►
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting 09-01-09 Whole Meeting
A
B
C
D
C
B
C
C
There's
no
conflict
of
interest
will
move
on
to
public
hearings.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
1900
monetary
drive.
It's
a
request
for
conditional
use,
permit
to
add
two
antennas
to
an
existing
wireless
telecommunication
facility
within
a
residential
zoning
district,
four
sections,
12.2
20
for
the
Samuel
zoning
ordinance
staff
report.
Please
thank.
F
You
and
good
evening,
as
stated,
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
expand
an
existing
cellular
facility
within
a
residential
zoning
district.
The
cellular
site
itself
is
located
on
the
corner
of
smith,
lane
and
skyline
boulevard,
and
the
associated
equipment
enclosure
is
located
about
5
to
10
feet
south
of
the
existing
cell
site.
Tonight,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
modify
the
existing
cell
site
by
adding
two
additional
antennas
and
adding
the
associated
equipment
to
the
existing
equipment.
F
Enclosure
area
the
applicant
will
be
incorporating
a
stealth
design,
thereby
therefore,
the
new,
the
two
million
tennis
and
the
two
existing
antennas
will
be
completely
screened
from
public
view.
Additionally,
the
associated
equipment-
that's
added,
will
also
be
screened
by
an
existing
chain-link
fence
at
six
feet
high
and
that
also
incorporates
green
slats,
which
will
blend
in
with
the
existing
environment.
The
Architectural
Review
Committee
did
review
this
project
and
forwarded
it
on
to
the
Planning
Commission,
with
a
positive
recommendation.
F
Staff
did
receive
one
comment
from
a
concerned
neighbor,
and
they
were
really
concerned
with
the
expansions
that
have
taken
place
at
the
Church
of
the
Highlands.
They
stated
that
they
didn't
support
any
expansion
of
any
kind
at
the
site.
Additionally,
they
stated
that
the
cellular
facility
would
affect
their
current
view.
F
Staff
stated
that
the
staff,
the
proposal
is
meeting
all
zoning
code
requirements
and
additionally,
staff
conducted
a
site,
inspection
and
verified
that
the
cellular
site
would
not
be
visible
from
their
residence
with
that
Steph's
supports
the
proposal
and
finds
that
the
new
enclosure
would
screen
the
antennas
which
greatly
improves
the
appearance
of
the
site
and
therefore
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approve
use,
permit
09,
01,
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
six
and
conditions
of
approval,
one
through
ten
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
I.
B
C
G
I'm
Elizabeth,
Rudnick
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
AT&T,
to
request
a
modification
to
the
useful
to
upgrade
our
facility,
we're
adding
two
antennas
and
we
already
had
two
antennas
existing
at
the
site.
So
we
worked
with
staff
and
with
an
architect
to
try
and
come
up
with
a
design
that
would
be
compatible,
and
we
think
we've
done
that.
The
antennas
will
be
inside
of
a
design
which
resembles
a
steeple
and
it's
part
of
the
sign
and
we
think
its
a
good
application
and
there
should
be
no
change
in
the
visibility.
G
C
A
G
Where
there
will
be
a
total
of
four
two
new
ones
and
and
what
it
has
to
do
with
this
capacity
along
Monterey,
Boulevard
and
skyline,
that
we
don't
have
enough
capacity
and
we're
looking
for
a
one
year,
growth
period.
So
that
means
we
wouldn't
be
back
to
the
city
of
San
Bruno
to
improve
at
this
site
for
at
least
18
months
and
it
so
that
people's
calls
don't
drop
so
that
they
don't
get
pushed
off
when
using
other
features
of
the
telephone.
And
it's
a
population
increase
in
a
traffic
increase
in
that
area.
G
G
C
A
C
A
C
All
those
in
favor,
aye,
aye,
opposed
motion
carried
and
also
please
know
that
there
is
a
10-day
process
for
no
action
activity
on
the
zone.
This
project,
you're
welcome
and
the
next
item
of
business
is
123
poplar
avenue.
It's
a
request
for
a
use
permit
to
allow
the
construction
of
an
addition
that
would
result
in
a
floor
area
above
the
point
five
guidelines.
C
F
You,
as
stated
the
applicant,
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
expand
the
existing
residents
that
would
exceed
the
maximum
permitted
floor
area
ratio.
The
site
is
located
on
Poplar
Avenue
and
is
situated
on
a
2500
square
foot
lot
and
is
developed
with
a
two-story
San
Francisco
style,
single-family
dwelling.
The
first
story
contains
a
large
one
car
garage
in
one
bedroom,
and
the
second
story
contains
two
bedrooms
and
one
bathroom.
The
project
involves,
in
addition
to
the
rear
of
existing
dwelling
and
a
first-floor
remodel.
F
On
the
first
floor,
the
bedroom
will
be
expanded
in
a
new
bathroom
and
television
room
are
proposed.
The
second
floor
expansion
includes
a
177
square
foot
bath.
The
addition
does
result
in
the
FA
ro
point.
Seven
six,
however,
when
comparing
this
single-family
dwelling
to
other
San
Francisco
style
homes
situated
on
2500
square-foot
lots.
F
The
addition
will
continue
the
existing
flat
roof
design
and
will
utilize
wood
siding.
That
is
consistent
with
the
existing
single-family
home
step
over
all
staff
supports
the
project
and
finds
that
the
addition
complements
the
existing
dwelling
and
the
surrounding
neighborhood
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
use
permit
Oh
9018
based
on
findings.
In
fact,
one
through
six
and
conditions
of
approval,
one
through
twenty-four
I'm
available
for
any
questions,
does.
C
E
That
shows
the
second
floor,
where
there's
a
new
closet
to
an
existing
in
the
bedroom
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
that
closet,
I,
find
it
unusable
and
I
wanted
to
know
if
the
city
had
considered
allowing
them
to
expand
that
doorway,
so
that
they
can
better
use
that
closet.
I
know,
there's
there's
a
window
next
to
it,
which
is
a
48
inch
window
and
structurally
I
think
it
can
be
moved
down.
It's
a
little
bit
more
cost,
but
or
maybe
the
window.
You
know
you
don't
have
enough
to
interfere
with
the
window.
E
It
could
just
be
expanded
a
little
bit
so
that
the
closet
is
more
usable
because,
right
now
it
doesn't
seem
like
it
will
be,
and
instead
of
causing
a
change
further
down
the
line,
you
know
while
while
it's
in
construction
and
they
realize
it
doesn't
fit
I
wanted
to
just
address
it
right
now.
If
there
was
any
concerns
about
it,
I
mean.
D
E
C
D
Through
the
chair
yeah
before
he
begins,
I'd
also
like
to
compliment
him
on
shirt.
Turning
in
sheet
a
11,
which
is
something
that
we
don't
always
get
with,
planning
application.
I
think
it
works.
Well
with
this
to
show
it
shows
the
homes
adjacent
to
this
home
and
along
the
streetscape
that
really
allow
you
to
see
how
that
how
the
setback
in
the
rear
kind
of
integrates
with
the
other
homes
in
the
neighborhood,
so
that.
C
H
C
C
B
C
C
Next
item
on
the
agenda-
601,
agnes
avenue
east-
to
request
for
a
use
permit
you
allow,
in
addition,
which
increases
the
gross
floor.
Air
gross
floor
area
by
greater
than
fifty
percent
is
actually
111
percent.
For
section
twelve
two
hundred
030
be
one
of
the
San
Bernardino
ordnance
staff
report
place.
Thank.
I
You
good
evening
the
application
is
for
an
addition
to
a
single-family
home
which
is
located
at
the
corner
of
angus,
avenue,
east
and
fifth
avenue.
A
use
permit
is
required
in
this
case,
because
the
floor
area
would
increase
by
99%.
The
project
does
comply
with
all
other
development
standards
of
the
Municipal
Code.
The
site
is
5,000
square
feet
in
the
existing
living
space
is
only
745,
they
have
an
attached,
one-car
garage.
The
project
would
include
the
addition
of
978
square
feet
of
additional
living
space,
so
the
total
living
space
would
be
1723
square
feet.
I
The
one-car
garage
would
remain
at
247
square
feet,
so
the
living
area
is
below
our
threshold,
which
requires
a
two-car
garage
and
the
resulting
floor
area
ratio
would
be
0
point
39
which,
as
you
know,
is
well
below
the
standard
of
0
point.
Five.
Five,
the
finished
materials
would
match
the
existing
house,
including
horizontal
siding,
shingle,
roofing,
&
1
by
4
window
trim.
I
We
do
have
the
color
samples
available.
It
includes
tan,
citing
white
trim
and
brown
shingle
roofing.
The
project
was
heard
at
the
August
thirteenth
architectural
review
committee
meeting.
At
that
time,
staff
recommended,
and
the
committee
agreed
that
they
should
highlight
the
front
porch
the
entryway
a
little
bit
more,
and
so
they
did
receive
a
positive
recommendation
with
that
suggestion.
I
So
since
that
time,
the
applicant
has
revised
the
plans
and
they've
included
a
new
gable
roof
emphasizing
that
front
porch
area
it
had
just
a
very
small
flat
roof,
as
it
was
hard
to
kind
of
distinguish
where
the
front
door
was
before.
They've
also
proposed
to
repaint
the
existing
four
door,
which
is,
they
said,
a
good
front
door,
but
it
will
highlight
that
area
a
little
bit
more
with
a
little
bit
more
contrasting
color.
So
staff
does
support
these
changes
and
things
that
will
be
an
improvement
to
the
property.
I
That
letter
is
attached
to
the
back
of
the
staff
report,
so
overall
staff
finds
that
the
addition
is
well
integrated
into
the
existing
house.
It's
consistent
with
the
house
and
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
It
would
be
a
big
improvement
to
a
modest,
a
relatively
small
home,
to
accommodate
the
family's
needs
and
meet
the
design
criteria
that
we're
looking
for
so
staff
recommends
approval
based
on
findings
1
through
6
and
subject
to
conditions
of
approval,
12
25,
so
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
J
Good
evening
my
name
is
Alan
got
off
Aaron
I.
Am
the
architect
engineer
for
this
project
and
mr.
and
mrs.
a
hundred
a
day
only
calls
for
a
while,
and
you
know
they
have
five
children,
and
so
the
space
is
very
small.
That's
what
they
decided
is
a
two-bedroom
house.
Now
they
decided
to
add
in
the
backyard.
Is
a
big
lot
5,500?
So
that's
what
we
are
decided
to
expand
at
the
Reno
yard,
and
then
we
did
put
into
consideration
all
the
facts
regarding
the
aesthetic
of
the
project.
J
C
C
D
Right,
the
first
is
to
remind
the
commission
that
the
September
15
Planning
Commission
will
be
canceled.
We
had
this
one
tonight
instead
of
having
instead
of
having
that
one.
So
the
next
planning
commission
meeting
will
be
on
october
20th.
We
also
need
to
select
the
sense.
We
have
a
long
time
between
the
next
planning
commission.
We
need
to
select
to
architectural
review
committee,
so
the
first
would
be
for
September
10th.
You
have
any
mr.
Peterson
mr.
B
asadi
their
volunteer.