
to
be
double
counted,
so
to
speak,
so
they
have
to
fully
plant
to
meet
their
heritage
tree
requirement
and
then
they're
going
to
be
replacing
trees
that
they're
removing
as
part
of
the
development
proposal.
So
overall
there's
going
to
be
an
increase
of
trees
on
the
site.
Okay,.
H
I
H
We're
incorporating
those
in
our
new
developments,
I
was
just
having
concern
or
is
there
concern
about
pedestrian
safety?
There's
I
was
looking
at
the
color
rendition
and
the
girl
is
walking
on
the
street.
There
is
their
markings.
Is
there?
Is
there
any
concerns
about
people
walking
in
that
area,
with
the
traffic
going
in
and
out
now
or
going
in
and
out
differently,
or
has
that
been
looked
at
or
should
we
look
at
it,
I
mean?
Is
there
like
sidewalk
markings
or
there.
B
A
J
Good
evening,
honorable
mayor
and
the
student
council
members,
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
express
our
mark
thanks
to
planning
staff,
is
Laura
and
mentioned.
This
has
been
a
probably
a
two
and
a
half
year
process
for
us,
and
we
we've
had
a
lot
of
communication
with
planning
staff
and
particularly
through
Laura,
so
I
did
want
to
mention
to
the
to
the
council
that
I
think
that
the
planning
staff
did
a
great
job
in
in
processing
this
project.
J
I'd
also
like
to
introduce
our
team
of
people
that
are
available
for
to
answer
questions.
Mr.
Tom
virtues
counsel
for
the
owner
is
available
for
questions
with
regards
to
his
interpretation
of
1284
and
then
Ken
Dressel
in
Jim
Porter,
who
are
representing
the
owner,
gerson
Baker
tonight,
and
then
Omar
Hernandez
from
my
office
from
the
architectural
office
is
here.
He
developed
the
drawings
for
the
project.
My
name
is
Andy
Raimondo
I'm,
the
architect
for
the
project.
J
In
response
to
some
of
the
questions
that
just
came
up
and
I
all
address
mr.
Barras
questions,
first
about
the
the
window,
openings
and
the
conversion
of
the
existing
building,
it
does
sit
on
a
slope
currently
the
side
of
the
building
that
faces
the
drive.
Aisle
is
sort
of
a
single
story,
element
of
the
building
and
then
the
great
slopes
off
pretty
steeply.
J
As
you
move
along
the
sides,
the
way
that
the
units
are
configured,
the
new
units
that
are
going
to
be
inside
of
this
building
are
such
that
the
private
or
bathroom
windows
are
on
the
back
side
of
the
building
facing
the
drive
aisle.
So
we'll
have
the
fewest
amount
of
window
openings
on
that
wall.
It
will
face
the
drive
area.
So
that's
an
area
where
we
don't
want
a
lot
of
openings
in
the
building
and
then,
as
you
go
to
the
downhill
side
of
the
building.
J
This
is
where
the
common
space
of
the
living
room
areas
are
for
the
units,
and
so
those
will
have
the
largest
windows.
Those
will
have
views
down
the
hill
and
then
the
sides
of
the
buildings
also
have
windows
into
the
bedrooms
and
they're
more
open
on
either
side.
So
the
restricted
side
is
the
uphill
side
that
faces
the
drive
aisle
and
those
are
basically
that's
a
essentially
a
plumbing
wall
with
where
the
bathroom
and
plumbing
stacks
go.
J
With
regards
to
the
question
about
pedestrian
safety
in
front
of
the
building,
the
the
rendering
is
maybe
a
little
bit
confusing.
Do
we
have
in
that
pack
at
an
image
of
the
the
plan
view
laura?
Is
there
anything
in
there
it?
Basically,
what
we
created
in
front
of
that
building
is
a
pretty
large,
concrete
landing
and
a
concrete
pad
area
in
a
walkway
that
connects
from
the
from
the
building
and
the
pedestrian
entrance
building.
J
So,
where
you
sort
of
see
the
trellis
area
in
front
of
the
building
is
connected
with
a
plaza
area
and
then
a
walkway
that
goes
back
to
the
new
parking,
so
they
so
they
are
connected
and
and
they're,
distinct
and
separate
from
the
dr
IL
area.
Ok,
ok
and
then
just
a
couple
of
general
comments
that
I
wanted
to
make
I
think
for
us.
J
We
found
that,
just
in
doing
a
quick
study
that
we
would
have
to
do
so
much
renovation
on
that
building
in
order
to
house
the
sort
of
multiple
functions
that
we
wanted
to
put
into
it,
that
we
would
essentially
be
obliterating
the
building
we'd
be
knocking
it
to
the
ground
and
rebuilding
it.
The
upper
end
of
the
site,
where
you
see
this
new
building
sitting,
is
a
very
logical
place
to
put
the
new
function.
It's
adjacent
to
a
to
one
of
the
two
major
driveway
entrances.
J
And
so
this
was
sort
of
our
effort.
The
final
rendition
of
this
to
downsize
the
verticality
of
the
building
create
some
interesting
architectural
features.
We
are
using
a
paint
scheme
and
materials
on
this
building
that
will
tie
to
and
be
consistent
with
the
residential
buildings.
All
the
while
the
form
is
different,
but
we
feel
that
the
form
should
be
different.
It's
a
different
function
and
it's
a
focal
point
on
the
property.
So
it
was
a
very
intentional
sort
of
a
departure
in
terms
of
the
monument
sign
we
did
as
well
as
Laura
mentioned.
J
We
did
go
through
quite
a
bit
of
on-site
sort
of
renovation
of
that
sign,
and
the
length
of
that
sign.
I
think
that
in
this
rendering
that
you
see
the
final
resolution
and
was
that
we
cut
the
length
of
the
sign
back
about
five
feet
and
we
did
look
at
the
view
angles
coming
in
and
out
of
the
driveway
to
make
sure
that
we
weren't
obstructing
views,
because
this
was
sort
of
one
of
the
things
that
was
of
primary
importance
when
we
were
looking
at
it
related
to
traffic.
J
There
were
some
other
issues
about
traffic
flow
coming
in
and
out
of
the
driveway.
So
we
we
looked
at
this
quite
extensively
as
far
as
view
in
and
out
of
this
driveway.
The
other
thing
that
I
can
tell
you
is
that
that
driveway
throat
opening
was
much
smaller
previously
and
now
I
think
we're
up
around
35
feet
of
driveway
with
the
opening.
So
we
have.
We
think
that
we
have
very
good
visibility
and
certainly
much
better
than
what
we
had
previously
before
we
imparted
the
building
on
to
this
location.
J
So
we
just
believe.
Overall,
this
is
a
very
nice
enhancement
to
the
property.
It'll
it'll
keep
it
sort
of.
You
know
consistent
with
other
product,
that's
in
the
marketplace.
It
has
very
nice
amenities
and
it's
going
to
provide
I,
think
a
nice
feature
for
the
property
and
and
make
the
give
the
longevity
of
the
project.
You
know
just
make
it
a
project
that
will
last
longer
and
be
more
consistent
and
I'm
here.
To
answer
any
other
questions
that
you
have
to
the
questions
of
the
oppidum.
K
Alan
lucky
fleetwood,
dr.
I
don't
think
that
the
first
reading
of
any
city
ordinance
should
be
waived,
and
I
request
that
the
proposed
city
ordinance
be
read.
This
reading
will
provide
television
viewers,
particularly
those
who
don't
get
to
the
library
and
don't
get
the
city
hall
the
chance
for
full
access
to
the
information.
L
Goody
Jean,
my
name
is
Maxine
Driscoll
and
I
live
on
piedmont
avenue.
I
understand
that
when
the
crystal
springs,
apartments
were
first
built
the
number
of
parking
places
we
was
deemed
adequate
and
met
the
code.
In
effect.
At
that
time
now
tonight
I
thought
I
heard
you
say
that
there
were
67
parking
places
for
132
units.
I
hope
I
heard
that
incorrectly
anyway.
It's
quite
obvious
that
the
current
renters
have
more
cars
and
there
are
available
parking
places.
L
The
cars
must
belong
to
the
renters
and
not
to
visitors,
to
the
apartments
periodically
the
sitter
worker
city
workers
post
signs
on
the
overpass
stating
no
parking
and
a
date.
In
fact
they
did
that
a
few
days
ago.
They
do
this
in
order
to
clean
the
large
amount
of
trash
and
debris
left
by
the
people
who
park
there.
They
clean
and
right
now
it's
it's
fairly
clean
for
that
area,
but
then
the
trash
begins
to
accumulate
again.
L
As
I
drive
up
crystal
springs,
road
I
frequently
notice
the
gardener's
taking
excellent
care
of
lance
apartment
landscaping,
it's
really
nice.
It's
it's
a
pleasant
to
drive
by
that
complex
then
I
see
the
messy
trash
on
the
overpass.
It
is
sometimes
really
a
good
stuff
gets
disgusting
sight.
There
is
also
the
danger
that
this
trash
might
blow
over
the
railing
and
onto
the
freeway
below
causing
an
accident.
L
Perhaps
the
apartment
management
could
do
one
of
the
following
one:
ask
their
tenants
not
to
use
the
street
or
the
overpass
as
their
personal
trash
cans
or
two
they
might
instruct
their
groundskeepers
to
remove
the
trash
left
by
their
tenants
on
this
overpass
I'm,
bringing
this
to
your
attention,
because
I
think
we
all
want
a
clean
and
safe
city
and
streets.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
G
A
E
E
E
It's
in
the
agenda
packet,
if
someone
wanted
to
read
the
entire
thing,
probably
the
reason
the
law
allows.
The
waving
of
the
reading
of
the
ordinance
is
that
you
know
it's
followed
a
public
hearing,
it's
followed
a
staff
report
and
the
reading
of
the
ordinance
would
probably
be
redundant
it's
available
online
as
well
all
right.
Thank
you.
B
So
right
now
there
are
628
parking
spaces
on
site
and
the
current
parking
ratio
is
1.45
parking
spaces
per
unit
when
it
was
originally
approved.
There
was
a
difference
between
the
number
of
parking
spaces
per
bedrooms
and
things
like
that,
a
little
bit
different
than
what
our
code
allows
today.
So,
under
the
proposed
conditions,
there
would
be
four
hundred
and
thirty
seven
units
639
parking
spaces
for
a
parking
ratio
of
1.46
parking
spaces.
So
that's
a
slight
increase,
very
slight
increase
from
pre-project
conditions.
Okay,.
B
A
D
Honorable
mayor
councilmembers
good
evening,
this
new
section
of
the
special
attention
was
added
to
our
program
I
think
two
years
ago,
based
on
your
direction,
wasn't
a
special
program
developed
or
Public.
Works
did
not
clean
this
section
of
the
overpass
before
right
now,
I
didn't
how
was
told
by
one
of
the
resident
that
just
was
cleaned
by
public
services.
A
few
days
ago,
yes,
I
heard
comment
that
whenever
they
are
going
back,
is
very
messy,
but
wasn't
brought
to
my
attention
that
this
would
create
and
his
special
culture
all.
I
Was
just
going
to
add
that
that
additional
special
attention
with
the
periodic
special
cleaning
where
cars
are
not
allowed
to
park
for
a
period
of
time
in
order
that
the
street
sweeper
and
the
public
works
crews
can
get
in
was
necessitated
by
some
amount
of
concern
that
has
occurred
over
a
number
of
years.
This
procedure
is
similar
to
what
we
do
down
along
shelter,
creek
lane
and
has
been
a
very
effective
means
of
maintaining
at
least
a
reasonable
level
of
attention
to
those
areas.
A
H
A
A
G
Yeah,
thank
you
a
couple
of
a
couple
of
things.
Mr.
lucky,
regarding
your
your
question
about
the
reading
of
the
ordinance
I
know
when,
when
I
was
sitting
down
there,
I
was
also
wondering
why
we
never
got
to
hear
the
ordinances
read
and
actually,
after
reading
a
few
of
them
right.
Not
having
that
happen,
I
would
ask
the
city
manager
or
the
city
clerk.
If
somebody
is
interested
in
reading
an
ordinance
prior
to
one
of
our
meetings,
is
that
made
available
to
the
public
and.
I
Absolutely
the
packet
is
posted
online.
Mr.
Lemke
has
correctly
identified
that
not
everybody
has
access
to
computerized
information.
However,
in
addition
to
making
available
in
that
manner,
the
packet
is
available
at
the
San
Bruno
public
library.
It
is
available
through
the
City
Clerk's
office
at
City
Hall,
and
we
make
available
any
agenda
items
in
written
form
to
individuals
who
request
that
information
I
believe
that
clerk
is
well
prepared
to
provide
that
by
mail
or
in
the
manner
that
the
resident
were
an
interested
party
wishes
to
receive
it.
I
K
Yes,
sir,
my
my
request
was
based
upon
principal
and
the
principal
stems
from
historic
goings
on
at
these
meetings,
particularly
with
regard
to
several
years
ago.
The
proposal
of
an
increase
in
sales
tax
and
that
particular
ordinance
proposed
ordinance
was
first
reading
was
waived.
Second
reading
was
waived
and.
K
A
F
The
chair
before
we
do
that
I
would
like
to
encourage
the
management
also
to
a
little
outreach
to
the
residents
and
I
I
mean
I'm,
probably
gonna.
Go
I'm
not
going
to
assume
that
a
majority
of
those
that
park
on
the
overpass
our
residents
of
crystal
springs
terrorist
apartments.
There
may
be
some
that
part
that
live
up
the
hill
in
other,
but
if
that's
the
case
that
a
majority
of
them
do
park
there,
I
would
hope
that
they
can
take
some
care.
Just
like
the
resident
says
and
helping
maintain.