►
Description
San Bruno Planning Commission Meeting September 17, 2013
5b. 3021 Crestmoor Drive
A
Okay
item
B
3021,
crestmore
dryer.
It's
a
request
for
use
permit
to
allow
an
addition
that
increase
that
creates
a
second
story
with
a
transparent
window
adjacent
to
a
budding
property
that,
as
a
side
yard
greater
than
10
feet
to
exceed
2,800
square
feet
of
living
area,
while
only
providing
two
covered
parking
spaces
for
three
are
required
per
sections:
12
240
be
112
280
a
3
respectively
of
the
skin
granot
Municipal
Code.
B
Thank
you.
As
stated,
the
applicant
has
applied
for
a
use
permit
to
expand
the
existing
single-family
dwelling
located
at
3021
crest
won't
drive.
The
site
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
Crespo
drive.
It
was
currently
developed
with
a
one-story
single-family
dwelling.
The
current
home
has
1823
square
feet
of
living
area
with
a
517
square
for
a
two-car
garage.
B
The
applicant
is
proposing
a
1130
three
square
foot
second
story.
Addition:
the
addition
will
include
two
bedrooms:
two
bathrooms
a
family
room
and
a
utility
room.
If
approved
and
constructed.
This
would
be
at
3473
square
foot
home,
consisting
of
2956
square
feet
of
living
area
and
a
517
square
foot
two-car
garage,
the
Architectural
Review
Committee
did
review
this
project
at
the
August
fifteenth
Architectural
Review
Committee
meeting.
B
They
did
for
this
project
on
to
the
Planning
Commission,
with
by
specific
recommendations,
those
recommendations
were
to
incorporate
a
garage
door
with
Windows
incorporate
a
trellis
feature
or
some
sort
of
architectural
abandon
on
the
left
side.
Elevation
to
help
break
up
the
first
and
second
story
wall
within
the
same
vertical
plane,
ensure
the
plans
are
drawn
to
scale
ensure
that
the
site
plan
accurately
reflects
the
location
of
the
second
story
addition
and,
lastly,
to
ensure
that
the
detached
structure
is
located
at
least
one
foot
from
the
side
property
line.
B
The
applicant
has
updated
the
plans
accordingly,
and
we
have
the
revised
plans
before
us
tonight.
As
previously
stated,
a
use
permit
is
required.
As
the
second
story
addition
contains
trend,
eight
transparent
window
adjacent
to
an
the
bloody
property
that
has
a
side
yard,
greater
the
10
feet.
As
you
know,
in
san
bruno,
the
site's
FX
are
typically
in
the
free
25
foot
range
and
therefore
we
don't
see
this
entitlement
request.
B
All
that
often
the
intent
of
this
entitlement
is
to
preserve
the
privacy
of
the
adjacent
property
owner,
because
they're
more
likely
to
use
that
outdoor
side
yard
space
as
their
rear
yard.
Outdoor
space
staff
does
not
anticipate
any
negative
impacts
associated
with
privacy.
There's
only
one
small
window
like
located
along
that
right
side
elevation
and
is
within
the
master
bedroom.
The
second
side
is
also
set
back
from
the
first
story
below,
as
a
result,
the
closest
point
of
that
second
story.
Expansion
is
located.
B
Seventeen
feet
from
the
shared
prompting
a
use
permit
is
also
required,
as
the
addition
is
exceeding
2,800
square
feet
of
living
area,
which
technically
requires
a
third
covered
parking
space.
However,
there
is
a
use
permit
process
in
place
which
the
applicant
has
applied,
for
there
is
a
large
two-car
garage
and
measure
its
517
square
feet.
Additionally,
there
are
two
spaces
in
the
driveway.
B
Therefore,
total
four
cars
would
be
able
to
park
on
site,
and
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
the
distance
between
the
face
of
the
garage
and
the
back
edge
of
sidewalk
is
approximately
21
21
feet
there
for
two
cars
will
be
able
to
fully
thin
on
that
driveway
and
will
not
block
the
public
right-of-way
staff
send
the
courtesy
notice
and
the
required
legal
notice
to
all
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
site.
Staff
received
one
comment
from
an
adjacent
property
owner
who
expressed
some
concern
with
the
second
story.
B
Addition,
this
neighbor
was
specifically
concerned
that
the
addition
with
blocks
sunlight
and
she
had
privacy
concerns
staff
explained
that
the
second
story
addition
was
located
seventeen
feet
from
the
shared
property
line
and
was
set
in
three
feet
from
that
first
story
below.
Additionally,
the
home
will
be
less
than
the
overall
28
foot
height
limit
staff
also
received
written
comments
from
a
resident
at
the
August
fifteenth
Architectural
Review
Committee
meeting.
Those
comments
are
attached,
as
exhibit
e
within
your
sap
report,
which
I'll
highlight
the
very
first
question
was
regarding
the
public
utility
he's
been
on-site.
B
The
specific
questions
where
how
the
construction
would
affect
the
public
utility
easement
and
upon
completion,
would
the
public
utility
easement
be
affected
in
a
negative
fashion.
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
the
there
is
a
varying
public
utility
easement
in
this
rear
yard
area
is
about
14
feet,
17
feet.
Deep
staff
will
inform
the
contractor
not
to
store
any
heavy
equipment
in
that
public
utility
easement
area,
and
we
would
not
anticipate
there
being
any
negative
impacts
associated
with
the
public
utility
easement
I'll.
Additionally
turn
the
applicant
or
the
actual.
B
The
concerned
property
owner
also
expressed
concerns
regarding
possible
privacy
impacts
and
requested
that
the
applicant
and
staff
reach
out
to
the
property
owner.
Once
again,
we
have
verbally
talked
with
the
adjacent
property
owner
for
the
above
or
for
the
previously
mentioned
reasons
we
are
supporting
the
project.
The
second
story
again
is
set
in
17
feet
from
that
shared
property
line
in
a
set
three
feet
back
from
that
first
story
below
and
is
meeting
the
overall
height
limit,
or
it's
actually
less
in
the
overall
height
limit.
B
Lastly,
the
resident
expressed
concern
with
the
project's
location
as
it
is
in
close
proximity
to
John
near
elementary
school.
Specifically,
the
resident
advised
that
construction
vehicles
in
construction
hours
not
unnecessarily
hinder
pedestrian
or
vehicular
traffic
and
expressed
some
concern
regarding
overall
construction
hours.
We
have
included
our
standard
condition
of
approval,
which
is
condition
of
approval
number
4
regarding
construction
hours.
B
Additionally,
staff
will
encourage
the
contractor
to
the
extra
careful
when
arriving
in
leaving
the
subject
site
during
our
pre-construction
meeting,
just
due
to
its
close
proximity
to
this
elementary
school
overall
staff
supports
the
project
and
we
do
recommend
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
use
qwest
based
on
findings
of
fact,
one
through
seven
and
conditions
of
approval,
one
through
26
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
C
Welcome
hi,
my
name
is
best
matata,
I'm
the
owner
of
3021
press,
more
drive
and
husband
George
right
over
there
and
going
to
be
here
three
years
since
we
bought
the
house
and
looking
forward
to
expanding
so
each
one
of
the
kids
can
have
their
own
room
and
stop
fighting
and
all
day
all
night
and
get
this
project
done
and
move
on.
Please
thank
you.
D
Good
evening
my
name
is
George
diam
and
the
designer
over
that
building.
My
job
was
to
make
a
compromise
between
the
planning
and
owner
and
at
the
end
we
make
a
compromise
and
listen
whatever
they
want
to
do
what
we
did
it.
You
know
so,
basically,
whatever
the
planning
cos,
we
do
this
any
question.
I
can
ask.
E
E
C
E
The
pickup
and
drop
I
haven't
been
on
site
and
I.
Don't
know
what
the
conditions
look
like,
but
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
and
it's
a
condition.
It's
it's
a
it's
a
condition
of
approval,
that
is,
that
we'll
need
final
approval
or
waiver
from
the
community
development
director
and
so
I'd
like
to
put
it
in
his
hands.
That's
okay!
We.
G
Can
do
that
we
would
have
a
pre-construction
meeting
with
our
building
inspector
and
the
contractor
and
evaluate
the
site
and
determine
if
that
kind
of
fencing
would
be
necessary
in
this
case.
Typically,
it
would
not,
but
if
it
is
necessary
in
this
case
we
would
ask
the
contractor
the
homeowner
to
install
it.
So.
G
The
pre-construction
meeting
and
going
on
site
we
would
evaluate,
if
there's
a
need
again.
Typically,
we
don't
find
that
there's
a
need
in
a
condition
like
this
in
a
situation
like
this
for
that
type
of
event,
so
it
would
be
unusual,
so
what
I'm
indicating
to
the
Commission
is
that
I
wouldn't
expect
to
need
to
have
that
kind
of
fencing.
In
this
case,
however,
if
we
see
a
special
circumstance
and
a
safety
need,
we
would
ask
the
contractor
to
install
it.
H
Through
the
chair,
mr.
chase,
you
know,
I
can't
ever
recall,
having
this
condition
put
on
an
addition
in
somebody
know
somebody's
house
because
of
a
close
proximity
to
a
school
or
whatever
and
not
to
be.
You
know
blood
but
well,
I
won't
be,
but
to
me
it's
definitely.
You
know
unnecessary
and
absurd.
In
my
opinion,.
E
E
I
Certainly,
support
the
thought
that
it's
in
the
the
commute
in
their
community
directors
hands
I,
think
that
at
any
time
that
we
may
not
see
something
that
you
certainly
would
ask
your
public
questions.
I
would
want
to
be
sure
that
we
don't
set
a
president
on
the
situation.
That
would
not
be
something
for
every
single
issue
that
comes
up
on
something
like
this,
but
I
think
that
Commission
Mishra
has
indicated
that
he
puts
it
in
your
hands
and
I
think
that
you
can
make
that
decision.