►
Description
San Bruno City Council Meeting January 28, 2014
10a. Construction of the Grade Separation Decorative Arch
A
All
right,
seeing
none
we'll
move
right
to
item
10,
which
is
conduct
of
business.
We
have
a
number
here
tonight,
but
I'm
sure
we
can
get
through
them
very,
very
quickly.
Item
10a
receive
an
oral
report
and
confirm
the
City
Council
direction.
Regarding
the
construction
of
the
decorative
arch
at
the
San
Bruno
grade
separation.
B
B
How
that
solid
arch
would
actually
look
when
it
was
completely
fabricated
and
installed
and
follow
on
to
that
discussion.
Your
sub
committee,
consisting
of
Marouane
and
councilmember
Rivera,
met
as
recently
as
yesterday
with
JPG
staff,
as
well
as
with
the
designer
from
the
contract
design
firm
engaged
by
the
JPB,
as
well
as
say,
fabricators
representative
out
of
Washington
State,
to
discuss
very
specific
details
about
the
fabrication
and
the
ultimate
appearance.
Up
close,
this
arch
decorative
feature
we
have
just
received,
and
just
provided
to
you
I
see
that
you
have
materials
in
front
of
you.
B
The
public
services
director
has
those
materials
also
available
to
display
on
on
the
screen
behind
me,
which
may
actually
give
you
a
better
way
of
seeing
the
very
specific
aspects
of
this
arch
feature,
in
particular
the
council's
interest
centered
on.
How
was
this
thing
going
to
actually
be
fabricated
and
how
were
the
joins?
B
Since
this
is
not
one
big,
continuous,
single
piece
of
steel?
How
would
the
joins
first
of
all?
How
many
would
they
be?
Where
would
they
be,
and
how
would
they
be
connected
to
one
another
in
a
manner
that
wouldn't
give
a
sort
of
pieced
together
appearance,
and
then
how
would
the
finish
coat
of
paint?
B
Look,
particularly
if
somebody
were
to
walk
up
close
to
this
arch?
Would
it
provide
the
substantial
it's
positive,
aesthetic,
appearance
that
the
city
has
anticipated
and
expected,
so
we're
diving
now
into
a
number
of
very
specific
details
about
construction
and
appearance
of
this
arch
in
order
to
finally
be
able
to
give
the
joint
powers
board
a
final
decision
which
they
have
requested
and
urged
us
that
they
need
to
have
by
the
end
of
this
month.
B
So
we
are
very,
very
close
to
that
time
period
and
want
to
be
able
to
night
to
simply
provide
you
with
what
we
know
and
then
to
answer
your
questions.
I
think
I'm
going
to
not
continue
with
a
staff
presentation
but
allow
the
subcommittee
members,
perhaps
too
identify
your
interests.
Your
observations
and
we're
happy
to
illustrate
with
the
materials
that
we've
received
since
you're
your
meeting
yesterday,
mr.
Raphael
Boland
from
the
JPB
is
in
the
audience
and
is
available
to
answer
your
questions.
A
We
did
meet
a
number
of
times
up
until
yesterday,
and
yesterday
was
our
last
meeting.
We
had
a
conference
call
with
the
fabricator
and
the
designer
HNTB
was
actually
present
at
the
at
the
subcommittee,
so
we
asked
a
number
of
questions.
I
was
frankly
have
just
say
it
straight
up
kind
of
surprised
that
after
all
of
these
months-
and
we
talked
about
an
arch,
a
lot
of
this
discussion
wasn't
really
have
had
really
been
planned
before
as
far
as
the
coding,
as
far
as
how
its
put
together
what
we'd
like
to
see.
A
But
having
said
that
I'm
going
to
move
forward
in
the
next
few
minutes,
hopefully
to
get
this
thing
resolved,
we
asked
about
seem
designs
whether
they
should
be
bolted
together
with
a
bolt
type
pattern
that
would
actually
be
visible
from
the
street
or
whether
there
would
be
some
type
of
a
scene
that
would
show
us
just
a
small,
very,
very
thin
groove
in
the
in
the
surface.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
the
seam
design
is
is
the
way
to
go.
A
I,
don't
think
we
want
to
get
into
a
lot
of
bolts
and
a
lot
of
exposed
metal.
I
noticed
here
that
the
panel
options
I
I,
can
talk
to
maybe
Claire
about
this,
but
I'm
a
little
confused
about
panel
options.
I,
don't
think
we
spoke
in
detail
about
that.
That's
number
one
and
then
also
there's
a
seam
frequency
which
I
guess
we
can't
do
a
whole
lot
about.
It
is,
in
fact,
what
it
is,
but
the
longer
the
seems
the
more
preferable
for
me,
but
I
definitely
want
an
arch
I,
don't
want
something.
C
Spare
and
yeah
it's
it's
come
a
long
way,
and
the
reality
is
that
this
is
not
one
piece
of
steel.
It's
not
a
smooth
piece
of
steel.
It
is
actually
a
bunch
of
each
one.
It's
a
sub
structure
of
structural
steel
that
is
being
wrapped
in
sheet
metal,
heavy
gauge
sheet
metal,
and
so
once
we
grab
that
idea,
that's
when
all
of
the
questions
came
up
as
to
how
one,
how
we're
going
to
put
it
together,
how
what
is
it
going
to
look
like
and
I
think?
C
Ultimately
it
boils
down,
and
what
is
it
going
to
look
like?
Is
it
going
to
look
anything
like
any
of
these
drawings
that
we've
been
presented
with
over
the
last
few
months?
A
few
years
I?
Think
we've
gotten
closer
I
do
agree
that
the
that
the
seams,
the
bent
and
clipped
seem
design
is
the
best
I,
just
hope
and
pray
that
the
sections
that
we
do
get
put
together
fit
together
as
nicely
as
the
seam
looks
and
as
nicely
as
the
the
renderings
in
the
drawings
show
I.
A
The
other
thing
we
talked
about
was
the
lighting
of
the
arch
or
or
the
fact
that
maybe
it
didn't
have
to
be
lit.
The
electrical
conduit
facilities
will
in
fact
be
in
the
base,
whether
we
use
them
or
not
at
this
point
in
time,
but
the
feeling
was
that
it
would
have
a
lot
of
light
just
on
its
own,
because
it
would
be
eliminated
from
the
the
actual
platform
which
has
substantial
lighting
and
also
the
tunnel
over
which
it
goes
is
going
to
be
eliminated.
A
Also,
so
we
weren't
didn't
have
a
big
concern
about
trying
to
illuminate
it
at
night
and
we
didn't
definitely
want
to
impose
on
driver's
eyes
driving
up
Sandra
Avenue,
so
I.
My
personal
feeling
is
that
we
do
not
eliminate
it
for
evening
and
that
if
we
wanted
to
in
the
future,
for
one
reason
or
another,
the
electrical
is
there,
it's
not
the
big
of
a
deal
to
just
you
know,
install
some
pictures,
so
that
would
be
from
the
bottom
up.
We
wouldn't
put
anything
on
the
arch
at
all.
B
B
Semicircular
arch
in
order
to
fabricate
will
require
I
believe
it
17
pieces
that
will
be
joined
together
and
the
consensus
I
think
at
the
conversation
yesterday
was
that
they
would
be
joined
together
in
a
manner
that
uses
the
clip
technology
as
opposed
to
being
bolted,
in
order
that
it
would
receive
then
as
smooth
as
possible
an
appearance.
You
have
a
picture
in
your
packet,
this
one.
That
shows
the
way
that
the
steel
is
bent
and
then
clipped
on
its
back
side,
and
then
it
has
at
the
join
location,
essentially
a
small
groove
or
a
divot.
B
Noisy
visual
appearance
to
the
to
the
person
who
is
standing
near
the
arch
so
based
on
on
our
understanding,
there
would
be,
as
I
said,
17
piece
is
that
would
be
joined,
but
with
the
clip
technology,
material
would
be
painted
and
we'd
be
finished,
so
that
those
joins
would
be
as
invisible
as
possible.
Although
there,
as
the
pictures
depict,
you
might
be
able
to
see
a
line
where
the
where
the
seam
actually
occurs.
C
Well,
I
guess
I
guess
what's
left
is
to
look
at
these
panel
options,
because
this
is
what's
but
which
is
very
new.
Obviously
we
want
the
least
amount
of
seems
we
like
to
go
with
the
four
panel
layout
option,
two
I'm
so
concerned
at
how
this
option
two
is
being
depicted
in
four
pieces
and
actually
having
a
you
know
on
for
four
edges.
What
we
experienced
yesterday
was
a
panel
that
was
bent
so
would
be
a
more
of
a
smoother
smoother
transition.
A
D
Okay,
so
the
first
thing
I
should
mention
on
this:
is
it's
exaggerated
that
obviously
the
size
is
exaggerated
for
a
fact,
so
the
one
you're
seeing
on
the
left
side
is
attempting
to
show
three
pieces.
Three
sides
of
it
bent
similar
to
what
you
saw
yesterday,
so
it
would
be.
It
would
be
approximately
that
radius,
the.
C
D
E
A
D
C
D
Talking
with
the
one
on
the
right
now
on
the
right
yeah,
so
in
that
scenario
you
would
clip
or
connect
all
for
you.
You
bring
four
separate
rectangles
up
in
the
air
and
then
assemble
in
the
one
to
the
left.
It's
you're
bringing
up
a
c-shaped,
almost
a
box
and
then
you're
sealing
the
box
behind
okay.
C
So
Mike
this
is
this
is
now
another
curveball,
because
we
originally,
we
were
concerned
about
how
each
section
was
going
to,
but
up
against
each
other.
As
we
went
along
the
arch
now
now
you
presented
something
as
two
different
as
to
what
it's
going
to
look
like
correct
on
the
edge.
We
know
we're
going
to
have
these
seams
now
we're
going
to
have
something
correct.
D
So
that
that's
what
we
were
trying
to
show
there,
because
in
plan,
when
you're,
actually
looking
at
it
in
dark
green,
it's
difficult
to
see
on
the
first
image
that
there
really
is
a
seam
running
along
the
top
and
the
bottom.
But
if
you
can
make
up
block
on
the
green,
then
you
got
better
eyes
than
I
do
so.
What
we
try
to
do
is
zoom
in
on
it
to
show
yes
exactly
right.
D
What
we
were
talking
about
yesterday,
which
primarily
that
there
will
be
scenes
as
each
piece
matted
up
against
the
next
piece
and
that's
still
true.
But
in
addition
there
have
to
be
something
you
can't
get
a
perfect
90
without
welding
and
grinding
flush.
So
we
did
you
bend
it
like.
The
pc
saw
yesterday
or
you're
going
to
have
a
slight
recess
where
the
clip
joins.
The
next
play.
Okay,.
C
D
You
can
in
the
one
you're
seeing
there
is
an
option
to
remember
that
the
intent
was
to
use
mechanical
fasteners
and
your
bolts
or
rivets
or
something
if
you
were
going
to
weld
it,
which
is
one
of
the
things
we
talked
about
yesterday.
Then
you
absolutely
wouldn't
you
watch
mountain,
so
you
wouldn't
see
that
little
recess,
like
you
see
there,
the
only
reason
why
it's
it's
slightly
inset
you
so
that
you
can
screw
it
or
bolt
it
or
do
something
to
it,
but
if
you're
willing
to
put
it
welded,
then
yes,
you
correct.
D
C
For
everyone
watching,
if
we
want
the
cleanest
design
with
the
clips
and
the
seams,
we
go
with
the
c-shaped
panel
layout
option,
one
which
also
has
more
more
sections
so
it
so
we
don't
have.
We
really
don't
have
a
choice
of
choosing
between
one
to
two
or
two
to
one
to
two
seam
frequency
or
two
to
two
seam
frequency.
We
have
to
go
with
one
to
two
seam
frequency,
which
is
a
lot
more
sections
yeah,
and
we
just
have
to
hope
that
it's
clean
and.
D
Our
designer
also
feels
those
advantages
to
that,
simply
because
it's
a
lot
easier
to
build
those
segments
with
parallel
straight
lines
that
it
would
be
to
try
to
create
each
single
piece
with
a
curve.
So
the
smaller
the
segment
gets
I
know
it
means
more
scenes,
but
the
smaller
segments
gets.
The
more
a
series
of
straight
lines
looks
like
an
arch.
If
you
were
going
to
go
with
like
these
eight
foot,
spacings,
which
you
could
you
just
added
an
additional
level
of
complexity?
D
So
it
would
never
look
like
that
bottom,
one
where
it
looks
like
a
truncated,
24-piece
thing.
What
we
would
it
instead
do
is
try
to
curve
each
separate
segments,
but
given
that
these
are
already
custom-made
clipped
on
panels,
you
just
made
it
significantly
more
complicated
because
now
everything's
got
to
have
the
correct
radii,
it's
still
mad
up
on
the
bottom,
so
we
think
we
could
do
it,
but
the
complexity
goes
way
up
because
now
you're
curving
play
you
know
all
kinds
of
stuff,
but
you're
not
doing
any
other
shorter
panel
of
configuration.
D
It
will
be
curved
what
I'm
saying
is
that
it
will
be
each
four
foot
section
would
be
a
series
of
straight
line,
but
take
it
together
give
the
effect
of
the
curve.
If
you
actually
try
to
cut
a
curve
into
each
piece,
then
you
would
have
to
physically
Bend
every
single
flash
like
youryour
doesn't
nice
little
clips
were
showing
would
have
to
somehow
also
be
curved
to
make
that
work.
So
the
thought
was
if
the
panel
size
has
got
a
little
bit
smaller,
the
smaller
the
panel
size,
the
more
it
looks
like
a
curve.
D
We
can
curve
it
it
is.
It
is
a
dupe
of
thing
I'm
just
going
on
for
my
designer
recommended
and
that's
if
you're,
using
a
clip
type
application.
There
are,
as
we
talked
about,
there's
other
ways
to
do
it.
We
always
have
the
option
of
welding
and
grinding
and
flush,
in
which
case
you
can
make
steel.
Do
whatever
you
want
it
to
do,
because,
as
you
as
you
correctly
point
out,
I
mean
that
steel
was
a
strain
hollow
structural
section
that
we
took
it
back
so
I
mean
it's,
you
can
do
it.
A
D
Again
doesn't
mean
it's
not
doable,
it's
just
that
the
the
concern
that
one
piece
doesn't
matter
perfectly
as
I
mentioned
yesterday.
It
just
becomes
an
issue
of
if
you
had
open
two
pieces
that
were
all
identical.
You
could
substitute
one
and
God.
You
know
that
Apple,
but
if
each
one
of
these
has
to
fit
like
a
jigsaw
puzzle,
it's
just
there's
more
risk
on
the
schedule
or
risk
on
the
fabrication.
C
D
D
So,
starting
with
the
assumption
that
it's
going
to
be
an
arch,
but
it's
going
to
be
that
of
a
solid
sheet
metal
construction.
Your
options
would
be
to
use
some
kind
of
physical,
even
so
either
a
rivet
erable
option
to
would
be
those
clips
that
we
talked
about
an
option.
Three
would
be
to
welded
and
grinded
flush.
I,
wasn't
able
by
council
time
to
get
a
firm
price
on
what
those
panels
cost
would
have
to
be
a
custom
application,
because
the
people
who
sell
these
typically
sell
them
for
buildings
and
they
sell
them
as
rectangles.
D
So
what
we'd
be
looking
for
is
sort
of
a
3d
parallelogram,
so
it
would
be
a
little
bit
more
complicated,
I'm,
not
a
country
sure
if
I
stuff,
like
that,
I
do
know
that
the
time
would
go
up
because
of
the
procurement,
the
sheet
metal
with
the
voltage
shop
welds
that
is
sort
of
the
baseline.
What
what
you
saw
previously?
D
The
only
reason
the
price
went
down
nominally
from
what
you
saw
before
is
that
I
took
out
the
86,000
for
the
elevator
glass
that
is
no
longer
being
considered
and
then
finally,
the
sheet
metal
using
all
welded
seams.
That
would
definitely
increase
the
cost,
because
now
you're
welding,
we
actually
doing
some
relatively
cumbersome
wells,
some
of
which
have
to
done
upside
down
in
the
air.
In
addition,
the
biggest
single
driver
of
cost
increase
enak
is
that
placing
panels
and
screwing
them.
D
Shirring
is
one
thing,
but
now
actually
having
to
perform
welding
on
a
platform
is
going
to
require
more
robust
platform
and
shoring,
and
things
like
that
that
plus
a
small
increase
in
the
design
costs
is
where
I
got
that
150,000
increase
from
the
base
version.
You
saw
that
also,
as
I
mentioned,
has
a
schedule
impact
approximately
an
additional
month
to
erect
that
type
of
arch
in
the
field.
So
it's
almost
three
continuous
weeks
of
welding
with
two
crews
to
get
that
in
and
then
there's
some
grinding
and
painting.
A
A
D
So
the
original
estimate
was
1.2
million,
and
that
was
the
construction
as
well
as
design
management,
etc,
etc.
What
that
included
is
an
arch.
At
that
point
we
were
talking
about
an
eternally
lit
arch
that
would
have
Plexiglas
on
two
faces,
with
LED
lights,
the
one
the
one
you'd
look
at
right,
coming
up,
sember
to
the
other
one
right
off
the
platform
and
then
sheet
metal
top
and
bottom.
In
addition,
including
that
1.2
million
was
I,
don't
recall
the
exact
figure,
but
there
were
some
monies
for
one
elevator
glass
to
be
upgraded.
D
D
The
steel
structural
element
significantly
more
robust
than
what
I
anticipated
back
in
2012
there's
a
number
of
reasons
why
this
these
things
happened,
and
so
my
estimate
on
that
has
actually
gone
out
from
1.2
to
1.4
million
for
the
same
basic
scope,
and
so
yes,
I
did
another
estimate
for
removing
some
of
the
features
and
looking
at
a
solid
metal
scope,
and
that
was
again
I.
Don't
have
it
in
front
of
me,
but
I
believe
it
is
one
point
one:
six
million
dollars
construction
again,
including
an
amount
for
a
green
elevator
glazing
as
well.
D
Subsequent
to
that
I
understood
there
were
lots
of
concerns
regarding
specifically
how
the
seams
would
come
together
and
that
brought
into
play
other
manufacturing
methods
that
can
minimize
that.
So
those
were
the
the
things
we
talked
about
yesterday,
so
the
either
welding
it
or
some
kind
of
clip
on
application.
D
That
was
not
my
assumption
when
I,
when
I
came
to
the
staff
and
said
that
it
was
1.1
65.
My
assumption
at
that
point
was
very
similar
to
what
you
saw
earlier
in
this
presentation
as
a
bolted
on
finish.
It
would
effectively
be
the
same
skeleton
in
the
same
mash
if
you
will,
as
was
proposed
previously
and
then
in
lieu
of
the
clear
glazing
and
lighting.
It
was
just
going
to
be
Sheila,
so
I
mean
all
obviously,
as
as
scopes
change.
I
have
to
fight
to
my
estimate
as
well.
C
C
E
Rough
y'all
you're
enthused
here
could
you
just
councilman
has
a
great
question,
but
let's
cut
to
the
chase,
let's
not
measure
the
words,
let's
just
say
what
it
is.
Let's
we've
been
dealing
with
this
for
a
long
time
and
the
longer
goes
and
the
more
I
hear
and
all
of
this
you
know
I'm
glad
I
wasn't
on
the
subcommittee
to
be
blunt.
But
could
we
just
but
I
mean
be
very
clear,
okay,
very
concise,
so
that
we
all
are
on
the
same
page,
Joe
Fisher,
very.
A
F
There's
a
lot
of
negative
things.
We
could
say
about
how
all
this
went
one
way
and
another
way
and
incomplete
information,
and
then
we
changed
things
and
all
that
stuff.
But
the
bottom
line
is
there's
an
arch
it's
attractive.
Looking
it's
interesting
I
in
my
opinion
and
the
options
you
have
here,
I
think
if
it's
painted
this
color
I,
don't
think
there's
a
big
difference
between
the
bolted
and
the
clipped.
Now
the
Golden
Gate
Bridge
is
bolted.
Nobody
pays
any
attention
to
it.
Nobody
looks
at
the
bolts
and
says
ooh
they're
ugly
or
anything.
F
A
You
know
how
this
all
transpired,
a
very
upsetting
that
we
talked
about
this
many
many
many
months
ago
and
when
we
paid
I
think
the
quote
was
twenty-five
thousand
dollars
for
a
so-called
mock-up,
which
was
slapped
together
in
literally
a
half
hour,
and
it
looked
like
we'd
be
driving
up
several
avenues,
saying
welcome
to
the
biggest
little
city
in
the
world
because
it
looked
like
junk.
I
was
really
disappointed
after
that
so
and
I'm
disappointed
with
this
too,
because
I
thought
the
JPB.
A
After
all
of
this
discussion
and
all
of
this
rush
rush,
we
have
to
know
right
now
that
you'd
have
some
specific
ideas
and
details
as
to
how
this
really
could
work.
It
wasn't
explored
it
sounded
like
till
yesterday
afternoon
I
mean
you
had
a
big
steel
structure
underneath
and
that's
fine
that
can
all
be
fabricated,
but
now
we
have
to
have
a
bigger
Foundation
and
now
the
only
way
to
bring
it
in
under
cost
is
to
bolt
it
together
and
it'll.
A
Look
fine
that
part
really
and
the
bottom
line
doesn't
worry
me,
but
it's
how
we
got
there.
That's
very
upsetting
and
I'm
very,
very
disappointed
and
please
pass
it
on
to
mark
Simon
and
Mike
Scanlon
about
how
this
all
transpired,
because
you
know
this
to
be
the
end
of
this
project
and
a
highlight
for
us.
A
It's
going
to
look
great,
but
it's
still
he's
a
very
bad
taste
in
my
mouth,
how
it
happened
and
how
it
came
to
this
point
so
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
If
that's,
if
that's
what
we
need
to
do
to
get
this
done,
I'm
not
going
to
spend
any
more
money.
That's
for
sure,
especially
on
something
we
don't
even
know
what
it's
going
to
cost.
If
you
can
do
this
bolted
and
and
actually
powder-coated,
if
you
will
arch
to
make
this
look,
look
right.
Then
I'll
go
along
with
it.
C
Well
said
mr.
mayor
I'm
not
going
to
belabor
it,
what
we
found
out
is
that
we
don't
have
an
option.
We
agreed
on
a
price
and
the
price
was
whatever
we
were
going
to
get
and
we
just
sort
of
slow,
slow,
the
process
down,
so
that
we
could
better
learn
what
we
were
going
to
get
and
I
think
it's
been
said
in
many
subcommittee
meetings
and
even
hear
what
we
expect
and
what
we
hope
we're
going
to
get
and
what
we're
visually
going
to
see.
C
If
it's
got
bolts,
fine
but
I'm,
I,
really
don't
think
I
mean
you're
in
the
business
for
building
railroads
grade
separations,
and
it's
I
think
it's
simple
to
say
that
safe
to
say
that
none
of
us
or
anyone
was
is
in
the
business
to
build
an
arch
like
this
I
think
we
we
got
sold
a
bill
of
goods
by
pay,
feel
Paoli.
They
stuck
with
that.
Now.
We've
had
professional
fabricators,
trying
to
figure
out
what
they
were.
Thinking
and
I
think
they've
done
their
best.
C
You
know
you
know
to
to
interpret
it
and
I
just
I'm
not
going
to
hold
my
breath,
but
I
think
it
will
look
good
and
well,
you
know,
will
be
better
for
it
and
will
will
be
pleased
when
it
is
finished,
but
yeah
no,
more
delays,
no
more
guessing
as
to
what
we're
going
to
get
or
something.
You
know
what
you
you
know
what
we
expect
and
you
go
forward.
E
I
can
add
too
much
I
assure
the
comments,
my
colleagues,
the
disappointment
and
frustration
that
the
mayor
indicated
one
of
the
things
that
I
voted
for
this,
though,
was
a
contribution
toward
the
community
on
your
agency
was
about
having
something
to
the
Gateway.
It
was
about
an
area
in
a
neighborhood
who
gone
through
the
bart
has
gone
through
this
and
who
deserved
something
in
addition
to
this
community
as
a
whole.
E
So
I've
heard
hope
and
hope
to
me
is
not
a
plan
but
I'm
going
to
tell
you
I'm
going
to
pray
a
little
that
when
the
incomes
and
the
result
is
finished,
that
we
all
stand
back
and
say,
looks
good
job
well
done,
I'm
not
going
to
hold
my
breath
either,
but
the
how
we've
gotten
here
and
all
the
courses
the
way
I
can
go
on
and
on
but
I
think
it's
been
articulated
and
so
I
agree.
Let's,
let's,
let's
get
it
done
and
let's
move
on
do.
D
B
Accordingly,
the
I
want
to
be
clear
that
the
what
I'm
hearing
from
JPB
staff
is
that,
even
with
the
bolted
fabrication,
the
total
cost
of
the
structure
could
go
above.
The
1.2
million
up
to
I
think
I
heard
mr.
belin
say
1.35
million
and
that
you
just
want
to
be
clear
that,
given
the
many
previous
discussions
about
that
potential
for
cost
increase,
that
the
council's
authorization
is
comfortable
up
to
fifty
percent
of
that
larger
amount.
I.
B
B
B
B
So
then
it
what
would
be
helpful
to
staff
is
your
expectation
of
a
cost,
and
so
what
I'm
would
with
that
clarification,
then
what
staff
is
understanding
is
that
the
expectation
is
an
arch
that
is
fabricated,
at
least
with
a
bolts
and
with
the
appearance
that's
been
presented
here
tonight.
Less
than
the
1.2
million
dollar
at
1.1
million
dollar
level
of
authorization.